Chicks Dig Jerks: Norwegian Terrorist Gets Love Letters In Jail

Emma the Emo writes:

That Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik is getting love letters in jail now, after killing over 70 people, most of which are teens. Psychologists theorize that women want to save/heal him somehow. If they wanted to save and provide emotional help, they could instead write letters to the victims who survived. There is no point in saving a murderer like that, it’s too late, and just gives men more reason to become murderers.

Emma is right. If “saving” or “healing” broken men was the prime motivation explaining women’s lust for assholes, then we would see women saving and healing all those unfortunate victims of a psychopath’s rampage. Not to mention, there are a lot more beatdown betas who are in need of saving via pussy therapy than there are happy-go-lucky alphas.

Which of course puts the lie to the feminist and mangina explanation for women’s attraction to jerks and thugs. While the savior complex may explain, in part, women’s craven desire, it is not the primary or sole explanation, or even a very important one. As everyday observation to those with the eyes to see demonstrates, the primary motivation is women’s love for unrepentant, rule-breaking assholes. That is the elemental, core female hindbrain algorithm that governs all other lustful dispositions and is the catalyst for her mate choice decisions.

Women love assholes because they are assholes. Because it inspires in women those emotions that most delight their pleasure centers. And that, based on the reaction it engenders from civilized men and women alike, is the truth too scary to contemplate.





Comments


  1. You’re not trying to inspire Gentile White Nationalists, are you? Voting is so beta or omega, and if it really accomplished anything that it was supposed to do, it would be outlawed has been stated before. Violence is so alpha and makes the ladies GINAS tingle. I see now the brillance of your combining GAME with White Nationalism. I see now you may be secretly making a bid to be our next leader after the violent chaotic apoclypse is finished. I thought I knew what a Citizen Renegade you were, but now my eyes are even more fully open. I mean this and this is not a joke. I do genuinely advise you, others and myself to play it right because BIG BROTHER may be watching you, me and everyone here. LOL and LMAO!!!

    Like


    • I think you’re reading too much into it.

      He’s just saying that assholes are sexy. They’re sexy for the same reason full, perky boobs are sexy. A reasonable human being can choose not to date the asshole or eschew the big boobs because they understand the long term consequences, but what turns you on at the moment is what turns you on. Dominance turns women on.

      White men stopped being sexy when they stopped being devils. When people thought you were Satan, each and every one of you a potential murdering bastard, they were imitating you instead of you imitating, say, Black men. When women knew sassing you might mean getting a backhand to the face, they respected you. When foreigners thought you might run them out of town, they weren’t so hot to move into your towns.

      So you don’t have to go on a shooting spree, just be okay with the idea of being a White devil. Draw a line. You might have to legally live with your browner citizens, but you don’t have to like them or let them impose their foreign culture on your people. Be an asshole. The women who matter will love you for it.

      Like


  2. Unfortunately my good ch, I believe in immalleability of human nature will haunt us forever. Just as women crave men like us, we crave females till the day we die. Unfortunately, in the present day, the developed governments who rule us have robbed us of any power in maintaining hand with females. Game is the only option, yet if the female calls our bluff or simply wants to test her power via the state, we always end up paying a dire price.

    What are your thoughts on the legal subjugation of males in developed society?

    Like


  3. on September 28, 2011 at 11:01 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    lzozozlzlzozlzlzozozl

    womenz conservative womenz like neocon charlotte allen learned educated conservaitve wome like charlotte allen see tucker max rhymes with goldamn sax the asscocker and secretive taper of asscocking and bully as a “six foot tall” (repetating the asscokers pr lies) heroic sexual alpha lzozllzozo while charlotte allen and the neocon wekely standadddth ignores the true men dying on fiat wars on foreign shores zlzoozozoz as they publish promote hype and tucker max rhymes with godl man asax lzozlzllzlzlzl

    http://eumaios.wordpress.com/2010/06/02/gbfm-code-the-symbology-and-terminology-of-great-books-for-men/

    Ben Bernanke : a symbol for central banks. Particularly, the rotating cabal of figureheads for the central banks.

    Tucker Max : a symbol for the kind of asshole alpha women lust for, lose their innocence to, and in GBFM’s piquant phrasing, invite in for a good asscocking.

    Charlotte Allen : a symbol for ostensibly good, virtuous, conservative women, especially the older ones who should know better.

    charlotte,

    please allow me to draw your attention to usmc Corporal Jason L. Dunham.
    http://www.jasonsmemorial.org/about.html

    “On April 14, 2004, 3 days after Easter Sunday, Corporal Dunham was manning a checkpoint in Karabilah, Iraq, when an insurgent leapt from his car and began choking Corporal Dunham. A scuffle ensued as two Marines approached to help. Reportedly, the last words from Corporal Dunham were, “No, No. Watch his hand.” Suddenly, the insurgent dropped a grenade. Corporal Dunham took off his Kevlar helmet, dropped to the ground, and covered the explosive as best he could.

    The blast seriously wounded all 3 Marines. Eight days later, Corporal Jason L. Dunham died at Bethesda Naval Hospital from wounds he received in the incident. He was 22. ”

    now the funny thing is that to the neocons the greater hero is Tucker Max, even though true heroes such as jason et al. are dying in the neocons’ war.

    Now our foxy Ms. Allen could have used the precious space in the Weekly Standard to give a shout out to a true American hero–Corporal Jason L. Dunham.

    But instead, she regurgitates tucker’s lies and corporate PR, as douchebaggery makes aging neocon’s ginas tingle, while true american heroism leaves them dry:

    “Tucker Max, 33, six feet tall, extrovertedly good-looking, and usually photographed latched to a girl, a bottle of booze, or a cheeseburger, is an honors graduate (in three years) of the University of Chicago. He has a law degree from Duke University, whose admissions committee was so impressed with his academic record that it awarded him an academic scholarship. . . Max is famous as a blogger (tuckermax.com), and his website is replete with stories like the ones above, all involving graphically rendered bedroom exploits (if your definition of bedroom includes vans, offices, and the great outdoors), massive quantities of alcohol, and copious vomiting. He is the author of several books, including The Definitive Book of Pickup Lines (2001, out of print but selling for close to $200 on Amazon), the 2006 blockbuster I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which spent more than 100 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, and the forthcoming Assholes Finish First. Beer in Hell, a dramatization of some of his website yarns, became an indie movie hit in college towns last fall. ”

    Tucker lies about his height & success & films buttsex without the woman’s consent, and thus the weekly standard exalts him, while rejecting and ignoring all those true heroes jumping on grenades in their war.
    http://www.quotabletuckermax.com/

    tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com/

    Like


  4. on September 28, 2011 at 11:05 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    womenz womenz love to publish, promote, publish, promote pump assockers and serctive tapers of asscoekckckers which is why the fed created the fmeinist movement to exalt asscoking the art of asscockcing and secrteive tapings of asscocoksisngs to new heaghts slzozlzl

    short beta men rose fast in teh unievristy as they were handed fiat bernanke cash fronm helicopter ben and they used it to surrpound themselves with syocphantic harems of womenze as all teh betas love honor worship tucker max their ultimate master because he rhymes with goldman sax and also he butthexes girls and films it woithout teh girlths ocnthent and the weekly stanadrd neocns repeat his lies lzozlzlzlzzl that he is six foot tall zlozzlzllzlzlzlzl honoring their #1 butthexual hero lzozlzlzl

    so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:

    http://community.feministing.com/2009/09/why-are-female-executives-publ.html

    Why are Female Executives Publishing Tucker Max?

    Saw this floating around. good question!

    MCCOY MOUNTAIN
    ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

    Ms. Priscilla Painton

    Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief

    RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Dear Ms. Painton,

    I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

    http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

    “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com

    http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

    Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

    –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

    http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system

    Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

    –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/

    “OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml

    Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

    Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

    “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

    What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/

    It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

    “Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

    So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?

    ” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.

    “Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/

    “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”

    It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .

    Best,

    McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD

    –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?

    the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

    What’s up with women these days?

    It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

    Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster

    http://gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster

    Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?

    Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?

    http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Does she get off on this?

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”

    Is that supposed to be funny?” –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:

    http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html

    http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html

    http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml

    “11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

    [I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

    [To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

    [To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

    [To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

    [To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

    11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

    Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

    ‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton

    http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html

    “What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”

    See? That is the clever banker ruse.

    Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.

    http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

    “A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
    and Government’s War on Fathers”

    “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

    The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

    –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

    “My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

    Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
    “I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

    What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

    End the Fed

    Review for End The Fed
    “Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
    –Arlo Guthrie

    “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

    The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

    Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?

    And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

    “Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

    http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798

    Like


  5. Let these women all marry him–and bring back sati.

    Like


  6. How much do you want to bet that if only Norweigian teenage girls and women in their 20’s were allowed to vote that Anders Behring Breivik would win the top elected post in Norway?

    There is a precedent as Adoph Hitler was more popular among women than men when he was elected. I bet Mao Tse Tung and Joseph Stalin would have been more popular too if they had real elections like Hitler did. Men aren’t as impressed by killers, douchebags and assholes, but women are more so generally speaking. Women vote to get the governement to be the real man in their lives by supporting women and crushing real human men while often choosing the most murderous bastards in history. there’s a reason why Heartiste has said in the past that it was a bad idea to allow women the vote. He’s right especially if they never have to accept full responsibility by even registering for selective service for the military draft like American men must.

    Like


  7. on September 28, 2011 at 11:13 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    i lozzozzozozlz that i may not weep — patrick henry lzozlzozozoz

    Like


  8. It’s really scary that Breivik is getting love letters :S

    I love assholes because they behave very naturally, and they seem to be more “alive” than most people. That’s what’s attractive, not rule-breaking, lying or psychopathy. I love people who listen to their heart and assholes seem to be like that.

    Like


  9. first fuck yeah wake up white man

    Like


  10. Female hypergamy plus female abdication of any sense of personal responsibility are combining to put a very big nail in our civiliation’s coffin.

    Like


    • So what. Based on Victorian, Edwardian, and literature going back to Herodotus, they’ve always been that way.
      They like big, strong, swaggering bad boys – so.take a look down there – there should be two of ’em – find them and use them.
      They’re not going to change, nor are they aware that their preference for assholes is destructive – so be a bit more of an asshole. They’ll adore you.

      Like


    • no – it’s just hypergamy, period. Abdication of responsibility is one of many consequences of hypergamy. Hence my diatribes here against hypergamy.

      And don’t forget the hypergamy test: a woman can claim to have overcome hypergamy only when she wilfully sleeps with men she finds UNattractive.

      Like


    • dunno whats funnier: your prose or your visual. PS sucking in gut provides only temporary relief HTH

      Like


    • Can’t wait for Mad Max to be real… thank you, entitled selfishness.

      Like


    • True, but I don’t think western men can escape any responsibility here.

      I mean seriously, we let it get this bad.

      Like


  11. on September 28, 2011 at 11:24 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    lozozolzozloz

    Florida Teen Murder Suspect Says She’s a Vampire
    Admits drinking blood of fiance
    http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/weird/Florida-Teen-Murder-Suspect-Says-Shes-a-Vampire-130691733.html

    our leading neocon conservative women are trianing our girls to worship and adore asscokers and secrative tapers of asscocking like tucker max rhymes with goldman sax and vampires (who suck the blood just like goldman sachs sucks the welath zlozlzlz) lzozlzozozo

    http://townhall.com/columnists/miriamgrossmanmd/2008/12/08/what_girls_want_an_edward_cullen_to_love_them/page/full/

    “American girls have a new heartthrob: a tall, gorgeous vampire who is in the eleventh grade. He thirsts for the blood of Bella, his human girlfriend, but learns to “just say no.”

    What is it about Edward Cullen, the male protagonist of the blockbuster Twilight series, that sends girls from Atlanta to Anchorage swooning? I asked three teen girls I know.

    Nava is 14. “He’s cute, and he’s really nice to Bella.”

    Kayla is 16. “He’s caring, and genuine. He expresses his love, and risks his life to protect her. And he’s handsome.”

    Tanya is 19. “Edward loves Bella and wants to be with her forever, so he controls himself. The self-discipline is very hard on him, but seeing her hurt would be even worse.”

    Not bad, huh? Now if only the professionals running our country’s sex education could figure that out. Because that’s what the Twilight craze is about: a guy who adores his girl so much, he’ll do anything to protect her. A guy who won’t allow his girl to get hurt, even if it means saying “no” to himself. That’s what girls want.” –NEOCON Miriam Grossman, M.D.

    lozozozozozlzlz

    false rape accusations from vampires:
    http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/weird/Florida-Teen-Murder-Suspect-Says-Shes-a-Vampire-130691733.html

    An 18-year-old Florida girl accused of helping lure a 16-year-old boy into a fatal trap says she’s a vampire who has drunk the blood of her boyfriend.

    Stephanie Pistey confirmed assertions by police in Parker, Fla., that the people involved in the July murder of 16-year-old Jacob Hendershot were in a vampire cult. Pistey, who was arrested last Monday and charged with accessory to murder, said she sees herself as a modern day Dracula.

    “Since I was like 12 every fiber in my body, basically everything, I know this is going to be crazy, but I believe that I’m a vampire and part werewolf,” Pistey told WBBH-TV.

    Police initially believed the boy was lured to a home and beaten to death because Pistey accused him of raping her. Now it is unclear what the motive was.

    “Jacob didn’t deserve to die. I didn’t even know he was going to die, but I honestly knew that they were going to beat him up and in my opinion he deserved to get the s*** beat out of him. He didn’t deserve to die,” Pistey said in an interview Monday.

    http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/weird/Florida-Teen-Murder-Suspect-Says-Shes-a-Vampire-130691733.html

    Like


  12. Whenever I’ve been able to get women in my life to reluctantly admit that a lot of them go for assholes, they provide one of only two reasons:

    The woman has such low self-esteem (caused by men of course) that she doesn’t feel she’s worth any better than a scumbag man.
    OR
    She is victim to her nurturing, maternal instinct and merely wants to change this misunderstood beast into a kind and gentle man.

    Now of course they never go up to the woman in question and actually ask her why she is with the bad boy – that would be too honest. Instead, they use all this conjecture to postulate on the reasons.

    Both reasons are utter bullshit, and cannot stand up to logical examination.

    If the cause was low self-esteem, then of course these women would not feel they deserve the bad boy leader of the pack type that every other girl wants. They would feel they deserve the less desirable men, i.e. the betas.

    If the cause was the nurturing instinct, they would more frequently turn this instinct to the men who are most in need of fixing – the ones who can’t get laid – again, the betas.

    Next time you hear the same old BS from women about how their asshole-loving motives are pure, pin them down on it. As usual the truth is the polar opposite of their mouthings:
    Their self-esteem is way way too high, and this is why they want to out-compete their girlfriends for the bad-boy leaders.
    and
    Their instinct is not to nurture, but to destroy, and this is why they relish living vicariously through a violent, destructive man.

    Like


  13. now i know why ross jeffries failed me… he helped my confidence , but he failed to trigger the asshole in me…. any tips, all i gte from this wonderful blog is that i have to be somehow the funloving asshole in front of women, ,, some how niceness is flowing thru my circuits…. any methods?? any advice…? thanks, your help will be deeply apreciated.

    Like


  14. First!
    True words. If women wanted to save broken men, they would have sex with the betas and try to ‘bring out’ the alpha in them. But Nahhhh they fuck the murderers and psychopaths. Why? Cuz they got more balls than the average Joe

    Like


  15. Yeah, it’s not so much about “saving” or “healing” broken men as it is “love for a warrior.”

    Like


  16. That’s not to say that “saving” or “healing” broken men is not something women don’t do. They do, when that man is alpha in some way. For example, a girl with prospects shocking up with an alcoholic bar band guitarist.

    Like


    • that’s right – women never want to save or heal betas!

      Let’s use their own weakness against them: Game’em, Pump’em, Dump’em.

      Like


  17. This is just one more piece of evidence that proves the obvious. I think this man’s principle motivation to defeat cultural Marxism had more to do with men being displaced in their traditional roles as paterfamilias and its leading to his inability to assume that role in his own life. He feels this was stolen from him by cultural Marxism. I think the anti-immigration stance he took and ranted about were red herrings compared to the issue of being frustrated in his desire to start a family and most importantly, to be in charge of that family. This blog has discussed this issue before when the man in China went ona rampage out of frustration at his inability to find a woman for a family. Too bad Anders can’t capitalize on his new found power over women.

    Like


    • “Too bad Anders can’t capitalize on his new found power over women.”

      It’s Norway so he can. Unless he gets treated unlike an average murderer, the Norwegian state will provide him and whichever of his admirers he chooses a comfortable private room and a big bed.

      Most likely they’ll isolate him first to avoid scandal and in a few years he’ll be more like a regular prisoner enjoying a schedule of sex and TV in comfort.

      Like


    • He doesn’t seem to have had much of a desire to start a family, which he could likely have done at any time. He comes from an affluent family and it appears that he was quite popular with women already.
      Of course you’re right when you suspect that the political reasons he states are not the true reasons for his actions, because those would have to be much more personal. My guess is that an unemployed muslim immigrant stole his girlfriend, and he couldn’t get over it. It happens a lot, because Norwegian men have exactly zero game.

      Like


      • I would submit that despite popularity with women, he saw them all as unworthy because their heads were filled with the usual socialist double talk so popular in Europe, especially in Scandinavia. He spent a lot of time with his mother for instance and likely felt that none of the modern women he met lived up to her somehow, I’m guessing. Anders saw too little support for a traditional way of life in Europe. People are free to live that way in Europe and usually do, but what was missing for him, I believe, was the lack of the state’s endorsement of the traditional way of life. The active denigration of that way of life in favor of all the usual left wing alternatives is what bothered him most I think. He wanted to be a paterfamilias and have the social respect he felt was due men for that role. Men who are husbands and fathers today are generally reduced to a state of chumpage and servitude to feminist ispired women. I was impressed at how well he targeted his enemies. He knew what he was doing.

        Like


    • Except “cultural Marxism” is not people. Only people are people. Who are the people responsible for “cultural Marxism”?

      I think the anti-immigration stance he took and ranted about were red herrings compared to the issue of being frustrated in his desire to start a family and most importantly, to be in charge of that family.

      Everything can reduce to that. Scientists build a telescope, an Afghan blows himself to bits, Breivik shoots up a lefty camp — their libido wasn’t pacified by pairbonding! Yet the Norwegian left is destroying their nation with abortion, feminism and non-white immigration.

      Like


  18. First! (I’m hoping)

    Like


  19. Women have such a warped selection hamster; it’s amazing civilization occurred at all.

    With thug witchdoctors getting pussy thrown at them, the jealous nerdbetas were motivated to create “culture and society” out of increasingly sophisticated mud huts with more lavish furnishings.

    Thus inducing women to give up the “wisdom” of pure thug attraction and hop on their other, perfected noble endeavor: golddigging.

    Like


  20. That guy shouldn’t be kept alive, nor his programmers. It’s funny the way things go – everyone talked about Tanya Harding (perp), but not Nancy what’s her name (victim).

    Like


  21. Source? Can’t find anything on Google relating to this.

    Like


  22. BAM! That may also explain how fellow Norwegian Varg Vikernes was able to have a wife and start a family while in prison for murdering Euronymous.

    Now he’s out of prison and making shitty albums.

    Like


  23. on September 28, 2011 at 12:17 pm Chris from Dublin

    Incredible but true.
    Difficult to acknowledge for some.

    That Norse arsehole did a terrible crime though

    Like


  24. on September 28, 2011 at 12:24 pm Recovering Nice Guy

    “Too scary to contemplate” is an understatement. Maybe we should stop talking about this stuff.

    Seriously, if most guys understood what attracts women, our world would become a waking nightmare.

    Like


  25. Or maybe, it just inspires som of them becuase just some of them are drawn to such extreme psychopatic, badboys. You are generalizing to hard.

    Oh, I almost forgot to say it.
    First.

    Like


  26. i can’t help but picture the women writing these letters as leather-faced (with matching motorcycle jacket), hopelessly trying to contain their smokers cough while reading over their confessions

    Like


    • By and large, it is the hottest chicks that go for the killers, because the hotter they are, the more beta all regular males are. Similarly, most western white converts to Islam are fertile age single hot chicks.

      Like


      • on September 28, 2011 at 4:44 pm So, Do the Zonk

        I saw first-hand a woman prison guard who sacrificed her career to f*ck a serial rapist in the prison she was supposed to be guarding. She was an solid 8, slim, blond. You can’t make this stuff up.

        Like


      • Here is an example of why I say that women lube up for rape in order to facilitate impregnation. It’s not just to prevent tearing.

        Women want rapist babies.

        Like


      • You read it here first, volks!

        xsplat is so xtreme i want to off myself

        Like


      • Really? A WOMAN guarding a MALE prisoner? And a “solid 8” (are there hollow 8’s?) working as a prison guard?

        Links.

        Like


      • exactly. And not a single female commenter on this blog dare take any of those hotties on – because only those with low SMV read the manosphere.

        The hotties are drunk on their power, and nothing in our society will stop them. Now we realize the wisdom of the ancients – this is why all women should be enslaved.

        Like


      • Hotties only have power because you acknowledge that power and let it control you. The essence of game in my opinion is to overcome that sense of awe at a woman’s beauty. It happens anyway after you’ve slept with enough women.

        Like


      • @Tyrone:

        I was not referring to any hottie’s power over a gamer – as we all know, no hottie has such power when you have options, including other hotties.

        The point is that with the armies of AFCs and betas out there, the hotties are drunk on the power of the attention they get from them. And it is these hotties that go for the killers. And there is no societal shaming of this terrible instinct – hypergamy is very destructive, and over the last decade and a half, women have gone beserk chasing it. Women seem to think that it is their god-given right to have an attractive man – they dont get it that most of them can only get commitment from an UNattractive man (sex they can get from an attractive alpha, but then they will promptly be dumped, I am talking about commitment). But it is more than that – without a man and a woman in a committed relationship, we lose the institution of family. Our major social institutions, including law, government, etc are founded on family. If there is no family, society itself gives way. Women, in their unrestrained pursuit of hypergamy, have gleefully destroyed family, without thinking about the consequences. When the consequences come (and some of those are already here), they will hurt countless women pretty badly. As witness, think about how many women are being pumped and dumped by readers of this blog alone!

        Like


      • Vote Taliban.

        Like


      • Hi –

        >
        Similarly, most western white converts to Islam are fertile age single hot chicks.
        >

        Could you cite a source please? I’ve never seen anything indicating that demographic was the biggest source of Western converts. Although considering the topic of this post, in view of the fact that the “prophet” Mohammed wasn’t exactly a decent human being, I wouldn’t be surprised if this were the case.

        I really hope the only lovin’ that Johnny Jihad Walker Lindh is getting in prison is in the form of a 10″ lethal weapon in prison, preferably one covered with herpes and genital warts.

        Like


      • He was queer anyway or at least wavering that way. That boy was just confused. I feel a bit sorry for him. His father was gay and left the family. I think it messed with his head big time.If his father hadn’t failed him, he would likely have not had an affair with a Pakistani boy and followed him to Kandahar. He’d just be some regular guy in California most likely.

        Like


      • Sometimes life provides no “source” but long observation of trends.

        I’ve seen it myself. Go nose about some Islamic dating sites — compare the m-f ratio of converts, you will find more females, usually in the UK but often enough in the Midwest. Why do they convert? Either to abrogate their filthy past, or as the chaste homebody’s equivalent of the bar slut’s submission to random alpha posturing, the need for authority.

        Same as dogs.

        Why do not more men convert? Because there’s no sexual reward given the strictures not just on out-breeding, but breeding altogether, among the most prevalent Islamic races. Which has also been proposed as a rationale for male suicide bombers. No access to fertile women.

        I really hope the only lovin’ that Johnny Jihad Walker Lindh is getting in prison is in the form of a 10″ lethal weapon in prison, preferably one covered with herpes and genital warts.

        Your sadism is noted.

        Like


      • Yeah, maybe all men are afraid of them except the psychos. Maybe even alphas are afraid of perfect 10s?

        “Similarly, most western white converts to Islam are fertile age single hot chicks”

        I think that Islam is not necessarily a bad idea for women – I was surprised when I saw this study (from 2005): http://www.scribd.com/doc/8008938/Sex-and-the-Modern-Women (see page 9).

        “The Bayer study examined women’s satisfaction with
        their sex lives and how they would like to improve it.
        81% of women are satisfied to some extent with their sex lives.Of these, 45% are very satisfied while 36% are somewhat satisfied. Saudi Arabian women
        are the most satisfied overall (92%)and have the greatest number reporting that they are very satisfied (64%). By contrast, Turkish women are least
        satisfied overall (65%)with just 32% very satisfied with their sex lives.”

        Like


  27. on September 28, 2011 at 12:34 pm Order of The Hand

    First!

    Like


  28. The collapse of the West continues…

    Like


  29. I think this is true, but women also are attracted to the notoriety. There are a lot of asshole alpha guys in prison for stealing, assault and other less interesting offenses. I doubt they get nearly the fan mail that the murderers do.

    Like


  30. I’d be interested in finding out if murderers who kill women get more prison letters than murderers who kill men. I’d guess that they do, which is a corollary to your argument.

    Women love assholes – especially men who are assholes to other women.

    Like


  31. That dumb ass explanation is also efficient to keep betas in their pedestalizing delusions. “Women are caretakers, women want to heal us evil creatures, women are wonderful, oh my god i’m gonna cry”.

    If only they knew…

    Like


  32. Probably doesn’t hurt that he looks like a Nordic SS officer. There’s a reason (related to the subject of this and the last post) that male fascist imagery remains a highly charged sexual fetish for women and gays (not unrealted to police images): raw, unapologetic masculine energy.

    Like


  33. And here is a media source:

    http://www.friatider.se/nu-strommar-karleksbreven-in-till-breivik

    and after popping it into Google Translate:

    Why mass murderers, rapists and so on attract women, there is no real answer to, despite all the tax billion annually spent on gender studies.

    – There are a lot of women who are attracted by criminal men who have done extreme things, like rape and murder, says researcher Thore Langfeldt to VG.

    – What lies behind the attraction to criminals men is not known, he notes.

    Like


  34. Based on my internet readings about women psychology (mostly from this blog), I decided to perform experiences with violent foreplay and post-coital aloofness. 3 tests so far. 3 women in love.

    Like


  35. He also displayed a number of characteristics that women desire; strength, determination, motivation, cunning, independanceemotional detachment. Not to mention that he’s also famous now.

    Like


  36. Pure, raw power… the power to take lifes, thats what its all about, power. Almost too fundamental to take serious but thats all this life is about. Everything else is a derivate of this simple truth. Read machiavelli, study the ancient italian families, or just (european) history.

    If people claim it’s different it’s just a different strategy, a deception.

    Like


    • This is also even more true when you read a lot of ancient history and realize killing back then involved being a serious badass. Even betas in the Roman line were tough as shit and very capable with a sword.All of us today are opussies in comparison to what the average legionnaire had to do in a day’s work. Raping and pillaging until the blood flowed in the streets up to one’s ankles and selling captives into slavery. Read about Sulla’s sack of Athens. That gives the women gina tingles at a very primieval level.Sulla got a LOT of pussy.

      Like


      • I always preferred Sulla to Caesar. You don’t read about Sulla dangling grapes before an Egyptian queen and not reproducing. Sulla was all Roman — sanguine lust to rule. Italians feared the name “Sulla” more than anyone feared “Caesar”, whom, they knew, could be moved to make treaty. Caesar, don’t forget, was also an anti-Sulla Marian. Populist heroes are not beta, but compared to a ravishing dictator like Sulla, they present something fundamentally weaker.

        Even Adolf ditched populism for war.

        Like


    • Or skip all the boring Renaissance history and just read Nietzsche.

      Like


  37. It makes one wonder… is there such a thing as being too much of an asshole?

    Like


  38. on September 28, 2011 at 1:37 pm Wu-Tang Financial

    Check the ending “we’ll save ourselves for you”!

    Like


    • Excellent! I was hoping someone had posted this, and if not, I would have.

      I hope you all check out his other 5 vidz, they are brilliant 🙂

      Like


  39. I wonder if women who write to murderers tend to be particularly submissive. I’m thinking yes. I should probably seek these women out, because I’ll bet they’d let me do some *really* kinky stuff with them.

    Although . . . from what I’ve see, these ladies aren’t exactly homecoming queens . . .

    Like


  40. MGTOW

    Like


  41. The above interview with a serial killer groupie is interesting, if only for the fact that she seems at least as deranged and frightening as her murderous boyfriends.

    I have a theory about killer groupies. Although the stereotype that “women are less violent than men” is thrown around without examination, I don’t think it’s entirely true. I think there’s an equal number of men and women per capita with latent sadistic/destructive urges; women just lack the testosterone-based aggression to act on them as often. These women will instead attach themselves to dangerous men in order to experience the vicarious frisson of eroticized violence. They get all the thrill and none of the consequences, like eager remora attached to the great white alpha sharks.

    Women like this would have no interest at all in betas, and in fact would probably harbor a subconscious desire to kill them. The sad irony is that they actually create more serial killers. How much pussy do you think a bitter introvert like Breivik was getting before his crimes?

    Listen to to the ecstatic tones of her voice as she rhapsodizes over her boyfriends’ evil crimes. Does anyone doubt that Sondra London wishes she could go on a killing spree herself?

    Like


  42. This raises the question of where the line is between genuinely civilized women who see the civilization-destroying aspects of bad boys and the women who just can’t help themselves and go for the rule-breakers. It seems that the line has shifted a long way since the sixties. There just aren’t as many women left who grasp the big picture.

    Like


  43. I’m not sure about that Breivik guy, specifically, maybe they’ve just read his manifesto and share his vision?
    I know I was impressed.

    He does a lengthy critique of feminism and it’s contribution to the decline of western civilization in there, how it facilitates and enables the downturn of society et cetera.

    He’s all for women staying in the kitchen and getting married and being monogamous to their husband and looking after the children and fulfilling their traditional role to uphold modern civilization; the way it was before it became the ‘modern’ civilization we have now, that is.

    Those are admirable positions – personally, I can see why smart, reasonable women would be attracted to the theoretical cornerstones of his worldview and all that thought and research he put into it, even if the action he believes beneficial to furthering that worldview, aka gunning down teenagers, are obviously extreme.

    Like


  44. Wait . . . I wonder if there’s a way you can *pretend* to be a prisoner convicted of murder. Get one of those private Mailboxes and place an ad in whatever magazine it is that these women use to look for their dreamboats. (I’d avoid food magazines.)

    Then as the letters start pouring in, you could could just copy and paste the replies for all 10 or 20 girls who write you, substituting their names in the appropriate places. Talk about how you don’t understand why it is that you do the things you do. “I guess it’s just how I am. This rage builds up inside me and . . . “ And then after a few letters, be sure to say, “It’s so nice to finally find someone who understands me. It’s like . . . we get each other.”

    I’ll bet that as you describe how lonely you are, they’ll start sending lots of explicit pictures of themselves. Surely one of them must be decent. (Like I said, avoid advertising in the food magazines.)

    Then, after a couple months, pick a decent one and tell her you’ve “escaped.” Have her meet you somewhere where you can bang her. Might as well have her bring money, too. You know, because you just escaped from prison and all.

    Like


    • You are one sick sonofabitch.

      Sounds like a plan.

      Like


    • no – game is easier, here’s why.

      Women have incredibly fine tuned radar to separate a real killer from a fake. Just as we men can see every wrinkle on a woman’s face at 2 parsecs, they can x-ray our confidence in 1 second.

      This is why betas find it so hard to learn game and also why “fake it till you make it” is necessary. Still, Game is easier to learn than acting like a murderer.

      Like


    • This couldve been a Seinfeld episode!

      Like


  45. So basically those windowless “book stores” a thousand feet from schools and churches on the outskirts of town were only needed for the men and their sick fantasies. We have always had prisons for the girls. Though, if I may, I suggest new zoning laws to encourage these book stores to build adjoining structures to type of glory hole the ladies really want.

    Like


  46. Same with Ted Bundy, Rodriguez and half the serial killers on earth.

    Women are strange.

    Like


  47. My eternal vision of women gets a little more disgusting every time I hear something like this.

    Like


    • don’t think anyone cares about your laughable generalizations. and im sure those women will get over you- in time….

      Like


      • Well, they will get over you first. Because assholes like him are usually busting their nuts in the wives of beta schlubs like you.

        Like


  48. Excellent point Fred. That is what I am seeing as well. Society-wide abdication of female accountability. There are exceptions to the rule and in speaking of large social tendencies there has to be generalization, but by and large women are quitting marriages and breaking up families, and using every legal manuever (including false rape and molestation allegations) to leverage men into paying for their selfish decisionmaking. And even when caught and their agenda exposed, they get a slap on the wrist. It’s pretty unbelievable. Men are left as the only party willing to advocate for the family and children, and often they don’t give a shit either. We are literally self-destructing from the family unit up, not the top down.

    Like


  49. It’s not complex. Women just like high testosterone, its that simple. Nothing says high testosterone like killing over 70 people. Very few low T men have the guts to do something like that. Beta’s simply have to grab their balls and execute men like Anders without remorse, socially shame women for chasing thugs, and keep them in line like they did back in the day.

    Someone has to be in the dominant position because men and women are never going to be equal. Society is always gonna be rigged advantageously toward males or females. Id say it needs to be shifted back toward male control, as we can see a society set up to favor women over men is destroying civilization. Eh, thats probably what women want. To go right back to the jungle so they can live in the Alphas harem and eat bananas and grapes with him alll day.

    Like


    • Woman is The Nigger of the World

      Like


    • “Id say it needs to be shifted back toward male control, as we can see a society set up to favor women over men is destroying civilization. Eh, thats probably what women want. To go right back to the jungle so they can live in the Alphas harem and eat bananas and grapes with him alll day.”

      This this this.

      People fail to realize that civilization stands in defiance of nature. The most successful civilizations harnessed and channeled our base biological instincts into productive endeavors. Shaming sluts, beating the shit out of thugs and cads, making sure men could head families and therefore have stake in society were all means to fully utilize the potential of the population. Its one of the reasons Britain and the US did so well (and why they are starting to fall apart now). Why fight and die to preserve the sultan’s harem? Why innovate and make new technologies if the king is just going to creampie your bride anyway? Why work hard in school and contribute to society just to have your wife get spunked by the unemployed guy with a sleeve tattoo?

      Achilles said fuck it when they took away his women. How much more so will modern man?

      Like


    • Women who actually live in jungles, have been known to pick up and leave with even the lowest of betas, if given the option.

      What’s wrong with the West, is not that women somehow magically metamorphosed into something hitherto unseen, but rather that men did. Women simply follow, that’s how their wired. They try their best to live up to what the men they look up to expect of them. No more, no less.

      So when some men, those with above average abilities to convince women, decided it would be advantageous for them personally, in their battle against other men, to recruit women as voters, women just did their thing and followed the alpha. But note that this is a positive feedback loop, where those with even a slight initial edge, are then able to use that to further stack the deck in their favor.

      What differentiates a civilized people from one not so, is specifically that men in the former don’t let this feedback loop run too far away. Or, more applicable to the West’s current predicament, quit harboring qualms about ripping up and destroying the entirety of the edifice that the accidental “elites” have ensconced themselves behind, should they find themselves in a place where the feedback loop already has. Afghanistan is an example of the former, Somalia of the latter. Men in both countries displaying virtues long lost in the post civilized West; which goes a long way towards explaining why the West is in decline, while Islam is the current heir to the world.

      As for Behring Breivik, while he may well have been scum, what are then the victims’ parents, who not only sent their kids away to an Island unprotected, but whose idea of parenting didn’t even include instilling in their own children the bare minimum self defense and preservation abilities? After all, a parent is responsible for the safety of his child; Anders Behring Breivik is not.

      Like


      • “As for Behring Breivik, while he may well have been scum, what are then the victims’ parents, who not only sent their kids away to an Island unprotected, but whose idea of parenting didn’t even include instilling in their own children the bare minimum self defense and preservation abilities?”

        The bare mininum of self defense and preservation abilities? They were unarmed and completely unprepared for the massacre. Breivik was heavily armed and had been in training for 10 years.

        Also, you seem to conveniently forget that most of these young people DID survive: By jumping in to the icy cold water and embarking on the long swim towards the main land, by swimming into caves and hiding there, by hiding under beds and remaining quiet as their friends were slaughtered around them.

        Like


    • Excellent summary.

      Like


  50. If you read Breivek’s manifesto (which gets very interesting in the end, where there are a lot of diary-style entries) you’ll see he went to Prague to try to score weapons, and bedded a few girls while staying at a youth hostel there.

    Sincerely,

    – crimesofthetimes.com

    Like


  51. “There is no point in saving a murderer like that, it’s too late, and just gives men more reason to become murderers.”

    The usual delusional female. She believes love letters are enough to become a terrorist. With such ego she could fill a dirigible.

    Like


    • You only go for 21 years in jail in Norway, and they can’t legally kill you. Later on, you can be allowed to be visited and have sex with your fans, if you have those (and he obviously has), so it’s not just love letters. Not the greatest strategy for most men, but some will be desperate enought to try it. Are you saying women loving killers doesn’t contribute at all to how men behave?

      Like


  52. Women like assholes because assholes appear to rise above the conventional rules of society. Women see violations of these conventions as indicators of power, and power as an index of superiority.

    In short, women love the strong horse.

    Now combine this with woman’s love of vicarious experience. They love to attach themselves to strong horses, if only in their imagination (or from outside prison), so they don’t have to do the strong horse’s work themselves. Their deepest impulse is for a strong horse to “take” them — and then to be free to be maternal, loving, and decorative. I know quite a few high-powered women, and they all, every one of them, express this as their deepest longing.

    Because to a woman, loneliness is death.

    All of this dovetails nicely with their ever-present princess complex, which makes them believe they should get the strong horse because they “deserve” it. Personally, I think this complex isn’t a bad thing necessarily — it helps some women stay slim and accomplished — but a problem soon arose:

    Feminism came, gelded the strong horse, and turned women against their own desires.

    It’s no surprise women are confused. They still experience the ancient tingle, but they are told not to like the men that produce them. They lash out at weaker horses, the betas (who are also brainwashed). At the same time, women are told to worship the tingle itself, to the point of ridicule. They are told that motherhood and homemaking are at odds with a healthy sense of self. They do supposedly strange things, like fall in love with strong horses who just happen to be in prison. They spend a lot of money on cats, to which they pitiably turn for comfort. They eat (a lot) as form of emotional therapy. They band together out of panic, to “support” one another. They vote for idiotic policies and putatively messianic, strong horse politicians. In all of this, they are powered by little hamster wheels of denial and rationalization rather than their deepest longings.

    Somewhere along the line, women traded the horses of desire for the hamsters of denial.

    America at least is full of the sound of their squeaking.

    The coming Depression might help set things to rights by making it perfectly clear that men are the strong horses they need after all. But who knows.

    Like


  53. At first I read it as “Women love assholes because they(women) are assholes.”

    Like


  54. You should examine your ideal of the bad boy. Outside this blog, in reality, the bad boy you worship is a garbage collector. Did you really think it could be that easy? That you could selfishly achieve anything of value by surrendering your ‘self’ to the impotence of evil? The real man is the self-made man, the man who embodies the virtue of selfishness yet devotes himself to constructive effort, which requires the true manifestation of all those virtues you falsely attribute to the bad boy: strength, courage, confidence, self-reliance, self-esteem. The real man holds a rebellious contempt for your premise of self-destruction as an ideal, and he would be loathe to renounce his virtues if he thought it would score him some tail. It requires no strength, no courage, no confidence to give up, to renounce, to roll around in an epistomological gutter and dare consider it the pinnacle of advancement. The bad boy you present as the diametrical opposite of the nice guy is not his antithesis–he is the other side of that coin. The man who lives for himself, who does not subordinate nor destroy himself in order to attain the fancy of women–the man who could care less for whether a woman thinks he is a pathetic sycophant or a courageous martyr of evil–his is the ideal you should champion.

    Like


    • Who got Guenevere? Arthur or Lancelot. Arthur was the man you describe. Lancelot was his champion. Arthur was good with a sword and a very able general, but as with Agamemnon and Achilles, he was nothing without Lancelot who really know how to kill. Don’t tell me you can hack off limbs or impale men on a lance regularly and it not affect your attitude.

      Like


    • We know you don’t get laid, no need to go on such a tirade.

      Like


    • @ Anonymous:

      You are completely wrong.

      Evil and Good are terms which can have meaning only if they are based on reality. The reality is that hypergamy is real, and that it operates completely outside of reason (which reason is an extremely small and feeble power – in reality). A murderer, far from being a evil person (evil as defined by a real, hypergamous, standard), is infact the exact thing that a woman, any woman, would react to as good (good as based on reality, not fantasy).

      If you are following Ayn Rand’s terminology, as your language clearly indicates you are, then check your premises. Metaphysics comes first, not ethics. Hypergamy is metaphysical. This blog, and its host, are infact virtuous, as is the argument presented in the post above.

      Like


  55. Glen Beck got in trouble for calling the yoot wing of the Norwegian Labour Party “Hitler Youth.” Beck owes an apology . . . . to the Hitler Youth. As far as I know they never had a policy of liquidating the German nation and people, unlike the NLP’s youth wing has toward Norway. They’re a cut below Nazis.

    Like


  56. This post is surprisingly shallow analysis of the situation: chicks dig assholes because they dig assholes? … Kind of circular and unhelpful.

    The main point is critical and indisputable: women love assholes because of their bad behavior – not in spite of it.

    But I do believe its critical to note that most women rationalize their love of assholes via the savior complex This is why occasionally mixing the asshole behavior with flourishes of niceness and generosity and vulnerability get a woman hooked: this sweet side of the man becomes her way to cover up and rationalize and cope with her deep love for his asshole side. (“Sure he never calls, and he also flirts with my friends and has never said “I love you” to me, but he also is so sweet and I know he can change…You just don’t know him like I do.”)

    Exploiting this rationalization to the male advantage via push/pull and vulnerability game is, I believe, crucial to really getting a woman to fall in love.

    Like


  57. brb, shooting up a mall tomorrow to GET DAT PUSSY

    Like


  58. Study hard stuff like math, finance, & computers, so that you make a lot of money. Lift weights so that you exude confidence, testosterone, and health.
    And go out thursday to saturday. Go to bars with women, and talk confidently to every hot one.
    You’ll get laid repeatedly. And the more you get laid, the more you get laid.
    I do strongly recommend religious use of prophos. Diseases are gross and kids/family court is a huge pain in the ass.

    Like


    • I have a buddy who is an Odin’s Warrior in Australia. He said they had model quality women as groupies and they would make them all work in the club owned srip joints and have orgies with them after closing. You tell me.

      Like


  59. Her own powerful man, locked up away from other women. A sexual beast caged for her by the state. Potential death is a vagina tingler.

    Like


    • I think you’ve hit on something. Brushes with death giving a woman a desire to pass on her genes NOW! It makes evolutionary sense.

      Like


  60. “The truth about the world, he said, is that anything is possible. Had you not seen it all from birth and thereby bled it of its strangeness it would appear to you for what it is, a hat trick in a medicine show, a fevered dream, a trance bepopulate with chimaeras having neither analogue nor precedent, an itinerant carnival, a migratory tentshow whose ultimate destination after many a pitch in many a mudded field is unspeakable and calamitous beyond reckoning.”

    Like


    • This writing is so bad it could only be that hack C MC. It’s unbelievable what people will actually turn the pages of.

      Next time: The Shark Infested Custard.

      Thank me later.

      Like


  61. Heariste, there’s a girl out there begging to be treated to the pleasure of jerk telling her off:
    http://dearwendy.com/?p=5562

    I just started law school a couple weeks ago. It’s been busy, but fun and interesting so far. However, even though looking for a relationship at this very moment is the last thing on my mind, I can’t help but think about my situation.

    um, good luck, lawyer girl.

    Like


  62. As an U.S. Army veteran of both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, I’ve had at least a dozen young women ask me if I’ve shot or killed anyone. They ask with a twinkle in their eye. I can’t be the only one they’ve asked. I adviise these women that it’s a bad thing to ask many,but not all veterans as it upsets some veterans even though I don’t mind them asking.

    Like


  63. Most women are trash these days. Either they’re deranged hags like the one in that youtube video talking about serial killers, misguided fools preoccupied with their “career” climbing the corporate ladder and sleeping with their boss or some feathered pua flavor of the month from the bar, or just plain stupid and wasting their 20s whoring around on campus. Marx was wrong, capitalism doesn’t destroy itself out of economic degeneration, it destroys itself because it admits (even requires) cultural degeneration. Good riddance to another fanatical delusion.

    Like


    • “it destroys itself because it admits (even requires) cultural degeneration.”

      sound of nail being hit on head

      Like


  64. And we still let women vote.

    Like


  65. on September 28, 2011 at 8:48 pm Johnycomelately

    The game rationalization of ‘sexually digging’ assholes is bullshit, women are adapted to supplicate to whoever can remove their mental state of fear which is often the very purveyor of fear themselves.

    There are only two mental states, fear and everything else.

    Fear forces the woman to supplicate to the whims of a savage man, it doesn’t matter that the man is behind bars, the fear doesn’t have to be rationally grounded, all that needs to be there is the perceived fear.

    The inducer of fear has the power over the medium which causes the fear whether it is social shaming, economic insufficiency, existential angst, physical violence etc.

    That’s why betas can’t command supplication, betas counterbalance the fear of poverty and social shaming which effectively doesn’t exist in today’s West but it certainly does in the East where betas get a good shake. When poverty and social shaming was a genuine fear, betas ruled the roost.

    Like


  66. To be fair, the newspapers also says that he doesn’t get to read the letters, so he’s not reaping the good results of his actions (yet?…).

    My friend says that women want to save the criminal by turning the bad guy into a good guy, but I don’t get it. I don’t understand why this is more exciting than changing a beta. Like, from bitter and sad to happy and smiley. Is it a proof of a woman’s changing power? Is it just the “catch an alpha and tame him” strategy? It almost sounds like some kind of Jesus thing to me – he said it’s the sinners who need attention and not the non-sinners, but in this case it’s misguided.

    Like


  67. [email protected] they can live in the Alphas harem and eat bananas and grapes with him all day.

    The frightening thing is, this is probably true.

    Like


    • This is certainly true.

      For women who do not rigorously suppress their emotions (which is to say all women), 5 minutes of alpha is better than 5 lifetimes of beta. In 5 minutes, they can get the alpha sperm that their hamsters are driving them toward. That’s why they will gladly share him in a harem with other women.

      In our ancient evolutionary past, there was no internet, no steel, no plastics, no fast food — in fact no nothing, our ancient past was a dirt poor one of extreme hardship. In that past, with survival at stake at every moment, it made sense for women to eat bananas and grapes with the alpha rather than try to build toward a future filled with prosperous technology. Not that evolution works because we use our brains (either men or women), however, evolution thus selected for a crude program running in women’s hindbrains, to select for alphas – this program is called hypergamy, a.k.a. women being attracted to alpha traits (there are no other traits women are attracted to, so hypergamy = attraction, actually). Women are blithely ignorant to this program, as witness all the rubbish that women post on this blog all the time.

      In our modern scientific age, hypergamy has long out-lived its usefulness. Women, including you @Asian Girl, need to get with the program. Stop needing attraction to spread your legs, instead, use your god-given brains, and have sex with UNattractive men.

      Like


  68. Starkk said:

    “It’s not complex. Women just like high testosterone, its that simple. Nothing says high testosterone like killing over 70 people. Very few low T men have the guts to do something like that. Beta’s simply have to grab their balls and execute men like Anders without remorse, socially shame women for chasing thugs, and keep them in line like they did back in the day.”

    Ee-yupp! Although I do think the statement “nothing says high testosterone like killing over 70 people'” is hyperbolic. That depends on context. If you’re a friendless recluse who mows down teenagers, you’re going to be attractive only to psychologically deficient women. If you’re a five-star general and you oversee the killing of 7,000 enemy combatants during a nation-backed war, then yeah.

    Re: socially shaming women for chasing thugs: You do know that the institution of monogamous marriage is the most successful wealth-redistribution scheme ever implemented by the great mass of betas, don’t you? The majority of men, which by definition are the betas of any given society/culture, are essentially socialists in this regard. (Oh sure, they aspire to be the harem-hoarding alphas, but insofar as they grasp reality, they end up endorsing monogamy as legal regime.)

    Like


  69. I 9 I dated a couple years ago got me this book:

    http://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Us-Alan-Weisman/dp/0312347294

    Evidently it was big among her circle of friends who otherwise seemed like perfectly decent human beings. My guess is that the Sexual Devolution and ensuing cultural/moral Alzheimer’s, especially among our best women, is some sort of collective allergic reaction to globalization/industrialization.

    One thing is certain – it sure ain’t “progressive”. That could be its fatal flaw.

    Like


  70. on September 29, 2011 at 12:05 am Chris from Dublin

    To clarify my earlier comment: this Norse murderer is not alpha – he’s a deranged omega who went on a killing spree. In the eyes of stupid women he’s alpha but not in many other eyes. Under no circumstances do I, even at the remotest level, endorse or excuse what he did.

    Like


    • George Sodini of the Pittspurgh, Pennsylvania, USA massacre and U.S. Army Psychiatrist Major Nidal Hassan the larger Ft.Hood,Texas, USA massacre were even more omega to women than Anders Behring Breivik. It’s probable that had Sodini not killed himself, he would be getting love letters from women now despite him wantonly targeting women for death. Hassan killed 13 unarmed soldiers because of his poor job performance, opposition to the Iraq and Afghan wars as well as his desire to leave the military which the Army would not allowbefore being court martialed,, and he’s probably getting plenty love letters from women too. I condemn what these 3 men did too, but it doesn’t change that they are now viewed as Alpha by many women who would have viewed them as omega before.

      Feminism is the primary cause for women and men like this to exist. A long time a ago he came out with a post here about how a real Alpha(among women) was a man who was desired by women, and I agree. He told the story of a physically powerful intellectually bright but socially retarded meathead U.S. Army Judge Advocate General lawyer officer was this way, and how men would gladly follow him to their deaths, but he wasn’t that popular with the ladies. However, such a man could beat, maim, mutilate ands kill his opposition. He is prevented from doinf so because civilization is still in effect. As feminism erodes civilization further, it will be harder to stop such men. This leads me to my next statement. The ultimate Alpha in this world is a man who can either by himself or better as a leader of men physically destroy his competition or even commit collateral damage by harming or killing human life. As civilization crumbles because of feminism more men like this will exist because it is omegaizing too many men who increasingly only recourse is violence, and it’s also leaving beta men in a bad spot too which also hurts.

      Ultimately, in the state of nature or the wild without civilization, any man can physically destroy the Alpha among womenby maiming, mutilation or death. Even in civilization, he can do this, but it’s harder to get away with. Even the omega man much less the beta man can do this.My point is that an effectively violent man who doesn’t creep women out too much in the state of nature or the wild is more Alpha than the smooth talking cad loved the most of all men by the ladies. Even in civilization, such a man could leave you alive, but so effectively maimed and/or mutilated that the ladies will leave you eventually. Even an omega and a certainly a beta can make himself look like an alpha among the ladies if he effectively uses violence. Then it’s a matter of faking it until he makes it. Under the old way being a law abiding beta with the ladies was good enough, and even being an omega wasn’t so bad. Now it’s making it bad enough because of feminism which causes the breakdown of civilzation, where the rise of such men becomes inevitable. Enjoy the violent chaotic collapse because on the current course we’re on, it will happen. Taliban men take pride in fighting U.S. Forces and get bragging rights in their village even among the ladies for survivng to tell the tale. I don’t wish for such a disastrous outcome and I dread it as an U.S. Army veteran of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and know how bad things can get, but it looks like it’s coming due to the course we’re on.

      Like


  71. I take your main point, for sure: women like assholes BECAUSE they are assholes, not IN SPITE of their asshole-ishness.

    But we should not dismiss the power of the savior complex: it is the principal way that women rationalize and justify their medium-term and long-term desire to be with an asshole!

    If a sweet woman is greatly attracted to a raging asshole, she has to find some way to justify this attraction to herself – so, she says, “But he has a sweet side! He just has issues, but he is working on them with my help! Nobody knows him like I do!”

    So, men: be assholes, 100,000%. But keep in mind that a woman will often frame the medium and long term appeal of your behavior is dependent on your offering, occasionally and in small ways, redemability (a flourish of generosity or a moment of real emotion).

    Things like vulnerability game and small, random acts of romance are so powerful because they feed into a woman’s elaborate internal justification for being with a man that flirts with other women, never calls, is selfish or has killed 90 people.

    Like


    • Actually, the ratio is more like 95% nice guy and 5% asshole. It just needs to be a bit unpredictable. This works very well for me. Also, always look at your woman like you want to fuck her and now. Women love to be seen as sex objects if they like the man. On a regular basis, reach up under her shirt and fondle her breasts, reach into her pants and massage her butt, kiss their necks, tweek her clit, all randomly. This keeps them in a constant state of mild arousal which can be scaled up as needed.

      Like


  72. So many women stepped forward to heal poor George Sodini and save him from his life of loneliness and suffering!

    Like


  73. Off-topic, but might be worth a post:

    “The New York Post has an interesting article up on the price of sex.”
    http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=3768

    Like


  74. Heartiste,

    Will a woman ever leave an alpha to spite him? in other words, is it possible that this woman hated the (hypothetically) alpha warden for lack of attention, him being too dismissive etc.? I’m thinking of the archetype of the woman who shoots herself when her husband coldly suggests it or the wife of a playboy millionaire who bangs her poolboy and then tells hubby about it.

    I’m in my late 20s, and I’ve recently moved to DC where any girl my age who is marginally cute thinks she is a HUGE catch – I often ignore or barely humor these girls because they’re headaches not worthy of the effort. Of the 15 or so times I’ve seduced these girls in the past 6 mos (I try to stick to foreign and college girls instead), I’ve frequently encountered genuine, batshit fury when I invariably don’t want to engage the woman on any level beyond the purely sexual. It’s a kind of rage I’d never seen in a girl before I got here (previously lived in northern cal and france). There is no universal trigger; I’ve seen it happen early (after I turned away from an interested chick at a friend’s party for no reason other than finding her boring) and late (after I hurried out the door of a cute but unimaginative girl’s apt post booty-call). I never show malice – just indifference. These girls tend to reach out into my social circle and try to fuck me over.

    I understand the general attitude to losing an alpha is heartache, hopefulness, and mild depression, but is it possible that some of the more egomaniacal chicks will try to humiliate you? Is it something about my frame? I’m aloof, charming, have a high-power career, walk and talk like an alpha, but I’m pretty warm and betaish w/ people I don’t want to compete with or seduce – I tend to show a deep, philosophical, comraderie w/ my bros, and I enjoy charming whatever unattractive girls are around me for kicks. What is so infuriating? Are they mad that I’m not beta? That doesn’t make sense. Even if they were hurt by my coldness, I wouldn’t expect such anger. WTF is going on?

    Like


  75. http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=44

    Read some of the postings on this board from girlfriends / wives of men in prison.

    Can you imagine this type of devotion for an average supplicating chump ?

    Like


  76. I am trying to figure out the evolutionary benefit of this for women. I understand the alpha male strategy of having sex with all women possible and not worrying about raising any children, figuring that enough of them will survive to spread your genes, but how does it make sense for women to have children with men who don’t support them and who have moved on to the next woman? I suppose you could make the argument that having children by an alpha male gives you alpha sons who would then spread your genes in the next generation.

    Like


    • I suppose that deep in their hindbrains, women always consider the possibility to hoist the bastard to a beta who will love him like if he was his own.
      Women project their love to their kids to everyone else. Ever dated a single mom? Don’t do it (again). They have this propensity to believe that everyone is able to love their kids just like they do. I think that they are programmed to guilt trip the betas into loving their bastard spawn.

      Or they could very well be making a trade-off between an alpha son who will be difficult to raise but will have reproductive success (more grandchildren, more thriving for the selfish gene), or a beta son who will probably be a failure even if the upbringing is easy.

      Like


    • @Flip:

      You got it. That’s it. This is called the “sexy sons hypothesis”, google it. That’s it. That’s the evolutionary benefit.

      Like


  77. The propreiters of the Chateau should define what eactly they mean by the term “asshole”. In soceity it has a rather broad definition and the un/newly initiated to the crimson arts may be confused as exactly is meant by the term- this clarification, of course, being for educational purposes…

    Like


  78. I think with many women, they believe they create life evidenced by the pregnancy, the mans role and the fact that it’s a natural process requiring niothing more than spreading their legs never occurs to them and of course men reinforce this belief. Since they create life, they have carte blanche to destroy life. In a sense they have to, else it calls into question their ability to create life and God like nature. Most women aren’t insane completely so they express the urge differently, mostly through destroying beta males verbally or attaching themselves to “alpha” males to do it for them physically since they most often cant beat them up.

    Like


  79. Hey guys. Sorry about the thread-jack. But what sort of jobs would you suggest that would allow me to travel around as opposed to be chained to a cube? I’ve been reading this blog and using game on and off. w00t!

    However, if I’m stuck at the same job for years on end… betatude will follow… any suggestions? I’m a software developer (who hates his current job). If possible, I’d like to travel around for a bit.

    Like


  80. That guy is more and more becoming the Osama Bin Laden of Scandinavia – he has called all the bluffs of the Nordic Matriarchy.

    Personally, I think that he needs to be executed. But thanks to the Matriarchy, not only is there no death penalty in Norway, there is no life imprisonment. He’ll be out in 20 years, still young enough to strike again.

    Like


  81. Women are attracted to what you could call “vulgar displays of power”, this is axiomatic. But yeah, I dunno where the idea that dudes dig bitches comes from. Looks are key, yeah, but aside from that you just want a girl who’s not gonna cause you trouble. If given the choice between a pushy, opinionated chick who demands attention and an equally hot chick who’s docile and polite, most any dude (excepting masocists) will go with the latter.

    Like


    • It’s due to the attempt of feminists to equalize everything. They’re delusional and think men and women should be held to the same standards.

      Like


  82. @”As everyday observation to those with the eyes to see demonstrates, the primary motivation is women’s love for unrepentant, rule-breaking assholes. ”
    _____________

    Which is why the modern “nice guys” who are the love interests in women’s books, movies, and TV are often vampires and werewolves. They argue they love the “nice man” part when it is really the monster that gets them going.

    Like


  83. @”As everyday observation to those with the eyes to see demonstrates, the primary motivation is women’s love for unrepentant, rule-breaking assholes. ”
    _____________

    Which is why the modern “nice guys” who are the love interests in women’s books, movies, and TV are often vampires and werewolves. They argue they love the “nice man” part when it is really the monster that gets them going.

    Like


  84. You could probably make good money selling the sperm of convicted murderers to women looking to get artificially inseminated.

    Like


  85. Leaving the date wanting more. A 3 hour rule. Thoughts?

    http://www.howaboutwe.com/date-report/1339-rate-the-date-advice-the-3-hour-rule#

    Like


  86. Whattabout a post about Amanda Knox? The chick was certainly an entitled American princes who slutted it up with the first soft speaking Italian she met.

    Yet it is so obvious she is innocent that we wonder what is that all about?

    Like


  87. Here is Jonathan Swift in 1726:

    “I was told that a great court lady, who had several children,—is married to the prime minister, the richest subject in the kingdom, a very graceful person, extremely fond of her, and lives in the finest palace of the island,—went down to Lagado on the pretence of health, there hid herself for several months, till the king sent a warrant to search for her; and she was found in an obscure eating-house all in rags, having pawned her clothes to maintain an old deformed footman, who beat her every day, and in whose company she was taken, much against her will. And although her husband received her with all possible kindness, and without the least reproach, she soon after contrived to steal down again, with all her jewels, to the same gallant, and has not been heard of since.

    This may perhaps pass with the reader rather for an European or English story, than for one of a country so remote. But he may please to consider, that the caprices of womankind are not limited by any climate or nation, and that they are much more uniform, than can be easily imagined.”

    Gulliver’s Travels, Part III, Chapter II.

    Some things apparently never change.

    Like


    • But he may please to consider, that the caprices of womankind are not limited by any climate or nation, and that they are much more uniform, than can be easily imagined.

      Yes, even Asian women and women of widely different cultures are basically women – using the same basic substrate.

      Nearly all game addresses the substrate.

      Like


  88. I can’t count the number of times wives of friends of mine would come up to me and say, “So, I hear your a bad-ass.” (even with their husbands there, which is the untimate shit/eat-some-shit test to the husbands in my opinion). The way they say it, and their tone while saying it, says everything.

    Buck

    Like


  89. on September 29, 2011 at 5:15 pm Proud-to-be-an-Omega-Male

    I love it when women complain about a man shortage, especially with what I read the other day about some females complaining about a lack of males on their university campus. I mean, doesn’t that strike you as laughable?

    Sure, the average college campus may be 60% female and 40% male, but the truth is, it only takes a few males to satisfy a whole bunch of women, so the complaint is total BS. I’m quite sure there’s more than enough math and tech geeks to go around more than a hundred times over. But the problem is is that these men are betas, which highlights the real nature of the female complaint: that there isn’t so much a shortage of males; there’s a shortage of dominant males. And given the whole obesity epidemic affecting the majority of young women, especially those on college campuses across the nation, it makes their complaints all the more laughable. Only in a society rule by feminists, cultural Marxists and other beta trash can fat bitches demand so much for what little they have to offer.

    As the Chateau always says: Goodbye, America!

    Like


  90. Heartiste says:

    “Women love assholes because they are assholes. Because it inspires in women those emotions that most delight their pleasure centers. And that, based on the reaction it engenders from civilized men and women alike, is the truth too scary to contemplate.”

    Guess what: he’s right.

    And authors separated by over a thousand years agree with him.

    Exhibit A: an excerpt from The Romance of the Rose, a medieval allegorical tale written around 1269. In the section quoted from below, an old woman laments her love for a bad-boy thug:

    Upon my soul, if I had been wise, I could have been a very rich woman, for great men courted me when I was pretty and charming, and I had some of them firmly in my toils. But by the faith I owe God and Saint Thibaut, when I had taken from them, I gave everything away to a scoundrel who put me to great shame but whom I loved the best. I addressed all the others as lovers, but he was the only one I loved, although I assure you that he cared not a fig for me, and said so. He was a bad man — I never saw a worse one — and he had nothing but contempt for me, calling me a common whore; scoundrel that he was, he never loved me. Women have very poor judgment, and I was a true woman. I never loved a man who loved me, but if this wretch had hurt my shoulder or cracked my skull, I tell you I would have thanked him for it. However much he beat me, I would still have had him fall upon me, for he was so good at making peace, whatever hurt he might have done me…and so he had me on the end of a rope, the false, theiving traitor, because he was so good in bed. I could not have lived without him and I willingly would have followed him anywhere.

    Yes, despite the tales of chivalry — of knights rescuing maidens from dragons and whatnot — at least one medieval author got it right.
    Not good enough for you? You prefer the grandeur of Rome to knights in shining armor? Fair enough. Try this: an excerpt from Juvenal’s Sixteen Satires, (Satire VI), where Juvenal describes a Roman woman’s (Eppia) abandonment of her husband and family to follow a gladiator (Sergius):

    Boldly she faced the Tuscan waves, the booming

    Ionian swell, heart steadfast, despite the constant

    chop and change of the sea. When a woman faces danger

    In a good cause, then chill terror ices her heart,

    her knees turn to water, she can scarcely stand upright;

    but wicked audacity breeds its own fortitude.

    To go aboard ship at a husband’s bidding is torture;

    then bilge – water sickens, then the sky wheels dizzily round.

    But a wife going off with her lover suffers no qualms. The one

    pukes on her husband, the other eats with the sailors,

    takes a turn round the deck, enjoys hauling on rough sheets.

    What was the youthful charm that so fired Eppia? What

    was it hooked her? What did she see in him that was worth

    being mocked as a fighter’s moll? For her poppet, her Sergius,

    was no chicken, forty at least, with one dud arm that held promise

    of early retirement. Deformities marred his features —

    a helmet scar, a great mark on his nose, an unpleasant

    discharge from one constantly weeping eye. What of it?

    He was a gladiator. That makes anyone an Adonis;

    that was what she chose over children, country, sister,

    and husband: steel’s what they crave…

    This was written around 110 A.D. Incidentally, The entire VIth Satire is a caustic examination of wives, mistresses, and female nature: I encourage readers of this blog to take a look at it.

    Nothing changes, gentlemen. Nothing. We walk in the footsteps of the men before us; we have to put up with female hypergamy, just as they did. The difference is that they knew how to control that hypergamy.

    We just have to live with it.

    Like


  91. OT:

    Gloriously grotesque cover photo on New York Magazine. The article is also *spectacularly* absurd:

    http://nymag.com/news/features/mothers-over-50-2011-10/?imw=Y&f=most-viewed-24h5

    I give ’em props for that photo; I haven’t laughed that hard in a while.

    Like


  92. Haha, what a somber way to make a point. But you’re right!

    Like


  93. Great news…..We have kicked neecy out from here!

    Like


  94. Sounds like a rationalization that fits in with their current thinking. Why would an innately caring and pure creature date a bad boy? Why, it MUST be to cure him!

    And women do try to tame the bad boys – but that is not the REASON for why they date them. They date them because men who force their way past womens token gestures of restraint are more attractive to women than men who are circumspect and respectful.

    Women want men who know that no does not mean no, and who know that stop does not mean stop, and who know that hold my purse does not mean hold my purse.

    They are attracted to the bad boy because forceful selfish men with high T tend to impregnate more girls, and any children from a bad boy will propagate her genes more widely. They try to tame the bad boy not to cure him, but to make him provision her and give her more kids.

    The takeaway from this for men is to let out more of your inner bad boy.

    Now I know a lot of panty wearing men will complain that they don’t have an inner douchebag, and that pussy isn’t important enough to them to be a real prick.

    Ok, fine. No one is pressuring you. Do whatever the fuck you want.

    Like


  95. @Riff Dog: great ideas. But the girl might kill you once she finds out you deceived her and are no real convicted killer but a decent guy.

    After you banged the girl, you probably should kill someone, just to be safe.

    Like


  96. To understand what’s going on with Amanda Knox :

    crimesofthetimes.com

    Like


  97. I’m glad to hear it. I was worried about that boy.

    Like


  98. It’s for the best – I was getting sick of her coming on here and trying to club us all over the head repeatedly with her fake rubber dick.

    Like


  99. While the savior complex may explain, in part, women’s craven desire, it is not the primary or sole explanation, or even a very important one. As everyday observation to those with the eyes to see demonstrates, the primary motivation is women’s love for unrepentant, rule-breaking assholes.
    >>>

    Not really “savior” per se, but as I posted before… they want to bring him to heel… like Rochester, Darcy, etc.. and a thousand other books and novels ad naseum.. and the bigger the pyscho the greater the challenge and the greater the prize. When you train a racehorse, you don’t want the warmblood, you want the hotblooded thoroughbred to bring to heel. You want to capture that magnificent vitality and make it your own. Betas have none of that, criminals and alphas have it in spades.

    Like


  100. Well, he’s not thinking of killing anyone, since he has a gf, but yeah, he’s still his old MRA self.

    Like


  101. A little off topic, the night before last, we had a Vodun ceremony for Eshu and Shango, that started on my balcony and ended in a local park.

    Part of the ceremony is fighting. Battles are required for a Shango event, and bleeding is a blessing. All the straight guys had to fight. It was beautiful, and in one case, changed the way we saw a relatively quiet, skinny man we’d previously nicknamed Ghost because he looks like he eats only the smoke of incense like the Spirits. That boy kicked everybody’s ass.

    White people should remember their gods of war and fire too, or at least respect their psychological value.

    Like


  102. “Bitches be Crazy”-
    Peter Sutcliffe, the ‘Yorkshire Ripper’ gets on average 30 letters every week from women who are in love with him:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1318641.stm

    Like


  103. Heartiste says:

    Women love assholes because they are assholes. Because it inspires in women those emotions that most delight their pleasure centers. And that, based on the reaction it engenders from civilized men and women alike, is the truth too scary to contemplate.

    Guess what: he’s right.

    And authors separated by over a thousand years agree with him.

    Exhibit A: an excerpt from The Romance of the Rose, a medieval allegorical tale written around 1269. In the section quoted from below, an old woman laments her love for a bad-boy thug:

    Upon my soul, if I had been wise, I could have been a very rich woman, for great men courted me when I was pretty and charming, and I had some of them firmly in my toils. But by the faith I owe God and Saint Thibaut, when I had taken from them, I gave everything away to a scoundrel who put me to great shame but whom I loved the best. I addressed all the others as lovers, but he was the only one I loved, although I assure you that he cared not a fig for me, and said so. He was a bad man — I never saw a worse one — and he had nothing but contempt for me, calling me a common whore; scoundrel that he was, he never loved me. Women have very poor judgment, and I was a true woman. I never loved a man who loved me, but if this wretch had hurt my shoulder or cracked my skull, I tell you I would have thanked him for it. However much he beat me, I would still have had him fall upon me, for he was so good at making peace, whatever hurt he might have done me…and so he had me on the end of a rope, the false, theiving traitor, because he was so good in bed. I could not have lived without him and I willingly would have followed him anywhere.

    Yes, despite the tales of chivalry — of knights rescuing maidens from dragons and whatnot — at least one medieval author got it right.

    Not good enough for you? You prefer the grandeur of Rome to knights in shining armor?

    Take a look at Exhibit B: an excerpt from Juvenal’s Sixteen Satires, (Satire VI), where Juvenal describes a Roman woman’s (Eppia) abandonment of her husband and family to follow a gladiator (Sergius):

    Boldly she faced the Tuscan waves, the booming

    Ionian swell, heart steadfast, despite the constant

    chop and change of the sea. When a woman faces danger

    In a good cause, then chill terror ices her heart,

    her knees turn to water, she can scarcely stand upright;

    but wicked audacity breeds its own fortitude.

    To go aboard ship at a husband’s bidding is torture;

    then bilge – water sickens, then the sky wheels dizzily round.

    But a wife going off with her lover suffers no qualms. The one

    pukes on her husband, the other eats with the sailors,

    takes a turn round the deck, enjoys hauling on rough sheets.

    What was the youthful charm that so fired Eppia? What

    was it hooked her? What did she see in him that was worth

    being mocked as a fighter’s moll? For her poppet, her Sergius,

    was no chicken, forty at least, with one dud arm that held promise

    of early retirement. Deformities marred his features —

    a helmet scar, a great mark on his nose, an unpleasant

    discharge from one constantly weeping eye. What of it?

    He was a gladiator. That makes anyone an Adonis;

    that was what she chose over children, country, sister,

    and husband: steel’s what they crave…

    This was written around 110 A.D. Incidentally, The entire VIth Satire is a caustic examination of wives, mistresses, and female nature: I encourage readers of this blog to take a look at it.

    Nothing changes, gentlemen. Nothing. We walk in the footsteps of the men before us; we have to put up with female hypergamy, just as they did. The difference is that they knew how to control that hypergamy.

    We just have to live with it.

    Like


    • Awesome. I love it when old hags express regrets for their stupid dumb shit.

      However, I think that even then, men generally tended to only believe that there are bad women and good women, smart ones and dumb ones… They were quite oblivious to female nature, and gentlemanhood along with chivalry thrived as a consequence.
      Clearheaded authors like Schopenhauer had their views about women easily discarded by their contemporary manginas.

      Only modern evolutionary “pseudo-sciences” and game allowed us to understand what the fuck is going on. All women are like that. We have no choice but to become the mysterious asshole that they will madly fall in love with.

      Like


  104. on October 2, 2011 at 2:54 pm Anon. E. Muss

    He is not a jerk. He is fucking hero. There should be more of him amongst white men. Someone needs to break him out of jail.

    Like


  105. on October 2, 2011 at 3:06 pm Anon. E. Muss

    Math and Tech geeks are a product of female selection of partners. Women like those men that remind them of themselves. “Mysterious”, “unpredictable”, like feminized artists, poets, actors and musicians. Just look at how much pussy actors get. A hardworking man’s man, who embodies masculine qualities, is found to be boring.

    The lack of masculinity is carried through to the offspring, producing feminized males, but the feminization will show up in physical weakness and cowardice. What the geeks make up for in brains, they certainly lack in courage, bravery and other masculine qualities.

    So, the geeks turn to even more feminine and submissive women, usually found in Asia, breeding a race of docile, authority worshippers.

    The ‘bad boys’ are what is left of masculinity. There are fewer and fewer of them. The ones that murder and rape usually get the female longing of the women who biologically ‘know’ the score.

    Like


  106. I was watching Mad Men with my girl and saw the scene in the second season when the female copyrighter’s older sister tells the priest in confession that her “little sister” seduced a married man and had her kid. Thus, intentionally destroying the friendship with the little sister and the priest by ratting her out. Utterly evil female bitch cunt shit on display. My girlfriend didn’t bat an eyelash and piped up “she really nailed her”… at first silly me didn’t realize that the woman was using confession as the vehicle to convey the secret disparaging story to the priest.

    Perhaps the real reason women like evil men is that women are actually quite evil themselves. This seems to be the Occam’s razor most logical explanation without getting into voodoo sociobiology and hindbrain crap.

    This blog touches on this, but the truth may be darker than even discussed her by this so called “sexist cynic.” Your wife/girlfriend is… deep down and under the act.. a vile monster who can relate a whole lot better to a psychopath than she can to you. Perhaps women were not always this way, but they sure are now. You see alot of this “women as the devil” stuff in greek/arthurian legands… much truth to it…. just a bunch of succubi. They do not belong knocked off their pedastal, they belong oppressed, disenfranchised and powerless… as they have been through history.. for a reason.

    Like


  107. My wife likes daniel day lewis in gangs of new york, i see why now.

    i bet she’d sleep with him if given the chance…fucking mother fucker!!!

    Like


  108. on October 4, 2011 at 5:26 am The Chrome Microphone

    I’m interested: If he’d publicly broken down and wept with remorse and contrition after the killings, would he be so popular?

    Like


  109. It’s more than about liking assholes, it’s about liking KILLERS.
    The male is a killer, the female is a nurturer.
    By killing the male shows maleness.
    The alpha killer is thus an alpha male.

    That’s what hormones do : they turn boys into killers and girls into nurturers.

    Women fantasize about serial killers.

    Like