Hot Girl Crazy

Spiralina observes:

It’s SO boring to be a hot girl. People are designed to evolve by struggling against the greater forces of survival. When everything is just handed to you with no effort, you lose your sense of purpose. You become dissolute and reckless. You start abusing your sexual power in petty ways, just to see how far you can push it. When you find someone who finally pushes back, it elicits an intense (albeit temporary) thrill.

Childbirth makes it all settle, and gives the hot girl a greater sense of purpose. That’s why most hot girls, if they stay single and don’t have kids as they get older, slowly go insane.

What Spiralina has described is hot girl crazy. Hot girls, by dint of their immense, immediate, and unearned power over men (and over women, to a lesser extent) start out life being less grounded than plainer girls (pretty girls as young as four know they are more attractive than other girls), become sadistically crazy in their primes (15-25 years old), and then pitifully deranged by their late 20s and 30s if they have not leveraged their hotness for an alpha male and little alphalets by then.

Hot girls live in the closest approximation to a fantasy world that exists in the state of nature for human beings, and in no time in history is that fantasy more fully fleshed out and intertwined with the threads of ugly reality than right now for the modern Western looker. This is why hot girls are some of the most illogical, deluded, and naively optimistic people alive: You don’t need a firm grasp of reality when a line of suitors and suckups stretches around the corner to wait on you hand and foot.

The “struggle against greater forces of survival” has been the norm for most people, most of the time, and evolution, as Spiralina has noted, has equipped us, more or less generously, with the flexibility and fortitude to bear this struggle without turning batshit crazy. There is actually a scientific term for this psychological — and, reduced to its essence, biological — phenomenon: hormesis. Or: that which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.

The hot girl in her prime, though, has rarely had to struggle. Or, if she thinks she has struggled, she has no idea what real struggle is like, particularly for ugly girls who foetally slouch through waves of human eyeballs invisible and ignored. The hot girl’s problems are other girls’ wish lists.

Freedom from struggle, as with all quasi-realized utopian ideals, lets slip unintended consequences, many of them worse than the struggle the utopian was trying to eradicate. Hot girls begin to despise their catered lives, and attempt to fill them with drama. This is why the expert seducer will quickly ascertain that it is the hottest girls who insufferably crave the most manufactured drama. He learns from this, and knows to give it to them on an intermittent schedule, like a scientist in a lab might drop a heroin-laced pellet to a rat to condition its responses.

And what kind of drama do hot girls crave the most? Dread. The hot girl wants what she doesn’t have: struggle. She wants to feel again, and the asshole lover who cavalierly tosses aside her feelings, who exhibits scarce consideration for her, fires her up like no lapdog or lackey ever could. Spiralina says this thrill is temporary, but here I disagree with her. I have been the beneficiary of, at the risk of crass first-person immodesty, the love of very attractive girls, and as long as the drama flows, the thrill remains the same. This thrill can go on for years, sometimes lingering after the breakup in her memories in the form of unexpected late night calls months past sell-date.

For as long as supplicating beta males exist, the selfish bastard boyfriend is king.

As stated, one cure for hot girl crazy is kids. Not just any kids. She has to push them out of her own wet incubator. Nothing grounds a mentally imbalanced woman quicker than childbirth, and the heavy responsibility that follows. Unfortunately, Western Civ is in a tailspin of single moms, dysgenia, endemic zero marginality, pathological Stockholm Syndrome, and soft concubinage. The womb issue within the confines of sanctioned pairings that would have sedated the self-destructiveness of attractive women in the past is now put off until a woman’s 30s, giving over her entire teens and 20s to marinate in the crazy. Poor beta males are then stuck holding her bag of bonkers when she’s nigh wall splat and resentfully settling for Mr. Subpar.

Another cure is the alpha male. Hot girls can be tamed into reasonableness with an unfaltering belief in one’s own entitlement (the hot girl LOVES LOVES LOVES the self-entitled man, perhaps because she enjoys the mirroring of her soul), a refusal to suffer crazy gladly, and subtle reminders to her of the inevitable price paid by the passage of time. The man of unshakeable self-confidence — better yet, overconfidence — is so rare among the men who have wormed their way into the hot girl’s world, that she is enamored of him instantly, and in moments of lucidity will tally the value of her catch and shudder what her impetuousness might risk throwing away.

It behooves the attentive alpha male to know when his hot girl lover is beginning to show symptoms of renewed crazy. Awareness is half the battle, and a girl crazy left unattended can rapidly escalate to incorrigibleness and even cheating. Of what signs should you, the aspiring womanizer, be cognizant?

Crib sheet of girl crazy

– She has begun accusing you of things you clearly have not done.
– She play acts at keeping secrets, real or imagined, to incite your jealousy. (“Oh, just some guy I know… don’t be so nosy!”)
– She has begun to take her birthday and assorted holidays and ceremonies way too seriously.
– She’s contemplating more than one cat.
– She has taken to calling you from public places, especially those of ill repute.
– The ratio of call-to-called has flipped, and she now calls you less frequently than you call her.
– She gets snappy with you for no particular reason.
– She puts words in your mouth for the sole purpose of inventing fights.
– She begins to favor fucking over lovemaking. (The usual BF/GF ratio is 2-to-1, lovemaking over fucking.)
– She’s gossiping more about her friends’ love lives, and with an air of envy.
– She’s started having those moments when she doesn’t want you to touch her.
– She cries inappropriately when she sees cute things, or during maudlin, anti-climactic rom-com scenes.
– Many of her conversations start with the words “Did you hear…?” or “I just want to get away for a while…”.
– Her spending sprees have become more frequent, and less cost-conscious.
– She’s begun commenting on feminist blogs.
– She’s staying late at work. (99% of hot girls do nothing vitally productive for the maintenance of the economy, so late hours in the office are a major red flag that she is boffing the boss.)
– She’s started hitting you, and not playfully.
– She’s started making demands of you in the bedroom. (“You can put it here, but not here.”)
– She’s become obsessive about fishing for flattery. (Appease her, and you will pay a dear price.)
– She’s gotten annoying about insisting you don’t photograph her from bad angles.
– She begins mouthing equalist and feminist shibboleths with sincere urgency.
– She has begun striking provocative poses at inappropriate venues and events.
– She’s become compulsive about rearranging your home’s furniture and repainting the rooms.
– She has started comparing you and her to other couples. (“Why don’t we hold hands as often as John and Geri do?”)
– She begins believing your hobbies are personal slights directed against her.
– She overanalyzes the most trivial and innocuous inconsistencies.
– She has a sudden onset of strange sexual appetites. (“I got us a purple saguaro. Looks like fun!”)
– She wants to moonlight as an art class model.
– She erects monuments to your presumed unfaithfulness, and wallows immoderately in the oddly exciting notion (to her) that you may be cheating on her.
– She begins challenging you. Over EVERYTHING.
– She thinks the world is against her, and you’re not helping.
– She pushes and pushes and pushes. Rock solid stoicism doesn’t seem to be working on her like it used to.
– She confesses to fantasies of you fighting another man for her hand. Then she actually tries this maneuver by instigating trouble in a bar.
– Her wardrobe has recently acquired a lot of red hues.
– She’s started asking you for money, instead of tokens of romance.
– Her “I love you”s have become chants of self-reassurance, often deployed immediately after she has flirted with another man.
– She needs to “do things” with you, because chilling out just doesn’t cut it for her anymore.
– She can’t believe you don’t agree with her on everything.
– Your playful teasing has become inadequate. She needs more edge, and more of it.
– The sine wave of her hot-cold routine has begun oscillating at a higher amplitude.
– She’s begun fighting you for control of trivial decisions.
– She acts “fake offended” when she catches you eyeing another girl.
– And the craziest sign of all? She tells you to “stop smothering me!” and you’re half a state away, balls deep in another woman.

As soon as you observe any or all of these girl crazy signs, run, do not walk, to your nearest alpha male reinvigoration chamber and fuel up, so that you can demonstrate once again in no uncertain terms that your company is not to be trifled with by the likes of her. A hot girl falling victim to her crazy from a growing perception of ease and entitlement needs another dose of struggleporn. Give it to her, good, long and ♥♥♥♥♥.

PS For those wondering, there is an alpha male version of dissolute entitlement. Men who have had the road cleared for them from birth, and their way with women unobstructed, tend to drama of the sort that appeals to men — multiple lovers, risky infidelity, public sex, emotional distance (the opposite ploy engaged in by women on the cusp of crazy), sadism and cruelty. Men of this sort are never fully tamed, except by a severe reversal of status. The women who are best at corralling the self-satisfied man are usually very feminine, sweet and nurturing, and operate by evoking the alpha man’s natural predilection to protect frail lovers who have assuaged him of their natural preference for faithfulness. Careerist empty vessels and ambitious, tankgrrl feminist sluts should imbibe the lesson that they are living and behaving exactly the wrong way to inspire the love of men who have their choice in lovers.





Comments


  1. Spot on about the kid thing. However, while having a baby works on most crazy hot girls, there is a dangerous group where childbirth has no impact on the crazy. “Cluster B” personality disorders are what to watch out for.

    Like


    • Children do not give a rat’s ass how hot their mama is. They will make their mama grovel. A Godzilla 10 can walk through high tension wires like they were cobwebs, but a petulant child will oppose the beast like Mothra. Regime change princess….

      Like


    • A good many items on that list also fit Block A PPD (Paranoid Personality Disorder), which my last LTR had in spades. I suppose that’s why she’s my last LTR – any girl who reminds me in any way of her behavior sends me running for the door.

      Like


      • I know the feeling. It’s like a bad tequila experience. One whiff of that same odor, and you’re puking.

        Like


    • Having dated one of these girls post-childbirth, I can verify your claims. Cluster B’s should be avoided once detected. There is nothing but drama ahead of you.

      Like


  2. on August 28, 2012 at 2:03 pm someguy302004

    Haha. “stop smothering me” when she’s half a state away!

    I got that from a woman in an email from an overseas location after one one line hello email. I used to screw her multiple times a week, but.. the expiration date on that 6 months of sex apparently arrived, so I just replied “OK”

    Like


  3. The subtle reminder line is a vindication for a concept mentioned a few posts back. Just don’t do it as if you’re operating from a point of weakness, like with any bitterness. Don’t go into nerdy scientific terminology and keep a granite frame as a brief mention of evo psych is no different from saying the sun rises and sets.

    Like


  4. … so where to find a hot girl that’s not crazy ? A sauna ? Nah.

    Like


    • Away from major blue state American cities….

      The population density, feminist propaganda, and gov’ment social engineering just feed steroids to the hamster.

      Like


      • Exactly. American blue states have the lowest quality females in the developed world. Combined with the fact that many of men in these regions come from more primitive and assertive cultures, it causes even moderately attractive women to receive excessive attention and become spoiled. In most other places, most young women are at least moderately attractive and the exceptionally attractive receive only marginally more attention.

        Like


      • Yup. Immigrant cat calling plus grrl power indoctrination make those bitches toxic.

        Like


      • c’mon. these girls are all over wealthy right leaning cities like Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Orange County, etc.

        Like


      • Yes, but right leaning in the US is often left wing in other countries at least as far as feminism is concerned. Where hotties will say “Eeewww” to the idea of dating a man over 30, that’s an equalist left wing environment even if, in the US, it happens to be a “red state”.

        Like


      • Those places aren’t very blue. Check their mayors and demographics.

        Like


      • I meant those cities aren’t very red, except for Dallas and even there large parts of the city are solidly Democratic. But demographics matter more than politics. Wherever you have large numbers of third world migrants, the population will be disproportionately male and the migrant women will be horribly unattractive, both causing attractive native women to receive excessive, desperate attention.

        Like


      • I fucked several bitches from the OC and several from AZ as I’m from the PAC 10 now 12. The chicks from those two places are definitely better than NYC whores.

        Like


      • I never saw much appeal in Yankee women at all.

        Like


      • Why and what do ya think the northern men were yanking?

        Like


      • On the whole women in the Northeastern states are remarkably unattractive.

        Like


      • They’re loud, tasteless, and trashy. Watch Jersey Shore for examples. I generally find American women to be boorish, bossy, and culturally ignorant. Southern women are the least offensive AW.

        Like


  5. Even if you never validate a hot girl, you must understand that thousands of other men are doing it everyday (even more so thanks to social media). Keep it negative, vague and short.

    Like


    • I recommend telling the girls you know to get the hell off social media. They will often agree to that, citing the constant barrage of men they don’t know trying to connect with them. There are a lot of super hot 18 year olds who haven’t posted a photo since before their last big growth burst that changed them like from a caterpillar. Tell them that you should be the only one who gets their photos, especially their beach shots from this past summer.

      Did I say “past”? Geez. Another summer over…

      Like


    • Really depends on where you live.

      Hot girls in new york go to the front of the line. Hot girls where I live wait on people in a line.

      Like


  6. on August 28, 2012 at 2:27 pm The Man Who Was . . .

    I don’t think it a coincidence that so many of the Roman emperors were bonkers.

    Camille Paglia:

    “The lives of the wastrel emperors demonstrate inadequacy of our modern myth of personal freedom. Here were men who were free and were sickened by that freedom.”

    Sexual Personae, p. 136

    Like


    • Camille has a loose grasp of history, I’m sorry to say, especially the classics. Still, she was once the only voice in the wilderness.

      Like


      • Yeah, I thought Paglia was anti-feminist back in the early 90s, right? She called out women’s studies profs for being intellectually lazy, and misinterpreting everything a priori. Whatever happened to her?

        Like


      • She used to do a Q&A column for Salon, but all the Commies there pilloried her regularly, so they dropped her. She still teaches and lives with her lesbian girlfriend and talks about writing books, but I never see anything coming out of it. The Gay lobby hates her, so the publishing industry must follow through with censoring thought crime.

        Like


      • Paglia is great. She is the prime example of how a bias for truth-telling overcomes every ideological tic and flaw intrinsic to the type. Not unlike the author of this blog.

        Graycunt-licking art professor and Democrat/professional dyke, the sheer gravity upon her position must tempt her to sell out to the pretty lies constantly. But she matches those temptations with an uncommon fearlessness and iconoclasm that retains her status as a blunt, honest, and artful observer of the truth.

        Her column was the only reason to ever visit Salon. There’s a hole in the internet without it.

        Matt

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 11:10 am thasswhatimtalkinbout

        are you on drugs? publishers will publish anything if there’s a money in it for them.

        camille’s problem is her books don’t sell enough copies to merit the fat advances she demands for the next one she wants to write. she’s never translated her fame into sales.

        Like


      • Are you on drugs?

        A vocal minority can easily win. Remember that OJ Book that caused and uproar and thus was cancelled?

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 3:01 pm thasswhatimtalkinbout

        Evil — you’ve named one book that got cancelled. Name another. Out of the thousands of titles that get published every year, you manage to find one lousy example to prove your point that it’s easy for a vocal minority to get its way.

        You really showed me.

        Like


      • Sexual Personae and her Vamps and Tramps collection of essays are all I’ve seen. Both were big sellers. Salon is a Marxist sewer and can’t handle any ideas outside of Rightthink. I agree about her column being the only reason to read Salon.

        Like


      • Its like proving a negative. Most are simply not published and you never hear of them in the first place. I would say that Mens’ Rights is a topic that is impacted by this. Had Rantings of an Angry Male been published mainstream, it likely would have been a bestseller, as it was funny as hell and very readable.

        Like


  7. Curious that the most famous academy award winning female actresses played these very roles.

    See Audrey Hepburn in ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s’, and Julie Christie in ‘Darling.’

    Both acted the part of hot girl crazy. All of the male roles in these films were sycophantic beta orbiters.

    Like


    • Gone With The Wind too.

      Scarlett O’Hara — the perfect 10 (for those days), betas buzzing around her like lovesick little flies.

      Like


      • And Gable got her and then dumped her. “Frankly my dear I don’t give a damn”

        Like


      • I don’t know if she was ever the 10 but she was good looking. However, here she is about 20 years later in a film. Yes, that sweet bird of youth flys away fast 🙂

        Like


  8. Men are to blame for this. I recently played a somewhat physical game with a a group of men and women. It is a game where quick reflexes are the the most important skill. One of the women is a beautiful, mid 20’s woman. These guys wouldn’t have thought twice about knocking me down or shoving me hard to win the point. They did not play nearly as rough with her. Not surprisingly, she won the game and I was eliminated in the first round.

    Like


    • Rule of thumb: Man doesn’t compete with woman. Man plays games with woman.

      Funny that even though we literally explain here why women feel indignation at more attractive females getting more attention, go into full detail for why the bio-social reactions less desirable women have towards hotter babes occur (to get you to leave the venue hahahaha) you literally are unable to take that knowledge and empower yourself. Hiiiiiiighlarious. No wonder women SUCK at improving relationship dynamics. You can’t even take this knowledge to feel better about yourself, let alone do something with it. Fucking learn something hahahah

      You’re going to get flamed for out of place ‘men are to blame for this’ comment by the anti-feminists, though I don’t give a fuck about them.

      Like


      • While I’m no fan of Lara, she was only repeating one of the blogger’s main points that beta orbiters and other “males” are primarily responsible for having let feminism get as far as it did.

        Like


      • What’s wrong with Lara?

        Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 10:36 pm Rihanna Deserved It

        An extra X chromosome.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 1:42 am driveallnight

        Nothing, Lara loves Asian women!

        Like


      • I like Asian women. I think you’re referring to a past comment of mine, where I was critical of the sex tourism industry in SE Asia (admittedly, I don’t know much about it). It seems like it would be demoralizing to the men living there. Ultimately, it’s on them to decide to tolerate it or to end it.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 12:59 pm driveallnight

        Just having a little fun L, busting your balls.

        Like


      • How can women use this knowledge to empower themselves? By learning exactly what men find attractive and striving to embody as many of those qualities as possible? By knowing our place and not angling for levels of attention from men they don’t deserve (given their SMV)? This is a serious question.

        Like


  9. Re: 10’s one line I’ve been dropping lately that always gets a smile is, “So how about the men in your life. Are they mistreating you like you like?” Friendly and cool, but hints that you ‘get it.’

    One thing I’m learning with HARD 10’s is to not DHV at all. I met a (non-stripping) hostess working at a premier strip club last Thursday- she flies out to Vegas on weekends to pursue her ballerina career. Blonde, gorgeous, 11/10. She liked me when we were just chatting but when I DHV’ed (HARD) I crashed and burned… fuuuck… I think they actually capped me compared to her life. Same thing happened with this SMOKING personal trainer. She told me her mom was a cop and I tried to DHV since there are a few badges in my family… nope. For some reason what’s a DHV with regular girls ‘felt’ like ‘trying’ with these girls. The GM of the strip club played it right with the hostess, he called her black swan since she was a ballerina- she called him The Vampire since he had that vibe. Should have stayed in that teasing/witty frame rather than try to go ‘real’ with the DHVs.

    IMO the hottest girls actually seem more normal to me since they’ve been socialized for so long, as long as they don’t have HB8-9 syndrome where they appease insecurities via alpha sex.

    Like


    • she flies out to Vegas on weekends to pursue her ballerina career

      hm, sounds like the kind of “ballet” that involves a pole on a stage. Host at home, dance away…

      Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 4:54 pm driveallnight

        Exactly what I was thinking.

        Like


      • Hey, man. Don’t Hate. Appreciate. She is an artist. Let’s see Ulyana Lopatkina do this:

        Alas, with all things, men do it better. Even pole dancing:

        Like


      • Although, here is a superior art form that can never be equaled by man. It’s all about the hip-balance:

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 4:43 pm blackbird.young

        How to Game a Hula Girl [from observation & pre-red-pill experience]:

        1. Marijuana (home-grown for extra brownie points; or organic, vegan, pot-edibles for one thousand extra yummy points).
        2. You & what little skill’s you have in approaching women during the daytime.
        3. Her – will be found at local indie cafes, small bookshops, parks, beaches, flowery nature spots that are close to suburbia’s, on campus in very public places, or on OKCupid; has accidentally Obscurantist tattoo’s, harbors odd “spiritual” beliefs, and likely isn’t on the same “wavelength” as you; will read your Aura.

        Her mating call: Hula hooping.

        Your Response: You [+ Weed] ——> to girl with Hula Hoop ——> smoke weed together; express interest in learning “how to hula”; if no weed, ask her if she smokes, and where to get weed. Drive with her in your car to buy weed from one of her many ex-boyfriend dealers, and smoke weed). Guaranteed [eventual] sex. Unless you fuck up, of course.

        She’s a Mermaid-Faery-Nymph and you’re her Redemption Song.

        Recap: Weed + Hula Hoop + Girl Hula’ing for you = bang. Hula Hoop = Sex Circle.

        They are also more open to group sex it seems. Never date them. I’ve watched many a man torn apart by these fiends disguised in Faery wings.It’s like the lot of them are part of the Hippy Camp BPD Traveling Family of Lightworkers, LTD.

        I’m curious if anyone else has had this experience: asking a girl to show you how you to do something, and her complying = sex, 98 percent of the time. As long as it’s not something you should as a Man know how to do already. Especially if it’s something you as a Man should not have any idea how to do. Like hula-hooping. Which, of course, you find a way out of learning how to do, because it’s definitely not sexy, nor does it feel sexy, to be a man with a hula hoop.

        Every girl I know that hula’s is a sloot. And every girl I’ve met that’s brought a hula hoop out at some point, has used it as an easy sexual welcoming device.

        But maybe that’s just in Southern California.

        [And to someone who asked down below if I am this blogs biggest fan (regarding the shitload of comments I have on this article), I’d say I highly doubt that. I’ve just had a lot of free time at work recently. And instead of writing my own articles like I should, I’m enjoying commenting here. And I found this article especially accurate. Well written too.]

        Last comment for a while. Don’t mean to bore you all with my trivial ramblings. But hopefully one guy will bang a hula-chick now that he knows her Game. It’s format is simple, it’s execution seen through to completion, however, relies on your ability to not be a fool. Or at least a wholeheartedly unabashed fool, privy to his own sexuality?

        Like


    • To quote Mystery: “A 10 must choose YOU. You cannot choose a 10.”

      http://www.bristollair.com/2011/pua-seduction-methods/examining-different-pua-methods-pt-2/

      Click the links at the bottom of that for Parts 1-4.

      Like


  10. hot girl: “My sugar daddy used to let me drive his Ferrari.”
    fredyetagain: “Great, now turn around and bend over.”
    hot girl: “My sugar daddy took me on a trip to Hawaii once.”
    fredyetagain: “Awesome, now turn around and bend over.”
    hot girl: “My sugar daddy called me last week, just out of the blue.”
    fredyetagain: “Terrific, now turn around and bend over.”
    and so on, and so on, and so on ….

    Like


  11. Like


  12. What most chicks need is a good hard smack across the face.

    Works for the Arabs. Works for the niggers—their women bow down and worship them.

    Freedom to women is just proving your beta. White men who beat their wives and girlfriends should be freed from prison.

    Like


    • This concept is moronic. You have no understanding of life, people, social dynamics.

      ‘The beatings will continue until morale improves.’

      Society should be shaped to match how NATURE works, not optimized for genetic detritus like yourself. Seriously, this concept that women should be managed so that every beta fuck gets a piece is totally flawed, anti-history. Leftovers from a past that probably never existed. You’re not anti-feminist- your beta-ist. You favor a social structure that supports betas.

      Thought exercise: Less freedom for women is not the answer. It’s more freedom for men. The freedom to walk across a bar and beat the ever living fuck out of some wimpy kid just because you don’t like the way he looks (and lap up the pussy juice that results). Notice how your proposed solution taints and destroys romantic love. Notice how my proposed solution inspires and ignites romantic love (and improves the gene pool). The idea that sex dynamics are optimized in a conservative society is so fucked, so obviously flawed and indefensible, it could only be proposed by the emotionally and socially crippled.

      Yet you won’t changed because you are fully enveloped in the warm embrace of your warped, stupid, cultural narrative. The disdain you feel towards foreigners is the same disdain I feel towards you, moron, gun-clinger, racist, faux-‘christian’ sympathiser, frightened white tribalist.

      Like


      • You seem upset, did he touch a nerve?

        Like


      • ‘Course I did. Lefties hate the truth.

        Like


      • Yeah need more competitive outlets now that fantasy draft season is over. Bottled-up negative energy is spiking from a lack of cervix last weekend and the next one seems so far away haha

        Like


      • Whorefinder is really crazy, and isn’t worth the energy. He’s fighting imaginary battles in his own mind. Better just to let him burn himself out.

        Nice post, Shocker.

        Like


      • Funny how lefties always try to play the “I’m so above you” card when they get their asses kicked and have to run away.

        And is anyone surprised that Omega Jason thinks wizmen should be protected at all costs?

        Like


      • Your definition of “asses kicked” = endless ad hominem attacks.

        Come back with a civil tone and a slightly more open mind.

        Like


      • Jason, you’re apparently oblivious to how silly you often appear on this blog. Remember, others must judge whether you are alpha or not. Making the claim is in and of itself a beta thing to do. If one is truly alpha, others recognize one for being so and it goes unsaid. Alphaness is best measured by deeds and character.

        Like


      • Making blanket statements about hating millions of people is what’s really silly, Tyrone.

        So is posting long senseless screeds about Marxism, copied and pasted from secondary sources. Next time, and I’m speaking for those of us here who actually went to college, spare us the lectures.

        Like


      • Tyrone, I’ll have you know that Jason has had a fine education… and he never let it go to his head.

        Like


      • Jason would be surprised to learn that I too am extremely well educated as well as cosmopolitan, but I enjoy the company of men who work with their hands more than educated men.

        Like


      • Never read something that stupid.
        You should comment more often, I would like to understand the functioning of stupid people’s little minds.

        Like


      • Looks like Jason has a masturbation partner:

        This concept is moronic. You have no understanding of life, people, social dynamics.
        —I do understand the following: men who beat women have women worship them and come back to them. Men who treat women with “respect” (p.c.-wise) get nothing.

        ‘The beatings will continue until morale improves.’
        —Actually, a valid psychological concept, in both disciplining men at arms and wives. You, as a leftist, however, are allergic to reality.

        Society should be shaped to match how NATURE works
        —in NATURE, women go running back to men who beat them.

        this concept that women should be managed so that every beta fuck gets a piece is totally flawed, anti-history.
        —Idiot. Controlling women is what great men do; betas fail to do so.

        You’re not anti-feminist- your beta-ist. You favor a social structure that supports betas.

        —-lol. I can tell what this leftist apologist is doing—the same as when lefties try to argue that fascism is right wing. It’s the Big Lie on Projection—trying to pretend their enemies are doing the evil they themselves are doing.

        Less freedom for women is not the answer. It’s more freedom for men.
        ——Freedom for men in society requires less freedom for women.A man’s freedom to rape is inhibited by a woman’s ability to get the law to arrest him. A woman’s freedom to dress “however she wants” and not be harassed inhibits a man’s ability to stare at a woman, oogle her, and fondle her.

        The freedom to walk across a bar and beat the ever living fuck out of some wimpy kid just because you don’t like the way he looks (and lap up the pussy juice that results).
        —So you inhibit the wuss’s rights in favor of yours. So you’re not against inhibiting rights—-just women’s rights.

        Beta.

        Notice how your proposed solution taints and destroys romantic love.
        —Good.

        Notice how my proposed solution inspires and ignites romantic love (and improves the gene pool).
        —-Nope. It’s not romance, it’s lust. And its not improving the gene pool, it’s making it more violent.

        The idea that sex dynamics are optimized in a conservative society is so fucked,
        —putting words in my mouth will not aid your stupidity.

        so obviously flawed and indefensible, it could only be proposed by the emotionally and socially crippled.
        —Noticing women love men who beat them =I am emotionally and socially crippled.

        Behold, lefty logic! Obama forever!

        Yet you won’t changed because you are fully enveloped in the warm embrace of your warped, stupid, cultural narrative.
        —I change with facts, not with harangues by female-defending white knights.

        The disdain you feel towards foreigners
        —Dude, I hate niggers. They’re a local production. I like the spics, they’re partially civilized and keep the niggers in line when they get them in prison. Get your facts straight.

        is the same disdain I feel towards you, moron, gun-clinger, racist, faux-’christian’ sympathiser, frightened white tribalist.

        —–lmao. Did your little feminazi overlords teach you to talk like that, little man?

        Like


      • “The idea that sex dynamics are optimized in a conservative society is so fucked, so obviously flawed and indefensible”

        You fucking traitors should get the fuck out of this blog.

        If you so love the modern state of affairs, wtf are you doing here? Go lick jezebel fupas and leave us the fuck alone.
        Arguing with “progressist” lefty faggot shits has been done over and over. It’s useless and tiresome, and if CH can’t convince you, no one will.

        Enjoy your freedom while you still have it, punk.

        Like


      • That’s dumb. More male fighting leads to … life in the ghetto. Nasty, brutish, and short. Live in real Alpha society for a while: West Africa, Compton, Watts, South Side Chicago, Cuidad Juarez. Life is cheap. And miserable. News flash, all those nice things you like: clean running water, power 24/7, sewage nicely disposed of and not running in the streets, requires a Beta Male society. In other words, a White or NE Asian society. Which is necessary but not sufficient for a nice to place to live. Which Alpha societies are decidedly NOT. After all, you don’t live there.

        I find it amusing that you endorse Black tribalism but don’t like the White kind (which non-White tribalism in a multiculturalist, “diverse” nation invariably creates). Yes traditional White society changes off hot Alpha sex for women in favor of clean running water, safe streets, low violence, and lots of male cooperation producing killer technology. I’m all for it. Only a loser would want to live like a Haitian.

        Like


      • More male fighting leads to … life in the ghetto. Nasty, brutish, and short. Live in real Alpha society for a while: West Africa, Compton, Watts, South Side Chicago, Cuidad Juarez. Life is cheap. And miserable.

        It’s called the Hobbesian State of Nature, not “real Alpha society.” Your unattributed quote gives it away.

        [E]very man is enemy to every man … wherein men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them withal.

        In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain … no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

        Leviathan, Chapter XIII

        A “real Alpha society” within the state of nature is orderly, and it already has a name: the pack.

        News flash, all those nice things you like: clean running water, power 24/7, sewage nicely disposed of and not running in the streets, requires a Beta Male society.

        You mistake savagery for alphadom. Civilized alphas sublimate their strength into means effective for the circumstances. They don’t practice civility out of weakness, just as the alpha wolf doesn’t rip out the throats of the subservient betas who surround and support his sovereignty — just because he can.

        Running water isn’t “beta male.” Without alpha leadership to create, support, sustain, and defend civilized boundaries, betas (and women) would not create a civitas that enjoys “power 24/7.” They would remain a scattered gaggle of spooked squirrels evading predators by scurrying up trees. Betas (and women) who inherit the work of alpha creativity relinquish it to decadence within a generation, as Western Europe and blue-state America are demonstrating today.

        The dystopias you describe are not natural. Detroit is not naturally occurring. Black Africa can only be so savage without the western technology that allows its duplication on a mass scale. Life is “cheap” and “miserable” because Compton and Juarez enjoy the end-products of civilization while lacking the disciplined alpha to maintain it. “You want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.” A man with the inability to think two steps ahead of his urges is bested by his alpha equal with a capacity for strategy.

        Yours is a very beta-male philosophy of “the other.” You misunderstand the sources of strength and therefore only recognize them in their most primitive expressions. You mistake “most primitive” for “greatest” and “most apparent” evidence of alphadom. Indeed, both are non-beta and therefore foreign to the hapless chump and therefore effectively equivalent. But which is the more alpha? The strong man on the margins who is slave to his urges, or the man strong enough to lead other strong men by example and leadership? We are not beasts. We are distinguished by, and we dominate by, our sapience. We don’t follow the dictates of the “king of the jungle.” We put the pussycat into a cage for our 4-year-olds to gawk at.

        Matt

        Like


      • Finally, some sanity!

        Like


      • Sanity? On a whorefinder thread? Good luck with that.

        Like


      • +1

        Like


      • You’re right, he’s an idiot ectodweeb from the lower class who would never get within a mile of any really good looking female with any class. Only punks and omega losers believe this nonsense that hitting a female proves they’re some sort of Alpha, in fact it proves the opposite. Can you imagine this little cellar dwelling video game playing ectodoofus even approaching a high quality woman? She’d probably call the cops or some real Alpha would smack him around for his presumption. Get back to Dogpatch you little creep!

        Like


      • “You favor a social structure that supports betas.”

        Yes, they call that “civilization.”

        Like


    • Maybe we need something in between our female-worship society and the female oppression society of the Muslims. You do not need to cover women in black sheets to stop them from running wild and eschewing family life.

      Like


    • Willing obedience is superior to forced obedience- Xenephon.

      Like


  13. Heartiste! Emergency!:

    http://cryptome.org/2012-info/go-topless/go-topless.htm

    Topless redhead, when becoming the hottest girl with her boobs out, you can watch her female ego balloon and her hamster spin her self-worth to 100000+!

    Like


    • Those are very pathetic older men with the cameras, signalling that they are omegas by behaving like a photo is all they are ever going to get.

      Like


      • Or they might be laughing their heads off at the stupid whores who think marching topless will make their utopian dreams come true.

        Like


      • The ones with the bras are emoting and empathizing. Most are having a good laugh and checking out some jugs. Going topless was cool in the 80s in Germany. They still do it on the beach. Its out of fashion at local lakes or public pools though. Its still common in spas and saunas in Germany. Its no big deal but its another Cultural Marxist myth that people aren’t checking each other out and nudity doesn’t contribute to sexual arousal. The nudist area at the local lake near Reutlingen was 80% men.

        Like


  14. My mother was one of these “extremely hot girls”. She was no doubt promiscuous in her days and I’m sure she’s been pumped and dumped quite a few times. She settled with my extremely beta dad and had me in her later 30’s.

    I can attest that childbirth only grounds these hot girls a little and they will still crave the drama that comes from alpha-chasing and resent their aging looks / lack of options / etc. I was often physically abused as a child due to her mood swings. I remember when I was 6 and woke up from a nap crying because I had a nightmare; she was ironing some clothes nearby and flipped the fuck out and burned a good chunk of skin on my hand with the iron. My earliest memories was her tying me up and beating me and making me look the other way so that I wouldn’t be able to see the whip or brace for the pain. My father was always there pissing his pants whenever my mom got angry and didn’t do jack shit to save his own son.

    Do not ever get involved with these crazy, unstable girls. I’m quite surprised that I never grew up to be a serial killer. Thank god for game.

    Like


    • on August 28, 2012 at 4:15 pm FuriousFerret

      That sucks man.

      This is what betaization does to society. Your Dad should have taken control and not let things like that happen. One can only hope the red pill spreads so that these things happen less and less.

      Like


      • There are many 40-something divorces running around SoCal who split up families just so they could play the field. “In sickness and in health, for richer or poorer, unless you are not happy. Then you can ditch your family.”

        Like


    • I question every “study” claiming there are more male socio/psychopaths than women.

      You’d think the huge number of blood thirsty, emotionless female divorce initiators would cause these fools to look at the data again.

      Like


      • It’s because they usually define psychopathy in their studies via physical aggression/criminal behavior, while female psychopathy is far more socially acceptable (gold diggers of various degrees, being emotionally abusive). They won’t find them because their definition doesn’t take them into account, because they’re more concerned about the criminal psychopaths rather than about understanding the root of that personality disturbance.

        Like


      • That’s because Psychopathy is a very specific psychopathology, and there are indeed more male psychopaths.
        However, there are almost double the number of women with psychopathologies.

        Like


    • Your mother would have lasted about 5 minutes in my house. That story pisses me the fuck off.

      Like


    • Tough luck. Sorry, man. At least you overcame everything.

      Like


    • If any woman is going to abuse children, then she loses any right to claim she is being abused. Your father should have backhanded her.

      Like


    • You must have inherited your dad’s wimp genes. Hey there are new laws on child abuse and you may still be able to prosecute the bitcch and send her to prison. See how tough she is bunking with Big Bertha 🙂

      Like


      • Nah, I grew up with a great deal of rage and anger issues and would pick fights with random people even though I stood no chances of winning (funny — whenever I came home bloody, my dad would be the one who freaks out like a bitch and my mom would be the one who tends my wounds). But most of the time, I was just a quiet loner who came off as nice and soft spoken and couldn’t even look at girls in the eyes. I have no need to prosecute her now, though, that’s beta.

        Like


      • Commiserations Adam. Like you, I was a child of a really really hot woman and suffered immensely at her psychotic hands – as did my poor beta dad (very good looking but inexplicably beta) whom she eventually left for another man. I made a comment in a previous thread of beautiful women generally not making good mothers and was called out for being a hamster.
        Yes, she did all those things on the list – like constantly deliberately making my father jealous, constantly craving the attentions of other men – even in the presence of my father. Making unrealistic demands of my father to keep her happy. Never being satisfied with his desperate attempts to do so. Always finding fault with him. She took sadistic delight in running my self esteem to the ground – constantly telling me I was ugly and deliberately making me so – trying to make me fat. Did not believe I was good looking until in my 30s and never had a boyfriend until then because I would refuse anyone believing they were evil men due to her stupid influence.

        Like


      • Yep. Sounds pretty much like my mother. I’m glad you made it out okay. Cheers.

        Like


      • Well then kick her arse 🙂

        Like


    • on August 29, 2012 at 2:58 am Precious Minerals Land Owner

      A great read for you

      Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us

      http://www.amazon.com/Without-Conscience-Disturbing-World-Psychopaths/dp/1572304510

      http://books.google.com.au/books/about/Without_Conscience.html?id=xfIEVtzj52YC

      2 million of them in north america alone according to the book, and very very interesting when read through game and evo psych filters

      Like


  15. This post is too vague, for one reason: almost every woman living in a first world nation “knows” that she is hot.
    As recently as the 1980’s, “hot” women used to have to meet a certain set of standards:
    (Slightly) Better than average height- 5’6″ to 5’9″
    A face that would make heads turn (repeatedly)
    A combined chest/waist measurement that was at least 40 inches higher than their waist.
    36-24-36, 36+36=72, 72-24=48
    Those proportions (combined with an attractive face and enough height to imply the potential for tall sons) made a woman universally attractive.

    However, every woman in modern times who isn’t obese (and not a few of the Roseanne Barr-sized ones) honestly believes that dyes the second coming of Julie Newmar, Lee Meriwether or Pan Grier. You’re just as likely to get “hot girl crazy” from an actual hot girl as you are to receive it from the bucktoothed 4’11” Cambodian immigrant girl, or the 5’11″/125 pound long-distance running famine victim, or “Large Marge”/”Boomshiqua” with the FUPA. The sole way to avoid “hot girl crazy” is to find the rare hot girl who doesn’t know that she’s hot (late bloomers, some geek girls, racial outsiders/”the one black/Asian/Hispanic girl in the almost all white town”, etc.)

    Like


  16. OT
    Last feminist-inspired whim: “Sperm is a marital asset”.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2194765/Sperm-donation-A-wifes-consent-donate-sperm-Thats-sexist-absurd-says-male-writer.html

    Just what was needed to make marriage more appealing. One needs to be a complete lunatic to get hitched under the current anglosphere zeitgeist.

    Like


    • Last feminist-inspired whim: “Sperm is a marital asset”.

      That’s true and since I already gave her some then all the other property is mine 🙂

      Like


    • I’m guessing that there’s an asset that doesn’t generate much interest.

      Overhead at a divorce hearing:

      “Well, I’ll take the Escalade, and he can keep his sperm.”

      Like


    • I don’t think that married men or women should be allowed to donate eggs or sperm to a third party unless the two have an explicit agreement to do so. It seems that with the current divorce rate couples aren’t even happy donating to each other, so how adding in fathering/mothering extramarital children in whatever capacity helps anything, I don’t get. With surrogacy becoming more popular, I wonder just how far away we are from The Handmaid’s Tale.

      Re sperm being a marital asset, who gets custody of the sperm in the divorce? Whoever holds the insurance? As I once tried to tell the good people of billing at the Cleveland Clinic: “We’ve been divorced for a year. I am no longer in charge of his sperm!”

      Like


    • My sperm is a national asset.

      Like


  17. I’ve found that the worst hot crazy comes from girls that are cute and pretty, but also very approachable (either with girl-next-door looks or a friendly, warm, approachable personality) and not the Megan Fox lookalike hotties. The Megan Fox types can certainly be evil bitches, but they don’t play the head games that the really cute approachable ones do because most guys won’t approach and the ones who do tend to be alphas who can keep them in line.

    The cutesy types get absolutely mobbed by guys who fall head over heels in love at first sight (mostly betas who consider the uber-hotties to be out of their league). These guys are not intimidated by her looks and warm personality, so they have no trouble approaching, but her charms, looks, and “coolness” hook the guy and he supplicates and gives away their power immediately, which the cutesy girl manipulates handily. These girls also tend to be fairly feminine, love to cook, and like children. so beta guys think they are perfect and their love is meant to be.

    These girls also tend to have the greatest number of platonic guy friend orbiters, a straggler-boyfriend who she isn’t all that into (he’s kind of a loser but is at least a bit more alpha than the orbiters), and girlfriends who will encourage her behavior while simultaneously hating her guts for it.

    Like


    • Co-sign.
      A hot girl, if she possesses anything resembling average intelligence or *acute situational awareness*, seeks to maximise her personal value. She finds the fittest (note: not “hottest” or most alpha) man, uses whatever advantages she possesses to make herself a fixture in his life, sternly yet gently rebuked (or overlooks) the occasional infidelity, then restricts full sexual access (IOW, making children) until the ring is on her finger. For a good example of how this works, compare the attractiveness levels of athletes’ or entertainers’ wives (if married) to their flings/baby mamas/etc. Regardless of the ravages of time (Pierce Brosnan’s wife comes to mind), the wives were/are always hotter than the women who threw themselves at their target. It even holds true in the case of rappers (Kim Mathers being the best example), where the woman who gets or keeps the ring is the fittest (yes, Kim cheated on Marshall. For Detroit, however, she’s a step below Mother Theresa.)

      The girls in the middle, however, are always trying to “keep their options open”(just in case Arnie Alpha shows up.) So they maintain their orbiters (because they want to mirror what they’re looking for in a mate.) They have their “greater beta” pseudo-partner (because they want the alpha to lay the smackdown on him to claim *her*. Gina tingles!) They readily put out to any *real* alphas in the vicinity (just in case the alpha in question is the type to settle down with the “best conquest”. Then when they hit 31 and all but the most fervent of their orbiters have either lowered their standards and settled down or hoped their standards and figured out the “Game”, their pseudo-partner (remember, she only wants to be seen with “hot guys”) has chucked her for “younger, hotter, tighter” or has been scooped up himself and all of the alphas and betas who weren’t involved with her has seen the way she treats people, she goes on the Internet and complains about “Where have all the good men gone?” And if/when the men in her circle point out her flaws (thanks for the list, blogmeister!), she responds with, “Misogynist!”

      Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 6:01 pm blackbird.young

        Misogynist! Has always = Will Fuck You If/When Opportunity Comes!

        In my experience. Especially if she has a boyfriend. ESPECIALLY.

        And I agree with the two comment’s above. From experience and observation. I think those are the types of chicks that account for the majority of cases that lead people to this area of the internet in the first place.

        Like


    • on August 28, 2012 at 4:20 pm FuriousFerret

      Aww the Zooey Deschanel syndrome.

      Mega hottie that has made a career at somehow projectioning an aura of attainability to uber-geeks.

      Woman is a genius.

      Like


      • Zooey Deschanel … I have to admit I hate her guts for what she did to that skinny dude in 500 Days of Summer. It brought back flashbacks for all the supplication I myself did in my (more) beta days. That role was a real revelation for me. The dude in the movie also did a good job in portraying how miserable guys get when they fall for one woman who then jerks them around. That movie really pissed me off.

        Like


      • After 2 years of intense CH reading, nearly all the movies piss me off.

        This blog is very bad for hollywood business.

        Like


      • You too?

        Like


      • The film was worth paying for because it was an honest primer on what a male should not do. What was not worth paying for was “Seeking a Friend for the End of the World”. This new one is pure feminist propaganda.

        The new film ends with the man not touching the much younger woman (41,26) while they lie on a bed with the asteroid about to hit and kill them. He wants to show he respects her. Says only “I’m glad I met you”.

        Like


      • She looks like an ordinary girl. You must live in an area where they’re all fat dogs.

        Like


      • Zooey Deschanel
        Mega hottie

        say what?

        Like


      • She’s average where I come from. Besides she looks like she’s in her 30’s

        Like


      • Yup, the manix pixie dream girl types are what I’m talking about

        Like


    • As a cutesy 7/8, I can attest that this is 100% true, especially since my personality changed recently to be more friendly than cold.

      I have male orbiters up the asshole, none of which I’m attracted to. So many of them try so hard too, and they think they’re gaming me effectively. It doesn’t help that I come off as very sweet and nice- much nicer than I actually am. The boyfriend is alright, better than 99% of his competition. Meanwhile, the one alpha I’m in love with doesn’t like me at all because he’s probably rolling his eyes at all the beta attention I get.

      Life is tough as a 7.

      Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 4:30 pm FuriousFerret

        Whenever I see a ‘Game’ aware woman that complains, I always say ‘WTF’ in my head.

        You know the damn score. You have even rated yourself as 7 so you at least in you own mind believe you are not Queen Cleopatra.

        All you have to do is find a good lesser Alpha and lock him down. Look how all the other women behave and do the opposite. Use ‘Girl Game’, weight/appearance management along with acting ultra feminine. Do a good through search for the lesser Alpha that will actually commit and go from there.

        Like


      • Well, I would love to except that even lesser alphas are very rare. It’s either betas that think they’re alphas, or lesser alphas that act like kings. The closest I’ve gotten is my current boyfriend, but he doesn’t believe in marriage (even if I don’t either, it makes me uneasy that he’s not very committed). Otherwise I would 100% go for him.

        What is ‘Girl Game’ exactly? Is it just acting feminine, conscientious, and non-vulgar? Should I make my voice a little higher than it is?

        Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 5:00 pm FuriousFerret

        Let me break it down.

        You say you are a 7. So you are in scale terms ranging from a HB5 – HB7.

        This means you are a dime a dozen. You say you are cute and that’s what most in shape young women are. That’s their thing, they are physically attractive for a time.

        ‘Girl Game’ is so damn simple, it’s just that most women will refuse to even ponder it’s advice but it so works for that very reason.

        1) Look as good within your biological means within reason. In other words just make a real effort to eat right and have some physical activity while doing things like having long hair with no skillrex haircuts.

        2) With so many women that have been brought up to act like pseudo-men, a woman that acts feminine has the ultra edge. Men with options will no put up with a nagging, cynical chick for a LTR. They will simply see pump and dump material. However, if you behave supporting, don’t nag, have positive attitude these attributes make you stick out from all the other women. I have seen this with my own eyes. This one girl was a little overweight and have a cute face but all the guys even the alphas wanted this girl to be serious with because she was for lack of a better term,’bubbly’. You was always happy and positive. Guys don’t want to date another guy.

        It’s fucking ‘Girl Game’. With the conditions that we live in right now,acting traditionally feminine will allow to punch above your weight for an ‘LTR!!!!!!!!!!!’. That to a woman should be worth it’s weight in gold. That’s the female homerun right there.

        Look at the one show on VH1 where they have that guy teach a bunch of hypergamous hags how to behave to snag a guy. He teaches ‘Girl Game’ what used to be known as being a woman.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 5:08 pm FuriousFerret

        Also,

        ‘The closest I’ve gotten is my current boyfriend, but he doesn’t believe in marriage (even if I don’t either, it makes me uneasy that he’s not very committed). Otherwise I would 100% go for him.’

        Break up with this guy. You are probably part of a soft hareem even you are female #1. This guy doesn’t believe in marriage until he does with someone that is not you. You are only attractive for a finite time and then it’s too late.

        Use ‘Girl Game’, search your ass of for the right lesser alpha, lock him down through feminine charm, not feminist crap. That’s pretty much my advice to any girl.

        Like


      • I’m not ‘bubbly’ though. I’m a quiet, reserved person and an introvert, which is often considered more masculine compared to constantly chirping like a bird like other girls do. Socializing and talking a lot sucks the life out of me. How can I spin this in a way that’s “feminine” and counter the perfect chatty damsel in distress image from all the comic books and action movies that guys love? I imagine that alphas don’t want to put up with all the work that’s required in order to get me to “open up” and I don’t think it’s wise to jump on any decent-seeming alpha and start sweet-talking him.

        Similar to all these guys coming to this site to study how to act alpha and actually maintain that aloof attitude during a LTR, it will probably be harder for me to pretend that I am something I’m not- an entertainer. I mean, I could end up finding a guy that I really like (like the alpha I mentioned in my first comment) and as soon as he gets a whiff that I’m not an airhead, he bails. For guys it’s no big deal, but I have a ticking clock so wasting both his and my time could have greater consequences.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 5:27 pm FuriousFerret

        Let me simplify it for you:

        1) Look as hot as possible

        2) Forget about outgoing/introverted. You are projecting you attraction cues to men vs their attraction cues to you.Just try these simple guidelines:

        * Be supportive and keep shit testing to a minimum.
        * Don’t nag
        * Be positive (This doesn’t mean you have to be outgoing and charming, I never said that)
        * I guess in other words, I’m trying to say try to be submissive within reason. If you have a willingness to see potential men as being your captain and let him do his job he will in turn thank you for it.

        Another thing is if you want a guy to actually respect don’t fuck him on the first date and at least pretend that you don’t fuck around with every alpha that wants you.

        Like


      • Females have a tendency to overate themselves so she’s likely a 3

        Like


      • Pick the orbiter with the most money, and marry/cuckold him while you wait for a better option to fall into your life.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 8:32 pm FuriousFerret

        LOL!!!!

        Like


      • I have male orbiters up the asshole …

        Stop talking like a road whore.

        It doesn’t help that I come off as very sweet and nice — much nicer than I actually am.

        Delusional.

        Meanwhile, the one alpha I’m in love with doesn’t like me at all because …

        because … you come across as a delusional road whore. No matter what you think you “actually” are.

        You require finishing school. You need to adopt the sophistication that inspires beta “orbiters” residing up your rectum to become the alpha who can take charge of you. Unfortunately, like the other girls of your age and station, you think by virtue of your “cutesy 7/8” (i.e. “short 5/6 with babyfat”), you are entitled to alpha. False. Your mentality is the very reason for the alpha shortage. Men are beta around you because you allow them to think you want beta. If you knew how to assure them otherwise, by subtle demonstration, trust me, they would be inspired to change their beta ways. But because of your quasi-masculine Grrl upbringing, you are too artless for that possibility. Or you are not attractive enough.

        He is “rolling his eyes,” all right. But you haven’t the first clue why. You contribute to the vicious circle you decry. You are a victim of your own behavior and willful ignorance.

        Girl game is the art of femininity. Women get the men they deserve. You are a very familiar type — perhaps the modern American female type — and you need to be shaken from the pedestal your pussy father constructed for his “princess.”

        Matt

        Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 11:07 pm FuriousFerret

        I think that I told her all of what you said in advice to help her get a decent guy.

        The question is, do you think this will EVER work? Do you actually think a woman will listen to these concepts and be like ‘oh yeah’ and implement it to have better relationships to the other sex?

        It’s just so damn easy when your a young woman. It’s so fucking easy and it’s like the Cassandra myth. You can predict the future with 100% accuracy but it’s useless because no one will listen.

        For a woman that’s say 22, you just have to

        1) Look hot as your potential allow
        2) Use some ‘Girl Game’, be traditional feminine, supportive, not totally self-absorbed
        3) Look for a greater beta/lesser alpha that has provider characteristics, along with a non-blue pill beta frame that is willing to commit. This might be the hardest part but if you start in ernest at 22 with a mission this is very attainable. However, I believe the Hamster sees part 3 as the ultimate evil as it would be ‘settling’.

        Like


      • I don’t think I can do it guys :/

        I’m a 7-9 (who knows, since I’m a delusional girl who overrates herself), and every time I find myself doing this “girl game” you describe I feel silly. I feel like an idiot. While it does come somewhat naturally when I find an alpha that I like, I eventually tell myself that he thinks I’m stupid and/or lack substance.

        I promise I do want an alpha I can lock down while I’m still young and hot (?!) but I can’t. playing this ultra feminine mothering type seems absurd and one-dimensional.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 1:24 am FuriousFerret

        Well, there is always cats.

        Like


      • It only seems absurd because of the feminism you were taught. It isn’t absurd. Believe me.

        You have to do the cooking and the back rubbing, which raises you 2 points right there.

        Like


      • Many guys like strong women. As far as I’m concerned, most of them are bluepill semi-gays who have mommy issues, as they were probably raised by feminist mothers or single moms who had to be tough to survive.

        They can be pretty alpha, but they have a dislike for women who are too feminine and passive. Maybe you can find happiness with one of those. But it comes with a price, they can be dark triad to the core and won’t tolerate weakness or laziness. And they will leave you the second a better option comes along. In fact, they are most of the time definitely unable to endure monogamy for more than a decade, even under ideal conditions.

        The best strategy for a woman is to be feminine and to snag an alpha who genuinely likes feminine women. But, those alphas who are mildly dark triad but free of mommy issues ask for a price, which is youth. Plus prettiness (as opposed to hotness, even the super alphas tend to avoid 9s and 10s for marriage) and femininity of course.
        In order for a marriage to work, they have to be significantly older and the woman must be on the right side of 25. If she’s not, the man must be even older and that tends to complicate things a little bit (Marrying a man 25 years older and becoming a widow at 50 is suboptimal, better to aim for a 15 years age difference and become a widow in your mid-late 60s).

        Like


      • Strong, like “curvy” is one of those expressions that gets tossed around a lot but is too vague to be of importance.

        I like “strong” women. In this case it means a good muscle tone and practical streak. I assume it’s because I’m a 10th generation university graduate, so all practicality and urge for physical work has been bred out of me ages ago. So I’m looking more for a “pioneer’s wife” type than what I assume most women think of when “strong” is said, being either a bitchy misoandrist feminist or shot putter.

        In fact, the two women who I’ve met who most fit this type were both military officer’s daughters. A family setting with a strong, mostly absent macho father figure and an emphasis for physical fitness.

        Like


      • “Life is tough as a 7.”

        It sounds facetious, but it truly is. I’ve often lamented that it’s so hard being “quasi-hot.” At least when a woman is a 6, if they are at all honest with themselves, they shouldn’t suffer from too many delusions of attaining commitment from men who occupy the top tiers. And when a woman is an an 8+, commitment from a high value male is all but guaranteed, granted she is reasonably sane.

        As a 7, I am approached on a by a number of men quite regularly, but the majority of these men are below my league, and a significant minority are above my league and are only approaching because they’ve deemed me as reasonably attainable and have no plans to invest much in terms of a committed relationship.

        It’s just a miserable existence. I am now more than ever convinced that I should go ahead and undergo an invasive cosmetic repair procedure now that I’m nearing the tail end of my early twenties. I also plan to grow my hair down to my waist, work out like it’s a religion, employ this feminine game, and hope I can attain commitment from a lesser alpha.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 2:13 am FuriousFerret

        That’s the spirit to try to improve so you can snag men above your score. Most American women think that just by showing up that it’s all they have to do. That they should out compete the guy by being a self absorbed bitch and this will endear themselves to the object of their desire. This will really only work on the betas that you loathe. Actively improving both personality and looks will give you an edge. The man with one eye in the land of the blind is king.

        Lets look at one statement though:

        ‘As a 7, I am approached on a by a number of men quite regularly, but the majority of these men are below my league, and a significant minority are above my league and are only approaching because they’ve deemed me as reasonably attainable and have no plans to invest much in terms of a committed relationship’

        Ok, so at of those men that approached you. You’re telling me that not one of those guys was your SMP 7 counterpart. It’s only 6 and below or 8 and above.Really???????

        That ladies and gentlemen is Exhibit A: Hypergamous Woman Number 5050050505094594059439059034905903490.

        Like


      • There seems to be a market mismatch, and I think women overestimating themselves are the cause. If no one in your league wants a serious relationship, maybe “your league” needs reassessment.

        I am contacted frequently by women that are only asking for trouble when they should be finding someone who will invest in them. They are delusional.

        Perhaps some men overestimate themselves, but I think it is more on the female side.

        Like


      • I understand people might expect that I’m over-rating myself, but I’ve based my rating not on how I perceive myself, but by the caliber of men who I’ve been able to extract commitment from in the past. One is a definite alpha and the other I would label a sigma/lesser alpha.

        I’ve done reasonably well in the past and I know I can end up with someone decent as is, but I’d love to distinguish myself more from the “quasi-hot as this will help take a bit more edge off of the competition.

        As it turns out, 7s in their early 20s aren’t that rare and what would equate to a male 7 (greater beta/lesser alpha??) have access to a number of 7s, 6.5s, and 6s at this time that the sexual marketplace has been skewed to the point of caricature.

        Nevertheless, I understand the apprehension surrounding a woman’s rating of herself. I’d much rather be an 8 though.

        Like


      • Consider men 10 -20 years older than you. It has worked very well for my wife and me. We’re 17 years apart and the age difference has not had a significant impact on our relationship at all.

        Like


      • Define Alpha as you perceive the term.

        Like


      • My guess is your idea of your league is different than everyone else’s idea of your league.

        Like


      • Talula shows promise above by referring to the “tail end of my early twenties”.

        Coming from an anglo woman, that shows that, if you did away with women’s studies courses tomorrow, within 5 years all the hotties in the anglosphere would be similar to their counterparts everywhere else in the world, who see the wall at 25 and not 30 or 35.

        I won’t criticize her for having high standards, knowing that she’s red pill aware otherwise.

        Like


      • In my experience, men who were out of my league, never approached me or put any effort into being with me. If he is willing to go out of his way for you, then he doesn’t see you as not good enough for him.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 9:51 am RappaccinisDaughter

        You think being a 7 sucks? Try being a manjawed 6. It’s not even the manjaw itself that messes me up–I’m not a warpig or anything, at least based on the way straight men treat me–it’s the fact that I have a masculine temperament. Men will approach me, all interested, until I open my mouth and start talking. They don’t run away in disgust, but two hours later we’ll be sitting outside smoking cigars and solving all the world’s problems. Yup, I get friendzoned.

        I can’t do “girl game” for shit. It’s just so completely unnatural to me.

        Like


      • That’s how I am. I can talk to all different types of men, on a wide variety of topics, but I cannot do flirty banter. It has always felt completely unnatural to me.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 10:14 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Oh well. At least we wind up getting new friends out of it. You can’t have too many people to watch MMA and drink beer with.

        Like


      • Trust me, you’re not in any friendzone.

        Offer any of these “friends” a blowjob or consequence-free sex and you’re out.

        There is no such thing as a freindzoned attractive woman. Those women who are are just fat or ugly and thinking they’re not.

        In other words, you need to be more overtly sexual–if you have a masculine temperament, it shouldn’t be hard to be horny. Like any man with a problem like this, the key is to make sure your focus is making any guy you like know that the first and foremost reason you like him is romantic/sexual in nature. Solve the world’s problems on your second date.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 10:41 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Being overtly sexual doesn’t come natural to me, LDR or not. I’m actually kind of introverted and shy in person. I have to get to know somebody before I can open up enough to hit on them, and usually by that time we’re talking about the economy…not whether he wants to get on me.

        Like


      • I don’t think this is good advice. Being overtly sexual is not attractive in a masculine woman. Also, I’m not sure why I’d give a blowjob or consequence free sex to a friend. He should find a girlfriend for that.

        Like


      • @RappacinisDaughter:

        Like I said, offer your man friends sex right now—11am EST—and they will be over your house by noon. There is no friendzone unless you are uglier/fatter than you claim.

        Do you get horny? Then channel that frustration into either 1) sleeping with a male “friend”; or 2) being horny when you go out to pick up a guy.

        @Lara:

        I don’t think this is good advice. Being overtly sexual is not attractive in a masculine woman. Also, I’m not sure why I’d give a blowjob or consequence free sex to a friend. He should find a girlfriend for that.

        —Lara, the point was helping this girl “get out of the friendzone” not that she’s even in one, unless she’s being dishonest or unrealistic about her looks. And the point is to make her the girlfriend. By showing that she is sexual and desirable and doesn’t need to have a full Ayn Rand-esque conversation before revealing that.

        Like


      • @whorefinder and evilalpha:
        OK, it looks like you are both asking my hamster what I look like. In this context, I guess it’s relevant, so here goes.

        I have empirical evidence that I’m not fat. My BMI is 19.5. WHR is .68. Not perfect, but not bad.

        As for my face, it’s harder to be objective. I have to go by the way straight men treat me and say, because women and gay men lie to try and make one feel better. Based on that, I’m either a 6 or a 7 depending on whether you’re a boob man or an ass man. *shrug* That’s the best I can do for you.

        Like


      • @RappaccinisDaughter

        OK, that’s fair. Which celebrity do you physically resemble? Skin tone, body shape, facial structure, etc.

        But, like I said, your male friends are ready, willing, and able to fuck you if what you say is true. Just give them a few drinks and suggest going back to your place. And wear a thong.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 2:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        @whorefinder:
        I get compared to Holly Marie Combs a lot. Jodie Foster sometimes too. Low-digit ratio “handsome” features, but not a total tire fire either.

        Like


      • Comment on my blog and use an email address.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 3:38 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Why? I’m not giving you crap, I sincerely want to know.

        Like


      • What are your measurements?

        If you really are a shy 6 all you need to do is dress slutty. You can talk economics all you want and still get dick.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 1:48 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Weird. The above “anonymous” comment is me. Don’t know why my name didn’t show up.

        Like


      • I dunno, I work with an absurdly hot economist (one of the two officer’s daughters I mentioned above). I find her passion for the subject rather sexy. I think the meaninglessness of feminine intellect gets slightly overblown here at the chateau. It’s not that it doesn’t matter. It’s just that it only matters when you have an LTR choice between two women of (roughly) equal looks.

        Instead of slutty, you might consider a well-tailored feminine business attire first. Of course, this comes from a guy who sees this on the streets: http://www.hel-looks.com/ (oh, ok, there’s actually some good-looking chicks there now that the uni has started again. Just keep rolling and filter out the hotties to get an accurate view).

        Like


      • You gotta maximize what you can, quit worrying about your food chopper. Jeebus, what a pity party. If you relate to guys really well you have the potential for good fun tomboy sort of girl game – feminine but not hot-girl-in-a-dress feminine. Most of the higher quality guys I know who like Tomboys like fit, fun girls – and without exception they tend to be lanky (naturally or from working out), and have *dynamite* asses. Most of those guys tend to be country boys or outdoor adventure sports types. Hit the gym, do three or four types of squats for 6 months, ditch the “It’s Pat” pants for some tight jeans that show off your ass (mini skirts if you’re going out-out), and then see where it goes from there. If you’re not a natural 7 or 8 you have to build yourself a body that guys will notice. You know that feminist thing, “Why are you staring at my tits, my face is up here?” Yeah, well, you want them to stare at something and if you don’t have Pam Anderson’s rack, Lolo Jones’ ass is the next best thing. And try to be fun. Unless you’re trying to woo Paul Krugman, nobody wants to talk about the economy. It ain’t them, it’s you. But you can change.

        Like


      • I don’t understand all the female “I can’t find a man” complaints either. Slim 6s and 7s with good personalities generally have the easiest time finding husbands. They’re attractive enough to get the attention of higher betas (who make up the majority of available men), but not hot enough to be intimidating. And higher betas are their perfect target demographic – lesser alphas will only marry 8s and up, and greater alphas won’t marry at all (or will cheat like crazy if they do).

        So either these women are too picky and rejecting men in their target demographic, or they’re actually sub-6s. Hypergamous or delusional, pick one. Otherwise they would never, ever need the advice of strangers to find a male protector, let alone to get laid(!)

        Like


      • Sorry if this comes across as naive. I guess I would describe myself as a ‘7’ as well, but I never had an issue finding guys (sorry to be an jerk). When you say that they’re “below your league,” what exactly does that mean? What specific attributes about a guy do you value and what are you trying to find?

        For me, it’s probably been easier because I’m relatively intelligent and I value intelligence in a man much more than the average woman, so my personal concept of an “alpha” is skewed. You’re likely smart as well, so if do you value intelligence in a guy, it seems like the combination of being smart and a 7 should be a huge benefit. I know that the guys here claim that intelligence isn’t that important in a girlfriend/wife, but anecdotally, the intelligent men I know have always dated intelligent women for the long term (not to say that attractiveness isn’t equally important to them, but as a 7, it seems like that should meet most men’s baseline attractiveness threshold)

        Also, like you said, definitely grow out your hair, work out, avoid sugar, etc. Take good care of your skin, wear a moderate amount of makeup, find flattering clothes..you know. And plastic surgery can be a very bad idea or a very good one. I had a minor procedure done and it was worth it.

        Like


      • I like how half this comment section is dedicated to trying to help a girl get laid.

        Like


      • Nah , they’re trying to help girls get married.
        But whiteknighting and trying to convince girls with logical arguments is surprising at this point: some dudes will always come out dry of an ocean of knowledge.

        Like


      • they’ll get better advice here than at some cuntosphere blog.

        Like


  18. Holy shit you were exactly right with the fucking:lovemaking ratio.

    Thinking back to all my prolonged flings, they’ve all adhered to that ratio to some extent.

    Like


  19. I would add that, because women mature faster than men, they suffer more from the prolonging of adolescence that characterizes modern american culture. Single men, with the right attitude and values (which are rare), can learn and grow a a great deal in their twenties, by expanding their horizons and cultivating themselves. Single women tend to simply cultivate their careers, and material success, if they cultivate anything at all.

    Like


  20. Nature is most cruel to her prettiest daughters. At 15 the best-looking women get an incredible gift: men will do almost anything to please them. The women retain that gift for 10-25 years, depending on how well they take care of themselves.

    Then, one day, the gift starts fading, and is soon gone forever. The once-pretty women are left with a memory of how, before, all men piroutted on the street to get another look at them, but now even ugly men glance at them with vacant, distracted eyes. No reaction.

    And since so many of the prettiest ones never had anything else to make them special, the former beauties are utterly and completely ordinary—i.e, just like the gals they outclassed for so many years without effort.

    Honestly, it must be absolutely murder for the faded women. I say that with no relish or joy. Anyone who was once a good athlete or in some very competitive activity they succeeded at knows the pain that comes with decreased competitivenes due to age. The former star athlete’s lost prowess is the only thing that could possibly approach the level of hopeless yearing of a faded woman’s sadness at losing her looks. All of the desire for glory and attention, but absolutely no capacity to reclaim the spotlight.

    Like


    • It depends how one uses that gift. Plenty of retired athletes have used their former glory to make nice lives for themselves. Sure, it’s a downer, when the attention drops off, but there are still many things you can enjoy.

      Like


    • Not a fair comparison; in varying degrees depending on the sport, athletes have to actually work hard and develop discipline and character to acquire their prowess. Chicks are born with it.

      Like


      • Nonsense. Athletes are born with it. You can pick an elite athlete out of first grade recess.

        Do they have to work at it? Sure…because there is probably another elite athlete four counties over. And he might be practicing. But Michael Jordan wasn’t Michael Jordan because he shot more jumpshots in the offseason than the next guy. Same goes for Magic. Same for Lebron. And that’s basketball, where actual skill is required.

        You think Ray Lewis practices football? Or just runs fast and hits hard?

        Like


      • “depending on the sport” being the operative phrase. Basketball is probably the most dependent on genetics; if you’re not built a certain way you’re barred from ever reaching an elite level. But high level T+F athletes, strength athletes (bodybuilding, powerlifting, weightlifting, strongman, throwers etc.), football players, mma fighters, etc. put in a full workweek and make a lot of sacrifices to reach elite, professional, and competitive levels. Of course there are outliers who get away with slacking off, but even at the professional level they are relatively few if you aggregate all pro sports.

        Like


    • You’re not fooling me with the fake compassion.
      Seeing a former queen lose her throne, especially if she’d been used to abuse her power, is shadenfreude at its finest.

      Like


      • I agree. I only feel bad when it’s someone in my harem or a relative.

        Also, the original comment should have said “retain for 5-15 years”.

        Like


      • on August 30, 2012 at 1:23 am Doghouse Reilly

        I disagree. Women can keep the gift for 25 years after the age of 15 but it’s very rare for one to do what it takes to ensure this. As an example, check out this picture of Padma Lakshmi at the age of 38.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padma_Lakshmi

        And 4 years later, at 42 years old, her beauty still has the power to captivate.
        I’m not saying that even Padma at 42 would be marriage material, simply because menopause is still unavoidable, but women who hit the wall hard at 30 are pathetic and have only themselves to blame.

        Like


    • If the woman used her beauty to find a mate and have children, fading beauty can be almost nice to watch. And for the best looking women that don’t ruin their skin in the sun, it fades very slowly. Like into mid-40s.

      Like


    • Women become invisible in a way that men don’t. People still rush inside, cross the road, when they see me coming down the street. This once offended me, now it amuses me. Prefer this to being a benign nice guy.

      Like


    • “Runners whom renown outran. And the name died before the man.”

      Like


  21. So Spiralina, you’ve made the statement that you’re hot. Let’s see some photos, preferably nude but bikini will do!

    Like


    • Haha, I WAS a hot girl. I’m now a 29-year-old married woman, and while I think I still look pretty good in a bikini, the only validation I need now is currently sitting beside me and probably wouldn’t want me posting any of “those” pictures!

      I just think it’s sad and stupid to go through life learning nothing from one’s experiences. All my former hot girl friends who seem happy are married with kids, or at least in long term loyal relationships. The ones who are pushing (or over) 30, still in the clubs chasing alphas – they seem profoundly dissatisfied and unhappy, and it’s only going downhill from there. Reading the early incarnation of this site when I was younger was quite the wake-up call. I recognized the dangers of my own hypergamy, and made informed choices. Now I am very happy with a wonderful man and a beautiful child. I’m glad this site exists, not just for men to learn Game, but for women who stumble across it to gain awareness of their own darker impulses.

      As always, it’s all about choices.

      Like


      • Wow. This is probably the most amazing comment ever posted here. This actually makes me feel like there is hope. A woman read Heartiste, recognized the truth of what he was saying, took steps to avoid the pitfalls, and went on to have a functioning life. Bravo! If only there were more like you.

        Like


      • What’s with beta sycophantic enthusiasm on this thread?

        Like


      • Mr. Skeffington game?

        Like


      • Good answer. Your husband married a good woman.

        Like


  22. on August 28, 2012 at 4:33 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    There are a couple of things on that list that aren’t necessarily red flags, especially if they’re happening infrequently…say, at 28-day intervals. I’m not saying that it’s ok for her to snap at you over nothing–by all means you should call her out on it, and she should apologize.

    But trust me, PMS is a real thing and it takes a concerted effort to control it. I’ve had to say things like, “Can we talk about this in two days, because I’m starting to get really upset and I don’t think it’s actually your fault.”

    Also, my opinion is that it is acceptable to have two cats. You don’t start edging to the border of crazy-cat-lady territory until you have three or more.

    Like


    • Agreed. PMS has to be taken into account.

      Like


    • Two cats is good advice.

      Also, make a list of the things important to you in a man, do it in one sitting, and if you realize later that you ‘forgot’ to add something, it probably isn’t that important. When you meet someone who is starting to check off the boxes, if you have alcohol in you, initiate kino yourself, but only do it once, and at some point, make ONE comment that can be construed as sexual. Then just simply do not resist any of his advances, if he makes them.

      This makes it ‘socially ok’ for a relatively normal, somewhat inhibited male to do the same. Many men can be alpha, but have been socialized against it. If you open kino and make a sexual comment (not during the same conversational beat mind you, you slut!), you have ‘legitimized’ that behavior in the present context, and if he is interested, he will start to pursue you. Since you’re a manjaw six, if you throw up resistance or turn the conversation to ‘thinky’ topics, you probably won’t get any.

      I’m guessing you like smarter guys, guys who can carry a conversation with you maybe? If you let the conversation turn to ‘big think’ issues before you fuck them, the relationship probably won’t get sexual, mostly because you’re a manjaw six.

      If you want to hang onto him once you have him, be awesome in the sack, be a generally awesome, submissive girlfriend; and make it so that his life is easier when he is around you than when he isn’t.

      Good luck!

      Like


  23. on August 28, 2012 at 4:39 pm John Campbell

    CH!! Another doozie! Keep it up; your readers are savoring 🙂 as for your book project (I hope you don’t make this post public), what if you took articles from your archives and organized them by subject or theme (e.g., dread) and called your book something like THE ALPHA MAN’S GUIDE TO LASSOOING WOMEN?

    Like


  24. There is no fidelity, faithfulness or loyalty. There is only limitation of options.

    The dumbest tweet to ever appear on this site. Sounds like a latch-key kid still sore about his parents’ divorce. Worse still, it takes on the tone of aphorism among your more solid, more genuine offerings.

    You diminish your authority whenever you wax pseudo-profound. If beneath all of your advice is a denial of the will, you are peddling cheesy fatalism. Stow the doggerel. Stick to what you know.

    Do thirsty betas fall for this bait-and-switch? I would think any man with any pride would eventually admit, “I’m right with you on the basics, but where do you come up with some of these secondary conclusions?”

    It’s exhilarating to liberate the downtrodden from the lies that oppress them, but you have no idea where to end the lesson, which undermines the entire project. Your initial righteousness degenerates into self-righteousness, and self-righteousness is all that remains to justify some bizarre philosophies, half-understood if pithily expressed. You yank on an annoying thread until the sweater is all gone.

    Which explains your gullibility above. You apparently have only been bounded by external limitations. You know nothing of self-discipline or simply failed at the attempt. Therefore you deny its possibility and claim cynically that all virtue is a sham. You assume us all feral dogs who need to be leashed because you never met a man with the ability to train them. Whatever. But don’t presume to think it wisdom. Keep your poison fortune cookies away from the desperate omegas.

    There is no health, slenderness, or athleticism. There is only limitation of food supply.

    There is no beauty or attractiveness. There is only the eye of the beholder.

    There is no game. There are only naturals. There is only the “limitation” of nature.

    Fail. Try again.

    Matt

    Like


    • Seems like you’ve never been with a young 10 after year 2000.

      BTW, how’s your old fat ugly wife doing?

      Like


    • Perhaps it was more of a cynical observation rather than an ideal. If its not then he is full of shit on this one because there is an avuncular streak for the social good even if it is an unwelcome ghost that haunts him. Why the legacy? It was a cynical moment from a point of view. Although denial of pleasure is torture. We crack under torture…that doesn’t mean we don’t have the wish not to crack that is itself indestructible. Pity we humans that carry the heap of flesh.

      Like


      • The problem with the “cynical observation” is that it becomes a convenient maxim justifying weakness at the moment when strength (inner frame) is required. Half-baked half-thoughts become situational rationalizations.

        We have to call each other out on these lapses. They feed the enemy.

        Like


    • Perhaps he never encountered people who stay together and are loyal to each other despite options. But we could also interpret this differently: perhaps loyalty isn’t something that should rest on self-control ALONE. It has to have some solid ground, like if the person is deserving of the loyalty, and keeping themselves as attractive as they can for practical reasons and out of respect. A reasonable person won’t drop a good mate if they were irreplaceable. That is, there are NO options that are better. Even if there are other people you fuck availible to you, doing so would be a bad choice, not maximizing your happiness.

      Like


      • “Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” (Reinhold Niebuhr)

        Yes, “we laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.” Which is all the more reason to call out CH’s pointless cynicism. A culture that observes virtue makes it easier to practice virtue. A culture that declares virtue impossible makes it impossible to act virtuously. What does CH know about what’s possible? Particularly about some behaviors he has never tried nor seen tried?

        One cannot suddenly become loyal once one finds an object worthy of his loyalty. It is the product of a lifetime’s habits and preparations in a world of unworthy recipients and temptations to treachery. The practice initiates in the faith that such an idea is possible in the first place, and CH declares it impossible based on no evidence and no logic. His fallacy is an argument from authority (argumentum ad verecundiam), claiming an ancillary wisdom we have no reason to trust. He operates strictly among the unvirtuous and practices vice as a policy — how does this make him an authority regarding virtue? He has never met the quality, much less can make a claim to defining it for us.

        This is why otherwise excellent observers of the human condition should take care against applying their method to concepts beyond their ken. They have no idea what damage they do, and their obliviousness keeps them permanently beyond correction.

        Matt

        Like


    • Fidelity, faithfulness and loyalty are all internal limitations. Often they are the internalization of external limitations. CH was on to something, but these virtues do exist.

      Like


      • Fidelity, faithfulness and loyalty are all internal limitations. Often they are the internalization of external limitations. CH was on to something, but these virtues do exist.

        They absolutely are expressions of “external limitations” more often than not. But the fact that he declares “these virtues do [not] exist” is an indication that he has internalized his own external limits, nothing more. He lacks a virtue, therefore he assumes that we all lack virtue, and further, that the very practice is impossible. It is a species of casual solipsism — encouraged by the tweet format, of course — presenting itself as aphorism.

        I’m just calling a fortune cookie a fortune cookie when I see it.

        Matt

        Like


  25. Looks like Jason has a masturbation partner

    I’ve had my dust-ups with Whorefinder (over tivial shit — lulz at Chuck’s — good times) but I’m glad to see him emerge from his lair. Nobody beats him at trashtalking. I am a fan of Whorefinder. Oh, and he’s right about most things.

    While I’m no fan of Lara

    I am also a fan of Lara. She has a genius for encapsulating a three-paragraph point in one sentence.

    Like


    • Whorefinder is da shit.
      I can imagine that he may offend apolitical gamers who hang around in here. But I like his stuff because I hate niggers and leftie faggots too.

      Like


      • Seconded. I like WF myself.

        Like


      • He’s a bit rough around the edges, but like Johnson said about some fellow whose name escapes me at the moment: “I’d rather have him inside the tent, pissing out, than vice versa.”


        We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
        For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
        Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
        This day shall gentle his condition;

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 2:17 pm Mr. Pointyface

        Why, how charming! I’ll invite you over my next elite fete with the supermodels any time now!

        (Isn’t it cute how the rural Alabama car mechanic says “niggers” like he’s better than someone else? I think these American relics are absolutely DELIGHTFUL!!!)

        Like


      • A rural Alabama car mechanic does valuable work. He is almost certainly better than you.

        Like


      • By ‘supermodels’ he means his cherished Big Daddy Roth collection from Revell… lovingly hand-painted in mom’s basement… two coats.

        Like


      • If we had ten of them for one of him, this nations would be great again. Those country boys know far more than you people think. I view city people as next to useless. Hank Williams Jr. said it well.

        Like


    • Yes, with emphasis on the TRASH. Almost 100% of the crap he accused me of in the last two hours was completely imagined.

      A most inglorious keyboard jockey.

      Like


    • Agreed. Lara is astute and concise, if not always correct. That is enough. For a woman especially, she is punching several levels above her weight class.

      The spazzes who treat women on these boards as unwelcome interlopers are asexual numbnuts. And the ones who lobby for their insecurity to become comment policy? Surpassing retarded.

      Men-only clubs are good things, they keep us focused and clear of counterproductive, competitive groin-grabbery. But a forum must be established on single-sex terms from the start and then enforced strictly (like the Marine infantry), or else it devolves into just one more naturally occurring social dynamic and all the hidden/overt intersexual flirtation that accompanies it. Even in the comboxes.

      This is the tragedy of closing the Men’s Clubs and opening Augusta National to women — it becomes just one more sexual souk, rather than a retreat where a man can relax for a minute away from the cunt race. The good news is, Augusta is a lagging indicator, the last gasp of the crones before oblivion. Condaweezy and Darla will be dead soon.

      (Good luck on the big speech tonight though, Madame Secretary!)

      Matt

      Like


  26. Most of the stuff on that list are things that should never happen, except to betas.

    I’ve been in 3 ltrs now since adjusting my personality according to CH principles, and I can’t imagine having a girl doing most of that shit. It would simply never happen if you keep a girl on a tight leash, no matter how hot she is.

    And if she ever does, it means that she’s low quality gf material, or that you’ve been a beta who doesn’t understand shit about shit.

    I can still imagine a girl cheating on me, but I’m positive that her pulling that kind of stuff will never happen in my lifetime. Thanks to CH of course.

    Like


  27. What you are essentially saying is hot young girls can be though of as dictators that routinely have people shot for failing to meet their banana quota.

    Hot girl = dictator.

    Like


  28. What’s a good Alpha Male Reinvigoration Chamber?

    Backpacking Joshua Tree solo for a few days is just the thing for re-establishing my relaxed confidence and charming dismissiveness.

    Like


  29. Assuming Spirulina is female, she is amazingly candid, although I disagree with the temporary aspect as well; that’s up to the man to solve. One thought about a life absent challenge and hardship, most men will seek some kind of challenge out at some point. Women and not infrequently those wallowing in the neurotic circular psycho babble over what some man is/isn’t doing try and belittle these efforts as a need to prove something. Perhaps, no Dr I, but from my observation at least men want most to prove something to themselves, in contrast to women for most of whom enough attention of any kind is enough.

    Like


  30. on August 28, 2012 at 5:51 pm blackbird.young

    The complaining about “doing[/not doing] things” and “other [“normal”] couples” is dead on as per recent experience.

    Solution: remind her no one is stopping her from leaving and “doing” those all-important “things”; and, who said we were a couple anyway?

    Imaginal though Realistically Inclined Projective Rant [Fictional Name’s; Time-tested scenario’s Idea]:

    Furthermore, who care’s what Jennifer and Robert do once a week according to their schedule and plans, as per, normal couple-hood’s somehow ambiguously dictated standards you’re imagining right now, in comparison to what is a relationship entirely initiated by you in the first place with me?

    One day, babe, you’ll meet your Bob. He’ll have a great job, a steady income, zero-addiction’s, an excellent relationship with his family, good credit, a clean record, shiny white teeth, and will be an avid supporter of feminism too! He even has T-shirts which advertise it, as he’s waddled the streets during many a Slutwalk with his anti-harem girl-friends before. He was a little crazy in college though, he regrets when he had this one night stand, it was awful, he felt so ashamed after, like he treated a Woman like a Whore; he hopes you’ll forgive him.

    You’ll even meet him in this beautiful forest on a magical Island, where the sun never sets but is always setting. Unicorn’s and faeries will sing blissful songs as you follow your heart and dance your way into his pudgy man-boobs pillow of a body, which also acts as a sponge for the many tears you’ll spill into it, and gratefully as a tampon for the many bloody “emotions” you’ll leak onto him, which he will happily soak up; and being the Perfect Mate that he is, will take like a man – apologizing for every tear and gunky glob of menstrual blood missed!

    Because that’s what you want: someone who isn’t a “mean man” like me.

    Hun, you’ll meet your Bob soon enough. And you and Bob can raise my children.

    They will be beautiful, babe. My DNA and yours are a perfect match, our bodies know it. Bob won’t be able to tell the difference, after all, he’ll be too busy with the chores you didn’t do, ’cause, he understands, you’re busy working late and climbing your way up in your Alternate Name for a Secretary career.

    Until then, shut the fuck up, stop complaining, or get out. ; )

    With Love,
    A Sincere Man

    Like


  31. “Consider the hypothetical case of a man who
    can have anything he wants just by wishing for it. Such
    a man has power, but he will develop serious psychological
    problems. At first he will have a lot of fun, but by and
    by he will become acutely bored and demoralized. Eventually
    he may become clinically depressed.”

    -Industrial Society and Its Future

    Kaczynski and Nietzsche already called it. Struggle in an inherent part of life. If you don’t struggle, you will create struggle to stop from going crazy.

    Like


    • A John Collier short story about a guy who could have any girl he wanted and how that worked out: well worth the read. http://ciscohouston.com/docs/docs/greats/bottle_party.html

      Like


    • I think Gibson puts it quite well in Count Zero, “the fabulously wealthy are no longer quite human”. Not only do they have the means to pursue all their strange quirks, they also develop strange quirks to pursue with their limitless power.

      I hadn’t quite considered how it applied to hot women, but it actually must be worse, since even the ludicrously wealthy person is still PAYING for stuff, even if the cost is meaningless to him personally – the hot woman gets it for free, an important distinction in a capitalist society.

      Like


  32. newbie to game here

    Are you only supposed to neg hot confident girls, like 8 and up ? Or can you neg any cute girl ?

    Like


    • Why is it that newbies always ask the same fucking question? Despite the fact that answers are all over the web.
      Actually the answer is in the fucking mystery method itself.

      Like


      • on August 28, 2012 at 6:08 pm blackbird.young

        What’s the Mystery Method?

        Like


      • The only book worth reading in the entire pickup industry.

        What are you, some RSD fanatic?

        Like


      • RSD blueprint seminar is fine too, but it’s not a book.

        My point stands still.

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 4:49 pm blackbird.young

        What is RSD?

        Like


      • go fuck youRSelf blackbirD.

        Or something like that.

        Like


      • No one knows , it’s a mystery .

        OK start by going to the dollar store and buying a floppy cheap hat, learn a few magic tricks, and then just behave like an old doosh.

        Like


      • You sound like a jealous ectodweeb 🙂
        Worse than that, you sound like whammer 🙂
        And whammer used to sound like a fart 🙂

        No wonder he changed his nickname into what again? MrChipps 🙂 hahaha typical ectodweeb nickname 🙂

        Like


      • I know who you are dweeb. You were so scared shit that you ran from the challenge. Punk

        Like


      • sorry there’s just a lot of contradictory information. Like for example I read about this approach on Fast Seduction where you’re supposed to go up to a random girl and tell her that you’ve been having a bad so far but once you saw her face it brightened up your day and made it better, and then you thank her for that. I forget how the exact line goes. But anyway, based on what I read on this site that would be a terrible thing to say to some random girl you want to fuck. It’ll just make you look creepy and weird right ?

        Like


      • Yes that will work because women with little to choose from will appear in random samples.

        It will even work better than the default on attractive women since any contact at all is a value greater than zero which in that case 1 in a million ain’t bad.

        Like


      • Only a very small number of men could pull that off. Unless you have a lot of experience, with many different women, I wouldn’t attempt it.

        Like


      • Not the best opener but ultimately, any opener is good as long as your fundamentals are solid (Body language, frame control, conversational skills…).
        You should keep hitting on girls and try everytime to assess your fundamentals and improve them.

        It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it. It’s all about the attitude, and nothing explains that better than this blog. But it takes a fairly long time to sink in.

        Like


      • I generally think the best openings come from referring to something immediate about the situation, since it won’t be contrived. It’s hard to do this in a bar or nightclub, since it’s already a contrived environment.

        Like


      • The best openings are hooks that prompts a girl to investigate/drop her guard. It’s really no different than fishing.

        Like


      • Jake go for simple.

        Walk up next to the girl you seek. When you catch eye contact hand her your drink. Say “Hold this” and Kneel down. Re-Tie your shoelace. Then stand back up and game.

        I do this at least once a week at a bar or coffee shop.

        Like


      • Dick much?

        Like


    • For cute girls, I’d neg them ONLY if they have an ‘attitude’ or believe their value is higher than their real value. Just to get them down to Earth.

      After that, negging is not as neccesary.

      Like


    • on August 28, 2012 at 7:33 pm Obstinance Works

      Note to game rookies. Google “neil strauss the game pdf”

      I see comments on here almost every post that tell me these guys who say they know about game either have forgotten about the most important book ever created on the subject, or they have never read it.

      Like


  33. on August 28, 2012 at 5:56 pm Charlesz Martel

    Where is Chuck’s? Does Lara post there? I like finding new blogs…..

    Like


  34. I got completely fucked over by a redheaded 9.5 (so not only hot girl crazy, recessive gene red head crazy on top of it). I’ve seen that entire list happen and wasn’t wise enough to handle it. In retrospect, the greatest thing that could have happened to me. Every man should experience pure crazy. It will change your life.

    Like


    • Agree 110%. My last LTR was a hot redhead. Found out the hard way that she was Block A PPD. As you say, it was pure crazy and it changed my life. But only recently have I accepted that it may have been one of the greatest things to happen to me.

      Like


    • I like a little crazy. Keeps things interesting.

      Like


    • Oh, yeah. My last LTR was a hot redhead, who unknown to me at the time was Block A PPD. Two years of pure crazy, but I was so deep into her that I didn’t realize just how crazy it was. It did indeed change my life and the combo of her and finding game blogs was probably one of the greatest things that ever happened to me. And you’re right – every guy should take one (but only one) ride on the crazy train. All aboard!

      Like


      • Same experience – was trying to reconcile how I got sucked into crazy and found game (picked up a copy of Neil Strauss’s book after hearing about it for so long) at the same time. The last year has just been a treat of young, fun and obedient women. Can’t believe I was missing out on this the whole time.

        Like


      • Yeah, you kinda have to experience it to believe it. It’s like the saying that a conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged. Once you’ve been toe-to-toe with true crazy (and survived to tell about it), there’s no way to deny it anymore.

        Like


  35. This is a really good read. The only problem this really has is that it skips over the great answer.

    The hot girl is lacking / searching for a higher power. QED become the higher power. Become the force that she must stuggle to please. If you want to keep her you can never let he gain the edge

    Like


  36. So, judging by some of the biographies discussing his early life and teen years, the alpha male hot girl equivalent are discussing is exemplified in Che Guevera.

    Like


  37. I don’t understand why any man who has fucked a woman a few times should *care* if she wants to get away from him. And especially so when the woman is “crazy”.

    Like


  38. Once again, you nailed it…

    Like


  39. whorefinder
    What most chicks need is a good hard smack across the face.

    Works for the Arabs. Works for the niggers—their women bow down and worship them
    ————————————

    But most importantly, it works for white people. The will and ability to apply a “good hard smack across the face” to any nonwhite person, anytime, anywhere in the world is what white supremacy means.

    Im not trying to make a value judgement, it just “is what it is”

    To be secure in your person and/or property, people must fear you.

    Nonwhite people are afraid of white people; don’t listen to what nonwhite people say, watch what they do.

    Like


    • I am going to take your advice and make the observation that nonwhite people are not afraid of individual whites. They would be fools not to be afraid of white power structures. Even I am afraid of those.

      Like


    • You’re right, Negroes are afraid of Whites. You’ll never see a Black girl diss a White man even when she treats Black men like niggers. They know that black men are just loud mouth big talkers but with Whites they’re still a bit apprehensive.

      Like


      • Think more along the lines of a group of white men with rifles than a single guy by himself. Everyone on Earth has learned to fear this.

        Like


      • Blacks represent only 13% of the population here, but are directly responsible for 38 of the 104 medals won in 2012. That’s nearly 40%. Where are whites

        Like


      • on August 29, 2012 at 1:10 pm driveallnight

        They’re incarcerated, for the most part. Something like 42% of those serving time for violent crimes are black, as I recall.

        Like


      • Try ’em on IQ 🙂 In fact if we had literacy tests to vote a democrat would never be elected again 🙂

        Like


      • The whites were busy providing the sort of environment where blacks could excel.

        You’re welcome.

        Like


      • Which medals? Which service? 104 is not enough for an entire year in the Army. Statistically, Blacks are grossly under represented in the combat arms and over represented in the support arms. Therefore I’m very skeptical of this claim.

        Like


      • I think he’s talking about the Olympics.

        Like


      • Thanks. I guess I was wrong then.

        Like


    • What is it with anti-black posts? What does it have to do with the topic of this board? I’m not even calling anyone “racist,” but it is off-putting. Few quality white chicks even go out with non-celebrity/non-pro athlete black men. They should not be a threat.

      Like


      • Thwack is a black man.

        Like


      • Re: Anti-black sentiments. A few of these fellas have lizard brains, Mark, and are slaves to their senseless hate. Not much is going to change them.

        Yes, it’s off topic and annoying. Let’s stay on evo psych.

        Like


      • Why do you assume we hate everyone or anyone at all? Since when is enlightened self interest hate? You encourage it for the pet groups that you dote over so you can tell yourself you’re morally superior to the rest of us. This is a perfect example of your Marxist projection and hyperbole and why its a big lie that will never succeed in the long run. Your positions are all propped up with lies and half truths. I posted those articles below for your benefit, as you seem to be painfully unaware how infused your entire worldview is with the lies and half truths of Cultural Marxism.

        Like


      • You guys are becoming tedious indeed… not one peep about the anti-white posts that often serve at the catalyst here for white lashback.

        Can’t have it both ways, dweebs. Either call the negroes on their bullshit as well, or just… STFU.

        Like


  40. Hotties like to believe the pretty lie that men are nice to them because they’re “nice,” not because they’re hot.

    My ex was a striking 25 yo brunette with legs up to her neck. She was constantly stopped on the street by men asking if she needed directions or whatever. When I pointed out those guys just wanted to bang her she got really angry. “No they don’t! They’re just nice!”

    Erm, ok.

    Like


  41. This explains why Republican women are better looking than Democratic women.

    Like


  42. Just caught this little nugget that made me laugh:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/09/boys-on-the-side/309062/

    —-

    Yellomamba:

    It’s a statistical fact that the more sexual partners a wife had prior to her husband, the higher the chances are that the marriage will dissolve within 10 years:

    http://socialpathology.blogspo

    Statistically, if the wife had even ONE lover prior to her husband, the chances of a successful marriage drop to nearly 50%.

    —-

    Susan Opal in reply to Yellomamba:

    This is why all women should play the field extensively before settling down. Would you look at one or two cars and then buy one, or would you study everything available on the market, read in detail about their specs, and take them on test drives, before making such a large and important purchase? Obviously, it’s better to make a well-educated decision. If women who are more experienced before marriage end up divorcing more often, it’s because their “purchase” hasn’t worked out and they know there are better options out there. We can hardly blame them for being educated and empowered and making the decisions that work best in their favor. After all, that’s what men do.

    —-

    Yellomamba in reply to Susan Opal:

    Your rationalization is extremely laughable.

    If the more experienced women are also more “educated” in their decision-making process, then why are they the ones MOST likely to end up in bad marriages that don’t work out?

    This is where your analogy comparing men to cars ultimately fails, because someone who test-drives a bunch of cars usually ends up with the best car for the best deal — this is not the case for women who “test drive” a bunch of men — as the divorce stats have proven.

    Therefore, statistically speaking, one can only deduct that you are advising women to have MORE partners so that they’d be MORE likely to end up in bad marriages.

    The hamster spineth.

    —-

    LMAO the hamster spineth indeed.

    Like


  43. Wearing red is a bad sign? Why? All I can guess is that it is supposed to be a sign that she wants attention, but even that seems far fetched. And the “Did you hear;” that doesn’t seem like a bad sign. I say lots of things that start with “did you hear.” Like, “Did you hear that the Cardinals won?” I think the cat thing must be a joke, although a lot of people have to be crazy to get a cat.

    Like


  44. The strongest 10 – more like an 11 – that I ever got to know up close once told me that she had never masturbated and struggled to understand the concept.
    Marilyn Monroe told her Pysch MD that she had never gone there. He claims to have taught her how to do so. Patient privacy issues were different back then.
    Is there a story here? Is any self derived attention so lame in comparison to what is on tap from guys every second for actual 10s that there is no there there when they are alone?
    More hands-on research needs to be done in this sensitive area of deep importance.

    Like


    • Sasha Baron Cohen lampooned this perfectly this summer. His Dictator character had been so well serviced by his harem that he’d never learned how to masturbate.

      Like


    • A Natural buddy of mine who laid over 100 new chicks last year and routinely has rotation girls and new girls he picks up on the weekend coming over through the week, doesn’t masturbate or have a porn collection or anything (well he has one but it’s some DVDs to put on when he has chicks over). He just doesn’t need to because he has such an abundance of women wanting to fuck him whenever he wants, and he actually looks at it as a failure, like the last possible resort and he’d have to be having a month long dry spell or something (pretty much impossible for him) before he’d resort to it.

      Like


      • I don’t have time for it either, with a rotation of 4. It’s free on the Internet, but the real thing is a phone call away.

        Like


    • Did you call her on her bullshit?

      I went to middle school with a little blond girl that grew up to be one smoking hot stripper. She was 13 once like they all were.

      Like


      • I’ve started to recently think that women generally have a 10-year hotness window that moves a bit. A bunch of school mates I had were ridiculously hot back in the day (14-20), but have now hit the wall really hard. The chicks who were awkward back then but bloomed in their early 20s are still smoking hot at 30. The Chateau advised age bracket is of course excellent since it tends to target the area where all the chicks are at their best.

        And, of course, there are the ones who were shit-ugly back then and only got worse, and the ones who’ve been mindblowing for almost two decades now.

        Like


  45. Anonymous
    Think more along the lines of a group of white men with rifles than a single guy by himself. Everyone on Earth has learned to fear this.
    ————————————————————————–

    Except,

    the person who does not.

    Those persons are called “crazy”. In addition, this is why Islam is so scary to white people. The thought that nonwhite people can have a greater focus on pleasing something other than them is disturbing. Actually, its not just Islam. Any man who follows a principle rather than another person is a problem because even the white man can’t kill a concept.

    And he knows this. Hence the use of the term “crazy” to describe nonwhite people who aren’t afraid of white people.

    (and Adolph Hitler)

    Like


  46. This won’t make it through the shitty moderation, but it’s obvious Heartiste didn’t write this.

    “she has begun, she has begun, she has started…”

    Multiple writers is stupid.

    Like


  47. OT – Hamstering in overdrive on Facebook page, “Single Women Ready for their Dream Relationship”. Excerpt: “If we are attracting men who are great catches, but aren’t a match for us, we’re probably really close to finding “The One”. The thing that’s ‘off’ may be something minor inside.” The subtext of the page is that women need to increase their self-esteem to attract what they want.

    Like


  48. H is on point as always, but if giving birth was a cure for hot girl craziness, i’d still be married. sometimes giving birth will send a woman over the edge, knowing she just doesn’t have the same options anymore and that her smv has plummeted is the ultimate hot girl-nightmare.

    Like


  49. Trying to hook a girl on a dating website. Here profile has stated she wants sex and we have been infrequently conversing for a while. I have mostly been going direct but she hasn’t responded, so I decided to move it forward and try some rapport building. Then I straight up ask her :

    me: So are you not interested in meeting up or are you just really shy?
    her: Kinda interested but sorta not sure.

    How do i move this forward?

    Like


  50. Also saw this on craigslist and LOLed:

    “Missed connections: Doctors office:

    you worked on my three genital warts yesterday

    i opened my legs willingly and boy did that nitrogen burn yoowch

    tell me where those warts were, what color were my eyes, how many groans did i let out and if i wear panties or not

    we glanced at each other a few times when you started to caress my vulva area and pulled on my little lips to see where all those warts were

    coffea doctor? “

    Like


  51. […] Hot Girl Crazy « Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  52. Ah, I knew you had a heart, throwing something nice in plainer girls’ way like that.
    On a serious note, this is something I’ve found out before – being hot attracts the wrong attention (creepy men, stalkers and such), makes women gossip about you and at the same time doesn’t give you enough serious life lessons. Being ugly means wrong kind of attention (staring, pitying looks, if you’re really ugly), and too many hard life lessons, sometimes too much to cope with. Being in the middle is pretty good.

    Like


    • “being hot attracts the wrong attention (creepy men, stalkers and such)”

      Hence the bitch shield. Alphas use that knowledge to their advantage.

      Like


      • Yes – saying no nicely often isn’t enough! Some men are very persistent and even smiling at them can give them an idea that they have a chance. Bitchy rejections are often an unfortunate result of this necessity (but sometimes it’s just bitchiness of her character).

        Like


  53. OT, submission for beta of the month :

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/28/have-you-snooped-on-partner

    8th comment down :

    “I don’t do that kind of snooping, but I get snooped on. My spouse has several hidden cameras (hidden because I don’t quite know where they are) set up around the house, along with a tracker on my car, and knows how to find out what I’ve been doing on the internet. To be honest, if I really wanted to do something bad, I would find a way. But if it gives my spouse a peace of mind, then I take a “whatever” sort of view. I don’t particularly trust my spouse either, but I won’t resort to snooping because it implies that you need evidence before you break up with them over suspicions. I think it entirely depends on an individual’s personality. But, like they say, if you’ve got nothing to hide…?”

    Like


  54. MrChipps
    Captain Yacub will be in command and he intends to intensify the sun’s rays so that every white man on earth becomes a negro
    ————————————————————————
    no need, the sun already hates you. And it will only get worse as you people destroy the little bit of ozone the Creator put here to protect you.

    Many of you here are young, but as you get into your 30 and 40s, some of you are going to get the call from your friend who finds out she has melanoma. I got that call two weeks ago.
    Its not funny.

    Black people exist because something created them.

    And its wasn’t white people.

    Like


  55. Meanwhile, In Hollywood… (Eye Bleach Warning)

    “Susan Sarandon and her toyboy put on an affection show as they watched the US Open last night.

    The 65-year-old actress enjoyed a shoulder massage from Jonathan Bricklin, 33, as they attend the opening night session.”

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2194941/Susan-Sarandons-tactile-toyboy-massages-shoulders-US-Open.html#ixzz24wBQPgrU

    God, no , please… make it go away!!!!

    Like


    • The caption for the top picture should read, “Jonathan Bricklin attempts to re-animate the frozen corpse of Susan Sarandon with therapeutic massage.”

      Like


  56. ”For as long as supplicating beta males exist, the selfish bastard boyfriend is king”’ exactly where i live, a load of my mates do everything for girls well, i’m not consider myself as an ultimate alpha but i refuse to do that but also i got more laid than them.

    Like


  57. http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02/cultural_marxism.html

    There are two misconceptions held by many Americans. The first is that communism ceased to be a threat when the Soviet Union imploded. The second is that the New Left of the Sixties collapsed and disappeared as well. “The Sixties are dead,” wrote columnist George Will (“Slamming the Doors,” Newsweek, Mar. 25, 1991)

    Because the New Left lacked cohesion it fell apart as a political movement. However, its revolutionaries reorganized themselves into a multitude of single issue groups. Thus we now have for example, radical feminists, black extremists, anti-war ‘peace’ activists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, and ‘gay’ rights groups. All of these groups pursue their piece of the radical agenda through a complex network of organizations such as the Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), People for the American Way, United for Peace and Justice, Planned Parenthood, Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Code Pink for Peace.

    Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America. They favor code words: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity. All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.

    Birth of Multiculturalism

    In anticipation of the revolutionary storm that would baptize the world in an inferno of red terror, leading to its rebirth as the promised land of social justice and proletarian equality-Frederich Engels wrote,

    “All the…large and small nationalities are destined to perish…in the revolutionary world storm… (A general war will) wipe out all…nations, down to their very names. The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only reactionary classes…but…reactionary peoples.” (“The Magyar Struggle,” Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Jan. 13, 1849)
    By the end of WWI, socialists realized that something was amiss, for the world’s proletariat had not heeded Marx’s call to rise up in opposition to evil capitalism and to embrace communism instead. They wondered what had gone wrong.

    Separately, two Marxist theorists-Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary-concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order. The West would have to be conquered first.

    Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class. The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a “long march through the culture.” Additionally, a new proletariat must be created. In his “Prison Notebooks,” he suggested that the new proletariat be comprised of many criminals, women, and racial minorities.

    The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history. All of these things must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.

    The Prototype

    In 1919, Georg Lukacs became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary. He immediately set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary. Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow. Lukacs launched a radical sex education program in the schools. Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority. All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters.

    Hungary’s youth, having been fed a steady diet of values-neutral (atheism) and radical sex education while simultaneously encouraged to rebel against all authority, easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers, and sociopaths.

    Gramsci’s prescription and Lukacs’ plans were the precursor to what Cultural Marxism in the guise of SIECUS, GSLEN, and the ACLU–acting as judicially-powered enforcers–later brought into American schools.

    Building a base

    In 1923, the Frankfurt School-a Marxist think-tank-was founded in Weimar Germany. Among its founders were Georg Lukacs, Herbert Marcuse, and Theodor Adorno. The school was a multidisciplinary effort which included sociologists, sexologists, and psychologists.

    The primary goal of the Frankfurt School was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms. It would provide the ideas on which to base a new political theory of revoltuion based on culture, harnessing new oppressed groups for the faithless proletariat. Smashing religion, morals, It would also build a constituency among academics, who could build careers studying and writing about the new oppression.

    Toward this end, Marcuse-who favored polymorphous perversion-expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals. Into this was spliced Lukacs radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics. Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques. The end product was Cultural Marxism, now known in the West as multiculturalism.

    Additional intellectual firepower was required: a theory to pathologize what was to be destroyed. In 1950, the Frankfurt School augmented Cultural Marxism with Theodor Adorno’s idea of the ‘authoritarian personality.’ This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism. Thus, anyone who upholds America’s traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist. Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists. By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America’s traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help.

    The pernicious influence of Adorno’s ‘authoritarian personality’ idea can be clearly seen in some of the research that gets public money.

    “In Aug., 2003, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced the results of their $1.2 million tax-payer funded study. It stated, essentially, that traditionalists are mentally disturbed. Scholars from the Universities of Maryland, California at Berkeley, and Stanford had determined that social conservatives…suffer from ‘mental rigidity,’ ‘dogmatism,’ and ‘uncertainty avoidance,’ together with associated indicators for mental illness.” http://www.edwatch.org/ ‘Social and Emotional Learning” Jan. 26, 2005)
    The Orwellian cast of the pathologies named shows how far Gramsci’s long march has led us.

    A corresponding and diabolically crafted idea is political correctness. The strong suggestion here is that in order for one not to be thought of as racist or fascist, then one must not only be nonjudgmental but must also embrace the ‘new’ moral absolutes: diversity, choice, sensitivity, sexual orientation, and tolerance. Political correctness is a Machiavellian psychological ‘command and control’ device. Its purpose is the imposition of uniformity in thought, speech, and behavior.

    Critical theory is yet another psychological ‘command and control’ device. As stated by Daniel J. Flynn,

    “Critical Theory, as its name implies, criticizes. What deconstruction does to literature, Critical Theory does to societies.” (Intellectual Morons, p 15-16)
    Critical Theory is an ongoing and brutal assault via vicious criticism relentlessly leveled against Christians, Christmas, the Boy Scouts, Ten Commandments, our military, and all other aspects of traditional American culture and society.

    Both political correctness and Critical Theory are in essence, psychological bullying. They are the psycho-political battering rams by which Frankfurt School disciples such as the ACLU are forcing Americans to submit to and to obey the will and the way of the Left. These devious devices are but psychological versions of Georg Lukacs and Laventi Beria’s ‘cultural terrorism’ tactics. In the words of Beria,
    “Obedience is the result of force…Force is the antithesis of humanizing actions. It is so synonymous in the human mind with savageness, lawlessness, brutality, and barbarism, that it is only necessary to display an inhuman attitude toward people to be granted by those people the possessions of force.” (The Russian Manual on Psychopolitics: Obedience, by Laventi Beria, head of Soviet Secret Police and Stalin’s right-hand man)
    Double-thinking ‘fence-sitters’, otherwise known as moderates, centrists, and RINOs bear the imprint of these psychological ‘obedience’ techniques. These people-in some cases literally afraid of incurring the wrath of name-calling obedience trainers— have opted to straddle the fence lest they be found guilty of possessing an opinion, one way or another. At the merest hint of displeasure from the obedience-trainers, up goes the yellow flag of surrender upon which it is boldly written:

    “I believe in nothing and am tolerant of everything!”
    Cultural Determinism

    The linchpin of Cultural Marxism is cultural determinism, the parent of identity politics and group solidarity. In its turn, cultural determinism was birthed by the Darwinian idea that man is but a soulless animal and therefore his identity is determined by for example, his skin color or his sexual and/or erotic preferences. This proposition rejects the concepts of the human spirit, individuality, free will, and morally informed conscience (paired with personal accountability and responsibility) because it emphatically denies the existence of the God of the Bible.

    Consequently, and by extension, it also rejects the first principles of our liberty enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. These are our “unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Cultural Marxism must reject these because these principles of liberty “are endowed by our Creator,” who made man in His image.

    Cultural determinism, states David Horowitz, is

    “identity politics-the politics of radical feminism, queer revolution, and Afro-centrism-which is the basis of academic multiculturalism…a form of intellectual fascism and, insofar as it has any politics, of political fascism as well.” (Mussolini and Neo-Fascist Tribalism: Up from Multiculturalism, by David Horowitz, Jan. 1998)
    It is said that courage is the first of the virtues because without it fear will paralyze man, thus keeping him from acting upon his moral convictions and speaking truth. Thus bringing about a general state of paralyzing fear, apathy, and submission-the chains of tyranny-is the purpose behind psychopolitical cultural terrorism, for the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda must, at all costs, be clothed in darkness.

    The antidote is courage and the light of truth. If we are to win this cultural war and reclaim and rebuild America so our children and their children’s children can live in a ‘Shining City on the Hill’ where liberty, families, opportunity, free markets, and decency flourish, we must muster the courage to fearlessly expose the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda to the Light of Truth. Truth and the courage to speak it will set us free.

    Additional References

    Slouching Toward Gomorrah, by Robert H. Bork

    Intellectual Morons, by Daniel J. Flynn

    Related Articles

    Trotsky’s ‘Permanent Revolution’ in America

    Exposing America’s Enemies, Part 2: Communist Progressive Democrats

    Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left

    Like


  58. Exposing America’s Enemies: The
    “Social Justice Seeking” Communist
    Left
    By Linda Kimball
    On one hand, Americans were outraged
    and appalled by the May 1 immigrant
    demonstrations that clogged streets and virtually
    closed down some cities. Law abiding citizens saw
    lawbreakers who not only seemed to feel justified
    in their criminal behavior, but also believed they
    ought to be rewarded for it.
    On the other hand, Americans are more
    infuriated and disgusted with their duly-elected
    governmental officials in both the legislative and
    administrative branches for not enforcing the law
    and protecting the rights of citizens. President
    Bush and the weak-kneed GOP have deservedly
    10
    come under fire. However, if our sovereign nation
    is to survive, it is of paramount importance that the
    harsh light of truth be focused upon the subversive
    element responsible for creating an atmosphere
    conducive to lawlessness and tyrannical militants
    brazenly declaring their intentions to “conquer”
    the Southwest and to throw Americans out of their
    homes and off of their land.
    The subversive element – a motley
    collection of Marxists, Stalinists, Trotskyists,
    Maoists, anarchists and malcontents – organized
    themselves in the 1960s and became known as the
    New Left. For over forty years the New Left has
    been waging a Gramscian “quiet” revolution for
    the overthrow of the America of our Founders.
    Today these subversives call themselves liberals,
    progressives and Democrats. Even though there
    yet remain good, decent Democrats such as Zell
    Miller, the majority as David Horowitz attested to,
    are social justice-seeking communists.
    “The Democratic Party is very close to being
    the (Communist-controlled Progressive) party
    of Henry Wallace…The vast bulk of the
    American left is a Communist left and they’ve
    introduced some fascist ideas like “identity
    politics,” which is straight out of Mussolini.”
    (How Marxism Dominates the Left, Phil
    Brennan, NewsMax.com, June 1, 2005)
    America’s Communist Left operates in a
    vast interconnected matrix of revolutionary groups
    disguised as respectable civil rights and legal
    organizations. These front groups have
    consistently worked towards the transformation of
    America through subversion of America’s rule of
    law, Constitution, judiciary, and all institutions
    necessary to the longevity and health of our nation
    and civilization. These groups attack all national
    security measures, subvert immigration laws and
    procedures, lobby on behalf of terrorist and enemy
    combatants, and engage in propagandistic
    apologetics for the most brutal dictatorships in the
    world even as they constantly vilify and demean
    America and Americans. As they do these things
    to destroy America and shame Americans, they
    hypocritically portray themselves as defenders of
    democracy and humanity.
    The purpose of this article is to expoThe purpose of this article is to expose, at
    least in part, some of the principal communist
    groups responsible for undermining and
    weakening America and who likewise serve as a
    power source, not only for the militant Marxist
    organizers of the recent demonstrations, but for
    Islamic jihadists as well.
    http://www.conservativesunderground.us/cu313.pdf

    Like


  59. 2 lovemaking sessions to every one dirty sex session? What? I’d say my ratio is 5 dirty sex sessions to every one lovemaking. And even that one “love” session gets dirty before its over. My girl is highly orgasmic though, so maybe she likes sex more than the average hottie, I don’t know. But I would even go so far as to say that it was the dirty things I said to her while we had sex that got her hooked.

    Like


  60. Exposing America’s Enemies, Part 2:
    Communist Progressive Democrats
    By Linda Kimball
    “For over forty years the New Left has been
    waging a Gramscian ‘quiet’ revolution for the
    overthrow of America’s Constitution, Rule of
    Law, sovereignty, and our way of life. Today
    the subversives call themselves liberals,
    progressives, and Democrats (and) as David
    Horowitz attested to (the majority are) social
    justice seeking communists. ‘The Democratic
    Party is very close to being the (Communistcontrolled
    Progressive) party of Henry
    Wallace…the vast bulk of the American Left is
    a communist left.” (“Exposing America’s
    Enemies, Part 1”)
    The Backbone Campaign is a communist
    front group in the Left’s vast interconnected matrix
    of revolutionary groups. On its website it declares
    its goal is to “empower citizens to nominate,
    comment on, and rate progressive leaders to serve
    as a virtual Progressive Parallel Administration…
    we are not content running campaigns, but
    preparing to run the country.”
    (http://www.backbonecampaign.org/cabinet/ )
    Chief among Backbone Campaignsponsoring
    organizations is the Progressive
    Democrats of America, who are committed to:
    “dismantling the military industrial complex.”
    (Ibid.)
    “The Progressive Caucus is made up of the
    most Far-Left members of Congress and best
    represents the socialist wing of the Democratic
    Party.” (James H. Hansen, Radical Road
    Maps , p. 186)
    Progressive Democrats are responsible
    for installing Howard Dean as Democratic
    National Chairman. In February 2005, Dean was
    quoted by U.S. News and World Report as
    exclaiming: “I hate the Republicans and
    everything they stand for.” Dean’s power base,
    according to DiscoverTheNetwork.org, are a
    bunch of “campus communists.” The Progressive
    Caucus will be the focus of this article.
    Social Justice is Communism
    Judging from the adolescent name-calling
    and howls of protest which my previous article
    elicited from Progressive groups such as the
    Democratic Underground, it is obvious that the
    enraged howlers have no idea of what it really
    means for one to be a seeker of social justice
    Either that or they really do know but are
    deceivers of the first magnitude.
    Be that as it may, some clarification and
    definition of the terms – social justice and
    communism – is in order before proceeding on to
    the issue of Progressive Democrats.
    To most Americans, communism means
    the Kremlin, gulags, killing fields, and Mao’s
    brutal Red Guard. These things, though, were not
    the essence of communism. They were the visible
    manifestations of inhumane power and its
    consequences, all of which resulted when social
    justice seekers acquired total control to remake
    society and man.
    The essence of communism is social
    justice, or justice in the social sphere. This is code
    for the elimination of poverty, of suffering, and of
    all differences between humans that erect walls
    between people. Fundamentally, social justice is a
    process of elimination that results in sameness
    (egalitarianism). When social justice seekers speak
    of the need for equality, what they’re really calling
    for is sameness.
    However, the attributes which make
    people different from each other and which social
    justice seekers are determined to eliminate are the
    product of human nature and of freely-made
    choices. For instance, some people are ambitious
    and hard-working while others are indolent and
    lazy and may willfully choose to live out of the
    pockets of the former.
    Notorious conservatism at its finest, at
    http://www.n otoriouslyconservative.com !
    3
    It’s the positive aspects of human nature
    that make a society dynamic. Dynamism is the
    animating force behind America’s greatness – her
    productivity, excellence, creativity, free markets,
    etc. In eliminating human differences, social
    justice seekers kill all of this, and as they did in the
    former Soviet Union, leave behind a smoking ruin
    haunted by despairing cookie-cutter claymation
    beings.
    In speaking of the social justice process
    of elimination, Balint Vazsonyi remarked,
    “Prophets of social justice – communists, whether
    by that name or any other name – focus on who
    should have less. Because they have nothing to
    give, they can only take away. First, they take
    away opportunity. Next, they take away
    possessions. In the end, they have to take away
    life itself.” (Balint Vazsonyi, America’s 30 Years
    War, p. 59)
    The America of our Founders simply
    cannot coexist with the Search for Social Justice.
    For instance, as designed by our Founders, the rule
    of law exists to guarantee that unequal people can
    have individual liberty, rights and possessions –
    including land ownership, which social justice
    seekers view as the original sin. Social justice
    demands that those who possess more of anything
    have it taken away from those who earned it and
    redistributed to those who did nothing to earn it.
    “Social Justice Seeking” Democratic
    Progressive Caucus
    The Democratic Progressive Caucus
    (DPC) is an organization comprised of about sixty
    members of Congress. It was founded in 1991 by
    Rep. Bernie Sanders, former socialist mayor of
    Burlington, VT and member of the Democratic
    Socialists of America (DSA). The DSA describes
    itself as, “the principle U.S. affiliate of the
    Socialist International.”
    (www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)
    The DPC advances its communist agenda
    behind innocuous sounding phrases such as social
    and economic justice. The three core principles of
    The Progressive Promise are:
    • Fighting for economic justice and
    security for all. (Code for: Elimination of poverty
    and suffering by taking away all possessions and
    wealth redistributing them.)
    • Protecting and preserving our civil rights
    and civil liberties. (Code for: Elimination all
    differences by pounding everyone down to the
    lowest common denominator).
    • Promoting global peace and security.
    (Code for: We – your Superiors – will finally feel
    secure and at peace once agendas 1 and 2 have
    been carried out to completion.) (Source:
    http://www.bernie.house.gov/document display_te
    xt.asp?FileToConvert=/pc/index.asp)
    In “Pelosi Leader of Progressive Caucus,”
    it was revealed,
    “Until 1999, the website of the Progressive
    Caucus was hosted by the Democratic
    Socialists of America (DSA). Following an
    expose of the link between the two
    organizations in World Net Daily, the
    Progressive Caucus established its own
    website.” (WorldNetDaily.com, Nov. 11, 2002)
    On the website of the DSA is the
    following brazen declaration: “We are socialists…
    Democracy and socialism go hand in hand…
    wherever…democracy has taken root, the vision of
    socialism has taken root as well.”
    (www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)
    The DSA increases its influence and
    power by networking with the Democratic Party to
    advance social justice programs and policies such
    as affirmative action and Stalinist hate crime laws.
    “Like our friends and allies in the feminist, labor,
    civil rights, religious, and community movements,
    many of us have been active in the Democratic
    Party.” (Ibid.)
    Following are brief descriptions of some
    of the social justice seeking subversives in the
    Democratic Progressive Caucus whose words and
    actions embrace the tenets of communism:
    1. Barbara Lee (D-CA): “…former agent of
    the Black Panther leader and convicted killer,
    Huey Newton. Lee conspired with fellow
    communist, Cong. Ron Dellums, who used his
    authority to impede US foreign policy with regard
    to the Communist dictatorship of Grenada.”
    (www.DiscoverTheNetWork.org) “…anti-
    American Communist who supports America’s
    enemies and has actively collaborated with them.”
    (James H. Hansen, Radical Road Maps, p.189)
    4
    2. Jim McDermott (D-WA): “In 2002,
    McDermott and fellow Progressive Caucus
    member Rep. David Bonoir (D-Mich) and Rep.
    Mike Thompson (D-CA) traveled to Baghdad,
    where they publicly embraced Saddam Hussein
    and created propaganda on his behalf.”
    (www.DiscoverTheNetWork.org)
    3. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), who has
    accepted an award from the DSA once told one of
    its writers: “The American people are not
    ideological; therefore, the way to go is to attack
    private power.” (Ibid.)
    4. John Conyers (D-MI): “In 1981 Conyers
    co-hosted a delegation from the Soviet front World
    Peace Council, giving that group a forum in
    Congress. Conyers endorsed a Communist-led
    antiwar demonstration in Washington in 1983
    and…spoke at another Washington demonstration
    led by ANSWER in 2003.” (James H. Hansen,
    Radical Road Maps, p. 189)
    5. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) “…has taken
    part in…CAIR (a radical group with ties to
    Mideast terrorist organizations) events…including
    a Ramadan iftar…hosted (on Capitol Hill) by Rep.
    John Conyers (D-MI), Loretta Sanchez (D-CA),
    and Barbara Lee (D-CA).” (“Kucinich Headlines
    Muslim Fundraiser,” WorldNetDaily.com, Nov.
    30, 2003)
    The Constitution requires that members
    of Congress “shall be bound by Oath or
    Affirmation to support this constitution.” The Oath
    of Office sworn to by US Senators reads:
    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
    support and defend the Constitution of the
    U.S…that I will bear true faith and allegiance
    to the same; that I take this obligation freely,
    without any mental reservation or purpose of
    evasion; that I will well and faithfully discharge
    the duties of the office on which I am about to
    enter. So help me God.”
    Very simply, if Democratic Progressive
    Caucus members truthfully believed in the
    Christian-Judeo God and likewise in our
    Constitution – the document conceived of by our
    Founders and not the Left’s living document
    nonsense – they wouldn’t be social justice seeking
    communists. Rather, they would be Conservative
    Constitutionalists. That they are social justice
    seekers tells us that when they took their oath
    before God, they lied. Quite simply – they lied.
    In Noah Webster’s 1828 edition of the
    American Dictionary of the English Language we
    find the correct term to apply to treacherous
    Democratic Progressives. That word is “traitor,”
    and the following definition is the one most likely
    referred to by our Founders.
    “Traitor: One who violates allegiance and
    betrays his country; one guilty of treason…
    who, in breach of trust, delivers his country to
    its enemy…who aids an enemy in conquering
    his country.”
    Through use of Stalinist psycho-politics,
    America’s Communist Left imprisoned the
    consciences of Americans within psychic straitjackets
    of political correctness. As long as we
    allow ourselves to be chained by political
    correctness, we will not be able to identify and
    speak openly about our enemies – those without,
    and those within. In the absence of freedom of
    conscience and of clear and honest speaking, we
    can neither formulate strategies for our safety nor
    deal appropriately with the treacherous deceivers
    operating amongst us who collude with our
    enemies while plottingto destroy our nation from
    within. The first order of business then, is for all
    Americans to break out of the psychic strait jackets
    of political correctness, thus allowing Truth to
    expose the treachery and treason at work in our
    nation.

    http://www.conservativesunderground.us/cu314.pdf

    Like


    • All of this is clear for anyone with eyes to see. But the issues won’t be settled with words or intellectual discourse.
      Anacyclosis theory would suggest that a tyrant will come out of this shitty mess and put things back in order. A bloody war will likely be necessary. Someone like H fits the bill, but he chooses to stay in the poolside.

      The odds of having a successful dictator in a post-modernist-mass-media-covered-internet-addicted society like America are very low. The other probability is the death of white-dominated America within a century. The odds are like 99 to 1.

      H’s choice to not engage in a traditional political battle is perfectly understandable. But I’m afraid that this blog and other right-wing anti-cultural marxist supports won’t be enough to win the war. All the cutting-edge knowledge of the manosphere will likely benefit those who inherit this land. I suspect they won’t be white americans.

      Like


      • The Chinese are not shying away from the truth:

        From the Economist(http://www.economist.com/node/16349434?story_id=16349434):

        “But the organisation is involved in even more controversial projects. It is about to embark on a search for the genetic underpinning of intelligence. Two thousand Chinese schoolchildren will have 2,000 of their protein-coding genes sampled, and the results correlated with their test scores at school. Though it will cover less than a tenth of the total number of protein-coding genes, it will be the largest-scale examination to date of the idea that differences between individuals’ intelligence scores are partly due to differences in their DNA.

        Dr Yang is also candid about the possibility of the 1,000-genome project revealing systematic geographical differences in human genetics—or, to put it politically incorrectly, racial differences. The differences that have come to light so far are not in sensitive areas such as intelligence. But if his study of schoolchildren does find genes that help control intelligence, a comparison with the results of the 1,000-genome project will be only a mouse-click away.”

        China seems to be the future, shame that they wont give citinzenship to people without Chinese blood.

        Like


      • “China seems to be the future, shame that they wont give citinzenship to people without Chinese blood.”

        Well, that’s the point. If they start giving citizenship like europe and north america, they won’t have a future.

        Easy citizenship, along with mass immigration and feminism are th recipe for ethnic self-genocide.

        Actually, most of the time, feminism leads to mass immigration because women’s empowerment, cock-carouseling, late marriage and low natality lead to a population shortage that leftists take as an excuse to let invaders come in.

        China will likely follow the japanese example, where the link between women’s liberation and mass immigration is cut off. Probably because they don’t have many jews.

        Like


    • My finger’s tired from scrolling past your shit.

      Like


  61. Let’s have a show of hands. How many here actually read all of Tyrone’s posts word for word? Thought so. Succinctness, man!

    As for this article:

    I recommend you check out a shrink for men.com for some excellent articles outlining bpd (borderline personality disorders) and other crazy shit women can get up to.

    Like


  62. A hot girl stealing a bike is repeatedly asked if she “needs a hand”:

    Fucked up.

    Like


  63. […] Impolite Graph Of The Month; The Alpha Male Look; Hot Girl Crazy; Women Gossip To Compete For Men; Comment Of The Week: Precision Analogies […]

    Like


  64. […] Heartiste – Hot Girl Crazy, Impolite Graph Of The Month, The Alpha Male Look, How To Respond To Girls Who Call Out Game, […]

    Like


  65. Minor problem………………

    IF SHE’S CRAZY AND YOU BLOW HER OFF SHE’LL JUST FUCK SOME OTHER DUDE.

    It is called check-mate. A 10 gone crazy has you by the balls because she will fuck your best friend or her X if you play dread on her. She’ll call your bluff and then some. This is called “DATING A 19 YEAR OLD MODEL DEATH SPIRAL” because short of marrying and knocking her up your options are pretty limited because the dread card can’t be played. You’re beta as hell because you are fucking dating her forever. She’ call your alpha shit because you’ve been playing the routine for years. if you pull the hit on chick in front of her she’ll just pick up five guys. You’re fucked. Only defense game works. Get her to the woods where there are no alphas for 100 miles or knock her up.

    Like


  66. […] The Types Of PUA Openers You Can Use To Acquire A Discussion GoingHot Girl Crazy […]

    Like