Girlfriend or Fling?

Player or Poseur gave me many minutes of quality entertainment, so in homage to that theme here’s something similar I call Girlfriend or Fling.  Examine the photo and figure out by superficial judgement alone if the girl(s) featured would make girlfriend material or good time material.  Does she look like the type of girl you could trust to be loyal and faithful, or would you be more likely to catch her dancing on a bar one night with a club monster sliding a hand under her skirt?

clubgirls1.jpg

The girl on the left would make a solid girlfriend, assuming she met your attractiveness threshold.  The girl on the right would make an excellent one night stand.  She is dressed sluttier and is more assertive in her grinding.  Plus, playettes are always striking poses in order to draw attention to their bodies… their bread and butter for getting what they want.  Girls with better values and a stronger internal compass tend to smile warmly and sincerely at the camera, because they are trying to convey their personalities.

Date Girl #1 like she was a normal human being who would be happy to enjoy the pleasure of your company.  Wait 2 days before returning Girl #2’s texts and phone calls, and when you do set up a date, tell her to wear something revealing.

Addendum:

gforfling2.jpg

This photo gives a better idea of what kinds of traits men notice when deciding girlfriend potential.  These two girls are nearly equal in attractiveness (in fact, they might be sisters), so differences in beauty are neutralized as a variable.  Yet, the girl in the orange top has heartbreaker written all over her while the other looks more grounded.  Judging by their clothes is difficult since there is not much distance separating them, though the orange top plunges lower showing more cleavage, and lace is always indicative of sexual adventurism.

Like with the first pic, the smile says it all.  Blue shirt girl’s smile is natural, unforced, and inviting.  She doesn’t give the impression of hiding anything about her true character.  Orange shirt girl is looking seductively at the camera under heavy lids.  She is making love with the viewer, while blue shirt girl is making friends with the viewer.  I would feel safer dating blue shirt girl.





Comments


  1. Just out of curiosity, is the girl on the right wearing pantyhose under her frayed jean skirt? It sure looks like it from the reflection on her thigh. If so, then she’s not as slutty as one might think. To the contrary, she’s a tease. The girl on the left is wearing a low-cut, empire waist babydoll top with skin tight jeans. I’m quite sure that her intent was to use her assets to attract attention.

    Like


  2. I like this idea. You should have gave us a few more photos.
    I agree, if I was a dude looking for a fling I’d probably go for the girl on the right. They both look kinda trashy to me though, just based on their taste in clothing, make-up and jewelry (especially rightgirl…good lord). Learn to dress, women!

    Like


  3. I agree. More photos, this is not enough evidence. Give us something more ambiguous.

    Like


  4. I’ve known too many appearances-can-be-deceiving types over the years to pass judgment based on just one contextless photograph.

    Like


  5. Roissy, I agree with your assessment and will add some of my own observations (biases). The girl on the right has had her hair colored a lighter shade of blonde, you can see her natural darker hair color emerging in her roots but note the contrast in her tips. Hair coloring to lighter or outrageous shades is among the most common techniques of an attention seeking woman. Why she’s wearing stockings under her short skirt is a mystery or simply indicative of her poor sense of taste. Unless she’s wearing tights which cut off at the mid-calf area, which are currently very popular but too casual to be wearing it that way. She still gets negative points for taste but I can’t complete my assessment until I’ve seen her shoes. Both of them that is. Shoes also communicate a lot about a woman.

    The girl on the left is a natural blonde. She has done very little to her hair and wears very little make up as well. She seems like better girlfriend material.

    Of course none of this matters as I’m a sucker for women with long raven colored locks, as long as they don’t come with an Asian girl attached to them.

    Like


  6. The girl on the right has had her hair colored a lighter shade of blonde, you can see her natural darker hair color emerging in her roots but note the contrast in her tips.

    Could it be significant in some way that she’s letting the dye job grow out?

    Like


  7. they would need to be attractive to be girlfriends…

    Like


  8. Peter, the presence of the dye job is what is significant not the state in which it is in, but I get the impression this exercise is lost on you.

    Like


  9. Peter, the presence of the dye job is what is significant not the state in which it is in, but I get the impression this exercise is lost on you.

    What gives you that impression?

    I am aware that there may be some significance to Right Girl’s dye job. I deliberately said “may be” instead of “is” because sometimes, as the old expression goes, a cigar is just a cigar. What seems just as or even more significant, however, is the way she’s letting her natural hair color come back in a manner that’s both obvious and somewhat untidy. If she’s no longer interested in having blonde hair, why not dye it back into something more closely resembling her natural color? That way it won’t be so obvious when the dye job grows out.

    Like


  10. I agree the left is more of a girlfriend type, but would you really want her to be your girlfriend?

    The stockings on the other girl is dead giveaway to her lack of girlfriend status.

    Like


  11. unless someone can correct me, girls don’t grow out dye jobs. they usually re-color them to closely match their real hair color while it is growing out.

    Like


  12. RE: Addendum Pic. My god those two are hot. Dimes fo sho and my guess is that they are Latin. The one on the left, given her natural hair (unstraightened and untreated) looks like she could be FOB from Central or South America. Orange top looks more Americanized, note the very large hoop earings on her. South American girls have more class, you won’t find large hoop earings on them.

    On first glance I’d say the one on the left is probably girlfriend material. Her smile is warm and her eyes honest while orange top looks like she’s nothing but trouble. She’s got the rack that probably garners her plenty of attention and note the beauty mark (mole over the lips) historically considered to be seductive (not that she needs it). However, I would say that blue top is more beautiful.

    Like


  13. Nice addendum pic. This feature seems like a winner to me.

    Like


  14. Re addendum: Smiles? What smiles?

    Like


  15. the blond on the right looks a little like a stocky reese witherspoon, doesn’t she?

    i think an even better idea would be like a bizarro girlfriend-or-fling post, where you post pics of innocent looking girls who turn out to be raging sex fiends, and sleezy looking girls who value their relationship with jesus more than the cack. that’s how it is here in japan. every time i see an innocent looking girl on the train platform, i wonder if there isnt footage on the innerwebs of her getting stuffed full of unagi.

    Like


  16. ok umm

    orange shirt girl has a larger nose and is posing in this way as to make her face look better. it’s a pose she’s practiced in front of the mirror for hours (i know lots of girls who do this…not me…of course…) it’s her angle. (google paris hilton / haylie duff)

    you neglected to notice that blue shirt girl has her stomach showing.

    Like


  17. My God, the impossible standards on this thread! Girl on the left is girlfriend material and very attractive.

    Like


  18. i noticed the bare belly, but as a means of captivation, cleavage ranks higher.

    Like


  19. parody is the highest form of flattery. i hope you like my next post.

    Like


  20. Top left passive girlfriend.
    Bottom left active girlfriend – I vote active every time.
    She has the best potential of all for real life intimacy.
    Top right fun with alcohol but boring vvvery quickly – *maybe one night if I’m drinking alot too.
    Bottom right fun without alcohol, but again boring after awhile – useful for Roosh’s notch count and perhaps international notch too?
    *bottom right health notice – be careful if minx’s upper lip has a sore or maybe it is just a beauty mark
    Bottom left would probably be a good travel partner too.

    Like


  21. Given my tastes in women, I’d simply become friends with the women on the left, and have sex with the women on the right. The women on the left just aren’t sexually attractive, and given their looks, they’d make great long-term friends if you’re the kind of guy that has female friends.

    IMHO, I’d rather be with a hot girl who cheats on me, but still has sex with me, than a plain girl who’d love me and never cheat on me. The hot girl is still attractive, the plain girl isn’t, and thanks to porn, there’s no need to have sex with plain looking girls.

    Like


  22. I’ll venture to guess that guys who go on about how the girls on the left are below their standards are poseurs, big time.

    For young women, being thin, nicely groomed, and with a good attitiude is 90% of beauty.

    The comment about preferring a hot but cheating girlfriend to a plain but faithful one suggests to me he hasn’t had either kind.

    Like


  23. I agree with PA’s observation in this case.

    Devoid of a humorous context, hypermasculine comments carry the stench of overcompensation.

    Like


  24. The comment about preferring a hot but cheating girlfriend to a plain but faithful one suggests to me he hasn’t had either kind.

    You’re right. I’ve been holding out for girls on the right because I don’t find the girls on the left attractive. My right hand and porn do a better job than the girls on the left ever would. Now, if the girls on the left got some implants (anything below a D cup is flat chested to me, IMHO), wore sluttier clothes, and put on more make up, then maybe they’d be more attractive to me. Otherwise, these women just don’t look sexual to me.

    Maybe one can blame a health diet of porn since I was 16 for my views, but fucking plain looking girls is a waste of time and energy.

    Like


  25. david – most girls under 25 are fuckable presuming they are in shape and free of obvious deformities. by “fuckable”, i don’t mean they are necessarily relationship material, but fucking almost always beats jerking off. unless you have a low sex drive.

    Like


  26. Eh, from what I’ve seen, most of the girls my age are sexless, or have become sexless overtime.

    For me, fuckable is the comparison of the girl in front of me to the women that I see in porn. In 95% of the cases, the women don’t match up. I’ve seen more fuckable older women than women my own age.

    Like


  27. […] Sep 14th, 2007 by roissy It’s been a while since the last scientifically sound assessment. […]

    Like


  28. […] the men’s side of the equation, here’s an excellent example of the damage wrought by porn.  Emphasis added. The comment about preferring a hot but cheating […]

    Like