The Female Snarl And The Male Smirk

The female snarl has become a topic of conversation, which is not surprising because American women in general are becoming less feminine and more churlish. When in the past women would gently demur the solicitations of beta and omega males, today they prefer the unrefined art of snarling like a hyena over a fresh kill, the kill being their overworked vaginas. Meanwhile, alpha males witness them snarling ungenerously and think, “Marriage material? Nope. Pump and dump material? Yes!”

don't bother me. i'm pooping a purple saguaro.

don’t bother me. i’m pooping a purple saguaro.

The author of the linked article posits that the frequency with which women snarl correlates to their age and the sexual market threat level of the targets of their disapproval.

A woman arguably snarls between five to twenty times a day. The frequency is directly related to maturity. The more immature, the more the snarl appears. High school, consistently snarling. College, frequently. Twenties, sporadically. Thirties, only when they see a younger woman. There have probably been a couple snarls while reading this.

Ha haa. I’d add that the snarl is increasing among all female age groups, though younger women do use it more profligately, and with good reason: there are more beta males lasciviously eyeing their goods for penile plunder. What’s a hot babe to do? She has to fend them off by the hundreds, and a fat cockblock won’t be there for her every time. So the snarl is unfurled like a banner of bitchiness.

Why do women overuse the snarl to such potent effect? Simple: they don’t get called out on it by their designated targets. Most beta males wilt like flowers in the high noon summer heat when they get blasted with the snarl shockwave. “Oh, sweet fancy moses, excuse me for so presumptuously intruding upon your oxygen supply. I shall slink away now and hope my penis has reemerged from under my pubic bone when I return hope to fap the night away.”

The thing is, the female snarl is exceedingly easy to call out without resorting to butthurt confrontation.

“Nice face.”

“Are you pooping?”

“Sniffing for grubs?”

“You look like my hamster! Wait, don’t stop doing that. It’s great!”

“Finally got a whiff of my sex panther cologne, eh?”

Or, you could answer the female snarl with the male equivalent:

i'm sorry, are you supposed to mean something to me?

i’m sorry, are you supposed to mean something to me?

Ah, the alpha male smirk. As penetrative of women’s self-entitled bitch shields as their snarl is of beta males’ self-confidence. The perfectly timed smirk is the best comeback plus more. It instantly patronizes, condescends and belittles, without so much as revealing an iota of spite or care that might be used by a woman to anchor another bitchy barrage.

A fantastically egregious bitch — let’s say, a chubster wearing too much makeup and muffin top who thinks every man wants her and deserves her worst shit tests — requires a bit more… encouragement… to reform her ill-suited attitude. In such circumstances, the smirk won’t pack the necessary wallop. You’ll need something edgier.

i see you're wearing flip-flops





Comments


  1. FIRST

    Like


  2. The young ones do snarl and it’s sickening to behold. The ladies do mellow with age and that infantile snarl mostly disappears when they become moms.

    Like


    • Yea, I don’t know how that first snarl picture was taken, but their expressions suggest that whoever took it had just jizzed in one of the girls’ brightly-colored sugary drinks. In other words… way over-the-top disgusted.

      Like


      • But who wouldn’t be disgusted at the demasculinization of American culture?

        Young Female = Higher Sexual Value

        Young Female + Increasing Number of Devalued Men = More Snarls

        Like


      • Maybe not, these girls are Clearly around the age range of 12-15 tops. If you were a kid and someone who fits the description of a predator found you sexually desirable. Wouldn’t you want them to go away. It’s a defense mechanism. I would much rather my daughter do that instead of making a predator feel wanted in the surroundings. DONT BE CREEPS GUYS…

        Like


    • It’s harder to snarl after botox.

      Like


  3. on December 4, 2012 at 2:05 pm seedofjapheth

    Why should I try to claim jurisdiction over a womans face? Let her make whatever facial gestures come naturally to her.

    [Heartiste: Women love men who claim their jurisdictions.]

    Like


    • Someone’s never given a facial.

      Like


    • women don’t want to be able to do whatever they want without reprecussions because it implies they’re responsible. they live in doubeworld with doublespeak and doublethink.

      Like


    • You claim jurisdiction over anything a woman does that is disrespectful to you.

      Her facial gestures, her comments, her mood.

      Like


      • on December 13, 2012 at 9:49 am Nobody of Import

        Oh, no, Heartiste isn’t claiming jurisdiction over that, taterearl… He’s calling out piss-poor conduct on their part. And the response he proposes in most cases is more withering and devastating to most of them than anything else you could do- and he spells out why.

        Like


  4. This is an epidemic among the D.C. youngins. Sense of entitlement accompanies the muffin top. Maybe they’re grimacing because their Spanx are too constrictive.

    Like


  5. This is exceedingly prevalent in the environs of a college/and/or/university campus.

    Like


  6. Who is the man (thing?) in the last photo? It’s going to give me nightmares.

    Like


  7. I like real-life photos from animal environs. Keep ’em coming.

    Like


  8. babies can only communicate trough crying or making faces.

    we tolerate grimaces from children ( especially spoiled brats )

    thus an adult using a snarl to communicate seems to be a sign of arrested development

    Like


    • on December 13, 2012 at 9:51 am Nobody of Import

      That’s why someone clued in will only view them as pump-n-dump candiates. Arrested Development is another word for Borderline or Narcissitic Personality disorder in most cases- and those are really, really bad mojo. I tend to refer to them as The Insane- for they are, really.

      Like


  9. on December 4, 2012 at 2:21 pm Lucky White Male

    I like the captions. A nice addition

    You and Krauser are on the cutting edge right now. I agree with you that when the “enemy” becomes egregious, WE need to become just as egregious.

    There is no respect without fear, at the very least some uncertainty about what else a guy has up his sleeve when he responds in kind to the snarl

    You are demonstrating, as the Pack Leader, that you are utterly unintimidated.

    This is where the tingles begin

    Like


    • Please explain this to the Republicans who are currently wilting and searching for their inverted manhoods before the Democrats have even snarled.

      Like


      • on December 13, 2012 at 9:53 am Nobody of Import

        The Republican “leadership” has been nothing more than shadowy reflections of the Democrats for a while now. (Hence the term “RINO”…)

        Boner…er…Boehner is a prime example of the spinelessness I refer to.

        Like


  10. “Who is the man (thing?) in the last photo? It’s going to give me nightmares.”

    “Jaws” from the Roger Moore era james Bond movies.

    Like


  11. on December 4, 2012 at 2:22 pm Good Luck Chuck

    A buddy of mine who is completely unaware of the manosphere made the same observation.

    He is from Orlando but now lives in a small town in the midwest. He was commenting on how women in rural Wisconsin don’t have the “snarl” like chicks in urban areas do.

    He was right. Problem is, all of the bangable women leave the second they turn 18.

    Like


  12. Interesting you should mention hyenas. Their societies are matriarchies, the alpha dog is literally a bitch with an extended penis like clit. I guess the atheists are right, we’re witnessing evolution as american females morph before our eyes to the changing environment.

    Like


  13. Again, this is in a sense rational – up to a point.

    An attractive women, especially if she also by e.g. her clothing signals availability, is shooting for men who have higher SMV than they do. This is likely to be successful for a short-time association, but unsuccessful for long term commitment – this has been discussed at length on this blog.

    In any case, this display (deliberate or not) will attract lots of men who have too low an SMV. (Women often overestimate their own which puts the bar higher than it would have to be.)

    So, in any case, a pretty young women WILL attract lots of unwanted attention. So she needs to dispose of these attempts expeditiously if there are many of them – and there often are.

    However, a snarl is overkill – possibly to impress her female friends – .
    A simple, “sorry, I am not interested” or similar would do the job
    nicely, without hurting the fellow’s feelings more than necessary.

    Thor

    Like


    • on December 13, 2012 at 10:00 am Nobody of Import

      A snarl used to be reserved for the guys that just bloody wouldn’t take a hint or were an omega trying to reach for a 6+ SMV woman…

      Nowadays they fling that damn crap about like it was the way to go.

      Heartiste basically spelled it out for what it was and how to actually deal with the bullshit (for that’s what it is these days…). It doesn’t impress. It is a deep turn off for someone to see you do it from a distance without real cause- which they do all the time.

      As someone observed, it’s a sign of “Arrested Development”- which is a simpler more lay term for a Personality Disordered individual. Bad things come from relationships more than an ONS with a PD’ed individual. Seriously.

      Like


  14. “Nice face.”

    I’ll be using that one from now on. So simple it hurts.

    Like


  15. on December 4, 2012 at 2:31 pm Jonathon Factory

    The snarl really is one of the most unattractive things a woman can do under any circumstance. Merely observing a woman making that face at someone or something completely eliminates her from my interests.

    Like


    • Have to disagree there. Once saw a teenage white girl on a youtube video saying, “What it do, yo?” with gang hand gestures and all.

      Like


      • white girls acting like black gangstas are quite repulsive to me too

        Like


      • Having grown up with 60% black friends (mostly lower income level us all), I can understand the speech influence that occurs, but even gangsters don’t say stupid shit like that for the most part.

        Like


      • “What it do, yo?”

        I just made a discovery.

        Ebonics is just a form of twitter before there was twitter?

        “my bad”

        “Miss me nigga!”

        “eeda dick!”

        “Call da po po”

        And don’t try to blame that talkin with your hands on niggers.

        Italians and Jews been doing it just as long if not longer.

        Always gotta try and blame a nigga up in this muffugah.

        Like


    • That’s kinda the point.

      Like


  16. After the feminist generation we have

    The snarl generation…

    Like


  17. Interesting article on saying women prefer thin males: http://www.livescience.com/25079-females-prefer-thin-over-macho.html

    Like


    • Please, who cares what they say. Take ’em anyway.

      Rape!

      Like


    • The gaying of america continues, media pushing gayboy appeals to women. I think there is a dead zone from thin (lead singer of Incubus) to thin with muscles (marky mark) to real big (Roger/mini roger from Jersey Shore or VK). Might just be a city thing because medium big gets obscured by clothes (need to be at the beach).

      Like


    • This is what happens when they push guys like Joseph Gordon Levitt as sex symbols.

      Like


      • And Anne Hathaway. loozlzlzoozoozlllll

        Actually, she’s just a Julia Roberts clone sans face-full-o-chicklets.

        Like


      • Yeah, she’s just a girl-next-door type at best.

        With a penchant for picking very Machiavellian men in her life.

        In Chirs Nolan’s defense, she is a better-than-usual Hollywood actress, and not so distractingly beautiful that you’d miss the forest for her trees. So picking her for Catwoman makes ok, sense-wise: she can deliver the artistry of her role well without distracting you with her looks.

        In contrast, bombshells generally disappear past 30 in Hollywood.

        Usually, for females in Hollywood, better to be cute-but-attainable-for-average-joes than bombshell. The former allows for a longer career and more sympathy for female movie-goers/left-wing critics. the latter engenders massive hatred.

        Like


      • Perhaps… but is she sexy?

        She and others of that look do absolutely nothing for me… and as far as “acting” goes, well… pffft.

        Like


      • It’s J-Law’s world. We’re all just living in it.

        I wouldn’t even say she has the most conventionally pretty face. And as far as “acting” goes, well… it counts.

        Other than that, today’s starlets don’t know what sexy is. For the scoop on the death of Hollywood glamor, consult Camille Paglia.

        Matt

        Like


    • That article is total bullshit. They have fat people, average weight and skinny people. They don’t define what “macho” is, it looks like they correlate “macho” with being fat. Then they say fat people are unatractive (groudbreaking discovery).

      This means chicks like skinny, as in “non fat men”. If a land of whales a non overweight person is considered thin, although that person just has a healthy weight.

      Retards!

      Like


  18. I see Heartiste has been watching some James Bond-marathons that have been on since “SkyFall” came out.

    The 70’s were a weird decade for Bond. Must’ve been all that faggy disco and nigger power movements and domestic terrorist groups and weak-ass white masculinity.

    You know. The environment that produced Mein Obama.

    Like


  19. I can’t remember the last time I was snarled at because I haven’t been in a feminist bastion like DC for more than a decade but, I’d say that the “non-butthurt” response suggestions would either not be effective or would come out as more butthurt than confronting them along the lines of what their problem is.

    Maybe the DC girls feel they can do it precisely because they know that even local “alphas” won’t directly call them on it.

    Like


    • DC girls are special. They’re already pre-fucked because they came here to pursue femmy power career ambitions or are socialists in training.

      Like


    • on December 4, 2012 at 3:36 pm Lucky White Male

      A lot of these girls in DC are Japs, which means they’ve never encountered a high IQ Alpha white male with a backbone –

      A guy who can simultaneously shut them
      down, attract them, and get them jealous with preselected pack leader cock all at the same time. You wouldn’t be seeing this behavior from girls otherwise

      The longer girls go without being “broken” the more bratty they get

      Like


    • on December 4, 2012 at 4:29 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      That snarl is primarily reserved for rival females. It translates as, “Who do you think you are, bitch?” It can be triggered by something so minor as having a nicer handbag than the snarler.

      I love that snarl. Every time I get one, it makes my whole fucking day.

      I’m just kind of surprised that it ever gets used on males. And shocked that a man on the receiving end would be interested in continuing to engage with a girl who looked at him like that. Why would you want to pick up a girl who was giving you a look like a cat’s ass?

      Like


      • There is also the fake snarl

        like when a woman pretends she is disgusted by something sexual – to keep appearances of “purity” – but is in fact into that sort of thing

        the gender that is famous for faking orgasms certainly fakes the snarl!

        Like


      • Exactly. And instead of a snarl, I respond with a wide-eyed, bemused look coupled with the smirk. Another reason I have no nasolabial folds.

        These girls are also not far-sighted enough, which is a result of the instant gratification mindset, to realize the guy at whom she’s making that ugly face is not the only person seeing her. The alpha, quietly scanning the room, sees it along with her target.

        Like


      • on December 4, 2012 at 8:26 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I do a right-eyebrow lift, coupled with an asymmetrical lip quirk. It actually looks quite a bit like the Willis smirk above, only with more mascara. And it’s not as ugly or disparaging.

        Like


      • on December 13, 2012 at 10:07 am Nobody of Import

        And, it raises your SMV up at least a fraction of a notch. It clearly impresses when you do that. You’re reaching for a pony bomb whereas those young ladies in the pic reached for a 40+ megaton H-bomb.

        Never use more disdain, etc. than you actually really need to convey the concept- regardless of whether you’re male or female. Using too much means you’re either clueless, nuts, or the like. Definitely a downgrade on SMV overall. I won’t do crazy for more than an ONS- and I’ll only really do it if I’m really randy. There’s more than enough more that’re not fucked in the head and after wasting 15 years of my life with some of The Insane, I won’t willingly choose it long-term and it’s not my first choice short term.

        Like


      • I’m just kind of surprised that it ever gets used on males.

        Me too, actually. I haven’t ever had that look thrown at me.

        Like


      • That’s probably cause you have game. I’m just starting out, and I’ve gotten it a few times.

        I suspect that I get this because I still have too much beta-bitch to unlearn. It seems masculinity is a cure for the snarl.

        Like


      • Word. I’m starting out too and I’ve gotten it TONS of times. I literally can’t walk down the street (I live in a University town) without getting a couple of them sent my way.

        Sometimes when the snarl is particularly egregious I’m tempted to make some lewd joke hinging on the premise that the snarl-er is being uncomfortably anally penetrated.

        Like


      • I have gotten many snarls before, funny enough its only in my home country. The thing that pisses me off the most is getting a little retarded snarl when doing warm up approaches.
        You start talking to some average chick you don’t want to fuck anyways, and she then she acts all smart and snarly. It disgusts me that a 18-22 year old seven that never did anything noteworthy in her life thinks she is above me.

        Like


  20. About Belcher, what do you think was really going on there?

    He stayed out all night but didn’t get any from the other woman he was with.

    His girlfriend also went out and stayed out most of the night without him.

    He was angry that she wasn’t home like a good mother of his child while he was out with another woman not getting any.

    So he killed her.

    Sounds beta to the core, not to mention something to do with roids.

    Like


    • Most niggers ARE beta. They do a lot of jive-talking, chest-thumping, and braggadico, but it’s all just veneer to cover up their inner pussy. It’s why they were dominated by Southern whites for so long—a white man with confidence and the willingness to fight them absolutely wrecked them. It wasn’t till they got into the ghettos of the North that the “black-man-as-alpha” idea took hold, as insecure beta bitch lefty boys were too entranced by the shuckin’ and jivin’ to see it was all a show.

      I knew a mudshark back in college, back in my beta days. She actually got really upset telling me about them, because such “gangstas” were pure pussies in the bedroom and betas behind closed doors.

      Like


      • on December 4, 2012 at 3:40 pm Lucky White Male

        These guys are not Alphas.

        Keep in mind the average IQ is 85. They cannot handle life generally speaking at that level

        There are also differences in thinking ahead and self control unfortunately

        Like


      • Actually, it peaked at about 83.7, and Murray fears that it had plunged to 80.2 by 1997:

        The Inequality Taboo, Footnote #44

        The really scary thing is that the Standard Deviation could be very very low, maybe as low as 12 [versus 15 for whites].

        If that’s true, then Blacks who can actually cut the mustard [IQ >= 120] are essentially nonexistent.

        Like


      • Thanks whorefinder, for your words of wisdom rooted in research and historical fact! I totally see your point now!

        Like


      • +1 (for the sarcasm)

        Like


      • Not everything requires research. That’s the problem of the left. They often think they need to waste money and time conducting research on issues that are obvious and could easily be observed. While I think we should conduct research on most things, just bear in mind that in the end most studies DO CONFIRM the obvious. So don’t overlook the obvious just because it hasn’t been confirmed yet by one of your superfluous studies.

        Whorefinder just stating the obvious and the observed in the Black community, but people like you would like us to keep our eyes wide shut for the sake of political correctness. No go.

        Like


      • A little bit of constructive criticism can go a long way for the black community. The problem is they don’t want to hear any advice.

        Like


      • “Most niggers are beta” – Aren’t most men beta? I’m not understanding the significance of the distinction.

        Like


      • Aren’t most men beta? I’m not understanding the significance of the distinction.

        People commonly think that blacks are more alpha. They’re more masculine, with higher T levels, but they are not inherently any more likely to be alpha than white guys.

        Like


      • Anonymous
        “Most niggers are beta” – Aren’t most men beta? I’m not understanding the significance of the distinction.
        ——————

        Its not meant to be understood. Its just racism; that train is never late. At some point, a nigger must be hung from a tree; its just the way they are

        Like


      • At some point, a nigger must be hung from a tree; its just the way they are

        You’re sounding like Chris Rock there… I guess it’s true

        Like


      • “Most niggers are beta” – aren’t most men beta? I’m not understanding the distinction, yet in this case being of “right” sensibilities seems to preclude the provision of evidence

        Like


      • “yet in this case being of “right” sensibilities seems to preclude the provision of evidence”

        Indeed!
        _________________
        “because such “gangstas” were pure pussies in the bedroom and betas behind closed doors.”

        They were raised by single mothers, so what do we expect? And those women aren’t the most feminine types and do have ball-busting capabilities with the way they hit and scream at their children. Did you ever see a black single mother taking her kids to the mall or a fast food restaurant? It’s the most classless exchange. So what example do you think these black boys had of being Alphas? None.

        Like


      • Nitelily, I am beggining to notice your flaming Hipocrisy. Yesterday you were all over ithe Pope thread attempting (albeit a failed attempt) to call out Greg (Elliot) for his “blind racist attacks”, yet here you are now responding to Whorefinder. I don’t care either way what your personal opinions are, everyone is entitled to belief what they want and voice said belief but its hilarious actually reading your responses to whorefinder and then your responses to Greg Elliot. As aforementioned my agreement or disagreement with what is stated is not the point but you smell like a hipocrite trying to hide whatever personal virtual vendetta you have against Greg under the auspices of denoucing his views as if they are without merit. As least Greg stays consistent. Smh

        Like


      • I find your manful defense of my name quite touching, woman… and I thank you, as yet another voice of normalcy, for noticing the extreme dichotomy of response which, at first, seems illogical and/or hypocritical… but which makes perfect sense when you revisit some of my replies from the previous thread about why I seem to put the useful idiot knickers in the tightest twists, though my language is far tamer than some of my WN peers.

        Good karma to you.

        Like


      • You don’t understand what’s going on here, and frankly I don’t want to get into this argument again, but since you brought it up I have to respond.

        I am not anti-criticism, especially constructive criticism that serves to help, not spread hate. It’s OK to criticize – criticizing Jews for usually being liberal, Blacks for not speaking proper English, or Hispanics for coming here illegally and using up the system. Also, pointing out some obvious trends within a community is not bad either, it’s reality. i.e – Jews tend to vote democrat and Blacks tend to have more children out of wedlock or collect food stamps, etc… The problem is the Left made it racist to criticize any minority but Whites. Whites and Christians are a fair game, but not blacks, Muslims, Hispanics, or whatever. That’s why you can’t see the difference. It’s OK, I couldn’t either at first.

        Criticism is a whole different thing than spewing hate. Maybe you haven’t read all the exchanges I had with Greg, but most of it was hate, hate, hate against Jews. It started with him writing comments that glorified Hitler and that’s what irked me about him in the very beginning. Maybe you don’t agree, but in my book Hitler shouldn’t be glorified and Nazi Germany shouldn’t be upheld as a good example of a White government. I can provide you the links if you want to read some of that Nazi adulation of his.

        Next, on another occasion, I expressed some of my feelings about Islam and terror. Again, not spreading hate, just pointing the obvious and the observable about Islam and its ambitions vis-à-vis the West. In fact, Wolfie and I were exchanging a few words about it. Well… that got Anon upset with me and calling me war mongering – ‘cause I think terrorists should not be allowed to strike America again, get it? That prompted his friend Greg to jump on me too with stuff like we can’t trust you, you’re a neocon, and spewing all kinds of other garbage of the hate verity, especially towards Jews again. I responded of course, and that got us in another long war.

        Next, I got irked with him because he constantly uses nigger, yiddler, schlomo, shabbos goy and other derogatory epithets as a winning argument against people he thinks are Blacks, Jews, or Jewish sympathizers. There are threads where all you see is cat-and-mouse game between him and thwack. A few times I chimed in to show his hypocrisy. He accuses thwack of being Jealous of white folks and their successes. So I pointed out to him that he is doing the same thing when he trashes the Jews for supposedly controlling the world with their influence and their money, and I showed him why it’s not true, way over exaggerated, there is no conspiracy of the Jews to try to dominate the world, and he is speaking out mostly out of Jealousy about their success. So that started us on another argument.

        There are a few more arguments, but they are mostly around this hysteria of his about the ”Jewish conspiracy” to control the world, and his constant attempt to substitute Jews for liberals and leftists, much like the left tries to substitute racists for conservatives. I am not hiding the fact that I am a hard conservative, but I am not a white-supremacist. I don’t think white-Supremacist are that conservative either. Most of them are pagan and anti-Judeo-Christian values. Their whole issue is they hate everyone who is not white. That’s not conservative values, and I don’t think you get rid of the Left by using white-supremacist dogma, or by substituting Jews for liberals and preaching another holocaust. You should read some of the comments by “uh”, he is another Nazi white-supremacist who hasn’t posted in a while. All he talks about is his hate for the Jews and how evil they are. It’s unbelievable the level of hate he spews, which both Greg and Anon are real fans of. I once rebuked Greg for his incitement of “uh.” “Uh” was so wounded-up and unhinged that I thought he was going to go out and do something stupid, which he and all of us will regret, that’s how much hate he was exchanging with Greg. It was beyond disgusting, especially his list of whom he’ll shoot first when Greg’s famous fray begins. Truthfully, I can’t believe there are people here who think this kind of rhetoric is acceptable, and that includes Matt, whom I am very disappointed in because he can’t recognize the danger.

        I have a lot more examples, but I think you get the point. Oh, and let’s not forget that when I put him on the spot regarding his hate, he starts to quote me Biblical verses as a justification. That’s when I told him he is descanting the Bible. The Bible is not an instrument of hate; it’s an instrument of morality.

        So again, just to sum it up. Criticism is not bad, and necessary if you’re trying to show someone the error of their ways (i.e Bill Cosby telling Black men how they are hurting their families by not sticking around to raise the kids they father, for which he was called an uncle Tom, btw). However, spewing pure hate that can get people to take action like a madman did in Germany 70 years ago is very dangerous and a whole different ballgame. There is no comparison. I hope I answered your question.

        Like


      • on December 5, 2012 at 5:20 pm Hugh G. Rection

        “I don’t want to get into this argument” writes NiteLily, followed by 8 paragraphs of getting into this argument.

        Like


      • @ Hugh G. Rection

        It has to be spoon fed because many people don’t understand the difference between legitimate criticism of a group, and spewing sheer hate against them. It’s one of the legacies of the left.

        I have to bring examples of what I mean and that takes up space. But I truly don’t want to get into it again. If you read what I wrote, you’d understand my point.

        Like


      • Denial of reality. Sigh.

        You lefties really need the red pill shoved down your throat. Unless you want a boot on it instead.

        Like


      • You’re wrong, whorefinder. Blacks are alpha as fuck, and killing white folks is cool and hip. Hollyidwood told me so:

        2:05 in: “Kill white folks and get paid for it, what’s not to like?”

        Get ready for a taste of Rhodesia, white america.

        Like


      • Tarantino strikes again… man, oh, man… what sort of nuclear bomb of a traumatic experience must he have had with either daddy or mommy as a child to betray his gender and his alleged “own kind” so, in film after film… one shudders.

        Like


      • As the ticket sales have declined, he is doing anything and everything to appease his (Jewish and culturally-marxist) paymasters.

        Like


      • A fair point…

        In that like vein: we often see actors/actresses who are either trying to break into the business, or has-beens who haven’t had a big splash in awhile, accept roles of the most perverse kind.

        Like


      • I used to really like Tarantino but damn, he’s just becoming a flat out parody of himself this last decade. or so.

        Like


      • At least he ain’t Jewish.

        Are we going to start hating Italians now? Many of them are liberals. In NJ and NY they vote for Democrats ????

        Like


      • White peoples greatest fear is that they will be turned into niggers

        Tarantino taps into this fear, probably because he is alpha.

        He takes white people to the abyss.

        Like


      • White peoples greatest fear is that they will be turned into niggers.

        Judging by our youth of today, their greatest fear is that they won’t.

        Tarantino taps into this fear, probably because he is alpha.

        I’m still trying to figure out if he’s merely the usual headcase writer/director that the Hollywood moguls love to tout because of his culture-wrecking glee… or if he’s some devious genius white nationalist looking to kick-start us in the ass by making the natives restless.

        I’m guessing the former, but hey… if a carpenter can get resurrected, anything’s possible.

        He takes white people to the abyss.

        Naw, he just collects his thirty shekels and takes them to the bank… all the while not realizing that, for all his studies in evil, Evil is studying him right back.

        Like


      • In ” Cloud Atlas” not a Tarantino movie but affected by the same disease, whites are unwashed primitives while blacks have a super advanced civilization with space ships and all that

        up is down, day is night

        What will Hollywood do next?

        A movie in which germs have an advanced civilization where humans are a disease for which germs are trying to develop a vaccin with the help of microscope, test tubes and computers?

        Like


      • They already tried that in Terminator 2… (substitute machines for germs)… complete with magic negro software engineering genius who “does the right thing” due to a guilty conscience.

        Credit where due, though… a great popcorn movie.

        Like


      • on December 5, 2012 at 6:42 pm The Artist Formerly Known As -

        “I Am Legend” (2007)
        The world is plagued by some sort of disease turning people into “zombies”. A scientist is trying to discover the cure. After a while, he realizes practically everyone is a zombie. They have created a sort of civilization of their own. And consider HIM a deviation and a monster from scary legends (a Dracula-like).

        Like


      • “Spike Lee questioned Tarantino’s use of racial epithets in his films, particularly the racially offensive epithet “nigger”. In a Variety interview discussing Jackie Brown, Lee said: “I’m not against the word… and I use it, but Quentin is infatuated with the word. What does he want? To be made an honorary black man?””

        Like


      • Yes. In this movie he has a black wife too.

        Like


      • You realize of course that white people are the dominant ethnic group in this country, not a tiny minority like they were in Rhodesia, don’t you? You do realize that the Rhodesian white govt surrendered power because of pressure from other white people (Europe, USA). You do realize that Rhodesia is a ruined country economically, now, don’t you? Do you realize anything?

        Like


      • gramps
        You do realize that the Rhodesian white govt surrendered power because of pressure from other white people
        —————

        No thats not true, it was niggers! its all the fault of niggers. My dog died because of niggers, my roof leaks because of niggers, my woman left me because of niggers! bla, bla, bla NIGGERS!!!!!!

        Like


      • Let’s not go crazy now… the dog died of natural causes, and the wife’s still here.

        Now, about that roof…

        Like


      • “NiggLer on a roof”

        wasn’t that a movie?

        ( kidding, of course I know it was fiddler )

        Like


      • The percentage of the American population that is white is steadily declining — whites will likely be a minority in the US within the next 100 years — but on an official level (in academia, say, or in the media, even in government) whites are blamed for every major social problem. Now what does history tell us about the ultimate fate of frequently- scapegoated minorities? You remind me of the old joke about the guy falling off the 20- storey building who halfway down says to himself, “OK so far!”

        Like


      • +1 Good analogy.

        Like


      • In the largest cities in Canada and a few large cities in Europe whites are already a minority

        and just as now the 1% of rich whites are blamed for everything, the day whites are only 1 % of the population they will still be blamed for everything and still accused of some white privilege

        at the rate things are going the next Holocaust will be against whites and then they will have to go live in a small piece of land the United Nation will give them like one throws a bone out of pity

        Like


      • “whites will likely be a minority in the US within the next 100 years — but on an official level (in academia, say, or in the media, even in government) whites are blamed for every major social problem. Now what does history tell us about the ultimate fate of frequently- scapegoated minorities?”

        Very true. The left often substitutes white for racist. Or conservative for racists. So we’re all racists, and that’s why there is injustice in the world, according to the left.

        Like


      • “at the rate things are going the next Holocaust will be against whites and then they will have to go live in a small piece of land the United Nation will give them like one throws a bone out of pity”

        Unfortunately, your words could be prophetic.

        You have been on fire today. Keep it up.

        Like


      • NiteLily,

        Thanks but you’ll be surprised to hear that today I am sick as a dog

        I have a bad case of the flu; body pains, burning sinuses, watery eyes, coughing that feels like sand paper in my lungs, no energy and a persistent headache et cetera…

        Physically it feels like a truck went over me but my mind is just fine ( might be the medication it does have codeine in it!)

        Lucky for me I work from my home

        Like


      • Wishing you a speedy recovery.

        Look on the bright side, you are now getting the flu behind you for the rest of the season, and if there are no further mutations (let’s hope) you’re free until next year. 🙂

        Like


      • will you crackers please stop.

        White supremacy is NOT a numbers game. White people are already a minority in a number of places including Brazil an the world in total; but they are still in charge in the world and in Brazil?

        There is some other factor at work you white people ain’t talkin about.

        Im not fooled by your “drunken clown” routine.

        Like


      • re: Thwack, maintaining our constitutional republic will be a numbers game. Giving that up, and admitting that we were wrong about the whole thing would be… frustrating. Luckily for us the demographics aren’t quite as bad as everyone seems to think.

        Like


      • I have no idea if black males are different from whites as far as beta/alpha is concerned, but one thing is sure,

        in our current culture the media is painting a very favorable portrait of black males ( and of other non white males ) on tv and in movies

        and this has to be giving an edge to non white males

        Like


      • Only to other betas and lessers. If you know your role, no one can tell you what it is or should be.

        Like


      • Remember that the little asian guy gets the hottest female in the Walking Dead series.

        Like


      • I awoke one day and the world had become
        A realm of topsy-turvydom,
        Where night was day, and day was night,
        Where white was black, and black was white.

        Like


      • King A
        do you minorities really go in for this kind of condescending tokenism? I would think you’d be more cognizant of the thinly-veiled SWPL’s idealism than their fellow liberals would be, and the strategy would backfire.
        ——————
        I don’t know about other nonwhites, but black people get the joke. Especially the white writer who gave the black character the name “T-Dog”; bless his heart… I know he was trying for an authentically “black name”, but he failed miserably and its a running joke among black people.

        But, from time to time Hollywood does offer some some insight into the white phsyche from their choice of black characters. For example, making Uhura the communications officer on Star Trek is a case of white people projecting their sense negro sound processing ability, in addition to our role of serving as messengers for white people. “Kench” on Hogans Heros is another example of this phenomenon. Black people are good at music and are often better than white people who have had years of training. White people think this is because black people have an extra bone in their inner ear; its also how white people account for black peoples dancing ability. We are even better when we are blind.

        Like


      • I turned off the show at that precise moment, in the drugstore, when the only thing worth looking at on the series began throwing herself at this sniveling überbeta Short-Round manboy. (Truth is, the show began to seriously flag with the stupid love triangle, then positively died when it meandered over to the farm.)

        Zombies? Okay. Kick-ass womyn throwing down? Whatever. A cooperative token named “T-Dog”? All righty. Total collapse of civilization into abject anarchy? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I can suspend my disbelief. About most things. But Lauren Cohan getting yellow fever with a scrawny nip with a backpack? Click.

        Now I hear there is a ninja negress with a sword swooping in on the group to save the day. Why not?

        Where are all the game-trained screenwriters? Let’s get cracking. So much dross, even James Bond has been turned into a pussy with mother issues. Will somebody with half a clue write an ebook series at least? It doesn’t even have to be that good.

        Matt

        Like


      • One could write the next great America novel, but if the necessary shibboleths and bizarro-world PC characters aren’t adhered to, well… good luck getting the necessary production and distribution resources to bring it to show time fruition.

        Like


      • But Lauren Cohan getting yellow fever with a scrawny nip with a backpack? Click.

        Now I hear there is a ninja negress with a sword swooping in on the group to save the day. Why not?
        —————-

        The white zombie flick market is fully captured; the job of these nonwhite characters is to pull in their respective demographics.

        Thats where the growth is. Tiger Woods was a twofer- chinks and niggers took up golf; its no longer an old white man sport. Now you can lift weights and cheat on your wife and get caught…live life like a big carnival, get drunk, act like an animal…

        Like


      • The white zombie flick market is fully captured; the job of these nonwhite characters is to pull in their respective demographics.

        Good theory, but it’s tangential in this case. The TV series tracks with the comic books, which were written years earlier by a solitary omega neckbeard, who more likely was personally reflecting an internalized zeitgeist than he was thinking demographically.

        Really, do you minorities really go in for this kind of condescending tokenism? I would think you’d be more cognizant of the thinly-veiled SWPL’s idealism than their fellow liberals would be, and the strategy would backfire. Did homies start watching Star Trek because of Uhura? Or was she offered up to assuage the liberals who believe that such tokenism atones for their white guilt, and it is therefore okay to watch the show?

        Woods and Yao Ming weren’t tokens. They were objectively worthy athletes given no special placement.

        Matt

        Like


    • Anonymous
      About Belcher, what do you think was really going on there?
      —————–

      Listen and learn

      Like


  21. I find that snarling bitches can be embarrassed by simply asking them how long they’ve wanted to be a man, and then smirking while they sputter.

    Like


    • doubleplusgood. Will use on my liberal feminist lesbian sister, who’s only mode of communication (with me) is sarcasm and snarling. It will be extra funny ’cause her SO is even more mannish than she is.

      Like


  22. […] out this photo and caption borrowed from Heartiste’s blog this […]

    Like


  23. After 4 months in Poland I can’t recall a single time I saw a girl snarl. I suppose if a drunk guy was being very aggressive at a bar it would happen. In California it’s used by many women multiple times a day, not only directed at Betas but used in conversation with other women to describe interactions with Betas, men, female competition, parents, bosses, “friends”, etc.

    I’ve already given up on American women among many reasons for their aptly described churlishness. For anyone holding out hope for an American girl, I recommend observing the frequency of their snarl as an indicator of marriage worthiness. If you notice it more than a couple times, dump her quickly. Men really need to start calling girls on this snarky behavior using such lines as recommended above.

    Like


    • “I’ve already given up on American women among many reasons for their aptly described churlishness.”

      From my OED:
      churlish |ˈCHərliSH|
      adjective
      rude in a mean-spirited and surly way: it seems churlish to complain.”

      Great word choice, Nick.

      Like


    • After 4 months in Poland I can’t recall a single time I saw a girl snarl.

      OTOH, Britain is the world capital for bitchy churlish girls. Read what happens to Polish girls in Britain:

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1810281/posts

      Like


  24. crazy ass election theory here. Romney and McCain were smirkless. Bush smirked. Bush won. Obama’s gay but at least he’s a god head to the gays and free shit crowd but he don’t smirk. I think Clinton had a smirk…or some other dark triad facial expression. Dole didn’t.

    Like


  25. The bitches in that first photo are butt ugly. Not even worth a one night stand.

    Like


  26. I bet those two 6’s in the picture think of themselves as a combination of Miss Universe and the Queen of Sweden.

    Like


  27. I find the proverbial “parent’s curse” works well:

    “Careful, your face could stay that way.”

    Followed up by the Eliot addendum:

    “Whoops… too late.”

    And then the alpha smirk. 😉

    Like


    • Haha, +1

      Like


      • I still prefer your “waiter i ordered cutty sark..not cunty snark”.
        but thats over most girls heads tho..lol.

        Like


      • The minute you call her the C-word, you’re probably burning the bridge.

        Fair enough, if that’s your intent.

        With the parent’s curse gambit, she’s probably heard that several times as a child and will remember it fondly… and with the surprise variation, there’s still a chance she’ll giggle, if your smirk is inviting enough. And then game on!

        Like


      • Brad Pitt can call her…anytime.

        Like


      • And a hammer can kill ants.

        Like


  28. on December 4, 2012 at 3:56 pm Johnycomelately

    What’s the male equivalent? Turning your back, ignoring or looking past a woman? I’m doing this and it doesn’t work.

    I’m trying to ignore several single mothers at work but they won’t stop approaching and smiling. I don’t want to cause a nuclear meltdown, I just want them to leave me the fuck alone.

    Like


  29. It’s disheartening being in a college town surrounded by thousands of hot chicks with “I smell shit” expressions.
    But a countering smirk does seem to make them aware that they’re projecting something negative.

    Like


    • I remember when you used to be able to eye-fuck girls whilst walking down the street. It was a mutually pleasurable thing for both people.

      Nowadays I don’t even bother. I completely ignore women and purposefully look away from them because I don’t want to give them an opportunity to be an asshole.

      It’s a sad state of affairs…

      Like


    • If you can’t get laid in a college town, something must be SERIOUSLY wrong.
      (=height/looks/age/cash)

      Like


  30. Some things I do naturally. The smirk is one of those things.

    Like


  31. Interesting that this look often goes with vocal fry and all the other irritating behaviors that teenage girls exhibit these days. The arms race has escalated to absurdity.

    Like


    • Vocal fry among young women is hundreds of years old. It’s just re-emerged lately.

      Like


      • I know what vocal is and what fry is but I had to google ” vocal fry”

        man! it is a lot of work being a French Canadian on a USA site!

        Like


      • I doubt 1 out of 100 U.S. males know what vocal fry is, either.

        Like


      • It’s an epidemic:

        Like


      • She demonstrate the two most annoying things…vocal fry and high rising terminal.

        Like


      • That is one of the best demonstrations of this -horrific- mangling of a sweet female voice I’ve seen, some other vids on this don’t show it quite as well. Listen to how lilting, pleasant, and feminine her voice is after she is done apeing these busted ass Americunts who have to even destroy their natural femininity vocally. Great example of this travesty/tragedy.

        Like


      • You would know it as “registre de strohbass” technically.

        Like


    • on December 4, 2012 at 4:44 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Vocal fry, or, as I like to call it, “Bulimic Sorority Girl Voice.”

      Like


      • Don’t forget its twin sister, “u-p-t-a-l-k”? Which is much more g-r-a-t-i-n-g? Like, I think you’ve h-e-a-r-d i-t?

        The use of uptalk and the mass deployment of the word “like” is a function of a widespread loss of confidence: a pussy can’t simply make a declarative statement or command, he has to hedge his bets with a sign of doubt, even with regard to the most obvious truths. He can’t say, “Stop being a prick.” He has to soften the directive with, “Like, you know, you’re kind of like, being a prick, justmyopinion” — as though he is preempting challenge and distancing himself from conflict through simile.

        Same with uptalk: “high rising terminal” is what we use to indicate a question, a slight raising of our tone toward the end of the sentence. It puts a question mark after everything we say. It is the vocal equivalent of questioning your own statements, for lack of declarative courage.

        Same reason why “Ummm … wow” is so fruity and feckless as a response: rather than being a man and confronting disagreement, the equivocator sits back passively using a vocal filler hoping to rally numbers to himself to do the courageous work of dissent in his stead.

        On a related note, I’m noticing an epidemic of young adult men with fey delicate voices and slight lisps, like the whole world has been faggotized. Canadians especially — just listen to the overrepresentation of Canucks on PUA videos (are they all from north of the border these days?). Do these people know any men? Were they all brought up by single mothers and gay uncles? College campuses sound like every boy is angling for a job at NPR after graduation.

        And fucking Nate Silver. He’s rocking the entire ladyboy package: look, sound, presence. He should be doing a big, asshole touchdown dance right now, dispensing manly braggadocio with a smirk. Live your victory, son! Before the election, he even managed to tweet some trash talk — for which he was criticized by his dickless bosses. Now, at the peak of his value, he has reverted to his default status: a soft, reedy, ectomorphic form. We are a generation bereft of masculinity.

        How are we losing to the eunuch/estrogen brigade? Sheer numbers? I refuse to contemplate that horror.

        Matt

        Like


      • Nate Silver?

        Doth King A name the You-Know-Who-That-Don’t-Control-The-Media-Nudge-Nudge-Wink-Wink?

        Be still, my heart.

        Like


      • If Jews were the only ones sitting in the media, you’d be right. But since there are many non-Jews as well, your point sounds like that of a 5-year old throwing a temper tantrum.

        Look at MSNBC. Other than Andria Mitchel, who else is Jewish there, and who else is dumping and trashing our conservative values? Lawrence O’Donnell (who is a Hollywood hack, non-Jewish)?, Rachel Maddow (who was raised Catholic and only her paternal grandfather was Jewish)?, Al Sharpton (the Black street-thug and clown)?, Chris Mathews (who is probably the stupidest person on TV and has a thrill up his leg for Obama, non-Jewish)?, Keith Olbermann (who is a nutcase of German descent who used to have a show there, non-Jewish, now he’s working at Al Gore’s network and spewing the same crap)? So who is sitting at MSNBC and peddling leftist ideology with such gusto? Most of them are not Jewish. Same thing at CNN and other media organization – there are Jews involved, but not all are Jewish; there are plenty of Gentiles too. Therefore, your premise is false. And if you still insist that ALL the media is Jewish, you’d sound like a demagogue with the brain of a mouse. Meaning, not a very smart demagogue.

        King smartly just puts out the information. He doesn’t add peculiar comments that look like he has an irrational vendetta. He doesn’t say things like: ‘it’s one of the members of the synagogue of Satan’ blah, blah , blah…….. So your heart needn’t be pounding so hard over nothing.

        Like


      • No, it makes a difference whether the mass pussification is a natural SWPL evolution or has another, more direct cause. If Greg Eliot has a case, I’m willing to hear it. I don’t think a combination of Jewish insularity and high-placement is healthy for a Christian society in the end, any more than I think Mexicans should illegally migrate themselves and refuse to assimilate to our philosophy, culture, and language.

        No subject is taboo, Lila. Stop trying to stagnate this fecund hothouse of ideas. If his conspiracy theories are off-the-wall stupid, no one will hesitate to say so and we will judge accordingly. That freedom from hesitation and that encouragement of blunt judgment are what makes this forum worth returning to, and it is something you are attempting to control through credulous and frankly hysterical appeals to a liberal conscience.

        The essence of philosophy is agnosticism. The way to wisdom is admitting “All I know is I know nothing.” Naïveté is a virtue for inquiry, even a deliberate, devil’s-advocate kind of naïveté. There is never a reason to dismiss a theory out of hand, even the scary and subversive ones, until a hearing has been had. Until then, I make no claims before a full case is made. In that regard, Greg is one-up on you. Because if you are attempting to make the case that it is distasteful and false to muse openly about, much less privately ponder the effect of semitism on a culture, you have not made a convincing case. Certainly not convincing enough to recommend the chilling effect a police-management of our rhetoric would create.

        Matt

        Like


      • “I don’t think a combination of Jewish insularity and high-placement is healthy for a Christian society in the end, any more than I think Mexicans should illegally migrate themselves and refuse to assimilate to our philosophy, culture, and language.”

        Visit California. Half the “white” people here — speaking English, learning our political philosophy, constituting culture — are of Mexican descent. Many of them are second or third generation. Some have families that have been here even longer.

        “If his conspiracy theories are off-the-wall stupid, no one will hesitate to say so and we will judge accordingly.”

        I’ll say so. His conspiracy theories are off the wall stupid.

        Like


      • “If his conspiracy theories are off-the-wall stupid, no one will hesitate to say so and we will judge accordingly.”

        So I am saying so and judging accordingly. I will respond every time I think someone has a totally cracker idea, whether in this supposed issue of the Jews controlling the world, or when people erroneously tell a woman to leave her husband. What do you expect me to do, be quiet because my “female” ideas are dangerous to the boys? If I speak the truth, my sex is irrelevant. Truth knows no sex, religion, race, or political creed. It’s universal, and everywhere it is true. Like 2+2=4. It’s true no matter where you are in the Universe, and no matter who utters it, Gentile, Jew, black, white, man, woman. If you believe in a creator, you understand the concept of absolute truth, don’t you?

        In this case, i just proved there are many Gentiles in the liberal media influencing America, not just Jews. As you know, MSNBC had a strong influence on liberals voting for Obama Mamma. I just proved my case and debunked his. Chew on that for a while.

        “If his conspiracy theories are off-the-wall stupid, no one will hesitate to say so and we will judge accordingly.”

        REALLY, is that what the German people did in Nazi Germany? They judged accordingly? Honestly? Chew on that for a while too. This is DANGER ZONE territory and I am saying so. You can choose not to listen and shut your ears, as many have done throughout hisotry.

        “and it is something you are attempting to control through credulous and frankly hysterical appeals to a liberal conscience.”

        WRONG!!!!! Just like he voices his demented irrational fallacies, which I just proved are fallacious, so I debunk. What are you fearing? That I am doing the job of men?

        “There is never a reason to dismiss a theory out of hand, even the scary and subversive ones, until a hearing has been had. Until then, I make no claims before a full case is made.”

        So that’s what we are doing. He says his stuff, and some of us show how erroneous it is. You don’t like that we’re doing it? Let’s see YOU debunk or validate anything he says?

        “In that regard, Greg is one-up on you.”

        In other words, you agree with his demented ideas. I can read between the lines, you know.

        “Because if you are attempting to make the case that it is distasteful and false to muse openly about,”

        WRONG, again. I am not policing speech, I am debunking speech, which is in my right to do.

        BTW, I love how my name keeps evolving. I love Lila. Has an air of the temptress to it. I don’t mind Delilah either. I am sure that’s coming next. Ta Ta….

        Like


      • Greg hasn’t presented a case, he just asserted his unpopular position a few times. That’s how he is one-up on you: you’ve been trying to prosecute an anti-semitism charge that I don’t find persuasive, whereas he is (wittily) reiterating the conclusions of a thesis never fully presented for examination.

        I’ve never heard his theory in full, so I refuse to preemptively dismiss it. (At the same time I am not yearning for a presentation, as I can guess at most of it.) Neither have you heard it, but you are so sure it must be beyond the bounds of liberal propriety that any hint of it must not be tolerated.

        I’m not so easily scandalized, is my point. I’ve been dealing with assertions-absent-support — including your own — for so long that it’s clear that we have to allow a different standard to guide our rhetoric if we hope to get anywhere.

        Otherwise, you and I can begin at the beginning — Socratic dialectic — and tackle the arduous task of defining words themselves so that we are sure we are in perfect agreement at every stage before proceeding. So allow me to start:

        What is “the good”?

        No? Don’t want to do that necessary spade work? Then display some good faith in a fellow conservative, and take a few rhetorical short-cuts for purposes of expediency, such as assuming your interlocutor is not intrinsically evil and impossibly misguided. He has done that for you and even for people diametrically opposed to his position, such as the black radical Thwack. Otherwise, you necessarily must talk past each other forever.

        Again, that’s where the woman thing comes in. Ladies like to talk just to express themselves, not necessarily to move the dialectic toward synthesis. It’s easy for a woman to keep going and going and going when men have already espied the pointlessness of a particular engagement.

        Matt

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 6:33 am FuriousFerret

        English is spoken through the motherfucking diaphragm not the nose. Why do people like Nate Silver not understand this very simple concept? I guess he didn’t want to sound too much like a male.

        Like


      • Excellent insight. I’ll be using that.

        It explains how we create and enforce these traits rather than merely “evolve” into them. Therefore it is a habit feminized betas/omegas can hope to train themselves out of, rather than resign themselves to be saddled with a disadvantage. If you can unlearn yourself out of a slouch, you can teach your voice not to sound like a eunuch’s.

        We are the generation without fathers. Men today never knew any men, not in their personal life, not in the popular culture. Queerness abounds, so comprehensively that nobody even thinks to call it out.

        Matt

        Like


      • I don’t watch PUA videos so I have no idea why so many Canadians are in it and effeminate

        but I think this feminisation of men is caused by multiple factors, mostly the incessant brainwashing from the left controlled media and entertainment business,
        but it is entirely possible and plausible that either female hormones that end up in drinking water and/or anti-depressant that also end up in the drinking water have made males softer, thus easier to brainwash

        or maybe it is some other chemicals such as pesticides,
        but too many changes have been observed even among fish in cold water lakes and rivers and with men’s low sperm count for this theory to be dismissed as just a silly idea

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        but I think this feminisation of men is caused by multiple factors, mostly the incessant brainwashing from the left controlled media and entertainment business,
        but it is entirely possible and plausible that either female hormones that end up in drinking water and/or anti-depressant that also end up in the drinking water have made males softer, thus easier to brainwash

        or maybe it is some other chemicals such as pesticides,
        but too many changes have been observed even among fish in cold water lakes and rivers and with men’s low sperm count for this theory to be dismissed as just a silly idea
        ——————-
        Why do you all make excuses for white men?

        Why can’t you admit that some white men just ain’t qualified? Plenty of niggas ain’t qualified and you say its cause they niggas; you don’t make no excuses and blame the media, drinking water, pesticides….

        Truth is, white males are soft because we all exist in a white supremacy system.

        White males don’t have to prove themselves because everybody will make an excuse for them;

        just like Canadian Friend did right here.

        White people have an easy life.

        Like


      • …Truth is, white males are soft because we all exist in a white supremacy system.

        White males don’t have to prove themselves because everybody will make an excuse for them;

        that is the exact opposite of reality

        the most powerful nation in the history of the world is lead by a black man who did put/ is putting other black people in high places

        It is blacks who never have to prove themselves because in our culture they are perpetual victims and we all make excuses for them

        can’t ace the test to become a fireman? sue the white man until he lowers the bar to the level of unqualified black men as they did in NYC

        can’t perform well in school? sue the white man until he lowers the bar to your level as many Universities have done

        if you are black you will be given money to go to college, if you are white you are on your own, is that white Supremacism?

        whites are never allowed similar things, they must succeed by them self because no one has sympathy for them, no one will lower the bar for whitey, and withey does not benefit from affirmative action, is that white Supremacism?

        many whites who are due for a promotion have to sit in silence and watch a less qualified black get this promotion in the name of “diversity” and other anti-white male stuff, robbing a white man of his promotion to hand it to a black, is that white Supremacism?

        Government employees are for the most part black even though they are only about 14 % of the population, is that white Supremacism?

        the requirements to get a mortgage are lower for black people while a white with the same qualifications is refused the mortgage because his skin is the wrong color, a white will pay MORE for a mortgage than a black! is that white Supremacism?

        they gave Obama a Nobel prize BEFORE he accomplished anything!!! he did not have to prove himslef, the excuses were all for blackie not withey AND it was WHITE men who gave him this Nobel prize, they must be white supremacists right???

        How about when the 911 call was doctored by ABC news to make it look like the hispanic – who was conveniently described as white by all media – who shot in self defense – obviousy if you have seen how bloody his face was – the violent criminal named Trevon Martin had said something racist about black people?

        He never said such a thing, but the media which is 98% white people lied trough their teeth – they doctored the 911call which is not only immoral but probably illegal ( they kind of apologized quietly a few days later )- to make a hispanic/white man look very racist and make him go to jail even if he was not guilty and they lied trough their teeth about the violent black man – to appease blacks – and were making excuses for him, posting photos of when he was younger and looked kind of innocent, is that white Supremacism?

        All the excuses were for the violent black man, all the incriminating lies were about the hispanic/white and you are telling me we live in a white supremacist world???

        Do they doctor the tapes of black people to make them look guilty ?

        Obama used black crack dealers turned rapper on his campaign; the 98% white media made excuses for him because they are all black, is that white Supremacism?

        Hundreds of blacks tweeted death treats to Romney, again excuses were made or these facts were simply swept under the carpet by the 98% white media, is that white supremacism?

        but the tea party was accused of racism simply because most of them are white, and the 98% white media bashed them for it for weeks and weeks, is that white Supremacism?

        Excuses are made when blacks are in charge of a city that turns into a wasteland such as in Camden, NJ, Detroit, MI, Birmingham, AL
        blacks turned those cities into dumps, they kicked out all the whites, but excuses are made for them, is that white Supremacism?

        Excuses are made for Obama who gives crumbs to charity while Romney was demonized even though he was extremely generous with charity, is that white Supremacism?

        Excuses were made for Obama having been pall with anti-USA terrorist Bill Ayers, is that white Supremacism?

        Excuses were made for Obama having a black mentor who hates the USA and hates whites with a passion; Reverend Wright, is that white Supremacism?

        The church of reverend wright is all about hating whites, hating jews and hating the USA, but excuses were made by everyone – politicians, the 98% white media and millions of white people who vote democrat- because he is black and his church is black, is that white Supremacism?

        it is blacks who are privileged
        and it is whites who are discriminated against

        I could post pages and pages of examples of that

        what you are saying is the opposite of reality

        you may as well tell me the sky is green and grass is blue

        it is blacks who are privileged and whites who are treated unfairly

        Like


      • White people have an easy life.

        Okay, thwack, that’s it… you’ve really crossed the line now.

        As soon as I finish my Napoleon brandy I’m going to summon my man Jeeves to write a stern letter to proprietor of the chateau and complain vociferously.

        Like


      • You’re a Francophone, right, Canadian Friend? I’m not sure this pansy phenomenon applies to Quebec.

        Like


    • on December 4, 2012 at 6:36 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Didn’t even know that had a name. Is there a name for this weird tick of starting every sentence with “like”? Especially combined with this raise of voice as if it were a question, not a statement.

      The older the woman gets the more annoying this habit becomes.

      Like


      • on December 4, 2012 at 8:29 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I call it “Retarded Eighties Valley Girl. ”
        It’s a submissive speech pattern, so as a dude, you should love it when you hear it. It means you’re talking to a stupid bitch.

        Like


      • What I hate are the libtard idiots in the universities who start every sentence [every paragraph, really] with “So”.

        “So. If you start with…”

        “So. If you posit that…”

        “So. If n=20 then…”

        “So. Assume that…”

        You can always tell an intellectual poseur if their command of the language isn’t sufficient to start a sentence [or a paragraph] with any word other than “So”.

        Like


      • Yes. It’s called a “filler” in linguistics: “like”, “y’know”, “actually”, etc.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filler_(linguistics)

        The raise of voice is called a “high rising terminal”, and yes, the combination is like grating my dick with coarse sandpaper and splashing Aqua Velva on it.

        Like


      • The Black equivalent would be ‘Nodahmsayn’.
        Large and flexible vocabulary is not one of most Americans’ strong suits.

        Like


      • Hate to bring this to race again ( but I hate pretty lies even more ) but just as low IQ Haitians – who French Colonists never managed to civilize – have turned French into a very simplified primitive language they can handle which is called Creole, our young people are adopting the ways of primitive low IQ people

        Young people in the USA, Canada and in England are now speaking a sort of mangled, broken and simplified ( and mumbled) bad English

        this is but one more symptom of the ongoing decay of Western Civilization

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        Hate to bring this to race again ( but I hate pretty lies even more ) but just as low IQ Haitians – who French Colonists never managed to civilize – have turned French into a very simplified primitive language they can handle which is called Creole, our young people are adopting the ways of primitive low IQ people
        —————————————

        But see, thats the paradox, all the good Haitians were killed by white slave owners in Haiti.

        That meant more and more of the black population was composed of savages.

        It was these savages that killed off the evil wicked slave master white people in Haiti.

        These savages are heros. Haiti was the 2nd republic in the western hemisphere; right white man?

        They just copied you?

        You think they came up with that republic stuff on their own?

        You think niggers swam to San Domingo?

        What country you from?

        What?

        Like


      • Thwack,

        instead of going trough all the intricate details I will simply say this,

        Blacks have pretty much turned Detroit into Haiti

        it must be whitey’s fault right?

        Like


      • The bottom-line is that racial diversity leads to a Babylon where the lowest common denominator becomes the norm.

        History shows us this, time and again… and the excruciating fact that we need to be reminded of it, over and over, just shows how fallen Man is when he looks to his own wisdom and desires instead of at-one-ment with God.

        Like


      • But see, thats the paradox, all the good Haitians were killed by white slave owners in Haiti.

        Bushwa… it was invariably the ones thought to be “good” that were the first to pull out the machetes… hence the old French proverb

        “Around the blacks, never relax.” :-p

        Like


      • Greg,

        Diversity has brought decay everywhere it has been imposed on us, be it Amsterdam, Toronto or Los Angeles

        but I am still puzzled as to why those who are imposing it can not see this decay and destruction?

        It does not matter if they are jews or white liberals or black politicians or hispanic activists, can’t they see the decay? the dying economy?
        the higher rates of crimes, of drug use and of so many other bad things?

        Can they really be oblivious to it?

        I have been reading about this for about a decade now and I am not satisfied with any answer I have heard

        Why would a people intentionally, willingly self destruct? ( which is unheard of in human history )

        I don’t mean the regular people in the street who are unaware and are more interested in facebooking and buying a new pair of Nikes, they are simply usefull idiots, but I mean those who are imposing this on us?

        What is their goal?

        The Cloward Piven Strategy might be the best I have found so far but still something does not add up.

        Elites are usually interested in building civilizations not destroying them, not their own anyway

        why are we at this point?

        we know the Roman empire fell and yet our leaders , our ” betters” are doing everything in their power to make our civilization fall while chanting ” faster! faster! ”

        I don’t get it.

        Like


      • As I mentioned in another thread, the whys and wherefores could be examined at excruciating length before a modicum of understanding arises… leastwise, the gathering of enough proof to convince the skeptic.

        The Cliffs Notes versions is this: think of Satan… smart fellow, he… one of the greatest angels, if not the greatest… who decided that he knew things better for himself and could challenge his very Creator.

        Well, when that didn’t work out so well for him and his fellow travelers, and they were tossed headforemost from their stations, he decides that he’s going to show the old boss who’s more clever, and so he sets about mucking up said boss’s other creations, to prove that a) he’s strong and b) maybe the old boss ain’t so perfect after all.

        The rub is, although he’s had some APPARENT successes thus far, when push comes to shove, he KNOWS he’s going to lose… he’s that smart and that foreseeing.

        But that thing inside him that made him rebel in the first place is so strong, so overwhelming, that he doesn’t care that he goes down eventually, so long as he has the grim satisfaction of taking as much down with him as he can.

        This is the true definition of Evil, and what rampant envy and pride can do to beings of free will.

        Now, Satan was so foxy he convinced a full 1/3 of the angels of heaven to join him in rebellion… so imagine what he’s been able to do with earthlings in re his bidding.

        Many people, through sloth or any of the other seven deadlies don’t understand that they’re in league with, or at least a useful idiot for, the minions of Satan.

        Yet some are… the Bible tells us that certain ones are “of their Father, the Devil”.

        So, this is the short version of the “why”, which explains how people, whether inadvertently or purposefully, performs acts that will lead to their very own destruction.

        The thing a wise man does is observe what sort of individuals seem to perform this behavior… and categorize them accordingly as chief instigators, stalwart soldiers and true believers, fellow travelers, useful idiots, etc, in order to truly “know they enemy”, as it were.

        I repeat, this is a topic which requires more than a few sentences, and is beyond the current scope.

        Like


      • Greg,

        Interesting explanation but being a non religious man I have trouble ” wrapping my head around it” if that is the correct expression.

        I used to be an Atheist but am now more of an Agnostic,
        the way I see it I can not believe God – if there is a God – is involved in the minute details of our existence

        but on the other hand – and this will seem contradictory – a lot of bad things have and still happen to me, some that are completely against all odd and should not happen because I am a good decent man

        I don’t lie, I don’t steal , I don’t do drugs, I don’t drink ( socially only ) , I don’t cheat, I have never been unfaithful to a woman, I don’t hurt others ( but believe in self defense 100% ), I have never raped a woman or abused a child et cetera et cetera

        everyone who knows me would tell you I am a good honest decent man, I am kind and always willing to help, that they would trust me with their house ATM PIN ( and some have ) et cetera et cetera

        yet bad things happen to me constantly as if I was being punished for something

        a few examples,

        a couple weeks ago – to my surprise – I received by regular mail a letter telling me I have an unpaid parking ticket?!
        so I checked where and when this was issued and it was in some town where I have never set foot.

        I wrote them back telling them they must have entered the plate number wrong( it is all done by computer now ) so my name and address came out and they left this ticket on the windshield of someone who upon seing that it was addressed at someone else, with a different car and pate number simply threw it away; thus it remained unpaid

        I know this is nothing and it can happen to anyone but stuff like this happens to me ALL the time and ever since I was a kid

        Last year I went for a sleep study at a Hospital in Montreal, they lost my file not once , not twice but three times !!!

        Once as child there was a street fair and they were giving away little 25 cents toys, when I went at the table wehre they were giving them away and I took one in my hand the woman thought I was a kid who had already taken many more – which he was not allowed to – and she slapped me in the face!

        a couple years ago I bought leather gloves, once home I pricked my finger putting them on; there was a sewing needle in them!!

        I could write a book on all those things that keep happening to me almost daily as there are hundreds and hundreds.

        I don’t really believe in God and the Devil but at times it feels as if something or someone hates me and is sending these events my way to annoy or even torture me

        but the rational part of me refuses to believe this

        (and I don’t believe in ghosts or aliens either)

        oh and I know people who are the opposite of me, they lie, they steal, they are unfaithfull and yet they have far better luck than me

        weird…

        if an entity ( God, Devil, Ghost, Alien etc etc ) is rewarding bad people and punishing good people like me, why is it doing something unfair like that?

        Like


      • if an entity ( God, Devil, Ghost, Alien etc etc ) is rewarding bad people and punishing good people like me, why is it doing something unfair like that?

        Again, there’s no proper short answer and the scope is beyond the chateau… but I will say this:

        We suffer the imperfect situation of the world, even when we’re good, because the trial of who truly owns it all is still underway.

        C. S. Lewis, I believe, said something along the lines of how a Christian today is fighting an underground war for a temporarily absent landlord.

        The Devil, and with him Adam and Eve, challenged God… saying “we can figure things out for ourselves, and indeed, with enough time, we’re smart enough to become self-sufficient and don’t really need you. We can rule ourselves, and your rules are not to our taste.”

        We see this attitude to this very day in Man, although history has shown we’re no closer to pulling off that ur-boast and winning the challenge.

        And so the trial began… and evidence mounts. When the time is right, and no one, be he angel, man, or otherwise, can claim that mankind wasn’t given enough of a chance to prove God wrong… and indeed, when Man, left to his own devices is just about ready to destroy himself totally, the Judgment will come, and Man will again be schooled back to Adamic perfection on a new earth without the influence of Satan.

        But until then, we must suffer the consequences of that foolish use of free will, and as in all warfare, innocents suffer.

        Our one hope is that, when this war is over, any suffering by “good” people will be amended, and in a BIG way… and the pains of this system of things will be like the memory of a childhood disease, whose pain has long-faded.

        The Book Of Job pretty much has it all in microcosm.

        Like


      • Its also an article of agreement designed to invite the listener into the speakers “frame”

        The white version of ‘Nodahmsayn’ is “indeed”

        It pulls the listener to identify with the speaker because it implies an agreement.

        Lawyers use this one a lot.

        “Clearly” is another one. Anytime a white man starts off a statement with the word “clearly”; that means he is about to tell you a huge lie.

        Its another word lawyers deploy all the time because it works so well at creating “frame”

        Like


      • …“Clearly” is another one. Anytime a white man starts off a statement with the word “clearly” that means he is about to tell you a huge lie.

        Obama’s favorite way of starting a sentence is with ” Let me be Clear! ”

        and then he lies trough his teeth

        Like


      • Obama’s favorite way of starting a sentence is with ” Let me be Clear! ”

        and then he lies trough his teeth
        ———-

        Yeah, but thats the white half of him speaking.

        Like


      • Heh, heh… thwack’s 180° world report:

        Yeah… getting a whites to tell the truth is like trying to catch a cuckoo in the woods.

        Getting negroes to tell the truth is like trying to catch the echo of the cuckoo’s call.

        Like


  32. Jaws’s girlfriend was pretty cute. And he won her over without saying a word.

    Like


  33. My wife is from Brazil and come to think of it I have never, ever seen her snarl at anyone.

    Like


    • on December 5, 2012 at 2:37 am driveallnight

      If my gf ever snarled, I’d feed her to whorefinder.

      Like


    • My wife doesn’t either, unless she’s in a realllllly bad mood, or if it’s justified because she’s seeing something truly odious, like Grover Norquist. She snarled at him when he was on Sixty Minutes.

      Like


      • Do you have an NPR voice?

        Allowing your woman to snarl at anything is a comment on your own bitchitude. Particularly over politics. Try, “Don’t be a cunt” next time she wants to inject her sorority girl emoting into our public deliberations.

        Omigod, Grover’s like sooooo odious!!!!!

        Let me guess your response: a titter and a giggle followed by a scandalized omigod I know, right?

        Don’t be a cunt, Jay.

        Matt

        Like


      • You *really* don’t know me, or my wife. I was already shouting at Norquist on screen. He’s done more to cockblock the body politic than any other human in DC.

        But, by all means, keep up the long screeds lecturing other people on lack of manliness. I love the smell of overcompensation in the morning.

        Like


      • I love the smell of overcompensation in the morning.

        That’s your own breath, backfiring on you.

        Like


      • Of course you were “already shouting” at a television. Your little slice of the Two Minutes Hate.

        I know a lot of women who latch on to their man’s bravado, and they catch a little thrill from it. Until they meet the genuine article. Your woman would be screaming “GROVER” by the end of the night — with a very different connotation. Keep your head on a swivel, son.

        Because of the philosophy that informs your politics, there is an apology at the bottom of your manhood. I have a permanent policy of bros before hos, so I wouldn’t take advantage. But you should know what your vulnerabilities are, and you must understand that there are men with far fewer scruples than I. I’m looking out for you, politics be damned.

        Matt

        Like


  34. on December 4, 2012 at 5:39 pm sydney carton

    Had a sweet little niece. Aged 8 she started watching those kiddie/teen drama or whatever they are, shows on the Disney channel. Ever since it’s been nothing but sarcasm and snarls. She’s now 10 and I can’t stand being in the same room as the little bitch.

    Like


    • As an uncle you probably have a lot of power to break her of that habit.

      Like


      • Parents being what they are, don’t you DARE correct their little angels… even if you are the brother of either wife or husband.

        Hell, in many of today’s families, even the father DARE not correct the cherubs without mom’s say-so.

        Like


      • Sounds like Daddy needs a ball transplant.

        Like


      • Sign o’ the times… why do you think everyone’s so damn unhappy and antimarriage these days?

        Like


      • Nah. Most parents these days need help teaching their children respect, as they never learned any themselves. They appreciate your assist.

        And if they don’t? Fuck them too. What are they going to do, make a fuss to protect their kid’s right to disrespect their superiors? When their precious pumpkin is plump, pierced, pockmarked, and pregnant at 16, their memories might drift back to the source of where it all began to go wrong. If not, it still doesn’t matter; they are living the hell they created.

        Regardless, who puts up with overt cuntliness, much less the nascent version from a confused and rudderless half-pint? They really only need telling once or twice. Then, no matter how the parents let their princess walk all over them, she will stand at attention when you make the scene. Not unlike dogs. Not unlike the properly formed woman, either.

        Just as the boatswain’s whistle pipes the ship’s commander aboard: “Captain on deck!” Animals must be trained to respond to cues.

        Matt

        Like


    • Aged 8 she started watching those kiddie/teen drama or whatever they are, shows on the Disney channel.

      You can thank the jew, Michael Eisner, for strictly enforcing the Frankfurt School agenda in that little corner of our “culture”.

      Like


      • Name that Jew!

        (cue Nitelily freakout in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)

        Like


      • We’re hoping all that Rooney Rifle ammunition was exhausted in the previous thread. 😉

        Like


      • Speaking of which, notice how Zombie Shane’s overt (and correct) statement gets a pass… but my bare whiff of a mention above, mostly tongue-in-cheek, causes another bloviating screed by the two usual suspect useful idiots masquerading as Righteous Gentiles?

        Like


      • ‘Xcept if she went to school in Frankfurt (Germany), she would actually be able to read, rite & rithmetic before she’s off to High School…….

        Like


  35. That’s why I love this site … here I am sitting a minute in between task near the end of the day, and then a few minutes later bam, a new goodie to put in my game toolbox. Snarl destroyers. Love it.

    But has anyone had the reverse, a girl call you out on doing the smirk? Seems like if it’s not hard to destroy the snarl, a smirk destroyer might hit me one of these days. What did she say, and did you think of a comeback?

    Like


    • Certain barbs prick both ways… observe:

      She: (upon seeing the smirk) “Careful, your face might stay that way.”

      Me: (holding smirk, hence frame): “Whoops… too late.”

      Like


    • I’m sure there’s a lot of material than can be gleaned from “cat that ate the canary, don’t choke on it” word-play involving birds and pussies… but I’ll let wiser heads than mine sort it out.

      Like


    • on December 4, 2012 at 7:27 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      “But has anyone had the reverse, a girl call you out on doing the smirk? Seems like if it’s not hard to destroy the snarl, a smirk destroyer might hit me one of these days. What did she say, and did you think of a comeback?”

      Her: “You look awfully pleased with yourself.”

      Me: “You would be too if you had what I had for dinner.”

      The good thing about this one is if she freaks you can always say “I meant steak, get your mind out of the gutter.”

      Like


    • Yep, As Greg & DBA both alluded, Agree & Amplify goes naturally with a smirk, like tequila and lime. Gets it every time.

      Like


  36. This is meant to be a feminist piss-take but it’s a great learning for guys without game….

    Like


  37. Everytime I see a spoiled twat at a bar pull the snarl I think to myself “Careful sweetie, pull that shit with the wrong omega and you’ll find yourself in his refrigerator.”

    Like


  38. Also a good comeback is “Are you having a stroke?” Helps if you sound sincerly concerned.

    Like


  39. on December 4, 2012 at 6:48 pm Hugh G. Rection

    Brilliant. Somehow reminds me of Bill Burrs “Old Man Face” bit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zm25oj8hq4g

    Like


  40. http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTi3AlXDtekvOl5yKWQcaXgbgyWv1kKJ1fPqH1gJNDt9diS-sMx77LlKtEp

    Here’s the old man’s counter-salvo when you’ve run out of smirks.

    Like


  41. on December 4, 2012 at 7:17 pm Zaphod Beeblebrox

    Watched with pride as my 14yro responded to “the snarl” with “oh…that’s a nervous tic…thought you were crapping yourself” and walked away. The “hot” one, behind the wall of churls and not really part of the encounter, peeled off and followed after him trying to get his attention. Proud, proud momment!

    Like


  42. on December 4, 2012 at 7:29 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Funny topic. Our eighth grade homeroom was in the basement of the school. And although my crowd and I didn’t have terms like “snarl face,” we did mock the girls who gave us what we called the “constipated look.” Our comeback became so popular everyone started using it:

    “Bathroom’s upstairs.”

    Like


  43. OMG, I love Bruce Willis. That is exactly the look some asshole in my MBA class gave me when I presented him with the most ridulously doctored financial statements he had ever seen.

    Bitch, please. Step. Aside.

    Swoon!

    Yep. Married 12 years. He still looks at me like that when I bitch him out for putting the mayonnasie away wrong

    I love it!

    Like


  44. The dude displaying an alpha smirk
    has a strangely asymmetric face.
    Interesting.
    Lyle Lovett was/is a singer/song writer from the wilder parts of Texas. He has a non-standard face.Observed from up close, his success with the ladies was stunning and apparently effortless.

    Like


  45. Sometimes I wonder who these girls are you guys approach – is it just nineteen year olds in bars? If so, then the preoccupation you all have with female hypergamy makes sense.

    Think of it like this: a 19yr old does not want to have a baby, so no need for nice guy betas.

    A 25 yr old is starting to think that she might want to settle down soon with a decent guy with at least some semblance of intelligence & character.

    The 25yr old 8 or 9 will be more polite to you at a bar or social gathering than the idiot 19yr old 6. But all you guys seem to think that after 23 all women are “old ladies”. But then you wonder why immature women act immature?

    I get it that women now get fat much quicker than they used to, but take a fit woman in her late twenties – if she’s beautiful – she’ll be more beautiful at 28 than she was at 18. And she’ll have the money to spend on feminine dresses & lingerie.

    Maybe this obsession with youth is an American thing? I’m European, we accept that as we age our value increases as women – not the opposite. But we don’t snarl or get fat either.

    Like


    • In the USA, a beautiful, feminine, well-behaved 28 y.o. is usually married with a couple of kids by then — in large part due to the sow epidemic which ensures that the most desirable women are snapped up quickly. And if she isn’t married, she usually is in a committed long-term relationship, or a member of some religious demonination, usually Protestant, that I want no part of.

      In Europe (except that pit Britain, which is even worse than the USA), there are many more available feminine somewhat older women.

      Like


    • No, it’s universal that 18 year olds are far more attractive than their older counterparts. Europe is no different. Hygiene might improve however. But, for that, virginity in someone who hasn’t learned fashion and daily showering is still worth more.

      Alphas prefer virgins in every culture, especially in Europe.

      But western Europe is outrageously politically correct now. Truth is a foreign concept there.

      Like


    • Helena – I’m (or was) European, too, and there is a HUGE difference.
      In the US, the 19-year old isn’t allowed into (most) bars and already has 1-3 kids. 60% + of the population are overweight, half of them obese (=30 lbs. or more over).
      Virtually all women (age and looks irrelevant) think of themselves as a combination of Miss Universe and the Queen of Sweden, and women between 16-55 are pretty much only interested in men 16-28, provided said man is at least 6’2, looks like a soap opera actor and has Donald Trump’s checkbook.
      And if she’s fit and pretty at 28, you can quadruple that demand.
      And yes, America may be the most youth-obsessed culture on the planet.

      Like


    • on December 5, 2012 at 1:31 pm Hugh G. Rection

      This is a profoundly stupid comment. You make many false assumptions.
      1. A 25 year old 8 was quite possibly a 19 year old 9. The opposite doesn’t happen, you don’t get more attractive as you age unless there are some radical changes to your body.
      2. A young girl is far less experienced and far more gullible, thus easier to pick up. She also hasn’t accumulated a useless degree and fluffy job title to feel more self important.
      3. A girl who is an idiot at 19 will be an idiot at 25. You’ll seldom see a woman learn from her mistakes, that learning experience is usually avoided by rationalization, blaming and society not holding her accountable.
      4. A beautiful 29 year old single women has something wrong with her. Quite possibly, she is a giant slut delusional about her SMV. She probably carries a lot of baggage from being fucked and chucked so often – the so called 1000 cock stare. Or worse, she has bastard children.
      6. American women are just as delusional about their value with increasing age, maybe even more so as European women. They think their liberal arts degree makes up for years of whoring and declining looks. A 10% decrease in sexual market value usually goes along with a 20% increase in hamster velocity. Unless we find a way to convert this into electricity you are not objectively more valuable.

      Of course, you have to take what’s there. If there isn’t a 10, there may be a 9 [..] and so on down the line until Rosie Palmer seems like the preferable date.

      Like


      • Well said!

        Like


      • Standing ovation on this one, bro… especially:

        A 10% decrease in sexual market value usually goes along with a 20% increase in hamster velocity. Unless we find a way to convert this into electricity you are not objectively more valuable.

        To borrow a Seinfeld allusion: That’s gold, Jerry. Gold!

        Like


    • on December 5, 2012 at 1:33 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Damn blog ate my comment. TL;DR you are full of delusions. American women also think their value increases with age, but this is just basic physics: Every reaction has an equal opposite reaction, in this case the decrease in value causes an increase in Hamster velocity.

      Like


    • “The 25yr old 8 or 9 will be more polite to you at a bar or social gathering than the idiot 19yr old 6. But all you guys seem to think that after 23 all women are “old ladies”. But then you wonder why immature women act immature?”

      Understand, Helena, that you are speaking to a lot of virgins with invented conquests. I’ve never in my life met a person who “peaked” at 19. Male or female…if a girl peaks in her teens she has either led a very hard life (meth addict, or something similar) or her peak was pretty sad.

      Like


      • I agree that some women do look better in their thirties than when they were about 19

        A few even look quite good in their fourthies

        My girlfriend is 52 and looks not a day over 42, she used to be a “traffic stopper” and is still quite hot for a woman her age , of course younger men here would lift their nose on her because well… she is almost a grandma to them

        even when I was a very young man I have always been attracted to women who were a bit older what is called today a “milf” or a ” mature”
        although I only dated once a woman who was older than I was,
        I was 32 and she was 40 and to me she seemed so much older!!!

        some women age well but I would say it is a minority

        Like


      • From a physical standpoint, people in general peak betwen 16 and 30, 19-25 being the sweet spot. The often awkward teens are behind them, and the first li’l signs of decay that start to slowly creep into the dark corners at some point in their 30’s haven’t made their appearance just yet.
        Anyone who claims otherwise is either lying or deluding themselves or was the ‘fat kid’ and beat the very long odds by losing the weight later in life.
        Online fgorums are chock full to the frickin’ rfaters with women in their 40’s and 50’s claiming to be newly awakened sexual dynamos, leading ‘active’ lives (= bowling….) and being more attractive now than they were in college.
        100% pure undiluted bullshit.
        Note that the above does not apply to female gymnasts and figure skaters.
        They are in essence washed-up grandmas at 22, at least in their sport.

        Like


      • Shaming doesn’t work here.

        Twenty is your physical peak, and your value is largely physical. Or, to use round numbers, your plateau is roughly around 16-24, with mileage varying. Mentioning that you begin your decline in mid-twenties is not the same as saying “after 23 all women are ‘old ladies,'” and you know that. (Exaggeration for effect doesn’t work here either.) Let’s accept this cruel time-frame as a rule of thumb and move on. There is no point in whistling past this particular graveyard.

        You are correct to say that a woman’s peak value is not necessarily tied to the chronological. In fact, you are pointing up the profound tragedy of female development: it runs along separate tracks. By the time a woman matures mentally, socially, and spiritually, her physical peak has passed. Which is why civilized people have always protected young women from making life-altering choices for themselves. When we abdicate this responsibility, we get the sexual morass-bordering-on-dystopia of our era’s slutocracy, depicted most artfully on the HBO show Girls.

        You are further correct to assume this site emphasizes the physical value of women to the point of outright distortion, but this is not without purpose. When two seemingly intelligent women such as you and Helena blithely perpetuate the absurdity that the beauty of youth is a mere trick or “American” “obsession,” a loud corrective is in order. If an audience is hard of hearing, one must shout. If indeed this is an audience of big-talking virgins with fake conquests, then all the more reason to disabuse them of the shibboleths that are trapping them in lies, shibboleths you unwittingly just perpetrated. Their eyes tell them one thing, their culture tells them another, and this promotes an environment of dishonesty all around.

        While the men may be hard of hearing, you are positively deaf — most likely for fear of admitting your powerlessness in the face of diminishing value: by the time you independently achieve the paternal wisdom that could have steered you toward smart decisions, the sagging, the crows feet, and the stubborn weight will have already appeared, even as your fertility continues to steadily vanish.

        But take heart. More goes into a lady than simple prettiness, even if that truth is not a point of focus on these sites. You have advantages, but pride, confusion, and an acquired dishonesty disallow you from pressing them.

        Matt

        Like


      • “Shaming” and “exaggeration” don’t work here?
        This must be one of the most ironic statements I’ve ever read. Perhaps it is a stab at satire. If so, well done.

        Like


      • He means for the guys… you know, the ‘bitter/jealous/keyboard jockey/can’t get girls’ litany, which you attempted.

        Like


      • Thanks, yeah I am starting to understand the code here.

        Sample statement: “The world is filled with assholes. I don’t like assholes, most other people don’t seem to either” or some variation of “people in the real world who are successful in an endeavor don’t usually spend a lot of time boasting about how successful they are”
        (fwiw, they also aren’t prone to using handles like ‘pussy magnet’ or similar, but that’s neither here nor there…)

        Response: “Red pill hater!” “Run hamster, run!” “Lies! Cunt!”
        Further response: “+1 bro!”

        In the relativity that is this forum the first statement is one of denial, shame, exaggeration. The response portion is cogent and poignant fact.

        Like


      • For what it’s worth, I’m in total agreement with you about most of the puffery that goes on in the chateau.

        But killing ’em with cunt don’t cut no ice, neither. :mad

        Like


      • ‘Kill ’em with cunt don’t cut no ice’…wait a minute…Rousseau, isn’t it?
        🙂

        Like


      • “Red pill hater!” “Run hamster, run!” “Lies! Cunt!”
        Further response: “+1 bro!”

        Those are indeed the responses because a shorthand is required until you get up to speed on your own initiative, if ever. Now here I patiently take the time to get you up to speed, and your clueless reply just confirms the utility of the shorthand, if anything to spare us a wasted effort.

        I suppose it’s not a complete waste, given that others are reading and noting the solid rationale behind the abbreviations and jargon, which will forever incite neophytes into going off half-cocked, especially the resentful female kind.

        And no, “exaggeration for effect will not work here” as it works with your wilting daddy and beta supplicants. We don’t buy into the princess persecution complex at the expense of speaking the plain truth. Nobody but you and your sisters make the claim that “23-year-olds are ‘old ladies,'” and yet you attribute that absurdity to us as if we aren’t familiar with your M.O.: hastily cobble together the crudest straw man to justify your criticism and ridicule, which pertain to nothing, as any observer who isn’t impressed with your assertions of quality (“I’m very successful in life on all counts”) can see. In fact, we see it clearly enough and repeatedly enough to identify a type. And your type gets a name. Hamster in overdrive.

        But do stick around. You are indeed “starting to understand the code here.” Once you internalize it a little better, you might have something useful to say. But then, twentysomethings living in dread of the wall hardly ever do more than repeat cliché as expected of them. Only after it’s too late do you acquire the humility to suffer into wisdom, rather than just whine about it, searching for someone who cares (besides your steadily accumulating house of cats, who never judge).

        Matt

        Like


      • Aw, gee Matt…you aren’t impressed with my ostensible “assertions of quality”? Okay, I’ll fess up. I am actually Babs Streisand posing as a “quality” person for my own nefarious purposes. You caught me, Tiger.

        Like


      • ‘Kill ‘em with cunt don’t cut no ice’…wait a minute…Rousseau, isn’t it? 🙂

        Probably Dangerfield channeling Bogey… surprised you missed the tongue-in-cheek noirishness, Madame Curie. :-p

        Like


      • Aw, gee Matt…you aren’t impressed with my ostensible “assertions of quality”? Okay, I’ll fess up.

        I’m not rejecting your assertions, cupcake. I’m pointing out that they don’t suffice as the distraction you think they are. I have no reason to believe you aren’t accomplished and satisfied with yourself.

        Stay focused, will you? I can present the comprehensive case, but I can’t make you follow along.

        Now try one post without sarcasm, Dizzy Lizzy.

        Matt

        Like


      • Here is your hope, to follow the smooth path of Susanna Hoffs to your mortal destiny, the way of all flesh:

        Age 29:

        Age 37:

        Age 42:

        Age 53 (today):

        I don’t mean to taunt you, but she is so rare it’s almost cruel to point her out. If you don’t have her saucer-sized eyes and smoky-schoolgirl voice, there’s not much to distract from the signs of rot. If she had work done, it’s not obvious to me. Then again, it may just be my boyhood crush talking.

        Sic transit gloria mundi.

        Matt

        Like


      • That’s hardly a taunt. I wouldn’t be here if I were an insecure person looking for ego stroking. I’m very successful in life on all counts, thanks.

        -Quidquid latine dictum, altum videtur

        Like


      • fwiw, I do love her voice…she is amazing.

        Like


      • My third emoticon for the day. That’s over the top. How nauseating.

        Like


      • Oh yeah? Well… um… Omnia Gallia in tres partes divisa est!

        Like


      • 😀
        Caveat emptor!

        Like


      • Carpe Diem! Seize the fish this day!

        Like


  46. Lyle Lovett had a weirdly un – balanced facial bone structure, Yet, for some reason, for those of us who saw his career and his love-life all up close only one answer seemed true: He got all the hot chicks with any apparent effort. Julia Roberts was like a waiting in-in-line- for
    Lyle. kind of girl.

    Like


  47. Lyle had/has a funny looking unsymmetric face So does Mr. Smirk Man in this post. LL was perhaps the most efficicent harvester of free -range-poon to have ever lived. ‘Effortless” is only a 10 letter word. But up close, it can look like Mozart in his Prime.

    Like


  48. […] The female snarl has become a topic of conversation, which is not surprising because American women in general are becoming less feminine and more churlish. When in the past women would gently demur the solicitations of beta and omega males, today they prefer the unrefined art of snarling like a hyena over a fresh kill, the kill being their overworked vaginas. Meanwhile, alpha males witness them snarling ungenerously and think, “Marriage material? Nope. Pump and dump material? Yes!” don’t bother me. i’m pooping a purple saguaro. The author of the linked article posits that the frequency with which women snarl correlates to their age and the sexual market threat level of the targets of their disapproval. A woman arguably snarls between five to twenty times a day. The frequency is directly related to maturity. The more immature, the more the snarl appears. High school, consistently snarling. College, frequently. Twenties, sporadically. Thirties, only when they see a younger woman. There have probably been a couple snarls while reading this. Ha haa. I’d add that the snarl is increasing among all female age groups, though younger women do use it more profligately, and with good reason: there are more beta males lasciviously eyeing their goods for Source: Chateau Heartiste   […]

    Like


  49. In all seriousness, thanks for addressing the fact that it’s hard for some girls to get rid of betas who just want a wet hole for the night. Guys like that are pushy to the point of, well, deserving the snarl sometimes. I do agree it’s highly overused, but how is a woman supposed to deflect unwanted attention? What’s the right signal? Guys, honestly, what is it you honor in cases like that?

    Like


    • just say ‘i have a boyfriend’. that gets rid of the betas real fast without being cunty.

      i bet ‘i have a dick’ would work too, but the guy might be into that.

      Like


    • Guys, honestly, what is it you honor in cases like that?

      Michon- or The Bride-esque swordplay is always mighty persuasive.

      Like


    • I do agree it’s highly overused, but how is a woman supposed to deflect unwanted attention?

      Stay home. Wear something dowdy. Neglect to use makeup.

      Contrived, exaggerated, and minor inconveniences do not necessitate a new social convention to preserve your inflated sense of entitlement. You do not have a right to treat a public place like a private one. The possibility of attention is one of the differences between “home” and “out,” and your constipated stinkeye cannot magically preserve the royal prerogatives that exist chiefly in your head. You interact with human beings through the long-standing conventions of etiquette and courtesy.

      That women pretend it necessary to contort their faces into ugly masks indicates the incongruity of female expectations more than the faux pas of men, as the original post indicates. You’re not that hot, so stop flattering yourself. In fact no woman is such a prize that she can establish a set of social privileges centered around her maximum convenience — the efforts of beta slavering notwithstanding.

      Look, it is a meat market out there. You are the meat. All meat attracts flies no matter the quality of the cut. If you want it to be different, you have to change the culture at its foundations, and even then your best hope is to make it a friendlier place for your daughters. Until then, unequal treatment is a non-starter, particularly when you dress the part. If you and your sisters sneer and hiss like animals, you will be treated like animals in return. If the best you can do is expressionistic shorthand and handicapped face-twisting, you deserve contempt. The rest of us adults understand the value of doing things the hard way, even if it requires a princess be momentarily interrupted.

      The snarl is a retreat to the state of nature. It is a sign of complete unsophistication. When the busboy comes to take your plate a little too early, do you snap your jaws at his hand and growl? “[H]ow [else] is a woman supposed to” indicate she is not finished with her meal? “What’s the right signal?” This is not a hard question! The fact that you are even weighing the answer against a feral sneer and coming up baffled is a sign just how far we have indulged the “noble” savagery of bitches unto their own privileged barbarism. Fuuuuuck that. (And fuck you.)

      How is a woman supposed to deflect unwanted attention? The way we all do. By politely and firmly engaging the human being in front of us, and giving him the chance to save face, return politesse, and withdraw. If he is drunk and rowdy and inappropriate, the social pressure is on your side. If he just happens to have, in your opinion, overstepped his station, then the onus is on you.

      Your call for quick & dirty solutions indicates you expect the world to invent and honor a social device designed to keep your pedestal above the horror of possible interaction with those whom your caprice deems unworthy of acknowledgment. If you don’t know how to neutralize an interloper politely, it can only be because you have never been expected to. That is plainly uncivilized. (And begging for comeuppance and humiliation, which happens to be my specialty.)

      So snarl and snot it up, snowflakes. It’s my favorite. The easiest “opener” to the quickest tingle there is.

      Matt

      Like


      • Geez, Louise… every word this man writes is a gem… can’t say it enough.

        Intellectual shock and awe.

        Like


      • Crap, I don’t think my reply to his post posted, but I was just asking a question. Not even really about bitch-face, just a question in general. It can be awfully hard to shake a guy loose who’s decided he’s going to fuck you that night.

        The problem with not being able to effectively and politely turn a man down is that sometimes you find yourself, as a woman, in a position you don’t want to be in. I know that doesn’t get much discussion around here, but we’re not always cruising for sex. (and seriously, CH, you should do something about when a guy knows to back off)

        The snarl is an affectation of perceived attractiveness, sure, but it’s also a defense mechanism against perceived threats (not defending it, just saying). Maybe a valid question here is what make the modern dating market so animalistic that some little girls have learned to behave like this in order to navigate it.

        Like


      • All I was saying is that sometimes, men overstep their bounds, too, and get pushy, and sometimes there’s very little you can do as a woman to shut it down. For the record, I’ve never snarled at a guy to get him to leave me alone. Sitting in a bar having a drink after work, in non-whorish clothing, does not mean I’m on the menu. I would never go out, dressed to the nines with my boobs hanging out, and expect no male attention. When I don’t want it, I dress conservative, but guess what, even that social cue disappears in the eyes of men after a few drinks. I’m not asking for some kind of special social convention. I’m asking how to deal with the set we’re all handed when we go out at night, unrelated to the act of snarling in any way. I was just using that as a springboard to ask a very simple question.

        In general, I actually agree with you. Decency works in 90% of situations, but in that 10% of times when you can’t get a guy off you, it can be almost panic-inducing. Some men simply do not accept a polite answer. I was asking about those situations, the really extreme ones, when a guy is too drunk or too cocky to realize the girl wants him to step off.

        I don’t know what I said that deserves the level of anger in your comment. You do understand that sexual relations have been so fucked with in this country that both men and women have a hard time navigating it, right?

        You think women have the advantage, but that’s only true for the sluts. They are the only ones that get anything out of the way things are now. The rest of us who aren’t in that category (the ones that men say they want as LTR material) are immediately put at a disadvantage by that behavior. If you’re not participating in it, you’re not looked at. That’s how it works. You want to be with a hot girl who doesn’t put out due to moral or religious reservations? Course you don’t.

        You think a woman has the upper hand over a drunk man? Only under certain conditions, where there are sober men who recognize what’s going on and are willing to intervene. You know how many men are willing to intervene? I have never seen it happen, and it usually doesn’t, unless the guy’s a bouncer or something. It’s basic psychology. You know how scary it can be for a woman, dealing with a drunk guy who wants something out of her? Have you ever been followed out of a bar in a situation like that, knowing damn well that there is nothing you can do to protect yourself?

        Decency is in really short supply out there, for everyone.

        But that’s not the point of this place for you, is it? It’s not about decency. You say you want it, but a woman asks an honest question about a situation that every female on the planet has found herself in, and you decide to bitch-slap her for it.

        Like


      • …Decency works in 90% of situations, but in that 10% of times when you can’t get a guy off you, it can be almost panic-inducing.

        This is a valid concern

        maybe you should not hang out in places where there are such men/drunken men?
        there are other ways of meeting men

        or maybe should never go out alone? having another lady with you could help in getting rid of the drunk idiot?

        Before feminism, men used to intervene when they saw a drunk man bother a woman, now we rarely bother as we don’t know if the woman is going to turn on us

        … You want to be with a hot girl who doesn’t put out due to moral or religious reservations? Course you don’t.

        well…it is true that a lot men in bars only want a one night stand and that is why I think bars are not a good place for you to go

        and once you find a good decent man, he will be able to understand you do not put out on the first date, if he does not, he might not be long term relationship material

        good men looking for LTRs will have more respect for you if you are not easy and make them wait ( how long is debatable but three dates is a minimum)

        Like


  50. THe truth should be got right on a Tuesday night LL

    Like


    • Damn, that look would put Jaws off his feed.

      Like


    • A lot of White women DO love Black babies. They just do: Sandra Bullock, Jillian Michaels, Madonna, Charlize Theron, Angelina Jolie, Hillary Rosen, I probably forgot a few. The perfect fashion accessory, apparently.

      Like


      • They get them because they match their sofa.

        Also, white women love “saving” broken animals… walk around with a bloody kitten and see how many white women you attract.

        Black women? Oh heeeeeell no!

        Like


      • The day black women decide it’s NOT okay to look like a Beluga is the same day MILLIONS of white women will suddenly wake up and realize they’ve been pre-selected to become lonely cat ladies.

        Like


      • If you find a bloody kitten, you should be headed straight to the vet.

        Like


      • If I behead it, what good would a vet do?

        Like


      • on December 5, 2012 at 1:04 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Cremate it?

        Like


      • you won’t be able to hang it from a tree

        Like


      • Canadian Friends wins this round.

        Like


      • Well, those are liberal women. Conservative women wouldn’t even adopt to begin with. They want to do their part of the obligation – get married and have children, even one of your own. Two is better.

        Many of these women are so liberal, they even forgo marriage altogether. They just adopt a baby, preferably of a different race, and think they are doing good in the world. They might be helping a poor soul but shortchanging themselves. Adoption should be a substitute, unless you can’t have your own children.

        Like


      • as someone mentioned here a couple days ago ( can’t remember who) a lot of women have the crazy cat lady syndrome and that explains why they adopt babies from other races or why they are so full of empathy for the children of illegal immigrants

        when empathy and compassion go over board either for cats of babies this is a mental disorder, a mild one but a mental disorder nevertheless

        Madonna or Angelina Jolie could adopt another 14 or 40 black babies, it would be less than a drop in an ocean because millions of babies are born in Africa and other poor third world countries all the time and this is not about to slow down anytime soon, and poverty over there is not about to go away either

        and I find it utterly insulting that those woman let white babies rot in orphanages

        They give themselves a good conscience by adopting black and yellow babies, but the flip side of that is that they are being unfair and even cruel to white babies in orphanages in their own nation

        they spit on their own race.

        They are anti-white

        they contribute to the genocide of whites

        Blacks, Browns and Yellows do not adopt white babies, no one wants white babies

        I am insulted by that.

        Like


      • The problem is they don’t view whites as requiring any sympathy. They are not the underdog, get it?

        I often say that just because one is the “underdog” doesn’t mean they are always the good or should always elicit sympathy. Just like a dispute between a rich man and a poor man. The liberals always tend to be sympathetic to the poor person. In my book, we have to evaluate the evidence accordingly and decide based on the merits who is right and who is wrong in a dispute. The media will right away gravitate towards the poor person, the underdog, or the ethnic person without evaluating things in an honest manner Just because someone is poor, black, or the underdog, it doesn’t make them automatically right, or vice versa.

        Liberals often substitute poor and the underdog for Right or Good, and whites or rich are always substituted for evil-capitalist or racists. Do you see how it’s all screwed up?

        Liberals often have misplaced sympathy. Showing sympathy to the underserving is tantamount to being cruel or unfair to the Good person or the person in the right.

        Good and bad, right and wrong, and common sense have been all mixed up.

        Like


      • Canadian Friend

        “and I find it utterly insulting that those woman let white babies rot in orphanages”

        Dude, there is a waiting list for healthy white babies to adopt; its not easy.

        Like


      • on December 5, 2012 at 8:42 pm driveallnight

        This is true. My cousin was a prime candidate to adopt (LCSW + government job + financially very stable), but after learning she’d have to wait 6-8 years for a healthy white American child to become available, she settled for adopting an aftermarket knock-off baby from China.

        Adopting a black baby, however, was more or less like calling Domino’s: delivery in 30 minutes or less. (Ok, ok, I made this part up just for Thwack.)

        Like


      • We have the same problem here in the province of Quebec,
        it takes forever to adopt a white baby and it is easier to adopt Chinese baby which is what a lot of people end up doing

        why make it so hard to adopt white babies and make it super easy to adopt any other baby?

        if our governemnt agencies were worried about people adopting babies they would make it just as hard to adopt a baby from a nation thousand miles away but no, the barriers are only for local white babies

        I’m not into conspiracy theories but this is weird, even suspicious, it seems to be intentional

        maybe a lot of social workers would be out of a job if people adopted white babies and they make it almost impossible to adopt one to keep their jobs?

        if they are Unionized, it is highly possible that they manipulate everything and everyone

        Unions are not much different from the mafia

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        I’m not into conspiracy theories but this is weird, even suspicious, it seems to be intentional
        ——————————
        Nigga do I hafta spell it out for you?

        Its not a conspiracy. The truth is, a healthy white newborn baby of good genetic and racial hygine is a very valuable thing in a white supremacy system.

        There is no incentive for a white woman to have a good white baby and then give it away?

        Its a white baby!

        Who tha fuck puts their Rolls Royce up for adoption?

        Like


      • Its not a conspiracy. The truth is, a healthy white newborn baby of good genetic and racial hygine is a very valuable thing in a white supremacy system.

        Ah, a tear of reminiscence comes to me eye when I think, back in the day, of junior’s first little stiff-armed salute.

        Like


  51. “A fantastically egregious bitch — let’s say, a chubster wearing too much makeup and muffin top who thinks every man wants her and deserves her worst shit tests — requires a bit more… encouragement… to reform her ill-suited attitude. In such circumstances, the smirk won’t pack the necessary wallop. You’ll need something edgier.”

    Like what? I give her the Bruce Willis smirk then casually hand her a card with the CH url on it…
    And then my bodyguard, Jaws, comes over, smiles, picks her up, and drops her muffin-top first into the nearest dumpster.

    Like


  52. I remember way back when… I was a young beta, travelling home from work on the train. I was staring off into space, more asleep than awake really, when I realized that the space I was staring off into contained an hot chick, easy 9, but a little old for me. The reason I realized she was there was because she snarled/sneered at me (“Imagine the likes of you looking at a hot babe like me”). The look of complete disorientation on her face when I cracked up helpless with laughter was not only beautiful to behold, but started me on the path to confidence.

    Like


  53. women prefer slimmer male bodies then men. body builders wept http://dienekes.blogspot.se/2012/12/quantifying-attractive-body.html

    Like


    • so even women agree that there is an ideal female figure and that it is one that most men would find attractive. feminist land whales wept.

      Like


    • Body builders don’t have natural muscles, they are just inflated balloons…they are lacking in natural T by upping the synthetic garbage. Most of them have a gut.

      However if you have earned your muscles the natural way…you’ll be slimmer anyway. Muscles take up less space in the body than fat or aired up balloons.

      A while women prefer slimmer male bodies…but you better have some back, chest, and leg muscles there. She doesn’t want a stick.

      Like


      • on December 5, 2012 at 12:52 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Biologically speaking that’s bullshit. Aesthetically speaking I agree with you, the Bodybuilder look is usually too extreme, much like a woman with too large tit or ass implants.

        Like


      • And there are good sites now about what makes a male physique that’s pleasing to the female eye. I use Rusty Moore’s Fitness Black Book stuff and you can read up on what they call the Hollywood physique on sites like evolvify. My girl is into the male back too, I’ve been working on it with the pull-ups and do them a lot better now (whole sets of them unassisted).

        Like


      • for a well defined back, do the pull ups where the bar goes behind your head.

        Like


    • A link to Sweden? You don’t hang around here much, do you. And I don’t care what some study says, I’m a natural skinny guy and I can feel the difference in how women react to me now that I’ve been lifting for a couple of years.

      Like


      • I’m a naturally skinny guy trying to get bigger as well (though I am, as my name suggests, lazy about it). I’m not saying you shouldn’t put on muscle, just saying that some guys overestimate the size of the ideal body. Of course, its not a huge problem.

        Like


  54. “I remember when you used to be able to eye-fuck girls whilst walking down the street”

    I do that everyday. It’s a lot of fun. About half of the girls eye-fuck me back.

    A few days ago I walked past a group milling outside of a pricey restaurant. It was several impressive, executive looking men and one unbelievably hot early-thirties woman wearing a smart skirt-suit and with legs out of this world. Everyone was dressed to the max. It was obviously an important business meeting of some kind.

    The chick must have already been in a state of elevated arousal, with all that tense alpha air about her group. I walked past, locked onto her eyes with a regal hint of smile and she looked had back at me and with a flushed facestayed eye-locked. Her eyes silently erupted in orgasm.

    Like


    • On a related note, I make it a habit to stare overtly at any women who is willing to put her goods on display. If you are wearing some form fitting outfit or have your cleavage out I will openly and actively stare at it because I find it pleasing and I care fuck all if my gaze makes you uncomfortable. The best is walking through a mall or store with some hoochie in front of me in tight sweat pants, skirt, etc. I will watch that ass sometimes not even seeing where I’m walking.

      Like


    • “I remember when you used to be able to eye-fuck girls whilst walking down the street”

      That’s because you’re cockeyed.

      Like


    • A lot of this is defensive urbanism, out of fear of provocation. You don’t get as much anxiety from eyeballing in the country.

      Steady eye-contact is a declaration of one’s worth, which can be provocative in certain contexts. The difference between a creeper’s gawk and proper peering is intent, which radiates from the “windows to the soul” as clearly as spoken words. It is “I adore you and am mesmerized by you” vs.”You are part of the landscape, all of which I own.” The difference is indifference.

      But apparently men aren’t terribly wise to this trick. Most girls must not be used to possession by glance, given their general inability to deliver a proper or effective response. They always break first, usually quickly. Indeed, there’s such power in eye contact that few have the gumption to explore it enough to react rationally and consistently to the sudden, everyday staring contest.

      It should be the first tool in every man’s toolbox. But it is useless, even dangerous, without first mastering intent.

      Matt

      Like


      • Matthew King (King A)
        A lot of this is defensive urbanism, out of fear of provocation. You don’t get as much anxiety from eyeballing in the country.
        ——————————-

        Thats right Matt

        In the ghetto they call it the “eye fuck”.

        Like


  55. I prefer the alpha female mini-squint and smirk.

    Like


  56. porkface on the right has zero reason to snarl considering her ftl approaching future smv. youth is her only quality.

    Like


  57. I’ve found that raising an eyebrow and a smirk then turning away sends the message. Or if she is part of the group, saying the old, “Careful your your face will grow like that.” Gets an embarrassed response – especially if you’re older since many times it makes them go back to their “little-girl” place. It’s interesting, while I may see a snarl at a bar; when I come down off stage, or am doing auditions and the women are trying out for a part, I never see it except directed at other women/girls who are trying out for either the same part, or have pushed their way to the front of the line.

    It’s all about presentation and objective. You have to remember an 18-22 year old, really is still a child (since she’s been protected from the real-world by parents and school) and still needs to be called out on unacceptable behavior or they tend to go feral. Too many women haven’t had a strong man in the house to train them properly in how to behave in a social setting, so it’s up to you to call them out on poor behavior – and not be a child yourself. Women tend to be like dogs – they really do want to please, but you have to show them you are the alpha dog and don’t take non-sense from females even if you plan to bend them over a couch later…

    Like


  58. Doc, the problem you would likely run into there is being laughed at. Most young women don’t care what is or what isn’t unacceptable behavior. In fact, many young women bask in what isn’t acceptable. Look at Rihanna for example. She’s the alpha dog of the music industry, and so is Lady Gaga. Both females. Both bad girls using rebellion to get what they want, attention, fame, glory, and money. And they get it. Women are caring less and less about how men want them to behave. The more they know what is expected of them, the more they do the opposite. You can try to show women that you don’t take non-sense from females, but they will flip the rug from under you and show you they don’t either.

    Like


    • Mainstream pop singers are rebels. Oh dear.

      Just read your word for politically correct screed against White males (conservative heterosexuals) on your blog. That was rebellious. Very Very Naughty.

      Like


    • The Wall will be there for them as well, stronger than ever.

      Like


    • Look at Rihanna for example. She’s the alpha dog of the music industry, and so is Lady Gaga. Both females.

      The jury’s still out on those counts.

      Like


    • Wrong. Whether women admit it or not, they give a tremendous shit about what everyone thinks of them. Look at how much trouble they go to before going out, even to the shops. You could, and probably will, see men at your local shopping centre who have unkempt beards, matted hair, stained shirts, and socks and sandals. These are people who truly don’t give a fuck what people think. Women spend half their fucking income on looking pleasing to the eye. The exact opposite.

      The reason women ‘act bad’ is because women like bad boys and mistakenly think it works the opposite way to — that is, that men like bad girls. Men have the same problem: they will often approach women in a nice, respectful, and friendly manner, because these are the personality traits we like in women. I hate to use a term belong to psychology, because I believe much of it is bullshit, but I believe this is referred to as ‘projection’.

      If you need proof of how much these bad girls actually care, scour the net for threads criticising tattoos on women. In them you will find many resentful bad girls who have their feelings hurt by such criticism. Further proof that women care about what others think is how she responds to insults. If a woman is insulted, she cries, whereas an insulted man just says “I don’t care what that cunt thinks anyway”.

      Like


      • I didn’t say that women don’t care what anyone thinks about them, period. I meant, and I should have clarified…. many of them don’t give a shit if anyone expects them to behave like “ladies” as in, dress pretty, act feminine, keep your legs closed and crossed, don’t curse, don’t burp or fart out loud, etc.

        Like


      • Talk more about farts and open crotches. Pretty is sooooo overrated, amirite?

        (Please can I fuck you pretty please?)

        Like


      • Then in that case men shouldn’t give a shit about being masculine…and women should still adore them.

        However in reality when that happens…women aren’t attracted to them. It is also the case when ladies don’t act feminine…men won’t be attracted to that.

        Like


      • Well they can all have the Bruce Willis types. I’d much rather take their friend zoned guys home with me anyway.

        Like


      • You mean like that dude who videotaped you in the pool.

        Because your body language just screamed…”I’m bored.” Which in my experience with chicks is the #1 emotion they despise.

        Like


      • I wasn’t bored at all. I was relaxed and being my usual introverted, calm, and relaxed self.

        Like


      • Obviously…because you knew that guy wasn’t going to do anything to rock the boat.

        I’d like to see how you act when a guy comes along that does rock the boat.

        Like


      • I’d send him a post card.

        Like


      • And yet you wouldn’t dare to do ANY of what you said in front of a man you consider Alpha.

        The last thing we need here is your “emancipation of women” feminist bullshit, seriously.

        Like


      • Good points

        I believe that nowadays women behave badly because it is the new trend and women want to be accepted, they don’t want to be outcasts, they simply follow the trend

        looking and behaving like a no manner whore is the new “in thing” to do, so they almost all do it

        they don’t analyze it, they just want to fit in

        that is why , to give one example, they now wear shoes that only ten years ago were called stripper shoes because well…only stripper were wearing them

        Like


    • on December 5, 2012 at 2:49 pm Holden Caulfield

      Your explanation helps to partially explain these facts:

      http://pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=1485

      Like


    • >Look at Rihanna for example. She’s the alpha dog of the music industry,

      That’s not how “Saint-Saens” is spelled.

      Like


    • Lady gaga is kind of foul. Look at what happened to Madonna, another ostensible “alpha”. Instead of getting old she got creepy, but the result is the same.

      Like


    • on December 5, 2012 at 5:13 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Nice theory, but so abjectly false it’s laughable. Women care very much about what others think about them. That’s why you have a brigade of cunts descending on you once you publicly judge a woman negatively for her behavior. Remember the slutwalks after a cop gave some innocent advice?

      Remember for example the case of the fatty news anchor who supposedly got bullied by a private, politely worded e-mail. She mentioned it on air to elicit positive attention. If she really didn’t care she would just delete the e-mail and move on with her life.

      You are in fact constantly whining if someone is telling you what to do. That’s the opposite of not caring.

      Like


      • That’s why you have a brigade of cunts descending on you once you publicly judge a woman negatively for her behavior.

        It’s actually surreal…

        I’m mentioned in passing “whoring starlets” in Hollywood… after some particularly egregious example trumpeted in the tabloids… and have had fifty-something hausfraus rush to their defense.

        Younger women I expect to be foible-full.

        But I’ve lost so much respect for older women over the past decade that it makes me look forward to the Apocalypse.

        I mean, if we can’t even count on aging out of the sexual marketplace and life experience making them smarter and more human, why the hell does the earth deserve to continue in this state?

        Like


      • There is a massive difference between caring how you are treated and caring what others think.

        Of course I care if someone tells me what to do. They don’t get to do that. I do. But if someone calls me a fat, lazy, cunt, or whatever name men think makes us “cry” or flinch….I usually don’t respond. It’s meaningless insult that doesn’t phase me.

        Like


      • It’s faze, you fat lazy cunt or whatever.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 4:37 am Hugh G. Rection

        There is not really a massive difference because one thing flows from the other. How you are treated very much depends on what others think about you.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 11:12 am Hugh G. Rection

        So you don’t care what others think as long as they don’t say anything or act on it? I suppose that makes a limited amount of sense and pretty well describes the way most liberals act around uncomfortable truths.

        Like


    • “The more they know what is expected of them, the more they do the opposite. You can try to show women that you don’t take non-sense from females, but they will flip the rug from under you and show you they don’t either.”

      No, I think it’s the men that are flipping the rug underneath us. They stop respecting and cherishing women, and they don’t want to get married anymore. Feminism just gave them all the excuses in the book to use women sexually, deservedly or not, without marriage. Feminism is a dream come true for men, not so much for women.

      Regarding Lady Gaga and Rihanna being the example of today’s desirable women, just because a few skanks can behave unfemininly because they have the world stage at their disposal, doesn’t mean the average woman can. Men are still very subconsciously oriented and formatted over what constitutes a worthy female for marriage, and the Lady Gaga and Rihanna types in RL are not it.

      And regarding marriage not being valuable, I don’t think there is a woman who starts seeing a guy without thinking he has potential to be a BF/husband and father, or the so-called night-in-shining-armor. If you think women are not interested in marriage anymore, you are HIGHLY mistaken. All they do subconsciously is for the marriage proposal. It’s too bad they don’t realize what their inner voice tells them, but instead they listen to old-hag feminists fill their heads with falsehoods.

      Like


      • Lady Gaga is a circus clown.
        Hell, David Bowie was Lady Gaga 20 years before Lady Gaga was even a glint in her daddy’s eye.
        And Rihanna – ‘nuddah one whose parents obviously had trouble spelling – probably gets slapped around all the time because her beause her beaus are sick of her caterwauling.
        She like.

        Like


      • Wolfie65
        Lady Gaga is a circus clown.
        Hell, David Bowie was Lady Gaga 20 years before Lady Gaga was even a glint in her daddy’s eye.
        ———————————

        Damn, I never thought of it that way but you are right. He can do just about anything. He even performed on Soul Train during his funk period.

        they called him “The thin white duke”.

        Like


    • on December 6, 2012 at 12:10 am Days of Broken Arrows

      This only works if all women behave like those pop stars, which will never happen.

      Men will bed the loonies but not call them the next day. They’ll stick with the good ones. Always was this way, always will be. You can will the battle, but will ultimately lose the war.

      And it doesn’t get better as you get older. Older women who never married are at a double loss because they tend to come off as crazy, not having been civilized by kids, and they also have to deal with men their age going for younger women.

      Finally, a lot of what you see in those pop stars is a contrived image designed to sell rebellion to women. Gaga doesn’t represent any sort of “new woman” any more than KISS represented a breed of new men.

      Like


      • Right. Celebrities are rich and protected enough to handle the consequences of their antisocial behavior. Meanwhile, fans who take their cue from the private lives of their idols wreck themselves in imitation. Voilà, trailer parks and Jerry Springer shows.

        Like


  59. How about….
    “You’re not supposed to be mad at me until tomorrow morning” or
    “Have we had sex before?”

    Of course, it’s all in the delivery….

    Like


  60. […] Cheating is allowed in this case, but not encouraged. […]

    Like


    • First line of the article:

      The good news is: feminism happened, so men don’t get to just run around slapping our asses with impunity anymore.

      looolllzozozozozolllll

      I stopped reading after that, of course.

      Like


      • that ass slapping with impunity never really existed

        maybe sailors did it to prostitutes but apart from that maybe one tenth of one percent of men ever did that

        feminists manufacture things all the time

        how could I ever have respect for them?

        Like


      • Exactly… any man who went around “slapping asses with impunity” (lllllozozozolllll… sorry, that just sounds so funny to me) usually got slapped down himself by either the woman or nearby men.

        True story: Back in the day, a friend’s girlfriend was telling us about how, while out jogging, some clown slapped her ass as she ran by (college town) him on the street… she wasn’t one to take this lightly, and I never knew her to curse, but said she whirled around and shouted at him “YOU FUCKING BASTARD!”. Well, two workmen driving by in a truck saw it and heard her, and they jumped out and chased the guy down, hammers in hand… and brought him back by the scruff of his neck for an apology.

        That’s how it was, some 20 years ago. I’d like to think it would still happen today… I know I’d do it, though I doubt I could run down a 20-something these days.

        Like


      • that is how I remember it as well

        when I was in my teens and early twenties( in the 1970s and 1980s before feminism infected everything ) , if a man touched a woman’s ass , her brother or some friends of her would threaten the guy with physical violence and make him leave the premises

        the offender occasionally got beaten up

        men had a reason to defend women’s honor back then and they often did

        now that feminism has made us ( white males ) second rate citizens only good for writing checks and that our entertainment/culture is making fun of us every chance it gets, very few men get involved

        Women had a good deal but they were too dumb to know it

        Like


    • Ya gotta love left-wingers.

      Men create society, and want some recompense for creating it and maintaining it. Mainly, broads.

      Broads: “Ok, but you only get in our pants if you act this way!”

      (Men act this way).

      Broads: “How dare you act this way to get in our pants!”

      Women truly do not understand the male sex drive.

      Solution?……

      ……………..
      wait for it……

      RAPE!

      Like


      • on December 5, 2012 at 3:04 pm Holden Caulfield

        Agree with your logic, but just to clarify, see the article below 😉

        http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26368

        Like


      • What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

        Busy little bugger, ain’t he?

        Like


      • Variation on the theme: a white woman is raped every 14 minutes by a negro.

        Geez, you’d think she would move out of that neighborhood.

        Like


      • With the rapid browning of the USA where will she move to?

        well she could always wear a ” I voted for Obama” t-shirt every where she goes, maybe that’ll buy her some “immunity” ?

        ( sarcasm of course )

        Like


      • I knew most of those facts but it is still is just as shocking everytime I read articles like that

        if one wonders what a pretty lie is and why it must perish, this type of article is what they should read

        talking about those shocking facts and wanting them to be known by everyone is being a race realist

        being told to shut the fuck up about it is racism

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        I knew most of those facts but it is still is just as shocking everytime I read articles like that
        ——–

        OK, how bout I make up an infographic showing all the dead maimed white men caused by Jew wars?

        Or one that shows white men selling out your country peice by peice to the chinks?

        Oh I get it. You don’t care about that because you plan on blaming niggers for that too.

        Like


    • Article says

      …women aren’t vending machines where if you put in enough Nice, sex comes out

      you can say that again!

      actually it is worse than that

      putting enough nice only gets you nice in return from women maybe 10% of the time

      Believe me I know, I’m 53 and have been a nice guy for most of my life and after having dated 25 women I can tell you that had I treated them like shit, they would not have been bitchier than they were after I had treated them like princesses

      no matter how you treat most women they will be bitches in return

      It is useless to be nice to women ( there are a few exceptions , maybe 5 or 10 % of women are nice if you find one hang on to her!!!)

      oh and what is not so funny is that if a woman gives you sex she then expect you to be super nice in return

      it is an unfair trade as it goes only one way

      Like


      • You have it figured out! That’s why you are posting here. Where all the super-successful with women people come to talk about how successful they are.

        Like


      • Consider CH to be therapy for recovering Jezebel victims, and it might make more sense to you. Probably not, but it might.

        Like


      • on December 5, 2012 at 4:37 pm Holden Caulfield

        spin hamster spin. someone should link to those awesome pics CH uses

        Like


      • Can I just ask a question?

        Why do you call us hamsters?

        Like


      • Because they aren’t clever enough to come up with new material.

        Like


      • It refers to the ability of women to rationalize all behavior as someone else’s fault – rationalization hamster is the full expression.

        Like


      • Because they aren’t clever enough to come up with new material.

        A good tale always bears retelling, dahling. 😉

        Like


      • These “men” on this website are spinning in little hamster wheels quite often. I’ve finally concluded that we should just leave them alone. It’s just a big sausage fest full of women haters. Us being here although amusing, is doing nothing…these men all clearly have self confidence issues. Although the way they are trying to deal with it is wrong, in reality, we don’t have to put up with men like this. If they want to live in denial then they are welcome to it.

        Like


      • You have it figured out! That’s why you are posting here. Where all the super-successful with women people come to talk about how successful they are.

        Come now. You’re “clever enough to come up with new material.”

        You might imagine this idea has been done to death by haters of every stripe. The thooopher thuthethphul are so thuthethphul that they spend every waking moment obsessively pursuing their goal and none reflecting on it or comparing notes with peers or just shooting the shit with the like-minded, &c.

        What if “It’s so easy / When everybody’s trying to please me”? What if they’re “out to please” and “ready to make” whether we post here or not?

        N.B.: Sarcasm does not become you, Elizabeth.

        Like


      • Vending machines? It’s more like, uh, playing the slots.

        Like


  61. Here in Israel, there are very few women of any age who don’t snarl often. It seems to be the most common facial expression.

    If it’s any consolation, it does eventually cause a condition a friend of mine coined as “ass face”. A wrinkle forms in the center of the forehead.

    Like


    • Koreans have a special word for the small, nearly vertical wrinkle that occurs just above the bridge of the nose (and usually in the shape of a ‘V’) when a person gets angry or concentrates very hard.

      We need a word for that too. Any ideas? Maybe “angreev”?

      Like


  62. Whore or not to be? That is the vaGina.

    Like


  63. Someone does that to me, I spit in her eye. I suggest all of you do the same.

    Like


  64. What’s with the face? -Wait, you just smelled your own vagina, didn’t you? …Yup. Smells from over here, too.

    What’s with the face; -constipation or gas? -Oh wait, yeah, you definitely have gas. God dammit, now you’re making me do that face, too. You are positively rotten! -Oof!

    Like