Your Daily Game, Condensed

– Yard sales and consignment shops are lucrative venues for picking up girls. Good ratio + young babes + opener props = win.

– When a hot chick makes a funny, don’t laugh too hard. In fact, don’t laugh at all. Just smile. LOLing is approval seeking.

– Be wary of conversational entrapment. The longer you talk about a woman’s concerns, the more likely she’ll friendzone you.

– Approaching in coffee shops is tough, b/c it’s so obvious. Try making a face at the girl first. Chicks love silliness.

– Make fun of chickscript. “O-M-G, that’s so totes true!!!” Girls love flirty teasing with an edge. Shows fearlessness.

– If you text a girl you met the night before and she asks who you are, text back “Kanye West”. Keeps the pickup ball rolling.

– Misinterpret a girl’s actions as coming on to you. Girl says hi, you reply: “Whoa, save the pillow talk for later, speedy gonzales.”

– Smile at women you pass on the street. Many more than you think will smile back. Lead with a smile, as you lead in life.

– When you have a woman at the foot of your bed, simultaneously grab her hair and palm her pussy while kissing her neck. Magic.

– If you distrust your girlfriend, don’t let it show. Feigned naivete is a powerful weapon against devious playettes. Think long-term strategy.

– Drop something. Dramatically pick it up. While bending, look over your shoulder at the girl, and ask “Getting an eyeful?” Assume the sale.

– Don’t get too excited by a girl’s physical escalation. She’ll value your ensuing interest less. Steer the seduction.

– If a girl mentions another man, hold up your hand & say “You hear that?” “What?” “The sound of this conversation dying.”

– Never tolerate a girl showing up later than you to a date. Visit another bar then return in ten minutes. She still not there? Leave. Alternate option: Talk to other girls who may be at the bar. When she arrives, she’ll experience preselection overload.

– When you meet for a date, don’t hug the girl. She’s expecting it then. Be bold and unpredictable. Touch her on your terms. Leave the beta males to eagerly lap up asexual hugs.

– After sex, or before if you like risk, tell girl “I’m not interested in a relationship with anyone.” Money-saving MOAB game.

– Emulate this guy. (Not the poker player.)

– Art museums are great first date venues to demonstrate not just knowledge, but wry humor as well. “Did he paint nipples?”

– If a date is going well, you’ll be tempted to stop challenging a woman. Don’t. Save your full acceptance until after sex.

– Got an arm cast? Have a niece or a few women sign it. Not an option? Fake it. Draw flowers and hearts. Cast game is nuclear.

– Pace a girl’s unspoken objections. “This is really crazy meeting a stranger on the street.” Pacing disarms and re-norms.

– “That’s just something a girl says when she can’t handle her feelings for a man” is a good, all-purpose reply to a shit test.

– If you go out a lot, you will have make-outs. Fresh breath extends sessions. Tip: chew mint leaves on your way out the door.

– If you kiss a girl and she reacts with confusion or pulls away, wait a beat and sexily say “hot”. Instant mood lifter.

– Science can segue to sexytime. “I read that people relate based on smell compatibility.” *sniff* “Your love smell is strong.”

– “I know how this ends. You’ll fall in love. Hard. Dream of rings and white weddings. I’ll run.” – said to a girl on 2nd date. Try it with a straight face. It’s chicknip.

Your Daily Game… take one a day for boner health!





Comments


  1. Real estate open houses are replete with prospects.

    The ‘designer showcase house’ is another great venue.

    Like


    • Waayyy off-topic, but I swear that guys like Rush Limbaugh and VDH are lurking in the manosphere.

      Earlier today, Rush was ragging on American women because they can only be 166 lbs fat in order to use the abortion kill pill, whereas European women can be up to 176 lbs fat for the same kill pill.

      And VDH has a new column up which looks like it was copy-n-pasted straight from the manosphere:

      “What more could Miley Cyrus do – wear two foam fingers? Could Mr. West mount his girlfriend, and sing and dance while riding backwards?”

      http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/a-culture-in-ruins/?singlepage=true

      That’s a scholar at the Hoover Institute, on the campus of Stanford University, using the verb “to mount” in a published column.

      Shit damn.

      Folks are starting to take off the gloves.

      Like


      • yeah a couple posts back rush and ch had the same take on the same article at about the same time or nearly so. rush definitely has the a lot of the same perspectives as most manosphere sites (feminists = bitter uglies comes to mind)

        Like


      • Game is applied Conservatism.

        Like


      • > “Game is applied Conservatism.”

        Yep.

        And the biggest “Game” of all is gathering together, with your homeboys, in Filthydelphia, and writing a mutual letter to King George, telling him to go fuck himself.

        Then “applying” your life and your fortune and your sacred honor towards bringing about that end.

        Like


      • On that note… what do you all think about crypto-currencies that are deflationary, especially Bitcoins?

        I haven’t given it enough thought, but it appears to be one hell of a cool way to overthrow stupid governments without wars or any other traditional overthrowing mechanisms… and without having to wait for the system to self correct.

        What do you all think?

        Like


      • For the time being, concentrate on hoarding the currencies which are neither inflationary nor deflationary.

        The most important of which would be brass-encased gunpowder and lead.

        Like


      • I’m driving down the road several times a week now – almost every day – listening to the radio, and swearing to GOD ALMIGHTY that Rush is lurking, both here at The Chateau, and also over at iSteve.

        I’m telling you, guys like Rush and Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly aren’t secure enough yet with their advertisers to confess to it, but they are definitely being informed by the Manosphere and the Dark Enlightenment [for instance, O’Reilly is all over Colin Flaherty’s work at WND].

        Maybe they’re even posting here under aliases, and helping to move the message forward?

        Who knows? But they certainly aren’t the clueless tards that their producers insist that they pretend to be.

        Like


      • I’d bet on the personalities being (or having become) clueless tards, but their assistants are snorting the red pill.

        Like


      • No – I used to think that – but a few weeks ago, Rush actually used the word “Tribe” in a descriptive sense.

        In the past, Rush has also talked about how it was Schumer who blackmailed Dubya-43 into placing Paulson at the Treasury.

        And just a few days ago, Rush ridiculed a big Romney insider muckety-muck for not knowing who Saul Alinsky was.

        Rush isn’t a fool.

        Rush knows what’s at stake here – I’m convinced of it.

        Like


  2. Go into victoria’s secret, tell the hot salesgirl you’re looking for something for your wife, and your girlfriend, “Should I get them in the same thing or different colors?” Deadpan, at first.

    Liked by 1 person


    • 21st Century Cynicism Game: The intentionally-removed wedding band [revealing the telltale suntan circle] so as to fake bachelorhood being replaced by the intentionally-worn purchased wedding band so as to fake husbandhood.

      She’ll Always Lust After What She “Can’t” Have Game FTW.

      Like


      • Does anybody really have luck with wedding ring game? The principle makes very good sense, but wearing my real wedding ring doesn’t seem to have any desirable effect.

        Maybe I’m still being naive, but I’m starting to think this whole wedding ring phenomenon, like a whole lot of the rest of game, works better in an urban environment.

        Like


      • > “Maybe I’m still being naive, but I’m starting to think this whole wedding ring phenomenon, like a whole lot of the rest of game, works better in an urban environment.”

        When I first started reading the Game Theory literature, my immediate visceral gut reaction was that Heartiste et al were writing about how to bed Blue State chicks, or, as you say, “urban” chicks, in the isolated Deep Blue pockets of the Red States.

        I maintain that there are still nice girls from good families out there – waiting to meet you and fall in love with you – if only you can find them.

        And you certainly don’t want to even dream about settling down with one of these “urban” chicks whose heart has already been consumed by The Darkness.

        But even with the nice girls from the good families, there is still a helluva lot that Game can teach you.

        Women want MASCULINE men.

        Women want DECISIVE men.

        Women want FIRM men.

        Women want JOVIAL men.

        Women want OPTIMISTIC men.

        Women want HILARIOUS men.

        Women want COLD STEELY-EYED KILLER MEN.

        Women want all of that.

        Even the nice girls from the good families.

        But women don’t want wishy-washy mealy-mouthed man-boobed herblings, except to the extent that the herblings can be discarded as just so much metaphorical toilet paper in the larger sphere of AlfaPhux-BetaBux.

        Like


      • > “When I first started reading the Game Theory literature, my immediate visceral gut reaction was that Heartiste et al were writing about how to bed Blue State chicks, or, as you say, ‘urban’ chicks, in the isolated Deep Blue pockets of the Red States.”

        SCIENCE FTW!!!

        Or whatever.

        Anyway, here’s a chick who is [or who at least claims to be] a leading expert on the American college campus hookup culture, and apparently she sees a really profound difference in her research:

        Large differences in “hookup culture” between Catholic/Secular college students and Evangelical ones
        Why such strong differences between evangelicals and Catholics?
        Written by Troy Gibson | Wednesday, November 27, 2013
        http://theaquilareport.com/large-differences-in-hookup-culture-between-catholicsecular-college-students-and-evangelical-ones/

        “It’s impossible on an evangelical campus to have a conversation about sex without also talking about faith. This is simply because, at evangelical campuses, the Christian tradition stands at the very center of who the students are…

        The opposite is true of all the other campuses I visited for the study, and it holds true even for the forty-five or so other campuses I have visited since the book was published. Whereas evangelicals cannot think about their sex lives without religion, students at secular or Catholic institutions cannot think about their sex lives with religion. The notion that religion would have anything important or useful to say to them about sexual decision-making is almost impossible to take seriously…”

        Like


    • This should be made into a competition: who can make the most outrageously “misogynist” request of a saleswoman in a Victoria’s Secret (or similar) retail store and still get stellar service? Video submissions.

      Like


    • on November 25, 2013 at 3:57 pm Subarctic Hillbilly

      Not bad. Even better: “Do you have anything in a 48A?” The look first of confusion, then slowly dawning comprehension? Priceless.

      Like


    • My five year old, walking past Victoria’s Secret with the wife the other day, loudly exclaimed, “Mommy, that’s the place I am going to get you something really nice for Christmas!”

      That’s not ….uh how we roll in my posse. He confused it with a little jewelry store next door where he has saved money to buy the wife a charm for a necklace.

      Supposedly half the folks were horrified, half the guys smirked.

      Like


    • Most likely result: Totally ignorant sales girl doesn’t understand anything and just goes into Hard Sell mode.

      Like


  3. RE: cast game. A variation on it that a friend of mine invented: Go in to a bar/ breastaurant of your choice (we did this at Hooters) with a few marker-drawn tattoos on your arms/neck/wherever is legal. Offer to let women draw whatever they want on you. The Hooters Girls were fighting over who got to draw on my friend next and he was a drunk mess/not looking particular good that day. I got numbers just by being around him and drawing funny sh*t on his arms.

    Like


  4. “Cast game is nuclear.”

    I lol-ed

    Like


    • Cast game, I love this. I’m laughing because I remember a guy in college coming up to me to sign his arm cast, he had all these girls names and numbers with smiley faces. I signed. He told me to put down my number and I said “why, you’ll never remember who I am with all these girls’ numbers on here” and he said, “put down ‘snobby girl'” so I know.” Lol! Now I now it was cast game + neg.

      Like


    • YOU ARE ALL NOW IN PATRICE’S COURT OF LAW

      3 DEFENDANTS:

      MATT – A KNOWN SHITPOSTER THAT COMBINES THE IGNORANCE OF RELIGION, THE OBFUSCATION AFFORDED BY OBSOLETE LANGUAGE, AND THE WHITE-KNIGHTING OF BETAS. WHEN HIS HYPOCRISY GETS CALLED OUT, HE AVOIDS TO RESPOND, AND WHEN HE ISN’T RESPONDED TO, HE CREATES AN IMAGINARY PUPPET SHOW.

      RD – A TANKGRRL EMPOWERED ‘FEMALE’ (TERM USED LOOSELY BASED ON HER BODY WITH A CUPS) THAT TRIES TO ACT TOUGH ON THE INTERNET TO GIVE OFF A MANLY DISPOSITION THAT SHE’S TOO STRONG TO BE AFFECTED BY RAPE (YO!) BUT AVOIDS UNCOMFORTABLE TOPICS IN THINLY-VEILED DESPERATION. BETTER JUDGE OF ENGLISH THAN MEN; AT LEAST WORDS WON’T RAPE HER.

      AMY – ARGUABLY ONE OF THE WORST SHITPOSTERS IN RECENT MONTHS. HER AFFINITY FOR BADBOY THUGS, LAME JOB, CONTEMPT FOR LEARNING, AND DISDAIN FOR TRUTH HAS EVEN SPARKED THE IRE OF CH HIMSELF WHO NEEDED TO CORRECT HER IN RECENT THREADS AND ASK HER NOT TO STRAY OFF TOO FAR AWAY FROM THE LINES OF COHERENCY.

      Reasonings:

      @Matt – I sent you two long replies; I know you’ll appreciate them, as you are the “King” of verbosity yourself. But why no reply? I am sorry if I upset you by pointing out your hypocrisies – I expected so much from such an ardent believer. Is avoiding me and calling me names how you win debates? What personality disorder is associated with ignorance, stupidity, and hypocrisy?

      Take the thesaurus down and tell me why you levy false accusations on people, and white knight a dumb girl that’s been told off countlessly by CH himself.

      @ Amy – Jeez (don’t get offended Matt – this is only an expression. I swear I wasn’t trying to use the Lord’s name in vain!). You are a big clown. CH himself (as well as I and other commenters) have told you off in multiple recent threads, and your response is to act like a child – throw out ad hominems – and cry like a little girl by saying “Et tu, CH?” with a frowney face.

      CH has told you “you are slipping, amy. please quit straying between the lines.”

      I have heard you are a half-nigger. No wonder, in addition to your blockheaded capacity for learning, you have such an affinity for the tattooed blights of society, and you have done work at a prison. Funny how so much of behavior can be explained instantly by racial backgrounds, right?

      @ Oh, poor RD. She still doesn’t want to stay on topic, and would rather discuss English. I don’t think you are as over that rape as you may think.

      I know you are a poor little rape victim, RD, so I will go easy on you, and tell you this – you good character judge of men, you – while whistling green sleeves, to help create a good ambiance between us.

      – Your very first response to Matt reeked of butthurt.
      – A woman is capable of both logically knowing that a man is bad for her while simultaneously feeling attraction for him.
      – Calling you what you are (a hideous creature as ugly on the inside as she is on the outside; and no I don’t mean the black lungs or tits of a 9 year old) does not imply I care about you. Or if I did care, it would be insofar as to create a more beautiful world without such execrable “women” walking on the face of the Earth.

      VERDICTS:

      MATT – BETA MALE. RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE. INTELLECTUAL FRAUD. WHITE KNIGHT.

      WILL DIE ALONE AFTER THE TACTIC OF “HEY AMY, I DEFENDED YOU ON THE INTERNET THAT ONE TIME SO FUCK ME” WILL NOT WORK.

      AMY – ATTRACTED TO THUGS OF SOCIETY. INCAPABLE OF LEARNING. REGARDLESS STAYS IN THE CHATEAU BECAUSE SHE LIKES THE ABUSE OF BEING TOLD OFF (OBVIOUSLY; JUST LOOK AT THE HALF-NIGGER’S DATING HISTORY)

      WILL DIE ALONE AFTER RIDING THE THUG COCK CAROUSEL HER ENTIRE LIFE AND DEMONSTRATING AN IQ OF A POTATO, SMV = 1 (ASSUMING NO MICE INSIDE VAGINA) OR IN A PRISON RIOT

      RD – OLD HAG OF A “FEMALE” OF QUESTIONABLE ANATOMY: A-CUPS, BLACK LUNGS FROM CHAIN-SMOKING FROM YEARS, AND DEVOID OF INNANE MOTHERLY INSTINCTS IN HEALTHY WOMEN. UNABLE TO STAY ON UNCOMFORTABLE TOPICS – LIKE HER RAPE AND HER ATTRACTION TO BADBOYS – SO SHE RESORTS TO TALKING ABOUT THE FASCINATING SUBJECT OF ENGLISH SYNTAX ON A DATING BLOG. CONSTANTLY LOOKS FOR ABUSE.

      WILL DIE FROM EMPHYSEMA OR GANG-RAPE AFTER A MEANINGLESS LIFE OF RIDING THE COCK CAROUSEL OF THUGS FOR AN AFTER-HOURS SPIN. WILL TALK ABOUT ENGLISH SYNTAX ON HER DEATH BAD AND ASK FOR CIGARETTES IN HER LAST BREATH. SMV = -3
      (AVOIDING HER IS DIRECTLY CONDUCIVE TO MALE VIRILITY AND HAPPINESS)

      Like


    • Good news everyone!

      I have dated tattoo’ed up felons, thugs, and badboys, but no more!

      I am sick of subverting society by dating its undesirable blights. I deserve so much better with my worthless liberal arts degree from a community college.

      Therefore, I am happy to announce that I am currently “dating” (he says he’ll call me sometime to hang out after we have sex) Jamal. He is 6’10 and fresh off the boat from Nigeria, and he is without a rap sheet.

      Oh, and – I suppose – even if he gets thrown in prison, that’s okay! I already work there anyway interviewing the same badboys that get my pussy wet and my vulva inflamed!

      You are all invited to our eventual nuptials! Just watch your wallets.

      Like


      • It’s okay baby, you’ll find someone. Shoot for girls with a 30+ BMI. They don’t mind a guy that’s one taco short of a combo platter, as long as you pick up a keg of Ben & Jerry’s on the way home.

        Like


      • Hey guys I am really mad at this guy for calling me out on my typical hamster-driven solipsism of not knowing some basic CH principles and being a mudshark that slums around, dates felons, works at a prison, and spreads her legs for abusive assholes, so to nourish myself, I will pretend he gets no girls because he doesn’t find me attractive!

        Isn’t that how it works, guys? If you don’t find an old carousel-riding mudshark that spreads her legs for felons like me attractive, YOU must get no girls, right?

        Oh yes, I also remember the countless times where I have been caught being wrong on topic and then corrected about it, and CH himself even asked me not to “stray between the lines” because I was shitting up the place with so much stupidity. I also feel really embarrassed about it because every time it’s brought up, I try changing the topic, or responding with “Et tu, CH?” and a frowny face because I feel so upset.

        I hope he doesn’t realize I am projecting my own feelings by asking if he hit on me before at a bar and then discuss his love life. I know my SMV is low and I am desperate not to enter spinsterhood. (Granted, it’s not as low as the gun-toting chain-smoking whiskey-drinking resident shemale with no tits RD’s, who also spreads her legs for abusive men, but I am still nonetheless worried.)

        Like


      • The funny thing is, Amy, that the fat chick you describe still has a WAY higher SMV than a whore like you, who is an old solipsistic imbecile that works at a prison and has slept with tattooed-up thugs and felons her entire life since age 14.

        I would call you white trash, but you aren’t even that. Filthy mudshark slut that is a living embodiment of everything anti-CH. You and your father are a disgrace.

        Like


      • Yes!

        Like


      • Lol, I actually feel a little sorry for you, ZS. Why all the hate?

        One more time, for the cheap seats:

        1. I’m not old.
        2. I don’t work at a prison.
        3. I was a virgin at 14 (and beyond).
        4. I had ONE ex-boyfriend who had a felony drug conviction in his past. He was clean, sober and had a legitimate full time job when I met and dated him.
        5. I’ve never dated or slept with a black man.
        6. I’m not promiscuous.
        7. My dad could beat up your dad.

        Like


      • Nuddah 19-year old, blonde, blue-eyed Nordic virgin – who is also a conservative Evangelical Christian with a MENSA IQ down the drain.

        Like


      • What is a “MENSA IQ down the drain”? You just meant “IQ down the drain” but wanted to add a little something?

        Strange how some absolutely hate Germanics, and can’t wait for a chance to show it. It’s like how uneducated workers want money, so they hate anyone who has it. Everyone wants to get into Germanic-built countries, while heaping shit over Germanics. What are you, buddy? Slav, Med, Arab, Negro? Y’all look the same to me.

        Like


      • Sarcasm is wasted on the stupid.
        As you can see, I’m 100% pure Black.
        Wenn Du Dich für so ‘Germanisch’ hältst, kannst Du mich ja gerne auf Deutsch beschimpfen……

        Like


      • lololololololol

        Like


  5. ”That’s just something a girl says when she can’t handle her feelings for a man”

    very good. shows stellar frame control if you can do it right. i’d say also don’t be afraid to flash a little frustration or even anger when you say it. it says “i can pass all your tests, AND i’m not gonna do this much longer”

    Like


  6. What if when you meet a girl for a first date you go for a hug, then feign, while yelling “spin move!”, and grapple her from behind?

    Dwayne Johnson game.

    Like


    • > “grapple her from behind”

      Whew.

      Is this a blind date?

      The femcunt feminazi man-hating nihiliste chicks’ll be calling up the police and having your ass hauled off to prison on assault charges.

      Might wanna gauge the body language first before putting yourself at risk like that.

      Like


  7. ‘- Yard sales and consignment shops are lucrative venues for picking up girls. Good ratio + young babes + opener props = win.’

    No love for the grocery store?

    [CH: produce section only.]

    Like


  8. Nice neg I used the other day:

    Saw a girl, probably an 8, sitting with some guy in the hallway waiting for class to start. Looked like he may have been trying to flirt with her. I walk on by, pause and give her a little look and say, “Oh my gosh you know what?” pause for effect “My grandma has those same boots! They look… A little bit better on you though.”

    Her face lit up. The other guy was flown out of the water so hard he started to scoff at me but she was hooked. It was beautiful.

    She says, “Haha well… I guess your grandma has a good sense of style then.”

    I reply with, “Ah yeah that must be it.”

    I’ve come a long way with your help CH. Almost brought a tear to my eye. I know by her eyes that her pussy was near sex juice Mt. Vesuvius status.

    Like


    • “You make me think of my grandma” to a young girl can be a good neg too.

      “Surely he loves his grandma that’s so sweet, but what is wrong with me???”.

      Like


    • The other night at the bar the cutest waitress was wearing one of those animal hats, I think it was the Tazmanian devil from Looney Tunes.
      Anyways, she comes up to take my order.
      I say ” Cool hat. ” *Alpha nod followed with a smirk* .
      She says ” Thanks ! blah blah blah , blah blah ” (about how it’s always been one of her favorite characters.)
      I say ” Yeah , all the kids in junior high are wearing them.”
      ” Jerk ! ” she says, followed with a little arm punch.

      Like


  9. Smile at every woman on the street? What happened to the badass alpha that doesn’t move farther than a smirk?
    Perhaps you ment “carry yourself with confidence, an air of satisfaction about yourself and pride”, which in turn gives you a cocky-you are all such silly bunnies-smile

    Liked by 1 person


    • Yeah, pure unadulterated Alpha game says:

      “Smile if you wanna smile, frown if you wanna frown, stoneface if you wanna stoneface, it’s all good.”

      “Hug if you wanna hug, run away if you wanna run away, shake hands if you wanna shake hands, it’s all good.”

      Etc etc etc…

      But in fairness to Heartiste, he’s giving specific examples of these approaches, not the general principle.

      Like


      • They do what they wanna do, say what they wanna say
        Live how they wanna live, play how they wanna play
        Dance how they wanna dance, kick and the slap a friend
        The addams family

        Speakin’ and thinkin’ about the addams
        You know the hammer is with it (I’m with it)
        Act a fool, no bones, swooop, goofy and randy
        You know we kick it (the posse)
        Now is the time to get in your mind
        It’s ok to be yourself (be yourself)
        Take foolish pride and put it aside
        Like the addams, yo! they def (that’s a family!)

        Like


    • Since the only women I’m likely to see (walking) on streets around here are either homeless, toothless alcoholics or 40+ roly-poly Mexican multiple mothers (Single or otherwise) or <16 school girls, I'm gonna give that advice a wide berth.

      Like


  10. another list to recite to myself every half hour, keep em comin CH …….

    Like


  11. Don’t be afraid to try a bridal show. Besides the brides, there are single sisters and bored bridemaids. They’ll appreciate your confidence and big cajones coming onto “their turf”. I was asked: “lemme get this straight: you came here to hit on girls?” Me: “yes. Exactly.” Her: “gimme your phone, I’ll give you my number.”

    Liked by 1 person


    • Wedding Crashers game.

      Like


    • I’ve had success at maternity shops too. You hit on the friends who are giving advice. Bonus points are earned when there’s at least one woman carrying your baby in the shop too.

      Like


      • > “at least one woman carrying your baby”

        LOL’ed.

        Polygany Game FTW.

        Like


      • n = m

        Like


      • There’s just something about kids that addles women’s brains. A man out alone with children draws all sorts of feminine attention… and women instinctually want what other women have.

        In maternity shops it becomes a sort of peer-pressure for the women without babies. They’re the sisters/best friends of the ‘lucky’ girl and instinctively want the same thing as the person they’re with.

        It’s like extreme pre-selection really. There are normally only 2 kinds of men in a maternity store: gay guys and hen-pecked wallets. If you don’t fit either category (and let’s face it, if you’re in either category, you have a lot larger issues than picking up women), women are forced to enter your frame because women have even more innate curiosity than cats.

        Like


  12. “After sex, or before if you like risk, tell girl “I’m not interested in a relationship with anyone.” Money-saving MOAB game.””

    Ouch. How is this day game if you say it after sex?? It’s “get lost” game.

    MOAB = Mother of All Bombs?

    Like


    • on November 25, 2013 at 11:22 am RappaccinisDaughter

      Massive Ordnance Air Blast.

      Like


      • I don’t know whether to be impressed or disturbed by the fact that you knew that.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 12:15 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Really? I thought that was common knowledge. You used to see it in the news a lot, right when we first invaded Afghanistan.

        It’s also a fun way to describe a truly cataclysmic fart. “I got on the elevator this morning just as one of the contractors was getting off, and walked right into this MOAB he’d obviously just laid.”

        Like


      • She’s got the clit-dick thing going on along with being a gun toting conservative, so….. not all that surprising actually.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 2:33 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Actually, Jay, anatomically I’m really quite normal-looking. Physically, the LDR expresses itself in my ringfingers and the squareness of my jaw. And most people don’t really notice that. You might, because you’ve been sensitized to it.

        The gun-toting conservative thing I’ll cop to, happily. I’m really more libertarian-leaning on social issues like gay marriage, etc., but I generally wind up voting for conservatives because I see the social issues as less important than fiscal/national security ones.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 3:18 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        You should be disturbed, Heywood.

        I am inclined to believe what Jay wrote below about this unfeminine masculinized gun-using shemale’s clit dick; except, I don’t even think she has a clit.

        We have already established the fact that she is an old chain-smoking hag, as flat as a Chinese boy, that has taken a thug version of the cock-carousel for an after-hours spin her entire life. I imagine her to live in deep Alabama, missing half of her teeth due to infectious gingivitis.

        The fact that you continuously put yourself in bad situations, by spreading your legs for abusive assholes, lead us to believe that you were complicit in the “abuse” you suffered. Doesn’t that make you feel better?

        Oh, and when truth is pointed out – like, for example, that I am not contradicting myself when I say that you are turned on by thugs emotionally even when you logically know that they are bad for you or calling you what you are doesn’t mean I care about you – what do you do about it? Get butthurt, change the topic, and want to talk about English instead, like a poor little scared girl.

        (This is only a metaphor, of course; you are an old chain-smoking harpy with a shriveled-up body from the years of having all of your orifices pounded by bad-boys).

        In fact, you have never faced me directly, out of my numerous responses. Do I frighten you? Do you have nothing better than quivering and inanely sputtering out red-herrings (that don’t even make sense in and of themselves)?

        How come that even with the most masculine of women – like you – you still have that same self-deluding solipsistic little hamster that’ll do anything to avoid uncomfortable topics?

        The sad part is you can’t even change the topic effectively. For example, you try to criticize my English when you make even more egregious errors by capitalizing wrong words, making up words (like “ragegasming”), and contradicting yourself by proclaiming that a word like ‘eviscerate’ only has a singular meaning while subsequently giving the word’s alternate meaning.

        And of course one of your more recent comments show you are, again, in complete ignorance. How long have you been here sweetheart? Probably long enough to know how the comment box works, right?

        Here is my reply to you again, reposted, after you accused me of being Patrice:

        —–

        Oh yes, obviously I am Patrice. Truly I fucked up by writing on my *real* identity. You got me, genius!

        And look, now I must be RappaccinisDaughter. I mean, that’s what my name says!

        Since I am the Chateau’s resident old bitter transsexual harpy, I will take this opportunity to make a BIG ANNOUNCEMENT:

        I wanted to let you all know that aside from being an old shriveled up chain-smoking unfeminine whore, as flat as a wall, devoid of motherly instincts, that had ridden the cock carousel her *entire* life to rapidly enter spinsterhood – one supplied by blights of society like thugs and badboys – that is too dishonest and hurt to stay on topic (about your attraction to badboys and your little rape incident; but hey at least you didn’t talk about English this time), I have another wonderful quality to share with the world….

        I AM A DUMBASS THAT HAS NO IDEA HOW COMMENTING WORKS!

        RD, I never thought you could fail any more – both here and in your personal life – but you continue to aggressively push the envelope and prove me wrong.

        Your last sentence talking about ME failing (considering your ignorance, cowardice in avoidance of topics where you were proven wrong, lack of physical and mental health, and the fact you are an old shriveled-up deranged prune with black lungs and small tits that constantly puts Chris Browns in her life in order to suck thug cock and get abused) is DELICIOUSLY ironic. Kudos for being my puppet!

        Looks like you don’t recognize the “tells” in my writing as well as you had mentioned before, right sweetheart? But that’s okay – we have already established you are solipsistic and delusional about your own capabilities, and you obscure and change the topic to avoid further embarrassment. Does the rape still hurt sweetie?

        Please reply talking again about English, avoiding the topic, and make another dumb remark. I don’t expect you to have the willpower to confront me directly. Hurry!

        You are good cheap entertainment. It is rare to see a creature fail so much.

        I know, this is so shocking to me; I expected so much from a dumbass chain-smoking shemale that had ridden thug cock her entire life. You sound like such quality in a woman.

        I will send you a box of cats to accompany you during your spinsterhood as a reward for my amusement.

        ———–

        Sweetheart, where is my response? I am – at this point – just documenting your seemingly endless odious behavior.

        P.S. I am not surprised to hear you wear typical masculine fragrances like musk and gourmands; it goes along with your other deliciously feminine features, like A-cups, black lungs, gun ownership, penis, and lack of healthy feminine motherly instincts.

        And then you described one of your “relationships” and you sounded like such an unfeminine, boring, sourpuss. Who would’ve guessed it from such an old deranged used-up harpy such as yourself, right?

        The Chateau is the polar anti-thesis of your very mind, body, and soul, old carousel-riding solipsistic unfeminine whore. But you can make amends with us by leaving its hallowed doors forever, and accept your fate.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 3:47 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Hey CH, my last reply to this twerp is apparently “in moderation.” But apparently he really, really, really wants to hear it.

        Yes, darling heart, I’m an A cup, I smoke, I don’t want kids, and I can shoot the ass off a housefly at 40 yards with my .45 and 300 with my .223. I drink my Scotch neat, I tell dirty jokes, and you could crack a walnut with my jaw.

        And yet…just like every other woman you’ve encountered in your 30 years on this planet…I still won’t sleep with you.

        That’s gotta sting.

        And yes, I’ve had to learn some ugly lessons, and I’ve had to learn them the hard way. Yet I’m not bitter about men, or afraid of them. I form rich, mutually satisfying relationships with them that encompass the gamut from casual buddy, to good friend, to lover. I don’t hold the vast majority of men who have never harmed me responsible for the actions of two guys.

        So what’s your excuse?

        Like


      • You had me at A-cup

        Like


      • Forty yards with a .45? I call shenanigans. Impressing the metrosexuals has made you flabby.

        Tell those half-faggot urban poseurs you can curve bullet trajectories with a flick of the wrist like in Wanted and they’ll believe you. GET AWAY FROM DC.

        Like


      • on November 26, 2013 at 12:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, Matt, the bit about the houseflies and their fundaments is a bit of an exaggeration as well…I’m quite sure they issued me a poetic license to go along with my permit to carry concealed. Which was, by the way, issued by the Commonwealth of Virginia, where I actually live. I’m inside the Beltway, though, so for brevity’s sake I usually just say I’m from DC.

        Like


      • The poor raped hamster has reared its ugly head again. Time to play!

        Of course I want to hear whatever your rationalization hamster absurdly concocts when faced with the evidence of your pathetic existence and solipsism that you even repeated yourself. There is a reason you are ugly, unfeminine, and take poor care of yourself, both physically and mentally, and I find this funny. You are good cheap entertainment.

        > “Yes, darling, I am a wretched specimen of female humanity”

        Nobody asked you if it were true. We knew it was true. Therefore, a more logical reason why you would enumerate all those lovely qualities you have – from your unfeminine mind, body of a 9 year old Chinaman, and disgusting black lungs – is probably because, on some deeper level inside your aberrant mind, you feel PROUD of these things. Disgusting.

        Are you also proud of that penis you hide? I’ll tell you what sweetheart; you are already more masculine than most men, which is a fact easily ascertained from both your behavior and your writing. (Bragging about your shooting accuracy? Really?) Let’s make amends, and I’ll pay for your gender reassignment surgery myself.

        It also has the added benefit of reducing the likelihood that you’ll be raped or abused again, since I know that you are – inexplicably of course – a magnet for abusive behavior in thugs.

        Oh, and here comes the projection from the hamster:

        > “I am a SMV of 0, but still I won’t sleep with you”

        Haha. Delusional to the max. “I am ugly on the inside and outside, but no I won’t sleep with you!” Sweetie, sorry I am no masochist, but I think the logical explanation for this absurd comment is that you are projecting your sexual feelings onto me. You sound so unappealing that part of me thinks that you made-up your rape story.

        Oh, and as the Chateau would predict from years of reading, since I hate you – a wretched, old, ugly, chain-smoking whore with no tits or intellectual dishonesty that has ridden the cock carousel of thugs – this must mean women do not want to sleep with me. Most of the men here at CH hate women like you (including the proprietors) – whorish, ugly, unfeminine – but this is not a reflection on us, but on you. And our selectively does not mean we get no pussy – it usually means the opposite. Your hamster is doing somersaults.

        How long have you been here? You are the typical solipsistic hamster-for-brains with the mantra of “if men don’t find the endless list of my unappealing traits appealing – like my black lungs, A-cups, leg spreading for thugs, etc. – then they must be gay or get no pussy!” Right?

        Your behavior reminds me of the posts that laugh at the rationalizations of morbidly obese women that insult the MEN for not finding them attractive. “Oh he doesn’t find my landwhale status to be sexy? He’s a closet case that gets no pussy!” Delusional child.

        Since I feel I eviscerated you enough (yes, I used that word on purpose for you, baby) I will show you mercy, and not talk about some of the other embarrassing things you have done.

        Examples include: a butthurt response to Matt and its denial asking about your rape, a lack of comprehension of a basic CH concept that women are turned on by assholes even when they logically know that they are bad, and your fallacious implication that I care about you in the slightest after I first penned down the line “old chain-smoking shemale hag with A cups that has spread her legs for assholes her entire life, who is devoid of natural motherly instincts.”

        Since I am even more merciful, I won’t even mention how you became so butthurt that you needed to change the topic to English syntax – n a thinly-veiled act of desperation of not looking wrong or embarrassed – and then, ironically, you contradicted yourself on the matter, made-up your own words even, and then made many egregious syntax and grammar errors yourself.

        Oh and I just saw that you used a “yo mama” joke on me in a previous reply and implied to sleep with my mother. Aside from the obvious questions it raises as to your maturity and capacity for levying insults (the last I heard such a joke was in the 2nd grade), do you find 60 year old menopausal women appealing? Eww.

        I guess when your SMV is so astronomically low because you are a chain-smoking whiskey-drinking gun-toting shemale that is as flat as a wall, that whored her entire life for thugs, and is also too dumb to avoid staying away from abusive men, you’ll take anything you can get, right?

        One more question – can you listen to green sleeves without crying?

        Like


      • LOL. Typical crazy hamster here, guys.

        “You don’t find an old hag with A-cups, black lungs, man-jaw, that totes guns, acts like a man, and has ridden the cock-carousel of thugs her entire life, as being attractive? Obviously since I am so desirable, this must mean you get no pussy!

        Either this hamster evolved into a komodo dragon to be so delusional and project her own feelings of sleeping with this guy or she is on anti-depressants or something. No wonder she got raped and hit by the men in her life. Shit damn.

        Like


      • on November 26, 2013 at 4:33 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Hey, Greensleeves!

        Check this shit out.

        So I was just out hunting last weekend, and I got a shot on a nice doe. Lucked into it, really—I was late heading out to my blind setup and the sun had already risen, but lo! she walked right out in front of me. Now, I had to take the shot freehand because my sticks were still slung over my shoulder, and fuck my life, I was doing it with iron sights. But I have a nice .50-cal inline muzzleloader, and they’ll reach out as far as 200 yards, so if I can see it in the iron sights, I can hit it. Brought it up to my shoulder, focused on the front sight, and KA-FUCKING-BOOM!

        I don’t know if you’ve ever shot a muzzleloader, but they make one hell of a smoke cloud. Even if you’re not in a blind, it can really make it hard to see how the shot went down. I knew I’d hit her, but by the time I came out of recoil (I didn’t even feel it at the time, but I had a nice bruise flowering on my collarbone by the next morning) she was gone, daddy, gone. You wouldn’t believe how strong a deer really is until you experience it firsthand; they can travel up to a quarter of a mile just on the oxygen that’s already in their muscles. Amazing creatures, really. And I was going to have to track her through some pretty heavy brush.

        So the first thing you have to do is, you have to let the bullet do its work. If you start trying to track them right away, they’ll keep running. So I lit up a cigarette—mmmm! tobacco!—and smoked the whole thing, just standing there. Then I put it out and put the butt back in my pack (because I’m eco-friendly like that), and went to work. Luckily, there was a light snowfall, so when I got to where she’d been standing, the tuft of tawny fur was really easy to see. So was the blood trail, which thankfully started right there.

        I wound up actually finding her about 45 yards away, piled up at the base of a tree. I like to follow the old German hunting traditions, given that it’s half my heritage, so I plucked a little twig and put it in her mouth, for her symbolic “last bite.” It’s kind of bittersweet, that moment, knowing that you’ve ended the life of this beautiful creature, but when I opened her mouth I saw how ground-down her teeth were. She was in good shape, but she was pretty old. Who knows if she’d have lasted out that winter?

        Then, I had to tag her and start cleaning her. Gross, but necessary. Piece of advice—you really cannot beat the “butt out” tool for getting that part of the deer out of the way. I’d heard coyotes howling all the previous evening, so I figured I wouldn’t need to bother burying the gutpile. The ‘yotes would have taken care of it by sundown.

        The bitch was hauling her out. I usually have this little sled-like arrangement that I use, but I’d been in such a rush that morning I’d forgotten to bring it along. So I had to grab her by her hind legs and drag her, because I’d ALSO forgotten to bring my blaze-orange engineer tape. There’s no way I’m going to try to haul her around on my shoulders without it…that’s a great way to get shot by another hunter.

        I took her back to the cabin and wondered if I should finish butchering her, but then I remembered that I was the one who brought the handle of Knob Creek, so I figured I could cozen someone into doing it for me as long as I shared. (I’m still learning the butchering part—I tend to waste meat by accident.) But I did go ahead and get the backstraps out, and by the time everyone else made it back in, I had them going in the broiler for everyone’s lunch. Hooray! The End.

        TL; DR for Greensleeves: If you’re going to write 500 words that have nothing to do with anything the original blog post is about, at least try not to bore everybody to fucking tears.

        Like


      • “Yes, darling heart, I’m an A cup, I smoke, I don’t want kids” “I tell dirty jokes, and you could crack a walnut with my jaw.”

        Gross. Just gross.

        I’ll never bless you with my cock.

        Like


      • translation: “la la la I can’t hear you” while you stick your fingers in your ears. The best sort of compliment I can get.

        Jeez, and I thought Matt pretending to talk to an imaginary you was bad. But what kind of 500-lb radioactive hamster must you have to manage to shit that long boring garbage about hunting deer?

        Sweetheart, I have noticed you have trouble staying on topic. Why is that?

        Does being an old carousel-riding whiskey-drinking chain-smoking gun-toting delusional shemale hag with A-cups bother you? Or being wrong about CH tenets? Is it trying to, again, change the topic out of desperation into things like English grammar, and then embarrass yourself by ironically making up your own words and contradicting yourself?

        Or to be so dumb as to fall for my ruse as being Patrice because you do not know that I can assume any name I want in the comment box? What’s the matter? Does the harpy finally realize she isn’t as smart as she think she is? That ‘yo mama’ joke you used on me about being attracted to my 60 year old menopausal mother doesn’t exactly help your case.

        Oh, I know! Was it the poor rape itself? I mean, who could’ve known hanging out with shady and abusive men could’ve lead to you getting hit and raped by the men in your life, right? Do you still need a doll, honey? We’ll custom-make you one with no breasts and black lungs.

        I love your last line, darling, calling my words boring and asking me to stay on the blog topic (as if I am not allowed to, you aren’t being a hypocrite about it all the time, and that I am doing something that you aren’t doing right now.) But funny how you never ask this of other people during debates – but then again, I think the only time that you have been raped this hard was when you last heard ‘green sleeves’, so a desperate measure from you is expected when you have no other tools to use. I understand.

        And as for my ‘500 boring words’ – I agree with you and I hope you will forgive me, but it is to be expected. I wrote about you, your life, and your 8 inch clit-dick.

        Like


      • you know what they say? third times a charm.

        Like


      • Tldr

        Like


      • tl;dr

        Like


      • Thanks (and thanks for responding on the other thread). I still don’t get why it’s day game vs. launch game.

        Like


  13. Gold Jerry!! Gold!

    Like


  14. on November 25, 2013 at 11:21 am RappaccinisDaughter

    Tweet: ” Colognes and perfumes are really meant to disguise MHC scents so that one’s field of possible mates is enlarged.”

    That’s a pretty strong theory. It’s something I’ve often wondered about myself.

    Although that could certainly explain the driving forces behind the behavior, unfortunately for many people, it’s either not helping or it’s actively counterproductive. The problem is that most of us pick out our own scents to use, so we’re choosing what smells good *to us,* not necessarily what’s going to smell good to the people that we’re trying to attract. Also, not necessarily what’s going to mix well with our own body chemistry.

    It’s a strong argument for only wearing cologne that women pick out for you (if you’re a man, naturally), or for not wearing it at all.

    Like


      • Major Histocompatibility Complex. Has to do with how two people’s immune systems mesh. Kids are healthier with less chance of miscarriage if there is harmony in a couple’s MHC profiles. Also more attraction and hotter monkey sex.

        Like


      • Would you mind copying and pasting and uploading what you just wrote as the official first definition at UD?

        http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=MHC

        The Manosphere & The Dark Enlightenment thank you in advance.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 1:34 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        The current theory is that MHC is what makes a person smell good or bad to you. It’s a particularly important component of attraction to women, because our senses of smell are demonstrably more acute than those of men. CH’s musing is that the use of cologne and other scented products is a subconscious way to obscure your MHC “smell,” so you won’t be automatically disqualified by a certain percentage of women.

        [CH: the hypothesis applies to women who use perfume, as well.]

        The other part of MHC theory that you’ll find interesting, ZS, is that a woman’s reaction to it is affected by the Pill. When she’s on the Pill, she’s more likely to respond to MHC that is similar to her own (e.g., a person who smells like a family member). The prevailing theory as to why this is is that the Pill mimics the effects of pregnancy.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 1:49 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        @CH: Oh yeah, I figured you meant that, too. And men do seem to respond to perfume, but they don’t seem to like the kinds that women prefer. Men seem to hate, hate, hate really strong, floral perfume and woodsy scents. I’ve gotten a lot more traction with perfume that smells of musk and…get this…food.

        I have one that smells of butterscotch and whisky from BPAL that I, personally, loathe. It actually makes me kind of nauseous to wear. But I get all these compliments from men, so…

        [CH: tbh, i’m a sucker for light, fresh, springtime meadow perfumes (on a beautiful baby of course). but i suspect perfume use is down, because i hardly smell it on women anymore. chalk it up to the increasing de-feminization of the West. however, black women buck the trend, because i can’t avoid smelling them when they’re within a mile radius of me. they must take a bath in it, and the stuff they use is strong enough to scorch nasal passages and tear up the eyes. revolting shit. i gotta wonder who they think likes them smelling that way? black men, i guess.]

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 2:04 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        @CH: Actually, probably part of what you’re seeing with the decrease in perfume use among women is that there’s been a movement among a number of workplaces to ban the use of perfume. Apparently enough people are “allergic” (use of scarequotes deliberate, as I doubt that most of them are truly allergic) that many HR departments have banned them wholesale rather than deal with complaints. She can’t wear perfume to work, so she falls out of the habit of wearing it at all.

        I think it’s more about the pussification of America than defeminization, frankly.YMMV.

        [CH: workplace banning of perfume use is both one cause and one symptom of the de-feminization of first world Western nations. Everything is getting desexualized in the push for total equalism, and more women in the workplace means more cattiness and backbiting and sly attempts to reduce the allure of female sexual competitors.]

        Like


      • “I’ve gotten a lot more traction with perfume that smells of musk and…get this…food.”

        I’ve read that men have the food scent preference, and I think strawberries allegedly topped the list. My ex went nuts for the coconut smell. I always thought men hated really strong perfumes in any scent, but “strong” is a matter of opinion. I like scented lotion; it’s enough to notice but not enough to knock someone out.

        Like


      • There’s an extremely vulgar little factoid about life as a man here, but I don’t feel comfortable talking about it with chicks in the room.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 2:24 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I think we can take it, ZS. Let’s have it!

        Like


      • If I were to smell your pussy, ass, or armpits I could tell if you were rh- blood type or not.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 3:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        That’s wild, Mr. B. What aspect of the smell is it that clues you in, and how did you figure out you could do it?

        (I can smell diabetes and chemotherapy, incidentally, although I don’t have to get quite so…up close and personal…to do it. Just breath and/or sweat is plenty.)

        Like


      • Mr. B just hinted at it.

        Some chicks just don’t smell very good.

        In fact, they smell down right revolting.

        Like


      • … and revolting smelling chicks smell particularly revolting when they are menstruating.

        Like


      • … and revolting smelling chicks smell particularly revolting when they are menstruating.

        Damn skippy they do. I’m married to one, too. She used to smell good. I couldn’t get enough of her scent. I don’t know what happened, but she smells awful on a good day, and you add some period pussy to that, and the only way to cope is to get too wasted to care.

        Like


      • Troubadour, anecdotally I have heard that women who regularly drink alcohol, particularly beer tend to have stinky pussies.

        Anyone care to verify or refute?

        Like


      • I should add that from my experience, women that don’t drink alcohol or drink moderately tend to have nice smelling pussies and that women that smoke tend to give their pussies a slightly to moderately bitter taste.

        Like


      • on November 26, 2013 at 7:24 am RappaccinisDaughter

        @Troubador:

        Augh, you poor dude. I might have some helpful advice. A couple of things:

        1. Has she put on significant amounts of weight since you married her? I’ve heard from a couple of my guy friends that for whatever reason, overweight/obesity seems to really change a woman’s personal aroma. I’ve never really been able to figure out why, beyond the obvious hygiene challenges that being very overweight would present. Maybe it’s because fat cells produce estrogen, and it’s messing up her hormone balance? If this is the case, then she should go back to normal if she loses the weight. Which would just be a good idea on every level anyway.

        2. Since you say she used to be OK, and then it changed, maybe she has an infection. If that’s the case, all she needs to do is visit her gyno. They’ll figure out what it is—there are a couple of different things it could be—and give her medication. Clear it right up. Don’t worry, it doesn’t mean she’s been unfaithful. A woman can get an infection just from a big change in her diet or a lot of stress.

        As far as how to bring it up to her…this is one of those things that’s very difficult to do without hurting her feelings, but you’re not doing her any favors by staying silent. (Although honestly, I don’t know how she could not notice it herself…) Just sit her down sometime when everything’s calm and nothing else stressful is happening, and tell her as gently as you can that there’s an odor, and you’re worried that her health might be affected, and you think she should go to the doctor.

        Like


    • on November 25, 2013 at 3:56 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Since I am the Chateau’s resident old bitter transsexual harpy, I will take this opportunity to make a BIG ANNOUNCEMENT:

      I wanted to let you all know that aside from being an old shriveled up chain-smoking unfeminine whore, as flat as a wall, devoid of motherly instincts, that had ridden the cock carousel her *entire* life to rapidly enter spinsterhood – one supplied by blights of society like thugs and badboys – that is too dishonest and hurt to stay on topic (about your attraction to badboys and your little rape incident; but hey at least you didn’t talk about English this time), I have another wonderful quality to share with the world….

      I AM A DUMBASS THAT HAS NO IDEA HOW COMMENTING WORKS!

      RD, I never thought you could fail any more – both here and in your personal life – but you continue to aggressively push the envelope and prove me wrong.

      Your last sentence talking about ME failing (considering your ignorance, cowardice in avoidance of topics where you were proven wrong, lack of physical and mental health, and the fact you are an old shriveled-up deranged prune with black lungs and small tits that constantly puts Chris Browns in her life in order to suck thug cock and get abused) is DELICIOUSLY ironic. Kudos for being my puppet!

      Looks like you don’t recognize the “tells” in my writing as well as you had mentioned before, right sweetheart? But that’s okay – we have already established that you are solipsistic and delusional about your own capabilities, and you obscure and change the topic to avoid further embarrassment. Does the rape still hurt sweetie?

      Please reply talking again about English, avoiding the topic, and make another dumb remark. I don’t expect you to have the willpower to confront me directly. Hurry!

      You are good cheap entertainment. It is rare to see a creature fail so much.

      I know, this is so shocking to me; I expected so much from a dumbass chain-smoking shemale that had ridden thug cock her entire life. You sound like such quality in a woman.

      I will send you a box of cats to accompany you during your spinsterhood as a reward for my amusement.

      P.S. If you want to criticize my English – in a thinly veiled attempt to save face and change the topic after being corrected about your fallacious remarks – you can at least be correct and not make up words, or contradict yourself by saying a word only has one meaning and then giving an alternate meaning.

      Like


      • Whoever you are, I fucking salute you.

        Keep it up, man. Keep it up….

        Like


      • Who do you think you’re kidding? No one is fooled by your constant ID switching and ventriloquist-dummy conversation with yourself. The omega seeps through regardless what clothes you wear. A clown is a clown even when he switches makeup.

        Your puppet troupe playhouse is like a retarded satire of Mark 9. A fractured personality torturing itself, unable to settle on one persona because they are all unpleasant. Beg to be sent to the swine, that you “may enter into them” and be freed of your schizophrenic misery.

        Matt

        Like


      • matt king’s P-R-O-J-E-C-T-I-O-N.

        accusing others things he is guilty of so others will not suspect he suffers from all the accusations he is making. tsk. tsk. (((headshake)))

        as confessed by the man himself in front of the court.

        GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS

        1. ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM
        2. WHITE KNIGHTING
        3. IMPERSONATING A PERSON
        4. MISLEADING THE WITNESS
        5. CHILD ABANDONMENT
        6. FRAUD
        7. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
        8. MENTAL INSANITY

        Like


      • on November 26, 2013 at 1:05 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        O.K., Legion, now you’ve finally managed to piss me off. Because you’ve driven me to white-knight for Matt fucking King.

        1. ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM
        There are several people in this thread alone happily recounting how simply reading Matt’s comments and following up with a dictionary has improved their English skills.

        2. WHITE KNIGHTING
        Occasionally being pleasant to a woman is not white-knighting. It’s called simple courtesy. You should try it sometime…you may discover that you spend much less time trying to rinse the oleoresin capsicum out of your eyes.

        3. IMPERSONATING A PERSON
        He sockpuppeted me once, it’s true. You’re posting under a minimum of three different names in this thread alone. If sockpuppeting is an indictable offense, perhaps you should recuse yourself from this proceeding.

        4. MISLEADING THE WITNESS
        You misspelled “witless.”

        5. CHILD ABANDONMENT
        What the fuck is this I don’t even.

        6. FRAUD
        Actually, I’m pretty sure the man really has read the Bible. He may have physically consumed it.

        7. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
        Lolwut.

        8. MENTAL INSANITY
        This is just too rich to even comment on. I mean, I can’t. It’s perfection as it is.

        Like


      • on November 26, 2013 at 6:01 pm I-got-Raped-and-dont-want-any-daughters

        #1 fan – the reason why RD’s response is incomprehensible is because she thinks I am you. lol. how sad.

        Sorry to break your bubble, ugly gun-toting chain-smoking whiskey-drinking shemale with A-cups that is devoid of motherly instincts who spreads her foul legs for thugs – but I am not the only one with contempt for both you and Matt. I am always happy to see other people join in on the fun.

        And I thought you said that you were able to look for “tells” in my writing. What happened? Another error for RD. What a surprise.

        Remember the time where I called you out on confusing CH tenets, and you ignored the topic and began talking about English instead? And then, ironically, you still made up your own words, capitalized improper nouns, and contradicted yourself by saying that a certain word only has one meaning and then giving its alternative meaning right after?

        Oh right, remember the time where you actually thought I was Patrice? LOL. Any idea how commenting works, or are you still new here? What a dumbass.

        And let’s not forget the ‘yo mama’ joke you used on me. I didn’t know you were into 60 year old menopausal women.

        How does it feel to be such a big sack of fail? There’s a reason you are an old hag about to enter spinsterhood.

        Like


      • RD, that was the sweetest thing a woman has ever done for me, even though you are completely wrong about most of your points. We know you are an old washed-up shemale hag but that was so nice and lovely nonetheless.

        A good example is that I was a white-knight for Amy on many recent threads, even though she was caught confusing CH ideas about female attraction to badboys and even had to be corrected, among many others, by CH himself. I just kept on defending her because – even though she was wrong and continued peddling her filth – she has a vagina. (Albeit, it is a fetid one, much like yours, from years of having been plundered by cock that she admitted belongs to tattooed convicted felons).

        I will disregard the fact that you erroneously (what else is new) misused the term ‘white-knight’ since I am a man and you are a woman (even though you act a lot more masculine than I do; a fact that is sad for the both of us).

        But I wasn’t surprised. Aren’t you the same person who doesn’t know how commenting works, bungled CH tenets of female attraction to badboys in the same solipsistic way Amy did, tremendously messed up English grammar while ironically accusing others of it, and openly admitted her attraction to 60 year-old menopausal women?

        In any case, your recent defending of me has turned me on. Hard. It’s the most attention I have ever received from a woman, since for some reason, they usually do not find a religious nutcase as being sexy. Wanna fuck?

        (I promise, in consideration of your advanced age, I will bring my own lube. I also won’t tell Greg Eliot.)

        Matt

        Like


      • matt I know it is difficult it is to accept the truth sometimes. It was you I once looked up to and was inspired by you but now I see you for the person you truly are. the man behind the curtain is a failure of a man. a fake. a phoney. a counterfeit. it must be soul crushing having to mark those papers again, and again, and again, nit picking out grammar and spalling errors and getting off on that because that is the most power you will have over anyone. ever. you already know that everyone of your students will exceed you and will go on to more interesting and better paying jobs than you. just accept the truth. quit being such a whiny little girl you old geezer and go look for a job that will give you a full-time salary instead of taking it out on people that have more potential than you. who wants to read a book written with contentless form? its like fucking a woman and shooting blanks. don’t have enough money saved for retirement? worried about job security? chill out take a few breaths. still worked up about how daddy and mommy didn’t love you when you’re already at the age of 35? buddy you should check out a shrink for bi-polar and depression it seems like you match all the criteria for those symptoms to a T. get on those antidepressants instead of drinking all the time. quit preaching about the bible when you repeatedly misquote it out of context, you hypocrite. stop preaching about hope and unity when you you are already falling apart inside, you hypocrite. RD cant save you she’s already preparing to spin herself out of a damaged existence. you hypocrite.

        matt.
        dodge this: YOU FUNCTIONLESS FORM.

        you hypocrite.

        Like


      • Poor Matt. Now he thinks that everyone who agrees with me – which isn’t a hard thing considering you, RD, and Amy are among the most hated commenters at the Chateau since you guys all embody its anti-thesis beliefs by white-knighting or being a carousel-riding hag soon to enter spinsterhood after a lifetime of leg-spreading for thugs and abusive men – are all just me with a different name. Of course, then our resident religious hypocrite resorts to the typical name-calling on behavior that, even if it were true, is not consistent with a clinical diagnosis of ‘schizophrenia’; it is just contempt for you wretched clowns.

        I am sorry to disappoint you, but it’s not true, old man. We really just hate you 3 losers – not just me – and I am doing the Chateau a service. I’ve gotten good responses from others both in this thread and in the previous ones where I made my presence known.

        Who knew the religious old kook would begin seeing imaginary specters of me constantly? I feel so honored. Oh wait, your belief in the imaginary is kind of your job description, right?

        But since you asked SO NICELY for me to switch my ID, Matt, here you go:

        —————————–

        Hey guys it’s Matt, I want you all to know that in my corrupted conception of Christianity that I follow in my own delusional mind, I am able to throw out ad hominem insults and make up shit about people due to a combination of anger and bitterness at my inability to respond to a person’s posts that discuss my hypocrisy, my stupidity, and my lack of capacity to stay on topic because my opponent’s coherent points have rendered me speechless and quivering.

        I am a religious man, but I do not practice what I preach by levying false accusations upon people, avoiding honest debates, and defending another person that is unequivocally wrong solely based on the fact that she is a woman. I have always had problems with the opposite sex because Jesus commands me to be a white-knighting vagina.

        Now if you don’t mind, I have girls to white-knight, goats to slaughter to fulfill my obligations from Leviticus, a puppet of RD to create because I feel so lonely (of all people, I respect RD and Amy the most; old single solipsistic cock-carousel riding unfeminine women with battered bodies from abuse that spread themselves for thugs pique my interest because of my Jesus complex), and a thesaurus to memorize in lieu of accumulating real-world experience and the common sense not attained by religious nut-cases.

        Oh, and if baby Jesus isn’t looking, I’ll give Greg Eliot a good penis wash while discussing our coherent beliefs in a flying spaghetti monster. Adieu!
        ————————–

        And if I were to guess a diagnosis for you, Matthew – since you like playing this game because you cannot face my arguments directly – it would be bipolar disorder. Half of your posts defend RD, while the other half insult her. You may want to make-up your mind.

        Matt (I attach my name at the end of my every post because of my humility)

        Like


      • Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.

        You fairy.

        Like


      • Uh, no. Many of us beside that guy don’t particularly like R.D.

        Quit being paranoid and delusional. You are everything that you ironically accuse the other person of being.

        Like


      • “ridden thug cock” – Pithy and Putrid comment of the day award.
        Not sure what the prize should be though, date with an early release thug murderer or something?

        Like


    • I never wear cologne.

      I guess it’s lucky for me that my current main likes to bury her nose in my armpit and inhale deeply. Previously I found it weird , now I think it’s comforting.

      Like


  15. Smiling at every woman you pass on the street is quite possibly the best advice on the list. For one, it brightens your day, ‘If I’m smiling so much I must be happy!’ your brain tells itself. For two, it makes it that much easier to go up to women and talk to them, as you are out of your shell and expect smiles from them.
    Plus spreading positivity around is good Karma.

    Like


  16. on November 25, 2013 at 11:34 am the latent sadist

    I have three things to add.

    I like the “Kanye West” response. I was getting back in touch with a girl i met over the summer. She pulle the “who is this?” routine. I said “derek jeter. wanna fuck?” i dunno why, it just popped in my head. Either she pretended to not understand or literally had no idea who that was. BUt it made me realize there is a new generation behind me. Funny. Possibly instructive to others..keep it relevant.

    When she talks about another man. Bingo. One girl was going on about some guy and i just shut it down with “whaddya paying me by the hour?”. End thread, (plus a”shut up!!” with a giggle.)

    Lastly mints all good. But hydrogen peroxide is your best friend. like 3 bucks a bottle at the store. Rinse with a bit of water…you will have a completely odorless mouth. Btw has anyone else noticed girls with fucked up breath being an epidemic? No negative social feedback from guys is the culprot…ill bet. I’ve made a girl rinse with that shit. Breath wasnt bad the next time! #Shameworks

    Like


    • > “girls with fucked up breath”

      Chicks who smell bad: Serious DNFW.

      Like


    • Btw has anyone else noticed girls with fucked up breath being an epidemic?

      they have poor oral hygiene or they’re bulimic.

      Like


      • I know girls and guys who eat out all the time and always get the tripple fried double basted garlic and chive delight. They stink in a way that no amount of peroxide will handle.

        Unless your carefull, every friggn thing you get while eating out makes you stink for days. You can brush, floss, and power wash. Nothing takes the stink away but time. Like many of the topics covered on this blog, its a rot that comes from the inside.

        Like


      • > “garlic and chive”

        BLECCH.

        Of course, it could be a good opportunity to try your hand at “Call ‘Em Out On It” Game: “Honey, I’d love to french kiss you on the first date, but dadgum, you gotta do something about that breath first.”

        Like


      • Garlic is really good for you, the smell sense tires quickly so the answer is feed your baby lots of nice spicy Italian food, then molest and date rape in the ensuing carbohydrate fog.

        Free fringe!- While she sleeps developing your offspring, her arteries are being kept blockage free! And since you BOTH stink to high heaven from the garlic, it’s guaranteed monogamy for a day.

        Like


      • Bad diets, not enough exercise also make chicks smell bad from every orifice. I’ve nexted several attractive women due to bad odors in various places.

        Like


      • If garlic is so bad, one cannot help but wonder why so many women find Italians, Greeks or Spaniards ‘sexy’.
        They tend to consume rather vast quantities of onions, garlic and all manner of other strong smelling stuff.
        I’ve never noticed any correlation whatsoever between body odor and attraction, in fact, most chicks seem to dig some man sweat and don’t care one rat’s ass about which cologne (if any) you wear.
        As long as you don’t stink like the homeless bum who’s been sleeping in a dumpster next to the exhaust vent from the sewage treatment plant for the past 3 months, pissing his unchanged pants daily, your smell is NOT the reason why she rejects you.

        Like


      • Nothing worse than a stinky pussy. Reminds me of a funny story I think I read on here. Someone broke up with his gf and after working all day outside he came in and wiped his taint with her finery. I still laugh to myself about that. The fact that you know it’s gonna stench really bad as you go on about your life kills me.

        Like


    • on November 26, 2013 at 10:29 pm the latent sadist

      thanks for the tweet reference CH!!! *****Imitative CH Preen*****

      (It is gross, and i fucking embarass them whether they like it or not. But i swear to god almost every girl save a few have had breath issues. I do society a favor, and I level her ego a bit…to my advantage)

      Like


  17. Would love an example of date-starting, “touching on your terms” but no hug.

    On first dates I always go for a hug, even if they put they’re hand out, I’m just like, “nope, I’m bringin it in,” and brush their hand out of the way as I grab ’em. I enjoy doing this, and it’s def on my terms, sets a dominant frame, etc.

    Like


    • on November 26, 2013 at 10:40 pm the latent sadist

      my suggestion would be that the way you progress overall touching on a first meetup is most important. Ive met up with a girl without a physical greeting. If it seems forced in that particular social context ( barely know each other) i personally dont push it. if youre confident about how you’re greeting her as it is then its no big deal…especially if they let out a little giggle. you could spin em around and say “my my” or whatev. But overall, your vibe and the smoothness with which you progressively escalate during the date is what matters.

      Like


  18. – If you go out a lot, you will have make-outs. Fresh breath extends sessions. Tip: chew mint leaves on your way out the door.

    What about Bad Breath Game? Before you kiss her you openly, confidently, and indifferently wonder if your breath smells just in case it kind of does (even though it never should).

    It signals to her that you don’t give a fuck, and I’ve seen alphas with sketchy hygiene keep hot women who supposedly value “good hygiene”.

    Like


  19. Great list- not much new but good summary/remidners. “Cast game” a little high-schoolish, though- I can’t imagine a grown man collecting female smiley faces on a cast.

    Like


  20. “When a hot chick makes a funny…”

    does this ever happen? not laugh-out-loud, at least for me.

    Like


  21. Ubercreepy Cast Game:

    “Hey can you help me with these books? I have a broken arm and this cast is making it difficult. My car’s just down the street”.

    Then you walk up to your yellow Volkswagen Beetle.

    FYI, don’t actually do this, it’s creepy for many reasons.

    Like


    • This would be so much better with a utility van.

      Like


      • I was thinking the same thing. And tell her you need help lifting a couch into said van. And could she get into the van and pull her end in? Then club her over the head with the cast and drive away. Success!

        Like


      • on November 25, 2013 at 2:57 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        First you gotta ask her if she’s about a size 14.

        Like


      • Hey RD why did you accuse me a few threads ago of being that vicious guy attacking you?

        I mean don’t you know how commenting works? I thought you were smart… 😦

        Like


      • on November 26, 2013 at 2:06 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        At the time, it was the first time he’d directly sockpuppeted someone else’s screen name, and he claimed to be you in his text as well. Plus, I couldn’t imagine why he’d attack you—so I believed it.

        I’m sorry I fell for it, Patrice, and I’m sorry for accusing you.

        Like


      • Dude…get your own screen name wtf.

        Like


      • Really that’s no excuse. You called me a “gigantic ball of fail” or something and made fun of my inexperience with women and I never even insulted you. You really should’ve known better and known how commenting works. It’s not hard to figure out that he can use any name. He didn’t attack me at all or mention me in his texts so please stop lying because you made a mistake.

        You are both angry and ignorant at the same time. I didn’t read his long posts but seeing how you behave he was probably right when he said you made mistakes and you tried to cover them up out of sham and you weren’t very smart.

        I have problems with women because of girls like you that are so fucked up that they act like whores and spread their legs for assholes that rape and hit them and just make fun of me because I don’t do that. You aren’t smart at all. Screw you. 😦

        Like


      • Tuck it back

        Like


      • You guys didn’t get the creepy reference.

        An infamous man once tried his own version of “Cast Game” to pick up girls, and it involved a fake injury, needing help carrying his books to his car “nearby”, and a yellow Volkswagen Beetle

        Guess the reference.

        Like


      • yep

        Like


    • What if it had been a great big honkin Ford Pickup Truck?

      With Confederate Flag bumper stickers FTW?

      The big problem there would be that no self-respecting Johnny Reb would ever be caught dead in public asking a woman to carry something for him.

      All of his ancestors would simultaneously roll over in their graves if that were to happen.

      Like


    • P,
      Don’t feed da hamsters? And “creepy”?!?? That’s like wow … just … wow!

      Like


  22. Mildly unrelated, but is it fair to say that a man that knows exactly what he is doing with women can be a woman’s worst nightmare but at the same thing the best thing to ever happen to her?

    Like


  23. lmao @ the beard pet. i havent shaved for most of november i am rocking full transient/hobo beard replete with neck beard hair down around the adams apple. alpha is not giving two fucks about my appearance in pandering to what females like– and still getting laid.

    Like


  24. chateau heartiste: come for the game, stay for the nooses

    Like


  25. Off-topic, but I’m sure some folk out there are unhappy…

    “Morning After Pill Touted by Liberals Doesn’t Work for Women Over 176 Pounds,” by Nichole Bailey, Townhall, 25 Nov 2013

    Like


  26. The one I use all the time is “Behave…” works in a lot of situations…

    Like


  27. http://www.onepeoplesproject.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=947:kevin-macdonald&catid=13:m&Itemid=3

    In short based on what Mehler and Lieberman has shown over a decade ago by going back and checking MacDonald’s own sources word-for-word with what MacDonald himself has written word-for word, MacDonald lied about what his sources said. That’s falsification of evidence and universities are supposed to punish faculty when they do that. Sadly, it is not always punished when it should be.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald#Academic_criticism

    MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]

    Reviewing MacDonald’s Separation and Its Discontents in 2000, Zev Garber writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as “provoked by Jews themselves.” Garber concludes that MacDonald’s “rambling who-is-who-isn’t roundup of Jews responsible for the ‘Jewish Problem’ borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation.”[28]

    In 2001, David Lieberman, a Holocaust researcher at Brandeis University, wrote a paper entitled Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald’s Research Techniques, where he noted how one of MacDonald’s sources, author Jaff Schatz, objected to how MacDonald used his writings to further his premise that Jewish self-identity validates anti-Semitic sentiments and actions. “At issue, however, is not the quality of Schatz’s research, but MacDonald’s use of it, a discussion that relies less on topical expertise than on a willingness to conduct close comparative readings,” Lieberman wrote.[29]

    Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]

    Like


  28. http://www.onepeoplesproject.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=947:kevin-macdonald&catid=13:m&Itemid=3

    In short based on what Mehler and Lieberman has shown over a decade ago by going back and checking MacDonald’s own sources word-for-word with what MacDonald himself has written word-for word, MacDonald lied about what his sources said. That’s falsification of evidence and universities are supposed to punish faculty when they do that. Sadly, it is not always punished when it should be.

    Like


  29. Would be so cool if you got like me and posted pics of your butt and stuff when you didn’t have time to write something new.

    Like


  30. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald

    MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]

    Reviewing MacDonald’s Separation and Its Discontents in 2000, Zev Garber writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as “provoked by Jews themselves.” Garber concludes that MacDonald’s “rambling who-is-who-isn’t roundup of Jews responsible for the ‘Jewish Problem’ borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation.”[28]

    In 2001, David Lieberman, a Holocaust researcher at Brandeis University, wrote a paper entitled Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald’s Research Techniques, where he noted how one of MacDonald’s sources, author Jaff Schatz, objected to how MacDonald used his writings to further his premise that Jewish self-identity validates anti-Semitic sentiments and actions. “At issue, however, is not the quality of Schatz’s research, but MacDonald’s use of it, a discussion that relies less on topical expertise than on a willingness to conduct close comparative readings,” Lieberman wrote.[29]

    Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]

    Like


  31. MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]

    Reviewing MacDonald’s Separation and Its Discontents in 2000, Zev Garber writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as “provoked by Jews themselves.” Garber concludes that MacDonald’s “rambling who-is-who-isn’t roundup of Jews responsible for the ‘Jewish Problem’ borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation.”[28]

    In 2001, David Lieberman, a Holocaust researcher at Brandeis University, wrote a paper entitled Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald’s Research Techniques, where he noted how one of MacDonald’s sources, author Jaff Schatz, objected to how MacDonald used his writings to further his premise that Jewish self-identity validates anti-Semitic sentiments and actions. “At issue, however, is not the quality of Schatz’s research, but MacDonald’s use of it, a discussion that relies less on topical expertise than on a willingness to conduct close comparative readings,” Lieberman wrote.[29]

    Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]

    Like


  32. MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]

    Like


  33. Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]

    Like


  34. hey CH why do you retweet roosh if he is a turk taking all yer white wimmenz

    Like


  35. So are implying that KMAC is being protected ny the all-powerful (and anti-Semitic) WASP-Muslim ruling class? What a joke.

    Like


  36. i had the same problem like many of the women that answered. i am from the island of Trinidad and Tobago.And growing up in my country i was exposed to Indian culture w Indian movies on the tv station. Even the Hindu festival Diwali is big in Trinidad.my experience was here in NYC. i met this Indian he was nice started to date . we got to know each other month become into a year. between months we had a very intimate relationship. we talked about marriage, future everything in the long run.we never fought never had any difficulties relationship was going well. then one day he called and told me some kakame story that his ex- girlfriend from south Africa (south African Indian girl) is coming back and he decide to marry her instead. he actually told me all this on the phone.i liked and accepted him for his personalities and even when he claimed he wasn’t working.but instead i got really hurt.i cried for weeks trying to figure out what went wrong.my family and friends warned we about Indian men but i didn’t listen.they said that he probably had a wife and didn’t want her to find out about me. or didnt want to get to deeply involve because at the end of the day it goes back to his Indian beauty. I’m turn off but not completely by the experience to shut all Indian away. I think the next time i would be very terrified and hesitant to go with a next Indian man that comes along. because of that horrific experience.

    Like


  37. on November 25, 2013 at 7:26 pm Mitch Cumstein

    I was having dinner with my gf, her sister, and her feminist friend. We were talking about Forrest Gump, and someone mentioned Jenny made a lot of bad choices. “Bad choices?” I asked. “She didn’t love Forrest until he became a multi-millionaire.”
    The feminist sneered. “That’s a man’s thinking.”
    “The only reason she reached out to him is because he was rich and she needed someone to raise their child. If it was even his.”
    Again, she just shook her head and sad, “That’s a typical man’s thinking.”
    I immediately responded, “Well, that response was short and elegant. Like a midget in a ball gown.”
    My gf and her sister tried not to laugh at that, but they couldn’t resist. If the feminist has a dog, she kicked it later that night.

    Like


  38. Can anyone recommend any good PUA books for guys who go out alone?

    I’m reading Mystery Method and so far his methods seem to involve the help of a wingman or a group of friends.

    You can’t create false time restraints (for example: i can only stay a sec my friends are waiting) if you’re at the club by yourself.

    Like


    • Credit to YaReally:

      Ya, RSD’s video articles are great, specifically Tyler’s. Watch his
      whole archive of videos for a bunch of great stuff. His work is pretty
      much head of the pack in terms of progressing pickup as an art-form.

      Same time though, I got into the community in the old-school heavy
      tactics days and I think having a grounding in the old-school stuff
      underneath all the new “be shapeless like water” stuff helps a lot.
      Mystery Method was solid gold, but it’s a looooong read/watch. If you
      can handle that, great, but if not then I’d recommend LoveSystem’s
      “Magic Bullets” which is like a really condensed “only the important
      stuff” version of MM.

      Paul Janka’s “How to get laid in New York” is a good read (free PDF
      file) just to get a different perspective (he’s a natural and he does
      day-game in a really busy fast-paced city, he has some interesting
      takes on how he games).

      If you Google you can find “The Tyler Digest”, but I’d actually
      recommend this one instead or as well:

      http://www.dallaspua.com/files/mystery_method_collaboration_11.08.06.pdf

      Like


      • Thank you

        Like


      • I wouldn’t call Janka a natural at all. From the videos I’ve seen of him, his vibe is borderline autistic. He’s a numbers guy who relies on looks and became conscious enough not to fall into beta traps.

        Guess it depends on how you define natural. For me it’s someone who is socially “together”, and never had any anxiety approaching women. Who gets laid through natural charm and rapport, and isn’t ashamed of it.

        Janka appears contrived in his interactions. I think the fact that you see him only pulling 6s and max a 7 is consequence of this.

        If Tyler was able to innately socialize like he does now, without have to learn his skill set, that’s what “natural” looks like.

        Like


      • I just mean that he wasn’t a “community guy” like the rest of us learning from Mystery/Style/Tyler/etc., he figured his style of game out on his own.

        I agree that he’s a robot and not a guy I’d want to go get a drink with, but some guys would find value in his perspective on pickup and daygame in a busy city (his “movie trailer” concept is solid for running short-sets like during subway/bus travel) and less-traditional strategies (he daygames during the week and arranges his dates on the weekends, VS going to the bars to compete against other guys at the bars on the weekends).

        His “How to get laid in New York” is worth a read.

        Like


      • @immoralgables

        Those videos have great ideas in them. Personally I find them hard to watch because he tends to ramble. Julien too tends to ramble. But what I pull from them is their positive energy and drive to improve. Sometimes the nuances of the message are a bit convoluted.

        Like


    • “You can’t create false time restraints (for example: i can only stay a sec my friends are waiting) if you’re at the club by yourself.”

      You can, there’s a reason it’s called “false”.

      Props for even considering going out alone. The first time I did that I felt like the entire club was watching me, wondering “where are this guy’s friends?” I did not dare to approach at all and got to the point where it felt so uncomfortable that I made it my goal for the night just to STAY in the club for 30 more minutes. Probably the longest half hour of my life.

      If you’re just starting out I’d focus on establishing a habit of going out regularly in whatever way. Count just getting your feet into the club as a successful night at first. Everything else will follow from there, slowly, over time.

      Like


      • yes, if you don’t have natural social aptitude, utilize shaping ( successive approximations of the desired behavior). And make the successive increments as tiny as they need to be in order for you to progress–even in the smallest way-every day.

        For instance, as above poster says about just getting your feet in the club.

        Sometimes, when I drag my pee-stained semi-corpse around in public, I see a smoking bright, willowy 9 shopping in the Dollar Store.

        i am not up to an instant marriage proposal at that point, but I at least move a little closer to her to force extinguish the anxiety of knowing she exists. I might not even look at her. But I DO SOMETHING.

        For you to escape what therapists cal “help-rejecting complaining” you simply need to do some physical action against emotion.

        DO SOMETHING.

        DO SOMETHING.

        DO SOMETHING.

        Ideally as part of a reasoned progression toward having a stunning blond-blue nurse saying “Fuck me Daddy I need a a baby!”, but lesser goals may still be worthy.

        Like


    • “You can’t create false time restraints (for example: i can only stay a sec my friends are waiting) if you’re at the club by yourself.”

      Sure you can. 🙂 If the set goes well and the chick is into you, you say “oh my friends left for another bar.” or “oh I’m actually here alone, I just didn’t want to sound creepy lol” or “oh I txted them that I met a cute chick and to head to the next bar without me”

      Or change it to “I can only stay a sec, I have to take a massive dump” lol. Don’t worry about the logic, once you get gaming and reach the “hook point”, they often forget you were supposed to leave because they WANT you to stay.

      If the set isn’t going great and you need to bail, say “well I’m going to go find my friends. Have a good night!” or “oh my friend just txted me asking where I am, I’d better go find her” and go to a different part of the bar that’s out of their line of sight…they have no idea that you don’t actually have friends over there and can’t see you so they’ll never know.

      If the room is an open concept so they can see you when you go to “find your friends”, just go across the room and pick the friendliest looking set and open them. No one has any idea that you don’t know them lol and THAT new set thinks your friends are the first set you were talking to. They don’t know that you just met them.

      Or open an easy friendly-looking set (even dudes, just comment about how hot the girls are tonight or ask how this place is later or talk about sports if you know anything about that shit (I don’t lol)…or a friendly looking mixed set (don’t even hit on their girl, say you have a girlfriend so you’re not a threat)…or a bachelorette party etc) when you first get there and say you’re waiting for your friends to show up and chill with them. They’re now your home base, and to everyone else in the bar those are your friends so you come back to hang with them in-between sets if you need to. No one knows (or cares) that you only just met then that night.

      Merge sets and introduce people you’ve just met to other people you’ve just met. Nobody knows or realizes that you’ve only just met everyone and are actually there solo cause the only thing crazier than being out by yourself and introducing complete strangers to eachother as if you’ve known them for years is ACCUSING someone of being out by themselves and introducing complete strangers to eachother as if they’ve know them for years. 🙂

      Go super early and tell people you’re waiting for friends to show up later…to anyone arriving after that, it looks like you’re already there with your friends and to this initial set when it fills up you say “I’m going to go find my friends” and go open more sets. They have no idea that you don’t know anyone is there.

      Or the reverse, go super late when it’s packed and no one can tell who knows who and you can get lost in the crowd and lose line of sight easily. You can just “go find your friends” and walk thru part of the crowd and open another set.

      Hell when I was starting out and had a lot of Approach Anxiety and was out alone, there were nights where I’d open a set, say “ok I have to go find my friends” and go to another room/floor of the bar out of line of sight and sit in a booth all by my lonesome, too petrified with AA to approach/open anyone, and then an hour or two later I’d get back to wandering around and bump into a girl from the set from downstairs and go “oh ya my friends are hammered so I came to find you” and game her lol

      If you go late and are stuck in line, start talking to whoever is in front and/or behind you in line…just make small-talk about “wow I’ve never been here this late is it always like this??” or “shit I’m gonna be sober by the time we get in there lol” etc. and when you walk into the venue now you have friends you can come back to as your “home base”.

      If you live in a city with a strip of bars, use “I have to go meet up with my friends at NameOfClub. You guys should come later, it’ll be awesome.” And do that with every set you open, at all the bars along the strip…then when you finally get to NameOfClub, there’s a good chance a couple of those sets you opened will be there and you introduce them to eachother and they’re your home-base.

      A few times when I was out solo, I would go to the end of a long line to get in and chat with whoever was around me, then as we got closer to the door I would say “oh my friends just txted, I gotta go meet up with them first” and just walk to the back of the line and line up again (ideally behind cute girls) and chat whoever is around me and I would do that like 6 times. Then on the last time I would just head into the bar with the last set I chatted up so when I got in it looked like I was with friends and there were 5 sets in there that knew me enough to say hi, which is enough for me to introduce them to the other sets and nobody knows I went there alone lol

      Think outside the box and get creative. You have more options than you realize. When you understand social dynamics and how people perceive reality, you can manipulate that perception and basically become Neo in the Matrix realizing there is no spoon and you can bend the rules that other people are trapped in. 😉

      I know you’re asking more in a general sense of like “how do I handle social proof and accomplishment intros and get isolation and lead her to my friends to introduce them etc etc”, but I expanded on this just to show you that a little creativity can overcome most of it. 🙂

      Like


    • ‘You can’t create false time restraints (for example: i can only stay a sec my friends are waiting) if you’re at the club by yourself.’

      Ya you can. Just lie. lol.

      Looking back on everything now, I’m going to say something that seems a bit cray —- MM is not for beginners. MM is for people who already have minor success with cute girls. I think basic RSD ‘talk to girls’ shit is better for beginners. Just go out, talk to them, sub-communicate (or directly communicate) some level of interest, and see where it goes. Get comfortable acting like a man and flirting. Once you get good at that, then it’s time to pour the MM nitro on to your game. MM is how you become larger than life. But, if you try it out at the start…you’ll come off like a chode. Why? The congruence is just too low. Once you have better internals and start thinking you’re the shit, then you can start adding the charisma layer — because you’ll have more congruence to it.

      I’d just read normal blue pill crap about flirting and talking to girls. It’s like a progression. You have to change your personal reality before external reality will follow.

      So right now you think “I don’t get pussy. I want to be a guy who gets hot pussy.” But the sheer amount of limiting beliefs, baggage, and negative experiences underlying that thought is staggering. You have to break each part down.

      The first step is probably — ‘I don’t even talk to girls.’
      So, just read basic stuff that will allow you to have convos with girls. And go up and approach them. Expect nothing from the interactions. After awhile, you’ll say ‘o ya….I talk to girls. Okay. That’s me.’
      The second step is something like ‘Girls don’t like talking to me, or my company is bad.’ This is different, btw, than ‘Girls aren’t attracted to me.’ So then you read more stuff…maybe do a little self-development..all while talking to hot girls.

      So once you get “i talk to girls, and I’m good company” then you start exhibiting the kind of confidence that you need. And then more of the red pill stuff becomes more helpful. I mean, it’s always helpful so that you know where you’re going….but it becomes more readily applied.

      Like


  39. Feds have decided to shut down 23andMe — that’s the company that’ll do genetics workups if you send them a sample.

    Were too many men finding out about the paternity of their kids?

    Or were too many potential Obamacare clients checking to see if they had risk factors before deciding to sign up?

    Either way, apparently the Democrats have decided you shouldn’t know about your own genes.

    This will only stop when we kill them all.

    Like


  40. […] – Yard sales and consignment shops are lucrative venues for picking up girls. Good ratio + young babes + opener props = win. – When a hot chick makes a funny, don’t laugh too hard. In fact, don’t laugh at all.  […]

    Like


  41. […] Your Daily Game, Condensed | Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  42. I just wanted to say I love this blog for another reason too; the english I’m learning. CH has a way of throwing in unusual words that a european like me have to look up to really get the sentence. Ah, good stuff, getting educated here even. Maybe CH should get some tax-money for the educational value haha.

    Like


  43. you’re fcking amazing. this is why I am here

    Like


  44. “When a hot chick makes a funny, don’t laugh too hard. In fact, don’t laugh at all. Just smile. LOLing is approval seeking.”

    There are very few face to face genuinely funny people in meatworld. If I hear a good joke I don’t care who the teller is, I’ll laugh. I control my frame and what I choose to do, not them, not anybody else. That said, there’s never a time when this has come into play in real life with an attractive girl, most think they are a laugh riot when instead they’re boring, loud, brash and insipid all rolled into one tight little package, and the ones who are not in that mold may have wit at times but wit is hardly LOL worthy.

    “…simultaneously grab her hair and palm her pussy while kissing her neck. Magic.”

    Context is key here, this kind of thing rarely works out well if tried on a girl you are chatting up at a bus stop.

    “Never tolerate a girl showing up later than you to a date. ”

    I go by the old college 10 minute rule. Ten minutes past the agreed time, and I’m out. In the age of cell phones there is no excuse for being late without a good reason given over a quick call. If she can’t muster that, she’s a game player, so…later.

    “Yard sales”

    WTF? heh. I must live in the wrong neighborhood(s) all of my life, but every yard sale I’ve been too has nearly zero “hot” content, except for a few random hausfraus with kids and herbivore hubby in tow. Most folks I’ve encountered at yard sales are generally middle aged or newly-coupled and looking for deals. Bit confused on this one.

    ” If you go out a lot, you will have make-outs. Fresh breath extends sessions. Tip: chew mint leaves on your way out the door.”

    Or, if you’re not a botanist, you can always use breath mints.

    “Be wary of conversational entrapment. The longer you talk about a woman’s concerns, the more likely she’ll friendzone you.”

    Solid truth. A girl going to great lengths about her troubles and concerns has become ho hum comfortable around you, which is the polar opposite of revved up and wanting to have you ravish her on the side of the road.

    “Try making a face at the girl first. Chicks love silliness.”

    Heh….um…no. Would only work if it’s congruent with your physical
    presentation and demeanor. Some guys it might work, but its not my thing.

    ” ”I know how this ends. You’ll fall in love. Hard. Dream of rings and white weddings. I’ll run.” – said to a girl on 2nd date. Try it with a straight face. It’s chicknip.”

    Very, very true. It’s powerful enough that you can basically guarantee being laid on the same day you say it.

    Like


    • Reading is key…
      when you have a woman at the foot of your bed, simultaneously grab her hair and palm her pussy while kissing her neck. Magic”

      ‘Heh….um…no. Would only work if it’s congruent with your physical
      presentation and demeanor. Some guys it might work, but its not my thing.’

      I doubt that you’ve ever done this.

      ‘A girl going to great lengths about her troubles and concerns has become ho hum comfortable around you, which is the polar opposite of revved up and wanting to have you ravish her on the side of the road.’

      lol wrong. Women love to talk…they will talk your ear off about whatever bullshit. The difference is in what they expect from you. If all you have to do is nod along and listen like you would to a kid, then that’s fine. If you have to pick her up and put her back together again, the ya, you’re a tampon.

      Of course, what I say only applies after you’ve fucked her. If she’s dumping shit on you before you’ve fucked, then ya…you’re a friend.

      Like


    • on November 27, 2013 at 4:37 am The Burninator

      >Reading is key…

      It was a joke Scray. *facepalm*

      Dang dude, you really need attention don’t you? You’ll pardon me if I don’t take you or your “expertise” seriously, given your antics towards others as of late.

      Like


      • no, i just get the feeling you’re a KJ living in a fantasy world. You write a lot of stuff that hinges on u being top 1% external attributes. Even if on the offchance it is true for you, what you write will not work for vast majority of men. so when u fuckup, ill just correct.

        Like


  45. CH and Ya, perhaps you can chime in on this. Was at a bar recently with a buddy. Upon leaving we see these two blonde 10s walk into the bar, at which point my buddy goes absolute bad shit at how bad-ass they were (they were, 6′, blonde, and curvy in all the right places, dressed to the Ts, wealthy looking) and how we should go back into the bar so he could try to pull. This got me thinking about what the absolute best daily game tactic would be to pull such women. One thing I thought about opening them would be something to the extent of (with a smirk on my face) “You ladies are somewhat hot, and I’m sure about 10 guys will approach you shortly offering to buy you a beer, so I was wondering if you could say yes to one of those desperate shlubs, tell him you want a (insert whatever drink is your favorite) and give it to me in return for me not trying to hit on you or buy you a drink.” When I open my mouth I’m sure they will expect me to offer them a drink, not talk about the social dynamic. Just a thought. I stuck to the 7-8 ladies in my hay days, so I’m all ears.

    Like


    • That opener is too try-hard. Whenever you’re stuck for something to say, just go with ‘hey dudes, sorry I’m/we’re late, what’d we miss…?’ You have some DQ there, you have a nice vibe, etc. Never gets a bad reaction and you set a great frame from the start.

      Like


      • To clarify though, I’d never say the above with try hard tone or intention. I’d say that shit as if I just wanted to fuck with them and see their reaction. I think calling them dudes would be funny as hell too just to see their reactions.

        Like


      • “You ladies are somewhat hot”

        weird and transparent

        “and I’m sure about 10 guys will approach you shortly offering to buy you a beer,”

        incongruent with your try-hard neg. plus you raised their value.

        “so I was wondering if you could say yes to one of those desperate shlubs, tell him you want a (insert whatever drink is your favorite) and give it to me in return for me not trying to hit on you or buy you a drink.”

        what?

        Like


      • Okay, well….that opener has a lot of moving parts. It demands a lot of attention for them to follow the little joke. It’s something cool to say like 5 minutes into a set because they’ll appreciate it. But when you’re first meeting, especially at a bar or a club, you have to get attention. Easy, loud ideas.

        “So who’s the richest girl here?”

        “Do I look like I just got out of prison?”

        “….hey, you’re the girl from the party last week!”

        These are better openers IMHO. I understand that ya, you could say 5 paragraphs worth of lines in a ‘non-tryhard way’ and somehow pull it off….but why make it hard?

        Actually, let me break down why I think this opener is not so good:
        “You ladies are somewhat hot,”

        Communicating interest — ya, ‘somewhat hot’ is still hot. See, the problem with this is that it’s trying to be some sort of neg. Girls aren’t stupid. They appreciate a man who can do this sort of shit subtly because — you guessed it, it communicates pre-selection and experience. However, this right here, sort of reeks of incongruity. Ya, we can tell that you’re trying to be a challenge.

        “and I’m sure about 10 guys will approach you shortly offering to buy you a beer, so I was wondering if you could say yes to one of those desperate shlubs, tell him you want a (insert whatever drink is your favorite) and”

        Still paying her a compliment here, and you’ve given so much away that the little twist of ‘those desperate schlubs’ v you ‘the challenge’ has almost no effect.

        “give it to me in return for me not trying to hit on you or buy you a drink.”

        And then wtf — in return for me ‘not trying to hit on you?’ lol wat. That’s not a DQ, that’s cutting off your dick. I’d have liked “in return for some lovely conversation” better or “in return, I will be your cuddle buddy. No it’s not sexual, you pervs. Its called intimacy. Jesus,” or something like that to riff on. At least that’s a little confident. This right here puts you into the chaser role.

        Now is there a way to deliver all of that in a bomb-ass cool way that sub-communicates all the right things? Sure. But generally, if you want to communicate interest, then don’t drape it in this little jokesy stuff. And if you want to play games, then play games. This opener is long, and it kinda waffles between ‘im into u’ and ‘but not rly that much i wanna have fun!’

        Like


      • Scray, I facepalmed just now. You reminded me I should think more before I hit the fookin submit button. I’ll keep it simple and follow Mystery’s advice about the hotter the girl is the more you should neg them (humor helps too)

        Like


      • Also too long.

        Like


    • how old were these “wealthy 10’s”?

      it matters…

      Like


      • sounds like they were 10’s once upon a time, probably in his “hay day”

        Like


      • 26 I’d guess. On another occasion some hot European girls at next to a few buddies and myself at a bar and they started ordering drinks and talking about what they should get. One girl was offering up drink names and the other would question what was in each. The girl mentioned some drink with Tequila in it (can’t remember what it was). When the other girl asked what was in that one, with a smirk I butted in and said, “Regret!” They both laughed and we chatted them up. I could have said, “Hey that’s a good drink, let me buy you one, but I know enough to know better. So I’m just curious what CH and Ya, who have probably had their fair share of 10s, would say about my previous question.

        Like


    • Concept is solid, execution is flawed. You’re on the right track, I’ve used a similar “pointing out the room dynamics” thing before and hot girls appreciate that you understand their world/reality, but the wording just falls apart in places.

      Conceptually your version contains:

      – reversing expectations
      – breaking out of the buyer(you)/seller(her) dynamic
      – showing you’re unimpressed
      – AMOGing the rest of the bar
      – showing you understand social dynamics
      – compliance test
      – self-depreciation (aka not trying to impress them or seek their approval)

      In theory, it’s packed with game concepts that ARE appropriate for this situation, they’re just executed too long-winded (I’m a verbose guy, but I’m conscisely verbose lol) and some of them would probably fall flat because you don’t have value established yet or they’d come off try-hard because they’re too blatantly trying to ignore reality (ie – calling them “somewhat hot” is silly ’cause they know they’re hotter than most of the other girls in the room, unless you said it with a ton of sarcasm where you’re pretending not to be impressed in a way that tells them you ARE impressed on purpose, but that’s getting pretty meta lol)

      So something like “You girls look hot tonight, I figured I’d come say hi before 10 guys line up to buy you drinks. Although maybe I should’ve waited a bit, I’ll seem way more charming when you’re drunk.” gets a lot of the same concepts across (not offering them a drink, AMOGing the bar, showing you understand the dynamics of what being in a bar is like for them, self-depreciation, etc.)

      Or if you wanted to make an impact and come back to them later (short-set method) you could drop a “Shit, you girls did good tonight (as you look them up and down). I think half the guys in here got whiplash when you walked in from cranking their heads around. I’m on my way to the pisser but I’ll come fight my way thru the crowd of guys lined up to buy you drinks when I’m done.” If they don’t have guys lined up when you re-approach them, you can make fun and tell them they look intimidating.

      “Woah, sorry, you girls aren’t allowed to come in here. You look too good tonight, you’re going to crush the self-esteem of all these ugly girls when their boyfriends line up to buy you drinks.”

      Just riffing off the top of my head here. The key is just to separate yourself from the rest of the guys there, acknowledge that you know they’re hot (pretending they aren’t hot is try-hard because they KNOW they’re hotter than most of the girls there lol) but that their being smokin’ hot doesn’t throw you off your game or intimidate you, and show that you understand what their experience is like for them when they walk into a bar (shows you’re familiar with the world of a hot girl, which means you’ve probably been around hot girls a lot).

      If they ask you “Aren’t YOU going to buy us a drink?” you could drop something like “No, the other guys here will liquor you up. I just wanted to say hi before these guys get you hammered enough to barf all over the dance floor.”

      You’re not going to land them with one line, especially if they’ve only just arrived…so a witty opener is cool, but the follow-up is more important. You don’t choose a 10, a 10 chooses you, so after your opener you’re looking at having to demonstrate/establish high-value and get them chasing…unless you’re a celebrity with built in high-value, you’re going to have some work to do lol

      Like


    • You could sit next to them and loudly order a shirley temple (or something equally pussified), then add that you want it “in a very dirty, manly glass”.

      Course, it’s all in the delivery.

      Like


  46. CH, I ask the team: have you watched Braveheart in the past 14 days? If not, it’s been too long. Watch it and plan accordingly.

    Like


  47. More sad news. “You wanna do WHAT to my baby, Alpha Male? Ummm… Well, if it makes you happy then let’s do it together!” Jesus. Fucking. Christ.
    http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/nov/26/lostprophets-singer-ian-watkins-admit-offences-attempted-rape-baby

    Like


    • Dunno, sounds more like the prototyical phantasmagoric elucubration-cum-mass hysteria that the anglosaxon “justice system” dabbles in on a semiregular basis. E.g. THIS.
      Not that, OTOH, people who WASP are not fully fucked up, OTOH.

      Like


  48. Nice work CH… 305k uniques a month, getting the word out.

    https://www.quantcast.com/heartiste.wordpress.com

    Like


  49. In-case it hasn’t been mentioned, the emulate this guy…. is this guy. http://instagram.com/danbilzerian without a doubt reppin it harder than anyone else i have come across, go through his instagram and be prepared to drool.

    p.s he is a poker player.

    Like


  50. Two scenarios for newbs going out solo and new to bars and needing to break through overall comfort zones:

    1.) Bring a book. – get comfortable. After work, pop into a cozy lounge and just read and enjoy the time by yourself. If you’re terrified of bars, this is helpful to get used to the atmosphere at a low-pressure time. Chat with the bartender.

    2.) Karaoke – can open anyone (guys/girls) with “What are you singing?” Easy convo, applaud everyone, sing and be the center of attention.

    3.) Jazz bars / coffee shops – any kind of super small performance in a small setting. You can sit and listen to the music, smile, and meet people – you’re there to enjoy the moment, no anxiety.

    These worked well for me, eventually getting to the point where I can walk into a bar solo now and not feel weird as fuck.

    Other helpful tips:
    Talk to the FIRST person you see, even if its the doorman. Invest a small bit of time, you’ll be warmed up then when you enter the joint.

    Like


  51. […] up girls, enhance their masculinity, and keep relationships loyal and passionate.  But in phase-2 it spreads to the girls too, who gradually stop denying it, and instead start denying the unreal equality feminism and start embracing the distinction of […]

    Like


  52. Women love to be pursued. Lines are bad. The only one you should be using is “Hi, My name is…” Approach her with confidence, because women have a sixth sense for weakness. Don’t talk about your job, or how much you make. It’s the last thing she wants to hear (unless she’s a grubby leech, in which you’ve probably chosen the wrong girl). You’re trying to get the girl of your dreams, not a job at Google.

    Like


  53. […] = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I knock PUA at times, but this latest post by CH is gold. Even if just used to manage chicks in general (not to date them), it's helpful. The techniques are […]

    Like


  54. CH, I need some advice on how to deal with a sexy one, solid 8.3 blonde, always playing the tease when I know she wants my dick. I’ve dealt with her shit for long enough that I want to give an ultimatum, she either hops on this or I’m going to drop her like 3rd period french. I feel like I’m letting my emotions get the better of me but I want to lay down the law. Any advice from any wise players especially CH would be much appreciated.

    [CH: not to impugn your good character sir (ma’am?), but rating a girl to the tenth decimal place (8.3 blonde) is a leading indicator the rater is a troll.]

    Like


  55. I can now have a conversation with random strangers about alpha and beta males. Thanks, CH.

    Like