Hamster Of The Month

This is the first of a new series called “Hamster of the Month”, or HOTM, in which the best (worst?) female hamster rationalization is highlighted each month and awarded the prize of helping men see the true nature of women. We thank you. ladies, for your service to the cause of knowledge dissemination.

At the end of the year there will be a Hamster of the Year award for the woman who makes the biggest fool of herself excusing the behavior of some total asshole she loves.

Our first winner of the HOTM goes to none other than… drumroll please…

Rihanna!

Here she is, puppeteered by her roided up hamster, explaining why she chose, again and again, to fly back into the arms of Chris Brown, the man who pummeled her face with fists of furious love. She was obviously unable to do without his alpha charms.

‘Because as angry as I was – as angry and hurt and betrayed – I just felt like he made that mistake because he needed help. And who’s going to help him? Nobody’s going to say he needs help, everybody’s going to say he’s a monster, without looking at the source. And I was more concerned about him.’


That is some rye-cheeee-us hamstering. The hamster is strong in this one.

For the readers who are prone to bouts of comforting delusion and head-in-sand syndrome who may be tempted to excuse Rihanna for her overbearing nurturing instinct, please note that beta males do not get the same allowances from women that alpha males like Chris Brown get. When beta males make a mistake — a beta male-ish type of mistake like, say, being too dutiful a provider, or too effuse with flattery, or too unromantic because of fatigue from long hours spent at the office — their women will have no trouble, no trouble at all, leaving them and staying away from them. You will rarely, perhaps never!, hear a woman excuse her incorrigible beta male boyfriend’s mistakes by saying “He made a mistake because he needed help. And who’s going to help him besides me?”

Nope. What you are more likely to hear from a woman who has complaints about a beta male boyfriend is this: “He’s too needy. I felt smothered. He should meet someone who can appreciate him.” And, like magic, she’ll be able to leave the beta male without any problem, unlike those alpha males who are mysteriously difficult to leave because… oh, I don’t know, pick your rationalization: fear of kidnapping, fear of homelessness from losing his support, voodoo hexing. Funny how women never seem to worry about these consequences when they want to leave beta males. They just get up and go. And they never look back about it on a couch side by side with Oprah.

So, kudos, Rihanna, for letting your hamster demonstrate on high spin cycle to the world that good-looking babes LOVE LOVE LOVE irredeemable badboys. And they love them BECAUSE OF, not in spite of, their assholery.





Comments


  1. What happened to Beta of the Month?

    Like


  2. Hamster of the month is a great idea but I do miss beta of the month.

    Like


    • Here ya go!

      Married mother of 3 in a gangbang with 5 students. Husband’s response:

      “I hope you will not pass judgment on her because you don’t have all the facts or details according to this situation,” Christopher Colleps said in May 2011, according to KDFW. “I want you to know I love my wife. I have loved my wife since I laid eyes on her 11 years ago. I have always supported my wife and will continue to support her through this entire ordeal.”

      http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/jurors-texas-sex-scandal-trial-watch-footage-teacher-allegedly-engaging-group-sex-article-1.1137146

      p.s.

      Manjaw’s gonna manjaw.

      Like


      • Jesus Christ, I remember reading about this flea ridden cock whore a few months ago. How the fuck can he even look at that filthy embarrassment, let alone defend it.

        I love these kinds of stories.

        Like


      • ugggg…. I do and I don’t. Unfortunately I got these goddamn empathy and pathos genes from both my mother and father. I can’t help but feel melancholia and despair along with righteous delight when I read about such overwhelmingly irrational and vile female lunacy that flows out of the abyss that is the their imbic heart of darkness.

        Like


      • http://fandaily.info/news/christopher-colleps-is-kennedale-high-school-teacher-brittni-colleps-husband/

        Pics of the beta. Army guy too… It doesn’t get any more beta than willingness to be sent to Iraq to die for Bush’s oil pals while his wife humps kids that would’ve been drafted back in the day.

        Like


      • Yeah… now that we don’t have the draft to “make a man” outta a young buck, looks like wifey’s trying to take up the slack.

        /Hey, what’s that swirling sound?

        Like


      • Jesus Christ. He’s actually quite good looking and she’s a fucking BEAST!!! OMG. I don’t know whether to cry, laugh, gnash my teeth, punch the wall, or just fucking unplug my computer. It’s the inverse of what I thought.

        Like


      • Some pics make her look passable… but he looks like the typical gung-ho white knight, and she, well… raised on Girls Just Want To Have Fun school of morality.

        The boys testified they didn’t want all this to “get out” and wanted nothing to do with testifying… I’m curious how this actually progressed to the point of legal charges.

        I mean, we all know that nobody can keep a secret anymore, and the whole high school probably knew about it… but I’d like to see the face of the mangina or “faceful of righteous indignation” harpy that took the lead in making this a legal matter.

        Heck, in the good ol’ days, this couple would have just been ‘banned and shunned’ as it were, and moved quietly to another town.

        Like


      • This stuff goes on all the time around the military. A lot of these guys get enough money to marry some girl they’ve fallen in love with because she blew him once. Cut them some slack, they’re mostly just “young and dumb and full of cum as the old saying goes.” Its a white knight complex in this case. There are number of clueless beta 18 year olds who join the military. I saw some amazing shit. This is sort of typical of the worst stories. But remember, the military is a population of about 1.5 million. Its inevitable you’ll get some of this. One dude killed and cut the head off of his wife’s lover, who had also been his best friend while he was talking to her in the hospital after she had his baby. The husband had had a vasectomy at her request because she never wanted children (with him). This guy had a very high IQ, was tall and handsome, and had an Enlish degree. The victim was in the pay phone outside of the unit’s mess hall. The husband came and pulled him out, stabbed him to death and then cut his head off. He did this in front of some 400 men who watched him from the messhall windows. The husband then took the head in g ym bag and dropped it off at his wife as a gift when he went to visit her. He got 43 years and he must be about halfway through his sentence now.

        Most men learn not to get too spun up over a girl, but some guys live in denial. This guy in the newsstory had three kids with her and had to tell himself something to keep up the illusion in his mind. He needs to come here for a while. Then he could take his wife back and she’d even want to stay because he hits that deep spot. But he’d be stupid as a man. The kids are the only reason to even consider such an option.

        Like


      • “The kids are the only reason to even consider such an option.”

        Fuck the kids.
        There’s not a single valid reason to stay with a whoring wife.

        Like


      • Army guys are all manginas. Who else would take orders from some lamebrained president or general?

        Like


      • Fuck you.

        Like


      • Anon, having kids is the whole point of game. Reproduction IS the definition of alpha. Even if a wife cheats, if your kids are genetically yours, you’re the alpha, even if she’s fucking someone who might be more “alpha”. A ghetto welfare black man with 20 kids with 13 different women is more alpha than anyone with 0 kids. It’s a shame, but that’s reality. Socialism functions as an environmental selector for inferiors to reproduce more than superiors. Those who don’t adapt to this will lose out to those who over-reproduce.

        Like


      • “Most men learn not to get too spun up over a girl, but some guys live in denial.” If you’re in a relationships (especially one with kids) and a girl pulls a stunt like this how do you not get spun up?

        Like


      • @ Steve who wrote, “A ghetto welfare black man with 20 kids with 13 different women is more alpha than anyone with 0 kids.”

        WTF? You need to examine yourself and ponder why you didn’t simply write “A man with 20 kids is more alpha than anyone with 0 kids.” your point would still have been made.

        You are needlessly diminishing your argument by invoking images that perpetuates a comforting (for you) status quo. The reality is:
        -All ghetto men are not black.
        -All black men are not ghetto.
        -All welfare recipients are not ghetto.
        -All welfare recipients are not black.
        – Black men with with multiple baby mommas are not always on welfare.

        Though it’s not optimal for our society, many subcultures in the USA admire a dude for laying good wood and being potent, even if he’s financially incapable of dealing with the consequence. That thinking is flawed, but don’t be smug. That neighborhood reputation as a swordsman is the only sad substitute for outward respect that men of certain backgrounds may ever earn. This is increasingly true beyond black and brown men in the ghettoes. Disaffected whites are acting out too…not all of them are making babies out of wedlock, but many ARE.

        Be it guns, drugs or sex, understand that people of every race are acting out, The “ghetto welfare” behavior persists across racial groups and social classes, looking for some form of significance in this increasingly immature and unfulfilling society. Not just people who fit the stereotypes that help you drum up false feelings of superiority.

        People of all stripes do dumb things in bed resulting in inconvenient pregnancies. I freely admit that there are too many underclass males who father multiple kids out of wedlock with multiple women. Their thinking and their cultural references are flawed. And the ones who are African American comprise a triflingly large segment of that population. Steve, you should feel blessed, not superior, because you weren’t born into that mentality, and you should be in admiration of those who started life like that but evolved to be your peer in every respect.

        There are many educated or financially sufficient black men, married to their only baby-momma, who are ignored by the media and entertainment complex because they dont fit the “narrative”. There are plenty of middle to upper class people of all races who have behaved like the ghetto welfare black man of your obsession. The difference is that middle class and upper class people do things to mitigate the damage, be it abortion, secret adoptions or shotgun weddings. And increasingly, white folks, not on welfare, not in the ghetto, are keeping the kids. So the baby-momma / baby-daddy population includes middle America.

        Are you calling all 40 and 50 year old white career women having bastard kids “ghetto”, and doing the same for the many married white guys getting their interns and mistresses pregnant, and all the middle class families having to use public assistance in this economy? Unless you refer to them all as “ghetto”, maybe you should just chill on using the term at all, Steve.

        Like


      • In the “good” old days, the kids would live with daddy’s parents after mommy was stoned to death. Or stabbed to death and then decapitated. Or something like that. And even her own mother would be so disgusted and ashamed that she would cheer the stoners and stabbers on. Cheap and effective, and most importantly, it leaves third parties out of something they have no duty involving themselves in.

        in Dystopia, said third parties who have nor want nothing to do with this kind of subhuman rabble, are stuck paying for a bunch of taxfeeders to “uphold the law”, or whatever the progtard heil du jour happens to be.

        There are so many people out there working their butts off and doing their best to behave decently. Why on earth should they be burdened with the upkeep of a police state who has taken it upon itself to serve as security detail for such utter scum? When societies sink that low, they weaken and are overran by their betters. As this dump thankfully soon will be.

        Like


      • It’s not the army that turns them beta, it’s the church.

        Like


      • Sadly, the majority of American men are brought up to be white-knighting manginas. Until that changes, these stories will get more common.

        Like


      • At her sentencing testimony, the husband admitted that they were swingers. So he was fine with it and/or has a cuckold fetish. Also, I live in DFW. In that particular white trash suburb, being skinny and having all of her teeth makes her at least a 6 by local standards.

        Like


      • She’s not only fugly but looks retarded. Can you imagine any man putting up with this? And if that weren’t bad enough she’s a skanky Ho too!

        Like


      • it should be noted that when you read the associated stories, they BOTH were into swinging and he had to admit to sleeping with other partners while on the stand.

        Like


      • He didn’t get fucked by 4 teenagers on cam though. See the difference, meathead?

        Like


      • “Christopher Colleps testified at his wife trial, and he said he and his wife had sex orgies before he joined the Army, he also said that he watched the homemade sex video of his wife and her students and that even though it made hi angry was happened was between him, his wife and God.”

        http://fandaily.info/news/christopher-colleps-is-kennedale-high-school-teacher-brittni-colleps-husband/

        Like


      • Her husband is in the military and she’s off banging all these guys. She should be prosecuted for treason as well.

        Like


      • wheres the study for manjaw? Ive never read it but would like to.

        Like


  3. on August 17, 2012 at 12:19 pm Holden Caulfield

    beta of the month is sickening to contemplate and painful to observe, but hamster of the month will usually inspire smirks and knowing nods. . .

    Like


    • Agreed. Some of the beta’s honestly brought tears to my eyes. Gut wrenching. Damn you Mom and Dad for being such compassionate, empathetic people and passing that pathos on to me!!

      This is much more palatable.

      Like


      • Like the drill sergeant told us our first day in Basic Training:

        “Sympathy is in the dictionary between shit and syphilis!”

        Like


  4. beta is the article

    Like


  5. Its really hard to get inside the headspace and, since I don’t know all the details to the story, haven’t seen the video since I don’t think it has aired yet (?) nor understand how (despite many attempts to explain this to me) fear is attractive, I’ll just make some general comments.

    Oprah, OPRAH, is sitting feet away from this young lady, and even she- Queen of self-help/improvement- cannot help her. Rihanna is trapped in a world that no one can break into and only she can break out of.

    How can that happen? When she loses everything as a result of her inability to let go and “help” someone else. When someone is using you or hurting you, you might think, better me than someone else. Or, if I (perhaps the only person strong enought to stand up to this) leave, I will just be replaced by a different enabler and the behavior will never change.

    If Rihanna was left with no friends, no family, and she saw her career beginning to decline, she would begin to see that for whatever reason she was holding on to this (proving her goodness to the world/herself/Chris) it was destroying her.

    And she might decide, NO. My life is important too. And suddently she would realize there was no one left to help her. Now how hard is it to get out. The only person who seems to care is the one you should be getting as far away from as possible.

    There isn’t anything anyone can do for Rihanna except leave her to her misery till she decides to change. Whatever benefit she is gaining from the connection keeps her in it as opposed to having a healthy form of love, significance, etc. When she stops benefitting, then change can happen.

    Like


    • One who is the box can never get out.

      Like


      • Very astute.

        Like


      • Rihanna is trapped in a world that no one can break into and only she can break out of.

        The conventional wisdom premise (and I believe it incorrect) is that she’s “trapped”, in “misery”, and needs to “escape”.

        Don’t believe it… she’s in all her pussy-moistening/Münchausen syndrome glory, and wouldn’t have it any other way.

        Like


      • Fuckin eh

        she love dat daddy dick

        Like


    • And here we have month 2’s winnah, folks!

      (whadda we have for her, Johnny…. it’s a BRAND NEW CAR!)

      Like


    • She might leave someday, but she’ll either run right into the arms of another abuser, or some white knight will swoop in to save her while she still loves Chris.

      Like


    • Whitney Houston didn’t stop until she ODed and died.

      Like


      • People are also forgetting that Black women are indoctrinated to accept and embrace abuse from thier men b/c of racial loyalty in the face of overall racism. So that is why its so easy for famous Black females to openly still take back abusers b/c they won’t lose their Black fanbase overall – who is also indoctrinated to believe that the men in the Black community (no matter how shitty they are) are to be coddled and forgiven for all of thier transgresions.

        Like


      • Perhaps you “indoctrinated” black folks should think about how coddling and forgiving your miscreants is what causes the very (alleged) racism you’re bonding together against.

        Like


      • It’s your choice… civilized community or law-of-the-jungle tribe.

        Like


      • Recognizing your decisions as yours is the only way to grow, but it’s far easier to blame it on some fairy tale of systemic indoctrination.

        Like


      • I stopped reading at indoctrinated.

        I should have stopped at neecy.

        Like


      • 😈 MUAH!!!

        you know you miss me boo bear!! 😉

        Like


      • A fair point.

        Like


      • You too Bull Connor! 😉 👿

        Like


      • Oops forgot to add:

        “you know you miss me too BULL CONNOR”….

        Like


      • Geez, you’re the second black woman who made a pass at me today… you gals really do go for the danger, don’t cha?

        Like


      • DO IT! I double dog dare you!!! try a sista.

        Like


      • You’re the one who mentioned Bull, my little Pasiphaë.

        Like


      • *heading off to google to make sure that Pasiphae isn’t a racial slur* lol

        Like


      • Racial slur? Naw, I used up my month’s quota on thwack.

        Like


      • 😈 MUAH!!!!

        You know you miss me boo bear!! 😉

        Like


      • on August 17, 2012 at 10:23 pm furiousferret

        Does Neecy run this blog?

        You would think so, when every other god damn post is her yacking about some rhetorical point. If we ignore her maybe she will go away.

        Like


      • on August 17, 2012 at 4:12 pm stevie tellatruth

        Neecy,
        If anything, black women are taught to disrespect brothas. You know, the whole doctrine of Nyggas Ain’t Shit? Heard of that?

        Like


      • Or that black women are more biased toward abusive thugs than white women are, and thereby reward black men who act that way with their love, making the behavior of black men even worse than it already is. If you reward bad behavior, you get more of it. (Loyalty to race? Nah. It’s because non-black guys are even less likely to act like abusive thugs than black guys are. And African women willingly screw white guys, suggesting that this preference among black American women is cultural.)

        Like


      • That’s why so few black women are left without a man … oh wait …

        Like


      • Indoctrinated? Neecy, that’s some first rate black woman hamstering right there.

        You’re hamstering/excusing behavior on their behalf. Please reread the post.

        Like


    • ITA Kate!

      Rihanna is a very troubled girl and people refuse to acknowledge this. this is a MAJOR part in why she continues to long for some loser like Chris Brown – not because she is young and beautiful. She could still be the same person who looks like shit on a stick and would still take Chris Brown back b/c that is where she comes from. Women of all aesthetics and ages will take abusers back – not just young and hot ones.

      Just because someone is good looking and young doesn’t mean they love abusers. Any woman or person tat continues to run back to people who assault them have serious mental issues and most likley came from a home where domestic violence was considered the norm or ok. And yes Ri Ri ADMITTEDLY came from an abusive home where she watched her father (whom she loves) beat and abuse her mother, while her mother continues to stay and take him back.

      I can clearly see Rihanna is a very troubled woman who is severly insecure and who does lots of questionable things – DESPITE how pretty she is. That has more to do with why she longs for losers like Chris Brown – and has little to do with her looks or her age.

      Also, yes when her careers starts to become affected by her questionable choices, I’m sure we’ll see a different side and hear a different story. As long as she is on top right now, she feels she is invincible.

      Like


      • on August 17, 2012 at 3:52 pm The Latent Sadist

        Wrong about only dysfunctional people will respond to abuse. Take John Lennon for example.

        Absolute alpha male (if anyone wants to dispute this because of his love songs, …try me). John Lennon was married to a woman named Cyntha before he met Yoko. Cynthia was the epitome of class, was raised in a good home, had excellent manners. The english call them “posh”….meaning they are goody goodies.

        John was a jealous motherfucker, and when they were like 17 or 18 (before the Beatles) he smacked her across the face HARD on at least a few occasions. She was angry and hurt, but she took him back after he pleaded.

        John Lennon also cheated on her relentlessly throughout their marriage AND admitted it to her, and she still stayed with him. I you watch any interviews with her….she is still helplessly in love with the guy. Even though he dumped her and their son for Yoko without looking back.

        Shes written two books about him, and you can hear the anger and dissapointment, but also this attitude of “you cant help but love him”.

        In fact her hamster is a great sight to watch for anyone interested. Cynthia Lennon…look her up on YouTube.

        Like


      • Well it sounds to me this woman was more enthralled with his fame and money and was willing to put up with his transgressions and abuse. I am sure if John had not been famous or had money she would certainly have not put up with abuse like that.

        Like


      • Wrong. The times he hit her occured in the late 50s when they were teenagers. They were married before beatlemania. The beatles wouldnt become famous until 1964.

        Like


      • Lennon was married to her before the Beatles became famous.

        Like


      • If John Lennon was such an alpha male why did Yoko Ono, an average looking asian lady, have him by the balls?

        Also jealousy screams beta.

        Like


      • Yeah when he posed nude with Yoko in that infamous pic he was really alpha!!

        Like


      • Dont know if ur serious…but i would say the fact that he didnt give a shit was pretty alpha. And that he willingly risked his reputation. From voicie tone to dominance of other men…everything about him was alpha

        Like


      • Wow. You’re even coming up with crazy, needy justifications for a woman you’ve never met!

        It’s not that she’s “troubled” or “insecure” (and it certainly has nothing to do with her looks). You’d expect a genuinely troubled or insecure woman to look for a supportive, nurturing beta male.

        No, she’s a successful woman in the throes of pure sexual attraction to this guy. And the fact that he slaps her around just makes him sexier. She’s got scores of yes-men who obey her every whim, but only one man who tells her “listen up, bitch, or I’ll give you the back of my hand.”

        Like


      • I don’t agree that troubled insecure women will run to the arms of beta guys at all – unless it is to use them for temporary emotional support and upliftment until another loser comes along. In fcat the more insecure and troubled a woman is, the more likely she is to want super losers (like abusers).

        All women love Alpha men, but certainly not all sane women love and want abusers.

        And I would also like to state for the record that people calling Chris Brown an Alpha is the most absurd thing ever!

        He may be todays warped defintion of what an “Alpha male” is, but the reality and foundation of true Alpha male – the ORIGINAL – he and others of his caliber certainly are not.

        This is another thing that irks me about this message H sends. Its misleading men to believe that true Alpha’s are those of Chris Browns caliber. An Alpha man doesn’t need to lay his hands on a woman and if it ever came to that HE’D leave b/c he’d have so many other women, options and opportunities that it wouldn’t be worth the risk to his life/reputation/freedom to hit on a woman.

        Like


      • “You’d expect a genuinely troubled or insecure woman to look for a supportive, nurturing beta male.”

        You would think that, but that’s not how it works. I’m thinking of advice I gave somewhat recently to a man who fell in love with an abused woman. I tried to explain to him that “normal” will feel wierd to her. That being treated “well” will be confusing. Predictably, she has pushed him away 😦

        [heartiste: correction: normal doesn’t feel “weird” to her; it feels lame. boring. asexual.]

        Rihanna’s looks do play some role. She is beautiful, but that doesn’t mean she in any way sees or believes that.

        [younger, hotter women tend to be the ones to go in for the abusive assholes. as women age and lose their looks — and hence their options in men — they find their standards shifting in the direction of pliable, beta providers. this shift is partly a response to their own changing smv and partly a real biological effect brought on by decreasing estrogen/increasing testosterone.]

        Like


      • “this shift is partly a response to their own changing smv and partly a real biological effect brought on by decreasing estrogen/increasing testosterone.]”

        So, would it be possible to change how a woman feels about a particular man by increasing her testosterone level? This is a serious question.

        Like


      • Don’t do it, girl… you’ll only mess up your body chemistry… and your dreams of me will still haunt you.

        Like


      • I prefer the Ludovico technique 🙂

        Like


      • lol If sexbots can be seen as a legitimate talking point, why not the alpha antidote? Is it a logical conclusion to draw that the most estrogenic women are the only ones falling for alpha thugs? And isn’t it sort of a shame that their biolobical disposition is being wasted on the very worst sort of man? Imagine being able to go to the doctor with the complaint of a broken heart and getting some prescription that would temporarily give you the lug nuts to leave the jerk.

        Like


      • Chemistry is not destiny. At least the dunderheaded genetic determinists around here have graduated to focusing on DNA, a more plausible universal explain-all than their grandfathers’ obsession with chemicals. The science has grown out of the turn-of-last-century, when Brave-New-World mythologies spoke about “taking a pill” to cure reality.

        There is no Soma to satisfy a girl’s instinct for alpha, no cocktail to cure hypergamy. The best our pharmaceuticals can do is blunt our desires, turn the hyperactive kid into a Zoloft zombie and the hysterical woman into a potted plant of Prozac. But nature is a persistent bitch. Her sprouts crack asphalt and pulverize concrete with the roots of mighty oaks. Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret.

        Reducing manliness to a hormone — even to a single letter, “T” — is a tactic of feminism. It’s bad enough when we use it sloppily in our speech for lack of descriptive rhetoric. But to imagine we can examine manhood by vivisecting our endocrine system is an imitation of the harpies, whose preliminary triumph was isolating manliness into its chemical concomitant in order to eradicate the entire phenomenon in the name of “neutral” “science.”

        Embrace who you are. Especially since it confounds the feminists.

        Matt

        Like


      • She’s not justifying anything she’s explaining. Believe it or not that’s not a nuance.
        2) You don’t know what he’s like most of the time. This was one incident that we know of. If a guy is perfect let’s say 98% of the time and a huge dip fuck 2% are you going to be like nah fuck it? I ‘ve seen dudes put up with just as stupid bullshit for less. Riri isn’t some normal person who can just date whoever remember that too. Most people have no idea what the hell her life is like and most people look for people they can relate to on deep levels for a relationship.
        3) It takes two to tango. If you aren’t part of the solution you are the problem.Wasn’t she supposedly grabbing at him? If she would disengage things couldn’t have escalated.
        4) You’d expect a genuinely troubled or insecure woman to look for a supportive, nurturing beta male……http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codependency

        Like


    • Some people are just reckless and subconsciously tempt fate for the thrill of it. She could have done all of this more discretely and never been in trouble.

      Like


    • It takes a pretty creative creative definition of misery, to assign it to someone like Rihanna. She can choose pretty much any life she wants. And this is what she is choosing. Wouldn’t be my choice, but people are different. And honestly, I suspect there are plenty of girls who, given the choice, would rather be beaten by Chris Brown, than be completely ignored by him, the way 99+% of women are.

      The important thing is, that everyone is equipped with a finite number of “sympathy units.” Squandering them on some gorgeous superstar, out of all people, ought to be seen as a sign ones priorities are a bit off.

      Like


      • Excellent points. It is a choice though I doubt she sees it that way. I, personally, don’t feel I have a finite number of “sympathy units.” I think the more you open your heart, the bigger it gets. So, I can have sympathy for Rihanna, the guy on the side of the road I gave twenty bucks to the other day, Whodoyathingyerfoolin, and anybody else who comes my way and still know these things do not get priority over my real duties.

        Like


      • “They say that people only use 10% of their brain… but I think we only use 10% of our heart.”

        BTW, thanks for that double-sawbuck, doll-face. I was gettin’ a might thirsty.

        Like


  6. You’ll be hard pressed to find any hamster as supercharged as this one.

    This is a nuclear level hamster.

    Like


  7. Did you see that video she made about Chris Brown?

    Like


  8. When beta males make a mistake — a beta male-ish type of mistake like, say, being too dutiful a provider, or too effuse with flattery, or too unromantic because of fatigue from long hours spent at the office — their women will have no trouble, no trouble at all, leaving them and staying away from them.

    Pure gold, right there.

    Like


    • +1… husbands, take note.

      Like


    • Beta is nothing more than being boring and predictable. It’s good in doses but shouldn’t be a way of life.

      Like


    • Nailed it. This was my pitiful situation — silly me for thinking that working hard, improving the world, making a good living, and being a considerate husband would be good enough for my wife.

      My experiences have forced me to conclude that women are incorrigible 1) narcissists and 2) sluts. Too bad it took me a good chunk of my life to realize that.

      Like


  9. BotM, Alpha Assessment, Spot the Alpha (body-language analysis from photos).. all vanished features. (Also, the stick drawings haven’t made an appearance for a while.) I suppose Hamster of the Month would be amusing- no shortage of regular stories to include.

    Like


  10. It is easier for a guilty alpha to receive sexual favors than it is for a beta to receive pity for an injustice.

    Like


  11. Beta of the month:

    Like


  12. on August 17, 2012 at 12:52 pm immoralgables

    Guys I found a potential Beta of the month. Unbelievable the denial this guy is in. I almost feel bad

    http://redd.it/yc8te

    Like


  13. on August 17, 2012 at 1:01 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozozlzozozllzzo

    Like


  14. on August 17, 2012 at 1:03 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    women luvs getting hit by alphas so den dey can legislate against all the betas and take all da betas money for the sins of da alpha and use all da betas money to raise pay for the alpha spawn afetr the alpha fucked and chcucked dem.

    dis is why da bankerz fund fmeinissm fmeinsisms–for da chcildrenz zllozlzzlzzlo

    Like


  15. Slightly, OT, but the best posts in this genre are those where the author explains how to move into an alpha frame–and leave the beta behind–without having to become an abusive pop star. The advice the author typically gives about how best to conduct oneself to maximize appeal to young women tends to track my own experiences as a slightly sociopathic, criminality-prone teen and young adult.

    There was no name for the outlook the author promotes (like “game” is used today), but the concept was imparted in the blue-collar class advice of “Never hit a woman, but don’t ever take any shit from one either.”

    In sum, a young man who seems a bit dangerous and impossible to control is sexual catnip to teenage and young twenty-something women. But as a young guy, you still need to keep your @#$ together and not actually end up being dangerous and out of control, because society cracks down hard on young men. I find the author of this blog does excellent work giving practical advice on how to walk that edge of projecting the right vibe, without having to actually be the abusive prick. For those who already have the right personality type, this blog tends to reinforce what they do normally, and explains why being an indifferent jerk never seems to be punished by the young women he knows.

    My other thought reading this was that women may still feel attraction to the Chris Browns as they age, but women generally squelch expressing that desire. Instead that desire is expressed as resentment of the qualities they find alluring. So Rihanna in 10-15 years will be dismissiving Brown’s antics as unacceptable and detestable, and hold up her devoted, loving husband as the ideal instead. Deep down, of course, she still yearns for the sexual endorphine release she experienced as a young woman mating with a scary alpha dude. Is it the loss of that thrilling experience, coupled with the desire for it to someday return (an impossibility), that leads women into bitterness, cougardom, cat-collection, denial of sex to husbands, etc.?

    Like


  16. To see vast herds of hamsters in the wild, read the online dating profiles of women.

    Like


    • Hell, just read the two hamsters running rampant on this very thread!

      Like


      • @ Greg Eliot — I couldn’t agree more. I thought we were done with Neecy. Her blog must have failed. And Geisha Kate just can’t get it into her head that she’s the equivalent of the annoying girl who insists on being part of the guys-only club.

        Like


      • If you have something interesting to add, why not do so instead of only posting to make some complaint against me. It makes you look like a reactionary instead of having any opinions of your own.

        Like


      • Nothing wrong with having Exhibits A and B.

        Like


      • Except when they post repeatedly, cluck excitedly with one another, and consume more than their fair share of threadspace.

        THEN there’s something wrong with Exhibits A and B.

        Which is to say, there’s something wrong with them pretty much all the time.

        Why the hell two overweight females would visit sites like this one nearly every day is beyond me.

        Like


      • Yeah, I see your point.

        Like


      • lol You are so transparent. Thank YOU for being the demonstration of red flags for women. You tell me to stop posting at Rollos, which I did. Since then I made one comment. I haven’t posted here on several threads because they didn’t apply to me. Now you want to shut me up again. Why? I can only imagine: weak, insecure, threatened. These are the traits that then turn into manipulative, controlling, abusive. The fact that I comment does not stop other people from commenting. I point out that you seem to have nothing of value to say and you demonstrate it yet again and now try to taint my enjoyment in conversing with another woman and insult us by saying we are overweight, which is clearly not the case. Your behavior is attention-seeking. If you want to shut me up, say something worth listening to.

        Like


      • Girl take it from me – save your breath and energy!!! Cause i certainly don’t give a damn what anyone here thinks of me anymore!

        Like


      • I find sites such as this to be effective inspiration to get in better shape and lose weight.

        Like


      • GeishaKate wrote:

        You tell me to stop posting at Rollos, which I did. Since then I made one comment. … Now you want to shut me up again. Why? I can only imagine: weak, insecure, threatened.

        What took you so long to solve the equation for this guy? I thought you sized him up properly and your response to him was properly droll. Here now we learn that you actually altered your behavior in response to a troll’s insecure pique? Shame on you.

        There are trolls, and then there are persistent trolls. Trollery is a frequently occurring phenomenon enough to be present in limited doses in many otherwise decent fellows. But persistence in folly is the damnable offense, obvious enough for us to place all such losers beneath notice until they naturally exhaust themselves. No one is so persistent in their error to rearrange the world around himself, unless we give such frustrated lonelyhearts an assist.

        Matt

        Like


      • Let’s be fair now… a little break from the sausage fest is amusing at times… but the ladies really should learn that more than a paragraph at a time becomes, well, Huffington-esque.

        And besides, every team needs a mascot. 🙂

        Like


      • Our mascot is da gbfm.

        We don’t need females outside the bedroom.

        Like


      • … and the kitchen!

        Like


      • I skip over all comments from females on this and most websites. One or two might slip by a month though.

        Do people here actually read their shit?

        Like


      • on August 18, 2012 at 2:28 pm driveallnight

        They’re amusing at times. “Like a cub bear playin’ with his peter, son. He don’t really know what he’s doing, he just knows he likes it.”

        Like


  17. Let me venture an educated guess into what’s going on in her head. “Nobody’s going to say he needs help, everybody’s going to say he’s a monster, without looking at the source” = “I’m special, because I’m the only one who could really love him despite his behavior, see that deep down he’s a good guy who doesn’t mean harm, and only I could help him become this wonderful person that I see in him”. The thing about the “beta mistakes” is that the elicit the exact opposite reaction – “any woman would appreciate him, he’d have no trouble finding what he needs”, so the feeling “special” comes from being different from all those other women. There are also all the emotional factors (the drama and all that) involved as well, but you covered those quite well already, while I’m not sure whether or not the desire to “feel special” has been brought up before.

    Like


    • Very good point. +1

      Like


    • Obviously hundreds of musicians, studio engineers, promoters, reporters, roadies, etc. are not beaten into submission by him. Yet they happily do whatever necessary to keep brown churning out hit songs. Where is said monster?

      He dont need to be rescued from a platinum album selling successful career. Her hamster makes that drama up so that she can fix it.

      Like


      • Are you seriously equating professional/creative success with personal/emotional well-being?!

        Like


      • Seriously i am seriously being serious.

        Haha j/k girl ill holla at you.

        You are a woman, right?

        Like


      • Why, do I sound hamstery? Or was it the tone? I mostly meant that the 2 factors are often enough negatively-correlated, did not feel like getting into an in-depth explanation (which would have to involve how creativity is often associated with emotional volatility, and how narcissism fits into the picture).

        Like


      • -He can pay for mansions, fast cars, and lots of bling
        -He can feed half the population of poor innocent children of Africa
        -He can pay for his entire extended family to live a suburban lifestyle.
        -He has huge extended social circles that will do anything for him
        -He can collaborate with pretty much any musician he wants, transcending all boundaries.
        -Chicks everywhere want to bang him

        I guess you don’t think these have any effect on his self esteem? *crickets*

        The dude may or may not get immense pleasure and satisfaction from his work. Why the fuck would a man want to be associated with a woman who seriously doubts it is even possible?

        Like


      • Of the things you listed, only the social circles who would do anything for him, and the ability to collaborate with professionally (which is also a social thing) would factor into his satisfaction, money just becomes meaningless once you have a whole bunch of it, you kinda take it for granted. There’s plenty of research on “psychology of happiness”, what people think would make them happy vs. what happens in reality, turns out that people are really bad at predicting those things.

        Now, regardless of that, in that particular situation I have no clue why he wants to be with her (and not any of the vast number of other girls who apparently want him) – I honestly know/care very little about either of them. What I do know is, he’s considered a felon of sorts for beating her up, the general public opinion is that he’s a scum of a person (at least from what I read, in the “mainstream media”), so that’s what she was referring to. I suspect that what you listed about him could also apply to her just as well, so she probably doesn’t even notice those factors as particularly note-worthy when evaluating him (maybe that’s actually why he’s with her, exactly because she can ignore all of those things, the way hot girls like guys who can ignore their appearance? I really have no idea, but this seems at least plausible).

        Like


      • someone who is a monster in their romantic relationships can be the total opposite in their business/professional relationships.

        but good point about manufactured drama.

        Like


      • Mel Gibson comes to mind. One of Hollywood’s top producers, and meanwhile is a total alpha asshole with women.

        Or maybe it’s just because he’s an alpha…

        Like


      • I’m sure that Mel was nice to his wife and kids. None of them had anything bad to say about him.

        Like


  18. My guess is there was some chemical imbalances involved in the incident. Perhaps they were hopped up or were the opposite – craving their fix and simply got on each others nerves.

    Perhaps Rihanna could allow Chris to freely explain his side of the story so that assumptions such as I propose could be laid to rest.

    Then again, entertainment is a circus and people love their circuses.

    Like


  19. Geisha Kate said:

    If Rihanna was left with no friends, no family, and she saw her career beginning to decline, she would begin to see that for whatever reason she was holding on to this (proving her goodness to the world/herself/Chris) it was destroying her.

    It’s not her fame or her status that keep her enthralled with the bad boy, it’s her femaleness. Look no further than the Katy Perry incident and her subsequent marriage and then divorce of Russel Brand.
    https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/five-minutes-of-alpha/

    Rihanna is living the blueprint of an Alpha Widow.
    https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/08/16/blueprint-for-an-alpha-widow/

    The only person who will displace the Alpha experience of Chris Brown is another, even more intense Alpha. Until (if) that happens for her, any subsequent lovers she has will only be Beta placeholders for Chris Brown.

    Like


    • The funny thing is, Brown isn’t that alpha, except as to women. He kicks *womens’* asses, not men’s. JayZ talked about beating up a guy like that in 99 Problems.

      “Now once upon a time not too long ago
      A nigga like myself had to strong arm a hoe
      This is not a hoe in the sense of having a pussy
      But a pussy having no God Damn sense, try and push me
      I tried to ignore him and talk to the Lord
      Pray for him, cause some fools just love to perform
      You know the type loud as a motor bike
      But wouldn’t bust a grape in a fruit fight
      The only thing that’s gonna happen is i’mma get to clapping”

      Doesn’t sound like he’s too impressed with woman-beaters. The beaten women, alas, often are.

      Like


    • You and your alpha widows 🙂 It takes time to get over bad experiences and, in my mind, it doesn’t all have to do with finding another guy. Men are not the solution for *everything* though they’re certainly pretty awesome. It takes time to start trusting in people again and being willing to try.

      What I was trying to express is that, for Rihanna, it hasn’t gotten bad enough yet. She still has to hit bottom and, maybe, because of her fame, etc. that might not happen. Ultimately, people are going to get tired to listening to her story and she’ll have to figure out a way to put it behind her whether someone else comes along or not.

      It is so clearly an unresolved trauma that she can’t let it go. It says more to me about her than it does about any alleged attraction Brown has.

      (re Katy Perry: one song about Brand was enough. If she’s so over it, why do we have to listen to it? “Part of Me” was great, but “Cloud Nine” is already over-reaching. Wanna know how Katy and Brand met? She threw a water bottle at him. lol)

      Like


      • Womanese: “getting over bad experiences”

        Translations: “the time necessary in figuring out that the significant prior Alpha who makes my current BF look comparatively Beta will never again find me attractive enough to want to fuck me, make me feel excited and feed my need of incessant indignation.”

        Like


      • Okay! Okay! I give up! What do you want in your McFlurry? 🙂

        This is why celibacy is better than the alternative. I don’t want to be enthralled by asshole alphas nor annoyed by boring betas. I’m back on the “marriage or bust” bus. Are we there yet?

        Like


    • on August 17, 2012 at 10:19 pm furiousferret

      How hard would it be for person like Rihanna to find another alpha? She is a a major celebrity that is known more for her looks than her musical talent.

      What does Chris Brown have, that another star wouldn’t?

      Like


  20. They should get married. And afterward, Chris Brown should not change his behavior.

    Like


  21. Rihanna is young and hot YES. But do you think it is a bit misleading to attribute all beautiful young women as to having the same desires as those of Rihanna’s caliber for dudes that beat them etc.?

    I have often pointed out, a lot of times young and beautiful women (and even ones who aren’t young or beautiful) who keep going with guys who beat them and truly treat them like dirt have serious metal issues and insecurities. its not simply b/c they are young nad hot. There are women of all ages and aesthetics who take losers like Chris Brown back and a lot of it has to do with thier up bringing.

    The young beauties who have it all together still like Alpha dudes, but not in the same class as the Chris Browns and such who beat and abuse women.

    you are fogetting a few other things that would cause someone like Rihanna and girls like her to keep taking losers like Chris Brown back.

    (1) She came from an abusive home herself in where she watched her father physically abuse her mother, and her mother kept taking him back (per her admission). So of course in her mind, there is really nothing that horrible with a man who beats and assualts women b/c she saw her mom go through it nad continue to take her father back.

    (2) She is a girl with serious obvious mental issues and insecurities. Spend 5 minutes on her twitter account and just read various stories on her and the things she says and does and you can see a very troubled young woman; this would explain a lot of why she would continue to long for someone like Chris Brown

    I wish you wouldn’t just leave it at “young hot women love bad boy abusers” without telling the whole story. Its usually “young hot women who are batshit, with a shitload of daddy issues, or troubles who love bad boy abusers”. I think its misleading and unfair to the actual hordes of good looking young girls and women in general who like Alphas but would never be caught with or taking back some losers who beats them.

    Like


    • Of course, it’s always the mans fault. I wonder how awful Rihanna’s mother was that she would drive a man to abuse her. Perhaps endless psychological and emotional abuse, the kind women do which gets swept under the rug and is often worse than physical abuse because it’s more insidious.

      I wonder how much Rihanna taunts and manipulates Chris Brown, hoping that he hits her, then play the victim again when he does and receive loads of support and attention, then go back again…

      Your hamster and Kate’s should go out for a drink one night.

      Like


      • Your hamster and Kate’s should go out for a drink one night.

        Just imagine the RPMs generated, one of ’em in the wheel and the other on it.

        Like


      • Oh, stop. We are having a conversation. There is a difference between hamstering and thinking.

        Like


      • Aw, c’mon Kate… we’re only limbering up our neg muscles.

        And for the record, there is a certain amount of hamstering going on.

        Like


      • I wonder what the man did to drive her to do that emotional abuse psych dramas.lol C wat I did there? These types are both sick puppies but no one wants to get punched.

        Like


    • I don’t get the impression Rhianna has low self esteem. Being told how beautiful you are, all the time, tends to have the opposite effect.

      Like


      • Well I guess I disagree. If she’s not insecure she definitley has some mental issues lol (i’m just going by what I have read on her twitter page and other sources where she maies comments and things).

        Actually being very pretty is even more reason for a girl to have low self esteem. Trying to live up to other people’s favorable expectations looks wise can be very difficult for beautiful women. Young attractive women who escape this have a really solid foundation from family since childhood. but these days most young women are being raised by batshit or half assed parents so they don’t have a true foundation no matter how good looking they are.

        Its not the looks that really determine a woman’s mindstate. Its what is inside based on her own beliefs and experiences.

        Like


      • Who are all these people who have expectations of how Rhianna should look? I couldn’t care less, and I bet most the world feels the same way.

        Like


      • Everyone. i am talking more about how women like Rihanna RESPOND to constantly receiving positive reinforcement for their looks. A lot of times it creates even deeper insecurities b/c they are constantly trying to live up to everyone’s expectations. that was my point.

        I too could care less about Ri Ri or whoever because honeslty all of these people are batshit crazy in the entertainment music industry anyway.

        Why we would even make posts using them as examples of anything other than LUNATICS is beyond me. LOL

        Like


      • The manosphere in general has to use insane people as examples and make sweeping generalizations and not allow much nuance. It’s easier. Same reason you see so many negative and sensational stuff on the news. Extremes get attention, meanwhile most normal people are off doing their thing in none extreme land.

        Like


      • No I’ll tell you what it does in reality. You become paranoid people are either trying to flatter you to get something (in your panties usually) or that must be your only attractive quality or people would compliant something else. You tell a smart chick she’s pretty and a pretty chick she’s smart because most people only appreciate the painfully obvious.

        Like


      • The chateau has already covered this… you gals have to start paying better attention or the homework assignments will be reinstated.

        A hot girl at the top of the world gets away with so much guff and has so many people constantly telling her that her shit has a wondrous redolence that she just doesn’t feel normal.

        Pushing someone who will finally knock her down a peg, even if it means literally, makes her feel human.

        This isn’t rocket science.

        Like


      • Isnt it interesting that a black woman is being discussed as beautiful–I mean literally “beautiful” w/o the usual “for a black woman” being understood,as they have done for say,a Whitney Houston. She is described as “beautiful”–with no ironic undertones.

        Like


      • Riiiiiight… what media whore or culture vulture would dare say “for a black woman” nowadays, when mentioning beauty?

        Besides, it doesn’t need to be said when it’s (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) understood.

        Like


      • What passes for her beauty is a heavy dose of cream in the coffee… much like Halle Berry and Vanessa Williams.

        Like


      • Lara,

        Being told how beautiful you are generates narcissism, not self-esteem.

        Contrary to what most idiots believe, self-esteem is not built by continuously compliments, awards, prizes and “Everyone’s a winner” type bullshit. It’s built by developing skills over a LONG period of time. It’s built by KNOWING what you are capable of and doing it.

        People, men and women, instinctively know this. They know the difference between being given free praise and given genuine praise. One builds a person up and is the payoff for actually developing talents; the other is false, empty and dries up as soon as the one receiving it is no longer needed.

        Like


      • Excellent observation and mini-exchange, wingwoman, Greg Eliot, and Matt. Narcissism vs. esteem — tight expression, tight formulation. Worthy of a discussion.

        Like


  22. on August 17, 2012 at 2:01 pm longtimelurker

    Long time lurker, never commented. I love the image of the spinning gerbil/mouse/hamster. I wish that was on every “rationalization” post just because it’s beyond appropriate.

    Like


  23. Women love a project that feeds them emotions. Trying to help and redeem an abusive alpha is one of their favourites.

    I am just surprised that Oprah is surprised.

    Like


  24. I also miss Beta of the month, it was fun but maybe readers weren’t diligent enough in finding more submissions?

    Anyways, great post.

    Like


  25. on August 17, 2012 at 2:21 pm Regular Hadron Collider

    Check out this article on the famous kiss photo in Times Square on WWII victory announcement day http://now.msn.com/iconic-kissers-from-times-square-reunited-for-67th-anniversary-of-vj-day

    Like


  26. She wants her own sons to be tough guys that can be alpha male and push women around. She cannot resist the possibility of mating with this very dominant male, even if her short term well-being is endangered.

    She might have more options than an untalented, poor woman, but that does not mean that the attraction still is not there.

    Like


  27. chris brown is gay i thought u knew
    if ya dont know, now ya know

    Like


  28. From Neecy:

    But do you think it is a bit misleading to attribute all beautiful young women as to having the same desires as those of Rihanna’s caliber for dudes that beat them etc.?

    Uhm,..yes.
    http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/horrible-reactions-to-chris-brown-at-the-grammys

    Like


    • Oh dear. LOL!

      I never said there weren’t a shitload of crazy chicks running around these days – yes many of them attractive. But I still say that it’s not about LOOKS its about upbringing and values instilled (or lack of) at home. There are just as many ugmos running around who also find abusive men attractive and worthy. And the bottom line is its not a woman’s LOOKS it usually relies in her upbringing that would cause her to see these behaviors as normal.

      My question to you and Heartste is: While I understand you are trying to point out the mindset of SOME young attractive women these days, why are you not willing to dig deeper and explain why they have these mindsets. I feel you are misleading men and ignoring the FACT that there are a shitload of troubled women (Ugly and hot, young and old) that have serious emotional and mental issues and would find Chris Browns of the world attractive.
      My next question is: I’m not sure what message or point you and Heartiste are making by pointing this out – do you want your male audience to turn into woman beaters to get some “good hot young va jay jay”?

      if that is what normal dudes want to go after then have at it. If a well balanced man wants to turn into a woman beater just to get laid by some batshit good looking young women, then I have to question his mental stability!

      Is it no wonder why young women today are like this? They are bred by men who settled for their most likely good looking YET emotionally unbalanced mothers. TA DA! The offspring is some poor girl who never stood a chance b/c her father didn’t pick a more emotionally balanced woman as the mother of his child. Then divorce happens and the mother is left raising these girls and – thus we have a crazy amount of young women who are emotionally unstable and confused.

      There are still attractive WELL BALANCED good looking women and young women who don’t find abusive men attractive at all.

      Rollo you have a duaghter who I am sure will grow up to be a physically beautiful young woman. Do you honestly think with your male guidance and love and her mothers that she will be one of those chicks? If you say no, then please explain to me why.

      Like


      • Yet another feminist victimization stance. Men are now “breeding” emotionally unstable women? What a ridiculous concept. Why are you excusing Rihanna’s actions and placing the blame on her upbringing?

        Do not forget that in the animal kingdom, males pursue and females choose. Rollo and Heartste are exploring an extreme spectrum of when women choose “bad” men.

        It’s not hard to find more examples. Women on Twitter also went crazy for the Aurora shooter James Holmes, calling him ‘Hot,’ ‘Sexy,’ ‘Cute’:

        http://jezebel.com/5927828/disturbing-james-holmes-twitter-groupies-think-hes-hot-sexy-cute

        And look at popular romantic fiction. Twilight is about a girl choosing a dangerous vampire who could kill her at any moment. No “male guidance” or friends could stop her hamster and vagina tingles. Perhaps all women have “serious emotional and mental issues.”

        In the end, women make the final decision in mating and they need to take responsibility for their actions.

        Like


      • Aaron,

        Those here who actually have a brain cell (and who are not consumed by their fear and idiocy and woman hatred) and who know me know I am far from a feminist mindset, that I HARDLY ever stick up for shitty female behavior. In fact, I have clearly stated that the sexual market is in disarray because of the poor choices women make in men and in general. I have also stated that women determine the actions of men in sorts by rewarding bad behavior, causing men to adopt these behaviors to get laid and to get women.

        Having said that. If you actually think I am making excuses for Ri RI then think again. But there are causes and effects on why people accept certain behaviors and thought processes. How can one simply IGNORE that a woman that comes from a home where domestic violence was accepted and never dealt with by her own mother, not fall victim to the same mindset that believing a dude that beats her is someone she should have no problem longing for? Especially if she loves her dad despite his abusive behavior. It’s very simple for her to also love and invite that into her own life b/c she grew up seeing nothing healthy involving the very relationship that should be a model for her to follow as young women – her parents. her mother and her father failed her and now we have the current Ri Ri and other women like her.

        I have also pointed out that Chris, too came from an abusive home where domestic violence by his stepfather was accepted by his mother. To say that he is also not somewhat affected by his upbringing is Ludacris.

        People are a product of their environments! And further society helps to mold and shape these attitudes by accepting and rewarding these behaviors as well. That is why you have in that link that Rollo provided, scores of young women saying “yeah Chris brown can punch me in the face” b/c honestly these chicks obviously have no real sense or idea of sanity. No sane woman will ever invite abuse from any male! And the difference between chicks who do and chicks who don’t – is the only conclusion is their upbringing and values instilled as children through adulthood. Some chicks got them and plenty others didn’t.

        Next. YES Men take some blame in this issue as well. Because when men overlook the instability of the women they mate with and marry, date, and pro create with, simply b/c the woman “is attractive” they are creating a bigger monster. Since its quite logical to assume that children often take on the traits of their biological parents, it’s safe to assume if you simply choose women based on how they look and not the fact they are Nucking Futs as well, then expect t these same women to also breed children (especially girls) who think and act the same.

        So that is why men need to also take responsibility for their ACTIONS and the types of women they choose and stop feeling as though it’s your natural right as a male to simply go for the hottest without experiencing some consequences when you overlook their obvious issues.

        You can’t turn a hoe into a housewife, just like you cannot turn a crazy girl into a sane o

        Like


      • This post is way too long, I only read like a third of it. A lot of manosphere posters tend to go full retard in the other direction. To them no man can do any wrong and women are always fully guilty. Combine this with the belief that all women are whores with no self control and the whole thing descends into full blown cognitive dissonance. A lot of men are (understandably bitter) about the sexual market which is why they turn to game (or reading about game anyway :trollface:). They will simply not trust anything a woman says (which is partially understandable) and you have your work cut out for you. I myself have given up on the idea that logical persuasion will fix our fucked up society. People need to be herded and whipped in the right direction like the beasts of burden that they are.

        Like


      • Yeah, it’s just like in that Precious film.

        Like


      • Here’s the short version,..

        Neecy: NAWALT!

        Rollo: Uhm, yes they are.

        Neecy: These women are outliers, complete idiots and representative of bad upbringing and evidence of the fall of western civilization.

        Rollo: These women are the norm as determined by a well documented and predictably routine evolved hypergamy. Women with the wherewithal and mental capacity to control it are the real outliers.

        Class dismissed.

        Like


  29. I submit to you: Omega of the month.

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/9qthccx

    Like


  30. the hamster is hilarious!

    Like


  31. This one is going to be tough to beat for hamster of the year.

    Like


  32. Hitting women is fun.

    Like


  33. “And who’s going to help him? Nobody’s going to say he needs help, everybody’s going to say he’s a monster, without looking at the source. And I was more concerned about him.”

    I agree with Rhianna here. That’s what I thought when I fell in love with CH. I thought he needed help and that I should do everything to save him. I strongly believe that it’s possible to change a ‘monster’ if you love him enough and if you find a way to show him that. Love has a power to heal the soul.

    Like


    • And hamster makes three.

      Like


    • There are plenty of bums on the street who would appreciate your love and help.

      Like


      • Haha, Lara. Very true.

        Like


      • You are in too charitable a mood. Even a mere bum considers those charms entitlement with the oft exercised option to decline. The comparable relationship: A bus boy is expected to top off the ice water in abject servility by an intolerable social elite with an appreciation for digging a canine into a tenderized slice of veal while dreaming of the fading noises of juvenile moo agony.

        Like


    • on August 18, 2012 at 12:21 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      Hahahahaha. This is trolling, right?

      Like


    • Maya,

      One question I always ask whenever I see anybody saying this is, “Why is it her responsibility?!” He beat the ever living shit out of her. Yes, he needs help. Why is it up to her to provide it?

      Women in general are extremely selective in who they choose to “help”; our host has explained why and I’m inclined to agree.

      Love might have the “power to heal the soul”, but there is no reason on this Earth why any sane person should think they have the responsibility to try with the one that just thrashed them. Let the bastard find his own help.

      As an aside, at what point do you cut your losses and abandon the monster to his own devices? Just as no man should forgive a cheating woman, no woman should ever forgive a physically abusive man.They might change, but it isn’t worth the risk. Let the bastard/bitch swing and move on.

      Rihanna is an idiot and anything that happens to her from this point forward is her own fault.

      Like


      • “Why is it her responsibility?!”

        It’s not her ‘responsibility’. She wants to help because she loves him.

        “Women in general are extremely selective in who they choose to “help”; our host has explained why and I’m inclined to agree.”

        Men are extremely selective too.

        [heartiste: not as selective as women. plz familiarize yourself with the evo psych basics before trolling. tia.]

        “Let the bastard find his own help.”

        And who’s going to help him? Nobody’s going to say he needs help, everybody’s going to say he’s a monster, without looking at the source.

        [when you pummel a girl’s face that badly, you are a monster. but chicks dig monsters.]

        Like


  34. Rhianna isn’t an American woman. that’s the main reason for her action.

    Like


    • I would imagine island mentality is “fix the problem” not “leave.” Cause, historically, where would you have been able to go?

      Like


      • Its even what I would consider Old World and they way I think American and Western women also thought until about 50 years ago. This attitude is still common in Eastern Europe for instance.

        Like


      • And possibly small towns/small circles.

        Like


  35. Did whiskey write this post?

    Like


  36. I also read mr. Brown’s reaction: it basicly boiled down to this: bygones be bygones, Rihanna betta shut up yo.

    Nasty piece of work.

    But then again, who am I to judge, Rihanna herself said he needed help…

    Like


    • Chris also came from an abusive home where he watched his stepfather CONSTANTLY beat the living crap out of his mother.

      its a viscious cycle folks!

      These are not people we should be upholding as Alphas and women to aspire after. i don’t care hot hot young good lookign and famous they are.

      They are people with serious damn issues and we need to recognize this and not normalize it.

      Like


      • The alpha definition is, as I understand it, not a moral concept. It merely signals male social dominance (and female attraction to such males).

        Most guys — alpha, betas or omegas — don’t have it in themselves to slap a woman around anyway. The only difference is that IF alphas slap women, they are forgiven afterwards, unlike betas would be.

        PS I don’t really buy into the “bad childhood -> bad grownup” Freudian psychobabble: Brown’s just a thuggish wifebeater. I don’t get why people make simple stuff complex. Some people just have low empathy; they can’t care about other people’s feelings, it just doesn’t register. The only solution is to lock them up if they go over the line.

        Like


      • Thx for pointing that out about the Alpha def.

        I agree trust I am not making excuses for Chris or even Rihanna, just pointing out how screwed up, upbringings can further warp a persons logical reasoning.

        Chris brown us a thug yes – but that is what he comes from – that environment where this behavior is encouraged and rewarded.

        Like


      • My wife, when we were courting many years ago, presumably brimming with oestrogen and desire, once asked me to smack her around. I couldn’t. I am fairly low empathy but I couldn’t hit her for no reason.

        Like


      • Brown is not an Alpha lol He looks like a little mama’s boy and gay to me. No real Alpha would even give some dingbat showbia girl like Ruhanna the time of day. Brown wasn’t even smart enough to know that hos like Ruhanna are nothing but trouble. He lost any career he had and had to plea to a crime and now has a criminal record. No real Alpha would even allow this to happen and would choose his women arefully. Pussy is cheap and Brown is just a little boy pussy begger and omega

        Like


  37. But Obama and Biden said that men hitting women is the WORST type of violence. It’s worse than hitting a baby:

    Like


  38. Hitting babies is now grist for the comedic mill, don’t cha know?

    Like


  39. To me, the distinctive thing regarding the Rhianna case seems to be the extent of the physical punishment. To desire a good smack or even a substantial bruise is normal. It hurts, but does not present any real danger to one’s health. But blood and swollen lips and eyes seems to take it too far, and to be turned on by a level of punishment that presents a real danger to one’s health does suggest to me some type of mental issue or the influence of unresolved issues from her past (like Neecy said). Not saying she has substantial mental problems, just that something more is at work than mere desire for alpha dominance.

    Like


    • Rihanna had no real injury. If you look at that pic it’s just a lot of smeared makeup.
      The pic was taken close up with her eyes closed under harsh lighting and with that TMZ over it. But I see no injuries here. She’s just a drama queen and attention whore and Brown a naive boy.

      Like


      • You could be right regarding the damage looking worse than it actually was. Those bumps on the side of her head look nasty as well. My point is the same though, regardless of what kind of beating Rihanna actually took – if the physical punishment is topical and presents no real danger to someone and that person desires it, then I see no real problem with it. But if it moves beyond that and there is potential for permanent damage (as could happen when getting punched in the face by a furious fist of love), then that takes it too far. That person needs to get out.

        I’m sure Rihanna can find another alpha out there who could dominate her in the way she desires, but not to the extent that her health is at risk.

        Like


      • Those are not bumps on her forehead. It is simply the harsh light reflection off her bony head. You don’t normally see these defects under normal lighting and when she has makeup on.
        Brown was driving a car when Rihanna had her little jealous fit, hitting him, and likely to make him lose ccontrol of the car. He was merely swattting her away from the wheel with his right hand and at most messed up her makeup or got her face a little red.
        Here she is perfectly made up and you can see the light reflexion from her boney forehead. And bw, she’s not that white without makeup

        http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/08/after-beating-rihanna-feared-monster-reputation-for-chris-brown.html

        Like


  40. I am convinced Heartiste, of the truth of what you say. It has been a long, long journey for me to see the truth.

    I entertained my own pretty little lies. My big lie, was the lie that if I loved a girl enough, she would be with me and stay with me forever. I’m now 40 years old. I only have to look at my own history, to know this is absolutely not the case.

    It’s gonna be hard, ditching 40 years of my betaness, and my deep desire to just love unconditionally.

    If I was more like Chris Brown, I would probably still have options with the women that I have loved, that have left me without remorse, or even a second thought.

    The hottest girl I’ve ever been with, left me for a drug dealer that beat her and mooched off her. She still thinks about him. On the other hand, I’m not even sure she would think about me, whilst I was in her.

    The way I look at it now, if I really do love a girl, I will put aside my own beta desires, man up, and use the shit out of her as nature intended. It’s so hard for me to do, but in my experience, it’s what works. This truth sucks for me, but the alternative is to deny truth, and live in fantasy and pain.

    I am determined to never again get saddled with outrageous child-support payments, that support a girl that is happily humping a bunch of other dudes, treats me like shit, and is worthless as far as nurturing me or my child.

    My last ditch effort, before admitting defeat, and using all my willpower to turn into an asshole, is my upcoming trip to Poland. I heard that girls there will value my provider beta nature much more. Maybe I won’t have to change into more assholio. We shall see.

    Like


    • “…whilst I was in her.” With using a phrase like that, you have more work to do. But I do congratulate you on your awakening and wish you luck.

      Like


    • A trip to Poland is a good anti-oneitis tool.

      Like


    • If you’re an omega in England you’ll be an omega in Poland so don’t get your hopes up.

      Like


      • Based on several friends’ experiences, I’m confident that my existing strengths, will serve me better there. But regardless of the outcome of that trip, I’m committed to doing whatever is necessary in the future.

        Like


    • Good luck, Sean.

      I’m in a similar situation, perhaps a bit farther along the road to reality than you, but still struggling. The key is to give up any hope for long-term commitment or loyalty from women. You may BS them into bed one time, but their attention will soon be drawn to the next shiny bauble they see.

      Such seems to be the inevitable consequence of being a beta male, alas.

      Like


      • Thanks Man. I agree, and it is a hard pill to swallow. I enjoy being nice to women. Unfortunately, my experience has shown that being nice usually gets me the opposite of what I want. In general, the nicer I am to a woman, the more likely that woman is to stop having sex with me in the future, and the more problems I can expect from them. This seems true, even after controlling for the hotness level of the woman (I can be nicer to less hot women I am with, but for extremely beautiful women, it sometimes only takes one instance of being nice, and the sex disappears). I think the answer is that I need to embrace my dark side more fully, and be more of an asshole in general. It is very difficult for me me to do this, possibly because I had such a loving Mom, whom I love with all my heart, and an awesome childhood.

        Like


  41. Didn’t Chris Brown cry on some awards show?

    Like


  42. Love the team women or NAWALT defense strategies even in the comments, its laughable.

    Like


    • Ok fine! So if you and others want to believe all young pretty women are like the Rihannas if the world – now what? You gonna become a woman beater to appeal to them and to get a piece of ass by them.

      If you men don’t care about the mental stability of women you engage sexually and intimately, then you have e no right to complain about the monsters you keep breeding, creating and rewarding with your admiration and affections.

      All I am trying to point out by saying that NAWALT is showing the actual men who DO CARE about the types of women they engage, that there is still hope n/c there ate still many decent pretty women who are not like the Rohannas of the world if this is important to them to not get involved with women who have obvious deep seated issues.

      Believe it or not there are some dudes out there who’d rather keep searching for the decent well balanced girls than settling for dealing with the crazies for a simple piece of ass. That is all I am Saying!

      Like


  43. The amount of danger and unstability girls want in relationship can be pretty crazy at times. I dated this girl in late 2011, early 2012 for about 5-6 months. All in all, a pretty tight relationship. She showed me the video for “Love in a hopeless place” by Rhianna. It’s basically all about Chris Brown and Rhianna’s emotionally tumultuous relationship, rife with drama and pain.

    She liked the song plenty. It’s admittedly kind of catchy. But, she LOVED the video and wouldn’t cease from telling me so. I hated it. I asked what she loved so much about it. Here we go…

    “The relationship is sexy, it’s crazy. I like that. They’re just two crazy kids trying to figure life out.”

    “All they do is fight and cry, interspersed with some drug fueled sex. Why would you want that?”

    “It’s exciting.”

    “Have you ever been around people like that? Do you know what it’s like?”

    “No, but I feel like I want to.”, she says.

    Needless to say, we didn’t last but maybe 1 or 2 more weeks when I finally sacked up and told her to hit the bricks. A woman who craves the unstability belied in that video is not a chick I want to tango with. I grew up in a family like that: parental drug abuse, cheating spouses, they were likely swingers, constant fighting, throwing things, divorced when I was 5.

    I took the red pill 10 years ago but the primal, feminine need for drama and instability is something that I can’t get past. Women with ‘daddy issues’ do not hold exclusive rights to this either; I can list high-achieving and, compared to their sisters, pretty emotionally put-together women who are the worst offenders of this.

    Like


    • Actually the high achieving women who have this issues are what we call today – bi polar. In fact more high achieving and even successful women are bi polar and crazy as betsy bugs.

      It’s just a around bad!! Lol

      But I always say, if one looks long and hard they can find women who have somehow managed to escape the common issues plagued by women today. Yes that needle in a haystack exists if a man is patient and keen on the signs of BATSHIT. Lol

      Like


      • In fact more high achieving and even successful women are bi polar and crazy as betsy bugs.

        And this is exactly why women in general need to stay in the kitchen making sandwiches for their man rather than try to be “high achieving” and “successful”. Nothing makes a woman batshit more than having to do a man’s job all the time.

        Like


  44. Sorry no sympathy from me. My logical brain tells me there is a double standard here – as if men do not give attractive women more breaks than less attractive ones. The same way women excuse bad behaviour from hot young studs which they will not tolerate in wimpy beta types. I get sick and tired of seeing attractive women getting to behave badly and getting away with it time and again, on account of nothing else but their attractiveness – with men allowing it of course. What is the male equivalent of the hamster ?

    Like


    • The Manster?

      Apex fallacy strikes again. Only beta men allow this behaviour. Round and round we go.

      Like


    • Alison you make a very great point that is often overlooked. Both genders engage in what exactly are double standards that they pick and choose which members of said gender can get away with bad behavior.

      Men feel its their natural right to coddle, protect and excuse the shitty or questionable behaviors of good looking women, while its ONLY bad when women do the exact same thing. While I don’t feel bad for women who keep choosing loser after loser, neither do I pity men who do the same.

      And must of the time the women that a lot of guys on here complain about and have been shitted on by, are the same women they are STILL trying to learn how to game, bed and date!

      Instead of creating a different set if standards by which they choose women (looks ONLY mental stability be damned) they’d rather go in circles chasing the very women that have treated them poorly during their good guy days, and who have proven to be clearly questionable choices as mates.

      There is certainly enough blame to pass around to both genders.

      Like


      • “Men feel its their natural right to coddle, protect and excuse the shitty or questionable behaviors of good looking women, while its ONLY bad when women do the exact same thing.”

        Men dont only do it with good-looking women though.

        “And must of the time the women that a lot of guys on here complain about and have been shitted on by, are the same women they are STILL trying to learn how to game, bed and date!”

        The problem is that many men who are learning game got treated badly by women in nearly all levels of attractivness, not just the 9s and 10s, Ive seen guys get shit on by 5s and 6s because they werent alpha enough. And most men are not as picky on the looks of women as women are on the alpha characteristics of men.

        “Instead of creating a different set if standards by which they choose women (looks ONLY mental stability be damned) they’d rather go in circles chasing the very women that have treated them poorly during their good guy days, and who have proven to be clearly questionable choices as mates.”

        This is bullshit, men with OPTIONS do have demands beyond looks. Also, the reason men got treated like shit when they were good guys is because they werent “cool” or alpha enough.

        Like


    • when a female says ‘my logical brain…’, it’s time to stop reading.

      Like


    • Chris Brown did not give Rihanna any breaks, except maybe in her bones.

      Like


      • I know a guy who tried to kill his GF via immolation. She refused to testify after calling the cops on him then apologized to him by sucking his cock after letting him pound her ass. Make of that what you will.

        Like


    • Bullshit….Chris Brown is attractive to women because he’s a jerk.
      Even though betas and omegas excuse a woman’s bad behavior, it is generally not the bitchiness that attracts them to her. So yeah big difference.

      Like


      • Even though betas and omegas excuse a woman’s bad behavior, it is generally not the bitchiness that attracts them to her.

        Exactly… this is the simple kernel of truth that the hamster cannot grasp.

        Like


  45. I have no problem with women posting in the comments. The problem lies when said women aren’t hot enough for me to care about anything they post. I am sure everyone agrees

    Like


    • You know what? I font think any of us women
      who post here give a flying polo stick what you fellas in here think about us – at least i don’t. If i did, i wouldnt bother posting. Carry on!!! 😆

      Like


    • The pictures of both Neecy and Kate show a marked improvement over time. Right now I’d at the very least cuddle with either one of them, so they get bonus points for at least picking up some useful tips here, even if that useful tip is along the lines of “bad lighting is better”.

      Like


      • Hmmm. uhm I’m not sure whether you just complimented or insulted us! LOL i have to admit that lighting comment made me chuckle. See I can be a good sport!! 😉

        Like


      • Way to rock the plumber’s butt on the chest. It still gives us no hint as to your waist size, tho.

        Like


    • Huh, do you judge the points the females make by the way they look rather than the intellectual merits of whatever they have to say? Or is it that the posts are supposedly just reflecting of their emotional inner-workings anyway and you assume that those inner-workings are different for more attractive females? If you saw that a post came from a female who is “hot enough”, would you be more likely to consider what she had to say, or would you neg/tease/do whatever other game-type behavior while still dismissing the validity of whatever was said (because the attention will be primarily on the looks aspect)? These are not rhetorical questions, I’m actually wondering.

      Like


      • Sure you got a brain, honey… but you got ass too… and which is bigger?

        What’s to “actually wonder” about? God put mens’ eyes right up front… the ears are back further.

        This isn’t rocket science.

        Like


      • Yeah, you know, I always did find it odd to hear about how male grad students in my department find my ass more noteworthy than my brain – reading this blog has made it a little clearer, but still not entirely. But no, my questions were because it just feels like dirty cheating of sorts, trying to get attention to what I have to say by using my looks, while also knowing that it could somehow bias the perception of what I have to say (rarely to the direction of more keen analytical skills, unfortunately), which is why I assumed that it’s better to just making my points without anything pointing to my being a female. So, I was wondering if there’s something critically flawed with this perspective, because I really am trying to understand the male perspective on this.

        Like


      • The male perspective is simple…

        As far as a woman’s mind goes, we’re more impressed with practical knowledge that redounds to the benefit of home economics and children… not “intelligence”, per se, as the Huffington Post describes it… and certainly not distaff “confidence”, beyond pride in nurturing the family… and that includes the husband throughout the entire marriage, not relegating him to a distant third, if that, once children arrive.

        After the naive idealism of our college days, we don’t need to debate things like Ockham’s Razor or the effect of Gamma Rays or Blue State voting patterns… especially not with women.

        We need to concentrate on the task of earning a living, providing for a good woman and our offspring, and hopefully having our troubled minds eased by said good woman who appreciates her man.

        All else is folderol.

        Like


      • Oh, I guess it wasn’t clear that my post was specifically asking about what the OP was saying, the “I have no problem with women posting in the comments. The problem lies when said women aren’t hot enough for me to care about anything they post”. But now I figured it out, it confused me exactly because the suggestion to care more about what hot women post actually goes against central game principles.
        What you explained was interesting and makes perfect sense (I actually often explain people that I’m only interested in topics that are related to optimizing on those practical matters in one way or another), it just wasn’t quite what I was asking about.

        Like


      • on August 20, 2012 at 4:11 pm RespectTehTingles

        “I always did find it odd to hear about how male grad students in my department find my ass more noteworthy than my brain”

        Allow me to illuminate you.

        First consider that the male vs female bell curves of intelligence are different. The male IQ distribution is wider than the female IQ distribution. While females tend to cluster around the safe center of the curve, males are more spread out, having both more morons, and more geniuses.

        Essentially, it’s easier predict what an arbitrary female is like, and what her abilities are, than it is doing the same for an arbitrary male.

        Then consider why it has become this way, in terms of sexual selection, and what that further implies.

        Women, under normal circumstances, are the gate keepers of sex. Sex, as in reproduction, is a huge huge investment for a woman. It doesn’t make much sense for a woman to spend her energy standing out in other ways than those that indicate her reproductive fitness. A woman’s reproductive fitness is indicated by her sex appeal, and in women, sex appeal is pretty much the same thing as beauty. The grading of beauty in women in a given population is predictable.

        Now, consider the beauty of men. Few men can claim to be physically beautiful in the sense most people would describe beauty, but remember that ugly men can have great sex appeal. This is way, _way_ (approaching 1 divided by 0) more common among men than among women. The grading of beauty in men in a given population is very unpredictable. Thus, in men, beauty is not as linked with sex appeal, as it is in women. Men’s sex appeal comes from other things.

        Explicitly, he has to bring something more to the table than just his schlong in order to impress the gate keeper of sex, and it has to be atleast equal to anything else she can get, but preferably better. Enter differentiation, niching, specialization, and what not.

        The general conclusion is this:

        While women like men who stand out and are somewhat unpredictable, men like women who and pliable and dependable. After all, a man will be way too busy bringing in loot to look after the kids, something which women has a greater affinity with anyways. A flakey woman who forgot to feed the kids because she was busy bouncing on the neighbours cock is not a good investment for a man. Neither is a woman who neglects the kids cuz she was busy trying to impress men (who mostly don’t really care) and other women (who will just think she’s a bitch for trying to impress the men) with the size of her brain. Even if she does have a brain bigger than her ass, men are still proportionally less impressed by female brains than female asses.

        Thus we arrive at the conclusion of this illumination:

        A woman’s brain to ass ratio has to be totally skewed for men to be more impressed by her brain than they are by her ass. Thus, she either has to be ugly, or her brain has to be more ginormous than her ass, for the former to be more impressive than the later.

        You are now illuminated.

        Like


      • Wow, that’s quite a thorough analysis! Very cool, thanks for taking the time to write it. One piece of information that I didn’t include, though, is that I am actually a genius (started PhD at 18), so I am significantly smarter then them (not that I try to impress them or whatever with this, just kind of a given). Since you’d have a much easier time finding females who are better looking than me than women who are more intelligent than me, it seemed really strange that it’s my ass which they choose to talk about. I hardly try to impress department people with my intelligence (what good would that do?), but I don’t try to impress them with my looks either, so if they choose to talk about me despite that (which is strange in itself, since I mostly just keep to myself), it seems silly that it’s the latter which they focus on, rather than the former. It’s not that I expect them to be “impressed” per se (wrong emotion, I doubt they see anything particularly positive about my brain), merely that it stands out more, statistically speaking; but, if you factor in the fact that they talk about female appearance far more than other attributes, I guess that accounts for that effect. Still seems silly from my end, but that’s why I’m following this blog, to get a better understanding of such phenomena, so that they no longer surprise me.

        Like


      • on August 22, 2012 at 1:37 pm RespectTehTingles

        Couldn’t post a reply to your reply to my reply (phew) for some reason, I’ll post my reply to your reply to my reply here instead.

        “Wow, that’s quite a thorough analysis! Very cool, thanks for taking the time to write it.”

        np.

        “One piece of information that I didn’t include, though, is that I am actually a genius (started PhD at 18), so I am significantly smarter then them (not that I try to impress them or whatever with this, just kind of a given). Since you’d have a much easier time finding females who are better looking than me than women who are more intelligent than me, it seemed really strange that it’s my ass which they choose to talk about.”

        Uh huh. I detect some confusion here, so let’s examine the reasoning behind said confusion and feelings of strangeness, just for funsies.

        Premise A: You are a female, who also happens to be smart or something.
        Premise B: There are other females who are better looking than you.
        Premise C: Men discuss your seat cushions, despite B.

        Conclusion: Men behave weird.

        Wrong. Unless your ass is bony enough to catch in a bear’s throat and choke it to death, or whalelike and gelatinous enough to smother that very same bear to death, or saggy enough to scare the damn bear so badly it has an heart attack and dies, there is a premise, nay, an axiom you are missing, and it is best expressed utilising Occam’s Razor:

        Men like asses.

        So now that this has been established, let us examine this whole story. Again, just for funsies.

        Axiom: Men, assuming they’re straight and healthy, like female asses.
        Premise A: You are a female, who also happens to be smart or something.
        Premise B: Your ass doesn’t kill bears.
        Premise C: There are other females who are better looking than you.
        Premise D: Men discuss your seat cushions, despite C.
        Premise E: You find D strange and confusing.

        Conclusion: You think too much. Enjoy that there are men find your ass noteworty while it lasts.

        “I hardly try to impress department people with my intelligence (what good would that do?), but I don’t try to impress them with my looks either, so if they choose to talk about me despite that (which is strange in itself, since I mostly just keep to myself), it seems silly that it’s the latter which they focus on, rather than the former.”

        Uh huh, but the luminous fact remains:

        Healthy, sane, non-neutered men are more interested in female asses than female brains.

        I work with IR imaging, and I’d like to liken the attention of men in the context of female brain vs female ass, with a heat seeking missile:

        The heat signature of a an ass is significantly greater than that of a brain. Unless the ass is so bony that its heat signature becomes indistinct, or so saggy its heat signature becomes undefined, or so whalelike that no heat can escape its gravitational pull, men will, well, you catch the drift.

        Like


      • Heh, heh…. thanks for the new meme/light neg:

        “Honey, does this dress make my behind look big?”

        “It won’t kill any bears.”

        Just have to be careful when saying “Her ass would kill a bear!” It might sound like praise.

        (still chuckling)

        Like


      • LOL 😀 You’re right, it is that I’m not accustomed to the fact that men really like asses here (I’m more used to them liking boobs, which is far more common in my home country), but given that my ass has not killed any bears so far I might as well learn not to be surprised by it. The fact that it seems odd to me is purely about how different that perspective is from mine (or even from what I learn to expect while growing up) – wasn’t supposed to be a judgement or anything, merely saying that I need to improve my theory of mind on that matter, which is exactly why I was asking about it (I also asked my male friends for explanations, but it’s kinda hard to know how representative those are). Anyway, thanks for the additional clarification, much appreciated 🙂

        Like


  46. Lots of clucking from aging poultry on here today.

    Like


    • Thread winner!

      Like


    • on August 17, 2012 at 9:02 pm Anti Blue pill

      LMAO

      Like


    • HA!

      *Neecy don’t do it. Be nice for the few here who are decent*

      Ok. I’m going to be somewhat nice to say – I’m sorry some of you are frustrated 😦 But taking it out on Neecy isn’t really going to help your overall issue.

      Like


      • We’re not frustrated… nor are our dicks small…

        What it is is this… after reading your most erudite and perscipacious posting… (wait for it… wait for it)

        WE’RE JUST JEALOUS!

        Like


      • hehe!! The truth finally comes out! :mrgreen:

        You obviously got the FUN FRIDAY memo. Others, psssh, who pissed in their cornflakes this morning? Geez! Certain posts are going to bring out the female commenters and our opinions more than others.

        Like


      • We’re all looking forward to praising you for your marked restraint on subsequent posts.

        Like


      • Aw come one Greg! I hardly post here anymore! I have given you guys a very big Neecy break the last several months. i have popped in only on a few ocassions and yes I go full monty on the posts when I do (and that is only b/c I am responding to those who post to me). its not like I am making a bunch of posts talking to myself.

        Like


      • Aw come one Greg!

        My word, Miss Scarlett… your Freudian slip is showing.

        Like


      • on August 18, 2012 at 2:58 pm driveallnight

        I haven’t seen a Neecy hamstercrotchfire like this since John Norman Howard left. Hmmm…..

        Like


      • Cut from the same surly star, I reckon.

        Like


      • You have never had capon?… Now that I think of it, I am offended since I often use rooster as a secret nick name for myself…..Fuck you nugganu.

        OK now seriously:

        You volunteered for stew when you should stood up for the roosters which makes it water on a ducks back.

        Like


  47. Rihanna’s “beating” was nothing more than a couple of smacks to make her stop hitting him harsh lighting or with a flash, with her eyes closed, and with the TMZ across it and distort it. I sand causing an accident while he was driving. She was hitting him first and he may have crashed the car.
    If you look at that pic that everyone has seen with the TMZ accross it, it’s easy to see that it was taken close up, under ee no actual physical damage in the pic and it just looks like a lot of smeared makeup.

    Like


  48. on August 17, 2012 at 9:02 pm Anti Blue pill

    OT okay throwing this out here heartiste and im too lazy to check,but has anyone ever seen any statistic’s regarding single chick’s and beastiality?
    here in chicago i see alot of single chicks walking big fucking dog’s (not small one’s)

    and yes i’m not trolling

    Like


  49. Rihanna is not “troubled” or “damaged” or “the victim of X/Y/Z”. Likewise, when she takes a dump, rainbows and bunnies do NOT fly out of her ass. She is a Normal Human Female. Completely insane, of course, but no more or less so than all of them.

    She stays with violent men because chicks dig violent men, even when they claim they don’t. Her silly attempts to explain her stupidity are as devoid of meaning as her vagina and colon are full of his sperm.

    She is slightly more talented than some and so her stupidity is better documented than most, and worse, it conforms the public notion that women are helpless victims who can do nothing to prevent their woesome lot.

    Note, I’m not complaining about how women are any more than one might complain that the ocean is too wet. It is simply a fact that men must learn if they are to cut through all their bullshit and bang those bitches they desire.

    Catch and release the trout, guys – mount her on the bed, not on the wall.

    Like


    • Tatum O’Neil married Buckwheat?

      Like


    • Hmm… so Michelle was already 27 y.o. with four kids when she first married the English guy, had two more kids with him, and is now 34. No thanks. Mr. Plews should take the kids he had with her and cut his losses.

      I wonder if the Gambian guy is a beta by Gambian standards, with his exoticism, youth, and language barrier being what is keeping her hooked on him. I say this because he is 25 and there should be plenty of hot Gambian chicks for him, because of Gambia’s youthful age structure.

      Like


  50. Am I the only one who sees this as (at best) a nugget of real life blown up into a massive attention grab?

    Attention is power. As long as people keep talking about it, they both remain famous, their pictures stay on the front page, everybody keeps getting paid, nobody slips into irrelevance… doesn’t matter who’s right or wrong or how engineered or spun it is, as long as it keeps enough people confused and intrigued.

    It’s a soap opera and people are hooked, so they gotta keep going. Who knows what the real truth is. You can’t tell me that the two of them, their managers, their publicists, Oprah, even their famous friends (who get their own relevance re-upped by commenting) haven’t ever looked at it this way.

    Come on, wag the fucking dog, they’re doing a pretty good job of tooling a lotta people.

    Like


  51. Only beta boys hit females. A real Alpha wouldn’t even bother with a female who tries to bait him or annoy him.
    You’ve probably seen Connery in that interview but he’s never hit his wife or anyone else and was just busting the feminist Barbara WaWa’s balls.

    Like


  52. Based on the Tweet about the army guy’s wife getting gangbanged, and seeing what women act like around where I live (a military town), I just got to say that it’s got to stop. Womens’ behaviour is getting more and more psychotic. I remember the quote: “if civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts”. And the longer i live, the truer this is getting. Their increasing viciousness is ever more apparent. In this day in age, the only way to be “alpha” enough to keep an ever increasing number of women in line is to be criminally violent with them (note I didn’t say ALL, just that the numbers are noticeably increasing). It seems like the only solutions would be to criminalize some female behaviours or to decriminalize hitting a woman. Women pushing men to the brink goes unpunished as of now. Something’s got to give. It’s insanity.

    Like


  53. I have not seen this mentioned, though it may have been, so I will raise it here;

    Maybe females are attracted to alphas because deep down, they want to produce a son who is alpha so that later when they are old, they won’t hafta fight his wife for attention because their son will be in charge to do whatever he wants?

    Does this make sense?

    Like


  54. Unrelated question: if one’s long term girlfriend reports a dream in which she is cheating on you, is dumping her the alpha move ?

    Like


    • “Funny, I dreamt I married your sister and we lived happily ever after.”

      Like


    • Sounds like a shit test alert… perhaps a weak attempt to make you jealous and/or drop a hint-prior-to-overt-ultimatum that she wants a marriage commitment?

      Like


  55. on August 18, 2012 at 9:30 am Always Be Fucking

    If anyone disagrees with this post, please have them produce a testimony from even just ONE man who can testify that he was loved
    by a young beautiful woman for long enought time to whom he was not an asshole.

    Like


  56. If you’re a woman posting here then I’d suppose you would have to accept some flak and not get all weepy or feminine about it or should not be even visiting the site mucn less commenting on it. Like they say, if you can’t take the heat, ……
    Actually my “logical” brain works by applying the same rules to both men and women and this means accepting both sexes do try to justify stupid memes and rationalisations for their inexplicable choices and decisions.
    Men say they don’t understand women who choose “bad boys” – well, why don’t they ask themselves why they choose “bad girls” – the reasons are the same – because they are hot ! hot ! hot !
    Don’t try to over complicate women. Sure they seem more complicated and in some ways they are. But when it comes to men and sex, the only thing that matters is what will get them going down there – as simple as that. Good looking men and women are usually bastards and bitches because the opposite sex cultivates such behaviours in these attractive people. Simple really. Actually the feminisit and the masculinst are preaching from the same page – which is that you have sex with the bad attractive ones, but marry the good family friendly ones.

    Like


    • Your hamster is in overdrive today.

      What men find hot – is beauty not bitchy behavior. What women find hot is not male beauty – but male power. Jerks and assholes just project it in a very overt way. Real men, aka alphas, don’t project their power overtly under most circumstances. Betas don’t have any personal power to project in the first place.

      Like


    • And hamster makes four…

      “Men say they don’t understand women who choose “bad boys” – well, why don’t they ask themselves why they choose “bad girls” – the reasons are the same – because they are hot ! hot ! hot !”

      The key word is “choose”, toots…

      When men “choose” an obvious bad girl, it’s merely for a quick pump and dump.

      When women “choose” a bad boy, it’s not a quick roll in the hay… it turns into a drama-writ-large that involves a relationship, more or less tumultuous, and all the other societal detriments that this wriggly can of worms entails… single motherhood, broken homes, visits to the emergency room, etc., etc., etc.

      Now give that poor rodent a rest.

      Like


      • ….”When women “choose” a bad boy, it’s not a quick roll in the hay… it turns into a drama-writ-large that involves a relationship, more or less tumultuous, and all the other societal detriments that this wriggly can of worms entails… single motherhood, broken homes, visits to the emergency room, etc., etc., etc”

        See Itsme comments about beta marrying bad girls.

        OK done for now. I don’t have hamsters but I do have rugrats to feed

        Like


      • I’m talking about alphas choosing “bad girls”… betas will take anything they can get (DUH!) and those aren’t the guys that girls natter about when decrying men choosing “bad girls”.

        And for the record, there really aren’t even that many betas actually marrying true “bad girls”. Most of the time its a girl who played the demur angel long enough to get a commitment before eventually showing her true self.

        Like


    • Actually my “logical” brain works by applying the same rules to both men and women

      and that is why ‘logical’ is in quotes. men and women aren’t the same; we don’t think the same way, we don’t have the same motivations, we have different mating strategies. so applying the same rules to both men and women is fallacious.

      Men say they don’t understand women who choose “bad boys

      no. betas (i.e. nice guys) don’t understand women who choose bad boys.

      well, why don’t they ask themselves why they choose “bad girls”

      betas ‘choose’ bad girls out of white knight altruism and pussy starvation. they’ll ltr or even marry them.

      alphas know bad girls are only good for fucking.

      Don’t try to over complicate women.

      we actually don’t. it may appear that way to you, because as men we have a natural inclination to dissect and analyze things at a level of detail that is incomprehensible to women.

      Like


      • …”betas ‘choose’ bad girls out of white knight altruism and pussy starvation. they’ll ltr or even marry them”

        Have you met any beta white knight coming to the aid of an ugly damsel in distress ? Nah…didn’t think so.

        …. Actually we are in agreement here — men dissect and analys things to death in order to simplify, classify and ultimately understand and control their cicumstances. So I’m just trying to make things simple for you – take it or leave it.

        Like


      • Puh-leeze! Here at the chateau alone, there have been innumerable posts in the past with examples of fair-to-middling looking dudes married to she-beasts… gals who, before there was a “ring on it”, probably acted like true lovers and help-meets, but later showed some true cuntish colors…. not ‘bad girls’, per se… just the normal hypergamous and/or unappreciative modern woman.

        Like


      • Have you met any beta white knight coming to the aid of an ugly damsel in distress ?

        sadly, yes. and i bet every guy here knows at least one or two guys who have done this.

        Like


    • Men are viscerally turned on by physical attraction. Women are not. This has been demonstrated in brain scans.aune you should argue by how reality actually is instead of how you want it to be.

      Like


    • I agree with you and thanks for opening my eyes. It’s embarassing to say but I think I love you.

      Will you please marry me?

      Please…

      Like


  57. Let this be a lesson to the prospective white knighters. No man should ever do such a thing again. If her ‘gina tingles for that human waste of space, well that’s her choice as an adult. Way to go Ms. Steinem.

    A close runner up for HotM might be the story about Eliot Spitzer’s whore finding some sucker to buy her a ring.

    Oh well…She found love when she got punched in the face…she found love getting puuuuunnnched in the faaaaaaaace…

    Like


    • Don’t cha hate it when people post to threads without bothering to read them enough to realize that what they’re posting was already posted in the very first reply?

      Like


  58. I’m with you on the general principle but Rihanna is a bad example.  Everything you see, hear, and read out of these people is calculated to manipulate your perception of them with one goal in mind: getting famous and staying famous. Who they get with, and when they break up, is also a career move to them. Same thing with the Pattison-Stewart thing too, I think he’s gay and she was bearding him. I think Rihanna just decided she had a better shot at staying famous with Brown, he has better star power than any of her other suitors and that was the important thing. They’re a power couple. If you want to say that’s just another way to say he’s alpha then fine, that’s true, but I still think she did stay with him despite him beating her up, not because of it.

    Like


  59. Mm yeah at the peak of my princess mindset and naiveness (19-22 years old), I was involved with the most alpha man on the block, and he was my first in a few ways.
    I pretty much went through the same horrors as Rihanna, I was verbally and physically abusived. At that time, of course I thought the assertive “manly” man was the only type of man I would ever be only attracted to, he was my arm candy and psycho lover. I admit, I was quite a psycho chick at that stage of my life as well. I was always emotionally highly charged and shit-tested him endlessly, which always end up in a violent mess. It was a vicious cycle, we would set each other off. He was definitely the bigger asshole, totally uncaring, narcissistic, insecure, jealous etc. I guess I put up with it for so long (3+ years) because I had a skewed perception of love, reality and female self-awareness in general.

    I snapped when I caught him emotionally cheating on me via FB chat. I had a feeling before that incident, that he did physically cheat on me, however I did not have solid proof. I knew that if I loved myself enough I would dump his sorry ass. Luckily, I’m the type of person who prefers a clean break, so there was no yo-yo dating after the break up. Also by that time, I have been actively reading a lot of red pill material on the net and had come to some sort of self-realisation, that I was attracted to alpha characteristics, but choosing the wrong type of guy to give myself to. Plus I needed to tone down on the shit testing.

    I cringe seeing how Rihanna struggle with her attraction to alpha assholes. Being famous doesn’t help her situation at all. Not sure if she can be saved, but only time will tell.

    Now, I am in a really happy relationship. I admit, it took a while to adjust to being treated nicely. I made a conscious decision to be with a really genuinely nice man now, and no I almost never shit test him, and I give him the respect and loyalty he deserves. He is probably 65% beta and very sweet. Sometimes I think there is that dangerous spark missing between us, compared to when I was with an alpha, but I remind myself that I am extremely lucky to be in a stable, fruitful and healthy relationship. And no, I will never cross over to the dark side ever again.

    It pains me a lot to see my beta male friends, or some of the beta guys I chat to at parties, not get any chicks. It also pains me to see some of my girl friends constantly being pulled in, by completely psycho (ex)boyfriends, again and again. It pains me to chat to psycho ugly nerd fat girls who think that their pussy rules the world.

    Like


  60. A quick review of the comments to this article shows that Beasty Neecy has posted something like two dozen lengthy comments. Overweight Kate has posted about the same number of comments, though her posts, thankfully, aren’t as gushily breathless as Neecy’s.

    Heartiste: these two females are clearly trolls. Can’t you ban them from commenting? They add nothing of substance to the conversation, and their clucking winds up dominating the threads.

    Like


  61. There was a guy I worked with once who told me something wise. He was black but that doesn’t matter. He said, “If a man does something wrong to a woman, every one calls him a dirty asshole.” If a woman does something wrong to a man, everyone asks, “What did he do to make her do that?”

    Like


  62. […] Chateau Heartiste – Beta Males Settle For Fat Chicks, The Right Game For Your Body Type: The Endomorph, TRGFYBT: Mesomorph, TRGFYBT: Ectomorph, Defying Your Body Type Temperament, Hamster Of The Month […]

    Like


  63. on August 19, 2012 at 12:42 am john mccains little budy

    Loose women sink ships and diplomatic correspondence is Hitiite consperice.

    Like


  64. http://www.bakadesuyo.com/how-can-you-tell-from-a-distance-if-two-peopl
    http://www.bakadesuyo.com/how-can-you-tell-if-two-people-are-in-love
    http://www.bakadesuyo.com/is-five-minutes-all-it-takes-to-size-someone
    http://www.bakadesuyo.com/what-are-ten-instances-when-you-should-defini

    Suck on this one feminists. Determination of beauty is proved to be subconscious.
    http://www.bakadesuyo.com/how-long-does-it-take-to-decide-if-a-person-i

    “The fascinating implication here is that beauty is perceived subconsciously. It’s not as if the subjects had much time to meditate on anyone’s hotness — they weren’t even aware of seeing a face. To a great extent, first impressions of people’s looks are less about choice and culture and cultivated tastes, and more about something deeper and universal. Judging attractiveness seems to happen just as automatically and matter-of-factly as judgng identity, gender, age, and expression.”

    Like


  65. @Neecy:

    Thanks for commenting and thinking out the box as smart people do.

    Be aware that alpha males defend their alpha status on a message boards, LOL.

    If you think that alpha myth is sold as compensatory narcissism too,
    i would agreee with you even more.

    Like


  66. on August 19, 2012 at 9:18 am RespectTehTingles

    One of the chicks at the office did some hamstering the other day. To make a long story short, one our colleagues who was going on a business trip got called back, when he essentially had one foot on the airplane, because of indecision on the part of the higher ups. She was really pissed off about it, because the reason for his recall had been brought up well ahead of time. So anyways, she dropped this gem:

    Hamster: “…and also, what if, when he gets home, he finds out that his wife, who thought he was going to be gone for days, was having an affair!?”
    Me, sensing hamstering: “What about it?”
    Hamster: “That would be really bad!”
    Me: “Bad for whom? Him or her?”
    Hamster: “HIM of course!”
    Me: “What, his woman having an affair, or him finding out about it?”
    Hamster: “Him finding out about it! I mean, what if they’re having a really good life, and its all ruined because he got home early!?”
    Me: “Riiight, so it isn’t worse when ones partner is having an affair behind ones back?”
    Hamster: “Of course not!”
    Me, with completely dead pan face, albeit sarcarstic tone of voice: “Riiight. I can see your ‘reasoning.'”
    Hamster: *Confused look*

    Like


    • The fact that that thought even crossed her mind, and she found it a topic of conversation, is a tell… about herself.

      Like


      • on August 19, 2012 at 11:19 am RespectTehTingles

        True dat. She’s the type of chick that, when exposed has not having a clue as to what she’s talking about, resorts to solipsistic and skeptic (as in philosophical skepticism) hamster type arguments a la “we can’t know anything for sure, and therefore I’m right and you’re wrong, and either way you’re a dick for suggesting I’m not perfect and all knowing.” When that happens, and it happens regularly, I usually either laugh or bullshit her into quietude, or pull the all serious “stop being a petulant child”/”Blah blah I’m not going to feed your ego any more” upon which I totally ignore her, and speak with the uglier girls instead. She’s a 7.5, and NOT used to being ignored by co-workers. Really amusing to watch.

        Like


  67. I have discovered a way to go beyond the alpha-beta dichotomy.

    For the longest time, I had a great problem with questioning love. I seriously considered going Sufi because I couldn’t bear the thought of living without love, of having a life without love; it was the absolute for me, I guess you could say.

    At the root of my desire for love was the persistent, erroneous belief to which I was clinging – ‘I have to have love/be in love to be happy.’ I eradicated this belief by realizing that it was, after all, a belief, and I thought about how much more interesting life had been since I began the breakdown of my social identity.

    When I gave up my belief – suddenly a potential girlfriend came into my life. The great thing about her sudden appearance is that it gave me a first-hand opportunity to watch how love functioned inside of me.

    Okay, so I learned REALLY fast the negative side of love – the sense of longing for the person when they weren’t present, the disappointment after sexual contact, the jealousy and worry over their whereabouts, the dependency, the fear that the other party would perhaps commit adultery – and so, too, I quickly decided that I wasn’t going to deal with this love thing any longer. I find it humorous that my friend referred to love as a ‘holy cow’ (or something similar) at some point when describing his experiences during the period where he was ‘enlightened.’ Then again, that description is pretty accurate.

    Something interesting that I recalled today was that long ago, I had realized that ‘love’ was somehow based in the instincts, especially romantic love. That is, I understood that ‘love’ was intimately related to the human sex drive, and that the driving force beneath all those sugary-sweet words was to fuck (no sense in sugar coating the word at this point, either; in fact, making the point in crude language further emphasizes the falsehoods of love). So in other words, love is about some sort of trade-off, ‘I’ll be nice and sweet to you as long as you make my sex organs feel good, as long as you make my life meaningful, as long as I have you to live for.’ In some respects, love is largely a socially acceptable way of expressing sexual instincts.

    Another point is that it goes back to the condemnation of the physical world, i.e., ‘sex is bad because the body is bad because being physical is bad because the physical world is less than the spiritual world.’

    What nonsense!

    So with questioning my belief in love, a whole ‘pillar’ of my social identity began to topple! Not only do I not need love to be happy, I do not need a relationship (though it is an option, a choice I can freely make) to be happy, I do not need sex to be happy, I do not need a companion to be happy. Because I do not need a relationship or sex to be happy, I do not need to struggle to act ‘alpha.’ Because I do not need to struggle to act ‘alpha,’ I can accept my body and character as-it-is. Because I can accept my body and character as-it-is, I can more readily accept other bodies and characters as-they-are. Because I do not need to struggle to act alpha, I do not need to compete with other males to attempt to gain more partners than they, I do not need to concern myself with an individual’s sexual identity to see if they are a possible companion, I do not need to concern myself with whether or not the person is beautiful enough for me, I do not need to justify my self-perceived ‘level’ of beauty by attempting to impose upon another my perceived level of their beauty, and so on and so forth. Because I do not need to feel ‘beautiful enough’ to attract a companion, I do not have to feel fear of rejection for not being beautiful enough.

    So the tag-team days of nurture and desire are quickly ending. Yay! On to peace, happiness, and harmlessness, baby!

    Like


    • Love is merely a social construct?

      Like


    • To whomever earlier in the thread asked what the male hamster would look like, here is your answer.

      Like


    • Whatever it is that you’re smoking, don’t tell me. I don’t wanna try it.

      Like


    • Good luck with this. Sincerely. I tried it. After my last major breakup, I went zen / semi-celibate for a few (not actively seeking sex, just taking what comes). Bottom line, now I know that I’m happiest when a hottie is laying on me, looking lustfully into my eyes. Everything else in life is secondary. Trying to do, what you are trying to do, is fighting against your DNA, your very biology. I think it’s a losing battle.

      Like


      • I heartily disagree. I’m with Jack Donovan. Tang comes as a RESULT of fulfilling one’s manly destiny. It’s a fringe benefit. It’s an offshoot. It should not be the end goal. That is simply another form of subservience to the female prerogative. It limits transcendence and negates the virtues of manliness. A man should create, destroy, build, dominate, master, subdue, and achieve because it is his destiny as a man to find fulfillment for his masculinity. Your life actions should NOT simply be a way to “get laid”. You’re caught in the inverse. You’re fully embracing the matrilineal bonobo masturbation society that females want. It’s part of the emasculated postmodern globalist liberal agenda of our feminist overlords.

        As Dave Chapelle poigantly said, “Men like nice cars because women like men with nice cars. If men could get women to fuck in a cardboard box that’s where they’d live.”

        I think it’s okay to do certain things just to get laid, but only because at times it’s necessary. Most projects and goals should be done because they are helping a guy achieve a proper state of masculinity. Poon will be there as a result necessarily.

        Like


      • “Poon will be there as a result necessarily”

        In my experience, the most poon is there when I proactively seek it.

        How do I know this? Because as I said, I went zen for almost a year, just doing my manly destiny, and spending absolutely zero time seeking women. By the end of that year, my nice rotation had dwindled from 8 girls to 1 (The Cute Chubby one remained. The Turbo was the first to disappear.). This was mostly the result of neglect, and partly the result of not giving a fuck.

        Perhaps you have wonderous powers than enable poon to magically appear “necessarily”. Me, I’ve found that I have to do work. Not just “manly destiny” work. Poon work.

        Like


  68. I always like reading the comments by all the women here at Jezebel.com

    …wait, what? This is heartiste??

    Anyway:

    Like


  69. @Jake:

    You can answer to your “questioning of love” only by a psychological assessment.

    But if you prefer, be aware of the free solution to act alpha on a message board, LOL

    Like


  70. Ok I nominate this one for male hamster of the month here is a quote from this hilarious article about being married to a porn star. “”I want her to be happy. And it’s a turn-on, in a way. On the downside, though, there are guys having sex with your wife.”

    Read More http://www.details.com/sex-relationships/porn-and-perversions/200808/what-if-your-wife-were-a-porn-star#ixzz241jaoJJj

    One more gem “I look at it as a guy with his dick in my wife, but they’re working and it’s not emotional. She never orgasms in porn. That’s for us. If it happened on the set, it would be a little weird.”

    Like


  71. Joni Mitchell’s “Blue Motel Room” is gold-class hamstering:
    ….
    I know that you’ve got all those pretty girls coming on
    Hanging on your boom-boom-pachyderm
    ….
    Tell those girls that you’ve got Joni
    She’s coming back home
    …..
    We’re going to have to hold ourselves a peace talk
    In some neutral cafe
    You lay down your sneaking round the town, honey
    And I’ll lay down the highway

    I’ve got a blue motel room
    With a blue bedspread
    I’ve got the blues inside and outside my head
    Will you still love me
    When I get back to town

    Like


  72. on August 20, 2012 at 1:51 pm Amanjaw Marcuntte

    Rihanna’s contempt for Beta males is beautfully encapsulated in the lyrics to her song Unfaithful:

    Story of my life
    Searching for the right,
    But it keeps avoiding me
    Sorrow in my soul
    ‘Cause it seems that wrong
    Really loves my company

    He’s more than a man
    And this is more than love
    The reason that the sky is blue
    The clouds are rolling in
    Because I’m gone again
    And to him I just can’t be true

    And I know that he knows I’m unfaithful
    And it kills him inside
    To know that I am happy with some other guy
    I can see him dying

    I don’t wanna do this anymore
    I don’t wanna be the reason why
    Every time I walk out the door,
    I see him die a little more inside
    I don’t wanna hurt him anymore
    I don’t wanna take away his life
    I don’t wanna be a murderer

    I feel it in the air
    As I’m doing my hair
    Preparing for another date
    A kiss upon my cheek
    As he reluctantly
    Ask if I’m gonna be out late

    I say I won’t be long
    Just hanging with the girls
    A lie I didn’t have to tell
    Because we both know
    Where I’m about to go
    And we know it very well

    ‘Cause I know that he knows I’m unfaithful
    And it kills him inside
    To know that I am happy with some other guy
    I can see him dying

    I don’t wanna do this anymore
    I don’t wanna be the reason why
    Every time I walk out the door,
    I see him die a little more inside
    I don’t wanna hurt him anymore
    I don’t wanna take away his life
    I don’t wanna be a murderer

    Our love,
    His trust.
    I might as well take a gun and put it to his head
    Get it over with
    I don’t wanna do this, anymore
    Ooh.
    Anymore

    I don’t wanna do this anymore
    I don’t wanna be the reason why
    Every time I walk out the door
    I see him die a little more inside
    I don’t wanna hurt him anymore
    I don’t wanna take away his life
    I don’t wanna be a murderer

    Like


  73. @ all alpha/beta brainwashed:

    Your black or white thinking is an aberrant oversemplication.

    Wake up!

    Like


    • on August 20, 2012 at 6:04 pm RespectTehTingles

      You might want to check your spelling when you accuse others of being brainwashed and of oversimplifying things. Spelling like a simpleton doesn’t help your case.

      Like


      • To Navigator –

        PUA and Game Theorists are espousing one philosophy of masculinity out of several that have spontaneously developed as a natural reaction to the highly unnatural effeminate and emasculated postmodern globablist liberalism that our jihadi feminist overlords have successfully implemented in western society. “Alpha” and “Beta” are used to describe traits, behaviors, thoughts, and ideas that should be either exemplified or dimished if one adhere’s to the PUA/Game Theorist philosophy. It’s a way of distinguishing between blue pill/ red pill men as well.

        There are other neo-phallocentric philosophies currently being espoused to help men understand their role as males in this perverse world of socialism/globalism/equalism/liberalism that are all inherently linked to the feminist dogma ruling western society.

        There’s MGTOW, MRM’s, Traditionalists, Nationalists, Omega Men. Anyone who is fighting against multicultarlism/globalism and for smaller states tribes based on shared culture, tradtions, and values would include a reassertion of the male, even if it’s not explicitly stated.

        However, male-feminists and the Quintessential Beta Male still account for the majority of men. The terms, while overlapping, are not totally interchangeable. A QBM blue pill man is likely to go PUA, MRM, fullblown alcoholic, or go full rogue ala James Holmes and committ mass murder when his cognitive dissonance can’t cope when he finds out his wife is porking the local bartender, her old college football playing boyfriend, and also a stripper at her bachelorette party. A male feminists accepts his subservience due to full scale indoctrination into the myths of patriarchy, privilege, and equality.

        Our hope is to reach the QBM slogging it out in the trenches and having his ass handed to him repeatedly. If we can get a red pill to him in time, he might be saved.

        Like


      • Well done.

        Like


    • You need to bone up on your evolutionary biology/psychology. Evolution is probabilistic and not deterministic. Therefore we use generalities to describe what is probable as an aid to discussion. No one here actually thinks there is an unyieldingly rigid alpha/beta dichotomy that has been predetermined for each man. But it’s probable we all fall somewhere on the scale and it’s easier to relate various behaviors as “alpha” or “beta” for purposes of simplicity,clarity, and understanding.

      At it’s most basic, we are trying to do is reestablish what is masculinity and what are masculine traits as differentiated from the effeminate emasculated man of globalist postmodern liberalism. Fyi – there is also the omega man.

      PUA and Game Theorists are simply one philosophy of maleness as many different philosophies are spontaneously arising as a natural reaction to this highly unnatural world we are facing as men.

      Like


    • Evolutionary biology/psychology is probalistic and not deterministic. We use terms like “alpha” and “beta” and generalizations for simplicty, clarity, and understanding. No on here acutally thinks there is a rigid and unchangeable predetermined dichotomy amongst males of “alpha” and “beta”.

      PUA and Game Theorists are espousing one philosophy of masculinity out of several that have spontaneously developed as a natural reaction to the highly unnatural effeminate and emasculated postmodern globablist liberalism that our jihadi feminist overlords have successfully implemented in western society. “Alpha” and “Beta” are used to describe traits, behaviors, thoughts, and ideas that should be either exemplified or dimished if one adhere’s to the PUA/Game Theorist philosophy. It’s a way of distinguishing between blue pill/ red pill men as well.

      There are other neo-phallocentric philosophies currently being espoused to help men understand their role as males in this perverse world of socialism/globalism/equalism/liberalism that are all inherently linked to the feminist dogma ruling western society.

      There’s MGTOW, MRM’s, Traditionalists, Nationalists, Omega Men. Anyone who is fighting against multicultarlism/globalism and for smaller states tribes based on shared culture, tradtions, and values would include a reassertion of the male, even if it’s not explicitly stated.

      However, male-feminists and the Quintessential Beta Male still account for the majority of men. The terms, while overlapping, are not totally interchangeable. A QBM blue pill man is likely to go PUA, MRM, fullblown alcoholic, or go full rogue ala James Holmes and committ mass murder when his cognitive dissonance can’t cope when he finds out his wife is porking the local bartender, her old college football playing boyfriend, and also a stripper at her bachelorette party. A male feminists accepts his subservience due to full scale indoctrination into the myths of patriarchy, privilege, and equality.

      Our hope is to reach the QBM slogging it out in the trenches and having his ass handed to him repeatedly. If we can get a red pill to him in time, he might be saved.

      Like


    • on August 21, 2012 at 5:33 pm RespectTehTingles

      @navigator

      Thank you. You’ve just provided me with a bit of entertainment.
      About the “intellectively” poor answer bit; you wrote:

      “at all alpha/beta brainwashed:
      Your black or white thinking is an aberrant oversemplication. Wake up!”

      Honestly, do you really think a post where someone effectively states that the targets of the post are brainwashed morons, without qualifying that position with anything better than spelling mistakes and “wake up,” deserves a good reply? I don’t. Do you even know what the word “aberrant” means? I certainly don’t think you do. Does it provide me with entertainment to bring forth the flamer when presented with such posts?

      Oh yeah.

      Did you expect people to bow before you and humbly recieve your wisdom? How childish of you.

      Now you’ll probably think along the lines of “who smelt it dealt it” and that I’m projektin’ my own insecurrities n’ stuff, but here’s a little secret for you:

      You do that well enough yourself.

      Also, calling people brainwashed is rather ineffectual if you truly want them to change opinion. The first rule of opinions is that the harder you hammer them, or as in your case, misspell at them, the harder they’ll be to dislodge.

      Now, you also wrote:

      “being a simpleton is the destiny of crowd’s members as you are, not the one of thinkers out the box.”

      Am I to presume that you consider yourself an out-of-the-box thinker? Really? Am I also to infer that you consider yourself distinct from “the crowd”? That you even, perhaps, consider yourself a little, but juuust a little (but noticeably) better than the members of said crowd? Truly? Perhaps you also consider yourself a LEADER, a VISIONARY, someone who will LEAVE A MARK UPON THE HISTORY OF WORLD! Oh how much better everything would be if you ruled…

      Lolz.

      Firstly: Who here has the main stream opinions? You, or those who think game theory and evo psych is on to something important and valuable which, while it can be used for purely selfish purposes just like everything else, can also be used as a catalyst for the betterment of society and human health?

      (Hint: It’s you.)

      Secondly: Arrogance and touchiness, particularly when combined words bigger than the individual in question can handle, and _especially_ when said big words are combined with tirades of psych terms which were in all likelihood skimmed from wikipedia, tends to indicate youth, inexperience, and low self esteem. “The certainty of youth,” as it were. Don’t worry about it though. You’ll grow out of it. Probably. Or maybe not.

      Now, you may not actually be young, but let’s not judge people by their appearances and age, b’cuz that would just be rude, dontcha’ know! 😀

      Like


  74. Lost the top of my post

    Navigator –

    Evolutionary biology/psychology is probalistic and not deterministic. The terms “alpha” and “beta” are used for simplicity, clarity, and understanding. No one here thinks that there is a rigid dichotomy of “alpha” and “beta” which men are predetermind to exist as in an unchangeable unyielding form. We exists somewhere on a scale. The terms “alpha” and “beta” allow us to talk about probabilities. It’s probable that you will experience a certain outcome if you exhibit what we classify as “beta” behaviors. It’s probable you will experience as certain result if you exhibit “alpha” behaviors. These probabilities are the ones determined by the evo bio/psych of men and women.

    Like


  75. funny thing is: Some men would elicit the same reaction from women: like hurting his wife over and over and still he is loved by the woman and excuses him always; even though these men may not be as “alpha” on paper or according to the number of women they slept with. There is a level of behavior of men which women consider to be alpha, and thus elicit this same reaction.

    Like


  76. @RespectTehTingles:

    Bad spelling is my fault, intellectively poor answer is yours:

    being a simpleton is the destiny of crowd’s members as you are,
    not the one of thinkers out the box.

    @ivanhoseph77:

    Thanks for sharing.

    And the blind followers of the alpha myth are unawares installing a compensatory narcissism.

    The alpha/beta omni-comprehensive conceptualization is the typical “splitting” of the narcissist.

    The free devaluation of others and the reframing games apt to defend your own alpha false self are other typical narcissisitc traits.

    For the last time, just wake up, guys!

    Like


  77. @ivanhoseph77:

    Thanks for sharing and culturally enriching.

    And the blind followers of the alpha myth are unawares installing a compensatory narcissism.

    The alpha/beta omni-comprehensive conceptualization is the typical “splitting” of the narcissist.

    For the last time, wake up!

    Like


  78. The article quotes one that says Brown is confused about why Rihanna keeps talking about the whole thing over & over…

    I knew Rihanna had something to do with singing, but getting her ass beat is the primary reason she seems famous to me.

    Keeping herself in the spotlight is the reason she keeps talking about it,..

    Like


  79. @RespectTehTingles:

    In your terms:

    you react and qualify too much, you are not a alpha, LOL

    In mine:

    the devaluation of others, the reframing games by winning fantasies apt to defend the false alpha self are nacissisitc traits (with or without your understanding).

    @ivanhoseph77:

    Thanks again for sharing

    My only point is the intra-psyche setting of the alpha male myth as
    a compensatory narcissim.

    Having written that, i leave the blog definitively.

    Like


    • on August 21, 2012 at 6:26 pm RespectTehTingles

      @navigator

      “In your terms”

      Really?

      “you react and qualify too much”

      Interesting.

      “you are not a alpha”

      Uh huh.

      “i leave the blog definitively”

      Bye.

      Like