Thanks, Suffrage!

New meme over the starboard bow, courtesy of yours truly.

In case you didn’t get the message, the meme is a celebration of female suffrage and the wondrous blessings it has bestowed upon the United States of America. Thank you, ladies, for bringing freedom, freedom, and even more freedom to the most forgotten among us, and for shitting shining your light of moral rectitude on the poor benighted souls who wallow in ignorance. America is a better nation today for the collected contributions of your wisdom.





Comments


  1. The only silver lining is that I’m really glad that I’ve decided to try to get into teaching.

    Once I’m employed in the public sector, I’ll become active in the union. I’ve heard from people who teach that if the administration thinks you’ll file a grievance they’ll leave you alone – they don’t need the headache.

    If that’s how the majority wants to play, that’s how we’ll play.

    “When the winds of change begin to blow, build windmills, not windbreaks”
    – Confucius – or possibly Mao Tse Tung, (like it matters)

    Like


  2. Ya we might need to do something about this whokr equal rights thing….

    If you arnt smart enoght to be informed and u vote on who is better looking you shouldn’t be allowed to vote. That being said I feel like every one should include a reason with there vote

    Like


  3. Humor is a necessity in the dark times we’re in, but joking aside, the election result is just another part of the bitter harvest sown by the feminist/sexual revolution. Men are expendable when daddy/hubby government can fill the beta provider/alpha tribal leader role as you’ve written. It’s a given that minorities overwhelmingly vote leftist, but the nail in America’s coffin was white, single, “emancipated” women.

    Like


    • I’m a dude and I’m damn happy about the election results. If you think the election results are due to feminists then you need to check your crystal ball again, man. Perhaps if the largest growing population in the country (hispanics) wasn’t ignored by the losers, then they might have fared better. But right wing politics ignores this group and since this group is only growing, it will make right wing politics obsolete unless they change their game.

      [your comment has so much wrong with it, there’s nowhere to begin without investing a few more minutes than i’m willing to do. suffice to say, odds are good you are hispanic yourself, and therefore are emotionally and cognitively incapable of grasping, let alone accepting as truth, the worldview of native euro-american whites. if you are a white man, then i pity you; there is no more pitiable creature than that who relishes sealing his own doom.]

      Like


      • More hand-outs, you mean.

        Like


      • As a Canadian, reading this, I sure hope we don’t start letting you fucks into our country. We’d be a third world banana republic in a generation.

        Like


      • “Hispanics” will never vote Republican or libertarian. They will always vote socialist/Democrat.

        Like


      • True dat…just look at South America.

        Like


      • Not true. Only a certain segment of uneducated, downwardly mobile Hispanics vote for free stuff. Miami is full of people from Cuba, Venezuela, and elsewhere that came to the US escaping statist kleptocratic governments. They are some of the best entrepreneurs this country has, especially as the native upper middle class increasingly sends its children for phony-baloney liberal arts degrees and SWPL work in non-profits and vampire banks. And the illegals and low-skilled immigrants typically don’t vote.

        No, what’s sending Latinos increasingly to the Dems is the second generation. Their parents worked their assess off so they could get educated and have opportunities they never did. But then they got into the US school system and college and were taught that they were discriminated against in the country their parents risked their lives to flee to. They know they could never live up to their parents’ example, so they turn to ego-based (that is, leftist) politics to explain their mediocrity. Through the magic of leftism, an unextraordinary B student of no real talents can re-invent himself into a fearless and fierce advocate of social progress. What was once average and boring becomes transgressive and exciting.

        Like


      • yeah, but just imagine A Day Without Mexicans. you wouldn’t have cell phones, computers, cars, planes, trains, the internet, indoor plumbing, and all the other modern conveniences minorities invented.

        Like


      • on November 8, 2012 at 9:34 pm Carlos Butler

        Hispanics didnot invent any of those, are you retarded. Cars Henry ford, planes the wright brothers, indoor plumbing the Romans! Ect

        Like


      • Let us imagine a day without liberals.

        Liked by 1 person


      • “Cuba, Venezuela, and elsewhere that came to the US escaping statist kleptocratic governments.”

        Cubans don’t consider themselves Hispanic and they look down on Mexicans. “Hispanic” is not some sort of monolithic block. Where I used to live students from different South American countries fought each other in the schools.

        The average “Hispanic” IQ is 89, which means they are incapable of understanding what this country was based on. It also means they will always vote Commie, i.e., Democrat.

        Like


      • “Hispanic” is not some sort of monolithic block.

        Exactly. That’s my whole point. But then you start talking about the “average” Hispanic. My point is that we have to differentiate between those that add value and those that suck up resources. Once they’re actually invited to, the former should vote with those who promise to respect the fruits of their labor. But you can’t get those first voters if you just pretend they don’t exist.

        And yes, Cubans do consider themselves “Hispanic.” “Hispanic” just means “Spanish-speaking.” It’s not a race.

        Like


      • “The average “Hispanic” IQ is 89, which means they are incapable of understanding what this country was based on. It also means they will always vote Commie, i.e., Democrat.”

        I agree. It doesn’t matter if they are Cubans; they are still undesirable. I just found out that about half the Cuban vote went for Obama. It went 52% to 48% for Romney. So this is proof that what you are saying is 100% true. All Hispanics vote Democrat.

        Like


      • “Not true. Only a certain segment of uneducated, downwardly mobile Hispanics vote for free stuff.”

        CORRECTION!!!!!

        The only reason Cubans vote Republican is because of the Bay of Pigs disaster, as they like to call it, and Castro. Remove, communism from their island and watch them voting for the Democrats, i.e. freebees and gov’t handouts, since “Hispanics are incapable of understanding what this country was based on” as Bob Wallace puts it. Yet, I don’t hold them responsible for that. It’s just not in their veins. Most of the world, doesn’t understand how special America is.

        While it’s true many Cubans are business owners, a lot of their people are on public assistance as well. In addition, many of their women are pregnant out of wedlock too. They have a very fee approach to sex, like most other Hispanics. Unwed mothers are not good for a thriving society. Same thing with Venezuelans, escaping tyranny in their homeland. But I’ll give you two things.

        1) Cubans and Venezuelans are better type of Hispanics than Mexicans.

        2) The younger generation, which doesn’t know much about Castro, is increasingly voting Democrats as they are being brainwashed by the University of Miami leftists agenda. They have stripped off their parents teachings and suffering under Castro, and they don’t care about their parents “beloved” island any longer. In other words, they are being Americanized. On the one had it’s great, since many other immigrant groups refuse to be Americanized, but on the other hand it’s terrible because they too are falling prey to the awful leftists education system in this country.

        Unfortunately, even though your argument is correct on some level, I’m still in favor of no immigration, legal or illegal. And if possible, throw everyone who is not white out of here. Like Heartiste said, “(you are Hispanic and thus ) are emotionally and cognitively incapable of grasping, let alone accepting as truth, the worldview of native euro-american whites.” I can’t agree more. Many races can’t understand our world view and the reasons and principles on which we established this land. Send everyone back to their mother country, and Blacks back to Africa.

        Like


      • Hello, anti-white apologist. Allow me to address some of your fictitious points.

        – ” Miami is full of people from Cuba, Venezuela, and elsewhere that came to the US escaping statist kleptocratic governments.”

        True. But while the Venezolanos bused to New Orleans to vote against Chavez, they still mostly voted Democrat. Why? Because they’re legally guests, and they imagine the Republicans still think of them this way. Silly!

        The Cubans have been there for a generation and are alone in voting partly Republican.

        – ” They are some of the best entrepreneurs this country has, ”

        This is a lie unless you can provide comparative statistics. I’ve never seen anything supporting this notion.

        – “nd the illegals and low-skilled immigrants typically don’t vote.”

        Illegal, legal — say hello to a false dichotomy. They vote. And they vote Democrat. Not that it matters when the Republicunt candidate humbled himself on Univision.

        – “No, what’s sending Latinos increasingly to the Dems is the second generation. ”

        No, what’s ‘sending’ Latinos ‘increasingly’ (i.e. consistently) to the Democrats is that they are non-white, and the GOP is erroneously perceived as pro-white, anti-immigrant

        – “Their parents worked their assess off so they could get educated”

        Ah, so. White parents never worked their asses off. Thank you for this crucial piece of information.

        – ” they were discriminated against in the country their parents risked their lives to flee to.”

        You mean by being allowed in our schools in the first place? White American kids couldn’t do that in Mexico or Guatemala, by the way. Not that they would want to.

        – ” so they turn to ego-based (that is, leftist) politics to explain their mediocrity.”

        Well, as Alex Linder said, Latinos are “an unrelieved plane of mediocrity”, so no argument here beyond incorrect attribution of motive.

        – “Through the magic of leftism,”

        The kosher Naturalization and Immigration Act of ’65, you mean.

        Like


      • You fucking retards,

        HISPANIC WHITES ARE AS GOOD FOR THE U.S. AS ITALIANS, SPANIARDS, PORTUGUESE…

        Hispanic means nothing.

        Those who descended from the Goths and were fighting the moors over here, used to style themselves “Emperor of all Hispanics”.

        Hispanic is the name the Romans gave to the inhabitants of Spaind and Portugal. White, European peoples, mostly of Celtic and Iberian background.

        The term Hispanic shouldn’t exist in the U.S. That only makes white or almost white hispanics identify more with the Native Americans from their countries, once they are lumped together.

        There are white Hispanics and non white Hispanics.
        Funny how you have problems with Hispanics but don’t have problems with Brazilians.

        Stupid fucks.

        Like


      • Heather MacDonald makes the case that the reason hispanics vote democrat is because they use government programs. They vote democrat because they are given things. They vote for Santa Claus. Just like all the other groups in the democrat coalition.

        Most hispanic immigrants are poor, and have low skills sets. The hispanic vote may have nothing to do with amnesty, and everything to do with the socialist model of the democrats.

        http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/332916/why-hispanics-dont-vote-republicans-heather-mac-donald

        Like


      • Most Hispanic nations are nothing but socialist, banana republics and it is the underclasses who then flee to the USA that voted it that way. It should come as no surprise that they vote for the exact same things when they get here.

        Like


      • “Most Hispanic nations are nothing but socialist, banana republics and it is the underclasses who then flee to the USA that voted it that way. It should come as no surprise that they vote for the exact same things when they get here.”

        Another BINGO!!!!

        That’s all Hispanic immigrants know. They don’t know any better, so to expect a tiger to change its stripes is unrealistic. The worst thing we can do is woo them with goodies or amnesty. None of it will work, and the Republican party is delusional if it thinks that wooing Latinos is the answer to its conundrum. We should stop immigration and kick out all the ones who are her illegally. Too bad we can’t throw the rest of them out of here. If we could, I support it. All non-white foreigners out of the USA.

        Like


      • As Gig said recently. YOU FUCKERS WERE THE ONES WHO MADE LATIN AMERICA COMMIE, ONCE YOU PREASSURED THEM TO HAVE DEMOCRACIES.

        There is a giant proportion of people in Latin America who simply cannot live in a modern, current, society.

        HOWEVER, ~90% white Argentina had almost the same pib per capita as the U.S. up to the 50s.

        Like


      • “Most hispanic immigrants are poor, and have low skills sets. The hispanic vote may have nothing to do with amnesty, and everything to do with the socialist model of the democrats.”

        BINGO!!!!

        I know for a fact they like getting free stuff, such as fee health care, free school education for their kids, free busing for their kids, free school lunches for their kids, food stamps, Medicaid, etc. They can’t fathom paying out of pocket for anything. In fact, at my gym there is a Hispanic woman that once told me her membership is being paid for by some do-gooder organization funded by the city to help Latinos and blacks live a healthy lifestyles. When I heard this I was livid. Here we are paying for everything through the nose (not asking for government handout) and the city takes our tax dollars to fund blacks and Latinos healthy lifestyle? WTF? Why is our government on any level – local or federal – picking winners and losers or taking sides? How is that equality? How is that land of the free home of the brave? When did it become land of the black and home of the Hispanic and my government serving them at every turn? Oh wait, it’s called social and economic justice, which means only blacks and Latinos get to have a membership in the club. Whites need not apply. No social or economic justice for them.

        Like


      • 100% true!

        Like


      • Let’s be careful not to let the establishment GOP push Marco Rubio on the latinos.

        He’s a white knighter if you ever saw one. He’s not our guy.

        Like


      • Either him, or George P. Bush. I see it coming.

        Actually — and I find this extremely ironic! — 0bama was the best thing to happen to white Americans, demographically speaking, since Slick. How sick is that… under a Republican pro-business president like Jorge Arbusto, we get businesses going all out and hiring illegal Hispanics, and their population booms, while under a dumbass statist Dem, their birth rates tank and they actually start going back to Mexico.

        Like


      • on November 8, 2012 at 5:54 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

        “Either him, or George P. Bush. I see it coming.”

        Dude, you don’t know the half of it.

        Like


      • Republicans will never be able to out-pander the democrats, except with evangelicals.

        I’m right there with you, Jose. Down with the republicans! The sooner the republicans are 6 feet under the sooner an explicitly pro-white party can perhaps blossom out of their decaying corpse, or at least whites will be shed of their illusions about turning back the clock and will be forced to consider seceding from the train wreck that is America.

        Like


      • Most hispanics are racists who want to reward other hispanic criminals at the expense of immigrants from all other places. If a party needs their corrupt votes to win, the country is already dead.

        Like


      • Some conservatives are so in denial. They are pontificating wooing the Latino vote. WTF? We don’t need their backward-ass ilk here.

        And indeed, Latinos are just as racist as Blacks. In CA, TX, AZ and other southwestern states they fly the Mexican flag and speak about revolution and war against America for supposedly taking these territories from Mexico. It’s an outrage what Mexicans do in this country, and it’s even more of an outrage they are allowed to stray. Whoever advocated for them to come or stay here should be shot for treason. It’s Palestinian mindset in action here. Many of their leaders in CA are spewing rhetoric about the USA returning land to Mexico. This is another sphere in the quiet war Hispanics are waging against America, which is gaining a lot of momentum in their communities.

        Like


      • “if you are a white man, then i pity you; there is no more pitiable creature than that who relishes sealing his own doom.”

        Isn’t a blog advocating caddishness part of the problem?

        [heartiste: hard for me to refute.]

        What if white men actively encouraged white men to settle down with white women, impregnate them, and pump out white children? We wouldn’t have all these single white women worshipping the leftist, uber-alpha-patriach of government.

        [i really wonder how such a program of encouragement would go. there are forces at work — the pill, female self-sufficiency, divorce paydays — that really make it difficult to put the genie back in the bottle.]

        Numerous studies show that married white women vote conservatively.

        [yes. though to be precise, married white women vote more conservatively than single white women, though still not as conservatively as married white men.]

        A married mother has better things to worry about than lesbian marriage when she looks at her children and worries about the tide of welfare, illegal immigrants, and corporate outsourcing that will eventually overwhelm her children.

        [true. novelty, boutique issues are mostly a single white woman hobbyhorse. but women in general do have stronger displaced empathy reflexes than men, and will tend to support things like gay marriage (however justified) at high rates, married or unmarried.]

        The problem is that white men have failed white women because they are following them instead of LEADING.

        [the best way to lead a woman is to arouse her. when she loves you, lusts for you, and admires you, she will follow you to the ends of the earth.]

        We have several generations of women loosed by feminism and white men are happy to follow and chase them in hopes of poon free from the consternation of the patriarchy.

        [social atomization comes with a cost for its individual freedom.]

        You can’t complain about white women leading the country into disaster while your dick wants to jump from chick to chick and is telling you, “Fuck it! Let’s join the poon fun while Rome burns!”

        [i can complain about whatever i want. if the women in my social sphere want to go whole hog for Obama, I will mock them and point out that their choices are helping hasten the decline of america, regardless of what my dick happens to be doing with them.]

        Like


      • “[the best way to lead a woman is to arouse her. when she loves you, lusts for you, and admires you, she will follow you to the ends of the earth.]”

        Truer words were never spoken. Standing and applauding. The question is how do you get a woman to love you that much? Imagine it’s an attractive women you totally fancy and you enjoy her company to boot. Could you get this lucky?

        Some food for thought for some of you playas out there that think only the jerks survive.

        Like


      • “Isn’t a blog advocating caddishness part of the problem?
        What if white men actively encouraged white men to settle down with white women, impregnate them, and pump out white children? We wouldn’t have all these single white women worshipping the leftist, uber-alpha-patriach of government.”

        That’s what in as trying to tell YaReally in another thread. I don’t think his lifestyle is good for society, and it’s pretty selfish to only think about his peen and mock all men that do find someone normal to marry.

        Like


      • “I’m a dude and I’m damn happy about the election results.”

        Yeah if you are a stupid feminist woman you are happy.

        “Perhaps if the largest growing population in the country (hispanics) wasn’t ignored by the losers, then they might have fared better.”

        And it doesn’t matter what you’ll do for Hispanics, they’ll still vote Democrat because they are incapable of understanding our values and the principles we were founded upon.

        Conservatives shouldn’t bother trying to woo them. It’s a losing proposition. Same with stupid-ass females that are not worthy to spit on, let alone woo with goodies. You and your ilk will get everything that’s coming to you. I have no sympathy for this country after they voted for this monstrosity the second time around. Fuck you bitch!!!!

        Like


      • ‘Hispanic’ means nothing other than a person who grew up in an environment more or less based on Spanish language and/or culture. Has zero to do with ethnicity. There are Black Hispanics, there are White Hispanics, there are Asian Hispanics, etc. etc. In this area, the overwhelming majority of people referring to themselves as ‘Hispanic’ or ‘Spanish’ are Native Americans with perhaps something else mixed in – which may or may not be Spanish – whose ancestors had Spanish names bestowed upon them by the missionary padres who found their original Indian names too ‘heathen’ – or simply unpronounceable. Hopi and Navajo are quite the tonguetwisters.
        In a way, I am also glad about the election results.
        ¿Pero – porque, you ask?
        Because it makes girls happy to have Dem Prezzes.
        Happy girls are easier.

        Like


      • “In a way, I am also glad about the election results.
        ¿Pero – porque, you ask?
        Because it makes girls happy to have Dem Prezzes.
        Happy girls are easier.”

        LOL! It’s not going to last long, their happiness, I mean.

        Don’t you know women are hard to please?

        Their euphoria is going to last only but two weeks, maybe. Then it will restore itself around inauguration day, only to fade once again when reality hits that Obama doesn’t have any more Obama dollars to hand out to his bitches, or that the rest of the world don’t respect us and kill our ambassadors or shoot down our planes. Euphoria is going to turn into hardship. Can’t wait for it to happen. I have no sympathy for this country. People got the exact government they deserve.

        By the way, what’s good for PUA isn’t necessarily what’s good for the country or society. I think Heartiste made this argument countless of times, and that’s why I think he has a great moral and ethical mindset.

        Like


      • My moral and ethical mindset is reserved strictly for a select (VERY) few who deserve it. The rest get the shaft.

        Like


      • People get the government they deserve..very true. This president is not going to take this country anywhere. BTW why CIA chief resigned??

        Like


  4. America had problems before women could vote and after they could vote. They didn’t make anything better or worse.

    [heartiste: incorrect. a study by lott showed conclusively that female suffrage moved the country leftward, and has been doing so steadily since.]

    Like


    • I didn’t know that, thanks for the correction. Then I’ll correct my statement and say that women getting the right to vote made our country better! I’m usually on board with the heartiste, but, as a blue collar worker, I gotta disagree with these anti-left comments.

      Like


      • The Vanguard welcomes this Useful Idiot.

        We will put him in the fields, doing our work. We will call him “Boxer”.

        Long live the Vanguard.

        Like


      • And remember what happened to Boxer.

        He got Free “Medicine” for being such a good worker.

        Like


      • “but, as a blue collar worker, I gotta disagree with these anti-left comments.”

        And let me guess, you are also part of a monster union that selfishly only cares about its benefits and power and the hell with the rest of the country, right? Like I said, you’re a male bitch.

        Like


      • Being blue collar has nothing to do with being Democrat.

        There are plenty of blue collar men out there with enough dignity and self-respect to reject socialism, but they are the entrepreneurial ones. Self-employed blue collar men are some of the most conservative people I know. When Obama and that fake Indian Warren said things like “You Didn’t Build That,” I heard quite a few self-employed blue collar businessmen who wanted to start a revolution right there on the spot.

        The reason people like you vote Socialist is because you are employees. Because you are subordinates. Because you are psychologically conditioned to answer to a superior man.

        Charlatans like Obama come along and promise you a much-desired sense of dignity and self-respect and social power. It’s a long-practiced art form.

        It’s all a lie, and what Obama is selling is actually making you poorer. But people like you lap it up, because that’s what beta rubes and useful idiots do.

        Like


    • on November 8, 2012 at 11:57 am Hugh G. Rection

      Well yeah, if there weren’t any problems to solve men wouldn’t have created a government in the first place. The thing is, I don’t see much problem solving going on in these recent decades. The government is getting bigger and more expensive every year, yet the roads are shit, the schools suck, entitlement programs are going broke, unemployment is rising, there are more poor than when the “war on poverty” was first declared, healthcare is still is a mess. While a lot of things are getting cheaper, better and more efficient, government is worse every year.

      Number one issue for women this election: Abortion. More important than Jobs and the Economy…

      Like


      • Number one issue for religious conservatives in every election since 1972: abortion. More important than Jobs and the Economy.

        What’s ironic is that the abortion advocates are the ones responsible for the slowing birthrate, yet even with the best efforts of the Duggars, the religious right can’t keep up. Or maybe they’ve just figured out that if we allow abortions, there are fewer kids to go on CHIP and school lunch programs.

        Like


      • Ever since gay marriage sprouted up it’s tied with abortion as the big issues.

        Like


      • on November 9, 2012 at 8:47 am Hugh G. Rection

        More abortions also means less criminals. There is a strong correlation.

        Like


      • How so? Those more likely to have future prison inmate offspring abort much less, if at all.

        Like


      • So true. Blacks and especially Hispanics almost never abort. It’s usually educated leftists women in the suburbs, or the big cities like LA and NYC that end up aborting. I hate to say it, but as far as I am concerned all of them are undesirable and should be encouraged to abort their spawn. I don’t understand the anti-abortion idiots out there. It wouldn’t be right for me, but if it is to other people why get in their way? I rather have more abortions than have kids growing up on the street and becoming criminals because their parents don’t have a way or interest in raising them properly, or have an over population of leftists born to be future leftist voters.

        Like


      • on November 12, 2012 at 11:38 am Anonymous Rice Alum #4

        Blacks and especially Hispanics almost never abort. It’s usually educated leftists women in the suburbs

        NOT TRUE. Black abortion rate is abt 5x the white rate; Hispanics, abt 2x. At least if the Federales aren’t lying. But why would they?
        http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0101.pdf
        http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0103.pdf

        Though the states with the highest rates (>25 per 1000 reproductive age women) are all Obama states: CA, DE, DC, FL, MD, NV, NY. Someone else can crunch the numbers to guess how many of those are white women.

        Like


      • the number one issue for men should be mandatory abortion. the man should have a say too. and if he isn’t around and the women can’t pay the child’s way, The Man should require it.

        Like


      • “Number one issue for women this election: Abortion. More important than Jobs and the Economy…”

        That’s because they are all whores. What do whores care about more than having sex without any consequences, physical or psychological?

        Like


    • Female freedom gives men a whiff of free pussy. Men who get a whiff of free pussy tend to less productive.

      See the black community vs. 1950s white community: easily obtainable pussy = crumbling cities that look like Somalia; no pussy without marriage = NASA and rockets.

      Like


      • easily obtainable pussy = crumbling cities that look like Somalia; no pussy without marriage = NASA and rockets.

        Funny way to describe the problem but I must say you are right.

        Like


      • @Anon
        “Female freedom gives men a whiff of free pussy. Men who get a whiff of free pussy tend to less productive.
        See the black community vs. 1950s white community: easily obtainable pussy = crumbling cities that look like Somalia; no pussy without marriage = NASA and rockets.”

        Thanks for the confirmation. It’s what I told YaReally in our debate in another thread.
        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/intermittent-love/#comment-384433

        “don’t get upset if some of us (even some men here) think it’s overly decadent and totally over the top, if not a total waste of time, to live your whole life going form fucking one ho after another. Aren’t there more constructive things you can do with your time? I mean it feels so animalistic. What do animals do all day? Look for food and fuck when the female is in heat. That’s their whole life. They don’t accomplish anything else, and they are not meant to. But I think humans are different, specifically men. If the men of our species check out and stop producing and inventing, humanity would fall apart. It’s not the domain of women to produce, invent, and build. Women have other roles. Sorry, if I view your lifestyle as pretty much worthless. It’s my opinion and I am sticking to it.

        Sorry, whether you like it or not, many people still value old-fashion marriages and strong men that produce and make the world go round. And it has nothing to do with Disney fantasy, which to you is just a tool to justify your wantonness and worthlessness.”

        And
        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/intermittent-love/#comment-384629

        “A man that has a woman he loves by his side and unfettered access to sex, which means he doesn’t have to constantly troll for it, can focus much better on building a career or a business.

        Sorry, I don’t see how a single guy trolling for hos every night has time to focus on building something worthwhile, or inventing and producing anything. That’s why most scientists, captains of industry, or entrepreneurs are married. Do you think they have time for prowling? “

        Like


    • The guy actually talks about his ostensible reasons for choosing O: http://bluecollarworkman.com/the-blue-collar-vote/

      Consistent with Sailer and Trende who say Romney lost because midwestern working class whites saw Romney as a job exporter.

      Like


      • Obamacare is going into effect. Jobs will be outsourced because that’s what Obamacare does. My best friend was laid off yesterday.

        Like


      • Your best friend obviously doesn’t have the necessary skills to compete in 2012. Don’t blame Obamacare for losing your job, just get skills that matter.

        Like


      • that must be why they laid off 20 employees and hired an independent contractor to do the same work requiring the same skills and why the IC only uses subcontractors.

        Like


      • I don’t doubt it. Easily replaceable jobs are the problem. Also highly correlated with low skill, low paying professions. If Obamacare is affecting your job, you have to take a long look at yourself.

        Like


      • I’ll bet the total workforce of the place is now <50. The piece of shit ACA only kicks in for firms with 50 employees. Such layoffs to reduce firm size have already been documented so your assertion might very well be true.

        Like


      • Interesting that between a job exporter ( who still creates jobs) and a job killer, they chose the job killer…

        Like


  5. The challenge, men, is to grow our stones back and undo female suffrage before da broadz destroy our civilization.

    Like


    • Let’s undo male suffrage too while we’re at it. Letting pussy-pedestelizing beta and omega males vote is why we got female suffrage in the first place.

      Like


  6. Maybe the problem is not the fact that women have the vote. Maybe the problem is that anyone has the vote, should anyone be allowed to vote for the leaders of our society? Men seem to vote just as bad as women.

    Like


    • I like the idea of people who pay taxes should get the vote…if you are on government assistance, you don’t.

      Like


      • But how does paying taxes make anyone qualified to run a country?

        What we need are rulers who have been trained from infancy in how to rule, and who have a line of ancestors who have gathered the trade secrets of ruling, and who have stake in the future success of the nation they are ruling as their children will inherit it. In other words, monarchy.

        Like


      • Ah, the glory of ancient Greece……
        Democracy for the top 5%.

        Like


      • I don’t think you guys realize how much it sucked to live in ancient Greece or any monarchy for that matter. What makes you think that you are the top 5 percent? If you were living in ancient Greece, you’d probably be a slave.

        Like


      • Fully realized. In ancient Greece – or anywhere else before,say, 1900-something, I would have probably been dead at the age of 10 from a burst appendix.

        Like


      • Not an appendix, from diptheria or measles or scarlet fever. Or you’d be dead by 20 of tuburculosis. Diseases that were virtually wiped out by modern medicine from the 1890’s to the 1980’s, when we still had modern medicine in the west.

        Like


      • I like the idea of people who pay taxes should get the vote…if you are on government assistance, you don’t.

        It was like that in the USA in the beginning for a short while

        got me thinking,

        should we let people who get food stamps and other free stuff vote on how much free stuff we the hard working tax payers should give them?

        my next question provides the obvious answer,

        should we let our kids vote on how much candy they can eat and how much brocoli they should eat or should the adults do that?

        Like


      • “should we let people who get food stamps and other free stuff vote on how much free stuff we the hard working tax payers should give them?
        should we let our kids vote on how much candy they can eat and how much brocoli they should eat or should the adults do that?“

        Beautify said as always, Canadian friend. I too advocate only people who are net payers vote. Otherwise people on welfare just vote an increase to themselves. Where does it end? They whole country is coming apart because of welfare and entitlement programs. Many immigrants who should be going back home, stay because of all the free stuff that help them “make it” here. It’s so frustrating, you have no idea. I assume it’s even worse In Canada, where leftists mindset is even stronger.

        @Thor, Exactly right.

        Like


    • +1

      What other areas of life do we put matters to a vote? Do surgeons put their procedures to a vote? Do engineers put their designs to a vote? Then why should something far more complicated, engineering and repairing a society, be decided upon by a mass of uninformed idiots?

      Like


    • No representation without taxation. Only net payers should be allowed to vote.

      Thor

      Like


  7. America has abandoned the feminine virtues of hearth and homeland from her youth for the sluttery of easy money entitlements for all askers, and she likes it. We, her dutiful beta providers, are upset that she has been knocked off of her pedestal in our eyes. But, America expects us to keep on providing for her while hating us for it.

    So, what are we to do? Game tells us to alpha-up.

    Most of us are unable to simply pump and dump the female personification of the USA; so, we will need long-term relationship game.

    We already know what to do to survive and thrive in our new socialist paradise. Kill the beta. Be aloof. Respond to her shit tests with Agree&Amplify. MAP. DHV. Maybe build a soft harem of some of the other slut-nations in the neighborhood.

    For example, GE get what it wants from the USA (protection and support from a vast military-industrial complex), but barely gives anything back to the USA (when was the last time it paid its “fair-share” of taxes?). Can the same be said for you and me?

    Gaming the female personification of a 1st-world nation-state will be interesting, but we already know how to do it. And, we should do it in order to preserve and further pursue our own happiness, just like Thomas Jefferson tells us.

    Like


  8. Children often confuse “freedom” with “free stuff”.

    Like


  9. The Catholic Church imports Mexicans. Mexicans vote Democrat, vote Obama. Democrats and Obama keep abortion legal. So the Catholic Church keeps abortion legal. Strange irony, isn’t it?

    Like


  10. Your first meme confuses me.

    I don’t recall Obama having sex with a young boy?

    Like


  11. It seems the more freedom you give to women…the more it enslaves men.

    Like


    • That’s probably true for beta dudes

      Like


      • Which would be 90% of the male population.

        Like


      • You don’t think guys that are alpha that put so much effort into game to attract women aren’t “enslaved” in a way?

        Like


      • Enslaved to whom? Women? Or their own biological needs?

        Like


      • Taxes take away from the number of lays a man gets whether he’s alpha or beta or gamma. Despite all the feminist inspired rhetoric about alphas not needing cash to get laid, you can believe that the man with cash plus game is going to leverage that game to get more lays than the guy with just game, unless he has to work too many long hours for the cash. Cash greases the logistics. It helps with venue bounces at the least.

        That is just common sense. Directly or indirectly, sex costs at least $50 a go for most alphas, probably, and $200 a go for betas.

        Divide your tax bill by $50 and that would be an accurate number of marginal lays the government is taking away from you.

        If you inherit a million bucks so you can retire and sarge women for the rest of your life, but the government takes 40% because you’re temporarily “one of the 1%” then you’ll probably have to keep working instead of taking early retirement which means that you are literally, not just effectively, being made into a slave. Every day you go to work after that robbery, you will remember who forced you to do so. And you’d also regret that the 400 grand the government stole would have gotten you laid 8 thousand times more than you will be getting based on the idea that an alpha spends on average $50 per lay.

        And that’s just the direct damage. Indirectly, when your 7 grand in taxes effectively pays for the student loan of a really hot freshman in the college town where you are doing well in business as a man in his thirties, she may be a thousand times less down with the idea of dating you and maybe moving in with you or bringing her friends around every few days to hang out and get some free food and entertainment while keeping you happy. Instead, she can live off your money and hate you for being an older white male oppressor after she really gets into her second semester womyn’s studies course.

        The Beach Boys understood women with their T-Bird Song.

        Old PUA ideology (pre-CH) was so friendly to the left wing younger male set that they tried to slam the idea that money increased success rates for alphas and betas alike. Any man who believes the “it doesn’t matter” meme fervently will then be OK with voting Democrat because he’ll incorrectly think “what does it matter, an alpha can get laid probably even more without his hard-earned money”.

        Like


      • If she wants you, getting laid is free. Sometimes, the women even pay.

        Like


      • Does a woman lead an alpha or does an alpha lead the woman?

        Like


    • It’s the other way around. The more you enslave men the more their women will demand independence from their pathetic asses.

      Like


  12. on November 8, 2012 at 12:07 pm David Alexander

    Regarding “there is no more pitiable creature than one that relishes sealing their own doom”

    Don’t a lot of women carry fetishes where they’re the only girl in an island of twenty men?

    Like


  13. “My number is 47. Thanks suffrage!”

    Like


  14. Freedumb

    Like


  15. It is time to end universal suffrage in GENERAL.

    You get to vote if:

    -You own land/property
    -You pay a certain amount of taxes
    -You are male and over the age of 21.

    Like


    • Universal suffrage is what turned the government into a pseudo-democracy. It’s still a constitutional republic…but the masses choose any person that gives them the most stuff.

      Like


      • Is it really? Since when did the banks and special interests groups give a shit about the Constitution?

        Like


    • How is that essentially different from what we have now?

      What we have today is a direct result of the logic that gave all white male landowners the vote. If it’s good to give the vote to every white guy with some land, then it must be good to give it to everyone. If it’s good for the goose it’s good for the gander.

      Like


      • Laconophile: you keep missing the pojnt. if you are a successful “land owner” you have proven yourself to be finacially capable and to be in posession of at least a moderate amount of good sense.

        it’s not JUST owning land that sets you apart. it’s the were with all to maintain, keep, and exploit your land that proves you worthy of making governmental decisions.

        Like


  16. Wow, Hispanics sound like a real pain in the arse. I hope they don’t start coming to Canada.

    Like


    • Just wait for the North American Union… [cue ominous music]

      Like


      • All Canadian large cities such Montreal or Toronto have a majority of non-caucasians.

        of course the further you are from a large city the more white faces you see.

        I live about 30 miles from Montreal and in my small town there is less than 1% of non-caucasians, but in downtown Montreal most faces are brown or black.

        We have a growing number of all kinds of immigrants, including Hispanics and of course a lot of Muslims.

        Canadian caucasians have less children than most immigrants, we are a ” shrinking” demographic just as in most caucasian nations on the planet.

        We may not be in as much ” trouble” as Europe or the USA is but we are getting there

        Our leaders have imposed “multiculturalism” on us without ever asking if we wanted it, back in the 1960s just about the same time it happened in the USA.

        And like a gift that keeps on giving ( if you know what I mean ) , immigrants have more children that the average caucasians, and once they are Canadian citizens they can have their uncles aunts what have you come over and become Canadian citizen

        whites are a shrinking population and even if we were to close our doors to immigrants they would still have more children; closing the door to immigration would accomplish nothing; we are a shrinking population they are a growing population

        Electing politicians that would close the door to immigration would only slow down but not stop what is going on.

        Multiculturalism benefits everyone but Caucasians, it is a form of suicide for white people and for western civilization.

        Like


    • Please you have Muslims in Canada, and they are just as bad. And Montreal; has Haitians too. Also, as Obama bankrupts the nation, they’ll start coming north and the Canadian liberals won’t turn them away. Anything to keep the white men in check.

      Like


  17. ed – I see the dilemma and I agree with the path it’s taking this country down, but at the same time it is RIPE with opportunity for (budding) alphas to plunder endless pussy and to rise in corporate ranks by virtue of game (and not merit). What’s not to love? The last 2 jobs I got I was hired by a female manager. I got both because they ‘liked me’. The second one I had 0 qualifications for trololol.

    We’re just entering a different era in history where psychological dominance (game) is the currency of success. Get good at game and watch as everything falls into place. Fight fire with fire.

    [heartiste: i agree. game is more important now than ever before for men. in fact, i would almost say it’s a necessary skill to possess to successfully navigate a freaked-out, feministed society.]

    Like


  18. I made two more “Thanks suffrage!” memes:

    http://qkme.me/3rp77i
    http://qkme.me/3rp76v

    Like


  19. There’s clearly a lot of factors going on in the election, but it is undeniable that without single women we’d have a different president. What our society is moving towards is the systemic elimination of risk/consequences. That’s what the matriarchy really wants: Freedom to do whatever and whomever they want without any ill effect. Got a useless degree? “Don’t worry we’ll find you a job.” Single mother? “Oh it’s not your fault, we’ll take care of you.” Don’t find your husband attractive any more? “Cash and prizes for you!”

    This is the exact opposite of the single male narrative that, not so long ago, we heard all the time. That was the one about doing something extraordinary with your life through hard work and calculated risk taking.

    Like


    • Don’t find your husband attractive any more? “Cash and prizes for you!”

      TD

      that could and should be on anti-feminist posters and t-shirts

      Like


    • I love Jack Donovan’s description of our current feminist matriarchy – “Bonobo Masturbation Society”. It’s such a succinct and germaine description of where we are at.

      Like


  20. Looking at the demographics of the O voters in the paper this AM. Struck me that they most represent people with nothing to lose. Young folks with little life experience and few to no assets, single women in contrast to married ones. Sixty percent of atheists or those who claim no religious affiliation. In short, those with no investment personally or financially.

    Like


  21. if you take into account voter turnout more americans didn’t vote than those who voted for Obama

    2012_US_Elections_Graph_1

    it’s not the kind of numbers you’ll see on the front pages. I wonder what the % of those who didn’t vote are white males.

    Like


    • Sadly the cohort of “unlikely votors” are even MORE for Obama. 65% or more. Fortunately, they’re too lazy to even vote.

      Like


  22. Goodbye America. Goodbye Europe. Goodbye Ireland. We are in the forecourt of gloabl collapse.

    Mitt Romney can hold his head up high – look how he whittled down Obama’s 2008 majority? This means that a majority of US voters do NOT support
    (1) what Obama stands for;
    (2) how Obama conducted his first term;
    (3) how they perceive Obama to conduct his second term.

    Isn’t it terrible how the European media (especially the PC drones in Dublin) are still having wet-dreams over Obama? European liberals would prefer themselves to be let vote for US President rather than those silly, red-neck Yanks who do not know what is good for them.

    Compare and contrast: the Irish Times of today Thursday 8th November 2012:-
    http://irishtimes.newspaperdirect.com/epaper/viewer.aspx
    “Obama promises healing” (eeeeeekkk!!)

    to the London Times whose headline states “Alarm in Wall Street”.

    The Brits aren’t all pretty pc faces …

    Like


    • Thankfully all of our grand-daddies got on those boats to get the f*ck out of that place. Now it’s being run by Socialist EU Weenies, destroyed by soccer hooligans, overrun with Islamo-nazis, and drowning in debt. What a sad end to such a nice continent 😦

      Like


  23. do women even fuck dudes anymore? do women even enjoy it??? what a boring world

    Like


    • A lot of women are lesbians. You can thank the feminists for that too.

      Like


      • A lot of women are lesbians. You can thank the feminists for that too.

        and a lot of them are frustrated lesbians.

        I mean they are not even happy with their lifestyle but since everybody is doing they are doing it,

        leftism is the champion of peer pressure syndrome; conform or be cast out…

        Like


      • I totally agree.

        And regarding men, gay sex is the chief reason for the destruction of civilizations. Look at ancient Greece. One of the main reasons for its decline was gay sex. Disgustingly enough, every older male had a before-puberty boy he used to fuck into manhood (Yuck!). Pretty soon most Greek men chose sex with males instead of females, and only married women for procreation when they had to.

        @JayMan – Homosexual sex is a learned behavior, not the result of nature. Never mind what gays spew, insisting they were born that way. Bull shit! They are lying through their STD-ridden dirty bodies.

        Most gays are the product of sexual molestation by older males. The first sex a male experiences is the kind he will prefer throughout his life. That information has been suppressed lately by the Left, since the truth doesn’t matter to Leftist in the grand scheme of things. The ends always justify the means for Leftists.

        If Gay marriage is backed by the federal government, watch a lot more gays being produced in the west. Their numbers will skyrocket. It will become mainstream – in the media, in the schools, in sports – everywhere gays could inject their agenda and lifestyle they will in order to be considered the norm and make straights be considered throwback reactionaries. That’s already becoming the way many liberals see heterosexuals who say homosexuality is not normal. They refuse to acknowledge that heterosexual and homosexual sex is not equal.

        In fact, what’s infuriating me the most is the fights I had with feminist old hags who dare to tell me that an older man with a much-younger woman is not normal and totally wrong, if not borderline child molestation and creepy, while gay sex is just as normal as straight sex and definitely more normal than the older male/younger female configuration. Folks, this is what we‘re coming to. The Left and the gay lobby has been able to make homosexuality the norm, while heterosexuality is viewed like a throwback lifestyle. This is how dangerous gays are to us all.

        Like


      • Homosexual sex is a learned behavior, not the result of nature.

        Most gays are the product of sexual molestation by older males. The first sex a male experiences is the kind he will prefer throughout his life.

        Evidence?

        If Gay marriage is backed by the federal government, watch a lot more gays being produced in the west. Their numbers will skyrocket. It will become mainstream – in the media, in the schools, in sports – everywhere gays could inject their agenda and lifestyle they will in order to be considered the norm and make straights be considered throwback reactionaries.

        Funny that the prevalence of male homosexuality has actually been declining, then:

        Special Post: The Decline of Male Homosexuality « JayMan’s Blog

        Like


      • Only a small percentage of women are lesbians. Most women who aren’t straight are bi, and even they seem to primarily concerned with fetching men:

        The Evolution of Female Bisexuality « JayMan’s Blog

        Like


      • “Only a small percentage of women are lesbians.”

        That’s not the point. We know most of the population is not gay. Right now it’s at 2.2%; still high enough though. However, it’s gaining even more momentum by gays and their helpers to make it more mainstream. Women are being encouraged to try lesbian sex through the media and popular culture. Kathy Perry singing, “I kissed a girl and I like it,” etc…..what kind of message do you think it sends?

        I agree with Canadian Friend, most of them are frustrated sexually because a woman can’t give another woman the same emotional and spiritual feelings during sex a man can, especially when there is a deep connection and love between the two. No way, no how. I don’t care what these women say. Eventually, many of them come back to be with men, no matter how troubled their relationships continue to be in the end, as most of these women are very confused and their lives are a mess.

        Like


      • Right now it’s at 2.2%; still high enough though. However, it’s gaining even more momentum by gays and their helpers to make it more mainstream.

        You have it exactly backwards my friend. The prevalence of male homosexuality has been declining.

        Women are being encouraged to try lesbian sex through the media and popular culture. Kathy Perry singing, “I kissed a girl and I like it,” etc…..what kind of message do you think it sends?

        The prevalence of female bisexuality (not lesbianism) is increasing, but since bisexual women are primarily interested in men, what’s your worry?

        Like


  24. To be honest, even though I am
    (1) actively gay (yeah! Anal! yeah yeah!)
    (2) European;
    (3) Irish

    this US election has left me devastated. We need a US that is hard-working, rich and strong. Like China.

    Many many Americans are very angry at the reality of China creeping up and enjoying the kind of prosperity America last had one hundred years ago.

    Fuck Obama and all his limp-wristed cock-sucker cronies.

    The end is nigh …

    Like


    • This blog is not for queers.
      GTFO, faggot.

      Like


    • The question is: who belongs to the American nation ?

      [heartiste: the better question is: what is a nation? answer that, and you can answer the second question.]

      I guess only 55-60% of US citizens, almost all white (although there are whites who are not part of the American nation).
      The rest (virtually all blacks, most Hispanics-Mestizos, Asians,..) are just permanent foreigners, not Americans.

      [pre-1965, america was 90% euro-white in ancestry. most of those americans are anglo-germanic with some scandinavian, slav, celtic and italian in the mix. those people, plus american blacks who can trace their family line to at least the civil war, are americans in the non-neocon, non-fruitloop open borders sense of the word. note i said “american” and not “citizen”. there are now plenty of citizens who are nothing like the americans were up until 50 years ago.
      and this will have consequences.]

      Like


      • Nation is a group of people sharing collective destiny. They may have some origin myths (now redundant), common language, customs, language & law and culture. There cannot be a multiracial nation, just a multiracial country or, for that matter, empire.

        For instance, the true litmus of a nation is primary loyalty. During Jewish uprising against Rome in 70s A.D., not only Jews in what is now Israel & Palestine had been sucked into death-or-life war with Rome, but also Jews from Alexandria in Egypt and Cyrenaica “volunteered” (as far as transport facilities of that time allowed) to fight- and die (ca. 1 million Jews killed) in Palestine.

        So, a nation is a crystallized collective loyalty & destiny. In the beginning of the US, this core nation consisted of mostly British Isles settlers plus some Northern Europeans, which formed a nation around a few traits: white European phenotype, English language, Christianity or Deism, common law, customs & legal principles and European cultural heritage. In the latter half of the 19th century new waves of European immigrants, now from Southern and Eastern Europe arrived, but they’ve been rather quickly assimilated.

        So- what’s American nation ?

        White phenotype, European cultural heritage & identification with American historical legacy and national identity.

        The other racial & ethnic groups are, IMO, part of American empire- but, the overwhelming majority, do not belong to the American nation. Empires come & go, from Rome to Ottomans and Soviet empire. The last one collapsed- but Russian nation lives on. I have no doubt that the American empire will have collapsed. Just- will American nation survive ?

        Like


      • “The other racial & ethnic groups are, IMO, part of American empire- but, the overwhelming majority, do not belong to the American nation. Empires come & go, from Rome to Ottomans and Soviet empire. The last one collapsed- but Russian nation lives on. I have no doubt that the American empire will have collapsed. Just- will American nation survive ?”

        No, because there is no real American nation. This country is falling apart because it’s a collective of so many different races, each vying for their own control and influence in America at the expense of the others. When the nation was made of the original Europeans that came here before 1860 or even the 1920, things were different because they all had some common ancestry. After 1965 when immigration laws were relaxed (just in time for the social revolution that was at the doorstep of America and the rest of the world), all kinds of races started moving here. It’s not just Hispanics. Look in southern CA; the place is overrun by Africans who engage in different illegal activities and internet theft. Who let these niggs come here? ACLU has been advocating for them. It advocates for the niggs, spics, and Muslims to come here unrestricted. Most white Americans have a strong aversion to these races, but you can’t speak against them or be labeled a racist. So people keep quiet. The only way we can salvage what is left is to divide this country into two (or more if necessary), where one of these countries is where the ancestors of various Europeans reside, and where no immigration and lefties are tolerated. A real America based on the original Constitution. Then maybe we can re-built the idea of an American nation.

        Like


    • on November 8, 2012 at 2:29 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Actively gay means you’re the pitcher? As opposed to passively gay…

      Like


      • I’m guessing ‘actively’ means he gets laid. Which does appear to be MUCH easier in Queer Nation , where height, looks, age and money don’t seem to matter much.

        Like


      • Hahaha.

        “Actively gay means you’re the pitcher?”

        Yup. I get the pleasures of anal with none of the pain.

        I’m guessing ‘actively’ means he gets laid. Which does appear to be MUCH easier in Queer Nation , where height, looks, age and money don’t seem to matter much.

        50% right – yes, I get laid a shitload. No, in Queer Nation height looks and age matter TWICE as much but nothing matters as much as attitude. I’m 39 and I get hit on by guys of 19 and 20. I am broke and heavily in debt but my attitude gets their peachy anuses to envelop my penis. Live with it – I do.

        Like


      • By the way, it is just my imagination or do a shitload of guys seem to have some interest in getting me to write about the joys and rewards of good anal sex?

        I thought I was the faggot …

        Like


      • no it’s not your imagination. i was beginning to wonder myself.

        Like


      • Chris from Dublin, I usually like your posts but you don’t have to keep telling us you’re gay. You’ve been doing that since the beginning (I’m a long time reader).

        Like


      • on November 9, 2012 at 8:49 am Hugh G. Rection

        I just went for cheap laughs. The rest is wishful thinking on your part. Exit only, Bro!

        Like


      • Chris from Dublin, I usually like your posts but you don’t have to keep telling us you’re gay. You’ve been doing that since the beginning (I’m a long time reader).

        Fair enough, and thanks for the praise, but it is, I think, relevant because there are many newer readers and because so much of the content of this blog deals with heterosexual dating – which is fine, it’s a free world – but I am a massive fan of the Chateau (as are many fags) and the blog’s opinions on men’s issues generally, politics, economics and status wars are so fucking sharp that my not being heterosexual should not (and indeed DOES not) exclude me. He has always given me good audience on the site (and if you want to see cruel and vicious blogs, check out the gay ones …)

        Like


  25. The zombie tube says the Republican Party is too white to win. They’ll repeat this idea ad nauseam for the coming months

    http://tinyurl.com/a4gre24

    Big Brother says: if you’re a white male you have to disappear along with the Republican Party.

    White voters defending their ethnic interests? That would be evil! We can’t allow that!

    [heartiste: this msm “too white” line of argument is self-defeating. if the gop is too white, then the dems are too black. if that’s the way they want to play, then so be it. both barrels blasting.]

    Like


  26. That girl in the suffrage picture looks more like Ferris Bueller than a girl.

    Like


  27. Romney was guaranteed to make war on Iran and someone above said, perfectly, that he is the stereotype of the Wall Street job-exporter. For any electorate not as fanatic as in the Southern US, those are pretty good reasons for voting against him and a quite good case can be made that Romney was the worse short-term choice

    Yet this pales in comparison with the much greater fact that conservatism is officially unelectable in the the US.

    The first point is like any treaty between Greeks and Turkks giving more rights to the Turks. The second point is the fall of COnstantinople

    Like


  28. There is a lot of bleating going on here. A herd of sheep, natch. America is not a monolith. It is not a “nation” in the sense of England being a nation of allied Anglo-Saxon tribes, nor as France is a Gaelic nation, etc, etc. America is, and has always been, a patchwork quilt of areas of native American territory that were Even in its earliest incarnation, America has referred to both North & South Americans. But even if we circumscribe the definition to include only those born with in the borders of the current US territories, we include vast areas of land that were first colonized by the Spaniards, who intermixed much more readily with the native population.

    You can see that various areas of the US, and all of North & South America were colonized predominantly by specific European settlers. Example: Minnesota & the Dakotas received a large population of Scandinavians, while New Orleans & Montreal got the Frenchies. So even the whiteys have never been a monolith. That’s why the “white power” people come off as so retarded. There’s no “white race.” It’s always been a bunch of different tribes that happen to be white. So somebody who celebrates being Scottish is seen as cool, or someone who champions their Nordic or Germanic heritage by eating the food of their ancestors & wearing the garb. But those who celebrate a generic “whiteness” have manufactured a false narrative, and it shows. Oktoberfest is a blast, whereas a KKK rally seems like a bunch of frightened bullys.

    Back to demography as destiny: the earliest, and the most prolific colonizers of this continent were the Spaniards, partially because those lusty brutes reproduced quicker and more easily with the natives, something the more “white” Europeans were loathe to do. This Spanish conquered, sexually and geographically, a massive area of the southern US. This area includes most of Florida, vast stretches of Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, and California. AKA big, blue states, or in the case of Texas, a state that will be blue in a few years.

    A simple way to tell the cultural genesis of an area is to look at the names of its cities, towns, mountains and rivers. If the town or other geological landmark has a Spanish originating name, it was first colonized by Spaniards. The Spaniards mated with the Indians, giving rise to the “Mestizo.” This is not new for anyone who’s passed a high school history course and has a working long term memory.

    This genetic half-breed, the Mestizo, has become, and will continue to become a dominant force in the political sphere. The Mestizo are more adapted to the environmental and geopolitical conditions of the New World. Yes, they may be more R selected than K, relative to the Northern Euros, but that is simply what the environment calls for. And they are “winning,” simply because their genetics have an advantage in this environment, they’re able to have more kids on a lower economic input, and, most importantly, they’re able to vote en bloc.

    This bloc happens to coincide with the SWPL white chicks, African Americans, et al. What do these groups have in common? They all seek to expand genetic diversity, and all benefit from it. This is a natural behavior of all species, an adaptive response to changing environmental conditions. The entire purpose of having sexual dimorphism, the purpose of having sexual reproduction, of even having males and females versus having asexual reproduction, is to create conditions where the males from diverse populations can bring genetic diversity to a more stable genetic population of females.

    This is why some white chicks love black guys, or Italian guys, or latino guys, etc. This is why Asian females love virtually any other race’s males. There are the occasional counter-instance, like the black female’s resistance to dating outside their race. I’m sure someone will infer something about their genetics based on that, but remember that the same is true for the HBD white crowd.

    In short, we can trace the Rolling Brownout back to the Spanish conquistador’s embrace of miscegenation, which may go back even further to the even earlier defeat of the Spanish at the hands of the Moors. Just like the German soldier’s sexual conquests in France during WW2, this interbreeding happens whenever a new group of males shows up in established territory.

    Thusly, is so fittingly ironic that Obama is a half breed from Hawaii, who was re-elected by an ethnic tidal wave. Which brings up another interesting observation: Why are all of the coastal states, with the exception of Alaska, Blue as the deep sea? Sea transport has been the main means of genetic drift, and areas with waterways have the most diverse populations for that exact reason.

    You can judge it all you want, wring your hands, bleat like sheep, cry like babies, but it will not change the demographic surge that is occurring. They best thing you white purists can do for your own mental health is to relax and embrace it. Get yourself a hot Asian girlfriend, a spicy little Latina side piece.If you don’t want to pollute the gene pool, get a vasectomy. These measures will help you “enjoy the decline,” but realize that it isn’t really a death, but a birth.

    One old cultural milieu being replaced with a newer, more robust one, driven by genetic drift. The mixing of cultures creates new cultures born of the blend of the genetic stock and cultural appropriations of both.

    Like


    • COMMENT OF THE WEEK.

      Epic.

      I’ve often said that a white American demanding white racial purity is like someone who finished a delicious pork chop — and then goes looking for that pig that used to live in the back yard. It’s long gone. Our white immigrant ancestors, going all the way back to the conquistadores, obviously viewed ethnic purity as a low priority.

      Surprisingly, Heartiste doesn’t seem to share this view about the healthy benefits of gene flow. I honestly thought he (they) was (were) smarter than that, given the amount of history and science on this blog.

      Like


      • One little problem with this comment Jason. Mestizos exist because Spain (white people) conquered Mexico in the first place. People of European descent run Mexico to this day. There goes that theory.

        Like


    • ALPHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

      Like


    • I think it’s even more basic than that.
      Asian chicks love non-Asian men because they’re generally taller.
      White chicks love Black guys because the White guys are fat and lazy and play video games, while the Black guys are ripped and shoot it out on a concrete basketball court. It also helps that they talk like the guys the girls see on MTV and such, making them pop-culture ‘heroes’.
      What I find interesting abvout the ‘White Power’ types is that whenever you see a picture in a paper or on TV of one of them being arrested for scaring the neighborhood by stockpiling 567 assault rifles and hand grenades, it is always some cross-eyed short guy with 2 chins and greasy, thinning hair. How the hell does someone like that look at himself in the mirror and see the ‘Master Race’?
      One problem with White guys getting themselves ‘Latina side pieces’: At least in this area, the only Latinas showing any interest whatsoever in White guys are the middle-aged, overweight Single Mothers(TM) with tons of credit card debt and 1 or more kids in rehab.
      Even if the White guy is anything but fat or lazy……

      Like


    • You are, by leaps and bounds, the MOST dangerous type of DWL, I applaud you for that sir. You know your history well, you speak articulately, and with conviction. A vast majority of readership probably thinks “Wow, this guy makes sense.” Let me now puncture your well thought out political puff piece with so many holes, not unlike a shotgun blast.

      Where to start? America is not a nation. Correct, The United States of America is most assuredly a nation. Once who, despite your wobbly fuzzy history about “a bunch of different white people” (I’ll not regurgitate what you spewed above) having no common links. Really? Are you sure? EUROPE–> Common Link. And in spite of differences between let us say Iberian peoples, Nordic Peoples, Anglo-Saxons, Teutons, and all the rest they shared this commonality amongst them all. Your use of “white” and “white power” is quite frankly, fucking insulting to the EUROPEANS who created this nice country, wholly, not in part, that you now occupy.

      Secondarily, it is “fun” when white people have Oktoberfest, or Little Italy day? Condescending much? So we can play dress up for a day and then go back to being some nameless drone whilst our “newer” arrivals have WHOLLY imported their entire culture here and without modification. Different language, different customs, and our need to accomodate all of this. The majority of skinheads and white power types are moderately retarded from what I’ve seen, let us say that you obviously know they represent a statistically insignficant minority.

      Lastly, so SWPL chicks, mestizos, and blacks are all just looking to become more “neutral brown”. Funny that you don’t mention white males looking to get “more brown” too. It is a field day on white women because they are, and everyone damn well knows this the gold standard of beauty across the entire planet. Of -course- you want to embrace diversity brownie, and they are marching along to the pied piper’s flute of beta provider government with little idea about what it took to BUILD this world and infrastructure that has allowed them to become the most spoiled and pedestalized women the world has ever known. Which has allowed them to become the vacuous self-absorbed bimbos they are with a knowledge of history which, quite frankly, is about the same as your own.

      You overtly state that when “new males” come into a territory they interbreed with the population. Those new males in the form of Spaniards in your example were also called Conquistadors and put entire areas to the sword THEN fucked their women. As it always has been in all of history. So your alternate proposal then is, through “soft” conquest we simply step back to the sidelines so you can be uplifted by DNA that is by every objective measurement via civilization, infrastructure, invention, modernization, and raw objective IQ tests, superior to your own?

      Not on my watch motherfucker. I will fight you tooth and nail, don’t let some dumb ass skinhead or a bunch of tired old limp dicked GOP blowhards divert your eyes from my kind. Young, intelligent, eyes WIDE open, and well aware that European as a whole unites in the same was as “African” American or any other bullshit moniker anyone wants to place on themselves.

      I’m here all week for further education…

      Like


      • Good post! I agree completely, Jay in DC.

        Like


      • I salute you, sir.

        This was a forum smack-down worthy of the best of King A, which is saying much… and yet another steel-laden “Up Yours!” to all the SWPL fellow travelers and shabbos goyim who throw around “epic” like a frisbee, when it should be a manhole cover… and take their giddy little anti-white delights.

        Like


      • Right on, Jay in DC. My thoughts exactly.

        Woe to the others when the Saxon awakes (as we are rapidly doing).

        The key group for leadership right now is composed of white, straight tradition-minded males ages 25-40, who might not be fully entrenched in the liberal status quo and who see no future for themselves in this rotten system if nothing changes. We must get increasingly organized, and quickly at that.

        We must also focus on educating our brothers and sons aged 10-25, because it is they who will probably have to finish the job in decades to come. We must prepare ourselves to pass the baton one day. Eternal vigilance must then take root.

        Like


    • Intriguing.

      Sources your would recommend to delve deeper?

      Like


    • Wrong. Buchanan, with all his faults, was right: http://conservativetimes.org/Conservative_Resources/PropositionNation.htm

      Without core ethnic group crystallized as nation, any country dissolves sooner or later.
      And there are no interracial nations, nowhere in the world.

      Like


      • Buchanan is one of my heroes; he saw this coming 20 years ago. He warned the nation that one day all these immigrants from different races are going to tilt this country against whites, and whites are no longer the majority. I can’t believe this day is upon us. If anything, this realization should be the thing to mourn more than this election of Obama. I doubt any candidate would be elected into office who isn’t a Democrat or at least favorable to the various minorities that are overrunning this country. America’s downfall is a runaway train colliding head-first with destiny. Who can stop it now? No one.

        Like


  29. It’s too easy to blame people for not voting for you. How about republicans try to be truthful and honest for a change. They accuse MSM of lies, but fox news does the same. And people still have not forgotten how they were lied to during the bush years.

    Frankly, Romney came across as disingenuous. Remarks about 47%, and endless flip-flopping did not help his cause. The days where republicans could nominate an idiot like Dubya and still win are long gone, and are never coming back. What they need is real principled leadership….you know a party is rotten when there is a dearth of good leaders. Conservatives have no power because their bastions have been corrupted with the meek and the dumb. That’s where they need to work…This is a good wake up call.

    Like


    • Romney’s remark about the 47% – his moment of Alpha – wasn’t what sunk him.

      Romney backtracking from his remark about the 47% was what sunk him; he was the proverbial pseudo-Alpha running successful game and failing a shit test.

      Like


      • Whether the 47% vote for you or not – once you are elected, they are still your people. You can make the argument that welfare state is not good for the 47% even though it seems like it. But, as a candidate, you cannot take a position against your own people.

        Like


      • on November 9, 2012 at 8:51 am Hugh G. Rection

        The great thing about the statement is that probably at least half of the 47% thought they were in the remaining 53%.

        Like


    • Nothing Romney could have done differently would have changed the outcome, except be a little bit more on the offense, but even that wouldn’t have matted much in the end. This wasn’t about Romney, it was about 50% of the country voting for their ideology, which is liberal.

      People didn’t vote for Obama either, since he didn’t do anything right, and most people are definitely not happy with his job performance. They voted for the Democratic party because it promises permissiveness without any judgments, and what low-standard loser doesn’t want to engage in his loser activity with impunity?

      The country is now left of center, and people vote for the sake of their ideology, not based on the economy or defense. This means that the following issues are what’s important to liberals: birth control, abortion, gay marriage, immigration reform (God, I hate this term because there is nothing reforming about it), entitlement and welfare programs, global warming and other environmental bullshit/nonsense, affirmative fucking action (shit, I’m cursing a lot today), and the misnomers economic and social justice crap. That’s why they will never vote for a conservative or libertarian candidate, even if Jesus Christ was on the ticket. Don’t kid yourself.

      Like


      • Latino excuse or labor excuse does not work in Iowa/New Hampshire. If you cannot even with these two states as a white candidate, there is something wrong in the message. You have to be able to reach out to white working class, not just the elites. Scott Brown is able to to it better than Romney.

        Also, It is not just about the policies you outline. People have to be able to trust you as a leader to do the right thing. Romney lied too much – both in his ads and in the debates. Obama campaign nailed it be defining him as a corporate shark, who is out to screw them.

        Like


      • As if Obama is not the biggest demagogue liar out there, right?

        No, people chose to overlook Obama’s HUGE shortcomings and lies, yet call Romney on a few inconsistencies. Get real!

        Everyone voting for Obama is leaning LEFT, big time. They support all of these fringe issues I outlined, at the expense of real American values, ideals, and principals on which this country was established.

        Like


      • Romney got caught lying – obama was not caught.
        Of course there is a cultural battle, but there are those in the middle too. Not everyone leans left. Republicans come across as stooges of big business. The candidates don’t even talk of american values any more. romney did not even have a coherent message. It was all about hating the other guy.

        Like


      • “romney did not even have a coherent message. It was all about hating the other guy.”

        Sorry, but I didn’t hear any hate from Romney or the Republicans. The hate came from the Left, Obama and his cohorts, and the Black community.

        As far as stooges of big business, this country wouldn’t exist without business. The business of America is business. Get it? It’s not socialism, social or economic-justice crap, as the Left calls it. It’s not entitlement programs and welfare programs for immigrants or for lazy backward-ass niggs.

        And what did Romney lie about again, which made Obama smell like roses? I don’t remember one thing, except he made some flip flopping on some issues. So what? Obama called his flip flopping evolving. The Left, they have all kinds of innocuous description for their shenanigans and chicanery.
        You’re argument is totally bogus.

        Like


      • There is a difference between capitalism and crony capitalism. This nation was not built on government subsidies and cheap loans to businesses. or on the military industrial complex which nudged the country in the direction of the iraq war.

        As far as lies, it was not one lie, but the series of small lies. the biggest lie, of course was the infamous Jeep ad which was clearly exposed as fear mongering. And somehow Romney’s flip flopping did not come across as change in views – more like what I should say to get you to vote for me. Add to that the obfuscation regarding money stored in overseas bank accounts, and the electorate just did not trust him.

        Republican operatives lie all the time…days before the election they were talking about enthusiasm gap, and all the polls were wrong. Well on election day we saw all that for what it was – republican campaigns are based on lies and manipulations. The party is broken.

        trust is important. republicans lost the public’s trust during the bush years, and have not earned it back. Bush and rove are still burning them…romney was the best candidate they could come up with, but he was not good enough.

        Obama may be many things, but compared to romney, he is known quantity. Romney never bridged the trust gap….forget the demographic gap.

        You can blame the left all you want – but truth is romney was just too elitist to connect with the masses. He may have ended up as a competent president, but as a politician he was terrible. You cannot win an election by appealing to only elites. You have to be able to connect with working class.

        Like


      • People like you are scary man.

        The same sort of people who see the recent campaign as one where Romney “was all about hating the other guy” and Obama was a sainted moderate speaking doves of peace are the same sort that think MSNBC and the NYT are unbiased centre-of-the-road news outlets.

        I am from outside the U.S so I don’t really care about you peoples politics, but anyone who seriously believes the meme of evil right wing corporate media brainwashing the dumb plebs need to graduate from College and get a job in the private sector before their brains rot.

        Lefties and righties are paranoid about media bias, and while the media does tend to decide WHAT is spoken about, people have a refreshing tendency to make up their own minds.

        Like


      • “You can blame the left all you want – but truth is romney was just too elitist to connect with the masses. He may have ended up as a competent president, but as a politician he was terrible. You cannot win an election by appealing to only elites. You have to be able to connect with working class.”

        Reading your bullshit is like listening to MSNBC, which is full of Obama propaganda. It’s the Leftists that have an elitist air about them, not people with old-fashion values who live traditional lifestyles. Just because he is still married to the same woman after 4 decades, has 5 successful sons also married and not whoring around with one female after another with children out of wedlock, and made money in his day, doesn’t make him an elitist. That’s what Romney is, traditional. He looks like he escaped from a time capsule that was sealed in 1962. That’s why he doesn’t appeal to all the lowlifes, such as gays, lesbians, multi-racial families, single women, single mothers, Blacks and minorities, Hispanic immigrants, African immigrants, Muslim immigrants, Hindu immigrants, union members, radical leftists professors, government workers, global warming alarmists, EPA lovers, Green peace and Sierra Club supports, ant-capitalists, and other various hippy types.

        People like to vote for candidates that look like them, not someone who is too perfect and looks like he is two or three levels above them, and makes them feel like they don’t measure up. In that sense Romney is an elitist, but not in any other sense. I can’t believe a traditional family man is rejected for being a supposed elitist, while Obama or Clinton, both the sons of unwed mothers, are celebrated. If that’s what it takes to win elections nowadays than this country is really fucked. I didn’t think we’ll ever see the day where mediocrity is celebrated, while excellence is rejected.
        Obama and his father were both helped all their lives by whites. How do you think they went to Harvard? Through affirmative action. It’s outrageous that excellence is being diminished and shills of affirmative action are being elevated.

        That’s what I tried to say in my original post. It doesn’t matter what Romney would have done differently, he would have lost because the country has tilted left. That’s why I don’t think the Republicans can win another elections, and to say they need to be more inclusive and like the Democrats is no answer. No matter how much the Republicans try to give to all of these fringe and minority groups, the Democrats will try to out do them. There is no end in sight. All we end up doing is pandering and pandering until we finish the nation and send it to oblivion. The minorities will overrun us.

        Like


      • “… People like to vote for candidates that look like them, not someone who is too perfect and looks like he is two or three levels above them, and makes them feel like they don’t measure up. In that sense Romney is an elitist, but not in any other sense….”

        You are right that is one part of the problem , but I think the other part is one of “perception”,

        the main stream media which is basically an arm of the left presents a distorted version of everyone on the right, so whatever is not perfect, little mistake or not ” likeable” about a Bush or Romney is magnified and repeated a million times a day in all the media.

        while anything bad about liberals is quickly swept under the carpet or the main stream media makes excuses for them.

        Maybe 5 or 10 % of the population have enough information from non biased sources to be able to compare the real Obama to the real Romney, the rest have completely badly distorted image or Romney and super embellished version of Obama.

        they think republicans are horrible human beings while Obama is a saint, but this is all rumors and hype.

        If ever there is a revolt or a civil war, the first thing that should be destroyed is the main stream media, they have too much power, it is insane what they can do.

        the main stream media elected Obama by hiding who he really is, who he used to hang with etc etc

        Had the media informed voters about such people as Reverend Wright, Obama would have never been elected.

        the main stream media is an arm of the left, like a branch or a department.

        the only people denying this are liberals

        Like


      • Of course it’s the media, but that only means that the culture is racing left, and the media reflects it, as the media is part of the culture. I am so past being upset at the media. I don’t expect anything else but complete chicanery.

        Our side tries to counter this with Fox News, talk radio, and some conservative blogs on the Internet, but it’s not enough in spite of Fox having the lion share of the cable news audience and talk radio has 30-40 M listeners. It’s not able to undo the media or the liberal leftist education. Let’s face it, besides the fact that immigrants are overrunning us, and gay sex as well as feminism becoming the norm, it’s the liberal education students are getting in high school and Universities. In the last 20 years, between the leftists media and the education department in the hands of the left, the whole country is on the verge of moral decay. Barak Obama’s first election already indicated that. His second election, leaves no room for doubt. Unfortunately, I don’t believe we will ever win another election the way things are going.

        I had other comments directed to you in this thread and the “what-is-the-point-of-telling-ugly-truths” thread, but they are held up in moderation. I hope you get at least this one.

        Like


      • Three causes of Romney’s defeat:

        1. demography of gibs-me-daters (blacks, Hispanics)
        2. permanent alienation & anti- white animus of successful minorities (Asians, Jews)
        3. decades long psychological warfare molding new moral standards re liberalization, pornification, sodomization, feminization, miscegenation… (white liberal types in New England & across academia,..)

        Like


  30. “You can judge it all you want, wring your hands, bleat like sheep, cry like babies, but it will not change the demographic surge that is occurring. They best thing you white purists can do for your own mental health is to relax and embrace it”

    What if they really took the gloves off again, and started advancing their own interests like when Europeans conquered the entire globe during the colonial era? Would hispanics, blacks, and asians be able to do anything about it? No, they really wouldn’t.

    What you’re seeing right now is handicapped whites, who feel guilty about being white, trying to be polite and tolerant and playing fair, not realizing the other side is impolite and intolerant, and playing for keeps. Be very afraid if they get pissed.

    I bring this up, because it’s already happening in Greece.

    Like


    • “Would hispanics, blacks, and asians be able to do anything about it? No, they really wouldn’t.”

      The Chinese, should they ever militarize, would own every country on the planet. The Japanese very nearly owned the Pacific. The South Koreans have compulsory military service.

      Asians would put up a hell of a fight and probably would win.

      Like


      • The chinese have a long and glorious history of being raped on the battlefield when they have faced foreign armies. That isn’t changing any time soon.

        Like


      • Agreed, about all the Chinese ever conquered were indigenous people WITHIN their own borders.

        Between their xenophobia and backward social practices – it’s amazing the Chinese have evolved into the export juggernaut they are now

        Like


      • It’s a running joke that Vietnam has kicked Chinese ass everytime they have fought. The latest was the Chiến tranh biên giới Việt-Trung in 1979. They got their asses kicked. But both sides “claim victory.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War

        Like


      • Really, Jason? Is that why the British Empire was able to own India and Hong Kong, and France to own French Indochina (Cambodia, Vietnam, ect.)? Did America defeat Japan if I remember correctly? This is what happens when you have not-feeling-guilty, non-handicapped white people acting: kicking ass. Remember that.

        Like


      • on November 9, 2012 at 8:56 am Hugh G. Rection

        Without the help of the USA, South Korea would probably be overrun by the North if it weren’t for the huge minefield. As for the Chinese, Numbers don’t count in modern Warfare. You can pretty much take out all resistance without setting foot on their land.

        Like


      • Any war with China would not only bankrupt Walmart – and thousands of other US businesses – any attempts to penetrate mainland China would be a bloodbath that would dwarf WW II. Much like past attempts to invade Russia.

        Like


      • “Much like past attempts to invade Russia.” You mean Russia, which is full of non-handicapped white people? What a coincidence!

        “any attempts to penetrate mainland China would be a bloodbath that would dwarf WW II” China has been penetrated so many times, the latest is they are still pissed at the Japanese for Manchuria.

        Like


  31. Losers complain. Winners deal with reality. Get fit, get charm, get laid, get paid. The more you focus on others, the less you focus on your own goals.

    Like


  32. Real change begins with changing yourself. (See: Game.) For everyone else, there is Election Day. Players don’t waste time thinking about politics. If you do you’re still a slave, to a class of prostitutes no less.

    Fuck it dude, let’s go bowling.

    Like


  33. Relevant post: The situation, in the long run, is hardly as dire as you guys make it out to be:

    Some guys get all the babes – not exactly « JayMan’s Blog

    [heartiste: jayman, i’ve read similar posts as yours on audacious e’s blog. like his gss data, one of the problems with measuring alpha maleness by number of children is the wide availability of contraceptives. when so many men can so easily thwart the end goal of reproductive effort, you cannot reliably assess male sexual success by how many women they knock up. most alphas, at least the non-thug variety, are smart enough to use a rubber, or go raw dog with girls on the pill.

    anyhow, not to get too far off point, but no one at CH ever claimed alpha men get all the ladies; only that alphas get a disproportionate amount of the action. oh, and btw, that quote from STF on your blog, referencing a comment on peter frost’s blog, was actually pulled directly from my blog. those are my words.

    peeps be jacking my brilliance!]

    Like


  34. Looking at the demographics of the O voters in the paper this AM. Struck me that they most represent people with nothing to lose. Young folks with little life experience and few to no assets, single women in contrast to married ones. Sixty percent of atheists or those who claim no religious affiliation. In short, those with no investment personally or financially.

    The hideous truth

    Like


    • “Young folks with little life experience and few to no assets, single women in contrast to married ones. Sixty percent of atheists or those who claim no religious affiliation. In short, those with no investment personally or financially.”

      Or, in short, the 47%.

      Like


  35. Yes, let’s go back to the glory days of the early 1900s, before women had the vote. It was really a great time back then, what with the smallpox, killer influenza, mass poverty on a level that makes the recession look like a party and best of all, sewage in the streets. Sounds lovely.

    (PS: I’m NOT trying to claim that women having the vote is necessarily what has made things better today — yes, they are better for most of us — because I think’s that’s more of a correlation vs causation sort of argument. But I do want to point out that the world has not collapsed as a result of suffrage. And arguably, conditions are 100 percent better in nations with suffrage as opposed to those without. If you hate the female vote so much, why don’t you head to Saudi Arabia and Brunei and see how you like it)

    Like


    • P.S. Note that the woman’s concerns are ones of safety. And the man’s concerns are ones of freedom. In my experience, this is the iron-clad rule, and why the Ds always win when they promise more candy/”freedom from fear”/etc. and scare the wimmenz that they gonna all be put back in chainz.

      Like


    • Andrea,

      Smallpox and killer influenza were illnesses that were not cured because women got the vote. They were both cured by male doctors and scientists that took the time to do so. Saying “Alright women, you can now vote” didn’t cause feminine magic to spread across the globe, wiping out disease. To try to link the two, even slightly, is extremely stupid.

      Mass poverty was the result of society’s change to mass industrialization. Again, this was not solved by feminine magic once they were granted the vote. It was solved by men starting new businesses and industry. Again, trying to link the two is stupid.

      The reason many men are either secretly or publicly against the female vote is because women tend to vote for what’s in their best interests (that is, what do I get out of this?), whereas men tend to vote based on what the group’s best interests are (how does this benefit the country?). The difference is huge. This has shifted the West from a place where people were able to work hard to get ahead to a place where people are given money just because. Single mother? Here’s some entitlement program money for you. Just initiated a divorce from your husband for no reason? Here’s some entitlement money for you until we can start making him send his money to you. Forever.

      This doesn’t even touch on the added costs of running a business in the new “We’re all equal!” society. Talk to a small business owner about how much it costs to deal with Maternity Leave. How about how much it costs having to work around a single mother’s schedule. Then there’s my personal favorite, having to pay money to make sure the small business meets all the bureaucratic red tape rules put down by local, regional and national government. That costs a lot of money and doesn’t add anything to the value of the business. That money can’t be spent on building business or expanding to provide more jobs.

      Liberalism leads to a short term increase in the living conditions of the population that gradually fades as the money runs out. As more and more money is used to fund ridiculously lavish programs (most of which wouldn’t be needed if the nuclear family was still intact), less and less money is available to cover the necessities of a nation; ie. infrastructure. Add to this the tendency of “kept” people to become lethargic and unable to work for themselves. Less men working at the peak of their productive output means less business. Less business means less tax revenue and faster national bankruptcy.

      In short, no women getting the vote didn’t result in an immediate world collapse. But, like most stupidity, the result of it is not immediately apparent. It takes a long time for this level of insanity to reach its fruition.

      To pull a quote from a favorite video game of mine, “It’s not the end of the world, but you can see it from here.”

      Like


    • on November 9, 2012 at 8:59 am Hugh G. Rection

      Most of the problems you mention were solved by men or economic progress (on the back of male ingenuity and labor).

      Like


    • mi laugh es tu hamster.

      Fucking cunt.

      Like


  36. Yes, let’s go back to the glory days of the early 1900s, before women had the vote. It was really a great time back then, what with the smallpox, killer influenza, mass poverty on a level that makes the recession look like a party and best of all, sewage in the streets. Sounds lovely.

    You know that as with all technological progress since the plow and the wheel, women played no role at all in those discoveries, don’t you?

    . But I do want to point out that the world has not collapsed as a result of suffrage.

    Hasn’t collapsed YET. Do you think Senegal and Mali are nice places? And France? And would you describe as “collapse” if France, a generation from now, became indistinguishable from Senegal and Mali?

    What about SoCal turning into Guatemala?

    Like


  37. LMAO. Oh shit…it’s not easy being a Conservative Hispanic. for a minute, I was taking you guys seriously.

    Like


    • And you still can, so long as you don’t buy into pandering revisionist history BULLSHIT about how this empire was formed. You are WHOLLY UPLIFTED by Europeans. If tomorrow, every minority, fag, entitled liberal cunt, etc. would instead of creating the “Ministry of Truth” full of lies, stare reality right in its face, I’d call of my full court press. Until then– F U C K Y O U. Am I clear?

      Like


    • At this point you might want to consider moving to Chile. The US is a lost cause.

      Like


  38. Anyway, fellers, let’s return to the basic plot here – Romney’s defeat.

    Only today Wall Street took another massive hit and the GOP pledged four more years of resisting Obama’s attempts to turn America into Sweden.

    Collapse, here it comes …

    Like


    • I don’t think the GOP could have stopped the decline, just slowed it down.

      I mean has anyone seen the US debt recently? It’s already a probable mathematical impossibility for that to ever be paid off.

      Even if Obama was the financial genius of his generation I would conservatively estimate the total will be around 22 Trillion by the time he leave the WH, since he is not it will probably be more.

      With interest taken into account the prospect of a US default or at least a titanic economic restructure is almost guaranteed in the next few decades.

      Hyper-inflation could be one way out of debt. But will the underclass be quiet while their Gimmedats shrink? Or will the U.S just collapse in on itself?

      I always used to laugh at the apocalyptic predictions of some on this site, but financially and socially the U.S seems to be in a touch of bother.

      Can anyone predict what will happen to the world if the biggest economy and the Hyper-abundance that has given rise to so many utopian visions collapses in on itself?

      As an Aussie I am looking forwards to finding out with a bag of popcorn and a beer.

      Morbid curiosity and alcoholism of course being two of our many national failings.

      Like


      • on November 9, 2012 at 9:07 am Hugh G. Rection

        Why would you want to pay down the debt? That would be the end of the Social Security Trust Fund. The Fed also holds a huge chunk that is pretty much neutral to the debt burden, as interest and principal are returned to the Treasury. That’s a huge chunk of the debt that is really of no concern.

        The real problem is not where the money comes from, the problem is where to spend it. Inflation is can be a risk, not the risk of default (which must be voluntary as the Treasury can’t run out of funding).

        Like


    • on November 9, 2012 at 2:52 am The Other Jim

      Yep Chris the collapse is coming. As far as I can tell the US has at least 9 types of economic hell ready to devour it. Soon. Place your bets; Student loan bubble, state bankruptcy of California, Illinois, NY, etc. municipal bankruptcy, Eurozone problems, Japanese debt & demographic crisis, and on and on.

      Well, at least the US had a good run and I’ve good memories the US in better times. Perhaps we ought to get some of the older Brits to talk about the end of the British Empire to commiserate with us Americans.

      Like


      • We are still bedevilled by denial – lies and bullshit in the media tell us to expect a “bounce” in the economy / growing employment etc etc etc.

        Horseshit – nobody in Dublin is working, there is no employment happening, shops are closing all over the city, the previously rich parts of the city are crumbling before our very eyes – the end is nigh if only because nobody seems to know what to do

        Like


  39. Really, some of it lies in Obama’s comment to the effect of votings the best revenge. But again, I’m incapable of grasping that sort of thing.

    Like


  40. @Heartiste:

    “that quote from STF on your blog, referencing a comment on peter frost’s blog, was actually pulled directly from my blog. those are my words.

    peeps be jacking my brilliance!”

    Thanks for letting me know! I’ve fixed it and properly credited the quote to you.

    Like


  41. @heartiste:

    “heartiste: jayman, i’ve read similar posts as yours on audacious e’s blog. like his gss data, one of the problems with measuring alpha maleness by number of children is the wide availability of contraceptives. when so many men can so easily thwart the end goal of reproductive effort, you cannot reliably assess male sexual success by how many women they knock up.”

    Yes, I’ve anticipated that problem, which is why I looked at marriage rates and number of children by number of women had. The GSS data suggest that most “betas” today will eventually be married, but it does remain to be seen what will happen to today’s 20-somethings when they reach 40.

    Like


  42. Was I the only one who felt when they cut to the victory celebration in Chicago that it was a see of fat black women with no husbands in sight interspersed with token SWPLs?

    Like


  43. This shit is funny. It must be what alphas feel like when they hear omegas going off. Most here dont know shit about Hispanics.

    Like


  44. FUBO!

    Like


  45. […] other men is clearly false. However, the reality of the situation may be in fact closer to what [Edit]: commenter STF noted over at Peter Frost’s Heartiste stated awhile […]

    Like


  46. I think Heartiste has really hit on something, here. We can expect Blacks to vote democrat. Hispanics also heavily tend to vote Democrat, especially the newly arrived brown folks — multi-generational American Hispanics, particularly those of a more European mixture, are more evenly divided. Old union men and hippies, definitely Democrat.

    However, there simply is not enough of the above mentioned groups (yet) to deliver this nation into the hands of the Democratic party.

    So, why the big swing towards The Long-legged Mack Daddy and his merry band of left-wingers in ’08 and ’12? Answer: WOMEN

    White married women, especially those who are wedded to strong men, are heavily conservative (women married to weenies not so much, as one can imagine).

    The key here is single women. A young lady of my acquaintance told me that she would absolutely not vote for Romney because of his supposed “radical anti-abortion” stance (not true, but never mind).

    Yes, today’s single young fornicators vote through their pussies, and the great issues such as the trade deficit, the disappearance of American manufacturing, energy costs, and the national debt do not even register with these. Anything that even THREATENS to interfere with the great alpha cock-chase and that which enables same (abortion, contraception, and those old “family values”) must be defeated.

    Single White females on the cock-carousel. Advantage: Obama.

    Like


  47. In other news, the President is crying like a girl. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBK2rfZt32g

    Like


  48. I grew up in a society where the women looked like the men, but with saggier tits. Being a lucky guy I somehow hooked up with a sex crazed Scando girl. Now Scando girls love Obarmy. I don’t quite understand the psychology. Same girls are kind and good company. But they just don’t have the higher judgement to see that they’re driving the fucker(our civilization) off the cliff.

    Like


  49. “a study by lott showed conclusively that female suffrage moved the country leftward, and has been doing so steadily since”
    Rhetoric moved leftwards. Money moved exactly the opposite way.
    “At the other end of the scale, Americans in the bottom fifth of earners saw their incomes increase by less than 20 percent across the nearly three decades. Incomes for those in the middle 60 percent climbed by less than 40 percent over the same span.

    Things start to look especially good for the top fifth of earners, who saw their cash flow jump by 65 percent.

    But it’s among the top 1 percent where the growth was breathtaking. That contingent saw their incomes spike by 275 percent.”
    Can read the entire report here : http://www.cbo.gov/publication/42729

    After 2007 the process of concentration of wealth and income to the top accelerated. Of course the rhetoric became even more leftist.

    The country is multinational already. So any association of the disparate people inhabiting the land is impossible. They will fight each other for the scrubs their betters are willing to let slip through their fingers.
    A working class white is useless for his overlords. Wealth can be much easier brought in by tribute from vassal lands or be created by imported peons.
    Power he does not have because except licking the boots of his masters like Mitt in the hope to get a slightly larger piece of the pie then the hated peons imported by his before mentioned masters he has no other ideas. Of course licking Mitt’s boots will bring him exactly nothing except more scorn but he is too dumb to understand.

    I do not see any reason why the empire should fall. Rome worked perfectly for centuries after the original Romans got crushed and replaced by their former leaders which became their masters. As long as the Army retains its hegemonic control on the navigation routes and the energy flows the empire and the ruling class are safe and wealthy. If the WCW die off or decay is pretty irrelevant. They have became useless. Their future has no importance whatsoever.

    Like


    • +1

      Every time H quotes that Lott study, he’s thinks he’s telling the whole story of the twentieth century–but it’s only one variable among many.

      Far more important to our daily lives is the widening gulf between rich and poor, which women did NOT engineer.

      [heartiste: i’ve never denied that the widening income and wealth inequality is a problem. but my take is that it is an emergent property of increasing diversity, both between and among races and classes.]

      Like


  50. If you were living in ancient Greece, you’d probably be a slave.

    My choice for Romney’s 47%.

    Like


  51. I am not surprised at all.

    Fraud in PA: Obama Got Over 99% of Vote at Polls Where GOP Inspectors were Removed; Turnout Somehow “30%” Above Gov’t Numbers

    http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/fraud-in-pa-obama-got-over-99-of-vote.html

    Like


  52. Lena Dunham looks like Jabba the Hutt, Couldn’t you blur out her face or something?

    Like


  53. Additional entries to the meme:

    “Families are sooo 20th century.”

    “Caring fathers are sooo 20th century.”

    “Should I wear sweatpants to my abortion? What if the doctor’s cute?”

    “I only make 72% as much as male freelance fashion bloggers do.”

    “Hugo Schwyzer.”

    Like


  54. Jayman’s analysis suffers from a fatal flaw: it’s confined to non-Hispanic whites (and also somewhat older cohorts, >40+ yoa). In a world in which the majority of children are born out of wedlock, it’s hard to imagine that men who’ve only had one sex partner are leading the charge.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/us/for-women-under-30-most-births-occur-outside-marriage.html?pagewanted=all

    Like


  55. I used to criticize TV for not having the guts to put actual ugly people in leading roles.

    For example, the star of Ugly Betty wasn’t really ugly per se, she was more quirky than anything else.

    However, once I saw Lena Dunham in a leading role, I take it all back. She is too hideous to look at.

    Like


  56. on November 10, 2012 at 7:01 pm Mild Speculation

    Heartiste, do you feel any moral responsibility to prevent the downfall of US civilization, or do you prefer to just make the most of it? These aren’t completely mutually exclusive, but at a point I think some traditional beta behaviors should be preserved (or maybe what I’m thinking of is actually more alpha than I am giving it credit). I’ve trended this way now that I’ve settled down. Here is a sort of code I like to live by…I’m curious to hear others’ thoughts.

    -find the most attractive, smart, and feminine woman you can get, and marry her in your mid to late 20s
    -do procreate, to counteract the evergrowing government-dependent class, plus this adds a sense of meaning to your life that very little else can
    -have a lot of sex with your wife, communicate, encourage her to be a stay at home mom if you can afford it, and provide real support for one another
    -run a tight ship with your kids while encouraging them, within reason, to follow their passions, and shape them into productive members of society
    -obey the law, don’t be a dick, be polite to old or ugly or disabled people, don’t needlessly waste energy and stuff that’s going to take up space in a land fill
    -don’t waste money on positional goods; the pleasure is not lasting and it is a zero sum game. By for quality instead.
    -exercise, eat right, educate yourself, think outside the box, challenge the mainstream but uplift the people around you
    -maintain close friendships, play rec sports
    -video games, board games, cigars, booze, even weed are all great in moderation
    -try not to contribute to the annoying self-conscious, ironic fads in fashion and attitudes that plague so many folks
    -don’t be an attention whore
    -defend yourself and your values when they are challenged, but don’t start unnecessary conflicts
    -don’t tolerate a shitty job if you can help it; doing something challenging and inspiring is worth sacrificing a surprisingly large amount of pay

    Like


  57. M3

    Your first meme confuses me.

    I don’t recall Obama having sex with a young boy?

    You were asleep.

    Like


  58. Went to iconic rock show tonight. Singer old friend, We go for tacos and Ritas after the show along with others. We go back years. Stayed at my house before famous. KNOW some same girls. Occurs to me, we are gonna be OK in the new normal if enough guards and guns and paranoia. America? As a whole thing?
    There are lists, you know. Always. To get back stage or to be allowed to hang out, much less to go as a natural matter of course to the more or less secret place of eating and unwinding that follows a Show.
    Not so many on lists. Not so many know of lists.

    Like


  59. http://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeedpolitics/what-the-2012-election-would-have-looked-like-with

    Posting the same link twice… I only realized that this was the correct post for this link now…

    Like


  60. […] In case you didn’t get the message, the meme is a celebration of female suffrage and the wondrous blessings it has bestowed upon the United States of America. Thank you, ladies, for bringing freedom, freedom, and even more freedom to the most forgotten among us, and for shitting shining your light of moral rectitude on the poor benighted souls who wallow in ignorance. America is a better nation today for the collected contributions of your wisdom. Filed under: Funny/Lolblogs, Girls, Goodbye America, Ridiculousness Source: Chateau Heartiste   […]

    Like