Chicks Dig Psychotic Killers

Charles Manson, 79 years old and still proudly sporting a swastika on his forehead, has a 25 year old girlfriend.

Charles Manson, perhaps the most infamous convicted killer of all time, is 79 years old and still locked up in California’s Corcoran State Prison, where he walks with a cane and sports chipped prison dentures. Star is a 25-year-old brunette who’s been loyally visiting Manson in jail since she was 19 years old and maintains several websites devoted to defending Manson and his pro-Earth environmental causes.

For those two of you who don’t know, Manson is one of America’s most infamous killers and cult leaders. When you combine fame with that sexy psycho vibe, pussy juice erupts all over the fruited plains.

And Star [ed: girls with one name are same night lay guarantees] says she can prove Manson is more devoted to her than any other girl: “I’ll tell you straight up, Charlie and I are going to get married,” she tells us. “When that will be, we don’t know. But I take it very seriously. Charlie is my husband. Charlie told me to tell you this. We haven’t told anybody about that.”

Star says there won’t be any conjugal visits because “California lifers no longer get them.” If they were an option, “we’d be married by now.”

Manson, however, seems less convinced the impending nuptials are a reality, “Oh that,” he says. “That’s a bunch of garbage. You know that, man. That’s trash. We’re just playing that for public consumption.”

Young hottie falls deeply in love with imprisoned killer 54 years her senior (and looking kind of badass for a geezer if you ask me). Young hottie wants to marry her old killer. Killer brushes aside her nuptial dreams as a PR ploy.

Alpha Achievement Unlocked: Supreme Aloof Overlord.

I want to say that a million loveless betas wept, but I’m sure by now they’re moved on from weeping to seppuku.

PS: For those perennial dumbasses who babble indignantly about how only ugly skanks fall for psychopathic murderers:

I got a hold on you, baby!





Comments


  1. The problem here is that The faggot Manson was not executed within 24 hours after his conviction.

    Like


    • on November 21, 2013 at 11:40 am Edmund McRofling

      Jealous?

      Like


      • Disappointed in lib society. Murderers should be executed by hanging post haste in the public square as in the 19th century. Then there would be some deterrence.

        Like


      • Civilization requires serious, moral consequences to acts of barbarism. What separates humans from animals is the willingness of humans to punish and excise humans who act like animals.

        He would have been stoned to death in accordance with the Old Testament law if we paid any attention to the Great Books For Men.

        Like


      • > “Great Books For Men”

        Speaking of whom… I hope he’s doing well.

        In fact, I’m rooting for him having learned that his girlfriend is pregnant, and that he’s gonna become a Dad in eight or nine months.

        [CH: you mean a dadlzllolozlzlzollzzlol.]

        Like


      • Really?
        When/where was the conception of this plot revealed?

        Like


    • Here is an interesting fact a lot of people seem to be unaware of;

      the Manson murders were committed by 3 women.

      Yes 3 women.

      Manson only planned the murders, he did not do it.

      the 3 women who admired him and followed him did the actual killing.

      here is Wikipedia on this,

      ” …He was found guilty of conspiracy to commit the murders of Sharon Tate and Leno and Rosemary LaBianca carried out by members of the group at his instruction. He was convicted of the murders through the joint-responsibility rule, which makes each member of a conspiracy guilty of crimes his fellow conspirators commit in furtherance of the conspiracy’s objective. … ”

      Since this happened just when Feminism was starting to ” bloom” of course the liberal media swept this information under the carpet.
      It was too inconvenient that the cold hearted murderers who committed one of the most famous crime in the last 100 years were females.

      This is but one out of thousands of truths the left and feminists have hidden from us to better push their anti-white male agenda

      Now how many women who have pushed a man to commit murder have been throwned in jail simply for ” joint responsibility” ?

      Probably zero.

      Because the patriarchy is oppressing women…right?

      Manson is still a crazy sun of a bitch but he did not do it; 3 women did.

      Those should not be called “the Manson murders” but “the 3 female murders”.

      Like


      • Now how many women who have pushed a man to commit murder have been throwned in jail simply for ” joint responsibility” ?

        Probably zero.

        Because the patriarchy is oppressing women…right?

        No. Because everyone acknowledges that women aren’t full adults and can’t be held responsible for their actions.

        A sane society acknowledges this and makes it a great sin for women to be without a responsible male authority – her husband or father.

        An insane society still believes this but doesn’t acknowledge it and still lets women get away with crimes but doesn’t hold them responsible for not being under the authority of a man.

        A sane society would have executed Charles Manson for using his authority over women to have them commit murder.

        A sane society that is losing it’s grip on sanity would imprison him for life.

        We’re no longer a sane society that is slipping.

        Like


      • Good points but if I may,

        a sane society would have not gone out of its way to hide the fact it was 3 women who did the actual cold blood killing and that Manson was not even there when it happened.

        A sane society would have executed those 3 women. That is all they deserve.

        A sane society would have called this ” the 3 women murders” or ” the 3 hippie women murders” and not the “Manson murders” as he was not even there.

        A sane society would have used this horrific event to remind us that women are capable of just as much evil as any man and that women need good men to protect and guide them…instead of using this event – in fact a twisted version of it – where any female contribution is practically erased from history and replaced by a new “fairytale” in which the man )the white male) is the murderer – to help feminists demonize men.

        Almost everything about this event was turned into anti-male propaganda.

        I am not saying Manson is a nice guy whom I’d have a beer with, he is a messed up sick man, that is for sure, but we have been lied to for decades; he did not kill those innocent people,

        three fuck’n women did!!!

        Like


      • You are absolutely wrong, Canadian. I once read of a murder in the news where a woman pushed a male friend of hers to murder her live-in boyfriend. The friend did so and accepted full responsibility for the crime. Years later he confessed that he was not the only person responsible for the murder, that the woman had told him to do it. She was promptly arrested, tried, found guilty, and received a stiff prison sentence.

        Like


      • Manson may be a psychotic but he is not crazy especially when it comes to needy women. He did not send 3 women out alone to commit the murders. He sent Tex Watson to supervise the murders and it was Tex that did most of the dirty work. Manson considered the Tate murders a bungled effort and had to go to the scene after the fact to pose the bodies and create a more witchy atmosphere since he wanted the murders to spark a race war. He also went out with the gang during the La Bianca murders to personally supervise. In fact, he was the one that broke into the La Bianca house and tied them up before leaving them to his gang to murder.

        In terms of guilt, Manson was just as guilty or more guilty than the ones who actually committed the murders. It was not like the women just decided to go out and murder people. They did it under the express instructions of Manson. Manson was a master manipulator. He chose weak women and brainwashed them through a techniques he learned in prison. Manson wanted to be pimp and had studied how to control women in Jail from pimps, primarily sexual and physical abuse. He also used other techniques that he learned from scientology and Dale Carnegie courses plus copious quantities of drugs.

        Like


      • ” … In terms of guilt, Manson was just as guilty or more guilty than the ones who actually committed the murders… ”

        I can in no way agree with this.

        Telling someone to go jump in front of the train and actually go do it are two different things.

        Simply telling someone to do a murder is messed up but not as bad as actually taking knives, pistols and doing the actual job of murdering people.

        It is a question of degrees, everyone is guilty but those actually did the killings are more guilty.

        Even if Manson had some unusual brain power with which he could control minds, he still did not do any of the killing himself.

        In a rape case it is the one who had his penis inside the rape victim that gets the harshest sentence, those who gave pointers and encouraged him to do it but stayed behind and did even touched the rape victims are less guilty

        No matter how evil Manson’s words were, he onlly was using words, his disciples killed people.

        How can talking about doing something and doing the actual killing be equal?

        What if you were to discuss how someone could assassinate a political figure, should you go to jail for that? NO because it is only words ( or free speech )

        but what if a person present during that conversation decides to do what he heard in the discussion and kills someone? he is not guilty much MUCH more than you for having done nothing bu talked about something?

        I can not imagine how anyone can make me change my mind.

        Manson is still a crazy guy, but he is not nearly as guilty as the people that killed people for him.

        Like


      • Curiously, Manson felt exactly like you that he could order people to be killed and, if he did not have actual blood on his hands, that he would be immune to prosecution.

        Unfortunately for Manson, he is/was a psychotic so he had a poor grasp of ethics. Worse, he had a fool for an attorney, himself.

        Fortunately for Western society, one who participates in a conspiracy to commit crime, even if they avoid direct participation, is culpable for it and more culpable if they are the leader of the conspiracy.

        Summation of Prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi in the Charles Manson (Tate-LaBianca Murder) Trial


        The law is clear then that once a conspiracy is formed, each member of the conspiracy is criminally responsible for and equally guilty of crimes committed by his coconspirators which were in furtherance of the object of the conspiracy.

        As I stated in my opening argument, if A and B conspired to murder X, and pursuant to that agreement B murders X, A, even though he was not the actual killer, is equally guilty of that murder. I don’t care where he was; he could have been playing tennis, badminton, anywhere; he was [a] member of that conspiracy. He was guilty of that murder. That is the law of conspiracy, and there just are no ifs, ands, or buts about it.

        Even if Charles Manson was merely a member, just a member of this conspiracy to commit these murders, and never killed anyone, he would still be guilty of all seven murders, but here he is not only a member, he is a leader, the leading force behind all of these conspiracies.

        Like


      • Oh the poor, weak, vulnerable innocent womyn where just being manipulated, brainwashed by the evil Manson using drugs and some secret prison technics.

        NO.

        The killers are no victims, they are still guilty of the killing they did. They didn´t do what they did because they where insecure, fearfull for their own lives or simply could not think of their own, they did it because they agreed with Manson´s beliefs and atitudes.
        Even more, they did so because they found it fun, one of them even boasted about it while in prison.

        Like


  2. rules:

    never say “psychopathic” like it’s a bad thing.

    if you can’t understand how this happens or ask yourself “why?” then you may be beyond help. accept that you might not ever get it. learn to live with it. because you don’t wanna turn into the King…..always lamenting the utter indignity of it all. thats no way to live.

    Like


  3. Really think this is generalizable? How about: (A small portion of) Chicks (who are completely fucked in the head) Dig Psychotic Killers

    [CH: you must be new here. read the archives. stories abound. and female behavior resides along a spectrum shifted in the direction of feeling aroused by the company of rule-breaking men.]

    Like


    • it’s generalizable in that there are no examples of young dudes falling in love with Aileen Wuornos or other old murder hags. It’s a purely female disease.

      Like


    • I’m with Jeff. You’re dealing with a specific type of girl here. Let me ask you a question, CH: how many girls have you been around who were into killers?

      [CH: what part of “female sexual preference for badboys resides on a spectrum” don’t you understand?]

      Like


    • Riiiiight. There’s an acronym for this. NAWALT. Not all women are like that. Famously used by petulant princesses claiming that they are not just a stereotype. They had to invent the acronym because they got sick of having to repeat the whole phrase all the time.

      Like


      • What chicks certainly DO dig is fame, of the mainstream media variety. If you can somehow, someway get on NBC News or the MSN front page or something comparable, your success with women should increase 10,000-fold, pretty much regardless of what it is you just became famous for.
        Which is one reason why this whole ‘bad boy’ thing seems to be much more rampant in the US than elsewhere.
        For example, I don’t remember European media making anywhere near this type of circus about some murderer, they usually just went quietly to jail, with nary a mention on page 24 of some newspaper unread by females. No fame = no chicks digging the mofo, psychotic or not.

        Like


  4. on November 21, 2013 at 11:45 am Lucky White Male

    CH- lets not get carried away with the supreme alpha overlord

    Star has Daddy issues and some deep rooted abuse issues most certainly as well. She’s hot but about to hit the wall

    Manson is Alpha in terms of true devil may care psychosis. He is far from the baddest example you can think of – he is the Alpha variety called ” white trailer park trash who kills a bunch of women in the middle of the night while they are outnumbered”

    Manson gets his ass kicked by a number of even badder Alpha types who combine very high dark triad psychosis with Machiavellianism and smarts

    Ragnar Redbeard: The most successful criminals ( read: the biggest Alphas) don’t get caught, THEY ARE LIVING IN CASTLES.

    Lloyd Blankfein, I’d like to have a cigar with that guy

    Like


    • CH exaggerates for effect, shock value, to make a point, a habanero pepper in a big crock of pabulum. This is especially effective — perhaps even solely effective — among the din of feminist illogic.

      Which is fine, until he tries to insist his theory’s consistency with any general standard of judgment. Women aren’t the only ones who are attracted (tempted) by transgression. The devil is sexy, we have known this for millennia. (Unbelievers believe in the tempting devil this insofar as they can take discern an opposite corollary, that being good is unsexy/boring by definition. Which is a satanic lie in itself, but this is not the place to expound.)

      Evil is superficial. It makes empty promises. There is an insuperable gap between what is expected (in erotic anticipation) and what is delivered. If there is any fulfillment in the deal, it is not by definition evil.

      Finally, women are attracted to power, glory (fame), honor, wealth — just as men are. The ends to which these earthly goods are directed are not relevant. It is not the evil per se of Charles Manson that makes him attractive;

      [CH: not only do i disagree with this based on personal experience, but science has already weighed in on the matter and found that women do indeed love evil men for their darkly triadic evil. like i say to every commenter who keeps repeating this tired bromide: read the archives. but this time, read them for real.]

      it is the fame and power that his evil brought him that makes him attractive.

      [that too. the CH dating market value test for men and the top of this blog clearly lists fame (or infamy) as the most potent aphrodisiac a man can possess.]

      CH promotes that this is a distinction without a difference, but then that leaves nothing for the observable attractiveness of non-villainous strongmen.

      I feel obligated to repeat this truth as often as CH repeats this comic exaggerations, but I admit, the feeling is fading. It wearies me. I am no zealot.

      [constant exposure to the ugly truths has a way of pounding the life out of people who haven’t properly inoculated themselves with a pragmatic acceptance of unchangeable realities.]

      Matt

      Like


      • Evil is superficial. It makes empty promises. There is an insuperable gap between what is expected (in erotic anticipation) and what is delivered. If there is any fulfillment in the deal, it is not by definition evil.

        Apparently, in this 0bamacare mess, 0bama’s support among women and young people has taken a particularly large hit. I wonder if there’s a correlation.

        Like


      • Matthew, you say, “Women aren’t the only ones who are attracted (tempted) by transgression. The devil is sexy, we have known this for millennia.”

        But then:

        “women are attracted to power, glory (fame), honor, wealth — just as men are. The ends to which these earthly goods are directed are not relevant. It is not the evil per se of Charles Manson that makes him attractive;”

        Got some cogdis there, bro.

        Like


      • Great point, and I’m glad you brought it up because there is cognitive dissonance everywhere with regard to this subject, and therefore it is little surprise that my criticism would be mistaken as such.

        My bullet list was more of a both/and rather than an either/or. I shouldn’t have used the phrase evil per se; evil alone would have been more precise. My aim in the former quote was to emphasize that this is not a temptation exclusive to one sex. My aim in the latter quote was to emphasize that, even given the universality of temptation, women are more susceptible because they are sexually attracted to power per se.

        Citing my weariness of banging my head against the wall with the ideologues, let me offer this — one of my many comments on the subject and probably the most recent — as my most comprehensive explanation and attempt to cut through the dissonance:

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/why-are-men-with-dark-triad-personalities-so-irresistible-to-women/#comment-433450

        And the original statement that provided the context:

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/why-are-men-with-dark-triad-personalities-so-irresistible-to-women/#comment-433285

        Matt

        Like


      • ‘but science has already weighed in on the matter and found that women do indeed love evil men for their darkly triadic evil.’

        Wait, that assumes that the ‘dark triad’ are a list of traits that, in and of themselves, are evil. High self-regard (narcissism), knowledge of how to manipulate people to achieve results (Machiavellianism), and the ability to remain non-reactive/have a strong frame (psychopathy), don’t seem to be ‘evil’ in and of themselves.

        if Charles Manson had used these traits to build the world’s biggest charity and marry a smokin’ wife, keep her committed, and have a family..he’d be considered a ‘great man.’

        Also, isn’t there research about attachment styles and this kind of stuff?
        As in, women with avoidant attachment styles are more drawn to the dark triad than other types of women (which would lend some support to the ‘only chicks with low self-esteem’ angle….however, dark triad doesn’t necessarily != ‘game’)

        Like


      • Wait, that assumes that the ‘dark triad’ are a list of traits that, in and of themselves, are evil. High self-regard (narcissism), knowledge of how to manipulate people to achieve results (Machiavellianism), and the ability to remain non-reactive/have a strong frame (psychopathy), don’t seem to be ‘evil’ in and of themselves.

        They aren’t. Jesus Christ had hordes of women blubbering over him while men were clamoring for him to be crucified because he p!ssed off the PTBs of his day. He had the Dark Triad in spades… the problem is that the terms “narcissism”, “Machiavellianism”, and “psychopathy” are associated with evil, and therefore only bring to mind the Triad’s evil side and not its good side. A term like “charisma” is more positive, but unfortunately, more vague.

        It’s like money — rich men tend toward evil because their temptations in that direction are much stronger. Same goes for men who are blessed in the Dark Triad department.

        Like


      • Congrats, corvinus, your thinking has ascended to heights of utter absurdity.

        Like


      • At least I can think, unlike you.

        Like


      • Ya. It takes these traits to both help and hinder the world.

        Like


      • “Darkly triadic evil” promises fame/power. The female attracted to “darkly triadic evil” perceives fame/power in the offing, even if such is not yet achieved.

        [CH: women (females, hah, such a nerd giveaway) are attracted to the attitude and vibe of evil men, i.e. they love the evilness (if not the actual evil act) itself. but your sophistry is duly noted.]

        By the way, it’s not fair to insert replies intra-sentence in order to destroy context. Don’t be a pedant.

        [try-hard.]

        Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 9:04 pm the latent sadist

        ill say this on the darkly triadic qualities, and womens love of them.

        Im hooking up with a girl right now. If im honest, shes maybe a high 6 at best. Her body leaves a bit to be desired, but shes got a very pretty face and she’s 22. Plus, she is very submissive and sweet tempered. Doesnt play games, screw with me etc. She has a sweet disposition. That can gain girls at least half a point overall, in my opinion…as has been asserted by CH in the past.

        But anyways for whatever reason i feel very comfortable letting it fly with horrifying racist comments, and just tearing the shit out of certain people we both know. I love to impersonate people and tear them apart, and every girlfriend ive ever had squeals with delight during pillow talk when i eviscerate someone with impressions. Used to be teachers we had in common. But this particular girl just squeals with shock and delight when i say horrible racist shit about people. Im not even really that racist ill just say funny shit like “oh look at this filthy spic” or i’ll go on mock-serious rants about how the white man is supreme (shes not white). She eats it up and fuckin loves it. She even joins in. You can tell she feels so relieved to not have to be politically correct. Girls love an irreverent badboy.

        Every girl in my class loved me throughout junior high, when i was ruthlessly bad mouthing my teachers and making the whole class laugh.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 5:41 am Never Mind the Balzac

        “it is the fame and power that his evil brought him that makes him attractive”

        Nice try Matthew but this doesn’t explain how he managed to convince three women to murder for him before he became infamous.

        This *uniquely female* trait is not as rare as you may think…

        http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/13/gender.uk

        Like


      • One fucked-up chick at a time. The original post was about the persistence of a prison groupie in 2013, not about Squeaky Fromm a half-century ago.

        Nuance. The internet is not made for it, as some excellent wag put it in these pages last week. But your beef is with nuance, not with me.

        Like


      • on November 23, 2013 at 5:25 pm haunted trilobite

        You need to at least consider the impact of jabberwocky,helter skelter r and rosemarie’s baby. Some serious dot connecting

        Like


      • Mathew King

        it is the fame and power that his evil brought him that makes him attractive.

        CH promotes that this is a distinction without a difference, but then that leaves nothing for the observable attractiveness of non-villainous strongmen.

        .
        ——————————————————————————————————-

        No Mathew, he does point out the difference but you don’t see it because its RACIAL (snow blindness).

        Far from giving n166ers credit for their Manson like behaviors, he attacks and ridicules them while supporting these same behaviors when practiced by white males. There is much hypocrisy promoted on this site, but the biggest one is the idea that white beta males can become alphas by acting like n166ers (wait it gets better)

        and then hating n166ers.

        The ultimate message of this site is NOT sexual, its racial;

        “being white means never having to apologize for acting like a n166er.”

        Is this the key to scoring white dime pussy?

        I don’t know because its not an experiement I can run. What I do know is that the world does not need more men acting like ni66ers.

        CH can’t come out and say it.

        But I can.

        *stand by for white hamster riot*

        Like


      • CH supports Manson like behaviors in white males???

        Then why is he disgusted that women are attracted to psychos like moths to a light bulb?

        Where does he recommend we behave “Manson like” ???

        Like


      • CH supports ni66er like behaviors in white males???

        Then why is he disgusted that women are attracted to ni66ers like moths to a light bulb?

        Where does he recommend we behave “ni66er like” ???

        Come on Canadian Friend, does Mathew King gotta spell it out for you?

        you know game recognize game.

        Like


    • > “Lloyd Blankfein, I’d like to have a cigar with that guy”

      Blankfein is a well-known sodomite.

      He’d shove his circumcised cigar right up your ass.

      Like


  5. So jealous… now I want to be a psychotic killer.

    mah plan:

    1. go on killing spree for the environment / children / cis-gender privilege / whatever who cares
    2. publicly taunt police with twitter account
    3. posts pics of being badass
    4. don’t get caught, stay on the run
    5. schtup hotties while on the lamb fleeing across country
    6. ???
    7. profit!

    Like


    • schtup hotties while on the lamb fleeing across country

      Granted, contrast is king, but you’d be better off with a motorcycle.

      Like


  6. You could meet that girl outside and not even think that she’s the kind that’d date a convicted serial killer. If she wasn’t this head over heels in love and public about it all, she could have ten betas paying for her everything and leading them on “I’m saving myself for the right man (he’s gotta be a lifer)”

    Like


  7. Correction: Manson never killed anyone.

    [CH: i know. keeping it simple for the short attention spans of the social media-lubed audience. but manson did direct others to kill. pretty much the same diff.]

    Like


    • Here is an interesting fact a lot of people seem to be unaware of;

      the Manson murders were committed by 3 women.

      Yes 3 women.

      Manson only planned the murders, he did not do it.

      the 3 women who admired him and followed him did the actual killing.

      here is Wikipedia on this,

      ” …He was found guilty of conspiracy to commit the murders of Sharon Tate and Leno and Rosemary LaBianca carried out by members of the group at his instruction. He was convicted of the murders through the joint-responsibility rule, which makes each member of a conspiracy guilty of crimes his fellow conspirators commit in furtherance of the conspiracy’s objective. … ”

      Since this happened just when Feminism was starting to ” bloom” of course the liberal media swept this information under the carpet.
      It was too inconvenient that the cold hearted murderers who committed one of the most famous crime in the last 100 years were females.

      This is but one out of thousands of truths the left and feminists have hidden from us to better push their anti-white male agenda

      Now how many women who have pushed a man to commit murder have been throwned in jail simply for ” joint responsibility” ?

      Probably zero.

      Because the patriarchy is oppressing women…right?

      Manson is still a crazy sun of a bitch but he did not do it; 3 women did.

      Those should not be called “the Manson murders” but “the 3 female murders”.

      Like


    • on November 21, 2013 at 1:04 pm Edmund McRofling

      Not “same diff”: killing your own victims is retarded trash-crazy. Getting three chicks to kill… that’s inspired, world-class game. It’d also batshit crazy, and a pathetic, retarded waste of a great talent.

      But the talent remains, with an awesome purity.

      Like


      • Just as we like to rate women on their attractiveness , I would rate Manson’s psychotic mind a 6/10 for “evilness”, while I would rate those 3 psychotic women at 10/10 for pure evilness.

        If you tell me to go jump in front of a train , that does not make you crazy nor dangerous, it is not “nice” of you but not crazy nor dangerous,

        but if I listen to you and go do it, then I am the crazy dangerous one.

        Manson did not do it, he only basically told them ; ” go jump in the lake”

        He did not put a gun to the women’s head, he simply told them to do something, they did not have to do it, they chose to do it, those 3 women are the sick psychotic ones for having murdered innocent people just because they were told to do so.

        And the leftist/feminist people who control information ( trough media, education system etc ) who have have managed to make the fact it was 3 women did it disappear down a hole and who managed to make tens of millions of people believe a man did it when he was not even there while the 3 women were murdering innocents, get a 7/10 for evilness.

        Yes, one more point than Manson.

        Some pretty lies ( and liars ) are that ugly.

        Like


      • Nah, I’m with McRofling.

        Anyone can commit murder.

        But only supremely evil people [Marx, Berkman & Goldman, Bronstein, Luxemburg, etc etc etc] can convince other people to commit murder in their stead.

        Like


      • World leaders are supremely evil.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 11:05 am Edmund McRofling

        Evil people try. People with game succeed. I didn’t rate Manson’s morals, I rated his skills.

        Reading comprehension is a valuable skill, guys.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 11:12 am Edmund McRofling

        Everybody agrees Manson is fucking evil, you spergtard. Rating Manson’s evil, what the fuck? What kind of a fucking idiot are you? Who fucking cares? EVIL ENOUGH, that’s how evil. DON’T BE THAT EVIL.

        Thanks for sharing the important news that it’s evil to kill people. THANK GOD one of the few men privy to that secret happened to stop by and enlighten us, or NOBODY WOULD HAVE EVER KNOWN.

        Moron. Autist. Imbecile. Clown.

        Like


      • Go change your tampax, ( or replace the batteries in your butt plug) you will feel better.

        then you might regain your composure and be calm enough to be able to understand what I said.

        Like


      • on November 23, 2013 at 5:41 pm haunted trilobite

        There is a possibility of other more sinister mechanisms being involved in that demonic scenario. Tate was wife of an up and coming director who may have needed a blood sacrifice.

        Like


    • I get your drift. But if they are the same diff, how many world leaders does that make murderers?

      I guess it usually goes as follows, world leaders or average guys…

      a) Convince others to kill for your benefit and win = hero
      or
      b) Convince others to kill for your benefit and lose = madman/ psycho/ murderer

      It’s telling how the females who committed the murders have largely been forgotten by history and are viewed as largely innocent tools and Manson is widely known and most people consider him a killer.

      *Social experiment… ask friends how many people Charles Manson killed. Not sure? Guess.

      Like


  8. Help me out here CH. She’s not ugly as in despicable, but she surely isn’t any kind of beauty. She’s a 5 there, maybe a 5.5 if she dolls up. I guess if the point was to only disprove ugly skank (HB 1 to 3), ok, but offering “homely boring looking farm girl” isn’t a huge improvement.

    I guess I’d see it differently at his age though.

    Manson never impressed me. So he had a couple of other people kill on his behalf during the height of the teen idiocy of the looney Left, ok, cult leader cred, but that kind of thing really seems so second hand and cowardly. Cult leaders to get my begrudged respect until they have an army of at least a hundred or higher. Some guy who convinced a couple of dopey ideologues to go out and hurt folks, eh, old and broken, even during that time period. Definitely not badass.

    That said, he is a cultural icon of sorts, in a dark way, so yeah, it does prove that women are absolutely out of conscious control of their sexual urges and turn ons.

    Like


    • ” Cult leaders to get my begrudged respect” = “Cult leaders don’t get my begrudged respect”.

      Rented fingers.

      Like


      • The 1-10 scale should be changed to 1-5. 9s and 10s = 5; 7s and 8s = 4; etc. There is really not so much nuance or subtlety that a 1-10 scales is called for.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 11:16 am Edmund McRofling

        True, but you’re wasting your breath, and if you try to go around calling hotties 5s, you’re not going to improve the cosmic signal to noise ratio as much as you may expect.

        Like


    • Do you know how much of a typical hot babe is makeup? I’d say she’s a 6. And if she looks that good naturally, she’ll clean up pretty nice.

      Like


    • “Some guy who convinced a couple of dopey ideologues to go out and hurt folks, eh, old and broken, even during that time period. Definitely not badass.”

      Compile a list of ‘some guys’ who convince people (women!) to go out and kill multiple persons and other highly illegal acts.

      I’m betting such a list is going to lean towards alpha. Not pedestrian “some guys”.

      Like


    • I’ve actually met real live women before. True story. So yes, I’m aware of what women without makeup look like. She’s a 5 in good lighting, tops. 5 doesn’t mean bone ugly, despite how some see it, it just means plain Jane but not somebody you’d be embarrassed to let your dad know you nailed. Average. Normal at best, 5 tops without makeup. 5.5 with I’d wager, add in dim lighting and alcohol and blue balls and she might hit 6. Sorry. Opinions differ, but to me, mine are right since my rating scale is used for my pleasure and my pleasure alone. If you’re content banging what I see as a 5 you don’t have to justify it or argue about it, just call her your 6 and move on.

      [CH: pointy elbow internet nerd syndrome alert.]

      Like


      • Exactly CH. you pointy elbow faggots are retarded. That girl is a solid 8 easily. Easily u fucktard keyboard commandos.

        Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 1:21 pm Ed the Department Head

        I’d give her a 9. Needs bigger tits I think.

        Like


      • Easily an 8.

        Like


      • A solid 8?!? LOL!

        Dude, get some standards.

        I defined a 5. A girl you wouldn’t be ashamed admitting to your pop that you banged. She fits into that category, rather normal and plain but not fugly. You guys are way over invested in your little scales and being “right” about something that is, basically, subjective beyond a certain point. We can all agree on 9’s (and 1/2’s) based on symmetry and weight/health and other factors, but the devil is in the details is the 5-7 range, in my view. Way too much play going on there for it to be objective in any sense.

        Would I do the broad? Maybe, if I had a drink and hadn’t been laid in a while and it was a dark room and calm night. I’m certainly not above it and don’t mind admitting so. Thus the whole “pointy elbow” criticism makes zero sense. But then, we’re talking egos invested in the fact that somebody else might not recognize how awesome you are if you walk in the room with what they consider a 5 on your arm. Am I right? heh.

        [CH: enough. stop trolling this thread with your personal hang-ups. it’s male hamsters like yourself who drive away smart, clever commenters with something insightful and entertaining to contribute.]

        Like


      • Lol. CH spanked u. Also ur gay fagginator.

        Like


    • You’re free to hold him in breathless admiration AlphaBeta. It doesn’t impress me that much.

      [CH: cut the crap dude. how many 79 year old men do you know are loved by 25 year old vixens? ps the girl’s a solid 7.]

      I give credit where its due though, but not a lot, he’s just not “all that” in my view. Any given half drunk redneck can convince a star struck chick to do just about anything at any given time. Alpha? I guess, in a small capacity, but it’s not the only kind of alpha, and certainly not the kind to admire or emulate. But maybe that’s just me.

      This is all besides the point, since the actual OP was making the point that women will go for what is perceived as evil on the half shell. The article makes that point well enough. I don’t have to agree that he’s impressive for that to be true, since society in general gives this little twit a larger aura than he’s likely due. But hey, little number 5 here responded to that aura as predicted.

      Like


      • *blockheaded rambling snipped.*

        [CH: you’re banned from this thread for egregious trolling and inability to grasp basic sociosexual realities.

        ps sockpuppeting or ip hopping results in lifetime ban. think before acting.]

        Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 1:02 pm Customer Service

        CH, the block is a good choice. People like that guy who fight for the other side are the biggest obstacles to the real talk movement. As long as there’s a scent of vag on the white knight side guys like him will exist. Best just to cut them loose.

        Girls a 7, when she was 19 she probably would have been a 8. You can bet she has a wicked hot body like most of the female thrill seekers do.

        Like


      • Thank God. If she’s a 5 I might as well go hit the Haagen Dazs.

        Like


      • Stop blowing the host, pismire. It’s a disagreement. Have some self respect.

        I’ve observed Burninator and he’s not an “obstacle[] to the real talk movement,” far from. You understudy shitbirds have the “white knight” bb spray on a hair trigger any time someone diverges slightly from the host’s dictate.

        And I doubt he would sockpuppet or ip hop either. What kind of self-respecting man would do that just to post to a weblog? It’s not that hard to walk away when you have places to go. And the normal response to an overblown misunderstanding is to laugh and move on, not get angry or vengeful and plot elaborate deceptions to reign supreme over a tempest in a teapot.

        Matt

        Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 2:29 pm Captain Obvious

        I was thinking she’s a 7 too. Wtf is this dude smokin?

        And for fucks sake…the man is 54 years older! Give him his props.

        Like


      • i do want everyone to kno that i called this guy out already. 🙂

        Like


    • “[CH: pointy elbow internet nerd syndrome alert.]”

      False. Your taste is not the objective last say on a girl’s attractiveness.

      [CH: men’s attractiveness standards are fairly universal. what one man considers a 7 is likely to be considered a 7 by the majority of men. the CH archives are filled with studies and supporting real world observations that confirm this assertion. so the only question now is whether you want to continue sounding like a fucking idiot or if you want to cut this line of contrarian nerdfaggot balderdash before you incriminate yourself further.]

      I’ve already explained how I view her to another poster. Don’t expect genuflecting and breathless agreement with your every nuanced view CH. I do agree with your main assertion in the article, but I don’t have to find your tastes the same as mine. Deal with it.

      Like


    • nah she’s a 7-7.5. tis a fine line to walk between obsequious pussy-sniffer and dem-elbows-is-too-pointy….but lo, I stride just fine.

      Like


  9. As much as I don’t like the guy…he’s got the right idea about what marriage is in this country. I’m stealing that line.

    Like


  10. “I don’t want to take my time going’ to work. I got a motorcycle and a sleeping bag and 10 or 15 girls. What the hell do I want to go off and go to work for? Work for what? Money? I got all the money in the world. I’m the king man. I’m the run the underworld guy. I decide who does what and where they do it at. Who am I to run around and act like I’m some teenybopper somewhere for somebody else’s money? I make the money man, I roll the nickels. The game’s mine. I deal the cards.”

    Like


  11. Why should he care. He’s already dead.

    Game lesson: have nothing to lose. .

    Like


    • Well you want to have your soul…everything else is up for being lost and you should have a devil may care attitude about that. Remember where your treasure is that’s where your heart is.

      Like


  12. I still say the picture of Obama putting a medal around that überyenta Steinem’s neck is far more disturbing.

    Like


  13. Once again it is proven women are attracted to evil incarnate.

    Hell I could point you to Eve and tell you that.

    Doesn’t mean it’s a good idea for men to go down that road…ask Adam how that worked out for him.

    Like


    • Evil and good do not exist. People do everything their self-interest, even going to church. The thrill that the criminal gets from stealing is the same thrill that the cops get from catching him.

      Like


      • I still prefer it when the cops catch the guy who stole my stuff. Thank you.

        Like


      • Thrills mean nothing…unless you are a woman and then your whole decison making process is based off it.

        But if they don’t exist…it wouldn’t matter if I give you a loaf of bread when you are starving…or kill you just because it would amuse me. Good and evil don’t exist.

        Remind me to never sign up for nilihism.

        Like


  14. is this same girl that YaReally pooped on?

    Like


  15. However gullible some/most/all (take your pick) women are by alpha men, I am boggled at the assertion that some Svengali can get any random woman to go commit the most amazingly brutal murders on his say-so. Give me a break…

    Like


    • on November 23, 2013 at 6:00 pm haunted trilobite

      It’s connected to backwards masking in beatles helter skelter and satanic rituals ala aleister crowley. Half of California was mk’d in the 60s

      Like


  16. Just a couple of cave people doing their thing a few hundred thousand years too late. He shouldn’t be in jail, he should be in a museum of natural history.

    Like


  17. on November 21, 2013 at 12:55 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    I think CH’s overarching point—that women are into “bad boys”—is a fairly solid one. Hell, ask any woman, and if she’s being honest, she’ll admit it.

    However, what *most* women mean by “I am attracted to bad boys” is that they’re attracted to the kind of guy who mouthed off to the teachers and played mean pranks and smoked cigarettes outside the lunchroom. He’s a rebel, a rulebreaker, but he’s not going to murder you and sew your flesh into a girl suit that he’ll wear while he lip-synchs to “Goodbye Horses.”

    For a small percentage of women, way out on the left side of the bell curve, that mostly harmless preference expresses itself as a destructive pathology. These are the women who do shit like Star, here. The syllogism is kind of like this:

    Regular women:Star :: Slobby frat dude:episode of Hoarders

    I do agree, Lucky and Tim, that CH does seem to focus on these extreme cases as if they were the norm.

    [CH: the focus has a purpose. throwing a spotlight on the extremes (and, really, it’s not that extreme, badboy inmates have hordes of young women hurling themselves into their tatted arms unlike anything beta males ever get to experience) is necessary to bust a hole through the bunker-hardened skulls of the unthinking platitude pushers. The extremes serve to illustrate that the entire spectrum of female desire is shifted toward the asshole-loving end of the belle curve.]

    A couple of weeks ago I related an incident in which I briefly crossed paths with a guy who turned out to be a serial killer. I didn’t know it at the time, of course, but the dude made my skin crawl. CH’s reply was, “Well, you remember him all these years later, while a million betas go forgotten.” (Yeah, and I remember the time I got in a car crash all these years later, while a million uneventful commutes are forgotten.)

    [car crashes and men are qualitatively different. for instance, this is the first time you mentioned on this blog that you had been in a car crash.

    ps were you raped?]

    Like


    • on November 21, 2013 at 2:24 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Well, this blog isn’t about car crashes.

      As far as your question, if you will tell me why you want to know, I will answer you honestly.

      [CH: i have noticed that women who have had very traumatic experiences with bad men sometimes elevate the virtues of the niceguy far above their actual feelings for them, and run like crazy from any man with even the slightest hint of a jerk-ish edge.]

      Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 2:39 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        As you no doubt have already guessed based on my previous ducking of the question, the answer is yes.

        [CH: do i know how to call it, or what!]

        And no, he wasn’t wearing a clown mask. That was just me joking around with whorefinder, because I actually find rape jokes rather funny. I know, I know: that’s weird. But there ya go.

        [as i suspected, your studied aversion to any and all flavors of badboy stem from a traumatic experience with a representative of the extreme tail of badboyism. but your individual experience tells us nothing about the preferences of the majority of women.]

        Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 3:12 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, here’s the interesting part, at least inasmuch as my aversion to “bad boys”: It actually stems from my teen years, when I had an extremely controlling and jealous boyfriend, who hit me one time. (And yes, the physical abuse was the reason I dropped him and never spoke to him again. As wake-up calls go, getting punched suffices quite nicely.)

        The rape happened later, when I was an adult.

        Like


      • Jealousy, controlling insecurity like that and hitting GF IS BETA. Sorry that happened to you.

        Like


      • But when did you decide to die childless?

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 7:43 am RappaccinisDaughter

        When I was a little kid myself, Matthew. I know it’s tough to believe, but the childfree-by-choice thing isn’t the result of any trauma. I actually had a pretty awesome childhood.

        I never knew it until I was an adult, but apparently there are a lot of people like me. Entire online communities of ’em. Most of them report the same thing, that they’ve always known they never wanted kids.

        Like


      • No rudeness intended: was your mother neurotypical?

        Like


      • Maybe you should tell us more.

        How often do women get to talk about something like this “in front” of such a large male audience?

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 10:35 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Ha ha, every day on every MSM outlet, ever? Hell, I’m bored with it, and I was there.

        Like


      • yeah but the MSM audience and this audience are very different.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 12:47 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        That’s certainly true, Canadian Friend, but everyone here has been exposed to the MSM their entire lives. You absorb the messages via osmosis, whether you really want to or not.

        But if there’s anything in particular you want to know, go ahead and ask.

        Like


      • 1 – How old were you?

        2 – Did you know him?

        3 – Did you file a complain?

        4 – Did you have “irrefutable” evidence?

        5 – Was he sent to jail?

        6 – (if he is out of jail) Did you ever run into him again?

        7 – Did he ever apologize/felt sorry?

        8 – How long did it take you to come out of this traumatic experience? ( you seem to be doing fine now )

        9 – too many questions?

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 1:54 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        1 – How old were you?
        25.

        2 – Did you know him?
        Yes, although not as well as I’d thought. I had dated him for a couple of months. I broke up with him because, although he had initially come off as being rather gentle and passive (your classic “beta niceguy”), I’d started noticing some weird red flags with his behavior. He lured me back to his house with promises of friendship. I actually hung out with him a couple of times as “just friends” before one night he gave me a drink that was drugged.

        3 – Did you file a complain?
        No. I just wanted to put it behind me and move on.

        4 – Did you have “irrefutable” evidence?
        Yes. Apparently he thought what he’d given me would completely erase my memory, and that when I woke up in the morning I’d believe him when he told me that what had happened was consensual. However, although I only had fragmented memories, I knew he was lying…and I remembered the camera.

        While he was taking a shower (whistling “Greensleeves” while he did it, I’ll never forget that), I extracted the memory card and took it with me when I left. It very clearly depicts a rape. In the video, I’m coming in and out of consciousness. When I’m conscious, I’m crying and swatting at him.

        5 – Was he sent to jail?
        No.

        6 – (if he is out of jail) Did you ever run into him again?
        No. He knows I have the memory card. (And if he’s out there, reading this: Don’t bother. It’s in a safe deposit box.)

        7 – Did he ever apologize/felt sorry?
        I’m told by mutual friends that several weeks afterward, he overdosed on the same drug he used on me. He survived and was Baker Acted, although he was released after 72 hours. Whether it was an accidental OD or a suicide attempt…or whether he was driven by guilt…who knows?

        8 – How long did it take you to come out of this traumatic experience? ( you seem to be doing fine now )
        Because of the method he chose to subdue me (which was kinda pussy, don’t you think? I do), I had very little visible physical damage. I had insomnia, panic attacks, and one very scary fugue in which I physically attacked a guy who tried to “strangle” me in bed without asking me first, but that all tapered off after about 18 months.

        9 – too many questions?
        No.

        Like


      • Thanks for taking the time to reply,

        Since you had solid proof why did you not file a complaint?

        Could ” Raped-on-the-chinny Dumber” who – judging from his reply in this thread is very angry at you – be the one who you say raped you? (his anger seems disproportionate)

        oh yeah and I have no idea how old you are now.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 4:05 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Canadian Friend,

        That’s a good question. It’s kind of “the” question. Before it happened to me, I used to get really angry with women who didn’t report their rapes—after all, that left the guy free to do it again, to somebody else. And even now I carry that guilt…has he done this to someone else? I don’t know.

        The only answer I can give you is that, right when it happened and after it happened, I just wanted to forget it. I didn’t want to have to go through with a trial. I didn’t want to have to face him in a courtroom. I never wanted to see him again. All I wanted was to take about six hot showers in a row, and then get ruinously drunk.

        As far as the guy below…I doubt that he’s the same guy. He had a number of distinctive “tells” in his writing that I’d recognize anywhere. As far as this person’s disproportionate rage in this thread, well, he went after Amy, too.

        And no, he doesn’t know what I look like. I’ve never posted a picture of myself.

        Like


      • Sorry Rapp, what a scumbag. If you don’t mind, what were the red flags that made you want to break up with him?

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 7:53 am RappaccinisDaughter

        @Amy
        The red flags:

        1. After only a few weeks of dating, he started pressuring me to move in with him. Too much, too soon.

        2. I took him to a Happy Hour that was arranged through some of my friends at work, and he acted like a jealous 16-year-old. He wouldn’t mingle or circulate; instead he stayed firmly affixed to my side like a limpet. That in and of itself wouldn’t have bothered me—not everyone’s a social butterfly. However, the fact that he kept trying to be inappropriately sexual with me in front of my colleagues was embarrassing. (Holding hands? Sure. Trying to tongue-kiss me in front of my boss? NO.) He was clearly attempting to “mark his territory,” and he didn’t care whether I liked it or not.

        3. When I took him aside and told him he was being inappropriate and to stop it, he sulked and pouted for the rest of the evening.

        4. A family member of mine died and I went to the funeral by myself. I called him at one point, and he grew upset and accusatory because he could hear men’s voices in the background. Those voices belonged to my father, my uncle, and my cousin.

        That’s when I broke up with him.

        Like


      • as the father of a six year old girl and an 8 year old girl who used to be 6, I can guarantee you that no six-year-old knows that she does not want to have kids. cannot even come close to knowing that at that age. I’m sorry you were raped and hit. There is no excuse for a man to hit a woman.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 12:37 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        First point: Well, I did. I changed my mind about a lot of things that I believed when I was six (for example, I no longer want to be a bull-rider), but not about that.

        Second point: Oh, there are reasons why a man should hit a woman. If she hits him first, he has every right to defend himself. Women aren’t generally as strong as men, but we can still hurt and injure. (That wasn’t the case with what happened to me, of course, but I think it’s harmful to society in general and men in particular to teach boys that they should NEVER hit a woman.)

        Please don’t take that the wrong way. I believe your kind words are sincerely meant, and I appreciate the spirit in which you are offering them.

        Like


      • @ RD no woman can physically hurt me in the absence of a knife or gun. I guess perhaps if she sucker punched me in the nose. So any man who physically hurts a woman is a piece of ant poop who deserves a painful death. That is all. P.S. This “society” is pure garbage.

        Like


      • RappaccinisDaughter

        The rape happened later, when I was an adult.
        —————————————————————————

        What color was he?

        Like


      • As far as your question, if you will tell me why you want to know, I will answer you honestly.

        = “Yes, I was.”

        Open up to us. You have a thousand compassionate counselors eager to help you down here in the comboxacombs.

        Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 3:02 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Why, Matt? You want his number or something?

        Like


      • on November 21, 2013 at 7:39 pm Rape-a-chimney Dumber

        Take note, gentlemen. CH should feature this in a future post.

        RD (who, somehow, appears to be increasingly disgusting and damaged with her every post) in 8 SHORT WORDS is showcasing a deep insight into her perverse human psychology.

        1) Butthurt. An immediate hostile response to Matt. Does the rape still hurt, sweetheart? Taking Zoloft?

        2) Psychological projection – her immediate thought is yet another scenario of sex, presumably hooking up with that rapist guy after calling him.

        Dr. Freud would say that her suggestion of Matt calling the rapist / fucking the rapist is actually an unconscious projection of *her* being on, no pun intended, the receiving end. Her inner limbic hamster cannot let an opportunity of getting her pussy wet to domineering badboys get away.

        3) (as follows from the previous) Badboy attraction – the one that all women have. She – and other women – may huff and haw all they want, but it is still there.

        This is the truth about your gender, sweetheart. There is a spectrum – certainly – but all women have the desire to be cumdumpsters to abusive assholes. The fact that you have had abusive men in your life is no accident. Any psychoanalyst would say that you, unconsciously, put yourself in bad situations because you LIKE IT.

        Learn to accept the harsh unmitigated truth – you chain-smoking masculinized shemale with small tits devoid of naturally feminine motherly instincts- and take it -all- in. No pun intended.

        We’re here to listen. Need a doll?

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 7:35 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Rape-a-chimney Dumber…I snarfed. But let’s see, you asked me some questions and made some statements, so let’s dig in, shall we?

        1-2) Matt seems to find me endlessly fascinating. Note that he replies to approximately 80% of the comments I make on CH. Nobody else does that. When I was absent for a few days, he actually created a sockpuppet of me and *talked to it.* Like the world’s dumbest ventriloquism show.

        So, I don’t think he necessarily would like to have sex with the guy who raped me, but I do suspect he’d like to smell his dick.

        1-3) Do you think it’s at all odd that you would accuse me of suffering continuing trauma (“Does the rape still hurt, sweetheart? Taking Zoloft?”) while simultaneously insisting that I have the desire to be a “cumdumpster[s] to abusive assholes”? I mean, pick one, dude.

        Then we’ve got your penultimate para, which I think is the best one: “you chain-smoking masculinized shemale with small tits devoid of naturally feminine motherly instincts.” Why do any of these things about me upset you? It’s extremely unlikely you’ve ever met me or ever will; I have no impact on your life whatsoever.

        And no, Chief, I don’t need a doll. I’ve got all the comfort I’ll ever need bumping reassuringly against my hip.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 11:35 am Edmund McRofling

        You’re supposed to use two words to her three, not fifty.

        Start over.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 1:34 pm Raped-on-the-chinny Dumber

        Oh man, RD, it’s hard to reply to you whilst stifling the masculine viscera and polluted air that your aura has cast on me – even from here – but I will try.

        1) Matt is a weird one – no arguments from me. But this does not excuse, nor condone, your immediate butthurt reply to him. I am sorry sweety – but neither one of us raped you. Is that a defense mechanism you attribute to all men that you have since developed?

        Matt – if you’re reading this – I am especially amused that you had previously attacked me for ‘following you around’, whilst I was telling off the resident dumb whore shitposter known as ‘Amy’ that set off your white-knight instincts, when I, actually and ironically, defend you on occasions such as this one.

        But anyway, back to you, damaged goods:

        2) How long have you been here at CH? I am guessing not very long, to think that there is a contradiction in what I said.

        One of the central tenets here is the paradox of female psychology where women are both turned on / get wet sexually from abusive men and bad situations, whilst logically knowing that it is bad for them. Heard of CH’s posts on Chris Brown, for example?

        Huff and haw all you want, you put yourself in those situations for a reason that even your logical part of your hamsterized brain cannot comprehend.

        You should read more of the archives before you call the Chateau your home.

        In fact, while other women – and men – will offer you their shoulders to cry on, because poor little RD has been beaten and raped, I will tell you the truth that nobody else has the courage to tell you otherwise: you made it EASY for them.

        3) I was rather proud of calling you a chain-smoking masculinized shemale with small tits devoid of motherly instincts – I am happy you appreciate my work. But this does not imply malice, or that I even care about you. It is just a statement of fact of what you are, like the sky being blue. Does this hard truth upset you?

        However, if you want to infer malice – I will abide. I am a giver. This is akin to the resolution of CH’s screed against fat women – the contempt is because undesirable women like you shit up the world for the rest of us. I remember he ended the post with a vision for a world ‘happier on the eyes and happier in the heart’.

        When deformed “creatures” like you quit being eyesores on the rest of us – you are such a far cry from a desirable feminine, coy, and lovely chaste girl that you shouldn’t identify yourself as being a woman – that his glorious vision of such a beautiful world shall be realized when creatures like you fall in number.

        You are right – I probably will never meet you. And for that, I am lucky.

        P.S. @ Edmund – I know you are a troll, but your inane post is implying that I am trying to pick up such a HB2 like RD (assuming she doesn’t have mice in her vagina), but I am no such masochist.

        However, your strict dogmatic adherence to “rules” and for wanting to fuck ANY kind of girl – even one as damaged and undesirable as RD – reveal your inner beta.

        I have a beautiful vision; you two should get married in the trailer park. Matt and I will ordain and laugh.

        Or you and Amy should scissor each other, lube up each other’s hamsters and decry that there are no ‘good men’ left in the world anymore, and then commit seppuku. We will have a candlelight vigil at the Chateau and jerk off on the ugly faces of prostitutes to honor both of your legacies here.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 2:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Say what you will about Matt King (and I have), at least he manages to be creepy in perfect, beautifully grammatical American English. When Matt is funny, it’s generally because he’s trying to be.

        You, on the other hand, are just begging for a fisking. Lie back, baby, and don’t fight…time to relax and enjoy yourself!

        “Oh man, RD, it’s hard to reply to you whilst stifling the masculine viscera and polluted air that your aura has cast on me”
        You are aware that “viscera” refers to internal organs, right? And that if you’re “stifling” it, you’re suppressing it. So the way your sentence reads is: “It’s hard to reply to you while I suppress my male organs.” I get this image of you with your junk tucked between your legs, doing the ol’ Buffalo Bill.

        “Is that a defense mechanism you attribute to all men that you have since developed?”

        What you’re TRYING to say in this sentence is that I think all men are rapists. What you’re ACTUALLY saying in this sentence is that I am attributing defense mechanisms to other men. Which is a whole different concept.

        Here’s an example of what that would look like: “The dude who comments as Rape-a-chinny-dumber and Amy-is-a-dumb-whore has been rejected by women his whole life, and his defense mechanism is displacing his feelings of inadequacy onto women who cannot hurt him because they are on the Internet.”

        “Matt – if you’re reading this – I am especially amused that you had previously attacked me for ‘following you around’, whilst I was telling off the resident dumb whore shitposter known as ‘Amy’ ”

        You can just say “while,” or “all the while.” Misusing “whilst,” just like misusing “whom” and “myself” is a classic hallmark of someone doing their best to appear intellectual. And failing.

        “One of the central tenets here is the paradox of female psychology where women are both turned on / get wet sexually from abusive men and bad situations, whilst logically knowing that it is bad for them.”

        Ibid.

        “When deformed “creatures” like you quit being eyesores on the rest of us”

        I think you’re trying to say I’m an eyesore TO you. I would not be an eyesore ON you unless…well. But maybe that’s what you’re trying to say after all, in which case I must note that your mom never complains.

        Like


      • How would he know you are an eyesore?

        Have you posted photos of yourself?

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 3:42 pm I got Raped-acinni's Daughter

        Man, with such a petulant attitude of taking apart syntax – I can’t see for the life of me why any man would want to punch or rape you! You sound so loveable!

        I wholeheartedly apologize to you for writing quickly and without proofreading; I didn’t know being petulant and looking for red-herrings in a transparent attempt to change the topic matter is a symptom of rape abuse.

        Of course, you are wrong on all accounts (and even if you weren’t, I can see why you’d want to avoid the subject). But I don’t have the time to educate you or explain the nuances of English (there is ONE English; ‘American English’ is a misnomer, but even so, who told you that I was even American for you to impugn my proficiently at ‘American English’? Oh, right…. the omniscient hamster. It also picks quality men for you too.)

        Fine – I’ll be charitable and give you one example. You are a poor wittle wape wictim after all, right?

        Viscera literally means ‘organs’ – good job! – but in modern parlance it can also mean ‘life force’. Ever heard of the word ‘eviscerate’, whose meaning is to take out someone’s life force? Where do you think it comes from?

        In any case, back to the regularly scheduled programming. I am not interested in red-herrings.

        This – ladies and gentlemen – is classic hamstering, of course – but this time with the added element of having psychopathology involved.

        Sweetie, did the rape hurt that much that you’d rather talk about my English than about the dire position you put yourself in as a result of being that same desperate chain-smoking masculinized shemale whore with small tits, devoid of motherly instincts, that I referenced before?

        It must be, because when I first wrote that, your first response was to cry foul, and say WAAH WAAAH WHY DO YOU CARE ABOUT ME?! YOU’LL NEVER MEET ME?!

        I guess avoiding this entirely in your subsequent post is an improvement. Good job. I expect you to continue to avoid things that bother you, poor little raped girl.

        Also, the questions that you answered above confirmed what I already suspected about you. You “dated” this guy “for months”, lol. You seem to have an affinity for the deranged and abusive assholes. Is it a result of being mentally deformed, or do you enjoy the abuse? Please tell us!

        Don’t get me started on the small memory chip you have in your safe deposit box. lol. Most quality girls have, you know, money, jewelry, etc. (you know, the ones smart enough to date quality men). But not you! You have a memory chip of being raped! Good call going to his place that night and – seemingly – aligning yourself constantly with violent people.

        Actually, I cannot tell; where they violent before they met you, or did you just bring out the best in them? Perhaps you questioned their English in the middle of debates, too?

        To be honest, though, I am surprised the first guy you spoke about from your teens actually didn’t punch you sooner. I will send him flowers for his patience.

        Do you date losers because your low SMV (bad body, bad attitude) demands it, or because you are a masochist?

        You are just proving me right: you’re not exactly helping your case of nit appearing to be a holier-than-thou nitwit when you actually focus on my syntax and not on the actual subject matter of you being an execrable retard that put herself in the position of abuse; and, from the kind of contempt I see, it looks like you deserved it.

        Since it seems that you don’t seem to be very much able to stay on topic, it looks like you need that doll after all.

        Don’t worry, my love, we will personalize it for you: we will give her a severe breast reduction, color her lungs black, put bile where her vagina ought to be, and finally give her the remarkable skill of misdirection to avoid hurtful topics and deny reality because she is a poor sensitive wittle victim.

        Oh, and be happy I didn’t pick apart your English; but I figured this message would be long enough.

        I wish you many more abusive men in your future. Undoubtedly – based on your disposition, looks, ideas, and views – you’ll be blessed with many more! Kudos!

        P.S. I don’t need Dr. Freud to explain why you chose a handle where the first word sounded, phonetically, is ‘Rape’, you chain-smoking unfeminine little whore with the body of a 9 year old Chinese boy.

        Like


      • Lol.. I’m starting to get jealous, RD. I think he’s leaving me for you.

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 4:18 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        “Ever heard of the word ‘eviscerate’, whose meaning is to take out someone’s life force? Where do you think it comes from?”

        Eviscerate means to remove the internal organs. That’s all it means; it’s never meant anything else. Sometimes people will use it metaphorically to denote utter destruction, as in, “I just eviscerated your argument like a got-damn sexual tyrannosaurus.” (Although, admittedly, I wasn’t spitting tobacco dip like Jesse Ventura at the time.)

        Why do I choose to go Grammar Nazi on you, rather than address any of your “points”? Answer: Because I see no point in doing otherwise. You won’t listen. You’re ragegasming. And holy fucking shit, it’s hilarious.

        Like


      • Matt seems to find me endlessly fascinating. Note that he replies to approximately 80% of the comments I make on CH. Nobody else does that.

        I do this because you are a provocative commenter who expresses herself well. And you are fairly reasonable for a woman. But it is not reasonable to interpret that as infatuation.

        I do like you despite our very different approaches to life, which makes me hesitate to point out that I have no thoughts about you whatsoever apart from when I am looking at your commentary beneath blog posts.

        I do find you interesting, not fascinating, you are amusing but not “endlessly.” I am happy to talk with the few regulars around here who do not exhibit personality disorders (like your latest anonymous interlocutor, who had the same kind of meltdown with me). If you reply, I usually reply back out of courtesy, not for attention. The solution to this is to not reply to me.

        When I was absent for a few days, he actually created a sockpuppet of me and *talked to it.* Like the world’s dumbest ventriloquism show.

        I would like to see that exchange again. I recall it as a jest about how awesome I was, fallen flat, done once, and among a string of other female regulars.

        Either way, I see what you are trying to do here. A big fat Whatever, Stop Flattering Yourself is all I got. I thought you were above this kind of overinterpretation of combox behavior. Even though you’re not, I can still appreciate your virtues. Does that strike you as unusual?

        Matt

        Like


      • YOU ARE ALL NOW IN PATRICE’S COURT OF LAW

        3 DEFENDANTS:

        MATT – A KNOWN SHITPOSTER THAT COMBINES THE IGNORANCE OF RELIGION, THE OBFUSCATION AFFORDED BY OBSOLETE LANGUAGE, AND THE WHITE-KNIGHTING OF BETAS. WHEN HIS HYPOCRISY GETS CALLED OUT, HE AVOIDS TO RESPOND, AND WHEN HE ISN’T RESPONDED TO, HE CREATES AN IMAGINARY PUPPET SHOW.

        RD – A TANKGRRL EMPOWERED ‘FEMALE’ (TERM USED LOOSELY BASED ON HER BODY WITH A CUPS) THAT TRIES TO ACT TOUGH ON THE INTERNET TO GIVE OFF A MANLY DISPOSITION THAT SHE’S TOO STRONG TO BE AFFECTED BY RAPE (YO!) BUT AVOIDS UNCOMFORTABLE TOPICS IN THINLY-VEILED DESPERATION. BETTER JUDGE OF ENGLISH THAN MEN; AT LEAST WORDS WON’T RAPE HER.

        AMY – ARGUABLY ONE OF THE WORST SHITPOSTERS IN RECENT MONTHS. HER AFFINITY FOR BADBOY THUGS, LAME JOB, CONTEMPT FOR LEARNING, AND DISDAIN FOR TRUTH HAS EVEN SPARKED THE IRE OF CH HIMSELF WHO NEEDED TO CORRECT HER IN RECENT THREADS AND ASK HER NOT TO STRAY OFF TOO FAR AWAY FROM THE LINES OF COHERENCY.

        Reasonings:

        @Matt – I sent you two long replies; I know you’ll appreciate them, as you are the “King” of verbosity yourself. But why no reply? I am sorry if I upset you by pointing out your hypocrisies – I expected so much from such an ardent believer. Is avoiding me and calling me names how you win debates? What personality disorder is associated with ignorance, stupidity, and hypocrisy?

        Take the thesaurus down and tell me why you levy false accusations on people, and white knight a dumb girl that’s been told off countlessly by CH himself.

        @ Amy – Jeez (don’t get offended Matt – this is only an expression. I swear I wasn’t trying to use the Lord’s name in vain!). You are a big clown. CH himself (as well as I and other commenters) have told you off in multiple recent threads, and your response is to act like a child – throw out ad hominems – and cry like a little girl by saying “Et tu, CH?” with a frowney face.

        CH has told you “you are slipping, amy. please quit straying between the lines.”

        I have heard you are a half-nigger. No wonder, in addition to your blockheaded capacity for learning, you have such an affinity for the tattooed blights of society, and you have done work at a prison. Funny how so much of behavior can be explained instantly by racial backgrounds, right?

        @ Oh, poor RD. She still doesn’t want to stay on topic, and would rather discuss English. I don’t think you are as over that rape as you may think.

        I know you are a poor little rape victim, RD, so I will go easy on you, and tell you this – you good character judge of men, you – while whistling green sleeves, to help create a good ambiance between us.

        – Your very first response to Matt reeked of butthurt.
        – A woman is capable of both logically knowing that a man is bad for her while simultaneously feeling attraction for him.
        – Calling you what you are (a hideous creature as ugly on the inside as she is on the outside; and no I don’t mean the black lungs or tits of a 9 year old) does not imply I care about you. Or if I did care, it would be insofar as to create a more beautiful world without such execrable “women” walking on the face of the Earth.

        VERDICTS:

        MATT – BETA MALE. RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE. INTELLECTUAL FRAUD. WHITE KNIGHT.

        WILL DIE ALONE AFTER THE TACTIC OF “HEY AMY, I DEFENDED YOU ON THE INTERNET THAT ONE TIME SO FUCK ME” WILL NOT WORK.

        AMY – ATTRACTED TO THUGS OF SOCIETY. INCAPABLE OF LEARNING. REGARDLESS STAYS IN THE CHATEAU BECAUSE SHE LIKES THE ABUSE OF BEING TOLD OFF (OBVIOUSLY; JUST LOOK AT THE HALF-NIGGER’S DATING HISTORY)

        WILL DIE ALONE AFTER RIDING THE THUG COCK CAROUSEL HER ENTIRE LIFE AND DEMONSTRATING AN IQ OF A POTATO, SMV = 1 (ASSUMING NO MICE INSIDE VAGINA) OR IN A PRISON RIOT

        RD – OLD HAG OF A “FEMALE” OF QUESTIONABLE ANATOMY: A-CUPS, BLACK LUNGS FROM CHAIN-SMOKING FROM YEARS, AND DEVOID OF INNANE MOTHERLY INSTINCTS IN HEALTHY WOMEN. UNABLE TO STAY ON UNCOMFORTABLE TOPICS – LIKE HER RAPE AND HER ATTRACTION TO BADBOYS – SO SHE RESORTS TO TALKING ABOUT THE FASCINATING SUBJECT OF ENGLISH SYNTAX ON A DATING BLOG. CONSTANTLY LOOKS FOR ABUSE.

        WILL DIE FROM EMPHYSEMA OR GANG-RAPE AFTER A MEANINGLESS LIFE OF RIDING THE COCK CAROUSEL OF THUGS FOR AN AFTER-HOURS SPIN. WILL TALK ABOUT ENGLISH SYNTAX ON HER DEATH BAD AND ASK FOR CIGARETTES IN HER LAST BREATH. SMV = -3
        (AVOIDING HER IS DIRECTLY CONDUCIVE TO MALE VIRILITY AND HAPPINESS)

        Like


      • Oh, where are my manners. I almost forgot.

        “Why do I choose to go Grammar Nazi on you, rather than address any of your “points”? Answer: Because I see no point in doing otherwise. You won’t listen. You’re ragegasming. And holy fucking shit, it’s hilarious.”

        Time to pick you apart:

        First off, the word “grammar” there shouldn’t be capital. I can, like you, play this dumb game of pedantry – but unlike you, I am not so butthurt about the topic of rape and badboy attraction that I need to change the topic out of desperation.

        “You won’t listen?” – to what? You said nothing but grammar corrections. And even those don’t make sense; you say eviscerate only has one meaning, then you proceed to give ANOTHER meaning. This hamster has gone suborbital.

        “ragegasming” – that isn’t even a word, so that’s kind of ironic for you to say, grammar Nazi. But if you mean that I am mad, I am sorry to disappoint you.

        I am pretty calm – and very amused – when I call you an old butthurt rape victim with black lungs, small shriveled tits, and a masculine pedantic disposition that tries really hard to change the topic with red-herrings out of sheer and pathetic desperation. I think you’re still hurting, sweetheart.

        “it’s hilarious” – I am very happy you find your affinity for thugs and bad situations, your lack of an ability to discuss such things on topic, incapacity for discussing things with integrity without distractions and red-herrings, and your lovely gift of having a solipsistic unfeminine mind devoid of motherly instincts, paired with an old deformed chain-smoking body battered physically and emotionally from thug carousel riding, to be amusing.

        They say laughter is the best medicine. If I laugh, it’s like my attraction to badboys doesn’t exist, and the rape never happened, right guys? Right?!

        Please feel free to avoid the matters of substance that you find unpleasant and again talk about English. I will find it very complimentary – I assure you; a cowardly refusal to stay on topic and talk to me speaks, ironically, volumes – and, as a reward, I will send you a CD with ‘green sleeves’ on it and a specialized doll that has had a mastectomy and black ash stuffed into its lungs to personalize it for you. God speed!

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 7:45 am RappaccinisDaughter

        So, we can see “Rape-a-chimney Dumber” and “Amy is a dumb whore” are both Patrice. He fucked up and replied under his own name by accident.

        That’s *immaculate*.

        How does it feel, Patrice, to be such a giant, pulsating ball of suck and fail?

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 12:21 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Oh yes, obviously I am Patrice. Truly I fucked up by writing on my *real* identity. You got me, genius!

        Hi guys, I have a BIG ANNOUNCEMENT:

        I wanted to let you all know that aside from being an old shriveled up chain-smoking unfeminine whore, as flat as a wall, devoid of motherly instincts, that had ridden the cock carousel her *entire* life to rapidly enter spinsterhood – one supplied by blights of society like thugs and badboys – that is too dishonest and hurt to stay on topic (about your attraction to badboys and your little rape incident; but hey at least you didn’t talk about English this time), I have another wonderful quality to share with the world….

        I AM A DUMBASS THAT HAS NO IDEA HOW COMMENTING WORKS!

        RD, I never thought you could fail any more – both here and in your personal life – but you continue to aggressively push the envelope and prove me wrong.

        Your last sentence talking about ME failing (considering your ignorance, cowardice in avoidance of topics where you were proven wrong, lack of physical and mental health, and the fact you are an old shriveled-up deranged prune with black lungs and small tits that constantly puts Chris Browns in her life in order to suck thug cock and get abused) is DELICIOUSLY ironic. Kudos for being my puppet!

        Looks like you don’t recognize the “tells” in my writing as well as you had mentioned before, right sweetheart? But that’s okay – we have already established you are solipsistic and delusional about your own capabilities, and you obscure and change the topic to avoid further embarrassment. Does the rape still hurt sweetie?

        Please reply talking again about English, avoiding the topic, and make another dumb remark. I don’t expect you to have the willpower to confront me directly. Hurry!

        You are good cheap entertainment. It is rare to see a creature fail so much.

        I know, this is so shocking to me; I expected so much from a dumbass chain-smoking shemale that had ridden thug cock her entire life. You sound like such quality in a woman.

        I will send you a box of cats to accompany you during your spinsterhood as a reward for my amusement.

        Like


      • lol whoever this guy is, he is awesome. wish i knew his name. he really roasted amy, matthew, and rd pretty hard they are speechless

        rd sorry you got raped. and no I don’t mean when you were 25.
        ‘I am a dumbass who doesn’t know how commenting works’ – RappaccinisDaughter hahahaha.

        no wonder this delusional broad needs to avoid facing that guy directly on topic. she is so terrified LOL!

        Like


      • Why, Matt? You want his number or something?

        I suggest a three-way will take you a long way down your path toward healing.

        I was giving you my backhanded sympathy for bravely opening up to an audience that only knows how to pillory you for exposing a vulnerability. I am not just your everyday Captain Save-A-Ho. I am the Chairman General of the Joint Chiefs-of-Staff for the Salvation of Prodigals. There is nothing you can say or do to make me desire any less that you “have life, and have it to the full.” There is no hurt or harm you can perform on yourself or inflict me with to keep me from wanting you to flourish.

        I always look forward to your retorts because they are always top-notch, even when based on falsehoods. You might even say that’s why I instigate things. But “You want his number or something?” was mediocre at best, any one of these combox drones could have come up with it. I’ll strive to be more worthy of your wit in the future.

        And by “three-way” I mean a group session or conference call, not a ménage à cock, though doubtless that is where your mind immediately went. We will work on those triggers too.

        Matt

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 11:38 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Ah, backhanded sympathy. I’d like to take this opportunity to cordially invite you to take said backhanded sympathy, roll it up as tightly or as loosely as your individual taste demands, and insert it into an area of your person where both the lighting and the air quality are poor.

        I replied to CH because I am satisfied that he only desired the information to fill out a dataset that was anomalous to his general thesis…to better understand the exceptions that prove his rule. Not because I desired or expected that anyone would feel sowwy for poow widdle Wappaccini’sDaughter.

        Your original comment, as well as this follow-up, were so predictable that I could have written them both myself. Why, then, should I bestir myself to pen a creative riposte? If you’re going to give me bathroom-wall graffiti, then all you’ll get in exchange is the text equivalent of a crude penis rendered in Sharpie.

        Like


      • CH THERE ARE TWO 10s IN THE MOVIE BRAVEHEART. WILLIAM FUCKS BOTH INCLUDING A QUEEN!!! 😉

        Like


      • Not because I desired or expected that anyone would feel sowwy for poow widdle Wappaccini’sDaughter.

        I didn’t think it was a deliberate pity play, but it did arouse my sympathy. Don’t take my fellow-feeling so hard. I didn’t expect you to receive it with any kind of generosity. Part of your rape-victim paranoia is prone to the translation of everything into an attack or to find all not-immediately-explicable events “creepy.”

        I invite your worst, if only to see if it will effect my sympathy. I know you don’t want it, and in fact, you take it as an insult. But that has no effect on my urge for solicitude either.

        Your original comment, as well as this follow-up, were so predictable that I could have written them both myself.

        Please write my next response then. I will give you an honest appraisal of your accuracy. I have a stake in truth and the kind of virtuous (if misdirected) work you normally produce. I am not trying to teach you a lesson perforce like your love-hate fan above.

        Your comment immediately above is maybe a C or C+. Grading against what I’ve seen you produce in the past, it’s a disappointing F, D- at best. You’re capable of better.

        Why, then, should I bestir myself to pen a creative riposte?

        Ars gratia artis. That is well above half the reason I myself am here/respond to you.

        Matt

        Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 7:11 pm Amy, Matt, RD are the real dark triads

        The poor little raped girl won’t play with me anymore. I guess she got offended and dumbfounded when I found her dismissal of my ideas – concerning her poor butthurt demeanor, denial of dark triadic principles, and her wretched existence as a chain-smoking damaged goods shemale victim with small tits that is devoid of any kind of motherly instincts – to be laughably transparent, and her desperate obsession with my syntax to be pathetically informative of how embarrassed and ashamed she must feel to stay on topic.

        But Matt – our resident hypocrite – will you play with me? Or is it just more obfuscation and misdirection – ignore me calling you out on your shit, and just throw some ad hominem at me? What’s the personality disorder associated with throwing false accusations at people, and instead of apologizing about it when called out, acting like some nigger tribal lord saying that you attack everyone indiscriminately and without regard?

        I am no believer in the Bible – but, to give you objective advice – I don’t think you do a good job in convincing people of the integrity of faith. What did Nietzsche say about that again?

        I am still waiting, Matt. You have recently made up shit about me that I had attacked you previously, and when I corrected you by saying that I had never even spoken to you before, and even added a little delicious irony by truthfully saying that I had actually defended you, you acted like a petulant little twat. Where is my apology?

        Oh, right, you are too busy white-knighting dumb whore Amy, despite her being completely wrong about various matters, and having been called out by CH himself in the last few threads MULTIPLE TIMES. She was wrong about the dark triad, and after being corrected – acting in a manner similar manner to yours, i.e. obfuscation, misdirection, and a change of topic – acted like a pedantic child, and said things like “Y tu CH?” with a frowney face, and “Okay my last comment was lame, but…”

        Let’s not even mention how in a recent thread she admits to spreading her legs for a convicted felon and working at a PRISON of all places. Do you enjoy defending people who are obviously wrong, damaged, or is your white-knighting impulse that strong that no amount of CH knowledge can ever save you? You do not belong here.

        I invite all of our glorious readers to see some of Amy’s recent moronic comments when she got schooled by CH, and by yours truly. She truly is the new shitposter de jour.

        So, dear friend, is this the kind of contempt for truth I can expect from such believers like you, Matt?

        Also, since I am so proud of my most recent lampooning of you, and in full dismay of not receiving a response yet from your cowardly self (but without complete surprise), I will repost it here right in your face – both of them – and laugh.


        “Oh Matt, you write so beautifully. It is a dear shame that I’ll have to pick apart the profound fallacies.

        In fact – the syntax and prose, in your post that is otherwise devoid of any sort of evidence, facts, or basic common sense – is the only drop of virtue you have in a black sea of lies. But I was always a fan of the baroque.

        In any case, of course I don’t expect you to keep track of my various “noms de plume.” In fact, I hadn’t even posted here much prior to when you last accused me of persecuting you, and never even having had the pleasure of speaking to you.

        But what I do expect is for you to keep your mouth shut and your evidence available before laying false accusation on people.

        But then again, what do religious people know about summoning evidence before accusing others of things, or believing in nebulous things anyway? Any evidence yet for that flying spaghetti monster of yours?

        But I will educate you and make amends. The Bible – something that you aren’t as familiar with you as claim to be – asks me to forgive you for your ignorance. And I do.

        Of course, none of this even mentions the actual subject matter in which I schooled Amy about the implications and lore of the Dark Triad – a topic I noticed you skipped over entirely. I wonder why? I don’t need Dr. Freud to tell me why you white-knight a dumb bimbo that got told by CH himself, or why you are avoiding the topic of the Dark Triad.

        She must not understand much about the Chateau to have been so confused, and CH himself had to educate her. But if these ‘commentators’ are the ones you value, Matt, and the ones – like me – who instruct her and correct her are the ones that you are contemptuous toward, what does that tell us about you here, Matt? Are you sure this is the right place for you? Mormon.org is that-a-way —->

        I won’t even begin to tear apart the whole ‘intense contempt = infatuation’ theory that you present. Last I heard such juvenile stupidity was in the 2nd grade. I guess, by your understanding, I like mosquitos and paying taxes, and CH likes SWPL, fat chicks, leftoids, proles, cheap chalupas, purple saguaros, betas, and Obama. Great logic you have!

        But it’s okay Matt- I will assume that you think that it is the end of days, as Revelations had written. Cats and dogs play with each other, and shitposting commentators like Amy get white-knighting accolades, and “mean” people like men who don’t whitewash reality and correct its deniers get persecuted by the very people they defended in the past. What do religious people know about hypocrisy, anyway?

        Matt. King of Misdirection and Fairytales

        P.S. Retard Amy, would you like to be my Sugar Plum fairy? It comes in size XXXL, so no worries.”

        ———

        Oh, and if I were to guess a pathology *for you* Matty boy, I would bet on something along the lines of bipolar disorder. We knew from before that you are sexually inexperienced, but from your posts that seem to sway back and forth from complimenting and insulting RD, you seem sexually confused too.

        My solution to clean up the hallowed Chateau walls: put Amy, Matt, and RD into a package, and cast them all into the flames; for they all contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.

        Like


      • matt king. are you going to take that? he is questioning your credibility here.

        Like


    • Bad boy appeal is definitely a valid point, which is what the article needs to be about (though I’m assuming he’s already posted a bunch of those and needs something else to write about). CH is bringing up extreme outliers here (Manson is probably the most legendary psycho of all time), despite his claim that these occurrences are “not that extreme.” Listen, CH: a title like “Chicks Dig Psychotic Killers” is just silly; you might as well write an article titled “Playing the Lottery Will Make You Rich” because those are the percentages you’re basically dealing with. Though maybe I’m wrong. Just pass along an article about all the chicks who wanted to spread their legs for Joseph Paul Franklin over the past couple days because I can’t find any mention of them.

      Like


      • on November 22, 2013 at 6:26 am Never Mind the Balzac

        It’s estimated that around 100 British women are engaged or married to men on death row in the US at any one time.

        http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/13/gender.uk

        Given the logistical/administrative difficulties of starting/maintaining one of these relationships, I suspect the woman that are inclined to this behaviour, vastly out-number the ones that actually go through with it.

        Like


  18. Poor Beta’s committing seppuku. Good! We need more fertilizer.

    I laughed – guy’s got more balls than most free men. Def Alpha Achievement. Am surprised he hasn’t managed to get Star preggers by now and sucking off the public tit.

    That’ll be his next Alpha Achievement to unlock.

    Like


  19. CH is SHOWING you guys exactly how the FEMALE MIND, or make that C-NT works. Now if you can’t get that then maybe you should spend a few hours reading the ARCHIVES of this site. Here you have a man telling you HOW IT IS, and all you can do is talk BULLSHIT? Seriously? C’mon.

    Fact is Evil makes women HORNY, don’t ask me why, maybe because it does who TESTOSTERONE, and I think a man who is UPFRONT about it is much preferable to the passive aggressive males that parade around today as the exemplar of the White male, White Men are threatening, just how it is, and ask any ex-con he’ll tell you about all these women writing to guys in the joint sending them money for the commissary and all that, hell they even get female COs to help them out, ever see the lengths the gfs of the ABT or AC go to for their men? Who are REALLY BAD GUYS. But keep reading CH and EVENTUALLY I’m sure you’ll get it.

    As to CH, himself, keep preaching the gospel brother,
    LL/LR

    Like


    • Wife’s friend actually started corresponding with a guy in prison, then married him when he got out. I think Captain Recidivism there was back in the hole for five years before she finally divorced him.

      Wife’s friend is beyond fugly. Cap’n R started cheating on her immediately, and she did nothing about it. He left her, and she did nothing about it.

      I hadn’t thought about that guy since I started reading all this stuff. Not the brightest star in the midnight sky, Cap’n R, but he does embody certain alpha qualities. He used some fat girl to help get parole, then took advantage of her and split; leaving her stuck with a kid.

      He did whatever the fuck he wanted, without thinking about the consequences. Nowhere is this more evident than in the manner in which he found himself redeposited in the state penitentiary. He stole a vehicle to go pay a visit to one of his girlfriends, adding a new crime to what was already a parole violation. He chose wisely, and made sure nobody would ever notice him, carefully selecting a gigantic orange highway maintenance truck with flashing yellow lights all over it as his incognito ride.

      Criminals are stupid. Stupid guys get a lot of pussy, really, but I don’t think I want to take being alpha to the extreme of being the tough guy who makes everybody toss his salad in the pen.

      Side note… While writing this, wife came in and told me about something or other. Blather blather blather blather for 15 minutes. My response? “K.”

      Like


    • I’m at a trendy bookstore in downtown Miami right now do you think there is one cute girl here hoping to find the type of guy would go to a bookstore on Friday night of course not. Lol

      Like


      • By the way the reason I’m here is that I’m a real man waiting to pick up my kids for the weekend as I do every single Friday night

        Like


  20. No shit, he is looking pretty good for a fucking old prison geezer.

    I would give the gal a 7. Have to see the backside, flat ass gets her downgraded to a 6, full round ass with hips could be a very solid 8.

    Like


  21. Manson can be witty: You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody’s crazy.”

    Like


  22. Ol’ Chuck don’t look bad for 79, do he?

    Like


  23. Just so you guys can all understand — this doesn’t mean that women go after psychotic killers because they are psychotic killers. This is just an example of how important the underlying attraction trigger really is. That attraction trigger is a strong, unshakable frame — boundaries. So crucial is this attraction trigger, that once women have a taste of it — well, you see the lengths they’ll go to to get it.

    That is why there is such a difference between attraction derived from ‘game’ and attraction derived from external, passive attributes.

    Like


    • Dude you are the student not the teacher. The summer was 2 months ago.

      Like


    • well i kno more than u for sure 🙂

      Like


      • I’ll simplify what you said Scray, so others can understand. Women are attracted to men with balls. It takes much more balls to do evil than good, which is why evil is so attractive. Being known for having balls puts a guy ahead of competition.

        Like


      • but we all remember you from 3 months ago (props for not sock puppetting) and now you think you are yareally cause you’ve gotten like 1 girl

        and no you don’t actually. I’m a 38 year old father of 2 who was married for 6 years and has had other LTRs from 1 to 3 years.

        new LTR is a 9. I will get more sex than a PUA over the next 3 years, even though it’s same girl….she’s fucking hot and awesome.

        Like


      • ya well u has gotten all my fax wrong. u should re-read my FR’s, you could learn something 🙂

        Like


      • 1 girl lol

        Like


      • “….she’s fucking hot and awesome.”

        Whatever makes you sleep at night

        Like


      • As a matter of fact, man reader, you ought to check out Scray’s FRs that have been archived at yareallyarchive.com

        http://yareallyarchive.com/scray/2013/11/

        It’s baffling how you try to downplay his accomplishments, he went from AFC to handling his shit and having a little harem in about 8-9 months….all from cold-approaching, applying what he learned here and changing his mindsets.

        Why are you giving him a hard time. If anything, Scray is probably one of the more experienced commenters here and it comes through via his analysis and writings.

        Shit, most manosphere guys maybe cold-approach what, 30 frumpy girls a year. Try doing 500+ and don’t even get me started on daygame.

        @ Scray

        Keep schooling these haters. Real recognize real and you’re doing a fantastic fucking job.

        Like


      • (Clay Davis voice) Shieeeeeeet Man Reader

        OP is going to deliver some more here

        November 2012 Scray (https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/reformed-beta-of-the-month/#comment-384695)

        “I’m getting into a space where it’s starting to feel hopeless. I recently started sarging, and my approach count is still low—a solid 30….but, as anyone can guess, the success rate thus far is zero. Rejection now feels like I have zero value to these people as a man, and while I’m thankful for the red pill…it still hits hard.

        Reading stories like the above just makes me more depressed. The impression is that unless you are alpha, either you will get completely shut out of the sexual marketplace or marry a lying slut. It’s also difficult to remain a non-misogynist, as more and more topics discussed on this blog are confirmed by experience—-mainly the zero-accountability, value-sucking existence women are allowed to live, even undesirable women.

        October 2013 Scray (https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/10/29/flirting-trumps-looks/#comment-492166)

        “This is a great vid. I’m gonna take it slow, tho. I’ve just been having a weird time with these girls. Last night the 6 broke down and admitted she loved me….and I mean, wtf do I do with that? I’m emotionally drained. And then I just feel like the 7is gonna wanna a full commitment any day now. That 7.5 I hooked up with awhile ago is hot but she’s so mannish. Yck. I’d hate to be left with just her.

        If I keep it up, I’ll end up right back where I started a year ago — with no one lol.”

        Shit Man Reader, I know what you’re thinking after reading that….

        http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/030/403/YouMad.jpg?1260647699

        Like


      • lol thanks man. ALTHO..that shit is painful and embarrassing to read now. Good reminder tho of where things started.

        Like


  24. Look into her eyes. What do you see?

    Nothing.

    Like


  25. So, either i kill people or i never get pussy?

    Like


  26. I’m glad you picked up on this. Star is wicked hot. Do some google searches for other pics.

    Like


    • I did a Google image search, there are only about 5 or 6 pics of her available.

      On two of them she is hot ( long hair, make-up),
      on two or three she is ordinary ( short hair, no make up ),
      and on one she is straight ugly BUT in her defense ; on that one she has a shaven head…yikes…

      It is amazing what hair and make up can do.

      When she is all “dolled up” she is kind of hot.

      Like


  27. The power of alpha. She even has that glassy-eyed look of the girls he had killing for him back in the day.

    What’s doubly funny is that I can’t imagine many 79 year old Nobel Laureates or Medal of Honor winners landing a prime piece like her.

    The West is Doomed.

    Like


  28. The sex-positive female ideal desire today… good luck any guy who’s not a psychotic Viking pillager.

    Like


  29. He looks damn good for 79. And manages to look more badass than most men. Even without the swasstika

    Notice she looks like a girl straight out of the 60s. If a movie was filmed about the Manson Family she would fit right in. A lovely looking feminine woman. Batshit crazy but that’s beside the point. And check those digits. It might be hard to tell from the angle and her pose but that ratio looks especially feminine .

    Anyone who dares to say he wouldn’t fuck her is lying. She has a doe eyed face waiting to be fucked slow and deep. Stopping only so she can catch her breath. Cute cupids lips softly missing the head of your cock glistening with saliva.

    Manson is about 5’3″ BTW and though those women were high as a kite he said get them to do all kinds of whacked out shit just by being himself . Watch any interview of his and you can see why some dumb young cjnt would follow his short ugly ass.

    Like


  30. BTW what ever happened to feministx? Did she tire of trying to attention whore here? Was Matthew Kings love not enough? Though it is never ending?

    Like


  31. […] = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Chicks Dig Psychotic Killers | Chateau Heartiste "Charles Manson, 79 years old and still proudly sporting a swastika on his forehead, has a 25 […]

    Like


  32. Bad boys have their place, but one thing I see completely ignored on this blog is what I call ‘Jesus Game.’

    [CH: either you’re a liar or you don’t read much here. ‘Jesus Game’ as you call it is the very essence of this blog’s message. The point of highlighting badboy game is to remind delusionists that women respond to assholes as much as (and perhaps moreso) than they do to the more uplifting, sprightly gentlemen of the pickup. The object lesson of drawing attention to women’s love for assholes is educational; it’s not a prescription for men to start acting like serial killers.]

    It’s where you own the frame in an interaction or a set by being fun, uplifting and positive while maintaining dominance. In my opinion it’s the most powerful form of game, since if people don’t submit to it they look like party poopers or douchebags. It mostly utilizes and slightly bends social norms to achieve its ends, rather than outright smashing them in the manner of bad boy game, which can incur severe reputational and social costs. Notable users of Jesus Game off the top of my head include Russell Brand, Barack Obama (first term/pre-first term election campaign) and the PUA instructor Adam Lyons (he won best pickup artist 3 years in a row at the PUA summit).

    Like


  33. Cult leader game takes it once again.

    Manson weirdly looks like he had a face lift, though since he’s in CA prison maybe he did.

    Like


  34. on November 22, 2013 at 6:59 am Never Mind the Balzac

    I wonder if anyone ever told him to …. JBY Charles.

    Like


  35. But does she perform personalized, erotic renditions of “Helter Skelter” for him? Til she gets blisters on her fingers (pow!).

    Like


  36. “Jesus Game”:

    A woman of Samaria came to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give me a drink.”

    The Samaritan woman said to him, “How can you, a Jew, ask me, a Samaritan woman, for a drink?” (For Jews use nothing in common with Samaritans.)

    Jesus answered and said to her: “If you knew the gift of God and who is saying to you, ‘Give me a drink,’ you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.” [The woman] said to him, “Sir,* you do not even have a bucket and the cistern is deep; where then can you get this living water? Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us this cistern and drank from it himself with his children and his flocks?” Jesus answered and said to her, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again; but whoever drinks the water I shall give will never thirst; the water I shall give will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal lifee. The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water, so that I may not be thirsty or have to keep coming here to draw water.”

    Jesus said to her, “Go call your husband and come back.”
    The woman answered and said to him, “I do not have a husband.” (i.e. shit test)

    Jesus answered her, “You are right in saying, ‘I do not have a husband.’ For you have had five husbands, and the one you have now is not your husband. What you have said is true.

    The woman said to him, “Sir, I can see that you are a prophet”. (i.e. shit test annihilated).

    Like


  37. Please..let’s not break down Jesus’ “Game”

    He spoke truth and knew it was truth and didn’t care what his detractors thought. In this way he was Alpha. The true Alpha with a capital fucking A.

    A true man of God does not fear the thoughts and words of men and will not compelled his woman to become a piss drinker for those who drink piss will be thirsty once more. But those who drink from the eternal cup of truth and light will forever have their thirst quenched and their hearts warned by the Heavenly Father.

    Amen.

    Like


    • When He said ,”I am the Alpha and the Omega” was He saying that He is an alpha but also has trouble getting laid?

      Like


    • Take therefore no thought for tomorrow….For this reason I say to you, do not be worried about your life, as to what you will eat or what you will drink; nor for your body, as to what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? 26″Look at the birds of the air, that they do not sow, nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not worth much more than they

      Like


  38. Putting Jesus on a pedestal, now?

    Like


  39. News in a portuguese newspaper: Kelly Anne McDade (prison guard) fell in love with a portuguese detainee. They had sex in the cell.

    Five British men were stabbed last week by a portuguese DJ on Mangaluf, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. Nelson Delgado, 25, was arrested and is awaiting trial on remand. A crime that made ​​headlines across Europe. But it was in 2009 that the same portuguese was spoken around the world, while he was serving a 3 years sentence in a correction center in England, for having committed an armed robbery at a house. The prison guard, Kelly Anne McDade, 31, fell in love with the portuguese and was caught several times by prison surveillance cameras entering the cell. Eventually become pregnant, had the child, was fired and sentenced to 30 months in prison.

    link (in portuguese): http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/detalhe/noticias/nacional/portugal/detido-engravida-guarda-prisional—150424593

    Like


  40. on November 23, 2013 at 2:47 pm Charlesz Martel

    A friend of mine is an attorney specializing in juvenile criminal defense. While going over some old files at the courthouse, he ran across a juvenile arrest file on Charles Manson. Just for the heck of it, he photocopied the file and mailed it to Manson along with is booking photo and a note: “Remember this?”. (This is legal, BTW- it’s a public record).
    A few days later, he got a telephone call from Manson, who spoke for 45 minutes. He said Manson was extremely intelligent ( spoke about how he never killed anybody and “the system” was out to get him) but that he was completely insane.
    Just another bizarre little anecdote about how weird one’s world can be if one has a large circle of friends.

    Like


  41. matt king. are you going to take that? he is questioning your credibility here.

    Like


  42. on November 24, 2013 at 7:51 am Ol' Chuck Himself

    Ehhhhhhhh………haha

    Thanks dudes….

    Like


  43. Nobody . . . I’m nobody. I’m a tramp, a bum, a hobo. I’m a boxcar and a jug of wine. . . and a straight razor if you get to close to me.

    Like


  44. on November 25, 2013 at 12:14 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    Oh yes, obviously I am Patrice. Truly I fucked up by writing on my *real* identity. You got me!

    Hi guys, I have a BIG ANNOUNCEMENT:

    I wanted to let you all know that aside from being an old shriveled up chain-smoking unfeminine whore, as flat as a wall, devoid of motherly instincts, that had ridden the cock carousel her *entire* life to rapidly enter spinsterhood – one supplied by blights of society like thugs and badboys – that is too dishonest and hurt to stay on topic (about your attraction to badboys and your little rape incident; but hey at least you didn’t talk about English this time), I have another wonderful quality to share with the world….

    I AM A DUMBASS THAT HAS NO IDEA HOW COMMENTING WORKS!

    RD, I never thought you could fail any more – both here and in your personal life – but you continue to aggressively push the envelope and prove me wrong. Kudos!

    Looks like you don’t recognize the “tells” in my writing as well as you had mentioned before, right sweetheart? But that’s okay – we have already established you are solipsistic and delusional about your own capabilities, and you obscure and change the topic to avoid further embarrassment. Does the rape still hurt sweetie?

    Please reply talking again about English, avoiding the topic, and make another dumb remark. Hurry!

    You are good cheap entertainment. It is rare to see a creature fail so much.

    I know, this is so shocking to me; I expected so much from a dumbass chain-smoking shemale that had ridden thug cock her entire life. You sound like such quality in a woman.

    I will send you a box of cats to accompany you during your spinsterhood as a reward for my amusement.

    Like


  45. He cleans up nice.

    Like