1585
1586
1587

CultureNikola Tesla explains why he never married. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by jacques_cousteau007

From an article in 1924

"I had always thought of woman as possessing those delicate qualities of mind and soul that made her in her respects far superior to man. I had put her on a lofty pedestal, figuratively speaking, and ranked her in certain important attributes considerably higher than man. I worshipped at the feet of the creature I had raised to this height, and, like every true worshiper, I felt myself unworthy of the object of my worship.

But all this was in the past. Now the soft voiced gentle woman of my reverent worship has all but vanished. In her place has come the woman who thinks that her chief success in life lies on making herself as much as possible like man - in dress, voice, and actions, in sports and achievements of every kind. The world has experience many tragedies, but to my mind the greatest tragedy of all is the present economic condition wherein women strive against men, and in many cases actually succeed in usurping their places in the professions and in industry. This growing tendency of women to overshadow the masculine is a sign of a deteriorating civilization.

Practically all the great achievements of man until now have been inspired by his love and devotion to woman. Man has aspired to great things because some woman believed in him, because he wished to command her admiration and respect. For these reasons he has fought for her and risked his life and his all for her time and time again.

Perhaps the male in society is useless. I am frank to admit that I don't know. If women are beginning to feel this way about it - and there is striking evidence at hand that they do - then we are entering upon the cruelest period of the world's history.

Our civilization will sink to a state like that which is found among the bees, ants, and other insects - a state wherein the male is ruthlessly killed off. In this matriarchal empire which will be established, the female rules. As the female predominates, the males are at her mercy. The male is considered important only as a factor in the general scheme of the continuity of life.

The tendency of women to push aside man, supplanting the old spirit of cooperation with him in all the affairs of life, is very disappointing to me."


[–]modAutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Just a friendly reminder that as TRP has been quarantined, we have developed backup sites: https://www.trp.red and our full post archive (and future forums) https://www.forums.red/i/TheRedPill. Don't forget to register on TRP.RED and reserve your reddit name today. Forums.Red is currently locked but will be opened soon.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]wiseprogressivethink 1188 points1189 points  (6 children)

Nikola Tesla was fired from Google for this post.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 65 points66 points  (4 children)

Could you imagine the cognitive dissonance if Elon Musk had penned that and they replaced him as CEO as the company began to flounder?

"Well yeah, they lost a couple billion dollars and had to lay off thousands of people, but it's about... fuck what are we doing?"

[–]SemiCurrentGuy 30 points31 points  (3 children)

That's basically what happened to Mozilla, right? They fired the guy who invented Javascript (yeah, I know) because of political correctness. Now they're out here changing the Firefox icon on the regular, using memes and whatnot. It's embarrassing.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Well to be fair their competitors were Microsoft and Google.

[–]ledbed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They were crushing Microsoft (which in general sucks) for years and held their own against Google

[–]the_mhs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re coming out with a new version of Firefox later this month that’s way faster though. According to some users, it also beats Chrome. So I don’t know what you’re trying to say.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 200 points201 points  (37 children)

In this matriarchal empire which will be established

Which may seem dandy for them in plentiful times, but when the system is stressed, they very quickly collapse. They got away with it for the last hundred years because thirsty men still got sex. They got it by way of marriage and their spouses were shamed into keeping up their end of the deal. However, what do they think is going to happen when armies of men go celibate, unable to attract a mate with either their looks or resources? And what about the army of married men that have since found out that women have no need to keep up their end of the contract?

Men going their own way? No. These are armies of men that despise the system and have no interest in seeing it survive. At first they will just ride the decline, but at some point they will shift gears and conquer and forge a new empire. It is how we are and it is not how they are.

Have fun, ladies. It won't last forever.

[–][deleted] 65 points66 points  (16 children)

I don't know if I can relate to anything other than the idea that there are a lot of these mateless men. Just in Asia there are millions. I wonder how this will play out.

[–]Mellyanish 1 points1 points [recovered]

There is already a solution at hand to waste the time and dull the rage of the mateless males.

Just as women marry the government, men marry their video games.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (2 children)

There is so much money to make from that. Not just video games.

[–]kyledontcare 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Not just video games. Very true. Pick a hobby or past time and start growing. Make a Top Ten list of places you want to travel to.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What I meant is that there are ways to capitalize on the desires of beta males.

[–]BendAndSnap- 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Soon to be synths with a.i. that they will mate with.

[–]Patriarchysaurus 9 points10 points  (5 children)

[–]Mellyanish 1 points1 points [recovered]

But women ARE just as funny as men.

/cough

[–]dissentforall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Obviously, why else would Netflix pay Amy shumer as much as Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock? /S

[–]unlikel_remedy 2 points3 points  (2 children)

It's terrifying to think that little nuggets of truth are sprinkled throughout TV shows like this.

[–]Patriarchysaurus 1 points1 points [recovered]

If you think that's terrifying, you better not dig any deeper. TV is called programming for a reason.

[–]unlikel_remedy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, you don't know how glad I am that I stopped watching television over 10 years ago. All it does is breed a mentality of us vs. them and desensitizes us to commit violence against who we deem, "them."

[–]Surf_Or_Die 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What about aggressive high testosterone Middle Easterners and Africans who are pouring into Europe? They've actually changed the gender balance in places like Sweden - there are now more men than women in the 15-30 bracket. I'll bet my money on even more rapes and sexual assault.

[–]marlybarrow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's also War, that always does the job in eradicating single, potentially threatening men.

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will be fine so long as the system remains stable. If you take a look at any improvished country, you'll see there's a direct correlation between the number of mateless men between the ages of 18 - 30 and the amount of violent maruading gangs filled with rapists and murderers.

Any nation that is unable to properly direct the creative elements of young driven testosterone, will ultimately suffer the destructive sides of it.

Lucky for the west most men are testosterone deficient by about 50%

[–]BendAndSnap- 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Not just any empire but a space faring, planet terraforming, a.i., robotics, and virtual reality fueled empire. Babies will be born from artificial wombs. Women will be perfect bodied synths with incredible a.i.. Real women will go extinct. Not joking.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will all be synths one day.

[–]xXSoroxXx 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I would recommend reading "A Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley. It's a dystopian novel written in the 1930's but it shares many characteristics as today.

[–]BendAndSnap- 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Just finished it. Awesome book

[–]thrillhouss3 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This will end when the Third World War begins. Testosterone will take the forefront again.

[–]1htbf 19 points20 points  (8 children)

It won't happen. Women are not dumb and readily submit to real men. No woman wants to collaborate with other women in taking the lead.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 43 points44 points  (6 children)

No woman wants to collaborate with other women in taking the lead.

You're right. They don't. I see how miserable they are in corporate America. However, the same powerful force that made them (generally) virtuous before the sexual revolution is the same powerful force that drives them into these sorts of positions.

Peer Shaming.

And yes, women aren't dumb, but their social behaviors often cause them to make dumb decisions.

[–]PowerVitamin 1 point2 points  (5 children)

If you marry the government, 90% of your behavior is tied to following social norms set in place by the government. Women get wet for displays of power. Women won't submit to a real man, when Alpha-Dog government will do a full display of power in riot swat teams. Nothing makes a woman wetter.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 13 points14 points  (3 children)

I get where you are going with this, but remember this. That serial killer drug addict with tattoos on his face and pending felony charges? He's getting pussy.

[–]PowerVitamin 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Good. I'm not going to be a serial killer to get pussy.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I support your plan. I follow it myself.

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"omg look at the size of those batons they're beating the men with*

Sploosh

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God I love that European survivor tv series with the men and women on different islands.

Didn't take long for the women to almost starve to death

[–]-ATLAS-_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Except that porn has literally changed the behavior of billions of men who now think they're getting laid and their body's biology is treating it as such since it can't distinguish if you used your bodies resources to form a new existence or if it's just into a tissue. The body reacts the same, releases essentially sedatives of all sorts of stuff to chill you out and shut you down. Look at any country in the modern age that has a high population of single men, and then look at its porn usage and prepare not to be shocked.

[–]nrafield 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Would not this just cause the "unworthy" men to die off without reproducing while everyone "worthy" passes their genes off, and thus everyone "unworthy" is eliminated forever from the gene pool in the long run?

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 0 points1 point  (1 child)

[–]V1SoR 289 points290 points  (42 children)

Practically all the great achievements of man until now have been inspired by his love and devotion to woman. Man has aspired to great things because some woman believed in him, because he wished to command her admiration and respect. For these reasons he has fought for her and risked his life and his all for her time and time again.

I would upvote this a thousand times if I could. When I was blue pill, I had far superior motivation in my career, to the point where I could live without any discipline at all simply because it was redundant and unnecessary.

[–]wiredtobeweird 125 points126 points  (27 children)

Jesus, same. I work in sales and for whatever reason when I was working to save up for a house so we could live together I never made less than 8k/month.

Being single, now it's a personal achievement if I do. Fuck. I need to find a reason again... my reason...

[–]LOST_TALE 45 points46 points  (11 children)

Read gulag archipelago, realize some things. Then no amount of money will be enough.

[–]sd4c 4 points5 points  (10 children)

What does GA have to do with kids..?

[–]LOST_TALE 11 points12 points  (9 children)

It's another form of evolutionary investment;it synergises well with children.

[–]ForeverMaverick 19 points20 points  (8 children)

Do you actually need to read the whole book, can't you give us a TL;DR just for the purpose of your comment?

[–]LOST_TALE 18 points19 points  (6 children)

TLDR: Some make children for pleasure or conformity. My comment assumes you make children as a form of fight against evil (assuming you're naturally better than the average (fewer are) ), and making children, some care about the future world they live in, thus in both cases, you'd want to fight political danger for your children or for the same goal you made children in the first place (though you might of had other reasons like the relationship it provides).

Vast swaths of the population is thrown in death labor camps, executed on sight and then starved of the economic freedom they'd need to feed themselves (and literally starve to death). Then degeneracy is subsidized. If you're part of the Degenerates TM then, I get it, doesn't mean I'd prefer you alive, either. Kill off all the productive well off and kulaks, and then your genes are all that's left, with some criminals and normies. I mean, nice. Sometimes to defeat the enemy, you must retard whole civilization.

''Man we defeated those more intelligent apes, but at-least we own the jungle now!'' - evolutionary dead end that gets burned by a red giant, never colonizes space and amounts to nothing more.

Some people have children because they got nothing better to do, are bored and just follow their instinct to please it and themselves or they just want to conform and virtue signal their parental ''virtue'' (likely vice, statistically speaking).

Then some people make children as part of a greater goal. I personally think pro-social institutions and culture are genetic based to a significant degree. I think by spreading my genes, the world will shift to how I want it to be in the long term. Sure you can also turn koreans in south korea and then also north korea.

Regardless of how much X change in genetics can account for, it is a more permanent variable you can control and not as easily changed.

As for the money. You can use the money to defend yourself, and others against political enemies (some of which are illustrated by gulag archipelago). I couldn't have enough money for my political desire of having a significant chunk of territory being capitalist, and not some micro nation or area under the jurisdiction of another shithole state. I consider myself (forget about SJW speech) an oppressed minority. Though I motivated by other things.

Economic free-zone are bullshit. They can be easily re-fucked by the host nation. They might aswell being a pig being fed only to be eaten later. After all, free slaves are the most productive. For this reason and other reasons, there is no economic area on this planet that is reasonably resistant to aggression from its own establishment. There's always a population willing to vote for political violence against economic freedom, everywhere, even in the most pro social areas like Britain (for it's high IQ, high patience psycho-graphics).

[–]ForeverMaverick 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I agree with you on a lot of things. Thanks for taking the time to post, I really appreciate it.

[–]TheSp4rk 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You should turn this comment into a post of its own.

[–]LOST_TALE 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's off topic per TRP's standards. Since it deals with values and morality. Sure I could present it/frame it in a way that is accepted (maybe). I feel like ''fuck off'' to the audience in this regard.

Here's for you, if you found the part on pro-social institutions interesting: https://pseudoerasmus.com/2015/10/04/ce/

The rest is easier to find. Mises.org for this branch of econ/politics if you're new (though I learned elsewhere).

As for primarily amoral posts, I have a history of bad ratings on my posts here. I, three times, vanguard posted a topic that I thought was very relevant and an expansion of TRP's practical research. Yet it was staggeringly rejected. I was very disappointed.

You're free to quote my stuff all you want and editorialize it. Sure could use some better syntax here and there.

''Man. We defeated those more intelligent apes, but at-least we own the jungle now!''

added a comma or period.

[–]1OneRedYear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Neanderthal were the more intelligent apes. :(

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Exactly how many Jordan Peterson lectures have you watched? Lol

I went on a similar tangent to a couple friends after reading GA. I think I terrified them.

[–]LOST_TALE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not many, a lot of these things I organized information on my own.

I listened to a lot of molyneux though.

[–]i_Hate_us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you actually need to read the whole book books

would love a tl:dr as well

[–]parsnippityjim 80 points81 points  (11 children)

Have a kid, 10x more motivating than a woman.

[–]HobbesTheBrave 44 points45 points  (9 children)

Funny you say that.

Statistics say that men earn about 10 times more when they get a kid. Because now they have 3+ mouths to feed. And he eats much more than he did as a bachelor.

[–]What_is_real_anymore 56 points57 points  (7 children)

Cause when you're single, you're making minimum wage working part time. When you're a professional in the middle of your career, you're making substantially more. That's the only way 10X works out.

I'd like to see those statistics.

[–]get-process 6 points7 points  (6 children)

I'm single and doing much better than that.

[–]HobbesTheBrave 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Those statistics imply a 'good wife', as in she isn't an useless mouth to feed. One who is cherished, one who does her job, one who only sleeps with her husband.

Everyone who does math knows that cheaters are as useless as feminists.

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Statistics say that men earn about 10 times more when they get a kid.

so how does having a kid increase his income?

[–]HobbesTheBrave 3 points4 points  (3 children)

2+ more people with wants and expectations, in his life. 2+ more who can't feed or clothe themselves.

He has to work much harder, much smarter, because it's his wife and his children. Unless he fears that he is going to get thoroughly fucked in the ass by divorce court. If that's true, he doesn't give a shit, just like a teenager doesn't give a shit.

Before the wife and the children, he didn't have to care about anything. Now he has to care about his wife and his children, and maybe even about his grandchildren.

Which is why #Feminism is cancer. That's how feminism ruins families, towns, countries and civilisation. They stop men from working, from paying taxes, and that's how everything eventually turns into complete shit.

Imagine that dumb girl you sat next to in school. Imagine her slightly hotter and slightly better behaved, but still dumb. Imagine having to feed her and her kid, which is also yours. That's what happen men when they get married and become fathers. Men have to start keeping those two cute, dumb ones from accidentally killing themselves somehow. And they want to do that.

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (2 children)

bro, how about answering the question?

You still haven't explained 'how' this change in a man's situation 'causes' an increase his income x 10!?

I get it that there are more mouths to feed/house etc But that only means a larger demand on his resources, not an increase in income of 1000%!

And then you spin off into "and that's why feminism is a cancer" WTF?!

Are you stoned bro, coz you're not making much sense?

IF it was that simple everybody would be getting married and having kids!

[–]nrafield -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does having a kid motivate employers to make you more?

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But too often the woman's 50x more expensive than the kid!

[–]1PantsonFire1234 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hold on to that old world and look for a place in this world where you can make a change. I can attest from anons that serve in the military or in politics and say that nothings has been more motivating than to fight against this slavery. When I was plugged in I wasn't half as motivated as I am now to reach new heights.

[–]xtralargerooster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've felt this... hell I may still be struggling with this... and I found my red pill through self reflection before really ever dealing with women...

You aren't alone... and you have brothers in this world even if we are hard to find sometimes.

[–]some_username2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to sound like religious prick, but this is actually mentioned in Sanatana Dharma (Hinduism), that men first need love/motivation before they can provide. And plenty of redpill stuff. People call it "oppression".

[–]WonderIfThisUsername 35 points36 points  (7 children)

Tesla was a wise man. So ahead.

Too bad about his sad life.

[–]nofilmynofucky 43 points44 points  (6 children)

He was inwardly red but outwardly blue - don't get me wrong, the man was a fucking genius but people walked all over him his entire life

[–]WonderIfThisUsername 76 points77 points  (2 children)

I think he was just a guy passionate about electricity, his toys and didnt give a fuck about people or people skills. It cost him. Edison was opposite in a way. Einstein too. They had flare and were machiavellistic.

Tesla was on another level. You cant even compare him with other scientists or geniuses.

He spoke interesting things about vibration and frequencies too. I suspect the guy will be celebrated even more in times to come.

[–]nofilmynofucky 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You make some excellent points, I was thinking about this in a far too simplistic manner. What can I say, not a genius myself.

[–]aboynameddrama 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From what I read of Edison, he was good at stealing other people's ideas and making money off them. Tesla was good at thinking things through and deriving formulas and shits so he could invent crazy ass things. He thought he could deliver free energy over the air and I think he died before he could build a tower capable of transmitting free energy. What a different world we could live in if he did it.

[–]Augustuscrassus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would you call a Tesla if it was invented by Nikola Tesla?

An Edison.

[–]mummersfarce_is_done 71 points72 points  (5 children)

Nihilism takes root when one previous idea is destroyed. If an idea can lose it's meaning, any idea can lose it's meaning. Sadly I don't know the answer to this problem as I suffer the same.

[–]ForeverMaverick 1 point2 points  (3 children)

If a car is yellow then all cars are yellow. Oh, wait...

[–]missinglastlette 2 points3 points  (2 children)

"Can" was the operant word you left out...

[–]ForeverMaverick 0 points1 point  (1 child)

OK, here we go: "Just because humans can run, all humans can run". Wrong. Humans without legs can't run. Yes, a hypothetical human, who hasn't been born yet, can eventually run. If he's born with legs. And a working nervous system. And <insert another 100 conditions necessary to running that you're willingfuly forgetting>. That's the problem with your statement. It's too generic. Specific people have different properties that can't be grouped to satisfy a statement like this.

The same happens with ideas. Yes, a generic idea without properties can hypothetically be destroyed, but once you materialize it into an actual idea, that statement is no longer guaranteed to be true. As a matter of fact, hopefully I just gave you an idea that can't be destroyed.

Kudos for creating an interesting fallacy but that intuitively doesn't make any sense and through analysis doesn't either.

[–]missinglastlette 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm actually not the guy that said it, I just noticed that your 1st comment didn't really make sense.

This one is better I think, and I agree with you.

[–]TheRationalMale.comRollo-Tomassi 260 points261 points  (24 children)

And all any feminist (female or male) will reflexively think about this is that Tesla was "afraid / intimidated by women competing against him" and entirely miss the point.

[–]widec 93 points94 points  (16 children)

It's pure projection. They are intimidated to compete against strong men. They assume it's the same the other way around and refuse to look at different factors.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 43 points44 points  (15 children)

All of the "Curvy/Thick" chicks on Tinder know they have a lifestyle problem, theyre just too intimidated by the challenge of charting a course to change.

Thats really sad actually.

[–]Patriarchysaurus 41 points42 points  (2 children)

I recently had one chat me up on Bumble the other day with a "hey handsome." When I probed her about the IG username she listed in her bio (fatgirl something or other), she went ballistic on me for somehow insinuating fat girls aren't ALWAYS just as attractive as any other women & then said she was "going to go fuck one of her other 4000 thirsty dicks now bye."

Talk about a loaded gun of insecurities.

[–]ANGRY_ATHEIST 6 points7 points  (1 child)

going to go fuck one of her other 4000 thirsty dicks now bye

like that's something to brag about... more projection on her part.

[–]Surf_Or_Die 1 points1 points [recovered]

I hate how everything is curvy nowadays. To me curvy means tits and ass - which I like. I don't like bitches who look like skeletor. But I hate fat chicks who say they are curvy. No bitch, you're FAT. Massive difference.

[–]kyledontcare 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Frankly I find thin very attractive even if they have smaller boobs. If she's "curvy" she will need a face that's a 10/10 in terms of beauty but still not too big either. I have standards.

[–]Surf_Or_Die 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Meh. Different strokes for different blokes. I think we can all agree that fat chicks are disgusting though.

[–]widec 22 points23 points  (6 children)

That or they might just be slaves to their addictive tendencies

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 22 points23 points  (5 children)

Changing my diet showed me I was addicted to sugar for sure.

[–]Surf_Or_Die 9 points10 points  (4 children)

Same here. I've always been in good shape but I had a massive weak spot for sweets and soda. When I decided to entirely shift my diet away from all the cheeseburgers and fries to basically salads I actually had withdrawals. I would dream of soda cans and I'd even hear the sound of a cork opening sometimes when I was all by myself. Really fucking weird shit. I just got over it a couple of months ago, but it's like smoking, it never really goes away. I still get cravings every time I eat.

[–]RPmatrix 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I would dream of soda cans and I'd even hear the sound of a cork opening sometimes when I was all by myself. Really fucking weird shit

I had exactly the same problem but when stopping cocaine -- I'd have dreams I'd just scored some fire and my grandma would come over to visit seconds before I could have it!

and then I'd wake up, exhausted from the crazy dreams! It took about a year for them to stop! Coke's a hell of a drink drurg

[–]Surf_Or_Die 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha so weird! Now that I think of it, I never got to actually drink the soda either. I'd always wake up a split second before that sweet sugar hit my lips. Really just goes to show that sugar is a drug.

[–]nagynorbie 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Man, it really is a hell of a drug. I had no idea what effects it had on my brain until I've quit for about a year. Now I see the chaos in my friends who are still abusing it. Scary.

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I see the chaos in my friends who are still abusing it. Scary.

and speed/ice/meth is just a long lasting version which sends you crazier for half the cost!

[–]biggerbetterjobs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i like em thick. ill give'r the ol thundercockin'

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've told a few of them after fucking them for a while that they would have a hard time getting husband unless they pulled their shit together, a few who were well educated and reasonable i actually sent them case studies.

One never talked to me again, another said I was an asshole and the third got horribly depressed and then asked for help a few weeks later in regards to fitness/health.

Most of them know, it rattles them to their core. They just don't have any immediate accountability

[–]bazingabrickfists 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What was your take on the point?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Rollo, I think it is plausible that you are the reincarnation of Tesla

[–]TheRationalMale.comRollo-Tomassi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd agree except I have the foresight and wherewithal to protect and own my ideas.

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"feminists", sure but I wouldn't say all women wouid think that in my experience

however 'feminism' a la US isn't here in any significant way down here in Oz, TF!

[–]Shaman6624 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is powerplay, to feign ignorance

[–]Glacierdust 68 points69 points  (3 children)

Guys, please don't fall for his pessimism. Women can never rule like a Queen Bee/Queen Ant model. Remember: they understand the reality around them through their emotions. Men understand it through their rationality, their reason, their analytical and logical thinking. It is this rationality that has accompanied us every step of the way from the swamps to the stars. It is what gave us skyscrapers, advanced sanitation systems, fast and reliable transportation, superior medicine, effective weapons, cutting-edge software, a structured justice system, and even masterful works of art and literature that help us understand our humanity. What have women done since feminism? Twerk because they're so liberated? Get fat and inked up? Did you see feminist "art"? Looking at it impoverishes the soul. Women cannot survive without us and history is living proof (mythology, legends, and religion also echo that notion).

And besides, all the women I know in my life feel absolutely worthless when they're single. They crave male attention. So relax. The only way we can be taken out is if we do it ourselves. We always do everything ourselves anyway.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Swamps to the stars", great Reagan line

[–]ForeverMaverick 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great comment. Very insightful. Needs more upvotes.

[–]BlackBiC9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where does MBTI play into this? I know the emotion/logic thing is a generalization but obviously there are nuances. How much can you trust this as a rule of thumb, or in what situations is it foolproof?

[–]0signal0 383 points384 points  (34 children)

Tesla, being MGTOW before it was cool.

[–]soulmysold 154 points155 points  (3 children)

Tesla wasn't a virgin, Thomas Edison fucked him good. Tesla was a great man, glad he's finally getting some fame.

[–]WolfofAnarchy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Holyy shit half the train is wondering why I just burst out laughing 😂

[–]Toastlove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was and its good he's getting recognition, but a lot of people have decided he was some scientific Jesus and we'd be living on the moon now is the evil Edison and Big Oil hadn't covered up his free energy machines .

[–]Red-Curious 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The tendency of women to push aside man

and

Then [God] said to the woman ... "You will desire to control your husband" (Genesis 3:16)

God totally called that one.

[–]llmercll 51 points52 points  (5 children)

MGTOW is not cool and will never be. There is too much instinctual drive in us to reproduce and raise families. It's a lazy solution to a complex problem.

Also, red pill is not mainstream, and likely never will be. It's too ego shattering for many, and too risky for the unintelligent to properly implement.

[–]BlackFire68 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It doesn't need to be cool it seeks to be right. It certainly will not be mainstream, to the detriment of many.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 6 points7 points  (1 child)

You're so far off the target you didn't even land within the range. Pushing a blue pill narrative and trying to make it appear red.

I'm amused by those who are in the rat race, rushing around, buying expensive useless shit, getting married over and over searching for the one who won't fuck him over. Unless you were born into a wealthy family, or stumble on something like Musk and Gates did (right place right time with something on the cutting edge) you're never going to be rich. You will not ever matter, you will be forgotten in three generations. Trying desperately to gain money, digits in a bank account, wasting your precious hours working for others doing meaningless bullshit.

Rather egotistical to think you matter out of 7 billion people and your genetics will make a difference. Not very good at math and biology from the looks of it. I've never had the urge to raise a family, was trapped into it. After learning the nature of girls the hard way, I'll never let one set up camp in my life again. I'll fuck them, spend time with those who earn it, and have fun with them, but they'll always be at arm's length.

As for checking out of society, why the fuck should I do anything to benefit you unless I benefit from it more than you? You don't mean fuck all to me, why should i share my inventions and knowledge beyond getting laid with you? I share my experience in how to get your dick wet because it's inexpensive to me. It's quite interesting watching people fail over and over then finally getting it and becoming something more than they thought possible. I have no need to sharemy other info with you, and there's plenty you could implement in your life. Why the fuck would you deserve it? You don't.

That is the next step beyond Tesla, he wanted to advance humanity, I'm more like fuck them. All they've ever done is fuck me over, use me, and try to kill me. Zero incentive to help them, especially without a return. You can be generous, I'm done with that bullshit. Getting some pussy is not worth fucking up my entire life or changing my plans, altering my life, or giving shit away. Had a cunt try that shit this week, didn't work for her. They want the vengeful dick, but they also want to see if they can control me, when they pull bullshit like that, they never hear from me again.

The losers who are "opting out" but have yet to do, know, learn, or achieve anything, they're the joke. That's throwing a tantrum, I'm taking my ball and going home. Nobody gives a fuck, they have other shit to play with. Until you're valuable, going your own way is an escape from reality, a excuse to not try. You can build your own life without the rat race, no need to keep up with the Jones's, but never have the delusion that you matter so much your genes need to continue... you don't fucking matter.

[–]llmercll 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your post is too philosophical to even touch. Resentment and nihilism, with a healthy dose of epicurean hedonism tossed in. Endlessly debatable.

Regardless, raising a family is not a blue pill narrative. You don't have to respect a women, love her, or give in to her shit in order to raise children with her. Men find tremendous meaning through raising their children.

If you just want to fuck women all your life and never reproduce that's your prerogative, do what makes you happy.

[–]etherael 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"Cool". Christ. What a fucking retarded metric for picking a path in life Fonz.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. MGTOW might be the way of the post-testosterone era in a Man's lifeline. Like 60 and on. When hopefully your life experience makes you wise counsel, and the desire to pursue women is greatly diminished and therefore does not cloud your judgement. It is unrealistic to ask younger men, who are at the mercy of their hormonal milieu, to forego a chief desire.

[–]porkmaster 40 points41 points  (3 children)

Past that, he fell for a pigeon.

[–]11-Eleven-11 10 points11 points  (1 child)

That's just not true it all. He was actually very good with women. He even dated a celebrity for a while until he decided she was too distracting.

[–]taylepathy 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Sorry, I missed the memo. When was being MGTOW ever cool?

[–]WolfofAnarchy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never. It's an excuse. Temporary Monk Mode should be as far as you go, IMO

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being mgtow still isn't cool

[–]SILENTSAM69 -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Not sure it has ever become cool. Just a group we accept. Like trans people.

That said it is understandable why some go that way. I just can't help but see it as admitting defeat.

[–]jacques_cousteau007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

12 hours later, this is the best comment.

[–]dRePe_Thill 78 points79 points  (31 children)

He saw the writing on the wall almost 100 years ago..

[–]falcon10474 60 points61 points  (16 children)

Seriously, this bullshit's been going on since 1924?

[–]tuyguy 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Since the civilisation of man brother. Except men have become more and more disposable and useless since the industrial revolution.

[–]digitaler_demenz 23 points24 points  (9 children)

Read G. K. Chesterton's "What's Wrong With the World" from 1910, particularly the chapter entitled "The Emancipation of Domesticity".

Here:

http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1717?msg=welcome_stranger

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Thank you. This is such a great read. It's very refreshing to have someone from 100 years ago explain my own thoughts about modern things better than I can.

[–]digitaler_demenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yw. I agree, I find that Chesterton's analysis along with that of many other authors from this period is often far more penetrating than anything you can find nowadays. For one thing, it seems that their general knowledge was both broader and deeper than that of our contemporaries, who perhaps instead have become more specialized.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Just means your thoughts are primitive.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's a ... good thing?

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Holy shit! Listening to the 5 minute sample is mind blowing.

[–]digitaler_demenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to hear, but where did you find that sample?

[–]Omnibrad 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Rockefeller was pushing this stuff back in the late 1800's.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Civilization tends to follow a 80-100 year cycle, essentially the length of the longest surviving people. The pattern holds for the largest conflicts (ww2, civil war, revolutionary war), even the great awakenings.

Read into Strauss–Howe generational theory. It's not a hard science but pretty interesting. It lines up perfectly in this case with 1924 and today.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The timeline actually makes sense because this is when the sexual liberation movement was occurring. Cultural Marxism took it's roots long ago.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It started in the US with the women that got alcohol banned.

[–]JornSellew 1 points1 points [recovered]

Yeah it shocks me. Weren't these supposed to be the patriarchal, conservative times? Serious question, what was going on in fcking 1924 already? This was even way before the sixties. Weren't women typists at best or something?

[–]circlhat 49 points50 points  (0 children)

feminist version of history and reality are two very different things

[–]parsnippityjim 28 points29 points  (7 children)

At least in the US this was when women got the right to vote and women pretty much led the temperance movement that swept America and parts of Europe. Women were getting uppity back then, the men that encouraged them for their own selfish gains had no idea what they were unleashing.

[–]ThrowMeABoneScott 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes 1920 it became law so not shortly after. WW1 before then too

[–]lopsidedlucky 7 points8 points  (5 children)

Remember the temperance movement was the driving force behind Prohibition in the US. They made it a god damn amendment to the Constitution.

Not only this but once women got the right to vote and the temperance movement went crazy WW1 started and we sent our most able bodied men over seas in droves to die. Who raised the children left behind? Women and the men who were to unfit to serve.

That's were this shit took root imo.

[–]parsnippityjim 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Eh in the grand scheme of things we didn't lose many men in WWI, barely a blip. But I agree with your other points. WWII is where you had lots of good US men leaving widows and single mothers. Then the GI bill helped destroy universities by over expanding them, then the boomers were created, etc etc. 1950s America is idealized but it set us up to be open to cultural Marxism.

We got off easy compared to the Europeans. Can you imagine? 25+ MILLION dead Russians, 10+ MILLION dead Germans (compared to 400k Americans), countless others from other places. The Russians soldiers raped every pussy from east Prussia to Berlin (I've read there were over 2M rape pregnancies). When we wonder why Europe seems to want to die we have to remember the best men already died, nobody left to keep it together.

[–]lopsidedlucky 8 points9 points  (1 child)

I agree with your WW II and other points. Losing that many fit able bodied men pushed this country far down this path.

As for the 2M rape pregnancies, I'd question it. Read Tomassi's article on war brides and read up on the French women who openly slept with German soldiers after so many of their husbands were killed.

Back to the point though, the trend has been accelerating since the 50's.

[–]parsnippityjim 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The situation on the eastern front was so different than the west it's almost like the two fronts were different epochs in history. The Russians and Germans fought a war of extermination that makes the western front look gentlemanly in comparison (compare casualty numbers).

Stalin was so brutal when his own ally, the commander of Yugoslav forces, complained that the Soviet soldiers were raping Slavic women he basically told the dude "who cares as long as they're also killing Germans". The Russians were in full barbarian mode after years of getting straight up owned by the Wehrmacht, they wanted everybody dead and raped.

[–]Tailback 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't forget the Napoleonic wars, the Franco Prussian wars, etc....

It's amazing to me that there's enough alpha DNA in Europe to maintain basic society. Sewer, clean water, garbage service, food standards, police, and/or military.

Those things aren't being maintained by a 75 IQ "refugee" from sub Saharan Africa.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

America's entry into WWI was one of the worst things that ever happened to the world. As a result, the war continued for another couple of years rather than coming to a negotiated peace, which led to the Soviet Union, the Nazis, WWII, the Cold War, Al Qaeda, and the loss of belief in Western supremacy. Not to mention the growth of big government in America.

That's not to say the world wouldn't have been a bad place without it, but it's pretty clear that nothing good came from it.

[–]BullshittingNonsense 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Tesla's mind explodes if he teleports to today.

[–]Ebrg 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't wish it upon him

[–]jm51 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what was going on in fcking 1924 already?

The Roaring 20s. Heroin thin babes and decadent parties. Everyone having a great time except the socially awkward. Boom times thanks to easy credit.

Marie Curie had won 7 awards when Tesla wrote that. Maybe he felt a bit insecure?

[–]-ATLAS-_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Temperance movement, central bank formation, prohibition, mass starvation imminent, ramping up of military industrial complex and wars. Industrial revolutions centralized work forces away from farms, cities became much more populated.

[–]hagolu 174 points175 points  (90 children)

Fuck man the very thought of a woman leading the society like a queen ant with male soldier ants being practically her slave sickens me.

And I see this mass feminization of men in all developed societies, where men are basically reprimanded for embracing their masculinity whereas females are prodded to embrace her "feelings" and "be an uncaged butterfly". Women will fucking destroy the world as we know it with their pettiness and indecisiveness.

Hopefully, movements like TRP will educate more men to be self-reliant and assertive because that is what is best for us and the humanity as a whole.

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (3 children)

Actually in ants the soldiers are female too, the only males ever produced are drones whose only purpose is to leave the colony and try to bang some virgin queens.

[–]hagolu 22 points23 points  (1 child)

You are right. Most ant colonies need far more females than males for the basic reason that females do all the work.

In humans, it is the opposite.

[–]WonderIfThisUsername 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sounds like fun.

One bee. One voyage of HIiIs Life.

In the fields of flowers. He meets his destiny.

Will he prevail? Or will he get snapped in half by a roided hornet?

Find out on netflix this Fall.

[–]grewapair 18 points19 points  (1 child)

Fuck man the very thought of a woman leading the society like a queen ant with male soldier ants being practically her slave sickens me.

Me too. Just make sure you lift, earn a ton of money, look a certain way, and do a million other things to get one who will divorce rape you. Then you'll realize we've already arrived at that point and you never even noticed it.

And don't forget to pay your taxes. Those single mothers aren't going to feed themselves!

[–]Patriarchysaurus 97 points98 points  (36 children)

In a popular HBO television series, a queen gets fucked by the baddest alphas in the world and commands an army of eunuch soldiers who will do anything for her. She is a favourite character among female viewers. What's that tell you?

[–]somenudedude 38 points39 points  (2 children)

Yeah when HBO turned an edgy show that didn't pretend the audience was stupid into a lowest-common-denominator show that your mother would feel cool watching she became all about guuurl power.

In the novels she's a 13 year old girl who gets silly crushes on swashbuckling mercenaries and crippling insecurities whose kingdom is ultimately managed by Barristan Selmy... whom HBO killed off.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 37 points38 points  (16 children)

Technically they only follow the Mother of Dragons because she is also the Breaker of Chains but I suspect that subtlety is lost in the emotional garbage that fills this series.

The Weiner's Song (in response to Butters complaining there are no Dragons in Game of Thrones, only floppy wieners) is the funniest thing...ever.

[–]Whoareyou559 13 points14 points  (11 children)

The Breaker of Chains kills anyone who questions her.... doesn't sound like freedom to me

[–]BullshittingNonsense 25 points26 points  (8 children)

Yes. This idea that Dany is this benevolent ruler is insane. She's like the rest of Westeros. Jon truly rose from nothing to be a ruler, which he doesn't even want to be.

[–]prettyflamazing 6 points7 points  (7 children)

Thank you, she loves to signal how she's soooo unlike her father yet following in his footsteps of tyranny.

[–]bountyhunterdjango -1 points0 points  (6 children)

That's very intentional by the show

[–]BullshittingNonsense 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Weird... I thought the show was completely random...

[–]bountyhunterdjango 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I'm saying that there's no feminist stupidity behind her character, she's being built to be a grey/antagonist character.

[–]Patriarchysaurus 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I always thought she'd get Targ madness and become the psychotic fire element to oppose an icy undead Jon Snow (like, he'd fail to "save the world" & end up a general for the Great Other). It seems to me like the two characters are an allegory: Dany is pent up with destructive fiery emotions, and Jon goes cold and unfeeling in a world that has no sympathy for him. Man & Woman, Ice & Fire.

[–]WonderIfThisUsername 25 points26 points  (3 children)

Sounds like female fantasy. Unlimited alpha cock and dragons. Which are Yungian cock symbol.

So its cocks upon cocks while betas serve her ego.

[–]PowerVitamin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Damn the quality of this thread is really good. Hahah

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I am still waiting for Tyrion to fuck her.

[–]Nautica51o 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why haven't more people seen this comment

[–]hagolu 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Well if you are the mother of dragons, you can be the queen but only in a fantasy world.

[–]Patriarchysaurus 31 points32 points  (4 children)

That's my point bro, its a woman's sexual fantasy. Wish-fulfilment. Be born a beautiful blonde princess and constantly have the world fall over itself backwards to give you the best of everything possible.

[–]FREEDNA 21 points22 points  (1 child)

And countless rich powerful sexy men lining up to court you!!! That's female sexual fantasy 101 Including her wedding night with Horse-Chad

[–]RPmatrix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the problem is it's bluepill beta males writing the scripts and producing and directing the shows!

for money

these males are as much 'The Enemy' of commonsense and reality as was Disney et al and his 'fantasyland princesses' were/are still today! Add shit that becomes a 'go grrl genre' e.g the hunger games/all powerful but very female assasin type characters, which come straight from games and no wonder young girls/guys have no idea what's what!

i think I'd hate to be a teenager in today's world

[–]PowerVitamin 3 points4 points  (1 child)

You're killing it, man. You should do a full write up on pop-culture Game of Thrones / Conor McGregor / Trump. Any of the three things everyone is tuned into at the moment.

[–]productive_monkey 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Women also like the male characters though. Jon snow, Tyrion a dwarf, etc...

[–]WonderIfThisUsername -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

snow is the guy she told you you shouldnt worry about... and you shouldnt.

[–]1empatheticapathetic -1 points0 points  (1 child)

You go girl!

What show is this?

[–]FREEDNA 21 points22 points  (22 children)

Game of Thrones.. have you noticed... it's all Queens now.

[–]AncientScrolls 37 points38 points  (12 children)

Its more like Game of Feminists. I stopped watching Game of Thrones as soon as they turned the show into a freakshow of weak men who do anything to please hot bitches.

[–]tuyguy 19 points20 points  (5 children)

About the time where GRRM's original medieval fantasy was replaced by the HBO pop culture narrative. About the same time I stopped watching.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 2 points3 points  (4 children)

What season did it go down the shitter?

[–]Patriarchysaurus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

People say it's as soon as D&D ran out of book canon, but I think it's when they decided to fuck it.

http://www.returnofkings.com/38518/how-feminism-is-ruining-game-of-thrones

[–]tuyguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hard to say it's been so long. I'd say I stopped watching 2 years ago.

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

after ole man (John?) Stark got his head cut off for some bitch's desires in the second episode of series one, that's when

[–]FREEDNA 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Schlicking Feminist fantasy fuckaroo!

[–]keepstay 2 points3 points  (1 child)

you still can enjoy the story tho, not everything is about sex-war

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sounds an extremely petty reason to not watch a show

[–]bountyhunterdjango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol fucking hell that is so innacruate. Most main charcters are male, stop bitching about nothing.

[–]FollowTheDodo 9 points10 points  (3 children)

"Game of Thrones.. have you noticed... it's all Queens now." --because Hillary was supposed to be president according to (virtually all of) the networks. Sorry to bring this up but worth considering, given this noticeable & valid point (or just that creepy wtf feeling you get watching what's been 'Good TV' for so long. Game of Thrones, The Walking Dead -both still good/great but the moment Hill was supposed to shatter that glass ceiling... The shows were suddenly cucked (which were well into production or airing already). IMHO.

[–]Casanova-Quinn 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Interesting observation. Idk about the others shows, but that doesn't make sense for GoT. The show is based on books written well before the election.

[–]FREEDNA 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The show is based on books written well before the election.

They can still take written scripts and update them to whatever political shit is going on for reasons.. also the show has departed from the book story line ages ago.

[–]Casanova-Quinn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They could, but it doesn't seem likely for GoT. The show only surpassed the source material after season 5, and the author has told the producers how the story will end.

[–]BullshittingNonsense 24 points25 points  (4 children)

And then Arya says "the world doesn't let girls choose what they want to be." I wanted to yell "bitch, it doesn't let men either. And if you actually fought a man, you would get destroyed. You have nowhere near the strength to fight."

[–]Casanova-Quinn 12 points13 points  (1 child)

What's funny is that a male lead character, John Snow, perfectly fits Arya's statement. He's King of the North but he's basically the only one that doesn't want to be a king.

[–]BullshittingNonsense 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And she says she wanted to be a knight. Sorry, it would have been child abuse to send her out to battle.

[–]bountyhunterdjango 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Well in the medieval world it's set in, women clearly have far less of a choice. As was true historically and in many places around the world today.

Don't think that line is a contempary political point.

[–]BullshittingNonsense 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You really don't think that was a contemporary political point? I got a bridge to sell you. Any work that involves history is about two things: the time in history it is actually about and the time in which it was written. Game of Thrones is about the medieval world, but it's also about the modern world.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

The funny thing is biology won't change. There will always be alphas and betas, and women around the former while the latter group is totally ignored. The only difference is Internet and social media which got people to be aware of a massive amount of information by idiots for idiots.

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Going to hipster type parties and being the only big strong masculine type is hilarious. The drunker the women get the more they'll gravitate to you. Some will even hit on you with their bf or guy who's chatting them up standing right next to you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brooklyn or SF? Anyhow I feel you aha. Those hipsters "men"...

[–]FudgingEgo 8 points9 points  (11 children)

What are your thoughts on a Queen running a country? Either in the modern age or throughout history....

[–]Unnormally2 53 points54 points  (1 child)

There is a spectrum of ability for both genders. A woman can be an excellent leader, but men on average will be better more often.

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, women are rarely excellent leaders and rarely even decent leaders. Even if that's true, it would be the exception, not the rule.

[–]hagolu 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If the lady leading is red-pilled herself, I really have no problem as long as whatever you want from a leader (direction, vision, ethics) are all right.

But as far as the concept of a Queen bee leading through subservient men, crushing men's testicles to fuel her "equality" propaganda is concerned, fuck those feminist scum.

TBH, there are only a handful of great queens in history and even they were standing on the legacy of their fathers.

[–]satanicpriest13 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I'd rather have a strong queen rather than a bunch of feminised politicians poisoning our youth. Nothing wrong with a good traditional woman leader who knows her stuff.

[–]jm51 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Victoria did ok. As did Elizabeth I.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thatcher wasn't bad, either. Though she did some disastrous things, like pushing the EU and the Global Warming scam.

Even so, she was far less bad than Blair, Brown, Cameron and whatsername.

[–]TheRedThrowAwayPill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask yourself : Did that queen create that kingdom?

Or did she inherit (literally) a fully assembled machine?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like bringing the common wealth to the UK was not a good plan

[–]Frenetic_Zetetic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Women will fucking destroy the world as we know it with their pettiness and indecisiveness.

This should be the tag line to the RP reddit header/banner.

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is all already happening. Work in acadamia, government or corporate land and you'll see it exists now.

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tend to agree with this sentiment. I came to the realization years ago that the only women I properly respect are ones with hyper masculine methods of operating and thinking. I don't think it could ever function if she was remotely attractive.

Probably the only reason Margaret Thatcher did so well.

[–]1v1crown -4 points-3 points  (3 children)

Whatever happens to women, men will be fine.

[–]circlhat 17 points18 points  (2 children)

umm, some men, most will die

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's fucked up, but some will survive. It is cruel, like Tesla said.

[–]WonderIfThisUsername 3 points4 points  (0 children)

*all men will die.

Some will die having their offspring go trough same suffering.

[–]productive_monkey -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Why would that necessarily happen if women become more like men. The thousands of male bees are absolutely nothing like a single queen bee/ant. This is an overreaction.

[–][deleted] 54 points55 points  (12 children)

I think he's being fairly pessimistic. I doubt western civilization will be reduced to bee / ants / insect colonies where the females rule. Matriarchal human societies don't last. Either people will realize how fucked up everything is, or the civilization will be overtaken by another civilization.

In the first scenario, the newer generations (in their 20s right now) will get fed up with all the political nonsense and will address the issues when they're in power (around 2040-2050 I suppose). I feel like most millennials are actually left-leaning, but I have noticed a huge spike in conservatism among them in the past 5-10 years. Alternatively, western civilization will be 'dethroned' by a patriarchal society. Probably more likely outcome.

[–]lala_xyyz 47 points48 points  (7 children)

It's already being dethroned. All Western societies are dying demographically. They have population growth only due to immigration and patriarchal minorities (mostly Muslim, but also various Christian denominations in the US) having lots of children. Feminism is fertility-negative and women supporting it will naturally go extinct. That's why supporting abortion is good in the long term - sluts having accidental pregnancies shouldn't have children anyway.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (4 children)

Demographics is largely irrelevant at this point. As more and more work is automated away, we'll have no need of a large population. And we're 10-20 years away from being able to grow babies in a vat from eggs made from skin cells, with the time largely down to how quickly the Chinese push the tech when they realize they don't have enough women for all the men to have kids.

Alternatively, feminism may lead to a complete social collapse before then, and we'll be in a Mad Max world where feminists won't matter any more.

[–]lala_xyyz 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Demographics is largely irrelevant at this point.

Demographics is everything in a democracy. One person = one vote. The land and the political system belongs to the most populous group with a shared identity.

As more and more work is automated away, we'll have no need of a large population.

There was never a "need" for large population. Population just keeps growing naturally. Demographics on a downward spiral is an aberration, an unnatural trend brought about by unnatural tendencies in the society. Growing extinct is nature's ways of telling "Fuck you". Technological progress and sizable population growth are not in a mutual conflict - that's just a sorry lie sold to us by politicians and ((them)), while they import millions because capitalism based on debt needs perpetual growth to sustain itself. Population growth is a problem only when you seek to maintain the status quo. If anything, history shows that extreme population growth is synonymous with extreme economic growth. Today's millennials are the first generation in ages to be less wealthy than their parents, and they marry/reproduce the least. That's not a coincidence.

And we're 10-20 years away from being able to grow babies in a vat from eggs made from skin cells, with the time largely down to how quickly the Chinese push the tech when they realize they don't have enough women for all the men to have kids.

Making babies naturally or in a lab, it doesn't matter, when people don't do it. Every woman in the West could get pregnant today for almost minimal cost - some governments even subsidize impregnation from sperm banks. Yes 50%+ fertile women in the West don't have babies. Designer babies, degenerate natural babies, it doesn't matter when there are none, and in three generations you'll be a single digit minority.

feminism may lead to a complete social collapse before then, and we'll be in a Mad Max world where feminists won't matter any more.

Perhaps the word collapse is too strong. But a traditionalist reset will happen, naturally. Women lacking strong maternal instincts will eventually grow extinct, since they are redundant/inferior to men in sustaining civilization. The number one problem as I see is massive centralization of power and wealth transfer from productive men via taxes. Women need to be stripped of voting rights to correct that injustice.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Demographics is everything in a democracy.

Sure, but mass democracy is doomed. It was a way to buy off the proles in the industrial era ('look, we'll let you decide which of us gets to boss you around!'), and the 1% won't need that for much longer, because they won't need the proles.

There was never a "need" for large population.

The industrial era needed a large population of relatively dumb people to operate its factories, because the side with the biggest factories won (and smart people don't work well in factory production-line jobs). Now, that's no longer the case. That large population of relatively dumb people are mostly unable to operate in a post-industrial world, let alone needed there.

This is, of course, one of the real reasons for feminism. Women are typically much better production-line workers than men, at least where physical strength isn't required. So the 1% wanted to get women out of the home and into their factories.

If anything, history shows that extreme population growth is synonymous with extreme economic growth.

Again, that's only true of the industrial era, where more workers meant more factories, which meant more production, which meant more wealth. In a world of robots and AIs, large populations are detrimental, because there are more people trying to make use of the same resources. This is why the left's 'Universal Basic Income' is just a fantasy: there's no benefit to taking resources from productive uses and giving them to people who'll do nothing but consume them.

Making babies naturally or in a lab, it doesn't matter, when people don't do it.

There are many, many people who'd have kids if the woman didn't have to spend the best part of a year growing it. There are also many who'd have kids if they hadn't waited until it was too late and their bodies were no longer capable of producing one.

Either way, the point stands that, if we decided we needed a rapidly-growing population, we could soon churn out kids as fast as the vats could produce them.

The number one problem as I see is massive centralization of power and wealth transfer from productive men via taxes.

Centralization of power was an inevitable result of the centralization of production in the industrial economy: big government could collect big taxes from big business in return for giving them big government contracts. Now production is decentralizing again, power is too.

[–]lala_xyyz 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Sure, but mass democracy is doomed. It was a way to buy off the proles in the industrial era ('look, we'll let you decide which of us gets to boss you around!'), and the 1% won't need that for much longer, because they won't need the proles.

How exactly is it doomed? What are "elites" going to do exactly? Kill everyone? In the age of mass media and Internet where you go to prison for a politically incorrect tweet? The 1%-ers can't do shit on their own, they're wholly dependent on the system itself. The instance they go against the system they're fucked. The IMF chief. The US president. The billionaire CEO. There are no sacred cows anymore. The capitalism generates so much wealth that most people are already unemployable and it's cheaper to finance them from the budget rather than lose productivity by having them "working". They'll vote more and more money from the public purse. No socialist wealth transfer program in the history of the US has been reversed. In Europe also since the end of WW2. Those who even suggest it get fucked on elections so much they'll study them in history books as what not to do in a campaign.

The industrial era needed a large population of relatively dumb people to operate its factories, because the side with the biggest factories won (and smart people don't work well in factory production-line jobs). Now, that's no longer the case. That large population of relatively dumb people are mostly unable to operate in a post-industrial world, let alone needed there.

Modern factories don't require dumb people. They require automation engineers, software developers, muscles to carry and transfer things (though this is getting increasingly automated). Dumb jobs are growing extinct in the developed world, unless they're protected by laws (unions, public sector and various monopolies in law, medicine etc.) Modern factories are run by few hundred people at most and have the output order of magnitude higher than those of few decades ago that employed thousands of people. Companies go bust by having key people in cognitive-related jobs quitting their jobs. Modern knowledge workers are not replaceable cogs in a wheel anymore. You're describing ancient history.

This is, of course, one of the real reasons for feminism. Women are typically much better production-line workers than men, at least where physical strength isn't required. So the 1% wanted to get women out of the home and into their factories.

Feminism is a result of politicians pandering to their female vote. Weaker groups always vote for "their" candidates. Blacks in the US 90% plus voted for Obama. The same ratio is in Europe for every single minority group voting for leftist parties. Women similarly vote for those enabling big government, wealth transfer and social support networking funded by men. As workers women are useless except in few typical female jobs where their biological predispositions are relevant - nursing, teaching kids and similar shit. They can be taught to work repetitive jobs but these are increasingly becoming less common. For high IQ they're orders of magnitude thinner in distribution, and for creative intelligence even more. The 1% are simply driven by economic incentives, which feminism enables. They don't give a shit for women per se. They'll drop the agenda the instant it stops becoming profitable for me, or gives them bad publicity. Cue the Gamergate scandals, Googler losing their job etc. Next big company will think carefully before doing something like that.

There are many, many people who'd have kids if the woman didn't have to spend the best part of a year growing it. There are also many who'd have kids if they hadn't waited until it was too late and their bodies were no longer capable of producing one.

Making kids is literally the easiest jobs in the world. If they wanted to get pregnant, they'd get pregnant. But they're busy waiting for the 2 meter tall jacked Chad billionaire in his yacht while their eggs rot exponentially. They don't want to have families but social status fantasy that the media has sold them and their mothers and grandmothers were too dumb to protect them from. It doesn't matter if the woman is in her 20s, 30s or 40s - it's only when they start to panic that the settle with the first willing guy that's good enough. Even then, they still believe in the fantasy deep inside. They are biologically evolved to give birth in late teens and twenties, and nobody told them that, that's the problem. The lie that there is always choice around the corner, and that modern medicine renders time irrelevant. That lie is the reason why most fertile women today are childless. Who sold the lie doesn't matter, what matters is the recognition of their capacity to delude themselves, and making sure that in the future they don't get to repeat the same mistake. Either by stripping them of the right to vote, or eliminating the high-powered sluts from the gene pool. Personally I hope for the latter option, for the sake of men who were trapped in Marriage 1.0 arrangement in ages gone by, lol.

if we decided we needed a rapidly-growing population, we could soon churn out kids as fast as the vats could produce them.

Nah, the degeneracy is irreversible. The pendulum swung too far. If the society were a stock market we're a on a strong bearish trend, with the support lying only far into the future when patriarchal minorities become two digit percentage of the electorate. Literally all the women profit from the current arrangement, as well as vast majority of the very wealthy men. Women will never just "decide" to have many babies without a willing man and wider societal support, and men will keep checking out of the society which discriminates them and rips them off with high taxes. All unwillingly and subconsciously, gut decisions by both genders. Economic incentives dictate demographic trends, and unless you have some kinds of of enlightened absolutism, the trends are irreversible simply by decision, since the collective will never make such a sharp turn spontaneously.

Centralization of power was an inevitable result of the centralization of production in the industrial economy: big government could collect big taxes from big business in return for giving them big government contracts. Now production is decentralizing again, power is too.

It's a chicken and egg problem, though I see it from another perspective - it's a necessity for the human civilization to evolve and solve wider (global) issues by centralization. That's why globalist love the global warming, terrorism and similar real or imagined issues which require centralized global efforts. The centralization itself is not the problem however, it's the ability for women to force their decision upon men by voting. The centralization enables that. So either will state decentralize or it will disenfranchise women to survive. If it does neither, it's demographically (and perhaps economically) unsustainable and will be replaced by something that is.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How exactly is it doomed?

Things that have no purpose don't continue for long.

What are "elites" going to do exactly? Kill everyone?

Yes.

It's not even a secret, with so many 'greens' claiming that the Earth's population should be 500,000,000 or less. They're not going to get there without murdering most of us.

And I'm not joking when I say that if the rich support 'Universal Basic Income', it's only as a sop to keep the masses content until the Terminator army is ready. There's a reason so many 0.1%-ers are building bunkers and buying private islands.

The 1%-ers can't do shit on their own, they're wholly dependent on the system itself.

A 1%-er with a billion-Terminator army has no need for 'the system'.

They'll vote more and more money from the public purse.

In a world where most jobs have been automated away, the only 'public purse' will be whatever wealth the 1% have left.

At that point, the Terminators will come out.

Modern factories don't require dumb people.

No, but they don't require many people at all. That's why most of the ex-factory-workers are unemployed or in make-work jobs. Once the 1% decide the system is no longer of any value to them, they're not going to pay for those welfare programs. Terminators are cheaper.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

sluts having accidental pregnancies shouldn't have children anyway

now I can def say how I'm 100% pro abortion, and not only because that's what's correct in society. Natural selection - Thank you for that

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abortion is so tricky. On the one hand it's great for population control and prevents the child from being raised under a poor, irresponsible parent but at the same time you technically are taking a life. But if we normalize abortion too much that could very well also lead to the destruction of the nuclear family, a wholly Marxist agenda.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Millennials are left-leaning, but the younger generation Z is overwhelmingly conservative. I find that comforting.

[–]RPmatrix 1 point2 points  (1 child)

but the younger generation Z is overwhelmingly conservative

I think the words you're looking for is "compliant"

this worries me a Lot!

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the words you're looking for is "compliant"

You think people call them Generation Zyklon because they're 'compliant'?

These are the kids who are buying General Pinochet shirts the way their parents used to buy Che Guevera shirts.

[–]1PantsonFire1234 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The comparison between insects who crawl in the dirt and humans who fly the skies is ludicrous. The reason why a matriarchaal society works for those small critters is because they are just that, critters. We are not. The male dominant society will always win and conquer the one that isn't.

[–]extremelyonlineguy78 45 points46 points  (2 children)

This is so on point with Sexual Selection theory that its scary.

Sexual Selection theory says that all of world culture is a result of females sexually selection creative intelligence as an attractive trait. When he says all the things men do is for women, its 100 percent on the nose.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When he says all the things men do is for women, its 100 percent on the nose.

I too, learned far too many life lessons from Seinfeld intro rants

[–]TheRedThrowAwayPill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This just sounds like a subset of women choosing "successful" men.

(And by "choosing" do we mean to include men raping and pillaging their enemies?)

[–]CaughtInTheNet 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Is this verified? Which of his writings does it appear in?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

There was more to the article, I will post as it is also well worth reading. Here it is:

I am considering this question not merely from the standpoint of a man, I am thinking of the woman's side of it.

As we contemplate any change, we naturally take into consideration the results that may follow such an innovation. One of the results to my mind is quite a pathetic one. Woman, herself, is really the victim instead of, as she thinks, the victor. Contentment is absent from her life. She is ambitious, often far beyond her natural equipment, to attain the thing she wants. She too frequently forgets that all women cannot be prima donnas and motion picture stars.

Woman's discontent makes the life of the present day still more overstressed. The high pitch given to existence by people who are restless and dissatisfied because they fail to achieve things wholly out of proportion to the health and talent with which Nature has endowed them is a bad thing for the world.

It seems to me that women are not particularly happy in this newly found freedom, in this new competition which they are waging so persistently against men in business and the professions and even in sport. The question that naturally arises is, whether the women themselves are the gainers or the losers.

Discontent makes for cranks and unnatural people. There seems to be an uncommon number of them about to-day. This is one of the reasons I remain apart from the crowds. The public, or semi-public, character is the target for all sorts of attacks and unpleasant communications.

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for that 88 mate, it really provides a much fuller context to his words

seems to me he was an intelligent and extremely perceptive realist

smart man, his own man and RP AF!

[–]11-Eleven-11 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm a big fan of nikola tesla. I watched a documentary about him and apparently be was very good with women. There was this one celebrity girl who he spent a lot of time with. He decided it was best to stop seeing her because he was too focussed on her and not his work.

[–]SpecOpsAlpha 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Declining testosterone in western men is a big reason for a lot of this. Men stop being men and women fill the void.

[–]Jailhouseredpilled93 12 points13 points  (5 children)

Shopenhauer was red pill as shit: .

A real man wants two things: danger and play. Therefore he wants woman as the most dangerous plaything. Man shall be educated for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior: all else is folly.

[–]WhyIsYosarionNaked 1 point2 points  (2 children)

That was Neitzche actually. It's a passage from Thus Spoke Zarathustra.

[–]Jailhouseredpilled93 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes! I thought so. The web site I was on said it was a Shopenhauer quote.

[–]WhyIsYosarionNaked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Schopenhauer might have quoted Neitzche in his own writing then it got attributed to him because of that.

[–]stpauley45 1 points1 points [recovered]

"You gotta break'er ass and shake'er her ass!" - Tupac

[–]Alpha_Jedi 8 points9 points  (0 children)

90 years ahead of the game

[–]Press2ForEnglish 26 points27 points  (14 children)

Now the soft voiced gentle woman of my reverent worship has all but vanished. In her place has come the woman who thinks that her chief success in life lies on making herself as much as possible like man - in dress, voice, and actions, in sports and achievements of every kind.

Damn this hits home. I just had an internet argument with a "woman" in my town who asked why she wasn't being hit on by guys in the area. I suggested that she was too masculine and this was her response:

I can retile a bathroom, fix your toilet, install a ceiling fan, change my own oil and spark plugs and tires. Drive a stick. I can impress you with my knowledge of sports, science, current events, the latest buzz worthy fashion and food trends. I workout 3-5 times a week. Ski during the winter. Snorkel and SUP in the summer. I camp and hike.

In order to demonstrate how much of a catch she is, she actually listed even more of her masculine credentials. Its a shame what American women have become.

You can read more of that shitshow in my recent comment history.

[–]InteriorEmotion 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'd date her (if she were hot).

[–]cjroney2 1 points1 points [recovered]

Time for Elon Musk to Disavow Telsa, and remove the Tesla name from the company...

[–]widec 24 points25 points  (3 children)

Is there any statues we can tear down as well?

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We should make it a thing. Get the sjw's on board. Would be hilarious to watch

[–]ChanceTheEMT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This needs more votes. I had a nice chuckle.

[–]ChanceTheEMT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This needs more votes. I had a nice chuckle.

[–]wanderer779 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

can someone make some memes and get this trending on twitter. I'm bored now that all the statue and russia stuff has died down

[–]Myollinir 5 points6 points  (0 children)

yes this is what happens after long periods of intelligence, peace, and prosperity. it will happen again and again, for all time. we cannot help it. all of written history it has reoccurred - when a prosperous society arises it brings forth its own downfall..

[–]1PantsonFire1234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ants, bees etc are insects. Their survival is limited to the mudheap the live in. Women might want to bring back men to this muddy orgie of hedonism but next to this mud hill will stand a shining bastion of civilization. And this bastion will win every time.

Everything in this universe is balanced and in this same way our species is. Women have it easy and are the valuable sex. But because of this men is propelled to higher heights. Exactly because or lives are disposable and replaceable- men is forced to ascend to super human levels in order to survive.

This is why I've never seen a woman perform miracles like men do. Women get work done at the bare minimum. They won't go and explore space, they won't invent complex machinery, they won't become the best athletes in the world and they won't create the best civilizations. Far from it.

Now lots of beta men will surrender to this reality of the female imperative. Throw down their hands and sigh as they look on, powerless. But the men who defy this notion will be the alpha men of tomorrow. When you stop being a passive spectator and take your destiny in your hands, good or bad. You are no longer at the whims of a woman.

Just as nature intended.

[–]CrimsonEllipse 20 points21 points  (8 children)

Nikola Tesla never married. He also died a virgin. He is the perfect example of why MGTOW is a joke.

Nikola did not forgo the pleasures of knowing women. He never even had the option. And his hamster was approaching light speed in its attempt to rationalize why.

Nikola Tesla was a genius. He was also an absolute failure of a man and he did his entire species a disservice by removing his intellect from the gene pool.

No one here should look up to him as a hero or example of the kind of RP success that is celebrated around here.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Nikola Tesla died a virgin because he basically dedicated his life to his work. He was an autistic absolutist who came up with crazy ass technology then destroyed it because he didn't trust humanity to use it for good. Also, he was in love with a fucking pigeon. There are plenty of others reasons for his loneliness rather than just MGTOW.

[–]apollosapien 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Definitely agree with this here. When nuance is applied, Tesla's life is a strangely taut balance of RP/BP foreclosures.

He never got married, but a big reason is that he followed his mission of finding electricity to the very end. He died a virgin, but lived to know what top-tier women were like. Nexting a celebrity of his time to focus on your work is some serious, serious dedication.

[–]jacques_cousteau007[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Great point. Where history provides a lesson, fiction creates a alternate possibility.

There's a reason that Marvel created the character of Iron Man - genius billionaire playboy who all little boys strive to be... in contrast to Tesla whose bloodline the world will never see, because the dude couldn't get out of his own head.

Imagine a generation of boys studying STEM, sharpening their business/company ownership skills, and reading TRP....all while having 3-5 kids each.

Little shits would change the entire world in one century.

[–]ForeverMaverick 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Natural selection taking its course. If you know anything about genetics you understand the importance of a diverse gene pool and that not only good genes produce good results. There's an aspect of randomness which can turn average or poor genes into quality offspring. Maybe his great aptitude for science was compensated by a lack of social skills (just the universe balancing itself out) and that would mean his offspring would also have a low chance of reproduction, which could inevitably keep lowering the population so, who knows, this could just be nature cutting its losses. Truth is we'll never know.

[–]RPmatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nikola Tesla was a genius.

show me anywhere he says "I am a virgin" or proof of your statement? I'd be impressed

That said, he clearly wasn't foolish enough* or so insecure that he needed to get married or have kids "for posterity's sake" and he didn't need a female "muse" (like he says other men did) to provide his inspiration to create remakable inventions we use to this day!

He was a classic Alpha Sigma in RP terms

Nikola Tesla was a genius full stop.

[–]EumenesOfEfa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read his biography. Tesla had many options: he was a good looking, wealthy man in rough financial times. He hung out with the social elite of New York, and lived at the Waldorf Astoria. He just truly enjoyed working on his inventions more then on anything else.

[–]Surf_Or_Die 7 points8 points  (6 children)

Holy shit, he saw it coming way ahead of his time. With that said, a genius like him ought to have fathered children anyway. His genes are now forever lost, which is a loss for civilization as a whole.

[–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (5 children)

do you know how Einstein's kids worked out?

[–]Surf_Or_Die 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I don't. But it doesn't matter - they carry the genes for hyper intelligence. We already know 150 markers for high IQ that can be isolated to make it very likely to breed high IQ babies. As we keep isolating more and more markers eugenics will make it possible to create a human race that is massively intelligent and very healthy.

[–]EumenesOfEfa 0 points1 point  (3 children)

[–]Surf_Or_Die 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Exactly like that. And that is why we are idiots and why the Chinese will take over. The interviewee is kidding himself if he thinks that the communist party has no plans for international domination. Look at the Chinese in Africa.

[–]EumenesOfEfa 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yep. most people do not know this, but China is heavily invested in Africa in Infrastructure and utilities.

As a side note, they also bought up studios in Hollywood, allowing them to manipulate the masses to any direction they please. They are executing the plan for world domination on many fronts at the same time.

[–]Surf_Or_Die 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are ruthless but intelligent. I'll take them over the libtards who are ruining our civilization. The Chinese wouldn't allow massive immigration from low IQ countries.

[–]sabbo_87 6 points7 points  (0 children)

uhh he was also in love with a pigeon, so...

[–]Mattcwu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Blue Pill people are going to FLIP when they see this women-hating post.

[–]APSTNDPhy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude can see the future or something? Should have been a scientist.

[–]segagaga 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was for Helen that the Greeks launched a thousand ships to sack the city of Troy.

Had this saga occurred in today's world, King Menelaus would have said "She is not worth a single one of my men's lives."

[–]tiklsh 1 points1 points [recovered]

I also think the human will stop evolving if men with minds like his don't have offspring

[–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's actually an interesting paper published recently about how homosexuals no longer leading secret lives has the unintended effect of lowering intelligence due to gay men having higher IQs on average and not reproducing.

[–]Thesharknightrises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If every man and woman of value were to breed continuously exclusively for the purpose of procreation their children would still be surrounded by people like you blaming them for not making the world better. "We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile."

[–]pmmedenver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Our culture has become "take take take what can you do for me". This has been man's lead and of course women are now following, tossing away all their feminine characteristics as a casualty. We as men need to start valuing, respecting and encouraging (and in some circumstances, yes, even embodying) the feminine characteristics and women will naturally follow our lead. As a "redpilled" man your natural response will likely be "but that's what betas do!". However, we tend to forget around here that true alphas embody both masculine and feminine characteristics. Elliot Hulse has a great video on this and he refers to it as 'tender aggression'. The difference is that a beta is unable to control when and how he displays these characteristics (and likely displays the wrong traits at the wrong time), but an alpha will display softer characteristics to women and children but a harder side when facing challenges. This leads rise to another rift between men and women. Because our work is so separated from women, and also because our work is largely more mental than ever before, it is much more difficult for women to observe our aggressive side in its natural state (which as we all know turns them on). Thus leading to men (and women) confused as to why a sexual component is lacking.

[–]Painsanity666 7 points8 points  (1 child)

That... And he may have been gay. According to his journals, the closest personal relationship he had was with his long time lab assistant. He was crushed when he left to pursue other work. It could have just been a close friendship, but there wasn't much else in his life that resembled romance.

[–]mummersfarce_is_done 9 points10 points  (2 children)

I'm afraid he still clings to the beta core where men were to do things to impress women. That is indeed true on a mass scale, as most of civilisation's men are beta looking to find another mommy to impress. But from the way he points it out makes me think he is still not over this need yet. Just that he understood that he will never find his unicorn, so he gave up on women alltogether. Whereas he didn't see that he could have given up on the idea of finding a unicorn, and had fun with women instead.

[–]ForeverMaverick 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is the purpose of life. You're here to reproduce, otherwise your race goes extinct. To reproduce you need to find a willing female. For a female to be willing you need to be better than the other guy trying. Add in modern transportation (cars) and factor the competition by 100. Add in telecommunications and factor by 10. Add in social media and factor by 1000. Add in online dating and cheap flights and I've lost count.

One can't fuck a woman simply because he wishes to. To deny this is to become Nihilistic.

[–]bullseyed723 13 points14 points  (1 child)

When will liberals tear down Tesla?

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Theyll avoid looking at it because its easier to hamster it away as unimportant, a passing phase he went through, blah, blah, blaaaah

Its mind blowing to me how women can A: rationalize anything that a high status man does/believes away because hes high status, and B: never clue into the fact that a very large number of men that they want to fuck dont agree with feminism and the rest of the pantheon of liberal beliefs to a lesser degree.

[–]Kommanderdude 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well maybe there is hope for us. We voted trump for president which is the polar opposite of the feminazi Hildabeast ( Hillary) that tried to become president.

[–]circlhat 7 points8 points  (11 children)

Perhaps the male in society is useless. I am frank to admit that I don't know. If women are beginning to feel this way about it - and there is striking evidence at hand that they do - then we are entering upon the cruelest period of the world's history.

We have to remember he was book smart, I however find this line very interesting he seems purple pill as his philosophies dictate women can be reasoned with, he is coming to terms that the women he grew up with and the ideologies he had are completely different.

He makes the mistake in thinking this is a new era of some kind and that women are making conscious decisions to not work with man, when in reality they never did want a partnership either they are dominate or you're dominate there is no 50/50 equality with a women.

The male is considered important only as a factor in the general scheme of the continuity of life.

The pill is so bitter here to swallow, I don't think he could come to terms, I mean you can really see his weakness in social issues, he is your nice guy (TM), most blue pillars and blue pillars that think they are red do this because they want A genuine good person not to have the negative annotation nice guys have.

Tesla was Nice guy tm, be like Edison

[–]dandons 1 points1 points [recovered]

Tesla is the goat. He was not blue pill. He was likely: taller than you, smarter than you, handsomer than you (and me and everyone). He is probably top 10 in terms of the most genetically fit individuals to have ever existed.

[–]circlhat -1 points0 points  (9 children)

If he failed to mate, he is a failure in the eyes of nature, blue pill ideology says he was great, Nature says he was useless and selected him out

[–]kelvin_condensate 8 points9 points  (8 children)

Nature doesn't 'say' anything. Tesla didn't give a fuck about passing his genes on. You could 'say' nature 'consciously' chose not to propagate his genes because intelligence is just as natural as anything else in nature.

The theory of natural selection doesn't even apply to sufficiently intelligent creatures which is why humans have largely stopped evolving since civilization.

Humans propagate their genes before there is time to select for them 'naturally.' The genetic stock of humanity is demonstrably inferior since so many genetic failures produce offspring while people like Tesla don't.

[–]circlhat -1 points0 points  (7 children)

Tesla didn't give a fuck about passing his genes on.

You're basing this on....?

You could 'say' nature 'consciously' chose not to propagate his genes because intelligence is just as natural as anything else in nature.

Or nature chose not to propagate because he was a pussy, and pussies ain't good for the human race

The theory of natural selection doesn't even apply to sufficiently intelligent creatures which is why humans have largely stopped evolving since civilization.

Or Intelligent isn't really all that intelligent in the first place, the smartest never survive, the most adaptable do. While Tesla did have social skills he never had a backbone, being born without one is a terrible thing

Humans propagate their genes before there is time to select for them 'naturally.'

Not really, Heart disease and cancer are still big killers , a genetic resistant to this is huge in our current society

The genetic stock of humanity is demonstrably inferior

Your definition of Inferior is closed minded, A winner is a winner , Tesla wasn't a winner, he had the genes of someone getting used.

I think you're focus on what you benefit from him rather than what he benefited from himself, until we learn to see man as individuals creatures and not a tool for public consumption we will see more and more Tesla selected out

[–]ForeverMaverick 0 points1 point  (6 children)

"Spines are wonderful, better than rings." someone, somewhere, said.

I specifically like the part where you say "until we learn to see men as individual creatures and not a tool for public consumption, we will see more and more Tesla selected out". That's brilliant. And true, according to factual observations.

Still, don't the benefits he provided humanity overweight the benefits provided by another "regular" reproducing men? I'm curious as to why would nature not make this trait more attractive. Maybe there isn't a reason. Maybe it's still just experimenting but I still can't kill that curiosity.

[–]circlhat 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Still, don't the benefits he provided humanity overweight the benefits provided by another "regular" reproducing men?

Look at the bigger picture Why not use his technology to fight corruption, his technology is being used to spy, and control the masses, he didn't protect his inventions. Tesla is becoming a self driving car, sure in the short term less accidents in the long term you won't go anywhere without the government knowing.

Benjamin Franklin invented electricity(Founded) , was a founding father and use his influence for

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

That is what nature wants, he benefited humanity more than tesla because tesla needed him , and he fought the elite at the same time, therefore he mated and his legacy carries on.

You can help people and still be Alpha , You also have to help yourself and think long term, not short term

[–]Thesharknightrises 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Long term- you won't be here. Your children will either be dullard pansies or will be pressured into the same. Two million gallons of your "superior" swimmers would still be diluted to irrelevancy in the ocean of mediocrity that is the human gene pool.

On the other hand, banging them for fun is still fun.

[–]circlhat 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Your definition of superior genes is way off

[–]Thesharknightrises 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is my definition of superior genes?

[–]ForeverMaverick 0 points1 point  (1 child)

So what you're saying is that his attractiveness depended on him protecting his ideas?

[–]circlhat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more abstract than that, He was a push over and a tool, And companies are now profiting billions off of his ideals, and selling it to us for 10000% markup

[–]tolerantman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most women wouldn't mind if 80% of men dropped dead tbh. And yes I know society would collapse right after.

[–]biggerbetterjobs 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wonder if he tipped his fedora upon writing that.. LOL

[–]RighteousSouljah 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Revelation 17 the queendom. They have built it

[–]dingman58 3 points4 points  (7 children)

He fell in love with a white dove (possibly hallucinated) so I'm not sure how much weight I'd put into his inklings on relationships

[–]kelvin_condensate 3 points4 points  (5 children)

You just fell for a common fallacy. If Tesla said 2+2=4, will you suddenly doubt this result because he fell in love with a pigeon?

[–]dingman58 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Tesla was a fucking genius in physics. But that doesn't mean he was good at everything. That's why I said "not sure how much weight I'd put into his inklings on relationships"

[–]kelvin_condensate 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You know how much weight to put via evaluating what he said directly via its merit, which is what I said.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

Uh it's actually very relevant. He's sharing his opinion on relationships, when his most meaningful relationship with with a pigeon

[–]kelvin_condensate -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How can you not see that you are falling prey to a fallacy? Use your damn intellect and evaluate what he said based on its merits instead of instant dismissal.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Ever think people come up with these ideas because, in reality, they're too fucking weird to get a hot wife? Serious thought.

[–]tteabag2591 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Fucking a hot mate is one thing. Marrying a hot mate is probably not a good idea.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or even get a hot mate once lol

[–]ForeverMaverick 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Pain makes man think. Thought makes man wise. Wisdom makes life endurable." - John Patrick

[–]ForeverMaverick 0 points1 point  (8 children)

Tesla forgot that women still need men to do all the dirty jobs that running the world implies so we do have some leverage there.

It does pose the question of what will happen to alpha males in a matriarchy. Will they be successful or will they be ruled over/die? What happens to supposed alpha males in other matriarchal societies of the animal kingdom?

The man was ahead of his time. Too bad he fell in love with a bird.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov 0 points1 point  (7 children)

its like he said about bees and ants. men are only useful for certain things and female bees and queens in particular are the important ones. you can see that a lot in nature with insects as well as marine life. if you really think about it, the female is what's really important for evolution. once the male has supplied the seed, he becomes expendable.

[–]Phaeer 1 points1 points [recovered]

The biggest difference being that men are physically stronger than women, so men will never be "forced" to work as slaves for the women. If men want it, we can have them back in the kitchen in no time. It is actually beta males who are the real issue and the once we should be afraid of.

[–]Thesharknightrises 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Technology really harms your argument. Your pecks can't stop a .308 regardless of the gender of the person killing you. Women are less likely to do that. However, most men would be driven to kill for status and pussy.

[–]Phaeer 1 points1 points [recovered]

We are far away from the day where men will surrender all technology to the hands of women but I get your point. It's only because most men are completely retarded and will do anything for a woman's approval, that we are in this situation to begin with.

[–]Thesharknightrises 0 points1 point  (3 children)

There are women on ballistic missile submarines, in war zones, hunting, in space, at Google, using mobile devices/computers, writing programs, giving their lives for the United States, running power plants and production machinery. Technology doesn't care what junk you have. Actually retarded men would have prevented this whole thing. Without agriculture society would never get to the point where people have the time to give a rat's ass about equality. Apes aren't equal. They only care about food and quiff.

[–]Phaeer 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Women's representation in those fields you just mentioned is 1% or something like that. So my point still stands.

[–]Thesharknightrises 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You really don't have any point.

Technology is still gender neutral. Between women and people who will tell you they are equal you are unemployable if you decide to say that you believe males to be better in any of those fields.

You are still wrong about the problems being caused by men being stupid because less intellectual species don't have the "equality" argument because they are busy surviving.

[–]Phaeer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I say retarded, I don't mean stupid. I mean men willing to do anything for the slight chance of getting laid.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The man who loved a pigeon

[–]aanarchist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean if they're ok with living like ants that says a lot about their intelligence. the ant queens at least reproduce, the feminist women are just total drains on resources, destructive consumers. the only reason that this situation exists is because the government encourages and enforces it. take away the government control and things go back to a natural state how it's supposed to be. how many men u think will worship pussy if they actually had real issues to deal with in life instead of their high school socialite bs

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Matriarchy can be beneficial to men. Mosuo tribe of china is a matriarchy. There, women inherit family wealth most of the time, but men have no duty to support their children. Women take custody of children, and men are freed from any duty. Children spend only a little time with their fathers. Men visit women at night and leave in the morning. There's no marriage.

Women do most of the work. Men have lots of play time.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went to the Tesla museum in Belgrade, and by the end of the exhibition it was difficult to not conclude that he was a repressed homosexual.

[–]Davidskylarkk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The move Rodger dodger has a great monologue you can find on YouTube about women using men for utility only...Everyone should see it!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, the wonderful days when people called out bullshit when they saw it instead of dressing it up to be politically correct.

[–]-ATLAS-_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He also had an insane relationship with a pigeon.

The guys brain was crazy on a level that is not comprehendable. He could imagine things nobody else could even dream of and then made a lot of that stuff into reality. He thought on a level that is absolutely not normal.

Also, he abstained from sex and thought it helped him think better. He wrote about wanting to be with a woman, but that his life demanded sacrifices as such. Also of note, Isaac Newton also had many similar beliefs, just no pigeon.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love, LOVE Tesla, him being a genius doesn't absolve him from human error.

[–]InteriorEmotion 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Tesla was also celibate for his entire life.

[–]Thesharknightrises 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Is there a source confirming that he never had intercourse with a woman or is that speculation on the part of internet sources? I am not saying you are wrong, I just want a source that isn't random redditors or opinion pieces.

[–]llmercll 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Perhaps the male in society is useless. I am frank to admit that I don't know. If women are beginning to feel this way about it - and there is striking evidence at hand that they do - then we are entering upon the cruelest period of the world's history."

I'm inclined to think this is a projected response to him being unsuccessful with women. Tesla may be externalizing his own failures with women onto the world at large. And indeed, it would be a terrible problem were it true, but the average woman is simply saving herself for an "alpha" male. To this man though, the woman's rejection of him which he cannot explain is indeed perhaps the cruelest thing that can happen. Let's not forget Tesla died in poverty, squeezed dry by Edison, which is an example of a classic alpha/beta paradigm.

Then again it's possible he's right, look at the way men thirst for pussy. Look at how throughout history we've died to protect/provide for women. Perhaps we've been serving them all along.

[–]jpreston2005 -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

I think it's pretty pathetic to be afraid of women supplanting your own fragile male ego. We're all just human, and Although I admire Tesla, his notions about women's subservience is ridiculous.

Practically all the great achievements of man until now have been inspired by his love and devotion to woman.

This is such an exaggeration. And not nearly enough to justify his idea that women should sit at home and believe in their man as a way to advance society. What a stupid fucking thing to think.

[–]Scheme00 1 points1 points [recovered]

Even John Snow has now bent the knee :(

[–]Kommanderdude 7 points8 points  (6 children)

Idk. He got the most powerful woman to fly to his aid with her 3 most powerful weapons just to save him while losing one of the dragons in the process and then she just sits there waiting for him to wake up while she creams her panties at thought of the king of the north that can come back from the dead fucking the shit out of her. John is pretty rp. Soon she'll be dropping panties for him.

[–]EXQUISITE_WIZARD 1 points1 points [recovered]

Nah she said he was too short for her.

[–]Kommanderdude 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Watch their actions not their words. Now read what I wrote again.

[–]EXQUISITE_WIZARD 1 points1 points [recovered]

I guess I should take your serious response as a compliment to my sarcasm. I was just making a joke about how women will reject a guy who is perfect in every way except their ideal of height.

Though now that I actually am thinking about it, she DID say that he was too small for her but now her feelings have clearly changed. Maybe this is some kind of attempt by MSM to show women that height isn't everything?

[–]Kommanderdude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe she saw his weener without him knowing and that's what she was referencing as being to small.

[–]Viking_RnP 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Fucking spoiler I didn't watch it yet.

[–]dakanos 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well, here's another one:

He didn't really.

[–]Scheme00 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry dude. One thing I have learned is that if I haven't watched the newest episode yet, i stay off the Internet.

[–]Atticus_Crowley -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Tesla was also a crazy person who fell in love with a literal bird....

[–]oaknutjohn -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So people were whining about having to compete with women even back then, huh. Next I guess we'll read that he thinks kids today have it easier than the previous generation.

[–]Tamazin_ -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

My new tinder profile text. For real.