Caplanization

Swiped from the Boys from Brasil Norte, a neologismic mockery missile worthy of repoasting:

Caplanization is the process by which the proponents of a particular policy (in this case unrestricted immigration) argue for it in such a manner than virtually all reasonable people are attracted to the opposite position.

Related. You know how robots that get too close to looking human, but not close enough to precisely mimic humans, reach what is known as the Uncanny Valley, and creep people out? Caplan and his hivekind are like the reverse of that process, humans who get too close to robotic facsimiles of humans, but haven’t yet reached full robotization, and creep people out with their vertigo-inducing human-borg form. Only when his transformation is complete will normal people begin to enjoy Caplan’s company, putting the cat on him and sharing a laugh as he roombas around the family room.





Comments


  1. http://www.epjournal.net/articles/taking-control-of-aggression-perceptions-of-aggression-suppress-the-link-between-perceptions-of-facial-masculinity-and-attractiveness/

    The more a woman is fearful of male aggression the less she finds masculine faces attractive.

    I guess this means feminist women and beta/herb men are a match made in heaven (or hell).

    Like


    • Back in the day, we used to call it Paul McCartney/Davey Jones syndrome.

      And then came Donny Osmond. lulz

      The teen magazines would always feature the “cute”, least-masculine looking guy from the pop groups.

      Like


  2. Oh, mass immigration proponents know exactly what they’re doing. They’re replacing Americans with foreigners. That’s it. Americans are troublesome and insist on things like “rights” while non-Americans are just happy that there are no rebels blowing shit up here.

    Like


    • it depends on who, and i guess degree of ‘mass’, but not all believe that. for example, without our ridiculous welfare safety net, and with a much stronger constitution, i would be very pro-immigration. in our current state it’s not going to be helpful, but i think that’s more a problem with the system than with immigration itself, and i think the system will need fixed, immigration or no. we wouldn’t be attracting the world’s shit if we weren’t already among world’s pussiest nations in terms of giving away our birthright, lack of any law enforcement on immigration at all, and no requirement to integrate or anything else with the pre-existing culture.

      Like


  3. Normal people’s rationalizations serve themselves. Autists serve their rationalizations.

    Caplan has reached Peak Autism. His rationalization’s consumption now exceeds his ability to feed it.

    Like


  4. I liked the parts in the IQ2 debate video where someone else was speaking and Caplan had to try and remain silent. Obviously, he disagrees with everything everyone else, even Wadhwa says. You see him squirming and jerking and jittering his facial expressions, just dying to burst out in open-borders Tourette’s syndrome.

    Like


  5. This reminds me of a commenter over the Econolib site in stating whether Caplan would personally boot out his own children if he could find immigrant children who are harder-working, harder-studying and generally earn their keep over Western ingrates?

    Like


  6. Naaah, the funny thing is how people even give this guy the time of day. NO control of immigration AT ALL? Most people disagree on the total amount of immigration–Caplan’s position is so extreme as to be counterproductive.

    Unfortunately, the status quo will continue–the Left wants the votes, and the Right (corporate) the cheap labor.

    Like


    • on November 12, 2013 at 7:58 am The Burninator

      Aye, your assessment is spot on, the status quo will continue for precisely the reasons you list. The elite on “both sides” (notice the quotes, I actually think they’re one in the same behind the curtains) want this. Cheap labor and votes for socialism, all the while displacing native liberty-loving enlightenment era European based culture and peoples. They want the population dumb, loyal and subservient, and white Anglo based culture is not conducive at its core to meek subservient mindsets. Even today, when we see weakness all around, there are still millions of “rebel” Anglo/Celt/Germanic types from our culture who are not giving up the ghost. Can’t have that, time to displace us with the descendents of recent stone age savages who obey all commands and question nothing.

      Like


      • An intelligent person made the “no immigration control at all” argument to me and specified that immigrants would not be eligible for any social services (which would be a standard libertarian position) and that immigrants would not be granted citizenship and their children would not gain it automatically either, even if the children were born in the US. In this model, immigrants would only come to the US if they are indeed the cheapest qualified people to do a job, which is how they would have to sustain themselves. Is there a problem with this?

        Like


      • That’s my preference as well. If you’re a citizen you are eligible for a citizen’s dividend or basic income of some sort. If you aren’t then you aren’t. Birthright citizenship would be limited to inheritance, and only natural born citizens would be eligible to hold any kind of public office. Naturalized citizens would be eligible to vote and to hold government jobs. Children with only one parent who was a citizen would be given automatic naturalization status as opposed to natural born status. This would remove all of the government incentives for immigration, and give a slight advantage to citizens. I could slowly help reverse the mass immigration trend and save money because there wouldn’t be resources wasted on deporting people who can just come back.

        Like


      • ” In this model, immigrants would only come to the US if they are indeed the cheapest qualified people to do a job, which is how they would have to sustain themselves. Is there a problem with this?”
        It takes away job opportunities from the natives and lowers wages. Also, it does not necessarily follow that only the “cheapest qualified people” would immigrate; likely the poorest third-worlders still want to get in because even without citinzenship their lot would greatly improve.

        Like


      • on November 13, 2013 at 12:07 am ChicagoRefugeeC

        Yes. There is. Many. How long do you think those restrictions would last, given the mathematical certainty of a barrage of propaganda from all corners of the church/media/academia/government complex? What is the essential distinction between this system and indentured servitude? Why should our fellow citizens have to ‘race to the bottom’ to compete with the entire world for those few jobs that still remain stateside? Do you think this new servant class would put up with this situation forever? Would Americans really stand by and watch the immigrant children go hungry and/or uneducated? How is this different from apartheid South Africa and how well is being a minority in their own country working out for the Boers there? (hint: check genocidewatch.com) Not to mention, our ancestors came here to get away from just that sort of society ….

        Like


      • Oh, btw everyone, I changed my name (finally). I used to be feministx.

        [CH: good, the CH influence on you is strong.]

        Like


      • BTW– a spoon is a cross between a spook and a coon.

        Just sayin.

        Like


      • lol, you aren’t the first person that wanted to take credit for my new name, but indeed, you are the person that deserves credit for it.

        Like


      • on November 12, 2013 at 10:50 am ProudFeministGirl

        So, people who think like you should become the new elite, iam a White girl, but i live in Mexico, i am White Hispanic, if i were an American like many of you are, i already would try to become a rich person to be part of the elite. I am a high IQ girl, but i don’t want to waste my talent on Mexico, is not my country, in the future i will live in United States or some European country and i will use my full potential to save them.

        Like


      • This is written like a dumb person parading their education.

        Like


      • The monicker chosen alone says “Meh”.

        Like


  7. It’s not mysterious. When elite educators and popular media alike have been denigrating patriotism pretty consistently since 1919 (with brief interruptions when elite educators and media producers thought they needed other people to put on uniforms to protect them from scary foreigners), it’s no wonder people like Caplan can only think of a country as nothing but a really big zip code, with no ties of loyalty among its citizens or between citizens and nation.

    We need to reform higher education down to the foundation stones, and we need to reform the media with rifle squads and rope.

    Like


    • “with brief interruptions when elite educators and media producers thought they needed other people to put on uniforms to protect them from scary foreigners”

      Or alternatively, when something like 9/11 happens and they are afraid if they do NOT act patriotic, they will get their asses kicked, get unelected, lose circulation, etc…

      Like


  8. Hence “public education”, to insure that “virtually all reasonable people” will be a shrinking minority.

    Like


  9. There’s immigration and then there’s immigration.
    They passed some laws – I believe it was called the Mann Act – in the 1960’s, originally meant to facilitate the patriation of foreign spouses of US servicemen, primarily Vietnamese wives/girlfriends.
    One side effect – which may or may not have been unintentional – of this law was that it became almost impossible for western Europeans who did not already have family in the US and weren’t rich/celebs/scientists to apply for immigration status.
    Coupled with the fact that over the past 40-50 years or so, the standard of living (depending on how you define it) in most of western Europe has been as high or higher than in the US, they haven’t even *wanted* to come.
    Which may be changing, because much of their social services structure is collapsing (can’t afford it, see also ‘Obamacare’), and even wealthy, stable countries like Austria have 1.2 million (of 8) people in or near poverty (their standards) and gangs of eastern European and non-European beggars, thieves and thugs, something that would have been completely unthinkable in the 1970s.
    Immigration to the US still being very difficult, they go to Canada, Australia, New Zealand,etc.
    French actor Gerard Depardieu recently emigrated to Russia (!!??).
    BBC News had a segment on a brain drain of young, unemployed Portuguese students and professionals to Brazil.

    Like


  10. I feel the same way about libertarianism. I love the idea of libertarianism, it’s just that most of its proponents argue for it in such an insane way that I have been almost permanently put off.

    Like


    • ^ This! I remember once discussing SS with a hard-core libertarian, and he was telling me SS should be canceled outright. I asked him what my 70+ parents were supposed to do? His reply “if they didn’t save enough fuck them!” I tried to point out that they HAD saved, but had also worked for 40+ years, playing by ‘the rules’, and now dudes like him were saying ‘fuck them’. Finally walked away in disgust.

      Like


      • Ethically, SS is not a big piggy bank that people pay into and then draw out of later in life. In fact, the funds go from the young payers directly to the old pensioners. It’s ethically asymmetrical. After giving your money during your lifetime to older folks, you have established no obligation in younger folks to repay you when you retire. You depend on the guns of the government to keep the youngsters paying you for debts they did not incur. This is the ethical dilemma that libertarians are trying to point out.

        Like


      • Bob, you are missing the point. People like my folks were lied to for years about how this all worked. I understand the inter-generational conflict that is unavoidable here. I do not regard ‘fuck your parents’ as ‘pointing out an ethical dilemma’.

        Like


      • A.K.A. a Ponzi scheme. In which you are forced to participate.

        Like


      • Exactly so. The point about ignorance of this still stands.

        Like


      • Your libertarian friend was rude and uncompassionate perhaps. But the fact that your parents were lied to and forced into a Ponzi scheme is not an ethical argument for forcing today’s young folks to participate.

        SS was money stolen from your parents and then squandered long ago (all according to plan IMO). Your parents were victims of fraud and armed robbery. But their victimhood and loss does not give them a moral claim to make themselves whole by stealing from the next crop of hapless victims.

        In the presidential primaries, Ron Paul proposed a reasonable plan IMO which would have allowed current recipients above a certain age and below certain means to retain their SS payments until death, during a transitional phase-out of the program.

        Like


    • on November 12, 2013 at 8:01 am The Burninator

      Random,

      Some bone head does not represent libertarianism in toto. Most libertarians who run for office generally hold the “phase it out over time” mindset regarding most social entitlements. It’s not rocket science to realize that a sudden removal of a “service” like SS would cause massive social upheaval.

      Like


      • “phase it out over time”

        Thats because the majority of the current old population is white. The “phase out” is meant to affect the future majority nonwhite old population.

        Like


      • It would have been feasible for me to advocate “phase out” a year ago. And then November 6, 2012 happened.

        Now? Burn the leviathan to the ground and sow the earth with salt. Not détente, rollback. Not compromise or conditional terms, but total victory and extinction. Extremism, violence, and a credible threat of war. (Which will not be necessary because the opposition is fractious, stupid, disorganized minorities, women, and sensitive self-hating men.) We will make the rubble bounce. We will make “a desert and call it peace.”

        With apologies to Reagan (PBUH), here is my strategy on the Cold Civil War: We win, they lose.

        Chose up your side. The enemy is fully committed, which necessitates our full commitment. White western man is “nice” to a fault, “until it’s time to not be nice.” Then enemies perish by the truckloads, rather efficiently and in maximum, creative horror: The soldier defiling “the locks of your shrill-shrieking daughters,” and “fathers taken by the silver beards … their most reverend heads dash’d to the walls. …”

        What is’t to me, when you yourselves are cause,
        If your pure maidens fall into the hand
        Of hot and forcing violation?
        What rein can hold licentious wickedness
        When down the hill he holds his fierce career?

        Like Harfleur, duly warned.

        Matt

        Like


      • At this point in time, your plan doesn’t sound as bad as it would have a year ago. I do grow weary of the ever roaring class warfare and demands for my life to be served on the half shell to parasites. I’m tired of “racist!” and every other name being thrown out by sneering Leftist goons at every turn, and I’m tired of seeing militarized police show up and shoot defenseless men and women for trivial infractions of the lawless law.

        Might not be long before I and others decide its time to become warrior poets and start forming up fianna once again. Flush this entire parasite infested system down the commode, then have a nice barbeque on the glass razed deserts that were once cities. All free minded men are welcome to join, come one come all.

        Like


      • I just realized the dramatic irony behind Dalton’s statement about the “time not to be nice”. He clearly did not recognize that time when it came outside of the controlled and artificial setting of roadhouse-bouncing. Dalton was unable to extend his wisdom in violence to the real world.

        Like


      • There is nothing deconstructable about “Pain Don’t Hurt,” however.

        Like


      • Burn, I agree. Unfortunately, the hard-core types seem to be the ones who get the most attention (deliberately, on the part of the media, I think.) Does’t alter the fact that if you ask 100 random friends/family about libertarianism, either you will get a blank look, or a negative reaction. They have NOT been good about articulating who the real enemy is here, and how to address the issues.

        Like


      • Not sure I call them “hard core” so much as “raving evangelicals”. Kind of like how some folks get all screaming raving frothing about telling you to convert and accept Jesus, or burn in hell!, all the while they themselves exhibit 0.0% Christian values. Hard core would be demonstrating the values and reasonably explaining due to a strong faith.

        Something about fire and brimstone types causes my middle finger to auto extend on any given day. All political policies have consequences and affect real life people, if we ignore this truth then we become no better than the gang of hoodlums who currently hold our lives as irrelevant as they pass law after law.

        Like


      • Fair enough. Can’t argue with your point.

        Like


      • Spare me your racism thwack. Whites are still over 70-some percent of the population. And who cares anyway? Theft is theft is theft, and it’s time to put an end to it. In the process we simply need to ensure that those currently on it are not suddenly disrupted and left in the cold. What your racist thoughts on the matter are, are frankly, inconsequential. I’m tired of racism from blacks just as much as I am from whites. If you can approach the discussion with something other than hand wringing emotion, I invite you to do so, else you will be disregarded as irrelevant.

        Like


      • Agreed 1000%, burn. Several years back, someone was proposing phasing out SS over (IIRC) 30 years or so, and funding the phase-out with bonds or some such. Seemed like a very reasonable idea. Then, the Democrats started the class warfare rhetoric and it died quickly.

        Like


      • The Burninator
        I’m tired of racism from blacks just as much as I am from whites.
        ———————————————————————————————

        But whom do you single out for a dressing down?

        Thats right, the black person.

        You never challenge the white readers here; but If I make a single observation you jump on me like Im the biggest racist that ever lived.

        There are no civilians in a race war so stop acting like one you 1 to 4% admixture hybrid neanderthal fairy.

        Like


      • That is because what most white commentors say here is not racism.

        Stating facts about high rates of crimes and stating such other symptoms of black dysfunction is not racism.

        Or when we say get rid of affirmative action and treat everyone as equal no matter their skin color, this is definitely not racism.

        But you Thwack calling us KKK members and accusing us of wishing to hang blacks from trees – simply because we state facts and discuss important issues affecting everyone – now that is racism.

        See the difference?

        Like


      • Actually, kiddo, I have called out the white supremists here and gotten my ass screamed at for pages on end. You just didn’t see or didn’t bother to see, having selective vision.

        Your race war is strictly in your head, nobody has time for your fantasies nor your inability to actually understand science (anthropology). As I said, you are now irrelevant to my discussion. Too bad, you could probably provide some insight if you’d take the idiotic chip on your should off once in a while.

        Slainte

        Like


      • That’s because you and your ilk are still too binary-minded to distinguish white nationalists from Cathedral-shaming litany of “supremists” or “supremacists” or whatever.

        I can honestly say I know of no “white supremists” here at the chateau… sure, in moments of anger and/or humor some disparaging remarks get made, or some chest-thumping occurs…

        But NOBODY is looking to “lord it over” outsiders… most of us are just looking to be left alone to pursue our given racial identity and cultural heritage… and assure there’s a future for white children.

        Like


      • Exactly, too many call us white supremacists when all we are is race realists who have as much a right as any race or culture to thrive and survive.

        Wanting to protect our race and culture does not mean we want to hang colored people from trees.

        Being proud of our race and culture does not equal hating other races and cultures.

        Not being happy our race and culture are being replaced does not make us haters nor supremacists.

        Like


      • How is separation supremacy?

        Like


      • Greg Eliot
        I can honestly say I know of no “white supremists” here at the chateau
        ——————————————————————————————-

        Note to nonwhite people: What Greg and for that matter Canadian Friend are really saying is: “Im not a racist.” You are going to get this a lot from white people; especially right after you come under racial attack. But here is the logic behind why you are justified to suspect they COULD be one.

        Here is the program:

        you: are there any white supremacists in the United States?

        Greg: yes

        you: are there any white supremacists in __________ (the name of your state)

        Greg: yes

        You: are there any white supremacists in __________ (the name of your city)

        Greg: Yes

        You: are there any white supremacists in __________ ( your zip code)

        You keep shrinking the geographical area until you get to the point which describes the room you and Greg are sitting in; thats when he will say NO.

        At that point you ask him, “what is it about this room that makes it IMPOSSIBLE for a white supremacist to enter it?”

        Force field?

        Infinite dimension Hilbert space?

        Jesus with a knightstick?

        WTF is it?

        You ain’t gonna get an answer and that is precisely what justifies you suspecting the white person you are talking to COULD be one.

        Don’t fall for the rope-a-dope or Fred Astaire routine.

        Treat them just like you would if you were a marine in Afghanistan and an I.E.D just blew up that took your legs off and killed 7 of your buddies; and there is Greg standing there with his turban and Koran talking about:

        “I can honestly say I know of no “terrorists” here at the market”

        Like


      • Thwack, you keep making the same mistake that being called a RAY-CIS is of concern to me.

        Here, write it out, my RAY-CIS confession, I’ll sign it:

        If wanting me and my folk to be left alone to pursue our given racial identity and cultural heritage… without the deleterious influence of outsiders who, at best, have no love for me and my kind… and at worse, would gladly see us perish… then I, your honor, am RAY-CIS.

        Like


      • on November 13, 2013 at 12:19 am ChicagoRefugeeC

        Either point out to me the 500+ ‘random’ incidents of white-on-black mob attacks over the last two years or STFU. People are dying due to racial hatred and you’re whining about comments on a blog. http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/

        Like


      • Anytime you run a prison, you are going to produce prison behavior. Inmates assault and murder each other everyday; every once in a while a guard gets shanked. It is your job as a prison guard to keep the inmates focused on each other with drugs, homosexuality and differing levels of access to things of value such as, yard time, cafeteria food, uniforms…

        The last thing you want as a guard is to have all the inmates sober, straight, and looking at YOU as the source of all their problems.

        But you already knew that which is why you installed an inmate as warden in 2008.

        Like


      • I think Paul Ryan (not even vaguely a libertarian) was making a similar proposal? May have him mistaken for somebody else, but the idea is sound and the humane way to go about it. And in the process, let’s wack some of the welfare programs off the slate as well, wean them off then be done with the programs entirely.

        Like


      • It was Paul Ryan, but he didn’t support a full phaseout; he proposed keeping status quo for workers over a certain age, and phasing in raising eligibility age, partial privatization, removal of the income cap, and reduced benefits over time for younger workers. I thought it was ironic that seniors were some of Ryan’s biggest critics, given that his proposals wouldn’t affect them. It’s the workers of my generation that should be upset. If you remove the income cap (taxing higher earners more) and means-test benefits, it’s just another wealth transfer program. Which SS was never intended to be.

        Like


      • Thanks for the illumination Amy, I thought it was him but wasn’t quite certain.

        Like


      • I suggest eliminating Medicaid for poor pregnant women and keeping Medicaid only for women who have a working husband making over a certain amount, say $35k.
        Since most poor woman will have kids with low iq, this will lower their birthrates. Over the next couple of generations, the average iq of the population will increase. Natural selection baby.

        Like


  11. Non-retarded ways of advocating libertarianism:

    1) Assuming a base population of people who can sustain it, and external protection as well as internal checks on parasitism or abuse of common good. In this scenario, immigration is ruled out.

    2) Assuming genuine liberty, where no population group is prevented by a powerful state from asserting its right to community and posterity. In this scenario, “Civil Rights” is ruled out.

    Like


  12. on November 12, 2013 at 7:14 am RappaccinisDaughter

    “Uncanny Valley” is my new official nickname for my vagina. (It used to be “The Hurt Locker,” but that movie’s a couple years old now.)

    Like


  13. That dude seems to be enjoying his robot.

    Like


  14. Off topic:

    Another addition of Fake It Till You Make It… this time during a job interview.
    http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20131111000517-5670386-a-secret-to-successful-interviews

    Like


  15. Well, the tin lining to this dark cloud is that… NotAllCaplansAreLikeThat.

    Like


  16. That Vivek ( how ever it is spelled) guy is not very bright.

    The debate is about being allowed to work any where in the world and he keeps talking about people who work from home from their computers…but the 1 or 2 billions workers of the world are not highly educated people who have jobs they can do from home on their computers…

    and every 5 minutes he comes up with either something that is besides the debate or that is such a weak argument it is ludicrous, and on top of this he talks too much, he has no self control.

    at around 57 minutes he jokingly declared his side has already won the debate???!!! it is not even funny as everything he says is so weak that even the moderator has to stop him.

    That Vivek guy’s IQ is about 30 or 40 points below that of the all the other people on that stage.

    And if anyone believes I am saying this because his skin is brown, then you are even dumber than Vivek.

    Just freak’n listen to what he saying!

    Like


  17. Caplanization is the process by which the proponents of a particular policy (in this case unrestricted immigration) argue for it in such a manner than virtually all reasonable people are attracted to the opposite position.

    Makes me wonder if Caplan isn’t a strawman-sockpuppet. From Wikipedia:

    “A strawman sockpuppet is a false flag pseudonym created to make a particular point of view look foolish or unwholesome in order to generate negative sentiment against it. Strawman sockpuppets typically behave in an unintelligent, uninformed, or bigoted manner and advance “straw man” arguments that their puppeteers can easily refute. The intended effect is to discredit more rational arguments made for the same position. Such sockpuppets behave in a similar manner to internet trolls.”

    Like


  18. on November 12, 2013 at 11:45 am Holden Caulfield

    I wonder what feminists would have to say if a guy said this about his aging/fat ass wife: “i couldn’t neglect my desires any longer”

    http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/courtney-stodden-breakup-couldnt-neglect-desires-172701056–abc-news-celebrities.html

    Discuss.

    Like


    • I can’t speak for the feminists, but if it was a 19 y/o guy saying it about the 50-something wife his parents pimped him out to when he was a child, I don’t see who could blame him.

      Feminists pitched fits about that couple, but as usual, it was for all the wrong reasons. It was much more about shaming men for liking young girls than it was about any concern for a horrifically parented 16 year old girl headed for full train wreck status by 20. The blame there goes to the parents, not the husband.

      Like


  19. Just did “put your # in my phone” w/ HB8 Brazilian chick. It worked. I think I’m 2 for 3 and this one speaks English! #winning

    Like


  20. on November 12, 2013 at 11:48 am Lucky White Male

    Caplinization-

    Not “fully human” due to centuries of inbreeding and cousin marriage

    Eugenics.

    Power motive.

    Aggression.

    Hate.

    Hostility to the “other”

    Ruthless

    Money hungry

    “The greatest deceivers are those who are most self-deceived. “

    Like


    • Germany’s rise up to WWII had a large part due to the work of Jewish bankers, investors, scientists, and industrialists.
      The USSR owes its huge rise to the work of Jews. Whether that is positive or negative is your opinion.
      The United States keeps its edge over the rest of the world due to its Jews.
      Sounds like you’re jealous.

      Like


      • Ach, yet another “justjealous” Cathedral company man?

        My, my… what WOULD we do without the beloved Joo?

        Like


  21. I’d like to thank the Gypsy for reminding me of human nature in its unguarded base ugliness. Double the Gypsy IQ and hone those base instincts over the centuries. Now check your pockets and check your crèche. You’ve been handed a steaming turd and told it’s barre chocolatée. The drummer from Def Leppard has one arm. The Gypsies stole Adam Smith. Il est logique.

    Like


  22. All of the open door arguments would be perfectly valid… if people everywhere were the same as people everywhere.

    Half of our world lives in an industrialized or post-industrialized paradise, while the other half lives in a Malthusian trap, at or past the carrying capacity of the land. The major difference between industrialized countries and non-industrialized countries is that the industrialized countries possess, in one form or another, to varying degrees, the following attributes:

    1) a tradition of property rights
    2) rule of, primacy of, and respect for, the law, rather than persons
    3) Protestant work ethic

    if we assume that everyone in the world possesses these attributes in equal parts, then fine, we could open the borders with no ill effects. And in the economic argument, these attributes are either ignored (as if Europe and the US achieved industrialization by accident) or they are assumed to be equally spread across all humanity. However this is simply not the case.

    In short, can anyone who is in favor of open borders please explain to me how flooding the United States with Haitians and Nigerians will fail to turn the United States into an offshoot of Haiti or Nigeria. Sure, we can absorb the population of the island of Puerto Rico without too much difficulty. We could probably absorb the entire population of Mexico as well. But we can’t pretend that there is no limit. As these people flow into our country, eventually we have a country devoid of the three above characteristics, and we have a slightly whiter, slightly colder version of Nigeria.

    How is that better for the world, let alone me and my family?

    Like


  23. Sicily is a dump and yet their American cousins are better off economically compared to Southern whites. Everyone thought these guidos were a menace in America and yet today they make up the largest part of middle and upper classes in the Northeast.

    [CH: a lot of sicilians interbred in the US, likely damping their sicilian-ness. their blood isn’t pure here.]

    Like


    • Actually, Sicily is rich compared to Naples. Now that’s a REAL dump (literally).

      Like


    • [CH: a lot of sicilians interbred in the US, likely damping their sicilian-ness. their blood isn’t pure here.]
      ————————————————————————————————

      But sicillians don’t take crap from the moullies; methinks you hung yourself from your own tree?

      Ya’ll need more Tony Soprano not less.

      Like


  24. Is a link to the original source of the quote too much to ask for?

    Like