The Wickedest Links

1. A commenter over at HBD Chick proposed in the comment thread to a post about chicks digging jerks that modern liberals (for all practical purposes the global Western elite) are like a nomadic r-selected species — that is, they prefer the metaphorical pump and dump lifestyle to the family formation lifestyle. He also passed along the catchy aphorism that [liberal elite] nomads are “farmers of civilization. The nomads allow civilizations to grow and then when they are ripe they eat them.” Ideas like this should catch on within Dark Enlightenment circles, even if they aren’t fully fleshed out. The world desperately needs courageous, free thinkers, now more than ever.

2. I read this Dissent article by [vapid shrike alert] Jezebel writer Katie J.M. Baker [/vapid shrike alert], about cad bounder Roosh’s time as a farmer of pussy in Denmark and his disdain for the local women there, and I thought something sounded off about both the tone and substance of the article, as if Baker’s ostensible book review of “Don’t Bang Denmark” was really a springboard for her to launch her stupid feminist agenda talking points. Having not read “Don’t Bang Denmark”, I couldn’t be certain my suspicion was well-founded. But now Roosh has answered Baker and accused her of distorting pretty much everything about his book and his time there. Suspicion confirmed. Good rule of thumb: When a feminist flaps her gums, she’s lying through her teeth.

3. Male self-delusion. The rationalization hamster can thrive anywhere there is a habitat for it, such as a field of sour grapes.

4. Remember the post about the gigantic obese chick who complained about all the weird looks she got from people who saw her and her thin “boyfriend” out together? The boyfriend has responded. (See the attached photo for extra 😆 s.) I still say the guy is a closet homo with the typical leftoid pathological over-sensitivity to hurtful hurtiness. The dude is a walking sexual identity crisis who gets off playing a martyr for the cause.

5. Answers to objections to monarchism. File under: It’s good to be the King’s subject!

6. The Obesity Era: Animals are getting fat, too. An intriguing theory: Is the obesity epidemic nature’s way of preparing all animal life for a coming Ice Age?

7. John Derbyshire on the cruelty of the overclass. One day, the wronged part of white America will notice the boot on its face. How they’ll respond, is anyone’s guess. Perhaps they’ll have learned to love being ground to dust. Or perhaps they’ll shed their inertia, and execute an escape move. If reaction fully unleashed, to be followed by a finishing move.

8. TED trolled.





Comments


  1. Re: #1 I totally agree with this, once I saw the light regarding the innate hypocrisy of feminism and liberalism when I heard this kind of theory a while ago, it made a lot of sense.

    I talked about it recently if anyone is curious, mentioning the ‘traitor’ theory encoded in liberal genes to see structures destroyed.

    http://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2013/09/24/brain-structure-and-political-leanings-r-vs-k-selection/

    Like


    • i wondered that in one of the last few posts, when someone mentioned the ‘wrong’ races procreating. if you look at how much white thought is so bound up in being concerned, and just often dislikes humans altogether, it makes me think we aren’t particularly positive to have around.

      Like


      • What do you mean by that part?

        Like


      • oh, before i was just thinking in broad terms of race when someone said basically the wrong people on earth are procreating just fine. i just sometimes wonder if a race as self-hating and anti-progress as modern western whitey seems to be is even the ‘right’ race to be perpetuating. the idea in #1 of a nomadic subset is more thought-through, i was just thinking aloud

        Like


      • > “i just sometimes wonder if a race as self-hating and anti-progress as modern western whitey seems to be is even the ‘right’ race to be perpetuating.”

        A large portion of Western Whitey is NOT procreating, and is doomed to extinction.

        That’s why The Left, in places like England and France and Germany and the USA, needs to import so many Muslims and Africans and Mexicans.

        What we have right now is a very strange stasis, between huge numbers of 50s-ish/60s-ish very economically & politically powerful Baby Boomers, who, on The Left, bred at substantially less than replacement levels, and who, on the right, bred at or above replacement levels:

        http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Republicans-fertile-future-Through-the-past-2488626.php

        So as the Baby Boomers begin to fade into the sunset, they will be replaced by younger whites, who are overwhelmingly more conservative, but also by hordes of third world cretins, like the Muslims and the Mexicans and the Africans, who are overwhelmingly more violent and indolent and uncivilizable.

        More or less throughout the world [with just a handful of exceptions], the infertile Left decided that It coveted power more than It loved patriotism.

        So it imported a new people in order to keep power.

        BTW, I agree with AoSHQ’s best writer, “Monty”, in that the very brief crash of the EBT system this weekend was the most portentous story we’ve seen in decades [maybe even in our entire lifetimes]:

        http://minx.cc/?post=344137

        Do not think for a second that The Frankfurt School will not hesitate to wield those tens of millions of ferals as an army against us.

        Bottom Line: Purchase more ammunition.

        Like


      • It’s very Hegelian: to have the younger generations consist of more conservative whites butting heads with Marxist darkies. Thesis – antithesis – synthesis.

        Like


      • The left doesn’t need to breed when they have higher learning indoctrination factories.

        Like


      • Romney won a MASSIVE LANDSLIDE over Obama amongst college edumakated whites.

        The GOP is rapidly becoming the party of edumakated & productive & fertile whites, opposite the DEMs, who are now the party of the Africans and the Mexicans and the YKWs and a handful of staunch old anti-Christian Jesuits, and of course the salt-n-pepper mulleted dykes living all alone in their apartments with just their cats to keep them company.

        Like


    • #1 is gibberish. To say it’s “not fully fleshed out” is a gross understatement; it’s not even clear what is being expressed other than some sentiment that liberals hate families and want to destroy civilization. I despise that sort of sloppy thinking.

      Like


  2. As per #5, I still contend Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Democracy: The God That Failed is the most important political book for anyone in these parts of the internet to read.

    Like


    • Somebody over at AoSHQ just linked to some seriously Game-esque shiznat from H L Mencken:

      H.L. Mencken on Husbands and Bachelors
      http://minx.cc/?post=344194

      “The average woman is not strategically capable of bringing down the most tempting game within her purview, and must thus content herself with a second, third, or nth choice. The only women who get their first choices are those who run in almost miraculous luck and those too stupid to formulate an ideal – two very small classes, it must be obvious…”

      Like


  3. “I’ve grown immune to the use of sex… I have no more interest in twenty-year-olds than they have in me.”

    not an article about any kind of functional male. no sex mentioned anywhere.

    Like


  4. Shuri has a thick skin, no shit!.

    Like


  5. All the white underclass and middle-class in America has to do is get out of the way of the black underclass and it will quickly annihilate the Liberal, unarmed white overclass.
    Given how quickly a short period of time of “No-Limit” EBT almost resulted in food riots at Urban Walmarts across the country, I’d say it wouldn’t take long at all.

    Like


  6. Sam Hyde muhfuggin BIX NOOOOOD

    [CH: ref. still can’t figure out what ‘bix nood’ is supposed to translate as.]

    Like


  7. The American and European overclass is sowing the wind, and will reap the usual harvest. The white lower-middle and working classes, the black working class and underclass, the Mexican immigrants, and pretty much everyone overseas who suffers under their smug, arrogant rule hates their guts, and some (all?) of these folks have been know to commit horrific violence when provoked. The overclass pretensions to moral superiority are fraying, the money to pay bribes is running out, and pitting one group of proles agains the other is slowly ceasing to work. Enjoy those double soy caramel lattes’ while you can, folks!

    Like


    • on October 16, 2013 at 4:39 am The Burninator

      Class warfare much, Karl?

      Most white lower class are blue collar gun owners, and many to most are not in unions, and are usually what we refer to as “rednecks”. Ergo, they are not particularly inclined to regard Leftists as their friends.

      Next time, try to use language that is not being actively taught in universities by class warrior Marxists (e.g. – “proles”). It’s dusty, long overdue for retirement, and shows the intellectual laziness so useful to identifying mindless college bred buffoons to the world.

      Like


  8. It’s basically a race to either possible climate change and peak oil instability (if either of those are real), demographic disruption and national cultural destabilization of hegemony, or greater-than-human intelligence being engineered (gene therapy/modification, brain-computer interface, or AI). The problem with the last one is you have to get it right or we might just be converted to paperclips from an unfortunately too intelligent amoral AI and/or psychotic human who didn’t handle the intelligence enhancement program too well.

    Without benevolent greater than human intelligence I see these problems-from-prosperity cropping up everytime, as they have through and probably before recorded human history.

    Like


    • Great show that has been hitherto lily white, now caving to political correctness. I doubt very much they’ll resist the temptation to depict miscegenation in a glorious light.

      Like


      • Great show that has been hitherto lily white, now caving to political correctness. I doubt very much they’ll resist the temptation to depict miscegenation in a glorious light.

        Yup, it just got removed from my watch list. Granted after the season 3 finale, I probably wasn’t going to watch it anyways.

        Like


      • Husbandman

        Great show that has been hitherto lily white, now caving to political correctness. I doubt very much they’ll resist the temptation to depict miscegenation in a glorious light.
        ———————————————————————————————–

        Is this a criticism of the show?

        I only ask because if its an accurate portrait of what occurred, why should it be excluded?

        Powerful wealthy white people have always taken advantage of their positions to gain access to talented entertainers, athletes, artists… Ive never heard of this guy or this show, but thanks to your comments, I might just watch it.

        He probably had game. Maybe you can pick up some tips.

        Stop hatin on the black man.

        Like


      • Thwack, it’s a great show, but it is not a historical narrative in the sense of being based on true events. It’s a WWI era fiction. There haven’t been any historical characters in the first three years so far, nor have there been any blacks cast. If you’re going to make a show about that era of England, it would be anachronistic fantasy to depict blacks.

        Let’s say that this new black character is loosely based on an actual dude who lived and sang around London at that time, a possibility I don’t deny. Introducing such a character at this point is a transparent nod to political correctness. The show has been criticized by SWPL’s as “disturbingly white”. Why disturbing? Because the milieu isn’t just white; it’s also beautiful, civilized, high-functioning, and is unrecognizable as the England of only 100 years ago. In other words, it shows an England that was in all ways superior to the present Island of Doctor Moreau that Albion has become since the gates were opened to Afro-Asian barbarians.

        Writing in a token black who seduces a high-class white broad is very blatant, along the lines of insisting on always featuring several minorities in combat scenes in WWII movies. It’s revisionist dishonesty contrived to warp public memory about how things actually were in order to ram more and more anti-racist mythology down the throats of the public.

        Like


      • Husbandman
        It’s revisionist dishonesty contrived to warp public memory about how things actually were…
        ———————————————————————————————

        Is this the FIRST or ONLY example of your complaint the show has depicted?

        Do white people ever add persons, language, events… to their historical theatrical productions in order to make them more “accessible” to the general public?

        When I watch war movies with veterans, they call bullshit on every other scene.

        Its called “artistic license”; producers and directors adding and subtracting people places and things in order improve the narrative.

        It happens all the time,why are you cherry picking this single incident?

        You need to go somewhere it sit down.

        Consider yourself lucky some ni66er cock is is trotted out to distract people from the bloody record of crimes the royals inflicted on the entire world.

        Like


      • thwack said-

        “Its called “artistic license”; producers and directors adding and subtracting people places and things in order improve the narrative.”

        Of course every artist is free to create art however he chooses, but unless the art bears a very strong resemblance to reality, the work will fail. The record on race mixing in the West is neither controversial nor confusing: it was not tolerated until it began to be aggressively pushed, from on high, by anti-Christs in Hollywood and Washington, then by extension in the rest of the West.

        The jungle fever plot in Downton Abbey is not an organic outgrowth of how the show has grown so far, definitely not. I don’t regard miscegenation as pretty cool and awesome. I recognize that it is an abomination. But if you repeat an image enough times in today’s mass media, you can condition people to think and do all kinds of unconscionable things and trick them into believing that such things are historically normal and healthy.

        “Consider yourself lucky some ni66er cock is is trotted out to distract people from the bloody record of crimes the royals inflicted on the entire world.”

        I’m more than prepared to criticize the vast moral failures of England and its English satellites. But if you think it’s been people of dark skin who have suffered the most at the hands of British imperialism, think a-fucking-gain. It has been their fellow Whites with less money and power who have been systematically shafted by the likes of Winston Churchill, Tony Blair, David Cameron, etc, who have criminally collaborated with a certain tribe to kill the West.

        Like


      • Husbandman
        It has been their fellow Whites with less money and power who have been systematically shafted…”
        —————————————————————————————-

        Thank you for making this comment because you just revealed the “moneyshot” thats the key to your initial complaint.

        Its not about color, or race; its about power. Powerful people exploit less powerful people; this phenomenon is not time or geographically dependent.

        How does blaming “the media”, or “tha joos” account for ALL past sexual activity white people have engaged in with nonwhite people?

        White people run around the world sexually exploiting nonwhite people; what tee-vee show taught them to do that?

        *I have no further questions your honor*

        Like


      • White people run around the world sexually exploiting nonwhite people; what tee-vee show taught them to do that?

        Thwack up to his usual ooJ-tube-is-reality histrionics, I see.

        Well, nobody ever accused MUH-DIK darkies of “Puritanism”…

        And those 3rd World hellholes are already crotch-deep in youth exploitation and sexual abuse, even when there’s no white face within a radius of 50 miles of whatever is willing to sell itself for a buck and a candy bar.

        And the relative miniscule handful of pathetic specimens that go on these alleged sex junkets, men or women, are pilloried and not welcomed into polite company, if discovered.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • White people run around the world sexually exploiting nonwhite people…

        Riiiiiiiiiiiiight… that’s why, when the topic of “international sexual exploitation” comes up, the first phrase that comes to any rational person’s mind is… wait for it… wait for it…

        White slavery.

        You internet forum retards are truly tiresome… in any other country, you’d starve.

        Like


    • al- are you the same al from back in the day? let me know if so. hope all is well.

      Like


  9. The TED video is wonderful. Those events are a total joke. They’re filled with SWPL tech-douchebag “aren’t we great!” types who deserve to be ridiculed. The talks used to be interesting with real innovators like Anthony Atala, MD, but now they’re filled with self-serving, useless @ssholes like Tim Ferriss.

    Like


    • Check your favorite search engine for Mike Rowe’s experience giving a TED talk. It was about sheep testicles.

      Funny stuff, rather insightful, and very disrespectful toward SWPL preferences.

      Like


  10. on October 15, 2013 at 10:38 am The Spirit Within

    I don’t hate anybody based on skin color or mental state, but I know that many people here do.

    A black couple with Down’s Syndrome is named king and queen of their high school’s homecoming court.

    It’s red meat, o ye atavists. Unleash the dogs. Let’s hear more confirmations of man’s inhumanity to man.

    [CH: i don’t know about hate, but i did laugh my ass off.]

    Like


    • i don’t think you ‘know that many’ people here hate people based on color or mental state. but i’ll grant you they don’t celebrate people simply based on them being part of some favored groups. and they don’t shy from pointing out differences. none of that has anything to do with hate.

      as for the story– you see anyone in the preview image that actually respects the pair? anyone that wishes they were them? i’m sure they all feel like they are better people having set it up, but there’s nothing inspirational about it. it’s nice to the two kids i guess and there’s nothing wrong with that, i just don’t get your point i guess. those two aren’t going to go on and find a cure for down’s syndrome because their classmates pretended they were beautiful for a day.

      Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 11:53 am The Spirit Within

        You’re one of the good ones, burke. But the haters will soon crawl out of the woodwork, like they always do.

        Like


      • Ah, yes… everyone has their “good negro, a credit to his race”.

        The unfortunates that ran into the “bad ones” couldn’t tell which from which until it was too late, though.

        This makes me a h8tr, I suppose.

        Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 6:53 pm The Spirit Within

        I have no idea what color burke is. “Good ones” meant “good people” generally. Read for comprehension.

        Like


      • Write for clarity.

        Like


      • i’m sure they all feel like they are better people having set it up…

        We call a spade a spade here. They are exhibiting condescension of an exceedingly pure quality, which has nothing whatever to do with the pimped-out negretards and everything to do with masturbating their moral pleasure centers.

        Now combine that rank condescension with the “bigotry of low expectations” and “defining deviancy down,” and presto-negro, you have all the components of the SWPL’s treatment of race.

        I respect non-whites for what they are, and unlike the mealy mouthed leftists whose experience with black people consists entirely of The Cosby Show reruns and that nice mulatto who lived in their dorm sophomore year, I mince no words about NAMs’ pathological dysfunction, both individually and as a culture.

        No, I reserve my ire for the neckbearded, NPR-nasal, self-hating white faggots who tuck their little cocks between their legs and prance around in high dudgeon about their former people. I’d advocate pogroms against SWPL if they had an ounce of threat in them. As they are, they will castrate themselves out of existence before we’d ever need to confront them.

        Just a hint of true violence will have them pissing down their own legs, which is why they cuckold themselves prostrate before big-talking pavement apes and craft entire personalities out of rationalizing/apologizing for savage imbecility.

        Matt

        Like


      • Thanks so much for posting the link to Walt -vs- the Schwartzes.

        Saved me a ton of time.

        Although I wanted to post the part about “Blame it on liberal guilt.”

        Like


      • Also the part near the very end where he ridiculed the crazy neurotic obsessive compulsive bitch about her tea-drinking habits.

        [Hope that’s not too much of a SPOILER for the folks who haven’t yet had a chance to watch the finale on DVR.]

        Like


    • I have plenty of brown friends. I just stay away from large groups of niggers because I don’t want to be robbed/raped/murdered.

      Like


    • A black couple with Down’s Syndrome…

      Redundancy.

      You are an antiwhite troll cunt, which is why you get my contribution to “man’s inhumanity to man.” For what other reason would it even occur to you to bait us with something so patently provocative?

      We have been onto your shtick for decades, and we have even calculated the whys and hows of this little experiment here, which was conceived and executed to make you feel morally superior no matter what the response — if we react negatively, we prove your “point”; if we react in a manner consistent with your grand-standing moralism, or if we don’t react at all, you get to feel like you taught us all One To Grow On, like you just made the world a little bit of a better place.

      Blow me. You politically correct shitbags love “humanity” and hate human beings. It is rich for you pre-programmed bot types to lecture the world about “inhumanity,” but then, you only know how to lecture, particularly on subjects about which you know less than nothing. The solution is to get to know these Magical Negroes personally, and then we can see how concerned with humanity you really are.

      Your “love” for humanity is a thinly disguised hatred that fools only your own similarly deluded kind. What concern you have for the mongogroid couple! what with your posting YouTubes to the commentary sections of pick-up blogs!

      Matt

      Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 11:50 pm The Spirit Within

        And … we have a winner. The Hate Games are concluded.

        Matt King has *spoken* — if you can call it that — and it ain’t pretty.

        I’m still waiting to learn the dark secret gnawing at his soul. And he has one, there is no doubt. Nobody can hold that much hate for others without holding an equal amount of hate for himself.

        Like


      • > “I’m still waiting to learn the dark secret gnawing at his soul.”

        Look in the mirror, nigger, and you’ll see the dark secret staring back at you.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 9:56 am The Spirit Within

        I’m sorry, the Hate Games have concluded. Please submit your (strong) entry for the next round of play.

        Like


      • YOU are the “Dark Secret”, motherfucker.

        Except that YOU are a “secret” only to YOURSELF.

        Because YOU refuse to look in the mirror and confess to YOURSELF the manifest stupidity, indolence, violence, criminality, miscreancy and general abject worthlessness of YOUR entire God-damned race.

        Everywhere YOU go, YOU spread disease, pestilence, crime, dissension, bastardy, corruption, disintegration, devolution, and death.

        But YOU are not a “secret” to us.

        Because we know exactly who YOU are.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 5:50 pm The Spirit Within

        Like


      • Point of information, Zombie, you seem to be confusing us with your lower classes and tools again.

        African people are some of the most moral and I’d say pathologically moralistic people on the planet. Do I need to post the video of the Sudanese woman getting whipped in the street for wearing pants again?

        There are even jokes about Nigerian women still having a curfew at 30. One of the reasons some of us who go to the west marry at higher ages is that without a supportive culture getting us arranged by 15-20, we are under extremely strict rules. Otherwise, one of you or one of your lost sheep with brown skin and barely any African-ness left in him, will seduce but then fail us.

        The only Africans who don’t suffer from over moralism are those who have been exposed to western “liberation” and “empowerment”. Then when the monsters you made turn on you, you say it is because of their race when it is because of embracing the ideals of your race, which are very non ideal.

        African women maimed themselves so as to be not only moral but above reproach while European women were unashamedly glorifying the dumping of one’s boring or worn out husband to pursue manlier heroes. Many of us still do. So don’t put your elite using African Americans as boogie men, or their provokation and sustaining of wars in Africa on some failure of our race.

        You’re throwing up your hands and bitching about people who are not preventing you from having apparently enough money to eat and have a computer with internet, while Africans with far less, and people shooting at them, are making musical instruments by hand and forming orchestras.

        You actually know nothing about Africans or African culture but what you see on television, self pity party forums, and the odd lost sheep you encounter who is as ignorant of his own history and culture as you are because he’s unfortunately dependent on the same poor “education” system.

        Like


      • Memo to Self: Don’t squander your breath trying to converse with tribalists.

        YKWs or Orangutans – It doesn’t make any difference – it’s a complete waste of time when you try to get them to engage in any sort of introspective contemplation whatsoever.

        Like


      • Would Jesus share your sentiments, I wonder?

        Like


      • Obviously yes.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 9:58 am The Spirit Within

        Jesus definitely hated the handicapped and the lame. He explained it all when he wrote the New Testament.

        (eyeroll)

        Like


      • What Jesus hated, and still hates, is phony Phariseeism, which is precisely what the religion of Political Correctness is. There is no biblical command to exalt yourself with faux pious self-righteousness. On the contrary, Jesus constantly rebuked conspicuous displays of pompous and empty religious exercises. Fro the video, the self-congratulatory libtards who decided to crown two retards as queen and king of dystopia are *not* practicing Christianity. They are practicing cultural Marxism, and they are very advanced in the religion. Shining the White Guilt spotlight on these two hapless souls isn’t doing a thing to help them live happier or more comfortable lives. It’s all liberal masturbation aimed at the idolatry of Magic Negro worship.

        And no, there is no condemnation in the Bible of so-called racism. Hypocrisy is definitely condemned, as are theft and covetousness. But pride in kith and kin are pretty much unmissable in Scripture.

        Like


      • He’s spot on.

        Like


    • on October 16, 2013 at 4:47 am The Burninator

      And the point of this video is what precisely? To try and shame people into cheering the picking of clearly unmotivating individuals for an honor they did not earn but received anyway based on some kind of bizarre “guilt of being born unhandicapped”? All these kinds of stunts do is make people feel good about themselves because they’re so “compassionate” as to disregard realities of life. It’s typical leftist middle class guilt-assuaging.

      South Park’s episode about Timmy when he joined the rock band is a perfect retort to your video. Stunts like this are because Lefty idiots are afraid to deal with handicapped people on their own terms and instead wish to pedestal-ize them in hopes that it makes them look better than their inner demons.

      Like


    • the juxtaposition of this couple and the guy wearing the warriors jersey is priceless.

      Like


    • “I don’t hate anybody based on skin color”

      Goody. Neither does anybody else. Nobody in the history of the world has hated someone else because of “the color of their skin.” They’ve hated them because of the racial traits and behaviors which are simply most easily classified by skin color.

      All non-black races look down on blacks because blacks are so obviously at the bottom of the human pile. It’s not because they are not-white or not-yellow. Similarly, local prejudices exist even within racial groups: e.g. northern Italians looking down at southern Italians, etc. Nearly every mono-chromatic group has further prejudices within the group, not based on “skin color” but on trait perception (e.g. “those stupid, hot headed southern Italians”).

      It’s always been about racial traits and not skin color. But the skin color trope has been extremely useful for Progressives — oh, how dare you hate that man because of THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN! See, that makes the hater seem illogical and crazy. Certainly, the Left couldn’t get the same mileage out of “how dare you hate blacks because of their stupidity and extreme violence!” See how that works?

      Like


  11. Isn’t there some quote about “people go crazy in groups but achieve sanity one by one…?”

    Sorry if I butchered the quote but here is an example:

    It starts a little slow, but he makes some key points comparing the economics of jobs/employment, with women and relationships.

    I betcha dollars to donuts he was trying not to title his video with those 3 words; but in the end, he just said:

    Fuck it!

    Women are ridiculous

    Who among us has not experienced this moment?

    LOL

    Like


  12. Two biggest insights from going out these past two weeks:

    1) I can go out alone.
    2) I’m sabotaging myself.

    I’ve been doing around 20-30 approaches over the weekends and these last two weeks I’ve been approaching out of state. Just being awkward. It feels like a plateau. Whereas before approaching was exciting and new and I’d gain confidence just off of the approach, it doesn’t excite me as much as it as it used to. I think that’s coming across in my sets (okay there were two good ones). There was a really good set that I let go when I was out alone, but I was insecure about my dirty clothes lol (long story). It would’ve been awesome tho, got a shit test right off the bat. A story for another time…

    Anyway, I come to this point where I hit attraction on the dance floor and then nobody says anything while dancing and it gets awkward. I’m not sure why this keeps happening (it’ll be high energy and fun and we dance and the attraction is on, but then it’ll get awkward because the two-set is apart of a much larger group of HS friends, sooooo… obviously not trying to raise my target’s ASD, so I just do nothing?). I wish I knew what to do here.

    Another thing I’ve noticed is that since this month I’ve tried to get a handle on approaching, I somehow forgot about shittesting. Basically realized I’ve been supplicating everytime I walk up, therefore displaying no personality or intent. It always comes off as “don’t reject me!” instead of “lol baby i know you want me just AD-MIT it!” That playfulness that was there in my prior weeks somehow vanished when I focused exclusively on approaching. What a crazy flip-flop: I go from almost badass dancing on the street and girls loving it, to stifled approach machine who can’t find the words to continue a conversation anymore.

    Definitely going to calibrate in my next approaches.

    Ejecting is still a problem, so to combat this, I’ve stayed in groups way longer than I usually do just to deal with the social pressure. Only a couple times, but I dunno, better than nothing.

    It’s kinda weird I started having this pua identity, but then somehow destroyed that and started sucking again. So now I’m in this weird stage where I’m not sure what to think or believe or accept. It’s supposed to come from myself, I know… and I think that’s where I’m headed next.

    P.S. I’ve sexted this blonde twice to orgasm (her) and I want to get her to meetup. She’s a total freak, really into cocky assholes. It’s weird cuz I sent her YaReally style texts and she literally ate it up and then I made her touch herself lol with descriptive verbose texts. I remember the last time I asked her to meetup I betafied and she was like uhhhh gross you’re not as alpha as I thought you were (paraphrasing), but I came back, was basically a dick, she sent pics and I didn’t try and pressure her to meetup. A bit stalkerish, but she lives nearby now so any tips on how to instigate a meetup without setting off her ASD? We have had no comfort at all.

    Like


    • Sounds like you learned some shit and used it so much it got stale. Just learn some new material and each night experiment with it. Whether it’s an opener, a body language bit, a story, phase shifting, whatever.

      The movie “leap of faith” had a bit where Steve Martin, as a preacher, took bets on whether he could insert words or phrases (like “aluminum siding”) into his sermon.

      You just gotta make it fun again.

      Regarding the chick you’re texting. Send one text: “booty call”
      Then just set up logistics.

      Like


      • Me and the blonde have never met. Online dating site… but she’s hot so it’s totally worth trying to make happen.

        I don’t think I’m high value enough for “booty call” to work to be honest.

        Like


      • What do you got to lose?

        You already said you think she needs asshole game so be that man. And you should def be chatting up multiple chicks online so you don’t put so much stock in one. There’s so many out there. Good luck with it.

        Like


      • I’m definitely trying… scarcity mindset, I know. Might as well give it a shot. Thanks man. I’ll do it this week.

        Like


    • Okay I’ve finally got some advice/direction for ya lol. I’ll type up a long-ass response here so check back. Sorry for waiting so long but I don’t want to throw random advice at you just for the sake of replying and send you down a path that’s a waste of time or leads you somewhere shitty cause that’d do more harm than good.

      You’re heading in the right direction but you’re a bull in a china shop playing the numbers game right now, which is great for breaking thru approach anxiety etc but it’s not focused enough to get you to the lay. It’s like being a passionate fighter who doesn’t have much technical boxing training…you can plow thru with sheer determination/enthusiasm now and then, but focusing on the technical side of game will help you stack the odds more in your favor. So I’m gonna recommend some techy stuff for you to focus on.

      Like


    • @Hunter

      Alright, from your Field Reports it sounds like you’re just lacking focus in set. You’re reading/learning a lot of theory, and throwing yourself into sets and sticking in them, but once you’re IN set, it sounds like you’re just kind of winging it and basically running Natural game. The prob is that you’re not a Natural yet, so you’re basically ending up rolling the dice and hoping for the best. That can work, but it’s a low % play. Even if your sub-communications, vocal tonality, confidence, etc. were solid, you’d still be running into tactical roadblocks.

      So you get in there and forget to win over the group, or get tripped up by shit-tests, or don’t lead things anywhere, or don’t escalate, or don’t isolate the girl, etc. etc. It’s like you’re getting in a car and flooring the gas, but forgetting to put the key in the engine or put the car in Drive etc.

      Like staying in set instead of ejecting is good, but if you’re not figuring out how to turn things around, you’re not really developing more than a tolerance to social pressure…which is a good thing to build, but it’s not going to lead the set anywhere.

      So I’m going to recommend a bit of strategic hyper-focus.

      Each night you go out, pick just one thing to work on and make it a mission to focus on that one thing. How the set goes doesn’t matter, all that matters is that you practice the thing you pick for that night. Keep in mind that this is going to be weird and feel weird and you’re going to weird some girls out, so you may want to only do it when you’re solo and not when you’re out with friends, and definitely don’t do it on girls in your social circles lol Some examples of missions:

      – Eye-contact: Lock eye-contact with the girl. Every girl you talk to, look her in the eyes and don’t look away. Stare her down as you guys talk. Learn to calibrate how much eye-contact crosses the line into creepy. Do this until girls start telling you you have nice eyes, that’s when you know you’re hitting the sweet spot. Soon as you break eye-contact, or she’s weirded out, bail and open the next girl.

      – Kino: Greet every single set with a handshake, followed by pulling them (as you look them in the eye and smile) into you and placing their hands around your shoulders as you place yours around their waist. Do this with every set. Some of them will run away or be creeped out, but that’s fine, learn to calibrate when you can/can’t get away with this. Do this until you can get at least half your sets to have their arms around your shoulders with yours around their waist. Soon as you get your arms around eachother, just walk away and do it to the next girl.

      – Leading: Try to move every single set you open. As soon as you get an ioi, or even before it, make eye contact, have a big smile on your face, take them by the hand or wrist (gently of course lol) and say “come with me” while you look at them and pull (don’t look away, they have to see your face and make a judgement call to trust you and your vibe) and just assume that they’ll come with you. Imagine there’s a million dollar check waiting for them at one of the bars, or the dance floor, or the smoke pit…like you’re about to take them to the greatest experience of their life, getting a million dollars, so any hesitation they have is silly and nonsense and you would just reply with “shh, it’s fine, trust me. Come.” and lead them. Do this all night with every single set, until at least half the girls you open will follow you to another spot in the bar. As soon as they follow you to wherever (literally just pick a spot in the bar that’s like 10 feet away), just walk away and do it to the next girl.

      – Isolating: Try to move every single girl you open away from her friends, or at the very least turn her away from her friends so her back is to them. I like to either physically pull them in and step to the side so their back is facing their friends, or I’ll just start saying something and as I’m talking I take a couple steps to the side…out of natural instinct/politeness, they’ll turn to stay facing me as we talk but they’ll end up with their backs to their friends. Try to get her to take 5 steps away from her friends with her back to them. Do this until almost all of your sets turn their back on their friends. As soon as they have their back to their friends and/or are a few steps away from them, walk away and do it to the next girl.

      – Heavy Leading/Isolating: Try to lead every single girl you open out of the club for food in under 5 minutes. Open, tease a bit, then say “hey I’m getting pizza up the street. Come with me, we’ll come right back after.” and pull them by the hand/wrist (lightly lol) toward the door. They’ll probably say they can’t leave their friends or they don’t know you etc. Just say “it’s fine, we’ll be back before they even notice” or “get them and we’ll all go together” or “my name is Hunter, what’s your name?” and build some quick rapport/comfort, then try again 10 minutes later. Then try again 15 minutes later. If she still won’t come with you, walk away and do it to the next girl. Do this all night, right up till last call, on every girl you open. If you get her out of the club just say “I forgot to tell my friend, I’ll be right back” and go back in and do it to the next girl. Do this all night.

      – Vocal tonality: Use a loud commanding breaking rapport tone of voice with every girl you open. Focus on commands and statements. “YOU. HERE. NOW. COME. What’s your name. Interesting. You’re not from around here are you.” No questions, no question marks, and no raising your voice up like when you ask a question. Just be a complete authoritative force. Mimic this guy:

      Watch his Old Spice commercials before you go out and pretend to be him for the night. Do this until you can get at least half your sets to follow your commands. Once they come over, or answer your questions, etc., walk away and go do it to the next girl.

      – Cold reading: Cold read every set with the same cold-reads. If it’s a 2-set, tell one girl you can tell she’s the good girl and the other girl she’s the bad girl of the group. Then cold-read that they must be nurses. “Let me guess, you’re both nurses.” If it’s a solo set, cold read her as knowing how to party, being trouble and being a nurse. If it’s a 3+ set, cold read them all as random personality types (the smart girl, the shy girl, the out-going girl, and the mother hen of the group). Do this for every set all night. Soon as they ask you “why do you think that??”, say “I can’t tell you.” and walk away and go do it to the next set.

      – Escalating: Go for the makeout within 30 seconds of opening every girl you approach. Look her in the eyes, look at her lips, look back at her eyes, pull her in, put a hand on her cheek, and go for the kiss. Do it mid-sentence, or ask her a question and then do it, or just do it without saying a word. Most girls will pull away from you and be freaked out…just smile and laugh it off and say “lol sorry, I think you’re gorgeous. I should’ve introduced myself first, my name is Hunter.” Then try again within 5 minutes. Then try again within 15 minutes. If you get the makeout, or don’t get it by 15 minutes in, walk away and go do it to the next girl. Do this until you get like a 10-20% success rate with it.

      – Group theory: Introduce yourself to everyone in the group except the hottest one. Save her to introduce yourself to last, but instead of introducing yourself to her, keep talking to the girl right before her and ask her some bullshit about “that’s a nice name, but my ex had that name. I don’t know if we can be friends, she broke my heart lol” and keep talking to her, then “forget” to introduce yourself to the hot one and just talk to the group. Do this until either the hot one calls you out on not introducing yourself to her, or until 15 minutes is up. Then walk away and do it to the next group set. Do this all night long, set after set.

      – Qualifying: Have 3 screening/qualifying questions that you’re going to ask every girl you talk to. Something like “Can you cook? I like when a girl knows how to cook.” (she answers yes/no) “Do you work out? I don’t like lazy girls.” (she answers yes/no) “You’re not from here, are you?” (she answers yes/no) To each of her answers just reply “Interesting…” or “I thought so…” or “I could tell…” Randomly react positive or negative to her responses. Either go “Oh no, that’s too bad” and turn your back to her, and on the last answer say “Okay, you pass. You can be my girlfriend for the night.” and pull her into you. Use these same 3 qualifiers on every girl, and do this until at least half of them actually answer your questions. Once you get through all 3 questions and tell her she can be your girlfriend for the night, try to kiss her, then walk away and do it to the next girl. Do this all night on every girl you talk to.

      – Story-telling: Come up with a 5-10 minute story about something interesting that’s happened to you and tell that story to every single set you talk to. Find a way to lead the conversation to it naturally. “Your name is Sarah? That’s weird, I met a girl named Sarah when I was (insert story)” Make the story ridiculous and clearly bullshit, or play it all straight, doesn’t matter. Finish the story off with asking her a question about herself that relates to the story (“have YOU ever–?”). As soon as she answers you, walk away and go do the same thing to the next girl. Do this until pretty much every set listens to your full story and answers your question. Do this all night.

      Get the idea? The key is picking one thing to hyper-focus on for the night. The results don’t matter, all you’re doing is building individual skills that you can later combine together. A lot of this will push your comfort zone, and will weird girls out, and will come off weird until you learn to calibrate it, and walking away in some situations will seem socially retarded, but that doesn’t matter. You’re just racking up massive reference experiences.

      Once you’ve built up the individual skills, we can take them and apply them together strategically. Think of this as waxing Mr. Miyagi’s car and painting his fences. We’ll put it all together into combinations later. ie – Opening with a commanding tonality, telling her to “YOU. COME.” and pulling her in with her back to her friends, then qualifying her with the 3 questions, then going for the makeout, then leading her to another part of the bar, escalating, then leading her out of the bar for pizza up the street.

      A solid efficient consistent pickup is simply a strategic combination and application of a sequence of individual skills. Right now you’re kind of all over the charts swinging wildly once you get in set so it feels like you aren’t getting anywhere. So we focus on the basics and tighten those up so that when you’re in set you instinctively pull those skills out when your calibration tells you to, and then we apply an overall general strategy that all these skills can be dropped into to create the most efficient consistent play.

      After THAT, you can go back to just naturally improvising and winging shit, because you’ll have your basics tight and instinctive and calibrated.

      Like


      • Lol not sure how you could be any more right than you are here. I’m setting a goal to get laid by Spring (gets cold in the Midwest in the winter, so not sure how it’s going to play out) so just gonna focus on building the skills.

        I’m ready to be weirded out and scare some chicks lol been doing that for weeks anyway. I’ll start with eye contact and work my way down the list.

        Thanks Ya, really appreciate it. I’m all in.

        Like


    • Brilliant and pithy.

      Like


    • on October 15, 2013 at 12:09 pm The Spirit Within

      +1

      Like


    • The rental lot number is right on the windshield. LMBO.

      But girls like that are perfectly within their rights to “gold dig.” What a resentful term. Who by now doesn’t know the score?

      It’s all in the game to tease women about gold digging, but who here can make a coherent criticism of the practice? For gold digging to be considered a distasteful practice, you have to assume the sexual transaction is an equal contribution in both degree and kind. Who but kneejerk egalitarians (physically hideous feminists and soul-sapped eunuchs) still believe in that?

      The Lamborghini is an “approach,” a pick-up tool — which succeeded. What happens after the entree, how one leverages his successes, is a different matter altogether. Like a golfer’s short game after a great drive, you have to get it on the green before you get it in the hole.

      To criticize gold digging is to encourage the feminist ethos. If you don’t know how to game gold diggers — as most sensible and good-looking women are — the problem is you.

      Still, a funny prank to warm the hearts of resentful losers (of both sexes) everywhere.

      Matt

      [CH: So you agree humans are flesh machines beholden to no god but the god of biomechanics?]

      Like


      • [So you agree humans are flesh machines beholden to no god but the god of biomechanics?]

        The mark of a committed ideologue: everything magically proves his predetermined assertion!

        [CH: Just seeking clarification.]

        How my observations above are supposed to coincide with nihilistic “biomechanics” is anyone’s guess.

        [Vitaly pressed a button. She responded like a Pavlovian conditioned dog. You chided the artistry behind it, recalling that men are just as easily duped and women are just as shallow.]

        Though I’m sure you’ve got seven straw men armed with seven tautologies all ready to go.

        [It’s my lucky number.]

        The sexual transaction and indeed the entire sexual “marketplace” can be understood/explained dozens of ways, none of which preclude natural law or even the most anti-scientistic, irrational Calvinist fundamentalism. Just switch out biomechanics (whatever that means on any given day) for depravity, and you would be as obedient a pew-dweller as a 19th century milk maiden raised in a little house on the prairie.

        [The sexual market is very easily explainable, to those with the egos to spare. Chicks dig men with power and resources. Hence, the effectiveness of lamborghini game.]

        You eventually need to step outside of your Church of Darwin bubble.

        [I just call it like I see it. Darwin provides a plausible explanation for my observations of female behavior.]

        I am seeing the best minds of my generation destroyed by the unconscious fideism that goes by the name “irreligion.”

        [I’ve asked you this before, but I’ll ask it again. As a hypothetical experiment with subversive undertones, how do you think people should act if we knew for certain that there was no god and only an infinite black void awaited us upon death? How do you think they would act? What would change about your perspective on the world?]

        This is by far your most shared trait in common with the left. Read more Vox Popoli on the subject, since you seem to be a fan.

        Matt

        [One can enjoy the poetry of love even if one is aware of the iambic pentameter.]

        Like


      • @Matt King: but…….do you still “love” Feministx ?

        Like


      • FX posted some pretty impressive shit the other day:

        http://feministx.wordpress.com/2013/10/12/2915/

        It’s a shame the poor bitch is so utterly fucked up in the head.

        If she had a little warmth in her heart then she’d have the potential to make a helluva wife and mother.

        Like


      • I have no warmth in my heart?

        messed up in the head?

        Thanks though. One day maybe I will make a good wife and mother.

        Like


      • That’s one clusterfuck of a statistical application. I don’t know why stat app makers insist on such shitty GUIs.

        Like


      • [Vitaly pressed a button. She responded like a Pavlovian conditioned dog.]

        So the observation of cause and effect itself now demonstrates the truth of nihilist-positivism?

        Who is to say “she responded” “biomechanically”? Habitual reaction is not the same as instinctive response, much less involuntary biological motion. In fact, from the video’s evidence it wouldn’t be too hard to make a case for simple conscious logic motivating her after a quick assessment of options, and a rational act of the will. Much less the willfulness/reason that contributed to her learned habits themselves.

        When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. C’mon, let’s round out your toolbox of Darwinist ball-peens with the power drills and nail guns of actual epistemology. It will make your shiny ramshackle objets d’art sturdier.

        Matt

        Like


      • Afraid to take a stab at answering CH’s hypothetical ? Rather pusillanimous of you — but also rather predictable.

        Scurry away, and don your “The End is Near” placard. And get thee to the nearest subway.

        Pronto!

        Like


      • [I just call it like I see it. Darwin provides a plausible explanation for my observations of female behavior.]

        This is because your grasp of the alternatives is severely wanting, dismissed as superstitious or superseded (another leftist tell).

        [H]ow do you think people should act if we knew for certain that there was no god and only an infinite black void awaited us upon death? How do you think they would act?

        We don’t have to wonder. We already know what happens in that case. It is all around us.

        To paraphrase Chesterton, when men stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing (the “infinite black void”), they believe in anything. Every finite thing is used to attempt to fill the bottomless vacuum — entertainment, sports, drugs, and dare I say game? Pascal called it “divertissement.” Modernity celebrated this condition until it discovered the unsatisfying emptiness at the end of such pursuits. Postmodernity then embraced that emptiness and called it “freedom” to console us.

        This temptation to nihilism is the default state of man. We all begin with the understanding that “an infinite black void” awaits us. It’s also known as our “fallen” condition: living in an imperfect world, yet with an inborn yearning for an impossible perfection. Explain that, Chuck D.

        I do not know that God exists. “No one has ever seen God” (John 1:18, my emphasis). I have faith that God exists and act accordingly. Why? Because, as Huxley observed, “It is impossible to live without a metaphysic.” Either you consciously choose one, or it chooses you. “Biomechanics” chose you because you never seriously entertained any other possibility, shallow as your requirements for satisfaction are. Reason shows us where reason fails. If and only if you delve deep enough. We both have faiths; only one of us acknowledges it.

        You do not know that Darwinism exists. You have faith that it universally influences behavior because it is merely “a plausible explanation” for a handful of your limited experiences. This is the stupidity of self-centeredness, if not flat out solipsism (a female tell!). You think an explanation is categorical and complete based on what seems plausible to lil’ ol’ you, according to your mortal, limited, and relatively infantile understanding of things, a scratch on the surface of all things ever known or knowable. Humility is the start of all wisdom. Socrates: “All I know is I know nothing.”

        [I’ve asked you this before, but I’ll ask it again. …]

        Brother, I know the feeling. One of us is not processing the other. Let me just offer this: I know your position inside and out. It is not new, it is nearly a century old by now, it is an incompletely rendered, postmodern positivist-materialism with ♥SCIENCE♥!!! as a fig leaf. You have yet to recapitulate my position in any recognizable way. I’m ready to call it a day.

        You are a proper zealot (and I mean that as a compliment). You have a boundless capacity for repetition, and it shows in your constant revisitation of several topics. I regret I do not have that patience. It’s not enough to simply possess wisdom. It’s useless if we never synthesize it into something unprecedented or appropriate to the idiosyncrasies of the age.

        Matt

        Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 8:24 pm FuriousFerret

        Matt,

        What exactly do you want from CH? I hear you criticize the bloggers yet you have no candor on what exactly it is you are looking for from them.

        No long winded diatribes either. Concisely tell us all what you expect from CH and the commenters.

        Like


      • attention, just like the women commenters

        Like


      • Welcome back brother… I know you have a level of fatigue with this place but as I said once before in a super nerdy analogy you strike me as the Obi-Wan constantly trying to keep Anakin(CH) from going full ‘Vader. It is not an ignoble cause at all, and not necessarily one I can even myself agree with. But, I’ll not shit on anyone attempting to fight the good fight even it may be futile. (The future right now seems very murky on this subject)

        Like


      • What exactly do you want from CH? I hear you criticize the bloggers yet you have no candor on what exactly it is you are looking for from them.

        I want them to lead the war.

        Who cares “what exactly” I want? I’m not some dippy broad with a clipboard and a checklist. I am only interested in what we need.

        Like


      • I’ll not shit on anyone attempting to fight the good fight even it may be futile. (The future right now seems very murky on this subject)

        Stinkin thinkin! You’ve already lost.

        Besides, there are romantic compensations for doomed causes. And inflicting righteous violence is its own reward.

        Despair is a sin. Give it no quarter. Gather up an arsenal and get ready for a nationwide Louisiana Wal-Mart situation. If nothing else, it will be fun.

        What’s the point of hopelessness? I never understood it. There are plenty of silver linings to keep us occupied on our way to the “impossible.”

        Matt

        Like


      • God, these religious zealots on “red pill” sites get really old.

        I do not know that God exists. “No one has ever seen God” (John 1:18, my emphasis). I have faith that God exists and act accordingly. Why? Because, as Huxley observed, “It is impossible to live without a metaphysic.” Either you consciously choose one, or it chooses you. “Biomechanics” chose you because you never seriously entertained any other possibility, shallow as your requirements for satisfaction are. Reason shows us where reason fails. If and only if you delve deep enough. We both have faiths; only one of us acknowledges it.

        The theories of physics and biology are empirically well supported and make useful predictions. There is zero evidence for the existence of any supernatural entities, and I am unaware of any religion with a record of accurate prediction of anything.

        It is entirely possible to live “without a metaphysic”. Metaphysics is mostly pure nonsense, totally unfalsifiable speculation about subjects lying beyond human comprehension.

        Perhaps a “god” exists, but until I see some evidence for that claim, I will assume “he” does not, the same way I assume invisible unicorns and fairies don’t exist.

        I am not asserting that any of these things definitely do not exist. Rather, I’m pointing out that there is no evidence that they do and that invoking them as an explanation for anything amounts to making a claim that can never be directly falsified and that is, therefore, meaningless.

        Maybe Allah is responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe, but I’ll trust the physicists to figure it out unless the Imams can offer some compelling evidence.

        Like


      • @Anonymous: bravo. Really well done.

        Like


      • @anonymous

        You shoulda signed your name to that. Now when I copy and paste your comment I got no one to attribute it to.

        Like


      • As a hypothetical experiment with subversive undertones, how do you think people should act if we knew for certain that there was no god and only an infinite black void awaited us upon death?

        Luckily, Puddleglum already answered this for us:

        Suppose we have only dreamed, or made up, all those things-trees and grass and sun and moon and stars and Aslan himself. Suppose we have. Then all I can say is that, in that case, the made-up things seem a good deal more important than the real ones.

        Suppose this black pit of a kingdom of yours is the only world. Well, it strikes me as a pretty poor one. And that’s a funny thing, when you come to think of it. We’re just babies making up a game, if you’re right. But four babies playing a game can make a play-world which licks your real world hollow.

        That’s why I’m going to stand by the play world. I’m on Aslan’s side even if there isn’t any Aslan to lead it. I’m going to live as like a Narnian as I can even if there isn’t any Narnia.

        So, thanking you kindly for our supper, if these two gentlemen and the young lady are ready, we’re leaving your court at once and setting out in the dark to spend our lives looking for Overland. Not that our lives will be very long, I should think; but that’s a small loss if the world’s as dull a place as you say.

        Thought experiments can be useful, but they often break down and become less than relevant because they covertly reject premises that we need.

        Whether or not you believe in a God, humans are clearly designed to believe in (and follow) one. The thought experiment of how “we” should act if there’s no God breaks down because “we” wouldn’t be “us” in that hypothetical universe.

        The reason Puddleglum would rather believe in Narnia “even if Narnia isn’t true” is because Narnia is true.

        Like


      • “To criticize gold digging is to encourage the feminist ethos. If you don’t know how to game gold diggers — as most sensible and good-looking women are — the problem is you.”

        That’s obvious. Beauty is an asset that helps women. Beautiful women use their beauty assets to attract wealthy, better educated, high-status men. A man who can’t come to terms with this is abjuring reality.

        In fact, all women are gold diggers, each one according to her level of beauty and her extracting-resource “expertise”. Feminists told women they shouldn’t rely on their beauty to attract men. Instead, they said women should cultivate non-feminine aspects, especially venturing into male domains. Observe any feminist in action, when she sees an obviously beautiful woman she immediately labels her a gold digger. I’m not kidding. It does not fail. Many men that criticize the gold digger don’t measure up in attracting a beautiful woman who is more prone to activating her gold digging nature more often than her homelier sisters do. They are “resentful losers.” Their attitude only strengthens feminist notions.

        From men’s respective, they generally try to get the hottest woman their financial situation and social position can fetch, save men like the land whale guy; such men are an anomaly. To that end, subconsciously, many men not only work on their physiques but they also seek to become highly educated because they think it will lend them a good job, and that beautiful wife along with it. In turn, many women use their beauty to find a successful/wealthy husband (a provider). It’s a tradeoff – money and brains in exchange for beauty. Cads make fun of providers because they can’t be one, as they have nothing with which to provide. So, they berate providers and the “gold diggers” that seek them, and then they also laugh at women that eschewed gold digging in exchange for supposed alpha cock, calling them stupid.

        I recommend that women not be embarrassed of being called a gold digger. All it mean is that you want a better quality guy. How’s that a bad thing? As far as I’m concerned, it makes you a better quality girl.

        Like


      • Sorry, I meant from men’s perspective.

        Like


      • Hey Ms. Philosemitic– I was with you basically until the last paragraph– where you went utterly and tragically off the rail. Secondarily, thwack who I have little love for, for obvious reasons even called you out recently. He sees the pathology of the lowest common denominator negro-hominid and rails against it. YOU on the other hand have NEVER, not once, called out the Zionists in the Mist (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095243/?ref_=sr_1) which is especially bizarre to me since you are not even tribal.

        Is it your theory that YHW’s can do no wrong? Like Bibi Netanyahu suing for WAR whilst Iranians sue for peace? Warhawks are the same under any guise or nationality. Your answer to this question will speak untold volumes about you.

        Back on topic– Jew bitches have been gold diggers since time immemorial so no great revelation there. But in a broader sense what you espouse is indeed the transaction between men and women since the beginning. What you call “Beauty” can really be ascribed quite simply, to youth. All men from 18 to 80 desire and want to fuck young women. We are like you. We cannot escape our hindbrain, our reptilian limbic system. We know that puberty (NASTY PEDOPHILE!!!) means the height of a woman’s reproductive status and fecundity. 16-18 year old girls will ALWAYS and forever outbirth and outsex busted 35 year old women in spite of any lies you’ve recently been fed.

        Like


      • WTF? Here I am talking about women should absolutely be gold dinging, and you attack me over your stupid hate of the Zionists? How are the Zionists influencing your sex life, pray tell?

        Should you not be out strangling sluts in need of cheap thrills? What gives?

        Thwack calling me out after one of your likeminded paranoid losers unleashed a ridiculous diatribe against the Jews. It was lost on thwack, who isn’t that perceptive. In fact, most of you aren’t perceptive, which is half the problem of the West. You are all prone to falling prey to conspiracy-theorist internet shills, as well as every shill selling an ideology no matter how plausible it is. That makes you weak-minded men. Not the alpha males I respect.
        .

        “YOU on the other hand have NEVER, not once, called out the Zionists in the Mist”

        LOL! You know why? Because I don’t consider the Zionists a threat to Western civilization.

        Islam and liberalism, yes. Therefore, I speak against them.
        .

        “Is it your theory that YHW’s can do no wrong?

        Pay attention, as I have said a gazillion times already, yet repeatedly one of you asks the same question. Liberal Jews I don’t like. Jews in general, I have nothing against. In fact, I rather like conservative Jews because I think they are highly moral in addition to being smart. As I said elsewhere in this thread, “Jewish and Gentile liberals are both destroying our society so that constant calling out the Jew is turning into a Jew hate agenda, not a saving-society-from-liberal agenda. Jew haters use Jewish liberals to turn hate against all Jews because this is the only thing they are really interested in from the get go.”

        I can’t be clearer than this, Jay.
        .

        “Like Bibi Netanyahu suing for WAR whilst Iranians sue for peace? Warhawks are the same under any guise or nationality. Your answer to this question will speak untold volumes about you.”

        He’s not pushing for war against Iran. He wants Iran’s nuclear program stopped because he rightfully perceives Iran a danger to Israel, as well as to the Greater West. Remember, we are the Big Satan. Israel is only the little Satan. The fact you don’t think Iran is a threat to world peace and stability, speaks volumes about you. The irony is, Iran will eventually attack us if we don’t stop them. They will strangle us with the same rope we give them. And, please don’t give me the weak claim that Israel has nuclear weapons. You can’t compare Israel having them for protection against Arab aggression, and Arab regimes hell bent on destroying Israel and the West though overt/covert wars, terrorism, or sex jihad. You’re comparing apples to oranges. There is no comparison between Israel and her Arab enemies.

        Unlike you, I am not afraid of a just war. Frankly, if we carried a big stick, terrorism wouldn’t have become the monster it has become. Both the US and Israel (as well as most Western countries) are weak. They are run by liberal pussies who are more worried about the Arab street than about flexing some muscle and showing we mean business and don’t fuck with us. You think Israel is subjugating Arabs? You’re crazy. It’s not doing anything to them, which is exactly the problem here. It’s all Arab propaganda. They are masters of propaganda, which is why Arab fascist governments found affinity with the NZs and gave them havens after WW2. If Israel was stronger, it would have chased all the Arabs to Jordan where they belong as per the Belfour Declaration. Meanwhile, the so-called Arab Spring, all of you losers blame Israel for it. You blame Israel for everything, which is why you have no credibility. What’s next, space aliens?

        What I oppose is stupid wars to speared democracy to people who neither want it or understand it. Not everyone, and not every nation or people are meant to be democratic. It’s not in the blood of non-westerners, who are less likely to put up with being enslaved. And frankly, any nation that wants democracy should do it for itself. It should struggle and shed its own blood and tears in that lofty quest, like we did in the War of Independence. It’s the only way they will appreciate how truly hard and costly freedom is. We can’t do it for anyone, because like taking medicine, you can’t take it for anyone else. I don’t support the US going to war for any people, and that includes saving Arabs in Yugoslavia, spreading democracy in Iraq, or what have you. These are all conflicts that we have no business being involved in. In contrast, I support carrying a big stick and using it against anyone who threatens our freedom and way of life. I rather we have this policy, as opposed to going all defensive and removing our shoes and clothing in airports and perverts groping us. We are being inconvenienced, while terror is still alive and kicking.

        Like


      • Lilybaby had a traumatic encounter with an uncircumsized cock once. The rest is internet history.

        I want to bang her perfect pouty pussy so hard that she screams kike and The Holocaust is a hoax! I think that’s her angle here anyway, far as I can tell, to provoke antisemitic rape. (Other than the Hasbara commission checks.)

        J/K, shmoopy! I co-sign your gold digger remarks.

        Like


      • “To criticize gold digging is to encourage the feminist ethos. If you don’t know how to game gold diggers — as most sensible and good-looking women are — the problem is you.”

        I disagree. I understand your thinking, but the conclusion still seems wrong to me. Gold digging is not a feminine virtue, it’s a feminine VICE. Feminists are gold diggers, they have cold hearts and see men only as what they can get from them, and what they can give. Gold digging is a natural female inclination, but that does not mean it’s a good one. If we have our eyes open and possess any good ethos, we will realize that.

        Not only is it immoral, it’s foolish. I have seen this firsthand. Rich men who get rich immorally and had bank accounts full of dirty money could have any immoral woman they wanted, however those women that sold their souls and married a bad man just for their money were not forward thinking. They didn’t think about how much more smart they would be to find a RESOURCEFUL and hardworking man. Money can be here today, and gone tomorrow, a man with good work ethic will strive through hard times to provide. I don’t come from a family with a lot of money, but my father never ever, neglected even one day to provide. This is the measure of a real man.
        A good man will go out to work on the fields to provide, he will do manual labor. This is the kind of man who should be admired and respected.
        I”m not saying all rich men are bad, but wealth has to be handled very carefully, if he’s not using it wisely, to benefit others too then he’s not a good Christian.
        And in a marriage where woman has exactly what she wants whenever she demands it and acts like a spoiled princess, it is sure to be a disaster. What will happen if this money goes? Do you think such a woman will stick around? No way- because her heart is cold, and such a woman doesn’t love the man, she loves only his money.
        Materialism and love of money is one of the greatest poisons of women, when we recognize it that it’s there in our nature, we can rise above it. Hard times build great strength of character in women and men.

        Like


      • Embracing,

        I really like your comment; it’s one of the best ones you have written.

        I just want to point out that we’re not speaking about “professional” gold diggers – the kind of woman who is not looking for love, just to find a rich fool to ensnare in her web. That type of woman is more a famme fatale than a regular girl looking for a quality husband.

        I agree that Gold digging is not a feminine virtue, it’s a feminine vice. And as I recommended in another thread, women must learn to transcend their vices and rise above their nature to become better women.

        However, I disagree that it’s a feminist practice. It’s a female innate nature to look for a provider. Feminists preach against all female nature and shame any woman who is attractive and looks feminine, charging she is archaic, stupid, or just a gold digger. Feminists push women into male domains, especially unrestraint sexual experimentation that brings lots of emotional baggage in its wake. This pushes women to be nonselective, drop the gold digging inclinations, and sleep around.

        No question about it, shaming women against gold digging encourages them to become less selective.

        It used to be understood in days of old that women want money and marriage (not penniless cads for noncommittal sex). How much of classic literature is about the male needing to have a large inheritance to get the woman of his choice. ‘How much does he have a year’, used to be the usual question.
        Charlotte Bronte, Jane Austen. They knew female nature.

        Therefore, I don’t think there is anything wrong with refusing to date jobless losers, clownish cads, or stupid men, just because they know how to use their cocks. At the same time, refusing to date a good man who can provide masculine stability and a decent living because he’s not rich enough is also foolish. Like with everything else, one must have a balance. Extremists are not well adjusted people, whether they are women/men looking for partners, or people ranting over the culture.

        Like


      • When we talk about gold digging, we’re talking about greed, and greed isn’t confined to the female sex.

        All women seek security. For some, security isn’t enough; they are greedy and seek great material wealth above all else. They’ll date and marry men they don’t love, just because they are rich… that’s a gold digger.

        A gold digger is the female equivalent of a wealthy beta, who’s willing to marry a cruel, unfeeling bitch just because she’s beautiful. The base biological instinct is right, but they’ve warped it to the exclusion of all else.

        Like


    • on October 15, 2013 at 3:38 pm Be yourself, NOT

      So much for women liking the real me, unless the real me owns a Lamborghini.

      Like


      • That prank proves nothing. His pick up was weak, his body language and delivery flaccid. But maybe thats the point of the experiment? Get a Lambo and you don’t need to get game.

        Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 4:06 pm Be yourself, NOT

        The prank proves if you have Lamborghini, your game doesn’t need to be tight.

        Like


      • Moral of the story:
        1. Work hard to get social status
        2. Be socially dominant
        3. Learn game
        Use all 3 to pump and dump sluts.

        [CH: if you have a lamborghini, may as well run lamborghini game. it’s not like women are any less shallow than men.]

        Like


      • “CH: if you have a lamborghini, may as well run lamborghini game. it’s not like women are any less shallow than men.”

        Lamborghini game seems so much easier. Unfortunately like most of the guys here I have to improve my game – NO Lamborghini.

        Like


      • The Vitaly prank is the equivalent of a frumpy dressed average chick sans makeup flirting with you, Mr. Bachelor Rock Star. You proceed to ignore her “open for business” signals (the equivalent of a male approach), and then spy her the next day at the pool with the body of Candice Swoenapllpl? Brooklyn Decker.

        So shallow. I hate shallow people!

        PEACE!

        Like


      • She did not give same chance to Vitaly before she learned he had a Lmbo. Now it is O.K. for her to follow her natural hypergamous desires, but women should be honest and say: We are hypergamous and we desire Alpha men. Betas need not apply. But what they say is: We like to meet a nice guy, who will treat us right. I don’t care about money etc…( all B.S.) As guys we are honest we like hot women and we make no apologies for it and better yet if a girl has a nice personality, is faithful we will treat her right even if she is only a 6 or a 7.

        Like


      • Consistent and earnest women are no fun. All truth and no play makes Jacki a dull girl. The thrill is in the tease, and the well-known (nigh universal) inconsistencies of her sex are essentially an open invitation to riff off them. If you can.

        How much better would it have been if he took her out and tickled her mercilessly about her hypocritical “hypergamous desires,” rather than peeling away in his IROC and giving her the middle finger?

        Instead of reverse gold-digging her easily-duped and well-coiffed vagina — be real, you can practically see the sunshine beaming out of her daisy dukes — he’s just one more vengeance-minded Man Going His Own Way, thinking he seized the high ground. Consolations of a loser. What is vengeance other than an admission of inadequacy and the eleventh-hour attempt to claw back a little dignity after having failed at your original purpose?

        Besides, honesty is not a hot girl’s strong point. It’s like asking grizzly bears to wear a bonnet and pilot a unicycle, rather than to follow their nature and devour men.

        Are you in the game or not?

        Like


      • Some of my best friends are Roman Catholic Pig-Fuckers. Present company excepted…

        Like


      • I’m in the game man, BUT our Civilization is at stake here. Our civilization is in the decline. I understand the way the world is. The nature of men, but in order to have civilization we have to curb our desires otherwise we are just a baboon pack. In order to be civilized we have to repress our desires at certain times and have a healthy outlet for them. In the past system of monogamy, the top alpha males got the alpha females, beta males beta females all the way down. But in today’s system Alpha males have soft harems of alpha and beta females, Beta males stay in the shadows until the beta female hits the wall at 30 + than he can have the “privilege” of providing for her and she will give him access to her for some pity sex. Not the kind she was giving to Alpha males while she was still worth something. I believe the old monogamy system was better. I’m not bitter. I get the point learn game, enjoy the decline. But gentlemen this will not save our Civilization.

        Like


      • “in order to have civilization we have to curb our desires otherwise we are just a baboon pack. In order to be civilized we have to repress our desires at certain times and have a healthy outlet for them. “

        Exactly, this is what I meant recently by using the word transcending. We must all go beyond our innate natures and do what is right, not what feels good.

        The only way any society or culture survives is its people learn to do what is right, not what feels good. The liberal viewpoint is always do what feels good. There are never consequences to bad choices because everything is acceptable – there is no good/bad, right/wrong. Eventually, the culture disintegrates and it ends. It happened in ancient Greece and Rome. We are the modern Rome.

        Like


    • Funny. But woulda been better if he banged her first.

      Like


    • on October 16, 2013 at 4:52 am The Burninator

      It’s not gold digging, gold diggers seek out wealth by intent in order to fleece, it’s an active meme, not a passive one She displayed rational behavior from a woman’s perspective. High wealth allows good provisioning should they pair up and squirt out spawn, and it might (…MIGHT) indicate that he’s wealthy because he’s aggressive, ergo he just might (…MIGHT) be alpha or close to it. All classical turn ons for women, noted for thousands of years. And if he turns out beta, well, she’d still go with him and then screw the alpha bad boy behind his back. Win win. To try and shame a woman for a rational choice is a bit silly. It’s like shaming men for picking out young, hot girls to date as if it is illogical or immoral.

      Cultural “shaming” has really gotten out of hand. Soon I’ll be asked to flog myself in public for being male.

      Like


      • Surprise! She opened up when she saw the car. Nothing wrong with that. Dude came across as severely butthurt. If your point of view about women is that “They must love me for ME, for who I am deep down inside” you are officially feminist tainted. He decided he preferred a gesture of revenge to hanging out with an admittedly fickle girl. What an idiot.

        Like


    • I would have reacted the exact same way as the girl and I’m a straight guy ffs. Big deal.

      “Hey, you want to go to a bar with me”
      “No thanks, I’m straight”
      *Opens flash car* “You sure”
      “Nice car, yeah let’s go to a bar, you’re buying you rich cunt”

      Like


  13. ” . . . it can’t just be that they’re eating more Snickers . . .”

    Well of course not; they’re eating oreos. That’s what lab chow basically is, fortified oreos. That’s how they so carefully control the dietary intake, by using highly processed foods made from highly refined ingredients, like hydrogenated (for storage life) vegetable oils, starch, etc. Throw in a vitamin pill and some soy protein.

    Stir, compress and bake.

    Maybe they leave out the chocolate flavor.

    Like


  14. “3. Male self-delusion. The rationalization hamster can thrive anywhere there is a habitat for it, such as a field of sour grapes.”

    OMG! # 3 is hilarious. Entitled: “My wife is ageing… and I love it”

    Can one be more delusional? Who is happy his wife is turning into an old hag? Who can be happy with aging, period? Unrealistic delusional brainwashed liberals is who.

    “I love the gray in your hair, not only because it’s a beautiful color but because you are comfortable enough to be yourself. Okay, it makes me a bit more comfortable with the gray in my beard. Yeah, I admit it.

    I love the wrinkles at the corners of your eyes and mouth. You’ve spent a lifetime smiling, which means you might give my nerdy jokes a mercy laugh.

    I love that your jaw line has softened. You were always beautiful, but that young, angular face lacked gravitas.

    I love your belly. It’s soft and womanly and without pretense. It’s a belly that loves life, not vanity.”

    Oh, he goes on and on. At best, he should keep quiet about his wife and him getting older, instead of celebrating his wife’s soft belly. Mind you, he doesn’t celebrate her cooking, the way she runs the house, takes care of him, or the way she reared their children, which indeed should be celebrated if a woman is a good wife and mother. He is celebrating superficial things in the same way he is lashing out on those who celebrate the superficial things that interest them – sex and beauty. Spot the irony folks.

    Why is it always that liberals can’t see their own hypocrisy? In addition, they celebrate the most unrealistic things that only sound good on paper, but which deep down inside no one thinks should be celebrated. In fact, they should be kept quiet of not outright mourned. Well, maybe mourning is a bit harsh, but suffice to say no one should celebrate getting older, looking like shit, and having less time to achieve.

    And they think this is a clever article at feminist iVillage?

    P.S. I think the author is a Brit. Feminism is strong there.

    Like


    • Exactly! Why not, My Wife Is Ageing and I Love HER? No one can help getting older but his focus is in the superficial.

      Like


    • P.S. I think the author is a Brit. Feminism is strong there.

      That thin idiot dating Gloria the Hutt is also a Brit.

      Like


    • Here’s #3 written by a non-fag

      Listen to me. A good woman ages beautifully. When I look at my wife, I see the most gorgeous woman in the universe. Her wrinkled hands got that way by keeping up with my two boys and working hard for them while I was on the road. The lines under her eyes are from years of shedding tears for me when I was at war, and those wrinkles on her brow are from decades of worry for me and my two sons. It was her legs they held on to when they were learning to walk, her lap was where they learned to read, and her breasts were their first
      nourishment. The first kiss those boys ever received was from her lips, and God willing, my last kiss will be from her lips.

      You two don’t know what you’re missing – or maybe you do. But all I know is that she’s as beautiful, desirable, and lovely today as the day I met her, and I wouldn’t trade one second with her for a lifetime of rowdiness with one of those harlots you guys have waiting for you back home.

      You two don’t know what beauty is. In a way, I feel sorry for both of you. I’m not getting on your case, because if there’s one thing I’ve learned from my own sons, it’s that womenaren’t what they used to be.

      The whole thing is just goddamn pathetic if you ask me.

      From a long defunct blog.

      Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 7:39 pm AlmostAnonymous

        That blog post is worth reposting in its entirety.

        Like


      • and here it is (a copy of a copy):

        Proverb 28: Women Can Age Beautifully
        January 18, 2011 by Solomon II 60 Comments
        
        A while back I was in Las Vegas for a new product showcase. We were a few men down, so I ended up working the booth with two of my clients. One is a 28 year old player from Brooklyn, the other, a 72 year old Irishman from Philly with last name I still can’t pronounce.

        Since the three of us had worked together several times before, we could talk freely during the slow hours. My phone and Brooklyn’s phone started buzzing one afternoon with girls sending dirty pics and telling us to hurry home for our “surprise”. Of course, Brooklyn and I had given different return dates to each woman to ensure that we would have a full night to enjoy the surprises without our phones blowing up.

        “I’ll be back Monday, can’t wait to see you” to Michelle, “I’ll be back Tuesday, can’t wait to see you” to Jennifer, “I’ll be back Wednesday, can’t wait to see you” to a different Jennifer, a.k.a “hot Jen”, and “I’ll be back Thursday, can’t wait to see you” to Rachael was my deal.

        Brooklyn had me beat by two bitches. The nerve of some guys.

        When the pic on your left [ommitted] graced my screen, Old Man Philly started laughing uncontrollably. He started going on and on about how much better it is to be a “young buck” today than it was back in his day. He was wowed by how I could turn my screen from side to side and zoom in on her tits, and just stood there shaking his head with a big grin on his face.

        You kids crack me up. This is unbelievable! How do you talk these girls into letting you take pictures of them like that?

        We don’t, Philly. They take them with their own phones and send them to us.

        You gotta be kidding me? Why in the hell would a lady do something like that?

        They’re not ladies.

        Un-freaking-believable. If I had a daughter and she did something like that for you two yard birds, I’d send her to the street corner so at least she could get paid for being a goddamn whore.

        I guess they like the power of being sexually desirable.

        Where the hell do these girls find power in having an old geezer like me look at their ass? Surely they know you two idiots are going to show these around.

        Let me tell you two knuckleheads something…

        Thinking we were in for a 30 minute sermon on the evils of taking up with women of ill repute, Brooklyn and I pulled up two chairs, turned our phones off, and gave our full attention to Old Philly out of respect.

        As usual, he wasn’t short on advice, but we were shocked at what he had to say.

        If I were you boys, I’d fuck every last one of these little whores. If I had the unfortunate occurrence to be 31 in today’s world, I’d show those women a thing or two.

        Wow. Not what we expected.

        Both of my boys are married to two of the biggest bitches and liars on the planet. Jim is an aeronautical engineer with Boeing, and Tony is a corporate lawyer for Apple. I raised both of them to have balls big enough to handle anything, but these harlots give them hell
        constantly. Women these days are spoiled and irreverent, and they’re not worth more than a fuck. One of my boys played College football in New York, and the other in Pennsylvania. I taught them to be men, not pussies. But I swear to God these two bitch daughters-in-law of mine have my whole family worked up. They threaten divorce, flirt with other men on the computer, and send those things that are like phone emails [text messages] to other men with words that are inappropriate for a married woman. My sons find them later, but they can’t say anything or they’ll end up in a screaming fight or divorce court.

        I told both of my boys that I was disappointed in them for letting women get to them like that, but after I started talking more to those two cunts [yes, the old man really said “cunt”], I realized that even I couldn’t do a thing with them. I mean, it’s crazy. You can’t punch them, but that’s exactly what they need. They need a man to knock the shit out them and then see how independent and feisty they feel. Both of those bitches are worthless, and need to be put in their place. They’re both brats.

        I’m glad you two boys are smart enough to see through that mess and deal with these girls they way they deserve. Keep treating them like the rubbish they are unless you want to end up like my two boys.

        Brooklyn and I were shocked. First of all, we had just heard the C word and the F bomb dropped by a man who hadn’t said a curse word in the three years we knew him. The man won’t even tell a dirty joke at a bar if there’s a female bartender or a “lady” anywhere within earshot.

        Naturally, Brooklyn and I chimed in, telling Old Man Philly about the girls we’ve been with and how while many of them certainly had their charms, there’s not a damn one of them worth the time and effort in the long run. As the trio stood there ignoring potential clients in lieu of woman-bashing and comparing naked photos of random chicks on our phones, Brooklyn made a comment about one girl’s tits. He said “yeah, but when she’s old and wrinkly, those things will be disgusting”.

        That’s when Old Man Philly changed his tone.

        Women can age beautifully, you know.

        Uh oh. That sermon we expected earlier was about to be delivered.

        Let me tell you boys something. I don’t take back anything I said about you guys running around with these little girls, since that’s evidently all that’s available these days. But there’s no reason for you to disrespect my wife.

        Sorry, we didn’t mean to be disrespectful to…

        Shut up. Both of you.

        Yes sir.

        Listen to me. A good woman ages beautifully. When I look at my wife, I see the most gorgeous woman in the universe. Her wrinkled hands got that way by keeping up with my two boys and working hard for them while I was on the road. The lines under her eyes are from years of shedding tears for me when I was at war, and those wrinkles on her brow are from decades of worry for me and my two sons. It was her legs they held on to when they were learning to walk, her lap was where they learned to read, and her breasts were their first nourishment. The first kiss those boys ever received was from her lips, and God willing, my last kiss will be from her lips.

        You two don’t know what you’re missing – or maybe you do. But all I know is that she’s as beautiful, desirable, and lovely today as the day I met her, and I wouldn’t trade one second with her for a lifetime of rowdiness with one of those harlots you guys have waiting for you back home.

        You two don’t know what beauty is. In a way, I feel sorry for both of you. I’m not getting on your case, because if there’s one thing I’ve learned from my own sons, it’s that women aren’t what they used to be.

        The whole thing is just goddamn pathetic if you ask me.

        I’m going to write down what you just said. Do you mind if I use it on my blog? A blog is kind of like a newspaper, but people read it on their computer.

        I don’t care.

        Old Man Philly walked away and started talking to a buyer from JC Penny. I returned to my phone to see that my former #1 girl who “loves” me had set up a date with some random guy she stalked on Facebook (she ended up fucking him on the second “date” which by her own admission was nothing more than a booty call). Brooklyn opted to call his wife, but
        she didn’t answer, and I could tell he was disappointed but not surprised. He dialed a different number and asked “is she with you?” quickly hung up, mumbled “lying bitch” under his breath, then turned his attention to one of our competitor’s show models to set up a rendezvous for that night.

        When the show closed, I opened my laptop and starting writing while Brooklyn stared at the cold concrete floor in a daze. My #1 girl was out doing what she does best, and evidently, so was his. We didn’t have to discuss Old Man Philly’s sermon, because our silence said it all. Our minds were on two very sexy, but certainly not beautiful women, and we both knew it. I think we were a little embarrassed of ourselves, because we both knew better than to get emotionally wrapped up in the ”independent and adventurous” modern women we put in rotation. It wasn’t the girl’s fault, it was ours and we knew it.

        I wonder if my former #1 girl or Brooklyn’s wife will ever have a strong Alpha male talk about them the way Philly talked about his wife? I highly doubt it. But once again, a very simple principle is repeatedly ignored by women like this: They can choose to be sexually popular for a few short years in the eyes of every man, or opt for a lifetime of beauty in the eyes of the one man who loves them.

        Beauty isn’t skin deep, and it doesn’t fade. Beauty is not a physical attribute; it’s an aura that is admired by men and women, young and old alike. Beauty is a timeless gift given freely and without hesitation as a birth right to all young women, but very few of them recognize, protect, or cherish it.

        Philly’s sermon about his wife is proof that women can age beautifully, but unfortunately, it takes a little grace, class and effort *gasp*, so the modern woman opts for being sexy in lieu of being beautiful. The world is crawling with sexy, ugly women who should not be valued for anything more than whats between their legs – it’s the only thing you can count on out of womankind these days.

        Who better to fuck the ugliest of women than the ugliest of men? Hey, at least my life has purpose.

        NEXT!
        Filed under Proverbs Tagged with alpha male, relationships, women

        Like


    • His wife is so beautiful he won’t show us pictures of what she looks like.

      Like


    • on October 16, 2013 at 4:57 am The Burninator

      Good catch Lily. He’s not celebrating worthy achievements, he’s celebrating superficialities, as if to shame us for enjoying the youthful versions of what he celebrates.

      Like


    • So the guy leers at his wife because she’s fat, wrinkled and grey.

      Three observations: First, this’s merely another iteration of the pervy preening we have seen since forever, so why not provide an edgy artsy bourgeois-epatering picture of this fellow with a featherduster up his ass too. Yeah, mom and dad, that’s who he is now. Second, gravitas huh? Is he screwing Henry Kissinger? And third, wifey probably thinks “Yeah, actually you can stop talking now. Any time will be good. Just. Stop.”

      Like


  15. Re:Obama’s legacy

    Well, Obama could be remembered as the POTUS who somehow did not involve USofA in another shooting war/colonial police action in the Asian landmass. Now this is some lowered expectations right here, because obviously sane political honchos should avoid getting the country into insane wars.

    I devoutly wish that this will stand true come 2016.

    Like


  16. Left more shit that’s in mod that will probably be irrelevant by the time it gets approved…

    Like


  17. The TED troll, that is a thing of legend. It reminds me of the guy from Brazil at the slutwalk rally and since it has been almost a year since that piece of hilarity, this is very timely.

    Like


  18. ‘modern liberals (for all practical purposes the global Western elite) are like a nomadic r-selected species — that is, they prefer the metaphorical pump and dump lifestyle to the family formation lifestyle. He also passed along the catchy aphorism that [liberal elite] nomads are “farmers of civilization. The nomads allow civilizations to grow and then when they are ripe they eat them.”’

    CH will be a better place when he can call a jew a jew.

    Though I feel he has supped from the [written by a jew] Unqualified Reservations cup for too long. That site, and its theories, have merit, but will send you down a blind alley by overlooking and deflecting attention from the you-know-jews.

    Check out Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion for a primer.

    Like


    • on October 15, 2013 at 12:11 pm The Spirit Within

      Blah blah blah blah.

      You are aware that there are conservative, family-oriented Jewish families, right? And that there is a hell of a lot of friction between them and their liberal counterparts, right?

      Like


      • Good point. There is a huge friction between conservative and liberal Jews. The two groups don’t see eye to eye on almost anything. Jew haters overlook this and try to make their social criticism about the Jews. Jewish and Gentile liberals are both destroying our society so that constant calling out the Jew is turning into a Jew hate agenda, not a saving-society-from-liberal agenda. Jew haters use Jewish liberals to turn hate against all Jews because this is the only thing they are really interested in from the get go. They don’t fool clear rational thinkers.

        I wrote some of the following on the previous thread, but it seems apt here too.

        Most of the Jew contention on the comment section is beyond ridiculous and has no basis in reality, such as ‘Jews run the world and are out to get white Gentiles’. It’s bullshit. Jews are smart and achievement oriented, and this is why they are envied and vilified; not because they have a scheme to destroy white Gentiles. It’s obvious what’s going on here. Furthermore, this argument only reflects badly on the ones doing the vilifying.

        Let me use a sports analogy that most here might relate to. Let’s take the Olympics and pretend that each one of you is a silver medalist. Deep down inside you are jealous of the gold medalist who triumphed over you. This is normal. But, what are you going to do? Go in the media and vilify him, trash him, bash him, and badmouth him? No, since no one will take you seriously if you do that. Everyone will say that you are a jealous sore loser. You’ll make a fool of yourself, and no brand would give you a contract to represent its products. The only way out of this if you still want to be considered the best is to compete against your opponent the next time around, and be better than him so you become the gold medalist yourself. Thankfully, there is also a side benefit to your struggle. The competition that you have generated by your jealousy and need to challenge your opponent’s gold medal, will also better humanity, since in order to win you have to overtake his record. If you win, you will push human endurance even further.

        This analogy also holds for Gentiles jealous of the Jews’ achievements. Instead of vilifying, slandering, and fomenting hate against the Jews, which only mean these Gentiles are jealous sore losers, Gentiles should compete with Jews. Competition helps humanity. Yet, all some can do is foment discontent over them. This means they’re jealous sore losers who have to resort to posting crap like this in the comment section every day.

        Hit-ler thought the same thing. Instead of competing with Jews, he thought he could remove them from existence and solve his perceived lowliness of the Aryan race. If he didn’t think the Aryan race was inferior to Jews, he would have competed to win. Instead, he thought Aryans could triumph only by making sure the Jews don’t exist. However, at the end of the day, winning feels better than removing. It’s more bravehearted and accomplished. But, if you have a low opinion of yourself, and think you can amount to nothing, then murder is the only way out for you. Or, cheap slander as is the case here.

        Like


      • Yes, but… most right-wing Israelis also despise all Westerners such as ourselves. Brown-nosing them while they despise you isn’t exactly alpha behavior, and I refuse to do it.

        Like


      • How are right-wing Israelis despising Westerners? This is nonsense.

        Most Israelis worship the West and think of themselves as part of it. They don’t see themselves as anything but Westerners, and Israel is a Western country located in the East. Only ultra, ultra, religious crazies who also hate other Jews have any ill feelings for the West. As usual, your analysis is wrong.

        And who is even talking about brown nosing? I think you read things in my comment I didn’t say just to find something to contradict in it because you’re worried I diagnosed the malady of these Jew hater losers.

        You don’t have to suck up, compliment, or speak well of anyone who is not part of your group. Building up your group is natural, as opposed to building up other groups. The only thing I am saying here is that making up bullshit lies, vilifying, trashing, and slandering Jews doesn’t bode well. You will get called a jealous loon, just like an athlete vilifying his competition. Better to keep quiet than to make up stuff not rooted in reality just because you hate the opposition.

        In addition, if you are really worried the culture is deteriorating, naming the Jew is not accurate since it’s a liberal issue, not a Jewish issue. No amount of Jew slandering is going to change the fact there are hordes of white liberal Gentiles. But if you insist on calling out Jew here and Jew there, which I am suspecting is all you care about – fomenting Jew hate – not solving our cultural ills, it will backfire in the end (as it did in Germany and Europe past WW2).

        My message is simple and clear, yet you complicated it with brown nosing.

        Like


      • How are right-wing Israelis despising Westerners? This is nonsense.

        Ctrl-F “blasphemy”.

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/07/15/chicks-digging-jerks-goes-mainstreamish/

        Like


      • Oh, so you are admitting religious fanaticism. Sorry, but that is the most illegitimate Jew hate. As I often point out Jew hate comes in 2 flavors.

        1) people jealous of Jew achievement
        2) Religious zealots who resent the Jews for refusing to convert.

        Both ate weak reasons to hate the Jew.

        Like


      • William Jew Kristol is one of the main faces of Cohen-servatism Inc. He has two contradictory positions on the expediency of immigration, positions which when we examine them side by side, establish his obvious contempt for the West.

        1) Regarding Israel, he is an unswerving proponent of all of their immigration policies, approving mightily their sovereignty when they round up and deport non-jews at will, especially when those non-jews are threatening Israel’s religious or economic stability. (Good for them!) Israel must also be immune to any criticism for maintaining a thick wall around its national boundaries.

        2) Regarding the USA, Kristol and all of the other neo-Cohen-servatives are relentless cheerleaders for yet another amnesty so that America can become even more thoroughly swamped with third-world degenerates than it already is. And of course the foreign criminals who are already here must be granted citizenship post haste, in order to reinforce ever more corporatism and funnel ever more money into the pockets of the plutocrats. Anything less would be wicked evil racism.

        Like


      • Husbandman,

        I have to correct you regarding Kristol. He advocates the same garbage for Israel as he does for the USA, just in different terms. For instance, he’s a proponent of land for peace for Israel that will yield no peace. He is really a centrist, which means he is nothing – he’s neither here nor there – which is why I dislike political centrists. This is why FOX brings him on board. All their commentators are not true conservatives despite trying to be the conservative cable news network. Look at Karl Rove, he’s also advocating amnesty, as to not alienate the Latin vote. Yet no one here ever mentions him. Karl Rove is no conservative. He’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

        When FOX was more on the right, their viewership was soaring. Then they thought they could attract more viewers by not alienating the left, so they become more centrists to pander to new viewers who supposedly don’t like too much far right thinking. As it turned out, and it was predictable, they are now catering to no one – not the right and not the left – so viewership started dropping. That’s what happens when you try to be all for all people. The Republican Party pretty much took the same trajectory and it’s losing elections after election because it does not have a definite stance. It shape shifts itself constantly – threatening not to go along with Obama or the Democrats and then yields to them everything they want.

        There are hoards of men like Kristol everywhere in this country, especially in local government. You only point the finger at him because he’s Jewish, and therefore he bothers you more than a Gentile who proposes the same political positions as him. This is the classic antisemitic viewpoint. Blame only the Jew for everything and anything, while overlooking all the white Gentiles doing exactly the same thing. Sorry, but this is a sure way to create more problems since you’re not diagnosing the malady. Liberals of all walks of life, backgrounds, religions, and races are complicit in the lefty culture, with more white Gentiles than any other group represented. Please identify the enemy. Stop looking for your personal Jew-scapegoating catharsis to make yourself feel better. It’s not going to be effective in persecuting this war.

        Like


      • Oh, so you are admitting religious fanaticism. Sorry, but that is the most illegitimate Jew hate. As I often point out Jew hate comes in 2 flavors.

        1) people jealous of Jew achievement
        2) Religious zealots who resent the Jews for refusing to convert.

        Both ate weak reasons to hate the Jew.

        “Religious fanaticism”? Oh for pete sake… an Israeli taunts Embracing with a rather disgusting and blasphemous remark, and you accuse me of “religious fanaticism”?

        Like


      • “an Israeli taunts Embracing”
        I don’t know what you mean? Please explain.

        Like


      • Lily, you are correct, Karl Rove is an evil sack of shit. I detest the entire Republican party as much as the other one. There has been zero policy difference among any of the last four presidents, two from each wing of the duopoly.

        Paul Gottfried, a jew, acknowledges and praises the fact that America is a historically Christian nation. He is one of the few such who make this concession. In general, jews of whatever political stripe affirm the psychotic notion that America has always been a nation supporting freedom of religion (which is a lie), and also that freedom of religion is inseparable from true liberty (also a damned lie).

        Like


      • “an Israeli taunts Embracing”
        I don’t know what you mean? Please explain.

        Obviously you didn’t look at my link.

        יהודה בן יוסף (that’s “Yehudah ben Yosef” btw) wrote,

        “You christian women worshipped a dead Jew called jeebus for 2000 years. Now you worship me a living Jew”

        Now, how is that not blasphemous? How is that not evidence of Israelis despising Westerners?

        Like


      • Oh, I see. Your link opened for me a whole thread, not one particulate comment, that’s why I didn’t understand you. Anyway, what you posted is taken out of context. He was arguing with Subway Masturbator who’s right to call him out, but which you hypocritically gained up against with Yehudah ben Yosef. Now you’re calling him out?

        Ok, he says something stupid:

        “You christian women worshipped a dead Jew called jeebus for 2000 years. Now you worship me a living Jew”

        And, embracing wasn’t even mad, she agreed and said, “Yes we do! Amen.”

        So that’s your evidence Israelis despise the West? I swear, the more I question you about your anti-Jew arguments and contentions, the more pathetic you guys sound. Is there anything you don’t tilt?

        The West is worshipping a Jew. How is that not factually correct?

        Also, one person saying something completely stupid (the “Now you worship me a living Jew” part of his comment) that you perceive to be anti-West (which I still fail to see what’s anti-West about it), doesn’t mean all Israelis think like him. BTW, I still don’t know what he was trying to say. Was he saying something about himself being worshiped??? WTF?
        .

        Now, let’s discuss religious fanaticism because you obviously don’t know what it means.

        When you insist on converting others to your religion, that is religious fanaticism. Last time I checked, Jews are not into forced-conversions, proselytizing, or calling anyone who isn’t Jewish damned. The first is done by Islam, and the second and third are often done by Christians. That’s religious fanaticism.

        The Jewish view is that all people can go to heaven if they are righteous people. Being Jewish isn’t a guarantee of heaven, only being a good person. In other words, anyone who keeps the 7 Noahide laws and/or the 10 Commandments, is considered a righteous person, irrespective of his religion. Meaning, people who perform good deeds throughout their lives, don’t engage in evil, and worship God as the only Creator and no other who made both heaven and earth, have a space in heaven. Remember, heaven is a Jewish concept, which both Christianity and Islam borrowed. Thus, this is its original form.

        In addition, the view Judaism takes is that any forced or coerced conversion is evil, because belief in God must come willingly, and with all mental faculties intact, not under the sword. Additionally, any conversion must not have an ulterior motive, such as consideration of marriage. It must be free of all considerations, except a true love for Judaism. I don’t think any religion could boast this type of respect for free will.

        BTW, the being free of ulterior motive aspect in Jewish conversion, is why many Reform conversions done for the sake of mixed marriages, aren’t even recognized as legitimate conversions for religious Jews. But I digress.

        In contrast, Islam demands that all become Muslims and will do so at the point of the sword if given a chance, and Christianity while used to engage in forced conversions, now just damns everyone who isn’t a Christian. In the Middle Ages, a person could be evil and do many bad things, but if he believed in Jesus it was suffice to go to heaven. Now, this view has changed somewhat, and Christians are expected to do good as well as be believers. But Middle Ages Christianity, is classic Christian dogma.

        Sounds to me like Judaism is the least fanatic of all of the 3 monotheistic religions. Maybe because it is the first and everyone copied its concepts, so they tried to legitimize themselves by being even stricter? Maybe.

        It doesn’t matter either way, but you have many misconceptions about Jews and Judaism. In addition, I find many times that many of you project your own religious practices on the Jews. That’s why much of your analysis is off.

        Like


      • Can’t you, for once, just shut the fuck up and not pollute this place with your massive, never-ending comments ??

        Like


    • “CH will be a better place when he can call a jew a jew.”
      What he said applies to regular White liberals aswell as liberal Jews.

      Like


    • Yeah, Mencius Goldbug is frighteningly smart, but he’s unable/unwilling to finish the deal regarding Frankfurt and YKW. Unamusement Park is in the exact same camp. Jared Taylor knows YKW but is holding that card very close to his chest.

      Like


    • on October 15, 2013 at 3:31 pm FuriousFerret

      You fucking Idiot. Look what you did.

      You brought the ‘one who must not be spoken’ out.

      Asshole.

      Like


  19. No matter how many articles Stafford writes praising his post-wall wife, she is going to keep him on pussy rations. Pretty sad.

    Like


  20. The skinny boyfriend of the fat girl is coming to America to pursue a degree in … psychology. The field that attracts the mentally messed-up.

    Like


  21. on October 15, 2013 at 12:49 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    RE: the fat-shaming tweets

    It all seems kind of…unnecessary and mean at first, doesn’t it? I mean, these people are already facing a lower life expectancy than that of the previous generation—the first time that this has happened since the advent of modern vaccines and antibiotics. And even if they manage to live as long as their parents, they’re going to do it in increasingly excruciating pain as their joints break down under a load that our bones and cartilage were never meant to carry. Constantly faced with the humiliation of seats that are too small, amusement parks they can’t ride safely, activities that the rest of us take for granted.

    Kind of feels like you’re kicking somebody when they’re down.

    [CH: The logic trajectory of your sympathy is a world of fat fucks whining about small seats. Don’t you think there’s a moral imperative to prevent beauty from being eradicated from God’s creation?]

    BUT…

    The current “fat acceptance” culture has gone way, way beyond the simple politeness of our parents and grandparents (“Don’t stare.” “It isn’t nice to comment on somebody’s weight.” “You don’t know their situation; perhaps they have a glandular problem.”) Like so many other well-intentioned movements, it’s eclipsed its original, laudable goals and morphed into a monster.

    [The fat acceptance movement never had laudable goals. It is in the business of normalizing sloth and gluttony and weakness and ugliness.]

    If anything, current culture THIN-shames, not the other way around.

    [Fat acceptance can’t exist without thin shaming. To extol the one is to necessarily belittle the other. But the real world doesn’t work that way. Some body shapes are better than others. There’s no equalist wishful thinking that will change that.[

    My BMI is 19.5 and I’m 20% body fat. (For you dudes, that’s actually rather good for a woman.) I’m slim, but my weight is well within the healthy range and my doctors agree. I am not anorexic. I do not look like a boy. And yet all of the below are comments that have been made, TO MY FACE, by people who all thought it was perfectly acceptable:

    Category I: The Concern Trolls
    “Why are you eating a salad? That’s just not enough food. You have to nourish yourself.”
    “No wonder you’re so cold all the time, you’re skin and bones.”
    “Do you have an eating disorder? I’m worried about you. It’s not normal for a woman to be a size 2.”
    “All that exercise isn’t good for you. You’re going to hurt yourself.”

    Category II: The Insults
    “Only dogs like bones. A real man likes a woman with curves.”
    “Your boyfriend must be a pedophile or something, if he likes women that look like little boys.”
    “Your man should ditch you and get with a real woman with some meat on her bones.”
    “You’re a disgusting twig.”

    Interestingly, I’ve never heard anything like that from anybody with XY chromosomes, or a woman smaller than a size 14.

    [Fat fuck whining about shaming, shames thin chick. News at 11.]

    Like


    • Women are generally more catty and cruel than men.

      Have you thought about respoinding in kind? Calling people (total strangers?) on their out-of-the-blue insults? I find I have no trouble doing this, reaming out strangers publicly for bad behavior. cathartic. it’s a wonder it doesn’t happen more ofetn. People should lose their inhibitions in that regard.

      Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 1:37 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Usually, no. Generally I just kind of blink at them and change the subject (if it’s someone I know and/or have to deal with again), or just blink at them and go about my business. Those kinds of insults don’t really bother me. They can say whatever they want; when I’m 75 years old and still rocking couture dresses and shoes (like my grandmother) or 95 years old and still hiking and horseback riding (like my great-grandmother), I’ll be the one who’s laughing.

        Like


      • “They can say whatever they want; when I’m 75 years old and still rocking couture dresses and shoes…”

        You have the right idea, girl. 😉

        Like


    • ” . . . some meat on her bones.””

      Fat is not meat.

      Like


    • Yup. Except you forgot “don’t you eat??” And my pet peeve, being called skinny. Skinny is an insult; it’s not attractive. But heavy people will hurl that at you without a second thought. If you object they try to say it’s a compliment. Hardly.

      Thin is the minority now, and it’s the minority that ends up being shamed. For now it’s just an inconvenience (being sized out of stores, having to give up half your airline seat because the person next to you doesn’t fit). But ultimately it will become a catastrophic burden on the health care system. I understand genetics play a role, but I get really annoyed seeing obese people chowing down cheeseburgers and fries, knowing we’ll be paying through the nose for the junk they put in their mouths. In some areas of the country, obesity is really all you see. It’s really disheartening.

      Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 3:42 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I live in a major urban center. The downside is Obama stickers, Obama stickers everywhere. The upside is the yoga/fitness culture. There are very few seriously overweight people here. You just don’t see them. It’s easy to start thinking that the “obesity epidemic” is just a matter of media hysteria.

        I thought that, myself, until I went to [MIDWESTERN STATE REDACTED] for a business trip. Sweet Ty-D-Bowl Jesus, skating on the blue waters. Those people are nice as hell, I didn’t meet one I didn’t like, but holy shit are they fat. And no wonder: I ordered a side of vegetables in a restaurant and they were served swimming in white gravy.

        Like


      • I had the same experience when I lived in NYC. But still, it depends on where in NYC you are. Manhattan tends to have the thin and affluent, but if you head north to the Bronx it’s a different story. It can’t all be attributable to poor diet and lack of exercise; genetics must play a role.

        I made the same observations visiting the midwest. A few years ago Anna Wintour visited some midwestern state and was quoted as saying the people were all as big as houses. Obviously she was slammed for it, but…. there’s some truth there.

        Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 3:54 pm FuriousFerret

        I know right.

        I just hate when other men shame me for having a 10 inch cock, the body worthy of a Michelangelo sculpture, the face of a young Paul Newman, along with my George Cloonesque charisma.

        This world is so cruel. Woe is me. This sad minority of having attractive qualities that most other people don’t have.

        Like


      • You are so tedious.

        Like


      • I luv you too.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 7:04 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Why are other men looking at your 10-inch cock?

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 7:12 am FuriousFerret

        It’s called a gym locker room. I own a section where I air dry alpha style.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 8:02 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Then, I’m sorry to tell you this, but you work out with a bunch of meat-gazers.

        Like


    • Interestingly, I’ve never heard anything like that from anybody with XY chromosomes, or a woman smaller than a size 14.

      Yeah, and fat broads squeal like stuck pigs over Roosh’s Fat Shaming Week. They dish it out, but can’t take it… like all libtards.

      Like


    • Like my buddy’s (overweight) GF asked me, “Why do you drink skim milk? You don’t need to.” My reply, “Duh.”

      Like


    • What happened to you, Rapp? You’ve let yourself go. Your Bullshit Mass Index is around 50%. Your commentary is becoming obese with no one keeping you to a healthy regimen.

      Let’s work each other out.

      King Rhabdo

      Like


      • Matt King: pipped at the post by Mark Minter, unrequited “love” for Feministx, and now sniffing up to RappDau.

        Lily — watch out. You’re next…..

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 9:15 am FuriousFerret

        “Lily — watch out. You’re next…..”

        Actually. I think this would work. Talk about two people deserving each other.

        Like


      • I actually think they would move physically near to one another and simply explode in a brilliant matter / anti-matter sort of way. 😀

        Like


      • Why don’t you go and exercise your legendary 10-inch cock, instead of worrying about comment length?

        In other words, is comment-length irritation a form of peen envy?

        Like


      • @FuriousFerret: I hadn’t looked at it that way, but I think you may be right.

        Like


      • Wait, have you seriously been lurking around here this entire time, just waiting for Matt to start posting again?

        Give it a rest, jock sniffer.

        Like


      • “Lily — watch out. You’re next…..”

        I was already – before he discovered I was a hasbara agent and he can’t control me 😉 Also, I won’t spend my hasbara paycheck on his new Porsche. That didn’t fly. He called me a feminist for having “my own money.“

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 7:03 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Appy-lolly-woggies all around, me little droog. Now come and get one in the yarbles…if ye have any yarbles…and maybe we can get to the old in-out, in-out.

        Like


      • Let’s settle for a medieval spike shield duel; loser has to quit commenting.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 3:36 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        That was actually for Matt King, but that sounds like a real kick and good for laughs and lashings of the old ultra-violent.

        Like


      • Agreed…..where shall I send the challenge?

        Like


    • on October 16, 2013 at 8:35 am gunslingergregi

      size 2 yea I could prob bang
      yea the haters gonna hate that’s a fact

      Like


  22. on October 15, 2013 at 1:02 pm Greatest Beta

    Going to some super exclusive charity event in Hollywood at a new upscale bar lounge. Me and my bro are friends with a baller that goes to these events on a regular basis so now that I’m recently single I get the invite too lol.

    It’s hilarious how much social proof gets established when you are hanging out with these people at their tables. There’s going to be tons of hot hot girls in this place looking to meet a baller. Of course with game and fun I’m curios to see how much success ill have in that venue.

    Like


    • omg you’re so annoying, you come across as so desperate, try-hard, and needy, please just shut up

      Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 4:10 pm Greatest Beta

        Lol hater.

        Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 4:10 pm Greatest Beta

        Lol hater.
        Why the hate tho? Cuz I actually post about REAL shit? Anon faggot

        Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 5:05 pm immoralgables

        1) Going to some super exclusive charity event
        2) in Hollywood
        3) new
        4) upscale lounge
        5) friends with a baller
        6) regular basis
        7) get the invite too
        8) tons of hot girls
        9) looking to meet a baller

        If you stripped out that list you could have conveyed your point. Without it, would you have still written your original comment?

        It’s similar to saying “I” a lot in an essay. How much powerful would it be without all the “I’s.

        – Guy who is trying to correct his ways so no hating here.

        Like


      • on October 15, 2013 at 6:09 pm Greatest Beta

        I don’t hang with this guy often, so it’s rare that I’m in such an environment. This is the first time ill be in such a place with red pill lens.

        Should be an interesting experience is all I’m saying. No bragger here dude most my time is spent in suburbia

        Like


      • I’d be curious to see what comes of it. My experience has been that money means jack if your baller friend has no game, especially if everyone else there has money. He’s a ticket to access to hotter women. Pay it back by being a charitable wing and he’ll include you again.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 9:41 am Greatest Beta

        Pulsotic:

        Jr baller was a classic beta turned little player when he started hanging out with my brother. I helped along the way. Then his pops sold a company for hundreds of millions the son did good work and got a nice 8 figure check. He’s now investing in all kinda of good shit.

        Jr baller has taken PUA live instruction with personal trainers on the field. He knows all about the negs, openers, etc. of course, having a player pad in Hollywood hills helps as he went from 6s to 8s and 9s and a few 10s.

        Personally I don’t like those circles as they are vapid as hell but the girls are incredible. Me and brother have used gold digger game well (our parents are wealthy) but I got out of that a few years ago. I prefer to pick up based on raw attraction and button pushing 🙂

        Like


  23. […] those things in mind, I’d like to turn you to this little blurb on the PUA, Heartiste’s, […]

    Like


  24. “[liberal elite] nomads are “farmers of civilization. The nomads allow civilizations to grow and then when they are ripe they eat them.” Ideas like this should catch on within Dark Enlightenment circles, even if they aren’t fully fleshed out. The world desperately needs courageous, free thinkers, now more than ever.”

    Maybe give them the name “the Reapers”. At first I was thinking of this name because it goes with the farming metaphor and because it links them to the Grim Reaper who comes for souls.

    But then I realized that was the name of the bad guys in Mass Effect… eh… maybe it needs some work…

    Like


  25. on October 15, 2013 at 1:36 pm Abelard Lindsey

    The so-called “monarchists” ought talk more about the government of China and Singapore, since these are the current examples of what they believe in.

    Like


    • Well Singapore is definitely better than the banana Republic of the U.S. and China IS NOT a monarchy but a dictatorship, a people’s one at that.

      Like


  26. Please do not link anything else from the good (‘n f’ed-up) men project. No justification (what not to think, how bad it can get, OMFG LMAO) excuses exposing human beings to that filth. My brain needs a scrubbing.

    Like


  27. #4 – Ugh! Ugh! Ugh!

    Did you see the awful pic of the BF looking with sexual intent in the eyes of his land whale of a sex object?

    Oh, no; he’s also from the UK. What’s going on over there? Are there any real men left in the UK? I thought Scottish men were very virile. On top of it, he’s conducting a long distance with her. How emasculating!!! Well, on second thought, this might be the only bright spot – that he doesn’t have to see her daily.

    WTF? How are they sexing? They should show us a video so we can see how fat peeps do it. I’m curious, aren’t you?

    “While I fell hard for Gloria after getting to know her, I’m not going to lie: I was initially attracted to her because of how she looks. When I came across her picture on Twitter, I was drawn to the shape of her face and her smile—she has such a captivating smile! And her eyes have this amazing sparkle to them. She is just so incredibly beautiful. When people say Gloria’s lucky, I say, “I’m the luckier one.”

    LOL.

    “Now I’m counting the days until I move to California to pursue a PhD in Clinical Psychology. Gloria also decided to lose weight and I support her because she wants to and in the long run, it’s a good thing for her health. But in terms of our relationship, there’s no need for Gloria to become skinny.”

    Ohhhhh…….he might leave her if she lost the weight, eh?

    He’s the one to be pitted here, not his GF. At least she lost 40 lbs. already. This means that she knows her weight is wrong, and she wants to lose it in spite of society telling her it’s perfectly acceptable to look like a cow, as well as her BF might lose interest in her when this happens.

    Despite their declarations of being great friends (whatever this lefty mambo jumbo means in the context of a sexual relationship, or lack thereof), I doubt she will stay with him if she really becomes skinny. Her having a rockin body is probably never going to happen. However, let’s pretend she could achieve it with no stretchmark residue, the irony is she’ll leave him in a heartbeat, because no women can tolerate or respect a man who thinks like him. Women love men who are sexual predators, not men who sound and act like him. He couldn’t generate a gina tingle if his life was on the line. In fact, despite all of their declarations of love, I doubt he’s giving her any gina tingles. Can a girl this fat even have them?

    Just goes to show that men’s sexiness is found more in their attitudes than in their looks.

    Like


    • For whatever reason, it would appear that men in the British Isles are more tolerant of fugly women than are men elsewhere. Interesting HBD question that should be investigated further.

      Like


      • England always was based on a kind of fagdom.

        Like


      • Ugly women and bad weather (and their food) are are what forced the men to leave and conquer the world.

        Like


      • British girls are really fucking hot. Don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. Now I’m not claiming that we’re better than the Czech republic or Poland for hot women, but we’re pretty good. Better than fatso USA for sure.

        Like


      • Better than fatso USA for sure.

        The U.S. records more British men than British women marrying Americans, which would prove this statement false.

        Like


      • Dude, you are fucking delusional. UK chicks are just behind Americans for world’s worst. You have taken everything that was utter shite about America and assimilated it. Get thee to Eastern Europe, post haste…

        Like


      • Master Beta (how I hate calling white people Master) I didn’t really mean they are ugly, thats kinda harsh. I think its that Im disappointed they aren’t more attractive since they are considered “more white?”

        Am I making sense?

        Am I the only one disappointed in the Spice Girls?

        Was that the best Britain could do?

        What were they thinking?

        Like


    • on October 15, 2013 at 5:23 pm The Other Jim

      This story of the fatty and Scottish dude echoes the Terry McMillan real life story. Instead of ‘How Stella Got Her Groove Back’ being based upon McMillan’s real life, McMillan ended up marrying a Jamaican dude who upon receiving his green card, came out as Gay, left her for a gay dude, and with a nice, multi-million dollar settlement. McMillan’s success came from capitalizing upon female hamsterbation, albeit of the black female sort.

      My bet is that once this Scottish dude gets his visa to study in San Francisco, he’ll be hitting the gay bars and bathhouses in the Castro district sooner than the fat chick loses weight. Once he gets his green card, he’ll end up marrying his boyfriend.

      As for the UK, even in Scotland, the matriarchal social welfare state rules and it tries to clamp down on any attempt by Scottish men to be men. That’s why the Feminists attack the Scottish football league, especially Rangers and Celtic. Beyond that, the Scots have really become quite Socialist with all the baggage that goes with that. The smart ones leave Scotland for Australia, NZ, Canada, or the US.

      Like


      • “My bet is that once this Scottish dude gets his visa to study in San Francisco, he’ll be hitting the gay bars and bathhouses in the Castro district sooner than the fat chick loses weight. Once he gets his green card, he’ll end up marrying his boyfriend.”

        This crossed my mind.

        .
        Too bad about Scottish society. One of my favorite places on earth.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 2:18 pm The Other Jim

        It is quite sad to see what is happening to Scottish society. I used to live in Edinburgh for uni. and had a great time there and wandering around Scotland. Right now, the Scots have given themselves up to Alex Salmon and the Scottish Nationalist Party, which really isn’t nationalist, rather quite socialist.

        As for what will change? IMO, the Matriarchal Social Welfare State of the UK isn’t sustainable and will crash soon. That will leave Scotland broke and without the substantial funds coming from England. What happens then? I’m not sure. Independence for Scotland? I doubt it as long as they can go to the EU for more handouts. Yeah, that’s how Socialist the Scots have become. It will only be when the Scots can’t be dependent upon England or the EU that they’ll be forced to stop being Socialists.

        Like


      • I’m not very well versed in Scottish politics, so thanks for confirming what I suspected about Alex Salmon and Scottish independence; it will be a disaster for Scotland. Without England it will become a very socialist state beholden to the tyrannical EU. This is more example of the fall of Europe.

        Like


      • “It will only be when the Scots can’t be dependent upon England or the EU that they’ll be forced to stop being Socialists.”

        we’ve seen this movie. It’s called Ireland.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 5:19 am The Burninator

        Great observations Jim. My family came over to the U.S. from Scotland last century (1900’s) basically because of what it (the U.K. in general) was becoming. The hard, dominant male Scottish men didn’t take well to the stark effminization and left (and/or are leaving), as you noted. My last visit over there was on the Isle of Skye, and a group of loggers (highly masculine group by default, then add in actual Gaelic speaking traditional Scots and you have testosterone out the ying yang) were quizzing me hard on the U.S. and wondering how easy it would be to pack up their belongings and head over to live. This was in the 1990’s.

        Like


      • Oh, so you’re a Scot, eh?

        This explains you better. Scottish men are hot – looks and personality wise. They are highly masculine/alpha/tough guys. They also have a chivalrous attitude toward their women. They don’t do the clownish cad or jerk-bit very well. However, they do rugged masculinity alphaness extremely well.

        The US and Canada have the largest concentration of Scots outside Scotland, and a large number of Americans are of Scottish origins. Everyone talks about the Irish and the Jews building America, but what about the Scots? Many great American minds were Scottish. Historically, the Scots contributed to the world many thinkers/philosophers/economists/physicists. Isn’t the Higgs boson discoverer Scottish?
        .

        “My last visit over there was on the Isle of Skye, and a group of loggers (highly masculine group by default, then add in actual Gaelic speaking traditional Scots and you have testosterone out the ying yang) were quizzing me hard on the U.S. and wondering how easy it would be to pack up their belongings and head over to live. This was in the 1990′s.”

        Bring them over here. I hate immigration, but for the Scots open door.

        As far as effminization, Scotland has been moving left for decades. You see the evidence in their large Muslim immigration.

        In addition, the Scottish independence referendum, will make Scotland even more liberal because it will be under the heavy hand of the EU, especially.

        Like


      • on October 16, 2013 at 1:19 pm The Burninator

        Yeah. They’re (we’re?) huge, often dour, easy to flare a temper, hard to befriend and notoriously miserly. That said, we make friends for life and once you get used to the sense of humor, quite funny (well, I think so anyway, YMMV). It’s not surprising that I turned out a biker, most bikers around these parts are Appalachian or one generation removed (aka rednecks), and that place is basically crawling with straight line descendents of Scots and Scots-Irish. It feels natural to me.

        Grandfather spoke Gaelic naturally and spent his life, even into the 1970’s, earning a living as a fur trapper and hunter, my dad speaks just enough to get along with grandpa (in pace requisite) and was a Marine Corps fighter pilot (F-4), and me only a smattering that I use to impress chicks and I’ve spent time soldiering in the employee of military units that will be left unnamed at this point in time. I’m second smallest in my family at 6’3″, my dad being first smallest at 5′ 10″ (wtf?) and my uncle being larger than both of us (and also a biker with blond hair, a pony tail and no small amount of badass-ness to him). The rest of my family are giants (the men), grandpa stood a good 6’7″ if he was an inch.

        Correct on the clown/jerk thing. I am called a jerk on occasion, but because of my natural acts and how sometimes they don’t mesh well with PC society (tell a yammering broad to shut up and catch a breath in public after she’s *loudly* said the same stupidity over and over again for 15 straight minutes without taking a breath, and people tend to offer their opinions of you). I don’t go out of my way to “be a jerk’, as is advocated as a style for PUA types. Most of my family will fight you at the drop of a hat though, if you’re a man causing us trouble (myself included in that, though I try to keep it reserved for idiots that really deserve it, which I suppose comes from my mother’s side). Fun family, but really we don’t fit in well even over here any longer. I guess that’s a plight shared by a lot of people in the more masculine cultures though.

        The other side of my family are Anglo-Saxon English, directly from London proper. My mother and father’s family actually had members that battled each other in history, which I guess explains their inability to get along.

        Personally however I’m a US of by gawd A American, though proud of my heritage. That may change in time, depending on how fast the powers that be try to goad the nation into a civil war. If that doesn’t happen though, well, that’s fine by me as well.

        Like


      • The Other Jim-

        My bet is that once this Scottish dude gets his visa to study in San Francisco, he’ll be hitting the gay bars and bathhouses in the Castro district sooner than the fat chick loses weight. Once he gets his green card, he’ll end up marrying his boyfriend.

        Yep, my bet too.

        Like


      • In lieu of evidence, go with the funniest theory.

        Like


    • We don’t need “real men” or even just “men” any more here in the UK. We have David Cameron instead. He will solve any problems you have. And he’ll do it by borrowing money that our unemployed and shrinking youth will have to pay back someday, which they’ll have to do at the same time as paying for half the populations pensions. I don’t know why other world leaders haven’t cottoned on to this brilliant strategy too.

      Like


      • David Cameron is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He was elected as a conservative and turned out to be anything but. Very disappointed in him. The magnificent British Empire reduced to rubble. Islamic and African hoards traversing the streets beheading innocent Englishmen and screaming ‘we’re coming to 10 Downing Street.’

        It’s upsetting what’s happening in all western countries. My favorite world leader right now is Canadian Prime Minster Stephen Harper. Canada is not easy though. It’s highly liberal, but at least he’s trying to hold the fort over there.

        Like


  28. About the guy dating the whale. Will his pedestalizing her make her dump him and chase and alpha who plays hard to get or is his SMV well weighed (heh) against hers?

    Your opinions …

    [CH: No matter what he does, she ain’t going anywhere. Mostly because of inertia.]

    Like


    • No, she won’t dump him. Women are acutely aware of their SMV, no matter how much spin is put on their flaws. Would she be susceptible to philanderings with alpha callers? I’d bet dollars to donuts on yes, but there would never be the opportunity.

      Like


  29. Love that TED talk; Million Dollar Extreme has a lot of damn fine videos.

    Like


  30. and by the way ginger Scottish on the rocks didn’t say anything about “sexual attraction”. everything is: “our values … we FEEL the same about our families” and “While I fell hard for Gloria after getting to know her, I’m not going to lie: I was initially attracted to her because of how she looks. When I came across her picture on Twitter, I was drawn to the shape of her face and her smile—she has such a captivating smile! And her eyes have this amazing sparkle to them. She is just so incredibly beautiful. When people say Gloria’s lucky, I say, “I’m the luckier one.” … come on bitch STFU!

    Like


  31. #5, who writes such clownish nonsense? Well, maybe many here would agree with this after all. It sounds like a lot of what some of you say lol.

    “The simple answer is that the Lockean concept of “natural rights” is profoundly flawed, and actually restricts human freedoms rather than enabling them. Nothing could be more unnatural.”

    “Bad kings are not nearly as bad as Demotist/Communist dictators. Bad kings are in a different universe from bad Demotist leaders. There is not even a vague comparison. In the traditional system, kings rely on the aristocracy and clergy for support, and have trouble doing anything without them. For a Demotist leader, there tends to be far fewer checks and balances. They can cause a million deaths in a place like Iraq with a snap of their fingers. Study up on the history of “death by government” to get a better perspective on what I mean. Kings and emperors very rarely, if ever, engage in mass murder against their own people.”

    WTF? Dictators – communist or fascists – are as bad as kings. No difference there.

    “The primary reason why it’s unfair is that the current rich are hoarding their wealth offshore rather than putting it to work for the populace, as they are traditionally supposed to. The role of a monarch is to use force and intimidation to ensure that the nobility does what it rightfully should — run projects that constructively generate wealth for the country and its inhabitants.”

    Right, and this is exactly what happened when there was King, eh? The king didn’t amass wealth, and the lords didn’t enslave the people and made them surfs. No one was put to death for sedition, either. Eh?

    The fact is, “absolute power corrupts absolutely.” (Lord Acton)

    The internet is notjob replete.

    Like


  32. “cad bounder Roosh”..seriously?King of omegas,a joke of all the pua community (just check any forum),eternal looser of grubby middle eastern appearance,suffering of psychological issues and pathologically sensitive ego (quite a typical for a beta man) is a cad?Lol.
    A professional failure,a dude who was laying whales during his prime in the states,who could not get laid in any country with GDP per capita higher than Argentina,who never shows picture of his alleged “lays” (most likely a fantasy) etc?
    He is as much of a cad,as a fat,balding 50 years old accountant clumsily dancing with a 29 years old internet bride (who has 90 dicks behind her back,one failed marriage and two abortions) with his hamster running like Ussain Bold.

    Flashing american passport in front of women in poor countries is not a game.Its beta males white flag.Women know this very well.Cant full them.

    I have a lot of appreciation for this blog,but I can tell you definitely one thing-as more association it has with roosh as less people genuinely interested in PUA and game will be reading it.

    Like


    • Roosh is playing the cards that have been handed to him reasonably well but as I see it, his style of game will need to change/evolve as he gets older or it will be obsolete.
      The older you get, the more financial independence or one’s monetary income plays a role.

      Like


  33. Socialkenny just put out a good video on how to get girls to send you nude pictures. It is is guide on sexting and getting girls to send naked pictures without a problem.

    Like


  34. The guy with a whale is a lucky bastard.

    He has a unique ability to have an erection with something so disgusting you don’t even want to look at,let alone touch it or have sex with it.

    His brain is reading information in a very peculiar way.The human brain is a miracle indeed.

    Like


  35. MariaTheresa, the female Schicklgruber?!? Wut?!??

    Like


  36. O, ye beta herb ghost sperm yet to be bernakified, behold your new hero(ine):

    CAPTAIN MARVEL:

    http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2013/10/meet-women-wholl-change-marvel-and-comics/70484/

    “Having Kelly Sue be such an outspoken, unapologetic feminist is so wonderful. Those are the voices we need in industries like that so, like she said, our daughters (and our gay sons and our trans kids and any of our kids if we’re not white) don’t have to,”

    “Over the last year, DeConnick has taken Danvers and turned her into the one of the most powerful, complex, and unbreakable heroes in the Marvel universe. (In the first Captain Marvel comic, Danvers is quick to remind a villain, along with the audience, that she outranks Captain America.)”

    there will be she-hulk as well so future generations don’t hold a fat shaming week

    Like


  37. on October 15, 2013 at 7:25 pm FuriousFerret

    I nominate this Neo Geo video for an add on to the wickedest links:

    Nat Geo: Going Ape: The Alpha Male

    Like


    • This is excellent. Lots of good examples of social dynamics here.

      Best part is how a lot of the stuff they’re doing (invading people’s space, using an authoritative tone of voice to bark commands, competing for attention, making other people come to you to shake your hand instead of going to them, how alpha males react when their alpha status is subverted or challenged etc.) are things that guys who don’t go out and interact socially much would say “Whatever man, if you told me to get out of your box, I would tell you to fuck off and then punch you in the face!” or “You can’t take a chair from my MMA buddy, he’d beat the shit out of you and then bang the prom queen”

      In reality, in the moment, people react on instinct and very few people will react by throwing down fists unless they’re mentally unstable unhinged socially inept psychopaths who are generally easy to avoid, or unless you take part in the “monkey dance” ritual of helping escalate a situation to violence.

      Great video, thanks for linking it.

      Like


      • In reality, in the moment, people react on instinct and very few people will react by throwing down fists unless they’re mentally unstable unhinged socially inept psychopaths who are generally easy to avoid, or unless you take part in the “monkey dance” ritual of helping escalate a situation to violence.

        I’m in general agreement and this is what you said before about this topic but there is a rather large X factor you are neglecting in this equation. These guys are all stone cold sober (presumably) in these situations. Your so-called “psychopaths” lots of times are pretty normal guys heavily influenced by liquid courage so rational thought tends to go out the fucking window. Most of the scraps I’ve been in have been drunken ones by either one or both parties. So you can run your “burn” game but if the dude is already hammered he try to lay you out straight away, whereas, with a clearer mind he’d take a different action.

        Like


      • If you can’t tell from someone’s body language that they’re too shit-faced to interact with and that you should walk away, you’re going to get into a lot of fights.

        “Hey man where are your friends?” from douchey frat bro with his buddies who chugged a few beers and shots before coming out = “banging your mom bro. Lol you had to know I was gonna say that. It’s cool man, what’s your name, I’m Bob and this is Sarah and Amanda.” no big deal.

        “HEY…you fucknnn…(up in your space, staring, tilting over) wherez yer fuckin frndsss huh…(death glare” = “over there somewhere, you guys have a good night” and walk away.

        This isn’t hard lol. What do you think alcohol does, hides inside a person so they’re standing there quoting Shakespeare until something sets them off and them BAM they turn into a raging Mike Tyson? Just go out a lot and you learn to read how drunk/angry/bravadoy/etc people are when you look at them or interact with them.

        Like


      • Well fuck… I can’t argue really, but as I said “one or both parties”. My vices particularly in my earlier days often got the better of me. So it was no pussy for anyone and fisticuffs for all whilst the females moved on to more even-keeled alphas. This is the one arena where I 100% agree with RooshV in spite of many things I dislike about his game. If your goal is pussy, do NOT, ever, drink yourself stupid. He was being dogged on this thread but this tenet is 100% ironclad and undebatable.

        I also think there is an element of “hang out with winners” too that I never realized younger. My early 20s were spent with roughnecks who had this “fight or fuck” mentality lots of nights. So we either spit game early before we get hammered to some dumb slut who is DTF or if not, we are gonna jump that faggot that did. As I got older, I became the TARGET of this, rather than the initiator so my views changed 100% and I got away from busted ass haters. They had “apex predator” muscles, balls, and willingness to inflict violence, and beta or omega level brains when it came to seduction. This way my personal journey to where I needed to get.

        Like


  38. Do not think for a second that The Frankfurt School will not hesitate to wield those tens of millions of ferals as an army against us.

    Fortunately, the history of the male (malê) rebellion in northeastern Brazil, the tupac amaru uprising in Peru and the maya uprising in the yucatan all teach that whites, even in outnumbered 10 to 1, still win over non whites

    Haiti only became Haiti because the French army crushed the white planters, who would have retaken the island even outnumbered 20 to 1 if France hadn’t sold out them

    Unfortunately, there is an army in the world today fully prepared to play the role of the French revolutionary army anywhere in globe. Sorry for the American readers here, but that is your good old us army

    Like


  39. What’s hilarious about Katie Baker’s piece is that her entire thesis is based on the premise that game is a way for men to demonstrate what good providers they are. She correctly reasons that the Danish nanny state makes women less dependent on men than they would otherwise be, and then laughably asserts that Roosh’s game failed for this reason. By her reasoning, 2013 America is a poosy paradise! for economically productive beta males.

    I haven’t read his book, but I have read some of his excerpts and blog posts about Denmark, and Roosh makes it clear that the real cockblock is Jante Law (i.e. Danes’ obsession with social equality which makes it extremely difficult to demonstrate high value in any way whatsoever). It has nothing to do with women being more economically secure, which presumably would only increase their preference for alpha behavior in the absence of Danish cultural peculiarities.

    I am curious as to how the sexual market actually functions in Denmark. I mean, I assume women there still prefer alpha males, yet Roosh claims he succeeded through acting rather beta. Do any Danes read this site? Can you explain the mysteries of your unusual culture?

    Like


    • It’s not true that you have to behave beta to get laid in Denmark. Not at all. If the girls are masculine then you have to be more masculine yourself. As long as you’re funny, charismatic, charming, extroverted and can take charge of the situation you’ll have her in bed within hours.

      Simply being aggressive and talkative can get you far with Danish girls, because Danish men are too shy. If you’re also lot of fun and don’t take girls too serious then you get even further.

      It’s not a bad thing to break Jante’s Law, it’s actually often good: behave like you’re some kind of rockstar and be the life of the party, then girls will love you. Don’t be a boring beta, most Danish men are like that already. Stand out. In Roosh’s videos he seems like a very dry guy, so it’s not surprising he couldn’t charm the Danish girls. He probably bored them to death.

      If there’s one way Jante’s Law apply, it is if you try to “display of higher value” by talking about what you do and have done. The Danes will interpret that as bragging and an attempt to impress them. If you want to display higher value, do it through behavior, simply by having a cool attitude.

      The Danish girls are financially independent, so they don’t give a shit about what you have do and done, it’s all about your presence in the moment. My Scottish friend calls Danes “instant people,” because if there’s a sexual chemistry we just fuck.

      Roosh came here thinking he was an interesting person because he traveled the world, while the Danish girls probably just saw him as boring.

      Like


  40. on October 15, 2013 at 9:02 pm gunslingergregi

    Would you let “her” give you a BJ? youtube.googleapis.com/v/9q4qwLknKag%… #SexbotRevolution ””””””””

    that looks creepily like a chick I know and yea lol

    Like


    • From the replies, an interesting posting, but evoking a completely different paradigm in my mind vs. OPs’ original intention…

      LaBoheme

      “Married? No, of course not. I can’t breed in captivity.”

      Like


  41. sorry to jump the line but……
    please young men do not read that good men project website. cover your eyes! it will deform your future progeny! I sometimes wish I could hack a website, “will no one rid me of this priest?”

    Like


  42. So, lemme get this straight – dem fat animals animals are suffering from a lack of willpower / need to be shamed properly, right?

    Like


  43. Roosh wrote an omega rant when he couldn’t get laid in Denmark. This is a funny double standard. When you can bumb and dumb women they are stupid and don’t respect family values and are to be blamed of the western decline. Otherwise they are bitches who don’t put out.

    Like


  44. on October 16, 2013 at 4:01 am Robert in Arabia

    I think this would be a wonderful opportunity to pause for a moment and give thanks for the many great contributions of the Black community to our society. Their peaceful and generous nature makes them ideal neighbors, lending testimony to their exceptional family values and parenting skills unrivaled by any other culture. Their commitment to academic excellence enriches our schools and serves as an example to all who hope to achieve prominence as a people. Real estate values are fueled by the influx of African-Americans into an area due to their caring and respectful nurturing of these communities, an example of all they have achieved through their enthusiasm for self-improvement, hard work and a self-reliant nature. Without their industrious and creative drive, we would be poorer as a nation.

    Like


  45. About the Roosh vs. Baker thing, Roosh failed to notice that the feminist was writing in the context of Bang Poland vs Bang Denmark.

    She was accurately remarking that a more socialist state causes its hottest women to be less prone to want to date American men.

    She was right about that. It just happens she hates American men and lauds the fact that European socialism hurts our prospects.

    Where she was wrong is she mixed up seduction with game. Game is commonly understood to be something that makes up for an undesirable equality in finances. Game would be more necessary in Denmark than Poland.

    Like


  46. No Blacks = No Whites

    you are after all genetic recessive neanderthal homo sapien hybrids

    Like


    • That is new. I taught that we whites are just albinos, a mistake of nature. Well you learn something new every day.

      Like


  47. Matt you ignorant slut.

    Just because we didn’t understand the lunar cycle 500 years ago didn’t mean the Moon had free will any more than your shallow understanding of human behavior means it’s not predictable. you are just to fucking retarded to either accept it or understand it.

    fin

    Like


    • As irritating as Matt can be, and his love to engage in contrarianism can be very annoying, he is a very deep thinker. This is why you don’t understand him. You’re too superficial to come close to his level of intellect. This is why you call him dimwitted. The dimwitted is the shallow you, refusing to understand truth/reality when it’s being explained. At least be someone who can entertain other ideas, instead of being so narrow-minded and shortsighted when encountering someone who doesn’t think like you.

      Try broadening your thinking for a change. It might do you some good. Matt has a healthy mind (most of the time, when he isn’t a hasbara detective 🙂 ). You on the other hand, just understand the cad bit, that’s all. Your whole philosophy could be summed up like this:

      We live today, die tomorrow, therefore let’s have as much fun as possible now, and get all the pussy in world, as there is no God and no law. Seize the day and take what you can. Trick women with your alpha shtick and use their pussies (because they are stupid broads who deserve it). Don’t try to be a good influence on them, teach them, or lead them to new heights. All men who don’t do exactly this are stupid ignorant religious men who believe in superstition.

      Am I right? And you call this type of degeneracy an alpha attitude?

      Like


      • Teach women? Now you’re dreaming. More like curtail their options so they don’t destroy society.

        Like


      • You dummy obviously missed my point. Women like to be led by dominant men, that’s what teaching mean. But, of course, for a simpletons like you, maybe just keeping women in a cage and taking them out when you want to have sex with them, is all you need. Any women that dates a man with your attitude is stupid, as you have nothing to offer. As I said, this type of degeneracy an not an alpha attitude.

        Like


      • And you, miss, are no lady.

        Like


      • And, you’re not my type of man because you don’t understand. My comment had nothing to do with women’s behavior. It had to do with Tilik’s philosophy that all religion is superstition, and all women are only good for pumping and dumping. So when Matt challenges those assumptions, he calls him dimwitted. He needs to live and let live, that’s all. Otherwise, I have nothing against you or Tilik.

        Like


      • Oh I get it. I just don’t agree with your implication that he or anyone should take responsibility for helping women make good decisions. Also, I sense an implicit reverence for white knighting in your comments.

        “instead of being so narrow-minded and shortsighted when encountering someone who doesn’t think like you.”
        Sounds like you’re talking about Matt.

        Like


      • “Oh I get it. I just don’t agree with your implication that he or anyone should take responsibility for helping women make good decisions.”

        I don’t think he does. I think he runs a different type of game than the usual PUA game. He relates to women differently too. Rather than being the PUA jerk and asshole that many women like, he acts like the master which many women like too. In that context, there is more brain-shaping and leading than the PUA jerk behavior. I am not endorsing which is good, just whatever works for you.

        Also, the difference between your acceptance of his ideas and his lack of tolerance is that he doesn’t hound anyone. He disagrees vehemently and argues with them, but he doesn’t resort to hit and run comments and personal attacks like his opponents. Not you, but the other guys, always hound him for his beliefs. I think it’s stupid. It’s better to argue with him on the issues themselves than to call him names.

        Hell, at this point we all call each other names here. I think it’s a sign of frustration. I’m sorry I was rude to you.

        Like


      • ever had jizz squirt out your nose from the back of your throat?

        i imagine its a similar sensation to the rocks rattling around up there now.

        Like


      • Please, don’t be upset by my harsh words. What I meant is that you need to live and let live, and stop trying to prevent him from commenting because you don’t like his opinions. You are free to skip past them, you know.

        Otherwise, I don’t understand the tyranny you are exercising here. Your attitude is too lefty for my taste.

        Like


      • like an empty soda can full of pissed off bees…..

        Like


      • LOL. I can’t even be angry with you cuz your metaphors are hilarious. You need a slut or two to cheer you up, though. 🙂

        Like


      • men discern, females nurture. if a guy says something retarded, our job is to club him with knowledge or a stick because his ability to reproduce has deleterious effects on the lineage.

        broads hug the mongoloid baby harder that the healthy one because it costs nothing. the man is there to toss the poor little retard off the cliff Sparta style to ensure the survival of all.

        now make me a sammich.

        Like


  48. “A California fitness enthusiast and mother of three is defending a controversial photo of herself that has prompted a cavalcade of Facebook critics to accuse her of fat shaming women.”

    http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/hot-mom-defends-herself-against-facebook-haters-192149769.html

    Yay! File this under “positive social pressure”

    Like


  49. That troll is of TEDx, not TED. TEDx is an extension project: “In 2009, TED started granting licenses to third parties to organize independent TED-like events internationally.” and the quality-control is not good.

    Like


  50. Chicks dig jerks ?

    Sure, here ya go, some hardcore evidence from my playground 😉

    58-years old, former mafia boss(top 3), gets out of jail after 8 years sentence, immediately stars dating 23-years old singer.

    She drops her signing carrer in TV for him, disregards all new propositions, only sings in few restaurants and discos literally owned by mafia former boss’es 😉

    It would go unnoticed but her voice is really astonishing and she was expected to be future superstart, ended dating mafia boss 😉

    Here you can see the guy speaking while still sitting in prision,

    He’s talking about guy that sent him to jail and fucked him up, guess what will happen in a few years.

    That’s Her, blond superstar

    http://onlyblacksoul.muzzo.pl/

    Like


  51. ^^^^^^ 12:30 video ^^^^^^ 12:30 video

    Like


  52. […] 1. A commenter over at HBD Chick proposed in the comment thread to a post about chicks digging jerks that modern liberals (for all practical purposes the global Western elite) are like a nomadic r-selected species — that is, they prefer the…  […]

    Like


  53. CH writes, “One day, the wronged part of white America will notice the boot on its face. How they’ll respond, is anyone’s guess.”

    Unless circumstances change greatly, the odds are good that they’ll put up with it like they do now. From an evolutionary point of view, living on your knees is much preferable to dying on your feet. The crucial trick of the overclass is to never reduce the reproductive value of being in the underclass to so close to zero that the expectation value of the minuscule odds of successful rebellion is greater.

    The problem that the underclass has is that it’s not economically competitive in the world arena. Taking over in the US won’t change the fact that Chinese peasants can man factories for half the price of Americans. Sure, the revolutionary rulers could institute protectionism, but you don’t get rich by only selling your stuff to other poor people.

    I predict bread and circuses into the indefinite future.

    Like


  54. Comment by user soren on the hbdchick article:

    Here’s a talk Charles Murray recently gave called “Rediscovery of Human Nature and Human Diversity”.

    http://darwinianconservatism.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-mps-in-galapagos-5-human-nature-and.html

    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fgplt8p8qazo3gd/smFvwoM7I-/murray.pdf

    Murray argues that equalism is undermined by recent research, especially on racial genetic differences. The orthodoxy of the last 40 years – that genetic differences between races are trivial – was propounded by Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould. It has already been disproved by a handful of studies – including one study of an allele of the MAOA gene that correlates with lifetime violent and antisocial behavior in males, and is found in 5% of African Americans but only 0.1% of whites. Many more genes will be investigated in the coming years, and Murray is confident that the idea of group equalism in its present form will become increasingly untenable as more and more genes are investigated – the timescale for this is 10 to 20 years.

    The idea that “disparate impact” is a sign of white racism, rather than group differences, will be blown away.

    Like