Hoax?

Has the Chateau been duped by a scorned beta male? A reader (who shall remain anonymous) emailed the following to Chateau headquarters regarding yesterday’s post about a woman seeking advice whether to upgrade from her current boyfriend to a luxury model alpha:

That chick has used the name [xxxxxx] to comment on other blogs.  She frequents [another dating website].  She previously claimed that she was a virgin.  Her real name is [xxxxxxx].  She didn’t seem dumb enough to do this so I’m thinking maybe someone with a grudge is pretending to be her.  If it is really her, this is an epic fucking fail on her part.

As has been repeated here many times, if you email looking for advice and don’t specify that you wish to keep it private and off the blog, your email can and sometimes will be used for a post. The girl in question did not state any wish for her advice-seeking email to be kept private. Fair warning was given, and total privacy was offered. Chateau proprietors keep their word.

However, if it is the case that someone impersonated her, then this is unfortunate. Betas impersonating in email their cheating girlfriends, ex-girlfriends or women they just don’t like for whatever personal reason and pretending to seek advice from your humble hosts in hopes of exacting a bit of the ol’ ultravengeance through the medium of this blog are engaging in subterfuge of the vilest sort. We run a tight operation here. And the Chateau *really* doesn’t like to play the dupe.

It’s a clever ploy, and one that is impossible for Chateau keepers to defend against. Thus, because of the ploy’s indefensibility and potential to harm innocent parties, the post has been removed. In addition, all future reader mailbags have been put on hold until further notice. There is now no way for the hosts here to know which emails requesting advice are genuine and which are impersonations by sly, vengeful betas intent on summoning the Kraken for a game of “let’s her and Chateau fight”.

While there is no hard proof that the original email is fake, the Chateau has decided to take all necessary precautions and treat it as if it were fake. As a result, the reader mailbag is dead. So thank you, haxxor betas, you have ruined it for every other emailer seeking genuine advice to improve their love lives and find happiness.





Comments


  1. Lame. Why not just remove her photos and change the names? There was still a good kernel of truth in that post. We can not let the scum win with their weak strategies built on lies.

    Like


  2. on August 21, 2010 at 12:20 am Ambiguous Point

    Isn’t it “beta” to close down the reader mailbag because you were duped by one bad egg?

    Like


  3. Can you at least post the section of your advice only and the comments. It is useful advice even without “her” part.

    Like


  4. on August 21, 2010 at 12:27 am gunslingergregi

    The truth us that is how woman are.
    Men don’t owe the coniving bitches shit.
    Men have value woman don’t.
    Get yourself some monetary value and freedom from money and let a bitch provide some comfort for you.
    But you don’t owe her shit beyond what you already give on a minute by minute basis.
    All woman will do the same shit they are not worth making any promises to.
    Just enjoy them for what they are but understand again you don’t owe them anything for their service just like a company doesn’t owe you shit just because you put in good work that allowed you to stay employed.
    But when you started slacking you were fired.
    Need to treat bitches like employees.

    Like


  5. on August 21, 2010 at 12:29 am Explicit Content

    You can’t reply to the obvious non-hoax emails?

    Like


  6. Someone figure out the truth behind this so we can bring back the original post. It was epic.

    Like


  7. Stop squawking like desperate betas, people.

    The Reader Mailbag isn’t gone; I guess Chateau proprietors will take it upon themselves to be more careful in the future before applying the cat-‘o-nine-tails that liberally.

    Like


  8. How integrityist of CR.

    Like


  9. Compartmentalize and categorize. Why not simply discontinue the specific category of the reader mailbag which was scandalous? Discriminate against the ladies, because I really doubt disgruntled betas would impersonate other betas.

    Like


  10. Well done taking down the original post if you’re not sure the identity is legit. Anonymous reader emails are one thing, but unless you can verify the photos are legit via Facebook or something similar, posting them could unfairly damage someone’s life.

    Like


  11. The readers are right. This is a lame reaction, one based on fear. Fear not least of some kind of lawsuit. The moral posturing looks fake.

    Chateau (clearly the collective no longer exhibits the aloofness of Roissy) went too far with their shaming and exposed themselves to potential legal ramifications, then backtracked in a cloud of squid ink.

    In an effort to hide the lame, they went too far in the opposite direction and canceled all reader mailbags. Stupid for any blog. Especially stupid for this one. Advice could easily continue with the necessary anonymizing redactions.

    Uber lame.

    This just demonstrates 1. that uncontrolled guest blogging is a bad idea and 2. that guest blogging under the bloggers own name is outright idiotic.

    Like


  12. Bit a the ol’ ultravengeance.

    Is a droog alpha or beta?

    Like


  13. That’s good. Because men suggesting she should “settle” and keep on her toes so her future hubby doesn’t indulge his hypergamous instincts and “trade up” for a hotter chick – were dumb.

    It’s not easy for guys to trade up. Especially busy betas who live to work. Surfers? Maybe. Everyone else? Not.

    Menfolk, heal thyself.

    Like


  14. I agree with The Chateau’s plan of action. Innocents shouldn’t have their names and reputations disparaged by vengeful Beta losers.

    That being said, I thought the post itself was fucken awesome and could have been used as some sort of scarecrow tactic to restrain hypergamous girls in their neverending quest to re-up.

    I understand where you’re coming from Chateau, but change the names and pictures and re-post that shit. It was pure gold.

    Like


  15. Yawn.

    Like


  16. Glad I was able to see the post and pics before it got deleted.

    Like


  17. There was quite a controversy going on about that situation.

    In any event, whoever that girl was: she hit almost every branch on the ugly tree as she fell down. A five on a good day.

    Like


  18. My vote is the reader mailbag should stay, but no names, no companies, and no photos.

    That aside, I think this goes to show you women and sex issues are extremely volatile and people will do anything to you, from ruin your reputation, to kill you, depending on whether or not you cater to their wishes.

    Like


  19. Hahaha, this overreaction cannot be remotely true.

    Can it?

    We’ve got hosts, they’re multiplyin
    They’re losin control
    ‘Cause the power they’re enjoyin’
    It’s terrifying!

    You better shape up
    ‘Cause I need the truth
    And my heart is set on you
    You better shape up
    You better understand
    To the Chateau you must be true

    Plenty left, plenty left for you to do

    Who’s the host that we want?
    O, o, oo honey.
    Need names for hosts that we want
    O, o, ooh honey.


    Anyway, this blog could’ve very well been a collaboration from early on in its inception.

    Like


  20. Sargeant Pyle, they’re paying for it, you eat it.

    Like


  21. on August 21, 2010 at 1:04 am Prophet Jeremiah your Daddy

    keep the fucking reader mailbag. fuck the grudging betas and their stupid girlfriends and fake girlfriends. let it be.

    you did not put one good reason to kill reader mailbag, it is almost like a girl justifying herself. “because he impersonated her, then I can’t tell who is a fake” and “I need to know fake, otherwise I might harm innocent people”

    you’re sounding euroweenie.

    of course you can judge man, wake up. there is such thing as obvious non-fake.

    get it together. reader mailbag is gold and you are going to let a super-beta put it down.

    …while you are citing abstractions.

    Like


  22. I thought regardless of whether or not it was a real person, the theme of that post was a great discussion point.

    I think you should put it back up minus the photos.

    The whole discussion of whether a girl with a boyfriend is shopping around hoping to trade up is worthy of further exploration.

    By the way, that reader mail bag is one of my favorite features of this blog.

    How about another “test of your game” scenario?

    Like


  23. It sure smells fake. Why would a woman ask such things to a complete stranger who gives advice (hard on woman) to men?

    Roissy, you should’ve known better.

    Like


  24. on August 21, 2010 at 1:28 am Prophet Jeremiah your Daddy

    great info on the post! but I would have spotted it and published no photos. You said it yourself: why ask you? Women don’t think like men and you know it.

    a 5-plus beta forgery group will be needed to dupe you again with similar shit.

    one rule: no photos on reader mailbag. it sounds creepy anyway.

    Like


  25. There’s been a breach at the Chateau. Alert the Sûreté.

    Like


  26. The entire post was a concise social commentary on the hypergamous behavior exhibited by the thundercunts that we all deal with. Take down the photos and the little details and you’re good.

    It’s ether to the feminists, and a wake up call to all the beta men who’ve lost control of all that mankind has given them. Stand by what you write regardless of the circumstances, be the man.

    Like


  27. It was to good to be true, I knew it was fake but still roissy shouldn’t have deleted the whole thing, maybe just the pics

    meh

    Like


  28. on August 21, 2010 at 1:46 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    lozzlolzzlzozl

    secrteiv tapoings of butthex without the girlths ocnthent are rewarded by da bneocons lzolzlzoz

    freedom of speech is hated on

    lolzozlzololzozlzlzozll

    Like


  29. Just do a confirmation process. Any girl asking for advice has to photograph herself looking at this site on a computer. Not quite 100% foolproof, but probably pretty close.

    Like


  30. +1 with matt’s idea

    or a piece of paper with the current date and her post name or something

    Like


  31. I just checked out your blog, gameinbk. Great job.

    And cold approaches impress the hell out of me because I’m a total wuss that way.

    Like


  32. This is reactive. Be indifferent. Ignore the losers and get back to regular business.

    Like


  33. I had a feeling something was wrong about posting someone’s pic publicly, and holding it up to scrutiny. Good decision to take the post down, Roissy. Who knows, maybe you’ve just dodged a lawsuit?

    It’s a good question, how can anyone ever know for sure that someone is who they say are in an email?

    You handled it well, like a pro actually. You’ve covered your tracks.

    But for God’s sake man, don’t trust anybody.

    Like


  34. on August 21, 2010 at 2:20 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    lolzozllozolzolzozolzozzozllz

    hey roissyt taht sucks i enjoyed your reader mailbag

    too bad there are so many betas on the net in thie rinegle mons basemtents tryng to brng down the turth as they wre raised by single mom and fiat dolalroslsl dollars zlzllzzlo

    anyway i am opeig my reader mailbag although i have not the patience like roissy to red and answr so eloquentyly

    so let me anser up fonrt

    uif you are a ten and a chcik then the answer is “yah lotsa cocka 4 u”

    if u are a 9 or less or a dude den de asnwr is “go suck cocka but not mine gotta save my hard on and splooge for da 10s” lzozzolozlozlzolzlzlzozozzlooz

    so dat is da GBFM mailbag up font ;zozozl;zozlzo your welocme betas and fuglies

    Like


  35. If the post was a hoax, the writer did a fair job of sending the girl up. If it was a man playing girl, he fell showed his tell in only one area. He lacked feminine wile. Girls rarely knowingly paint themselves in any bad light. They don’t openly explore their motivations, especially when those could be impunged. They will deal more smoothly in falsehoods. But as to a female character, that was believable.

    Like


  36. Didn’t get to a computer on time to see the photos. When I read the post last night on a mobile phone, I knew the photos would be up only a matter of hours.

    If they were still up now, I’d be asking Roissy to please cut the girl a break because, if it wasn’t a hoax and she’d just made a mistake, this would have cost her the boyfriend and maybe her job. Not cool.

    Outing the specific CTO was against the rules of solidarity among men. He had every right to try to add to his harem.

    This would have gone viral on Wall Street on Monday.

    Like


  37. I still have the page open with the pic and her ‘fake’ email – yay for having a million windows open at once! I think she’d have to have been pretty stupid to have put the position and the company of the potential suitor and send it to the Chateau. Someone wanted her to be outed for some reason. Or she was that stupid.

    She has pretty eyes, but there is no WAY she weighs what she says she does. Women always state a lower number than the actual, they can get away with it too because men really don’t have a clue what women’s weight is relative to their size. Not only that a slender looking woman can weigh more than a heavier looking one if she has good muscle development.

    Like


  38. If it were real, there would have been a 100% chance of the boyfriend dumping her. I couldn’t imagine any of my current girlfriends making the assumption that they could keep me long term. He’d wake up fast.

    Let this be a lesson to men: Develop an MLTR. Even though the women probably should not learn about each other, they will suspect they’re constantly competing against “something”.

    Like


  39. IIRC the original letter had her living with the boyfriend. Lesson #2: Don’t ever live with the girlfriend. It might make her think she’s got you under her thumb while it will cramp your style in dating others. I have a date tonight and it wouldn’t be cool if I couldn’t take this new woman home because my girlfriend was living with me. Its not cool to have to take a date to a hotel because seeing that you live in a cool place is part of what they often want. Don’t cohabit.

    Like


  40. Hey little kids.

    Do you fuck sometimes or do you spend all the day on the Internet talking about alpha qualities you don’t have or beta characteristics you try to hide 😀 ???

    http://roissy.wordpress.com/about/#comment-196184

    Like


  41. I knew that girl in college- doesnt seem like something she’d do, but then again, there are only two things that are infinite

    Like


  42. Lame-ish (even GBFM, your biggest fanboy says so), but understandable. We live in the real world, where lawsues ARE an issue.

    But damn, that e-mail could have been fake? Are you sure? I mean, the belief that guys care about her education, the over-evaluation of her value, her “ME ME ME ME ME” attitude.

    I find hard to believe that a guy, specially a beta male wrote that.

    Like


  43. The photos are in my inbox. That black outfit wearing type is a big reason why I moved to Eastern Europe despite doing well enough in Manhattan and having a new cocktail party to go to every night. I was meeting this type constantly and just didn’t have my heart in it.

    Its ironic she slams her boyfriend for being East European. That would be a feature for him, not a bug. She could only wish he’d mix his genes with hers.

    Like


  44. Since Obsidian considers her to be partly black, I’ll clarify that I referred to the type of skinny woman who wears black outfits and are, therefore, practically unnoticeable at Manhattan cocktail parties. I wasn’t being racist. I’ve seen some black tens in the Caribbean that I’d mix my genes with under the right circumstances. But a man should move to where the genetics match what he mostly wants. “Melting pots” only end up providing singles with very little of what they want.

    Like


  45. on August 21, 2010 at 5:45 am gunslingergregi

    lol jerry it isn’t racist to not want to fuck black chicks that is your individual choice.

    It is racist to say that blacks should have slots because they are black not because of being able to score well on tests and beat the other people out of a slot.

    How do you think the black guys pick up white chicks.

    Yea you guessed it.

    They call them racist for not dating a black guy ie fucking a black guy and it works on some of them.

    That is their individual right.
    Course you know that probably will be taken away but still.

    Like


  46. on August 21, 2010 at 5:49 am gunslingergregi

    shit funny as fuck life that is.

    Hey black dudes on blog try that shit for pickup on white woman let us know if it works.

    Game in bk this could be your break through apocolypse game you have been waiting for.

    Like


  47. on August 21, 2010 at 5:52 am gunslingergregi

    White dudes on blog as I have said before no game really needed to get black chicks they are drawn to your whiteness like white on rice.

    Like


  48. on August 21, 2010 at 6:00 am gunslingergregi

    Yea the games over when men lose all balls.

    Bunch of pussies.

    Like


  49. on August 21, 2010 at 6:22 am Gunslingergregi

    Here’s a little pick me up from one of my bros favorite groups.
    The dude who was invietnam during you know the war and shit.
    He calls me an insane clown.
    I guess I’ll take it as a compliment.

    ICP (INSANE CLOWN POSSE) LYRICS

    “Fuck The World”

    [Violent J]
    Fuck. Fuck this shit.
    Fuck givin it to me.

    [Chorus:]
    If I only could I’d set the world on fire
    If I only could I’d set the world on fire
    If I only could I’d set the world on fire
    Sya fuck the world! (Fuck the world!)
    If I only could I’d set the world on fire
    Fuck em all! (Fuck em all!)

    [Violent J]
    Fuck you, fuck me, fuck us
    Fuck Tom, fuck Mary, fuck Gus
    Fuck Darius
    Fuck the west coast, and fuck everybody on the east
    Eat shit and die, or fuck off at least
    Fuck pre-schoolers, fuck rulers
    Kings and Queens and gold jewelers
    Fuck wine coolers
    Fuck chickens, fuck ducks
    Everybody in your crew sucks, punk mother fucks
    Fuck critics, fuck your review
    Even if you like me, fuck you
    Fuck your mom, fuck your mom’s momma
    Fuck the Beastie Boys and the Dali Llama
    Fuck the rain forest, fuck a Forrest Gump
    You probably like it in the rump
    Fuck a shoe pump, fuck the real deal and fuck all the fakes
    Fuck all fifty two states! Oooo, and fuck you

    [Chorus X 2]

    [Violent J]
    Fuck Oprah, fuck opera, fuck a soap opera
    Fuck a pop locker and a cock blocker
    Fuck your girlfriend, I probably did her already
    Fuck Kyle and his brother Tom Petty, Jump Steady
    My homie, fuck him, what are you gonna do?
    (Fuck that bitch, fuck you!) Yeah well fuck you too
    Don’t bother tryin to analyze these rhymes
    In this song I say fuck ninety three times
    Fuck the president, fuck your welfare
    Fuck your government and fuck Fred Bear
    Fuck Nugent, like anybody gives a fuck
    You like to hunt a lot, so fuckin what?!
    Fuck disco, Count of Monte Crisco
    Fuck Cisco, and Jack and Jerry Brisco
    And fuck everyone who went down with the Titanic, in a panic
    I’m like fuck you, AHHHHH!!!!

    [Chorus X 2]

    [Violent J]
    Fuck Celine Dion and fuck Dionne Warwick
    You both make me sick, suck my dick
    Fuck the Berlin Wall, both sides of it
    And fuck Lyle Lovett, whoever the fuck that is
    Fuck everybody in the hemisphere
    Fuck them across the world, and fuck them right here
    You know the guy that operates the Rouge River draw bridge in Delray on
    Jefferson? FUCK HIM!
    Fuck your idea, fuck your gonnoreha
    Fuck your diarrhea, Rocky Maivia
    Fuck your wife, your homie did, he’s fuckin you
    Fuck the police and the 5-0 too
    Fuck Spin, Rolling Stone, and fuck Vibe
    Fuck everybody inside
    Whoever’s on the cover, fuck his mother
    Fuck your little brother’s homie from around the way
    And fuck Violent J!

    Like


  50. on August 21, 2010 at 6:28 am Gunslingergregi

    Time to ride.

    Like


  51. I got fake stuff all over my house and it’s just as pleasing as real. Besides, isn’t this an entertainment site? Heck, I mean it’s not like you’re a newspaper.

    Just re post the epic thread with a disclaimer at the top. “Sorry, we may have been burned on this piece, etc, blah blah. But it’s classic. And in this business we don’t cut classic — we stand by our fraud.”

    Remember, if you have to explain, you’re losing.

    out

    Like


  52. on August 21, 2010 at 8:01 am Anonymouses Anonymous

    @gunslingr:
    ICP is a bunch of posers. They copied The Disgruntled Clown and then had the nerve to sue him for copyright infringement. If they were for real, they would have jumped him and bea the crap out of him and taken the ID.

    Lawyers are for pussies.

    And, that leads us to:
    @Roissy:
    I understand the concern. Lawyers can shut an operation down faster than earthquake could topple the Chateau.

    You have a mission from God to help men reclaim their rightful place as the rulers of this planet. There is no need to waste your finances fighting a slander case. I hope to meet you in person, because you, along with the local lair, have helped me advance far beyond what the three main PUA sights could ever have.

    That gratitude demands i buy you a drink.

    Like


  53. lolzzzzz, shens it is.

    FWIW, the ‘Gender Genie’ spat ‘fem’ out when fed that post.

    Like


  54. Furthermore, why not just try to work out the bugs in your play than resort to the classic authoritarian punishment tactic: “Okay, someone’s been stealing the strawberry ice cream, so now nobody’s going to have a lunch break for the next two years.”

    This whole site is based on a hoax (or hoaxing women) anyway. See the 12 Commandments of Poon.

    Although funny and true, Poon is basically a guide to behavior modification. You modify your behavior using these techniques. And when the lessons become rote you will up the percentage of getting some number 10 poon tang standing over there rocking her jeans.

    In other words, you will have turned into a psychopath.

    Like


  55. on August 21, 2010 at 8:21 am Anonymouses Anonymous

    @gunsliner:
    “White dudes on blog as I have said before no game really needed to get black chicks they are drawn to your whiteness like white on rice.”

    Having dated several black women, and being I white guy, I can say with authority, “White men dating black women DO need game.”

    The game needed is different. White women will require you prove your worth before they will give you the attention. Afterward, they will be relatively chill.

    Black women will give a white guy attention, almost immediately, but will constantly shit test him to the Nth degree. They will test you to the point you can get upset at all the shit they give you. And, if you fail, they unload on you like an Tech9. Once you fail a black woman’s shit test, she has the upper hand on you and will not relent.

    Like


  56. Lets assume it is fake:

    The plan was to send a very believably written e-mail to Rossiy in hopes that he would post it, without leaving out the personal information so that… he might somehow leak it to her boyfriend?

    Seems like a very flimsy sabotage plan if you ask me.

    Like


  57. Actually, a believable hoax like that could play havoc with someone’s life. I was concerned last night and wanted to get to a PC to ask Roissy to take her identifying photos down.

    A guy working for a major investment bank in Boston a few years ago, got a new job at a competitor’s branch in Seoul, Korea. Obviously, his social life there was a lot better than it was in Boston. A lot better is an understatement. Boston is the feminism capital of the world.

    He wrote an email to 5 guys he had worked with at his previous company, basically tellling them, in detail, what the difference was in terms of his social life with women.

    The letter was no different than a field report on the posts and comments here on this blog.

    But only a few years ago there was no free speech on this topic…his email went viral, especially in the investment banking community. He was promptly fired, officially for using company email for private purposes.

    There should be a movement to sue the bank that fired him because, if a lesbian banker had written a private email to some friends about her great lesbian life in Boston, they wouldn’t have fired her (the suit would be thrown out but a per se action would be symbolic).

    He was fired for being a heterosexual who had finally found a decent place to date lots of friendly, beautiful women…and for daring to be proud of this.

    It wouldn’t look good for a woman to get fired because she respected Roissy’s opinion.

    Feminists would say that all women who respect Roissy should get fired.

    Like


  58. on August 21, 2010 at 9:15 am Too Soon Olde

    A person referring to herself as “Subject of the post” has written a number of frantic comments over the last few hours under the Obsidian Files post commenting on this Roissy post, explaining the situation and asking that the post be taken down. True or not, you decide, but until proven one way or the other, it is radioactive toxic waste.

    http://theobsidianfiles.wordpress.com/2010/08/20/studies-in-how-the-white-mans-ice-is-colder-relationships-game/#comment-15493

    Like


  59. Crap, I just realized who that girl is, based on a hunch from the description. Googled it and got verification. Almost certainly a hoax. The actual girl in question isn’t nearly stupid enough to do this, and she’s a good kid. Really, complete asshole whoever pulled this stunt, and not the good kind.

    Like


  60. Looks like the Chateau proprietor(s) have lost their edge, the famous mean streak. I suppose that comes with success. who knows what has happened behind the scenes – the flap must have had some influence on the decision to publish personal info. But I agree with the consensus – take down the pics and other identifying information: it’s worthwhile even in the abstract, even if made up, as a case study.

    However: over at the Obsidian post above, the purported “subject of the post” says, in a series of emotional comments, that it was indeed a hoax, that her Facebook acct was hacked after someone was searching for her over the Internet. If this is so, she probably e-mailed the Chateau as well with the same story. In which case they seem to have done the right thing.

    Like


  61. Antonio is right…
    Just remove her photos and change the names. It was a good post.
    I get that you don’t want to play the fool, but whatever, it was solid advice for others in similar situations.

    It’s too late now, you already posted the hoax and announced the death of the mailbag, so it’ll be dead for a while even if you come to your senses.

    [Editor: The hoax has been confirmed. Do readers understand the magnitude of this violation? It is severe. The Chateau has been used like a cat’s paw by either a bitter beta on the rampage or by a wicked trickster. Proprietors are fuming, as well they should be. Measures must be taken to prevent this from happening again.]

    Like


  62. what happened to the blog seasons of tumult and discord????

    Like


  63. We understand the magnitude of the violation. It came about because of your incautious assumption that reader emails are genuine. Treat them as hypothetical case studies henceforth, like everyone else with half a brain does.

    Your overreaction does not disguise your foolishness, it only compounds it with emotional incontinence.

    Like


  64. Urgent field report….
    ——————————

    Roissy as a follow up to Trial Texts…you should report on “Hail Mary Texts”

    These are texts that are by definition long shots….but like the originals save the day, from zero to hero.

    They work best on 8.5-10. I have tried them out on 3, 8-9s recently…

    After 1-2 weeks of email, txt banter, exchange of late nite photos, and some flaking on scheduled dates…..I delete ALL their contact info.

    Sure enough, they note this silence and respond with a Hey or What up.

    OK, here is the gold, my response:

    -?

    -who?

    -Who is this?

    They usually throw in a: me, c’mon, u rm’br?

    Then:

    “YOU DELeTED MY CONTACT ??????!!!??????????”

    somehow this is a smart bomb to their inner insecurity.

    They cannot fathom how a Man:

    -would not even give up .00001 bytes of storage space,
    -or add them to .0001% chance booty call list,
    -deleted a coveted ph # of a 9
    -or even have the balls to ask a 8.5-10 who r U?

    Key is to 100% delete their info. So when they txt u r not sure if its spam, bs, a 6 or a 9, or even a wrong number. When they call your relaxed, noncommittal tone is gold.

    Examples:

    -Cover girl Yoga instructor, she goes from 2 wks of silence, then txt, then calls in seconds…astounded, then books 3 dates & fucks

    -On a 30yo, 8; she calls after 3 wks, i feign getting a new iphone…she books 3 dates, bangs

    -one 25yo, 9, last night she txts, i give above txts, she furiously re-txts. She goes silent then send pic of beach at 8am. I return, miss me huh; send ur pic…morning puffiness precludes that.

    They love this shit…

    Like


  65. on August 21, 2010 at 10:28 am Gunslingergregi

    ”””Anonymouses Anonymous
    Black women will give a white guy attention, almost immediately””””

    That is what I am talking about.
    I ain’t talkin dating for years here.

    ””””Anonymouses Anonymous
    @gunslingr:
    ICP is a bunch of posers.
    ”””’
    Really?
    Fuck em I don’t care
    ain’t my group
    he he he

    Like


  66. The comment from Anonymous at 8:54AM directly above was mine. Technical glitch.

    Yes, this is serious enough that I can see the Chateau helping this woman get some justice if she wants it. The perpetrator could have seriously hurt this blog’s reputation if the original posting with photos had gone viral on Wall Street.

    Like


  67. HALT, HOAX has been confirmed? THERE MUST BE CONSQUENCES…………….I have to come back and read the entire thread! OMGosh!

    the below are my random thoughts before I knew this was the real deal:

    hmm, what kind of guy even writes in about this? to create drama in a hoax? I dont get it.

    so, on the girls part her status could have changed? social autism strikes me alot. was this is a outright lie on her part and does she know. uh, getting a headache. I think I better stick to my video games.

    with the web is that we essentially don’t know who anyone is. like when you posted all those economic graphs I thought, is this really VD?

    of course, not, but it crossed my mind.

    the email bag is gone then…can u utililize coco comment to link things better? I dont know…coco comment could assume a reader email bag like a forum.

    well, thanks to whoever ruined this for everyone.

    Like


  68. Looks like the Chateau proprietor(s) have lost their edge, the famous mean streak. I suppose that comes with success.

    Nah. It comes with a demented repulsive stalinist DR and scorned single mom LR siccing lawyers and “authorities” several months ago. Self-protection is why I suspect the operation diversified into multiple proprietors.

    And no edge was lost. The Chateau’s response to the purported letter-writer was compassionate, helpful, candid and wise, given the information in the fake letter.

    Like


  69. I don’t get why people are so pissed about his reaction. I’m pissed that this asshole ruined the reader mailbag, but somethings are more important to a man, like a code of honor, and not being used like a slut. He did the right thing, even if it sucks for the rest of us.

    Like


  70. on August 21, 2010 at 11:47 am Gunslingergregi

    ””””’
    Obsidian

    As soon as I got through the first paragraph, I recognized who wrote this letter; I won’t put her screename out on Front St., but those of you who are regular readers of Hooking Up Smart will know who I’m talking about. Thing is, what she was running down to Roissy wasn’t alien in any way to me. In fact, she had told me the very same thing, about seven months ago.

    You see, after writing a post about the importance location is to your Game, this young lady stepped to me, offlist, inquiring about very similar things-over the course of a LENGHTY email conversation, I might add. Of course at the time, no “CTO” was in the picture, but she was in the-then beginning stages of her relationship with Mr. Eastern Bloc, and whether she should go ahead with it or not. I won’t divulge any more than that, but suffice it to say, that she didn’t take heed to my words, and thought that Roissy’s take, such as it is, would be better.

    So be it.

    But, here’s the thing: we all know how Roissy feels about Black Women, or those he deems Black until he can ascertain for sure. In a word, not very highly-but that isn’t the worst part. The worst part is, that he is by no means alone. Does our young heroine honestly believe, that guys like Mr. CTO will ultimately choose her over Amy, Becky and Taylor? I mean, for the longhaul, now. Not a P&D-on the quiet?

    Roissy doesn’t think so, although he’s a bit too crafty to say so outright. But if you know him, and many here do, you can read between the lines in his response to our young lady. Simply put, not only is girlfriend outta her league to begin with, but when you toss in the fact that she looks Black, it’s all but certain that Mr. (White) Big ain’t likely to put a ring on it. And when you really think about it, why should he?

    If I may, here’s what I said back in Feb of this year:

    ”””””””””””””””’

    Looks like you pulled some old 7th grade shit. Just come clean lol

    Before it was black woman aren’t attracted to white men.
    Now on your blog it is black woman obsess about white men.
    Which the fuck is it?

    Like


  71. Self-protection is why I suspect the operation diversified into multiple proprietors.

    I believe Roissy’s allusions to writing of this blog being a multi-PUA operation are intended as tongue-in-cheek self-aggrandizement.

    Like


  72. “Editor: The hoax has been confirmed. Do readers understand the magnitude of this violation? It is severe. The Chateau has been used like a cat’s paw by either a bitter beta on the rampage or by a wicked trickster. Proprietors are fuming, as well they should be. Measures must be taken to prevent this from happening again.”

    Yeah, I get it. It’s some fucked up shit that not only messes with your credibility but also makes you look the fool. But what can you do? You caught it early, you retracted it immediately, and you’re taking steps to prevent it in the future. Done and done.

    Like


  73. Does anybody have a cached copy of the post?

    thanks!

    Like


  74. “to improve their love lives and find happiness”

    come on Roissy, do you really believe in that?

    Like


  75. Anonymous–

    RSS subscribe to this blog on Google Reader. Google has a cached copy. Not the comments though, which is a shame. Though you could have google subscribed to the comments of that post while it was still up, probably.

    Like


  76. I tried to call foul play, as little as ten comments into the thread, bjt my comment was mod’d and then deleted in less than one minute.

    Tolja so.

    Like


  77. This. I pointed out that Roissy was likely punked by ‘Miss Hypergamous in NYC’, on the other page. I was called retarded. I’m very bitter now. I going to post on ‘The Spearhead’. 😉

    — intp

    Like


  78. I am back. had to get my workout in, clean up, and read the thread…So about this hoax. I am pissed, completely pissed. At this time I desires stone cold justice in response to this utter and complete bullshittery.

    We need a AWCA, asap. (hint)

    There must be consquences…sure I adore mercy, love and all that. However, this was a wrong act – freaking hoax.

    Chateau’s/Citizen Rene’s response is just and fair…Maybe one day the mail bag can come back though. I had a list of stuff I was wondering about.

    Either way, I will continue to send your work around email to freinds and family who enjoy it. I am hoping they will start actively commenting and support the work…

    This hoax will only bring more support in due time. you know, turn lemons into lemonade.

    (note, I will change my category from “Roissy” to citizen renegade/chateau/roissy. I usually pick up some posts here and sing praises to them at my blog)

    Rock on and continue in your work!

    Like


  79. Good call.

    Have to admit the thought crossed my mind as I was reading the email that it could very well be a hoax because it set up an almost too picture perfect hyergamy-n-hamster scenario to be publicly flayed. Then I presently got lost in the witty response and that thought faded. But I’m not surprised it was a hoax.

    Like


  80. “Measures must be taken to prevent this from happening again.”

    Reader mailbag sans pictures oughta shield you, no?

    Like


  81. Just up on Instapundit:

    “‘Cougar’ Trend of Women Chasing Younger Men a Myth.”

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,599825,00.html

    Roissy’s worldview confirmed yet again.

    Women seek older, wealthier partners, men younger, prettier.

    Like


  82. on August 21, 2010 at 5:12 pm Gunslingergregi

    Makes sense original jb.
    No identifying information.
    Kind of like yea you might want.
    Other than that freeflow of ideas nice and cozy and shit.

    Pretend it is dear abby or some shit.

    Like


  83. on August 21, 2010 at 5:20 pm Gunslingergregi

    Point in this “hoax” though is that obsidian corroborated the story of the chick through past personnal emails with her in the past. Obsidian has knowledge of this woman. He said she sought out his advice from another blog. Then she told him she was gonna seek advice from roissy. So yea not a hoax.

    So really not a question of hoax but seems legitimate request for advice.

    And obsidian seems to have extensive knowledge of situation.

    Like


  84. Jerry

    IIRC the original letter had her living with the boyfriend. Lesson #2: Don’t ever live with the girlfriend. It might make her think she’s got you under her thumb while it will cramp your style in dating others. I have a date tonight and it wouldn’t be cool if I couldn’t take this new woman home because my girlfriend was living with me. Its not cool to have to take a date to a hotel because seeing that you live in a cool place is part of what they often want. Don’t cohabit.

    Ya, this is a tough trade off to weigh. I’m sending a live in back to another city today. She was my personal servant, and companion, and sex was on demand. So that’s a lot to give up just to keep an empty apartment. Especially when I don’t have a lot of dates lined up.

    So I’ll have to work on lining up dates.

    In the meantime, there seems to be a new applicant for position of personal servant, and you’re right – not a good idea to move her in.

    Like


  85. xspat =! xsplat. One of the trolling female parodists. actual xsplat is a lot smarter.

    Like


  86. @Ex-Chump

    “Self-protection is why I suspect the operation diversified into multiple proprietors.

    I believe Roissy’s allusions to writing of this blog being a multi-PUA operation are intended as tongue-in-cheek self-aggrandizement.”

    They said multi-headed, not multi-PUA. I see different writing styles in different posts (Game or MR/political).

    Like


  87. “Your overreaction does not disguise your foolishness, it only compounds it with emotional incontinence.”

    Call him foolish, call him incontinent, but it sure as hell is not an overreaction. It is the minimum that ethics and decency require.

    Like


  88. on August 21, 2010 at 7:41 pm Philosoraptor

    Please, bitch – this *post* is a hoax!
    You can still post reader mail if you just don’t use any incriminating info (e.g. pictures, names, etc.).
    Posting the pics was idiotic for legal reasons – unless you personally meet every person visibly identifiable in every pic and get their express (and documented) permission to use each pic, etc., you’re potentially liable, but otherwise you’re pretty safe. [I am NOT a lawyer, but I’m not an idiot either.]

    Like


  89. Not a lawyer (dropped out after failing the compulsory course on Feminism & the law in yr 1) but it would seem to me that whoever sent in those photos committed a serious AND CONSCIOUS breach of that young layd’s privacy, possibly even defamation. Much more serious than anything the Chateau has done. If caught, the hoaxer could be looking at exemplary or punitive damages. Not to mention a claim against them by the Chateau for fraudulent misrepresentation.

    Like


  90. What law school made you take a feminism and law class in 1L in the US?

    Like


  91. @dana- anplayer is from ireland. no idea why a school there would require a feminism class in yr 1. perverse, I agree.

    Like


  92. Even though the story was fake there is a reason why its struck a cord, this is a typical scenerio that is being played out by millions of women out there.

    Lessons were still learned and great advice was still given.

    Like


  93. @dana, maurice

    Compulsory sub-module of Legal Systems course. The compulsory project involved re-writing leading judgments (think our equivalent of yr Marbury v Madison) from a feminist point of view. I just couldn’t see the point..

    Like


  94. @anplayer, dana, SD- Marbury v. Madison was about judicial review, the precedent that the Supreme Court could nullify legislation if it was “unconstitutional”. What that has to do with feminism is not at all clear. To put it mildly. hmmm.

    Like


  95. @Maurice

    That was the point. The bloody judgments weren;t even about womens’ rights in the first place. That was when I realised feminists are inherently illogical.

    Like


  96. Hah hah, funny thing about them betas, they’re so damn resourceful that they’ll fuck everyone – women and alphas alike – over in the end.

    Good for the beta, striking back at the world.

    Sorry Roissy, but you’ve fucked over enough betas in your life, you’ve got no right to complain if one gets some retribution at your expense. How many times have gotten poon at beta expense? And don’t you consider cuckolding to be the equivalent of rape for men?

    Beta, in the Roissysphere, is only a “pussy” in relation to his success with women.

    But some betas can be devious bad boys in their own right, lol.

    There’s a whole lot of beta-karma coming to the world, I’m afraid.

    In the end, the Golden Rule applies: you get what you give.

    Like


  97. on August 21, 2010 at 9:48 pm Chris from Dublin

    Fuck betas.

    Fuck them upside down, inside out and sideways.

    I’m a fag, a happy gay alpha male. Why should str8’s hate us when they’ve got betas?

    ):((

    GRRRRR!

    Like


  98. Ask her to send you a picture holding a ‘I ❤ Roissy' sign as proof of authenticity.

    Like


  99. @sharpcool

    “There’s been a breach at the Chateau. Alert the Sûreté.”

    +1

    Like


  100. True, Maurice, I was having a stupid moment. I forgot my own name.

    And an addendum to my comment: it’s damned difficult to get a girl out of your house, sometimes. Tomorrow, tomorrow, tomorrow, creeps on in it’s petty pace, from day to day.

    Like


  101. @Bhetti

    Anyway, this blog could’ve very well been a collaboration from early on in its inception.

    No, there are definite changes in writing style, tone and attitude from day to day. Those things used to be consistent before.

    Like


  102. xsplat

    True, Maurice, I was having a stupid moment. I forgot my own name.

    And an addendum to my comment: it’s damned difficult to get a girl out of your house, sometimes. Tomorrow, tomorrow, tomorrow, creeps on in it’s petty pace, from day to day.

    the best way to get rid of an annoying girl in the house is to bring in another

    Like


  103. “the best way to get rid of an annoying girl in the house is to bring in another”

    Not really. That’ll just start a cat fight. Ever see girls in a cat fight? Drama drama.

    I did invite the girl to my apartment. Before we entered, I said, wait a minute, got to make a call. Ok, all clear. Then up at the apartment I reminded her that I’m living with a girl, and that it’s complicated because we aren’t romantic.

    It’s all about the frame. She said “no, that’s not complicated. That’s life”.

    I have never found any need to lie.

    The girl who is leaving knows all about this as well.

    Call me simple, but I ain’t stupid. Controlled drama works for me.

    Like


  104. xsplat

    “the best way to get rid of an annoying girl in the house is to bring in another”

    Not really. That’ll just start a cat fight. Ever see girls in a cat fight? Drama drama.

    all the time.
    one mans drama
    is another’s comedy

    Like


  105. I don’t know if other men have noticed this, but honesty is an attractive trait. It’s a statement of supreme confidence. You just couldn’t give a shit enough to bother lying. About anything.

    And if you don’t want to talk about it, you simply refuse to talk about it.

    Life can be simple.

    Like


  106. “one mans drama
    is another’s comedy”

    Good point.

    In some of the in-room catfights, I was openly beaming. And laughing.

    Good point. Good times.

    Like


  107. A big part of anger at multiple partners centers around the loss of intimacy that lies bring. It feels as a betrayal of trust – a bond broken.

    That can be avoided by the habit of truth and boundaries. Refuse to talk about what you do when out, if that makes things easier. Make it known you may fuck, or that you don’t see yourself as monogamous, and will fuck.

    The other thing that pisses girls off is publicly losing face. So be discreet.

    The actual fucking of other girls is painful for them, but if you handle the first two, you can get away with the third, for a while, at least.

    But lying and getting “caught” will just fuck things up big time. As it should.

    Not that I’ve never been unforthright or lied about where I was going at night, or that I had other girls. With one sweet 19 year old previously virgin I did. Seemed somehow more appropriate – she seemed so innocent and fragile. Just saying, honesty is an option a lot of guys never even consider, and the counter intuitive and surprising thing is that it is extremely viable.

    I much prefer it. And year by year I think it leads to greater life satisfaction.

    Like


  108. on August 22, 2010 at 3:25 pm Gunslingergregi

    ”””””””’xsplat
    I don’t know if other men have noticed this, but honesty is an attractive trait. It’s a statement of supreme confidence. You just couldn’t give a shit enough to bother lying. About anything.
    ”””””””

    And it can lead to shit that the peeps would have a hard time even imagining.
    Hell even I am shocked lol

    ””””””””Firepower
    xsplat

    “the best way to get rid of an annoying girl in the house is to bring in another”

    Not really. That’ll just start a cat fight. Ever see girls in a cat fight? Drama drama.

    all the time.
    one mans drama
    is another’s comedy
    ””””””””””

    Even sometimes for the same guy.

    he he he

    Like


  109. Roissy, when did you receive the message in question in your inbox? Just recently or several months ago?

    Like


  110. […] over 250 hits – by far the top referrer that day – from a Citizen Renegade post that has since been deleted. What the fuck did I […]

    Like


  111. […] Tagged dr laura, Identity theft, Laura Schlessinger, People, Radio, Steve Harvey, Talk radio, Tiger Woods I arose from my slumber this morning to find that over at Chateau Roissy, he/they have announced that they have taken down yesterday’s post, on the grounds that they have reason to believe it was a “hoax”. I’m pretty sure by now you’ve seen it, but in case you haven’t, you can check it out here. […]

    Like