Scaring A Girl Into Sexual Arousal

I have this fire- and waterproof safe at home. I store financial papers, love letters from past and former girlfriends, and backup hard drives in it. In other words, anything that I don’t want a girl I am dating to see, or to ever see.

Maxim #20: Do not ever reveal the details of your finances to a girlfriend or wife. Avoid getting joint accounts. As a man, you must draw a line in the sand separating money from love. If she balks, dump her.

Naturally, when girls come over and happen to notice the safe (it’s in a closet) they are curious about its contents. Most of them are usually savvy enough to refrain from asking me what’s inside while the relationship is still in its infancy. If a girl is champing at the bit that hard to discover my secrets so soon after starting to date, then she is likely an untrustworthy, self-aggrandizing prospect for the long term. If she asks after a couple of years, that’s more understandable. But she still won’t get to know.

There’s something else I keep in the safe. Since I know that a girl will sometimes ask, I have prepared for the eventuality.

GIRL: “Ooo, you have a safe. Um… so what’s in it?”

THE GRAVEN IMAGE U FAP TO: “The severed fingers of my enemies in a jar.”

GIRL: “Ha, ha, funny. No, seriously.”

At which point, and with a totally straight face, I open the safe and remove a jar of yellow red-ish liquid resembling formaldehyde containing severed fingers which I then show to her. The last time I did this, the girl screamed at the top of her lungs and fell backwards over my couch, bruising her shin on my coffee table in the process.

You can get realistic looking novelty severed fingers at any online magic shop.

Later that night, we copulated with a ferocity that would have made wild boar sex seem tender in comparison. She never asked to see what was in the safe again.

So, yes, there does appear to be a direct line of connection between the fright neurons and the vagina neurons in girls’ brains. Stimulate one, and the other kicks out reflexively. (During foreplay, girls are often frightened — and cross-eyed — when I whip out my enormous offshore drill.)

Surprising girls with pranks is also an effective arousal state inducer. The girl in this video might have been pissed for an hour after she was victimized by her boyfriend’s prank, but I guarantee he had the best sex of his life that night.





Comments


  1. If married and both are working, separate bank accounts is the way to go. You have to make it equitable: I make more than my wife so I pay for the mortgage and all utilities, while she just pays for childcare and groceries.

    I think my wife and I have a pretty strong marriage in comparison to other couples we know, but if we were fighting over my wife’s stupid purchases to a shared account, I doubt we’d still be married.

    Even adjusting for our different incomes, I pay for a lot more of our joint expenses out of my account than she does, but its worth the peace of mind. Everytime she spends $200 on clothes she doesn’t need, or makeup her friends are selling her, I don’t worry about it. Her inability to save ANY money whatsoever has also been an excellent source of hand for me in the relationship.

    Like


  2. This is why it pays to read the Twilight series, no matter how dumb and immature you think it is.

    Women want a guy to represent imminent danger.

    Just the other day I met an 18 year old at a party and we ended up hitting it off and sitting next to each other (my age is offset by being 6’2″ and by working out a lot).

    I told her when she constantly leaned into me, that her natural scent was drawing me wild and, like Edward in Twilight, I wanted to “eat her” (double meaning in English but not necessarily in her language). I repeated more lines that Edward used in the series.

    This only caused her to lean in more.

    On the first real date we walked alone in the forest and I repeated, as we constantly stopped so I could bury my face in her neck, that I wanted to ravage her “but would never hurt you”. She said that I was the most romantic guy she’d ever met.

    Go figure.

    The young ones want a dark, brooding, dangerous “Edward” moe than a muscle-bound “Jacob” who loves her.

    I should have learned this 25 years ago when I was in grad school and a woman told me she did not need me to walk her home because “I’d like for some rapist to jump out of the bushes and ravage me”. She had seen me as a Beta gentleman. I knew nothing about game back then and, unfortunately, did not learn from that humiliating put-down.

    Game is everything and this “seem dangerous” element can be part of it.

    Like


  3. I keep an entire room in my apartment that is out of bounds to even my full scale local girlfriend. I’ve told her that I don’t want the formaldehyde of the press board furniture there to waft into the rest of the apartment. I do this because

    A) I’m storing the suitcase of my other main girlfriend there now and

    B) Some day she may surprise me by dropping by (even though she is not allowed to just drop by) and I may have to hide another woman in that room who knows about her.

    Like


  4. Ahahaha, this is the best blog ever.

    Like


  5. Fear of the unknown doesn’t have to be that shocking.

    Fear can be bringing her out of her comfort zone in some way.

    Sometimes in my Latin dance class, new girls will say “I’m a bit scared, I’ve never tried this before.”

    I say, “But the things that scare us are also very exciting aren’t they?”

    After that, they usually want to keep dancing or chatting. The major IOI’s are there, brushing of hair, heartbeat is accelerated.

    This is something I’m learning to amplify in some way.

    Like


  6. thats funny… I’ve tried something like that as well. I have this really big pickle jar full of alcohol and I drop mice into it that get stuck in glue traps I leave in the backyard (also some small toads and tiger beetles and stuff). Then when I bring a girl back to my place the first thing I do (after removing shoes, washing hands etc and sitting on my sweet cherry red futon) is to start pouring from the jar her a drink into a large tumbler. Look on their face is priceless, intrigued afraid and damn submissive after thtat, but a caveat is that these kinds of tactics rarely work on a group of girls. She’s gotta be alone.

    Like


  7. I think women are naturally turned on by violence because we’re looking for protectors. Straight to caveman days, basically.

    I agree about keeping finances private. Whether you’re making a little or a lot, keep it to yourself and show that you’re in control of your personal issues. No one needs to hear you bitching about how little money you have or bragging about how much you earn – both reek of insecurity.

    Yay for keeping women in the dark on some things… back to the strong, silent type.

    Like


  8. As the above comment eluded to, frightened is just another form of excitement.

    Like


  9. OK.. I do not want to spam this post, but here is a question that I would like feedback on. What do you think is the median numbers of sexual partners for a 30-year old woman who lives in an urban area of north-america or western europe?

    http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/what-is-their-real-number/

    I am asking this question for one simple reason. There are too many studies that are outdated, lowball that number or inflate that number. What is your objective and educated guess, given what you NOW know about the true nature of women.

    Like


  10. My husband once got in a fistfight with his brother in our living room

    i looked up at them from cringing and saw my husband standing over his bro with a 10 lb weight in his hand, about to smash him–i was terrified and screaming NO! DONT! STOP! but i have to admit he looked like a god to me–his shoulders looked really broad, there was a shiny aura around him and like cartoon glings were coming off of him i was shocked to discover how attracted i was to him at that moment

    Like


  11. and yes.. inducing those emotional states (stress, anger, fright, humiliation, fear of getting caught) in women does make them want you more. Sad but true!

    Like


  12. THE GRAVEN IMAGE U FAP TO: “The severed fingers of my enemies in a jar.”

    Dude, that is fucking funny. I burst out laughing. How in the world do you think this shit up?

    Like


  13. on August 23, 2010 at 12:22 pm Chris from Dublin

    Funnily enough this typa game doesn’t work I’m fag-land. Also the fag can be totally open about his $ situation.

    But I can see how this is so very important in breeder world. Basically essential in fact.

    Roissy, WTF ARE you?? You wouldn’t happen to be Bill Clinton?

    Like


  14. on August 23, 2010 at 12:36 pm Gunslingergregi

    I actually have the internet capability to see the video.

    funny shit.

    I saw why he did it though.

    That house/appartment was fucked up.

    Clothes and shit everywhere. wtf.

    Bitch get to cleaning.

    Like


  15. Just a random thought.

    I was with a group of 20-somethings this weekend (me, mid-30’s). Most of them were women.

    Why is it that men always talk about and do more interesting things than women? Men do more. Men get out more. They have adventures. Real adventures. They go to wars, invent shit, come up with new ideas.

    Women seem to just sit around and gossip and talk about people. Really, why is this?

    They have more to say and are just more interesting. The company of males is just more interesting.

    And the only two interesting women all weekend said exactly the same thing. It’s the basic reason why they prefer the company of men.

    Sad.

    Like


  16. There are a some negatives associated to meeting a girl through a cold approach as opposed to meeting her through friends. One of them is that she may not trust you and is worried that she may end up dead in a ditch somewhere. But this fear also works to your advantage in that the excitement turns her on.

    There’s a bar near me that I like to take women on first dates. All it says is ‘Bar’ over the door and there’s a long walk through a dark hallway to get to the interior of the bar. That long hallway is somewhat scary and it turns women on because she doesn’t know me well enough to trust me yet.

    Eric

    Like


  17. on August 23, 2010 at 12:44 pm Middle Greek Letter

    Apropos of fire safes, make sure your “fire safe” is actually “heat safe”. A lot of fire safes will keep the fire out, sure, but will still allow the internal air temperature inside the safe get beyond the flash point of paper (and will certainly ruin most magnetic media).

    Better all around solution is a safe deposit box, and a lawyer on retainer.

    Like


  18. on August 23, 2010 at 12:45 pm Gunslingergregi

    I like the finger thing.

    Course my claim to fame is having seen where millions of people died in an upclose and personnal way.

    The only problem for me is it is true.

    Like


  19. on August 23, 2010 at 12:51 pm Gunslingergregi

    But yea pussy always fantastic after some near death shit except for the one time it was like fucking an airplane hanger. That was just wierd. Although yea I still felt hard though and finished and then just told her to get me another woman and she did.

    Like


  20. on August 23, 2010 at 12:52 pm Chris from Dublin

    “itsa ma boyfriendsa pubesa ona ma face”

    Brilliant!

    Notice something? How hot the chick is and what a douchebag he is? Nevertheless he just totally pissed on her with that! Very good and totally unapologetic. Great sex with chafing followed soonafter.

    Like


  21. Fear is useful. Hence scary movies.

    Also discomfort and novelty.

    All the same process.

    Like


  22. on August 23, 2010 at 12:56 pm The Rational Male

    New girlfriend was at my place one night soon after we started dating.

    I was cooking dinner and I grabbed my chef’s knife and steel out of the drawer. She was in the living room and I walked around the corner to ask her a question as I was drawing the knife along the steel to sharpen it.

    The combination of seeing me swing the knife along with the “sching, sching” of the knife hitting the steel made her eyes as wide a saucers.

    Scared the hell out of her for the ten seconds I was standing there looking like I might be getting ready to carve her to bits. Might have to try that one again, this time on purpose.

    Like


  23. Why is it that men always talk about and do more interesting things than women? Men do more. Men get out more. They have adventures. Real adventures. They go to wars, invent shit, come up with new ideas.

    Women seem to just sit around and gossip and talk about people. Really, why is this?

    This is answered by PA maxim no. 2, which was buried in mod over the weekend:

    Men have biographies.
    Women have grandchildren.

    Like


  24. on August 23, 2010 at 12:59 pm The Rational Male

    Gorby-

    “Fear is useful. Hence scary movies.”

    Chicks LOVE horror movies.

    Studies have shown that if you are watching a horror flick with a woman you can make her more attracted to you simply by the way you react to the movie.

    Like


  25. on August 23, 2010 at 1:07 pm aspiratingonreality

    UGH @ Gunslingergregi…

    And….

    I don’t need to know everything about everything in my relationship. Truth is, there is freedom in not knowing every darn thing. Then I don’t have to waste a bunch of time trying to label it “under control” or “not under control”. The “safe” and it’s contents aren’t so much a funny joke, as they are an ability to understand the true nature of the creature in your bed without having to listen to her “explain herself” to you (for hours).

    I like to be thrilled, I like it a lot!

    Like


  26. Chris from Dublin

    “Notice something? How hot the chick is and what a douchebag he is? ”

    If you look at their videos, the chick comes off more as a douchebag.

    Like


  27. Men have biographies.
    Women have grandchildren.

    I like that. Well stated, well stated.

    Like


  28. on August 23, 2010 at 1:15 pm Anonymouses Anonymous

    I just scare them by talking about Barack, Pelousi, and Reid.

    Like


  29. Jerry

    I met an 18 year old at a party and we ended up hitting it off (my age is offset by being 6’2″ and by working out a lot).

    here’s the kind of game
    money just can’t buy

    Like


  30. ok, I got another maxim but it ain’t mine. pulled it from Vincent Ignatius blog:

    socializing is to women what fighting is to men.

    Gorb, this would explain why women don’t go out and DO interesting things. socializing, gossiping and status-jockeying IS a woman’s biography, war, invention and adventure.

    Like


  31. on August 23, 2010 at 1:19 pm Robert Seymour

    That woman is not turned on. She’s pissed. Scaring women turns them on. Pissing them off does not.

    Like


  32. […] (23/08/2010):  re contents of Cabinets of Curiosities, Severed Fingers are so noughtie(s). Why not go a little bit further and try a  Hand of Glory?  The combination of […]

    Like


  33. That’s fucking hilarious…

    Like


  34. This would explain orgasm during rape.

    Like


  35. AnonyMouse

    This would explain orgasm during rape.

    you don’t
    have a clit
    in your anus

    Like


  36. on August 23, 2010 at 1:48 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    GBFM here 2 answer all yer quetssiosnssosnso??? quetsions lozlzozzo

    “Gorbachev
    Just a random thought.

    I was with a group of 20-somethings this weekend (me, mid-30′s). Most of them were women.

    Why is it that men always talk about and do more interesting things than women? Men do more. Men get out more. They have adventures. Real adventures. They go to wars, invent shit, come up with new ideas.

    Women seem to just sit around and gossip and talk about people. Really, why is this?

    They have more to say and are just more interesting. The company of males is just more interesting.

    And the only two interesting women all weekend said exactly the same thing. It’s the basic reason why they prefer the company of men.

    Sad.

    lozozozlzloz

    this si because men get their wealth and riches form teh world

    women get their welath and riches from men lzozlzolzozlz

    dat is whyde federal reserve funded teh feminist movement as ben bernke employs millions of womenz to take riches and moneyz form menz and give bernanke and his goldman sax rhymes iwth tucker max firneds a cut zlozzlozlzozlzozozzlzo

    dat is why bernanke and his firensds lzozozozlz give mwomenz lotsa fiat dollars and paper mbas and paper law degres worth as much of teh fiat cash and come up with new legalisma dn laws to take money and welath form men as en bernkae and his goldman sax friends just creat paper out of thisn air debt and the desperately need to transofrm it into qelath and physical porperty via the feminsit gossiping bitching police state zlozzlozozozozozo

    ya bernake know that all women do is sit around and gossip gossip gossip and fund and fuck and publish and promotte and repate the lies of secretiev tapers of butthex lzozlzzzozzoozo who fuck girls in the butt and tape it with out their contehnt. bernanke and neoocn control freak buttox botox friends his friends know that this is what owmen ar efundamamhetaly like and so they give them lead positions at tehir neocon magaiznes and lead positions and a their publishing houses to fund assockers, deouls the rising genration of womenz and teahc them to rip their ftehuthes out of their womnds and tempt and temp an d take and tak tempt men with short skirts and smiles and sell them a subprime bernake loan lzozzoozlzozozozlz tapers of butthex

    lzozoozlz

    happy to answer your quetsion!!!

    this si because men get their wealth and riches form teh world

    women get their welath and riches from men lzozlzolzozlz

    Like


  37. I took a Love Systems bootcamp this weekend. Judging myself and my progress in the past year in relation to the instructor-provided example of strong game, I concluded that nothing helped me unfuck myself more than reading Roissy during that time.

    But I won’t be running out and buying fake fingers. Just sayin’.

    Like


  38. YOU, however
    DO have a clit
    in your anus

    Like


  39. @AnonyMouse

    This would explain orgasm during rape.

    34 year-old woman I was with a few years ago had been sexually assaulted when she was 21. She was raped by a man she’d just met. It was relatively violent, as she described it to me.*

    She was fucked up about sex for a decade before she met me. Until she met me and the guy immediately before me, she’d had a problem: The biggest, most powerful orgasms she’s ever had were with the guy who assaulted her. She said they were mind-blowing, even though she was terrified. She said she had several, and for 10 years, she couldn’t reproduce the experience, even with masturbation.

    She was really fucked up about this before I met her.

    Other than that, she had no hangups that I experienced.

    * As a note, I’ve heard only 2 stories of sexual assault from women I’ve been with; not scientific, but most were comfortable talking. Of the entire number, then, this is a tiny percentage – a miniscule fraction. Sexual assault seems to be a lot less common, talking to women I know or have been with, than appears in the media.

    Like


  40. A prankster says what? At the beginning he says “my roomate” is getting ready to go out tonight. He’s a beta pussy LJBF boy pranking her to “get back” at her for not fucking him. He never saw two hairs of that pussy in his life.

    Like


  41. I took a girl to a bonfire out in the country this past weekend. I got bored of the people sitting and talking about bullshit.

    So I made my way towards the grassy field with my girl walking behind me. She was a little scared at first, but my protective aura I displayed put her at ease really fast.

    She started walking out further than me. So I hid in the tall grass. Then I ran out behind her and tackled her.

    Then I spit out “you know, horror stories happen like this” with my hands gripping her arms. She was slightly worried, then I just hugged her and laughed about it.

    Then I bit her. She smacked me lightly. I spanked her. She grabbed my chest and made out with me. Then … yeah. You know the rest.

    Like


  42. Evan

    But I won’t be running out and buying fake fingers. Just sayin’.

    superlative move – plus, don’t post too quickly after greatboobsformen when we’re on the board together either.

    Like


  43. That was a good prank. I’ve never seen that one before.

    Like


  44. chateu inc.

    You can get realistic looking novelty severed fingers at any online magic shop.

    do you have any
    that DON’T look like
    they came off of lilgrl?

    Like


  45. @Gorbachev

    Did she report the guy to the police?

    I’m wondering if this kind of thing is why the crime is under-reported.

    Like


  46. that is totally juvenile, in a bad way. what if the girl wears contacts?

    Like


  47. on August 23, 2010 at 3:01 pm gunslingergregi

    ”””””Schmoe
    A prankster says what? At the beginning he says “my roomate” is getting ready to go out tonight. He’s a beta pussy LJBF boy pranking her to “get back” at her for not fucking him. He never saw two hairs of that pussy in his life.
    ”””””’

    Good catch and might explain the shitty living conditions.

    If I wanted to live like that I’d be single he he he

    Like


  48. Chateau

    Maxim #20: Do not ever reveal the details of your finances to a girlfriend or wife. Avoid getting joint accounts. As a man, you must draw a line in the sand separating money from love. If she balks, dump her.

    Absolutely right. Also no joint credit cards. And never lump sum pay off any of her educational debt etc.

    Keep financial power. It’s not enough but it matters. It’s also far more alpha. Having hand always is.

    Share with her but do it on a case by case basis, not carte blanche. That’s entitlement, which she doesn’t deserve.

    Like


  49. Pupu–

    I agree. I’d never do that talcum power practical joke. What a mess it made, far beyond her just having to take another shower.

    I don’t think Roissy wrote this post. Or maybe the other one today either.

    Like


  50. on August 23, 2010 at 3:04 pm gunslingergregi

    Maybe that is why I do well in ltr’s

    The woman know I really really need them.

    Maybe they feel their work is meaningfull.

    Like


  51. Of course, another option is to actually be dangerous (as opposed to pretending).

    Like


  52. i’ve found
    the best way to scare Asian girlfriend
    is tell her my 401k
    went belly up

    Like


  53. Bruce Wayne’s dad was actually performing some marriage game on Mrs. Wayne to try and scare her into arousal by hiring a degenerate to mug them in the alleyway, but the plot went awry and he got doublecrossed by the mugger and they both got shot. Lesson as always, don’t get married.

    Like


  54. on August 23, 2010 at 3:46 pm gunslingergregi

    lol heman.

    I have seen that look back before.

    They must teach them that shit.

    Like


  55. Like


  56. on August 23, 2010 at 3:56 pm Just A Horny Dude

    Ugh, no. That guy probably slept on the couch that night. Roissy, you seem to forget that lots of chicks are just bitches. They can’t take a joke; they certainly do not like to be the butt of jokes. My guess is that the guy is a “beta” whose pasive aggressiveness led him to this, admittedly funny, prank. But it sure didn’t lead him to “the best sex of his life” that night. C’mon, Roissy, you know that what works for an alpha won’t work for a beta.

    Like


  57. Gorbechev–

    She was fucked up about sex for a decade before she met me. Until she met me and the guy immediately before me, she’d had a problem: The biggest, most powerful orgasms she’s ever had were with the guy who assaulted her. She said they were mind-blowing, even though she was terrified. She said she had several, and for 10 years, she couldn’t reproduce the experience, even with masturbation.

    It sounds to me like she was aching for BDSM play, without knowing it.

    Like


  58. @Firepower

    don’t post too quickly after greatboobsformen when we’re on the board together either.

    why? went over my head.

    Like


  59. @Doug1
    Gorbechev–
    She was fucked up about sex for a decade before she met me. Until she met me and the guy immediately before me, she’d had a problem: The biggest, most powerful orgasms she’s ever had were with the guy who assaulted her. She said they were mind-blowing, even though she was terrified. She said she had several, and for 10 years, she couldn’t reproduce the experience, even with masturbation.

    It sounds to me like she was aching for BDSM play, without knowing it.

    Possibly. She wasn’t into rough sex; she was pretty calm and collected and liked the lights off. Romantic, too.

    But she’d had some moment with her previous BF, and could finally have orgasms the way she wanted to. She said for 10 years, it had been immensely frustrating; she’d felt guilty and had fantasies about being raped, and been disgusted with herself, but had no idea how to repeat it. When I was with her, she no longer had this problem.

    She suspected it was some sort of internal block. No idea what it was; maybe it was a trust thing? The other men she’d had sounded pretty gentle, beta-types; the previous BF was a hard-assed biker type, and I was in my prime Game mode when she met me. So maybe she developed a taste for bad boys.

    It’d be interesting to see where she finds herself now.

    Like


  60. “Maxim #20: Do not ever reveal the details of your finances to a girlfriend or wife. Avoid getting joint accounts. As a man, you must draw a line in the sand separating money from love. If she balks, dump her.”

    Good advice. But not the first maxim #20. . .

    “Roissy Maxim #20: The gina tingle is the principal moral code to which women subscribe. All other moral considerations pale in comparison.”

    Link: http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/reader-mailbag-marriage-independence-day-edition/

    Like


  61. on August 23, 2010 at 4:55 pm gunslingergregi

    name

    Any bitch did that pan shit to me is gonna get her ass whooped like a man right there and then done.

    But yea hopefully people aren’t trying the shit in their own homes. I mean I would want my woman to feel safe around me.

    When I pick her up and toss her around like a medicine ball she doesn’t get hurt.

    If you have any frustration with your woman take them out during sex.

    Break a bed or pelvis she knows that is physical time. Some off the wall shit fuck that.

    Like


  62. Gorbachev, I read some legit testimonials from rape victims, and they usually have two kinds of psychological sequels: one is the need of violent sex, as you mentioned and the other is to not refuse any request of sex from any man that asks.

    Like


  63. on August 23, 2010 at 5:19 pm Philly beer guy

    Two comments about this post:

    1. Even though she is an attractive under-25, presumably with options, the guy who pranked his girlfriend in that clip is now engaged to her, after asking via a different prank (the video is also on Break.com and YouTube, but I can’t find it).

    2. In the middle of a fight with my then-girlfriend, I smashed a running table fan to bits with my bare hands, bloodying them in the process. We had incredible sex that night; the next morning she told me that she had never been hotter for me.

    Like


  64. @ philly beer guy
    1. So… he wins but really loses? Pyrrhic victory in getting engaged to that girl.
    2. Rihanna and Em’s video with Megan Fox and Charlie would agree.

    Like


  65. Girlfriend pranks definitely FTW.

    One I do to filter out nuts to see if they’re worth keeping around: put really crazy shit in your medicine cabinet. Fruitbat women always do a medicine cabinet check. If you put something really weird in there, they’ll, well, they’ll have something to keep their hamster wheel spinning just about forever. Some of ’em will actually bring it up; you should dump those.

    I’m not going to tell what I keep in mine: secrets of the guild and all, but do feel free to use your creativity.

    Like


  66. @ gorb: “Why is it that men always talk about and do more interesting things than women? “

    Probably because women are literally dumber than men. It’s rarely said, but perhaps it should be:

    http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/untimely-observations/on-the-intellectual-capacity-of-women/

    I think women’s intelligence is vastly overrated. They’re charming and nice and all, but most of them are as dumb as a box of rocks.

    Like


  67. “enormous offshore drill”

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    Like


  68. Tell me about it. I got Nicole and Aoefe obsessed. I am sure LILGRL is interested in me too. Too bad for Epoxy, can’t even AMOG me on the internet.

    Like


  69. love the post. When I can pull a girl back to my place and she gets too comfortable ill say, “look at u gettn all comfortable, u don’t kno me yet, how can u trust that I’m not gonna tie you up, cut u in pieces and throw you in the rivahh.”. Tingles follow

    Like


  70. the girl is an outright bitch, her “pranks” involve hitting him and laughing like a hyena and her reactions to his pranks are bitching like crazy.

    Like


  71. Like


  72. on August 23, 2010 at 7:17 pm Snowflakes love Roissy

    This whole post was some 3rd grade sh*t.

    Who do you date, Roi? Tweens?

    Like


  73. Do men and women like violence for nostalgia? It reminds us of caveman days? It’s in our DNA?

    Kind of like the same reason we feel more at ease surrounded by animals and greenery.

    Like


  74. on August 23, 2010 at 7:43 pm gunslingergregi

    namae nanka

    Yea I am thinking obviosly it is consensual.

    What man gonna get attacked from out of nowhere and respond by fucking getting up and whining like a bitch.

    Dangerous for hos to see shit like that because someone gonna get fucked up in about a millisecond in real life.

    You want to turn a mans switch to animal understand playing with fire.

    Like


  75. Just saw two really bad Hollywood films as camrips. They weren’t worth my time despite being free of charge to see.

    I’ll start with “Scott Pilgrim”. Its a teenage angst film about a young loser with a high pitched voice who never bothered lifting weights, getting a haircut, buying clothes worthy of anyone in the middle class or learning game…inside of some strange video game sequence that caused me to fast forward through 90% of the film. In the end and despite doing nothing except run around with a lot of Angst, he gets the “out of his league” girl whom he put on a platform the entire film. No game displayed. No improvement in his appearance achieved. The whole film is pure trash, nihilistic. Don’t waste any time with this. Its not even worth fast forwarding through.

    And yet it was the kind of Southern California male teenage loser crap most of us were raised with and which taught us NOTHING about how to really behave with women.

    The other was the new Jennifer Anniston film (Better Than Friends is the English title I presume) about a Super Beta in his late thirties in love with his LJBF best friend, played by Anniston, but apparently not having had the guts to tell her this while she rode the carousel of other men beyond her fertile years into her late thirties.

    The plot is that she decides to get artificially inseminated before menopause hits. He volunteers his sperm.

    But she tells him his genetics aren’t good enough!

    And he still loves her after this. I had to go barf at this point.

    Anyway, she picks an athletic guy to be the donor. But the “hero” gets drunk and switches his sperm and the donors (after masturbating to a photo of Diane Sawyer from Good Morning America – this is a feminist chic flick if you haven’t noticed).

    Seven years later she must be 45. The donor, who looks like he is in his early 30s, is courting her and wants to marry her. The Super Beta loves her as much as ever as well, even though he’s gotten successful and looks a lot better.

    Her child is his biologically and the plot revolves around his trying to tell her this while bonding with the kid.

    No mention is made about how this would set him up for about $200,000 in child support including back support.

    There is a “happy end” as the donor is thwarted in his proposal attempt to the 45 year old woman.

    She punches the hero when she finds out she was basically raped by the sperm switch 7 years before, but weeks later she comes to him to say everything is OK. He marries her….the end.

    I guess this film was worth it in terms of it showing the depths of hamster rationalizing that older American women are now going through where oldies like Julia Roberts, Cam Diaz, Meryl Streep and Jennifer Anniston are playing menopausals whom the best looking males are supposedly still chasing in multiples.

    All of these chic flicks feature the menopausal having two great looking suitors chasing her (Bridget Jones is yet another example of this bullshit).

    I also saw The Expendables tonight. It had good action sequences but I’d also advise against paying any money for it as it promoted blind chivalry in several scenes.

    Like


  76. […] didn’t I think of that,” I present to you the funniest video since yesterday, via Roissy. Categories: Arcana Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment […]

    Like


  77. The theme of the new Jennifer Anniston film “Better Than Friends,” like “When Harry Met Sally,” is that young women can ride the carousel as long as possible because, in case they fail in getting the man they really want, their LJBF Beta male friends will “come through” in the end as a safety net and marry them and give them kids before menopause.

    It says to women “get yourself a decent beta worshipper as a backup in your life (and wreck his dreams, of course, if you get a better offer and don’t need the backup).”

    In “The Expendables” Vin Diesel’s character comes home to find his girlfriend sleeping with another man. It *his* fault she says, because he is always off fighting bad guys around the world. Later Vin learns that the new guy has beaten this woman. He then risk jail by beating the guy to a pulp along with the rest of the guy’s basketball buddies. Its Hank Moody all over again.

    Like


  78. Gun, You want to turn a mans switch to animal understand playing with fire.

    Correct. In the case of the prankish couple, one of them will end up dead, one day. Hedge your bets.

    Like


  79. I thought the Expendables was fun to watch with the old guys having a last hurrah and all. I thought the approach of the Expendable to women was awful. Women on pedestals and women were a man’s ticket to being a full human. Just the short of thing I was raised with. And, which has blighted my life. Not kidding. Ugh.

    I loved Scott Pilgrim. That femme fatal reminded me of a lady I spent a lot of time with several years ago. Made me nostalgic. Pilgrim is at least original.

    But, I think by now we should know that movies don’t reflect reality, at all.

    But, they give us a window into the the psychology of the target audience. We should watch these films and learn. A girl who wanted to manipulate beta nerds, for example, might get some pointers from watching Scott Pilgrim. (Look freakish but sexy, and exude an air of mystery.)

    On the other hand, a girl who wanted to manipulate a “tough guy” could copy the M.O. of the ladies in The Expendables. Sexy babes, independent and tough, but in need of protection from bad men.

    Maybe, we guys should suck it up, and go see Chick Movies. We might not like what we see. We might look weird and stand out. We might scoff and mock. But, guys, it is what it is.

    The truth might make you free, but it will rarely make you happy.

    Like


  80. I do miss the herb sightings.

    Like


  81. The brain part which processes violence is next to the brainpart which processes sex. There for sure exist some shortfuses

    Like


  82. on August 23, 2010 at 10:34 pm David Collard

    Speaking of films, my wife and I were watching Slumdog Millionaire last night. There is a scene in which the young hero tries to help his old love escape from her situation. She is living with a gangster in a huge palatial home. It is implied that he has hit her. The gangster comes home; changes the TV channel from the program she was watching; and tells her to make him a sandwich (which she does with a great lack of skill.)

    The impression the filmmakers apparently intend to create is that she would be just dying to run away from the gangster brute with the penniless slumdog. I said to my wife that I suspected that in real life she would much prefer to stay with the gangster.

    Like


  83. Women (and everyone else) want to feel alive.

    Fear makes you feel alive.

    Like


  84. on August 23, 2010 at 10:57 pm David Collard

    Nothing gets my wife wetter than a good spanking. It has a lot to appeal to the female psyche: dominance, fear, pain, humiliation.

    We live rather safe lives these days, and I think a lot of women do crave something a bit more red-blooded.

    Like


  85. david what happened to blk&german?

    Like


  86. Sev, in some tomes this feeling of being alive is called a peak experience. Grass is greener, everything is more vivid, every detail surrounding you, you can perceive in a crystal clarity… you get the pic. However, fear does not seem to trigger it, except the adrenaline rush. The state of mind triggered by fear may be closest to peak experience state, as if by one foot in the door looking inside. Not the thing, just a glimpse.

    No one knows what is the mechanism of peak experience, it is so rare that an individual may not have one throughout the whole life. Some say turning off the internal dialogue for a few hours may be how to get there… but that is nearly impossible–try not to think of anything for 5 minutes (let alone temporarily relegate internal hamsters on vacation!). 😉

    The literature mentioned men having this experience, not aware of any women. Yea, hamsters. Thus women need some white cane (like fear) to get at least their foot into the door and take a peek.

    Like


  87. on August 23, 2010 at 11:36 pm David Collard

    chic noir

    Good question. She commented for a while at The Thinking Housewife and The Spearhead as Vanessa. I had a couple of private email exchanges with her. Then I heard nothing further. I assume that life took over, and she has left the blogosphere. She still has some material up at Complementarian Marriage:

    https://sites.google.com/site/complementarianmarriage/

    I miss her. I learned a huge amount from her, about myself and about marriage. She used a range of pennames (Alte, Black&German, Cecilia, Vanessa). I think she had a very good and unusual mind for a woman.

    Like


  88. “Ape days”, as Mystery referred to it.

    A alpha male ape is something to be feared for martial reasons. Female apes probably also feel some fear around an alpha male ape. That vaginatingleceptor that the Chateau has hypothesized about is probably latently tripped by scary displays of potential savagery.

    Lots of women seem to like Horror movies where the point is to get scared.

    ————————————————————————-

    By the way for the Chateau,
    A man’s “Survival Value” is damaged post-divorce-theft,

    but a woman’s “Replication Value” is not damaged post-divorce theft.

    That hit me in Mystery-Method-E-book terms the other night. That book he wrote really does have most all of the keys to the Cardinal’s cabinet therein, just in a somewhat remote language—hidden in plain sight

    Like


  89. @Morsellaux

    >try not to think of anything for 5 minutes

    I can and have done this many times. I consider it a form of centering/meditation, and it renders me very aware of my body and my sensory inputs. As a writer, it’s damned useful. Never done it for hours, though.

    I’ll turn off the internal dialogue for an extended period of time this Wednesday, and report back on what I find. (If I fail, I will report failure.)

    Like


  90. This may explain why teenage girls love horror flicks. Get’s them aroused that some male killer is around, and that only sex (the virgin always lives) may placate him (that latter clause is all implied).

    Chicks did violent guys.

    Like


  91. Jerry, Vin Diesel is in The Expendables? It’s not on the IMDB page for either The Expendables or for Diesel. Perhaps a different movie or actor?

    Like


  92. chic noirbuttox,

    david what happened to blk&german?

    I permitted her to Detox my Buttox. This is because the last time you detoxed my buttox, you used a lavendar essence, but you did not use enough of it. I require more.

    But, since you have been asking for a long time, I will permit you to undertake the ceremonial privilege to…

    …..wait for it, wait for it……

    Detox my Buttox.

    Like


  93. @AnonyMouse
    @Gorbachev

    Did she report the guy to the police?

    I’m wondering if this kind of thing is why the crime is under-reported.

    She reported it, but the guy was a smart bastard; he wiggled out of charges that he should have totally gone under from.

    It’s hard to prove; the rape kit provided nothing, just her word against his. She went through the whole thing.

    Turns out he had a conviction when he was a teenager – she found out later. It couldn’t be used in court.

    I think rape laws are too general and broad, but this was was clear and cut and dry. And they couldn’t convict him.

    It happens.

    Anyway, she told me her orgasms with this terrifying experience were mind-blowing; it didn’t make the experience good, at all. But it was mind-blowing. Like some sort of sneeze or instinctive reaction. She felt guilty over it, and was truly fucked up about it for years. By the time I got to her, she had gone through a “therapeutic” relationship with another guy, and had surpassed the experience; but she wasn’t a hard-sex kind-of girl. She just found some way to get past it.

    Still, it took 10 years. And the guy probably did it over and over to other girls, too. Bastards like that make life for the rest of us hard.

    Like


  94. Although an ingrained beta, nevertheless one day at work I felt the need to alleviate the boredom. In what was for me extremely uncharacteristic behaviour, I stormed into Office Girl’s office, slammed the door behind me so hard she jumped out of her seat, and snarled at her in the meanest voice I could muster, “Don’t play games with me, you know what I want!”

    Office Girl just sat there, wide-eyed and drop-jawed, and I fully expected her to bawl me out for being an idiot when I revealed I was actually after the Scotch tape, however I was flabbergasted when she said she had got quite turned on.

    Like


  95. Re: joint accounts -> My parents both told me that with a joint account they’d have divorced years ago. 41 years later they’re still happily married. They said that they would have fought far more over money than they actually did. and they fought quite a bit as I was growing up.

    In the words of my Mum, “for your own sanity, keep accounts separate.”

    Like


  96. “Even though she is an attractive under-25, presumably with options, the guy who pranked his girlfriend in that clip is now engaged to her, after asking via a different prank (the video is also on Break.com and YouTube, but I can’t find it). ”

    Its not the same couple. The marriage proposal prank is probably the most beta prank video on youtube:

    This should be required watching for all men just for the chicks reaction at the end.

    Like


  97. Thing is most dudes are pretty feminine, so when a girl finds a scary guy (scary intimidating not scary creepy weirdo) she is turned on by his exuding masculinity. My friends getting a girl isn’t about game, its about being masculine. If you look like a man and act like a man you don’t need to put any thought or effort into getting women, women want men after all. You’ll never fail a shit test because you will never concede shit to her and she will learn that quick. She’ll be concerned with your approval since women validate themselves with male approval. A slightly charming masculine man will have lots and lots of pussy offered. You don’t need lines or fancy trendy clothes or any other gimmick

    Like


  98. on August 24, 2010 at 3:34 am Willard Libby

    The guy in the video sounded like a cross between a faggot and a hooting chimpanzee.

    I’m guessing he’s just a friend who wishes he was her boyfriend. Or maybe he’s a full fag buddy. Or maybe he’s her younger brother.

    She was at no time sexually attracted to him after this. She sees him as a bigger dork and goofball than she thought.

    She’s probably embarrassed to have such an immature frat boy/nerd type in her life.

    He would have turned her on if he had started to caress her when she was getting ready and not said a word to her.

    The friend zone is bad but the dorky, spastic frat boy, high fiving, male bonding, treat a girl like she’s a guy friend is worse.

    No women find this kind of behavior sexually arousing.

    It’s ‘gina Novocaine.

    Like


  99. @Willard Libby

    If you’re talking about the brunette in R’s post then the its her boyfriend. Her rather unsurprising revenge is (like most chick pranks) a swift nutshot.

    http://www.break.com/index/hot-girl-gets-nutshot-revenge.html

    Like


  100. A variation on this one can be performed at the cinema. Work your cock through the bottom of the popcorn box and allow her to discover it.

    Like


  101. I’m taking matters into my own hand and hi-jacking this thread since Roissy hasn’t addressed the topic. I’ll keep it simple.

    Cigarettes – dirty and scummy by nature, but isn’t there something sexy about smoke?

    Also gaming chicks who smoke.

    Discuss

    Like


  102. on August 24, 2010 at 6:45 am Vincent Ignatius

    I’d assume the risk of “creeping” her out would be too great with something like that.

    Good to know.

    Like


  103. @Willard Libby, actually, not always things are what they seem.

    John and Nikki were friends during their high school years and later they fell in love. They were always pranking each other and simply continued with the tradition when they got together.

    I am not sure what jobs they had, but now their occupation is pranksters. They love pranking and what greater thing could be there than doing a job you love. TV shows– MTV “Pranked”, Vh1 “Undateable”, WebSoup:The Best of 2009, TruTv, “The Smoking Gun Presents”, “Most Daring”, America’s Funniest Home Videos, Rude Tube UK, Explosive-Germany, RTL Nikki and John special -Germany, The Bonnie Hunt Show, SLQH-Spain. I think as time progresses, they would be more into public pranks (if they plan any children that would be a reasonable assumption, though they may never cease to push each others buttons.

    John has some beta patterns, but not that much–the proposal clip is probably reflecting his idea how he is supposed to behave in these circumstances, though learning some game would not hurt. Nikki is not your run of the mill average girl, either. Actually a cutie. Borderline 8. I’d say their relationship is unusual and they surely do keep each other on their toes.

    http://nikkiandjohn.com/archives/182

    Like


  104. @Gorbachev

    “Still, it took 10 years. And the guy probably did it over and over to other girls, too. Bastards like that make life for the rest of us hard.”

    Umm, Gorby, I think it is the lives of women that are made harder by rapists and potential rapists.

    Like


  105. Roissy is against social networks like facebook or orkut. But I learned that joining a community named “I have been expelled from a nightclub” caused a very good impression on girls.

    they would ask specifically about that as soon as they could.

    also, this falls in line with my view that visible signs of orthopedic problems attract girls. Obviously I am not saying girls are attracted to cripples. BUt visible signs of knee/hand/shoulder surgery attract them

    I had this experience a couple times. Now a friend is staying at home and broke his hand hitting a guy in a moving car. Last time we went out he was wearing a hand-splint for the first time. Unknown girls would come and talk with him about that

    This guy lives in california, and broke his arm once while surfing. There is a huge scar in it. He told girls that the scar was a shark bite.

    Being a true friend, whenever girls came asking him about his hand he would point at me and say I had a knee surgery. And the dude is going to have exactly the same knee surgery I had once he goes back to the USA

    Like


  106. Maxim #20: Do not ever reveal the details of your finances to a girlfriend or wife. Avoid getting joint accounts. As a man, you must draw a line in the sand separating money from love. If she balks, dump her

    Whattabout those girls you bed by openly revealing details about your finances, or lying them up?

    Once in Uruguay a girl asked a friend “what does you father do”. When faced with such a question, you can throw up maxim#20 in the dust bin

    He answered: “He owns a bank. It is not that big in South America, but it is kind of imprtant outside it”. Her: “how is it called?”. Him: “Goldman Sachs”

    Like


  107. Anton, maybe if these women lived on an isolated island in solitude. But it also affect those that interact with them. to some degree. The 10 years recovery time is not unusual and often even after that there is some psychological scaring that is never quite healed, that shows in close relationships with others in unexpected ways.

    Like


  108. I always thought it’d be fun to take a girl onto a “fake” crime. I would pretend I’m this elaborate criminal, ask her to wait in the car while I go traipse around a barren warehouse, then run out screaming, hop in the car, and tell her to drive away fast, etc.

    Obviously, I would deflect any questions about what I’m doing, etc “for her own safety”

    Like


  109. rape is the price of female liberty.

    Like


  110. @Gorb

    Fear is useful. Hence scary movies. Also discomfort and novelty. All the same process.

    That’s because all excitement is similar on a physiological level. Some peeple get their signals crossed. That’s why some people enjoy BDSM and medieval nuns who self-flagellated had erotic visions of Jesus.

    OTOH, the prank stuff is juvenile. It would turn off many women. I personally would prefer a twisting, turning drive up a mountain road and a breath-taking view from the top of the mountain.

    Like


  111. Whenever I think of myself as too much of a right-winger, Dana comes to the rescue to make me feel like Trotsky again.

    Like


  112. @Dana

    rape is the price of female liberty

    Because rape doesn’t take place in say Saudi Arabia where the girl’s family will kill her to protect the family honor or Somalia and Darfur where warring factions rape little girls out gathering fire wood? Only SATC types get raped? C’mon, Dana!

    Female liberty may change the circumstances under which rape occurs–frat party vs. battlefield– but it doesn’t cause rape.

    Like


  113. @Firepower

    i’ve found the best way to scare Asian girlfriend is tell her my 401k went belly up

    LOL. I was walking down the street with my husband a few weeks ago when he past a white guy with an Asian wife or gf. Reminded of this blog, I aksed him what the attraction to Asian women is. His reply was “Damned if I know. They strike me as women who henpeck men and are looking for money. They’re petite, which is cute, but I like a different face.”

    Like


  114. Real-time test of PUA techniques:

    I am sitting at a cafe/restaurant eating breakfast. Girl walks by. She’s a 6.5-7, pleasant looking, wearing semi-hippy clothes with a 1930’s Bonnie and Clyde-style hat. I nicely say hello. She stops and smiles and says hi back rather than saying hi and continuing on, so I take it as at least mild curiousity.

    Me: (pleasant with smile) Nice hat. Are you a gangster or something (with dismissive smirk)?

    Her: (smiling) Yeah, right, a mobster, ha ha ha…(she quickly leaves)

    I can’t tell if she dismissed the neg, failed to recognize the neg, or if she’s sitting over there with the hamster working overtime. She chose a seat with her back to me. I will update if she makes a second pass.

    [disclaimer: I am wearing my wedding ring]

    Like


  115. gig, classic post re Dana. Couldn’t have said it any better. I like her, though. Very interesting gal. Story about husband almost killing his brother priceless.

    Like


  116. She either didn’t pick up on the smirk, in which case she thinks it’s just..you know…a friendly normal short conversation which most normal girls have on a day to day basis with people they meet. Or light flirting/teasing.

    Or she picked up on the smirk and thinks you are a sarcastic weirdo.

    Like


  117. Real-time update:

    Girl walked by my table, didn’t make eye contact with me, seemed pouty. Walked by again, and then back to her chair.

    Like


  118. @AMF
    John Dillinger game, eh? Funny how girls prefer Depp over Bale’s character in that movie just like they do Joker over Batman. Bateman Bale however, would also trump Enemies and Dark Knight Bale in the amoral eyes of susceptible girlfolk.

    Like


  119. @ sidewinder

    I Like her too. Just recognyzing the existence of people to the right of me…

    Like


  120. on August 24, 2010 at 10:55 am Gunslingergregi

    well sidewinder now you have to kick in nice guy and understand her broiling emotional feelings.

    Like


  121. on August 24, 2010 at 10:56 am Gunslingergregi

    ie being nice enough to grace her with your cocka he he he

    Like


  122. gunslinger,

    I wish. I would feel awkward taking it to the next level, so I’ll just enjoy her occasional looks at me over her shoulder.

    If I were in the game for real, do you think I should have initiated conversation again when she walked by? She didn’t make eye contact, and didn’t stop…I would have had to have stopped her. Or, is it better to let her come to you post-neg?

    Like


  123. My gf’s way smarter than most of you bitches. She can do all calculus ‘n shit. Of course I’m smarter than her, but I’m a fuckin’ genius phd lol mia msm etc brb. She skydives, pilots planes, scuba, programs computers, she’s a regular jane bond. On average men are smarter, boctaoe, biches.

    Like


  124. considering i was a jewish fascist skinhead auxilliary before many of you reading this were born it would be hard for most of you to be to the right of me lol

    Like


  125. on August 24, 2010 at 11:18 am Gunslingergregi

    Well this is where you throw out the life line to save her soul because you know that she needs you and doing her a favor by selecting her for your sexual needs he he he

    ””””Schmoe
    My gf’s way smarter than most of you bitches. She can do all calculus ‘n shit. Of course I’m smarter than her, but I’m a fuckin’ genius phd lol mia msm etc brb. She skydives, pilots planes, scuba, programs computers, she’s a regular jane bond. On average men are smarter, boctaoe, biches.

    ”””’
    Yea ok I do have soft spot for bitches who can do it all.
    But they always lack one thing. A man to tie it all together.

    Like


  126. Yesterday I was sitting in traffic. I looked to the left lane just as the light turned green several cars ahead.

    9, strawberry blonde (which I have an incredible weakness for) applying lip gloss in the mirror. I had no opener. We were sitting in different cars, in traffic.

    For a brief second I considered throwing the wheel hard left and accelerating into the side of her car as she started to move. Then I could simultaneously meet her, get her number (insurance close), and tingle the gina with the fight or flight response of being struck by a large automobile. The venue would have been ideal since there was a gas station parking lot adjacent to two bars that were hip. The whole crash-kiss-instadate.

    Next time Gadget, next time.

    Like


  127. @gunslingerregi
    Right. What she needed was a man to out-alpha her (me). She’d follow me into hell; it’s kind of cool having that level of adventure partner riding bitch.

    Like


  128. @ Bassoon

    Three second rule, three second rule. Approach! Just crash your car into her next time instead of being inside your head.

    But as for tactics you could also neg her choice of insurance company. “All-State… I thought you were… different.”

    Like


  129. Did roissy write this? doesn’t sound like him. I can’t make out some of the first paragraph.

    Like


  130. it would be hard for most of you to be to the right of me lol

    The second-nicest thing any dude ever said to me was some years ago after a bachelor party. Mostly professionals, most being standard-issue Republicans, and one lawyer-ultraleftie with us as well. Lots of drinking and then discussion veers toward politics. Obligatory admiring remarks about Ronald Reagan.

    Next morning, everyone is coming-to and sobering up. One guy says, “duuue, PA… I thought I was a conservative. After hearing you talk last night… I’m … I’m… not worthy.”

    Since everyone is now curious what the nicest thing a dude ever said to me was: twelve years ago, a betaish buddy, bewildered by a hottie I delightfully paraded in front of him intriduced to him, asks me later:

    “PA, don’t get me wrong, you are a cool guy and all, but how is it that you are such an asshole, and yet you’re banging girls like her?”

    Like


  131. The fates are smiling kindly this evening – This story will show how a bad day for a PUA can turn gold in a heartbeat.

    Because I fry easily, I stayed out of the sun as much as possible this summer but still got a lot of exposure during daylight dates where I couldn’t reschedule. It was extremely rare for me to try to game women during peak sun hours on the beach, despite the fact that one gets to see that way exactly what they would look like in bed.

    I was also mostly hen-pecked by two girlfriends this summer who did their best to leave me little time to game other women. That’s women’s main occupation: keeping their men from meeting other women.

    One day in late July while scrambling at the peak sun hour to buy a new bathing suit because I’d gotten an InstaDate with a 9, I found the nerve to ask the only 10 of the summer (for me the minimum requirement for rating a 10 is someone over 5’11” and full figured without heading toward being fat) where I could buy said bathing suit. She let me know.

    Ten minutes later I passed by her again. I made a point of thanking her for having taken the time to help a helpless foreigner. She turned out to have a heart of gold – unlike most 9s and 10s, she didn’t know how great she looked. She was leaving the beach to go home to the countryside far inland. She gladly gave me her number and I thankfully synched my number with hers. She texted me her email address the next day.

    I then texted her that I would write her an email on Monday.

    That night my phone was stolen, together with her number and email address of course. It was permanently gone. No, that model of phone doesn’t synch with PCs at all.

    I reconstructed the SIM card to get the same number immediately. But the question was: would she ever text me again or would my failure to send an email indicate to her that I wasn’t really into her?

    I also have the police using satellites to try to locate that phone so I can recover her number from the lost database.

    I guess its only been about 3.5 weeks but it seemed like a lifetime.

    Today I was at a river beach where the only 10 rejected me. I mainly only try to approach 10s so I put myself up for a lot of disappointment and I sure got that today.

    What really pissed me is that it isn’t fair for a new 10 to reject me when another 10 had given me her number and then that was stolen. It was like the Gods were fucking with me big time.

    But coming home dejected, about to take a shower to prepare for a quiet evening at home with a main girlfriend, I received a text from the lost woman asking how I was and why I had never sent an email to her.

    I immediately called and she was thrilled to hear the story about how everything had depended on her sending that text just now.

    Moral of the story: Swing for the fences for, when a 9 or 10 rejects you, you may come home to find a text from someone you didn’t expect to ever contact you again.

    Like


  132. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4fRuRoXhXs Watch this.
    Notice how it’s all women speaking?

    Delusion, a mating strategy, just as you said.

    Like


  133. The_King

    Tell me about it. I got Nicole and Aoefe
    obsessed. I am sure LILGRL is interested in me too.

    Improbable – if not totally impossible.
    2 are married and one is like, engaged.

    Like


  134. Pa

    here’s another song from my youth for you–since you appeared to like Laibach–i defy you to find another song with the lyric “mutual nonaggression pact” lol

    Like


  135. on August 24, 2010 at 1:04 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””’Schmoe
    @gunslingerregi
    Right. What she needed was a man to out-alpha her (me). She’d follow me into hell; it’s kind of cool having that level of adventure partner riding bitch.

    ”””””

    Are you channeling me lol

    ””””on August 24, 2010 at 11:34 am Bassoon
    Yesterday I was sitting in traffic. I looked to the left lane just as the light turned green several cars ahead.

    9, strawberry blonde (which I have an incredible weakness for) applying lip gloss in the mirror. I had no opener. We were sitting in different cars, in traffic.

    For a brief second I considered throwing the wheel hard left and accelerating into the side of her car as she started to move. Then I could simultaneously meet her, get her number (insurance close), and tingle the gina with the fight or flight response of being struck by a large automobile. The venue would have been ideal since there was a gas station parking lot adjacent to two bars that were hip. The whole crash-kiss-instadate.

    Next time Gadget, next time.

    ”””””
    Whats funny is after you told her why you did it and after you got out of jail. You might of had a chance he he he

    Like


  136. “”Whats funny is after you told her why you did it and after you got out of jail.”””

    aint it the truth.
    that says a LOT about America today – John Wayne, playing a con

    Like


  137. on August 24, 2010 at 1:07 pm Gunslingergregi

    ”””Miley_Cyrax
    @ Bassoon

    Three second rule, three second rule. Approach! Just crash your car into her next time instead of being inside your head.

    But as for tactics you could also neg her choice of insurance company. “All-State… I thought you were… different.”
    ””””’
    oh shit lol

    Like


  138. It would take real balls to swerve a car into another in order to meet a woman.

    But the fact that one thought about it shows he has the kind of mentality it takes to do well.

    He’s got the right idea.

    Try walking into a few women first.

    Like


  139. on August 24, 2010 at 1:25 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””””””’I reconstructed the SIM card to get the same number immediately. But the question was: would she ever text me again or would my failure to send an email indicate to her that I wasn’t really into her?

    I also have the police using satellites to try to locate that phone so I can recover her number from the lost database.

    I guess its only been about 3.5 weeks but it seemed like a lifetime.

    Today I was at a river beach where the only 10 rejected me. I mainly only try to approach 10s so I put myself up for a lot of disappointment and I sure got that today.

    What really pissed me is that it isn’t fair for a new 10 to reject me when another 10 had given me her number and then that was stolen. It was like the Gods were fucking with me big time.

    But coming home dejected, about to take a shower to prepare for a quiet evening at home with a main girlfriend, I received a text from the lost woman asking how I was and why I had never sent an email to her.

    I immediately called and she was thrilled to hear the story about how everything had depended on her sending that text just now.

    Moral of the story: Swing for the fences for, when a 9 or 10 rejects you, you may come home to find a text from someone you didn’t expect to ever contact you again.
    ””””””””””””

    Yea right mr bond.
    he he he

    Like


  140. @FatNigger
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4fRuRoXhXs Watch this.
    Notice how it’s all women speaking?

    Delusion, a mating strategy, just as you said.

    I watched it. It’s disgusting.

    Okay, they’re trying to make themselves feel better.

    But if the figure is right – 60% of Americans are fat – and this jibes with what I see – it’s truly disgusting.

    I could barely contain myself while watching this.

    I got a visceral, disappointed feeling of head-shaking despondence when I watched this.

    Like


  141. @Gunslinger

    Ian Fleming smoked and drank too much. He and his alter-ego, James Bond, died at age 53.

    Most on this board can do better than that.

    The particular new friend I made above – and then had her contact information stolen until she texted me tonight – relied very much on my looking like the innocent tourist who found someone who wasn’t full of herself. No suave manner or International Man of Mystery IMM game was necessary.

    Like


  142. @Firepower

    You would like to believe that married and engaged women don’t cheat wouldn’t you?

    Go reread the whole blog, you missed the big picture.

    Most women are married to beta chumps and wouldn’t mind cheating with a HV man like me.

    Like


  143. on August 24, 2010 at 1:56 pm Gunslingergregi

    You want to know what really really gets the ladies instantly ovulating.

    My son already likes to make people laugh and shit and he isn’t two yet. The thing is me and the wife have been re-eforcing it though making him our little entertainment committee. He has us rolling in the room with just like antics intentionally to make us laugh our asses off. But yea I was also teaching him some rythm and shit. Take a can top and beat a beat like one two one two three.
    Plus trying to get him to understand math at the same time.
    Anyway everyone loves my kid and he gets a lot of exposure to all kinds of people.

    So yea he had no fear when daddy was getting his internet upgrade and it took like two hours of daddy sitting there with his computer. So my kid instead of crying and shit just starts macking all the people in vicinity. Has all the woman start ovulating and praying to god to have a kid now. Then woman looking at me like yea I want to have one with you. he he he

    He brought joy to all the people in the mall. Kids own. I still don’t get the deal with parents and talking about how a kid owes them or something for bringing kid up. I get more than I give.

    I am going up escalator and I turn back and a line of chicks are at bottom huge smiles waving.
    My son delivers coup de gra
    and waves back and melts hearts.

    lildude is gonna smash hearts but hopefully not he he he
    He got a balloon my woman got him and he broke it apart. Then I taught him how to put it back together.
    Which after he gets done playing with the baloon he does a crush on it with his bare hands until it pops. lol
    But yea he is tossing it to the middle of the isle and then looking like someone get it.
    So then some chick would run over and grab balloon and give it to him. Then he would toss the plastic holder out and another chick would grab it and give it to him.
    lol
    He was straight up pimping. Went total aloof game and had the girls working their asses off. hahaahah
    Then had me hold balloon and he started knocking out a beat on it with plastic wand.
    Brought daddy into picture as a prop.
    Picked him up and he sat there chillin.
    Gave me some respect.
    Shit was wild.

    He was man walking with daddy in the gracery store picked out and apple starting eating it. I am like no prob.
    He did try to put it back though. So I got to teach him that once you start eating an apple from the grocery store you got to buy that shit lol

    But yea if I picked up any of the virgin ladies they would be expecting kids and marriage within days he he he
    Not game for the timid.

    I just think that is like one of the worse things the west teaches is that kids are somehow a burden. I just don’t see it.
    I mean he is probably the most meaningfull thing I have done so far in life.
    Creating a midget who is gonna own life and do as he wills in it.
    It does obviously help to have a woman who looks up to me and teaches him that papa is as close to god on the planet as it gets but still even surrogate kid would be cool to have I think.
    Although yea I didn’t want a kid until I knew I could teach him about life. So really for guys probably is good to live some first because you want to be actually able to teach the midjet something he he he
    I’m not seeing any of the problems associated with having kids in the media or anywhere else. They add joy to life.

    Like


  144. on August 24, 2010 at 2:03 pm Gunslingergregi

    And I didn’t even create him lol

    Just working with the raw material to turn into superman lol

    Good raw material though he comes from the blood of my womans family so yea he has good genes to start with.

    Like


  145. As a man, you must draw a line in the sand separating money from love.

    John Mayer might, but I assure you that Tiger Woods does not read your blog.

    The last time I did this, the girl screamed at the top of her lungs and fell backwards over my couch, bruising her shin on my coffee table in the process.

    Yea, as if it’s a real severed finger – why are some women so stupidly incredulous?

    Like


  146. Sidewinder

    It’s difficult to game women who are passing by at the best of times.

    Good opener though – throw in a neg like a satchel charge.

    Like


  147. Alpha Bang Report: 5th YTD (2nd/7days, 3rd/45 days)

    Went on 3rd date with 26 yo Bulgarian babe [1st was 1 drink; 2nd burgers). Nice dinner 8, <26 walked out on me with that.

    They know you want to fuck, so fuck.

    Bonus: she works for major hospitality chain; comped 3 day, weekend coming up….

    Like


  148. With respect to the Chateau and its denizen(s?) – while dominating your lady is probably the most important of a man’s tasks, I’m not sure that the formaldehyde finger trick would work with a lot of women:

    Too revolting for most – in the case of the extra-jittery ones, they would probably run off screaming. The question might be asked, what kind of man would store a fake jar of fingers?

    The advice on finances is golden.

    Like


  149. on August 24, 2010 at 3:11 pm Gunslingergregi

    To be honest though I ain’t cleaning up diapers or feeding him or putting him to sleep and shit.

    So yea none of the drudge work just hero play and teaching he he he

    I don’t clean the piss up off of floor when he decides to let loose lol

    That may actually contribute to my happiness level of having the kid he he he

    Like


  150. cap’n bob

    The question might be asked, what kind of man would store a fake jar of fingers?

    total alpha
    the more fingers, the more alpha

    i’ve only got two,
    but i do have
    one ear

    Like


  151. Firepower,

    I suppose there are many paths to Alpha.

    There was a NY gang in the fifties, called the Westies. They used to carry a guy’s head around in a glass jar. It was their banner.

    Like


  152. @dana considering i was a jewish fascist skinhead auxilliary before many of you reading this were born it would be hard for most of you to be to the right of me lol

    A common misconception. In reality, Collectivism/totalitarianism = left; Individualism = right.
    Fascism (and Nazism) were leftist ideologies. They were right of Bolsheviks, but they were anti-individualistic, still squarely in the left ideological spectrum. Mussolini was originally a socialist, but then realized that the only way to get in power without breaking things the Bolshevik way was to get corporations on board and create corporate socialism. If you read the Fascism Manifesto, its socialist underpinning is apparent to anyone but a willfully blind. Nazis (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei – national socialistic german workers party), a different brand of leftist ideology. Stalin, until Deutches Reich attacked, firmly believed that they wouldn’t because they were ideological “brothers”.

    So, why Nazis were so gung-ho to eradicate communists and socialists or social democrats? Fro the same reason Stalin went after Trocky or Bukharin. Or for the same reason sunni and shi’a would lob the heads of the “incorrect” creed, given opportunity.

    Like


  153. @Morsellaux

    Individualism = right

    this is contrived libertarian historiography and conceptualization, and wrong.

    Like


  154. KUATO IS MY WINGMAN.

    Like


  155. rhettro, no. Though there are manifestos to compare and they are typical leftist screeds, but you also need to consider the fruits. By your fruits you recognize them. All the ideologies that are collectivist have one thing in common. Hekatombs of dead. They just competed which one would have a bigger tally. The communist branch beat the nazis hands down (fascist were wimps in comparison), with 100 million souls on their tab in the 20th century.

    Like


  156. on August 24, 2010 at 3:48 pm Gunslingergregi

    You talkin dude from total recall that was inside the other dudes chest lol

    Like


  157. Errata: By their fruits…

    Like


  158. The best distinction between Left and Right I’ve seen is as follows:

    The Left is a “horizontal” philosophical orientation, and by this metaphor it’s progressive and universalistic. A slogan associated with contemporary globalist left is the claim that a British and an Indonesian businessman have more in common with each other than they do with carpenters from their respective nations.

    The Right, in contrast, is “vertical” and thus hierarchical and particularistic. It recognizes “the great chain of being,” with God on top. It also supports the idea of national solidarity regardless of one’s rank within the nation.

    Rather than being progressive, the Right is spiritual, aspiring to perfect itself up, toward the divine. The left strives for perfection forward in time, hence the notion of “progress.”

    Like


  159. And BTW, I was born and grew up in a commie country. A first hand experience. I came to these conclusions a long time ago, before I had any idea there is such a thing like libertarianism.

    Like


  160. And BTW, I was born and grew up in a commie country.

    Same here. Which one?

    A first hand experience. I came to these conclusions a long time ago, before I had any idea there is such a thing like libertarianism.

    In my experience many Eastern Europeans who lived there during Communism profess libertarianism once in the US. It’s because their experience is one of seeing a talented and homogeneous population suppressed by excessive state interference. But they have little experience with variable qualities of diverse population groups, and for that reason they tend to take certain “human capital” givens for granted.

    Like


  161. on August 24, 2010 at 3:58 pm Gunslingergregi

    Yea nice way to put it pa.

    Or the liberal way makes the thug want to fuck up the doctor’s daughter.

    The right way makes him be willing to protect her from getting fucked up.

    Like


  162. That youtube video was disgusting. The funniest thing was that it didn’t seem like any of those women had real jobs.

    Also the “fat chaser” is a SMALL minority of men. I know guys who have done fatties, obviously, but copious alcohol was always involved.

    Like


  163. Roller coasters, haunted houses, scary movies … the fear/desire connection is well known

    Like


  164. PA, some degree of truth. The proclamatory leftist egalitarian vision of stratification of society reduces in reality the multitudes to two classes. The ruling class (The Party — and there can be only one) and the rest. As Orwell wryly noted, there are some people that are more equal than others. This setup precludes mobility, once the society stratifies into the two classes, it is immutable until a violent (or rarely not violent) revolution.

    Individualism inherently supports a wide range of strata, but they are fluid. One can move up (and down) the ladder.

    Like


  165. PA, Czech. I am not a libertarian. Simply a conservative with maybe a hint of a libertarian streak, but with minimalist agenda=which translates to reduce the government to an absolute minimum that it can’t do no harm, taxation only to an absolute minimum that is necessary to maintain infrastructure and defense and not to support bloated bureaucracy; primacy of private property; and absolutely no entitlements whatsoever.

    Like


  166. I had to post about the car game because I seriously considered it for a second. That good of a redhead.

    I’m writing a book right now so I decided to incorporate that scene as if it had actually happened. I would have blamed her for the accident, yelling at her for not seeing the lab pup that almost was run over by her careless driving (while she was applying lip gloss) and forcing me to swerve into her to avoid crushing it.

    Once reduced to tears (probably easy after the adrenaline dump) it would be easy.

    I’m trying to think of the ballsiest thing I ever actually did to meet a girl. Probably just telling the 19 year old Ecuadorian/Lebanese girl (that I had never met in person, just facebook) to leave her friends at the club, walk out front, and get into my black SUV without saying goodbye. I think this was about two weeks after I left my wife, so I was doing nothing but Apocalypse game. Excellent results that night, despite her boyfriend.

    Like


  167. @Paul Also the “fat chaser” is a SMALL minority of men. I know guys who have done fatties, obviously, but copious alcohol was always involved.

    And a copious volume of brown paper shopping bags, I think. 🙂

    Like


  168. ” And BTW, I was born and grew up in a commie country”

    Same here.

    “Simply a conservative with maybe a hint of a libertarian streak, but with minimalist agenda”

    On a good day, same here.

    On a bad day — the commies will never leave us alone, let’s use draconian means to PROACTIVELY fight them. But that usually passes.

    BTW, just a heads up, I’m smelling a new version of the narrative from the transnationalist left: global welfarism. Since Obama is such an epic fail at maintaining political power to ensure continued redistributionism, we must have a guaranteed living wage for every human being on earth, including free education, healthcare, etc.

    It’s days like this you just want to, as Mencken says, hoist up the black flag and start slitting throats. Not stupid, just evil. ‘Cause nobody can be THAT stupid.

    My fundamental thesis for the next quarter century of politics is that our eventual fate as a civilization, and ultimately species, depends on whether accelerating technology can outrun and neutralize base commie desires for unprecedented, global tyranny.

    “The best distinction between Left and Right I’ve seen is as follows:”

    Jerry Pournelle had a great four quadrant delineation of politics: y axis from irrationalism to rationalism, x axis from no state to an all-powerful state. So anarchocapitalism is (rationalism, no state), progressivism (rationalism, all-powerful state), countercultural anarchism (irrationalism, no state), classical fascism (irrationalism, all-powerful state.)

    If you can classify something by two essential qualities, you’re probably in the ballpark.

    Like


  169. Original JB, in my view, the political spectrum is 3-dimensional, defined by three intersecting planes: Personal freedom, political freedom and economic freedom. The scope for all 3 is from authoritarian (a totalitarian being the ultimate authoritarian manifestation) to libertarian (anarchy as the ultimate manifestation).

    Some add a 4th plane, statismdynamism, but I think it is implied in the 3-d model. One may see it as a specific, narrowly defined subset of the 3-d model.

    Like


  170. on August 24, 2010 at 5:22 pm Gunslingergregi

    ”””’BTW, just a heads up, I’m smelling a new version of the narrative from the transnationalist left: global welfarism. Since Obama is such an epic fail at maintaining political power to ensure continued redistributionism, we must have a guaranteed living wage for every human being on earth, including free education, healthcare, etc.

    It’s days like this you just want to, as Mencken says, hoist up the black flag and start slitting throats. Not stupid, just evil. ‘Cause nobody can be THAT stupid.
    ”””””

    Yea that is the type of shit that makes me wonder if it is worth it to continue to see the world to its bitter end. I guess I’ll see it but yea can’t they just leave some people alone to have their own culture.

    Like


  171. on August 24, 2010 at 5:24 pm Gunslingergregi

    Oh shit a no post day.

    Like


  172. on August 24, 2010 at 5:25 pm Gunslingergregi

    But really life short enough I guess have a good time anyway.

    Like


  173. morsel

    i am aware of all of that

    in the 80s (when i was talking about) in the US right wing meant fascist/nazi in common parlance

    the right-left dichotomy in fact has no place for US founding philosophy–it is descriptive of nationalist vs universalist collectivism and has nothing to do with classical liberalism and individualism

    i am several extreme forms of laissez faire/rational egoist/objectist/minarchist now–not “right wing ” at all

    Like


  174. Dana, most people have a bit of problem with 3-d projection, and some with 2-d frame of reference. The dichotomy is a simplification, and since the totalitarian collectivists see themselves as left, they sort of forced the left-right paradigm. Which mean that the political forces on the opposite side of the spectrum had to re-define the “right”.

    Not mentioning that they (them) successfully hijacked the liberal label nearly half a century ago. It is now being replaced by “progressivists”–another misnomer, there is really nothing progressive about them, it is the old marxist tripe in a different coating; the goals remain the same, only the contingencies of achieving the goals changed.

    Like


  175. I’ll try ad different tack… three intersecting planes.

    Personal freedom – nearly extinct. Only certain groups are allowed personal freedom as long as these are in sync with the overall agenda and contingencies of the progressivist ideologues.

    Political freedom – nearly extinct. Only allowed withing the scope of narrowly defined political correctness, deviations are met with all forms of sanctions. It is not yet in the life-threatening structural mode, but give it time.

    Economic freedom – about half-point towards the extinction. The progressivist agenda has to be financed, so for time being a degree of the economic freedom is allowed. But a serious attempts to eliminate the middle class are in progress by political-corporate complex, by different means, be it an excessive regulations and raised legal thresholds for entry into economic activity, or excessive taxation (hidden taxes comprise a lion share) and redistribution schemes (no fault divorce laws) to remove capital from the middle class.

    Like


  176. R in his first paragraph said “I store financial papers, love letters from past and former girlfriends…”

    Please clear up my apparent blond moment – what is the difference between a past and former girlfriend?

    {Editor: past is a girl who left because of extenuating circumstances. former is an ex who left on good terms.]

    Like


  177. @King

    I have only one crush on the interwebz and he’s ignoring me right now.

    mout

    Like


  178. aoefe, a past GF status is settled with a terminal finality.
    Former GF may have a status change to a present FB. She is, so to speak, in the orbit, for time being.

    Hope it is all now crystal clear to you. 😉

    Like


  179. aoefe, mout?

    It seem more line moat up! 😉

    Like


  180. line = like.
    Bloody typos.

    Like


  181. I strongly disapprove of trying to “prank” girls it’s very insensitive and shows disrespect for her personhood. You want to surprise your girlfriend with something nice? Give her 15 minutes of oral pleasure, blindfold her and lead her to the bedroom where you’ve invited a hot 18-yr-old athlete who will fuck her brains out! Then untie the blindfold and taa-daa! She will love it and appreciate the surprise you have prepared for her. She will know you are a good boyfriend.

    Like


  182. I meant untie the blindfold before, so she can see the hot stud you have brought to fuck her.

    Like


  183. Ahhhh gotcha, thanks Morsellaux.

    Like


  184. Well, there is one consolation, jon123, you are very unlikely to procreate.

    Like


  185. Yer welcome, aoefe.

    Like


  186. PA, Morsellaux- one thing of note on the left/right divide: Leftists tend to be very skeptical of Game and the associated concepts, while right-wing folks tend to be more receptive to the ideas, perhaps because of their drinking less of the feminist cool-aid

    Like


  187. PA–

    The best distinction between Left and Right I’ve seen is as follows:

    The Left is a “horizontal” philosophical orientation, and by this metaphor it’s progressive and universalistic. A slogan associated with contemporary globalist left is the claim that a British and an Indonesian businessman have more in common with each other than they do with carpenters from their respective nations.

    The Right, in contrast, is “vertical” and thus hierarchical and particularistic. It recognizes “the great chain of being,” with God on top. It also supports the idea of national solidarity regardless of one’s rank within the nation.

    Rather than being progressive, the Right is spiritual, aspiring to perfect itself up, toward the divine. The left strives for perfection forward in time, hence the notion of “progress.”

    The left believes in the essentially blank slate theory of human personality and gender and racial/ethnic differences. It doesn’t completely ignore the role of culture but tends to think it much less important than income and class position and easily changeably, despite much evidence to the contrary.

    You’ve described the religious right, but there’s also the realist or pragmatic right. That version of the right does consider culture and nation very important, and has limited expectations about the perfectibility of man. Some progress but only to a point. This right believes in human differences which are a least partly inherited and biological. Much of it is receptive to evolutionary thinking and also to real politique, for national advantage, rather than always the worlds freedom and equality evangelist – or desire to be a national leader in enviro / climate change evangelism.

    Like


  188. on August 24, 2010 at 8:44 pm almost 40 year old virgin

    I don´t know why I´m still constantly amazed at the crap you guys do to entertain the pussy.

    Guess this shows that men are indeed better than women.

    OUR rationalization hamster is so powerful it makes us believe WE´re in charge when we come up with new and bold ways to pander to lowest female instincts.

    The human condition, or stupid is as stupid does.
    Well, at least we´re entertaining.

    Like


  189. Cap’n Bob, it is not a left’s skepticism. It is a fear.

    If there is a quiet and unrelenting force that chips away at the leftist paradigm, it is the Game. They used different means of subverting the society, some of them may be comparable to the Game, but in a broader scope–trying to “turn” whole groups of people.

    They recognize the pattern and they know they don’t have a defense, because the Game is more primal as it focuses on the fundamental existential aspect of human behavior.

    Like


  190. almost 40 year old virgin, pandering?

    No. Harnessing. Making the basic female instincts work for you, instead of against you. As simple as that.

    Like


  191. Morsellaux
    “If there is a quiet and unrelenting force that chips away at the leftist paradigm, it is the Game”

    That makes sense: Most of left-wing thought has been built on the denial of reality. And leftists don’t take kindly to anything that threatens their castles in the air. Or anything that empowers non-feminist men.

    I remember the vilification that Mystery (and Neil Straus’s book) received in a lot of the mainstream media when the phenomenon of Game first appeared: What seemed to horrify the writers most of all was the thought of beautiful women succumbing to the advances of normal men. The idea of a level playing field for beta providers horrified them.

    Like


  192. the left is so intent on insisting there is no reliable experience of “real” reality that they MUST reject all pattern seeking. that is the heart of their hatred of “discrimination”. if you can discern ANY pattern then reality IS actually accesible to our senses and comprehensible by reason which destroys their entire gnostic project to remold the World with the Word and to immanentize the eschaton.

    Like


  193. Dana, no point being logical as the left is concerned. They are capable of an extreme cognitive dissonance, without any trace of pain or discomfort whatsoever. Meaning they can hold several contradictory concept at the same time in their minds (or whatever functions as a substitute in that capacity) without turning it into a pretzel. Sure, it may be considered an adaptive trait, but it is unsuitable for humans, only for pod people.

    Like


  194. There’s only left in the U.S., since it’s foundation. Not lefties as mother russia but still left. True righties kneel for the crown and the tiara.

    Like


  195. Silvio Berlusconi-

    Alpha or Doofus?

    Like


  196. Gotz, those are very old notions. They did cease to bear any reflection in reality when the French parliament was split between Jacobins and the rest, after the monarchists were largely shortened by the size of their respective heads.

    As for the present left ant it roots, go to youtube and enter as a search keyword: Bezmenov

    Like


  197. Gotz,

    “True righties kneel for the crown and the tiara.”

    Not true – the Right has many intellectual traditions, and most modern ones are not Monarchist. You’d have to reach back to De Maistre in the late 18th Century for an example of an Ultra-Monarchist.

    The Throne-and-Altar variety is Panda-rare in the States.

    And the American Revolution was a Conservative revolt against an over-reaching imperial state.

    By your logic, Bill Buckley and Ronald Reagan were lefties – a grave insult in my eyes.

    Like


  198. I hate laptops with sticky keys! 😉

    …and its roots…

    Like


  199. on August 24, 2010 at 10:17 pm Gunslingergregi

    Silvio alpha he was sticking up for the common man like why are you giving someone a ticket in front of me. I will now stick it to you.
    Bitch writing a ticket and shit he took her down a notch.
    I like it.

    Like


  200. Resuscitating a discussion that died on the other thread, when that whole other brouhaha went down:

    The whole virginity preference thing?
    The preference for virginity is a second-choice preference. It’s a preference that’s only relevant to those men who can’t get their first choice — i.e., the hottest women.

    In other words, the preference flowchart goes like this:
    1) Can I get the hottest women?
    YES –> DONE. Get the hottest women. Don’t give a shit whether they are virgins.
    NO –> GO TO STEP 2

    2) Can I get virgins / inexperienced women?

    That’s the preference matrix.
    Show me a guy with a preference for virgins, and I’ll show you a guy who can’t get the hottest women.

    Like


  201. Bassoon:
    I had to post about the car game because I seriously considered it for a second. That good of a redhead.

    Bassoon, if this is the half-cocked shit you think up after reading about how fear induces arousal… I’d love to know the shit you’ve dreamed up after reading about how, say, violence induces arousal.
    Maybe you’ve thought about punching a girl in the face as an opener?

    Please do tell. Please. We’re all listening.

    Like


  202. on August 25, 2010 at 2:05 am Manuel Atanasio Girardot Díaz

    During foreplay, girls are often frightened — and cross-eyed — when I whip out my enormous offshore drill

    Speaking of “foreplay,” I’ve noticed that the blog host(s) basically never writes about actual sex. Just about no specifics whatsoever.
    The reason I find this noteworthy is the utter contrast between that, and the ridiculous amount of detail in which everything else pertaining to m/f sexual dynamics. Long (and impressive) treatists on trial texting, contrapposto posture, etc. etc., … and then basically nothing about fucking. All appetizers, no entree.

    It would be interesting to see some better posts about… well, fucking. ‘Cause that’s a hell of a lot more important to a relationship — even a short-term fling — than trial texting, or contrapposto posture, could ever even think about being.

    At best, after this many years of constant blogging, it’s a glaring omission. At worst, it reveals that the host is just an extremely observant guy looking into the world of sexual dynamics from the outside … and therefore only writing about topics that can be seen from the outside.

    Editor: http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/shit-stains-after-sex/%5D

    Like


  203. @dalerojo: The preference for virginity is a second-choice preference. It’s a preference that’s only relevant to those men who can’t get their first choice — i.e., the hottest women.

    What a nice strawman! I hope you can come up with more and will be full of anticipation of your next post. Promise!

    Apples and oranges are both fruit, but that does not mean apples = oranges.

    The preference for virgins related to LTR, while for the PUA STR context it really does not have much relevance.

    So let’s concentrate on LTR and the preference goes:
    Let’s find a virgin that is hot, hot, hot ([7],8,9,10). It is a narrow pool, requiring a sheer luck, IMHO, but that is the stated preference.

    Don’t presume. ask these people that want a virgin for their LTR/marriage. ‘K?

    Like


  204. Morsellaux,
    I’m talking about LTR preferences as well, obviously. Or at least it should have been obvious.

    Let’s find a virgin that is hot, hot, hot ([7],8,9,10). It is a narrow pool, requiring a sheer luck, IMHO, but that is the stated preference

    Saying “I want both” is just attempting an end run around the issue. The issue is which preference is STRONGER, which is obviously not addressed by clumping the issues together like that.

    You have to phrase it in terms of tradeoffs. Say, who would men want as a wife, between:
    a virgin 9 vs. a 10 with one or two partners?
    a virgin 7 vs. a 10 with five to ten partners?
    a virgin 5 vs. a 10 with a hundred partners?

    I think these are fair controls, and I have no doubt that men — at least men who would ever stand a realistic chance of getting whatever a “10” is in their book — would pick door number two every single time. Every. Single. Time.
    I.e., men who would pick door number one are going to be those men who have no possibility of getting the 10’s, and who can therefore go sour grapes.

    So, *in a monogamous society*, virgins are a consolation prize, end of story.

    Like


  205. Don’t presume. ask these people that want a virgin for their LTR/marriage. ‘K?

    Also, for a man who apparently knows all about strawmen and other assorted logical fallacies, it’s a bit rich that you think “asking these people” is going to elicit bias-free responses.
    Number one, I don’t care what people say, I look at what they do. And guys (excepting religious freaks) who get the chance at marrying a 10, even if she’s on the slutty side, will pretty much always go that route over the lower-ranked virgin chicks.
    In fact, from what I’ve seen, this preference is so strong that the only guys who can say, with straight faces, that they’d rather marry the plainer virgin than the hot hot hotttt slutty girl are just armchair quarterbacks who have no realistic chance at the latter option.
    Number two, really? This board is good and thought-provoking and all that, but do you think the guys ON THIS BOARD are a representative sample of anything other than … this board?

    Like


  206. @dalerojo, hehe, you did not disappoint!

    Bassoon, if this is the half-cocked shit you think up after reading about how fear induces arousal… I’d love to know the shit you’ve dreamed up after reading about how, say, violence induces arousal.
    Maybe you’ve thought about punching a girl in the face as an opener?

    Have you ever seen Battleship Potemkin from Sergei Eisenstein? Oldie (1925) but goodie. A ground-breaking flix.
    There is no real in your face violence in the movie. And yet, when you see the movie, you get the impression that it is all about violence. The violence is implied, letting your internal hamsters running wild, filling in the blanks. We all have hamsters, male and female, just that men have them on a short (or much shorter) leash.

    As individuals, we react to direct violence differently, based on your internal psychological makeup.

    However, the reactions can be abstracted into general patterns that have a distinct character.

    Men have generally two main patterns of physical/psychological responses.
    1) Face turns pale. Body locks up.
    2) Face turns red. Body flexes, ready to respond.

    The 1) is driven by fear, the 2) is driven by the need to confront the threat.

    These patterns were actually used in Roman military to decide where the soldier would be placed, either 1) in logistics, or 2) as a warrior.

    It is, of course, not clear cut. Most men have a mixture of these responses, because the threats of violence do not exist independently on social context. But if the threat is imminent, most men flip into the red-faced/flexed mode.

    For women, the opposite is true. Most women freeze. They also get lubricated. It is not an arousal, it us simply a physiological response, to protect the genitals in the case of a forced sexual intercourse (rape). In the case an intercourse happens, some women may experience a strong orgasm. It is an unfortunate side effect of the fear lock up that gets released once it seems that the danger is over (which is not necessarily the case). It does not mean, if it was just a rape that is is an enjoyable experience, not at all.

    Those are physiological/psychological responses. There is no point in denying them.

    Now back to Battleship Potemkin…

    What Roissy described was an implied violence, or rather a hint of implied violence, a pattern sublimated twice over. All designed to feed the hamsters. Nothing more, nothing less. It works.

    Now, the case of Bassoon… The general idea is that one lets the head below shoulders to decide whether the female is desired, but the head above the shoulders does not lose the grip on reality and is directing the show. The point is not to generate violence (which would be generally an unpleasant experience), but to do a little mind fuck–to imply violence distilled twice over, with a goal to generate a mutually pleasant experience.

    Bassoon was thinking with his dick. The likelihood that the accident would result in a positive outcome is slim. That is not a good way to proceed. He needs to keep his wits about. He could simply spend a half an hour tailing the woman (about the time frame for the accident resolution) and get some info about her that way and create “entirely random encounter” in less hair-raising settings.

    See, instead of your shaming lingo, you could spend 2 minutes explaining to Bassoon where he errs.

    Like


  207. dalerojo, virgins are not my preference. I am ok with max 3 previous liaisons (and I can get the accurate figure).

    However I know men (and they are not religious freaks) that have the preference as I stated and as you pointed out, I watched what they did, not just what they said. They ended up with a virgin 8/9 grade of female. It just took them an inordinate amount of time from my perspective.

    Like


  208. on August 25, 2010 at 3:36 am David Collard

    Then I must be a religious freak. I don’t care if a girl looked like the Goddess Venus, if she were not a virgin, I would not marry her.

    I married a pretty virgin. I would never have married a woman, no matter how beautiful, who had been fucked by another man.

    Like


  209. David, are you a religious freak? 😉

    Yes/no.

    Like


  210. on August 25, 2010 at 4:05 am Manuel Atanasio Girardot Díaz

    Great, David. You’re also the guy who readily admits that his wife finds sex boring. And who won’t do play rape scenarios, even though wifey has hinted at wanting them.

    Don’t know whether you’re a religious freak, but I damn well hope so. Because if you really have a bored wife at home… whose husband REFUSES to make an effort at fulfilling her fantasies… then the only thing between her and *lots* of other men’s dicks is a bunch of Our Father’s and Hail Mary’s.

    If your wife has hinted at play rape, why not indulge her? Too afraid that you’ll shove her down a slippery slope?

    Like


  211. Morsellaux, from whom are you “get[ting] the accurate figure”? That’s a striking degree of certainty.

    Like


  212. dalerojo, from them wimminz. It involves a fairly advanced degree of NLP reading and a lot of practice.

    Like


  213. and also, morsellaux, I note that you are still avoiding the issue of relative importance of virginity vs. looks, by citing only the example of … both of them combined. Again.

    To rehash, if a man could choose for a LTR, between perfect looks and perfect virginity (NOT BOTH)… think “A xor B”… they would take looks. If they could pick exactly one.

    I will take your continued obfuscation, in response to this extremely simple hypothetical, as an admission that I am correct.

    Like


  214. Morsellaux, I hope you don’t really mean what you words actually say, i.e., you think that you can reliably determine a woman’s exact number of sexual partners via general people-reading abilities and a fair bit of neurolinguistic programming / pattern recognition.
    I hear you on being able to peg her general level of historical sluttiness and/or general sexual restraint. So, if by “accurate figure” you mean “general ballpark idea,” then, yeah, ok, sure. But if by “accurate figure” you actually mean “accurate figure,” then you are insane. (What are tomorrow’s winning lottery numbers?)

    Like


  215. Dalerojo, in a functioning monogamous society, most guys would rather shag the non virgin 10 and still marry the virgin 3-5.

    I’m not talking about religious freaks. Whether it’s not being a virgin or being a different ethnicity or whatever other flavor of socially inconvenient, guys would shag whoever’s hot, but marry a “respectable” woman.

    There’s not really a tradeoff when prostitution is legal, or there is a substantial enough underclass to provide plenty of sportshagging opportunity for the upper classes.

    Even though I’m not exactly hot, I’m an exotic here in Israel. Guys will pick the more socially convenient option even if it is less pretty and/or less feminine and nurturing for marriage, regardless of who they want to or actually do shag on the side.

    In some cultures or subcultures that aren’t particularly fanatical (such as Kafkazi here) that is a virgin. Most want to marry a virgin, or a woman who was a virgin before they started dating. Someone else being hot, they’ll shag, but not marry…most of the time.

    That does seem to be shifting though, due to americanization of the culture here. I know a couple of Kafkazi guys who could have married virgins because they were connected to the type of people who keep their daughters on lockdown, but have married former prostitutes instead. Over the past five years it seems to be happening more often. Retired prostitutes from Tel Aviv move to Haifa to find a husband.

    Like


  216. Just some preemptive comment regarding my post that is held (again!) in the moderation jail. Inferences usually suffice, but sometimes things need to be said in clear terms.

    The Game should be understood as a complex of patterns with a caveat: do no serious harm (spanking or such do not constitute permanent/serious harm). It should be a given, for a normal, well adjusted adult.

    Bassoon’s toying with the idea of an impromptu accident has a serious harm potential. He may be in control of an applied “accident” vector force on his part, but he can’t control the other variables. The woman may lose control, she may get a trajectory that puts her car in a path of another car and she may end up in a morgue instead of bed. It is a dumb idea to say the least.

    Like


  217. @Dalejero

    Your point is moot. If most guys could get 10s, they would NEVER commit to anyone. So yeah basically we know alphas can have 9s and 10s, but what does that have to do with long term exclusive relationships in the first place? Remember women don’t stay hot forever, so at best an “alpha” has use for his 10 for a few years max and then moves on if hes that alpha, if hes really alpha he already moved on while still banging her and cheated on her. if hes THAT alpha he never committed in the first place. Thats not a relationship at all. This is all based on your logic that looks/sex is all a man could possibly be looking for in a wife.

    Why do you keep ignoring the premise? ALL RELATIONSHIPS AND COMMITMENT IS BETA. If anything, a desire for chastity is correlated with INTELLIGENCE, not betaness(although i have heard a few theories that betaness and intelligence have a correlation).

    ONLY the lowliest of betas would COMMIT to a woman based on looks alone. Alphas just aren’t so easily mesmerized. Looks aren’t rare for an alpha to find, if he was an alpha and was hypothetically looking for a relationship, he could bargain for the most chaste 9/10 he could bagg so the arbitrary choices you present are pointless. Alphas if anything can see past beauty better than anyone else.

    Iv’e banged a few 9s and 9.5s and had no great desire to marry them. No great desire to marry anyone at all. Not because i’m an alpha supremo, but because i know my shit. Everyone check out this dalejero…..this cat thinks marriage is about hot sex….no need to get married for that. Only a beta mistakenly would.

    Like


  218. dalerojo, I really don’t care what these men I personally know would do under a hypothetical scenario. What they did (all 3 of them), is they found virgins (two 8s, one 9). They did not accept the xor setup, and given time, they found what they wanted. It may be anecdotal, but it is not hypothetical.

    As for accurate figures… yes, you can get them. I can teach you, provided that you have a spare 20Gs. One thing, I don’t care if the figure is more than 3, how many. Only less or equal to 3. It is really not that difficult to gauge the threshold.

    Like


  219. A dumb beta at that.

    Like


  220. the realist, disagree. With the Game, you can eat the cake, too.

    Like


  221. on August 25, 2010 at 6:41 am David Collard

    Morsellaux

    I am very religious, but as I said before, even if I were not I would not have wanted to marry a woman who was not a virgin.

    Fuck sluts if you must, but don’t marry a woman who has been used by another man.

    The concept just viscerally disgusts me.

    Like


  222. Morsellaux,

    Is that a picture of you?

    Like


  223. Dalerojo, in a functioning monogamous society, most guys would rather shag the non virgin 10 and still marry the virgin 3-5.

    Fail of “functioning monogamous society,” Nicole.

    Like


  224. Morsellaux says, ” With the Game, you can eat the cake, too.”

    …but Realist’s point is that every cupcake eventually goes stale.

    So in a long term relationship, there needs to be more there than the frosting. It has to be a cake you’ll feel glad to eat after a year in the freezer.

    Like


  225. Esteri, there is no such thing as an absolutely monogamous society that is functional. The wiggle room has to be there, at least for men and women who don’t fit the wife profile or requirements, to keep the peace.

    Like


  226. I should clarify though, that if beauty standards are natural and bound to femininity, finding a virgin or at least relatively chaste woman who is also beautiful, isn’t difficult.

    That’s what Israel was like 12 years ago. I was stunned at the sheer numbers and concentration of gorgeous girls even here in Haifa…not to speak of Tel Aviv.

    …and then the soy oil and sweatshop clothes came. 😦

    Like


  227. Esteri, yep, c’est moi. What is obscured somewhat is my pronounced brow ridge. I am really a caveman. 😉

    Like


  228. @Nicole So in a long term relationship, there needs to be more there than the frosting. It has to be a cake you’ll feel glad to eat after a year in the freezer.

    Naturally. Even a purdy face gets boring after a while if there is no substance behind the skin deep beauty. The rapport between the man and woman later in marriage should compensate for a degree of staleness. But, it is withing the power of both to keep their bodies in a shape. That also applies to the mind. If I want my woman submissive, that does not mean I want her dull!

    If both are able to say (and mean it): “I’ve got your back”, there is no power in the verse that breaks them. Extremely rare, but I know one such a couple. Both what I call sigmas.

    Like


  229. @Manuel Atanasio Girardot Díaz
    It would be interesting to see some better posts about… well, fucking.

    Manuel, the Chateau proprietors offer many pointers on how to get the girl and manage teh relationship. They probably presume that the fucking part you can figure out on your own.

    Like


  230. Yea, Manuel, google “how to fuck” yields 106,000,000 results. 😉

    Like


  231. Dalejero:

    I don’t think you have had the pleasure of turning a cute (7) nineteen year old virgin into your personal fuck toy who lives only to please you.

    If you can get 10s, which is highly unlikely seeing as how you are reading an advice blog, feel free to deal with going where many men have gone before and where someone else is going to be in a week.

    Like


  232. @ Morsellaux

    rhettro, no. Though there are manifestos to compare and they are typical leftist screeds, but you also need to consider the fruits. By your fruits you recognize them. All the ideologies that are collectivist have one thing in common. Hekatombs of dead. They just competed which one would have a bigger tally. The communist branch beat the nazis hands down (fascist were wimps in comparison), with 100 million souls on their tab in the 20th century.

    still wrong. the right is not essentially individualist. saying so is a counterhistorical move to make libertarianism something it is not–a right-wing force–and to clumsily paint authentic right-wing ideas and approaches into a corner.

    whom the state punishes, and for what purposes, ends up mattering. it will not do to naively put every statist, non-libertarian arrangement on a par.

    Like


  233. four quadrant delineation of politics: y axis from irrationalism to rationalism, x axis from no state to an all-powerful state.

    That’s a serviceable model as well. Except I’d rephrase “irrationalism” with another word to do away with the bad connotation. Maybe renaming the x-axis as “naturalism to rationalism.” This better shows the axis as a continuum from things that appeal to human nature and instinct on one end, to a de-personalizing rationalism at the other end.

    All the ideologies that are collectivist have one thing in common. Hekatombs of dead.

    That’s a hyperbole, and a bad one because it colors all collectivisms as bad, regarless of kind or degree. Any social kinship and identification is a form of collectivism.

    And the state, when properly functioning, enforces this collectivism via things like guarding the borders, distinguishing between citizen and alien, and guarding other cultural-consensus things.

    Like


  234. The fingers in the jar in the safe with the realistic looking blood?
    Wow.
    Genius.
    Like I’d get so wet.

    Like


  235. The ” men” who are most interested in this site have one thing in common: you HATE women. Your stereotypes – no, caricatures – of women are pathetic and absurd. For instance, “men have biographies; women have grandchildren”. Really? How many of the jerkoffs on this site have actual biographies that other people read? And there are no biographies of women? There are boring women and boring men (obsessed with sex, sports and beer, for example). There are cruel and kind, stupid and bright, submissive and dominant men AND women. Have any of you considered how your hostility towards women repels them? And that you become even more hostile with each rejection? The most popular man I know is financially poor, doesn’t even own a car, and is short, chunky and basically homely. He isn’t especially dominant. He would never try to frighten a woman, even as a “joke”! Other men often ask for his secret. He has said, “I really LIKE women. In fact, I love women. I have lots of women friends, platonic friends, as well as lovers. I enjoy people. I like to have a good time and help others to have a good time. I enjoy life.” He is very relaxed. He never pressures a woman for sex. He is warm and friendly, patient in the extreme, gentle, with very good manners, calm, never aggressive, hostile, sarcastic, demanding or desperate. Women fall all over him, call him, write him love letters, ask him out. Yet he does the opposite of what most “be the alpha male/take control/ force or trick the dumb annoying bitch-ho into giving you the pussy you “deserve” RIGHT NOW” websites suggest. Could these sites just be a way to trick some frustrated clueless males into giving up some $$$$?

    Like


  236. yeah women do have biographies, it’s a sum of the men in their lives.

    Like


  237. Oh, yeah, one more thing: If my boyfriend had a safe and wouldn’t let me know what was in it, he would come home one day to find the safe open and all contents gone, or an empty spot where the safe had been.

    [Editor: If he was smart, he’d then dump your ass like a gallon of sour milk.]

    Like


  238. bettie

    and that’s why women get killed

    Like


  239. I thought of the car crash opener (instinctively, not reasoning) before I read Roissy’s post the next day. And you guys take what is said on here far too seriously.

    @dalerojo – no, I would never just punch a woman (or any person) like that. The general rule (as formulated by a recent girlfriend) – “No hitting unless your cock is in me.” I think that’s a decent rule to live by. Of course that doesn’t preclude a swift slap on the behind because that isn’t considered pugilistic. In any case I try to not leave serious marks in case she decides to make up a false story. They do from time to time.

    I have little or no desire to inject violence into a sexual relationship. The consistent pleas for it over the years have led me to adopt it.

    And if I had hit her with my car it would have been a low velocity crash, I was only a few feet away and accelerating from rest. You worry about negative externalities, and I’m telling you she was a solid redhead.

    Like


  240. Oooh…Dana…I’m sooo scared. I’ll change my behavior immediately. By the way, my ex has actually killed people, but they were all other men, strangely enough. So, I’ve been around truly dangerous people of both sexes and I’m not only still alive, but expect to live a long and happy life. The men in my life respect me and treat me great (and, yes, I return the favor) – too bad for those who hate women and are hated in
    return. Don’t hold your breath waiting for my demise, angry boy.

    Like


  241. Bettie, you are awesome. A long tirade and then a follow up comment basically saying “Yeah, that stunt would get to me.”

    Don’t you get it? Roissy or “Citizen Renegade” and this sight have got to you? Do you spend much time thinking or complaining about guys you aren’t really that interested in? The opposite of love isn’t hate, its indifference.

    End of comments needed on this chick.

    Like


  242. Bettie, what makes you think you have the right to snoop or steal someone else’s property.

    You are dumb and hateful.

    Please, please remove the plank from your eye…

    Like


  243. Bettie,

    “The ” men” who are most interested in this site have one thing in common: you HATE women.”

    That is not true. And it’s usually good manners not to write about something you have clearly not read. There are all kinds of views here, but most folks are here to discuss about how the fairer sex thinks, combined with some (pretty interesting) political discussion.

    “Could these sites just be a way to trick some frustrated clueless males into giving up some $$$$?”

    If you had glanced at this website for more than five seconds, you would notice that the editor(s) do not sell any products; do not organise classes; has no advertisements and offers free advice in answer to peoples questions. This is probably the least commercial website on Earth.

    “The men in my life respect me and treat me great (and, yes, I return the favor).”

    It’s good that you’re treated with respect by your dangerous entourage. It’s a shame that you didn’t accord the readers of this website the same courtesy before writing that bizarre screed.

    Like


  244. The_King

    @Firepower

    You would like to believe that married and engaged women don’t cheat wouldn’t you?

    Go reread the whole blog, you missed the big picture.

    Most women are married to beta chumps and wouldn’t mind cheating with a HV man like me.

    my diagnosis is
    they’re just all just telling you
    they’re married.

    Like


  245. Beauty summed up: To tell if a woman’s really attractive, it’s all in the figures: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1306012/Beauty-summed-To-tell-womans-really-attractive-figures.html#ixzz0xd9E48pq

    Like


  246. on August 25, 2010 at 11:21 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey betty!! lzozozolzozzozoozozolz you write “Bettie
    The ” men” who are most interested in this site have one thing in common: you HATE women. Your stereotypes – no, caricatures – of women are pathetic and absurd. For instance, “men have biographies; women have grandchildren”. Really? How many of the jerkoffs on this site have actual biographies that other people read? And there are no biographies of women? There are boring women and boring men (obsessed with sex, sports and beer, for example). There are cruel and kind, stupid and bright, submissive and dominant men AND women. Have any of you considered how your hostility towards women repels them? And that you become even more hostile with each rejection? The most popular man I know is financially poor, doesn’t even own a car, and is short, chunky and basically homely. He isn’t especially dominant. He would never try to frighten a woman, even as a “joke”! Other men often ask for his secret. He has said, “I really LIKE women. In fact, I love women. I have lots of women friends, platonic friends, as well as lovers. I enjoy people. I like to have a good time and help others to have a good time. I enjoy life.” He is very relaxed. He never pressures a woman for sex. He is warm and friendly, patient in the extreme, gentle, with very good manners, calm, never aggressive, hostile, sarcastic, demanding or desperate. Women fall all over him, call him, write him love letters, ask him out. Yet he does the opposite of what most “be the alpha male/take control/ force or trick the dumb annoying bitch-ho into giving you the pussy you “deserve” RIGHT NOW” websites suggest. Could these sites just be a way to trick some frustrated clueless males into giving up some $$$$?”

    no.
    we love womenz

    it is da neoconz who are assocking them and taping it without their conmthent thusly deosuling them who hate their bodies and their osuls lzozlzlzlzllzl lzozlzozoloz

    it iw womenz pwoerful womenz who are funding and promoting and publishing the assocking of girls and the taping of it without tehir conthent zlzozoozzozoo

    lozlzozllz

    hey betty betty

    riddle me this please pelase pelase

    why is it

    that

    women

    finance
    publish
    promote

    men who tape butthex withoutthe girlths contehnt and lie about tehir height?

    why do woemnz like priscilla painton of simon and schuster adn charlotte allen at the weekly standadth finance publish [promote and repeat the lies of tucker max about his hieght lzozozozlzol who rhymes with goldman sax.

    laides ladiesplease anser

    why why why?

    what drives you do to this?

    who is fiancning you to do this?

    lzozlzl

    tell me please!!! pthanks!!

    hey ms. mccfartle.

    riddle me this batwoman. why does womenz powerful woemnz promote douchebaggery and secretivetapers of butthex without a girlths conthent and wire them hundreds of thosuands of fioat bernanke cash so they can pick up sknakskkssk? lzozlzl

    community.feministing.com/2009/09/why-are-female-executives-publ.html

    Why are Female Executives Publishing Tucker Max?

    Saw this floating around. good question!

    MCCOY MOUNTAIN
    ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

    Ms. Priscilla Painton

    Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief

    RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.”gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Dear Ms. Painton,

    I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?
    gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

    “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”
    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com

    tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

    Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

    –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?
    gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system

    Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

    –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/

    “OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml

    Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

    Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

    “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

    What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?

    washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/

    It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

    “Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” –movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

    So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?

    ” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.

    “Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?
    rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/

    “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”

    It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .

    Best,

    McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?

    the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

    What’s up with women these days?

    It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

    Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster
    gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster

    Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?

    Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?
    http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Does she get off on this?

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”

    Is that supposed to be funny?” http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?
    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:
    http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html
    tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html
    http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml

    “11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

    [I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

    [To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

    [To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

    [To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

    [To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

    11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

    Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

    ‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton

    http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html

    “What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”

    See? That is the clever banker ruse.

    Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.
    http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

    “A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
    and Government’s War on Fathers”

    “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

    The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

    “My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

    Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
    “I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

    What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

    http://www.amazon.com/End-Fed-Ron-Paul/dp/0446549193/

    Review for End The Fed
    “Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. ”
    –Arlo Guthrie

    “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

    The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

    Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?

    And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

    “Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” http://www.savethemales.ca/

    http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798

    Like


  247. on August 25, 2010 at 11:25 am Gunslingergregi

    Why are woman allowed to use children as weapons. Pathetic shit. Kids should be taken away from these hos they don’t deserve them. Men need to get the kids in every instance.

    Like


  248. on August 25, 2010 at 11:25 am greatbooksformen GBFM

    ^^^^^^

    lozlzozlz

    i love how the feministing community removed teh link criticizing tucker max and priscilla painton

    at the end of the day feminsist women loves docuhebags who films secrrteive taping fo anal without their girlths ocnthent.

    epic douchebaggery and feminism are two sides of teh very same coin which isn’t a coin but just a fiat peice of paper now lozlzozlzzll

    but sniper nd lily

    answer myq uestiosn above?

    why why why do womenz like you fund and promote douchebag butthesexers secerteive tapers of butthex iwthout teh gorlths conthent who make fun of owmenz and mionrities? why do you fund/promote this?

    Like


  249. on August 25, 2010 at 11:29 am Cannon's Canon

    i couldn’t help but think of this:

    http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/04/23/we-are-not-your-weapons-we-are-women/

    rowr! arousing!

    Like


  250. Reader

    Teenage girls most at risk as STIs in the UK reach record levels:

    when the brit girls stop fucking pakis and muslams, they’ll go back to normal, only getting the clap from black american tourists

    Like


  251. on August 25, 2010 at 11:36 am Cannon's Canon

    Bettie,

    The ” men” who are most interested in this site have one thing in common: you HATE women.

    the opposite of ‘love’ is complete, empty disinterest. think about it

    or should i say “marinate on that for a minute, sweetheart”

    Like


  252. on August 25, 2010 at 11:50 am Gunslingergregi

    I just keep looking at my woman and laughing my ass off.

    I am like why are you cute too much?

    She says she doesn’t understand.

    lol

    Like


  253. Morsellaux,

    We already have alphas, betas, and gammas. Please expound upon the concept of the sigma.

    Like


  254. @greatbooksformen GBFM

    NEOCOMMS, not neocons, unless you mean the “con” as con-men (or women).

    Like


  255. PA,

    All the ideologies that are collectivist have one thing in common. Hekatombs of dead.

    That’s a hyperbole, and a bad one because it colors all collectivisms as bad, regarless of kind or degree. Any social kinship and identification is a form of collectivism.

    And the state, when properly functioning, enforces this collectivism via things like guarding the borders, distinguishing between citizen and alien, and guarding other cultural-consensus things.

    BS. I were talking about an ideology as a political basis of organization of society (state).

    Forming a guild is not a collectivism. It is a result of freedom of association.

    Delegation of functions that a citizen can’t provide on his/her own is not a collectivism either. It is a delegation of functions.

    Your use of collectivism is inappropriate and fucked up. It may create an impression “hmmm, collectivism is not that bad”. and a slippery slope to acceptance of totalitarian mindset.

    Like


  256. rhettro, the Left puts libertarians on the right (anything opposed to their screed is right of them). Deal with it. Redefine what right means, since most people think in a linear model.

    Like


  257. Sigmas… While the general structure from alphas to omegas is more or less linear, there are types that may seem perpendicular to this structure. They are outside the game, because their personal characteristics do not conform to the notions associated with the alpha-omega scale. They are usually clumped together with alphas because they generally seem to have the the natural game as men go but with sometimes incomprehensible responses, or a lack of femalian hindbrain hamster treadmill as women go, but they are outliers with patterns that do not fit the general linear scheme. Outside, with behavioral patterns of their own… and rare. Sigmas seek sigmas because that is their ideal relationship configuration.

    Like


  258. You know, we really need to make a lexicon with credits. There are so many terms coming out, and it’s hard to keep track of who came up with what and what various things imply.

    Like


  259. on August 26, 2010 at 11:46 am Gunslingergregi

    well “mout” was created by firepower to signify he is pissed off and is aloof and indiferent to it so just leaves. lol

    Cannon has established the “no homo” to signify he is not gay when in fact he might actually be talking about maybe some somewhat gay shit. lol

    Then you have “racist” which first began being used against black people by me I believe. he he he

    Like


  260. on August 26, 2010 at 12:00 pm Gunslingergregi

    Of course gbfm with the lollllllzzzzz

    Prob spelled it wrong.

    But now I can shit in almost any language and get the jist.

    Just read a job offer email all in french and understood what they were talking about lolllllzzzzzz

    Like


  261. on August 26, 2010 at 12:01 pm Gunslingergregi

    should have been read shit.

    I didn’t say I could type in any language.

    Like


  262. @ Morsellaux

    i have dealt with it, whereas you plainly have not. instead you’ve simply bought the left’s grid of reality–we know this because you stated it. the left says what things are and you nod. you work for them, and therefore you do not work for the right. this is rather obvious and unarguable, conceptually, yes? even if it isn’t, libertarianism’s leftist pedigree is, and is well-documented.

    Like


  263. Gunslingergregi

    Then you have “racist” which first began being used against black people by me I believe. he he he

    They’ve kept us enslaved for 50 years now gunni – time to Take It To Da Man.

    Last I recall, our massa done have a name like Barracks Mboma or sumpin’

    jes sayin’

    Like


  264. Or for Italian macho try this:

    Like


  265. on January 28, 2011 at 1:11 pm Pedro De La Plata

    In reference to arousal of women via fear, I can share this story which is I hope informative and a little interesting:

    I’m a 24 year-old guy and two years ago a likewise 24 year-old woman I know from home that was attending law school not far from where I was attending a university told me the nothing left out version of when she was raped by a stranger. We weren’t dating or anything, just a kind of friendly/flirty relationship and we got closer but then went off to our respective schools. Anyway, in her description of the events of her being raped by a guy that had tricked her into letting him into an apartment building she said that dealing with having had a few ‘mind-blowing’ orgasms during the ordeal was one of the most difficult aspects of it. Particularly because she had a desire to feel that way again. But when she had tried re-enacting or playing rape games with boyfriends it was just not the same.

    For selfish reasons (she is a rather hot Irish/Chinese mixed girl) and because she really seemed sincere about what she had confided, I resolved that I would some day fulfill that forbidden wish and try to replicate the feeling of that night for her.

    I called her on Valentine’s Day two years ago after having driven to her town and pretended to be still at my own school. She advised me that she was just hanging out in her apartment that night instead of attending a Valentine’s Day party that she had been invited to. I said, hey, I sent you a small Valentine’s gift so be expecting the delivery soon. She sounded pleased and after a little more small talk I bid her good night.

    A short time later, armed with a classic mugger’s ski mask, a dozen red roses and some duct tape I went to her apartment. I buzzed her and told her I had a delivery. She buzzed me in. I went to the apartment door on the second floor and knocked. She opened the door immediately after maybe momentarily looking through a peep hole but I stood with my back to the door so she couldn’t see my face with the rosses prominently displayed. As soon as the door opened I stuck the roses in her face and she stared wide eyed at my ski-masked face, not knowing it was me at all. I disguised my voice and hoarsely whispered Happy Valentines’ Day and pushed her back into the apartment.

    She ended up stripped, blindfolded and tied to her bed. Touching her in her private place she was more lubricated than any woman I’ve ever had the pleasure of touching and she would visibly shudder in anticipation with every light touch and caress.

    I replicated the things she told me the rapist had done that had made her orgasm the first time: going down on her, hard fucking doggy style, etc. She came several times roaring and whimpering. It was mind blowing for me too.

    When I finally let her see who i was she was wild with lust again and we had sex virtually all night long until we were completely exhausted. We ‘dated’ a while afterwards but distance was too much of a downer.

    So, fear is indeed an aphrodesiac for at least some women…probably for many. I know that for a fact.

    Like