Freelance Comment Of The Week: Equalism Logic Trap

From an anonymous commenter over at Steve Sailer’s site:

The military is too male. I don’t have a joke, I’m just really in awe of that phrase. I’m thinking about the length of a journey that a culture must undertake in order for that to stop sounding crazy.

The catch-22 in the leftoid mentality is that when you hitch your ego wagon to equalism, and “progress” can only be achieved by increasing total equality in the world, then you quickly reach a reductio ad absurdum vanishing point of infinite stupidity where continued progress must necessarily be squeezed from more costly (in every sense of the word) increments of equalization. Since true equalization is impossible given biological constraints, the stupidity will just ratchet up with each Pyrrhic liberal victory, and the rationalizations for the stupidity will become more labyrinthine, until civilization is paralyzed into inaction, and then eventual implosion and full regression to a pre-stupidity state. Much avoidable suffering will accompany this trajectory.

But I guess we’re all just gonna have to learn this lesson the hard way, again. Thanks, leftoids!





Comments


  1. on October 5, 2013 at 12:26 pm Stg58/Animal Mother

    It’s an asymptote.

    Like


    • on October 5, 2013 at 12:34 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      zlzolzozozo

      cheeer up tehre there are perks to debasing the currency which means we must debase the culture too zlzlzoo perky perkz!

      http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/terry-richardson-miley-cyrus-topless-nudie-nipple-photoshoot-the-perks-perky-little-perks-of-debasing-the-currency-lzozozozoz-which-alwyas-by-deifnietions-debauches-da-cuclteue-zlzozozlzo/

      Terry Richardson + Miley Cyrus Topless Nudie Nipple Photoshoot! The Perks (PERKY-LITTLE PERKS!) of Debasing the Currency lzozozozoz (which alwyas by deifnietions debauches da cuclteue zlzozozlzo)

      images from: http://terrysdiary.com/

      Terry Richardson + Miley Cyrus Topless Nudie Nipple Photoshoot! The Perks (PERKY-LITTLE PERKS!) of Debasing the Currency lzozozozoz (which alwyas by deifnietions debauches da cuclteue zlzozozlzo)

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #22

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #21

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #20

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #19

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #15

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #16

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #18

      images from: http://terrysdiary.com/

      Miley Cyrus in NYC #17

      images from: http://terrysdiary.com/

      NEWSFLASH! BEN BERNANKE originally wrote MILEY CYRUS’S hit song WE CAN’T STOP as a FEDzlz mission statetemenstz lzzoizzlzoz

      last nightz as i was going to bed with my new grifeinedz miley curyrus, she condifed in me something a scertet SECTRET!! she mad me promisesz not to tellz, so i promisedz but den i thought bzaout it, and u are all my good friendz! and BROS BEFORE HOES Zlzizzlizzlzizlzoizlzizilozlzz

      ao anywho many of youz do not know this but BEN BERNAnKE originally WROTE da hit MILEY CYRUS SONG we cant’ stop:

      WE CAN’T STOP
      by ben ebernake zlzozlzzo
      It’s our House (& Senate) we can do what we want
      It’s our Fed we can print what we want
      It’s our dollar we can bankrupt who we want
      We can bailout who we want
      We can butthext who we want (2x)

      Red commies and sweaty neoconz everywhere
      Hands in the air like we don’t care
      Cause we came to make so much debt now
      And the betas here must pay it all now.

      If you’re not ready to go home
      Can I get a hell no
      Cause we gonna pump all night
      Till we see hyperinflation alright

      So la da di da di, we like fiat currency
      Dancing with Bernanke
      Doing whatever we want
      This is our Fed
      This is our rules
      And we can’t stop
      And we won’t stop printing
      Can’t you see it’s we who own the right
      Can’t you see it we who bout’ thug life
      And we can’t stop
      And we won’t stop
      We run things, Things don’t run we
      We take everything from everybody

      It’s our Fed we can bernankify who we want
      It’s our dollar we can print we want
      It’s our party we can bomb who we want
      We can butthext who we want
      We can bankrupt who we want

      To my Keynsians here with the big butts
      Shaking it like we at a strip club
      Remember only Greenspan can judge ya
      Forget the haters cause Bernanke loves ya
      And everyone in line in the bathroom
      Trying to get a line in the bathroom
      Inflation so turned up here
      Getting turned up, yeah, yeah

      So la da di da di, we inflate with glee
      Pumping with Bernanke
      Doing whatever we want
      This is our Fed
      This is our rules
      And we can’t stop
      And we won’t stop
      Can’t you see it’s we who own the right
      Can’t you see it we who bout’ thug life
      And we can’t stop
      And we won’t stop
      We run things
      Betas don’t run we
      We take everything from everybody

      It’s our Fed we can pump what we want
      It’s our dollar we can inflate all we want
      It’s our congress we can buy who we want
      We can butthext who we want
      We can bailout who we want

      It’s our Fed we can do what we want to
      It’s our House (& Senate) we can butthext who we want to
      It’s our country we can quantitiative ease if we want to
      It’s your mouth you shall suck when we want you to
      Yea, Yea, Yeah

      And we can’t stop printing
      And we won’t stop inflating
      Can’t you see it’s we who own the right
      Can’t you see it we who bout’ thug life
      And we can’t stop
      And we won’t stop
      We run things
      Betas don’t run we
      We take everything from everynody
      Yea, Yea, Yea

      Like


    • > “until civilization is paralyzed into inaction, and then eventual implosion”

      Which has been the goal of The Frankfurt School since Day One.

      The complete and total and utter destruction, annihiliation, and eradication of Western Civilization.

      Nothing less.

      Like


    • but i don’t think it can continue asymptotically, at least not in a free-ish society. either their movement loses, or it wins and coerces us, in which case we just get it force-fed directly instead of being able to at least disagree a little now.

      for example, abortion: full, unfettered, free access 24/7 right up to 9 months, perferably a little past that. that’s one leftoid position. born-that-way supremacy of homesexuals is another. those two positions can’t survive each other, because when the biological sign is found, the abortions of gays begin. which way to turn for poor leftoid?

      their stances cannot even survive themselves, much less a rational opposition. and that’s just one example, female abortion is already an issue being brought up in canada. the article above is another. it’s endless.

      it is not a coherent or rational philosophy, which is why it suits screaming women and wussified men so well. scream scream scream and then scream again. and fantasize about authoritarianism.

      Like


    • but it can’t continue asymptotically. take leftoid position one, 24/7 free abortion up to 9 months and maybe beyond. leftoid position two, gays are born that way and better than the rest of us. so when the biological marker is found and the culling of gay fetuses begins, where does the modern correct-thinking lefty go?

      abortions of females is very similar, and has been noted as a problem (with no lefty solution) in asian populations in canada. the military situation is another one.

      their philosophy is not rational or even coherent, which is why it lends itself to shrieking womyn and nearly-men. they scream scream scream and dream of government force.

      Like


    • In other words, “asymptotically approaching an equilibrium” doesn’t work when the limit economy is not an equilibrium.

      Like


      • Good God Almighty, I hope that this is a hoax:

        Q&A: The Women Who Write Dinosaur Erotica
        http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/10/qa-the-women-who-write-dinosaur-erotica.html

        Taken By the Pterodactyl
        Taken By the T-Rex
        Ravished by the Triceratops

        “We were assigned to be roommates in our dorm the year before last. Since then we’ve been really awesome friends!

        …We are not lovers at all; we are just best friends. I’m sorry if I misled you. We always joke with our friends that Christie and I are “part-time lesbians” because we spend so much time together. I hope our joke doesn’t seem offensive or anything. Christie is bisexual and I am straight. Though when it comes to sexual interests, I have been told that I’m pretty kinky, and I have heard some stories about Christie…

        I am studying math/finance and creative writing. Christie is studying accounting, though I am trying to pull her into a few creative-writing classes. We are currently going to a satellite school of a large state school (Texas A&M).”

        Like


      • God, I hope that that’s just some big fat pimply-faced pasty-white 30-something loser dude, living in his mother’s basement, hacking away at his keyboard, just PRETENDING to be a pair of bisexual nymphomaniac junior-year gals at a TAMU satellite campus.

        That it’s all just a hoax.

        Please let it be a hoax.

        Dinosaur bestiality porn – that might be even worse than the Japanese infatuation with octopus rape.

        A civilization simply cannot withstand the simultaneous assaults on all possible fronts by the collected forces of all possible amoralities and nihilisms.

        Something has to give.

        The falcon cannot hear the falconer.

        Like


      • This is just the female equivalent of furries, etc. Notice the dinosaurs have the attributes of alpha males–strong, vicious, and so on.

        Like


      • Did not read it, will not read it. Libtard fatties who have never been hatefucked/choked looking for dominance. A fucking 2 meter long triceratops horn that would actually puncture your delicate womb at about 50cm causing irreperable internal hemmoraghng? Fiddlesticks! Love the Jurassic Cock…

        Like


      • Welcome to intellectual Jurassic Park.

        Like


      • Heather Koon is arrested for raping an infant at a daycare
        http://www.fox19.com/story/23618142/infant-raped-at-elyria-daycare-center

        ELYRIA, OH (WOIO) – Police say they have video of Heather Koon, 25, having sex with a baby. The video was found on Koon’s laptop.

        “I still haven’t wrapped my mind around it. It’s every parent’s worst nightmare,” said the baby’s father, who wants to remain anonymous.

        The father is speaking out about the incident so other parents can figure out if their child was also victimized. He says ABC KIDZ daycare in Elyria asked him not to talk about the incident.

        “They tried to act like it was a simple assault. A few hours later they called us back again and asked us to keep it discrete,” said the dad.

        The shocked father’s advice; “Any child that’s old enough to talk, they should talk to. Any child that’s not old enough to talk should be taken to a physician.”

        Police arrested Koon after checking up on her boyfriend, James Osborne. Osborne is listed on Lorain County’s sex offender website as living at another address. Police arrested him and confiscated a laptop found in the apartment. A police report shows it belonged to Koon and contained a video file of her “engaging in sexual conduct with an unknown infant”.

        Police had to figure out who the child was.

        “They showed us still photos,” said the father.

        Koon faces two counts of rape after police identified a second victim.

        The management of ABC KIDZ had no comment.

        Osborne and Koon are in the Lorain County Jail waiting for their day in court.

        Like


  2. March 2011. Plumbing the archives?

    Like


  3. And not believing in equalism is third greater crime, they will use it to try to debase your arguments

    Like


  4. The catch-22 in the leftoid mentality is that when you hitch your ego wagon to equalism, and “progress” can only be achieved by increasing total equality in the world, then you quickly reach a reductio ad absurdum vanishing point of infinite stupidity where continued progress must necessarily be squeezed from more costly (in every sense of the word) increments of equalization.

    This is what James A. Donald calls the leftist singularity. The only way to stop it is for a Cromwell or Stalin to rise from within the leftist ranks and purge every one lefter than he.

    Like


  5. So they push and push to get “equality” (or more) but you can’t change human major. Women now earn the majority of university degrees, yet my STEM classes remain overwhelmingly male.

    Like


  6. In the comments on Sailer’s site: “Maybe we can do like golf and let women shoot from closer positions.”

    Like


    • hahahahahahhahhaaahahahahaha
      they already let em shoot till they either pass or the instructors think its time to go home

      Like


      • I’ve got zero military experience, so I’m in no position to comment on what constitutes competency for a soldier. I will affirm that I can shoot 1 MOA with a good rifle at 100 yards. A little worse as distance increases. I can also disassemble and reassemble my rifle, including the bolt and trigger mechanism, and comprehend its function. I suppose I’ve got all the other basic skills, including close and unarmed combat, but I’d hate to fight for my life against a 26-year-old Army Ranger. Daunting. I think I’ll go lift weights while I’m motivated.

        Like


      • marines prob tougher I made the mistake of going army should of gone marines I didn’t want to be stuck on a fucking boat with a bunch of gay sailors though he he he

        Like


      • theres plenty of shitbag marines. rangers are more highly trained/badass than the average grunt marine.

        my credentials? 2 Afghanistan deployments with marine infantry battalions.

        Like


      • on October 6, 2013 at 3:05 pm Robert the Wise

        I’m pretty sure that one of the requirements of the Marine Corps is being able to spell “should’ve” correctly.

        Like


      • I doubt it. Come on, they’re supposed to kill our enemies, that’s what’s important. Nobody requires scientists to be able to get laid. Different skills.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 5:08 am gunslingergregi

        no lol they have the lowest score to be able to still get in

        Like


    • on October 7, 2013 at 8:01 am RappaccinisDaughter

      Actually, that’s one of the things where women really are truly, equally competent. Shooting. Ask any pistol, rifle, or shotgun instructor; they’ll tell you. You don’t have to be big or strong. You just have to have good hand-eye coordination and the ability to do ballistics calculations (which, if you can’t do it in your head like I can, you can always sub out to an app or even a handheld calculator).

      There’s no biological reason why women can’t be snipers.

      I’m not saying “girls can do it all!” Of course, some of the things soldiers have to be able to do are extremely physically arduous, and most women can’t do them. You will find a small, outlier percentage who can. If they can pass the same tests the men can, let ’em in.

      What I object to is changing the standards for women, as if war were some kind of Title IX sport. It’s not.

      Like


      • Snipers have to endure extreme discomforts. Can a girl lie in freezing mud for three days?

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 8:19 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Actually, women tend to do just a little bit better in extreme cold-weather conditions than men. It’s the extra subcutaneous fat. Other than that, it’s about six of one, half a dozen of the other. Everyone has a different endurance limit for pain, boredom, fatigue and hunger…it’s not really sex-based.

        Like


      • denial…… not just the name of a river in Egypt

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 8:57 am RappaccinisDaughter

        OK, Mob Barley, find me a study or studies that indicates that women have inferior tolerances to pain, boredom, fatigue, hunger, and cold.

        Like


      • Studies are liberal nonsense that prove nothing.

        “It’s too cold in here! Turn up the heat!”

        -anyone who’s ever lived with a woman.

        Case closed

        Like


      • This is decontextualized nonsense. Women break down under physical duress FAST.

        I was in the military, btw. Women can’t handle sleep deprivation, cold, hunger, and lack of access to hygiene. Much less heavy loads, physical fear, open-ended stressful situations, and loneliness.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 9:16 am RappaccinisDaughter

        The heavy loads, sure. That’s an upper-body strength thing. But so much of that other stuff is psychological resilience, which isn’t really sex-based.

        Like


      • Repeat after me: women cannot handle military hardship.

        Additional point: presence of women in a military unit destroys that unit’s esprit d’corps.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 9:45 am RappaccinisDaughter

        That’s funny. I grew up in the military, and none of the male soldiers I knew then (or know now) said that.

        The main complaint that I heard was that some of the hetero female soldiers had a bad habit of sleeping around with lots of men from the same unit, which did indeed cause discord. The lesbian soldiers, on the other hand, seemed to fit right in with their brothers-in-arms.

        Like


      • Field training exercises: females get on a truck every evening to the barracks to wash their pussies. Males dont shower for froty five days.

        Road marches: “sergeant, can we slow down? My pussy hurts!!!”

        Like


      • I don’t know what kind of women these are, lesbians or not. I agree with PA, “Women can’t handle sleep deprivation, cold, hunger, and lack of access to hygiene. Much less heavy loads, physical fear, open-ended stressful situations, and loneliness,” as well as “presence of women in a military unit destroys that unit’s esprit d’corps.”

        I think it’s a bad idea for women to do the military thing, and not just because of the points PA enumerated. It also ruins our collective femininity and male perception of women – it creates more beta males and masculine women.

        The Male/female relationship has been under assault of decades now, the military is another nail in the coffin, when it should be kept out of the war against femininity and masculinity. The military is not a social experiment. Rather, it’s a deadly tool of protection in times of danger. It should absolutely be kept out of the Liberal’s greater war against traditional values. The military should be untouchable.

        Like


      • Funny,

        A bunch of guys who were in the military say one thing but papa never told her so it can’t be true.

        Solipsism

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 10:39 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Lily: Absolutely agreed that the military is not a social experiment, nor have I ever tried to argue that every single MOS is appropriate for females. Readiness and efficacy are the military’s one and only job, and it’s critical.

        However, there are some roles for which women are equally suited, and some for which they’re superior. Shutting women out of the military entirely is equivalent to cutting off your nose to spite your face.

        As far as ruining our collective femininity…I disagree. There is no “collective femininity” to ruin. Either you are a feminine individual, as is classically designated and universally understood, or you aren’t. The fact that I can stalk, kill, field-dress, and butcher a deer does not affect your ability to attract men. (Oddly enough, it doesn’t really seem to affect mine, either.)

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 10:43 am RappaccinisDaughter

        @John South:

        Is this criticism coming from the same guy who claimed last week that, because one woman hasn’t paid back a personal loan he made to her, therefore women have no honor?

        And by the way, that’s not solipsism. That’s confirmation bias.

        Like


      • One woman, no.

        Every woman who ever lived with perhaps one or two rare exceptions.

        Other than that you nailed it.

        Yes, it is solipsism.

        My experiences!

        My papa!

        Me!

        Me!

        Me!

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 11:08 am RappaccinisDaughter

        A man who claims he understands the motivation and moral fiber of every woman who ever lived, accusing others of solipsism.

        The hamster is strong with you, John South. Would only that we could somehow hook it up to a turbine, that we might power the entire Eastern seaboard.

        Like


      • Nah, just enough to form a general rule.

        Like don’t stick your dick in an electric fence.

        Sure, there’s 1 or 2 that won’t shock your dick off but don’t get cocky.

        Sorry I hate to generalize, I know there’s some nice electric fences out there.

        Welp, time to go pull pins out of grenades…

        Studies show that not all of them blow up.

        Like


      • I got a heavy load for ya Rap

        Like


      • “However, there are some roles for which women are equally suited, and some for which they’re superior. Shutting women out of the military entirely is equivalent to cutting off your nose to spite your face.”

        RD, assuming you’re right – there are jobs women are suited for – within the military…… why waste money and resources on training them if they aren’t going to see combat, or are you a proponent of women going to combat? If you are, sorry I have to differ with you. PA is right; women are not built to live in prolonged army condition. As funny as it sounds about washing pussy, it’s 100% correct. I couldn’t go a whole day without showering, especially not washing that area. Try not washing it for a weak, you will be in pain, I guarantee it.

        Imagine getting captured and not able to shower for months, and being raped every day. These conditions can cause death for women.
        .

        “As far as ruining our collective femininity…I disagree. There is no “collective femininity” to ruin.”

        Well, I disagree. There is collective femininity. Individual women’s actions do influence the entire sex. Why do you think feminists are livid when individual women choose to stay home and raise a family, or when women talk about the ills of abortion? Because they know that if enough women made those choices it will make them (feminists) look like an abnormality in the eyes of society. Same here. If enough women purposefully become tomboys and looked more like men than women, and if enough acted like men and purposefully opted to go into male-dominated jobs and activities, eventually men would prefer tomboyish women and the male/female differences would start to be obliterated (as most liberals dream of and actively trying to pull with these stunts) and it will have a terrible effect on our species. The Male/female relationship has been under assault of decades now; the military is just one of the last strongholds.
        .

        “The fact that I can stalk, kill, field-dress, and butcher a deer does not affect your ability to attract men. (Oddly enough, it doesn’t really seem to affect mine, either.)”

        You’re right, when you do this as an individual, not as a job or a career, and pretend that most women can do this too. The few anomalies are not a rule make. I know you can discern the difference.

        Like


      • I have found it useful to simply disregard everything RappacinisDaughter says.

        Try as she might, she will never be accepted as “one of the boys,” all her shooting/hunting/fishing/skinning/opining on ammunition, pistols, snipers, military matters/the definition of honor/etc. notwithstanding.

        Just ignore her and move on.

        Like


      • You’re, right, of course. Women at competitive levels demonstrate the capacity to shoot with accuracy equivalent to that of men. Practice, I can attest, dramatically improves shooting accuracy. Hence the anecdotal observations about reduced performance standards are all the more troubling. My comment regarding the closer combat position was intended to emphasize the dangers lacking equivalence, such as melee combat, and the acceptability of support roles.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 11:11 am MikeInRealLife

        A shooting instructor might tell you that – largely in the interests of bolstering the number of women in the shooting community – but it’s really only true of shooting that is based solely on accuracy. In practical shooting that mixes speed with accuracy while shooting relatively powerful guns, and sometimes movement such as short sprints, men continue to absolutely dominate. This is much closer to most actual combat than static paper target shooting, where women can be somewhat competitive with men (though they seldom actually are).

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 11:13 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, outside of combat situations, one of the closest analogues would be 3-gun. And women are really starting to clean up with that, as well.

        Like


  7. I agree. We need more females on the front lines…to deliver sandwiches and brownies to the rest of the tired soldiers.

    Like


  8. There are exactly two answers to the current conundrum of women in the military; equalize it to 50% female by force, or remove women entirely. Only one of those options makes any sense, but it’s also the only one nobody wants to consider.

    Like


    • As Rush Limbaugh says, the utimate purpose of the military is to kill our enemies and break their things. Do we really want women to do this?

      Like


      • To be fair, a lot of men in the military seem to forget that too. But I agree; traditionally, large numbers of females in the military isn’t a sign of progress, but desperation. Unfortunately, the military is the largest population of people the federal government has complete and utter control over, so it’s a convenient place for social experimentation.

        You’d think, though, that if the kind of integrated living conditions one finds in overseas and deployed bases has no effect on men, like the liberals insist, we’d see co-ed prisons.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2013 at 4:00 pm Hammer of Love

        Good point. Bring on the co-ed prisons !

        Like


      • They already got em’ just drive thru the ghetto.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2013 at 9:42 pm Hammer of Love

        Do you contradict yourself with every post, or just certain ones ?

        Like


      • What do you mean?

        I don’t make this stuff up:

        Like


      • Cynthia, don’t forget that in a peacetime army (which we basically have now, regardless of Afghanistan), the top-level of the officer corps ends up taken over by officers who are, let’s just say, ‘politically aware’. It’s been getting worse for years, but I don’t think it’s a coincidence that it’s gotten worse on Obama’s watch.

        Like


      • Oh, I get it. Generals are political animals, and therefore, the GO ranks are full of pussies. Generals who don’t toe the current feminist bullshit line are punished, harshly. Which is why we’ve got women on sub crews now.

        There was an interesting case recently where a female general (Maj Gen Helms) imploded her career by overturning a court martial finding on a rape case. She threw out the court martial due to lack of evidence but still gave the captain involved a general discharge; some bitch on Capitol Hill has destroyed her for it.

        A good hard war might correct it, but then again, I’m not sure who’s going to be left to pull up. Officers like Patton don’t make it past O-5 anymore. And the officers who do have had their collective common sense removed via military culture’s inherent cognitive dissonance. Men who make it in the armed forces these days are pure beta.

        As far as Obama’s concerned… frankly, I’m more worried about shit like his endorsement of Harvey Weinstein as Pentagon religious counsel than the Dems’ BS gender politics.

        Like


      • I recall reading that there is a changeover between wartime and peacetime military, where between wars generals good at politicking tend to rise, whereas during actual wars they get cleared out because they need the assholes who can win battles. Thing is, I’m not really sure who’s going to challenge the USA militarily now. China, sure, but they’re more interested in selling us crap. All the real competitors are likely to go cold-war because everyone’s afraid of a hot war eventually going nuclear, and then everyone loses.

        Thoughts from any real military people?

        Like


      • For me personally… it is a great thing for two reasons, one at a personal level as a DC dude with some military ties to many friends, I like to see MANY more “Queens for a Year”. This slur is used against female enlisted women who are the Bells of the Ball surrounded by aggressive, primarily low intelligence, young men from 18-27. These women use to have to take ALOT of dick based on scarcity of pussy. BUT! As our military becomes more and more “Service Oriented” for alpha male low IQ killing machines, it also becomes less effective against the very same that don’t have ‘brothels in the bunks’.

        My future conflict vision is that we will have a 50% less effective fighting force. Shrapnel injuries will fuck us up as always, but! When our gimps get back behind the lines. They will lay together, legs gone, but vagina and penis intertwined is a tragic lovesong of front line bravery. Our enemies, will have overrun our position by then so our young lovers will only have a moment of life left to reflect on this cosmic tragedy…

        Like


      • The U.S. military is a victim of its own success. Now, it will rise or fall to the level of its competition.

        A.J.P.

        Like


  9. on October 5, 2013 at 2:53 pm Hilary Clinton

    Women’s boxing at Olympics. Yuck. Unfeminine, rough trannies.

    Like


  10. on October 5, 2013 at 3:24 pm Hilary Clinton

    Male #500 tennis player would beat female #1 but they get same prize money.

    Like


    • And they only play three sets

      Like


    • > “Male #500 tennis player would beat female #1 but they get same prize money.”

      There’s a persistent, ah, “urban legend”, over at iSteve, which holds that Michael Chang’s career ended when he somehow “dissed” Sabrina Williams in the green room and she went all roid-rage on his ass and threw him up against a wall and ripped his shoulder apart.

      Don’t know whether there’s any actual truth to it.

      Like


      • Complete nonsense.

        You probably don’t understand the logic because you’ve never been #1 at anything; but when you are #1, you cannot be dissed. Everything said or done about you is some form of flattery and/or jealousy.

        Like


      • > “You probably don’t understand the logic”

        What logic?

        The story is that Sabrina Williams took umbrage at something or other [whether actual or merely perceived] coming from Michael Chang, and as a result, she went postal and beat his ass to a pulp and he had to retire because of the injuries which he sustained.

        Now whether there’s any truth to the story – I don’t know.

        But the story is out there.

        And the story is persistent.

        I keep hearing it over and over and over again.

        Like


      • If true, that must be some serious settlement money and an ironclad gag order.

        Like


      • There is truth to it. Goran Ivanisevic Good Coaches Can Beat Women’s World Number 1 see here: http://www.croatiaweek.com/ivanisevic-good-coaches-can-beat-women-world-number-1/

        Like


      • Actually it is not a urban legend.
        “The former Wimbledon champion Goran Ivanisevic has agreed with stars such as Giles Simon that women earn far too much money compared to men in the sport.

        “The difference is enormous. The question is the prize money for tournaments. Men play for 6 hours, and they play for 33 minutes. I respect women’s tennis, there are a few of them who play very good, but the main difference is that some better coaches (male) could beat the women’s world number one, so I think that they don’t deserve the same money,” said Ivanisevic on Antena Radio today.”
        http://www.croatiaweek.com/ivanisevic-good-coaches-can-beat-women-world-number-1/

        Like


      • But then didnt he then run her over in his Range Rover?

        Like


    • Hmmm. Couple of thoughts.

      One of my favorite balloon puncturing arguments about income parity proposed laws is to suggest that male porn stars be paid the same as their female counterparts. Blank stares.

      There are a few sports where women are paid more, and the men wish not to compete with the gals – snooker and pocket billiards. Allison Fisher ‘Duchess of Doom’:

      “Feeling that she did not receive the same respect as the male players, she moved to the United States to play on the pool circuit. On 18 March 2009, she endorsed the Delta-13 billiard rack and has her own signature series.
      Fisher was nominated to be inducted into the Billiard Congress of America Hall of Fame. Fisher did not take long to make her mark in the world of pool, winning only the second tournament that she played in. She has an unequaled record, winning 50 WPBA titles, which includes 4 world 9-Ball championships.

      Since her move, she has also been the highest-earning player on a number of occasions, which takes into account male and female players.

      Its interesting that in the world of three cushion and artistic billiards – a decidely more mental – a mathmatical and demanding game – not many women standouts.

      Like


  11. on October 5, 2013 at 3:59 pm Hammer of Love

    I have strange notion that the whole ” women in the military ” concept will disappear quite quickly, as soon as the USA fights a major, multi-year, war against a militarily equal and vicious enemy. After its conclusion, even the most hardcore butch lesbian, with military aspirations, will want to be a “stay at home mom “.

    Like


    • Doesn’t need to be a militarily equal enemy – just one who inflicts casualties. A lot of them. As soon as our ‘little girls’ start coming home in body bags, the tune will change muy pronto.

      Like


  12. “I’m thinking about the length of a journey that a culture must undertake in order for that to stop sounding crazy.”

    Step 1: Kill this guy:

    Step 2: No step 2, journey’s over.

    Like


    • Yawn…sure, backstab your allies in the middle of the war so you have to fight on two fronts, steal the women of the countries who actually do fit your racial purity standards (Lebensborn) so they hate you too, persecute the various ethnic groups who might otherwise be convinced to fight with you because their current masters are so evil(Ukraine)… the Nazis had the shortest empire in recent history. Sorry, but you can be too alpha. If the guy had stuck to just picking up the German-speaking parts of nearby countries and dug in and defended that position, he’d be considered the father of greater Germany. All he did was get the country sawn in half for 45 years and lost a whole bunch of territory to Poland.

      Like


      • Hitler was an embittered Omega weirdo and megalomaniac who rose to power after about a dozen failed attempts on the backs of a well-organised bunch of jack-booted thugs. I will agree that if they had gone about things differently, the world (or at least Europe) might be a very different place today.
        Hate whoever you want, but shoving people into ovens or conducting weird Dr. Frankenstein experiments on them tends to make you pretty unpopular, regardless of what else you do.
        So does declaring everyone who isn’t 6’4 with blonde hair and blue eyes a sub-human.
        What never ceases to amaze me is that whenever they arrest some neo-Nazi, White supremacist or someone like that, the person in question is pretty much always some short,fat, cross-eyed troglodyte with thinning, greasy (dark) hair.
        How the hell does THAT guy look in the mirror and see the ‘master race’?????

        Like


      • Well said, and you’re a European too, from one of those countries, no less. I am often amazed why all of these “American-born or raised” Aryans are so racist while the ones in the mother continent are much less. Weird!

        I believe because they haven’t tasted real tyranny yet. They think Hit-ler was a picnic. They are so spoiled in America and keep talking about remarking it in the 3rd Reich’s image. I’m disgusted.
        .

        I agree Hit-ler was an omega weirdo.

        Like


      • Oh, that one’s easy. Europeans don’t like Hitler because a lot have some awful story from their grandparents about Nazis shooting someone in their neighborhood or something similar. Look at the Brit Derbyshire–no fan of NAMs, but he does not like the Nazis.

        Really, WW2 was a really, really bad thing for Europe. The whole continent got trashed and forfeited world leadership to America and Russia. It’s easy to make fun of the Western Europeans for being socialist wimps, but look what fascism and war did to their continent. (And yeah, communism killed just as many people on the eastern half, which is why the Poles are so pro-capitalism.)

        It also made any reasonable attempt at nationalism sound unreasonable. I’ve got nothing against European countries wanting to preserve their heritage and even their bloodlines as long as nobody’s being exterminated–heck, Jews are always wanting to do the same, ensure their kids marry Jews or that the non-Jewish spouse converts. (Most ethnies do better with a *little* new blood over the years.) If everyone has a country to go to, no need to kill anyone (and yes, I do think the Afrikaners should have one too, or at least Holland should take them back.) But if you say that people are always afraid the Wehrmacht is going to come back, and, well, the last time they visited the place…

        Like


      • Wolfie, sugar,

        Slavs are blue eyed. Real Germans are blond, GREEN eyed, no matter what YKW&cracker propagandists told you.

        Like


    • Great link!! Sooo, have to understand this. Hitler was right? Don’t talk so crazy in public please you may be “escorted” to a re-education camp by DHS, et al, who labor with great toil for YHW and Israel. Neither of which would ever tell us lies, be warmongers, or prop one another up through state funded black-ops (aka terrorism).

      Like


  13. on October 5, 2013 at 4:18 pm Hammer of Love

    On a lighter note. John Mcafee, Alpha badass or not ?

    Like


  14. Forget equality between the sexes in jobs, military pay, et. al. We’re already way beyond that.These people want to eliminate ALL differences, incl. any distinctions between genders, biological or otherwise. The ultimate absurdity: the diversity crowd is really for no diversity at all.

    Like


    • on October 7, 2013 at 5:08 am The Burninator

      That is an very insightful comment, because it is demonstrably observable in every push that the Left makes to get rid of differences. We’re all different as long as we have nothing different! A typical Leftist mental breakdown if I ever saw one.

      Like


    • “The ultimate absurdity: the diversity crowd is really for no diversity at all.”

      lol, that’s the irony of it all.

      Like


  15. McAfee is a sigma in the more nuanced Alpha-Sigma-Beta-Delta-Gamma-Omega model. The thing is that the girls he’s getting are not especially hot. A white 7 or 8 you could get at a bar in America or Europe is easily better looking than the lot. Were I him I’d focus more on quality than quantity, still he is a man living on his own terms with a healthy attitude toward women.

    Like


  16. on October 5, 2013 at 6:20 pm The Scolds' Bridle

    I demand that half of all childbirths be from a male.

    Anything less is sexist; the females are trying to monopolize the bearing of children.

    Like


    • Naw, child-bearing is both slavery and a female privilege that we enjoy/celebrate almost as much as we celebrate abortion. We’ll never surrender that to men. Although I’m sure some biology lab is working on that tech.

      Like


      • While listening to a hard-core feminist shift from male pregnancy sci-fi fantasies to techno-womb wishes, I looked her in the eye and said, “If ya’ll stop having babies, men will have no more use for you.” She brought up sex. I laughed and departed.

        Like


      • You know, there’s a whole sub-sub-subgenre of female “literary” erotica built around the concept of male pregnancy. But like so many things my gender fantasizes about, nobody’s really thought through how horrifying it would be in reality, and where it would actually leave us. Nobody’s ever accused women of having a good handle on the concept of consequences.

        Although I can see external wombs becoming very popular someday. Why be inconvenienced by the discomfort of pregnancy when you can just grow one at the local hospital and specify your hair color, IQ, gender, and pick-up date?

        Like


      • And why bother with a relationship if you don’t need one for children?

        Like


      • @ cynthia
        “Although I can see external wombs becoming very popular someday. Why be inconvenienced by the discomfort of pregnancy when you can just grow one at the local hospital and specify your hair color, IQ, gender, and pick-up date?”

        Most important thing is why ruin your figure when you can do it externally.

        @tteclod
        “If ya’ll stop having babies, men will have no more use for you.” She brought up sex. I laughed and departed.”

        You’d still need women for sex, or would you like to have an external vagina like the external womb? LOL, who knows? If men can be aroused by a hairy ass hole, why not an external vagina too?
        .

        “And why bother with a relationship if you don’t need one for children?”

        And, since when do you have meaningful relationships anyway with women if not just the type that ends in pump-n-dump?

        Anyway, the woman is still needed to raise her child even if she didn’t carry it in her wound. Why be against medical advances. Progress shouldn’t stop just because some people are shortsighted. Male/female connection shouldn’t be dependent upon women carrying children in their wombs.

        The one adverse thing I see resulting from women stopping to use their wombs to carry fetuses is wombs will disappear and that eventually might obviate the need for 2 sexes. Slowly, we might become one sex, a species dependent solely on our brains – every lefty and techno-geek-visionary’s dream. I don’t like us being one sex.

        Like


  17. OT question,

    Sandra Bullock, bang or no bang?

    Like


    • Bang

      5 min investment.

      Like


    • No thanks. What about all these white chicks wearing “afro-buns”? It’s like it makes them masculine, yet haughty with a feminine edge.

      We will only achieve parity with women when our military men can wear hair-buns.

      Like


    • No. Guys? Bang/No Bang: a)Rihanna b) Miley c)Katy Perry d)Beyonce e)Kerry Whatsername,the TV colored gal f)Melissa McCarthy Answer: Yes,Yes,No,No,Yes,LOL!

      Like


    • Jesus Harold Christ thwack! She is even busted by BLACK standards. 40 something dessicated and putrified womb who cannot produce chillun either white or black, that had to adopt a nigger baby which is the HOT trend in Hollyweird. Consider it the latest accessory like that goofy little dog Paris Hilton keeps in her purse.

      Usually nig-nogs go for the younger and more obese white detritus, which makes sense. The middle-class—> high rolla blacks go for higher quality white bitches MUCH to the chagrin of sistas.

      Which leads me to something I have noticed and been thinking for years. In spite of my utterly racist views, I work and interact with lots of sistas. Many of whom want to fuck me, and also as most black women do, speak their mind.

      They STRAIGHT UP hate race mixing black men. I get it… what an ODD coupling for the same cause are European males and African women. Could any of you, ever, had imagined this? Because why? Black chicks understand that every trophy chasing brotha means their unique DNA which will never be passed on and will die with them. Likewise, beta herb white boys understand the same but will vote Hillary 2016 in joyful glee whilst their women take 70IQ DNA from the nigga dick. I.E. We have the same problems….

      Like


      • I recall some old saying about strange bedfellows.

        Like


      • Jay, the reason I ask is because she is starring in a new movie and Im interested in how its being marketed?

        I heard a quote that the movie is basically 90 minutes of her producing various orgasmic sounds (grunts, heaving breathing, screams…) while floating around in space; in contrast to her alpha male fellow astronaut cracking jokes about death and dying?

        I kinda get it.

        And yes, I would bang. Since she has never really been the smokin hot model/actress, I think she’s brings somthing else to the bedroom?

        Im not sure what it is, but I would try to find out.

        How can you be sexy while wrapped up in a big space suit?

        Maybe thats why they picked her?

        Like


      • That quote captures the film, almost entirely.

        Like


      • “They STRAIGHT UP hate race mixing black men.”

        Truth. Even more do they hate the white women who ‘take our men away from us!’ It was widely known that this is the reason the OJ defense team stacked the jury with as many black women as they could.

        Like


  18. on October 5, 2013 at 7:41 pm AlmostAnonymous

    The Gods of the Copybook Headings will not be denied.

    Like


  19. Check out this:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Kinder-Gentler-Military-Americas-Gender-Neutral/dp/0684852918/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1381024905&sr=1-1&keywords=a+kinder+gentler+military

    “The Kinder, Gentler Military” is a devastating critique of how and why the military – the most tradition-bound, masculine institution in the United States – spent the 1990s in a tortured attempt to reform its time – proven warrior culture into a new, politically correct value system, which is decimating morale in our armed forces.”

    […]

    Stephanie Gutmann argues with ever fiber of her soul that our current approach to gender integrating the military will hurt us in a future war. This is especially likely to happen in a repeat of the Somalia experience if urban guerrilla combat is involved. The key argument relates to the observation (in the military) that many women cannot perform the strength tasks that are essential in many combat and combat support roles. This includes loading artillery shells, carrying 80 pound packs, removing injured comrades and changing truck tires. In integrated teams, the men often have to do the women’s work which reduces team effectiveness.

    The danger to military effectiveness is broader than that, however. In training with integrated troops, the training is physically reduced to accommodate the needs of women and the men don’t get as much training as they would benefit from. In addition, women are injured much more frequently in doing tough tasks so units are often understaffed due to unexpected losses of personnel.

    Third, the rules of proper sexual conduct toward the opposite sex have been applied in a way similar to work environments in the civilian world, and the limitations put people on edge in tight quarters like aircraft carriers. Basic training has had to be revised to be a confidence building exercise, rather than a rite of passage that prepares one to fight.

    Thousands of top-performing military people have seen their careers ended by the aggressive efforts to make a gender-neutral military. Many more fail to re-up because they don’t like the new style.

    The fundamental cause of these problems seems to be a civilian world that has grown unfamiliar with the military. Where congresswomen and men at one time mostly had served in the military, relatively few have that experience now. Civilians who lobby Congress on gender issues have even less knowledge. So, in many cases, the new rules are coming from the relatively uninformed. Descriptions of congressional fact-finding trips make it seem like that uninformed status is likely to continue.

    Like


    • She’s right on the money. It’s obvious our military is a cultural entity, based on political correct gibberish. Our military is not about winning wars, which is why we haven’t won one since WW2. The Vietnam War was a prelude of that political correct garbage that has insidiously crept into our culture ever since.

      Like


      • The US absolutely waffle stomped in Desert Storm. When the mission is to absolutely lay to waste another nations war making capacity, the US is without a doubt more capable than at any point in history. It is invasion and reconstruction that the US is not particularly great at. The Chiners are far superior at nation building, via non military means (go figure) than the US. But we are still number one at fucking shit up.

        Like


  20. This blog is so full of anger and despair nowadays…

    Like


    • Agreed, it is a thing of beauty. There are a hundred other websites that can teach you “how to bang hotties”, it is nice to see some additional content that hasn’t been recycled for the past decade.

      Like


  21. Well, I joined the Army when I was 18 and went “airborne” because Jimi Hendrix had been a paratrooper, and I though I was going to be a guitar god too. Wound up in AIT one of thirty men among 200 women. Unexpected outcome but I had a good time I tell you what.

    Like


  22. Why? The Spartan women got military training. The Mongolian women ran society so their men could fight abroad. Add women into the military system and you get twice as many people.

    Like


    • No dipshit, women make people. Add women into the military today and you get half as many soldiers tomorrow.

      Like


      • > “No dipshit, women make people. Add women into the military today and you get half as many soldiers tomorrow.”

        I don’t know whether Heartiste ever scans this far down into a thread, but that’s the Comment of the Year at the Chateau.

        Like


      • In a previous attempt at a reply, I had nominated this for Comment of the Year.

        But WordPress is now eating well over 50% of what I try to post at this blog.

        It’s getting kinda frustrating.

        Like


      • correction: they turn food into people

        Like


    • The Mongolian men conquered the world so they could get away from those ugly fucking broads.

      And most of Sparta is a myth.

      Like


    • And in neither of those two examples are you talking about women in live combat. Putting your women in the line of fire only makes sense when the short-term situation is so dire that not doing so equals the destruction of the nation/clan/people. Losing a generation of men is a tragedy. Losing a generation of women is a death sentence.

      Like


    • “Why? The Spartan women got military training.”

      The Spartans actually thought that a woman who worked out produced a better child for the future of the state.

      Let alone that Sparta is mythologized.

      Like


    • on October 7, 2013 at 5:16 am The Burninator

      Running society while the men are out at war is not the same as being a soldier. Learning how to pick up a sword does not mean that they put them in battle. That wasn’t even a 1/10 on the lame scale there Gil. Try harder.

      Want history on women on the front lines? The Russians learned that lesson in WW2 when females would be captured and then gang raped and destroyed by advancing German troops. Men and women are not physical equals, and an army built around women is going to go down in such epic fail as to make these united States of America a laughing stock for centuries after we’re destroyed for this foolishness.

      Like


      • Spot on!

        We haven’t won a war in decades because of this madness. The military is not a game or a social experiment. It’s an effective tool to protect us. Why would anyone tamper with it?

        Why aren’t the generals standing up and fighting this disaster? I suspect because the Left even brainwashed the generals with this madness – half of them are leftists and the other half are centrists. General Wesley Clark type.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 10:29 am The Burninator

        There are several reasons. First, lots of “generals” are now women. Second, men who dare breath one politically incorrect word about women in the military are come down on hard and with a vengeance. I was in during the mid 1980’s and even then you dare not even look at a female longer than the time it took to see her rank or you were facing an article 15, let alone if you did something in appropriate, such as act like a man and flirt with her. It’s only gotten scores worse since that time. Generals defying the great social experimenters? Can’t happen.

        Like


      • Women generals? What a joke.

        Islam is at the door knocking hard, we better have some strong male generals greeting it before it enters inside. Female placating will not work.

        Like


  23. The USA has oceans and nukes. We really don’t need that big an army for defense. So, we can get away with a lot of stupid crap countries in weaker strategic positions don’t. This is part of the reason the feminists get away with so much silliness–cause, you know, who’s going to land troops in California? (Arguably, the Mexicans with illegal immigration, but that’s a different sort of invasion.) As Bismarck (should have) said, God watches over fools, drunkards, and the United States of America.

    I have to say, the thought of sending feminists into battle and letting them fight jihadis does have a certain appeal. Blood for the blood god!

    Like


  24. The USSR used all the women who wanted to join-up in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. It was well understood from the beginning that their main job in the army was to ride officer cock and get preggers, and then be sent home to safety and to sustain the biologic survival of the Russian genome.. “Field wives”. They were called.
    Now, the US of A sends confused young girls to war while the vast majority of young men are dis-connctected.
    Next. Hard next.

    Like


  25. ACOG,
    American College Of Gyny-cologists,,, or
    Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight…or
    Wordpress comment moderation is like a bleeding hemarrhoid.

    Like


  26. Gil
    You get twice as many people only if you have found a way to use up all the men.

    Like


  27. I have to say the idea of sending whales and ugly feminists to war in my stead sounds VERY appealing.

    Like


    • > “whales”

      I drove through the campus of one of the local colleges yesterday, and the whale-to-HB ratio was just astounding.

      Frankly, the ratio was approaching positive infinity [given that all l saw were whales, with about zero hawt babes amongst them].

      It was so bad that I was noticing tall slender athletic handsome dudes accompanied by short squat girlfriends carrying an extra 25 or 30 lbs of blubber on their hips and their thighs.

      I’m not sure what to make of it all – there’s something really “big” going on here – something very epicyclic.

      I guess it will be a good thing if all that extra weight serves to increase the chicks’ total fertility rates [vis-à-vis the other extreme of anorexia and bulemia].

      But some folks are positing that mammals in general are sensing dark times in the near future:

      http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/171368/

      “Consider, for example, this troublesome fact, reported in 2010 by the biostatistician David B Allison and his co-authors at the University of Alabama in Birmingham: over the past 20 years or more, as the American people were getting fatter, so were America’s marmosets. As were laboratory macaques, chimpanzees, vervet monkeys and mice, as well as domestic dogs, domestic cats, and domestic and feral rats from both rural and urban areas. In fact, the researchers examined records on those eight species and found that average weight for every one had increased. The marmosets gained an average of nine per cent per decade. Lab mice gained about 11 per cent per decade. Chimps, for some reason, are doing especially badly: their average body weight had risen 35 per cent per decade… ”

      “…perhaps this is nature’s way of preparing all species for an oncoming ice age.”

      Like


    • I’m sure they’ll still find a way to draft us if they ever really need soldiers. The Gods of the Copybook Headings and Biomechanics and all that.

      Admittedly, this is one of the few things that could finally unite men against feminism–being sent to die while they stay home and bake cookies. The draft was one of the reasons I never took feminism seriously.

      Like


  28. “I’m thinking about the length of a journey that a culture must undertake in order for that to stop sounding crazy.”

    Yeah.

    Yesterday I was reading the “New Yorker” (don’t start) and stumbled across an article by a woman complaining that one of her male friends only dated hotties, as if this were some kind of moral failing. She even described beautiful women and the men drawn to them as “victims of beauty.” She was completely serious.

    Wow. A culture must warp itself beyond recognition for people to lose sight of basic truths.

    Like


  29. Not sure this even matters.
    The chances that *pretty* girls (7+) ever feel like joining the military for real are EXTREMELY slim, and who cares what the rest do?

    Like


    • on October 7, 2013 at 5:22 am The Burninator

      As a former soldier I can tell you that I would have cared quite deeply “what the rest do”. The last place I’d want to be is having to hump not only my pack but carrying Princess Butterface’s sack because, gosh darn it, forced marches are hard! ™ Most to all women *routinely* fell out of *no pack included* hard runs during PT when I was in (several mile runs, as a platoon, with cadence), and forced marches had them all suddenly becoming ill and needing to stop, or weeping and breaking down after it started to become difficult, and bullshit like that. At the time it didn’t matter (mid 1980’s) because we knew that they’d never actually be on the front line or around combat with us. Now, it matters, a lot. Men are going to die at accelerated rates because of this nonsense.

      Like


      • My military didn’t have any women in it, but I know where you’re coming from. However, men dying at accelerated rates is what war is all about, nature’s way of keeping a lid on the male population.
        If you have parents or grandparents of the WW II generation or thereabouts (especially if they grew up in Europe or parts of Asia), they may have told you stories about several women competing over 1 guy during and after the war.
        Wonder what happened to that? Too many guys, that’s what.
        Go to any bar, any club, anywhere, there’s a MINIMUM of 3 guys per girl, 15 guys per *cute* girl.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 10:24 am The Burninator

        I meant accelerated over the normal attrition through death during war. A guy who, you just know, will feel compelled to help Princess Butterface hump her ruck is going to be a hell of a lot slower to respond or get into a trench, being weighted down more, and such. Plus guys will make it a point to defend the female even if it becomes strategically disadvantageous. And a whole list of other problems. This entire push has epic fail written all over it, IMO.

        Like


  30. on October 6, 2013 at 8:41 am gunslingergregi

    boing weekend talked to bouncer said he talked to the chick that swung on my bitch last weekend and she said she didn’t know why she did it

    Like


  31. With regards to ejaculations such as “stick to poon”, “I thought this is a Game blog,” “how does this race-post help me get laid?” that predictably pop up on ideological posts such as the previous one — here is why they happen:

    Liberals have been coasting for decades on a deadly concession from righties that they (libs) are: 1) smarter; 2) better; 3) sexier.

    And like every illusion, the one about liberal supremacy of mind, heart, and body is becoming a spent force. A brief explanation follows.

    1. The lie that leftists are smarter: though this may not be apparent, liberals have abandoned their claim on intellectual superiority. Free inquiry and scrupulous reason is now the domain of the so-called “dark enlightment”. The leftists, feminists, anti-racists, statists, now resort to censorship, personal destruction, and faggoty snark. Leftist thought is, as Bryan Caplan arrogantly admitted, little more than marketing for the ruling classes.

    2. The lie that leftists are better people: we all know the founding moment of leftist moral superiority, when Welch told Joseph McCarthy: “at long last Sir, have you no decency?” Please take the time to read THIS, up to and especially to the sweet payoff in the post’s final line.

    3. The lie that leftists are sexier. Or more cool, more attractive, more hip. That is the one they still hold on to, willfully oblivious to the fact that they are fearful, tight-lipped prigs. But this is exactly why no-name commenters mews “stick with poon!” when slapped with a CH clear-talk evisceration of a feminist of an anti-racist shibboleth. They are disturbed, very deeply, by the fact that verve, coolness, sexiness, style, and Game are ours, not theirs.

    The brains, the heart, and the body ascent toward excellence when congruous with themselves, each other, and with truth, beauty, and honor. And those things are what we seek, while they desperately try to bury.

    Like


    • THIS! A thousand times!

      Like


    • Strong Comment of the Week material.

      Like


    • Sounds nice and I’m sure your confidence helps you with the ladies.

      But…
      1. I think it’s pretty obvious liberals lie about some things (race, poverty) and conservatives about others (global warming, corporate corruption). Similarly, liberals are (on average) better at the arts and science and conservatives at engineering and business. Your average liberal is better at constructing arguments, your average conservative at running an enterprise. Every group censors thought it doesn’t like (look at the Religious Right’s attitude toward sex) and tells people what they need to hear (religion in service to the state throughout history anyone?). The question is, which group of thugs would you rather run with?

      2. No, pretty much every ruling clique is fond of deception and dirty tricks–it’s how you stay in power. Nixon and Clinton both played dirty. Again, which group of crooks is your group of crooks? Do you trust the NYC-DC-LA mandarinate or the Texas-Midwestern oilmen and farm magnates to be less destructive to your country?

      3. I think there are actually two optimal strategies, which CH should comment on, because I’d love to hear his thoughts on how this relates to alpha-beta. One is the smooth, lady-killing metrosexual popular in the big cities, the other the rough, masculine alpha male more popular in the suburbs and country. (Think investment banker and cowboy.) Each one appeals to a slightly different set of women. There are other archetypes, they’re just not appealing to women–women don’t date nerds, for example, unless they have no choice.

      Like


      • On 1 and 2:

        I think you are making a mistake in assuming that both sides are equally as bad. Just because both sides lie about different things doesnt mean that they lie as much, or that their lies have equal impact on society. The same goes for the two presidents you mentioned and the other stuff.

        Like


      • You are missing the ppint. Republican presidents and Texas oilmen aren’t “us” either.

        Like


      • Exactly. I would guess that politically most of the “us” here would be classified as paleo-cons or something approximating it. Also, the lies of the right fuck you out of money. The lies of the left fuck you out of existence via replacement demographics. There is an order of magnitude in the difference.

        Like


      • Anon gets the truth of the matter. Texas oilmen and multi-millionaire farmers are only “conservative” because we worship Mammon, and our politics are so ordered. In any true sense of the word “conservative”, there is no room for such malefactors.

        Like


      • Actually the lies of the left – not the average leftist but the politicians – fuck us with money as much as the right does.

        It is a myth that big corporations and capitalists are all right wing.

        Wen Fortune 500 or Forbes publish the names of 100 or 500 of the richest people often more than half are Democrats or contribute heavily to the democrat party.

        an example; The big banks that Obama saved after the 2008 crash were all large donors to the Democrats and gave crumbs to Republicans; Google it, you will see I am not making this up

        Big corporations give money to politicians ( on both sides ) who will help them make more money by adapting laws and bills to them or give them tax breaks or whatever, and then those large corporations can give more money to politicians and this goes on and on

        But there is more hypocrisy from leftist politicians because leftist politicians pretend to care about global warming and other such stuff, but it is all abig lie; they are lying to get votes from gullible leftist voters, most of those politicians are in bed with large corporations and are filthy rich.

        if one hates capitalism and large corporations , what is worse?

        a Republican who never pretended he did not love capitalism and large corporations?

        or a Democrat who lies trough his teeth pretending to care about organic food, little turtles in the Amazon and other leftist causes while large corporations are filling his pockets and he gives them tax breaks in return?

        both parties are full of lazy corrupt idiots who only care about money but one side is extremely hypocritical about it.

        Liberal politicians are the same ruthless hungry for money as the ones on the right but they and their media have everyone believing they are not, that only republicans love money

        you are being fooled,

        wake up!

        Like


      • two things,

        1- the banks were large donors to democrats BEFORE the crash of 2008

        2- you are getting fucked twice by the democrat politicians; once with race replacement and second with their receiving as much or more money from corporations as republicans do

        Like


      • That was kind of my point–that they’re thugs, but less bad thugs–but, honestly, you said it better. 😉

        Like


    • Answer to 1.: Libtard academia has dumbed down so much since the 1960s that they celebrate their being dumbed down as “postmodernism”.

      Answer to 2.: Fag “marriage” should by itself put the lie to that… and to dumb-mock-crazy itself.

      Answer to 3.: Shout-out to CH for pointing out how their most ardent representatives are obese feminists and revolting manboobs,

      Like


    • 1. James Watson
      2. Chris & Channon
      3. Slut Walk

      Like


    • Sharp and clear, PA. Good work.

      Like


  32. on October 6, 2013 at 10:07 am Greatest Beta

    I’m thinking of going monastic for 90 days when it comes to women. That means no opening, no texting, no dates, no kiss closes, obviously no sex. Just a complete shut out of women from my life. I haven’t done this since 2003.

    I guess this sounds MGTOW style but seriously I sense a power in this. Women, by their natures are emotional, financial, psychological and physical vampires. They take from us while we give. I want to see how much of my self I can gain back and even more by completely giving nothing to them. Already I feel the tank filling back up.

    For example, last night I was at this little get together aprox 20 people. There were 2 hotties, both with bfs. Me and my brother serve as the lightening rods as we are usually the better looking guys in most settings. I sat on this chair and IGNORED both of the two hotties. Instead I engaged in general conversation with some of the regular women (5s on the scale). This 7th grade boy was there and I spoke to him about his interests (this kid was fucking brilliant he knew so much about cars). What I noticed was that BOTH of the hotties were looking over at me which made sense as their little hamsters were annoyed “heyyyyy why isnt he giving meeeeeee attention!!!” lol that was interesting as I didnt want to give them an ounce of myself not even a stare.

    I’m going to see how this turns out for me got a strong feeling it will be extremely rewarding and empowering.

    Like


    • “So Jennie,how was that party last night?” “It was gross! There was this creepy guy there who was hitting on some teenage BOY! Kept trying to talk to him about cars and oil and stuff. The poor kid He just wnated to getaway but this creep seemd to be trying get all Woody Allen on him! It was disgusting! What a fag!”

      Like


    • I don’t see how that is better than negging them and making them moan “You’re so meeean!”.

      Like


    • you need more interactions not less. necessarily, as you grow, you will find yourself engaging with females less and less because they are frankly quite stupid and easy to trick.

      read “Narcissus and Goldmund” by Hess. you’ll like it. then re-read CH or Rollo. tell me what you learn.

      learn to ignore them when they are right in front of you, the power is in the real “no” not tricking your instincts to mimic a no.

      Like


      • In reality, going ‘monastic’ will get you precisely nothing. Literally.
        Unless you are the 6’4, 22-year old Brad Pitt look-alike multi-millionaire they ALL want (if you are, why the hell are you wasting even just 1 precious nano-second of your time reading THIS?), ignoring women (or just the hotties) will get you ignored also, nothing more.
        They don’t need you at all, they each have 15 guys constantly badgering them for attention (pussy), they have absolutely ZERO need to acknowledge some non-Brad Pitt who is ignoring them as anything other than furniture.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 9:24 am Greatest Beta

        Not going monastic to “get me something” externally based, but looking inside and to get stronger internally.

        The game is there and always will be. Just asking the question if its ever bad to take a break from women??

        My goal is to be comfortable enough with myself to where when I do meet a hot girl I don’t develop intense oneitis (as an emotional guy this happens to be hence the username greatest beta).

        Basically I’m the opposite of yareally where he is unemotional I’m extremely emotional being. By taking time off and dealing with my inner issues ill become stronger.

        Like


      • No you can never stop talking to women.

        They are fat, ugly and stupid but you’d be crazy not to want to spend every waking moment getting their approval.

        Like


      • That doesn’t make any sense. That’s like saying by taking time off of weights you will become stronger internally enough to lift the same weights next time.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 12:37 pm Greatest Beta

        Emotional strength. Sometimes we need to refill the tank

        Like


      • I dunno. Is it bad to take a break from breathing? Every second you ain’t pussy hustlin’ is a second you’ve resigned yourself to the death that awaits you.

        #slingdickordietryin

        Like


      • @Scray lol @Immoralgables Thanks man! Had a shitty weekend but still on course. I’ll give these a good read.

        Like


      • lol you are wrong, Wolfeinstein. Just get in a bish’s face and tear her down with a smile, then that’s it. She’ll realize she was just a little girl with that Brad Pitt-wah-wah-wah.

        Like


      • Having fewer interactions seems like a cop-out. What do you learn from that? It’s like saying “I can fuck that girl, so why even try…” A “gimme” in golf is when the ball is inches from the hole, not when you’re refusing to tee off because, hey, you can get a hole in one anytime..

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 9:29 am Greatest Beta

        I’ll look into that book.

        For now I’ve been watching and learning. I spend a fuckton of time alone (ended a 14 month relationship recently) so I went from daily female sex and affection to nothing. It’s amazing the shit that goes through my head, all kinds of negative thoughts that I’ve slowly been putting to rest! Hence the 90 day no woman freeze out. Kill the negative energy then start out from a stronger position as I’m vulnerable now and see myself falling into another LTR if she’s hot enough. U see what I mean?

        Like


      • your identity is LTR and thats where u will fail because you are constantly trying to get home…. That’s the discipline you have to learn…..never going home. where you are IS your home. ferret that shit out and legitimately say no NO MATTER HOW HOT THE BITCH IS with no outcome dependance.

        You are trying to figure out how to maintain your identity without doing the work. like Ya says, thats just a different prison.

        Roosh did a killer thing on this with a vien diagram on the three pillars of identity. Go find it. social health, testosterone mgmt, and financial health.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 3:45 pm Greatest Beta

        I can agree with those pillars. And yes there is work to do but strategically it’s best to enter a battle zone strong NOT when you are emotionally suffering. Lets face it the mating marke is a battle of some sort as you are competing with other alphas, betas with money, your own demons, and the cluster bs trying to manipulate you! Personally I would advise most men to lay low for a bit post LTR breakup.

        Every week that goes by I get stronger its been 6 weeks and already the personal growth is substantial. I’m betting by Christmas time ill be revitalized with much more power and knowledge.

        Like


      • why did you ever get weak that you need to get stronger? and if a woman leaving you did that to you then merely staying away from women is rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. you feel me?

        Like


      • Greatest Beta, you are kinda right (definitely needed time off after my crush crushed me, but don’t stay like forever. As long as you understand that, you’re good.

        Gotta get back out there eventually…

        Like


      • on October 7, 2013 at 3:38 pm Greatest Beta

        Oh I agree. Already itching for it but need to get stronger.

        Today I did some work drove up to the mountains and blasted my Greek villager clarinet while smoking a cig. We all have our escapes mine are the mountains. I’ve always been in awe of them, of their unshakeable power. All the media, feminists, courts, PUA, governments will come and go but these peaks will always be here. Not a worry in the world just me and my peaks. I can see how some men after ripped into pieces after a brutal divorce can go MGTOW

        Like


      • on October 8, 2013 at 5:06 am The Burninator

        We have something in common then. The mountains call to me in ways that nothing else on earth does. Whether the lonely highlands of Scotland, the foggy loneliness of the Smokies or my favorite, the Rockies as seen from Wyoming, they hold a power that no amount of reality evading society can ever touch. Why I’m moving to Wyoming in a few years actually, the mountains.

        Like


      • Where are these FR’s man? I haven’t seen any of them lately. Let me know, I wanna see how things are going for you! Plus they’ll motivate me to get my sorry ass out there and sarge.

        Like


      • Haha I dunno dude, CH hasn’t been approving them. I posted them at Rational Male and YaReally said he’d get back to me with breakdowns.

        Here are the links:

        http://therationalmale.com/2013/09/30/the-rational-male/comment-page-2/#comment-23406

        (I left two FRs in the comments section, just search “Hunter”)

        Like


    • There is a power in this, because now that you have found this site and know game; this is what will happen: You will become a complete nasty old uncle to them and this will make them hate you which will drive some of them away, but in turn, they will come back and follow you around. I did this at church a couple months ago, and now they are slowly starting to give me their proximity again.

      Like


      • I agree with CH in that it is better or sometimes best, because of The Darkness everywhere in America, to make a woman hate you within the first few times of meeting her. Once I see the hatred in their eyes, I know I have them.

        I’m not even looking for IOIs anymore, what I’m looking for is solid qualifying from them when I tell them there is something about them that doesn’t add up, or when I give them strong IOD body language and even disgust and then they move closer and closer to me like cats.

        Like


      • just did this and the girl spread her legs from under her dress wow

        Like


      • yep. grls r havethe dumb

        Like


  33. on October 6, 2013 at 11:49 am Holden Caulfield

    Feminist angry that Breaking Bad allowed masculinity:

    http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/10/breaking-bad-toxic-masculinity/

    Like


  34. David Spade is more of a ladies man than George Clooney!

    Like


    • Clooney comes off as a bit of a batty-boy to me, but I still find myself wanting to believe he isn’t.

      Like


  35. The arc of modern technological warfare has been to increase standoff firepower. Though it doesn’t cover every situation, you certainly want capability in that area greater then your enemy’s. Women could fill that role physically. Of course there is a whole host of complicating fraternization issues involved in a two sex military. When standoff firepower doesn’t get the job done, then you need a swarm of humans going door to door. Do you send in the best you’ve got, or the PR showcase version.

    Like


  36. “I’m thinking about the length of a journey that a culture must undertake in order for that to stop sounding crazy.”

    It’ll always sound crazy to rational observant people!

    Like


  37. “Since true equalization is impossible given biological constraints

    You are not going far enough, and you have stopped in a bad spot.

    Like


    • e.g.

      “It is clear that although our large brains have enabled Homo-Sapiens to outmanoeuvre lions and tigers, the elements and viruses, that same cleverness also enables us to defeat ourselves with our dreams of Utopia. Until human nature is changed, and that will not be any time soon, dreams of – in this case – female empowerment can only end in Dystopia.”

      Like


  38. cathedral had a fucking orgasm as they hit the “send” on this one http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/06/world/africa/us-forces-africa-terrorist-raids/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

    Like


  39. I just farted.
    Moderated; not so muuchh..

    Like


  40. Fecal-Anal-Rectal-Transfer. splurt…

    Like


  41. Of course the game is rigged. How did they rig it? By getting you to believe that the game is rigged so that you won’t try. Because if you try you might find out that the game is, in fact, not rigged… and they’d have to compete with you.

    Like


  42. Can we not send ugly women to war? We don’t want them having children anyway.

    Like


  43. It is clear that although our large brains have enabled Homo-Sapiens to outmanoeuvre lions and tigers, the elements and viruses, that same cleverness also enables us to defeat ourselves with our dreams of Utopia. Until human nature is changed, and that will not be any time soon, dreams of – in this case – female empowerment can only end in Dystopia.

    As Ayn Rand opined you can evade reality but you cannot avoid the consequences thereof. In the meanwhile enjoy the decline.

    Like


    • The solution, of course, is to get ourselves the same kind of management that we have had for thousands of years when the best fighting civilizations were the ones that were spreading farthest. That would be the management of a hereditary monarchy.

      Like


  44. on October 7, 2013 at 8:40 am Brazil is your future

    Massive, indiscriminate 3rd world immigration and multicultural policies, combined with natives foolishly subsidizing their own population replacement while birth rates are shrinking, will finally result in the total physical destruction of the white race in America and Europe. While I support the principle that those who promote their own physical and cultural genocide should be handed Darwin awards and allowed to die off, I know that less white people means no future in the west. This is because replacing the ethno-racial composition of a nation through mass immigration alters the basic character, the essence of the host country’s civilization; for example, a group of Zulus magically transported to Europe, even if granted full access to all the achievements of western science and technology, would not produce a functioning European society, because of average differential civilizational abilities. So, it stands to reason that handing western civilization over to 3rd world immigrants means civilizational decline and the proliferation of 3rd world living standards and quality of life. Hispanicization of the American southwest, and eventually of the entire US, is not the cultural enrichment of western civilization; on the contrary, it is its destruction and eventual debasement to 3rd world living standards. Why is this happening? It’s because western governments everywhere have succumbed to zionist and globalist influence; they believe in greater international integration arising from cultural, economic, and social interchange, resulting in the homogenization of world culture and a transnational elite presiding over a totalitarian new world order.

    So, in the final analysis, whites committing suicide means nothing to live for and a dark future filled with selfish, greedy 3rd world parasites fighting for control of a western culture on the brink of total civilizational collapse. It’s unfortunate this issue is so rarely discussed.

    Like


  45. EQUALITY IS ALIEN TO NATURE

    Like


    • Exactly, but the left is also alien to nature, which is why they push the equality gibberish.

      Leftists ignore nature/reality. This is why all their experiments fail, and they ruin everything they touch – education, the military, male/female relationship….you name it.

      Like


  46. You’re going to love this…

    http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/10/07/sugar-daddy-dating-sites-say-government-shutdown-a-huge-boost-to-sign-ups/

    Moochers a moochin’, and the world goes ’round once more…

    Like


  47. Sorry.. but you’ve never been to the Mexico City airport…. I’ve traveled a lot, in Europe and U.S. but I have never in my life seen some many 9-10’s in one place all speaking Spanish. Of course all of the D.F. isn’t like that but I never wanted to leave that airport.

    Like


  48. […] [Freelance Comment Of The Week: Equalism Logic Trap] […]

    Like