A Blatant Case Of Sex Discrimination In The Law

A couple was arrested for having consensual sex on a public beach in front of people dining in a nearby restaurant. The bail was set at $10,000 for the man, and $2,500 for the woman.

The anti-male commissars infesting our legal system are getting awfully bold, aren’t they? I would like a feminist, any feminist, to explain how exactly this bond disparity isn’t crass gender discrimination.

I won’t be holding my breath.

ps The arrested dude is one ugly mofo, but his face screams aloof asshole. And we all know how much young, hot girls swoon for assholes.

UPDATE

HalfCanadian writes:

The girl had 2 priors that have been posted. DUI and obstruction.

http://gawker.com/5814320/florida-couple-arrested-for-putting-on-surfside-sex-show?comment=40294078#comments

He has priors as well, which include a DUI with drug possession (Mary Jane and prescriptions).

So my original question remains valid. How is this disparate bond amount not gender discrimination under the law?





Comments


  1. The severity of the alllegations is only one factor that a court looks at in setting a bond amount. The primary criteria is to what extent the defendant appears to be a flight risk. To evaluate, courts look at prior criminal record and whether there have been previous failure to appear warrants issued against them. My guess is that this guy had priors and the girl did not.

    Like


  2. Wait until you read the Washington Examiner on the new Federalization of yucky men in college article.

    Like


    • Just posted it in the last thread.

      The Office of Civil Rights or OCR is part of the Department of Education.

      They can control what all colleges do to men because they can withhold federal grant money to the colleges. They literally have male professors and administrators by the balls.

      That’s why alpha college professors teach overseas.

      Like


  3. on June 22, 2011 at 4:50 pm Basil Ransom

    Because who wants to see him naked?

    Alpha: posting bail while the girl languishes in county.

    He’s not ugly, just has retarded hair.

    Like


  4. This could be blatant misandry or the dude could have some prior record or some such thing. Interesting to find out which.

    Like


    • on June 22, 2011 at 5:01 pm A. Nonny.mous

      Second this comment. He may have a prior. Though feminists wouldn’t need an excuse, agreed.

      Like


  5. “My guess is that this guy had priors and the girl did not.”

    I doubt he had priors. This kind of sexism is SOP in the criminal justice system. In multiple-perpetrator crimes, it is almost always the woman who is offered the plea deal in return for testifying against other defendants. Women get better plea deals than men do, they get shorter sentences than men do, their prisons are much more secure than men’s are, and their prisoners are a hell of a lot nicer.

    Like


  6. And we’ll wait baited breath to see if he has priors, it’s not like our court system is misandrist regardless.

    Like


  7. She’s smiling, he’s not. She’s happy the world knows she fucked that guy. What does that tell you?

    Like


  8. on June 22, 2011 at 5:14 pm Gunslingergregi

    under article in comments says they gonna be sex offenders now so are they gonna have to walk around and tell new neighbors that they are and be in same group as the real freaks. OMG consensual sex good lord surprized jesus didn’t come down and hit them with the lightening bolt.
    Anyone watched animals fuck on national geographic before shit funny.

    Like


  9. The sex discrimination was appropriate. In such a situation the man was the leader. Men lead. It’s natural.

    You want gender equality – is that it?

    Like


  10. She’s smiling because she’s getting attention.

    Girls love attention, even it’s for committing a crime. She’s also smiling because she knows that she won’t face any serious consequences for behavior. Her female friends will all validate her bad behavior while her rationalization hamster will be spinning quickly in order for her to blame him for coercing her.

    Like


  11. xsplat– wrong. Woman are the choosers. The entire reason Game exists is to tap into that hardwired brain that is attracted to this type of guy.

    Like


    • I’m pretty sure he was being sarcastic, but its hard to tell without *sarcasm* written after it.

      Like


  12. she has 2 priors, him 1 I believe

    Like


  13. Zatarra, you are making a category error. She chose to let him fuck her. He led her to the place of the fucking.

    Like


    • …and what? She was too timid to say, “Not here. Let’s fuck over there.” Most of the girls around here just love directing traffic, can’t help themselves. Couldn’t say about England for sure, but they seem pretty head-strong.

      Like


  14. I agree that it’s b.s. (misandrist) on the bail amount, but for these two people to have sex near a bunch of children? C’mon that’s just tacky. You can have outdoor sex and not do it in front of children. Children deserve a period of innocence ; all healthy civilizations are built upon this assumption.

    Like


    • How the fuck do you think children are made? Oh wait, 2 lesbians and a turkey baster!

      As for “healthy civilizations”, the US has been terminally ill for a long time. Two drunks fucking on the beach will have little effect.

      Like


      • “As for “healthy civilizations”, the US has been terminally ill for a long time. Two drunks fucking on the beach will have little effect.”

        Ding ding ding. Winner!

        Like


  15. I’ve had public sex dozens of times. I have no idea how many times. And I have no idea with how many girls. Pretty well all girls are into it. Pretty well all will put up little or no resistance.

    Yet none will initiate it.

    Like


    • My, my… aren’t YOU the one. Compromise your girl friends by having sex in public, and yet too much of a gentleman to keep score. That would be bad form 😉

      Like


    • xsplat

      I’ve had public sex dozens of times. I have no idea how many times.

      You’re fortunate farmers don’t put up surveillance cams.

      Like


  16. The guy may have had a prior record.

    Interestingly, you make the same error that feminists make when alleging unequal pay between a woman and a man doing the same job in a workplace is presumptively discrimination. Without context, which could provide a whole host of legit reasons for the discrepancy, it is premature to cry discrimination.

    What I find hilarious is that the guy made bond but left his girl to stay in jail. Definitely asshold alpha.

    [Editor: How many women would spring for their man’s bail in similar circumstances? I’d have done the same as this dude, unless the girl was a long term lover.]

    Like


    • It is possible that he posted bail immediately and her bail was reduced after not being posted.

      Like


  17. If you pay a bail bondsman to get you out of jail, the fee is usually 10% of the total bail set. Wouldn’t that then mean that his bail was set at $100,000, making it 40x the amount set for the girl?

    Like


    • “Bail was set” which means that’s what the judge said. Dude could have posted the entire 10k himself or bonded out for 1k.

      Incidentally, your math sucks, because they both would have got 10% on bond and it still would be 4x.

      Like


  18. He’s free as a bird and she’s still in her county blues. I wouldn’t sweat it. Plus, during job interviews, the HR director can flick her bean while he tells her about the time he crushed 21 year old latina ass on a beach in front of 50 people.

    Like


  19. on June 22, 2011 at 5:46 pm Half Canadian

    The girl had 2 priors that have been posted. DUI and obstruction.

    http://gawker.com/5814320/florida-couple-arrested-for-putting-on-surfside-sex-show?comment=40294078#comments

    He has priors as well, which include a DUI with drug possession (Mary Jane and prescriptions).

    Like


    • It’s telling how all the men here said “maybe he had priors” without even considering that she might.

      Like


  20. The most outrageous aspect of this story is that a couple were arrested and thrown in jail for having consensual sex. This country is so fucked.

    Like


    • Everyone is so lame and non-confrontational now. All the restaurant needed to do was shine a flashlight on them or otherwise let them know that they were being watched and they would have stopped. Worst case scenario, send a waiter to walk towards them, making noise, and they would have pulled their pants up and ran off.

      Like


  21. This is a crock. I live 15 minutes from where this happened and the “beach” in which the uh hum, inappropriate touching took place is not really a beach. It’s a beach bar called Caddy’s where people go to get drunk, show off their bodies and copulate lake rabbits. If I were to guess I would say that they had probably met that day. On a side not the girl is pretty hot, consistant with the types of girls down here. Ahhhh Florida.

    [Editor: She probably thinks of herself as daddy’s little princess. Some beta will eventually foot the bill for what this douchebag got for free on a beach.]

    Like


  22. He possesses a weapon of mass destruction (a cock) and must be neutralized.

    Like


  23. on June 22, 2011 at 7:19 pm Stabbin' Cabin

    It says she’s from Tallahasee. Could this be the same chick? If so, this dude is def alpha. Just look at her picture, she’s smokin.

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/erica-huerta/24/935/a5

    Like


    • yes, she is, look at the previous conviction pics on Gawker, the eyebrow shapes are too similar for it to be 2 different women

      Like


  24. Only thing i can think of is i thought bail was set based on income, ability to pay or whatever, hence being set higher for the guy as he likely has more money than the women, because shes a woman. Note the guy paid already and the woman hasn’t. Because shes a broke woman. But i could be completely wrong, never been arrested.

    Like


  25. I’d guess that males, being more aggressive and physically fit, are more prone to flight risk. This would justify a higher bond. Court is fair in this case.

    [Editor: Males, being more aggressive and physically fit, are more prone to career ambition. This would justify a higher income.]

    Like


  26. It’s like “Lady’s Night” at a nightclub. Sure it’s unfair, but just like we want more ladies at the club, we also want more ladies, as opposed to men, being indecent in public. Put it this way, if there were two gay dudes fucking in one direction, and two lesbians in the other, and only one policeman, which would you prefer he arrest?

    I say we don’t rock the boat of this one.

    Like


    • Honestly? I could care less to watch two lesbians doing it. Two lesbians doing it is the same a two chipmunks doing it. I’m not going to be involved. Now, if it were two bi women…………..

      Like


  27. Well there you have it. If you want to know why we have a justice system biased against men, just read these comments.

    One fucked up comment after the next about priors and dude she’s hot and other bullshit. We’re fucked.

    Like


  28. Just read the article my favourite line: “Douglas was released the next afternoon after posting a $10,000 bond. Huerta remains in custody in lieu of $2,500 bail.” LOL she still in jail. Bail is also based on the financial circumstances of the accused. He may have money and she has none, hence $2500 was enough for her as she can’t even post that.

    Like


  29. Explains why Gaianism is a crock of shit. Great series, overall.

    Like


  30. that girl, hot? ummmm…maybe in a white trash way. not to mention that none of the pics show the rest of her body.

    fgas always has the last laugh.

    Like


    • she is 140 lbs and 5’6” ..so do the math. the info is available on the previous charges against her from gawker

      Like


  31. Bail is supposed to be set based on the crime alleged, the defendant’s prior record, and any factors that indicate an increased probability of flight (dual citizenship, out-of-state residence, etc). That’s it.
    I speak from experience. My girlfriends had to bail me out a few times in my teens and early twenties.

    Like


  32. I think men are suppose to look kind of ugly, being a pretty boy with fine facial features is a sign of high estrogen/ low testosterone. A cave man face is a sign of high testosterone so no wonder women are attracted to rough looking men at best and ugly men at worst.

    Like


  33. Guaran-fucking-tee you she pressured him to do it. Just judging from the look on her face. He probably had at least some hesitation and she pushed him on it – possibly digging at his manhood – and he complied. I mean, not that he didn’t have fun or isn’t glad to have a story to tell. But I think, as men, we’ve all been in circumstances where we do something crazy because a chick wants us to. Especially at 22 years old.

    So slap her with the hefty bond.

    Like


  34. It’s okay ’cause she’s hot. Priorities, man!

    Like


    • Note the update:

      “That beach banger on Boston went to FSU. I hooked up with her 2 or 3 times. Girl is a pig. Mug shot is easily the hottest she’s ever looked”

      Like


  35. Got a text tonight from a one-night stand from 14 months ago. Cute blonde. Kinda kinky. She talked about wanting a threesome. I chuckled as I banged her and she kept going on about it. Fun. Would definitely bang again. I hit her up again a week later but she said she was seeing someone. I dropped it and have had no contact since.

    Anyway, 14 months later, tonight, I get this:

    “Hey Max, hope all’s good with you. Super-random, but any chance you’re free in the next two weeks to meet up for a drink? I have a friend I’d like to introduce you to.”

    Beta brain says “Oh, how nice, she wants to intro me to a friend. Maybe I can bag her.”

    Alpha brain says “How can I bang her AND her friend?”

    How would you respond?

    I’m gonna give it a day to respond. No rush.

    Like


    • on June 23, 2011 at 10:40 am Some Bullshit Handle

      Alpha brain says “How can I bang her AND her friend?”

      How would you respond?

      Thursday at my place, 8 pm.
      Wear something hot.

      Like


    • @Max
      “Hey Max, hope all’s good with you. Super-random, but any chance you’re free in the next two weeks to meet up for a drink? I have a friend I’d like to introduce you to.”

      The friend is probably another dude.

      Like


    • OMG!! Youre friend kssing another girl??While u watch…and take part? Would your friend GO DOWN on the girl??? My GOD!! 🙂

      Like


  36. Da mugshot isn’t that glorious. Note the forehead wrinkles.
    http://florida.arrests.org/Arrests/Erica_Huerta_4681471/
    Age : 21 Years Old
    Weight : 140 lbs
    Height : 5’06”
    She’s nearing the starting point on her fast track toa whaledom. Give her a few years.

    Like


  37. @Max,

    Dude, just name a place and time and do it. Check between your pants and make sure you’ve still got balls. If yes, just do it.

    Be cool and pretend it’s all natural. A bit of a joke, and fun. Then it is.

    Like


  38. McChang

    I’d guess that males, being more aggressive and physically fit, are more prone to flight risk. This would justify a higher bond. Court is fair in this case.

    [Editor: Males, being more aggressive and physically fit, are more prone to career ambition. This would justify a higher income.]

    Exactly.

    Like


  39. Bond has little to nothing to do with the underlying offense. It is about 1) ensuring appearance for all future court proceedings relating to the charges, and 2) curtailing any danger to the community posed by the defendant. Personal history (especially violent conduct or prior failures to appear for court), connections to the local community (including family), and similar factors are given outsized importance. Without knowing more, it’s impossible to say what motivated the bail decisions. Could be just based on sex, but that’s not a given.

    Like


  40. Why should he post her bond? She would just skip appearing in court and he would lose his $2500.

    Talk about white knighting.

    Maybe, just maybe, this was an act of prostitution mistaken for consensual sex.

    Like


  41. OT, but important to this site.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/us/23bulger.html?hp

    NOtice how he was caught. A warning to all.

    Like


  42. He didn’t post her bond because he just met her at Caddy’s that day. This was a random hook-up.
    Caddy’s is a meat market (oh the good times!) It happened at 7pm, they were both plastered. Read the Boston article from above, he couldn’t even get it up. Dude is not an Alpha just luck of draw. Drunk horny chick.
    Prob some jealous prick called the cops on them…

    Like


  43. Something doesn’t make sense. If you look at the mugshots on florida.arrests.org, it shows both of them as having bond set at $10000.

    Like


  44. sharp

    Well there you have it. If you want to know why we have a justice system biased against men, just read these comments.

    One fucked up comment after the next about priors and dude she’s hot and other bullshit. We’re fucked

    Not if you don’t play. Avoid them. Many women out there are oblivious to misandry but others are not. Let them start to question why men are refusing to get involved. Maybe they might open up their mouths for something else besides stuffing them with food or cocks.

    And as for the men, if sex is your primary path to happiness then you are lost. Evil in this society, integrity is gone, words mean nothing, and there’s no honor anymore. Trust? What the fuck is that? A piece of pussy is not a replacement for it and never will be. Fucking women isn’t the answer to it; it’s the main cause of it. Money is not the root of all evil here guys, women are and the ways in which men are manipulated to go about supplicating to them. How they toss other men under the bus just to dip their dicks or with the hope they get the chance to. AKA the white knight, the courts, the police, the government, the feds, the feminist, the SWPL’s, and everyone else in between.

    Like


  45. Something I find interesting that appears counter-intuitive:

    Why is it that patriarchal societies are more nurturing towards family, marriage and children, and the more a society becomes matriarchal, the more it breaks down into individualism, hedonism, with a communal, entitlement “village” mentality?

    One would think that nature would dictate the opposite: women have more at stake in the sexual exchange, share a stronger physical bond with their offspring, are more in need of male resources during pregnancy and immediately after child-birth…why aren’t the women the ones clammoring for traditional conservative family structures, penalizing infidelity, and making divorce more costly and difficult?

    There may be no reason to it at all: women attempting to influence such public policy may be akin to children playing with firearms. They just aren’t ready to handle this level of responsibility and do not have the vision and sense of accountability capable of seeing the likely consequences of short-sighted policy. Short-sightedness seems to be the common characteristic of feminist policy, usually based on good intentions. For example, a small minority of women are trapped in abusive marriages, so feminists push to essentially gut the entire institution with no-fault divorce. Some women are abandoned by men that impregnant them, leaving them unable to fend for themselves and their offspring, so the feminists push for entire social welfare programs that end up PERPETUATING the very phenomena they sought to address.

    Like


  46. on June 23, 2011 at 11:20 am David Rockefeller

    “Da mugshot isn’t that glorious. Note the forehead wrinkles.
    Age : 21 Years Old
    Weight : 140 lbs
    Height : 5’06″”

    If she cops to 140 lbs, she’s probably packing 160-170 lbs.

    No one wants to watch get a fatty get porked. Too disgusting. That’s why someone called 911. That’s probably also why the dude couldn’t get it up.

    Like


  47. This is an iron-clad subject for what could be one of the most commented posts on this blog:

    A Southwest Airlines pilot didn’t know his mic (to air controllers) was open as he ranted to his copilot about the corporate policy of hiring mainly “guys and grannies” as stewardesses:

    http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/southwest-airlines-pilot-rant-124402094.html

    There might be one or two males left in the US who haven’t caught on yet that the feminists and union policy for stewardesses has been to thwart airlines from hiring gorgeous young women, partly by making it so aging women cannot be fired for aging and, in hiring new stewardesses, experienced old ones who worked at other airlines must be hired before other young women because otherwise you’d have a blatant case of a woman not being hired because of her age.

    The pilot was basically saying the truth that anyone who isn’t a naive fool already knows about the US airline industry. Read the whole thing.

    Note that the CEO didn’t say he would fire the guy possibly because then there might be a hell of lawsuit about free speech. Then again, we know he’d lose in the courts.

    So maybe the CEO didn’t fire the pilot because he knows that American businessmen, his customers, are in full agreement with the pilot.

    Like


  48. heartiste

    How is this disparate bond amount not gender discrimination under the law?

    The article states They were in plain view of roughly fifty beachgoers and restaurant patrons, children among them.

    Both these idiots need a $10,000 bond. Life is not a public movie, especially not a porno.

    Like


  49. What’s interesting is a comment on a CNN article about the pilot being disciplined. Apparently a White Knighter, who is a Mason, slams a man who wrote “the pilot was only telling the truth” with the comment “You’re a disgrace to the Fraternity”:

    Are the Freemasons supposed to be heavy-duty feminism pushers?

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/06/22/airline.pilot.rant/

    bdgfn @32ndDegree…if you are on Southwest, you did NOT pay +2 baggage fees, unless you gad 4 bags, or any other fees other than your ticket. And if your screenname refers to what I think it does, you’re a disgrace to the Fraternity.

    And what are “Grandes”? Does he mean Southwest hires fat latinas?

    Like


  50. That woman is hot shit.

    Like


  51. Classic beta response.

    Like


  52. If they were gay, no one would care about the public sex. That’s what the West has come to.

    Like


    • If someone complained about two homosexuals banging in public, then that someone would be charged with a hate crime.

      Like


  53. This didn’t take long. The Southwest Airlines Flight Attendants Union doesn’t just want the offending pilot fired, they are probably about to sue their employer for what he said about them:

    http://www.click2houston.com/video/28313494/index.html

    You can’t make this up. Only in America in the End Times would you get such a politically correct work world.

    If they fire this pilot, I don’t fly SWA anymore.

    Like


  54. Court Bias, by the numbers, courtesy of the DOJ’s Bureau of Justice Statistics. Link for data: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=dcdetail&iid=241

    Most serious conviction offense Total in months
    Male Female PussyPass Discount
    All offenses 40 25 15
    Violent offenses 74 45 29
    Murder/Nonnegligent manslaughter 252 200 52
    Sexual assaulta 109 63 46
    Robbery 90 55 35
    Aggravated assault 43 28 15
    Other violent 39 40 -1
    Property offenses 31 22 9
    Burglary 42 28 14
    Larceny 22 17 5
    Fraud/Forgeryc 26 23 3
    Drug offenses 32 22 10
    Possession 22 17 5
    Trafficking 39 27 12
    Weapon offenses 32 24 8
    Other specified offensesd 25 20 5

    Like


  55. I’d like to propose a radical approach to this issue: Get the facts that the judge had.

    Even if gender discrimination is rampant in the courts, that doesn’t mean that any given case about which you have mainly headlines is an example of that discrimination.

    Which defendant’s priors are felonies, and how serious are they? Does either defendant have a history of not showing up as ordered by a court? Who has more ties in the local community? Who is a greater flight risk, according to the facts? What did the prosecutor say in court? The defense attorneys?

    How on earth can you know what’s going on in this particular case without knowing the facts?

    Like


  56. Agreed with Cadnerd that this chick is on the final frontier of hotness. Imagine how used up and bloated she’s going to look in ten years.

    Like


    • by then
      you’ll be 23
      and not care

      Like


    • Well, , she and other like her are actually inspiring me, so they have their place in the scheme of things.

      I am working on an album titled: The Wall.

      Like


  57. More on the left wing mental makeup of US airline crews:

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/06/22/BAH01K1EK2.DTL&tsp=1

    The heterosexual football player gets accosted by an airline crew and later arrested for having baggy pants while, on the same flight, a flaming fag was wearing only women’s underwear (bra and panties).

    The war against heterosexual males is open and on. Don’t think the other side isn’t fully aware of what they’re doing.

    Like


  58. I first thought..so what…they are not hurting anyone. Why call the cops. Just walk over and tell them to stop. BUT, the more I think about it..haha!! If the cops weren’t called, maybe more people will be having public sex and then the whole place will be people having out right public sex and what kind of place would that be…..haiya!! Maybe calling the cops is good. hehe!! oops!

    Like


  59. Guys, learned the most important lesson today. White knighting crosses all political boundaries. There simply is no getting around it. Do be careful because these guys are too dense to realize the harm they do.

    Like


  60. Calling another dude an “ugly mofo” because he doesn’t look like your Twilight pretty boys is homo. Strong homo.

    Like


  61. No ugly chicks working as stewardesses on Japanese airlines. Or KAL. Or Singapore Airlines, famous for its slim, young temptresses.

    Like


  62. Youtube is not allowing anyone to view the video with the audio of the pilot’s rant about the stewardesses unless they sign in proving they are adults:

    http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http%3A//www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D8dLS8_xM2LI

    Like


    • But a kid can turn on the telavivision at any hour of the day and find two flaming faggots kissing.

      Like


      • yep
        youtube is not some “free speech, man” bastion of the NerdNet
        as it was touted.

        It IS, however a tool of liberal political correctness

        Like


      • Oh, please. YouTube is a direct reflection of its audience. There is no panel of experts looking at each video to rate it adults-only. Rather, if enough people “flag” a video, YouTube automatically puts up the gate. ANY video can get flagged, and people do it for all sorts of good and bad reasons.

        Some of the highest-profile cases of flag- and copyright-claim-abuse at YouTube in fact have been liberal atheists whose videos were the targets of organized campaigns by conservative Christians.

        Like


  63. @demirogue.

    White knighters aren’t a new plague. The issue is to be able to shame them effectively and call them out.

    Be brave enough to call them on their shit.

    Like


    • Where you’re from
      are they called…
      Yellow knights?

      Like


      • I thought Gorby was from Canada. He just goes to China to fuck chinese broads toi get away from Canadian bitchez?

        Like


      • I’d love to fuck some Canadian bitches. From what I see they’re not fat fat fat moo moo cows like our lovely American Real Women.

        Send ’em on over. Fetching foreign accents. I’ll even put up with the granola.

        Firepower,

        I’ve missed you. You abandoned me .

        Like


      • Recently I was the beach here in the north east of America and it was loaded with hot, slender girls. Perhaps all the skinny girls in America were at that beach that day or obviously fat girls stay away from the beach, but while it’s definitely true American girls are probably on average the fattest in the world, I do think the case is overstated for dramatic effect. There are plenty of skinny, hot girls here (albeit usually teens and early 20s). I see this at the mall too.

        Like


      • I think when people say “fat american women” they are talking about their wives. I saw lots of hot chicks behind home plate at the baseball game last night. It helps that the team is winning. When it’s losing the hot chicks are nowhere to be found.

        Like


      • dude, hot chicks were behind home plate because that’s the $$ place to sit, so they probably have high quality bf’s with money.

        Like


      • Schmoe,

        May they invent a game
        where each team wins
        Then everybody gets the
        hot chicks all the time

        Like


      • Even Othello
        can be a
        White Knight

        Is a Yellow King
        the one with
        a yellow serail?

        Like


  64. @DB
    If I was an American I’d be pissed the FBI bought 350 30-second commercials on Dr. fucking Oz to capture two people who probably just kept to themselves.

    Like


  65. That girl looks fucking hot, I’d have banged her in a more secluded place…..

    Like


    • I also thought so at first.
      More room/time/privacy to hit the clit and find out if she’s a moaner or a screamer.

      But, as of late, I’m finding all girls jaded. That’s what happens to them after having group sex in a dorm, for amateur bukkake vidz on YouPorn. For the 30th time.

      Like


  66. on June 23, 2011 at 1:31 pm Born Again Alpha

    I doubt very much that it’s sex discrimination

    The florida statute sets out the key factors: protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the presence of the accused at trial and assure the integrity of the justice system. In practice most circuit courts follow guidelines that take into account a more detailed list of factors.

    The real injustice here is why they were required to pay money for a crime that wasn’t dangerous. I think it must be based on committing a lewd act in the presence of children. Bit of a stretch. I’m not sure the intent of the statute was to protect children from the “danger” posed by witnessing consensual sex in the distance.

    Like


    • What kind of pussy is afraid of horror movies, but then goes to see them because his girlfriend wants to?

      Like


    • This is just classic. There’s so much one could learn about the female brain by reading that email and the advice given there.

      Like


  67. on June 23, 2011 at 2:04 pm Good Luck Chuck

    Always wondered why american flight attendants are all museum relics or homos.

    Fly Virgin Atlantic. The UK hasn’t devolved to our level of retarded (yet).

    Like


  68. on June 23, 2011 at 3:21 pm Polichinello

    Income and wealth could have played a role. Someone with a lot more money in the bank would be tempted to blow town. So if the person is less wealthy, you’d give him or her a lower bond.

    Either way, it seems like a case where the judge could just fine them a grand or sentence them to two weeks of community service and save everyone a lot of trouble.

    Like


  69. Sorry for off topic but did anyone follow this link from that story:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2006749/Man-hides-portable-toilet-Hanuman-Yoga-Festival.html

    Portable Toilet Game, now I’ve seen it all.

    Like


  70. Male or female. I thought there wasn’t a difference?
    Read this NPR article. Cover your keyboard in case you accidentally vomit.
    http://www.npr.org/2011/06/23/137342682/the-end-of-gender?sc=17&f=1001

    Like


  71. “I’d love to fuck some Canadian bitches. From what I see they’re not fat fat fat moo moo cows like our lovely American Real Women.

    Send ‘em on over. Fetching foreign accents. I’ll even put up with the granola.”

    You people really need to stop making comments about Canada and Canadian girls. You don’t know what your talking about and it’s fucking up your credibility.
    There are plenty of fat Canadian girls. Canadians are not granola. Come to my part of Canada and get your ass kicked cuz I guarantee that me and my fellow men are tougher than you city motherfuckers.
    Roissy once wrote about Alaska being the “land of Alphas”. Canada is the same demographic. It’s only our politically correct Liberal government and foreign policy that gives the lame impression.
    Btw, game was invented in Canada.

    Like


    • Sorry cuz. Canadian men are the property of women and minorities. Now go pay those exorbitant taxes.

      Like


      • Taxes…. really? You guys are nerds trying to be Alpha. I hope the author of this site does this for his own amusement because it’s lost of most of you guys.

        Minorities? … how many spics you guys got running around down there now? And how many kids are they having? Pretty soon your gonna be the minority.

        Like


      • Forgot to mention faggots. Canadian men are the property of women, minorities and faggots.

        Like


    • Dick, there’s a diff between city and rural girls. The city girls, in toto, are as fucked up as Merkin girls.

      Like


  72. OT
    http://www.hudson-ny.org/2219/netherlands-abandons-multiculturalism

    “The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people. In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society play a central role. With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society.”

    Dutch invented it
    They should apologize
    now to everybody

    Like


  73. @DICK,

    I’ve been to Canada a few times. Guys there look as lame as Americans. And there are more hot women than at home.

    Tough Canadians? Three marines on a drunken bender could wipe their asses with the Canadian flag on the front steps of your government and you guys would say, “Hey there, good fellow, nice to see you taking an interest, but perhaps you shouldn’t wipe your ass with our flag? It’s not quite respectful is it, EH?”

    Canada. Get a grip.

    Nice place, but I’ve been there. You guys aren’t exactly hard-core. And from what I hear, it’s Red Central with your Hate Speech Commissions and Equality Legislation and your family courts are worse than ours. Femo-Marxist central.

    All the Canadians I know live in stark raving fear of their cunty wives.

    Give me a break. Alpha Male country. More like Pussyland.

    I hear you used to be a real country, back when you could storm beaches and pull rifles from the mangled bodies of dead Nazis.

    Been a while, EH?

    Like


  74. It’s fucking funny how you guys come on here talking about how horrible american women are, how america is going to shit, how femenism has taken over your country… and yet you still think america is something special. Everyone in the world knows that the americans are stupid and we laugh at you. You generalise about Canada after spending a small amount of time in a few small parts. It’s a big country gorbachev. Wise up.

    Like


  75. @Dick,
    It’s fucking funny how you guys come on here talking about how horrible american women are, how america is going to shit, how femenism has taken over your country… and yet you still think america is something special. Everyone in the world knows that the americans are stupid and we laugh at you. You generalise about Canada after spending a small amount of time in a few small parts. It’s a big country gorbachev. Wise up.

    All the problems we have you have with women, but more. Except that fewer Vancouver chicks are fat.

    I’m sure people in Moose Brain or Saskabingo are awesome. I’m not likely to get there.

    Like


  76. Seems more like punk discrimination to me

    Like