Comment Of The Week: Cruisin’ For A Putin

Suburban_elk takes home the tumescent trophy,

It has been said that in the old days, in Russia and elsewhere, the folk tradition was that a man was expected, upon marriage, to beat his wife, one time.

He was not supposed to enjoy it, as might a demented sadist, but he was expected to do it.

And then she always knew.

“What did she know?!”, wails the assembled. She knew love.

***

Clover_Annie graces the board with a feminine wisdom gradually being lost to generations of Western women:

“I propose that we resurrect the memento mori for the hot young ladies in our society.”

As a 45-year-old peri-menopausal woman just itching to educate these fools, let me pile on here: “Here’s what you need to understand about being ‘hot’. First, no matter your level of natural beauty, once you hit 35 or so, you will not be anywhere near hot unless you work very, very hard at it. We’re talking diet, exercise, cosmetics, and possibly plastic surgery level of difficulty, and even with that, it’s possible that bad genes or a bad youth will make this all for naught. Second, even if you are hot when you are 35 or 45 or 55, that WILL NOT MAKE YOU HAPPY the way it did when you were 20. Love and family and friends and security and a good attitude will make even the ugliest 55-year-old happy, and lack of these will make even the loveliest elderly woman miserable. Beauty is not an end, it’s a means, and you had best use it while you can.”

Make love when you can, because it is good. A maxim that has seen me well. But for women it might better be said, “Make family when you can, because it is good.” The means of female beauty finds resolution in family. For men, the equation is different. The means of male power, in whatever form, finds reproductive resolution in the love and loyalty of many beautiful women. But unlike women, men’s reproductive resolution doesn’t have a stark finish. The acquisition of power is a lifelong pursuit, because the love of young women and the pleasure of their sex is an infinite joy.





Comments


  1. (No. 2) Very beautiful and wise.

    Like


    • on December 22, 2013 at 11:47 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      cariglsistz LOZOZOZOOZZOZLZOLZLZOZ WOMEN ARE DEPRECIATING ASSTETZZ ZLZOLOZIZZLZIZIZZOZOZZ

      http://www.yelp.com/topic/buena-park-craigslist-gold-digger-finds-out-women-are-depreciating-assets

      A WOMAN WRITES:
      “What am I doing wrong?

      Okay, I’m tired of beating around the bush. I’m a beautiful (spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I’m articulate and classy.

      I’m not from New York . I’m looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don’t think I’m overreaching at all.

      Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 200 – 250. But that’s where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won?t get me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she’s not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?

      Here are my questions specifically:

      *Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars, restaurants, gyms
      *What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won?t hurt my feelings
      *Is there an age range I should be targeting (I?m 25)?
      *Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I?ve seen really ?plain jane? boring types who have nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I?ve seen drop dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What?s the story there?
      *Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows – lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?
      *How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY
      Please hold your insults – I?m putting myself out there in an honest way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I?m being up front about it. I wouldn?t be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn?t able to match them – in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth.

      PostingID: 432279810”

      THE ANSWER FROMZ A MANZ!!!! :

      “THE ANSWER

      Dear Pers-431649184:

      I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament.

      Firstly, I’m not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here’s how I see it.

      Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a crappy business deal. Here’s why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here’s the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won?t be getting any more beautiful!

      So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you?re 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

      So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold?hence the rub?marriage. It doesn’t make good business sense to ?buy you? (which is what you?re asking) so I’d rather lease. In case you think I’m being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It?s as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

      Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as “articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful” as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn’t found you, if not only for a tryout.

      By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn’t need to have this difficult conversation.

      With all that said, I must say you’re going about it the right way.
      Classic “pump and dump.”

      I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of lease, let me know.”

      Like


      • don’t know about anyone else but i missed you

        Like


      • on December 22, 2013 at 1:18 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zlozozzozooo

        http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2013/12/21/true-christian-women-do-not-need-to-be-gamed-dalrock-voxs-christianity-is-not-the-christianity-of-jesus-christ/

        True Christian Women do Not Need to be Gamed: Dalrock & Vox’s Christianity is not the Christianity of Jesus Christ

        A true Christian woman does not need to be gamed. A true Christian woman follows the Law of Moses which Jesus came not to abolish but to fulfill:

        16 Unto the woman he said , I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bringforth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. -Genesis

        Indeed women no longer follow God, Jesus, and Moses, but their butt and gina tinglez. And the hilarious thing is that rather than trying to resurrect the Christian Soul in the churches, schools, universities, and family court system and reform women, the “Christian men” such as Dalrock & Vox suggest that we all become slave to butt and gina tingelzozozizlzo and learn how to serve them first and foremost, over the teachings of Christ and Moses, as serving butt and gina tinzgzzlzlozolzoz over Christ and Moses is the heart and soul of game.

        Dalrock & Vox’s “Christianity” is not the Christianity of Jesus Christ

        A true Christian woman does not need to be gamed. A true Christian woman follows the Law of Moses which Jesus came not to abolish but to fulfill:

        16 Unto the woman he said , I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bringforth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

        Posted this at Dalrock’s blog, who placed my comments in limbo, as the words of Christ in the Sermon on the Mount are considered to be “too disruptive” on a Christian blog. lzozlzozozlzo. & dat is why like d da heartsites as heartises never cesors da words of jesus christ as heartsites does not fear them zlzolzoozzlzoz for his soul is pure

        http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/losing-control-of-the-narrative/#comments

        Interesting that this post should be titled “losing the narrative.”

        Dalrock states that Christians need “Game,” and Vox writes, “I’m neither the first nor the only one to notice the intrinsic relationship between Biblical Christianity and the foundational concepts of Game: Women are fallen and women are inherently different than men. Being truth, Game is a subset of Christianity that happens to relate to an area of particular importance and interest to men.”

        Vox states that Game is Truth and that it is a subset of Christianity. The most-respected, most-read, and most-profound blogger on Game is Heartiste. His “Sixteen Commandments of Poon” summarize Game:

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/

        Heartiste makes no claims of being a Christian, but he may well be, as there are those who say they are not going, who go, just as there are those who say they are going, who do not go.

        Dalrock and Vox are stating that the teachings of Heartiste are the same as those of Christ, who, by all accounts, defines Christianity. Dalrock and Vox are thus submitting that the Sermon on the Mount actually goes something like this:

        The Beginning of the Sermon on the Mount
        1 And seeing the multitudes, Dalrock went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciple Vox came unto him:
        2 and he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,

        The Beatitudes
        Lk. 6.20-23
        3 ¶ Blessed are those who fuck her good: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
        4 ¶ Blessed are they that ignore her beauty: for they shall be comforted. Is. 61.2
        5 ¶ Blessed are the irrationally self-confident: for they shall inherit the earth. Ps. 37.11
        6 ¶ Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after two women in the kitty: for they shall be filled. Is. 55.1, 2
        7 ¶ Blessed are the ones who never say “i love you” first: for they shall obtain mercy.
        8 ¶ Blessed are they that keep her guessing and never marry her: for they shall see God. Ps. 24.4, 5
        9 ¶ Blessed are they that make her jealous: for they shall be called the children of God.
        10 ¶ Blessed are they which are persecuted for too much boldness: 1 Pet. 3.14 for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
        11 ¶ Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for Game’s sake. 1 Pet. 4.14
        12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets 2 Chr. 36.16 · Acts 7.52 which were before you.

        Folks–if we are to regain Christianity, will it come from men acting less Christain and perverting the teachings of Christ, or will it come from men following the true teachings of Christ over Game?

        I leave you with the true teachings of Christ, and I fully understand that I may be censored/banned/persecuted for doing so:

        The Beginning of the Sermon on the Mount
        1 And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him:
        2 and he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,

        The Beatitudes
        Lk. 6.20-23
        3 ¶ Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
        4 ¶ Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. Is. 61.2
        5 ¶ Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Ps. 37.11
        6 ¶ Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. Is. 55.1, 2
        7 ¶ Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
        8 ¶ Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. Ps. 24.4, 5
        9 ¶ Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
        10 ¶ Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: 1 Pet. 3.14 for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
        11 ¶ Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 1 Pet. 4.14
        12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets 2 Chr. 36.16 · Acts 7.52 which were before you.

        The Salt of the Earth
        13 ¶ Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savor, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. Mk. 9.50 · Lk. 14.34, 35

        lzozozozozoz

        Like


      • GBFM yo’re a crazy one but a needed voice. Your posts are better when they’re halfway coherent, like this one. lzozoz. Keep on keeping on.

        Like


      • on December 23, 2013 at 6:13 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzlzozozozzmgzlzozozozozozozozzozlz

        atanks alotz!! lozlzozzozlz

        Like


      • on December 22, 2013 at 3:35 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        i am with you, always

        zlozzolzolzozzolz

        Like


      • on December 22, 2013 at 3:37 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        hey heartrsietztztzzzezez!!! she shouts out DA GREAT BOOKS OF RMENZZZ AND DA CHATAUE HEA?RTTSIETSZZ!!!!!!!!!

        lzozozozozzozozozozozoz

        Like


      • That’s Nicole, silly.

        Like


      • on December 22, 2013 at 6:01 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lozozozoz da GBFM know it’s nicolelzozozo

        da GBFM luvsz da NICOLEzlzozo!!!

        merry christsimans to all
        and to all a good nighztz zlzuzkzoozzlozozolzoz

        Like


      • I Heard often that Asians look the same, the thing is that actually, to me is harder to tell Africans apart, she may be Nicole.

        Like


      • hey its robin quivers

        Like


      • Wow..genuine, unadultered female hypergamy in its purest form.
        Almost a pleasure to witness.
        lolzzzzz

        Like


      • A little off-topic, but this Russian dude could have used a little Pootin-in-Him:

        Police: Man May Have Thrown Son From Roof Before Jumping
        December 22, 2013 10:59 PM
        http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/12/22/man-and-child-plummet-from-60th-street-building/

        “Meanwhile, Kanarikov’s own neighbors said he lived alone in a home in Mill Basin, Brooklyn, but his estranged wife and son were occasionally seen visiting. The couple was going through a divorce, and it was believed that the conflict may have led to the tragedy. Police told 1010 WINS Dmitriy Kanarikov was embroiled in a custody battle with the boy’s mother, and was despondent over having to return him.”

        I mean, WTF is it with these beta herbling manboob losers?

        Shoot your wife.

        Shoot your wife’s parents.

        Shoot the judge who awarded custody to your wife.

        Shoot the sheriff’s deputy who comes to seize the child.

        But for the sake of God Almighty, your first duty as a man is to defend the child – both physically AND intellectually/morally/spiritually.

        Man up.

        Get yourself a fake SSN like everybody else, and disappear with the child and your 12-gauge and your 1911 and your .308 battle rifle into the underground economy.

        SRSLY.

        Like


      • Oh the red pill is so tasty.

        Like


      • Have seen this one around many times.

        Nice to have you back GBFM.

        Like


      • ‘How do I get to her level?’
        Ay mami.
        What she (??) should be asking is, ‘How do I become a half-decent human being?’
        Which is very obviously not high on her list.

        Like


    • Beautiful to an eternal child, I suppose, for whom an “infinite joy” is a lifelong fantasy of endless conquest, of being loved only to abandon “love” again and again, with much rhetorical flourish and fury signifying nothing.

      Like


    • on December 22, 2013 at 6:02 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      hey heratyeitestztzt!!!

      i realzized why da red pill don’t work for eveyronesz!

      some folks put da red pill in der bunghzozlo instead of der mouytholelzozlzolzozoz

      lzozozlzolozozolzoz

      Like


    • Women are in their prime from their mid-teens to their mid-20s. By 30 they are past their use-by date. Their looks are beyond the point of no return. They have faded. Wrinkles, dimples and sagging have set in. There are plenty of hotter and younger women on the market and this has formed a critical mass such that you don’t need to bother with the older women. Never date women over 25. Never shag women over 30.

      Like


  2. As a russian I can say that No.1 is pure bullshit.
    The only thing that comes close to this is that in the past (middle ages ) there was a stick hanging in a family’s house reminding the wife that should she disobey her husband-he will be punished-with that same stick.

    Like


    • In a lesser-known James Bond short story collection by Ian Fleming there is a story that involves James Bond spearfishing in the Caribbean while on vacation and he bags a stingray. His boat captain jokes with him that he might want to save the tail as A-rabs traditionally keep one around to discipline their wives with.

      Later he crosses paths with a loutish American millionaire and his young ex-model wife and is invited aboard their yacht. He notices a stingray tail hanging on the wall of the stateroom…

      Like


    • I was going to ask a Russian guy I knew, but you spared me the trouble. I knew of course that it would be B.S. Some guy tells an anecdote from his family that he thinks is funny, and suddenly it’s supposed to be the standard for an entire nation. Or several nations. The improbability of this particular story gave it away instantly – something obviously designed to fit into a stereotype of what someone imagines a country to be. But maybe I’ll tell my Russian buddy about it just for laughs.

      Like


    • In the USA, we think of a stacked dude saying in a Russian accent, “In Russia, if she misbehave, you beat wife! If you not, she think, that you not love her!”

      Like


    • Irrelevant. The point is still salient and it is -very- true in one other certain culture. Islam, for all it’s fault has 100% got the right angle on their women. They keep those bitches on lockdown and if you step out of line you will get your ass beat, at a minimum.

      Like


    • Thanks for taking to task; let us clarify.

      A stick in the house for whose punishment, upon her disobeyment. (Your syntax is ambiguous; you try and mean that when she disobeys him, they will both be beaten with the stick?)

      The theme you are representing, on expressed folk wisdom, matches up, approximately exactly, with what i said.

      To spell it out, smart guy (and you can take your Russian authority home to nurse): when the wife disobeys there is a beating to be had.

      So the details confused and you missed the point (it happens).

      Like


    • And otherwise, what i wrote was, “It has been said”.

      You do not like that such evident folk wisdom is framed as a (particularly) Russian tradition.

      You say it is not, and go on to give an example of the wife beating stick hung above the doorway. Okay buddy – here is your stupid stick, go and suck.

      Like


    • hullo … ?

      Like


    • I thought this was the manosphere, and that Russians were tough and could take a beating.

      Like


  3. In b4 we get Islam Hailers

    Like


  4. Women need to be humbled…I don’t care if it takes a beating, the removal of all her entitled things, taking away her voting privildges, her birth control, or putting her back into the kitchen barefoot and pregnant…their egos are too big and it is suffocating everybody.

    Like


    • i’m in for the voting. that was the shooting match

      Like


    • I once saw voting results for various European referenda broken down by sex, and it wasn’t pretty. Women always vote more than men for the alternative that seems the most safe, no matter what the consequences or scientific studies. (Science is only accepted when it can be turned into another talking point for their already decided choice, never accepted as the foundation for the choice. In fact, this is the case with too many men as well, in particular those with a two-digit IQ.)

      So for example they have voted more than men to keep driving on the left side (because a change might mean more car crashes in the first year), to ban alcohol, to ban nuclear power, to hand over control of retirement funds to the government, etc etc. And of course, they always vote more socialist than men do in elections. Without female voters there would be conservative election victories nearly every time. The Left would only be able to survive by moving rightward.

      With this in mind, would abolishing democracy really be that bad, or is it inevitable? Is the question simply which kind of dictatorship we will have – one where the Left takes control, or one where the Right takes control before that can happen? Isn’t the quality of life in a country mainly decided by the quality of its people? Even if the dictatorship would be as corrupt as, say, senators bought by lobbyists and media, a right-wing dictatorship would be small since it wouldn’t have to constantly try to make people act against their instincts. There might be kleptocrats in the bureaucracy, but it would be a small bureaucracy. The best part: no socialists would ever try to win elections by importing hordes of voters. Nay, not even if it was a socialist dictatorship. As long as the country isn’t turned into a part of Africa, every other policy issue can be solved in time.

      Like


      • i still think you are an exceptionally logical girl but i’ll settle on a very metro-fey gamma. either way, estrogen poisoning is evident.

        Like


      • Speaking of banning things, hope you guys are stocked up on regular (incandescent) light bulbs, the kind that costs like 60 cents.
        Because just when you thought that paying upwards of $2-3-4,000 or more per month for your affordable care was the last straw, you will also be paying $ 12 or so a pop for new (non-incandescent) light bulbs.
        Wonder what they’re gonna ban next.
        Spoons? Pillows? Air?

        Like


      • Incandescent lights are a good source of heat in the winter as they are so energy inefficient in regards to light vs. heat output.
        The Swpl lawmakers will be disappointed when they see their heating bills increase using the non-incandescent bulbs. good example of irony.

        Like


      • We don’t have to abolish democracy. We just need to abolish universal suffrage.

        Why is it sacred that you are entitled to a vote just because you were born? Everyone should earn the right to vote — propose your own criteria. Mine is that only net taxpayers should have the privilege to vote. No more Obamaphone gimmedat voters.

        Like


  5. True. The more women deviate from that maxim, the nuttier and more unhappy they become.

    Quick question for the chateau. Is it ever wise to ask a chick if she’s ever hooked up with any of her friends/social circle? (it’s possible to ask in a non-insecure way). I’m about 4 months into a relationship with her. She has plenty of male friends and I don’t care a whole lot if she’s been cocked by any of them but it does annoy me to think *they* think I don’t know, like some hapless dupe oblivious to their little taboo secret past. Get me? I’d rather they know I know and that I don’t care. We’re all starting to hang out together a lot now.

    Like


    • I’m in the same predicament at the moment. I have confirmed 1 cocking by “good friend”. She also “really wants me to meet him”, I told her to go to hell in that regard.

      I need advice on how to handle this.

      Like


    • Even asking the question reeks of insecurity: you do care. If her male friends [sic] are blue-balls beta orbiters, you can be confident they haven’t dicked her; if any of them are alpha types, you can be pretty sure they have.

      Like


    • i get where you’re coming from, except i would care, because girls cherish those little secrets and it’d just annoy me endlessly to have one around all the time. even if i told everyone i knew and didn’t care. so i don’t know if it’s doable but i understand that that would be annoying.

      i’d avoid girls that choose to keep close contact with former lovers when i’m the man in her life. if she doesn’t like it she can go back but i’m not into integrating her lovers into my life.

      Like


      • Balrog,
        Dmann is telling you the truth.
        Mentioning it at all in that context reeks of insecurity.
        Let go of the need to tell them you know. That is by definition, needy.
        As far as those exlovers being integrated into your life, you’re looking at it in the wrong light. If you used to nail a girl, and now wanted you to hang out with her new dick, would you do it or would you rightly get that feeling that you’re a chode?
        Kick back and relax. He’s amogging himself. Even better if he pulls you to the side to try and give you that “she’s a good girl, don’t hurt her nonsense”, perfect opportunity for you to smirk, pat him on the back and let him know you think he’s a really good eunuch guar..uh I mean friend to her…

        Like


    • Balrog

      it does annoy me to think *they* think I don’t know, like some hapless dupe oblivious to their little taboo secret past. Get me?
      —————————————————————————————————–

      Yeah I got you bro, and here is my suggestion:

      Since you cannot change the past, and even if you ask, her answer could be a lie; “give her a new secret” to keep that is so humiliating to her that a past cocking by a friend doesn’t even register as a secret anymore.

      Do you get me?

      When “Ya really” took a shit on that girls chest, you think she ever told anyone?

      He gave her a new secret.

      Be creative.

      *protect yourself at all times and goodluck*

      Like


    • Working assumption: yes she did. Don’t bother asking, she’ll probably lie.

      Like


  6. “Make family when you can, because it is good.”

    Wait wait wait. “Good”? You’re starting to sound all Biblical and whatnot. Why not couch your maxim in your usual question-begging evolutionary cant:

    “Make family while you can, because billions upon billions of years of Evolution has adapted the female homo sapiens to have only a short window in which she is fertile and thus, to maximize the future persistence of her selfish DNA, she should start reproducing her DNA as early and as often as possible.” Now that’s Science!

    Evolutionary theory [sic] is just a word-substitution game, substituting God’s “good” with Evolution’s “enables [X animal] to make more baybeeeeez!!!” It’s good to see you acknowledge this, however tacitly.

    Like


    • Is it that hard to fathom that God was the author of evolution?

      It’s one of His most ingenious ideas… right up there with free will.

      Like


      • Greg, natural selection through RANDOM mutation?

        Are you saying that if I go through the dictionary and randomly change letters; after millions of years I will end up with the Bible?

        Or,

        if I go through a lady Gaga song and RANDOMLY change notes, time signatures, keys…, after millions of years I will end up with Beethovens 5th?

        What country you from?

        Like


      • Our views of what evolution entails differ… there are obviously a lot of variations of the same kind of creature that can be explained as adaptations to different environmental stimuli over given periods of time… some very long, some relatively short (e.g., that fox/dog thing they did in Russia).

        Anyway, it’s a discussion that can’t be satisfied in a few sentences, and best left to another thread.

        Like


      • Thwack,
        You’re misrepresenting how it works.
        To use a simple analogy,
        Imagine an island with a population of deer. This island is of high altitude with particularly rough winters, very cold.
        Out of all the deer, which ones, if any, with more than likely survive the winter, the deer with longer or shorter fur? With each passing generation, the deer with the longest hair are better equipped to survive and more likely to pass on their long haired genes to fhe next generation.
        Multiply that effect over thousands of generations and you’ll find that successful species are remarkably adapted to their enviroment.
        The helpful mutations are passed along, the harmful weeded out, and the neutral mutations don’t matter.
        Nature is self regulating, it’s no surprise we find life the way that it is on our planet.

        Like


      • And if we started providing the short haired deers with warm coats they would then survive longer and be able to pass their short hair genes to more deers who would then need our benevolence – providing them with warm coats – to survive.

        The short hair deer population would increase and require more warm coats from us. We would need to work harder and harder and use more and more precious resources to make those warm coats…and all this would only make deers a weaker animal that would not be able to function without our help.

        See ( I’m talking to Thwack ) the parallel with welfare, food stamps, affirmative action, free obamaphones and certain demographic groups?

        Like


      • Mutatriarch

        Thwack,
        With each passing generation, the deer with the longest hair are better equipped to survive and more likely to pass on their long haired genes to fhe next generation.

        —————————————————————————————————-

        True, and guess what?

        Its still a deer;

        it has no fins or quills like a poruipine…

        the gene for long deer hair is not a mutation, the information to produce it was always there in the genome of the original deer.

        But there is a limit to variation; once you get into the shallow end of the gene pool you cant survive by increasing the trait, and the information to get back to where you were has been bred out.

        For example, 2 black people can produce lighter skinned offspring; but 2 white people cannot produce darker skinned offspring; no amount of “random mutation” for millions of years will produce this ability.

        Give me an example of a USEFUL mutation?

        Like


      • Give me an example of a USEFUL mutation?

        The sickle cell immediately springs to my mind…

        Like


      • Oh, snap!

        Like


      • Jay in DC

        Give me an example of a USEFUL mutation?

        The sickle cell immediately springs to my mind…
        —————————————————————————

        Is this what you tell nogs in Cleveland suffering from sickle cell anemia?

        Do you suggest they also cut off one of their hands so they can never be handcuffed by the po po?

        Fat ugly women can’t cheat; so are you gonna marry one?

        Let me rephrase my question:

        Give me an example of a mutation that results in an increase of information instead of a loss?

        In other words, show me a mutation that results in something simple becoming more complex; instead of something complex being simplified?

        Ni66ers never lose their luggage when they go on vacation; how can you go on vacation when you don’t have a job?

        Like


      • In this encode/code/decode model, the guy on the right counters with the concept of dithering. While this process is necessary for most encoders as an error checking function, once they master the code (perfect pitch, perfect timing…) its no longer a requirement for the encoding process because (and Im speculating) some other process (better) is being used.

        Given a choice between noise and latency, what would be your choice if forced to choose?

        The only way out is to master the code.

        Like


  7. Men have biographies. Women have grandchildren.

    Like


  8. Disagree with Suburban_elk. At the point you need to beat someone into submitting to you, you’ve lost the war.

    Clover_Annie has it exactly right though.

    Like


    • At the point you need to beat someone into submitting to you, you’ve lost the war

      And if you’re intolerant, the terrisssts have won.

      Like


    • most girls will beat themselves up if you ignore them

      Like


    • No. Here’s the thing. The best men don’t need to. The worst men lose if they do or not. In the middle, there are men who can make a relationship happy by exercising their strength and dominance in an obvious way. They don’t have the capability to make a woman happy with soft control alone.

      That Russian proverb is for that majority of men in the middle.

      It’s the same with children. We’re told that spanking is cruel and there are better ways to raise a child (the justification is, of course, the dregs who would abuse their children no matter what.) The suggested alternatives are invariably exhausting research projects into the psychology of the child, standoffs, slow conditioning processes, and therapy. Only rich parents of only children have the time to pull this off. Everybody else raises shitty children.

      Spanking is not a bespoke child-correcting solution, but everybody knows how to do it. 80% of parents have to choose between the rod and nothing, because they have to work or shovel the driveway or they’re just tired.

      It’s the same with women. The difference is that children don’t realize what a gift they’re given until adulthood but women realize it right away.

      Like


      • When a couple marries, the woman has to accept that he is superior in the family power dynamic. If she does (and he remains superior), the marriage is highly likely to be a solid, healthy and happy and a good place to raise a family. You can’t beat anyone into deference, it’s like beating someone into respecting you. You can make them shut up, but that isn’t going to be a healthy or happy environment.
        Subjugation isn’t respect. It’s actually the opposite case and the man loses respect when he completely loses his shit and starts hitting.

        Like


      • You’ve watched too much TV.

        1. How does he retain superiority? How did he get it in the first place? Remember, we are talking about a regular guy.

        2. Why does he have to “lose his shit”?

        3. Why would a regular woman not love a man who can use his strength to communicate with her? Why would she love a man who doesn’t? (Remember, to love is not the same as to find convenient.)

        Try to answer without the assumption that all men can be master mental manipulator alphas.

        Like


    • Cause and effect, chicken versus the egg – when do they (women) submit?

      (By the way, excepting sick people no one likes a good beating; and yet life demands it.

      The “war” is a lost cause; and yet it is the only thing.)

      Like


  9. I thought Dostoevsky said there was a practice to have a boy whip a girl for something she’d done wrong. Next day: engagement, with a happy marriage to follow.

    Like


  10. It’s kind of like beating someone into respecting you.

    Like


  11. Testing to see if I’m banned. The site ate my Dostoevsky comment.

    Like


  12. Memento Mori

    I’ve been thinking about this all week. The absolute truth of it, in every respect.

    If I was to disfigure my body with a tattoo it would be: Memento Mori, etched in the finest calligraphy, across my chest.

    Like


  13. I’ll tell you this…I enjoy exercising with the punching bag and look forward to it each time. Plus it never complains…I might have just found a girlfriend.

    Like


  14. Here’s how it is done:

    “Mr. O’Shawn, here is a good stick to beat the lovely lady”

    Like


  15. “For men, the equation is different. The means of male power, in whatever form, finds reproductive resolution in the love and loyalty of many beautiful women.”

    The only valid reproductive resolution for men is having children.

    “But unlike women, men’s reproductive resolution doesn’t have a stark finish. The acquisition of power is a lifelong pursuit, because the love of young women and the pleasure of their sex is an infinite joy.”

    How can you believe that nailing pretty young girls replaces the fulfillment of children for men? They are two joys in life that do not replace each other. People of Eurasian stock come from a very long line of fathers that stick around to raise their kids. They don’t just have a desire to nail pretty girls and collect a harem or else we wouldn’t have multiple civilizations based on permanent marriages.

    A man’s reproductive resolution is in his children. It is not different than the reproductive resolution of a woman, it just is something that can take place at a later time (with the risk of the accumulation of mutations).

    Like


    • I will submit to you that yes, those men stuck around to raise their kids, but if you think there was not a concubine for many of them, you thought wrong. Sure the middle class men may not have had the means for this, but the concubine has been a staple of the upper class since forever.

      Like


  16. Angola bans islam, for some reasom i think you might be interested on knowing this.

    Like


  17. @yareally
    @immoralgables

    FR from yesterday…this one really got delayed in the moderation stack.

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/12/20/a-woman-needs-a-man-to-put-her-in-her-place/#comment-508201

    Like


  18. Before I scolded Heartiste for his dastardly opinion about the male reproductive resolution. Just to clarify, it is because he is so beautiful and I hate to know that the world will go on without his potential because he did not pass his genes to the next generation.

    “But unlike women, men’s reproductive resolution doesn’t have a stark finish. The acquisition of power is a lifelong pursuit, because the love of young women and the pleasure of their sex is an infinite joy.”

    If you write something absurd like the above, my hope is that for once you don’t mean what you say and that this isn’t some kind of denial you will go to your grave with,

    You look upon beautiful girls and find it tragic if they do not reproduce. You think their lives will be wasted once they are older no matter what else they do. You cannot see yourself in the same light but I can- perhaps it is because I am of the opposite sex looking at you. It is the same tragedy that will befall you and all of future society as a result.

    When a man looks at a pretty feminine girl, he sees her mothering attributes. When a woman looks at a wonderful man, she thinks “I’d like to have his babies.” It is the same tragedy for either gender if that potential does not come to fruition.

    I won’t chastise you at all for advocating wife beating or whatever else, but this denial of your reproductive prerogative I must wail against.

    Like


    • It may be that at a ripe older age CH decides to put a bun in the oven, you never know. But I think he would like to, rightly, capitalize on his current ability to be around many women. Given the extreme differences in “peak SMV” curves for the sexes, if you are knocking one girl up and committing under say about 40ish, you are insane.

      Like


    • Think of CH like St. Paul, working away, neither giving nor being given in marriage for the sake of the gospel. We accept his sacrifice as an investment that pays magnificent returns. Certainly he wouldn’t have half the entertaining vitriol if he spent every night reading books to his child.

      Like


  19. In other nooz, ni66ers have also banned poverty, cancer, tornados and the moon.

    Like


  20. Real-life anecdote, vaguely relevant:
    There’s a woman who frequents one of my favorite haunts who could be a poster child for the Aging Hottie.
    Originally from South America, she’s about a 7.5 – 8 overall, in her age group (mid-30’s/early 40’s), she’s a 20.
    Super fit and shapely, the kind of body that comes only from a happy (VERY happy) combination of excellent genes, a very healthy diet and megatons of cardio and yoga.
    I don’t see any signs of plastic surgery, which she probably couldn’t afford, anyway.
    Many teenagers would kill to look like her.
    She’s a little leathery close up – too many decades of wearing bikinis in sunny climes – but if you’re willing to overlook a few crow’s feet and some tanning excesses, she can still turn heads.

    Like


  21. I’m wondering if we’ll see a significant re-evaluation of feminism if and when more men become wiser to the laws of SMV.

    At the moment I’m still seeing way too many men of a 28-35 age bracket marrying women around the same age as them. This is a female – and indeed a feminist – utopia. Girl gets to spend her prime SMV years single, shacking up just before the wall hits. Man shacks up just at the point his SMV is about to pass hers for the first time in his life. In this scenario only one gender – the female – gets to capitalize on her high SMV.

    Every time this happens it also vindicates to onlooking women that there is no price to pay for riding the cock carousel.

    One of the big reasons men fall for this is because they spend their 20s with little-to-no game, and are just happy a woman of similar SMV has finally taken notice of them.

    Blinding men’s eyes to the SMV chart -but only when it negatively affects women – is perhaps the most cunning stunt of the feminist-induced dating arena.

    Like


  22. Many of the most brutal killers of the Holocaust were women; creatively cruel and sedulously murderous women — and most of them got away.
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0547863381/wwwfallbackbe-20

    Like


  23. Perhaps feminism is merely nature’s way of taking a defective subset of genes out of the population.

    Frankly, if true, this is a nature fail. Girls with the feminism gene should just have the overwhelming naturally desire to go running in front of an oncoming train.

    Rape!

    Like


    • The same thing *could* be said with regard to homosexuality.

      Think about it for a moment – what other plausible reason would nature have to embrace such behavior(s)?

      Like


      • There are Hot ,intelligent and creative gays out there, don’t think reproduction the all of a human being.

        Like


      • And they will never breed.

        And their “creativeness” is in making useless ephemera like fashion, talk shows, flimsy movies, and assorted crap TV and bubblegum, meaningless pop music (Lady Gaga, Madonna, Nicky Minaj….)

        But their true worthlessness may be in something else—some gene that would not be able to protect society or contribute to it—hence why they are gay or feminist—to prevent contamination to the greater human race.

        Also, here’s hoping you meet a group of Obama supporters in a back alley and they smack you around like the worthless bitch you are. Polar bear hunting and vibrancy, all in one!

        Like


      • Maybe homosexuality is a male compensatory response to living in an “unbalanced” culture? A culture in which males are retarded and even punished for getting in touch with their more delicate/emotional side?

        Are gay men really better at certain things like the arts? or does it just seem that way because all the straight men are afraid to engage in them over fear of being called a faggot?

        “he’s not gay, he’s English”

        The Homo and the Negro

        James J. O’Meara’s The Homo and the Negro brings a “queer eye” to the overwhelmingly “homophobic” Far Right. In his title essay, O’Meara argues that the Far Right cannot effectively defend Western civilization unless it checks its premises about homosexuality and non-sexual forms of male bonding, which are undermined not just by liberals and feminists, but also by Judeo-Christian “family values” advocates. O’Meara also uses his theory to explain the stigmatization of Western high culture as “gay” and the worship of uncultured oafs as masculine ideals.

        http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/11/the-stark-truthrobert-stark-interviews-james-j-omeara/

        Like


      • lol. All you sub-humans are on the down low–in between humping your half sisters LoQueesha and Tanyaze, you’re bending over for each other in the back alleys and bathrooms.

        Which is why the HIV rates are so high amongst your “men.” Also why there’s so much hilariously-laughable over-the-top wanna-be “masculine” behavior by your “men”—attempts to cover up the obvious.

        Poor little homo beasts. lol.

        Like


      • whorefinder

        lol. All you sub-humans are on the down low
        ————————————————————————————–

        We are not on the down low, but the negro male does share a curious affection for shoes with females. I still remember the teasing when the brothahs discovered I wore the same pair of tennis shoes every day; and how I got them dirty. Their reaction was as if a certain dirigible had caught fire at Lakehurst NJ.

        Such behavior only served to solidified my suspicion that the late Elvis Presley was a negro. Only a negro male could be so obsessed with a pair of blue suede shoes to sing about them.

        Like


      • I think its in the back of every straight young man’s mind to make enough money to be able to raise a family. Even if they go PUA, it makes life easier to attract quality women. If you’re gay, you’re free to have a chump job because they don’t care and for them, more room mates equals more fun.

        Like


      • on December 23, 2013 at 9:10 am ProudFeministGirLIsBackAndInFullForce

        Your views of the worth of a human are very simplistic, maybe poor gay animals have value with just the reproduction, but humans have talents, So what if TOM DALEY don’t have children? he wins medals, and anyways he could adopt a child and fulfill his role as father. Likewise Ellen degeneres make us laugh a lot and Michael Angelo??? hello. Checkmate.

        Like


      • None of those disease incubators you listed has any talent. Go fish.

        Like


      • Your views of the worth of a human are very simplistic
        –lol. Denying reality by calling it “simplistic” won’t work here, attention whore.

        It’s real. And it’s spectacular!

        maybe poor gay animals have value with just the reproduction, but humans have talents
        —Species-ist!

        he could adopt a child and fulfill his role as father.
        –mentally-diseased people (as homos are) should not be allowed to adopt: they don’t love their children, they molest and rape them at extreme rates, and they abandon them when they cease to be faddish for the homo.

        Ellen degeneres
        —lmao. You just lost right there….

        I can’t wait till this worthless whore and her “gay bff” meet a pack of thwacks one night—and the gay bff kicks her in the shins and throws her like a piece of meat to the hungry animals while he runs away screaming like a bitch.

        Also, her rationalization the next day of how the sub-humans gang raped her because of “white male oppression” will be awesome as well.

        Checkmate rape!

        Like


      • Intelligent interior design.

        Like


      • Excellent, sir!

        Like


      • Although I do enjoy the music of Joe Jackson, Jerry Hermann, et. al., still… not sure it counterbalances all the OTHER general swinery and culture-decay.

        Like


      • If we took 100 of the most creative, most talented, most intelligent gays on the planet and put them on a desert island, and then we came back to check on them a 100 or 500 years later, there would not be a nice civilization on that island, there would be nothing, they would all be dead.

        What part of “gays can not reproduce” don’t you understand

        Like


      • All the palm trees would have glory holes, though.

        Like


      • Ironically, social and legal acceptance of homosexuality can result in a massive decrease in future homosexuals simply because they won’t be passing on their genes. In the past, men had to get married to fit in with society so they had wifed up a ‘beard’ and fucked her enough to produce some kids. No so anymore. You can roll up the street in assless leather chaps with rainbow stickers plastered over your jacket proclaiming your love of the cock.

        Like


    • IIRC, the genetic diversity of the white race relative to the number of people is much smaller compared to other races, so maybe things are coming to some sort of biological equilibrium… or maybe XIXth century was the white race’s chance to break out biologically from the rest of mankind, a chance wasted in the slaughter fields of Somme and Verdun.

      Like


  24. Pajama Boy is there….

    Like


  25. A real knee slapper, look how desperate this guy is to see a pair of tetas:

    Like


  26. on December 23, 2013 at 1:30 am Imperial Leather

    OT

    Isn’t it ironic how libtard chicks don’t realise that trying to act like a man in this PC world has consequences for them as well

    https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/p-exec-cupid-tweets-racist-joke-flight-africa-article-1.1554500

    Like


  27. on December 23, 2013 at 2:17 am MosesTransports

    Though somewhat unrelated to the topic at hand, I thought a newer article would get me more answers regarding my dilemma.
    I wanted to get some light on a recent event I went through. Jesus, now it sounds like a tornado or something. So I was playing some football and my team lost. Twice. It wasn’t ’cause of skill, just a couple of lucky shots.
    If that wasn’t enough, their alpha (more perceived than real) started his shit talk and I really don’t enjoy listening to that type of thing.
    Now, even though, I think that, at the start of it, I had some good stuff, the dude threw my wannabe AMOG try right back in my face.
    With very little alterations, here’s the exchange we had. To note that other people were present, and of course, one of his lackeys was commenting on the side with expressions such as “Oh snap”, “Funny”, or “This is hilarious”. Depending on the responses of his alpha.
    His material shall be in quotation marks.

    Just so everyone knows, we won ’cause you got lucky.
    “Blow me. We won ’cause you were shit.”
    Easy bro. I don’t swing that way.
    “Homo turd.”
    Really now. If I recall corectly, that ain’t what you mother told me last night. Look here dude.
    “You’re trying too hard to make me look foolish. You’re lame bro.”
    I ain’t trying to make anyone look foolish, was just analyzing your sexual statement. A statement you used without knowing its meaning.
    “Okay, you fat titty bitch.”
    You talked shit because you got lucky winning that game. You’re like every ordinary dude that talks shit and can’t back it up.
    “Play me. 1 vs 1.”
    Are you serious now. I hope you don’t make me suck your dick. I ain’t into that stuff.
    I wanted an explanation for your use of shit talk, but it escalated in you throwing insults at me, and stating that you were better.
    “Cause I am, bitch!”
    In the end though, it’s all good, dude. But try, for future reference, to back up what you’re saying.
    Because the lack of substance really made you shine in a poor light.
    “Dude. You lost. Twice.”
    Did I deny that. Nope.
    “I was the best player both times. I’m better.”
    Did I say you were shit. Nope. Only said you won ’cause of luck. Then, you wanted to have sex with me.
    There was no “You’re better, I’m worse” type of stuff involved.
    “You’re gay as fuck.”
    Again with this. Already told you that my boyfriend doesn’t agree with you, dude.
    That is how you use irony, bro. -> this was in response to his lackey that tried to be ironic with me before the game.
    “Never said I wanted sex from you. Your homo mind just thought that.”
    You actually thought I was serious, dude. Come on. You never really said it, but you implied it.
    You took my humor seriously, got butthurt, and judged, unkowingly, my sexuality.
    Everything that escalated was from you.

    At this point, I lost interest in the conversation and it slowly defused by itself. What sucks is, that I know he came out of this mumbo jumbo with more value than me.
    I tried to be as polite and as detached as I could, but I got the feeling I wouldn’t resolve anything being that way. I’d imagine he’d back out, but apparently, politeness only made it worse.
    My request to you dudes is, to tell me where I actually lost the steering wheel of the conversation(if I ever had it, that is), and how I could’ve AMOGed the guy.
    The politeness tactic didn’t work, as insults were the words of his choice. Which was quite ironic, considering most men would know it’d make them look bad, a thing that did not happen here.
    Any kind of advice would be appreciated. Cheers.

    Like


    • on December 23, 2013 at 2:43 am Imperial Leather

      yeah….stop using luck as the excuse why you lost….TWICE

      The Victor can trash talk the loser 100% of the time

      your hurt feelings don’t mean squat in the field of action….

      Be the Victor Be Victorious

      Like


    • If you’re going to pay attention to the trash talkers, you have to be prepared to have the last word, and in the fewest possible words.

      As you will have noticed, further discussion after “Blow me” was pointless and ill-advised.

      If your steely-eyed missile man gaze was not enough to back the fellow down, and you aren’t prepared to slap that sass out of him, then you should have just walked away with a dismissive “You fairy.”

      Like


    • You should have never even engaged him.
      The moment he started you should have laughed, looked at your buddy and said “get a load of the hall of famer in this guy”,
      And the moment he started up again cut him off with dismissive laughter.
      He has two options,
      To shut up or escalate to a fight.
      Ever watch a bully in school react to the rationalizations of his victim? When you argued back you validated him.

      Like


  28. on December 23, 2013 at 7:21 am RappaccinisDaughter

    “And then she would know love.”

    Or maybe she’d walk out on Awesome Alpha, go home, and tell her father what happened. And maybe no cops would ever get called, but the Awesome Alpha would turn up in the ER with four staved-in ribs, a cracked orbital socket, broken nose, two missing teeth, and no idea who’d done it because someone had thrown a blanket over his head before the beating (which may or may not have been administered with a doorknob in a sock) commenced.

    At least, that’s the proverb we tell where I come from.

    Like


    • Hamsterization.

      Like


      • on December 23, 2013 at 12:32 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Whatever you say, bub.

        Like


      • And what I say is…

        RAPE!

        Like


      • on December 24, 2013 at 5:01 pm Theodore Logan

        every woman deep down inside loves it like this:

        Like


      • blood is not sexy. I don’t like that scene at all. I think is disturbing if many people find this erotic.

        I don’t know the context of the movie, but I will assume that the lady is a movie character type that can fight 8 dudes with guns with round house kicks, but still. He kicked her in the stomach on the floor. Not the type of thing I spend much time fantasizing about at least.

        Like


    • You wish … or you don’t wish (that) … or you don’t know and you pretend that between your father and suitor is some epic struggle.

      (Ok miss precious you are one in a million, there is no one else.)

      You are nobody and a burden and your attitude needs switching from dark to light.

      Like


      • on December 23, 2013 at 1:23 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, I suppose it’s entirely possible that the young man whom I’d just unceremoniously dumped for hitting me just met with a series of very unfortunate events. Perhaps he was just going down the hall, suffered a minor dizzy spell, got twisted up in some curtains, became disoriented and then fell bumpty-bumpty-bump! down the stairs. Cracking four ribs, his orbital socket, breaking his nose, and losing two teeth.

        Actually, that must be what happened. Because it’s illegal for a man to go throw a blanket party in honor of the guy who thought it was OK to lay hands on his daughter. And because no man would ever object to having his daughter beaten up. And no daughter would ever object to being beaten up. Right? Right.

        Thanks for clearing that up!

        Like


      • Good story – i believe it!

        But you sought that drama.

        Whose girl do you want to be.

        Like


      • A couple years ago a man you are dating drugs you up, rapes you, captures the whole thing on video and now a man you are dating hit you

        With all due respect,

        is your radar defective?

        or are you that attracted to bad boys that you can not help it?

        Like


      • on December 23, 2013 at 10:51 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        The guy who hit me was first. Mein Vater fixed him.

        The man who raped me was second. It’s true; I fucked up. I gave a second chance to a fuckin’ Stage Five Clinger. Tried to help him. Never again.

        But there was one question you forgot to ask me, Canadian Friend. Can you guess what it was? What you missed?

        Like


      • How many teeth the second one lost because of your father teaching him a lesson?

        no…but…seriously, I don’t know what I am missing/what question I forgot to ask.

        Like


      • YEEEHAWWW!

        Perfect example of white knightery in service of feminist slut entitlement. Your pussy papa’s backwoods twang doesn’t hide the fact that he served to further your degrading behavior rather than your virtue.

        Maybe it released some of his own sexual frustration by pretending the Let’s You And Him Fight Over Me was noble rather than servile and unbecoming a man. Only the omega/betamale unfamiliar with female nature could be so duped by his flawless little princess.

        There are times when violence in the protection of a good girl is warranted, but it is obvious by now that such undeserved license afforded you the opportunity to waste your peak years and deliver your dad a militant feminist drybox rather than the perpetuation of his line.

        Like


      • There are times when violence in the protection of a good girl is warranted, but it is obvious by now that such undeserved license afforded you the opportunity to waste your peak years and deliver your dad a militant feminist drybox rather than the perpetuation of his line.

        A most damning, and true allegation against your disgusting lack of faith in your own need to realize your DNA.

        DO THIS TO ME, and my daddy will defend my honor violently! Yes, his genetic line will die with me, but fear not! In spite of giving him no offspring, yet fulfilling my dick wishes, he will defend me until the grave.

        F U C K Y O U— You can be a conservative gun toting chick with a rapier wit. A swimmer’s body who is down to fuck, but at the end of the day RD, you fucking FAIL. Utterly. Because why? You’ve decided your father’s DNA dies with you. You may as well just lick pussy until death. I’d at least like to see you on video in a 69 with some hottie.

        Like


    • So your dad is the type that will slap around an asshole … but sharing with your dad that you’re a stupid cunt whose stupid behaviour gets you slapped around by an asshole will not ensure your dad doubles down on the admonishment?

      Like


      • on December 23, 2013 at 1:56 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Why so angry, Gro? Are these your incisor and eyetooth?
        Do you want them back?

        Like


      • Indeed, if my daughter comes to me with that shit. She has been amply warned about douchebags. And she knows I have a heavy hand.
        .
        What an imbecile you have for a father, tho.

        Like


      • on December 24, 2013 at 11:03 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, you can’t have them. They’re mine.
        The human teeth, broken and brown with drying blood, that he put into my outstretched hand.

        Like


      • And you pulled that stunt on your father, TWICE.

        and did not get a righteous asswhopping ONCE

        That’s wow … just … wow

        Like


      • When my daughter came home, crying about how her husband hit her, I hit her myself… for whatever she did that her husband had to hit her.

        Like


      • on December 24, 2013 at 2:45 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        No, no, no.

        Mein Vater doesn’t know about the second time.

        I took care of that one myself. ;-D

        Like


    • Slappachinisdaughter
      Be honest.
      How hard was your nub when you were typing that?
      Computer chair foam acts as a sponge, it’ll be hard to get that peculiar scent out of it.

      Like


      • on December 23, 2013 at 2:20 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Patriarch:

        Not at all. But do feel free to swing by and give my chair a sniff…again.

        Like


      • Bicycle seats only… the ones that the proverbial fish need.

        Like


      • LOL!! This reminds me of the first time I had ever encountered this act. I was a wee lad, just out of college at my first “real” job. There was this light skinned Haley Berre hottie that worked with me and this half black dude in the same office. We use to sweat her hard because body wise, she was a hard 10, no shit.

        She got up one day to go the bathroom and my man jumped outta his chair and ran over to her chair and just inhaled the largest lungful of air right off the seat. And said to me in total deadpan- “Jay, this chair smells so good I would let her fart directly into my fucking face.”

        That was a classic line I’ll never forget.

        Like


      • on December 24, 2013 at 9:31 am RappaccinisDaughter

        See, this is why I keep coming back to CH. The priceless information.

        When I was first starting out, I couldn’t afford a place on my own. I had this male roommate. We had opposite schedules, so we rarely saw each other. He was clean, neat, quiet…perfect, right?

        Only my panties kept going missing. Out of my DIRTY laundry. It took me a long time to notice because I tend to pick a style and color I like and just buy a dozen at a time. But when one of my Date Panties* disappeared out of the hamper, I started to get suspicious.

        So one night when he was out, I went on a safari into his room. A desperate, last-ditch mission to retrieve my expensive silk sky-blue-and-lavender Victoria’s Secret tangas. And sure enough…in his nightstand, right next to his bed…along with a bottle of Jergens lotion…my panties. Lots of my panties. Bedizened with enough DNA to put a dozen O.J. Simpsons** in jail, or to make about 200,000 more.

        I mean, I know technically there was nothing wrong with them that a spin through the washing machine couldn’t fix, but as far as I was concerned, they were his panties now. I was thoroughly grossed out. And more than a little confused. I think Jay’s comment may have resolved some of said confusion.

        But other than that, he was a great roommate, so I finished out the lease. I just made sure that my dirty laundry stayed behind my locked bedroom door.

        *Here’s some information for you: All women have Date Panties. Or, more properly, Third-Date Panties. We put them on when we know we are going to get laid. That’s the reality of the sexual market, guys…we always know well ahead of time. If you ever go to smash a girl and you find a pair of plain white cotton panties, reach around your shoulder and give yourself a pat on the back. That means you overwhelmed a girl who wasn’t planning on sleeping with you with carefree, devil-may-care lust.

        **He was actually a brown-eyed blond.

        Like


      • I’m going to give the lady a polite golf clap for that one. Patriarch, give it up.

        Like


      • Give what up?

        Like


      • I do love that musk…

        Like


    • Wasn’t the anecdote about a society where the marital beat down was expected? Your story seems to have a different context.

      Like


      • on December 24, 2013 at 11:09 am RappaccinisDaughter

        The point of the anecdote was that women just luuuuurve being beaten; that you should hit women in order to make them love you.

        Like


      • Can I sniff your seat again?

        Like


      • on December 24, 2013 at 12:03 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Not like there’s anything I can do about it, Patriarch. I gotta go home sometime.

        I have a long reply to Jay In DC, about an ex-male roommate of mine who used to steal my dirty [email protected], that appears to be in moderation. So I’m being all cute about how to spell [email protected]

        Like


      • Hahaha
        Glad to see you can take a joke.

        Like


      • The point of the anecdote was that women just luuuuurve being beaten; that you should hit women in order to make them love you.

        Not the point of the anecdote at all.

        Your lifetime White Knight Posse has altered your character. That’s not to say a father shouldn’t employ shotgun and fist to protect his daughter’s virtue, but implied within that arrangement is the girl’s contribution to the family by not creating an unnecessary need to invoke that princess privilege. Therefore you were free to go about acting any way you wanted, putting yourself in dangerous situations, knowing that daddy is there to bail you out/take revenge in your name. Chivalry requires participation by both sexes, and your father is a beta male who compensates for it with flashy, inappropriate violence. Or else he would have beaten you the moment you showed a propensity for leasing out your cunt so freely.

        “The point of the anecdote was that women” need to be controlled, protected, and commanded to have a chance to be contented, and that a single physical reminder of that at the beginning of a relationship sets a tone that actually reduces the number of beatings the woman will get — whether by the world or by the husband. It is in fact an act of love. If you had been spanked rather than encouraged for slutty “independent” behavior, you might have given your dad grandchildren, rather than rationalizing the life of ageing, self-mutilating, sterile, hedonist feminism.

        The reason why the beatings baffle you is because you’ve never had one from someone who loved you. You only received them at the hands of the selfish, which makes you erroneously assume all physical restraint must deep down be motivated by evil. But never fear, the feminist culture has contorted itself precisely around your own twists, so you will mistake distortion for reality when men like us are bringing you the truth, albeit belatedly for you. Reform becomes exponentially more difficult every year after age 25.

        Matt

        Like


    • Is it just me? I took the Russian proverb as meaning that if the wife acted up, the husband had permission to hit her once. “And then she knew”– meaning he established from the beginning who was in charge. I think it makes more sense that way.

      Like


    • While reply is in moderation …

      That isn’t the way the “proverb” goes. Yours is a twisted feminist version where the beta-male does all the faux-heroic dirty work.

      This is how the proverb goes. Dad hands over the paddle to the husband:

      Your hillbilly beta enforcers are a complete corruption of the idea. My Princess Is Never Wrong is the opposite of men culturally sticking together to contain the scourge of deliberate female troublemaking which arises naturally from hypergamy.

      Matt

      Like


  29. http://rt.com/news/pussy-riot-alekhina-relased-655/

    The hot one came out of jail better looking. The other one was about the same.

    Like


  30. on December 23, 2013 at 9:32 am haunted trilobite

    On the more liberal side of russian traditions, I think anyone with 2 braincells to rub together can break down this literary exchange into a few succinct words.

    http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/nov/15/pussy-riot-nadezhda-tolokonnikova-slavoj-zizek

    Like


  31. (Cool story bro time.)

    Today they roped me down to the slaughterhouse called Ikea.

    A mattress in a truck (and so we did).

    A struggle; seeing them who would have been men.

    On a leash but coffee for free.

    Like


    • Come on … no accolades?

      Not my best but it stands the test of one night; go ahead, read it again.

      I had to go there, for real – and never again. There was (along side fifty women) one other man.

      Like


      • About 10 % of what they have at Ikea is cool, the rest is effeminate or gay, and the colors…the colors…really awful colors… ( I don’t know if all Ikeas have the same stuff, but here near Montreal it is mostly girly rainbow and unicorn colors )

        Like


      • Their inventory comes from the same pool of items but is adjusted to local taste and budget.

        Like


  32. As this is Christmas, I must give thanks……that I was born a man.

    Like