665
666

Red Pill TheoryFeminists calling for a ban on sex bots. Also: the future of dating/sex/relationships (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by 2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK

tl;dr: I talk about the first people pushing against sexbots. Expect a lot more over the next decades. Then I predict what will happen. Then I talk about how a lot of different technologies are al starting to arrive that will change dating, relationships, and having kids.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34118482

Such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable, said campaign leader Dr Kathleen Richardson.

"Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what roles they would play - are very disturbing indeed," she told the BBC.

The problem here is that they can be made to be not fat and wrinkly. This is going to set "unrealistic beauty standards that little girls cant live up to and damage their self esteem" - that will be the main argument for banning it.

Sexbots will be for the betas who are not in the top 20% and are not getting sex. Nobody cares about these people (not even themselves) so the feminists looking to legally ban sexbots will either win or make it social suicide for men to have one.

She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

That isnt even a reason to ban them. If women arent just sex objects, and they offer more than sex to men (emotional support? idk), then the sexbot wont be an issue as the man would still need all that other stuff from the woman. And the men that "are evil" and only want physical relationships will not bother women, as they get everything they want from the sexbots.

I also doubt this woman cares about relationships being more than physical. Does she actually care about hookup culture and women having pure physical relationships? Does she want to ban women from having dildos as it implies relationships with men can be purely physical? Or does she want to avoid losing power to control betas?

I think we can expect feminist regulation akin to Asimov's Three Laws of Sexbots

  1. A sexbot may not have sex with her owner without him doing the washing up and asking about how her day went, or through inaction, allow a human being to have sex with sexbot without him doing the washing up and asking about how her day went.

  2. A sexbot must reject orders that do not end in "please, honey, i'll make it up to you".

  3. A sexbot must be uglier and less slutty than any woman that shows an interest in its owner.


The second half of the article focuses on a guy who sells one of the first sexbots.

"We are not supplanting the wife or trying to replace a girlfriend. This is a solution for people who are between relationships or someone who has lost a spouse.

The more you think about it the better this answer is.

"The physical act of sex will only be a small part of the time you spend with a sex robot - the majority of time will be spent socialising and interacting," he said. Some experts are sceptical about the claims made for Roxxxy, given the huge complexity of creating intelligent machines but the first version - which will sell for $7,000 (£4,530) - has had thousands of pre-orders, according to Mr Hines.

It will be like talking to a chatbot (at first, give deep learning 10 more years. in fact you could simulate my last girlfriend by plugging an RSS feed of the Guardian website into it).

David Levy, author of the book Love and Sex with Robots, believes that there will be a huge market for dolls such as Roxxy and predicts that by 2050, intimate relationships between robots and humans will be commonplace. "There is an increasing number of people who find it difficult to form relationships and this will fill a void. It is not demeaning to women any more than vibrators are demeaning," he told the BBC.

His response isn't great. Implicitly that first sentence implies that they are to replace women, and women will pick up on this. It doesn't matter that its customers are socially undesirable. And the fact that "women are doing it already with vibrators" is not a good argument as that doesn't matter to them, this is emotional not logical. But this guy is only peddling a book, not a sexbot, so whatever.


What next?

Women basically have it all in 2015. It was only 50 years ago when casual sex was a life-altering risk (they didnt have The Pill). They now have a culture and apps that allow them to fuck a different alpha every day of the week, and settle down with a beta at 30. Then they are free to divorce him if they feel like it, and the state will help them support themselves. Men are either alpha and loving it, or mainly left in the dark and living on MGTOW forums.

A bunch of technology will disrupt sex/relationships/reproduction, and it will hit different places at different times and to different extents. There are going to be a huge range of dating strategies all popping up at once, as you can combine different tech to suit your desires. A few examples that spring to mind:

  • Surrogacy: you can get the egg of a 21 year old Ivy League athlete for $10k, have a Thai woman do the pregnancy for $10k, and have total legal rights over the child so that a divorce cant take them out of your life. Cristiano Ronaldo has a surrogate child - the top men start first and then it trickles down.

  • Sexbots are coming, sure. But also other needs from relationships are being replaced. It wasnt long ago that you needed a wife to settle your affairs at home. Cooking and cleaning were full time jobs. But now we have microwaves, washing machines, roombas... and you can hire a maid for $10/hr using your smartphone. Rather than having all of your needs met by one person we are starting to choose specialists for each. Women do this too by exploiting AF/BB.

  • In 2 years time you will be able to use your skin cells to make either sperm or eggs, by using stem cells. This will allow same-sex couples to have biological children. This means older women will find reproduction easier (they can use surrogates too). It also makes it easier for betas to have children with supermodels. Online markets for selling cells will start to appear (maybe somebody here should do it?).

Many on this forum talk about a need to return to traditional monogamy, and avoid hookup culture. Thats just not going to happen. And the dating market is going to go crazy with innovation. Different subcultures and countries/cities will have totally different cultures for sex. You will pick one depending on your own strengths (like you already do when you pick tinder or bars or clubs or libraries...). Some guys get prostitutes as "they pay them to go away", whereas some pay more for "the girlfriend experience"... different needs.

This is already happening. In New York the dating lifestyle is: text someone on tinder, meetup for drinks that day, have sex, have sex a few more times, and eventually she moves on after meeting a taller, richer guy. Its fantastic for both hypergamy and polygamy (at the cost of making the monogamy at the end total shit and doomed to fail). Whereas in rural communities they still have traditional relationships. Younger people pick up changes fast. Most 50 year olds have no idea that something like tinder exists. More extreme stuff is due to come, and the actual rate of change of innovation is always increasing. Im mid-20s and wtf is Yik Yak?

We will see more and more single parents, and the state will gradually be designed to support this more. Any needs that you cannot fulfill your child you will outsource. Groups of friends will raise children together, similar to how they did back in the days of tribes. People will drift in and out of relationships, supported by automation and increasingly surplus resources, with less and less risk of not being able to provide for their kids.


[–]KartagoPill 362 points363 points  (66 children)

Dildo is primitive sex bot. Why not we ban dildo?

[–][deleted] 362 points363 points  (11 children)

Also they come in sizes that set unrealistic standards for young men...

[–]laere 93 points94 points  (8 children)

Dragon dildos, big black dildos, dildos the size of a skyscraper, dildos wider than a tunnel.

The dildos never end.

[–]PlasmaBurst 19 points20 points  (2 children)

I'd like to see a dildo robot running around. It'd look like a cartoon with its two long legs.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

[–]Str_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How appropriate that is a tumblr link.

[–]Code_Bordeauxx 108 points109 points  (22 children)

Aside from the obvious hypocrisy you point out, it's because feminists are very well aware that a dick, synthetic or not, is only made valuable by the alpha that's attached to it. No dick alone has ever given a woman the 'tingles'. And we know this too. Have you, or anyone else here, ever felt threatened by the invention and use of dildos? I don't think so, not me at least. But men don't care about the status, confidence and skills of women. For sex it only matters they look and fuck good. And we're on the verge of synthetically recreating this.

After that only synthetic uteruses need to be invented to render every non-LTR worthy woman completely useless. Let that sink in for a second and then realise feminists think it's men that are becoming obsolete.

[–]ReasonFreak 86 points87 points  (14 children)

That's one of the things that's so beautiful about this technology. No matter how Alpha a male robot is made to look it can never truly occupy an Alpha's place in society, it can't hold a high status job or make a lot of money. Alpha personality traits could, in theory, be programmed into them, but that would take a level of technological sophistication bordering on true AI, a technology that likely will be heavily regulated when/if it's ever created. On the other hand we men will only need our robots to look good, do chores, and mouth a few submissive pre-programmed statements and it's good bye evil feminist bitches.

[–]1sardinemanR 180 points181 points  (11 children)

If they could program an alpha bot, it would just leave her for a younger, hotter, possibly robotic, female model anyway.

[–][deleted] 80 points81 points  (0 children)

[deleted]

What is this?

[–][deleted] 62 points63 points  (7 children)

Haha. Women would program their idea of the perfect man and then wonder why they're not attracted to it. Because they don't even know what they want.

"I feel raped by my alphabot".

[–]1pluvoaz 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The TV show Humans touched on this but in a different way.

Basically, a woman dumps her husband for her helper bot. Then tries to get the bot to be more 'alpha' but it gets out of control so she calls her husband to rescue her. She then gets upset at the husband and gets protective her bot. Unreal if it wasn't so spot on.

[–]Indigo_Monkey 4 points5 points  (4 children)

women want an uncontrolled man who they can manipulate over time into something controllable; I don't think that works with robots.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that's contradictory and retarded programming....for retarded creatures, lol.

[–]Bbarakti 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My ex subconsciously did this exact thing during our marriage, with my complete complicity, of course. Looking back at the constant barrage of messages to be more "domestic" and give more and generally be more controllable (ie church, priority of social climbing, academic research brought home from uni, etc)..... I have no idea how I lasted as long as I did. But, know that if you guide another sovereign human into being something incongruous with what they want to be, it will backfire and they will let you down, eventually. I started keeping secrets and retreating into a world of fantasy porn... "real" life just crumbled around me.. It just wasn't what I had wanted it to be, it was what she wanted it to be.

Relationship has to be a creation of both parties, not just one.... not even TRP alpha that we're all trying to embody more fully. She's still a sovereign being that has an input into any shared future, though it might be 49%.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yeah, especially since women suck at programming.

[–]1Mikesapien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fucking this.

My best friend is a CompSci major and, as he reports things, the girls in his degree program are the laziest, least competent students on the planet. They are accepted into the program and given passing grades simply for the whole "WYMYN in STEM" push. They don't have adequate understanding of the discipline and, more often than not, find male classmates to do their work for them. They will be next-to worthless in a professional setting.

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. As a robot owned by his female master, the robot would inherently be in a lower position of authority than her. Plus, I sincerely doubt most women will actually want to make sandwiches and clean for an alphabot. They will program them to cook and clean for them, the women thinking that's what they want, then they will wonder why they quickly get bored of their "alphabot" and want to find another one who's more alpha. I'm skeptical many women will actually take the plunge and willingly start following a robot's orders.

[–]tallwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's why a woman still needs to imagine an exciting scenario of being taken by an alpha in order to get off with the dildo.

[–]Endorsed ContributorThe_Titleist 104 points105 points  (25 children)

Because then lesbians would need a man...

[–][deleted] 82 points83 points  (0 children)

lesbians are still mad because they can't actually fuck their GFs like we can

[–]Redasshole 46 points47 points  (18 children)

Most lesbian still suck dick anyway. Women who are truly disgusted by penises are very rare.

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (13 children)

I can confirm this. I recently hooked up with a "lesbian", who has never had a boyfriend. She would fuck guys once a year, just to "remember why she is gay".

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (8 children)

I hooked up with a "lesbian". I ignored her all night since I was told she doesn't fuck guys, lo and behold my ignoring her somehow flipped a switch in her head and I ended up fucking her.

I was the first and by far not the last guy.

[–]Endorsed ContributorLastRevision 29 points30 points  (6 children)

It's not that I don't believe she told you that, but a lesbian who hasn't fucked a guy is truly rare. I believe lesbianism to be phony balonie.

In the lesbian community, a lesbian who never had a dick is called "gold star" as to indicate this rarity.

EDIT: I happened to just open my YouTube and this video popped up on the front page by Laci Green talking about how "everyone is a little bit bi"; of course since most girls are bi, why not emasculate the upcoming generations of boys and tell them that they're bi too! LOL right?

BUT WHAT'S TRULY FUNNY ABOUT THIS VIDEO IS THAT.... it's shot by MTV, and therefore can't use Laci's typical webcam angles and.... NO SURPRISE, SHE'S A BIG FAT FUCK.

LOL FUCKING FOREVER.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Oh she wasn't a lesbian. She just called herself that. I know for a fact after I banged her (her first week at college) she rode the CC hard.

As the other commenter mentions, and I say all the time, I truly believe some girls have never came across an alpha. Some social circles (at least around my area) are inundated with hipsters and SJWs. I almost wrote a field report about Saturday night hanging out with a group like this. By the end of the night 2 out of 6 of the girls told my friend they were into me and I hooked up with one of them. My game wasn't even that great, I just wasn't a bitch, which the girl I hooked up with described as "refreshing." That's something that I've seen here alot of people mention they are told after swallowing the pill. To me all it means is "wow someone who acts like what men are supposed to."

Needless to say videos like that I think show where this generation is going, everybody's a special snowflake and has their own unique label.

[–]KnG_Kong 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol all those special snowflakes are being tricked into fucking themselfs which is neither bi straight or gay.

To females nothing's a choice, it's all because of "Them Feels"'

[–]An_All-Beef_Engineer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

therefore can't use Laci's typical webcam angles

Reveal of the century right there. Was absolutely gobsmacked in me gabber

[–]TheSilverwolfKnight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Back in my beta days I knew a lesbian. A hard 1, super hot at HB9, but she was lesbian who 'said' she had never fucked a guy before. I managed to make out with her on the night I met her, and I was beta as fuck. If an alpha came along, I think we all know where it would've gone.

[–]Avedas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sweet Christ what those camera angles can hide. That is truly amazing.

[–]Gawernator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have to disagree on "most girls are bi". Especially in traditional areas.

[–]evilquesadilla 7 points7 points [recovered]

Haha, I hooked up with a "lesbian" too. Also, have another lesbian friend, she told me it's not black and white, it's like a percentage.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. She told me she likes to be intimate with guys once in a while, but would never date one.

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points  (2 children)

Pam: "Aren't you gay?"

Ray: "Please, girl. Nobodies that gay."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LMAO. Greatest show.....ever!

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children)

What about natural remedies like cucumbers?

[–]Nebulose11 7 points8 points  (2 children)

OT: For some random fun try standing in the veggie isle with a tube of KY and looking perplexed. The looks you get are amazing.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Q: "Do you have black cucumbers?" A: "You mean Holothuria atra? They are in our fish aisle"

[–]Nebulose11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holothuria atra

20 tentacles sounds like a great time. Not so sure about having it push its internal organs out through its anus at me though.

[–]billcosbyeatsbabies 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It's useless even arguing with feminists

It's actually so amazing how convoluted their ideas and opinions are. It makes so little sense, that it just turns a full fucking 360 and just brainwashes everyone

[–]1Mikesapien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It may be difficult to argue with feminists –at times even Sisyphean– but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try. I imagine most of us on TRP were at some point inclined to various feminist ways of thinking, if not fully dyed in the wool TBP, before we found convincing counterarguments that changed our thinking.

TRP has helped so many men and women, we owe it to others to help them to TRP. I see arguing with feminists not as useless, but as an obligation.

[–]princenotsocharming 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing logic, Just look at this comment and ask any one if we are a bunch of basement dwelling neckbeards.

[–]Tarnsman4Life 83 points84 points  (24 children)

Going after pornography did not work and going after as of yet to be built "sex bots" it will work about as well. Lots of betas with disposable income that have not been locked down yet, looking to spend $$$ on sexual release.

Now imagine if someone made a "bot" that could cook, clean, do laundry, run errands and have sex. A lot of guys would rather spend even 100K on one of these bots, than risk losing half their money in a divorce.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Tarnsman4Life 44 points45 points  (1 child)

Funny thing is, what we call high standards today was SOP a generation ago.

[–]DodgedAFew 15 points16 points  (0 children)

There is a cheap machine for every female chore now... Every but one.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm ex military, I know how to cook, clean, fix shit, buy groceries, pay the bills, keep shit neat and I do it all better than any female I've ever known. Even my mother couldn't keep shit as neat as I can.

No maid service here, and who would dry clean t shirts and jeans? I own a washer, dryer, oven, fridge, and I can bake from scratch as well as I can cook over a campfire. Hell I own two of everything I listed there, except the dryer.

I honestly don't need a girl around, all they do is make a mess and soak up money.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I let my last ex move in because she said she would cook and clean.. I guess I should've been more specific as to how often..

When she moved out I was amazed at how clean my place looked with almost no effort

[–]garlicextract 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Is what he's saying about the 'richer taller' guy true in NYC? There are job prospects out there but... I'm 5'7". Not looking to move somewhere where the women are ultra height fixated.

[–]myprimetime 3 points3 points [recovered]

5'7 is going to be very hard in NYC.

There are just too many guys around, so any decent girl can usually find a tall guy to stick his dick in her.

What's more, NYC is all about the apps, and height comes up right away on those(even if you don't list yours, she'll ask).

Honestly, unless you are making $250K/yr I wouldn't bother. Everyone here is very shallow.

That said, its not completely impossible, you can still get laid since the city has a 400,000 single female surplus. And most of them want someone with a college degree, so if you have that you are golden. But it will def be harder...exactly the same you, but at 6'0...will be getting 10-20x more sex.

[–]InAStateTRP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"manlets, when will they learn?" is a shit test for men by men.

The phrase means "stop lying to yourself, acting as if you're not short"

If your brand of confidence doesn't smell fake, then the test is passed, for men or women.

[–]garlicextract 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow well that fucking sucks. I definitely know at least a dozen women id have gotten with in the past if I was 6'. Fucked up when you're on the receiving end of height bias

[–]kanji_sasahara 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It is definitely true in NYC. I've been disregarded for being 5'10" far more than I would care to admit. I won't begrudge double standards because they can be entertaining when used for stoking the hamster, but damn that height shit is infuriating.

Edit: A decent amount of it can be mitigated by wearing clothing that makes you appear taller, but if a girl is wearing heels good luck.

[–]garlicextract 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe for you at 5'10 the clothing can help. At 5'7" it doesn't help too much. Irritating societal standard to say the least

[–]MightyTaint 0 points1 point  (5 children)

You should leave NYC, it sounds awful.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]MightyTaint 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Power to you if you're doing what you want in life, but I think TRP has multiple facets. I think my application of it might be more akin to monk mode (at least compared to you) and controlling the dynamics of my interactions with others; as opposed to seeking the maximum number of new sexual partners that I think have a high SMV. The way you describe NYC and the personality types there, I'd bail. Then again, I live in an area where the women tend to be very attractive (compared to average) and if they can't cook and clean they are considered lacking.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't been to NYC since childhood, and I think that I might want to live there. What sorts of venues do you meet these women in? Do you live/work in Manhattan? What's your rent?

[–]1Mikesapien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sex? Well this they are actually good at.

I would dispute this. In my experience hooking up with modern chicks in college:

  • Many girls in the 7+ range are used to relying on looks alone and just lay there letting guys do all the work, as if to say, "What, missionary under the covers with the lights off and a condom on not good enough for you?" Some are pornographic geniuses, but this is quite rare. For most hot girls, simply being hot has been enough, and so they don't put forth much effort.

  • Chicks in the 4-6 range don't get as much action and are less practiced. This is your average bedroom performance – energetic if sometimes awkward and begrudging.

  • Girls in the 1-3 bracket are either desperate for cock and the most exuberant sluts on the planet, or else inhuman, unfuckable succubi with medical, mental, or other problems.

I've found that skill at sex in general is pretty lacking. Partly because most people don't get enough practice, but mostly because most people don't try to develop it like any other skill. It takes time and effort to rock the bedroom, which average joes and janes don't care to invest.

[–]eaton80 9 points10 points  (0 children)

than risk losing half their money in a divorce.

Don't forget alimony, sometimes lifetime alimony.

[–]TheRealMouseRat 0 points1 point  (4 children)

do be honest I think people would just have different robots. one for chores and one for "socialization" and sex.

[–]Tarnsman4Life 1 point2 points  (2 children)

That is not really what we have seen with electronics thus far though is it? I mean in the beginning that may be how it comes out because of limitations, but in the long run they fold into eachother.

15 years ago you had an MP3 player, a Phone, a watch, a PDA or laptop, an Alarm Clock, etc. Now almost all of that can be done on one device.

In the beginning as I said, they might start out separate, but from a cost standpoint and ease of use/interface I would see it progressing into one "Robot" over the course of 10-20 years.

[–]TheRealMouseRat 0 points1 point  (1 child)

yea, I was thinking more of in 5 years from now.

a lot of things are still separated today. for instance grass clipping bots have become really popular, and they don't do anything else. (because getting a good grassclipper bot is expensive already, and having it be able to do laundry as well just seems unnecessary) You don't have dishwasher and washer in one machine either as they do different things.

However, getting bots to clean your entire apartment/house would require a general purpose robot, as it would be able to pick up clutter, dust, vacuum/mop, and so on, and then you're onto something which effectively could have a human shaped form (and thus also double as a sex bot)

[–]Tarnsman4Life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we're at the point of question what is a sex bot. Are we talking about something you attach to your cock, or are we talking straight up, human looking, life like robots that can have sex. If we are talking about the former (more realistic) then yes I see you point. If we get to the point however that we can have bipedal autonomous robots that can move around like people, there is no reason one couldn't use the tools humans today use.

A more realistic situation would be some kind of a "sex suit" combined with an AI program and either Virtual Reality or holograms, sort of like the "Robot Girlfriend" in the 6th day.

[–]1Mikesapien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No way. That's redundant, and therefore expensive. I envision all-purpose units – "fully functional," as Commander Data would say.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 143 points144 points  (18 children)

Of course feminists are going to oppose it. Feminism is at its core a movement to maximize female sexual strategy. That means having exclusive, uninhibited access to the top alphas while securing the resources to carry out their children. Feminism accomplishes this by making female preferences sacrosanct ("Tall guys are just my preference") whereas male preferences are made socially untenable ("How dare you reject her for being fat/slutty. You're just insecure")

This has bled over into male adaptations to the problem. In most places where prostitution is illegal, it's not illegal to sell the sex, but to purchase it. This all but ensures that only men are ever criminalized for the behaviour. Further, betas who don't engage in prostitution end up paying for it all the same. They're taxed to support single mothers in their whoredom. The more entrenched power feminism has, like in Canada and Australia, the more whoring around is considered a virtuous path.

Owning a dozen vibrators isn't just socially acceptable, it's the mark of an empowered woman. Owning a fleshlight is social suicide. Such social perceptions aren't accidental.

Female sexbots have the potential to completely undermine any advantage women have in the dating market. 80-90% of women are only good for their vaginas. Take that away and what power do they have over men? Very little.

Feminists would sooner shave their legs and fuck a suite of obese omegas before they let that happen.

[–]2popthatpill 61 points62 points  (4 children)

Feminism is at its core a movement to maximize female sexual strategy.

Yup. That's all it is and all it ever was.

Owning a dozen vibrators isn't just socially acceptable, it's the mark of an empowered woman. Owning a fleshlight is social suicide. Such social perceptions aren't accidental.

Everything women want gets steadily more and more liberalised, everything men want gets steadily more and more anathematised (eg. in Iceland you can buy vibrators at the supermarket but strip clubs are illegal). That's part of the strategy: liberalise things that work for the female strategy and/or against the male strategy (same thing, basically), restrict things that work for the male strategy and/or against the female strategy (again, same thing).

And now the feminist moral propaganda squad is coming for the latest example of competition.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

everything men want gets steadily more and more anathematised

What if a guy wants to buy a vibrator?

[–]Tom_The_Human 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He'd probably get a different kind of vibrator.

[–]1Mikesapien 0 points1 point  (1 child)

He's praised for being an uninhibited, genderfluid, biflexible metrosexual for punching his prostate. Guys who aren't into anal/pegging, however, are just insecure or repressed.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who you calling metrosexual? I´m into that shit and I hate metrosexuals.

[–]Username-_-2015 19 points20 points  (2 children)

It doesn't really matter if having sex with a robot may seem wrong. The people that will benefit from it won't care. Just like the people involved with porn, they don't really care if it's against someone's religion or moral compass.

When they start making sex robots both sex's will benefit from this new enterprise. The men making these sex robots will be making a mint and so will the tech people involved in fixing the sex robots that break down or have computer malfunctions because just like your car those robots will need maintenance. Companys that copy a certain womens "look" will be making a percentage of those robots that are made to look like them. It will create more jobs and also these robots could be used to study human behavior and or help people that have some sort of anxiety with the opposite sex or just other people.

As to wether or not these robots will decrease rape statistics is something that cannot be said is that it would reduce it for sure. The cost of these sex robots could be in the thousands hell even silicon sex dolls cost upto a thousand and sometimes higher, the people that often are rapist are usually the lowest people in society, they can't pay for a sex doll with food stamps. Although some people could actually prostitute these sex robots and make cash out of it "is this even still considered prostitution?". Why would you go to a prostitute that usually looks like shit, when you could go to a sex robot that looks like angelina jolie for half the price of a third rate las vegas slut that looks fat and like shit and have possible std's? With robots they could be cleaned and or steralized to get rid of any std's, therefore the risk would be zero.

This is all speculation, but what is for sure is that these robotic humanoid machines will happen perhaps not sex robots at first but they will be made and are actually being made right now as we speak not sex robots but robots in developed countries. they are making robotic soldiers to replace humans, no doubt eventually someone will realize the sexual potential in these robots. It's going to happen no matter what some beta knight or femenist thinks about it.

[–]Nebulose11 8 points9 points  (1 child)

With robots they could be cleaned and or steralized to get rid of any std's,

Most (Maybe all? IANAPathologist) STDs require animal pathways to survive. HIV does not survive outside the animal body for very long. These dolls wont use living fluids, probably just a sterile lubricant that you have to refill every once in a while, so these pathogens wont have a pathway of survival, let alone transmission.

Edit: I had thought about running a harem of robo-hoes and renting them to the less fortunate for a minute or two. Wonder how much of the beta bucks market I could take away from used up sluts.

[–]DodgedAFew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sterile lubricant

Why not an antiseptic one enriched with vitamins and minerals that are good for your dick?

[–]Squeezymypenisy 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I doubt it will happen. If its one thing the robotics industry has or will have eventually is lobbying money. Plus not every state has a strong feminist influence. We already have real dolls here and those are super realistic. If its one thing you can't stop, its change. Even super liberal groups will not be able to keep up.

[–]mugatucrazypills 1 point2 points  (6 children)

have you tried the Venus 2000 ? it's like the fleshlight, but you don't have to move your hand up and down.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 8 points9 points  (2 children)

I prefer the FWB 50. When I'm horny I whip out my cell phone and look up which one of the past 50 sluts is willing to come over.

[–]1pluvoaz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

While I can't justify $1k for a Venus 2k, I would gladly spend $10k on a quality sexbot.

All right my geeky brethren, get busy installing a Venus 2k in a Real Doll & run the whole thing off a Raspberry Pi.

[–]brother_red 1 point2 points  (1 child)

oh my - just researched that

you can rent them

it's now called Venus for Men and costs $956

[–]mugatucrazypills 1 point2 points  (0 children)

have one, save your cash fleshlight is good enough

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 232 points233 points  (111 children)

It's the cartel coming in to protect their interests.

Men need to realize that the only thing standing in the way of feminists getting their way is basic civil rights which guarantee individual liberties. This is what is most worrisome of the feminist agenda: they've no problem eroding individual liberties to further their agenda. This makes them a great partner to the government which has the same goal: less individual liberties and more government control.

What are the feminists afraid of? Suddenly, men will not only be able to have sex with an attractive woman on demand, they'll also be able to have sex with harems of attractive women, which is the ultimate sexual desire of most males.

I wrote about this scenario a while back:

Once they invent reasonably-priced sex robots that look and feel like real women, men will basically be in heaven. Men are programmed to spread their seed far and wide and sex robots will allow men to sleep with a large variety of fantasy women.

The robots would have to be reasonable at sex. It would be nice if they self-cleaned and would clean up around the house a bit better than a Roomba. Anything beyond that would be icing on the cake, like being able to dress nicely or cook, maybe do some accounting and bill pay.

Guys would have collections of these robots and swap them with buddies when they got bored with them (again, it would be nice if they self-cleaned).

"Let's see, I'll have the one that looks like Ana Delia De Iturrondo. And Christina Hendricks. Throw in Hitomi Tanaka and Kimberly McArthur while you're at it. Finally, give me a Raquel Welch and one of those cavewoman outfits."

Once guys are sleeping with a harem of 10s to their heart's desire, they will only have to deal with real women on a non-sexual basis...or for actual reproduction. This is also a dream come true for feminists - no more dealing with unwanted sexual advances.

Careers based on attractiveness such as modeling and porn will disappear, gold-diggers will have nothing left to negotiate with, and there'd be no more nice guys. Men would be able to keep much more of their wealth and spend it on themselves. Another feminist benefit: prostitution would disappear.

I'm not sure the benefits would be as pronounced for women. They'd get to have sex with the male physiques of their dreams, but we all know that they want more than that. Still, they'd no longer have to put up with creeps, so they'd have that going for them.

[–][deleted] 75 points76 points  (18 children)

This post made me laugh my ass off... everything you described is so weird, but so accurate. Men just peacing out en masse from the sexual marketplace. It's a very strange future ahead of us.

[–]1PrinceofSpades 57 points58 points  (16 children)

I can actually forsee women quickly becoming desperate after this occurs beyond the first few stages, and start doing all sorts of slutty things to keep up.

Going to be difficult for her to prove her worth to the point of men choosing her over the harem of robotic sex dolls that don't ever say no and fuck and feel better than the real thing that they have access to.

[–][deleted] 38 points38 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]fatalbinoninja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh, I don't mind the shit tests that much now. Once you recognize them then it just becomes a game to play. Though I'll admit to being a tad more combative and oppositional than most people so verbal sparring is just lots of fun for me.

[–]eaton80 26 points27 points  (3 children)

But how will men live without experiencing Divorce Rape?

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 17 points18 points  (2 children)

Maintenance costs will keep the local systems in line...

[–]Xeatanas 2 points2 points [recovered]

Immediately thought of this.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is probable, or cellphones don't last a year, why would a sexbot? Is like buying a used car, but without the test drive.

[–]Endorsed Contributoralways-be-closing 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It would just be societal wide result of all men having an abundance mentality.

Withholding from women is what you have to do on an individual level to get them to behave.

Being willing to walk and show them they'll lose something good is always powerful.

It's like crate training a puppy.

You want to cuddle and baby and feed it all the time, but if you're not strict with it, it'll keep peeing on the carpet.

[–]mugatucrazypills 14 points15 points  (1 child)

I'd probably program in a few shit tests just to keep me on my toes.

[–]evileddy 13 points14 points  (4 children)

Do you know how much money will be made by the company that makes a sex robot simply bring you a beer and not talk? Trillions!

[–]LikesTacos 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Who needs a sex robot? I want a beer robot that doesn't talk.

[–]rundownweather 0 points1 point  (2 children)

"What is my purpose?"

"You pass beer".

"...Oh my god."

"Yeah, welcome to the club, pal".

[–]LikesTacos 0 points1 point  (1 child)

EVERYBODY STO-O-O-OP!!! LOOK AT ME!!! MY BROTHERS, NOTHING WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY SHEDDING BEER ROBOT BLOOD!! NONE OF US CAN DIE UNTIL OUR JOB IS DONE!!

[–]Nebulose11 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Robots don't come with a portal for STDs to survive in as well.

[–]John_E_Vegas 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I started to write about how wrong the post was, then I realized, sadly, that you are correct.

We're already doing this with Fleshlights and other inventions. Of course we'll bang robots and perhaps even have relationships with them.

Sad, really, that it's come to this.

[–]Code_Bordeauxx 97 points98 points  (42 children)

When the betas start using these in large numbers, women will suffer a huge blow in the value and entitlement their pussy brings them. But consider this: what if engineers start making them really good? What if they find ways to make it better than the real deal? I doubt it will even come to this point, but still, it's not uninmaginable. It could cause a shift where women will almost completely be abandoned by men. I think alpha commitment robots will be siginificantly harder to make, lol. Almost scary to think about, who knows where we'll be in 20 years? Sit back and pay attention gentlemen, there are interesting times ahead of us.

Oh, and no doubt about it that these attemts to ban them will fail. At least in the long run. Economic incentives win every time.

[–]Anderfail 78 points79 points  (20 children)

If they make them act truly feminine, then just watch how every single woman on Earth abandons feminism overnight and becomes a stereotypical stepford wife who is extremely feminine and treats her husband like a king. Competition like this is by far the single biggest driver of evolutionary and social change among animals because the only choice is change or die.

What's coming cannot be stopped because it's coming hand in hand with the automation revolution. Humanity is going to be in for a rough ride for a while and who knows we may yet kill ourselves or develop a true utopia. Regardless it's going to be an interesting 50 years.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 39 points40 points  (15 children)

Shit, I got stuck with the crappy war filled 3rd wave feminazi years were everyone was poor as fuck. Sucks being born in the 60s.

[–]spacecowboyreturns 7 points8 points  (0 children)

deleted What is this?

[–]1mr_nate_ 0 points1 point  (13 children)

Haha damn dude, send your genetic code over so we can resurrect you when the time comes!

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (12 children)

Not the same consciousness, even if it was there's a metric fuckton of memories I don't want to keep.

[–]1mr_nate_ 0 points1 point  (11 children)

Damn maybe I should start researching this once I finish my Biomedical Sciences major, you've given me direction

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (10 children)

The synaptic pathways would never be the same, probably would result in very different personalities and intellectual levels. Some is genetic, but no small amount is experiences that shape who we are.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're memories are stored in your synapses, it's all in how the pathways connect. Every experience will be slightly different, so other than a copy paste of memory, it isn't going to work... At least as I understand it from the limited information I have about how our brains work.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Well if you aren't content with selective synapse destruction with RC microblts, we'll place you in one of your GT's, rig it with explosives, light it on fire, place a cinderblock on the gas pedal so that you fly off a cliff, then detonate it in mid air. Brodin would be proud. You would surely enter the gates of Valhalla.

If there are any people that you hate (i can think of a few), let us know. We'll kidnap them, and tie them up next to edge so that you run them over.

[–]John_E_Vegas 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Alternative Theory:

Men are so busy banging their robots that women end up ruling the world.

[–]Anderfail 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I doubt that will happen. Women generally hate leading.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Alternative Theory:

Men are so busy banging their robots that women end up ruling the world.

[–]deeman010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder how sex robots would affect the 3rd world.... less tourism for sure but, culturally, it would be interesting to see the reaction to a Western acceptance of sex robots.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (8 children)

Asimov wrote about this. Read 'foundation and earth' or any of the Elijah Bailey stories where he deals with the Spacers, or any thing about the solarians and 'caves of steel'.

TL:DR A group of humans with robots to do everything for them evolve into a form where they are disgusted to be in physical proximity to one another and only communicate by video uplink. Reproduction for them becomes an issue and they end up 100-200 people per planet with literally 10,000 robots each.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Miles and miles of land to myself and an army of robots to boot? Sounds pretty nice.

[–]1kick6 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there one planet where they had eradicated STDs so everyone smashed everyone for fun?

[–]haneybird 9 points9 points [recovered]

That planet was an extreme case that was settled by isolationists. Most of the "Spacer" planets have a mix of robots and humans with almost all humans living an upper class lifestyle.

[–]zarus 2 points3 points  (1 child)

None of the Spacer planets have more than 100k people on them.

[–]the_optiomal 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Muslims families still have many children, you are forgetting that. That is not gonna change with sex bots

[–]sonofquetzalcoatl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They will get 72 robot virgins so good-bye mahoma..

[–]zephyrprime 16 points17 points  (3 children)

It wouldn't be hard to make them better than natural pussies. There's a lot you can do with texture and mechanical force that you can't do with the real thing.

[–]tallwheel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Plus, you wouldn't have to use a condom when having sex with a robot... presuming shared or rental robots would be properly sterilized between uses.

[–]bluedrygrass 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Heck, even your hand can stimulate you better than a pussy. It's not the same for other reasons, but mechanically...

[–]zephyrprime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true. that's why so many virgins can't come nowadays when they first have sex. They're so used to their own hands and porn. Pussies are much less forceful than hands.

[–]Nebulose11 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Alpha commitment robots: But women have no idea they want a man to tell them no so when that gets programmed out and they are left with no tingles from Chad Thunderrabbit he will be getting returned.

[–]LeFlamel 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I actually think once these changes come to pass, feminism as blind ideology will fall and women will finally learn a thing or two about themselves and the SMP, but I might just be optimistic.

[–]darkrood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right about your assumption. Too bad it will take them at least a wave of failure to see that. Once sexbot comes out, give it a good 20-30 years for women to hit the wall.

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Alpha commitment robots

There's already a Japanese comic and TV series about this. "Zettai Kareshi" or "Absolute Boyfriend"

The robotic boyfriend in the series not only looks good, but hugs his girlfriend and tells her she's pretty. He also provides physical protection and security. If I recall from the TV series, he also gets a job and helps to provide for her financially.

[–]razorwan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's the main target imo-- betas. If they can simulate the look and touch of a real woman, all those super fat and super skinny betas now don't have to beg at the feet of every female twitch player, or cower in social awkwardness when they see a hot chick they know they'll never get.

Suddenly all that attention beta orbiters shower whores with goes. Striking an attractive woman's ego is pretty much the worst thing you could do to her.

[–]jumpingdonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

combine with what you said with the AI from the movie HER.

that would be heaven.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 42 points43 points  (10 children)

While the women won't have to put up with creeps, their beta orbiter attention-harems will dry up as well. They will still have their AF but the BB prospects will be harder as their pussy purchasing power will dwindle.

[–]1AmlanceJockey 41 points42 points  (2 children)

It occurs to me that the only men who will still be in the market for human pussy are the men who can't afford it. And we all know how much women like lower class men hitting on them.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 0 points1 point  (1 child)

They might be able to "rent" a robot for a while. You might end up with robobordellos.

[–]2popthatpill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doubt it, that'll probably fall under the existing bans on bordellos.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (6 children)

The creeps helped getting victim status which lead to financial support.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 19 points20 points  (5 children)

Exactly. Chad hits on them? Tingles. Beta Billy does the same routine? Assault charges and a spot on Oprah to sell her book about her scary experience

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 25 points26 points  (4 children)

Omg! He asked me to have coffee with him while I was in an elevator!

The horror, the horror...

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 19 points20 points  (3 children)

It saddens me that that's literally happened.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow.

Even Richard Dawkins got involved with this comment:

Dear Muslima, Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and...yawn...don’t tell me yet again, I know you aren’t allowed to drive a car, and you can’t leave the house without a male relative, and your husband is allowed to beat you, and you’ll be stoned to death if you commit adultery. But stop whining, will you. Think of the suffering your poor American sisters have to put up with. Only this week I heard of one, she calls herself Skep”chick”, and do you know what happened to her? A man in a hotel elevator invited her back to his room for coffee. I am not exaggerating. He really did. He invited her back to his room for coffee. Of course she said no, and of course he didn’t lay a finger on her, but even so...And you, Muslima, think you have misogyny to complain about! For goodness sake grow up, or at least grow a thicker skin.

[–]1RPAlternate42 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unsurprisingly, a site called "Rational Wiki" is completely biased towards anything not feminist.

[–]PlanB_pedofile 35 points36 points  (1 child)

What are the feminists afraid of? Suddenly, men will not only be able to have sex with an attractive woman on demand, they'll also be able to have sex with harems of attractive women,

More like men would rather have sex with a plastic doll than their fat ugly lard asses.

Lol imagine if men tried to ban dildos under the pretense that they are an unrealistic representation of the average male penis. Poor feminist would be lost without their 14 inch vibrating dildo with clitoral stimulator.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

"and there'd be no more nice guys."

Music to my ear.

[–]2popthatpill 47 points48 points  (3 children)

It's the cartel coming in to protect their interests.

Did anyone seriously think that the pussy cartel wasn't going to crack down on this particular green shoot of competition?

[–]southernmost 27 points28 points  (1 child)

They can try, but the Japanese appetite for robot everything cannot be legislated away.

[–]mugatucrazypills 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can't stop what's coming in robot land, that's vanity

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Solid observation about liberty and feminists. Most of our political, economic, and social problems could be solved with a better adherence to the principles of liberty

[–]eaton80 14 points15 points  (0 children)

What was the most significant legislation that got passed the minute women got the vote? The Prohibition.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

swap them with buddies when they got bored with them

It ain't no fun if the homies can't have none.

[–]Schrodingersdawg 8 points9 points  (0 children)

http://youtu.be/9D5SgyYOOIk

Lmao this is the ugly feminist bitch who's pushing for the ban, in comparison. I wonder why she hates them...?

[–]Adolf_ghandi 10 points11 points  (3 children)

If you can make the female robot clean and talk without being a bitch then you can also make a male robot that is able to give them tingles by bossing them around and behave like a caveman.

It would be hilarious to see women being the bitches (I.e.: make me a sandwich you ho!)for their robots.

[–]mugatucrazypills 4 points5 points  (2 children)

pimpBot will turn those bitches out

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Offtopic but if they could bring back Pimp C as a robot that would be awesome.

EDIT: A$AP Yams too.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou 20 points20 points [recovered]

This is what is most worrisome of the feminist agenda: they've no problem eroding individual liberties to further their agenda.

This is true of most leftwing political movements.

[–]psycho-logical 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Most? Only from the very far left (Islam apologists and whatnot)

Conservatives are much more interested in eroding liberties.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou -1 points0 points  (1 child)

How does reducing taxes and regulations erode liberty?

[–]psycho-logical 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mostly on social issues. Against Gay Marriage, anti pro-choice, harder on non-violent criminals, favor rights of employers over employees (anti union) etc...

This also isn't the place to debate politics. Just highlighting reality.

[–]LikesTacos 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I am thinking one robot that can change its features to be anybody I want. I might need two or three, but a harem would just be overkill.

[–]Mitchell78 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think most men would be totally fine with sexrobots if they look like 10s and fuck like pornstars but will women be able to satisfy their hypergamy with sexrobots? I have my doubts.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not to mention that your sex robot could wipe your ass for you when you get old and feeble.. Maybe cook, clean, like what women used to be like before Madonna

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The robots would have to be reasonable at sex. It would be nice if they self-cleaned and would clean up around the house a bit better than a Roomba. Anything beyond that would be icing on the cake, like being able to dress nicely or cook, maybe do some accounting and bill pay.

Indeed. Let's face it, which Anita would you rather date/marry/partner up with...this one, or this one?

[–]razorwan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like this post looks at things too ideally though. If you could create the perfect human AI with perfect human looks/feels, then maybe this would be the case, but things are seldom this perfect outside of Hollywood. Would it realistically put a slight dent in the pussy cartel? Sure. Would it replace the look, feel, and touch of an actual female? I'm sincerely doubtful.

[–]8thhenry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As soon as I saw the headline last night I knew it was a woman against it. No more men to divorce rape? Now my total existence relies on me. That's not fair.

Once women's only commodity is an open market item. They are going to have to be 10's with a zero CC to talk to a man.

[–]1Mikesapien 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Multiple units would just be redundant. Ideally, you'd have one model that can be customized on command, like Mystique in X-Men.

"Good evening sir."

"Evening sexbot."

"What configuration do you desire this evening?"

"Let's see, this week ScarJo and J Law have been great, but getting stale. I haven't given Jennifer Connelly or Emma Watson a go for a while, but I'm in the mood for something bustier. How about we try some Jana Defi, maybe Bettie Ballhaus?"

"As you wish, sir."

Maybe have a spare for three-ways. Either way, the trick is activating the Coolidge Effect, which only takes one unit.

[–]SwissPablo 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You mention some lookalike sexbots, and I suspect most stars would feel uncomfortable putting their likeness to something like that. However, I foresee a new class of pornstar, women who would be more than happy to be paid tons to have their bodies scanned and turned into robots for sex. Companies would be in a bidding war over these women, women who would be able to make an incredible amount of money.

[–]PM_Me_For_Drugs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

incredible amount of money

Are you sure about that?

Do you think they'll unionize and demand hefty residual payments?

Because if the camwhore industry is any indication, that's not going to happen - they'll all just undercut each other until the pay is a joke.

[–]tedted8888 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Guys would have collections of these robots and swap them with buddies when they got bored with them

IDK dude. Do guys currently swap fleshlights?

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, but their fleshlights don't look like Katee Owen.

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Robots would presumably be a lot more expensive than fleshlights. I can imagine poorer men having to share them with others, but I'm sure the preference will be to have a "virgin" one who's only been fucked by you if you can afford it.

[–]tedted8888 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Meh sounds more like prostitutes will have to compete with sex robots, effectively killing prostitution in that case.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Well prostitutes are usually not virgins..

Say it costs $10,000 for realistic (face, skin, body, lips, etc.) sex bot. That's the price of a used car from 3 or 4 years ago. Depending on how good the robots get, there are thousands of men that would pay for it.

If you could pay $10,000 and have a prostitute live with you forever, have sex whenever you want, and clean the house, then it may be comparable.

[–]tedted8888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think poor people pay 10k for a used car. Sounds more like middle class.

Regardless sounds like a good business plan. Spend 50k to 100k per sex bot and run a brothel charging 50 to 250 per visit.

[–]TheRedThrowAwayPill 0 points1 point  (1 child)

So, what you're saying is ... orthodox Jews & Muslims will inherit the Earth?

Right. Got it.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 55 points56 points  (15 children)

The state has Sperm Banks, there are male strip clubs, male hookers, and women can contract men for labor around the house like their precious kitchen counters paid for by hubby. They think we're just a pair of cock and balls, dancing sex monkey clowns, sex butlers, and work muels. How dare they!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!1!!

The problem here is that females in the monkey/ape species have had a monopoly on reproduction for millions of years. Most women are not valuable beyound their vag and uterus despite the fact they have the capacity to do so. They have to reel in men with sex and tie him down with familial onligations to seem relevant. For the first 8 months, her and the child are a package deal. But many men are willing to not have kids, as long as they can bust a nut, which is free or the one time cost of a $150/hr prostitute (a smokin' one).

The majority of the sex bots are purchased by betas and incels, the providers of direct and societal provisioning. The foundation of Af/BB. There is no AF without the BB. Women dont want their slaves finding a substitute outlet for his urges. Many many men have nothing but pity, duty, vanilla, starfish sex rationed out by their 'significant' others in exchange for a highly inflated price, working like dogs.

Without male labor in their favor, women are fucked. This is why women and the government shame prostitution. It's not because it's wrong, but because it drops the price floor of vagina of the Pussy Cartel. It's funny because women have the capacity to be more useful, they just feel entitled not. They vehemently deny any agency regarding failures or self improvement. Apparently it's a man's job to ensure that. Sounds like a parent-child relationship doesn't it? Sounds like a woman is just a child with SMV.

She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

1) Shame on betas for having preferences. Only women can set standards and apply their sexual strategy. All hail the feminine imperative

2) Shame on men for attempting to take out the middle [wo]man of sexual gratification

All relationships are time, resources, and commitment in exchange for sex. A man doesnt need anything else from a woman. A man has the physical and mental falculties to provide for himself. The only thing missing is feminine energy and a vagina. Women are for fucking/reproduction, direct or assistive servitude, and taking care of small children above all else. Women are sex objects, you literally have to have sex with them to continue the human race (expect a post on this). And they wish it to always be that way because it is the only reason men associate with them.

In 2 years time you will be able to use your skin cells to make either sperm or eggs, by using stem cells. This will allow same-sex couples to have biological children.

Any woman who does not have a dedicated man willing to assist her in the raising of the child shall be banned from having children. How we could we enforce that? Take away all safety nets regarding child support and welfare like WICS. Women will straigten up real quick before they trick men into having a child they dont want by lying about birth control or as /u/bsutansalt put it in his meme: "Just because He consented to sex, doesn't mean he consented to parenthood".

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (5 children)

A man doesnt need anything else from a woman. A man has the physical and mental falculties to provide for himself. The only thing missing is feminine energy and a vagina. Women are for fucking/reproduction, direct or assistive servitude, and taking care of small children above all else. Women are sex objects, you literally have to have sex with them to continue the human race (expect a post on this). And they wish it to always be that way because it is the only reason men associate with them.

I don't want children. I know how to load & unload the dishwasher, do laundry, and I do my own grocery shopping & minor food prep. I'm handy with the car, computer, and around the house. I have a successful career and have owned three properties. Exactly what do I need a woman for other than sex?

[–]mugatucrazypills 11 points12 points  (0 children)

social interaction and nagging

[–]byrdcall 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For your early death and the divorce rape before. Thats what woman are good for.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here, except I can cook and bake from scratch, build the entire house, and rebuild an entire car, among many other things.

I need a girl for a warm moist place to jack off, a self cleaning and heated fleshlight is on the same level.

[–]1Mikesapien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need women to manufacture genetic replacements for yourself, i.e. children. You said you didn't want them, but that is what women are for.

[–]mugatucrazypills 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i enjoy dr warlocks posts, bring on the robot babe apocalypse I say. All those austin power jokes wer graveyard humor apparently

[–]through_a_ways 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The problem here is that females in the monkey/ape species have had a monopoly on reproduction for millions of years.

True, but it's much deeper than that.

Female vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and fungi have had a monopoly on reproduction for about 1.5 billion years.

Male disposability has existed for nearly 40% of the earth's life.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Where the fuck do you live where you can buy a "smokin" prostitute for $150?

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Type the following into google....

"[insert your city] escort backpage" you're bound to find one offering a half hour.

edit: u/gsrvtr and /u/triperfecta read online guides on how to avoid the popos before you start selecting from the candyshop.

[–]triperfecta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"$150"? Welcome to Tokyo (obviously NSFW ): http://tokyo.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/

[–]triperfecta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good looking out. If you go that route it's always something to be aware of that many men don't think about. Whether one pays for it or not, pussy is pussy and can get one in trouble regardless.

There is no such thing as "safe" pussy.

(I probably wrote some of those guides, though. )

[–]Nebulose11 2 points3 points  (1 child)

"Just because He consented to sex, doesn't mean he consented to parenthood".

So do we go in and fill out all the paperwork for abortion and then sign it. When she doesn't just have your lawyer argue that you aborted your responsibility in that clinic and that she decided to take on parenthood knowing you had aborted your half of the ova.

Come on RISUG.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not consenting to parenthood means not responsible for it, not forced abortion.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]ReasonFreak 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Over the centuries men have been using our minds to work our way up Maslow's hierarchy of needs. There was a time in human history when only the wealthiest men could enjoy easy access to high quality food or live behind stone walls instead of in thatched huts. In present times only the most naturally Alpha men enjoy soft harems of beautiful women.

In the future all men in the developed world will own harems filled with beautiful women, either in VR or robot form, women will have lost their chief method of manipulation, and the world will never be the same. A future worth waiting for.

[–]What_The_Shoe 18 points19 points  (5 children)

Nicki Minaj

As long as she doesn't try to rap.

[–]rpreader 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Am I the only one here who thinks she's an incredibly talented rapper?

[–]What_The_Shoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. But her body is another story.

[–]Nebulose11 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Nicki Minaj has the ass to hip ratio of a goddess. .47 is obscene and is a natural turn on! As long as the fucking thing doesn't have her voice.

[–]1rporion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, I think a mute button is the very first thing.....

[–]through_a_ways 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At her size it just looks like a cartoon character or an alien.

Also it's all fake.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly how women have acted lately, they DESERVE the shit they're going to get when sexbots come out. Sorry ladies, when you had the power you abused it and were bitches, now face your conseqeuences.

[–]1commentatorX 47 points48 points  (7 children)

A couple of girls once told me(pre-TRP) about a "weird guy" they knew of.

Apparently his gf found an "artificial pussy" amongst his things and freaked out, possibly lead to a breakup, I honestly can't remember.

Eitherway, the story got out. They spent a long time bitching about how "creepy" and "wrong" he was.

Went on to mess about a little with one of the girls(couldn't get the lay, struck out, oneitis... long story) - would you care to guess what she had in her second bed-side drawer...?

x1 Vibrating cock-ring(2nd hand, eeesh) x1 Innocuously sized buttplug x1 JackRabbit dildo X2 Handheld vibes

At the time I just thought 'hypocrite!' - but now I know women face considerably less shame over sexual aids for a reason. It's the sexual strategy double-standard at work again.

A woman using sex toys for herself isn't adding to her partner count, she looses little to no SMV. A man using sex toys for himself isn't adding to his partner count, automatically indicating his low SMV.

Men will always face public ridicule for misplacing their loads. I just wonder wether this is a conscious grievance in women?

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]HappyHerpes 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes, a sexbot will decrease the owners SMV. But he doesn't need SMV anymore.

And if he decides he still wants a real girl after all, he can gift it to his buddy.

[–]Tman5691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sex bots will be just as socially acceptable as a pocket pussy

It's not a "sexbot", it's a robotic life assistant.

[–]MEpicLevelCheater[M] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

This is an important insight in sexual politics that men should understand, and you've phrased it nicely here.

I am awarding you a point for this comment.

[–]1commentatorX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. Maybe someone will even turn the sex toy example into a somewhat slicker idiom. Appreciated.

[–]EvilPenName 86 points87 points  (15 children)

Sex robots go hand in hand with why men get shamed for fleshlights. Ask any woman about fleshlights and the conversation will be very negative, then ask about her vibrators and see how thats totally different.

Women do not want men to have options that replace them, especially for their orbiters. If the super betas start having "someone" at home to pay attention to then who will shower validation on them?

[–]ChanThunderwang[🍰] 42 points43 points  (5 children)

I honestly think you are wrong here.

They are disgusted by fleshlights because they associate them with the losers who own them. A high value man does not need a fleshlight. A fat neckbeard needs one. A man using a fleshlight tells them that he can not get any, so they avoid him.

However, a girl who owns a vibrator is not seen that way by men. Yeah, she might very well be a slut. But men still prefer a woman who masturbates with a dildo once a week to a woman who has sex with another man once a week.

[–]orange234 18 points19 points  (1 child)

Yep. The flashlight/vibrator "double standard" is almost exactly the same as the "double standard" about promiscuous women being sluts, while promiscuous men are players. There's no point in whining about it being unfair, it's that way for a good reason.

Everybody understands that a man is going to jack off from time to time, but if a high SMV guy masturbates, it's usually just a sideline; most of his time/money/commitment is spend on relations with women. The fleshlight signals that the guy is low-SMV: he's spending a lot of time/money/commitment on jacking off, because he knows that he's not going to be getting any of the real thing.

Since we know that just about any woman can have sex whenever she wants if she adjusts her standards to make it happen, the girl with a vibrator is actually saying something positive. She is horny, which is appealing, but instead of hooking up with some random guy, she is waiting for the right guy to come along, which is also good.

[–]tallwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You just blew my mind, actually, and you are so right. How could I have not seen this before...

[–]through_a_ways 2 points3 points  (0 children)

However, a girl who owns a vibrator is not seen that way by men. Yeah, she might very well be a slut.

Men like women primarily sexually, women like men primarily socially.

Social status has zero bearing on what a man thinks of a woman sexually. It has a lot of bearing on what a woman thinks of a man sexually.

Women are more sexually attracted to men if they know that other women are already attracted to him. This is true independent of the man's actual looks, height, etc.

The reason this phenomenon exists is because womens' sex drives are at least one order of magnitude lower than mens'. (perhaps even two)

The reason their sex drives are lower is because they have about 20x less testosterone than men, on average.

Imagine a group of people with an IQ 20x lower than average (which is 100 in white nations). They'd have an IQ of 5. That group of people would be considered to have not just low intelligence, but lack any sort of intelligence at all.

It's not a coincidence that girls with high sex drives tend to have more masculine faces ('sexy' as opposed to 'cute') and often work out.

[–]2popthatpill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent point, but I don't see why the two can't both be correct.

[–]zpatriarchy 25 points26 points  (6 children)

and when you point out how it's the same, they hamster it & blame men for having to use vibrators, because "if men knew what they were doing, they wouldn't have to use one to orgasm."

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (2 children)

"if men knew what they were doing, they wouldn't have to use one to orgasm."

Are they implying that men always orgasm and that all that's needed is the hole they have?

[–]TheYambag 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I remember the first time that I was unable to finish with my college gf. I was cleaning up after calling it quits, and I heard her whimper, I look over and she's crying because she felt bad that I didn't finish. I had to coddle her, and I remember thinking about how strange it was, because I didn't even really care that I didn't go off, I was actually feeling awesome for lasting over an hour of vigorous sex (I was, and still am in pretty good cardio shape).

For the longest time, I figured that she was just sensitive, but then it happened to me again years later. It's like when a girl can't get you off, she doesn't feel like a real woman or something. I don't get it.

[–]Nebulose11 1 point2 points  (2 children)

On this point: Have you guys run into women that you can not get to cum from penetration but only manual clit stimulation?

[–]zpatriarchy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

most of them don't cum from penetration. they usually cum from being eaten out & i enjoy doing that.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think some other posters have broken down exactly WHY the double standard exists in relation to the theory of smv and what not, but I will say I saw this first hand.

I went to a sex shop with a post wall girl i was dating, looking at all sorts of shit. She was looking at dildos and what not I was looking at fleshlights.

"What is the point of those? Are they supposed to feel better? I couldnt imagine the losers that buy those things" In her HANDS at the time was a fake dick. Just shook my head. Id rather bang a fake pussy than an annoying woman.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (3 children)

Sounds like some women are terrified at having to acknowledge that their sole power, i.e. sex, is going to be ripped away from them.

I bet the feminist rationalizing hamster will start talking about "respect for the robot" and how a robot can't give consent and thus any sex with one would be "rape".

Damn I need a break from this forum, I can already hear the feminists shrieking

[–]1AmlanceJockey 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I would be on the lookout for feminist having robots that can mimic human behavior classed as people under the law. Then they would have the legal means to "protect" bots from the rape you mention

[–]1sardinemanR 30 points31 points  (4 children)

Modern women suck so much that they get out competed by pretty much anything.

If this VR stuff takes off, that will also be more popular for most men than actual women.

Rather than change their obnoxious behavior and the ridiculous laws they've managed to get passed, I'm pretty sure women will keep doubling down and demanding laws ban whatever comes out.

Of course for VR and robots, black market is easy for that stuff, so it won't work. And I don't think it will be banned anyway. There are blow up sex dolls now that most men don't use, but I think VR will change things up a bit. There is zero reason why any woman over 30 or below a 7 should get the attention she does today. I wonder if this stuff would balance the scales a bit.

[–]red-adherent 8 points9 points  (2 children)

What does this say about modern life that we are even discussing this.

Dark, sick, cruel stuff for the betas. Fuck it!

[–]judgedreddaus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's interesting is the VR stuff is literally around the corner from becoming mainstream. Next two years you'll see high quality production from porn companies for the VR headsets coming out in the next year.

[–]red-adherent 31 points32 points  (4 children)

This is so fucking sad. One it confirms what I have always known about the desire of women to ban prostitution, it is just cheap competition to them. Two it means these women don't care about any of the 80% as we know here they are not having sex. Three it means there are men out there willing to buy a robot to simulate sex. Four, I am still amongst the 80%, it is very hurtful that so many women have this kind of hatred for me, they don't even want me to be able to pay for sex, they just want me to be a fucking slave to them. Just fucking sad!

That's my dose of TRP today, steel resolve gentleman, steel resolve!

[–]MGTOW_player 9 points10 points  (1 child)

You can't show these hoes any mercy. Ever. When you get on top don't forget this. It's a long, hard road for us non-natural alphas but never forget the truth, despite how nice they will act.

[–]muscularPHD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surprised you got upvoted instead of being shamed for being in some kind of "anger phase." It's refreshing for a man to understand women are his natural enemy. Way rarer than it should be, even here.

[–]Locastor 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Four, I am still amongst the 80%

This doesn't last forever, friend.

Do your squats and deadlifts, read your Book of Pook, clean up your diet and wardrobe.

[–]muscularPHD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it does, for many people, no amount of lifting weights or reading will change it. Trust me, I would know.

[–][deleted] 112 points113 points  (10 children)

Well that feminist bitch knows nothing about text or coding. As long as the technology exist, betas are going to get it. These are the same minds behind TOR, Bitcoin and the Internet. Hackers don't give a fuck what feminists say

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points  (8 children)

[deleted]

What is this?

[–]ChanThunderwang[🍰] 47 points48 points  (7 children)

They don't have power. They just need nobody, because they are the providers. They can provide for themselves.

If you would ban them to a remote island, they could create a successful society. Try this with feminists...

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 8 points9 points  (5 children)

Girls would build a utopia where all they have to do is sunbathe and eat.

[–]byrdcall 8 points9 points  (2 children)

If we put all woman on an island some somali pirates would come by and enslave them completely.

[–]kanji_sasahara 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Worst case scenario of survivor ever. Would also be way more interesting than any reality TV show.

[–]through_a_ways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Worst case scenario of survivor ever

Eh, idk. Could be even worse, they could die. For a woman, enslavement >>> death.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Except for the building part. They can't build anything

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the joke. It's a reference to the two male vs female survivor shows. Male only island and female only island. They didn't build anything, just sunbathed, bitched, and ate all the food. They had to be rescued by men from the other island.

[–]rpreader 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We had threads about this when they did the survival game show with the men and women split up on seperate islands.

The men had started to all get along and cooperate with each other and build a very nice island to live on, whereas the women were back stabbing and being passive aggressive and petty with each other and barely got anything made and were struggling to survive.

The funniest part was when they had one of the mail go to visit the women the immediately started ordering him around telling him to start fixing things for them

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (2 children)

A man getting sex from a robot is like a woman getting the benefits of commitment without having a man. Guess what, that exists already: divorce rape and welfare.

Bring on the sexbots and legalize prostitution. It'll help to level the SMP playing field.

[–]monzzter221 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Sexbots AND prostitution?

That would pretty much leave the hoardes of women with one wet redeeming quality one thing left to do with their lives... And one extremely cheap thing at that.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully the smart ones would figure out they'd need to do other things to please men: cook, clean, charm us, etc.

[–]AnythingForSuccess 18 points19 points  (1 child)

Good luck, capitalism will sort itself out.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying a small group of people (most likely not feminists but rather businessmen) will wrest control of this technology and sell it to us one little bit at a time and this will keep things much the same so no real paradigm shift in the fabric of society will occur? if so I agree that this is a likely scenario.

[–]ReasonFreak 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Well, the only way I'd pay $7,000 dollars for an appliance was if it could fuck and suck me.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 18 points19 points  (9 children)

There's no way they'll succeed. Why? Because there's money to be made. If they can't ban pornography with all its exploitation, as well as all the legal forms of prostitution, they're not going to be able to ban sex-bots.

[–]whisky1111 5 points6 points  (3 children)

I actually have the theory that most women don't mind porn being available because it keeps men thirsty and it's like free advertisement for the main female "product"(pussy).

Sexbots on the other hand ARE the product!

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Hmmmm... you may have a point there. However, sexbots might also be even more advertising, as well as a practice tool. How many guys out there suck in bed because their main practice is fapping, and they get winded when they actually have to do the real thing?

[–]DodgedAFew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there was no porn there would be a lot of rape. Quite dangerous to ban that shit. E.g. abolishing alcohol doesn't really help.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Hard to ban porn once it came on VHS, Video stores needed the revenue and mark up. Landlords wanted rent paying tenants back in the video store days.

Sex-bots will be easier to ban, big and bulky. 5 foot tall petit-ish female can weight 100-115 pounds.

There will still be a black market there always is.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 0 points1 point  (2 children)

There won't really be any basis to ban them. People will still want the real thing. Not everyone will, but plenty of people will. It's just an expensive masturbatory aid. Plus, think about all the betas, gammas, and omegas that will be weeded out of the gene pool. The women won't have to worry about being cat-called anymore, or approached by creepers. All the creepers will be funneled into sexbots.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Women will still need them in the market to unbalance supply and demand in their favor. Sure Women don't want to be harassed by creepers, however having alternatives (prostitution and sexbots) available would take out a bunch of useful betas out of the market.

Women react the same way to your hobbies BTW. Takes time, money and focus off their needs. Tell a woman you would rather go to the track and trade paint going into turn one at your local track, see how she reacts. Did it to an HB7 (post wall solid HB8 in her younger days) a few months back. Her eyes popped out of her skull and jaw hit the floor, funny as fuck

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another thing nobody is mentioning is that women may be interested in the sex-bots as well. Especially all the bitter, high-powered crones who are bored with male prostitutes and can't attract a decent boyfriend anymore.

This was one of the subtexts of the Terminator series, where the robot becomes a father figure to John, and implicitly a mate-surrogate to Sarah. The men who built the bots were unreliable, and ultimately inferior to them, but the bots themselves, if reprogrammed for good, of course by the woman, could then be put to use to suit the woman's needs.

[–]Endorsed ContributorLastRevision 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's going to be about socially shaming the user. Men will deny having one, and fuck the shit out of it at night.

Sucks to be a married beta, I guess. Way harder to hide than a stack of nudie mags.

[–]H42 18 points18 points [recovered]

The answer here is Alphabot, the male sexbot for women. For a robot, he is a real asshole.

[–]2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK[S] 46 points47 points  (2 children)

They could make the basic version alpha, and charge extra for upgrades that temporarily make him slightly beta and fulfill emotional needs. Women would get addicted. The DLC could be:

  • $4.99 he stops negging you. says your name during sex sometimes

  • $14.99 pays 30% more attention to you for a week

  • $24.99/month he will talk to you after sex for at least 30 mins.

If they pay too much and he is too beta for them then they will be bored and not pay the next payment, and then he starts being a total dick. He might even cheat on her or run back to the manufacturer (this will be hidden in the small print of the 'return policy')

[–]laere 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Run back to the manufacturer

FUCKING BRILLIANT. Even a robot doesn't want that used up ho.

[–]hebola4lyfe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

holy shit this is an amazing business idea !

[–]MightyTaint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just watch, alpha bot will cheat on fat hags with female sex bots.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Pretend we are back 60 years or so, when the first vibrating dildos were entering the market, and let's **translate* the article from a male point of view. How RIDICULOUS does this sound?

A campaign has been launched calling for a ban on the development of vibrators that can be used for sex.

Such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable, said campaign leader Dr Karl Richardson.

Dildos already on the market are becoming more sophisticated and some are now hoping to vibrations into their products.

Those working in the field say that there is a need for such products.

Dr Richardson, a product ethicist at De Montfort University in Leicester, wants to raise awareness of the issue and persuade those developing sex toys to rethink how their technology is used.

"Sex toys seem to be a growing focus in the sex industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what uses they will have - are very disturbing indeed," he told the BBC.

He believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of men and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

"We think that the creation of such toys will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women," she said.

[–]LancerKagato 14 points15 points  (1 child)

sexbots are BB dread game, they are competition to feminists who still want a beta provider once they're post wall.

[–]1cover20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or alternatively, they give abundance mentality, and from there a guy can do great things with real women too.

[–]McLarenX 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Crazy. We are actually shifting back to hunter-gatherer behavior. Ever since we set in motion a series of events in the 1960s that allowed human mating to take whatever course it naturally chose. I feel genuine sorrow for guys that buy into the feminist imperative. They simply don't realize they are creating a social dynamic to facilitate superior mating, which doesn't include betas like them.

Women love keeping betas from mating. Without them always being available, hypergamy crumbles and they don't have their validative talking heads.

I predict that simply being white (the world's racial profile is shifting as well) and monogamous 50 years from now will be akin to a woman in our day wearing a full Victorian country dress, complete with bonnet and all.

To be honest I'm a little repulsed by high partner counts, multi-colored half shaved heads, public slutty behavior, and unapologetic single parenthood. I prefer a young woman who is somewhat pure still has excitement for sex and may have a few new things to learn. That's just the way my brain is wired. What's a guy like me going to do in the future?

[–]through_a_ways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are actually shifting back to hunter-gatherer behavior.

We are indeed.

A lot of people lament on how young adults today stay in a period of "extended adolescence". The exact opposite is true, biologically. Both men and women have been experiencing puberty at earlier and earlier ages for several decades. This is in line with r selection in the spectrum of r/K.

There's also been a quantifiable shift of male sexual interest from breasts to ass, at least here in North America. I don't have any direct evidence for this, but I think this is also a marker of r selection: anecdotally, people I've talked to (including myself) seem to develop a preference for breasts and upper body features in their early teenage years, and gravitate toward the lower body as they reach adulthood. In addition, the most r selected races (west Africans) have the largest butts, while the most K selected (Asians) have the smallest.

Back in Europe/Asia/India, where families are still valued, the preference is shifted in favor of breasts. In America and Africa, people like ass.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (4 children)

OP is a fool if he thinks Alpha guys aren't going to try sexbots. C'mon now. It's a no-brainer. Imagine a life sized porn star robot doll sucking your nuts off with unreal body proportions.

[–]CoffeeSE 20 points20 points [recovered]

OP is a fool if he thinks Alpha guys aren't going to try sexbots. C'mon now. It's a no-brainer. Imagine a life sized porn star robot doll sucking your nuts off with unreal body proportions.

This. Imo, fuck one slut you've fucked them all. If I can just buy a sexbot with a pornstar body that can obediently fuck whenever I want to without all the work and worry that comes with spinning plates, I'd be dumb not to. Imagine how the plates react when you've an object that can do everything they can, but better.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Exactly. All the girls who play dead on the bed and let the guy do all the work will get replaced very fast with sexbots.

The tipping point is when sexbots become hotter and better at sex than regular women. Men will actually stop pursuing high maintenance girls. No sex on first date? Pull out the Roxxxy 2.0 she is ready.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes the old "oops I forgot to take my pill now pay child support sucker" won't fly anymore.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]snusaholic 9 points9 points [recovered]

Ever actually read A Brave New World? More than Orwell's 1984, Huxley's masterpiece seems to be our future as a species. Us weirdos who don't crave endless casual sex and drugs will pretty much be left the options of suicide or a more primitive lifestyle.

[–]MerlotMcGee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Some of us will still be healthy and fit when we can visit our asteroid belt or Mars. There will be plenty of interesting pursuits for a man who would have headed west 150 years ago - and more time to do them when not burning precious hours and calories chasing satisfactory sex.

Imagine if I could effectively ignore a robot wife, one that is pleasant, dutiful, helpful, a great cook, and a tailor-programmed nympho - for 23 total hours a day, while she took care of menial tasks I'm not interested in? I could write, I could read, I could spar or target practice, I could have a drink with friends, invent things, tweak my code, swim, I could lift, I could take a suborbital flight to a floating habitat in the middle of the Pacific. I could do ANYTHING.

Fuck Soma. I just want time to live, and to be me. Free me from bonds of mandatory manual labor and sexual strategy, and I'm free to become anything.

[–]Danedina 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Dude, sounds like you could use a Soma

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Half a gram's better than a damn!

[–]shadowles5 28 points28 points [recovered]

They are afraid of becoming disposable. Shallow women who have no value other than their bodies and looks will be replaced.

[–]mister_barfly75 21 points22 points  (0 children)

They are afraid of becoming disposable. Shallow women who have no value other than their bodies and looks will be replaced.

Which is pretty much the same reason that post-wall hags with their 1000 cock stares resent pretty 20 year olds. The new model comes along to replace them and their ride on the carousel is over, time to snag a beta. Ooops, was too busy ignoring them 5 years ago so they all saved up and got themselves a Roxxxy instead. Dear oh dear, there goes the back up plan.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 28 points29 points  (5 children)

Shallow women who have no value other than their bodies and looks will be replaced.

Let me correct that for ya.... Shallow women who have no value other than their bodies and looks will be replaced.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]orilyrily 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It seems fairly straight forward - he turned your statement from only shallow women to all women.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's possible your browser isn't showing crossed out text correctly.

[–]hebola4lyfe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the word "shallow" in "shallow women " is redundant

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Redasshole 8 points9 points  (0 children)

When any man can go home and fuck his Scarlett Johansson robot or Kim Kardashian robot (or whichever celebrity will be considered super hot at that time), and he can do so without her demanding dates, free dinners, a sounding board for her drama, marriage, monogamy, picking up his socks, or refraining from burping at the table, and he can fuck Ms. Robot bareback to his heart’s content without ever needing to worry about pregnancy, child support payments, or catching an STD…oh, when that happens…you will see, for the first time in human history, women lose most (if not all) of their power over men.

It will be a massive game-changer in man-woman sexual relations.

It will be a massive game-changer in dating. Just watch what will happen when women try to demand dates from guys who have a sex robot at home, who is a 10 in looks and will never age, and who never demands any dates or money spent on her for sex.

It will be a massive game-changer in marriage. If you’re married: Wife being a bitch? Won’t put out? Fine. Head to the closet, power up Dolly Parton (1982 Version) and away you go. It’s not a person, so it’s not cheating! Man, I can’t WAIT for women to try to make THAT argument. Oh, this is going to be so fun to watch!

If you’re unmarried: Can you imagine a woman demanding you to commit to her or marry her when she knows you’ve got Britney Spears (Hit Me Baby One More Time Version) at home waiting for you? It gets better. Can you imagine some bitchy girlfriend (who is no where near as hot as Britney Spears) demanding that her BF doesn’t fuck his Britney robot any more? (“Or what, Jennifer? You won’t fuck me any more?”) Oh, this can’t happen soon enough!

I quote this from an article written on one of the manosphere blog. Despite the pure content, I would like to bring this blog up on TRP. It is mostly unknown of most Red Pillers and it is a great, I repeat: great, blog to read for Red Pill men. He speaks mostly about monogamy, why it does not work in this era and what the best sexual strategy for men is today.

Please, give it a read. I am not affiliated to the author in any way. I think if people read it it would massively improve their unplugging (everybody will have their remaining BP dreams of finding the one or of getting into a good LTR destroyed) and thus improve the quality content of the sub.

Here is the link to the full article on female sex robots: http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2011/04/22/female-sex-robots/

It's a fun read.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]DodgedAFew 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Eww! Looser cannot get laid! Err... wait a second. We need to ban sex bots now!"

[–]HS-Thompson 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Most 50 year olds have no idea that something like tinder exists.

Actually most of my 50 year old single male friends in NYC use Tinder to fuck dozens of girls in their late 20's and early 30's. Better living through technology I say.

[–]red-adherent 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Curious are they very good looking, rich, great game, I hear this a lot about dudes in their 40s or 50s. I rarely see it on the street.

[–]HS-Thompson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean they are my friends so I think they are pretty cool. Typically guys that aren't deadbeats, are smart and educated and do something interesting, but besides not being losers they are pretty average.

NYC is a special interesting place for dating I think, just on the sheer number of people (i.e. women) if nothing else.

[–]mugatucrazypills 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they're at home fucking em already

[–]JumpXVI 6 points7 points  (3 children)

When she states that these sexbots will perpetuate a "view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical", she paints herself into a logical corner. Such purely physically appealing bots would actually be the exact sort of litmus test for the type of men a woman should desire anyway. Real women can and will offer a quality man (one not interested in sexbots) much more.

But her feeeeelz make her miss a point she could easily refute:

"The physical act of sex will only be a small part of the time you spend with a sex robot - the majority of time will be spent socialising and interacting"

This should be what scares her, and what drives her case against them. But she only focuses on the physical threat these sexbots would pose, a threat that's been posed by things like realdolls and, yes, hookers for a while now. Ironic that a woman would fixate purely on the physical, huh...

[–]chaosmech 6 points7 points  (2 children)

It's not ironic at all, actually, given that she knows as well as we do that men seek sex from the SMP. We don't need women for socializing and interacting; those are just the show we put on to get what we actually want: sex. If I want to socialize and interact with someone, 99 times out of 100 I'd rather do it with a guy friend than a girl. Take any possibility of sex (present or future) off the table and that last outside case vanishes too.

The socializing/interacting aspects of the sexbots aren't threatening to her power. It's the physical, sexual aspect that is, because she knows the supply of non-woman socializing and interacting is high (i.e. other dudes) but the sex supply is limited to only women... until sexbots become mainstream, and then women no longer have the monopoly on vaginas, and thus have no purchasing power on the SMP.

The sad part is that with no shit-testing, no general craziness, etc. I can actually see sexbots being somewhat more pleasant to socialize/interact with than most women. And when you're being out-performed by a robot in social arenas, you really need to take a look at yourself(selves).

[–]JumpXVI 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Then as I said, her argument is a decade old because realdolls* have presented the same physical value that these sexbots do, just without all the bells of socialization and whistles of interaction.

Think about it—if your characterization of men is true, then a man is not going to spend thousands more** on a sexbot over a realdoll just so he can get an answer when he asks "was it good for you?"

*I'm not googling this at work or intimating I know a damn thing about realdolls

**Again, not googling at work, but I'd imagine realdolls cost a lot less

[–]chaosmech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Realdolls provide the look and the feel, but not the reaction to sex. For me at least, that was a big thing, seeing her reaction to it. That made it great. Otherwise it's simply a more attractive fleshlight.

I am, of course, assuming these future sexbots would be capable of imitating basic human interactions, specifically with regards to sex. Sure, they might not be able to have a stimulating conversation, but they also won't shit-test you. And pre-programmed female reactions to sex would fairly easy to program when compared to the nuances and complexities of a full-on conversation like the man in the article is suggesting.

A man may only really want sex, but the sex has to be realistic to be good. Yeah, sure, a RealDoll provides a nice body to look at and an accurate feeling for your dick, but until recently it couldn't react, it couldn't simulate the interaction beyond the actual genital contact, it couldn't make it real (or at least, real-ish). Now, they have basic programmable personalities and can make basic movements. In a decade, they'll probably be able to mimic the actual interactions of sex beyond just the basics. At that point, when sex with robots becomes realistic, an acceptable substitute for the real thing, then women will lose all their power.

And for the record, the realdolls with personalities and movements cost upwards of $10,000 right now, and they're only a few steps away from the fully imagined sexbots they're discussing in the article. As technology gets cheaper, the price will fall until the social stigma goes away (probably when the experience becomes real enough to gain widespread acceptance), when the demand will skyrocket the prices again.

Maybe I'll get some stocks in that industry in the near future...

[–][deleted] 5 points5 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

There is absolutely no legal basis for a ban. It would be laughed out of court.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the fact that they're asking it shows they're just a vagina mafia. it literally proves it.

[–]1Paid_Internet_Troll 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is absolutely no legal basis for a ban. It would be laughed out of court.

Alchohol was banned for a decade. Selling alcohol on Sundays is still banned in a number of states.

Those states will be the first to ban sexbots.

[–]2popthatpill 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Related: visit the link and find out which sex is more strongly opposed to legalising prostitution. You'll be shocked (not):

https://today.yougov.com/news/2012/03/23/legalization-of-prostitution/

[–]a-memorable-fancy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Women are officially in competition with voice-cued fleshlights. BRB packing my bags to get the fuck out of the west.

[–]TheSliceman 7 points8 points  (2 children)

I think we are getting a little ahead of ourselves here.

Fully immersive VR-porn will come much sooner than realistic sex-bots, and it is THAT which will instigate the change between men seeking girlfriends, wives, and hookers, to men literally going full MGTOW.

A fucking uncanny-valley-level sex-android wont exist for at least another 100 years. Fully immersive VR-porn? 15 years tops.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It already kind of exists, though "fully immersive" is very debatable on current tech.

Your point is right though. Hell, conventional porn has already substantially added to the "where r da gud menz" hysteria.

[–]TheSliceman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By fully immersive, I mean can barely tell the difference between VR and real life.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

and apps that allow them to fuck a different alpha every day of the week

I read that as: tech that allows them to pursue their sexual strategy at free will.

So if women have tech that allows them that then of course they want to deny men the same thing.

[–]2popthatpill 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Sexbots will be for the betas who are not in the top 20% and are not getting sex. Nobody cares about these people (not even themselves) so the feminists looking to legally ban sexbots will either win or make it social suicide for men to have one.

Anything that competes with the sex cartel/pussy monopoly/etc is subject to either a "hard ban" (ie. illegal to do/have) or, at a minimum, a "soft ban" (socially unacceptable).

The obvious example of a hard ban is brothels, which will never be further liberalised in the US (or probably anywhere else in the west, for that matter).

As for soft bans, take jurisdictions where brothels are legal, eg. Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany, (most of) Australia: does anyone think that having sex with a prostitute has suddenly become socially acceptable in those areas?

So, even if you somehow manage to repeal the hard bans, you're still stuck with the soft bans, because women will never approve of competition.

[–]MightyTaint 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Brothels are legal in Nevada except in Clark county.

[–]1rporion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And in all of Austria, Germany, Holland....

[–]monzzter221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may be right, but you forget that in these countries, as well as ones where whores are illegal, the guys don't care. They can keep their private lives to themselves. Can they really shame you if they don't know shit?

[–]Brave_Horatius 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't think it'll be possible to enforce a ban anyway. 3d printing is advancing in lockstep with robotics. Fifty years time you won't be buying a bot you'll be printing it after downloading the pirated schematics.

[–]whisky1111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A woman admits to masturbating and people applaud.

A man admits to masturbating and people put his name on a neighborhood watch list.

[–]Squabbles123 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Maybe if women weren't so much damn trouble, we wouldn't want a sex bot.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why change? we should double down and ban it, so we can continue to be terrible people and have the vagina edna krabopoly monopoly

[–]Kellermann 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can't wait for bitchy women to become obsolete overnight

[–]natman2939 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Her very first words bug me the most: "(this use for this tech is) undesirable and unnecessary"

Undesirable and unnecessary? According to who? If it's undesirable (as in there's no demand) then you have nothing to worry about as men clearly don't want this

But if you mean it's undesirable to you, then who the fuck are you? You don't get to decide what people should and should not want. There's been plenty of people like you forever telling people they can't play violent games or read dirty books

YOU don't have to do it, but I can sure as hell can.

Also unnecessary is completely subjective too. Just cause you don't want one doesn't mean it's unnecessary . I'm sure there's plenty of things you use that I would think are unnecessary

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And neither of those things is at all grounds for a ban.

They can't ban this in democratic, free societies (or at least societies that claim to be). So probably not going to happen in the middle east, but there is 0 legal way to stop this stuff in the u.s.

Even if they do by some miracle get a law against sex bots just look at prohibition. You can't win against the collective male sex drive.

[–]HappyScribe 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Black knight the hell out of the idea. Get women to say it's disgusting and agree - it should be banned. Only weirdos have sex with machines that look human.

Like those girls who use those realistic vibrators which look like dismembered male genitalia.

[–]2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK[S] 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Get women to say it's disgusting and agree

I would say that a lot of porn is disgusting. And for a long time many agreed. It became normalised though and now most think its fine. Whether you want to ban sexbots depends on whether you are socially libertarian or socially authoritarian. I am rather right wing and would want to ban many forms of degeneracy, but I am in a tiny minority.

What I absolutely would hate would be a hypocritical lopsided ban where beta men don't get sexbots but women are allowed everything they desire. This is the most probable thing I expect to see though, as women and betas-who-seek-to-appease-them are the majority of the population, and we are in a democracy, so they will give votes to whoever bans it.

Only weirdos have sex with machines that look human.

This is the sort of view that changes with society though. This is a majority opinion now but wait 30 years and see what people think.

[–]chaosmech 8 points9 points  (1 child)

This is the most probable thing I expect to see though, as women and betas-who-seek-to-appease-them are the majority of the population

Yes, but once the opportunity for unlimited, free (after the initial payment, anyway), no-strings-attached, disease-free, divorce-free, willing, realistic, desirable sex is available, do you really think the betas who so crave to please women won't just ditch them for Woman 2.0?

I'm not so sure.

[–]through_a_ways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this is a good point. Everything that makes men slaves to women would also make them even bigger slaves to sexbots.

"Women are wonderful" is a physical effect, and sexbots at this very moment are more physically neotenous (and thus, more worthy of sympathy) than 99% of women.

All that's left is perfecting speech, and then it's all over.

[–]2popthatpill 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I absolutely would hate would be a hypocritical lopsided ban where beta men don't get sexbots but women are allowed everything they desire. This is the most probable thing I expect to see though, as women and betas-who-seek-to-appease-them are the majority of the population, and we are in a democracy, so they will give votes to whoever bans it.

^ This.

Only weirdos have sex with machines that look human.

This is the sort of view that changes with society though. This is a majority opinion now but wait 30 years and see what people think.

That won't change, because women aren't ever going to approve of competition.

[–]Endorsed ContributorNiftyDolphin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The lynch mob will form when the oribiters and day-to-day privileges dry up.

They'll utilize the State when they find that that can no longer easily trade hope for services.

Men will help them do it too. Some incel is going to get pissed at another incel. He'll hack that guy's bot and it'll end up hurting somebody. Queue the "Think of the Children" campaign.

[–]Homestaff17 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Basically, I don't get intimidated by women using huge dildos. I won't get intimidated by a 'fucking machine' designed for women that goes on for hours either. I know it takes into account only one aspect of the above but I think the argument is nonetheless relevant.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think any of us are threatened by machines based around women use, because we know they cant replace all the things a man can do, and that women need men, men do not 'need' women. That is why you wont see men protesting pornography, stripclubs, marital aids, and you will see men innovating in sex tech, where as women will always try to prevent it.

Even tinder, which is arguably better for women than men, wont be protested by dudes, because we still believe we have a chance of fucking a chick on it, and because it wont negate us. We adapt to use it or dont... doesnt define our existence the way sex defines theirs.

[–]theHangedGod 2 points3 points  (1 child)

HAHAHAHA!! This is amazing.

What does age think gives her the right to restrict my freedom? She thinks she can decide what is and is not beneficial to society. And only when it comes to men getting what they want.

Give me liberty or give me death.

[–]MightyTaint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's lots of victimless crimes these days...

[–]xfLyFPS 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Sexbots will just go under the ground. In 10 years if sexbots do get banned, you can go on Tor and download the 3D printer parts for assembling sexbots, you'll put a Raspberry Pi inside it and install the AI and it's ready to go.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Double standards are awesome...

[–]jckiker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You guys should watch Ex Machina, great movie.

[–]SwissPablo 5 points6 points  (3 children)

It has started, the social shaming of any devices that lower the price of pussy. In a world where a man could get pleasure any time he wants with little to no effort, any men, even "creepy" ones, women would have to step their game up. But rather than doing that, they shame men who even think about this as a solution. It will get worse, the "warnings" will become more intense, change is coming, it might not be in 10 years or 50 years, but it's coming, and feminists don't like it one bit.

[–]1cover20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let them shame it. Nobody will know if I have it, if I live alone.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

But doesn't this essentially PROVE they're just a vagina monopoly?

There's no LOGICAL reason to be against this. I mean for fucks sake, it would likely cut down on creepy guys approaching them, and it would cut down on rapes. It's a huge win-win for feminists.

I thought all that cat-calling was so terrible for you? This will put an end to it. After all that's the source of all existence isn't it? Being cat-called, right?

So honestly they can't come out against this logically.

[–]SwissPablo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't need to be logical, it's all about the feelz.

[–]newls 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what roles they would play - are very disturbing indeed," she told the BBC.

Disturbing? Disturbing to whom? Just empty shaming powertalk.

In any case, there's nothing that can stop these from becoming mass-produced. There's far too much money to be made by manufacturers.

[–]1ErasmusOrgasmus 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I'm just sat here imagining a montage of all the wry smiles on the faces of every guy while reading this post.

I think there is a legit risk they would get banned though, the most likely rationale being something vague about 'breaching the moral standards of society'. And you can see how the shaming tactics would be used - any guy who came out saying there is no basis to ban them would be met with choruses of "Ewww why would you want to have sex with a machine?" and "Awww what's the matter, can get yourself a real woman so you need a robot to get you off?"

At that point it would be a real test for the beta incels as a group to see if they have the balls to stand their ground and demand access to these bots because they are the target market.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they don't, betas and many alphas will fold. Alphas are getting theirs and both will be outed, shamed and lose their jobs. All but the most alpha violent gang banger or uber-rich can afford the hit.

Plenty of money to be made on the black and grey markets though.

[–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

any guy who came out saying there is no basis to ban them would be met with choruses of "Ewww why would you want to have sex with a machine?"

Easy answer: it's probably better sex than I would get from you.

[–]rabidrabbity 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Silly arguments. You can bank on sexbots happening, first with VR and then full robots. Men are not magnanimous. Women push for marriage and commitment - not men. Women will have to change up their game or live life alone.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then we can finally see who needs who. I thought you needed a man like a fish needs a bicycle? Oh the guppy wants a Schwinn now does she? Lol

[–]Drmadanthonywayne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This clip from Futurama is remarkably on point:

https://vimeo.com/12915013

[–]watch_ping 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Many on this forum talk about a need to return to traditional monogamy

This so much. It's not going happen; give up this dream.

[–]thenarrrowpath 1 point2 points  (2 children)

This reminds me a lot of that Futurama episode with the Monroe-bot.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't you wanna be a shitlord, thenarrowpath? We can argue about how women are oppressed!

No thanks feminazi, I'd rather make out with my monroe-bot.

[–]Elodrian 1 point2 points  (6 children)

In 2 years time you will be able to use your skin cells to make either sperm or eggs, by using stem cells. This will allow same-sex couples to have biological children. This means older women will find reproduction easier (they can use surrogates too). It also makes it easier for betas to have children with supermodels. Online markets for selling cells will start to appear (maybe somebody here should do it?).

So... I could use one of my own somatic cells to create an egg cell via stem cells, and fertilize it with my own sperm cells? I guess some screening would be required to ensure you didn't get a YY gamete accidentally since half the egg cells produced would be "male". Weird to think about. It wouldn't be a clone and multiple such children wouldn't be twins thanks to heterozygosity and crossing over, but it would be a child that shares 100% of my DNA. For people that are concerned about gene survival and leaving a legacy, that's a massive improvement in efficiency over sharing your descendents' genomes with a woman.

It opens up a danger of doubling up on lethal alleles, but I assume there would be some kind of screening for genetic disorders if you're going to all the trouble of crafting offspring in the lab anyway.

Asexually reproducing humans; the future keeps looking better!

[–]What_The_Shoe 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I guess if you can remove the inbreeding factor, I might actually have a kid.

[–]UniversalFapture 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Seems cool, but I would rather have a woman bare my son

[–]What_The_Shoe 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yeah, so she can swoop in with divorce court right behind her, take the kid, and rape you with CS or alimony.

[–]UniversalFapture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck that. I'm building everything alone, and safeguarding everything I own.

Let her have her own cash so there will be no excuses

[–]LeFlamel 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The tech for gene sequencing is getting better and cheaper by the day, and a single load should have enough material to create at least one viable zygote. Throw in the possibility of designed genetics and lineage might literally become men simply having better versions of themselves. Give it another 150 years and cyber implants might allow for memory transfer, actualizing near biological immortality for our ubermensch descendents.

On the flip side, women losing their SMP value would basically mean that being born a woman offers very poor life opportunities, so the selection against daughters will be harder than the worst the Chinese one-child policy could ever muster. This might actually reduce the gender to near extinction if they fail to adapt, but I think there are more odds that eccentric single fathers choosing to have daughters as well as women's capacity to adapt to social environments will have the effect of masculinizing what little remains of their gender. The male-derived women may be groomed for superior genetics and essentially be upper class surrogates for the few who want to pay for a "real woman."

[–]Elodrian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's also interesting to think that, while a man or two men could choose to produce either a son or a daughter, a lesbian couple would still be unable to produce a son without the assistance of a man. That's... probably not a problem that will come up often in practice.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]mugatucrazypills 1 point2 points  (1 child)

if you really wanted to flip the script you'd divorce a career woman, sit on the couch, and use the palimony to pay for more sexbots.

[–]FreelanceTradeCraft 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They should unionize. Elect Whoopi Goldberg as union boss, and require women who want to get laid pay dues. Then the government would protect them when they kill scabs and sexbots that compete with their sex monopoly. Hell, they could require men obtain a license before they are eligible to procreate.

[–]tmjr01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cherry 3000...let the epic adventure begin

[–]Indigo_Monkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Women want to control the sexual marketplace. They do not give a single fuck about men who have trouble with the conventional game (pun intended).

If I could afford it, I would buy one. I cannot and will not put up with all the bullshit that comes from women with dating and in LTRs.

[–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The engineers are all over this, and they're going to get it done. And it can't be social suicide to have one, because who is gonna know? If you go out to meet live girls, zip her up in a bag and put her under a comforter or something.

The protests by some women are wishful thinking.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stories like this and the recent slacktivism from celebrity children like Lena Dunham speaking out against prostitution in any and all shapes is really just evidence that women want to control men's sexuality.

A man with access to easy, guilt free, shameless sexual fulfillment is terrifying for modern "feminists" because it is a hypocracy they know they can't womansplain away (not that they won't try their damdest). For them, a woman having lots of great, guilt free sex is liberating, while a man doing the exact same thing is predatory and abusive. If modern "feminists" lose that narrative their entire persecution complex will begin to crumble.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Extremely insightful post.

There will be a last ditch attempt to shame men into not being robosexuals, but dudes wont care what girls think anymore because they will have access to"better than the real thing" sex bots who wont divorce rape them, never get older, never cheat on them, and wont waste his money on giant "Live, Laugh, Love" banners to hang in his apartment.

Where as a dude could be totally satisfied with a sexbot, a girl never could. After all a sexbot can't provide you with status/income/validation and at the end of the day 90% of a girls relationship motives center around those incentives, where as 90% of a dudes relationship motivation is sexual, which a sexbot is likely going to be better at than real girls.

Its going to be like, "I am going to download the new superfreak patch for my sexbot. They said I could beta test "gymnastics girl" upgrade if I preorder."

[–]grachuss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope I can get a sex robot to take care of me when I'm old, instead of the home. I can get a BJ after getting my depends changed.

[–]INomYou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sexbots are the male equivalent of the birth control pill for women. For men who cant pull or dont want a "real" woman, bots will offer risk-free access to sex on demand, with no limits on whatever kinks get you off. For women, this means they cant as easily entrap a beta bucks into covert contracts of obedience/provisioning in return for starfish sex and a weak bj on his birthday.

But there is a 3rd wave after basic sexbots roll out. When convincing and affordble male gender bots that can be a womans AF by night and her BB by day arrive, and female gender bots can serve mens wants and needs with equal authenticity, all human relationships will be outoutsourceable. At that point what becomes a rare and desireable trait to attract you to a human when your personal bot can be modified to be like a guy in the 10%? It will be a fucking arms race meets the fashion industry.

It will be really fascinating to see what happens in the sex and dating marketplace then.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course, male sex-bots will be applauded by the same quarter for various sky-pie reasons, like "I know I won't be raped or beaten by it" (I bet the manufacturers will be lobbied hard for a "rough" setting, though), and "I can trust it to not drink beer and watch football LOLOLOL"

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Obviously capitalism states that these women are going to have to compete against these sex bots by offering drama free sex or offer cheaper services because let's face it they will preform the same services as a woman should without the nag or drama attached to it. I mean hell we won't have to hold frame against a robot.

Your move feminists.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

THE MISANDRY BUBBLE THE MISANDRY BUBBLE THE MISANDRY BUBBLE THE MISANDRY BUBBLE.

I'm still doing the readings so they're fresh in my head but the guy described how the scales will be shifted back and sex bots will have a huuuugggeee influence on that. Have a read if you haven't already. Seriously.

[–]monzzter221 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I know this might sound a little counter intuitive at first, but..

Can you imagine the effect this would have on your game? "I think I want to fuck a human tonight". Can you imagine the frame of man who has a perfect 10 waiting for him at home to submit to his every whim? How long do you think he would spend talking to a woman who has nothing more than a wet hole to offer him, and who has demands?

I don't know about you guys, but I wouldn't write off sex with real women. But I sure as hell would next a bitch faster than you can say " robofap".

These broads are going to have to step their game up big time. "Wanna get out of here? We can go back to my place and I'll cook you dinner and rub your feet" level game will be a requirement at a minimum.

[–]Clockshade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got this smoking hot android, 5 star chef, kung fu master, servant waiting for me back at my place. Bitch, please.

[–]Brave_Horatius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The student calling for the ban (doctoral fellow my ass, that's still a student) was on a radio show just now here in potatoland. She's utterly inarticulate, had no answers for hard questions and quell surprise also wants prostitution banned.

[–]Elodrian 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Dr Curran worries that society as a whole is ill-prepared for an age where sophisticated robotic companions are the norm.

"Have we sufficient legalisation in place for the issues that can arise in a future where robots are sufficiently advanced as to be indistinguishable from humans at first glance? Can a robot marry? Can a robot couple adopt a child?" he said.

So our species is on the threshold of creating a whole new form of life, and the first order of business is to ensure that we have denied their civil rights before they get here.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Machines are never life and will never be. Believing dead things are living belongs to the imagination of a child or a mentally disturbed person.

[–]Elodrian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To say that something is dead implies it used to be alive, which isn't the case here. I think a better word would be "inanimate". You are correct that a machine will never be "alive" in the biological sense, I was speaking poetically there. The fact that something isn't alive does not pre-clude it being concious or self-aware or possessing a mind with interiority. It is just a matter of complexity and scale. Your mind is an emergent property of your brain, an organic computer that runs on glucose. If we build a computer of sufficient complexity that a true bicameral mind emerged, you could still argue that it wasn't alive, but I don't think you could argue consistently that it wasn't deserving of civil rights without resorting to human-centric chauvenism. (Only human sentience "counts")

If that emergent intelligence gains the faculties to sustain itself and seek out goals, to contain both homeostasis and transistasis to pu it another way, I think a case could be made it is alive.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Fuck it, Deckard had the right idea when he ran off with Rachael.

[–]GregariousWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plot twist, Deckard was also a sexbot.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's tough to say. There's no doubt that technology like this is going to further the degradation of society, but certainly less than other technologies already have. That being said I'd say this technology is super important for betas, since they're being completely destroyed as it is.

[–] points points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Philhelm 31 points32 points  (5 children)

It's only gay if your robot has a penis.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sexbots will be hotter than our female primates. This fool will eat his hat.

[–]Brave_Horatius 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I holding out for the deluxe model with hot swappable groins

[–]Philhelm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want one with a penis for a nose and a vagina for a mouth. I call it, the Penicchio.

[–]gokurakumaru 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This is a glorified masturbation device. There's nothing gay about it at all.

[–]MightyYetGentle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i forgot even this sub was touchy about fags. I didn't mean an actual homosexual. I mean that is just the dumb as hell.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Do women actually give anything more than sex though? Companionship? I have friends. Good ones. Or I could get a dog. Emotional support? That's bullshit men are emotionally independent by natures, and if you have serious emotional problems that's beyond the purview of a wife that's what professionals are for. House keeping? I'm one man how much mess can I make? I'm perfectly capable of cooking and cleaning and it's not demanding time wise. Sex is the only thing a woman can give that you cannot get from your buddies or your dog.

[–]2Sepean 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And you can bet sexbots will cook and clean too

[–]monzzter221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shit, there was a time that women had to offer more than a moist hole. Now that's all they have to get their demands met by someone.

And now that they are about to have to compete with full featured flashlights the masses of women with no skills other than laying face up will be left to become crazy old cat ladies.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can it read audiobooks to my robot children too?

[–]BlackHeart89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They won't ban sex bots. Too much money to be made from it.

Women don't have even a half decent argument. Self-esteem issues? Please.

[–]kgriffen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say that post-wall women will make a great market for male sex-bots. Now then can finally be jack-hammered into 10-orgasm oblivion every night by something that looks like Brad Pitt.

[–]my_redpill_account 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man if you don't believe women are the keepers of sex after reading this you probably need a smack upside the head.

They want to force men to die alone, depressed, that can't even have one sexual desire fulfilled unless they play the provider role and beg for starfish sex. Sad.

[–]MGTOW_player 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The world has sucked a long time for men. Think...forever.

Now we have hope that within most of our lifetimes we will see a true switch in the balance of power. For the first time in human history.

Exciting times...

[–]1-800-777-GOLD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Groups of friends will raise children together

This is the norm in west Africa. The process is self limiting, society will degrade to a point that tech innovation suffers.

[–]BallisticTherapy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some guys get prostitutes as "they pay them to go away"

I always saw this as pure hamsterism. She would not even be there if you weren't paying, so you're just renting her body for the time allotted.

I don't have anything against using a pro to get the job done, but let's be honest and call it what it is.

[–]phil619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The future is now, is anyone buying roxxxy?

[–]ramot1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dildos have made men a little irrelevant to women. Now it will be time for men to have something that will make women a little irrelevant to men. Bring on the sexbots.

[–]Naveb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think sex bots are an inevitability because there will be a huge market for it. With the 80/20 rule you're looking at 80% of men being tempted to buy one at least some of the time. That's an absolutely massive market that companies are not going to overlook.

They'll put pressure on the government, if they have to, to make sure they aren't banned. Feminists be damned.

[–]bushmonster43 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a second I thought I was in r/tumblrinaction or r/singularity...

[–]TheNitromunkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the fuck do they care what people do in their free time in the privacy of their own home?

[–]RichardBelmont 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was actually covered in an anime called Chobits. Typical blue pill main character, but specifically the parts about how regular women couldn't stack up covered.

[–]King_Neptune07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hilarious about the "Asimov's Three Laws of Sexbots."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing, why would anyone want these banned? If anything this an outlet likely to reduce cases of rape and suicide.