Blue Pill ExampleTinder: The Menprovement Initiative - The Bluepill Strategy. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by [deleted]

For those of you who haven't seen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3WwQkItiUM

There are a few more videos in the series.

Tinder has launched a campaign to end "doucheness" and "douche like behavior." Ironically, they bring in a post-wall (35) comedian as their spokesperson. None other then Whitney Cummings.

For all you need to know about Ms. Cummings. She's a feminist. She's sub-par comedian. She froze her eggs. Oh, and she claims "...men don't like strong women."

Cue a slew of blue pill videos aimed at men in order to "cure" them of this disease, a la forced programming. Here are some of the titles.


The Compliment Generator

The Eyeroll Reaction

The Chivalry Enhancer

The Ghostbuster

There are few interesting details I want to talk about in the above videos.

The first detail is, besides being produced by Tinder, they claim that they use real Tinder female employees. These female employees say "we all agree that calling out douchebags should be easy and fun." They then proceed to put headsets on said male "douchebags" and force program them to however they see fit. All test subjects are portrayed as sleazy, self absorbed, in some cases conventionally unattractive, and most do not lift.

The second detail is in the Chivalry video. The victim is a man who would rather go to the gym for leg day, then go dancing. Cue the "Chivalry Enhancer" program. It makes the man drop his workout to instead "work it out on the dance floor."

The last detail is the icing on the cake. The Ghostbuster episode. Up to this point, the videos have been showing "creeps", the last video is a stereotypical Chad with a foreign accent. The only one with an accent. He has a conversation with Ms.Cummings. Ms. Cummings is obviously aroused, as any post-wall female would be by a younger Chad. Chad then vanishes (ghosts), most likely because he's got better things to do and younger women to have sex with. With the push of a button though, Chad is back in the conversation, to which a typical redpill conversation starts.

Chad: ".....lets get brunch....bottomless mimosas....it'll be fun."

Cummings: "I'd say I'll also be bottomless."

Chad: "You sound like my type."


Key Takeaways:

  1. Women view anyone who they find unattractive to be creeps or douchebags.

  2. Women are free to talk about sex, but men who do the same are douchbags.

  3. Men should skip on their workout to entertain the female.

  4. If the male is Chad, he can say or do anything, sometimes even what the creep said or did, and it is a turn on.

  5. Females can mock males who they view as less worthy and it should be "easy and fun".

  6. Men should be expected to change their behavior to suit the needs of the female.

I open the floor to discussion.

[–]ClarityTRP 308 points309 points  (37 children)

I'm glad we can all watch this garbage and instinctively cringe. Did some swiping just now and saw most/all women's profiles engaging in what these "employees" were complaining about in male profiles, e.g. listing expectations/height/weight/race preferences in bio.

Looking forward to parody videos to end "bitchiness" and "bitch like behavior" that are subsequently slandered as sexist.

[–]sigma272 118 points119 points  (15 children)

parody videos

For nuclear-level triggering, someone should make a fake Tinder add-on that calculates a woman's weight based on percentage of face-only photos and camera angles.
EDIT: it would also add 20lbs for winged eyeliner

[–]bitchpotatobunny 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I would use and promote this shit out of this if it existed for the sake amusement.

[–]ClarityTRP 22 points23 points  (2 children)

and that frickin doggy ears/nose filter. no that shit isn't cute.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 25 points26 points  (1 child)

doggy filters is the indicator of a butterface

[–]JohnnySixguns 1 points1 points [recovered]

LOL. I come here just to see the bullshit you young redpillers have to put up with. I’m old and married and lucky in life, but still have to put red pill best practices in place every day to keep myself sane.

This idea of a weight calculator is just freaking hilarious. I can’t even play with Tinder as a married man but I live vicariously through you fellas.

Don’t let me down. I’m rooting for you to save Western Culture.

[–]RighteousSouljah 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Men are designed for multiple wives is even in the bible women just want to own a man

[–]BirchSean 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Username checks out.

No way! The bible!? That's amaaaaaaziiingg!!

[–]TheRedPillRipper 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Or an algorithm that calculates craziness levels based on facial aesthetics.

"Ah I see based on her face she's an 8; but her craziness level's sitting just below Bat Shit Crazy. Hhmm... I'll pass."

[–]CQC3 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Oh she looks wonderful, I can see the whites above and below her eyes and she has an unflinching gaze not unlike that of a soldier who has come back from war...

[–]sshtoredp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And add-on to calculates age, that's extra nuclear-level

[–]MKSsystem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even a fake promo video would do the trick

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points  (1 child)

Looking forward to parody videos to end "bitchiness" and "bitch like behavior"

They would be created by Blue Pill for Blue Pill. Or to be fair maybe someone bored who just feels like making some satire. It's not always completly black and white. My point is: The Alpha couldn't care less about female expectations. If he would... he wouldn't be said alpha.

[–]ClarityTRP 6 points7 points  (0 children)

yeah for sure. I meant satire, not any sort of serious effort. A genuine BP counter-campaign would just be depressing.

[–][deleted] 39 points40 points  (1 child)

Not happening. A dating app isn't as valuable as the number of people on it. It's as valuable as the number of women on it. They realize this and won't change anything

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is so fucking true. Tinder has to be extreme as possible on their side to cover their ass. Reality will happen regardless

[–]2Dmva100 19 points20 points  (6 children)

Cummings is simply enacting her own sexual strategy on a mass scale. What better way to attempt to sway the behaviors and sexual preferences of the Alpha Chads than infesting the largest online dating platform?

'I'll show them! Ill make them all beta so the younger hotter girls wont fuck them based on asshole behavior-induced tingles and then they will all see who the REAL wimmin are! Muhaha!'

(She said while petting her cat, eating ice cream, and wearing a genie bra and an AB belt and watching strong independent wimmin on 'The Talk').

[–]2awalt_cupcake 10 points11 points  (5 children)

'I'll show them! Ill make them all beta so the younger hotter girls wont fuck them based on asshole behavior-induced tingles and then they will all see who the REAL wimmin are! Muhaha!'

Interesting point. So when will it stop being primarily Feminism & Betatization and become Old Hags vs Young Pussy? I was fucking this college girl (19) and her mom loved having me over. I swear she liked hearing us fuck. She would talk openly about sex and "her daughter's breasts getting bigger". I thought she was just wanting me to impregnate her daughter (from what I can put together I was the best guy she was with,she had a habit of being loose over idiots) but now I wonder if she had a thing for me too? I wouldn't be surprised if the next step of feminism becomes an internal conflict between the post-wall and the new women as they jealously and brutally try and claw their way to Chad's heart. Maybe it'll destroy itself?

[–]2Dmva100 7 points8 points  (4 children)

I think once the 80/20 becomes more like 90/10 or 95/5 and men literally have no sexual selection power, we will see a big shift in the sexual strategy of women when it comes to shunning the younger gals (like white knighting for chicks??). Not sure how it'll work but young women will be treated like betas are treated by women now, stacking the cards against then through social convention and encouraging a-sexuality for the sake of career in their party years. Only problem is by comparrison the beta males make up 80% versus 18-24 girls are nowhere near that percentage of female dating pool, so yeah something would have to give.

Basically young women who have nothing going for them outside of their snapchat stories and a cup of Starbucks will be ridiculed into SIW careerism under the threat of societal ostracization (much like betas are conditioned by society to be good producers/breadwinners.)

[–]Alathon 6 points7 points  (2 children)

If we're for serious here, leaving 85-95% of men out of the equation means those men will take what they want. Probably with a veneer of justification, through Islam or something similar. The wealthy get their harems (they can afford the security), the middle get their wife (mate guarded with violence and cruelty), and the bottom of the barrel find some other way to get their visceral kicks.

[–]Ruhkov 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Found the Trump propagandist. You sly bastard you.

[–]Alathon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What can I say? Once upon a time I was all 'Rand Paul this, Rand Paul that', and then I watched as the Emperor of Man shit in one hundred million wheaties and laughed.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I could see that. Not to get too story-like but then society would literally become systematic under one queen. Whoever mates with the queen would have to overthrow her over brutally to establish himself as king and hopefully put things in their rightful order. Whoever that man is going to be will have to literally be the 1%, the Chaddest of Chads. The most fit genetics in the most prime opportunity. God among men.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 29 points30 points  (2 children)

Simply do all the things women complain about, and you'll do fine.

[–]ClarityTRP 18 points19 points  (0 children)

heh, indeed. When I first got into Tinder I looked at some BP articles where women complain about the profile pictures they "hate" - have had good results with those same kinds of pictures.

[–]Drumcode-Equals-Life 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Funny how women can put in their bio that they demand a 6'5" white financial executive who drives a BMW and hits the gym daily, nobody bats an eyelid.

Guy writes that he wants a woman who's as into working out as he is...what a fucking monster fat shaming women!

Such a joke double standard.

[–]sparks_mandrill 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Seriously, this is way too true. Part of the reason I've stepped away from online dating. The women are pathetic as fuck and basically make demands on how guys should be and most are homely as fuck.

[–]Regs2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've quit online dating altogether because I realized the best I can do is 6 online, whereas I've had no problems bedding 9-10's from a cold approach.

[–]slumdog-millionaire 12 points13 points  (0 children)

was thinking about what that video would look like as well.

Most women are great.

And then their are the bitches.

They can be a real problem.

These are the men determined to solve it.

Cut to a room full of men calling out women on being fake, stuck up bitches.

Yea wouldn't go over too well

[–]APointAndALine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guys, just remember that as a man with game you have options. If the cost of doing business somewhere is too high (having to pay for gold, building up a fan base that wants "correct" behavior) you can and should just pack up your business and move on.

Put this on another post, but I also don't see this promoting the number of bangable girls on the app. It's just going to increase the number of feminist princesses that I would not want to meet in real life. There's more options in the market (bumble, league) that will help you find better matches.

[–]sean-larson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How to Start A Conversation on Tinder (Step by Step Method): http://hookupsonautopilot.com/blog/how-to-start-a-tinder-conversation/

[–]Ruhkov 341 points342 points  (36 children)

I think online dating companies are very smart. It's like a nightclub. Women get in for free. Women bring the men. The men pay. Keep the women happy, the women keep coming, the men keeping paying. It's not a surprise that the apps cater to female experience. Doesn't change reality or the laws of attraction though.

[–]Koryphae_ 58 points59 points  (15 children)

Overall media with advertisements is largely consumed by women, isn't it?

[–]Ruhkov 32 points33 points  (14 children)

The stay-at-home-mom media consumer? Overall maybe. I highly doubt the gap is very high between men and women nowadays. Maybe 50 years ago. I'd be interested to see any numbers on it.

[–]Kalepsis 7 points8 points  (11 children)

Especially considering ads are ubiquitous and unavoidable now.

[–]RemoveXenophiliacs 11 points12 points  (5 children)

Get an ad blocker. I never see ads.

[–]bizarrehorsecreature 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There are still paid shills, promoted posts, artificially "upvoted" content, undisclosed paid reviews, products plugs and placements and so on.

[–]youngzari 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Please suggest one. Seriously.

[–]tekn0_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Download adblock plus for chrome or safari or firefox

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

don't forget "strict pop-up blocker" add-on

[–]championchilli 5 points6 points  (4 children)

It's simply a marketing tactic as tinder is reacting to the market share lost to bumble that is more female centric (women talk first) app. Presumably decaying to a dip in female profiles or new female sign ups.

[–]Ruhkov 12 points13 points  (3 children)

Interesting thing to note about bumble is that women are facing the same trouble that men face on the rest of the apps because the onus is on them to initiate contact.


As you probably know, one of the main differentiators that Bumble has going on in terms of user guidelines is that women are the only ones that can initiate conversations. Some stated that it has its downsides because women are not naturally “initiators”. Even a woman seemed to have a negative opinion about this: “At first I liked this app. However, after a while I realized it’s really geared to benefit men. They are inundated with women reaching out to them so they no longer need to put effort into finding a mate. In short, this app gives them the “it’s a squirrel!” syndrome. Sad to say, no longer a fan of Bumble.”

Stop using dating apps people! Or maybe we have to start using them a different way something needs to change.

[–]championchilli 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tbh every single msg I get on there is a variation of 'hey' so does hold up to the not natural initiator comment. I like dating apps tbh, I don't slay it like some kind of pussy killer but it works pretty well for me.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Invoking Carl the cuck here...

Are you fucking kidding me???!!??

Every single message by a woman is "hey".


So they are bitching that they're too fucking lazy to write a three letter word.

[–]FREEDNA 2 points3 points  (0 children)


"hey you are boring as fuck"

[–]u-r-silly 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Aren't you forgeting the massive amount of advertising on social media and coincidently, the massive usage female have of said media?

[–]Ruhkov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. I don't know if females consume social media more than men. I'd like to see numbers on it for sure.

[–]therealpkg 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Spot on. And not exactly shocking. Tinder may execute its strategy a bit differently (from other matching platforms, specifically) and even seem edgy or unique, but it's still owned by a narrative pushing conglomerate that has its own vested interests. They don't actually give a shit about the user experience beyond keeping them engaged, but they have to signal that virtue.

[–]Docbear64 24 points25 points  (6 children)

A family member of mine is a complete beta , I try to coach him on women but he doesn't care or try and I see my effort as a waste now. He stunned me the first time he mentioned he's tried every dating app and to him trying equated to paying a subscription for all of them hoping to meet one girl . It only shocked me because I've never paid a dating app / site subscription and I've met a hand full of women and at least chatted with a good number ( or a good number who said they were real women) .

After watching that Ashley Madison doc and some of those OKC blogs I wouldn't be surprised if there's a large number of men who pay and don't ever actually meet anyone or have more than a one message conversation.

[–]1empatheticapathetic 3 points4 points  (1 child)

What doc is this? Will watching it further destroy my self worth?

[–]Docbear64 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ashley Madison: Sex, Lies, and Cyber Attacks is the title , and if you invest a lot of time into online dating with little results it will. Chances are if you are on this sub it's not new information though . We know the top 20% get the majority of women so in the case of this single online portal the numbers are even worse and the sites take advantage of our blue and less women-savvy brethren .

[–]CrazedHyperion 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Of course, what do you think? It looks like the whole site is populated by bots or imbecile women than can't utter more than a few random words every now and then. Fuck that.

[–]Docbear64 2 points3 points  (2 children)

You're right but it's not about what I think it's about what George who hasn't gotten laid in two years and done a dedicated exercise in 5 thinks. Do you think George might find $50 for a 3 month subscription worth the improved chances of getting laid or even GASP finding the one ?

[–]CrazedHyperion 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If George so desperately wants to get laid, then, he needs to exist in a target-rich environment. He better hop on a plane and fly to Thailand, Pattaya, to be more accurate.

[–]Docbear64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But George is a good guy who respects women, Paying women who would willingly spread their legs for his cock is demeaning .. or something .

Again I agree with you 1000% but that's the reason we read/ post here . We are not the Georges of the world. For every man who says women are people who do stupid shit, can lie and manipulate, and enjoy just getting fucked sometimes too there are 20 Georges imagining every woman they've met as a chaste angel who probably doesn't even really know what sex is.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 19 points20 points  (5 children)

I think online dating companies are very smart

So why poison the well now? They think they are making fun of men, but what they are really doing is calling their prime market a bunch of sluts.

Remember boys, slut shaming is female business.

[–]causeandcorrelation 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The well is poisoned already with bluepill. As long as the betas pay and have some sort of socially acceptable 'standard' to achieve, the will perceive hope and continue to excersice their schemas through their wallets.

[–]Ruhkov 2 points3 points  (3 children)

You could be right. Maybe women wouldn't react well to it. Or maybe women will look at it and identify with the excitement of such an easy hookup with a hot guy. Put another way... most normal adjusted guys don't think of themselves as the dudes being made fun of but rather their own special snowflakes. Only the most fucked up and insecure people will feel like they're being made fun of I think. Most of the people would probably be like "oh yeah i'm the chad" even if they're not at all lmao

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 2 points3 points  (2 children)

rather their own special snowflakes

Yeah, men will never be a problem for hookup sites. Hell, retards are still giving money to Ashley Madison so they can talk to bots.

Women will be a mix. Some as you say won't give a fuck. However, others will have their Slut Avoidance Algorithms activated and pretend they want none of it (though they do). It was an unnecessary act for a company that was others doing fine.

[–]Ruhkov 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, yeah, every girl has done chatroulette and omegle lol. You bet they're gonna check out those apps. Don't get me started on the dudes. I just posted something about how guys need to get off of dating sites and stop providing so much easy online fawning for the women and I got downvoted to hell. It was a funny story too. Guys will never get off. The guys draw the women as well, so it's a two way street isn't it?

[–]_speak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What a perfect analogy! I immediately found this subreddit after trying to find somewhere I could voice my dislike for this bullshit.. I've had such a positive experience on Tinder, but seeing how they're pushing this bullshit I cannot with good conscience continue using it.. I've never been more disgruntled haha

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

I won't go out with a woman that clubs. Why the fuck would I want to go to a pmace with you where I'm expected to drain my bank account for you while you act like you're the shit and try to get other guys to flirt/try and dance with you in order to try and make me jealous and put me in my place? Fuck off I'll grab a beer with the guys. You do what you want and maybe I'll stick around maybe I won't.

[–]Ruhkov 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I like clubbing. I love to dance.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That's all good if you are going there to try and pick up. If you go because your girl drags you, good luck with that.

[–]Ruhkov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just like to dance to loud music. It's independent of sex. Clubbing is actually a really expensive way to do it so the only time I actually would go is with other people; male, female, group, etc. There are bars which have a dance floor and loud music that are far cheaper venues so I tend to prefer that. Or concerts.

[–]Endorsed ContributorJamesSkepp 100 points101 points  (14 children)

The videos are not instructional, they are marketing videos, all of them. They are designed to elicit some emotions from you, as is most of modern marketing. Treating this as an actual instruction on how to behave is overthinking the subject.

What this should show you is that Tinder CHOSE the "douchebags" (Chads) as their main theme for advertising. This means they are aware that Chads exists as demographic on their platform and that the Chads are recognized as an archetype by both Tinder and their customers.

Put yourself in the position of Tinder. Even if you are not RP, you have your statistical data from servers, so you know which men are getting most the pussy, the 80/20 rule applies regardless of RP knowledge. You can't shame women (obviously), you can't shame beta/BP men (second biggest demographic), so you're left with shaming the smallest number of customers you can (but they don't care anyway, just wait and see), while "uniting" women and betas behind it. It's a win/win for you.

Look at it from the point of view of the users too. Betas/BPs are going to get encouraged to be more beta/BP. Alphas/Chads will remain alphas/Chads b/c they have far too strong frames and their IDGAF attitudes toward women and women will still be women, maybe they'll shit test men a bit more.

I do agree that the ads are BP and encourage women worship so strongly that it makes me cringe, but then again what did you expect from today's society. Overwhelming majority of men are BP, so they are simply repeating the same BP concepts they've learned before. I could envision Tinder making these ads in a way that would make the fun from the "nice guys" or women, but they would firstly require someone in charge that takes huge risk (and a lot of it) and it would be almost certainly a shot in the foot, not the most logical, rational decision.

[–]2kevin32 10 points11 points  (1 child)

What this should show you is that Tinder CHOSE the "douchebags" (Chads) as their main theme for advertising.

<Dons Morpheus' shades>

What if I told you that this advertising was designed to shame unattractive BP men? For the purposes of this campaign, it's not Chad who's the douchebag. It's every other man except Chad (i.e. the "Nice Guys", guys who don't lift, men under 6 feet, beta males, needy men, etc).

Chad can do no wrong except reject them for younger women, and even then they're willing to forgive, as evidenced by "The Ghostbuster" vid.

I wouldn't be surprised if down the line any negative "reactions" a man receives from a woman on Tinder will have penalties. "Sorry! Looks like your last 10 Tinder matches splashed their drinks on you! You must have said or done something to offend them, and we want the Tinder to be a positive experience for everyone, so we're going to temporarily suspend your account."

It's a stretch, but I think the end goal of this "Menprovement Initiative" is to eliminate all the decent men so there are only Chads on Tinder.

[–]Rampage360 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you’re absolutely right

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 18 points19 points  (4 children)

. They are designed to elicit some emotions from you, as is most of modern marketing.

It's way worse than that. It's how Tinder employees attempt to absolve themselves from creating a monument to hypergamy. This is what I love about this latest tech bubble. Self-rightous retards fuck up their own companies because of their fee-fees. It's been exhilarating to buy up IP for pennies on the dollar because of shitshows like this. I'm up to five this year alone. Fortunately for Tinder, their core market isn't going away--women wanting to get railed by guys with muscles and a square jaw.

[–]red_matrix 4 points5 points  (1 child)

It's been exhilarating to buy up IP for pennies on the dollar because of shitshows like this. I'm up to five this year alone.

Can you explain what you mean by this comment?

[–]Endorsed ContributorJamesSkepp 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It's how Tinder employees attempt to absolve themselves from creating a monument to hypergamy.

I'm on the fence when it comes to the question if Tinder employees understand the actual m-f SMP dynamics. Maybe they do maybe they don't.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They would rather stay in the matrix and eat the steak. That's why they did this.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This means they are aware that Chads exists as demographic on their platform and that the Chads are recognized as an archetype by both Tinder and their customers.

Must make for some interesting internal discussions regarding TRP tenets like 80/20 if they have user data that spells it out clear as day.

It took me a while after swallowing the red pill to notice it, but Tinder is very adept at making betas "perceive scarcity", constantly filtering the second hand guys through a somewhat similar sequence of women over and over to make the pool of women in the area seem much smaller than it is. Its basically how they drive the whole "Boost" feature as a revenue source

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 31 points32 points  (0 children)

For those of you who haven't seen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3WwQkItiUM

"Comments are disabled for this video."

hahahaha. Ahem. So this is what I find hilarious. Tinder thinks they have an image problem so they ask women to help them with it. However, it isn't men that turned it into a 90/10 meat market; it's women that did that.

Tinder doesn't have an image problem. In fact, they played to their strengths in epic fashion. It's employee hamsters that have become uncomfortable with the truths they have exposed. So what are these vaginal-employees going to do? Fuck up the entire enterprise.


[–]Koryphae_ 59 points60 points  (1 child)

Seriously they get a woman named 'Cummings' as the front lady. This seems more like a joke than a real campaign. Hilarious. Ghostbusters scene topped it.

[–]1564001 55 points56 points  (2 children)

"Comments are disabled for this video."

Wonder why.

[–]james_the_dean 21 points22 points  (2 children)

I love how they call in a female council to solve "doucheness" a.k.a. plans not going according to female imperative, and calling out a guy for looking for similar interests like fitness (which you can solve btw, and similar interests make a better match) but no word about the tons of females who make a list on their profiles like "6'2" min, beard, green eyes, abs etc." excluding like 95% of the population and many of them you cannot fix

[–]CrazedHyperion 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Yeah, it's like she may ask, but it's unlikely to get .

[–]CrazedHyperion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And I was going to say, because they limit themselves to certain characteristics, they shoot themselves in the foot, because there will be a very limited number of bearded, green-eyed and whatever else, because these are exceptional qualities, so the guys who see their standard don't even bother to check them out.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 21 points22 points  (1 child)

What's sickening about this, isn't watching post-wall women demanding their betabucks and pretending to complain about Chad fucking younger women while really complaining about Chad not fucking them....

No, what's really sickening is that Tinder themselves are thinking "we need more women to use Tinder, so let's put women in charge of cleaning men up, yes that'll work".

The big dating apps always go this way... pandering to what women say rather than what women do. Realising that more women on board is key to their success... and then listening to them rather than realising that the whole sexual market is inherently skewed from the outset.

[–]billsmashole 42 points43 points  (1 child)

Whitney Cummings is only 35? I would have guessed 45.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Jesus this is the only noteworthy thing to come out of this tinder campaign. And they have her mocking a guy for calf implants? Botox the bitch!

[–]emilandersen043 12 points13 points  (2 children)

I find it funny that old bitch thinks we will start dating and bending over backwards for them after her little campaign

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (1 child)

They don't think. They are women. They create something other women can "relate to". Then they feel understood or appreciated and then talk to their friends about it. This is neither logical nor is it aiming at improvement. Some smart guy above simply paid the women to do their videos to increase Tinder-Traffic. And it also is for Blue Pill idiots aswell. They can point at the guys and say "I would never to that. I respect women!" and go buy another Tinder subscription because he knows how to treat women...not.

[–]Fapisluv 21 points22 points  (2 children)

I cringed at the first 30secs of the first video.Couldn't bring myself to watch the rest of them.

I understood some of what you wrote though,and i will add to your key takeaways:

1.True for online dating,almost true for real life.

2.Combine it with 1,men who are deemed ugly or douchebags,don't talk about sex.Attractive men are free to talk about it.All women are free to talk about sex.

3.Women like seeing men with fit bodies,but they dislike seeing the effort behind it.They feel insecure,because they always want to look pretty and having someone who is fit next to them,will force them to try hard for their physique too,else,they might be nexted.They also view going to the gym as tryhard.That's why,a good idea by TRP standards,is to do a sport.That way you have an excuse for your physique.



6.Ultimate shit test.Men who do this get shit on afterwards.

[–]Kink3 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Are there any threads you'd recommend that go into more detail on #3?

[–]Endorsed Contributorex_addict_bro 38 points39 points  (5 children)

Wtf, we watch buzz feed now?

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

"Know your enemy", though the enemy part should be taken lightly. Or to make another example: "The strongest general doesn't just plan his own strategy, he also plans the strongest strategy for his enemy. He will see through the eyes of his opponent and thus win the war."

But you are right. This thing is kinda "meh" content. Though i would rate it still acceptable.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Didn't buzz shit produce some cucking is cool videos recently? Or was that mtv? I lose track because there are so many cucks in this world.

[–]Endorsed Contributorex_addict_bro 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Went to the cinema yesterday. Saw a trailer for a movie in which a divorced woman lives with her 3 lovers (+ 2 daughters). Then the ex-husband shows up and wants to fix stuff. I actually wanted to puke when I saw this.

The deal is, they show this stupidity to women and women think it is achievable. The situation in the movie, when a Hb6 single mom with 2 daughters has 3 slim, young lovers and can afford a house won't happen ever.

Leftists and feminists hurt women by showing them surreal situations. Then women think they can achieve that. Source: I'm divorced.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This trailer sounds so bad I have to see it. Any idea what the name of the movie is?

[–]ShotgunTRP 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I saw a buzzfeed (or vice or some shit) ad on YouTube "husbands who suck their wives boyfriends cocks. It's so empowering" lmmfao

[–][deleted] 44 points45 points  (2 children)

I like Whitney Cummings. She's a human female, so all RP theory applies. But I wouldn't classify her as some moronic feminist. She seems to be pretty self aware--a requisite for being a decent comedian and writer. I only know this having listened to her on Joe Rogan's podcast. Her and Dr. Rhoda Patrick are the only women I care to listen to on his podcast. They're both pretty interesting. BTW, she had an HBO or Showtime standup show a year or two ago; a thread on TRP noted how RP aware it was.

So she's being paid to do an ad for Tinder. So what? I find it more interesting that Tinder needs to do such an ad campaign.

Also, here's endorsed contributor, IllimitableMan's, take on strong women:

Unpopular controversial truth: Men find insecure low confidence women more attractive than hyper confident women. Not because "they're threatened by it" or some dumb female shit like that But because highly confident women are obnoxious, and obnoxiousness is ugly.


[–]Rian_Stone 15 points16 points  (3 children)

You think any of this is gonna matter when you throw up some abs onto the screen?

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 10 points11 points  (2 children)

That won't stop a female VP of Marketing from fucking up her company.

[–]Rian_Stone 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Definitely sounds like my problem.

any programmers out there? Looks like some new space in the sex app market.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm thinking something like "Ab-ster." It's where men post pictures of their abs only and wait for the mating proposals to roll in.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Whitney Cummings.

For all you need to know about Ms. Cummings. She's a feminist. She's sub-par comedian. She froze her eggs. Oh, and she claims "...men don't like strong women."

it has nothing to do with not liking strong women... it's that 10 years ago, she was moderately attractive, but now her makeup/surgery makes her look like a tranny.

[–]WSBagholder 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The phrase, "women don't know what they want" seems to almost always be true when women have any sort of options, from men to clothes.

[–]ywolok 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Here’s something no one ever says. Women are horrible at online dating. They make the same mistakes men make, only they have no idea that they made a mistake. They just assume the guy is a player/asshole.

[–]francisco_DANKonia 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Lift. Unattractive dudes are like crappy internet ads from the 90s that everybody hates. You want to be the professional and interesting viral ad.

[–]newName543456 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Comments obviously disabled... HA HA HA HA HA. Typical leftist nonsense.

But wait... one of the guys is black. FUCKING RACISTS!!!!!!1111!!!!!!111!!!! :D

As for so called douchebags, when there is demand, supply will be created. Also, being called douchebag by them is actually a flattery at this point.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If women would stop sleeping with the dudes they claim not to be into and regretting it afterwards, maybe they would be.... Oh hahahahaha, couldn't do that with a straight face.

[–]vandelayarchitect 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Man you guys never get bored of these circlejerks lol. Yeah, women make exceptions and drop their panties for hot guys. Nothing new or nothing surprising.

[–]goldaxis 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tinder is trash anyway. Last time I checked, it served up about 50 ugly-to-average looking women in a row.

[–]shango130 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The imagery of men being fitted with devices around their heads that modifies behavior invokes thoughts of electric shock therapy and sanctioned lobotomy. Jesus, I need to get the fuck out of this country.

[–]nazis_are_socialists 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Who cares. Tinder is a business that needs to market itself to women to keep them on board with the app. Whatever dating app women decide to use, there will always be men following them. So of course Tinder is going to tailor its PR to appeal to the feminine imperative. It's financially in their best interest.

[–]Camp_KillYourself 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fuck that disgusting THOT Whitney Cummings

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All I need to know is that she has cum in her name.

[–]mtl_dood 4 points5 points  (1 child)

There is no middle ground to this. If you are on Tinder, you are being beta. I dont care if you get action. As a man you have no power on Tinder. Go out in person and meet a bitch rather than slinking around on Tinder.

[–]Patriarchysaurus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tinder: The Wall-Approaching Woman Beta Bucks/Alpha Fucks Lockdown Initiative.

[–]MagnumBurrito 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I hope they do a women series like this too.

[–]thomascoopers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is no way in fucking hell that's going to happen.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

How about we get an add-on that dates when your photos were actually taken? Next time I go to meet someone and she is 5years+older and 20lbs+ heavier than on her photos, Im just going to walk away.

[–]prodigy2throw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Moral of the story here is ignore what these losers say. Lift, work hard, improve, do gang shit and call girls bitches to they face.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Man I cancelled on a tinder date the other day after she was really pushing for it and double checking I wasn't going to cancel. Her response was to get pissed and send me a pick of another "super hot" match that she had to try and make me jealous. This woman was hot, but 40 and. Ever married and made it a point to tell me how all of her exes always tried to get back with her.

I was thinking wow you are full of yourself and they proybjust wanted another lay out of you because you sound completely exhausting and not worth it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it is pretty amusing how these types of videos always end up looking like satire with how transparently dumb they are. must keep happening a lot because they always disable likes/comments on the youtube videos too.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the same programming that has been taught by "society" for the last 60+ years. Used to be more subtle but it's still here. What they don't understand is that the bahaviour they are trying to create in men is what they think they want. Who wouldn't want tohave everything go their way? But what they are missing is that attraction ISN'T a thinking process. The fact are that these charateristics are now entrenched in the majority of men but they are actually unattractive to women. See divorce rate for details

[–]_TheRP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's economics.

Guys that act like 'douche bags' are just dudes selling dick, and they've found a tactic that works.

If the market didn't demand it, they would use a different tactic.

[–]Graceful_Ballsack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Women suck, but its fun to have a hole to fuck.

[–]MisterOrigon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good grief, the hypocrisy. Like any piece of feminist bullshit, if you reversed the genders, there would be a total outcry.

Can you IMAGINE if there was a video series about how WOMEN could improve themselves from MEN? The left would have an absolute FIT.

[–]Xoramung 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if 228k people downvoted each of those videos once....

I will start.

[–]Mr-Ed209 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The George Costanza rule applies to female dating advice.

Do the exact opposite of what they think is right.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Who gives a fuck what a dried up old hag feminist has to say? Literally. Fucking freeze dried. Disgusting. Sure if you're a blooper you might take these vids to heart but thank god we are not.

Furthermore, if I wanted to date a "strong woman" I'd just date a man. I am attracted to women with womanly qualities. Not this post modern liberal transsexual gender fluid bullshit.

Now on a tinder tangent:

I have done some experimentation and found that tinder and bumble are fake apps. I'm convinced bumble is the worst offender. Look at bumble pics and nearly every single profile the bitches look like models. Statistically impossible.

However I have found that coffee meets bagel and okcupid actually result in real dates.

This is my anecdotal experience. Do as you will.

Some variables possibly messing up the results. Apps like tinder are probably super saturated due to popularity. My age is listed above and below an arbitrary cutoff range for my target that could further change the results. I had the idea to make the profiles completely identical but nobody got time for that shit.

I think my results give decent support to my hypothesis that much of these apps are driven by fake profiles to increase the user base and male adoption rates. Basically it's an investor scam.

I'm not going to dox myself so no attributes other than to say I have decent attributes--not perfect or model like but very decent. Also the fact that I get dates from the other two apps points to either a problem in demographics or app fakeness.

Don't get me started on the bots. And the one word replies. My strategy is a few exchanges then "hit me up on #" and cease contact. No time for time wasting bullshit.

[–]bigTOElovah 1 points1 points [recovered]

Whitney Cummings may be 35 and "post wall" but you guys would lay her down and give her the old in and out without a second thought if she was in your bedroom. Hell, just name ONE female celebrity who is hotter than her, Can't DO it!

[–]RPBulletDodger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you really believe that there are dudes out there who cannot out-think their dicks?

I wouldn't even fuck her with Bill Clinton's dick bro.

[–]doobs_mcdoobs 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I found these videos kinda funny and entertaining. How do I cure this?

[–]candyman420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are the reaction emojis for men?

[–]Luckyluke23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

at first. I thought this was a real video. since tinder. but this video is cringe worthy at best.

I went on tinder today to see they changed it AGAIN. now when you click on a profile you can click left top part of the screen to see another picture and click the right part of the screen to see the left part. while the bottom part brings up the profile.

you may as well get rid of the fucking profile bit all together! if you ain't ripped NO POINT being on tinder. it's just a fucking joke!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"No employees were harmed in the making of this video" - what the actual fuck

[–]Luckyluke23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the male is Chad, he can say or do anything, sometimes even what the creep said or did, and it is a turn on.

this is a key point.

If a woman likes you it's not creepy AT ALL. if she doesn't like you, it's creepy AS FUCK.

[–]2kevin32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the Compliment Generator, her last words: "I feel violated", from his compliments.

Not too far from "He raped me by looking in my direction."

[–]bolupua 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the male is Chad, he can say or do anything, sometimes even what the creep said or did, and it is a turn on.

Be attractive. Don't be unatractive.

[–]SgtBrutalisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP, you're reading too much into this. I don't see any malice behind any of these videos.

[–]red_rover_red_rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

perception is always reality

[–]jace81 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I find it amazing you took the time to watch all of those videos then write a report on them. Awful.

[–]BoyWhoreWithASword 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting to look into the Matrix from the outside.

The fact that so many people can't see this for what it is speaks volumes about the complete and utter mental and moral degradation of society.

[–]APointAndALine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First time poster here, and honestly this video disgusts me. Everyone here has really hint on points for why this is just a stupid tactic (the idea that you can "change" guys, attributing the problem on men instead of themselves, etc.)

I wanted to, however, ask whether the marketing strategy solves the problem at hand. I feel like the issue here is that tinder girls want to match up with more Chads (or at least non basement living guys). I don't believe that the marketing tactic helps the problem since there's only two ways you're going to match up with more Chads (either increase the number of Chads in the market or increase their response rate)

I'm not saying I am a Chad, but tactics like this just makes me want to focus my attention on other dating apps (Bumble, League) where I can meet more quality girls. The last thing I want to do is match up with some self-entitled feminist princess who thinks I should be waiting at her beck and call. There is just a lot more girls out there (I live in NYC) who would be interested in what I can offer, and I can't see this marketing to attract the girls that I want to meet (I find that most of the girls who fall for this feminist propaganda are ugly as sin). I already have to slog through a ton of unattractive matches to have to deal with more of these.

TLDR: Guys, just remember that as a man with game you have options. If the cost of doing business somewhere is too high (having to pay for gold, building up a fan base that wants "correct" behavior) you can and should just pack up your business and move on.

[–]FREEDNA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we call out all the sluts on tinder then? Equality, cunts!

Douchebags are typically in a vagina.... just saying.

[–]theosib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Manprovement" is pure satire. It's ironic, over the top, and cleverly designed viral marketing for Tinder.

And it's working. Before, Tinder was "that social media site that has something to do with dating... maybe." Now it's, "that social media site with the outrageous campaign to 'fix douchiness in men'."

Don't you get it? It's time to buy stock in Tinder. Every youtube video and article about the misandry of Manprovement plays right into their hands. The controversy they have created (completely fabricated by geniuses at their marketing firm) is making Tinder more well-known than any other social media site short of Facebook.

[–]Monsterzz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm okay with the video. Most men don't care much about it anyways. It's to pull more women into tinder, which is always a plus regardless of their expectations going into it.