Older Moms And Divorced Moms Raising Generation Of Psychopaths?

Adam Lanza, the school shooter, shot his divorced and single mom — the mother who raised him — four times in the head before embarking on his journey of mental disassociation from reality. Her face must surely have been rendered a mash of unrecognizable pulp.

Four times. Point blank. In the head. You don’t do that unless you possess some serious unresolved rage against the mother. This kid hated his mom with a passion, and we can only guess why now that he’s dead. But clues abound.

First, older moms are more likely to spawn autistic kids. Most autistitards are harmless, but some with severe handicaps to relate as normal human beings are powderkegs in an increasingly atomized society that they find impossible to manage or even comprehend.

Second, the mom was divorced. Children of divorced parents and female-headed homes are at much higher risk for delinquency, jail, and violent crime. Lanza’s pop was paying his ex-wife a tidy some of money (which she did not earn, let’s not forget) to keep her spendthrift ass afloat. We can surmise that the mom was so fucking crazy that the father had no choice but to get away from her, or that he was SO BETA she pulled the trigger on the divorce and cast Adam’s father to the modern equivalent of the icy wastelands. Single moms be warned: If your kid thinks you gave his dad a raw deal, he is going to resent you for life. Maybe a few of those kids of divorced moms lack the normal social outlets to release that building resentment, and it comes out all at once in a violent episode.

As the child of a divorced, single mom, Adam Lanza had the deck stacked against him.

Studies cannot prove conclusively that fatherlessness—or any other factor—actually causes people to commit crimes. For that, you’d have to do the impossible: take a large group of infants and raise each of them simultaneously in two precisely equivalent households—except one would be headed by a father and mother and the other by a lone mother. But by comparing criminals of the same race, education, income, and mother’s education whose primary observable difference is family structure, social scientists have come as close as they can to making the causal case with the methodological tools available.

This isn’t entirely a story about genes, either. Single momhood has skyrocketed in the last forty years, and there is no allele that can account for that. Such a rise in a short time is driven by cultural and social pressures.

The answer to the Adam Lanzas of the world is not gun confiscation, that fool’s panacea so beloved by the cathedral leftoids who would like nothing more than a completely defanged white middle class and working class. (Hint: Adam acquired his guns illegally.) The answer is not easy, but it is within sight. A multifactorial approach that re-institutionalizes the primacy of the two-parent biological nuclear family and the social nee genetic cohesion of the nation, and which discourages late-in-life strugglepreggers by aging SWPL moms is some of the harsh, potent medicine that will begin to fix the ailing body politic.

I won’t be holding my breath for any member in good standing of the snarkerati to grapple with this medicine in any meaningful way. Which is why I remain, respectfully, toes a-dippin’, poolside.





Comments


  1. Nonstop news casts for hours on end and not a single reporter talked about the single mom sydrome that is destorying this country. Not a single reporter talked about the divorce that no question killed this boy’s inner soul. Not a single reporter talked about the lack of a father figure in this kid’s life to show him how to score some ass, how to interact with kids, how to become a leader of men. Nope….they wanted to talk about gun control (which is an issue.)

    Trying to raise a son in a house without a father is like trying to bang a hot chick with a limp pecker. Doesn’t work.

    Like


    • That’s dumbocracy for ya. Most people will latch onto the most easily understood, or misunderstood, element of the story, because they’re no match for the complex nature of reality.

      “Gun control will end this violence!”

      “No! School prayer is the solution!”

      People are stupid.

      Like


      • School prayer would be more effective than gun control. Atheism plays no small part in this drama.

        Like


      • In Islamic countries they have prayer schooling. Does that stop massacres?

        Atheism probably does play a part in the problem, but the lazy thinking that religions often foster will play no part in the solution.

        Like


      • @ Laconophile

        “Atheism probably does play a part in the problem, but the lazy thinking that religions often foster will play no part in the solution.”

        Atheism isn’t necessarily pro-reason; but religion is always anti-reason.

        Like


      • True, which is why liberal equalist political correctness is a religion.

        Like


      • Successful religions usually have a lot of wisdom in them, and they acquire more wisdom over time. The problem is that this wisdom isn’t understood, it is just taken on faith, when faith is lost the wisdom is lost as well, and the atheist is left rudderless until he relearns the wisdom the hard way.

        Like


      • Right, because how could any reasonable person even POSSIBLY think of disagreeing with your beliefs?

        Like


      • Atheism isn’t necessarily pro-reason; but religion is always anti-reason.
        The Gnostic Gospelist begins his Gospel by declaring that Reason [pace Heraclitus, The Logos] is an aspect of God’s nature.

        [Or maybe if you wanna split hairs, you might say that this aspect of God’s nature is the necessary precondition for the existence of Reason.]

        From the Trinitarian point of view, you would then say that Reason is one-third of what makes God God.

        Like


      • Atheism isn’t necessarily pro-reason; but religion is always anti-reason.

        Isaiah 1:18: Come now, and let us reason together, saith Jehovah…

        Like


      • You don’t understand religion. I am religious because of reason, not despite it.

        Like


      • Atheism is a religion too.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2012 at 6:27 pm anonymous does not forgive

        It stops massacres of their OWN people, which is what matters to them.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2012 at 9:52 pm Nobody of Import

        Really? You sure you want to claim that?

        http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/muslims_killing_muslims_in_the.html

        There’s quite a bit more. All it takes is one of them believing that the others are apostate and off they go. Seriously.

        Like


      • “In Islamic countries they have prayer schooling. Does that stop massacres?”

        Islam is a mystic-political death cult. Islam is a “religion” like Auschwitz was a theme park.

        Think about it. Aside from shared goals (destruction of the Judeo-Christian West) why do American Leftists have their head so far up the jihadi ass?

        BECAUSE THEY SHARE A LOVE OF MURDER AND TYRANNY.

        A daily moment for Jewish / Christian prayer in our schools and teaching the Ten Commandments weekly would be a good start at bringing back COMMON SENSE MORALITY to this hell we have allowed to fester in America.

        Like


      • You must be new here.

        Like


      • Everything you said is 100% true, especially this point:

        “A daily moment for Jewish / Christian prayer in our schools and teaching the Ten Commandments weekly would be a good start at bringing back COMMON SENSE MORALITY to this hell we have allowed to fester in America.”

        Think about how going to school every morning and being greeted by a huge sculpture of the Ten Commandments (telling you Thou Shalt Not….) and the teaching of morality, Judeo-Christian values, and the Constitution in school would make kids more moral and decent. All of this old –fashion goodness has been replaced with teenage pregnancy, drugs, violence and disturbed kids.

        Like


      • NiteLily,

        I am not a religious man and I do not have children

        but were I a parent and if the only two choices were

        a school like you described or a school where they teach my kid that gay men fisting each other up to the elbow is normal behavior

        I would pick the religious school without blinking

        Like


      • Canadian Friend,

        “I would pick the religious school without blinking”

        That’s because you have good old-fashioned common sense – a commodity lost in today’s society, and which has been demonstrated by many of the comments in this blog.

        You and I are relics of the past, even though you’re much older than me and we’re of two different generations form each other. Despite our age difference, we still see eye to eye. That’s rare.

        BTW, what I described used to be the way public school was back a few decades ago, not necessarily a religious school. That’s how low we have fallen.

        Like


      • “In Islamic countries they have prayer schooling. Does that stop massacres?”

        What an idiotic argument. They don’t have massacres in Islamic countries. Their killing is directly connected with their religion. They massacre the infidel or anyone they think is helping him, or anyone speaking against Islam. They don’t have anything remotely resembling what happened in CT last Friday. These are two separate issues. You constantly display extreme ignorance.

        Like


      • “They don’t have massacres in Islamic countries. … They massacre the infidel or anyone they think is helping him, or anyone speaking against Islam.”

        hehehe

        Like


      • They don’t have anything remotely resembling what happened in CT last Friday.”

        Frustrated, sex-starved men living in a culture that glorifies violence, who kill lots of innocents in suicide attacks?

        You’re right, that never happens in Islamic countries.

        Like


      • Don’t cherry pick. I said:

        “They don’t have massacres in Islamic countries. Their killing is directly connected with their religion. They massacre the infidel or anyone they think is helping him, or anyone speaking against Islam.”

        I stand by that. They don’t have deranged crazies there like we have in our permissive society. Their type of crazies’ massacres stems directly from their religion, for the sake of their religion. Here we just have deranged crazies without a viable motive. There is a difference.

        “Frustrated, sex-starved men living in a culture that glorifies violence, who kill lots of innocents in suicide attacks?”

        They are not sex starved. They all get married early, or they have sex with prostitutes and infidel. It’s a misnomer to think it’s why they carry out suicide attacks. They carry out suicide attacks for the sake of their religion. They think they must make Islam the dominant religion and will justify whatever means. It has nothing to do with beings sexually frustrated. We in the west are more sexually frustrated than they are.

        Like


      • I just skip NiteStinkweeds posts. I recommend you do too.

        Like


      • How much does school prayer cost? You’d be hard pressed to find a more cost effective solution. Lazy thinking always exists, regardless of the underlying dogma.

        Like


      • I agree, it’d be better than learning about Emmett Till. I still remember the day we were guilt-tripped about that in school. Oddly enough, they never told us about his father’s whistling shenanigans in Italy.

        Like


      • And Emmet himself did more than merely whistle.

        Like


      • Islam conditions its followers to violence, racism, misogyny, depersonalization and devaluation of human life.

        Like


      • @ Tyrone

        “Atheism plays no small part in this drama.”

        Yeah, there are of course no known Christian masskillers…

        Like


      • Are there many mass- killers who are also genuine Christians, i.e. regular church- goers? I can’t think of any names offhand. Even McVeigh wasn’t a Christian as it turned out.

        Like


      • Name one.

        Like


      • @ Iain Johnston

        General Custer slaughtered large number of Sioux-indians.

        Like


      • @ Tyrone

        For example, the very christian knights who participated in the Crusades.

        Like


      • If all you can come up with is people fighting wars in a manner that was accepted in their time, you’ve got nothing.

        Like


      • @ HoHoHo

        I thought that Christian morality was meant to be eternal. But if the only thing you need to do is to conform to your place and time…

        Like


      • Sorry, Ulf… you lose. Fail less in the future, there’s a good fellow.

        Like


      • When you start to tell them about Atheism, they think you are trying to teach them religion. It’s unfortunate atheists refuse to acknowledge a creator. But why are they rejecting Judeo-Christian values? Our country is based on those values. We teach none of those values in school, so the line of demarcation differentiating good and bad has been obliterated – that’s a fact. You don’t have to be a “Jesus freak” to see how lack of values leads to a war on men, homosexuality, big government, and diminished respect for human life. It’s all tied up together, but liberals like to blame irrelevant things like guns to make their straw man arguments.

        Like


      • So not knee jerking to your place in some kind of all-pervasive cosmic dictatorship makes you susceptible to murderous outbursts?

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 10:26 am Hugh G. Rection

        The burden of proof is on you, not on the atheists. It’s a nice theory you have, I just wonder how many murderers in prison identify as Christian and how many as Atheist. For a nice overview of the superior christian morals, read Leviticus.

        Like


      • Weren’t no Christians in Leviticus.

        Like


      • You’re wrong. Atheism make no sense. I can respect someone who says they’re agnostic, but atheisms is as closed-minded and illogical as they come. In fact, it even looks like physics is on a fast track to proving there is a creator because no physicist has been able to prove the origins of the Universe, and the best answer they come up with is a universe from nothing, which is impossible and they know it. In addition, the order to which the universe adheres must have an intelligent designer. That’s why to explain the unexplainable, they are now coming up with a new theory of the parallel universes, or multiverse. They’ll exhaust this theory too, and eventually will have to recognize that the universe indeed has a creator. That’s why I can respect the agnostic, because at least he is looking for answers, looking for proof either way, as opposed to the atheists that has already made up his mind because he feels it’s inconvenient to believe in a creator.

        But let’s put atheism and the belief in God aside. There is morality in Judeo-Christian values, motility that made the West, and even more so America, the most successful civilization in human history. It’s the erosion of these values that has caused our society to deteriorate and go downhill.

        As to how many Christians vs. atheists in prison, I can answer that clearly. Most people in prison for violent crimes are people that don’t go to church regularly and have no connection to moral values. It’s usually deranged lowlifes or just evil people who hurt others for financial gains or enjoyment. Was Scott Peterson a church goer, or the guy who shot the two police officers in IL, or the guy that shot the gas station attendant? There is a direct correlation between religious people and goodness.

        And what do you have against Leviticus? What law there didn’t tickle your fancy?

        Like


      • For a nice overview of atheist morality, read Stalin.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 3:00 pm Hugh G. Rection

        So how many gods do you believe in? If it’s just the one, you are almost as close minded as I am. I am also very close minded on arithmetic. I have no faith in 1+1 equaling 3. As for a scientific explanation of the origins of the universe, you know just as little about it as I do so any explanation you come up with is just as useless as mine unless you introduce new proof.

        You might not consider people who don’t go to church or pray or aren’t baptised or whatever to be christian, but it still doesn’t make them atheist.

        Like


      • “So how many gods do you believe in? If it’s just the one, you are almost as close minded as I am.”

        I believe in One Author – the Creator.

        “I am also very close minded on arithmetic. I have no faith in 1+1 equaling 3.”

        I agree. 1+1=2. And guess what, it equals 2 everywhere in the universe, no matter where you’re standing. That’s why absolute truth exists in the universe. Once you establish absolute truth (a truth that’s constant and always the same no matter where you are in the universe) you know there is Order. Once there is Order, there is a creator. This universe couldn’t exist without a creator.

        “As for a scientific explanation of the origins of the universe, you know just as little about it as I do so any explanation you come up with is just as useless as mine unless you introduce new proof.”

        You don’t have to be a physicist to learn about the new theories they are devising vis-à-vis the origins the universe. So far, they can’t even prove these new theories with mathematical equations, so they are mostly the musings of different physicist thinkers. In order to prove something in physics, it has to be proven mathematically. For instance, even before they observed black holes with telescopes (actually the light disappearing) they knew they existed because they could prove them with a mathematical equation describing them. So far, none of their new theories are provable mathematically, which means they are grasping at straws because they are coming up against a dead end and all arrows are pointing to a creator. But physicists won’t give up this easily, or should they. Let them continue searching, which is their job. What bothers me is people that insist there is no God and refuse to acknowledge we don’t know yet and we’re still looking for proof one way or the other. I respect agnostics because they are open-minded. Atheists have ulterior motive. They are not really looking to find out the truth. They want to justify their position and brainwash others.

        “You might not consider people who don’t go to church or pray or aren’t baptised or whatever to be christian, but it still doesn’t make them atheist.”

        OK, here is where I agree with you. Just because someone is not a Christian doesn’t mean he/she is an atheist.

        Like


      • Strange how some people absolutely need a ‘god’ to give them some sense of validation in life. The more totalitarian, the better it seems.

        Like


      • @Hugh Rection: The burden of proof is on you. There is no civilization in the history of mankind that has not acknowledged in one way or another some sort of intelligent design (aka creator). So far ALL atheistic regimes have led to incredible bloodbaths breaking the records of all massacres recorded (Soviet Russia anyone) and moreover such haven´t being able to produce anything near in value to the Christian Western Civilization.

        @Nitelily: It’s Christian values, Judeo-Christian values is an oxymoron, akin to saying Judeo-Muslim values or Hindu-budhist values.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 7:47 pm Hugh G. Rection

        All I need is proof and I might change my mind. And then I need someone to answer who created the creator. In any case, it doesn’t have any real bearings on my life and how I interact with people.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 8:06 pm Hugh G. Rection

        PM the atheist regimes didn’t murder in the name of atheism.

        Like


      • @Hugh G. Rection

        “All I need is proof and I might change my mind.”

        That’s a fair enough. That’s why agnostic is better than saying you flat out don’t believe. There will be proof eventually. Technology is moving in the direction of proving it within a couple of decades, maybe even before. But will never know all his secrets. It’s an awesome power that created the Universe, which is unfathomable for the human brain to fully comprehend. However, I do think we’ll know enough within a couple of decades.

        Nobody created the creator. If someone created him, he is not the omnipotent Creator, the Master. He is infinity. He always was and will be.

        If you think about it, scientists are saying the universe seems to expand. Right now their latest estimation (it keeps changing) is that the universe is about 13.5 billion years old, but I suspect they soon will change it again and say it’s even older than 13.5 billion years, and eventually they will see it has no date because it keeps expanding as they are already realizing. When they say it’s expanding, it means they are seeing back in time. So if they say it’s 13.5 billion years old, it means the light form 13.5 billion years ago is only now reaching us. That’s why I say it’s all theory and speculation right now. No one knows for sure, but they are sure looking for answers. Therefore, to dismiss God forthright is foolish.

        Like


      • @ J.M.

        Well, you are one of those people that likes to remove Judaism from the history of Christianity, but that’s not possible because Christianity is built on Judaism, not the other way around. And the Founding Fathers didn’t believe in Christianity as the deity, but they did believe in the creator as it’s stated in Judaism, and incorporated that language into the Constitution, which calls God the Creator. Therefore, before you go saying it’s Christian values, you’ll have to say it’s really Jewish values on which America is built, as per John kasich, the Governor of OH. But since this is not a Jewish country, despite it being very deeply steeped in Judaic traditions, we say it’s Judeo-Christian values. It’s not an oxymoron. It’s giving homage to both parts of that traditions. Maybe their theology is different, but the shared values between Christianity and Judaism are almost identical.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2012 at 11:27 am Hugh G. Rection

        Of course you can have a theory about a creator or god or whatever you like and adjust it to scientific findings, but that’s really just weaseling out of calling yourself an atheist, intellectual cowardice. You also can’t prove that vampires or fairies don’t exist, but I would rate the probability of their existence very low (just as I would do with any god, especially the ones major religions thought of). I don’t think that makes me close-minded. If you can’t form any congruent belief without doubt, your mind might just be too open. And how would you ever get anything done?

        Like


    • Were it only so well; that the “single mom syndrome” did indeed get around to “destroy the country.” Whatever is left of it is nothing more than worthless garbage anyway.

      What’s truly sad, is to see ostensibly productive and aspiring decent people, so thoroughly indoctrinated, that they waste their energy desperately fighting tooth and nail, to keep the shit sack from simply blowing apart and disintegrating, once and for darned all.

      Like


      • Another single mom bites the dust! 28 fewer mouths to feed! This is a problem how? This is the sweet future feminists wanted, remember?

        Like


      • The shit sack blowing up has a lot of unintended and potentially catastrophic consequences. That’s reason enough to postpone the day of reckoning.

        Like


  2. Any time one of these mass shootings happen now, I only have to ask two questions:

    1) Was this man getting laid?
    2) If yes, was the woman semi attractive?

    If both questions are ‘No’, then you know why the certain event came to fruition.

    I know the problems are much deeper than that like mental disorders and deep seated emotional pain, however I still think that if the man was getting hot ass, he would be like you know what ‘I like fucking decent pussy and I’m not giving that up’ and not go through with his plan.

    Prostitution and the destigmization of said activity would radically drop these pyscho mass murdering events.

    Like


    • Tyler put it something like: “It’s amazing how many of these issues, depression, suicide, stress, anger issues, drug addiction, alcohol abuse, etc. suddenly vanish once a guy starts regularly getting laid. :P”

      It’s hard for women and guys who’ve had even a little success with women (let alone a Natural who gets laid a lot) to wrap their head around the mental mind-fuck of someone going 20-30+ *YEARS* of their entire life, from childhood all the way to mid-adult-hood, with no one ever touching them (girls are hugged, touched, etc. by their female friends, a guy with only a few male friends and no female friends can end up having no reassuring/loving human touch available when he’s down or stressed etc.) or wanting them in any romantic way. Not just “not the ones I want” and not just “some jerk who broke my heart” but literally no one. And then on top of it, actually desperately wanting and wishing for that but being told you’re a horrible perverted loser for wanting it and that you should just cross your fingers and hope for the universe to throw you a mediocre bone (meanwhile the girls telling you that are reading Cosmo’s “50 tips to land a guy” while everyone grrrl-power rah rahs them for it), while you watch everyone else around you getting into relationships, settling down, having kids, throwing away relationships you dream of having, etc. which all remind you of what you’ll probably never have. And then on top of that, if you dare try to improve yourself, you’re scorned as a liar, a fake, scum, manipulator, etc. etc. and that you should just accept your place at the bottom of the barrel in life (“hey, some guys have it some don’t, it’s that simple”), till you get to the point where you literally start to think that you’re going to go your entire life alone and unloved and die alone and depressed.

      It’s not real hard to imagine that being a pretty fucking big factor in the whole “he was a quiet guy who kept to himself” profile of a lot of guys who snap.

      I’m not saying pussy is the cure-all for every mental issue a guy has, but I’d prefer a guy go accidentally creep out a few girls in a bar with a fuzzy hat and a Horse Girl opener and spend his time reading self-improvement shit, rather than spending his time stockpiling guns so he can go mow down an elementary class “shooting each child up to 11 times”. Man that’s fucked up.

      Like


      • I said legalize prostitution and not learn game for this guy because I don’t think he was capable of learning game due to him being a legit aspie not some pseudo-aspie that whines that he has to learn social interactions and doesn’t even attempt. I think Adam Lanza could not learn Game. He simply wouldn’t be able to do it.

        So at least he would have an outlet for his frustrations. Any number of crippling disorders can have the same effect. Men need to get laid. Period. When large chunks are doing without well we see the chilling effects.

        Like


      • I swear to God – every dude like this (and every Beta putting up with a FemBot’s bullshit) should own a FleshLight. Close as you can get to the real thing.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 12:24 am Henry Spencer Ashbee

        Lacks the dignity of buying a whore. Not that there’s much dignity in that, but there’s some.

        Like


      • Sold! I never heard of this til now. I am gonna get one when I get paid this Friday. Do you get a commish??

        Like


      • Hear you.

        Like


      • It’s not real hard to imagine that being a pretty fucking big factor in the whole “he was a quiet guy who kept to himself” profile of a lot of guys who snap.

        Fembots and manboobs take note: teaching Game to meek, quiet spergs saves lives.

        I’m not saying pussy is the cure-all for every mental issue a guy has, but I’d prefer a guy go accidentally creep out a few girls in a bar with a fuzzy hat and a Horse Girl opener and spend his time reading self-improvement shit, rather than spending his time stockpiling guns so he can go mow down an elementary class “shooting each child up to 11 times”. Man that’s fucked up.

        It was his divorced mom who stockpiled all the guns, apparently because she was “afraid” of her money tree ex. She also had herself trained Adam how to use them. So add the ex-wife’s irrational paranoia and hate of her ex-husband to the mix of what has already been mentioned in CH’s post. Ex-wives hate their ex-husbands, but still have unconditional love (usually) for their children which makes them overlook their darker sides.

        Like


      • “teaching Game to meek, quiet spergs saves lives.”

        On the note of spergs, from what I know about the disease (which isn’t much lol), old-school routine game seems like something that would actually be useful to them because it breaks down “when someone says blah blah, you respond with this, when someone does such and such action, it means they’re feeling like this” and gives them solid signals to look for and patterns/routines to respond with. Not necessarily to turn them into super players or anything, but to at least help them learn to get by in a social society.

        I wonder if there’s a market for someone to translate the social dynamics parts of PUA routine-based game into politically correct MSM-approved general socializing, specifically designed to help parents with Aspie kids learn how to blend in. Or even normal shy kids…like a book a parent would approve of and could give them that wasn’t focused on just getting pussy but on like making friends at school etc. for the kids who just have no idea how social interactions work.

        The MSM blue-pill types tend to react with hostility when you reduce something as wonderful and special as human interaction down to a simple predictible flow-chart though lol

        Like


      • I think something as simple as reading this blog could do it. This blog has helped me immensely, and much more than any of the other PUA stuff I’ve read put together. Perhaps it’s because it deals with the theory and fundamentals behind attracting women, breaking it down and analyzing it, rather than just spitting out methods based on the theory that may or may not work. Now all of this stuff makes complete sense. No more agonizing analyzing… I get it now.

        Unfortunately, I wouldn’t know how to take this red-pill information and put it out there in a PC fashion — it’s guaranteed to piss off both the left and the right in one way or another — but heck, even a watered-down PC version may help prevent more Adam Lanzas.

        Like


      • I agree with that the mentality should be taught to all men and would help immensely. It’s so hard to anti-game when you see women and relationships for what they actually are. I would have to purposely try to anti-game now where before it was just my natural default beta mode. I cringe looking back on the beta game I used. I literally cringe.

        Sifting out anti-game is the single biggest improvement that any man can make in his sexual life bar none. Thankfully, that’s the easiest step with the biggest benefits. Once you are ready to accept that your views will be considered ‘sexist’ by most of society and don’t give a fuck, you will interalize so you will not anti-game.

        Active game is totally different animal though and is tough to get going. With losing anti-game you will increase success through your normal passive social circle meeting of women. With active game you need to hit the pavement and get fucked up. Approaching and crashing and burning. More risk (to your ego anyway) more reward when applied right (to your dick anyway).

        Like


      • on December 17, 2012 at 10:01 pm Nobody of Import

        Well, it’s certainly why I’m still hanging about.

        Like


      • You have an aspie kid. You teach him and make him read game, and you bring him a hooker a couple of times. End of fucking story.

        He’ll probably do better than the other aspies who’ve been raised by SWPL parents and liberals quacks.

        Like


      • You think us girls have a duty to hot-eye an obvious beta every now n then in a situation where we know they can’t creep us?

        Like


      • Nothing wrong with a little harmless flirting now and then to make someone’s day. 🙂 I flirt with fatties occasionally lol

        But it’s trickier for girls to do this because creeper beta guys are retarded and get obsessive and don’t understand that a flirty hello doesn’t mean you want them to stalk you at work and murder your boyfriend so you can be together lol

        Like


      • on December 17, 2012 at 2:19 pm Lucky White Male

        Great comment.

        Someone said, I think Krauser, that “so much feminine indignation in men is due to sexual poverty.”

        Game changes lives.

        Like


      • You two said exactly what I wanted to say but far better.

        Like


      • Many of those hugless fellow could benefit from some Ballroom Dance activities.

        Like


      • …where he gets to ‘hug’ other guys’ girlfriends, fiancees and wives – or cougars old enough to be his mom/grandma.

        Like


      • It’s human contact, and the smell of a woman can do wonders for an awkward young man.

        Like


      • I agree these issues disappear for AFCs, but I still know a ton of dudes who drink, smoke, drug, have all kinds of inadequacy issues but are huge players. One of my best friends is training to be a doctor in NYC and he lands ass constantly, even having threesomes with sex columnists and whatnot but still has huge money problems, drinks like a maniac, is very insecure, etc.

        Like


      • lol that’s usually how it goes with 1) Naturals and 2) people who fell ass-backwards into getting tons of pussy.

        In the case of 1) they often learn through a lifetime of partying to build connections between their success and alcohol/drugs/etc. so to them quitting self-destructive behaviors like that (much like changing your “lucky socks” during a winning streak in sports) is risking fucking with the “magic” even if they know they really should quit. Add to that the stress of med school/work shit (I have some med buddies and they get tanked blackout hardcore when they go out…I imagine the docs handling that school shooting got hammered after a day of dealing with dead children).

        In the case of 2) it’s like the lottery winner who’s so used to being poor that they can’t make the mental shift into being rich or don’t feel they deserve it and they actively sabotage their own good fortune and subconsciously punish themselves until they end up poor again.

        Both cases are pretty sad. The best Natural I’ve ever met’s life is not one anyone would envy outside of he hotties he gets lol he’s starting to learn to get his life together but Tyler talks about the “Charlie Sheen” effect here, he’s trapped in a short-term mating strategy (I get stuck in it myself when I go out a lot too, got to learn that balance/shift between work and play):

        This is part of why despite how weird some of the guys the PUA community churns out are, most of the top instructors advocate 1) handling the rest of the shit in your life while you learn pickup (same idea as MGTOW guys except with time set aside to learn to get pussy on top of the working out and setting career goals etc), and 2) not drinking or doing drugs.

        Some instructors don’t really care about people doing number 2, and some of them drink and do drugs themselves (like Jeffy from RSD), but guys like Tyler & Julien (and recently Brad) from RSD don’t drink much if at all and it would be odd for day game instructors to have to get loaded before they go out to a mall to game lol

        The main thing is regardless of their personal relationship with that stuff, when they teach newbies they stress not to go get shit-faced if you want to learn game because it fucks your brain up and you need that thing to be working proper to take in all the reference experiences you’re collecting and to bring to the surface strategic game plans for getting the lay…otherwise you’re just going out and poisoning yourself and crossing your fingers you get laid, and that’s not learning pickup that’s just being every other guy out there.

        So I like their approach to teaching because I think it forges healthier mindsets in newbies who are putting themselves in a lot of party environments. I myself don’t do any drugs and I have big drinking nights but I know going in that those won’t be productive at all in terms of game lol. Most nights I keep it to 1-3 drinks just to make bartenders/managers not hate me.

        Like


      • I meant to add to scenario 2) there that in terms of having financial problems and insecurities etc vs just external substance abuse, that stuff comes from that same idea of “I didn’t really earn this so I didn’t build the skills necessary to handle it or to feel good about it” so you get that internally fucked up shit going on or a lack of discipline with managing money etc. and since they’re getting success they don’t NEED to develop those skills…so your buddy getting poon left and right has no real reason to get self-introspective and decide the learn to overcome his insecurity, because he’s getting rewarded by the universe for being fucked up.

        Again another benefit to the community. Since we’re often nerdy guys without much going for us, thus the lack of success, we HAVE to fix our internal mental shit to get consistent success or we’re back to square one.

        Tyler says something like “you’re only as smart as you NEED to be. Does a smokin hot girl with fake tits NEED to be smart? No, the world will hand her everything, it’s not her fault she’s dumb or a shitty person, she has no reason to BE smart or work on her personality. An ugly short balding ginger like me? I have to be VERY FUCKING SMART to get girls.” lol

        Like


    • Right. Adam Lanza was a complete omegavirgindork who couldn’t even talk to people normally in a regular non-sexual setting, let along to hot chicks in a sexual one. Just like Cho Seung-hui, One Goh, and James Holmes.

      Like


    • Freakin’ Bullseye, man. Life isn’t so bad when a cute girl is on your arm. When you are without woman, everything becomes an abyss and the negative feed back loop begins.

      Like


    • Wow. So, if a guy is not getting laid, or if he is fucking a chick that doesn’t measure up to your idea of “semi attractive,” we should expect that sooner or later, as a logical progression, he will gun down a bunch of children?

      Wow.

      Like


      • No,stupid. It means if he is an aspergy type who is drowning in bleak depression,if he feels he is a nothing,and is leaning towrad acting out–if he should somehow be able to connect with a girl and get some sex,he might—-knowing that the Indian or whatever he was that shot up the Portland mall had a GF and seemed to get along w/people—step back from the abyss.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 9:26 pm Ed the Department Head

        I suspect most male suicides could have been prevented if the men who make this choice had access to good sex. I don’t think it is a big secret that sex starved omegas, white knight betas who just got smacked with the surprise divorce papers, and lonely old guys make up a disproportionate amount of those dead from suicide.

        Like


  3. right on right on ..just a fact.. feminism more to blame than the NRA

    Like


    • A smothering, overpowering mother who never had to work for her lifestyle… no wonder he was angry (and 4 shots to the face at close range w/ a Bushmaster AR-15 is QUITE angry).

      Like


  4. Wow I was just talking about this the other day. A friend of a friend got herself knocked up and when my friend was talking about her I finally had to say “I really don’t feel like talking about one of the main reasons why this country won’t exist in 50 years”

    “This country won’t exist because people are having babies?” He asked

    “No this country won’t exist because sluts are having fatherless bastards who will most likely end up on a stripper pole or under an overpass doing whippets off of a can of ready whip.”

    Like


  5. `The answer to the Adam Lanzas of the world is not gun confiscation, that fool’s panacea so beloved by the cathedral leftoids who would like nothing more than a completely defanged white middle class and working class

    You know a Mencius Moldbug reader when you see him…

    Like


  6. I’ve seen a number of older, single moms with clearly mentally challenged sons in tow at the grocery store recently. I guess they are a step up from growing old with cats, but a step down from a normal child.

    Spinster’s preference in what she grows old with:
    1. Normal children
    2. Mentally challenged child (the donor was a doctor/football player, makes mommy feel needed forever)
    3. Cats

    Like


  7. I was brought up by educated, progressive parents and considered myself a feminist in my 20s. In my late 40s I was run out of my job as a social studies teacher in an increasingly feminized educational system. It occurred to me that some of these kids spend their entire early life with mommy and women (at school). It is one big reason the education system is failing. The little brats and mistrustful, misandrist moms who ran me out of my job played the creep shame game. See it for your own eyes.

    http://teacherhunt.blogspot.com/2011/11/student-inventor-projects.html

    http://teacherhunt.blogspot.com/2011/11/blog-post.html

    I have a few minutes of video from the last day I worked. Notice the girls are misbehaving, breaking school dress code, evasive and unprepared. I never got my say really…I could not see trying to teach in that hellhole after that last year where girls could claim I was a pedophile or whatever and I had little power to keep them in check. Note that I taught for over 20 years but it wasn’t until I became older, and uglier that the feeding frenzy began. I hate to say but I now have a visceral dislike for many teenage girls on first impression.

    Like


  8. You know when this story first broke and they said he killed his mom i asked. “Where is the dad?” When i found the parents were divorced i looked around to see who came to the same conclusion as i did. What do you know this is the only place.

    Like


  9. Remember all the news stories and outrage about the 1.2 million children murdered each year? Oh, sorry feminists, I forgot, you call them fetuses. Never mind. They don’t count. Carry on being outraged.

    Like


    • Everyone who knows anything about human biology calls them fetuses. But that doesn’t count. Carry on being outraged about something that should be the least of your concerns.

      Like


    • All women should be required to have abortions unless the father consents, and both are liable for financial support. America would be a better place.

      Have you seen the human vermin that infests every nook of America?

      I was passing through a small town (population 150,000). On one side were ghetto, crackhead, scum. On the other side were rich SWPL living in nice, large houses pretending to other side of town a mile down the road didn’t exist. Both sides are diseased.

      Goodbye America.

      Like


      • “All women should be required to have abortions unless the father consents, and both are liable for financial support. ” This would be the most effective law ever made.

        Like


      • I agree, but conversely a woman should not be able to abort unless the father consents.

        And fathers shouldn’t be made by the state to pay child support, that will ensure many women will not get pregnant out of wedlock. Watch pregnancies without husbands plummeting when that happens.

        Like


      • Duh fatha can’t consent if he doesn’t know/is hiding out 3 states away/on the lam/in a Mexican jail/dead.

        Like


      • That’s true. I was just trying to make a point that men should have rights to their children too.

        Like


    • lol win.

      I’m pro-choice, but my emotional register wasn’t moved an inch by the school shooting either, so its consistent.

      Like


      • You’re pro choice? Your parents weren’t. But they must have aborted your soul for you to not be moved an inch by this event. But, hey, if you’re pro-choice, have fun with that. I’m not stopping you.

        Like


      • Oh, you’re doing that ol’ gag where you equate pro-choice with “always abort” and ignore the whole freedom from government telling you what you can do with your body.

        Like


      • No, I’m pointing out the irony of liberals/fems outrage over the slaughter of innocent life regarding this latest incident. As I said, do what you want with your own life.

        Like


      • Nobody cares what you do with your body. Your baby’s body is a different story.

        Like


      • to respond to that standard retarded pro-life quip: yes, my parents are pro-choice, they CHOSE not to abort me.

        I’m pro-choice now so that if I ever have to avoid paying child support by pressuring a slut I knocked up into having an abortion, I won’t be a hypocrite. I’d probably lie and tell her I’m on Thalidomide (which is present in sperm when taken by men) so that any child would be at risk for serious birth defects should she not abort. Evil but most likely effective.

        Like


      • Its only retarded because its true and you have no effective counter argument.

        Like


      • no its retarded because being pro-choice does not mean you want to abort all babies.

        My parents ARE pro-choice. They CHOSE to have me.

        Think mcfly.

        Like


      • How can someone say they weren’t moved an inch by the events in CT? Watching pictures of those little angels that were gunned down without mercy. I am sorry but it’s pretty awful some people don’t have empathy. Wasn’t Lanza without empathy too? I’m heart broken.

        Like


      • NiteLily
        How can someone say they weren’t moved an inch by the events in CT? Watching pictures of those little angels that were gunned down without mercy.
        ——————————————————
        Its called Instant Karma

        Like


      • WHAT????? Are you justifying what happened to these poor kids in CT because the US killed some Pakistani kids whose parents put them in the line of fire in their greater war of Jihad against the west?

        Talk about moral equivalency dude. Now, I know why the country looks like it does. No common-sense morality around anymore. Atheism does that to you; it warps your mind so that you can no longer distinguish between right and wrong , good and bad.

        See, your moral game playing is like saying the 20 murdered children in CT were killed because a baby was aborted for being the source of danger to his mother’s life. Those Pakistani kids were in the line of fire in a war we didn’t start. They were around a source of danger we needed to destroy in the interest of winning the war and they got killed in the process. It was unavoidable. The Muslims started it so the blood of their children in on their hands, not the US for bombing them. Your perspective is wrong.

        Like


      • NiteLily
        WHAT????? Are you justifying what happened to these poor kids in CT because the US killed some Pakistani kids whose parents put them in the line of fire in their greater war of Jihad against the west?
        ——————————————————–

        Im saying there are no civilians in a race war.

        This is why you should stop practicing it.

        Like


      • I think I have evolved emotional efficiency. My empathy would do absolutely ZERO to help the situation. Neither will yours. Getting too emotive over crisis situations is actually negative in many cases.

        Like


      • I’m pro choice. If there was a ban on abortion we’d be overrun by hoodlums, even more so than now. You know who gets the bulk of abortions? NAMS! Not preachy feminists who manage to get their last egg fertilized through techonology….

        I don’t approve of anyone white above lower middle class getting them though.

        Like


  10. The father paid in excess of $250K THIS YEAR ALONE in alimony. He left the care of the mentally disturbed son to the mother. The father was remarried and lived in another town. Why wasn’t the son given adequate treatment whe it was so obvious that he needed extensive professional help? The mom was apparently into magnanimous $$$-related gestures at the local watering hole. How did the son access her guns when they should have been under coded locks? so many questions

    Like


    • Mom hit the alimony jackpot.

      “Nancy Lanza, received $289,800 in alimony this year. It was to continue until December 2023, with slight increases each year for cost of living.”

      Increases each year? Until 2023??? Day-um.

      Like


      • I couldn’t believe that number when I first saw it. I wonder if investigators consider it a motive.

        Like


      • If I was an investigator, I would think a son watching his dad pay a quarter million a year to a psycho bitch might make the son think some thoughts about what a waste of life his mom is. Oh i’m sorry, you were referring to suspicions about the father? Typical hamster.

        Like


      • As I said elsewhere , obviously the mother treated men like shit

        can you imagine how awful she must have treated the ex husband and her own son for him to kill her?

        but the liberal media will spin this into the exact opposite of reality; they will say this incident is more evidence that men treat women like shit and something must be done about those awful awful men

        Like


      • By your logic, then the children and teachers must have also treated Lanza poorly?

        The kid was a psycho – and yes extraneous circumstances did play into effect, but this is complicated matter that does not have one answer.

        Like


      • Some people cut theselves to let their inner pain out. What would they do if they couldn’t feel pain themselves? Perhaps inflict maximum pain on others to experience it vicariously.

        Like


      • I’m sure dad is happy about the early termination fee being waved lol

        Sorry. Couldn’t help myself.

        Soon as I heard about it on the news, I told a coworker ‘something about the parents will factor in’ 5 minutes later I hear he killed his mom. 20 minutes later find out they divorced.

        Not. Surprised.

        Like


      • A classic case of mixed emotions…

        Your demon spawn is viewed as a monster of the century (rightfully so).

        But, hey… a quarter mil is a quarter mil… especially per annum.

        Like


      • Yes, but 27 people murdered is not a small price to pay. I wonder if the child was demonic from birth, or he just developed that way because of his stupid fucked up parents.

        The only consolation, which isn’t much, is that he killed his stupid idiotic delusional mother that took him to the shooting range when she was told already by professionals never to let him out of her sight.

        Like


      • And now she hits the dirt with a unrecognizable face, SINGLE MOM BE VERY VERY CAUTIOUS OF YOUR LITTLE BASTARD.

        Like


      • I guess she won’t be receiving it now. Too bad a bunch of kids had to die for that to be so.

        Like


    • “Professional help”, my ass. Just another crock of progressivism. Having some self promoting “expert” collect huge fees for spewing nonsensical psychobabble.

      If you have a few hundred million people, an occasional one is going to get his kicks out of playing killer. That’s not really a problem. The problem is huge concentrations of drones so thoroughly indoctrinated that they offer themselves and their kids up for sacrifice defenselessly.

      Of course, in the long run that isn’t much of a problem either. After all, it’s not like as if starry eyed progdrones are an endangered specie these days. So, merry Christmas, and let the children of decent people take up the slots vacated by those of progdrones, abortionists, and others of that ilk. It’ll be a better world for it.

      Like


  11. I heard that all the guns were bought legally and belonged to Mom. Not sure about the Bushmaster, but the Sig and the Glock were Mom’s.

    Four times in the head, you say? That can’t have felt too good.

    Like


  12. As long as a white man commits the crime it is okay, he get treated like the individual he is, and is not indicative of all whites. We can isolate his mental health, his family background, & environment. His humanity is not called into question.

    [Heartiste: Mass shootings are special cases. And the facts are the facts: news has reported the kid had identifiable mental issues.]

    Had this been a black male CH, their would have not been enough n*[email protected], monkeys, spear-chuckers to describe the visceral hate you & your posters would have flooded the post & comment section with.

    [Black men commit murder at eight times the rate of white men. Take it up with the FBI stats if you don’t like it.]

    I am not looking to be seen as an equal, because that would ruin your white nationalist fantasy and as a “Venusian Artist” I know their is no such thing in the SMP.

    [Universal equality is a myth. Some people are winners, some are losers.]

    I am just reminding you, how much of a hypocrite that even well-mannered, articulate, rational, intelligent, eloquent white male could be.

    [You aren’t reminding me of anything except your facility with strawmen, red herrings, and smear jobs.]

    Adam Lanza should be getting the Negr0 treatment (postmortem) that OJ got when he was accused of cold-blooded murder (even though OJ alledgedly murdered adults.)

    [Blacks nearly leapt for joy when OJ was acquitted. That clarifying moment was a cultural touchstone that began the awakening of white consciousness from decades under the thumb of malevolent propaganda.]

    SSTTE. Mamba Out.

    [Truth in.]

    “If it’s all white, it’s all right!” Chris Rock

    [Projection… it’s what’s for breakfast, lunch and dinner!]

    Like


    • Adonis,

      Boy (outside of Whorefinder, who’s apparently the site’s token bigot) are you of base. Chris Rock already covered this quite eloquently in his “dove my ass right out of the elevator” speech.

      And he’s quite right. I’m pale as a sheet of paper, and I know I’ll get rude behavior from other whites, and extreme courtesy from “white ethnics” and blacks. There be PLENTY of hypocrisy in SWPL-land — hell, it’s their national sport.

      Like


      • lol. Dude, to get the full irony, you need to state I’m the “token white bigot.”

        Like


      • SWPL are probably the worst reprehensible creatures on earth.

        They are bascially all catty bitchy women, male and female alike. Although they are the people that make up my area, work and SES, I never really got along with them. Every fucking comment is snark by the young crowd. That’s how they outdo and one up each other.

        I have always been criticized by these people whenever I stated my own viewpoints about subjects because I read sociology articles and scientific studies. I came to some of the very viewpoints on my own by reading such materials and they would always come back and say how I was a bigot or some other un-PC code word.

        I couldn’t understand this because I was simply stating my conclusions based on academic studies and I wasn’t trying to be racist or sexist, I was just stating what I objectively saw as the truth. It wasn’t until I found the manosphere that I was holy shit, this all makes sense and solidfied some of the beliefs that I knew but didn’t really interalize. I actually read the ‘Evolution of Desire’ six years ago but didn’t really but it together expect being an interesting read and kept on being blue pill without knowing that I was.

        As I stated before, Feminist ideology is a midde/upper class disease. Being born in privledge has some major downsides. The lower classes escape the equalitian ideologies simply by being undereducated and/or stupid. But we all know they have a shit load of issues too.

        Like


      • “As I stated before, Feminist ideology is a midde/upper class disease. Being born in privledge has some major downsides. The lower classes escape the equalitian ideologies simply by being undereducated and/or stupid. But we all know they have a shit load of issues too.”

        The lower classes escape the various lefty ideology because they don’t go on to higher education (don’t even finish high school in some cases) where their head is filled with nonsense by lefty professors with lack of common sense. Anyone who goes to university, especially to graduate school, is going to be exposed to lefty stuff 24/7, and will probably be brainwashed by it by the time they finish their education, unless they have a very strong conservative upbringing.

        But as you stated, they have lots of other issues that are literally bringing this country down.

        Like


      • Please note, I am the site’s biggest “racist and bigot.” Just for the record.

        Like


      • Whiskey, with all due respect, you got nothing on my racism and bigotry.

        Like


      • Oh oh!! Can I pull out my e-peen too to be the biggest honkey ass cracka on the forum too. 🙂

        Like


    • Nobody of any race is defending this fucktard, but zillions of blacks defended OJ as the victim of racism.

      Like


    • Adonis (and a fine European name that is) is scared because whites are beginning to see through the reality of regular blacks acting like our enemy by circling wagons for criminal blacks every single time a black-on-white atrocity is committed. Hope you enjoyed your black-indulgence decades — all good things come to an end brah.

      How black is that, LOL.

      Oh, and Whorefinder is awesome.

      Like


    • Wrong. The DC Snipers, who were black were treated as individuals. As was Wayne Williams, the serial killer. Mostly because they were rare cases.

      Common violent criminals—aka black men—are a dime a dozen. And should be treated as such.

      Like


    • on December 17, 2012 at 2:43 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      @Adonis: Actually, this is a problem. If we categorized it as a “white male” problem, maybe we could get some help for these troubled kids. Instead we say they have “white male privilege” and funds in schools go to everything female.

      Whether or not you realize it, both black, white and hispanic men are screwed when it comes to getting any proper care in the schools. They drop out in droves and pursue higher education less and less. This isn’t the 1980s. Title 9 and the spate of books like “Reviving Ophelia” changed the game.

      And I don’t know if you’ve been reading news stories about the murdered kids, but Lanza is NOT being treated with kid gloves and is being called the psycho he is.

      Like


      • @Days of Broken Arrows

        Your comment is legit

        Lanza is NOT being treated with kid gloves and is being called the psycho he is.

        I agree. But he is still being treated as if someone who is a victim of circumstances. Which is fine, if blacks were extended that same courtesy.

        [Heartiste: Sorry, there’s no comparison between black street crime committed by perps with mile-long rap sheets and the exceedingly rare dude with multiple confirmed mental disorders suddenly snapping one day and shooting up a school after spending his whole life quietly abiding the law in every respect. Now go troll some other board, your afro-grievance shit is tiresome.]

        Like


      • @Heartiste

        Now go troll some other board, your afro-grievance shit is tiresome.

        So, are your half-truths.

        Sorry, there’s no comparison between black street crime committed by perps with mile-long rap sheets and the exceedingly rare dude with multiple confirmed mental disorders suddenly snapping one day and shooting up a school after spending his whole life quietly abiding the law in every respect.

        Although I would not defend neither act. “black street crime committed by perps with mile-long rap sheets” do not come from the greatest of circumstances & then decide to take up a life of crime. He is also a victim of circumstance.

        But if you have an racial agenda, I can see how it is hard to put things in context.

        Like


    • on December 17, 2012 at 2:44 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      I just made a comment that disappeared. What happened?

      Like


    • There are more black serial killers, you have all been brainwashed by the pro black media

      I know serial and mass killer are different but in both cases many are dead before they can be stopped

      it is time fir a few facts

      …Another startling thing he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 26.83% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%.
      This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 88.24% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.
      Aside from trends, this book offers reasons most people assume black serial killers don’t exist—from the media prohibition on the subject, to general misunderstandings.

      http://www.sonsofjapheth.com/rise-of-the-black-serial-killer-2/

      Like


    • There are more black serial killers. you have all been brainwashed,

      Another startling thing he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 26.83% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%.
      This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 88.24% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.
      Aside from trends, this book offers reasons most people assume black serial killers don’t exist—from the media prohibition on the subject, to general misunderstandings.

      http://www.sonsofjapheth.com/rise-of-the-black-serial-killer-2/

      Like


    • Your whole post reeks of jealousy and butthurt. Sorry you weren’t born white. It happens…

      Like


    • “PUAs” “Venusian Artist” or whatever monicker they go by are a bunch of beta white nerds who have quantified and mimicked the methodology of the low IQ black male when it comes to the mating game. Using D&D terminology so their aspy brains can comprehend it.

      [CH: Some of history’s greatest seducers were white European men.]

      I think this blog will be more your speed.
      http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/

      You will only find small dicked insecure HBD losers here who’s only achievement and pride come from their performance on a standardized test.

      [Oh I dunno… the Stealth fighter jet is pretty cool too.]

      I would also recommend checking out the bed of procrustes.
      http://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/14286203-the-bed-of-procrustes-philosophical-and-practical-aphorisms

      Don’t let them get you worked up. What you are witnessing within the confines of this blog are the last gasp of a demographic in its extinction phase.

      [you misspelled last gasp of a deception.]

      Like


    • …As long as a white man commits the crime it is okay, he get treated like the individual he is, and is not indicative of all whites.

      what you are saying is the opposite of reality

      far more blacks commit violent crimes yet our media and politicians pretend this is not happening

      you may as well tell us women never get custody of children after divorce, that would be just accurate as what you said above

      saying up is down and night is day does not make it so , so stop now

      Like


      • @Canadian Friend

        Those racist blinders can get you a disability badge for your car.

        WHEN THEY DO REPORT crime, white crime is put in context.

        Black crime isn’t.

        White crime is explainable. Black crime is inherent. (Which is BS.)

        Again racist views NEED to be validated, so we ignore context, history & how we got to this point.

        Like


      • @Greg Eliot

        Its over whitey, it over.

        Don’t make it too easy for me. I am supposed to be the uncivilized brute.

        Like


      • In the words of our esteemed colleague, GBFM:

        LOOOOOZOZOZOZOZOZOZOLZLLZLZOZOZOZOZOLZLZLZLZL

        Don’t bother selling your woof tickets here, Jasper… nobody’s buyin’.

        Like


      • @Greg Eliot

        I am not selling anything. The fact that you are void of a real rebuttal, let’s me know what it is.

        Talk to me when you have coherent to say. Stop looking the nigs you claim to despise (or wish you can be like.)

        Like


      • Damn, I thought Django wasn’t supposed to be unchained until 25 Dec.

        Like


      • I am not selling anything. The fact that you are void of a real rebuttal, let’s me know what it is.

        The hell you aren’t… and when you post something worthy of a real rebuttal, instead of the tripe thus far that only merits mockery, well… even then, as has been evinced with your ilk in the past here at the chateau, cogent rebuttal is superfluous, because your kind just keeps posting the same negro babble on subsequent threads.

        And for the record, you might want to work on your coherence.

        Like


      • @Greg Eliot

        Well, I don’t need gimmicks superfluous YT vids to relay my lack of a rebuttal. I already broke it down for you.

        I am not white, so I am not going to go out of my way to appease your inferior grammatical standards. I will just continue to upgrade your English language like blacks have been doing for the past 3 decades. You & others went on every tangent but the simple point I made on this post.

        When whites commit crimes, there is an explanation for why those monsters have strayed from his/her natural humanity.

        When blacks commit crimes, it is inherent, we have no answer for it, and we ignore all of the obvious “passes” that you so generously gave to “Adam Lanza”.

        That someone who wants to believe so badly that they are superior to black people. Even though we pre-dated you & had to civilize you & give you some culture that you could be proud of.

        If you need to believe in the racist bullsh*t, to help you keep on with the business of living, then so be it.

        I see BS, I call BS

        Mamba Out.

        Like


      • Adumbass (@MOTDarkAges):

        If our race is “defective”, your race has been through Chernobyl.

        Pot. Kettle. Black.

        Like


      • …Even though we pre-dated you & had to civilize you & give you some culture that you could be proud of.

        Yes of course cannibals who in the 150,000 years that they have been around were never able to invent a written language did civilize us

        yes of course

        now take your crack and go commit some more black on white crime

        Like


    • I love it when Heartiste supports race realism out of one corner of his mouth, and then goes ahead and promotes qausi-fraud black PUA Justin Wayne out of the other.

      Like


      • There is no conflict for a rational man, Heartiste is a Race Realist, not a bigot. If a an individual has something to contribute, he is accorded the respect due his accomplishments. Knowing the average doesn’t require you to ignore the reality of any given situation.

        Like


  13. Drugs, feminism, and virulent anti-white brainwashing for this kid’s whole life in the schools don’t ever get a mention. It’s always just about guns.

    Like


  14. I suspect the father was too beta for her.

    The dead mom seems pretty alpha to me — she was preparing for the collapse of society with guns, ammo and food supplies (not a bad idea, IMO), was comfortable with guns and spent time at the shooting range. This all suggests that she was looking for a man who would likely fare well in the apocalypse she anticipated.

    The ex-husband is a tax adviser, who remarried a librarian. None of that shouts “alpha male in charge of his household and fending off looters.”

    Like


    • I guess owning a gun safe didn’t figure into her survival strategy. Oops.

      Like


      • She was so delusional she taught her dangerous defective kid to shoot guns. She shouldn’t have had guns in the house, let alone teach him to shoot.

        Like


    • Not a bad idea, I agree. But what if she instead channeled that energy towards helping her fuckup son?

      Like


      • She didn’t have the ability to do so — as a woman, she suffered from a chronic insufficiency of testosterone.

        She may have been a relatively masculine, gun-collecting woman, who ascended to the rank of alpha in her home because her husband abdicated that position, but she was still a woman.

        Boys need fathers.

        Like


      • She was probably trying to help her son, but her idea of “help” was undoubtedly to teach him to bury his aggressive instincts and be more nice.

        If you have testicles, you can only get so muc lower than omega before you explode.

        Like


      • This. We are made as we are for a reason.

        Like


      • He was always a weird kid but after the divorce of his parents when he was 16, things went downhill from there. Definitely, boys need fathers.

        Like


    • on December 18, 2012 at 12:03 pm Hugh G. Rection

      She also honed her survival skills with receiving millions in alimony, clearly a self sufficient person. It’s kind of ironic that she indulged in doomsday theories but didn’t notice her sons hatred for her.

      Like


    • She had to be NUTS,living in Whitopia,with 280K every year for doing NUFFIN!!! And she is worried about the coming collpase or whatever?She shoulda been poolside with CH,maybe he’d let slip the Anaconda of Love and give her a thrill, I doubt she saw much dick in the later yeras,esp with you know who lurking…

      Like


  15. I posit a slightly different causality with some genetic links.

    It’s true that you don’t get mutations very quickly, but what you CAN do very quickly is change the genetic makeup of a nation through selective breeding. If men with blue eyes were not allowed to breed, it wouldn’t be long before brown eyes were predominant.

    There is a difference between the kind of guy that a girl f4cks and the kind of guy she marries. Since marriage has become little more than an extension of serial monogamous dating and 1/3rd of kids are born out of wedlock in the first place, an increasing number of our kids are fathered by “the kind of guy that a girl f4cks” — which means, guys who would ordinarily be excluded from the gene pool because though he may be attractive, he isn’t husband/father material because his personality traits aren’t conducive.

    I’ve seen several articles lately about black guys who fathered 13-20 kids (that they know of). These guys are overwhelmingly irresponsible, but they are preferentially selected by women because they meet short-term needs in an environment of short-term casual hookup relationships.

    I would not be at all surprised to discover that the same phenomenon occurs among white people.

    Like


  16. +1

    Boys growing up without a father figure to guide them towards becoming men. Instead, boys being raised by Girl Power! who refer to their sons as ‘Little Man’

    Like


    • I think this is a good point. I read a good quote, “Men have to become, women are”. In essence, by being born with a pussy, life is pretty much your oyster at least till middle age. Men have to earn their lot. This requires teaching. To be a “viable” female, you just have to be present. To be a viable man, that has to be achieved.

      Like


      • +10

        Like


      • Agreed. Women are not hard-wired to appreciate the value of earning respect nor the enjoyment of striving. When that key component of a young mans mind is missing he’s lost at sea.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 12:05 pm Hugh G. Rection

        The value of a woman is assumed because of her reproductive capacity. But is this kind of womb worship a new thing?

        Like


      • I think it’s newer than most men in the men’s rights scene acknowledge or want to acknowledge. Even though many give lip service to traditional values they still hold a deep altruistic belief that capitalism is about greed and evil. And so there’s still a reluctance to admit that American socialism is a disaster and much worse than it’s relatively laissez faire system was. Plus no one was actually around for those times so most assume that things now are how they always were. No one wants to admit that the past was better in some significant ways and that we could better our lives by going back to those things, like having a minimal state. Too many consider themselves too modern and ‘progressive’ to consider such things. They’re basically trying to play both sides of the fence. I’m not against true progress, the past decades have seen great technological progress but socially I think it’s pretty clear we’ve regressed due to the growth of government and widespread acceptance of socialism.

        Like


    • Nothing sadder than a boy whose mother got him in the divorce. Had a kid like that in my last office. Took an endless amount of time trying to deprogram him. He was utterly worthless until the guys started beating some of his mom’s bullshit ideas out of him.

      Like


  17. This begs a pun about loaded cocks, but I’m undercaffeinated.

    I don’t think there is, ultimately, a way to keep shit like this from happening. All the emotional flapping aside, crazy people are going to snap every once in a while. Penalizing everyone for the actions of 0.003% of the population’s behavior makes no sense.

    Like


    • Exactly. No amount of nerf-padding will make the world 100% safe. To live is to accept some degree of risk.

      “It’s a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door.”

      Like


    • …Penalizing everyone for the actions of 0.003% of the population’s behavior makes no sense.

      yet the left does not seem to see how irrational that is.

      punishing tens of thousands of duck and deer hunters because one in a million person might go on a shooting rampage is fine with liberals

      also I read somewhere that only 3% of gays want to get married, and since only 5 % of the population is gay that is .0015% of the total population ,
      yet a politician can lose elections for that .0015% of the population who can not get married

      Liberals see no problem with punishing millions of people for that .0015% of the population who are gay and want to get married

      the main stream media which is an arm of the left sees no problem in destroying someone’s carreer for that .0015% of the population

      and some wonder why I have such a low opinion of leftists?

      Like


  18. The reason why there will not be a radical shift in gun control laws is thoroughly explained in the book The Isis Papers: The keys to the Colors. There is one full chapter on the issue of guns in the US. Another thing to keep in mind is that Connecticut has one of the most stringest and toughest gun laws in the union.

    Like


  19. Combine fatherless families with living on top of each other like rats, most people never smelling fresh air their entire lives. Then being pumped full of artificial hormones and preservatives from our lab made GMO foods. Then we are pumped full of drugs and “medicine” with no studies on the long term effects to combat the lack of exercise and nutrition. Then any time a boy acts like a boy in school he is chastised and told all his natural masculine feelings and emotions are wrong and bad so he bottles them up. Is it any wonder mental illness is so prevalent?

    Meanwhile we spend billions of dollars to fight a drug that is so natural it grows along the railroad tracks in Iowa. Great life choices America.

    Like


  20. While their are detrimental effects of single parent households, pinning the mass shooting on this root cause is a little reactionary. Statistics reveal that mass shootings are on the decline.. Their coverage, is moving in opposite. I am in agreement that women’s entitlement and protected class status have made it harder than ever to be male, however the school shooting or any mass killing probably has different roots.

    Like


  21. This was my first thought as well. Ya Really touched on it above- one feels anger and contempt at a society that seeks to condem you to a life of being a social reject and unworthy of sex. This stuff didn’t used to happen when we had intact traditional nuclear families and boys could depend on being supported in life. Now they’re just defective girls. There ain’t enough rope or trees for all the SWPLs who deserve hanging.

    Like


    • Actually it did happen, historically speaking. But when you look at the facts, often enough the guys who did this stuff decades ago did it for reasons involving women.
      Difference is back then it was 1 guy of many who had a problem and society had the ability to recognize it was just a loose cannon. Now society creates the loose cannons and wonders how come there’s so damn many running around.

      Like


    • “…till you get to the point where you literally start to think that you’re going to go your entire life alone and unloved and die alone and depressed.

      It’s not real hard to imagine that being a pretty fucking big factor in the whole “he was a quiet guy who kept to himself” profile of a lot of guys who snap.” — YaReally

      There seems to be few outlets for a struggling young man in unhappy family and/or sexual situations nowadays, too. At least in ’68 such a guy could join the Marines and shoot gooks and be considered a hero of sorts. “Some folks are born, made to wave the flag…”

      Like


  22. coconut oil and which is a medium chain triglyceride, does not need bile to digest. that info could be helpful to many.
    http://www.ofspirit.com/brucefife1.htm

    Like


    • ignore (unless you find it helpful)….wrong thread

      Like


    • On a further note that everyone may be able to use.

      Coconut oil makes a fantastic sex lube. Natural, edible, cheap, and actually helps keep a girl from getting a yeast infection. Whats even better is this time of the year (cold) its solid, way fun to melt on each other.

      Like


  23. “This begs a pun about loaded cocks, but I’m undercaffeinated.”

    Here’s mine: Either girls will get cocked, or guns will.

    You read it here first.

    Like


    • I get both – nothing gets a snail trail going like taking a girl shooting and teaching her the fine points of running a gun.

      But your point is well taken.

      Like


  24. Ayn Rand..a rare breed of Woman. With a handle of Evolution and Human Sexuality even in the ’50s.

    “Rand asserted that “the essence of femininity is hero worship – the desire to look up to man” and that “an ideal woman is a man-worshipper, and an ideal man is the highest symbol of mankind.”[7] In other words, Rand felt that it was part of human nature for a psychologically healthy woman to want to be ruled in sexual matters by a man worthy of ruling her. In an authorized article in The Objectivist, psychotherapist Nathaniel Branden, Rand’s extramarital lover and onetime “intellectual heir,” explains Rand’s view as the idea that “man experiences the essence of his masculinity in the act of romantic dominance; woman experiences the essence of her femininity in the act of romantic surrender.”

    Like


  25. Heartiste, in May of 2010, you had a post about a rash of child killings that were going on in China at elementary schools:

    There’s been some discussion on this blog lately about sex ratios and male violence. The theory holds that when the sexual market is skewed in favor of women (more men than women), men will be better behaved (i.e. “dads”) because women will be able to demand that of them. Another side argues that once a tipping point of excess males is reached, violence erupts when all those bachelor males not getting any realize the hopelessness of their situation. In China, at least, it looks as if their 35 million excess males are starting to act up, and the Chinese government doesn’t know what to do about it, except beef up security at schools.

    35 million hard up bachelors with no hole to go home to. And it’s projected to get worse, with possibly 60 million more men than women in China by 2050. The usual caveats about correlation and causation, but it bears noting that savvy investors ought to keep a wary eye on China’s supposed unstoppable growth machine — a lot of funny stuff can happen when huge armies of dispossessed men are tossed to the icy wastelands of involuntary celibacy.

    I understand the U.S. has its own unique set of attributes, but do you think your assessment of sex ratio imbalances is having an impact on guys like Lanza or James Holmes or the guy shooting people in the mall in Oregon two weeks ago? I know for a fact the Oregon killer had split with a GF just a week prior to his killings.

    Like


    • In China it’s the sex ratio imbalance, but in the U.S. the single mom vs. intact parents ratio is probably more of a factor.

      Like


    • Sure. The obesity epidemic has been exploding among younger women (15-30 y.o.) in the last decade or so. When half your young women are fat shits that only the most desperate men would screw, then it’s the same effect as their not existing at all.

      Like


    • I’ve heard stories of the Chinese easing restrictions on the entry of Asiatic females from all over, even Africa as a means of allowing the men without access to impoverished foreign brides to stem the tide.

      Another riddle. Isn’t unrestrained hypergamy and the pareto principle an artificial sex ratio imbalance even if the real number of bodies is equal?

      Like


      • Makes sense.
        A totally new type of redistribution of the world’s population: China have dozens of millions of surplus men ,so they have to import girls from Thailand, Azerbaidjan, Kenya, etc. , the US have dozens of millions of fat cows no one wants, so we have to import hot, slender Ukrainians and Estonians.

        Like


      • and Hungarians. Don’t forget the Hungarians. That’s where I got mine, and MAN can they bake.

        Like


      • Does anyone know where I can see the Anne Hathaway Pussy-Exposed picture? The one snapped as she was exiting her car to some awards thing,dressed sans panties?

        Like


      • Never heard of it but if it really happened, and taking into account she recently got married

        she is a piece of shit that deserves no respect

        Like


      • @Canadian Friend

        Of course she deserves no respect she was helping occupy wall street too. She is nothing but a fucking liberal slut.

        Like


      • The sex ratio imbalance, and the availability of wives in China, is actually being compounded by other factors as well. As only children, they’re the first generations of Chinese women to even get the full encouragement/resources of the family in terms of education and career prospects. So it’s taking natural hypergamy and multiplying that by the increasing difficulty of finding a higher-status male (as many women are highly educated and highly paid in their jobs). Means fewer and fewer urban females are opting in to the dating/marriage market at all.

        Like


      • So – lacking guns, the millions of mega-frustrated Chinese guys are just gonna go on karate-chopping sprees?

        Like


      • Laughing my ass off but more like kung fu, karate is Japanese.

        Like


      • I think you guys missed the point on M3’s post:

        ” Isn’t unrestrained hypergamy and the pareto principle an artificial sex ratio imbalance even if the real number of bodies is equal?”

        M3, correct me if I’m wrong here, but to put it in reverse, basically you saying that the socio-sexual mores against adultery and slutterry limited the market for easy sex, so men had to commit. But unleashing hypergamy basically made the number of women out there infinite so that the value of sex dropped to the point where it’s basically free… Good for players, bad for society. (Story of my life, story of this blog, the raison d’etre of the ‘sphere.)

        Like


    • This and the fact that feminism has benefitted ALPHA males, but been to the detriment of betas (or delta/gammas like this kid seemed to be, if looks and what’s been reported about him so far are any judge).

      Like


    • Feminanzi-ism destroys societies.

      Like


  26. Here’s another aspect of this shooting I have not heard mentioned. This kid had three weapons and was systematically going room to room expending multiple bullets into his helpless victims (Bad-ass alpha huh?). Not until he heard first responders (i.e. true, armed alphas that were not afraid of his weapons of alpha-ness) did he stop shooting, get scared and take his own life (which was ironically probably the only act he ever took in his own life to shape his own destiny the way HE wanted to). F’ed up.

    Like


    • Shooting little kids is not very alpha. Not fighting off the cops isn’t really cowardly either, since it’s pointless, will spoil the fantasy of being omnipotent, and may result in being captured wounded.

      Like


      • “Shooting little kids is not very alpha” I know that. What I’m saying is he was playing the part of alpha until real ones showed up to remind him of the slug he truly was.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 2:26 am Days of Broken Arrows

        They were his mom’s weapons. You can’t get less alpha than that. The dude was an omega — a violent loser like Arthur Bremer or the guy that killed John Lennon.

        Like


    • I know chicks dig serial killers, but if he lived, I wonder how many jailhouse groupies this dude would have gotten.

      Can you be too evil to inspire the tingle?

      Like


      • Fame will get you EVERYWHERE with women.
        Source of fame irrelevant.

        Like


      • 100% correct. Never underestimate the masochistic pathology of truly broken women. In spite of lullabying 20 kids permanently, some head-case woman would have loved this Cthulhuean footsolider from afar whilst he rotted behind bars.

        Like


      • Even Hitler got laid. Dahmer got plenty of e-mails and he wasn’t even straight. So did Ramirez not to mention that one of the jurors of his case fought over him with another woman. OJ SImpson (aftermath of the trial.) Mike Tyson. The list goes on.

        Like


      • The Menendez Bros. 2 nerdy losahs living – quite literally – in their parents’ basement, couldn’t get laid in a whorehouse with a briefcase full of cash.
        They pump mom & dad full of lead one lovely SoCal eve, get the 2nd most publicized trial right after OJ’s… iirc, one of them got married in prison, the other opne’s got dates lined up till the sun burns out.

        Like


      • Hitler had the charisma to rise to the leadership of the world’s foremost industrial power. OJ Simpson and Mike Tyson were professional athletes.

        Really, the line between alpha and thug isn’t that thick. Alpha-beta is an obvious prisoner’s dilemma situation: it’s better to be alpha, but societies with lots of alphas do worse (compare Africa and Japan). It’s one of his big themes, I think.

        Like


      • “I know chicks dig serial killers…” Dude, you have GOT to improve the kind of women you hang with.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2012 at 2:58 pm Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

        AWALT

        Like


  27. on December 17, 2012 at 2:12 pm Lucky White Male

    How it is that – minutes after any gun tragedy – MIKE BLOOMBERG appears on TV to call for “IMMEDIATE banning of handguns” ?

    That’s right – not just banning them, but doing it immediately – so no one can even debate it?

    Can someone please explain to me: Why is this Jewish American Billionaire so hard up to stop other American men from their Constitutional Right to DEFEND THEMSELVES?

    Why is Mike Bloomberg so hard up?

    And what about Warren Buffet?

    Why is Warren Buffet, a man worth north of $50 billion dollars – so insistent on raising taxes? He has turned it into a crusade?

    What is it to him?

    This guy is a charlatan with a hard-on to raise taxes – yet he KNOWS that it will only fund the economy for 9 DAYS.

    What is going on here?

    It is a lesson in “ALPHA”

    Meaning – the guys on top of any field — and here we have two billionaires in a select group of maybe a hundred men in the world —

    These guys on top much more psychopathic, and Machiavellian than you or me.

    How “vicious” to you have to be when you are on top? When you watch these two guys in action – the literal crusade that Bloomberg and Buffet are on, – you are seeing how “vicious” vicious can get..

    You are seeing narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism in action.

    Narcissism: “I KNOW what is best for you – I am absolutely certain there is no other way. In fact, I am going to pontificate like a fucking god with absolute certainty, in front of millions of people on TV, in newspapers read world wide.”

    Psychopathy: “I don’t give a fuck if what I’m pushing for is going to ruin you financially, or possibly even lead to being killed because you cant defend yourself. I am actually USING MY enormous money, resources, and media access to ruthlessly destroy you, your well-being, and that of your children.”

    Machiavellianism: “I am pretending to be a “compassionate conscientious” liberal — yet I actually have a hidden “progressive agenda” I am trying to shove down your throat that will benefit myself and my own tribe, …and to put this into action I will blatantly LIE OVER AND OVER when I speak (Bloomberg and Buffet both actually giving wrong facts about guns and taxes)”

    They figuratively want to * cut the throats * of the millions of men struggling to make it big like they did – and to protect their families.

    Warren Buffet wants to tax you into oblivion and bleed you dry.

    Mike Bloomberg wants you defenseless while a Politically Correct Fascist-Lite Police State Government is armed to the hilt… and can charge white men with a “hate crime” simply on the say-so of a non-white who possibly “offended” them with a off-hand remark.

    Like


    • Fuck Bloomberg with a rusty spork.

      Like


    • Buffett’s crusade to raise taxes is the height of hypocrisy. I really admire him but I just can’t understand his position on this issue.

      He complains that his taxes are “too low.” But he can solve that “problem” with a snap of his fingers. After all, he’s 100% in control of how much he pays the government. He’s perfectly free to pay more. The IRS would be happily accept it. But the hypocrite doesn’t do it.

      So when Buffett says “My taxes are too low” what he really means is “Other people’s taxes are too low. I want to force other people to pay more taxes.” Erm, yeah, that’s very generous of you to volunteer other people’s hard-earned money.

      I always use this argument with lefties who say “taxes are too low.” I ask them “Are your taxes too low?” If they say yes I ask them why don’t they pay more voluntarily? If they say “no” I ask them “Oh, you pay enough but you’re entitled to tell other people to pay more?” It’s fun to watch the hamster squirm.

      Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 12:29 pm Hugh G. Rection

        And Buffet will give a lot of his fortune to charity after or before his dead so the government won’t get it’s sticky mitts on it. I also never heard him suggesting some sort of tax plan other than the one Obama proposes, which doesn’t affect him because he pays mostly capital gains tax…

        Like


      • If you believe he’ll give much of his money to charity, you’re a dupe. Who cares what he says or promises, he’s a liar.

        Like


      • Don’t feel like looking for it but in my bookmarks somewhere ( and I have hundreds) I have an article that explains clearly that Buffet only pays less taxes than his secretary in one category of tax.

        one damn category

        so yes he is a liar

        very few very successful people are not cheaters/liars/manipulators

        I still love capitalism but I am under no illusions about human nature

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 8:24 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Well what he really is playing off of is the average persons stupidity and ignorance. I would bet you a lot of people don’t know what rate of tax they actually pay or even could explain what a deduction is. It’s very clever rhetoric to say he pays less than his secretary (which is true percentage wise but laughably false in dollar terms).

        Like


      • “I have an article that explains clearly that Buffet only pays less taxes than his secretary in one category of tax.”

        It’s called capital gains tax. That is usually 20%. His secretary is paying tax on wages earned, which is anywhere between 29% to 39% depending on her earnings, so technically she is paying more in tax, percentage wise. He never took a salary so he didn’t have to pay the tax on wages earned. He only pays on his stocks profits, which is 20% tax. See how that works?

        The people are so stupid they fell for it.

        Liberals are so ignorant it’s beyond the pale. And Buffet is still scamming them, and they can’t see it. Now they’ll pay more in taxes while he is sitting pretty on his billons and getting stock options from failed corporations and government tax breaks for his help in spreading his big lies and misnomers.

        That’s why I don’t think he’ll give his money away. He seems only to care about increasing his investments as if he is going to live forever. It’s just not indicative of someone who is getting ready to leave his money to charity. Mark my words, he won’t.

        Because he keeps saying he’ll give his money to charity when he dies, people believe him (or he comes across as honest and decent) when he says people need to pay more in taxes and that he doesn’t pay enough while his secretary is paying more than him. He uses it as a mask to cover the truth about himself.

        Like


      • I also forgot to include that he owes over 1 billion dollars in taxes, which he hasn’t paid in 10 years, yet he tells us to pay more taxes and how he isn’t paying enough, and that he is going to give all his money to charity anyway. LOL! Actions speak louder than words. People are such dupes so they believe the likes of him. All liberals are the same. They are filled with propaganda and lies.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2012 at 8:09 pm Hugh G. Rection

        I find your lack of faith disturbing. It’s likely he’ll croak before us so we’ll find out.

        Like


    • They both annoy the shit out of me as well. My thoughts…

      Bloomberg – this guy is just over the top on wanting to control people (banning large sodas??) so I agree with your comments above (narcissism)

      Buffett – this clown acts in his self interest even more than Ayn Rand. He is rich beyond everyone’s dreams (so tax rates wont affect him one way or another), and he knows raising taxes on the rich wont close the deficit while he makes idiotic arguments about paying more taxes than his assistant (sure, after you paid the 35% corporate rate that you conveniently forgot to include!). So what reason is left? His legacy. His actions today, as an 80 something old man, is not to make more money or fuck his gross mistress. It is to ensure his legacy a hundred years from now. He knows some former tycoons got a bad rap after they died (Henry Ford, Rockefeller, etc) and he is doing everything in his power so the history books will remember him as “that cuddly brilliant billionaire who demanded the rich pay their fair share!”

      It’s amazing how everything becomes so clear once you figure out people’s incentives.

      Like


  28. According to this…..Adam’s mother Nancy Lanza divorced Peter Lanza in 2009.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/17/nancy-lanza-peter-lanza-divorce_n_2316461.html

    Like


  29. I know you’ll not like this Heartiste, but you can’t leave out the fear of divine rewards and punishments as a motivator. Mankind has tried to find non-religious reasons to behave altruistically for millennia; they have never been able to come up with one. Fear of divine punishments in the only success story mankind has ever had for getting people to behave truly altruistically in this life (even if the rewards are supposed to be in the next).

    Like


    • Womankind has been trying to find altruism for as long as mankind has given her affluent living, but determinism only allows self-interest that can be labeled baaaad using selfishness. Why keep around people good only by fear with its administrative overhead when you can naturally select for people who are intrinsically good by selfish nature and higher intellect and who dare discriminate to be on a strong team worthy of their potential? Religion has evolved to keep pace with greater awareness of men. It’s ultimate value is in philosophy not orthodox dogma to redeem the masses. I think we’ve redeemed too much dead weight economically and culturally as it is.

      Like


    • on December 18, 2012 at 12:32 pm Hugh G. Rection

      But how would you suppose to get rid of atheism, and how would you construct a religion based around your philosophy? Many christian churches are abject failures when it comes to effective altruism.

      Like


    • JS,

      “Mankind has tried to find non-religious reasons to behave altruistically for millennia; they have never been able to come up with one. Fear of divine punishments in the only success story mankind has ever had for getting people to behave truly altruistically in this life (even if the rewards are supposed to be in the next).”

      That’s the bottom line. People are shit. The only thing that can make them behave is the fear of God. That’s what the Hebrew tradition and Christianity by extension is all about. This is the legacy the ancient Hebrews left us. If it weren’t for them, we’d still be throwing to the lions convicts, political dissidents, and everyone who isn’t popular.

      It’s not a small accident our era is also referred to as the “modern fall of Rome,” because by removing the fear of God, we remove all morality, and we revert to Old Rome and its decadence, lack of morality and ethical behavior. That’s why removing God will bring down our society.

      “There is only one way to achieve a great society, and it is not by creating a massive state that doles out other citizens’ money. It is by cultivating citizens who try to live by these Ten Commandments. They are as relevant today as they were 3,000 years ago.”
      http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2011/08/16/still_the_only_solution_to_the_worlds_problems/page/full/

      “That God is not doing well in the Western world may trouble God. But it is we humans who should be most troubled. The moral, intellectual, artistic and demographic decline in Western Europe (secular countries don’t even have the will to reproduce themselves) is only gaining momentum. And the consequences of that decline will be far more devastating than all the tsunamis and all the earthquakes that may come our way.”
      http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2011/04/05/why_god_isnt_doing_well_these_days/page/full/

      “Since the inception of the United States (and, indeed, before it in colonial America), liberty, i.e., personal freedom, has been linked to God.
      America was founded on the belief that God is the source of liberty. That is why the inscription on the Liberty Bell is from the Old Testament, the Hebrew Bible (Leviticus 25): (SET ITAL) “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof.”(END ITAL)
      The Declaration of Independence also asserts this link: All men “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
      Because the Creator of the world is the source of our freedom, no state, no human being, no government may take it away. If the state were the source of liberty, then obviously the state could take it away.”
      http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2010/10/12/god,_liberals_and_liberty/page/full/

      Like


  30. For what it’s worth, there was a good analysis done (using data from the FDA) about a year ago on the strong link between psychiatric drugs and violence.

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mad-in-america/201101/psychiatric-drugs-and-violence-review-fda-data-finds-link

    Of particular note…..

    ————————————————-

    “The 31 “suspect” drugs accounted for 1527 of the 1937 case reports of violence toward others in the FDA database for that 69-month period. The drugs in that list of 31 included varenicline (an aid to smoking cessation), 11 antidepressants, 6 hypnotic/sedatives, and 3 drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Antidepressants were responsible for 572 case reports of violence toward others; the three ADHD drugs for 108; and the hypnotic/sedatives for 97.”

    Like


  31. Not only did Adam Lanza not have his father around, his older brother said he hadn’t talked to him in a couple of years. So no male presence from there, either. And the pics we saw of the brother when he was first falsely “outed” shows a typical metro-sexual looking works-in-New-York hipster doofus, so no great masculine shakes there in the Lanza household either.

    Some friend of the mom did say that Lanza got worse after the divorce (shocking!). Mom did seem to have some interesting aspects, with her survivalist kick. Not very SWPL in that regard, though her house was an SWPL palace and her neighborhood a whitetopia.

    Mom also seems to have been rather pretty based on the few pics of her that have come out (no body pics so I don’t know if she was fat or not). I wonder if she was seeing other men? I haven’t heard any mention of a boyfriend, so maybe not. Then maybe she was doing the whole “bitter at men” routine.

    But overall, the culprits here are a combination of feminist insanity and the hypergamy culture that makes life for an omega male such a hopeless desert, Cultural Marxist brain-washing (if it feels good do it!), sick and perverse media, and Adam’s Little Helpers, whatever “cocktail” of meds he was on. Gun control? That’s about twentieth on the list. He broke multiple gun laws anyway, what would one more have done? Like he gave a shit about the gun laws he was breaking.

    Like


  32. Blacks commit a lot more crime than whites, but mass shootings is not their m.o. The profile of mass shooters is usually white. Of course, there are a couple of exceptions.

    Like


    • and what does this have to do with the price of fish in China? The main point is that an overwhelming majority of socially ill equipped psychopaths (which should be distinguished from sociopaths) come from single parent households which are being headed by women. Whether these psychopaths are black gang bangers or white mass killers is besides the point.

      OAN, I rarely hear of single parent households, where the male (father) is the single parent either via divorce or death, producing these kinds of psychopathic degenerates. I am curious, can anyone name a well known psychopath that was raised by a single father? When will these feminazi’s come to the stark realization that a woman solely raising a child, male or female is a huge recipe for disaster? oh wait…

      Like


      • @ PetiteOlive

        “and what does this have to do with the price of fish in China? The main point is that an overwhelming majority of socially ill equipped psychopaths (which should be distinguished from sociopaths) come from single parent households which are being headed by women. Whether these psychopaths are black gang bangers or white mass killers is besides the point.”

        I was reacting to another comment that came before mine by Adonis, but for some reason mine got posted above his comment and his has been pushed all the way down. He said:

        “Had this been a black male CH, their would have not been enough n*[email protected], monkeys, spear-chuckers to describe the visceral hate you & your posters would have flooded the post & comment section with.”

        So I was trying to set him straight about crime in America. It is being committed more by Blacks than Whites, but mass shootings is usually profiled by the FBI as a white male. The one exception I think is the DC shooting. So all his anger that we like to blame Blacks for no reason is not well-founded. The statistic show that more blacks commit crimes.

        “I rarely hear of single parent households, where the male (father) is the single parent either via divorce or death, producing these kinds of psychopathic degenerates.”

        I agree and I will up you one. I hardly hear ever about kids of married couples, or kids raised by single fathers, falling victim to child molesters and kidnapers. There is just something about the single mother that’s so foul and so wrong. Single mothers raise defective kids or their kids are not supervised so they fall victims to predators. When a father is around kids are protected and very well-adjusted, even if he is an absents father who works a lot. The fact that he sleeps in the house every night, is enough to create immeasurable benefits to children. There is another study that shows girls raised with fathers around have more self-esteem and don’t end up pregnant teenagers. Usually, most pregnant teenagers have been raised without fathers and no whiff of him around to deter them form acting like a slut. Boys need fathers but girls do too. I often say, a father is more important than a mother. Every father that wants to raise his children after a divorce should be given custody. The children will be better adjusted.

        Like


      • Mothers tend to be lenient and fathers tend to be too harsh

        single mothers are usually extremely permissive and disorganized and have almost no control over their kids

        basically mothers are too lenient

        while fathers are too demanding

        it is not coincidence that we have more messed up kids coming from single mother families

        having both a mother and a father is a more balanced situation or environment for children

        this does not guarantee good results but it makes it more probable that kids will more balanced individuals

        Like


    • There are actually a lot of black serial killers, no one ever talks about them, that is all.

      this guy wrote a book about it and he exposes the myth of ” serial killers are all white ”

      …Another startling thing he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 26.83% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%.
      This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 88.24% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.
      Aside from trends, this book offers reasons most people assume black serial killers don’t exist—from the media prohibition on the subject, to general misunderstandings.

      http://www.sonsofjapheth.com/rise-of-the-black-serial-killer-2/

      Like


      • LMAO! You’re dumb as fuck.

        Apparently you can’t differentiate between a serial killer and a mass killer?

        What is your IQ moron?

        Like


      • The fact you missed my point does not make me feel like a moron in any way

        oh and my IQ is about 50 points above yours

        if you can count that high

        Like


      • Apparently you can’t differentiate between a serial killer and a mass killer?

        They both kill a bunch of people. End result is the same.

        Like


      • He is not stupid. He’s one of the smartest readers here. No need to be so nasty.

        For the record, mass killers and serial killers are a subset of each other. Like Corvinus said, they both kill a bunch of people. They just do it by different means.

        @Canadian Friend, yes I know there are black serial killers, but I did mean mass shooters. Most of them have been profiled by the FBI as white.

        Like


    • NiteLily
      Blacks commit a lot more crime than whites, but mass shootings is not their m.o.
      ———————————–

      Except when it is justified:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Essex

      Like


  33. on December 17, 2012 at 2:33 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Somebody just wrote” Adam Lanza was a complete omegavirgindork who couldn’t even talk to people normally in a regular non-sexual setting…”

    If this was the case, then I blame the dad for not getting his ass to a prostitute or two. This what they do in Europe. Fathers need to take the initiative and help their boys out.

    If you’re thinking “that’s immoral!!!” what about all the divorced moms who throw vibrator parties with their daughters?

    Like


    • You really want to compare the morality of women to men.

      Let me clue you in…women will listen to snakes, men will usually give God His due.

      Like


      • I spent 23 years of my life in Europe, not once did I ever hear anything about fathers taking their boys to prostitutes.
        Quite the opposite.
        The only differences are that prostitution is more out in the open in Europe and the Evangelical Taliban railing against them doesn’t exist there.
        Most European hookers are, just like their American counterparts, diseased, nasty and look like hammered dogshit after more than 6 months ‘in the life’.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2012 at 4:09 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        OK maybe it was Latin America I meant.

        That said, high end call girls tend to be pretty well preserved from what I gather and the dad could have gone this route. Or with his salary (he was paying his ex 200K a year) he could have just gotten a college girl for his son to do “soft prostitution.”

        Like


      • Maybe he wasn’t interested in sex, period? He sounds pretty fucked up and needed to be locked up. I don’t think anything could have prevented this from happening, unless they would have locked him up years before. But liberals don’t like locking up people. I don’t like it either, but sometimes it’s absolutely necessary. Look at all the homeless in NYC, why are they on the street? They are mental patients the liberals allow to sleep on the street and destroy the city.

        Today I heard information that he committed this because he thought his mother was going to commit him to a mental institution. Well, it could be true. After all, he killed her first with 4 bullets to her brain.

        Like


      • Morality is not a gender issue, taterearl. With that attitude I can imagine why you would find yourself on a site like this. Ugh.

        Like


      • morality is a gender construct.

        Like


      • Really, as if there are no moral women, just men. But I have to say that most women are not moral these days. Most of them are sluts. That’s the legacy of feminism.

        Like


  34. “This begs a pun about loaded cocks, but I’m undercaffeinated.”

    Phinn’s Law: Either women will get cocked, or guns will.

    Like


  35. I think it is important to note that systemizers (those who give us civilization) are being disenfranchized as alleged headcases. Autism has been expanded into an autism spectrum with Asperger syndrome at the lower end that I expect to be lowered more and more. There is the choice of vocabulary and definition here. A savant, what I’d call a true autist, is not a threat to society. They can’t systemize society, model themselves in it, or function in it. Their brains are too narrowly specialized. That’s sexual reproduction and HBD for ya. Maybe the only other true autists are savants without the narrowly specialized talent, naturally brain damaged if you will by very bad genetic inheritence.

    A systemizer who can see his potential lost, who can conceive of functional civilization for himself, can go nuts. Have an instinctual hamster raise a boy with civilized potential and things can go wrong. That hamster is empowered only by the state, your tax money. Civilized if not real men are being picked off as boys in the name of treating mental illness. Cf. The Essential Difference by Simon Baron-Cohen.

    We are being led to culturally criminalize individuality as the lone wolf and champion subservience similar to the domesticated dog. It is the human lone wolves that, given the chance, will work out their differences and form functional packs and pacts (moral codes) that make what good we enjoy possible. PUAs are systemizers and lone wolves, and have formed a superior culture as far as it goes, a subculture. Dogs are bred group-think slaves. Wolves retain their individual agendas. Good economics and culture is ecological not mechanical. Cf. Aurini’s video posted by Cappy Cap: http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2012/12/real-men-vs-corporate-drones.html

    It appears too plausible to me that humanity will be sharply divided into the group-think pets and livestock and those who might own them according to individual preference. It has alway been so to some degree, nobility vs. commoners and such. The only barrier I see to serious domestication of humans is that any group of ruling individuals will be faced with the same old political challenges to maintain an order of individualists unless their numbers are kept very small, in the family or families of banksters perhaps. It’s hard to predict, but if humanity remains grounded on genetic evolution, will women be forced to evolve up toward logic or will most men be forced to evolve down toward indolence? I don’t think it matters because might makes right and one would think in the long run brains will beat stupidity and brawn alike. Nature has no compunction about starting entirely from scratch, much less removing 90% and eventually expanding the elite 10% or so, or replacing humanity with AI. I believe the children are the future. La, la, la,…

    Like


  36. The first thing I thought after hearing about this is; “I’d bet money he lived in a single family household with his mother.”

    The writing is on the wall and all the beta males in control will never admit the real reason. Gun control will once again be the scapegoat. What would our founding fathers think of their beloved country now, the country they fought so hard to establish. The land of the Nazi feminism and anti gun rhetoric. I feel the United States has peaked.

    Like


  37. I’m a big proponent of legalizing prostitution. The massacre on Friday just confirms that even more. As it has been said — give these guys an affordable, easy access outlet to ejaculate inside of a willing female and it’s more likely to calm the monsters inside their head before they go and do something absolutely horrific.

    Game can be learned, but for lot’s of guys finding the community, most will never make it. Whether it’s some slight form of autism that doesn’t allow them to relate as a human or if they are unable to break away from their ego to make change…lots of guys aren’t willing to face the truth and march up the mountain. I know this because when I first got started it was brutal, but I came out on the other side a better man (and my journey wasn’t nearly as hard as some of these nerds posting on here).

    STOP THE STIGMATIZING OF COMPANIONSHIP FOR PAY!

    Like


    • Well, dating practically is companionship for pay these days.

      Like


    • on December 17, 2012 at 6:48 pm anonymous does not forgive

      What about those too poor too afford it?

      I propose we go further than that and have the government issue “sex stamps” which work like food stamps but for hookers instead of food.

      Every man should have the right to fuck an 18 year old 10 once a month, and I think we should tax the men who are most successful with women in order to subsidize it.

      Like


      • I don’t think there are enough 18 year old females let alone tens for that to ever be possible. Ugly people outnumber beautiful people by a truly staggering ratio.

        Like


  38. So I guess many of you guys have older moms, eh?
    jk

    Like


  39. Blacks don’t just defend OJ they defend every criminal in their community and continually offer themselves up to be victimized over and over again by the same thugs they defend. No snitching means no jail for many career drug dealers, rapists, serial purveyors of violence to strangers and neighbors, burglars and thieves.

    In a small Texas town, I believe it was called Cleveland, upwards of 15 black men were gang raping a 12 year old Latina on multiple occasions while filming and sharing the event with everyone they knew. They were eventually arrested and the usual black spiel began “they good boys”, “it’s not their fault”, “the girls a slut” etc. The entire black community defended these monsters and they don’t seem to feel any shame in defending mass rape of a child.

    One black criminal is not representative of anything but an entire community can paint quite a picture.

    Like


    • Black America is the most feminized segment of our society, and therefore the most violent. A patriarchy advocates retribution for transgressions; matriarchies advocate understanding and forgiveness.

      Matriarchies replace consistent behavioral standards with solipsistic softness for “my baby, he deserves another chance.”. Observe which works better.

      Like


      • on December 17, 2012 at 3:54 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        That’s half of it, Martel. The other half is that the black community disconnected fatherhood and the family. As such, women no longer looked to breed with the kind of responsible men that made good fathers in the old days (if you know any elderly black couples, you’ll know exactly the kind of men I’m speaking of).

        Because the state was allowed to step in and play daddy, women chose men who were fun or wild or thuggish instead. They chose cads instead of dads. So the genetics they were passing on were not the genetics of the potential business owner or lawyer (like the elderly black men I referenced) but the thugs. Genetics matter. You don’t breed with Bill Gates and get Ray Lewis. Nor does the reverse happen. Hence, the dissolution of the black community into violence.

        The problem now is that this is happening in the white community as well. Once you remove the man-as-breadwinner prototype, women breed with cads and you get chaos…..

        Like


      • True. Black males have very little incentive to become responsible. If you do too well in math class, not only will the women ignore you as boring, the other males will beat the snot out of you for being an Uncle Tom.

        It’s just a preview of what all of America will be soon. Siingle moms, losers who get all the pussy, way more women in college than men, and on and on.

        Like


      • Soon?
        We’re there already.

        Like


      • I’ve noticed the glaring disconnect women seem to have between men’s behavior and genetics. These women have children with violent ex cons, and then they try to raise their son’s into being some gentle beta male who will work in a office from 9 to 5. That is simply not happening. Are they truly that surprised when they and their neighbor’s son’s terrorize the neighborhood, refuse to get a job, and show no respect to females at all?

        Like


      • Good one!
        Women seem to have an endless capacity for denying the fact that 50% of their offspring’s DNA is the father’s and that genes do indeed make a difference, not only physically, but mentally, too.
        Just look at romance novels or listen to songs written by women.
        The guy’s basically just a sperm donor/eye candy, the baby is HERS!!!
        The reason why a mother would sabotage HER OWN FLESH AND BLOOD by raising him as a ‘Nice Guy(TM) Gentleman(R) Who Respects Women’ has puzzled me for decades.
        The only explanations I’ve come up with that make any sort of sense are that either
        a)She ‘s trying to turn the boy into the man she wishes she would have been attracted to (but wasn’t), in the vain and pointless hope that a new generation of women will be attracted to such a man (fat fucking chance)
        or
        b)She hates the boy’s father with such blind, rabid fury that she’s trying to essentially castrate her own son – but without going to prison for assault and mutilation, of course.

        Like


      • “The reason why a mother would sabotage HER OWN FLESH AND BLOOD by raising him as a ‘Nice Guy(TM) Gentleman(R) Who Respects Women’ has puzzled me for decades.”

        I don’t think that’s true, only in the modern Anglicized world (US, Canada, UK, Australia, etc) it’s true. Feminism is strong in these countries. Although, in the rest of the west feminism is gaining momentum, especially western Europe.

        Like


      • Martel, you’re not correct on all fronts. For example, for child discipline, black families are far harsher than white families. Corporal punishment rates are high in black communities, while other minorities and whites tend to employ the time-out method.

        Like


      • Yup; My mom shot me when I was 7 years old.

        Like


  40. American society doesn’t care about its men, one of many examples would be the total lack of concern for something like the male/female suicide rate which is 4 to 1.

    You would think something that important would get just a little bit of press? Nothing. Most of the time a guy like this would just off himself and everyone would be on their merry way.

    – can’t get laid: creepyloser

    – learn game, or how to improve your success in relationships with women: sexistmisogynist

    – possess masculine confidence: douchebag

    All you have to do is watch a few commercials to see how America sees its men: like barely functioning emasculated morons. So while America slobbers over its women and shits all over its men, I’ll have a cheerful middle finger up to this feminist society and I’m going to enjoy my life, as I try and stay out of the way of the bullets. I don’t have a pool.

    Like


    • Caveat — none of that applies to Black Men, who are by definition (according to women and White women in particular), sex machines. Apologies to James Brown.

      Like


    • It’s a real, real, big misconception its only in the US. In fact, it’s the same all over the western world. European women are gaining on their American counterparts with regard to feelings of entitlement, the educational system in most EU countries is being raped over by feminism, and male/female suicide ratios are of the same order of magnitude. There might be different degrees of ‘bad’, depending on the country involved, but as a male – whether it’s in the US or in Europe – the odds are massively stacked against you.

      Like


  41. I’d bet dollars to donuts this kid has been on medication for the better part of his life-

    mommy too

    Like


  42. Jovan Belcher and Josh Brent raised by single moms too.

    Like


  43. “First, older moms are more likely to spawn autistic kids”

    THANK YOU FEMINISM FOR THIS GIFT WE NOW RECEIVE.

    Like


  44. “late-in-life strugglepreggers”

    this has to be patented and turned into a t-shirt to sell to spinsters. or turn it into one of those ‘IM WITH’ shirts LOL.

    Like


  45. The fact that the mother was shot 4 times in the face really has not registered to anyone in the media. They actually paint this woman as decent with a “hushed home life”. I actually had to do a bit of searching to even find how she died.

    Well he shot her in the head…anyway he moved on to the school…and no reporter saw any significance in that? They give the impression that being a nutcase is only internal. Never cultivated from something external such as a shitty parent.

    The fact that it was the first thing he did never registered to them either. They are seemingly pushing the angle that it was only to get the guns.

    Nothing says i hate someone to their very core like shooting them point blank in the face. And no one gets that kind of hate for absolutely no reason.

    Like


    • Did he have any weapons that were capable of firing single shots? I don’t know anything about guns.

      Like


      • All of his weapons were semi auto. But just about everyone was shot at close range.

        Like


      • Get back inside.

        Like


      • lol- I can’t. I work in a school. Inside is outside. I’m going to have to learn.

        Like


      • What do you mean “single shots”? He did not have an automatic weapon (machine gun). Every trigger pull was a single shot. “Assault Weapon” in media speak just means rifle has a black plastic stock and/or a barrel shroud.

        Like


      • Oh, okay. I was under a different impression. Thanks for clearing that up. It really makes a difference in how the events are perceived.

        Like


      • The difference is that the media says “assault weapon” and Americanus Leftus Ignoramus immediately thinks of hollywood style machine guns.

        They believe they are educated, but they are far from it.

        Automatic = finger held on trigger repeatedly shoots bullets. These are pretty much banned.
        Semi-Automatc = finger has to pull once for every bullet fired, just like a handgun.

        Like


      • Thanks. That’s a helpful primer. Okay, so just to clarify, this guy had a semi-automatic gun and the Aurora shooter had an automatic?

        Like


      • Nope – no automatics have been used in any of the shootings we’re discussing here (not for you, Danger, for the lady.)

        Like


      • I’m under the impression that ‘assault weapon’ in media speak means anything that can hurt someone.
        Which might include pillows and butter knives.
        Better put warning labels on those.
        I’m not sure why any private, halfway normal citizen would need to own a semi-automatic rifle, and I could support regulations that would call for anyone wanting to purchase any type of firerarm (or a crossbow, for that matter) to have to take a safety course (which could be held by the gun shop) and pass a test afterwards.
        Not a ‘multiple choice’ one, either…….
        In addition to the background check, waiting period, etc.
        Might cut down on stuff like children shooting each other with dad’s Glock.
        Of course, no amount of legislation can prevent criminals and nut jobs from obtaining guns illegally, which they always can, even in places whose gun laws make NYC’s seem liberal…….

        Like


      • The mom would certainly have passed tests and jumped through hoops. When an upper-class middle-aged white woman can’t qualify for a gun, no one can. Also it makes no sense to think that rifles are more “bad” than close-quarter concealable weapons like handguns. All gun regulation is just a backdoor to a total ban. That is what Obama’s hardon is for, the police state of the socialist utopia.

        Like


      • On a side note: visited a local gun shop today… the proprietor was like the proverbial chicken with its head cut off… couldn’t answer the phones and unpack the boxes fast enough… sold 20 ARs, at inflated rates, within 3 hours.

        Like


      • “I’m not sure why any private, halfway normal citizen would need to own a semi-automatic rifle,”

        Because when you’re hunting you can shoot repeatedly at rapidly moving prey without having to reload after each round. Also it’s less of a pain when you’re target shooting, for the same reason.

        Remember that “semi- automatic”, in itself, tells you absolutely nothing about the lethality of any given firearm — even the trusty .22 (small- game rifle) can be a semi- auto.

        Like


      • 1 shot, 1 kill.
        Practice.
        A longbow can be ‘semi-automatic’, too.
        15 arrows/min. is pretty good…….

        Like


    • That mother should never have educated her son about guns.

      Taking him to a firing range? Making him feel comfortable with semi-automatic weapons in his hands? Teaching him how to fire, over and over again? She KNEW he was mentally and emotionally troubled. She KNEW he was a ticking time bomb.

      And now she sadly paid the ultimate price.

      Like


      • Exactly, she is mostly to blame for all of this, and if there is anything befitting here is that she paid the ultimate price. Stupid fucking delusional woman.

        Like


  46. This video from France was noted by John Derbyshire in a recent article. It good to see that some in Europe have figured out the scam. I especially like the dig on the Generation 68. That is when Europe succumbed to Cultural Marxism.

    Like


    • It good to see that some in Europe have figured out the scam.
      ——————————————

      Do they name the Jew?

      If not it = fail

      Like


  47. what does racism has to do with this massacre? We are talking about a young man who made a stupid decision to end these kids’ lives instead of getting help. That is all.

    Like


  48. on December 17, 2012 at 3:52 pm torn and frayed

    Let’s see, she got married at 21, had her first boy at 28, and had the Sperg at 32; that’s not exactly pushing the age envelope for having a tard-child.

    Like


  49. Dude, I gotta tell you, this is First Class, Grade A, #1 bullshit.
    I’m gonna skip the links on this post because I don’t want this held up in your spam filter.

    “First, older moms are more likely to spawn autistic kids. Most autistitards are harmless, but some with severe handicaps to relate as normal human beings are powderkegs in an increasingly atomized society that they find impossible to manage or even comprehend.”

    First of all, autism/Aspergers had little to nothing to do with this shooting! There are untold millions of Aspies in the world (who made what we’re using to discuss here possible) and the overwhelming majority are clearly not violent. Indeed, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population, and are in fact likely less so. That rubbish has got to stop.

    Second, older women (and older men) are more likely to have autistic kids primarily because parents who have kids later tend to be autistic themselves! There is little evidence that parental age in and of itself leads to increased chances of autistic children.

    “Second, the mom was divorced. Children of divorced parents and female-headed homes are at much higher risk for delinquency, jail, and violent crime.”

    And what type of people are likely to get divorced?

    It’s called heredity for a reason. Come on, man.

    General rule: you can learn little to nothing from comparing children with their biological parents. That, my friend, is a confounded nightmare.

    “Maybe a few of those kids of divorced moms lack the normal social outlets to release that building resentment, and it comes out all at once in a violent episode.”

    Right, because these killings are happening everywhere, all the time…

    Some perspective, please?

    “As the child of a divorced, single mom, Adam Lanza had the deck stacked against him.

    Studies cannot prove conclusively that fatherlessness—or any other factor—actually causes people to commit crimes. For that, you’d have to do the impossible: take a large group of infants and raise each of them simultaneously in two precisely equivalent households—except one would be headed by a father and mother and the other by a lone mother. But by comparing criminals of the same race, education, income, and mother’s education whose primary observable difference is family structure, social scientists have come as close as they can to making the causal case with the methodological tools available.

    Nope, this tells you absolutely nothing. Social science, as it’s often practiced, is such a sorry operation it barely deserves to be called science. You cannot control for external factors to gleam the effects of family structure. You could not do this even with adopted children. Firstly, you cannot truly control for heredity this way (you think you’re comparing apples to apples, but you still are, at best, comparing apples to pears).

    Then there’s child-to-parent effects (when the children’s traits influences their parents’ behavior).

    “This isn’t entirely a story about genes, either. Single momhood has skyrocketed in the last forty years, and there is no allele that can account for that. Such a rise in a short time is driven by cultural and social pressures.”

    That’s true, but so what? Phenotypes (that is traits) are the results of genotypes (heredity) and the gross environment. If you change the environment, you will change the phenotype even with a change in genotypes. Pointing out that genes are expressed differently doesn’t save your case, because it clearly doesn’t prove that the family environment (or, more accurately, variation among family environments) is a part of the environment that has an effect. In fact, there is abundant evidence that the family environment simply doesn’t matter all that much.

    Can you (and other HBD bloggers, for that matter) please stop harping on parenting until you have a way to explain the behavioral genetic evidence, and for that matter the birth order evidence? The home environment and parents simply DOES NOT do what you think it does, and we have a mountain of evidence to this effect.

    Like


    • “The home environment and parents simply DOES NOT do what you think it does, and we have a mountain of evidence to this effect.”

      I dont know about this, the studies do show that parenting doesnt seem to matter much but isnt that just because children arent spending as much time with their families as they are with their friends, school, etc.

      Like


      • No. There is a very broad range of families in behavioral genetic studies, and many children do spend a lot of time with parents. If there was an effect, it’d turn up in the studies, but it does not.

        Like


      • Also, I found this:

        http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.1
        “There is clear evidence that parents can and do influence children. There is equally clear evidence that children’s genetic makeup affects their own behavioral characteristics, and also influences the way they are treated by their parents. Twin and adoption studies provide a sound basis for estimating the strength of genetic effects, although heritability estimates for a given trait vary widely across samples, and no one estimate can be considered definitive. This chapter argues that knowing only the strength of genetic factors, however, is not a sufficient basis for estimating environmental ones and indeed, that attempts to do so can systematically underestimate parenting effects. Children’s genetic predispositions and their parents’ childrearing regimes are seen to be closely interwoven, and the ways in which they function jointly to affect children’s development are explored.”

        Like


      • As I said before, rubbish. You can’t determine parenting affects by looking at children raised by their biological parents.

        Like


      • From the paper:

        “From an interactionist perspective, the idea that in a long-standing relationship such as the one between a parent and child, the child would be influencing the parent but the parent would not be influencing the child is absurd. While it is entirely reasonable to assign the child’s part in parent-child covariance (i.e. evocative effects) to the genetic component, it is not reasonable to assign the reciprocal parent contribution to the child’s genetics. The parent’s response is surely a function not only of the child’s initiative but also of the parent’s genetics, learned modes of behavior, perceptions of the child’s needs and characteristics, and socialization objectives. And, just as surely, the parent’s response to the child’s initiatives is a central element in the child’s environment. Thus, to assign the whole of parent-child covariance to G is surely to overestimate G and underestimate E.

        A recent study from the Rutter-Plomin research group in London (O’Connor et al 1998) beautifully identifies the contributions of correlated G and E factors to developmental outcomes. Using longitudinal data from the Colorado Adoption Study, these researchers identified two groups of adoptees: one at genetic risk for anti-social behavior (i.e. a history of anti-social behavior in the biological mother) and the other not at risk. At several points during the adoptees’ childhood, both the children’s characteristics and the adoptive parents’ child-rearing methods were assessed. Findings were that children carrying a genetic risk for antisocial behavior were more likely to receive negative socialization inputs from their adoptive parents—an evocative effect. But parental negative behavior made an independent contribution to children’s externalizing, over and above the children’s genetic predispositions.”

        Like


      • @Anonymous:

        “There were two groups of adoptees, one with risk for anti-social behaviour and one without. And as you say the group with risk did get more negative parenting, but:

        ‘…the findings also showed that most of the association between negative parenting and children’s externalizing behavior was not explicable on the basis of an evocative gene-environment correlation and that an additional environmentally mediated parental effect on children’s behavior was plausible.'”

        The flaw in their analysis was that they were using the biological mothers’ own reported behavior as their genetic control, as if the children were the genetic clones of their mothers. You can’t actually do this—even real clones, aka, identical twins are only 50% similar to each other. What in fact is happening is that the worst behaved kids were receiving the harshest parenting (because the little hellions needed it)—a child-to-parent effect, with the researchers foolishly assuming that the biological mothers served as a control.

        Like


      • Yay, my post appeared.

        “he flaw in their analysis was that they were using the biological mothers’ own reported behavior as their genetic control, as if the children were the genetic clones of their mothers. ”

        I dont think they assumed this at all.

        “What in fact is happening is that the worst behaved kids were receiving the harshest parenting (because the little hellions needed it)—a child-to-parent effect, ”

        Yes, but the parents response to the childs behaviour is a result of the parents genetics, life experiences, knowledge of parenting, etc. If all the parents knew how to optimally respond the amount of negative pareting could have been minimized.

        Like


      • @Anonymous:

        “‘[T]he flaw in their analysis was that they were using the biological mothers’ own reported behavior as their genetic control, as if the children were the genetic clones of their mothers.’

        I dont think they assumed this at all.”

        What do you think they mean by this:

        However, the findings also showed that most of the association between negative parenting and children’s externalizing behavior was not explicable on the basis of an evocative gene-environment correlation

        Like


      • The spam-filter hates me. Anyway, the paper above cites this one:

        Genotype-environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting.
        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9779743
        “From age 7 through age 12, adoptive parents reported on the negative control, positive parenting, and inconsistent parenting they use in managing their child’s behavior. Repeated measures analysis of variance indicated that children at genetic risk were consistently more likely to receive negative parenting from their adoptive parents than children not at genetic risk, indicating an evocative genotype-environment correlation. However, the findings also showed that most of the association between negative parenting and children’s externalizing behavior was not explicable on the basis of an evocative gene-environment correlation and that an additional environmentally mediated parental effect on children’s behavior was plausible.”

        whixh supports the notion that parenting does have an effect.

        Like


      • Jayman is good at doing parallogisms

        he presents things in a way that appears logical but then he comes to a wrong conclusion,

        Like


      • Apprently you missed the part about child-to-parent effects.

        Troublesome kids are going to elicit different parenting behavior than well-behaved ones

        Like


      • “Troublesome kids are going to elicit different parenting behavior than well-behaved ones”

        Ok, from “Parenting and its Effects on Children: On Reading and Misreading Behavior Genetics”

        “A recent study from the Rutter-Plomin research group in London (O’Connor et al 1998) beautifully identifies the contributions of correlated G and E factors to developmental outcomes. Using longitudinal data from the Colorado Adoption Study, these researchers identified two groups of adoptees: one at genetic risk for anti-social behavior (i.e. a history of anti-social behavior in the biological mother) and the other not at risk. At several points during the adoptees’ childhood, both the children’s characteristics and the adoptive parents’ child-rearing methods were assessed. Findings were that children carrying a genetic risk for antisocial behavior were more likely to receive negative socialization inputs from their adoptive parents—an evocative effect. But parental negative behavior made an independent contribution to children’s externalizing, over and above the children’s genetic predispositions.”

        “O’Connor et al 1998” being:

        “Genotype-environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting.” which I linked to above.

        tl;dr parenting seems to have an effect.

        Like


      • The spam-filter is messing with me.

        “Troublesome kids are going to elicit different parenting behavior than well-behaved ones”

        There were two groups of adoptees, one with risk for anti-social behaviour and one without. And as you say the group with risk did get more negative parenting, but:

        “…the findings also showed that most of the association between negative parenting and children’s externalizing behavior was not explicable on the basis of an evocative gene-environment correlation and that an additional environmentally mediated parental effect on children’s behavior was plausible.”

        Like


      • @Canadian Friend:

        “Jayman is good at doing parallogisms

        he presents things in a way that appears logical but then he comes to a wrong conclusion”

        Feel free to take a crack at it. I’d love to see your interpretation of the evidence…

        Like


    • Autism has nothing to do with this case. Besides, I am not sure how legit autism is as a real disorder. It seems they blame every mental disorder on autism these days. And when it doesn’t exactly fit into the autism description, they come up with related disorders like Asperger.

      Please. I don’t think this case has anything to do with older women having kids either. Yes, it’s true older women have less chances of healthy kids, but that’s why we have pre-natal tests for these things.

      The main culprits are the downgrading of the society, which doesn’t teach values any longer, pharmaceuticals given to young boys for real or perceived behavioral problems that mess with their brains, and children raised by single mothers that spend most of their time unsupervised on the streets, or with friends that teach them bad and not good.

      Like


      • “Autism has nothing to do with this case.”

        Only in the most tangential sense, at most, yes.

        “Besides, I am not sure how legit autism is as a real disorder. It seems they blame every mental disorder on autism these days.”

        Autism is most certainly real. Everything gets blamed on it because most people are stupid and use it for a shorthand for either/both “mentally challenged” and/or “highly nerdy”.

        “The main culprits are the downgrading of the society”

        Before we start worrying about what the culprits are, can we at least confirm that:

        A. There is a problem
        B. If so, does it need to be explained?

        People have been killing each other for a long time. Don’t let CNN and Fox News make you think these things are a bigger problem than they actually are…

        Like


      • “People have been killing each other for a long time. Don’t let CNN and Fox News make you think these things are a bigger problem than they actually are…”

        Well, what exactly do you mean? This is not like any type of killing we’ve heard about or killing in war. This is murder committed by a nutcase who had issues with mental health since adolescence – maybe he was born this way or maybe he was created – either way, makes no difference; he needed to be locked up and wasn’t because of his delusional parents (yeah, I blame his absentee father too, not just his incredibly negligent mom), and because of liberal policies that prohibit people getting locked up when they should. So don’t give me this “people have been killing each other for a long time” nonsense, because you sound like Mayor Bloomberg and his overreacting to every tragedy that his liberal policies help create.

        We need to pinpoint the cause of these massacres, and it’s usually crazed unhappy males who have been neglected by their families who can’t continue caring for them anymore. Even Adam Lanza was neglected to a degree – his father was out of the picture and his mom left him to his own devises in the basement of that huge mansion she lived in. While alone in the basement he befriended Satanists on the internet and was heavy into Satanism. I posted the link in another commented which failed to post.

        Therefore, I don’t blame this on autism or on older women having babies – as long as women have babies with their husbands, I have nothing against it and could care less about the mother’s age. This is just CH trying to tie it with his negative world view of women. Although, I do agree with him that this has to do with divorce to a certain degree, as well as to do with single mothers raising losers. There is no question that divorce and single motherhood doesn’t produce the crème de la crème of kids. But this also has to do with mental health – there are many crazy people living in this country and we have to admit it, as painful as it is. Maybe they were born that way and maybe it’s overmedication of overactive children that cusses it. Maybe even both. Either way, there is a problem in this country that needs addressing ASAP. However, the liberals are hijacking the issue and using it to pass gun control laws. We shouldn’t let them hijack the issue under any circumstance, but of course conservatives have no backbone and they will acquiesce to the liberals in this matter as well. That’s another depressing thing about this whole sad sorry saga – another assault on the Constitution and conservative values

        Like


      • “This is just CH trying to tie it with his negative world view of women.”

        Yes, sounds about right.

        “Although, I do agree with him that this has to do with divorce to a certain degree, as well as to do with single mothers raising losers. There is no question that divorce and single motherhood doesn’t produce the crème de la crème of kids.”

        But do divorce/singlemotherhood cause those things? No one here has offered proof of that…

        Like


    • Jayman, are you trying to claim there is no cause-and-effect for behavior like *speaking english* if their parents speak english? It’s all just random, no connection stuff to you, raise by a single mom means nothing?

      Like


      • “Jayman, are you trying to claim there is no cause-and-effect for behavior like *speaking english* if their parents speak english?”

        Traits that depend on content, such as which language you speak, aren’t heritable.

        But, ask yourself this: if the parents speak another language (say Croatian), but the child has English-speaking peers (and presumably lived in an English-speaking country from a very young age), what language will the child grow up to speak?

        Like


      • Unfortunately, I don’t think studies are going to be conducted on this issue with such readiness. After all, it’s not so popular to criticize women in our society. So don’t hold your breath for it anytime soon.

        That said, there are things that are so obvious, studies would only confirm them. This is one of them.

        There is no doubt that single motherhood produces degeneracy. Boys and girls need a male energy and a female energy to nature them in tandem. Each energy works differently, since men and women are different, but both are needed and no substitute is going to do a better job than the original – the biological mother and father. Of course, in the absence of one of these we have to improvise and do the best we can. That’s when single parents remarry, or single parents try to be both the mother and the father to the kids. However, in either one of these scenarios the situation would have been much better if both biological parents were available to raise their kids. There is no question about it so that studies are almost unnecessary.

        The problem is that we can’t criticize women for any of their choices, or right away you’ll be called anti-woman, sexist, misogynist, atavist, or primitive. So we have to put up with their whoring and out-of- wedlock birthing, while they use the government as their protector and substitute hubby at our expense, and while their kids are raised on the streets or at friends’ houses ending up greatly lacking and often problematic. Therefore, on the single motherhood issues I do agree with CH – it’s bad for society.

        Like


      • “There is no doubt that single motherhood produces degeneracy. Boys and girls need a male energy and a female energy to nature them in tandem. Each energy works differently, since men and women are different, but both are needed and no substitute is going to do a better job than the original – the biological mother and father.”

        You’re reciting dogma; the evidence firmly shows that this is not the case.

        Like


      • At this time your evidence is bullshit. It’s too early to judge since it’s not enough time to decides whether or not single motherhood destroy a society. Maybe in a few more decades we’ll know the obvious, but I acknowledge that it’s too early to invoke it as the truth because I know liberals won’t believe anything until they see a study proving it, and usually if the study proves something against their belief system they have to see multiple, multiple, multiple studies before they’ll be convicted their beliefs we wrong. So I am still sticking with my common sense, which seem to be greater than yours since you admitted in your blog that “I love watching Bill Maher and I’m usually in agreement with most of his views.” No disrespect to you because I enjoy debating with you, but that statement tells me a lot about where you’re coming from, politically and socially, and why you argue against the obvious.

        Like


      • @NiteLily:

        “At this time your evidence is bullshit.”

        Gotta love sweeping dismissals. I’d ask you to explain yourself but let me save us some time.

        The key problem is that single motherhood cannot in and of itself cause the downfall of anything since parenting does not influence how children turn out. Ergo, fatherless, in and of itself means squat. It is merely a correlate of other things. You can debate whether those “other things” are problematic for society, but focusing on fatherlessness itself is myopic and a wasted effort.

        Like


      • The reason I am dismissing is because I don’t have patience to debate the obvious. But if you insist:

        “parenting does not influence how children turn out”

        Oh really? Would you like to take that back? I think you should in light of how stupid a statement this is. Up until the 60s when people lost all their common sense, it was rightly understood that children turn out to be exactly how their parents trained/raised/taught them. That’s why people looked for a bride or a groom from a “good family” for their children when it was time to marry. The family’s background was taken into high consideration as much as the potential spouse.

        To say parents have no say in their kids’ future means you shouldn’t spend extra on education or extra on ballet lessons or piano lessons, etc… because you can’t influence how your kids turn out. Please, please….I have heard some pretty stupid stuff from the liberals but this takes the cake.

        Sorry, but single mothers are almost all on the verge of destitution, that’s a fact. Whether divorced or whether never married to the child’s father, most do much worse as singles than they did or would have done being married. In fact, divorce or an out-of wedlock birth negatively affects a woman’s net worth. Yet, it doesn’t affect the man in the same way, even a costly divorce. You just can’t raise children in poverty or on the ex. husband’s dime and with that kind of pressure and expect them to be on the same level as children raised in a two-parent home. I know it’s hard for you to accept, which is why you refuse to acknowledge the obvious, which by itself is foolishness.

        In addition, kids raised in single-mother homes are more likely to be raised on the streets or in other people’s homes because the single mom has to work to make ends meet and because she is busy looking for another husband/provider. How many kids get molested by the new strange male she allows into her home? How many kinds get abducted because there is no father around? In fact, if you look at statistics you will find that almost all kids who get abducted or molested are kids where there is no father around. In addition, kids get into trouble much more often when they have no father influence in their lives – drugs, sex, bad grades, etc….. Again, I know it ain’t a nice picture, and it sounds unfair to women on its face, but with facts no one can tamper, unless you like lying to yourself.

        Like


      • @NiteLily:

        “The reason I am dismissing is because I don’t have patience to debate the obvious. But if you insist:

        ‘parenting does not influence how children turn out’

        Oh really? Would you like to take that back?”

        No.

        “Up until the 60s when people lost all their common sense, it was rightly understood that children turn out to be exactly how their parents trained/raised/taught them.”

        Was it really?

        “That’s why people looked for a bride or a groom from a “good family” for their children when it was time to marry. The family’s background was taken into high consideration as much as the potential spouse.”

        And what else do good families have (ahem, good DNA)?

        “To say parents have no say in their kids’ future means you shouldn’t spend extra on education or extra on ballet lessons or piano lessons, etc… because you can’t influence how your kids turn out.”

        Unless it’s something the kids enjoy, pretty much so.

        “Sorry, but single mothers are almost all on the verge of destitution, that’s a fact. Whether divorced or whether never married to the child’s father, most do much worse as singles than they did or would have done being married. In fact, divorce or an out-of wedlock birth negatively affects a woman’s net worth. Yet, it doesn’t affect the man in the same way, even a costly divorce. You just can’t raise children in poverty or on the ex. husband’s dime and with that kind of pressure and expect them to be on the same level as children raised in a two-parent home.”

        And what’s systematically different about between families who marry and men and women who don’t? And what will be different about the children each spawns?

        “Again, I know it ain’t a nice picture, and it sounds unfair to women on its face, but with facts no one can tamper, unless you like lying to yourself.”

        Before you accuse me of trying to tamper with facts, would it not be helpful to look at the facts yourself?

        Like


      • …“parenting does not influence how children turn out”

        If you had said ” good parenting does not garantee good results” maybe you’d have a point but saying parenting does not influence how children turn out is beyond ridiculous

        what will you say next?

        good strong winds do not influence the speed of sailboats?

        that the height from which one falls does not influence the seriousness of one’s injuries?

        Like


      • @Canadian Friend:

        “If you had said ” good parenting does not garantee good results” maybe you’d have a point but saying parenting does not influence how children turn out is beyond ridiculous”

        It what’s the evidence says. See above.

        [Heartiste: Color me skeptical as well of the notion that parenting has vanishingly little effect on kids. (Smaller effect than peers, perhaps, but not no effect at all.) To take an extreme example, kids who have been locked in the cellar for five years by their parents are surely going to suffer psychological problems down the road.

        Also, no one has ever fully satisfied me with an explanation to why single momhood has exploded in the past forty years that doesn’t rely on a genetic alteration in these moms, said alteration which would be impossible in such a short time frame. I suppose we will see in the coming decades how the bastards of this large and growing single mom cohort turn out, but if past performance is any indication… well, we’re in for a world of hurt.]

        Like


      • “It what’s the evidence says. See above.”

        Like I said, the evidence you like to reference is nothing but liberals nonsense, which most people with a little bit of common sense know to discard. But of course, liberals can’t think for themselves. They follow what their professors told them or the media told them or they read in some ridiculous publication. That’s why liberals are able to discard all their common sense for some statistical study that has no basis in reality.

        No, genius. Parenting has everything to do with how your kids turn out, and to say you have no control or influence over your kids is just a way to limit criticism of bad parents like single mothers, gay couples, or ghetto residents. Any of those three groups usually have less than staller kids. Let’s put it this way, they are not raising genius – just burdens on society.

        Like


      • CH,

        That’s what I told him a few days ago, that it’s too early to tell how kids to single moms are going to turn out, but chances are they will be nothing to brag about. Same thing with kids raised to gay couples.

        We can already see the effects of single motherhood in our society. Girls raised without a father are more likely to engaged in teen sex or get pregnant. Boys also get in trouble with the law or involved with drugs. Many kids of single mothers, boys and girls (the new trend) get into gangs or drop out of school. Are these kids going to be winners, compared to kids with both parents raising them?

        The picture is not pretty, yet so many liberals would like to stick their finger in our collective eye and blind us so that we won’t see the truth ‘cause God forbid you criticize single mothers and stigmatize them. The protection from stigmatization is more important to the liberals than the truth. That’s the only reason they are trying to cover it up with these bogus articles. I will never believe any of their statistics for another 50 years. Until then, I will let my common sense guide me. In 50 years we shall see the carnage – that is, if our society is still standing then.

        [Heartiste: I’m not necessarily opposed to what Jayman is hawking here (except for the noxious stuff about coercing beta males to foot the bill for women via mandated maternity leave and the like). For too long, the cathedral has been shoving equalist blank slate garbage down people’s throats, and a big push back against those lies is in order. To restore balance to the force, and all that. But as I’ve probably mentioned before, science eventually comes around to confirming 80% of what I see with my own lying eyes, but 20% outright contradicts or massages my real world observations. For instance, one thing I notice is that bad parents and single moms have some fucked up kids, and when those parent(s) get better behaved (as sometimes happens when a dad or mom comes off drugs) the kids start to behave better as well.

        Anyhow, when the 20% of those studies which contradict my real world evidence come out, I apply a more stringent standard of proof to them. It may ultimately turn out to be correct that parents are no more useful to their kids than as germinators and diaper changers, but I have yet to read enough solid evidence that that is the case. In any event, we will soon have plenty of evidence for or against parental influence when the present day bastard spawn start coming of criminal age in the next decade or two.]

        Like


      • @Heartiste:

        “Heartiste: Color me skeptical as well of the notion that parenting has vanishingly little effect on kids. (Smaller effect than peers, perhaps, but not no effect at all.) To take an extreme example, kids who have been locked in the cellar for five years by their parents are surely going to suffer psychological problems down the road.”

        Indeed. But as I said in my most recent post:

        Contrary to the enshrined conventional wisdom, even in the HBD blogosphere, parenting is simply not that important in the big picture.

        (This, of course, is apparently past a certain baseline. Human children appear to need a certain minimum level of support and emotional warmth for normal development, to which Romanian orphanages attest. However, beyond this baseline, extra parenting effort, past what children need to get by, is simply ineffective.)

        We’re talking about providing food, shelter, basic human interaction, and not locking your children in a dark room for years on end. The 0% contribution of the shared environment indicates that the minimum necessary amount of parental care must be pretty low, below that which is provided by the parents in these samples.

        The vast majority of parents in the developed world exceed this apparently necessary minimum contribution. Study on (lower IQ) non-White parents is more limited, the evidence we do have indicates that parenting is of little long-term importance there too (as Steve Sailer will note about the Black “stolen generation” wisdom).

        Like


      • CH,

        I appreciate you trying to be objective about your beliefs, unlike so many people who can’t accept anything unless it proves their world view. You give all the evidence a chance to come out and see where the chips fall. It gives you credibility.

        May I just point out that many studies eventually confirm the obvious and time-tested values that people already knew instinctively. But yes, we’ll wait for real-world experience to yield us some answers despite our common sense.

        Unfortunately, I don’t see society mending the single motherhood problem, unless the government stops funding it and society begins shaming it again. We both know studies confirming our beliefs won’t do any good because you can’t criticize women with impunity. Any study published against single motherhood will be greatly sugar coated. Smart people will have to read between the lines to understand the real meaning behind the sugar coating. It’s very frustrating.

        Like


      • So according to Jayman and his studies, it is all about nature but nurture does not count for anything.

        Then Jayman must agree that it is useless to change the environment in which blacks and Hispanics grow up and live as their dysfunction is in their genes

        Blacks and Hispanics will always be semi illiterate, lack scientific curiosity, perform poorly in school, be drug addicts, be promiscuous, have more illegitimate children and have much higher rates of crime and violence than whites as no matter what good nurturing we provide them with, and no matter how many billions or trillions Obama takes from the rich to give it to the colored poors to provide them with better nurturing
        it is all useless as nature made them that way and we can not change that.

        Using liberal arguments is a lot of fun!

        Like


      • …Any study published against single motherhood will be greatly sugar coated.

        NiteLily,

        this reminds me of a Men’s Health article I read almost 20 years ago
        in which the author demonstrated how a study ( paid for by liberals and feminists and published in main publications such as the New York Time) managed to conclude that children who spend time in daycare do better than children raised at home

        the guy did some digging and found out that the study was done about children of women with an average IQ of 80 and most of them were either drug addicts, alcoholics or prostitutes, so of course the kid did better away from home ( which by coincidence contradicts Jayman’s “nature is everything nurture is nothing” argument)

        this important detail was conveniently ignored by all the liberals and feminists who were mentioning this study.

        they were cheating and lying , they wanted everyone to believe that if mommy is away at her job little Johnny does not suffer and we all know that this not true unless the mother is messed up in the head

        They did not care about the truth, they had their liberal agenda to impose on us

        Like


      • CF,

        “the guy did some digging and found out that the study was done about children of women with an average IQ of 80 and most of them were either drug addicts, alcoholics or prostitutes, so of course the kid did better away from home ( which by coincidence contradicts Jayman’s “nature is everything nurture is nothing” argument)”

        Unbelievable! This is a perfect case in point, which is why I often say any studies need to be greatly scrutinized before we accept them, since liberals have an agenda and they will often sacrifice the truth for that agenda.

        “They did not care about the truth, they had their liberal agenda to impose on us”

        Another thing I often say is that the truth doesn’t matter at all to the liberals, especially the hard-core lefties. They will change it, omit it, twist it, hide it, skew it, all in the interest of their agenda. Think of communist Russia and how they used to tamper with the truth at every opportunity, even going as far as changing street names or city names when they needed to change or hide something and make people forget about it.

        Bu as I always say, you cannot cover the truth forever. The truth has an intrinsic trait, which ensures it pops up at the most inopportune moments. Fat chance they will get away with it in the long run. That’s why we need more discussions like these. People like us will not let the truth get covered up or changed.

        Like


  50. on December 17, 2012 at 3:54 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Something is wrong today — second comment disappeared. What is the deal?

    Like


  51. Growing up with nuttin’ but a Single Mommy(TM) probably didn’t help, but looking at this boy, I am not sure how much dad could have helped.
    Depends on the dad, I suppose.
    What I find odd is that after killing mommy dearest, he went and took it out on a bunch of little kids.
    Would make a ton more sense if he went and shot up his high school/college non-buddies, his workplace, some adults at the mall….
    Wonder what the 6-year olds did to him or his drug-addled mind.

    Like


  52. I see everyone missed the whole point of what I just said.

    We just explained all the reasons why Adam Lanza went off the deep end. And yes, he is catching hell.

    If Tyrone Brown committed the exact same act, we would immediately talk about blacks have low IQ, inherently violent, less evolved, animals etc. And how we need to quarantine the area that he is from.

    We would not be talking about how “Bright, quiet & disturbed” he was.

    We would not be talking about his lack of sexual prospects. We never put black crimes in context. And yes, whites of the past & today contribute to that.

    Instead of taking in account of his family background, is socioeconomic status, environement, & his mental health.

    Adam Lanza got that privilege of being treated like an individual. 9/10 the next black person that does something equally despicable will not.

    Again, y’all are some of the most intelligent men around, but want to justify your white supremacist views so badly, that was I just spit went over your head.

    I was not going to just let you have the typical conversations that intelligent up & coming white gamers.

    Like


    • on December 17, 2012 at 4:12 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      People are talking about how “bright” he is because he was an honors student. If Urkel was a real person and had committed this act, for example, people would also be talking about how bright he was.

      Like


    • Wrong on all counts. Mass shooters who are black are profiled and analyzed just the same, like the Beltway Snipers. The average murder in Detroit is not since such things are a daily occurrence.

      “We never put black crimes in context”

      Yes we do. Though that context is not politically correct.

      Like


      • @Dan Flecher

        I am not talking about FBI professionals who have no choice BUT to get to the bottom of things.

        We are talking about the owner of this blog, racist whites, & media coverage.

        Stop acting like me & you are portrayed the same when we commit the same exact act (intra-racial crime specifically)

        Like


      • Wrong again. Don’t know if you watched the news during that Beltway shooting but the “racist whites” & media coverage gave tons of airtime to the psychology of the two shooters (this blog wasn’t around back then).

        Did you even attempt research for your claims? Even if you weren’t old enough/watching news at the time a quick look at the wikipedia page will give you TONS of links and info about the intense media analysis that was done into the psychologies, motives, background, etc… of these guys. Check the references section.

        “Stop acting like me & you are portrayed the same when we commit the same exact act (intra-racial crime specifically)”

        http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf

        Heh. You’re right on that one. Black on white crimes are drastically more common than white on black and are typically ignored by the media or the race of assailant ignored. However, the relatively rare white on black crimes are hooked onto by the media and exploded out of proportion (Trayvon being one example)

        Like


    • If Tyrone Brown committed the exact same act, we would immediately talk about blacks have low IQ, inherently violent, less evolved, animals etc. And how we need to quarantine the area that he is from.

      —Because it’s never just a lone, isolated Tyrone Brown. It’s done every day by hundreds of Tyrone Browns, darkie-lover.

      We never put black crimes in context.

      —-lmao. What a liar. Every single nigger crime is a “tragedy” to you, where the monkey who does it is “troubled” and “has a rough life” of “poverty” and is never responsible for his crime.

      Lying won’t help you here, nigger-hugger.

      Instead of taking in account of his family background, is socioeconomic status, environement, & his mental health.

      —When white people do this regularly, lemme know. And no, example-itis is not a statistic, retard.

      Again, y’all are some of the most intelligent men around, but want to justify your white supremacist views so badly, that was I just spit went over your head.
      —lol. Keep living in your delusions, jigaboo-hugger.

      Like


      • @Whore

        Don’t worry whitey, I will be your mud-ducking giving you n*gger granddaughter soon. Invigorating your defective gene pool.

        Like


      • Never know it to fail… the “muh-dik/your daughter” trash talk always comes into play.

        Negroes gonna neg.

        And then you coloureds wonder why we disdain your odious presence.

        Like


      • @Greg Eliot

        Keep in mind @WhoreFinder was talking slick about blacks long before i got here. Historically speaking, whites hit first, blacks are forced to defend themselves.

        We put you on to some culture, & civility & you bite the hand that feeds you,

        And then you coloureds wonder why we disdain your odious presence.

        It is very simple. My genes are superior AND dominant to your inferior & recessive genes. That includes intellectual capacity also. Contingent upon getting the stench of white influence off of me.

        And since you are fighting so are to genetically survive, you need all these racial smokescreens to make it seem like blacks are a nuisance to humanity.

        I am not Jackie Robinson. If you wanna debate let’s debate, but if you wanna go THERE with racial drivel, we can go there.

        But you won’t win. I’ll just get banned. because the work is too heavy for you & the owner of this blog.

        Again, if we are going to make “pretty lies perish”, let’s be true to the blog’s purpose.

        Like


      • You tried to come off as smart and then you regressed into your petty “Immo fuck your daughter” impotent,insecure, trying to be alpha nigger behaviour. I am romanian and I speak better english that you do.

        Like


      • *than . ‘T’ is next to the ‘N’ on my kb.

        Like


      • @Aleister

        You tried to come off as smart

        You mean succeeded. The thought that blacks are smarter than you, disturbs your very soul.

        regressed into your petty “Immo fuck your daughter” impotent,insecure, trying to be alpha nigger behaviour.

        So, this @Whore guy must be a scholar. You need better representatives

        I am romanian and I speak better english that you do.

        But if only your writing of English can be as impressive.

        But ignore @Whore’s response riddled with n*ggers. But that is par for the course here.

        Fun

        Like


      • Don’t worry
        —What me, worry, nigs?

        I will be your mud-ducking
        —Be a big boy. It’s called “fucking”, little man.

        giving you n*gger
        —Aw, ain’t that cute. Fucking can be alluded to, but the term “nigger” is verboten. Poor wittle darkie–doesn’t want his feelings hurt!

        Invigorating your defective gene pool.
        —–LMAO. Oh nigs, your denial of your own bestiality is hilarious. Have you been to places where the majority is black and has power?

        Like


      • @Whore

        I like coal-mining better. You have to give your daughter a medal the way she handles the black invasion.

        I’m not into boys like your kind is. Especially black boys (See Sandusky)

        —–LMAO. Oh nigs, your denial of your own bestiality is hilarious. Have you been to places where the majority is black and has power?

        Bestiality, & cannibalism, pedophilia is your shtick. That projection 101. Although I have not been privyed, chances are we are still trying to shake off the stench of that destructive, demonic white influence.

        Stop giving us a sinking ship & then blaming us while we try to plug up the holes.

        Like


      • I like coal-mining better.
        —lol. Something about sour grapes….

        You have to give your daughter a medal the way she handles the black invasion.
        —LMAO. Invasion! Someone has high hopes and low I.Q.

        I’m not into boys like your kind is.
        —Nah, just fucking your sisters and cousins.

        Especially black boys (See Sandusky)
        —lol. Those little faggot darkies gladly became the bitch of a white man.

        Bestiality, & cannibalism,
        —-Hey! A nigs admits to it. Well done, boy.

        pedophilia is your shtick.
        —lol. Even Spike Lee talked about nig male-on-nig male rape in his films. And let’s not forget who are the majority of prisoners….and being the bitch of other black prisoners…

        That projection 101.
        —Aw, ain’t that cute. Jigaboo learned a new word.

        we are still trying to shake off the stench of that destructive, demonic white influence.
        —The glory of Detroit And Sub-Saharan Africa!

        Stop giving us a sinking ship & then blaming us while we try to plug up the holes.
        —lol. We gave you a nuclear submarine and you monkeys took a battle ax to the reactor and the hull. Because it has bad juju!

        Niggerdom, everyone!

        Like


    • That’s because everyone wants to act like blacks are just inherently fucked up so they don’t have to look at the fact that it was government programs that screwed them up and that returning to evil, greedy, selfish capitalism is the solution. Nevermind that the poverty rate was decreasing steadily before welfare came in in the 70’s. That if the same trajectory continued there would be very little poverty stricken blacks to speak of.

      Like


      • If it is government policies then why are parts of Africa where white people have had virtually no influence some of the worst hell-holes on earth(Sub-Sahara)? Why is every predominately black area on earth a hell-hole? The average black living on welfare is MUCH better off than their distant relatives in Africa.

        Everybody in the country can get those same welfare benefits yet we don’t see the same problems plaguing other ethnic groups.

        Not to mention that it is blacks themselves who are some of the biggest supporters of welfare policies and claim any attempts to end welfare are “racist”.

        These facts suck. I take no pleasure in repeating them. I truly wish this stuff wasn’t true but until we accept reality for what it is we have no hope of changing things for the better.

        Like


      • @Dan Flecher

        That is not true.

        First of all when the media comes to Africa, it shows you the WORST parts, the villagers in huts, children with big bellies & flies around their mouth. Africa is doing better than what they show you,

        (I can show you many places in America, black & white where people live in equally deplorable conditions)

        Second, to act like Africa has not been influenced by invaders is being intellectually dishonest.

        Honest historians would disagree with you

        Like


      • Did you even read my post?

        Please, tell me about the “good” parts of Africa. You’ll find that the best parts of Africa are where white people have had the most influence. (South Africa and parts of West Africa)

        “(I can show you many places in America, black & white where people live in equally deplorable conditions)”

        Worse than the average African conditions? Please share. Even the poorest in America can eat their way to obesity. The problem is that all predominantly black communities turn into hellholes while the same is rarely true of predominantly white/asian communities. Give a single example of a predominantly black community that hasn’t gone to shit/are primitive. I honestly don’t know of any.

        “Second, to act like Africa has not been influenced by invaders is being intellectually dishonest.”

        Again, did you read my post? I said that the parts of Africa that had virtually no white influence were the worst off. No one denied that colonist impacted Africa, only that parts of Africa were virtually untouched by this.

        Need to brush up on that reading comprehension before you can move onto debate.

        Like


    • That is because white crime, especially violent horrific crime like this is an outlier, whereas in the black “community” it is a pattern. With outliers you must look at the individual problem, but with trends you try to find similarities which would explain a pattern.

      Like


  53. I’m surprised that The Atlantic published that article on the link between crime and single-parent families. They’re usually pretty liberal.

    Like


  54. I’m surprised that The Atlantic published that article on the link between crime and single-parent families. They’re usually pretty liberal.

    Like


    • Shh, it’s ok so long as they don’t then go blaming black people for being uncivilized brutes.

      Remember, the problem is always whitey.

      Like


    • Hrm, I wonder which group has the largest percentage of single-parent families….

      ….

      Crap. Gotta hit my brains reset button again.

      Like


  55. I agree with everything Heartiste stated above. Reading this has been quite the revelation this morning.

    I would add, however, that the main problem with these guys that go crazy like this is that they have a lot of anger. Anger at who they are, how they have the problems they do but don’t know how to correct them, and with the divorce…well, I’m sure there’s a lot of anger at Mom and how she may or may not have driven away Dad.

    Maybe Dad was the only one who knew how to deal with the kid, or who the kid respected. Maybe Lanza desperately wanted to live on his own and be his own boss, but Mom kept treating him like a child and reinforcing the belief that he had “issues” and wasn’t capable of living on his own without her tender care. All I know is that after he shot Mom several times in the face, his next step was to take out his anger on the “rest of the world”. He didn’t just drive to his Dad’s house to take him out too. No one seems to have pointed that out.

    As many on this blog might agree, when you grow up as one of the “smart” kids in school, you tend to be a little unpopular. Sure people might think you’re “brilliant” and “gifted”, but ultimately your worth in society largely grows to depend on the grades you get or the university you get into, or the degrees which you are expected to receive. Get a few bad grades in High School, or you don’t get into Harvard, and suddenly you’re not the eccentric genius who’s just too smart for everyone else. You’re the eccentric dork who’s not worth even saying hello to for fears that the cooties will rub off.

    It sounds like this kid was highly intelligent, but he wasn’t a real high achiever at school. It also sounds like (as other readers have posted) that there wasn’t any other male role model around to show him 1) how to be a man, 2) how to fit into the world being who he was, 3) and most importantly, show him that he was not some kind of freak and that he had value as a man. In olden times, religion could actually serve some of that purpose.

    If you deny a boy those lessons, and if he also has no support group of male friends (let alone the mental/physical/spiritual validation of being intimate with a woman), you are asking for disaster. The boy will lash out, in one way or another, and you’d best be clear of the blast zone when it happens.

    Like


    • The problems with kids being raised by single women is they are being raised by liberals, and liberals don’t know how to cope with troubles and adversity in life. They think they are entitled to everything from health care to a job to birth control. They have no inclination on how to deal with stuff and troubles when they hit, and they do hit because life is no picnic.

      No liberal mother tells her kids they need to work hard to get what they want in life to be winners. That’s why they give trophies to all the little kids in the ballgame in these liberal schools. That’s why they have affirmative action or “leveling the playing field” polices.” Therefore, when a kid has real troubles and he needs to be able to cope and withstand adversity, find solutions and survive, some can’t and they freak out. Sometimes, they become troubled kids and sometimes they become mass murderers.

      Like


      • “The problems with kids being raised by single women is they are being raised by liberals, and liberals don’t know how to cope with troubles and adversity in life.”

        Right, that’s really the problem…

        And conservatives do so much better on those things…

        Like


  56. Many moons ago, I bought a book called the A – Z Encyclopedia of Serial Killers. In it are 10 general characteristics of serial killers as determined by the FBI. 1 of them is ‘They come from dysfunctional families. Typically, they are abandoned by their fathers and raised by domineering mothers’. I know this guy was a mass murderer not a serial killer, but I still thought it was worth mentioning. Edmund Kemper, Henry Lee Lucas, David Berkowitz, and Ed Gein were largely driven to kill by the actions of their mothers. I believe the first 2 even killed their mothers. Charles Manson’s mom tried to exchange him for beer. That said, there are killers whose fathers seem to have been far more influential (i.e the Boston Strangler, Peter Kurten)

    The media wankfest over the massacre and the subsequent kneejerk request for greater gun regulation is all too predictable. I’m guessing deaths attributable to alcohol outnumber those attributable to guns by a factor of 2 or 3, but few will ask for that to be banned

    If anything positive is to come out of this tragedy it’s that more people might consider homeschooling. Schools are just going to pump your kid’s head full of that ‘Oscar and His 2 Daddies’ shit anyway.

    Like


  57. Soooo, I think the comment above about the EBIL white males is a perfect segueway into this -very- strong and logical argument regarding all white men losing their power. Right on time…

    http://www.examiner.com/article/connecticut-shooting-white-males-and-mass-murder

    Like


    • I really hope you were being sarcastic when you said that article presented a very strong and logical argument. That is one of the biggest piles of tripe I’ve ever had the misfortune to read.

      Like


    • Don’t take my word for it, read below

      There are more black serial killers ( I know not the same as mass killer but similar results; many dead before they can be sopped )

      we have all been brainwashed by the media/culture

      read this

      …Another startling thing he uncovered is black serial killers have never represented less than 26.83% of the number of serial killers in a given decade, despite their overall percentage of the population never exceeding 13.1%.
      This trend has steadily increased to the point that in our current decade they represent 88.24% of the number of serial killers apprehended since 2010, yet only account for 12.6% of the populace.
      Aside from trends, this book offers reasons most people assume black serial killers don’t exist—from the media prohibition on the subject, to general misunderstandings.

      http://www.sonsofjapheth.com/rise-of-the-black-serial-killer-2/

      Like


  58. I wrote an article on the recent spate of mass shootings that I seem to be having a lot of trouble getting it published in mainstream media outlets. Please peruse it and help me understand why. It follows:

    “I wondered why the plot in Quantum of Solace was about something so mundane and trivial as the water rights to the utility services in Bolivia. I mean, this is James Bond we’re talking about here, the greatest spy in the world. His job is to prevent global nuclear war, or stop the largest depository of gold in the world from being blown up, or to stop some maniacal plan to destroy cities with a satellite laser beam space weapon. But Bolivian water rights?!? Why is such a mundane plot even in a Bond movie?

    But then I researched it, and I discovered why: its because the main script-writer for that film, Paul Haggis, is an out-and-out fanatical extremist Marxist, and it seems this whole Bolivian water rights thing is some sort of cause célèbre amongst radical left-wing Marxist fanatics.

    Apparently, it actually happened in 1999: the Bolivian Government tried to sell the water supply rights in the third largest city in Bolivia to a private company. Now, of course, any kind of capitalism or private enterprise is like a red flag to a bull as far as Marxists are concerned, and so they protested and demonstrated and howled and screamed, and in the end they won and forced the government abandon its plan to sell the water rights.
    (As a corollary, to this day there are water shortages in that city, because the necessary dams and infrastructure which would have been built by the private enterprise, never got built by the Government, and thus the poor people in Bolivia are far worse off for of the activism of fanatical extremist Marxists than they would have been otherwise if a private company had just been allowed to profitably provide for their needs.)

    But of course, committed Marxist extremists like Paul Haggis don’t see it that way, and thus it makes sense now why such a stupid plot was written.

    I wondered why in Quantum of Solace and Skyfall, Bond seems so asexual, and the interactions between Bond and various different women are so unnatural, and, well, un-Bond-like.

    You see, in all the previous films, Bond’s sexual exploits have been an integral part of the story, and, they are used in very specific ways: sex is usually seen as a celebration, a life-affirming and joyous act, a fitting ending for the triumphant Bond to rejoice and celebrate the villain’s defeat by making beautiful love to a beautiful, doe-eyed woman.

    Sometimes, Bond uses sex as a weapon to further his investigations, such as with Miss Taro in Dr. No. Other times the femme fatale uses sex to get closer to Bond so as to distract him and get a chance to kill him, such as with Fiona Volpe in Thunderball.

    Once, in Goldfinger, Bond’s (forcible) seduction of a lesbian (Pussy Galore) ends up saving the day, because it “appealed to her maternal instinct”, and switched her allegiance over to the good side. 60 000 people would have died instantly, and untold economic damage would have been wrought, we are to believe, except for that, luckily, Bond had the presence of mind to rape a lesbian when he had half the chance to.

    (N.B. I don’t think Bond is actually a rapist, I think he’s just a good old sexually assertive traditional alpha male. Its just, I know that’s what modern feminists seeing that Goldfinger scene in the Barn would squeal, especially since Pussy Galore is supposed to be a lesbian)

    But in Quantum of Solace and Skyfall, none of these types of sexual exploits are incorporated in meaningful ways into the script. Instead, Bond’s sex scenes are just tacked on as an afterthought, as if they are included almost under duress. When Bond has sex in Quantum of Solace and Skyfall, its not a celebration or a life-affirming act at all. In Quantum of Solace, it seems like Bond is just bored, and just decides to have sex (with agent Fields) because he “can’t find his stationary” (wtf?) Fields is then promptly disposed of, and we find out she was completely superfluous to the plot in the first place.
    Incidentally, Quantum of Solace was the first Bond film ever in which Bond didn’t have sex with the main female protagonist (the “Bond Girl”). (Which I think is a vandalism of a fine tradition)

    In Skyfall, its even worse. When Bond is shown having sex with an anonymous Turkish woman at the start, its used to portray the exact opposite meaning of the sort of life-affirming celebration that sex is supposed to portray in Bond films. The script-writers want us to believe that Bond has descended into a dark, dark place of alcoholism and despair, neglecting his duty and letting everyone think he’s dead. And by showing Bond having sex in this way, the implication is that its something dirty, something that he should be ashamed of.

    Then, when he meets Sévérine in the casino later on, he interacts with her in the most creepy, unnatural and unnerving way. “You were a child prostitute, I can tell”, sheesh Bond~ way to charm the ladies! (/sarc) Shortly after, he just creeps naked into her shower without saying a word.

    Then he promptly lets her die! A metaphor I suppose for his powerlessness and impotence with women (although as soon as she’s dead, oh NOW he’s somehow able to kill all the henchmen and capture the villain…)

    I wondered why the script-writers didn’t show Bond actually creating attraction, being cocky and witty and charming, developing a sexual rapport with the opposite character.

    But then I researched it, and I discovered why: John Logan, the main script writer for Skyfall, is openly gay. He doesn’t know the first thing about male-female sexual dynamics, and that deficiency of knowledge really comes out in his work on this Bond film. So instead, the only sexual dynamic in the film is between two men, Bond and the villain.

    Honestly, when Bond said something like “How do you know its my first time?” in response to Silva stroking him, I felt my skin crawl. It was really uncomfortable for me. Because you know, I’ve seen every Bond film, and I KNOW what Bond is like. It was a disturbing scene.

    Look, there is a reason why all this matters, there is a serious reason why these corruptions of our hero must be opposed. When Fleming created the character, he said his books were for “warm-blooded heterosexuals”, and for 50 years, James Bond has been the leading archetype of warm-blooded, white, Anglo-Saxon male heterosexuals, and James Bond films have been glorifications of that archetype.

    Human beings need archetypes they can identify with; it is a deep-seated psychological need. But the condition of being white and male and straight has come to be seen by the bien pensant leftist cultural elite as the enemy, as something to be torn down and trampled. It is the patriarchy! It is the oppressor! It must not be glorified; it must be belittled, diminished and destroyed! (They believe)

    But what happens when you take away a group of people’s identifying archetype, and marginalise and alienate them, is they go crazy! They retreat into an introspective world of confusion and psychosis. This is the direct cause of the spate of mass shootings: intelligent young white heterosexual males who have been alienated by society and deprived of their identity.

    Society doesn’t realise what they’re doing to this cohort of people. They are driving erstwhile capable and contributive members of society into a darkly introverted psychosis, in which space, inevitably, some of them snap and “go postal”, as it seems to them to be the only possible release for the pent up and constrained emotions they are consumed by.

    Yet if they just had an archetype they could identify with as a hero, who could exemplify the distinction between good and evil, whilst simultaneously giving expression to all the passions that come naturally to white male heterosexuals, such horrific senseless violence in our schools and public places could be avoided.

    That heroic archetype is James Bond, and that is why he MUST be restored to culture in his original, intended incarnation. We must fight the good fight and not give in to the forces of Marxist-feminism, for they know not what evil they create.”

    Like


    • Thanks for posting the article – I read the whole thing and enjoyed it. Great points relating to the Pussy Galore seduction.

      Not surprised that you can’t get the mainstream media to publish it. Too un-PC for them.

      Like


    • Well, you’ve published it here! 🙂

      In all seriousness, to whom did you submit the article? Have you tried submitting it to good blogs? Many of them will consider outside submissions.

      Like


      • IIRC correctly, James Bond was created in the wake of the Philby case.
        Mr. Philby, a British citizen, had apparently been spying for the Soviet Union for decades, but was able to slip away from authorities and disappear behind the iron curtain. Which led to major embarrassment for Her Majesty’s secret service and a lot of distrust between Great Britain and her allies.
        Enter Mr. Bond, a fictional near-superman to restore British intelligence reputation……

        Like


    • You can ask any of the prominent bloggers in this sphere to let you guest-post this article.

      James Bond became unwathcable in 1997 when a woman was cast as M and gave James Bond a dressing-down which he took like a beta schoolboy. In that same movie Miss Moneypenny told him she no longer lives him.

      James Bond is a traditional artifact that, like all of our other traditional institutions (church, military, government, academia), have been taken over or subverted by the enemy, and is dead. So its best to value the classics, reject their contemporary zombie facsimilies, and work in the underground where new great books for men are now written.

      Like


      • IIRC, Ian Fleming created his character in the wake of the Kim Philby case, circa 1963. Mr. Philby had apparently spied for the Soviet Union for decades, and was able to evade authorities and disappear behind the iron curtain, a massive embarrassment for Her Majesty’s secret service, which led to some major mistrust between Great Britain and her allies.
        Enter the feel-good character of James Bond, a fictional near-superman…….

        Like


      • The timing is off by a decade… the first James Bond novel, Casino Royale, was written in 1953.

        Like


      • “James Bond became unwathcable in 1997 when a woman was cast as M and gave James Bond a dressing-down which he took like a beta schoolboy. In that same movie Miss Moneypenny told him she no longer lives him.”

        LOL, I think you’re right. I love all of the old JB films but the newer ones are annoying. His real sexuality was taken away. Like dickmojo says he used the sex as part of his tactics and who he is as a man, and to take that away made him a neutered shill of himself. Who wants to watch such a JB?

        Like


    • Part of that 1999 Bolivian law made it illegal for people to continue to collect rainwater from their roofs. You cool with that?

      Like


    • Excellent article and right on target. Who refused to publish it? Everything you said is 100% true. People refuse to listen to the truth when it’s not PC.

      Like


  59. As long as a white man commits the crime it is okay, he get treated like the individual he is, and is not indicative of all whites. We can isolate his mental health, his family background, & environment. His humanity is not called into question.

    Dude, get a life.

    Like


  60. on December 17, 2012 at 5:31 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

    Related.

    Like


  61. Tyrone:
    Not sure I buy the atheism-plays-a-part-in-this-drama meme. The point isn’t that someone doesn’t believe in God, it’s what they DO believe in given that they don’t believe in God. And, absent the use of reason as the touchstone by which all decisions should ideally be made, one’s religious beliefs (or the lack thereof) become secondary. After all, religious people are mass murderers, too.
    RT

    Like


  62. “A multifactorial approach that re-institutionalizes the primacy of the two-parent biological nuclear family and the social nee genetic cohesion of the nation, and which discourages late-in-life strugglepreggers by aging SWPL moms is some of the harsh, potent medicine that will begin to fix the ailing body politic.”

    Most of the parents who are not in a two parent biological family arrangement don’t want to be in one.

    Choice 1: take away guns from as many people and venues as possible- That choice does not affect a normal person’s life in an important way. We go to work, go on dates, go see movies etc. We do not need guns for living.

    Choice 2; Compel people to stay in nuclear family arrangements. Umm gross. That wrecks the lives of hundreds of millions of people who do not want to deal with the parent of their child day in and day out. Maybe they are happier with someone else?

    If the choice is between preserving the nuclear family and gun control, I am wayyy for gun control.

    Like


    • Quoth the hamster: “If the choice is between ineffective flailing at the nearest target in a manner that puts on a good show of ‘fixing’ the problem without actually inconveniencing me, and attempting a solution that requires painful social introspection and actual sacrifice, I am wayyy for the first thing.”

      No shit.

      Like


      • Damn straight I don’t want to make the considerable sacrifices needed in order to live in a society where everyone is stuck in nuclear family arrangements.

        Have I ever needed a gun for anything? no. I don’t even know anyone who has ever needed their own gun.

        Like


      • There’s some teachers a few days ago in a Gun-Free School Zone in Connecticut that probably could have used one. A while before that, I recall a bunch of movie theater patrons in Colorado who were probably wishing they had one.

        Like


      • Virginia Tech was a gun-free zone too.

        Like


      • I don’t know none of those fools. I know plenty of happily divorced folks though.

        Like


      • Can’t tell if being trolled, or there are actually human beings this solipsistic and ignorant.

        Like


      • Can’t tell if being trolled, or there are actually human beings this solipsistic and ignorant.

        I can’t even understand what she just said.

        Like


      • Who does?

        Like


      • Some people are more afraid of guns than of criminals with guns.

        They are usually women, feminists and various leftists.

        Those people are irrational

        Irrational people should not decide what is good for other people

        Like


      • “Irrational people should not decide what is good for other people”

        LOL 🙂

        I hate those people. They are destroying our lives.

        Like


      • Probably because you’re a coastal-dwelling blue state latte-swilling twat, would be my guess.

        Like


      • Yes though I’m not clear on how lattes are particular to blue state culture.

        In all seriousness, the people committing these mass shootings tend to be seriously isolated omegas. In a world where guns were not easily obtainable, I doubt these people would be street saavy enough or well connected enough to find ways of aquiring them illegally. If guns were rare, I doubt gang violence would reduce because those are the criminals who would have guns anyway. but a guy like this might very well be stopped if regular americans did not have guns in the house.

        Like


      • Yes though I’m not clear on how lattes are particular to blue state culture.

        As in, deep-blue Seattle, home of starbucks and the radiant of the Northwest coffee culture.

        In a world where guns were not easily obtainable, I doubt these people would be street saavy enough or well connected enough to find ways of aquiring them illegally.

        The difference is, there are plenty of white left-leaning types willing to participate in the underground weed trade, while white right-leaning types are generally too honest and law-abiding to start an underground gun trade, which would be left pretty much to the urban nonwhite street gangs. I dunno, maybe I’m wrong and there are white libertarians who are both into buying and selling pot who’d be open to selling guns too.

        Like


      • Sooooo,

        What would stop the likes of an oppressive government if regular people did not have guns in their house?

        Like


      • Besides accidents of course, you are much more likely to face other types of violence than a mass shooter. Like home invasion and rape. Hell, even being abducted by a serial killer and tortured to death is more likely. Being disarmed leaves you totally vulnerable. Of course you don’t carry now because you are oblivious to actual risks, and only worry about what the TV tells you to worry about. Obama and the media leftists don’t give a shit about kids, Obama himself has killed hundreds with pleasure, and he coldly watched many thousands of kids die. It’s all about centralizing government control and pacifying the population for these sociopaths.

        Like


      • Damn straight I don’t want to make the considerable sacrifices needed

        Which is why our civilization is doomed to failure.

        Like


      • More and more whites hate our civilization

        the fact our civilization is dying is not something that alarms them,

        they celebrate it

        Like


      • lol. Here’s hoping you run into a group of visually identifiable Obama voters late one night, and when only a gun and a white man in power could save your Pussy Galore vajajay, none is around.

        Gang rape is an all-too-fitting punishment for you, you rug-muchingg thunderdyke.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2012 at 3:23 pm Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

        Dopey troll is dopey, no cookie!

        Like


    • This is why you never should’ve gotten the vote.

      Like


      • “This is why you never should’ve gotten the vote.”

        This is why you never should’ve BEEN GIVEN the vote.

        Like


      • Yeah, man… I literally laughed out loud – her response to forcing parents to stay married is “umm gross”. That says it all.

        Like


      • Funny how one little phrase encapsulates the entire thought process.. or lack thereof.

        Like


      • I wonder sometimes if Susan B Anthony and all the others involved in the suffrage movement would have given it up if they knew where it was going to lead. If you could go back in time, sit them down, and explain it to them.

        But then again, didn’t the real problems start up when the pill became widely available?

        Like


      • I could give a shit was Susan B Anthony would think. She is dead. I am alive.

        Like


    • “Most of the parents who are not in a two parent biological family arrangement don’t want to be in one.”

      And what do the children think of that? hmm?

      Like


    • The lying dumb dyke has returned, in all her attempting-to-emasculate-white-men glory!

      How goes the Photoshopping of your personal portraits, butch?

      Like


  63. […] estatísticos explicam suficientemente a tragédia? Muito se falou nos dias seguintes ao crime do estado degenerado da sociedade americana (8), que é fértil em criar indivíduos (9) como Jared Loughner, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold e […]

    Like


  64. madvillian, write your comments in a text editor, then post. I’ve lost some brilliance as well, and I’m giving it away for free.

    As for blame, Salon has the answer :

    Time to profile white men?

    http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/would_the_u_s_government_profile_white_men/

    Like


  65. […] Adam Lanza, the school shooter, shot his divorced and single mom — the mother who raised him — four times in the head before embarking on his journey of mental disassociation from reality. Her face must surely have been rendered a mash of unrecognizable pulp. Four times. Point blank. In the head. You don’t do that unless you possess some serious unresolved rage against the mother. This kid hated his mom with a passion, and we can only guess why now that he’s dead. But clues abound. First, older moms are more likely to spawn autistic kids. Most autistitards are harmless, but some with severe handicaps to relate as normal human beings are powderkegs in an increasingly atomized society that they find impossible to manage or even comprehend. Second, the mom was divorced. Children of divorced parents and female-headed homes are at much higher risk for delinquency, jail, and violent crime. Lanza’s pop was paying his ex-wife a tidy some of money (which she did not earn, let’s not forget) to keep her spendthrift ass afloat. We can surmise that the mom was so fucking crazy that the father had no choice but to get away from her, or that he was SO Source: Chateau Heartiste   […]

    Like


  66. Jezebel joins the anti-white male screeching as expected.

    Have You Noticed That White Dudes Keep Mass Murdering People?

    Like


  67. “If the choice is between preserving the nuclear family and gun control, I am wayyy for gun control.”

    Don’t want a gun? Don’t own one. Problem solved.

    Unless, that is, you want to force your narrow views on others.

    Like


  68. http://abcnews.go.com/US/kendra-st-clair-oklahoma-girl-12-shoots-intruder/story?id=17524438

    ‘Kendra St. Clair, 12, was at home alone in Oklahoma, when loud banging began on the door to her family’s home. Soon, the glass shattered and an intruder had entered.

    “I was scared and I didn’t know what to do next,” Kendra told ABC News.

    Petrified, she called her mom Debra.

    “I said Kendra get the gun and go get in my closet now. And call 911.”

    The young 6th grader followed her mom’s orders to the tee.

    The 911 tapes tell the story as it unfolded.

    Kendra: “I’m at my house. I’m in my closet. And I ran away from (inaudible) someone’s trying to get into my house and I do not know who they are.” Dispatcher: “Ok I have a deputy en route, I want you to stay on the phone with me. Ok?” Kendra: “Ok. Please. I think they are in the house.”

    Kendra had taken shelter in a closet, clutching her mother’s .40 caliber glock gun while she listened to the intruder make his way around her home.

    [According to a local newspaper, this guy was in the house for six minutes while the kid hid in a closet waiting for the cops to show up.]

    Kendra: “Please help me. Please.” Dispatcher: “Alright, alright. I understand. Do you still have your mom’s gun there?” Kendra: “Yes I do. I have it in my hand.”

    Her fear intensified to sheer terror, when she saw the knob of the closet door beginning to turn.

    At that point, that for the first time in her life, Kendra fired a gun.

    Police said the bullet traveled straight through the closet door and struck 32-year-old Stacey Jones in the shoulder, scaring him out of the house.

    They arrested him a few blocks away and charged Jones with first degree burglary.

    “When I had the gun, I didn’t think I was actually going to have to shoot somebody,” the 6th grader recalled. “I think it’s going to change me a whole lot, knowing that I can hold my head up high and nothing can hurt me anymore.”‘

    Like


  69. The mom is NOT dead. They just gave an interview with her speaking of how she was afraid of her own son.

    Like


  70. This is exactly why Beta males are the most dangerous people on the planet.

    This is what Beta genes produce. Mass murderers. You can just look at his dads picture and tell he was a beta white knight phaggot.

    Like


  71. I was reading this article by a single mom and her son who threatens to kill her and himself a lot. It is a real problem. The thing is at the end her mini-bio writes “…She is also a single mother of four bright, loved children, one of whom has special needs.”

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/lizalong/i-am-adam-lanzas-mother-8ga2

    Like


  72. The moment I heard the shooter was a young man who had killed his mother I knew immediately the woman was divorced and the father kicked out of the home. I was not surprised when this was confirmed hours later.

    Like


  73. The moment I heard this was a young shooter who killed his mother I knew she was divorced and the father was kicked out of the home. I was not surprised when this was confirmed hours later.

    Like


  74. There’s one problem with this theory of single motherhood causing crime — despite mass shooting like these, crime rates (especially for violent crime) have seen HUGE decreases in the last 30 years.

    [Heartiste: Incarceration is the answer you’re looking for.]

    Meanwhile, the age of motherhood has increased (side note — older motherhood is actually linked to better-adjusted kids, although I’m assuming that’s because 30-something moms are usually educated and married to high-earning men) and the percentage of families headed by single moms has seen a slight increase.

    [A whole host of child development problems is linked with single motherhood. As for the falling crime rate, who’s to say it wouldn’t have fallen much further had there not been a single mom epidemic?]

    Like


    • Precisely Andrea. Though don’t be smashing their ideological fantasy world with awful things like facts… 😉

      Like


    • despite mass shooting like these, crime rates (especially for violent crime) have seen HUGE decreases in the last 30 years.

      There’s nothing left to take.

      All seriousness aside, abortion-on-demand amongst the last few generations of pöbelvolk have contributed to the lower crime rates (Freakanomics)… but like heartsy says, who’s to say it wouldn’t have fallen even further without today’s single mom epidemic?

      [Heartiste: Has Pinker tackled the issue of better treatment for shooting victims? I wonder how much the drop in the murder rate is the result of gunshot victims surviving thanks to modern medical care.]

      Like


    • “A whole host of child development problems is linked with single motherhood. As for the falling crime rate, who’s to say it wouldn’t have fallen much further had there not been a single mom epidemic?”

      That, ultimately, is a eugenic issue, not a social/values one.

      [Heartiste: Single momhood has skyrocketed in the past two generations. So has mass incarceration. The latter thankfully is, so far, assisting in canceling out the worst effects of the former. The fact that single momhood is way up over a few decades tells us that this is not a genetic trend, but a social one, with social effects. There aren’t suddenly millions more women with a genetic propensity to single momhood than there were before, say, 1970. (See: Greg Cochran for the mathematical impossibility for that sort of widespread genetic change to happen so quickly.) What has changed is the culture, which is encouraging whatever latent “single mommery genes” (or hypergamy genes, or cad lover genes, or thug life asshole lover genes, or poor judgment genes, whatever you wish to call it) which exist in most women to flourish, and flourish particularly hard in the lower classes and in NAMs.]

      The people who harp against single motherhood ultimately do so as a eugenic argument.

      [It is a eugenic and cultural argument. The single momhood plague is raising a generation of broken souls. Single momhood is both a reflection of underlying dystopian genes being expressed more fully by cultural forces, and a negative influence on children in itself.]

      If only the people who would wait until marriage to procreate did so, you would have far fewer genes for anti-social traits in the gene pool.

      [Or if only the culture encouraged early in life marriage so people didn’t have to wait in celibate hell for years on end. Of course, that would require a culture which ceased placing so much emphasis on women going to college and grad school to earn useless libtard degrees.]

      Not that there’s necessarily any problem with a eugenic policy in that spirit.

      [Any policy which forces men to help defray the costs of single moms, or even married moms, to have kids and a career via mandated maternity leave and daycare and the like is a doomed policy, and an immoral one. It is immoral because it is a cash grab from beta males to women to help them raise unrelated spawnage. It is doomed because it fails to take into consideration the absolute loathing men have for footing the bill for women they aren’t fucking to help them raise the kids of other men. It severs the natural quid pro quo between the sexes — namely, she gives her sex and paternity guarantee for his resources and protection. Mandated “women can have it all” feminist-inspired policies are essentially “she steals his resources and protection for no sex in return.” This is what is known in industry parlance as a raw deal.

      As for the argument that whites need to increase their fertility rate, I call bullshit. America was a fine place to live when it had 150 million people. The problem isn’t the raw numbers; it’s the diversity and the entitlement programs (said ponzi scheme programs which practically had failure embedded in their code). Close the fucking borders, ship out the migrant squatters, end equalist propagandizing, and a lot of pro-eugenic stuff will fall easily into place. On the other hand, if you want a society where women are incentivized to have kids outside of marriage with the forcefully redistributed money of unsexed beta males with growing rage issues, well, we’ve already got an example of what that looks like in the real world. It’s called Africa, land of the original r-selected hellhole.]

      Like


      • “The fact that single momhood is way up over a few decades tells us that this is not a genetic trend, but a social one, with social effects.”

        I certainly did not claim that increased single motherhood was due to genetic change; in fact, I specifically said otherwise.

        Society has changed because phenotypes have changed, and this is because of environmental changes. The same genes will lead to different traits in different environments. This doesn’t still doesn’t demonstrate that single motherhood, in and of itself causes any of these problems. Single motherhood is merely a symptom, not a cause, of the changes that have occurred from times gone by.

        “‘If only the people who would wait until marriage to procreate did so, you would have far fewer genes for anti-social traits in the gene pool.

        [Or if only the culture encouraged early in life marriage so people didn’t have to wait in celibate hell for years on end. Of course, that would require a culture which ceased placing so much emphasis on women going to college and grad school to earn useless libtard degrees.]”

        Early marriage is definitely NOT what it’s cracked up to be (people who marry earlier are more likely to divorce—likely because of increased likelihood of mismatched personalities).

        While I agree with you the need for lengthy education is overstressed, unfortunately, that’s unlikely to change anytime soon. Education is indeed primarily about signalling, but de-emphasizing its importance in that role will take a significant change, which I’ll soon address.

        “Any policy which forces men to help defray the costs of single moms, or even married moms, to have kids and a career via mandated maternity leave and daycare and the like is a doomed policy”

        We will see how it fares in the NW Euro countries that have adopted it (immigration policies notwithstanding, which is really the main problem in these countries).

        Like it or not, women in the workplace is a genie that’s not going back in the bottle. Yes, it does cause problems, and I agree with many your analyses of how it causes these problems. However, that said, it’s just not going to go away.

        “As for the argument that whites need to increase their fertility rate, I call bullshit. America was a fine place to live when it had 150 million people.”

        I agree. I’ve said much the same, and was going to reiterate this point in new post.

        The real problem is:

        “The problem isn’t the raw numbers; it’s the diversity”

        Yes, primarily the high fertility of certain immigrant groups.

        “close the fucking borders, ship out the migrant squatters, end equalist propagandizing, and a lot of pro-eugenic stuff will fall easily into place.”

        Yes. The sustained influx of 1 million migrants annually is, ultimately, behind many of the problems we face. Indeed, the reason that the bachelor’s degree has become so important as a signalling device is because employers are free to pick and choose among potential employees. The American worker has fewer bargaining chips, hence, employers are unwilling to train or impose otherwise unreasonable standards.

        However, shutting down immigration alone wouldn’t do the trick. Wages would rise, and so would birth rates, across the board. You’d still need incentives at both ends to ensure that breeding was eugenic.

        “[M]andated maternity leave and daycare and the like is a doomed policy, and an immoral one … It is doomed because it fails to take into consideration the absolute loathing men have for footing the bill for women they aren’t fucking to help them raise the kids of other men … Mandated ‘women can have it all’ feminist-inspired policies are essentially ‘she steals his resources and protection for no sex in return.’ This is what is known in industry parlance as a raw deal.”

        And yet, in the homogenous NW Euro societies, men happily pay to support their fellow countrymen.

        It is only hated by American conservatives because of the lack of ethnic homogeneity here; such money goes to support people who the payers aren’t related to, hence the blow back. Such policies are not as “raw” of a deal in a place where people share more DNA, hence why NW countries are so socialistic.

        You would need to have maternity leave and family planning to achieve eugenic breeding even if you shut down immigration.

        “On the other hand, if you want a society where women are incentivized to have kids outside of marriage with the forcefully redistributed money of unsexed beta males with growing rage issues,”

        Evidence to date doesn’t support the notion that breeding is going on that direction. The most monogamous men seem to have the most kids.

        Like


      • …Single motherhood is merely a symptom, not a cause, of the changes that have occurred from times gone by.

        often the symptom and the cause are the same

        single motherhood is both

        just as being addicted to drugs is a symptom of something wrong with a person , and doing drugs is the cause of more problems with that person ( from psychological to financial )

        being addicted to drugs is both a symptom and a cause

        it does not matter which came first, one causes the other and they feed each other like an endless loop

        single mothers produce more dysfunctional men who in turn will impregnate more single mothers

        single mothers produce more dysfunctional women who will become single mothers

        the cause and the symptom are one and the same

        Like


      • “‘Single motherhood is merely a symptom, not a cause, of the changes that have occurred from times gone by.’

        often the symptom and the cause are the same

        single motherhood is both.”

        Uh, no…

        Like


      • “On the other hand, if you want a society where women are incentivized to have kids outside of marriage with the forcefully redistributed money of unsexed beta males with growing rage issues, well, we’ve already got an example of what that looks like in the real world. It’s called Africa, land of the original r-selected hellhole.”

        We have another example with 20 dead kids in CT.

        While game could not have saved Mr. Lanza, his mom never being allowed to push around a beta GE financier might have helped.

        Like


    • It isnt that weird that women over 30 have better adjusted kids, its usually the prole-type women who have kids earlier. But still, if a man wants kids its best for him to have them with a young non-prole woman.

      Like


      • “It isnt that weird that women over 30 have better adjusted kids, its usually the prole-type women who have kids earlier.”

        Yes. Interesting, isn’t it?

        Like


      • Ah. Untangling cause and effect – a tremendously difficult task. As tp “prole-type women”, there is a world of difference between (typically rural) women marrying early and producing a passel of kids, and an urbane ghetto type women starting early to produce welfare recipients.

        Etc.

        Thor

        Like


  75. When I heard about the shootings, I said, “He was raised by a single Mom in a rich household, with an entitlement mentality, i.e., poster boy of feminist single Moms.” As the story unfolded everyone thought I was a soothsayer – rather than simply observing the common thread of all of these.

    One could easily have said, “He’s a loner/loser, not getting laid.” And been equally accurate… Of course the fact that had one of those teachers he shot at first been armed it would have been stopped, never comes up on the Oh So Liberal Media….

    Like


    • Obviously the mother treated men like shit

      her own son shot her

      and she was afraid her ex husband who was paying trough the nose ( 280,000 a year???) would come and hurt her

      How badly must a woman treat her own son for him to shoot her in the face?

      but the liberal media will spin this into the opposite; they will say this incident is more evidence men treat women like shit
      and that more must be done about those awful awful men

      up is down, night is day in liberal world

      Like


  76. What about the other two shooters?

    Like


  77. re tweet: “What may have transpired in the Lanza household had it been run by a strong, dominant husband and father. amnation.com/vfr/archives/0… 1 hour ago”

    This is good. Really good. From what I understand, men act for the general welfare wheras women act for the welfare of the individual. Only men can convince women to do something a woman wouldn’t personally want to do (like institutionalize her child) in order for sociey to benefit.

    I’ve recently been thinking about this idea that men see women in the same way women see children and I have to feel sorry for them. Never to have a partner to lean on for strength, never to have a conversation of any depth, always to be the “bad” cop and say no to ridiculous things. You guys who are pulling it off deserve a lot of credit.

    Like


    • “What may have transpired in the Lanza household had it been run by a strong, dominant husband and father.”

      It was run by one (at least, the husband was present) until Adam was 17!

      [Heartiste: The father was there (so far as we know), but that doesn’t necessarily mean he was a strong and dominant presence.]

      “From what I understand, men act for the general welfare wheras women act for the welfare of the individual. Only men can convince women to do something a woman wouldn’t personally want to do (like institutionalize her child) in order for sociey to benefit.”

      Ask Michelle Bachmann or Margaret Thatcher what they think about that.

      If you are going to cook up pet theories, which is fine, you might want to do your homework first…

      [If Lanza suffered from congenital analgesia coupled with aspergers, then, yes, it was the crazy single mom’s fault for not getting him help and keeping an arsenal in the home for him to play with.]

      Like


      • Its not a pet theory. Its a pretty recongnized one. And you just used NAWALT!

        The point the comment enclosed in the tweet made was that a strong and dominant father would have made a decision that the family welfare was more important overall than any individual’s welfare within the family.

        I think its inaccurate to call the woman a “single mother” as the divorce took place three years ago. A “single mother” is a woman who has never been married.

        Fault can be applied both directly and indirectly to a great number of people and institutions.

        Like


      • “Its not a pet theory [‘men act for the general welfare wheras women act for the welfare of the individual’]. Its a pretty recongnized one.”

        I’m not so sure about that. Sources?

        “The point the comment enclosed in the tweet made was that a strong and dominant father would have made a decision that the family welfare was more important overall than any individual’s welfare within the family.”

        And if the father was different, a whole host of other things would have been different, as you can see below. It’s not really a fair or terribly productive line of reasoning.

        Like


      • “Heartiste: The father was there (so far as we know), but that doesn’t necessarily mean he was a strong and dominant presence.”

        If he was a different man (assuming that he wasn’t “a strong and dominant presence”), Adam Lanza wouldn’t have been Adam Lanza, but the son of this different man. Heredity is still heredity.

        [Heartiste: We’re not discussing Adam Lanza’s gene profile; we’re discussing his father’s ability or lack thereof to tame Adam’s mother and exert some influence over his life trajectory. Granted, that fatherly portrait is partly genetic, partly social. (We can argue the ratio another time.)]

        “If Lanza suffered from congenital analgesia coupled with aspergers, then, yes, it was the crazy single mom’s fault for not getting him help and keeping an arsenal in the home for him to play with.”

        First, of course, those two things alone wouldn’t have made him a violent killer. We are in agreement that he, and his mom, and perhaps his dad were/are a little off in the head.

        [The son and mom evidence the crazy. There is no evidence that the dad is anything other than a garden variety, smart, hard-working beta male who got the shaft by his ex-wife and the divorce industrial complex.]

        Shall we however refrain from trying to condense his illness into one or two neat little (generally innocuous) things, going on what little we have to go on?

        [Refraining is beta!]

        Second, how do you know that he wasn’t receiving treatment?

        [Any treatment worth its salt would have notified authorities of the mom’s home-stored weaponry, and removed the son from her vile influence.]

        Like


      • “Any treatment worth its salt would have notified authorities of the mom’s home-stored weaponry, and removed the son from her vile influence.”

        That’s the kicker.

        Nancy Lanza owned her weapons legally. I don’t see any sort of intervention that would have been undertaken by mental health professionals or the authorities in this case.

        Like


      • To the contrary. A competent psychiatrist would have learned of the weapons and rang the alarm bells, to the mother first but he or she would not have stopped there.

        And don’t the current gun laws ask if you have someone living with you whom you consider to be mentally ill?

        Is Anarchist Soccer Mom really the 52 year old mother saying she is 40? Or is it the woman who wrote “I am Adam’s mother”?

        Like


    • Thanks for the credit, Kate. It’s easier to do when you had a Dad that modeled the (bad cop) behavior for you.

      Like


  78. Liberals only get loud on gun control when white people die.

    Where is the outrage when blacks die from gunfire in far higher numbers on a monthly basis?

    Are liberals, perhaps, stone cold racists?

    (and ironically when Trayvon martin died the conversation was about RACISM, not gun control. fucking hypocrites)

    Like


  79. thanks for the post and the blog.
    In my circle of friends and family I am famous for saying,
    “What’s ruining this country are three things, faggots, women and wimps”.

    I think wrote a post, No Country For Young Men where he further outlined these problems.
    Let’s fight the good fight gentlemen, the future of our species depends on it.

    Like


  80. Who said this?

    ” 2012 will likely go on record as the year America declared War on Women”

    Adam Lanza’s mother at her own blog

    yep just as I said she hated men with a passion

    http://anarchistsoccermom.blogspot.ca/2012/07/news-from-war-on-women-front.html

    Like


  81. Jcc
    I would add, however, that the main problem with these guys that go crazy like this is that they have a lot of anger. Anger at who they are, how they have the problems they do but don’t know how to correct them,
    —————————————-

    Maybe race suicide is the logical outcome of racism evolved to its highest point of perfection?

    After all, what is the value of killing nonwhite people when they don’t even qualify as fully evolved humans?

    The true test of a white supremacist is killing other white people; especially white children.

    Looks like Adam Sperg got the jump on all you fools!

    Like


  82. Using the word “autistitards” disqualifies you from judging anyone.

    Like


  83. http://tinyurl.com/crosh8f

    Just more proof that dads matter more than most single mothers (or women who intend to be with the attitude that, ‘other than sperm, I don’t need no man’) care to admit.

    Men and women have roles in society. Equal but different. Feminists take note for once.

    Like


    • Apart from the unhealthy fatherless environment, there is another factor.
      Genetics. There is a common if rarely expressed clearly belief among
      women that the genetics of the father does not matter. (Except for the deeply subconscious desire for badboys). I call this the spark plug theory, that
      the sperm is just the spark, the genetics doesn’t matter. It is of course false.

      (There is a parallel belief among some men that genetics is all from the paternal side, the “seed” an the woman is just the flower pot. With a diploid species, that is about as false, never mind fine points about X chomosomes
      and mitochondria)

      It really DOES take two to make a baby, and they are essentially equally
      important.

      Duh

      Thor

      Like


      • Not only it takes 2 to make a baby, and both the father’s seed and the mother’s egg are equally important, but also I think the father’s influence is much more important after birth. There is nothing like a father’s discipline to straighten you up fast. I can’t fathom raising kids without their dad.

        Like


  84. It is really simple. Abolish welfare, or at least routine welfare. Make custody an auction – whoever is willing to take on the kid(s) with the least amount of child support gets custody.

    And as to guns, rescind or at least revise the federal law that makes schools gun-free zones – and encourage concealed carry among school employees. This will cost virtually nothing.

    Thor

    Like


  85. […] of heritability of behavioral traits. Certain commenters (such as recently Dennis Mangan and Heartiste) have noted that there have been distinct changes in behavior over the last century, particularly, […]

    Like


  86. As a follow-up to some of the discussion here, and as an in-depth discussion of heritability in general, see my latest post:

    All Human Behavioral Traits are Heritable « JayMan’s Blog

    Like


    • You realize that this has implications on race and other things which liberals don’t like to admit. Of course, many behaviors and personality traits are inherited and genetic, but then many are also the effects of nurture. But to say it is all inherited means that blacks will always be stupid and unaccomplished. See the comment by Canadian Friend. He nailed it”

      “So according to Jayman and his studies, it is all about nature but nurture does not count for anything.
      Then Jayman must agree that it is useless to change the environment in which blacks and Hispanics grow up and live as their dysfunction is in their genes
      Blacks and Hispanics will always be semi illiterate, lack scientific curiosity, perform poorly in school, be drug addicts, be promiscuous, have more illegitimate children and have much higher rates of crime and violence than whites as no matter what good nurturing we provide them with, and no matter how many billions or trillions Obama takes from the rich to give it to the colored poors to provide them with better nurturing
      it is all useless as nature made them that way and we can not change that.
      Using liberal arguments is a lot of fun!“
      https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/older-moms-and-divorced-moms-raising-generation-of-psychopaths/#comment-400627

      Like


      • “You realize that this has implications on race and other things which liberals don’t like to admit.”

        Read my blog.

        ” Of course, many behaviors and personality traits are inherited and genetic, but then many are also the effects of nurture.”

        “Nurture” is a tricky word, as it implies a degree of control over the environmental factors affecting behavioral traits that we don’t necessarily have.

        “Then Jayman must agree that it is useless to change the environment in which blacks and Hispanics grow up and live as their dysfunction is in their genes
        Blacks and Hispanics will always be semi illiterate, lack scientific curiosity, perform poorly in school, be drug addicts, be promiscuous, have more illegitimate children and have much higher rates of crime and violence than whites as no matter what good nurturing we provide them with, and no matter how many billions or trillions”

        Again, read my blog. The same goes for Canadian Friend…

        Like


      • ok I get it now, like all liberals, to you what science has demonstrated does not apply to topics you find uncomfortable

        so in your liberal world, good parenting is useless for white kids but does magic with Black and Hispanic kids

        and dysfunctions in whites are in their genes, while dysfunction in colored people is caused by anything BUT their genes

        In liberal bizaro-world, do the laws of physics also change when applied to Blacks and Hispanics?

        Like


      • @Canadian Friend:

        “ok I get it now, like all liberals, to you what science has demonstrated does not apply to topics you find uncomfortable”

        No.

        If you can’t be bothered to read my blog, I don’t see the point in bothering to discuss this further with you.

        Like


      • NiteLily

        Please write to me at

        [email protected]

        Like


  87. She was smothering him. One anecdote I read in a story about the Lanza case mentioned a time when Adam was sick in bed as a teenager and wouldn’t let his mom into the room to care for him, so she slept outside his door all night. Other anecdotes talked about how he was always at her side when they went out and about. Sounds deeply weird. I’m sure she clung to him as a male figure when the dad left and the older brother moved out. A smothering, anxious mother can really warp a young man.

    Like


    • Please don’t make excuses for him. What he did is inexcusable. If she was really hurting him emotionally he could have left home and moved in with the dad. And why didn’t the dad take him in knowing his ex-wife was driving his son crazy? I don’t put much stock in the story you read. There is a lot of hearsay around this horrible incident.

      Both parents are to blame. The father just took off and left her with this difficult child and she was a stupid single mother, negligent as she was to allow him to shoot guns. If she was this controlling and this over-protective she wouldn’t have allowed him to handle guns. The fathered just claimed Adam’s body on Monday, New Year’s Eve. Too bad he wasn’t there when Adam really needed him.

      There are all kinds of stories about what went on in that home behind closed doors. They say he was spending hours in the basement surfing the Internet and frequenting Satanist websites. Maybe that’s why he destroyed his computer, as to not implicate his Satanist friends. No one knows for sure. The only thing we can actually be sure about is that he was disturbed and shouldn’t have been allowed near guns. He probably should have been locked up years ago.

      There is also another rumor that she was going to lock him up and that’s why he killed her. He killed the kids because he was jealous of them. The elementray schools is where she volunteered. Some say she couldn’t lock him up because of the ACLU fighting on behalf of disturbed people and the homeless from getting locked up. Most homeless people have mental issues. No one knows the truth about Adam Lanza. He had no friends and he left no clues.

      It was a true evil act by an evil person – so senseless and so heartbreaking.

      Like


  88. […] ethno-nationalism (read: White ethno-nationalism) that will get White Americans to act more in their own interests instead of those of the rest of the World. The proponents of this feel that this is a positive […]

    Like