Entitled Careerist Woman Logo

Petition to make this the official logo of the modern, Western, feminist, entitled careerist woman.

“I watch you die.”

Ugly, bloated Western woman dressed in the latest fashion sits idly with look of perplexity as a man in distress collapses before her leaden gaze. She even leans away from him, offended at this breach of protocol. Another woman seated nearby joins her in the sitting. The men around them rise to help the stricken man.

It’s a peculiar time when men rush to help another man out while women dawdle uselessly, their nurturing instincts vacuumed out of them by decades of feminist indoctrination and consumerist rat-racing. Another bell tolls for the West.

Could someone make a gif of the relevant portions of this video? And then plaster Jizzabel’s comment wall with it?





Comments


  1. Some clever graphic artist can simplify that photo into something more graphically simple.

    Like


  2. One down, 3.5 billion to go.

    Like


  3. Please read and comment on this hilarious blog of two way-past-their-prime mercenary cows trying to find sugar daddies (!) in New Orleans. What a perfect Heartistian fucking train wreck!

    How to Bag a Big Daddy in the Big Easy

    http://bagadaddy.wordpress.com/

    Like


    • Gross. I scrolled down to her pictures and puked all over my computer screen. What a waste of life

      Like


  4. And the bitch is fugly too!

    Like


  5. on July 3, 2012 at 3:30 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lozozozozozozoz heartsistez!!!

    i need to send dat lady some t-shirts!!!!!!

    http://www.cafepress.com/greatbooksformen.582539775

    “da professional womenz ode”

    alpha fucks and beta bucks
    dat is how we roll
    da butthexting cockass we fucks and sucks
    and in our anuthes it doth deosul
    alpha fucks and beta bucks
    it is da way of da fed
    to transfer assetss to dose who butthext
    cuckold dose who pay for our bread
    beta bucks and alpha fucks
    it’s what day teach us we;’re entitled too
    da assetts from betas we plucks
    after da alphas desol us through our hole for poo
    lzozozlzzolzlzlzlz
    cuckold da betas cockhold da alphas
    datsz what day taught us in mba grad school
    as da feiisnsits see no truth nor justice in their laws
    and say da great books for menz was all fools.
    yes, yes, i did very good on my gmats
    dey bernenakifed my soul away, left me with cats

    zlzlzzozozozo

    Like


    • gbfm

      alpha fucks and beta bucks

      After the 1,000th time
      one hears it,
      it really has
      Quite The Poignancy

      gbfm, you scamp! Are you really telling us Feminism gave males a raw deal by deceiving them from childhood?

      Like


      • I’m not gonna lie. When I first came here I always skipped all of GBFM’s posts because they’re as tucker max’s dick when he’s secretly taping the butthexing of anal virgins. Plust the spelling/grammer annoyed me. These days, I just read ’em and zlzlzolzolz

        Like


      • It means well, but it’s for a diminished, dim audience.

        Like


      • No links…ok.
        It means well, but it’s Cartoon Philosophy for a http://wp.me/p2kmGE-gX

        Like


      • Suddenly, I have this vision of a choir club composed of well-to-do professional women intoning this ode with a kind of uplifting seriousness… Handel’s Messiah with a gbfm twist.

        Like


  6. It’s Sophie Mirabella, née Panopoulos, Aussie MP for the center-right liberals, and she seems to be quite right of that center. She claims to have been “in shock” Else, yes, spot on, what a freak.

    Like


    • It’s Australia, their “right” is only slightly less liberal than Europe’s (or the US’s for that matter, political parties are just liberal circle jerks these days).

      Like


      • The Liberal party in Australia (despite its name, the party of the Right) is not very liberal in the American sense. It is currently led by a socially conservative Catholic and was previously led by a socially conservative Protestant. It is in coalition with the National Party, which is more conservative still and traditionally represents country and regional interests.

        Sophie Mirabella is not left wing, nor a feminist as far as I know.

        Like


      • I don’t know their party agenda, but if it doesn’t include an absolute ban on non-white immigration and mass deportation of illegals, then they are not “Conservative” in any meaningful sense.

        Like


      • Such action presupposes a radical frame of mind. A conservative one, given the presence of millions of non-whites, legal and not, will take the easiest approach — registration, longer queues, and all that bureaucratic semblance of protecting the interests of the founding stock.

        The trouble with conservatives is that they will try to conserve that which they are too weak to attack.

        Like


      • You are being too etymological. By your way of thinking, feminists and the left are “conservative” because they want to “conserve” the prevailing regime and culture. And yet nobody calls them that because everyone has a workable understanding of the concepts beneath the practical labels. (Let’s not get started on the word “liberal,” cognate of “liberty.”) No conservative properly understood wants “registration, longer queues, and all that bureaucratic semblance.”

        I prefer to think in terms of right and left, and radical and complacent. The left is totalitarian, collective, and group-dependent; the right is autonomous, self-sufficient, and “liberal” (“libertarian”) by way of returning to the institutions that once preserved autonomy, self-sufficiency, and liberty. Further, one can be radical or complacent in the pursuit of preserving or eliminating the present leftist drift in the west.

        I am radical-right; I demand a rebirth of the institutions of liberty. You are radical-left insofar as you identify yourself primarily with your race collective, have contempt for the western institutions between you and your goals, and advocate a totalitarian standard of victory.

        Most people are complacent left or right, having gauzy half-notions of the general direction they prefer, but with no intellectual heft behind their prejudices which therefore tend to sway in the weather.

        Matt

        Like


      • King,

        That was all quite fair and I could do no more than quibble (for example, the old lib-con mantra, launched by von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, that n.s. was “leftism”, heavy square quotes).

        But to sharpen my original point: no conservative agenda is equal to the reforms that would be necessary for large-scale, lasting course-correction. That’s why they are called conservative. Restoring institutions sounds like a worthy project, but it does not bodily remove thirty-million Mexicans, or a hundred-thousand Somalis, and so on. Nor does it neutralize those who encourage such madness.

        If the political ideology which alone were able to handle such matters be “leftism”, then I suppose I am a “leftist”, but it’s obvious that as much contradiction exists between my ideology and radical Jews’ as that between conservatives too weak to attack and leftists who “conserve” the fruits of their radical campaigns.

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 5:30 pm Beautiful Truths Ignored

        Read Burke’s “Letters on the Regicide Peace”, then get back to me.

        A *real* conservative knows how to take off the gloves, slip on the brass knuckles and get down to business.

        A good rule of thumb for American conservatives: If the $PLC doesn’t list you as a “hate group”, you aren’t doing it right.

        VDARE.com and Family Research Council – conservative

        Noah Millman – not so much

        Like


      • Thanks for the high-level reference, BTI. I will read it. We need more connection with the best that has been thought and said. None of our problems are truly new.

        Of course, uh, we must the nerve to “bodily remove thirty-million Mexicans,” but the mere insistence of this from our severe minority amounts to so much ineffectual whining. The real way to do that is to recover the institution of proper citizenship, which before the “reforms” of 1965 were far more practically restrictive than “give me your tired, your poor.”

        Our differences are about method. We are both interested in getting from A to B, but I incorporate the pragmatism required to get there more intrinsically to my thinking than you do. It’s not enough to just fearlessly declare the problems the majority feel more comfortable ignoring and hoping will go away. We also must create a feasible, comprehensive battle plan that includes what baby step we must take today.

        … conservatives too weak to attack and leftists who “conserve” the fruits of their radical campaigns.

        True, as long as it is clear that this is not a problem of ideology so much as it is a problem with the failure of nerve you cite (“too weak to attack”). The bourgeois merchants in middle America are disposed against radicalism — it would ruin their livelihood. But since their livelihood is being ruined by others anyway, they have nothing to lose by becoming radical.

        There has been a popular uprising by the bourgeoisie against Obama and Pelosi, though it remains placid, if not dormant, for now. When/if it becomes clear that their ruination cannot be prevented by the normal constitutional means they so admire, I don’t think they will be shy about radicalizing quickly. After all, the other component of their civic worship is the founding of this country in violent revolution. We have “conserved” that Lockean institution which gives us the right to rebel. The only question is how well have we conserved it.

        Have the men become too domesticated and feminized to indemnify their liberty with a real threat to revolt? Are we too pussy to pledge our “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor” on what we believe, or is griping about it in dark corners such as these sufficiently cathartic to maintain complacency?

        I am obviously less pessimistic on that score than you are. It never takes consensus or even plurality to spark radical change. It merely requires leadership — “One man with courage makes a majority” — consistency of principle, and a fidelity to the truth. Once it is demonstrated that radicalism of our stripe may speak frankly and survive, the masses will find its vicarious courage to at least remain neutral while better men fight on their behalf. Once the samizdat we pass around here finds just a 5% acceptance in the culture — that is, once our voice is liberated from ghetto status — the gains will become exponential. It’s all in the timing. If we peak too soon or depart our pseudonymity (“Publius” anyone?) and unpopularity too quickly, we get mowed down quickly.

        A to B. Do you have a better suggestion how?

        Matt

        Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 11:30 am Peace be with you.

      The bloke, Simon Sheikh, who had the seizure is a Soros funded ultra left liberal and HE not Sophie is the radical feminist.

      Sophie Mirabella likely thought he was involved in a stunt; personally I’d be slow to want to touch the guy myself.

      Though no one takes the organisation ‘GetUp’ he fronts seriously, they’re given airtime because the ‘ABC’ is a taxpayer funded ultra left liberal public broadcaster – and jokes themselves all over Australia.

      Like


  7. Ugh, who the fuck
    is jizzabel?

    Like


    • jezebel.com

      Like


      • Thank you, tartarus.
        Finally, somebody with manners
        and politeness around here.

        Like


      • on July 4, 2012 at 3:58 am Art Vandelay

        Please go fuck yourself. How’s that for manners?

        Like


      • It’s all status games. Men do ’em too–it’s how you get to the top in any organization. Of course, you’re actually expected to be able to do things too in some cases.

        You’re expected to know what the group alpha (ie Heartiste) knows (ie jizzabel=Jezebel) and people fall over themselves to go on about how funny GBFM is when, frankly, while he gets off a couple of good phrases (alpha fucks and beta bucks) I think he could do without the endless ‘lzzlolzlzolz’ and the butthate about ben bernanke (yeah, fine, you think we should go back to the gold standard…like greenspan was so much better? you think any fed chairman who doesn’t go along with the elite’s policies is going to get appointed?)

        OK, fine, I could figure out the jizzabel thing. But, really, this sort of thing is everywhere.

        Like


      • When you turn 21
        THAT kind of answer
        – will be totally Alpha

        Like


      • on July 4, 2012 at 5:33 pm Art Vandelay

        good… good.

        Like


  8. on July 3, 2012 at 3:57 pm Amanjaw Marcuntte

    Pfft.. he was *obviously* trying to get an upskirt view of a strong woman who was too intimidating for him. Good on her for pulling away from that kind of sexual harassment.

    Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 7:45 am SheCantSayNo

      I’ve always felt there’s plenty of truth behind the sentiment that men are afraid of strong, empowered, independent women… they’re afraid to see them naked!

      Like


  9. And then they want men to stay on a sinking ship while they get the lifeboats.

    Nope.avi

    Like


  10. “offended at this breach of protocol”

    lolz

    Like


  11. sounds like this one deserves a quickmeme

    Like


  12. She’s a cabinet minister from Australia. I read about this on another blog.

    Feminist cunts.

    Like


    • Correction, she’s a shadow minister. As in she is in the opposition party not in govt. that bitch is Sophie Mirabella. She’s my local MP. I don’t recall meeting anyone with less empathy.

      Like


  13. You are incorrect. That is a man on the right. She at the very least has a micro-penis.

    Like


  14. Apologies if 4share is a frowned upon file-sharer. I rarely use these.
    Also apologies about the size of almost 2MB, I didn’t want to cut it any further…
    http://www.4shared.com/photo/j8F5ub-9/collapse.html?

    Like


  15. The logo is a bit of a rush job, but perhaps you find use for it 😉
    http://www.4shared.com/photo/rsExXHff/feminist_manifest.html?

    Like


  16. Always remember: women are the kinder, more compassionate sex. The world would be in perfect harmony and totally at peace if women were in control of it.

    Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 4:18 am adore teh goddessss

      That is just soooo true. They just exist on a higher moral, empathic plane. We can but adore them

      Also, we can shut down all women’s prisons in the UK, ‘cos women aren’t capable of true evil (like menz) and so can be kissed better and let loose.

      Like


    • Always remember: All female participants in the Milgram obedience to authority experiment continued shocking the puppy despite their tears.

      Half of the men stopped.

      Like


  17. brb attacking the comments section

    bitches need to learn that it is not okay to be a bitch and a feminist.

    Like


  18. on July 3, 2012 at 4:59 pm ThatNorwegianGuy

    Well, fuck. I’m almost amazed at how beautifully those 44 seconds sum up how feminism has asscocked Western civilization.

    Like


  19. on July 3, 2012 at 5:38 pm Franklin Delano Robocop

    She’s appalled because dying is so Beta.

    Like


  20. Forget that, I’d probably react the same way for a minute or two. Here’s the real news, conveniently one direct click away from the original story:

    ‘I’ve fallen in love with man who beat my boyfriend to death’: Victim’s girlfriend admits she’s been writing to killer in jail

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/gary-suller-murder-girlfriend-katie-907632

    Like


    • on July 3, 2012 at 7:09 pm Dan Fletcher

      Jesus. This one deserves its own post.

      Like


      • Perfect example of why not to be captain save a ho. Girls who are that mentally screwed up can’t be helped

        Like


    • The guy who tried to save this soulless, dead eyed, heroin addicted whore was a hopeless idiot. Nobody deserves to be beaten to death, but one wonders what exactly he hoped to accomplish with this waste of flesh.

      Like


    • Holy sh–. Just before reading anonymous’ post above, I was reminded of a nature video that has traumatized me. It was a pack of large baboons. The dominant male killed a subordinate male. A week or so later, the subordinate male’s ex-girlfriend allowed the dominant male to mount her. The dead male’s offspring looked on either perplexed or in horror.

      It might sound funny or pathetic or both, but I think about that video all the time. I wonder how our females could be equally amoral as another primate if society allows it. Are we there yet? Can we stop it?

      Like


    • Suller’s sugarbaby is a 6 at best to me but I can see why a lot of other men over 35 would consider her the best they could get ever, especially if they stupidly decide to live in feminist places like the UK where young women like that don’t normally date relatively rich older men like himself (cuz that wouldn’t be “equal”).

      He died because he couldn’t get a hot young woman who wasn’t a drug addict to want him at least as a sugar daddy. The economy is so good in the UK that higher class girls her age could easily work for minimum wage and wouldn’t need an older man with a job to support them.

      This was the cause of death. If he’d moved to a non-english speaking country, he would have been able to date a woman of her youth and looks who wasn’t a lower class heroin addict.

      Like


  21. off topic
    What are the best game books?
    Any specific recommendations for young men (18) or older men (40-50)?

    Like


  22. I don’t really have a problem with this chick. I think she’s just a little slow on the uptake and repressed/shy.

    Women should be slower to assist a man in apparent distress; they’re vulnerable.

    I watched the video and she showed a mixture of shock, bewilderment, compassion, alarm, and introverted repression.

    If she’d tried to alpha the situation that would’ve been a lot more obnoxious. Instead she was just passively pinging off of everyone else even after he’d been whisked off, trying to get her bearings.

    If anything the “show must go on” dude was the bigger douche.

    Let’s not all pile on the introverted ladies, m’kay? They’re the good ones.

    Like


    • I think she’s a naturally repressed person who did what those do in that type of situation – clearly signaled by body language her alarm, redirected attention thereby, and pinged off others waiting for the appropriate move.

      What I did not see was a lack of compassion – her recovery time from a concerned state was much slower.

      Her initial phase of alarm and disgust at the creepy body space invasion didn’t strike me as unjustified. It was amusing to watch her peck her neck like a chicken, struggling between fear and concern.

      However tough this chick may act on TV (I haven’t seen her in action), the brief moments I watched of her revealed her fundamental insecurities, weakness and low social status. It’s too bad she’s getting crucified for this undeservedly. I’d much rather see one of the true pigs getting butchered.

      Like


  23. on July 3, 2012 at 7:08 pm Adam And Eve Reboot

    @great books for men. Y do you just repeat the same thing over,and over? Are you autistic or something?

    Like


  24. A full summation of Feminism in 45-seconds.

    Like


  25. it’s a shit-test…

    Like


  26. Reckon you missed the mark on this one. I mean, sure she’s a cold bitch and all that, but the thing next to him is no man – it is a bleeding heart feminist vegan wanker. I’d have been more likely to finish the job than help him too.

    Like


  27. I love how she reaches out to touch him only after she realizes everyone else is taking action.

    Like


    • on July 3, 2012 at 8:59 pm Franklin Delano Robocop

      I was thinking that, too. But the idea of a woman waiting for men to handle a crisis situation and then – only then, of course – taking part so as to seem caring and compassionate while avoiding any personal danger/responsibility is so crazy as to be unbelievable. Amirite?

      Like


  28. That’s a chick? I thought it was PJ O’Rourke.

    Like


  29. and she is ugly

    Like


  30. Pft, that femcunt has nothing on some of the labor femcunts currently in government. Penny Wong is the Saruman of the left.

    Like


  31. This man said eff you to the divorce-industrial complex — and, more importantly, to his greedy bitch of an ex-wife (and LOL at the Daily Mail for calling him the “world’s worst dad”):

    A Canadian father-of-four has been dubbed the ‘world’s worst dad’ after he ‘abandoned’ his children for a new life in the Philippines.

    Hans Mills ditched his ten-year-old cancer sufferer son Steven, daughters Jackie, 14, who has Down Syndrome and Maggie, 17, who is fighting depression, and his eldest boy, a 19-year-old drug addict.

    The 53-year-old education software expert said a court ruling which made him pay $4,000 a month to his ex-wife in child support would financially ruin him.

    And so, with extensive work contacts in South East Asia, he sent his former love Donna Mills an email saying he had left the country for good.

    He wrote on November 2, 2011: ‘The result of the legal instrument you recently designed and implemented is there’s no possibility of a comfortable life or (secure) retirement for me in Canada at all.

    ‘Therefore I have left the country to seek greener pastures elsewhere, and will never return. Well done Einstein. Good luck and goodbye.’

    It saw him join the legion of 120,000 parents in Ontario wanted for being in arrears on spousal and child support payments.

    Speaking to thestar.com from his new Manila home, he said he blamed a ‘broken’ Family Court system that ‘forced him to cut and run’.

    He said: ‘I did a terrible, awful thing, because I had no reasonable option. I miss my children terribly. I abandoned Canada, but not my children.

    ‘My hope is some day I reconcile with my children, but not in Canada, a morally bankrupt state. The Philippines is about as far as I could go. If I’d a spaceship I’d be much further away.’

    He said his children were ‘innocent bystanders who got caught in the crossfire’ and added that it was ‘not my intention to hurt them’.

    He also revealed he would ‘never, ever, ever, ever’ pay spousal support nor return to Canada. It is a blow for his ex-wife, who has spent eight months trying to get Ontario’s Family Responsibility Office to find him.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2168126/Deadbeat-dad-Hans-Mills-abandons-children-new-life-Philippines.html#ixzz1zc62afVA

    Like


    • Yeah but soon there will be no place left to hide.

      Like


    • His 17yo daughter’s pretty cute.

      Like


      • Yeah, but catch the phiz on that harridan wife… damn near made ME hop a plane to the Far East.

        Like


      • I thought the same thing. Her looks alone would make me leave the country

        Like


      • And if he’s a real alpha, the fact that he has a 17 year old daughter does not logically take him out of the sexual marketplace for hot young women. I didn’t see the Filipina he remarried to but I’ll bet she’s over 30. I say that because he would have had to be a pathetic Canadian beta just for what he’d already given up to his exwife before she wanted even more. That million dollar home should have been sold and the cash squirreled away in different places long ago.

        And what the ugly ex wife wanted was revenge not so much the cash itself. She wanted to totally destroy him and make sure he could not date any woman younger than herself.

        Like


      • He’s a fool for getting married again.

        Like


      • Forget the 17yo. The fourteen-year-old with Down Syndrome will be an order of magnitude easier to close. Tighter too.

        Hell, go after them all. Their daddy issues are now internationally famous. That tabloid piece was a worldwide dispatch proclaiming to men of every nation, “Here there soon be sluts.” Their busted family is now a cranked-up incubator of manic promiscuity.

        How’s that divorce working out for you, mom? She “liberated” herself on the ruins of her children’s psychological stability. This is the dramatic, bloody conclusion of the feminist’s script. She dismantled the family, all right, she got what she and Friedan wanted.

        The seventeen-year-old is struggling with “depression”! You don’t say! That’s the least of it. What carousels she is destined to ride.

        Matt

        Like


      • I’m on the 14yo.

        Like


      • Game admits of no dibs.

        Like


    • Rather than wring his hands over the children (hence, paying lip service to the meme: won’t somebody please think of the children!) he should have simply stated to the press (and his wife):

      “If no husband, then no father… and no pay outs.”

      And if he felt a bit more garrulous:

      “I encourage all men of the West to follow my lead.”

      Like


    • At least the comment section generally sympathizes with the man, declaring the bitch wife “greedy”.

      Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 4:02 am Art Vandelay

      Wow that family is a train wreck, cancer, depression, down syndrome, cunty deadbeat ex wife…

      Like


    • Hans Mills ditched his ten-year-old cancer sufferer son Steven, daughters Jackie, 14, who has Down Syndrome and Maggie, 17, who is fighting depression, and his eldest boy, a 19-year-old drug addict.

      Leaving this frightful pack of dysgenics, not having sired them, is what makes him “world’s worst dad”.

      The modern West for you.

      Like


    • Applause. Minas Tirith must fall.

      Like


  32. Was this ever a refreshing slap in the face.

    Like


  33. So a guy collapsed in front of Mike Myers in his SNL Coffee Talk get up? He’s just staying in character, I don’t know what the fuss is all about.

    Like


  34. simon proving once again the pass out game does not work…

    Like


  35. on July 3, 2012 at 10:44 pm Rocket Science

    Just a pro tip. If someone passes out, it might be due to low blood pressure. Dehydration, medication, cardiac problems, etc.

    DO NOT SIT THE PERSON UP.

    That will cause an immediate drop in blood supply to the brain, possibly causing a stroke. I autopsied a guy who tried to sit up to get from his bed to the ambulance stretcher. He was suffering from dehydration due to diarrhea. Raising his head killed him. No blood, no oxygen, no life. People have died from passing out, due to low blood pressure from medication, in phone booths.

    Instead, gently lower them to the floor, and elevate the legs slightly.

    But, this happened in a news room. A good illustration of what ignorant, stupid, pompous people they are.

    BTW, according to my sources, the best place in the world to have a cardiac arrest is not in the hospital. In fact, it is the worst place. Almost nobody goes home from the hospital if they have a cardiac arrest while in the hospital. An American casino gives you the highest chance to survive. Why? Because everybody is always being watched, at least on camera. And, the employees are trained in CPR.

    Would this be a good conversational topic to open up a woman?

    Like


    • You have left an intelligent comment sir, and if this holds across multiple domains, I’m quite sure your IQ is formidable.

      Like


  36. Wait.. thats a woman? oh shit..

    Like


  37. Some of you idiots don’t know what the hell you’re talking about. The asshat that collapsed is a beta male who runs a far left hot button outfit in Australia.

    This creature. http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/image/3016986-3×2-700×467.jpg

    The woman looking down at him is a right winger. She most likely was horrified at the thought of helping and quietly hoping he’d died, as all far left beta males should.

    Like


  38. Guess I’ll post here on a bit of a tangent, but I’m wondering about the relationship between drama and the female ego. A girl at work is constantly complaining about her boyfriend (some real stupidity involving his dogs, and how they moved into an apartment that doesn’t allow pets…uh, yeah)…but this isn’t unusual. I’ve known her for months, and we’re sort of friends at work, and she’s always talking about the drama in her life.

    Thing is, she never actually asks me about me, doesn’t really care either. I tell her about things in my life, and she turns the subject back about her drama (today she even interrupted me mid-sentence while I was telling her about my dad to say something bitter about her ex boyfriend from three years ago).

    First, I think she might have depression: She might need drama to get her feeling *something* vital, anger can be a temporary relief from melancholy. But the second thing I’m just starting to put together, so I submit it for critique: female ego = attention = drama. This doesn’t make sense to most men: We can’t stroke our egos by telling everyone how crappy our lives are, but this is a thing for women. It’s probably genuinely a thing that occasionally women will intentionally insert drama in their lives just to have something to talk about with their girlfriends.

    What do you think? I guess a lot about this woman starts to make sense once I look at it as ego gratification. Otherwise I’m left trying to figure out how to solve her problems (first error: she doesn’t actually *want* a solution), and then trying to figure out why I’m trying to solve her problems (second error: total misunderstanding about what her problem actually is).

    Like


    • She’s desperate for attention/always wants to be the centre of it. HOw hot is she out of interest?

      Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 12:28 am Days of Broken Arrows

      This reminds of a woman I used to date who was actually diagnosed with bipolar disorder — the serious kind, not the pop-psych kind that everyone gets diagnosed with now.

      I don’t know what your intentions are here, but a few notes:

      1). Your part about not-wanting a solution is spot-on. Mine complained to me once when I offered some advice saying “It’s a male thing to want to solve problems.” She got that from an idiotic women’s studies course. Never try and solve a woman’s problems (unless a house is on fire, and even then think twice). See #4.

      2). Complaining for women is often a veiled form of bragging. For example, complaining about the b/f lets you know she’s no spinster. I know a woman who would go on and on about how difficult it was to have a sunroom, letting everyone know (without really saying) she lived in an expensive house. Women also do this with alleged “harassment,” which is a way to really let you know how desirable men find them wile pretending the whole time how “awful” they find all that attention.

      3). If you’re thinking she’ll cheat with you, find out if she’s already cheated. A lot of times cheating for women is about creating a dramatic soap opera. If so, she may be open to you.

      4). If the above holds true, just amplify: “Wow, so you must have felt bad then!” “Gee, that’s horrible!” You’ll build emotional intimacy that way. If you find it heading in this direction, introduce alcohol at some point for an easier entryway out of the friend zone. Be careful of a harassment charge — might be better to do this if one of you quits.

      5). She is not g/f material. Trust me, I tried. Drama queens are great because they usually do insane things in bed (mine was very anally-oriented), but they are not good to deal with day to day. Sex buddy is a good plan.

      Like


      • on July 4, 2012 at 12:45 am Days of Broken Arrows

        I forgot to mention something. If you do plan on getting in her pants, you may want to find out if she dates “troubled” guys (I’m willing to bet money she does). If so, find a subtle way of inventing some drama in yours.

        Pretend to be in a bad mood one day and if she asks why, mention a probation officer and how you “wanted to put that part of your life behind you” (women love men who allegedly “change”). Or casually mention finally standing up to your abusive father. But don’t think you can brag about any accomplishment ever, because that will just say to her “boring, stable guy.” Or she’ll be threatened and hate you (her veiled bragging is a sign of insecurity, BTW). Anyway, there are women you need to lie to about how you DIDN’T go to college, but DID go to jail. It’s become a topsy-turvy world, but that’s the way it is and we have to deal with it.

        Like


      • You did really well with your bet: Her BF is the “troubled guy” par excellence. He had some kind of fucked up upbringing, former drug dealer, used to get into fights, and there are holes in the wall from their old place where he punched the wall. She says he’s bipolar. I guess he’s more alpha than me from this alone, aside from the dead end, minimum wage job that eats his soul.

        Anyway, there was once an opportunity for me, in my pre-pill days, but that opportunity is gone now, and I don’t even want her sexually now anyway. But thanks for your insight., just in terms of knowing what exactly I did wrong when I did have the opportunity. I’m very glad I didn’t though, in hindsight.

        But the main lesson I’ve learned from all of this: I need to call women out on their shit more.

        Like


      • DOBA

        “If the above holds true, just amplify: “Wow, so you must have felt bad then!””

        Cheating whores should be shunned out of polite society. They don’t even deserve a pump and dump. Amplify? Fuck that. Tell her she’s a whore then never talk to her again.

        Like


      • on July 4, 2012 at 10:48 am Days of Broken Arrows

        This is a pick-up blog, not a religious conservative one. My advice is designed to get him into bed with her, because from experience, these women are hot in bed, as I clearly state above. “Crazy in the head = crazy in the bed.”

        THEN he can never talk to her again.

        Like


    • The question is why are you talking to a chick that you don’t intend to fuck.
      If she’s a coworker that you don’t wanna fuck, keep it professional and don’t talk about your dad.
      If you want to fuck her, then you might have to change your strategy cause it doesn’t seem to work.
      If you’re already fucking her, then you can disregard this post.

      Don’t befriend women who don’t suit your sexual tastes, and even if you do, focus on gina tingles to stroke your ego and hone your game instead of talking about your dad.

      Otherwise, it’s asking for boring drama. Women love that kind of drama because they’re women… and boring.
      Don’t be an emotional tampon.

      Like


      • There was some time in my pre-pill days where she was leading me on while still with her boyfriend, and I genuinely thought something was going to come out of it. I killed all the feelings I had for her, and she does do favors at work for me. Yeah, I’m trying to avoid being an emotional tampon, starting to call her out on her shit.

        “Don’t befriend women who don’t suit your sexual tastes, and even if you do, focus on gina tingles to stroke your ego and hone your game instead of talking about your dad.”

        That’s the plan. I guess part of me thought she genuinely wants to be friends..silly me.

        Like


      • I guess part of me thought she genuinely wants to be friends

        she genuinely wants you to be her orbiter. big difference.

        Like


    • She sounds like a good practice-dummy against which you can refine your psychological slight of hand, even if, as you say, you “don’t even want her sexually now.” (Has she become fat, like certain depressives tend to?)

      You brought her to our attention for a reason. You were already aware of the female trait that contrives drama for ego gratification. It is not exclusive to depressives, it is only more apparent in them.

      Keep a string tied to her. She (or you) can call it “friendship” if that makes her feel better. You can learn a great deal about women in general from interacting with an exemplar like her, and no second-hand advice from us can equal first-hand experience with you. All of the little manipulations the above commenters advise are useful in that they will make you more familiar with button-pushing. It is good to witness cause and effect.

      You will be able to elicit a kind of stunning vulnerability in her, and the look it produces can only be described as, “How in the world did you know that?” Simultaneously disarming, terrifying, and tingling. It’s what her “bad boy” fuck-pal accidentally draws out of her by relating to the core of her experience. Kind of like how gays, drunks, and addicts can recognize each other in a glance. They are kismet because they are refugees from the same kind of disaster.

      Bipolarism is resident in every young woman, dormant to greater and lesser degrees. Our culture insisted on planting and developing the seed of depression in our girls in exchange for their “liberation.” Women like your subject patient simply have their short-circuitry amped-up to visible melting and smoking levels. The bipolarism of today’s typical mutilated girl is a matter of degree not kind.

      Matt

      Like


  39. A worthwhile FAQ about women and men and mating by a UK Academic.

    http://sexes.martinsewell.com/

    Like


  40. It’s a real, real shame that left-terd GetUp faggot didn’t drop dead.

    Like


  41. Why a very high iq can be bad for men socially:

    http://www.cpsimoes.net/artigos/outsiders.html

    Like


    • Social skills are rendered in the form of neural connections. These take up space in the brain, space that could be better used boosting ones’ IQ score.

      Therefore, the more of your brain you have dedicated to being smart, the less you have dedicated to being human. Simple.

      Like


      • No, you idiot. Many highly intelligent people are extremely socially adept. They’re called Melonheads.

        But thanks for your “compartmental theory of skill allocation” theory of the brain. BTW, the 15th century called, they want you back.

        Like


  42. on July 4, 2012 at 4:18 am whorefinder

    Hope he was a lefty. If so, I hope it causes permanent, painful damage.

    Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 10:07 am Mr. Pointyface

      Why, you’re so assertive ans strong! Really manly.

      Like


      • on July 8, 2012 at 1:43 pm whorefinder

        Poor wittle wiberal. You managed to wreck the country and the constitution, but still get your wittle feewings hurt when someone wishes you harm.

        go fuck yourself, Obama-voter.

        Like


  43. On topic, an Arkansas woman hit and run driver left the scene because she didn’t want her ice cream to melt

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/melting-ice-cream-alibi-456213

    Like


  44. Yes, this “modern, Western, feminist, entitled careerist woman” is Sophie Mirabella, a noted right-winger and anti-feminist, married to a military man. She’s also an ethnic Greek, which in my book means she is not “Western.”

    [heartiste: you don’t think conservative women can be shaped by an overarching feminist culture? a conservative careerist woman and a liberal careerist woman have a lot more in common than a careerist woman and a stay-at-home mom of whichever political persuasion.]

    Like


    • Western civilisation is to a largely an outgrowth of ancient Greece, dude. Why do think Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, and so forth are so highly regarded here? Democracy and the major and minor scales which define Western music came from Greece. The hippocratic oath that Western doctors take is Greek. Western Civilisation is up to its eyeballs in Greek.

      Like


      • True enough… but ethnically-speaking, the Greeks of Homer and the Acropolis were of quite a different mettle than today’s mixed multitude which inhabit the Aegean. Their gods had golden hair and blue-grey eyes, in their own image.

        Like


      • Yes fuckwit, and the men steering the triremes, erecting the temples, plowing the fields, dying in war against the Trojans and Lacedaemonians … THEY were your hideous “mixed multitude”.

        Not gods. Real men with — oh no! — dark beards and BLACK EEEEYES. booga booga booga

        Like


      • Dude, even Scandinavians, indeed, Aryans throughout history, sometimes have black beards and dark eyes.

        Point is, the ancient Greeks were far more Aryan than today’s lot.

        Like a recent headline in the Onion’s “Countries Of The World” stated: “Greece: Living On A Two-Thousand Year Old Reputation”

        Like


      • That would make sense. Today’s population is clearly less Neanderthal. When did the shift occur, the Macedonian invasion or later? Or perhaps slave importation from the golden age precipitated fatal miscegenation.

        Like


  45. “It’s a peculiar time when men rush to help another man out while women dawdle uselessly”

    This is a silly point. In traditional societies women are generally expected to dawdle uselessly or panic in a crisis while men take charge. Sophie is just making the point, unintentionally to be sure, that women do not belong in positions of power.

    Like


    • “When in danger or in doubt,
      run in circles, scream and shout.”

      Like


    • But, but what about wise Latina women making good decisions?!

      But, but, what about Hillary taking that 3 am phone call?!

      lol

      Show me a standing, working society where women are making the important decisions. Show me even one.

      Like


      • Anonymous, whether the leaders are male or female shouldn’t matter.

        What we need are RATIONAL and EMPATHETIC leaders who are good at playing the multiple, simultaneous games of three-dimensional chess that modern politics has become. It’s a tall order for any human to be both.

        I personally don’t care what gender of skull contains that brain. You mentioned Hillary. She’s a wickedly capable individual, and probably would’ve made a really effective president (regardless of your views of her policies).

        As far as societies where women are making all the important decisions … well, that’s never happened, so the jury is out. But it’s an irrelevant debate anyways.

        Like


      • Jason missed the memo. What an excruciatingly long learning curve.

        The idea that it doesn’t matter “what gender of skull contains that brain” is cryptofeminism too stubborn to be eradicated by the regular means of enlightenment. Even people who are presumably aware enough to be reading this blog persist in the nostrums artificially inseminated into them in elementary school.

        Women are not men. Men are not women. The distinction is present in the chromosome in every nucleus in every cell of the body.

        There will never be a female president. The worm has turned on that. Hillary was their penultimate chance, and Palin was the spectacular coup de grâce that will bury the idea until the nineteenth amendment is repealed.

        Matt

        Like


      • @Jason,

        A leader who is entrusted with important decisions needs to be Rational only. When said leader is being elected it’s good to appear Emphatic – kissing babies etc – too.

        My father is an Alpha and has a great understanding of women. When I was 14 yo and my brother was 12 yo, he called us into the sitting room one Saturday afternoon and told us he has some important stuff to discuss with us. He asked my mother to bring us refreshments in an hour. When my mother came into the room later, she saw my father had spread out financial statements and bank balances on the coffee table and was discussion a $100,000 investment he was about to make with the two of us. He knew we were smart chaps and wished to get a second opinion. After my mother had left off the sandwiches and tea, she stood listening for a few minutes till my father asked her to leave. Now my mother left, but wasn’t too pleased about not being consulted on a $100,000 investment, or even knowing about it at all. She later complained to me – her favorite – about this. I was a little confused why this was so then, but by the time I was 16 yo I realized why. My father was a serial entrepreneur, and coming up with ideas and calculating opportunity costs and making complex decisions was what motivated him. My mother, though very smart for a female, and good with numbers, never understood taking risks, never understood investments strategies. When my father was successful she would chalk it up to luck, when a venture failed she would chide him on taking risks. So her advice was useless, and less valuable than even my 12 yo brother’s advice.

        Most women are like this…

        Like


      • Great examples, That Guy.

        Like


      • @Jason,

        What do you notice about this picture of Hilary Clinton at the time of the assassination of Osama bin Laden:

        She has a markedly different gesture than the other men seated. Her hand is covering my mouth, people do this when they are lying or trying to hide the truth from someone. What her gesture says loud and clear is that she absolutely would NOT have pulled the trigger on bin Laden had she been in charge.

        That photo alone is worth a 1,000 or even 10,000 word essay of why women can’t be in charge – EMPATHY.

        Like


      • What exactly has Hillary accomplished besides ride her husband’s coattails and place herself in the right place at the right time among the Marxist chattering classes?

        Like


  46. “Social skills are rendered in the form of neural connections. These take up space in the brain, space that could be better used boosting ones’ IQ score. Therefore, the more of your brain you have dedicated to being smart, the less you have dedicated to being human. Simple.”

    Being smart is not having a particular neural connections but having a brain capable of quickly reshaphing those connections. Stupid men are stuck to being naturals or not. Smart men can learn game conceps and getting a feel of them by practicing.

    Like


    • Naaah, there are certain forms of intelligence (the math-and-science) kind that don’t lend themselves to social skills. In extreme form you see this with all the Aspergery types like Newton and Einstein; in less extreme form you rarely see the guys from Accounting being the best dancers.

      Of course, given the importance of these fields to human advancement (cars, computers, medicine), you could make a case this is another side effect of feminism: if women have more economic power, they don’t have to marry nerds, which means they don’t get to reproduce, which means technical ability will decline over time and the human race will gradually get more r-selected.

      Like


      • on July 5, 2012 at 1:07 am Dan Fletcher

        Einstein got pussy.

        Like


      • Einstein was also a celebrity.

        Like


      • Yes, Einstein got pussy. But he did show some Aspergery traits. A late talker. Odd dress sense. Very cold towards his family. Never listened to critics as he should have.

        Einstein’s success with women – of whom he had a low opinion I understand – probably owed a lot to his extreme fame. That said, a certain level of autistic coldness could be attractive to women. “Aloof game”.

        Like


      • Einstein was a Melon-Thal hybrid. Melons do well with women. They also have questionable ethics, as evidenced by whispers of plagiarism and fraud.

        Like


  47. I have to say I think you are being unfair to Sophie Mirabella. As Australian political females go, she is not too bad. If you want to hate on someone, there are more obnoxious women in the more left wing Labor Party.

    The guy who collapsed works for ActUp, if I recall correctly, a somewhat freaky activist group, and Sophie M may well have thought he was pulling a stunt.

    But really, you are picking on the wrong target here.

    Like


  48. This is ridiculous…. as a couple of aussies have tried to point out, none of you have any idea what you’re talking about.

    Sophie Mirabella (the woman who sat there doing nothing) is in no way shape or form a feminist or a ‘lefty’. She’s on the far right of our Conservative Party (amusingly enough called the Liberal party).
    It’s as though you’ve just gone out and started laughing at what a “fag loving hippy” Rick Santorum is. Hell, I can’t possibly put into words just how absurd this is.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Mirabella

    also worth noting:

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/national-affairs-old/people-in-politics/sophie-mirabella
    particularly:
    “Mirabella’s strident style has irritated some of her colleagues, but she is unafraid of courting controversy. She boycotted the parliamentary apology to the stolen generations at the start of 2008 and the same year launched a savage attack on former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser for his criticisms of George W Bush’s foreign policy.”

    She was also the main force behind of the previous governments of abolition of compulsory student union membership at universities.

    The bloke who collapsed on the other hand is head of a left wing activist group, GetUp.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GetUp!

    It’s embarrassing to see a normally on target blog pushing an angle that’s just diametrically opposed to reality. It’s almost comical.

    Like


    • Excuse me but Rick Santorum is a white knighter who kisses the asses of right wing anti-sex feminists all the time and he is no friend of the heterosexual male. As a super beta, he married Karen after an alpha abortion doctor twice her age finally let her go when she turned 30. She would never have turned conservative if the former liberal boyfriend hadn’t dumped her. Rick resents alphas for having had first dibs on his own wife and he wants to regulate these other men now as being less noble than he is. Luckily he quit the race.

      Margaret Thatcher wanted to give the British feminists everything they wanted, almost, and it was only the fact that her male aides threatened to quit enmasse that stopped her.

      In California, regarding the 41 year old James Hooker dude who’s moved in with the 18 year old former student, a female bitch Republican (conservative) legislator is now pushing through legislation that would make his actions a felony, putting alphas of the future in jail.

      So, hearing that this Aussie MP is “far right”, one can assume she could easily be a man-hater who wants new Australian laws, such as making marriage more of a poison pill institution (if you marry her, we will make your life hell if you cheat on her or abandon her). She could easily be the type that wants men arrested for speaking with a police decoy prostitute.

      So, unless an Aussie here can show that this MP recognizes men’s rights and is generally pro-male, the post seems appropriate.

      In short, nobody who has read the manosphere for more than a day would assume that only left wing politicians are man haters.

      Like


      • Well she’s on the record in Parliament deriding the Prime Minister as a man hater. Married to a military man. She’s still a major party politician of course and Australia has tight party discipline.

        But anyway, I wouldn’t piss on Simon Sheik if he was on fire. This is a guy who’s made a career out of pushing global warming, promoting faggoty, and standing up for illegal immigrants by attacking Australia’s border protection policies.

        Again: most of you have no idea what you’re talking about.

        Like


  49. The more i read your posts Heartiste, the more i’m beginning to believe that females do not have any true compassion or a loving bone in their body when it comes to Men. Anything close to it (if you’ve managed to successfully game her to loving you) is all a mirage.
    It’s her over bloated Ego for validation and challenge to win you over, by acting as accomodating as possible in order to soften and eventually blow a man out of the water.
    Women simply see relationships/marriages as transactions and has nothing to do with their feelings for you. They would rather indulge in it with ice-cream, chocolate and an over-abundance of male attention in social networking sites.
    Not that i can complain. There has never been a better time in history, in a world of female hypergamy, entitlement and ‘girl-power’ to be a complete jack-ass/player/gamer and feel no guilt towards it.

    [heartiste: men and women are vile in their own ways, but women’s vileness is ignored, papered over, or rationalized by all right-thinking and good-feeling people. this blog aims to correct that misperception and bring balance to the force.]

    Like


    • Love exists and most of us are capable of it. However unconditional love, except in terms of a sense of duty, doesn’t exist. Every child will eventually become despised by the very parents who beamed with joy at its birth if that child becomes a burden on them. For love to exist in the state we dream of, then it is conditional on selfish needs being met.

      Like


    • Women can love men, but it is very, very conditional. Just remember that and you’ll be fine.

      Like


  50. How exactly is this feminism’s fault? What evils did it commit, in your mind, that made a reaction like hers–shock–the downfall of Western civilization and/or the human race?

    Like


  51. on July 4, 2012 at 2:05 pm Norkenkomamder Clitzkrieg

    As this silly simon sheikh fellow is a leftist and a uber herby beta perhaps her disgust at him has something to do with her reaction.

    Like


  52. Wow. That woman lives down the road from my parents, I kid you not. She is no fan of feminism, but has gotten to where she is due to inroads made in the name of equality . She’s an unimpressive unappealing Federal politician.

    All I see in the video is a moment of visceral revulsion, then blank incomprehension that leads to a total inability to comprehend the situation an act accordingly in order to help your fellow human.

    She was more of a power-suit-and-red-lipstick kinda image, not a semi claw haircut and leather jacket kinda image.. I’m out of touch.

    Like


  53. Notice that the top rated comment on the Daily Mail are from other women stating, for example:

    “She didn’t know how to react – clearly seen in the photos. Neither would I. She is shocked. Leave her alone you horrible people who are criticising her (whoever you are on the social networks).”

    – Gabriella, London, UK (and Oz), 3/7/2012 12:26

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2168232/Australian-woman-MP-faces-onslaught-criticism-fellow-TV-panelist-collapsed–did-nothing.html#ixzz1zguJkiQm

    Like


  54. Also, Simon Sheikh is in a group called ‘GetUp!’

    Ah ha ha hahhahahaha

    Like


  55. Whenever Greg Combet opens his mouth I want to bang my head into the desk to.

    That said, if everyone in that room was dead Australia would be better off.

    Like


  56. Could she have done more to avoid looking like this?

    Like


  57. on July 5, 2012 at 1:08 pm Rock Throwing Peasant

    NAWALT

    Serioulsy, though, you should see the slip of Bob Beckel faking an on-air heart attack. He was doing it to make some dark humor, but the reaction of Dana Perino is decidedly different than this woman. It’s actually fairly moving. She looks to maintain professionalism, but can’t stifle her concern for someone (even, gasp, someone across the political aisle) in apparent distress.

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bob-beckel-scares-the-crap-out-of-dana-perino-with-fake-heart-attack/

    Like


  58. I don’t understand why the people posting on this blog constantly insist on bashing womens’ appearances in random pictures like the one featured in this post. No, she’s not particularly attractive. But does it really matter? What purpose does it serve, bashing some woman you’ll probably never meet? If you eyes are sooo offended, why don’t you head over to that barely legal porn site you love so much and look at the 18-year-old Eastern European babes?

    The sad thing is, instead of providing a REAL thought-out answer, the first person to respond will probably accuse me of having my panties in a bunch because I’m supposedly fat and ugly.

    Like


    • ‘barely legal’ in eastern europe would be 16. at most.

      truth be told, you don’t write like a fat ugly girl. but a hot girl wouldn’t need to ask the questions you just did, either.

      Like


  59. I tend to agree, Andrea.

    Like


  60. […] Heatiste – Men Aren’t Attracted To High-Earning Women, Entitled Careerist Woman Logo, Comment of The Week, Chicks Dig Cruelty, Chubby Chaser […]

    Like


  61. I can’t accept the fact that the figure that look male in every aspect is a woman. WTF are those people in your country? Never saw similar in here. |Even the borad shoulders, the face, the nose, and the hair. In fact “she” look a bit like Robin Williams in that movie “Mrs. Doubtfire”. No, I take that back, I just saw a poster while searching for the movie title and he looks way more feminine than this image.

    Like