Comment Of The Week: Memento Mori My Little Pretty

Wrecked ‘Em suggests an old Roman tradition could serve well the modern day West.

During a Roman Triumph it was traditional for a slave to ride with the victor and whisper to him reminders of how fleeting is glory and how short is life. In Latin this was called “memento mori”.

I propose that we resurrect the memento mori for the hot young ladies in our society. A coming-out parade, of sorts, where the ladies will ride in cars accompanied by an old woman who will whisper to them things like, “By 40 you will be invisible to men” and “You’ll be over 40 for more than half your life” and “At 55 the only things that will bring you joy are your children and grandchildren; not your career, not your travels, nor your accomplishments.”

For now, the cloaked figures of the House of Heartiste will release those whispers into the ethernettian winds, assuming the duties of the mothers and grandmothers who have shirked theirs.

***

Runner-up COTW is Matthew King, disgorging a wallop of righteous bile,

We elevate the subhuman and inanimate to idol status, like sports, politics, pop-star vapidities, and here especially, masturbating into latex gripped by the dryboxes of disaffected wigger club whores on permanent vacation from daddy. Kakocratic paganism.

The hate is strong in this one. Excellent. To extract such id-ious concessions from a man wrapped in the cloth is, in a word, delicious.





Comments


  1. on December 15, 2013 at 10:11 am Isaac Asstomouf

    “to his coy mistress” used to be required reading for high school students. But no more because bernanke butthex lolol

    Like


  2. In Brazil older women are hot

    And the American?

    Like


    • on December 15, 2013 at 3:51 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozoozozo

      DA GBFM’S BRIEF HISTORYZ OF RELIGIONZ

      in da beginigzgz everyoenz went
      ooga booga ooga boogaz and danced aorund da jungelzozlzoz
      da lotsotatas cockasz would get der lostsas cockas in da biggest oogga booggag bunghzlzoe and gina hoellisz
      then, one day a man began to think
      and ponder
      and invent
      and build
      and create
      while da womenz wnet ogaga boogzesz and followed der gaina tingelelzz bunghoelz tingzlzzol onto all da ooga booga cockeasz zlzozlzo
      and so the thinker, creator, inventor
      left the tribe
      and built civilization
      and came up with the idea
      that if men and women wanted to participate
      they would have to stop going “ooga boga ooga boogaz”
      because it was distracting
      and da womenz couldnd ride da ooga boogagas lotasasa cockasz caroleleuz
      as it undermined PROPERTY RIGHTS
      and stole from teh invetors/creators/good guys
      who were cuckholded and forced to slave away
      to raise other menzzlzozozoz ooga booggasz spawn.
      and so,
      after noting womenz inherent lust for lostsas cockas and her
      generla inability to follow HONOR, REASON, and TRUTH
      over BUTT AND GINA TINAGLAOZZOZ
      after noting her predilection for the LOSTAS COCKASZ SEPRENT
      over GOD AND REASON,
      the thinker, cretaor, invnetor
      penned GENESIS:

      http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+3

      “16 To the woman he said,

      “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
      with painful labor you will give birth to children.
      Your desire will be for your husband,
      and he will rule over you.””

      the thinker, cretaor, invnetor
      penned GENESIS so they
      could GET SOME FUCKING WORK DONE
      WITHOUT HAVING TO WORRY THEIR WIFE
      WOULD JUP ON ALL DA LOTSA COKASZ EVERY TIME HER BUT OR GINA TINGELLDLDL ZLZOZLOZZOL:

      and the rest of the GREAT BOOKS FO RMEN MNEZ.

      Then, thousands of years later, the bernankifieresz relaized they could enslave men en masse by libertaing womenz to follow their butt and gina tingslzlzlzozloz, and so the cnetral bankers funed fmeinist studies departmentz to deconstruct the GRETA BOOKS AND AND CLASSICSZ and ERADICATE DA GRETA BOOKSZ FOR MENZ and replace them with ooga booga musics zlzozl so they could rule suprmerez zlozoz

      MORE SOON! MUST GO DONATET SOME OF MY LOSTAS cOCCKAS TO A LIBERATETD OWMENZ BACK SOONSZ! LZIZIZZLZOZLZO

      Like


    • No, they aren’t. Some can be hot well into their 40, but they aren’t the majority.

      Like


      • And I’m talking about the brazilian as Brazil is my country. And Brazil has a lot of ugly people by it’s race mixing.

        Like


      • And I’m talking about the brazilian as Brazil is my country. And Brazil has a lot of ugly people by it’s race mixing

        True, from another Brazilian. And yet white Brazilian (& Argentinian/Venezuelan) women are the hottest on Earth. But they aren’t the average.

        The most beuatiful race, meanwhile, goes to white South Africans

        Like


      • How do you know they are the hottest on earth, gig? You have been to every country?

        The most beautiful race is white South Africans? Let me see. They are British (not a good starting point) and Dutch (much better). Assuming that they didn’t somehow mutate into a DNA different from their countries of origin in just a few centuries, the British and Dutch would be the most beautiful. I wonder why you forget those; maybe because you have been to SA, but not Europe. And why would the Dutch be more beautiful than for example the Germans, with which they are genetically identical? The Netherlands is after all “nether” in relation to the other German lands – the Flat Germans and the High Germans in the Alps.

        Like


      • have been to Holland three times and lived in Southern England for six months. I have never been to Russia, but I have been to Croatia, Montenegro and Serbia.

        The diet and weather in South Africa have been, and still are, a little bit different from the North Sea… Also, the “environment” of South Africa (highest mu.rder rate in the world) does make people more fit.

        It is much more dangerous to be a fatass in South Africa.

        And really dont’that any country in Asia or Africa is eligible for the most beautful ranking, don’t you? There is no point in complaining that I have never been to Korea… Koreans themselves, by their behaviour, tell me that white Brazilians or Slavs are more beautiful…

        Like


      • Traveled to Brazil, women are beautiful.
        The older women too, but not most.

        Like


      • lots of octoroons in Brazil

        Like


      • exactly, that’s why you can’t say that “Brazilian women are hot” as you can say that “Ukrainian women are hot”. The average Brazilian women is uglier than hitting your mother on Christmas’ eve.

        Like


  3. Awesome comments.

    Wow.

    Not sure what this means: “masturbating into latex gripped by the dryboxes of disaffected wigger club”.

    But I love the tone of voice.

    Cynicism Game FTW.

    Like


      • It’s pretty easy to figure out from everyday(ish) words, even if you don’t know Greek.

        Democracy; cacophony; etc.

        Like


      • Should be mobocracy, it seems, which as far as obscure words go is more common. Though who am I to deny a writer his poetic tools.

        Like


    • “Masturbating into latex”- Bitches act like dead fish. usually hard living crusted over cunts. / Guys fucking low class/ fat/ fugs just to get laid.

      “Gripped by dryboxes”- Ain’t wet, ain’t attracted, still wants dick.

      “Disaffected wigger club whores on permanent vacation from daddy.” – Self explanatory

      Like


    • Elevating the dregs of society is like contraceptive sex.

      Like


      • zmbikilir, the Caths need to make everyone else a high-producer of fertilized eggs to make up for the non-productive priests, monks and nuns.

        I remember reading what a man’s observations from a century ago, where he noted that the nuns were usually the most attractive and intelligent women. (Attractive people being on average more intelligent, as research shows and as is logical, which the establishment hates.) They were told that the monastery was the most intellectually stimulating environment, and they were the ones most inspired to do good.

        If only monasteries had also had a rule that the nuns should produce as many children as possible to be adopted away, sired by the monks with the highest-quality genes. Now that would have been an institution worth its price in resources.

        Like


      • You fetishize cultural tinkering like the Marxists.

        Step 1: Impregnate the nuns
        Step 2: Have the monks raise them as guardians
        Step 3: …
        Step 4: Utopia!

        You get the causation backwards because your little Marxian microscope is the lens through which you interpret the world, which can be briefly stated as: If only we did this or that, life would be perfect.

        Little mind says, the church promotes fecundity because it needs a celibate clerisy. Never imagining it adopted celibacy late (TRUE STORY) because an already present, un-mandated, natural fecundity provided for the possibility. This is how I detect your deep leftist influences: it doesn’t even seem weird to you that a large cultural effect might have occurred organically and on its own, rather than at the directive of the leviathan’s policy.

        The church never set out to build a paradise on this earth. It takes this world for what it is and creates ways to refine instinct into virtue and channel passions toward constructiveness. A constructiveness that, not incidentally, built Western Civilization.

        But since you are so far up Karl’s moth-infested beard (and Hegel’s and Rousseau’s collective historicist poop-chute) you unwittingly (?) assume that all comprehensive approaches to the social order must by their nature be an attempt to remake humanity into a perfect, inerrant species.

        Matt

        Like


      • Kakocratic government?? We could only wish!

        That’s not really correct. Obama is in many ways a monastic and admirable man. A family man, devoted cultural marxist, he rejected a playboy /law firm partner status for “the cause.” He selflessly moved to Chicago to study Alinsky.

        Cultural marxism and economic Fox/Piven is THE central religious movement in human history. There has never been a more successful movement. The West is now PC theocracies. People blame jew for this, but the mainstream protestants supported Alinsky all the way. So, we aren’t so lucky to be just dealing with some vile kleptocracy or minor decadence. Alinksy did us the favor of publicly dedicating his work to Satan.

        Miley Cyrus can be dismissed, but she represents a profoundly spiritual figure. A hero to so many young girls, for her to grow up in this manner represents a conversion and fanaticism. Her BF dumped her, so great her dedication to the cause. Like Obama, she serves her demonic cause with stoic determination.

        So to must the “knockout game” be viewed as a spiritual movement. They are heroically risking their lives to make an expression of their hatred for white society.

        So, this is no Kakocratic government… it is a full tilt satanic theocracy embodied by the triumph of the Alinkskyites. In old testament terms, the West worships Baal (a god of depravity).

        Like


      • You get the causation backwards because your little Marxian microscope is the lens through which you interpret the world, which can be briefly stated as: If only we did this or that, life would be perfect.

        LOL Being called a Marxist for saying nuns should have children instead of staying celibate. Hilarious!

        What a weird little Christian you are, Mattyboy.

        Uh, and no, the parasitical Catholic church did NOT built Western civilization. Any more than the Soviet state built Russian civilization. People advanced science despite the Catholic church, never because of it.

        The story of a French cathedral illustrates the point: the parasite church forced villagers and farmers in the vicinity to hand over their money to the building of the cathedral. The local nobility opposed the church’s henchmen, but he church hired mercenaries to fight the nobles.

        The Catholic church has never been all of Christianity either – not a single year of history, in fact. It is a crime organization that has always attacked and murdered other Christians whenever it had the chance, just like it attacked and murdered non-Christians whenever it could. To think that neocon pundits claim Islam is a “religion by the sword” when that is exactly how organized Catholicisim has always, always behaved. It only stopped its crimes against Europe and other lands when finally forced to stop by Protestants and secular rulers.

        Martin Luther showed the way away from organized Catholicism. Let’s dedicate this Christmas to the man who opposed the criminal Cath organization. And let’s look forward to the day when the last priest is burned at the stake, like their victims in the past.

        Like


      • Your flamboyant ignorance requires only the most minimal response.

        I provide you with a Wikipedia link in the hope it stirs some molecule of critical self-examination that one day decades from now will culminate in a chain reaction liberating you from your crippling idiocy.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_Catholic_cleric%E2%80%93scientists

        Like


      • I took a look at that very interesting list and one thing stood out – something I admit I did not know…that it was a Catholic priest who came up with the idea of the Big Bang Theory!

        here is an excerpt from Wikipedia,

        ” …Monseigneur Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître, (French: [ʒɔʁʒə ləmɛtʁ] ( listen); 17 July 1894 – 20 June 1966) was a Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Université catholique de Louvain.[1] He was the first person to propose the theory of the expansion of the Universe, widely misattributed to Edwin Hubble …

        Like


      • And a friar was the first geneticist, Gregor Mendel. What does not compute they ignore.

        Eat your hearts out, Darwinist fifth-raters.

        Like


      • > “If only monasteries had also had a rule that the nuns should produce as many children as possible to be adopted away, sired by the monks with the highest-quality genes. Now that would have been an institution worth its price in resources.”

        They say that this is what the Ashkenazim did during their years in the wilderness [Ukraine, Georgia, greater Russia, wherever] – that they intentionally instituted a proto-Darwinian eugenics program of forcing the smartest boy in each village to mate with the smartest girl.

        Truth be told, this is more or less what would have happened anyway – by and large, high-IQ chicks can’t stand the company of low-IQ dudes, but the Ashkenazim just greatly accelerated the process.

        There are also persistent rumors that the Han may now be dabbling in this sort of thing.

        And the Brahmin essentially wrote it directly into their religion – that the upper castes were strictly forbidden to miscegenate with the lower castes.

        The idea of young men and young women marrying for love, and love alone, is, as far as I know, pretty much an exclusively Christian phenomenon.

        Like


    • It means blowing your load into a condom while fucking the dried, used up vagina of a club whore whose been spreading her legs for coke, ecstasy, and pills since high school.

      Multiple examples of these clubwhores and their cum donors can be found on The Dirty.com

      Like


      • At CH,

        http://www.the dirty.com is a virtual treasure trove of examples of female hypergamy, whorishness, the irresponsibility of single mothers, as well as offering a plethora of examples of how women are attracted to dark triad men. You can thank me later.

        Like


      • Thanks but if I have any more red pills I might throw up.

        Like


      • Yeah I was physically disgusted after seeing some of the reprobates featured on that website. I did use it effectively to convince a good natured country boy I knew in college from joining the marines, I’m like dude do you really wanna die so that some slut can suck dick for coke or some wigger can impregnate 16 year olds.

        Like


      • Then when you get back, after having been indoctrinated in the tradition of killing ’em all, and dying on foreign shores– until the bodies are piled too high to scale– you come back home to see some princess– standing atop a 3,000 year old mountain of dead men, most of whom fought to preserve the West and their women from raping barbarians– claiming we live in a “rape culture.”

        Like


      • > “masturbating into latex gripped by the dryboxes of disaffected wigger club whores”

        > “It means blowing your load into a condom while fucking the dried, used up vagina of a club whore whose been spreading her legs for coke, ecstasy, and pills since high school.”

        Thanks.

        In retrospect now, it shoulda been obvious.

        But I kept thinking of boxes of Kellogg’s Cornflakes or Special K or whatever.

        Like


      • ” … It means blowing your load into a condom while fucking the dried, used up vagina of a club whore whose been spreading her legs for coke, ecstasy, and pills since high school…. ”

        That would also work to describe what a few decades of feminism have “accomplished”.

        Like


    • he’s referring to condomistic sex in the context of one-night stands and short flings as masturbation.

      the Church refers to all condomistic sex in any context as masturbation.

      I don’t agree with the Church, but I do agree that it’s a position worthy of consideration.

      Like


      • I am a Calvinist, and I agree there is some merit to the notion, theology aside. I have 5 kids and there is nothing like impregnating a good looking woman. It makes the rest seem like… like.. well, masturbation.

        Like


      • Yeah, after you have kids – and you understand exactly why God gave us our sexuality – you quickly come to realize that purposeless fornication [fornication which does not – or, more to the point, CANNOT – lead to the live birth of a child] is one of the greatest sins which men and women can commit.

        Like


      • Be careful, Shane. I’m going to have to alert the local bishop that you are preaching Catholicism without the proper ecclesiastic credentials.

        You cryptopapist.

        Like


    • That’s a surprise … it’s in effect what you’ve been saying all along here – sex without intention to reproduce is purposeless and craven.

      Like


      • He’s befuddled about who his friends and enemies are. It’s not a surprise his principles are just as confused.

        Like


      • Funny, I was thinking the same thing, except in reverse: Matt- faults considered- would probably be nice to have around as a friend. Why do so many here turn on him? I do know how those eating-locusts-in-the-woods types can get on your nerves, especially when they turn their gaze upon you. Hell, Israel stoned all her prophets to death for that kinda stuff. But that’s fine by me, as long as they’ve cleared the log out their own eye first; as iron sharpens iron.

        Like


      • Who the fuck is Zombie Shane anyway?

        Like


      • Really? Everytime you’ve had sex you were thinking about making children, and not just busting a nut.

        Like


  4. I haven’t been here long enough, but can somebody explain what’s the deal with this Matthew King guy.

    Like


    • Holier-than-though blind-squirrel Jesuitical faggot who likes the saggy-titted old virgin nuns down in the dungeons of the monastery but who occasionally stumbles upon an acorn of Truth from time to time.

      Like


      • “Holier-than-though” = Holier-than-thou

        Like


      • You sadden me, friend… I thought you were on the correct side of most things, and don’t remember you having such ill-placed snark and bile for a man like Matt.

        Like


      • We don’t hate Matt.
        On the contrary, we realize the best way to get the bear to show up is to hang rotten meat everywhere, sit back and wait for the carnage.

        Like


      • You’re another one who disappoints, as I mentioned in a previous thread… you seem to be on the right side about most things which threaten the West… and I can even understand the lack of interest in religion… but this loathing of Matt and what he stands for puzzles me.

        Like


      • Cheer up, emo kid. You just have to have some thick skin to go into righteous battle, if that’s your mission. It’s nothing personal.

        Like


      • It’s his style, not his stance. Part Chesterton, part Tyler Durden. The mix doesn’t always come out right.

        Like


      • ‘”you seem to be on the right side about most things which threaten the West…”

        Don’t underestimate the impact of endless relentless mind programming geared to have us hate everything to do with European Christian civilisation.

        I know, I was that soldier for about 40 years and am still partially in recovery mode.

        Like


      • Who told YOU that you could talk with men?

        You South Park snarker… you tedious dweeb… thou thimble… thou thread.

        You fairy.

        Like


      • No, I don’t hate Matt or even dislike him.
        He writes his best when he’s ruffled.
        I actually enjoy reading his posts.

        Like


      • The latter directed to zmbikilr, of course.

        Like


      • It’s his style, not his stance. Part Chesterton, part Tyler Durden.

        Which is what makes it so unique and of high interest.

        I see even the nay-sayers are starting to admit they at least enjoy the reading… something that wasn’t being acknowledged at first.

        Like


      • That’s a stubborn case of the vapors, emo kid. Why so serious?

        Like


      • Keep tap dancing on the landmine, you little twit.

        When I get my hands on you, I’ll pull your head the rest of the way through your ass so that you have a truly shitty outlook on life.

        You fairy.

        Like


      • I’m merely the opposite side of the philosophical coin of Matt.
        Do not, for one instance think that I hate European Christian culture.
        In my opinion, the Christian part has jumped the shark, and we could do better replacing it with a belief system that is a little less, “Tribal”, if you know what I mean. I’m convinced They use It as a tool, they have the backing of the conservative religious rightno matter what they do due to their status as the Chosen. I believe European success is more to do with the character of our will, and not the religion that was imported from an alien culture.

        Like


      • I happen to disagree, but fair enough.

        Just don’t judge today’s Mickey Mouse PC Christianity as the real McCoy. Many false Christs running about, and the devil himself quoting Scripture and acting as an angel of light, were predicted for these, the End Times.

        Like


      • Are you a racecar in the red, Greg? Let’s really feeeeel it this time. Think “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”

        Like


      • I despise the pc unbelievers, the atheismplus crowd who characterizes unbelievers as effiminate egalitarian castrati.
        My faith is in the European Strongman.

        Like


      • Just don’t judge today’s Mickey Mouse PC Christianity as the real McCoy.

        Where does one find this authentic version? Certainly not in the multicultural church down the street from me.

        Like


      • Are you a racecar in the red, Greg? Let’s really feeeeel it this time. Think “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”

        So, you’re another of those “proud to be an annoying asshole” types, eh?

        Worse yet, you invoke maxims inappropriate to the situation at hand… me being male, and this tasking having nothing to do with romance.

        I can forgive pretty much anything except poor writing style and weak thought… lightning bug intellect where there should have been lightning.

        I will admit that you have disturbed my usual sang froid laden equanimity… to the point where I just drop-kicked my wife’s Shih-Tzu off of our veranda… I hope you’re satisfied.

        She, for one, was not.

        Like


      • Hahahaha

        Like


      • > “things which threaten the West”

        The West is Christianity.

        MK is a God-damned papist, for Christ’s sake.

        What does he know about Christianity?

        The only thing which threatens the West more than Jesuitical Nihilism would be full-blown Frankfurt School Nihilism.

        Sheesh.

        Saggy-Mammaried Old Nun Titty-Fucking Game FTW.

        Like


      • Nihilism? Faaaaack.

        Say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, dude… at least it’s an ethos

        Like


      • Your excessive use of ellipses is flattering, but the thinking here is it should be accompanied by a dearth of text. I’ll be heartbroken if you say it’s simply indicative of your impeccable and back-to-normal Siegfried and Roy laden writing style, Greg. Does Matthew approve of such flamboyant punctuation in sentence construction? He most certainly must.

        Eh, well, who am I to question such a fantastic intellect such as yourself on such a righteous quest? Ellipses forever…

        Like


      • Matt’s major fault is he falls for troll shenanigans all to often for a man who’s intellect indicates he should know better.

        Like


      • It has occurred to me that the ellipsis is the holy trinity of punctuation, to be used in intellectual discourse among Godly men as well as in the text-slaying of pussy by dark triads. The modalism is sheer genius!

        Like


      • The West is Christianity.

        MK is a God-damned papist, for Christ’s sake.

        What does he know about Christianity?

        Actually, the Protestant Reformation was the first libtard revolution.

        Like


      • Patriarch wrote:

        In my opinion, the Christian part has jumped the shark, and we could do better replacing it with a belief system that is a little less, “Tribal”, if you know what I mean.

        The toothpaste is out of the tube on that one. There is no going back. Christianity didn’t just defeat paganism, it annihilated it. It is a one-way ratchet. When the Europeans abandoned Christianity, it didn’t go back to worshiping trees and thunder. It went straight to nihilism. (Psst. That’s what “God is dead” means, which Nietzsche regarded as an unprecedented calamity.)

        So what else ya got? Do you even have a fleshed-out concept of this magical opium of the masses to replace the original Christian Revaluation of All Values, Sid Meyer? Eternal return? Zarathustra worship?

        And what do you find so distastefully jüdische about Christianity? The monotheism? Christianity appropriated Judaism and turned it inside out. Before you go and redesign the world according to your ignorance, you should probably start with Galatians 5. And Beyond Good and Evil #52.

        Matt

        Like


      • Matt hits hard. Any man who engages in such behavior is going to generate suspicion, envy, resentment… thats why ya’ll hate me.

        Its also why I like reading him. He takes a strong position, he puts himself out there in a way that makes him subject to taking a beatdown. I much prefer this instead of the pep rallies and “sing alongs” that accounts for so much of our interaction as men; we are men right?

        Im not a Christian but I like any religion that explains why people are so fucked up. You gotta start with that. You gotta account for why people continue to behave so flawed even when they are smart?

        Ni66a you know better, but you insist to piss me off…

        Why?

        What is wrong with you?

        Christianity taught me that our alienation from God is the source of our alienation from each other.

        Thats a PROBLEM.

        Why?

        Cause it means my fist hasta stay balled up ALL THE TIME. Is that why Im here? Is that what Im supposed to be doing?

        I think something is wrong with people, and any religion that first attempts to compensate for this problem is taking the correct path to solve all other problems.

        Matt is not the problem.

        Like


      • > “Cause it means my fist hasta stay balled up ALL THE TIME. Is that why Im here? Is that what Im supposed to be doing?”

        Shit damn.

        An introspective nigger?

        Will wonders never cease?

        Like


      • Any man who engages in such behavior is going to generate suspicion, envy, resentment… thats why ya’ll hate me.

        Naw, we just don’t like n166ers.

        lloZozlzlzlzlzozozlzlzozozlzlzl

        Like


      • Matt,
        You don’t need me to explain to you how Christianity and Jdayism are interconnected, the Bible in your study will suffice for speaking for itself.
        Christ was no AngloSaxon warrior king and his ideals don’t exactly mesh with the Code of the Vikingr raiders, but if you need help rationalizing “antiTribal”
        rhetoric with devotion to a “Seamight” deity,
        Stormfront is a nice reference piece for that.
        The toothpaste is indeed out of the tube, and while I’m not certain which religious creed will replace the current European state of affairs, it’s looking pretty atheistic over there at the moment, and no amount of internet sermons is going to see a Catholic State in old Europa again.

        Like


      • Matthew King I feel you are another to ask: The religious cat is out of the bag, and it probably isn’t going back in. Doesn’t anyone see this obvious problem? It’s not even with something like immigration control: It is about truth of the world, and that God probably isn’t part of that.

        It’s easy to see how religion can hold the West together, but it’s apparently not easy to see how to bring that about with, well, the scientific method and all. Personally the only (unlikely as it is) solution is human intelligence augmentation and modification (or super-AI). Touting Christianity while also perusing topics by science and using products by science and engineering has a certain ironic contradiction to it.

        Also, if you guys really do end up making some sort of new religious order, please take the monks out of it. We really should keep our smartest reproducing.

        Like


      • It’s not the “sermons,” twit. It’s the inexorable, exponential omnivorousness of replacement-plus fertility rates.

        But you’re such a deep thinker you think this is mere happenstance. God is a fiction, and yet those who dismiss him also tend to extinct themselves in the space of a few generations. Promiscuity and sodomy and felching your fellow man’s asshole are a hell of a time, but it leaves a population burned-out, childless, fatherless, desiccated, disordered, deviant, diseased, and suicidal. Oh, did you think Sodom and Gomorrah were consumed in literal brimstone, or was that just a vivid retelling of what ultimately happens to Fire Island fuckalls and San Francisco chain parties? Sin is self-slaughter. Apparently I have to point this out to those of you still doing battle with cartoon catechisms.

        “So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.” (Isa 55:11)

        Those who “are fruitful, and multiply” have a life worth passing on, thanks be to God. Those who possess no such liveliness make a deep spiritual connection with the oblivion. They see no point to extending their line, and neither does God. They flit out of existence, scarcely noticed. They get extinguished; everybody’s happy.

        I once attended a funeral for an Irish Catholic of the old school, a faithful pillar of the community with two sons who became priests. Eight siblings, eight children, 24 grandchildren. So far. The line for the privilege of paying last respects stretched out the door and down the street, a minimum hour wait time, for six straight hours.

        Meantime, your spiritual cousins are living out the last branches of an inverted family tree. Four grandparents make two parents who conceive (and allow to live) one child at age 40. I’d say, would the last atheist please switch off the lights before they snuff themselves out, but they will already be consigned to the abyss, and no one will be around to observe their passing.

        Matt

        Like


      • You use “Patriarch” as an internet identity. Meet my Irish friend who didn’t jack-off into sheepskin, shout bravado against the abyss, and snark all over the internet, “non serviam.”

        Some live the life of the patriarch, others sniff the fumes of another’s accomplishment and pretend that appropriating the name makes him an equivalent. “You have been weighed in the balances and found wanting” (Daniel 5:27). You postmodern drag queen.

        Matt

        Like


      • Matt, as God is fiction, do the elders at the top who know this omit this? How can the top continue to sell this when the internet undermines the lower-status, but smart enough brahmin who see religion as false? The cat is out of the bag, it’s either reconciliation of this (via even technology, IF it gets advanced enough) or catastrophe. If catastrophe, I doubt most of these neoreactionary bloggers will be able to place themselves at the head of much.

        Like


      • Don’t waste your time Davidtheduke, Matt sees nothing noble about the European Man in and of himself apart from his historical embrace of the Mother Faith.

        Given the choice between only these two options, Would Matt prefer Mammon, to sacrifice the Church in favor of Europe or would he prefer God, to sacrifice Europe to spread the Catholic Church?
        His response to that question would be a refraining and reframing, I can assure you. You tell me what that says of his loyalties.

        Like


      • I actually think he could Heartiste himself, they have similar writing styles, only Matthew’s is obviously more aggressive. Both like to go into short, amusing descriptions of what the opposition is up to, etc.

        Like


      • Given the choice between only these two options, Would Matt prefer Mammon, to sacrifice the Church in favor of Europe or would he prefer God, to sacrifice Europe to spread the Catholic Church?
        His response to that question would be a refraining and reframing, I can assure you. You tell me what that says of his loyalties.

        You erroneously believe, against all evidence, that one must choose between the Church and European man.

        Hilaire Belloc once said that European man will have to return to the Church, or else he will perish. Chew on that one.

        Like


      • Now you’re getting close to the truth…

        Like


      • Are you insane?

        Everyone reading this will be quite aware of how you needlessly redirect the discussion away from inconvient truths and onto attacks of your opponents personal lifestyle. You think no one notices?
        I’d be ok with you practicing your horribly misguided syncretic mixture of Neitzche and JUDEOChristian religion if you’d do it in peace but given your inability to not proselytize here at the Chateau, a blog with obviously nonthestic overtones, it becomes necessary to spoon feed a few bites to you from your own shit salad you wave in front of everyone here to show that you aren’t the Titan you believe yourself to be.
        I’m done making points to you to only have you cower behind your rhetoric.

        Like


      • on December 16, 2013 at 3:15 pm CaptainObvious

        Patriarch I share your disdain for the “tribe” in reference to Christianity but actually the Catholic church has been a huge enemy of the synagogue of satan and even though it has been thoroughly subverted by crypto-wannabe semites at this point, historically it knew them as their true enemy.

        And lets be honest if Christianity did not sweep over europe and unite them under a homogenous religion, the euros would still be worshipping the evergreen in their groves, sacrificing their children on altars to some RPG fantasy god of the past and dancing around in circles chanting for a better spring.

        But wait a minute…don’t think Im a catholic either. For all these nominal christians and papists celebrate Dec 25th…which is the birthday of the sun-god and they think they are christian whilst celebrating the saturnalia and worshipping the evergreen in their own homes and adorning it with silver and gold.

        Something that the God they claim to believe in destroyed his own people for doing. They worship fertility goddesses on their pagan days and throw around eggs yet somehow this is related to jesus christ? Fools and hypocrites.

        Oh how we forget the past…….actually we dont forget we just try to repackage it and sell it over and over again like its something new. Shame on the church for that deviousness!

        But alas patriarch despite all of that my gut tells me that your European Dionysian superman will never come.

        Like


      • And before anyone misunderstandd,
        It’s not a well kept secret that Matt is an unbeliever masquerading as a Papist. He finally admitted it above. Now the next task is having him admit his next secret…
        The reason why he stares down his crooked nose at us.
        He is aware of what our conversation is *really* about.

        Like


      • Your faith In your fellow Europeans saddens me, friend.
        My opinion is that the Church was brought to it’s glory by the People who converted, not the other way around.
        If what you’re saying is true, that the only worth to the European is the current arrangment, then I see no reason to save him.
        The weak deserve their plight.

        Like


      • wtf Zombie, go administer to yourself a flogging, then return with an apology you Judas.

        Like


      • It was my understanding that self flagellation is frowned upon in this establishment.

        Like


      • True that dude, as a former papist I would like to apologize to any founding stock protestants for the disgusting religion that my forebears brought to this country. Specifically I would like to apologize for the rampant machine politics that catholics introduced into American political life, their continual anti-abortion stance, organized crime, calls for open borders, gun control (father phleger), molestation coverups, and lastly Notre Dame/St. Pat’s Irish jack off day.

        Like


      • > “their continual anti-abortion stance”

        Huh?

        That’s the only good thing about them.

        Like


      • No, not when abortion helps to keep tyrone and laquesha from making more welfare queens and convicts. Also, please watch some of the shows on MTV and learn that there are alot of whites in the USA who should not be bearing children.

        Like


      • You little utilitarian, you.

        Like


    • He’s a guy that is in Zombie Shane’s brain.

      Like


    • Cojcerning Matt King,
      He’s fucking crazy and if I have any say In it he will be the next Pope.
      Pope Insidious I

      Like


      • LOL’ed.

        Where’s GBFM when you need him?

        We need to hear from the Good side of the force.

        Like


      • imagining him stomping around the Vatican knocking over bishops, overturning tables and punching holes in the walls while inconsolably rambling about Faustian delusions of duality sounds like one hell of a reign of infallible terror to me.

        Like


      • But you need GBFM in there smashing all the statues and the murals and the icons and the various other residue of their Maryolatry.

        Like


      • I’m not going to be aware of any of it. I want to be as far away as possible when they triumphantly enter the Eternal City.

        Like


      • I will admit, the saint statue praying stuff always did make me uneasy, as a form of idolatry.

        So point taken on that account.

        Like


      • But you need GBFM in there smashing all the statues and the murals and the icons and the various other residue of their Maryolatry.

        Statements like this just go to show that you know absolutely nothing about Catholicism.

        Like


      • Yeah. Western civilization is being reduced to ashes, and you want to quibble over the difference between idolatry and veneration.

        Want to figure out transubstantiation and consubstantiation while the towers are coming down? Maybe we can wait until after we address the looming proximate catastrophe before we come to an agreement on the Filoque?

        You fucking people. Making twenty solid enemies for every one half-wit ally.

        Like


    • Let the man’s words and style speak for themselves… whether one agrees with all or part of what gets said, or whether or not one cares for a faith in God, a reasonable and fair man will at least have to admit Matt’s intellect and comprehensive educations, running from both the sacred to the profane, are matchless.

      He is one of the lone voices attempting to pull these prodigal sons of PUA back from the Abyss… for which he gets little thanks.

      A prophet has no honor in his own land.

      Like


    • Intelligent dude that can intellectually torch you then piss on your charred, smoldering carcass. See: RD and thwack.

      ***

      PS Why, Heartiste, centurion of The Enlightenment that is Dark, do you not have your monicker and likeness emblazoned most righteously, on one of these awesometrading cards?

      Like


    • ANYBODY CAN BE A CHRISTIAN. That’s an enormous problem. There would be no Mestizo problem in North America if the “Western Civilisation’s” religion considered the the souls and spirituality of non-Europeans irrelevant, as any pan-European religion that supports continuing the race God-damned well should.

      Like


      • That’s similiar to my view.
        Christianity, like it’s parent religion Judaism, sees everyone as members of the same family, the descendants of the first couple, Adam and Eve.
        I’m afraid multiculturalism is embraced more often than not with the justification that races are simply an issue of which line of descent your family falls on.
        There is a group here at the Chateau that seems to not share this opinion or at the very least doesn’t want to live with their nonwhite cousins, and I’m ok with that, but the majority of the Christians I’ve met in real life see no reason to embrace racial segregation muchless concern themselves with the state of the European lands, both in Old Europa and the Colonies across the ponds as they view this world as a mere warm up for the real world that is to come.
        That to me is the antithesis to life and kin.

        Like


      • That’s similiar to my view.
        Christianity, like it’s parent religion Jdayism, sees everyone as members of the same family, the descendants of the first couple, Adam and Eve.
        I’m afraid multiculturalism is embraced more often than not with the justification that races are simply an issue of which line of descent your family falls on from the first people.

        There is a group of Chdistians here at the Chateau that seems to not share this opinion or at the very least doesn’t want to live with their nonwhite cousins, and I’m ok with that, each European man is more than entitled to his own personal beliefs, bringing them out for debate as he sees fit, but the majority of the Christians I’ve met in real life see no reason to embrace racial segregation muchless concern themselves with anything in this world, such as our ancestral home Europa or her settled lands across the oceans because in their belief, this world is not our real home and not worth saving. To me that is antithetical to life and kin.

        Like


      • Excellent comment by Matt. Even more impressive was its unusual succinctness.

        Like


      • That’s similiar to my view.
        Christianity, like it’s parent religion Judaism, sees everyone as members of the same family, the descendants of the first couple, Adam and Eve.
        I’m afraid multiculturalism is embraced more often than not with the justification that races are simply an issue of which line of descent your family falls on.
        There is a group here at the Chateau that seems to not share this opinion or at the very least doesn’t want to live with their nonwhite cousins, and I’m ok with that, but the majority of the Christians I’ve met in real life see no reason to embrace racial segregation muchless concern themselves with racial issues or the continued existence of European lands due to focusing on the afterlife instead of the here and now.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2013 at 6:22 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

        Yes, well the typical Christian emphasis on “salvation” from here rather than doing a good job here first is not supported by the Bible and is a good way to separate people from their lives and money.

        Like


      • Depends on your particular flavor of Christianity.

        Like


      • Most people are infected to a greater or lesser extent with liberalism. There is nothing in Christianity that says that you have to give away your homeland to invaders. Mixing with other races is likewise not mandatory, although it’s not forbidden either. St. Augustine even warned against excessive outbreeding, that it would tend to lead to treating complete strangers as if they were your own kin.

        Like


      • I don’t see how anyone can call themselves are real Bible believing Christian if he has pre-marital sex or adultery. St. Paul clearly says it’s morally wrong, just like homosexuality is morally wrong.

        You people believe strongly in fucking around AND the Bible, which is incongruent and ridiculous.

        Like


      • Yeah thats how I see it.
        Most nonbelievers are ate up with it.

        Like


      • Your priorities in the present crisis are out of whack. That’s the point. You need to acquaint yourself with the idea of triage. All of your fourth-order concerns are lots of fun teasing out. It’s a gas to tweak the prigs and piss everyone off. But there is a war on, son. C’est la guerre.

        While you are picking impossible fights under the current milieu, the left is solidifying its stranglehold over that very milieu.

        The primary fuck-up is regarding the most distinguishing feature of the human species down to the cellular level: our sex. Nothing changes for very long until we unfuck that major malfunction in the culture. That is the battlefield.

        Every advance toward your pipe-dream of segregation in the present circumstances is temporary until we fix this most intimate corruption brought on by the left: feminism. Everything else is a relative luxury.

        Even if we establish Whitopia, it won’t matter because we’ve sterilized ourselves to death in the name of despising motherhood in the name of the fantastical, self-hating, fat woman’s goal of “gender” “equality.” We will extinct ourselves all the same, so there will be consolation that we did it separate from the mud people?

        Your bitching about politically correct absurdities helps nothing, except maybe relieves a little tension. If you’re serious, you would concentrate on the frustratingly slow spade work that must be done to transform the audience to become receptive of your complaints, rather than just constantly whining about how far from your preferences this world is and thinking such feminine nagging will do a damn thing. Like old ladies on the porch, tsk-tsking and shaking their heads. What a world!

        Don’t you know there will be time enough for internecine nitpicking when the proximate calamity is resolved?

        C’est la guerre.

        Matt

        Like


      • I don’t disagree with anything you said Matt, except I would like to pick just a single nit. I see no problem with accomplishing these goals concurrently. I would posit, that will probably happen in a de facto manner anyways. Once you start to tear down one golden idol / sacred cow, the unwashed masses of the Eternally Aggrieved will rally behind that banner. So you start firebombing feminism and the minority victimologists and fags will certainly rise in their defense.

        Like


      • Just peachy, except that short-sighted fools insist training artillery on their own lines and destroying themselves before they see the whites of the true enemy’s eyes.

        The reality requires focus. A gaggle of frustrated chumps indiscriminately hunting down every little peeve they have is a mob easily scattered into chaos. They are sated by cathartic one-liners, even though it amounts to throwing pebbles at their oppressors from the ghetto. They roleplay an internet intifada from a hundred comfy Barcaloungers while expending their most savage energy on critiquing motes in their brothers’ eyes.

        Of course we can walk and chew gum at the same time. But that presumes discipline and unified purpose, the foundational qualities of any effective assault.

        Like


      • Some direct immediate exposure to enrichment (e.g. a week in Camden or Malmo) would sort that out pronto. They’d join the KKK on their return to civilisation.

        Like


      • Jesus should be as concerned about the souls of Bantus, Hottentots and Australoids as He should about those of coyotes and hyenas. Please let me know when the Pope proclaims that Jesus’ salvation is exclusively for Europeans and none others may consider themselves members of the church. I’ll be at the door of the local parish church at 7:00 am the next Sunday. Until then, bugger off!

        Like


      • Now I may be off base here but it seems to me that no self respecting deity/god would allow a mere mortal such as yourself to define what he should and shouldn’t be concerned about. I mean would you, if you had the Almighty Throne in Heaven/Valhalla/Olympus? Would All Father Odin walk around groveling awaiting the lofty pronouncements about what he needs to be concerned about as voiced by those who are as ants to him, and if he did, would he in fact be All Father or simply a weak willed knave with neat powers and a cool spear?

        So why do you then think that you get to define, demand even, what Christ should be concerned about and then reject him for not accepting *your* rules? Kind of have it bassackwards there, chief.

        Like


      • Let me encapsulate it for Jon:

        Who told YOU that you could dictate to God?

        You f#cking child… you company man…

        You fairy.

        Like


      • I dont need anyone to tell me. I have a billion or so examples of His mistakes (some of which one can encounter for the cost of a trip to Rosengård in Malmö). And at least one example of bad judgement in the extreme (that Hottentot = Nordic spiritually).

        Like


      • (that Hottentot = Nordic spiritually).

        Sheesh… nobody is saying that… but when both come to a belief in Christ and are willing to be schooled during the Judgment Day, well… there’s your equality.

        Ever notice that some white folks are no better than n166ers, and some black folks are downright decent people?

        You fairy.

        Like


      • @Thwack: That you might be as “good” (read: proficient) as some Scientologists and Jim Jones adherents is a non-argument. And my sons have enough of a sense of themselves and ability to critically think reality test that I think you might have better luck looking elsewhere for recruits.
        @Greg: You can’t do any better than “I know a smart black guy”? Look, I care more about my people than other people’s people. Their spirituality and souls are their business, not mine. If Jesus wants me to make it my business, fuck Him! IMO Christianity no longer serves us. It’s time to discard it. Christian morals are good but they’re not the sole property of Christianity. If your and my ur-great grandchildren are part of a coffee-coloured mass, I don’t know about you but I couldn’t care less if they believe in Jesus.

        Like


      • You can’t do any better than “I know a smart black guy”?

        I did a lot better than that, you disingenuous twerp.

        Look, I care more about my people than other people’s people.

        And I believe my reputation precedes me on that account. Pay attention, if you would bandy words with me.

        Their spirituality and souls are their business, not mine.

        Where do you get this from? Every man has free will and is the captain of his own ship in most matters, and certainly in the spiritual.

        Preaching an occasional word to those with the proverbial “ears to hear” is an enjoyable past time… the degree of rancor it invokes in others is more a reflection on them than those attempting to shed a light.

        If Jesus wants me to make it my business, fuck Him!

        Care about all men, but none too much. Points for the capital H show of respect, but otherwise, well… [email protected] you too!

        (and I mean that in the best way possible 😉 )

        Like


      • @Matt: Your really call that pathetic example of Bantu oneupsman content-free argument by self-reference and self-congratulation “schooling”? Can you really be that ideologically blinded?

        Like


      • I don’t take fairy tales literally. I read the ones to my sons that impart useful allegorical lessons (and when it comes to myself or my family, I am the sole judge of what’s useful) and discard the ones I consider baleful.

        Like


      • Jon

        I don’t take fairy tales literally. I read the ones to my sons that impart useful allegorical lessons
        —————————————————————————————————–

        If I taught your sons about Christ they would “get it”; and after they got it, they would be lookin at you “sideways” for the rest of your life for your failure to teach them.

        Maybe you should get to them before I do?

        Like


      • What is the state of the white race when a purported champion like Jon gets schooled by a brotha in the space of two sentences?

        I love these conspiracy theorists who claim to have special knowledge into “how things really work,” which cultural mainstays are based on lies, and how to resolve everything to perfection. They dismiss the bible — the ur text of Western Civ — without ever taking it seriously, not even anthropologically, but only as some social instrument of which they believe they alone (and perhaps the Masons) can fathom the proper utility.

        Nietzsche would be appalled at what passes for his spiritual great grandchildren. Last men who think themselves Die freien Geister.

        Like


      • Oh, bravo… on both replies.

        Like


      • I practise Christianity on itself, “judging by the fruits” (close to literally): the Catholic priests from the 15th Century onward married Spaniards and Indios, rendering entire North America an instant Brazil kit (just add Mexicans).

        I recopy my response from above (sorry, I didnt keep track of the threads)

        Matt: “What is the state of the white race when a purported champion like Jon gets schooled by a brotha in the space of two sentences?”
        You really call that pathetic example of Bantu oneupsman content-free argument by self-reference and self-congratulation “schooling”? Can you really be that ideologically blinded?

        Like


      • I don’t say anything about any “conspiracy”. My argument, quite simple (once again), is that Our sacred people should be at the centre of any religion that we practise and other peoples held as irrelevant in our metaphysics. So far as “how things really work” goes, I have approximately 200 million reasons for my point-of-view on the matter: the Mestizo population. Your, Greg’s and Thwack’s arguments are aimed chiefly “at the man”.

        Like


      • I practise Christianity on itself, “judging by the fruits” (close to literally): the Catholic priests from the 15th Century onward married Spaniards and Indios, rendering entire North America an instant Brazil kit (just add Mexicans).

        Like


      • Actually, it could very well be that Christianity was at the start not intended for Negros. After all, the Big Guy in the sky never bothered to command, “thou shalt not eat thy neighbours”.

        Like


    • Matthew King: believes in angels, demons, daemodands, miracles, saints, and other supernatural beings and events; is a pompous, arrogant blowhard who has not touched a woman in — well, most likely, ever; courted “GeishaKate” and was pipped at the post by Mark Minter; is a regular beta orbiter at “Feministx/Littlespoon’s” blog site; believes all women, even the most jaded and mercenary of sluts, are worth white-knighting and saving; is a self-professed “Big Brother to many women” and runs “big brother” game, especially online; is a religious lunatic who can be laughed at, but never heeded.

      Like


    • Start here: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/comment-of-the-week-the-natural-state-of-woman-is-submission/

      I read these words reposted in another corner of the internet, and its safe to say they changed my life. Learn all you can, and give respect where its due.

      Like


    • Zombie Shane twitched:

      Holier-than-thou blind-squirrel Jesuitical faggot who likes the saggy-titted old virgin nuns down in the dungeons of the monastery but who occasionally stumbles upon an acorn of Truth from time to time.

      Fool. You have more grudges than principles, if you have legitimate principles at all. You focus on differences and allow them to irritate you into blind stupid spastic rage rather than seek out allies with common ends. You are an old paranoiac revenging himself on enemies in every shadow, with no energy to lead, and can only gripe that the world isn’t perfect.

      Even your little hobbyhorse — fertility rate in the face of nihilism — was perfected in the modern practice of Catholic theology, but all you can fixate on is hoary Know-Nothing caricatures you know less than shit about.

      And to cap your absurdity, you praise the most transparently imbecilic gobbledygook this site offers, like you can’t spy the mediocre thought beneath all the cryptic chaff. You fail the GBFM shit test. Which means you’re a poseur worshiping an even more obvious poseur, losing your mind over your apparent impotence, screaming TFR! TFR! on a pick up blog to make you feel like you did something today to confront the abyss.

      We share common enemies — just as CH and men like me share common enemies — no matter how much you superficial, flippant, and short-sighted misanthropes like to piss on your friends (when you’re not busy making even more foes). I am thinking that is mostly a function of your age and your faithlessness: what do you have to lose alienating the world at this advanced stage? Your future is abbreviated, a path to victory in the next few years seems impossible before you enter the

      Last scene of all,
      That ends this strange eventful history,
      [In] second childishness and mere oblivion,
      Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything.

      You’re more of a nihilist than you have the intellectual capacity/courage to recognize.

      That said, I can keep my enemies straight. You’re not one. I know how to distinguish them from the cynical old cranks. Unlike you, I wouldn’t give a second thought to your brand of small-minded perfidy, and I welcome anyone’s effort to defeat the threat looming over all of civilization, which, if you haven’t noticed in this age of leftist cultural ascendancy, isn’t the clerical class. I’m ready to fight alongside you, soon as you’re done waging war with the “Jesuitical” phantoms doing so much damage from the inside of your skull.

      Matt

      Like


    • Nothing is “the deal” with him. He’s strong intellectually and takes independent positions, whether you see them as right or wrong, quite firmly and without couching those positions in sophistry and “wiggle room”. He also thinks for himself and doesn’t walk around like many here do quacking “Gosh, you’re right again!” to every single post on the site by the site owner. Yet, any reasonably awake person can see that he does in fact agree with many of the actual positions and outcomes of the manosphere (such as it is), but his agreement seems to flow from his own reflections as opposed to simply being led by the nose. Those who are led or who have rationalized away their own moral agency in preference of total submission to the hierarchy naturally feeeeeel unhaaaaaappy that others have not taken things the way they have, and lash out, and of course herd psychologyy then comes into play and others pile on like the good little lemmings they are, predictably.

      There is no contradiction in feeling disdain for those who expressly and consistently refuse to hear truth. There is no victory to be gained by mocking as Matt expresses his righteous contempt for those in society who intentionally mock and make themselves our lessers through their own choices, such as the Leftist manboobs, willful beta/omega schlubs and feminazis do. You can only cast pearls before swine for only so long before you start to realize that you are in fact dealing with swine.

      Better put; the First Crusade was not undertaken by men bowing and meekly groveling for forgiveness for their faith, nor by those who worshiped weakness and mildness while counseling quiet acceptance of the Muslim sacking of the Levant. When what they venerated was attacked, they struck back swiftly and forcefully and without apology. What is being mocked here in the article is not Matt’s actual diatribe so much as the inferred contradiction of his attitude as compared to the quite wrongful view of Leftist defined faux-Christianity; which they define as a flaccid, spineless religion worshiping basically a sockpuppet Hippy Jesus. This misunderstanding is, of course, false, and thus the deliciousness, as it were, sours and putrefies with proper chewing and digestion.

      Jesus smashed the tables of the money changers in righteous anger. In fact many men in the Bible did righteous, yet violent, deeds in the name of the glory of God. David slew Goliath and later led his people to fight (hey, violence!) the Egyptians. The priests of Medieval times brought down the Norse pantheon and chopped down their oak trees as the supposed high Viking warriors with their axes and shields stood by helpless (tell me that didn’t take strength, extreme courage and contempt for untruth and I’ll call you a liar). Or for those without much history, the Battle Hymn Of The Republic was not sung by men marching to war who believed they were defying Christianity. There is no need to tie oneself to the faux Leftist Hippy Jesus, and Matt correctly, does not.

      Like


      • +111

        It’s posts like these that attenuate the rancor I feel from the usual suspect and South Park snark brigades.

        Like


      • Burninator,
        No one here is above criticism, not even your champion.
        Agree with him or not, I don’t care.
        I personally take more issue with your blatant dick sucking in the above post. You don’t need to wax on and on about how much his strength of character is refreshing yadda yadda.
        Quit being a male orbiter.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 1:10 pm The Burninator

        “No one here is above criticism,”

        False premise. Nobody has claimed that no one here is above criticism. Remark disregarded.

        “Agree with him or not, I don’t care.”

        A quick scan of the thread reveals you care very deeply about whether one agrees with Matt King or not. You have spent a lot of effort and bandwidth caring, anybody with a scroll bar can see that. Remark disregarded.

        “I personally take more issue with your blatant dick sucking in the above post. ”

        Ad hominem and in no way an answer to my post. You also clearly demonstrate that you missed the point of the post. I’m not going to re-hash it for you, presumably you can read, so I recommend you to it with an eye that doesn’t care so much about whether others agree or disagree with him. Eventually you’ll find I was criticizing the critique as being invalid since it relied on a false premise (faux Lefty defined Christianity as the object upon which to point and say “J’accuse!” regarding a presumed hypocrisy).

        (oops…I gave it away!).

        “You don’t need to wax on and on about how much his strength of character is refreshing”

        I determine what I need to do or not do, and nobody else. You presume too much and forget your place in this conversation. You are empowered to command precisely yourself and nobody else, so you may wish to come to terms with that.

        I know you don’t “care” or follow my posts (or at least I assume as much), but I’m a big proponent of consistency, fearlessness, independent thinking and bold assertions of what the speaker believes is truth regardless of the consequences he/she may suffer. Hell brother, it’s standing before the throng of a babbling dangerous mob and declaring a truth they do not like that makes many a man braver than most. Thus, I commended Camille Paglia’s recent article for it’s bold stand for truth despite how she’s chosen to live her life. I even find other posters here quite admirable in their ability to stand independently of the braying herd of mostly wannabe alphas here, even if I may (or not) disagree with them on most things (YaReally, thwack, Greg Elliot, RapD, etc).

        Your need to interject with ad hominem, unwarranted laughably assumed authority and tired, third generation deconstructive nihilism is, frankly, boring. You’re free to bray with the herd, just don’t expect to be taken seriously by actual independent minds.

        Slainte

        Like


      • There you go again… in your case I’m sure it’s not teh ghey projection, merely South Park snark that comes uncomfortably close to the same Cathedral type of shaming litany when a bro stands up for a bro.

        I expect that sort of tripe from the peanut gallery mob of usual suspects, shitskins and funny hats… but as I told you before, you’re better than that… so straighten up.

        Like


    • flowery christian rhetoric to counterbalance stinging depraved biological theory

      rare voice of dissent and rare poster to actually try to think, but lack of inclination toward science/quantitative analysis is questionable

      Like


  5. An fine choice of quotes it is. Kudos to the proprietors of The Chateau and to the commenters it draws. To borrow John F Kennedy’s words, “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together …, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”

    If CH were traded on NYSE, in a manner of early investor I’d be very rich now, what with my visits here beginning in this blog’s formative days.

    Like


  6. Jesse Ventura: “Religion is for the mentally weak.” (Going by memory.) Delicious hate indeed, but not unexpected since we are all about actual human nature here.

    Anakin, if one is to understand the great mystery, one must study all its aspects, not just the dogmatic, narrow view of the Jedi. If you wish to become a complete and wise leader, you must embrace a larger view of the Force. Be careful of the Jedi, Anakin. Only through me can you achieve a power greater than any Jedi. Learn to know the dark side of the Force, and you will be able to save your wife from certain death.

    We are simply playing a game of competing political orders of competing patriarchies. So many men are afraid to play as men and play as pawns. This is what happens to you when you lose the game of power…

    I would rather live a short life of glory than a long one of obscurity

    Paging earl to catharsis, paging earl to catharsis.

    Better to have loved and lost than to not loved at all.

    As true with politics as with sex.

    Like


    • You can release just as much emotion through fighting as sex….while learning more about yourself.

      Like


    • Jesse Ventura: “Religion is for the mentally weak.”

      Beyond The Valley Of The Ironic.

      Like


    • We have at our disposal more reliable references than space cartoons.

      Whenever I hear someone referring to the “Jedi” or the “Dark Side,” it is despairing. We piss away our greatest advantage by adopting this Year Zero, leftist mind-wipe of history and make it impossible to avail ourselves of our greatest advantage: the hard-won wisdom from scripture and literature, which has already been field-tested and triumphant through the very predicaments we face today, not for the first time.

      A civil war general could inspire his army with a reference to the Amalekites, right down to the last illiterate rube. Us? We have to make do with hokey comic-book gnosticism and Jar Jar Binks.

      Like


      • ‘the hard-won wisdom from scripture and literature, which has already been field-tested and triumphant through the very predicaments we face today’

        And that is why those very things are prime targets for our destroyers.

        Like


  7. In other countries older women are not invisible

    Like


    • What. Like, sexually? Eew. Or maybe you’re confusing what it means to a woman to be seen by a man, and what it means to men to see the people around him. Older women are no longer sexual objects. Which both pisses them off and makes them sad. Ironic, considering the non-objectification of women is a goal of Feminism, yet no woman actually wants it.

      Remember, men (generally speaking here) like women. Even old women. No one can cook like an older woman. But where a man can appreciate a woman for the meal she just made, with no sexual desire at all, all those women know is that no one wants to fuck them anymore.

      Like


      • The most não.Mas know some attractive

        Like


      • Woman of 40 do not have sex? the husband can not be attracted by the wife?

        Like


      • If the husband loves his wife, of course yes

        Like


      • In Brazil older women are hot.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2013 at 5:54 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

        That’s true if she has not grown a family during that time. An old woman with a loving family of children and grandchildren is a success. I have certainly known women like this. Like any old person they have memories of what they once were, maybe an idealized version thereof, now that they aren’t that any more. But they may have the wisdom to understand that this life is finite, bla bla bla.

        There is life beyond the meat market. For those who are lucky it goes something like that. It has more pitfalls than it used to, by a factor of about 100.

        Like


    • on December 15, 2013 at 11:37 am North Vinlander

      They limit it to under-40’s because otherwise most of the hottest heebs would be over 40. lol

      Like


      • Shalom Harlow hit the wall before she hit 40. Now she’s ugly, uptight, opiniated, has no husband and no children. It’s a fucking disgrace. It’s worse than morbid narcisissism, it’s a testament to the banality of evil. Better she were invisible.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2013 at 5:49 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

        The question I always have about these showbiz people is: why do you care? Why does anyone? They are just showbiz people.and you can even save money if you don’t go to their movies. They are irrelevant fluff, the TV keeps sticking them up there and I keep going to different channels where they aren’t.

        Like


      • This.

        Like


      • You should quit watching television altogether.

        Like


    • Heh, heh… the ones who look most Aryan or Italian are the hot ones.

      Like


      • They are like the blacks,they have to sneak in a bunch of 1/2 jews and 1/8 jews and jews in name only (JINO’s ,I belive)and claim jewish women are beautiful. That Natalie Portman is not my cup of tea,yech! And calling that Bar Rafaeli a jew when she is obviously Rusian is cheating…

        Like


      • Exactamundo, my friend.

        I always thought Portman was way overrated… as well as Mila Kunis and Julia Roberts… who, if they ain’t YKW, are the next closest thing.

        Then again, my tastes run more towards the Christina Hendricks and Anna Nicole Smith (before the blow-up) types… looks-wise, that is.

        Like


      • Mila Kunis is a bitch, and not at all attractive in person. At least to me.

        I met her at a friend’s house about a decade ago.

        Jew for sure.

        Like


      • Kunis is only about a 5. Portman is bangable, about an 8. Scarlett Johansson is another overrated one, about a 6.

        Like


      • Had they not been of the Tribe they’d never have been heard of (for the grammar Nazis who adorn this site, forgive my ending with a preposition).

        Like


      • Anna Nicole Smith was an octoroon.

        Like


      • And I look all white but my dad was black.

        Like


      • Thwack signs a looney tune,

        doesn’t believe we’ve been on the moon,

        says we are all octoroon,

        what a buffoon

        Like


      • Or Isla Fisher, who IIRC was just a Christian Scotswoman before she married Borat and converted.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2013 at 5:46 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

        In Russia, at least this is how they did it in the Soviet Union, Jews would be identified as having “Jewish” rather than “Russian” nationality. So it seems a little unfair for Israel to call her Russian, while Russia is calling her Jewish.

        Like


    • If you notice, most of these Jewish women are either Israeli or European. American Jewish women are not hot. Likewise, most American women in general are not hot. No surprise the guy compiling this list found most of his hot Jewish girls in countries other than the USA. Sad for American women.

      Like


    • Most Jew ladies tend to be ugly
      Beak like noses, bitchtastic attitudes, condescending
      Not my cup of tea
      Almost worse than my black female compatriots

      Like


      • on December 15, 2013 at 5:44 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

        The kids will have about twice the IQ though.

        Like


      • One reason I don’t believe the Khazar hypothesis is because the Turkic women in southern Russia are super-hot. Completely different from most Jewesses.

        Like


      • Nonsense de jure! Some idiot trying to push a debunked theory to sell books, while ignoramuses believe it. lol

        Like


      • Another ADL shill, how wonderful!

        Like


      • If by ” de jure” you meant ” of the day” ,
        then it is spelled ; ” du jour ”

        I would know, my first language is French

        Like


      • From the Amazon review:

        “As a full exploration in English of the history and culture of the Khazars, this volume is without equal…” –Edward J. Lazzerini, Visiting Professor of Central Eurasian History, Indiana University Bloomington

        “a compendium of information gathered from every available source… a useful reference work” –James Howard-Johnston, Lecturer, Corpus Christi College, Oxford, in Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies, Winter 2009

        “a concise and readable digest… current and accessible… extremely valuable for its consolidation of this disparate material.”
        –Eve Krakowski, University of Chicago, in Journal of Near Eastern Studies, October 2011

        Far from being [merely] a romantic interlude whose brief existence sparked the imagination of generations, Brook’s volume shows that the Khazar experience is intrinsic to the narrative of Jewish history. (Jewish Quarterly Review (Review Of First Edition))

        Kevin Alan Brook, thirty years on, strives, with considerable success, to satisfy the appetite for information about the Khazars which Koestler generated. The Jews of Khazaria is, in essence, a compendium of information gathered from every available source. . . . He has provided a useful reference work for all those intrigued by the most striking single case of successful Jewish proselytism, as well as for those interested in the affairs of one of the four great powers of western Eurasia in the early middle ages….[Brook] should be complimented on the trouble which he has taken to assemble so much information, out of so many disparate sources. He has provided a useful reference work. (Shofar, An Interdisciplinary Journal Of Jewish Studies)

        A comprehensive study. . . . Acquaintance with this book will be . . . useful. (Ab Imperio)

        Kevin Alan Brook has decided to look behind the various views of the Khazars and produce a non-ideological work that examines the little-known but critical moment in world history. In a deadpan voice that one could attribute to a scholarly Joe Friday, Brooks provides us with the facts, only the facts. And, it’s a good thing, because the facts are fascinating. (Jewish Book World)

        Brook…has a passion for his topic, demonstrated by many articles, his stewardship of the website of the American Center of Khazar Studies (Khazaria.com), and the first (well received) edition of this book (1999)….Brook supplies a timeline, a glossary, a list of Khazar names, an appendix on other examples of conversions to Judaism, and maps to help the reader who is less familiar with the subject than he is. (Outlook)

        Far from being [merely] a romantic interlude whose brief existence sparked the imagination of generations, Brook’s volume shows that the Khazar experience is intrinsic to the narrative of Jewish history….. (Jewish Quarterly Review (Review Of First Edition))

        This second, revised edition of Kevin Brook’s well-received publication in 1999 of The Jews of Khazaria, integrates important new data culled from ongoing archaeological digs in southern Russia and the Crimea, genetic results of DNA processing, examination of formerly unknown or ignored coin hordes, and the continuing research of scholars around the world. It succeeds in elucidating controversial issues, while contextualizing the Khazar polity within the competitive 9th-11th-century world of Byzantium, the Arab Caliphate, and two regional upstarts: the Dnepr-based aggregate of Nordic, Slavic, and Turkic peoples known as Rus’, and the Turkic-Islamic kaganate of Bulgar flourishing in the middle and upper Volga territory. As a full exploration in English of the history and culture of the Khazars, this volume is without equal, and would be quite useful reading in courses focused on the Kievan period of Russian history, as well as broader ones treating the dynamics of Central Eurasian history during these lively and formative centuries. (Edward J. Lazzerini)

        About the Author

        Kevin Alan Brook is a historian who has researched the Khazars since 1993. Since 1995, Brook has maintained the website Khazaria.com. He has lectured on the Khazars in Ontario, Ohio, and Massachusetts. He is the author of the following articles, among others:
        •”A Brief History of the Khazars” in Rabbi Korobkin’s edition of The Kuzari: In Defense of the Despised Faith (Feldheim, 2009)
        •”Khazars and Judaism” in The Encyclopaedia of Judaism, Second Edition (Brill, 2005)
        •”Khazar Empire” in Encyclopedia of World Trade (M.E. Sharpe, 2005)
        •”Khazar-Byzantine Relations” in The Turks (Yeni Türkiye, 2002)
        •”The Origins of East European Jews” in Russian History/Histoire Russe, Spring-Summer 2003
        •”Jews in Medieval Armenia” in Encyclopedia of the Jewish Diaspora (ABC-CLIO, 2008)

        Like


      • I don’t care about those stupid reviews. Anyone can write a book on any subject and make unprovable claims while getting favorable reviews from people who hold the same belief system That’s why people that believe Jews are descendents of Khazars wrote favorable reviews, strengthening the delusional ascertains of this writer.

        Jews are descendents of Khazrs is nothing but a half baked theory that doesn’t hold much water and the only ones that believe it tend to be anti Jewish in their belief system.

        That said, some Khazars did convert to Judaism, but NOT in large numbers, so most Jews are not Khazar in origin. Furthermore, more Khazars converted to Christianity and Islam than to Judaism. “Jews are really Khazars” nonsense is wishful thinking on the part of some anti Jewish groups who would like to plant the idea that the Jews of today don’t go back all the way to the Jews of the Bible, who are God’s chosen, and therefore hating said Jews is justifiable, or the land of Israel doesn’t belong to them. In other words, they have psychological and political reasons why they keep pushing this nonsense.

        The Khazar hypothesis is greeted with skepticism by most scholars. The general conclusion is that, if traces of descent from Khazars exist in the Jewish gene pool, the contribution is quite minor or insignificant. This is why anyone writing a book trying to push this myth has ulterior motives.

        Let’s throw some cold water to bring you back to reality:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ashkenazi_Jews/Khazarian_origins_theory

        “Historians and scientists today believe the Khazarian theory should more accurately be called a myth.[17] The theory, which claims that today’s Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of the Khazar empire that had converted to Judaism, has been widely spread on the Internet and is often associated with anti-Israeli pro-Palestinian groups as well as antisemitic circles.[18] A 2013 study of Ashkenazi mitochondrial DNA found no significant evidence of Khazar contribution to the Ashkenazi Jewish DNA, as would be predicted by the Khazar hypothesis[19] and although there is no historical or DNA evidence to support the Khazar idea, it is still popular in Arab states.”

        “Generally, the theory has brought up speculation[21] and opposing arguments that there’s no legitimate evidence to support it[22] by numerous scientists.[23] Another contradiction to the theory is that documents show that Ashkenazi Jews begun settling in Germany in the year 321 B.C.,[24][25][26] (and in Rome in 139 B.C.[27]) or approximately 500 – 700 years before the alleged Khazar conversion. In addition, Ashkenazi Jews have been found to have a strong DNA connection to Israelites and the Middle East,[28] sharing many common genes with other Jews from some 3000 years ago.[29][30], therefore it “does not support this [Khazar conversion] idea.”

        “Nadine Epstein, an editor and executive publisher of Moment magazine said “When I read Arthur Koestler’s The Thirteenth Tribe, I bought his theory that Ashkenazim were descended from the Khazars … But in 1997, Karl Skorecki in Haifa, Michael Hammer in Tucson and several London researchers surprised everyone by finding evidence of the Jewish priestly line of males, the Kohanim. Half of Ashkenazic men and slightly more than half of Sephardic men who claimed to be Kohanim were found to have a distinctive set of genetic markers on their Y chromosome, making it highly possible that they are descendants of a single male or group of related males who lived between 1180 and 650 B.C.E., about the time of Moses and Aaron.[35] In 2000, the analysis of a report by Nicholas Wade named Y Chromosome Bears Witness to Story of the Jewish Diaspora “provided genetic witness that these [Jewish] communities have, to a remarkable extent, retained their biological identity separate from their host populations, evidence of relatively little intermarriage or conversion into Judaism over the centuries…. The results accord with Jewish history and tradition and refute theories like those holding that Jewish communities consist mostly of converts from other faiths, or that they are descended from the Khazars, a medieval Turkish tribe that adopted Judaism.”[35]

        Read it and weep!

        Like


      • on December 16, 2013 at 7:03 pm Theodore Logan

        majority black and jewish chix = ratmonkey:

        Like


  8. My comments raped those.

    Rape!

    Like


  9. a sunday post, amazing.

    Like


  10. In Brazil older women are hot.

    Like


    • Hard to believe Brazil will be chock full of 40 something Halle Berry lookalikes..Im guessing an older woman more of the Mexican look ie. mainly lots of ‘eggs with legs’.

      Like


    • on December 15, 2013 at 5:43 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

      Sounds like everything is backward in Brazil. Does that mean American men who are not confused like this can go there and scoop up all your 16 year olds, or whatever the age of consent is there?

      Is it that the older women have had time and money to get lots of plastic surgery?

      Like


    • No, you happen to be brazilian and dig older women, which makes you a weirdo.

      Old women are less attractive than younger ones,.. fucking everywhere.

      Like


    • This is absolutely false. Brazil is on the fast track to become the fattest country on the planet, watch out as it will overtake the American crown on the obesity arena. 20 year Timeframe.

      In Brasil, nowadays it is impossible to go out anywhere and not see some number of american sized land whales, some 10 years ago it would take day before I would see these animals in the open

      Like


    • It is the third time – so far – you have posted the same comment about older women in Brazil.

      You work for the Brazil tourism department?

      Like


  11. Who will love to an older woman, only the husband

    Like


  12. If the hatred was a little stronger in the righteous…feminism wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.

    Delicious indeed.

    Like


    • We don’t even need hatred, merely the willingness to drive the wicked before us.

      Like


      • And hear the lamentations of their vimmen.

        Like


      • no let us hear the ecstatic moaning of their women as we bang them into Paradise…

        Like


      • Lamentations first… then comes the moaning. 😉

        Like


      • A hatred of sin would help out.

        Instead we are told by our overlords to “tolerate” it.

        Women wouldn’t get away with the majority of their garbage if men hated fornication.

        Like


      • Quite astute, and actually in line with what is said here by some, unknowingly.

        “Hatred is not the opposite of love, indifference is” If I’ve seen it once in print I’ve seen it a thousand times. It’s mantra here, and it’s true. And what you state plays on that perfectly. Hatred of sin means we recognize the sin and want to eradicate it. Indifference, which the leftists teach as “tolerance” is what is allowing sin to flourish, and allowing the evil of feminism to take strong root here. Their vine withers when it encounters strong opposition (hatred for sin), without fail, and there’s a lesson in that.

        Like


      • Note the usual suspect end-around of “hate the sin, not the sinner”. What namby-pamby disingenuous bushwa.

        By their fruits shall ye know them… hence, sinners are destroyed for (actually by) their sins.

        Like


      • Then why do we have hatred in our makeup? Theology opium teaches you to never go in business for yourself because in the actual reality competition is a sin better selection and better quality in political options.

        Like


      • Hatred is vital, hatred of evil is pure and necessary.

        Like


  13. […] UPDATE:  See this by Douthat, and go read Waldman’s “The Love Affairs of Nathaniel P.“  People, neoreactionary truths are starting to percolate into the open consciousness (and don’t forget Heartiste’s comment of the week) […]

    Like


  14. Allow me to be a little off topic for once, and paste a comment that was posted on Counter-Currents today, regarding this incredible blog and the PUA-community in general.

    “I’m not interested in a flamewar debate on “game” but I have some observations.

    Besides being heavily involved in the sort of Steve Sailer-like breezy superficial HBDism that I believe is ultimately hostile to WN, there is a more fundamental problem I see with the PUA/game community.

    With respect to sex and mating preferences and the reality of female attachment to destructive alpha male “bad boys” – I agree completely with CH and the other PUAers. With respect to analysis and diagnosis on male-female relations, what CH and others say is 100% in accord with my own observations. And it is backed up by empirical research. Diagnosis – 100% on target.

    The problem is with prescription. The game/PUA guys are male-oriented, male-focused, with a skeptical eye to the preferences, behaviors, and “hamster wheel rationalizations” of women. I see no problem with that. Very good. For example, CH recently wrote:

    “…if women had to grapple with their malignant sexual natures on a regular basis, they might very well go crazy. Or crazier than they already are.”

    I agree with that assessment. BUT… what’s the PUA prescription? That men should make women and their “malignant sexual natures” the focus of our attention. That we should change our personas to appeal to, and appease, those malignant natures. The “Cathedral” makes female preferences and hypergamy the center of the sexual marketplace and the center of gender relations. The PUA community seems to do the exact same thing, albeit from the standpoint of exploiting this malignancy to get laid. So we have a male-oriented movement focused on changing men to appeal to female malignant natures. That’s a bit of a paradox. Yes, I know the claim is that “acting more alpha” will help a man in his general life, and I agree – up to a point. But that’s not really the main focus of PUA, and especially not of CH’s commentariat. The main focus is adjusting male behavior to satisfy female preferences for alpha bad boys. It’s mostly about snagging the “hot babe.” The trouble is that the abnormal society should not be adjusted to. There is a ‘tragedy of the commons” aspect as well. Even IF it is beneficial for one individual beta to act as an alpha cad – beneficial for that beta’s love life – society as a whole would collapse if all the betas started acting alpha. This is all besides the narrow definition of “alpha” as being success with women, rather than in other aspects of life. Some men may refuse to accommodate to female malignant behavior and are thus not very successful with women, but they are not soft and weak mewling manboob nancyboys.

    Rather than a “when in Rome, do as the Romans do” “Ride the Tiger” attitude, why not upset the applecart? The “Cathedral” would not be able to function without the work of beta White men. If those men are disenfranchised by the System, then it’s time to follow the Counter Currents revolutionary attitude of trying to create something better than to focus on getting laid, picking women up at bars, and so forth. I understand that the lessons put forth by CH can be used by men in established relationships to improve and stabilize those relationships, and that’s all to the good. But, let’s be honest: that’s not the main focus of CH, or the general PUA community. The main focus is a more hedonistic approach to exploit the weaknesses of the “Cathedral” to “get as much quality pussy as possible.” Excuse my vulgarity, but that’s the reality. It’s a different attitude. The “game of the Cathedral” is stacked against White men, particularly the betas. The PUA solution is to become better players at the game. The WN solution, or at least my solution, is to flip over the table, refuse to play the game by those rules. Female preferences and hypergamy may be hardwired, but society’s reaction to it can be flexible. Alphas may always be more successful with women, but hypergamy can be managed. No doubt, betas had it better in pre-feminist America. By analogy, a CEO in 1953 earned more than a worker, but the difference was much smaller than in 2013. A 1953 alpha was better off with women that his beta counterpart, but the situation for 1953 betas was nowhere as desperate as it is in 2013. Female nature didn’t change, society changed.

    We can all afford to act a bit more alpha with the ladies, but that should not be the main focus of our lives. We should replace the system, not accommodate it. I admit I have a particularly radical and palingenetic temperament, but I can’t see making accommodation to “malignant natures” the center of one’s life, or reaction to modern society.

    I wish that the more thoughtful and analytical of the PUA crowd would focus their admirable intellectual energies to killing the tiger, rather than riding it.”

    Like


  15. Matt King is competing with CH for verbose upmanship. CH it’s all your fault!

    Like


  16. Women are disgusting.
    Especially once they are old.
    And their vaginas dry up
    And only squirt sand
    And their nipples squirt dry milk

    Maybe you guys are being a little too hard on them? You sound kind of bitter.

    Like


    • found the 40yr old woman

      Like


    • hey lady…men don’t use the word “vagina” when addressing other men when no women are present.

      Like


    • You forgot to mention the disgusting little Pills they stuff in their snatch (and get in your face and want you to pay for) so that they can stop bleeding all over themselves, or as an abortiofacial, or something, or whatever.

      Like


  17. correction by 30 ur invisible to men since your looks and fertility declined

    Like


  18. on December 15, 2013 at 2:06 pm The Greatest Man

    Zooey Deschanel is most sensitive pc person ever. Her show flatmates: 1 white, 1 Asian, 1 Jew, 1 black. She is Noah for race.

    Like


  19. There are women who even at a young age are not able to have children, or are not blessed with grand children. I am not suggesting indulgence, but don’t they have to be able to find happiness too?

    Like


    • There is obviously a difference between those who can’t because of natural reasons…versus those who don’t because they willingly didn’t want them.

      Like


    • And hers is a wretched lot. How much more wretched is it then for those who choose that path?

      Like


    • on December 15, 2013 at 5:38 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

      It’s not up to a guy to give up his own posterity to rescue such a girl. If we had polygamy, she could be an additional wife I suppose.

      Like


  20. “I propose that we resurrect the memento mori for the hot young ladies in our society. A coming-out parade, of sorts, where the ladies will ride in cars accompanied by an old woman who will whisper to them things like, “By 40 you will be invisible to men” and “You’ll be over 40 for more than half your life” and “At 55 the only things that will bring you joy are your children and grandchildren; not your career, not your travels, nor your accomplishments.”

    For now, the cloaked figures of the House of Heartiste will release those whispers into the ethernettian winds, assuming the duties of the mothers and grandmothers who have shirked theirs.”

    Mmm hmm. Is that so? Someday the day will come when you will look at a girl, who is like a lovely flower in full bloom but just about to wilt, and you will look pitifully on her tragically short lived beauty as you have done a million times before, but then you will realize, that you yourself are on the cusp of wilting and that that the young lady actually has more years of decent SMV left than you do.

    Alas, I am here to tell you that this day has already come, cloaked one. For by 60, you will be invisible to women and I am guessing that you will be over 60 for more than half of your remaining life.

    Our attributes may have different life cycles, but in the end, we are all expendable and we are all perishable. So Caesar, be wary of gloating over the sea of decaying beauties. I whisper to you as well, “glory is fleeting and life is short.”

    Like


    • on December 16, 2013 at 8:55 pm Theodore Logan

      “Mmm hmm. Is that so? Someday the day will come when you will look at a girl, who is like a lovely flower in full bloom but just about to wilt, and you will look pitifully on her tragically short lived beauty as you have done a million times before, but then you will realize, that you yourself are on the cusp of wilting and that that the young lady actually has more years of decent SMV left than you do.” Says the shameless attention whoring childless spinster

      Like


  21. on December 15, 2013 at 5:36 pm FamilyMan (formerly David)

    The upper class society tradition is the debut year.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debutante . She is traditionally 17 or 18 years old. She has one year during which it would be really nice if she would get hitched.

    After that there is a new crop of girls, and she’s going to sample the taste of being over the hill.

    Upper class traditions are designed to produce babies and strong families. “Modern” feminist-friendly practices are designed to produce decline and decadence.

    Like


    • After that there is a new crop of girls, and she’s going to sample the taste of being over the hill.

      That’s a good point.

      Like


  22. […] And, in a crazed twist of positive trolling genius, Heartiste gives Matt King some rope in the latest Comment of the Week. […]

    Like


  23. On the topic of fading looks, a 21 year old obsessing over the beginnings of forehead wrinkles is a good candidate for a memento mori, and that’s exactly what I did.

    “I’m getting a wrinkle, see?”

    “Yes you are. Your looks are already starting to fade.”

    At work a few days later, some coworker I never met before came up to me and said, “There you are. A cute girl in such and such was telling me all about you.”

    Two months later, I finally wound around to going back to such and such. One of the highlights:

    “So you mean to tell me you go to strip clubs and show that you have money, but you don’t pay them anything?”

    “That’s right. Strippers aren’t worth spending any money on.”

    “You tease and torture them! You truly are evil, aren’t you?”

    “Yes I am.”

    *TINGLES*

    No, I didn’t bang her yet, but the conversation ended with “I can’t believe you took the time to talk to me this long.”

    There are winning chances on this board for sure, and I’m better at solving chess puzzles than winning live games. I like my chances.

    Like


  24. Same reason child stars often end up as coke-addled fuckups and 80% of NFL players are flat broke within 2 years of retirement. It’s why, back when we had civilization, a guy who wanted into a girl’s panties had to qualify himself to her parents, not her. Now they just turn her loose to wield her vagina power like a five-year-old who got a chainsaw for Christmas.

    Like


  25. Why the fuck are you guys so bent out of shape about this? Do you want to get married at 25? I fucking didn’t. Why in god’s name would I be mad that women aren’t marrying me? I’ll shack up if I ever feel like it, and until then, I couldn’t give two shits about the “modern west’s” women that chap your ass so much.

    Like


  26. In other news…
    My gf was blowing me and she playfully suggested sticking her finger up my asshole; I obviously refused. Is this a subtle, subconscious shit test checking for effeminateness?

    Like


  27. To extract such id-ious concessions from a man wrapped in the cloth is, in a word, delicious.

    You don’t seem familiar with the concepts of (or even the possibility of) righteous anger, holy wrath, and a proper fear of the Lord. Like a good son of feminism, you think gentle Jesus is the most complete understanding of The Christ. Because the King of Kings, the All-Conquering Redeemer, God Himself, he would just have to be soft and femmy and passive if he is also “good.”

    “I came not for peace but a sword” (Matt 10:34).

    I’m not sure how many other ways I can say it, but, your understanding of evil was written by feminism and memorized in childhood. Darkness, violence, upheaval, hardness, “bile,” confrontation, aggression — these things upset the ladyfolk. So to eliminate manliness, they redefined manliness as “evil” — which you also agree to be the proper definition.

    In that way you are have more in common with the bearded guitar strumming choirboy churchgoer than with the Christian rightly understood. But rather than calling manliness evil and rejecting it and becoming a pussy, you embrace so-called “evil” in order to retain your manhood. Like feminism, you would have to be deliberately blind to millennia of history and scripture (and the very audacity of calling the creator “he” rather than the more natural “she,” as in “mother” nature, as in the sex which produces from within its own self, as pagan religions tended to do) to keep up the pretense.

    Hey, works for me. If you, in your partial understanding of my kind, have to locate irony or hypocrisy or even paradox before paying attention to the truth, I’ll call that an accomplishment. Whatever advances the ball.

    Matt

    Like


    • How can you be such a pompous windbag?

      Like


      • His points are valid… how many times in the past few months have we had to cover the same territory in re nonChristians attempting their “ha! hypocricy!” snark when a Christian lays down a solid rebuke?

        You fairy.

        Like


      • on December 16, 2013 at 3:28 am Hugh G. Rection

        Step 1: Buy a dictionary.

        Like


      • > “How can you be such a pompous windbag?”

        Even in his moment of greatest triumph, the Jesuit can’t be a gracious winner.

        He needs an old hag whispering in his ear: “Saggy-Tittied Nuns FTW!”

        Like


      • “Moment of greatest triumph”? To have a quotation featured at the bottom of some blog post? What kind of omega aspiration is that?

        I was wondering what this spate of petulance was all about from you. I didn’t imagine it could be envy.

        And what’s with this “Saggy-Titted Nuns” groove your record is skipping on? What does that even mean?

        I have to say, you’re a disappointment. Talked a decent hardcore game but now you’re behaving like one of my internet groupies who latch onto every reference to me and often sock-puppet, infinitely repeating the same talismanic chants, like a superstitious schoolgirl with obsessive-compulsive disorder hoping it makes the bad man go away.

        You present like a deep pool of hard-won wisdom but turns out you’re as shallow as a woman. Such a “romantic.”

        Matt

        Like


      • Well, Matt, it’s all the fault of the Joos, doncha know? 🙂

        Like


      • In this case, we blame Desinex… or maybe the Bossa Nova.

        Like


      • Matt’s greatest enemies are pagan and atheist gentiles, with pagans being the worst because they lack all conscience. Like their greatest hero, the leader of Deutschland of the 1930s and 1940s, they have no morality – not only because they don’t fear God; they also hate Him. The pagans have declared war on God.

        Thus, religious Jews are not the enemy. They are the example. Yet, for people like Matt and Greg, the Jews (all of them) are the ultimate enemy because they don’t believe in the Roman forgery called Jesus, whose made up birth date is the birthday of the sun god, or the winter solstice – pagan all the way!

        God, as the Jews describe and worship Him, is the true King of Kings – the Creator of the universe, the Author of time, the Owner of everything we see and are. He is Lord of His world. No imposter could take His place and call His world his. Jesus is the imposter god, created eons ago by men trying to civilize Europe.

        Jesus was created as an acceptable form of Judaism for the pagans of Europe. True Judaism is too spiritual, and thus too restrictive for pagans who have no idea about spirituality and no concept of the Creator. Judaism calls the individual to control his urges so that a civil and peaceful society could emerge, a foreign concept to the pagans. The Old Testament is about two things:
        1. worshipping ONLY the Creator
        2. Controlling urges (bad behavior) by following the Creator’s ordinances as a means for the world to flourish. The Jews called the Creator, The King of Peace, or the One whose peace is His – recognizing that only He could bring true and everlasting peace to men – and the way to begin getting that peace is through worshiping only Him and following his decrees. The Jews don’t believe in Utopias created by people.

        This attribute of God – King of Peace – has been stolen and unashamedly placed on the imposter Jesus. Yet, the pagans of Europe couldn’t grasp the notions of peace, controlling ones urges, or restricting bad behavior by following their Maker’s decrees. Could Europe, the hub of paganism, replace war with peace, or become civilized without some form of Judaism? Not in a long shot!!!

        Enter Christianity, a watered down form of Judaism. It focuses on ‘love thy neighbor’ bullshit that has been stolen from Judaism and misinterpreted as acceptance of all sin, no matter how detestable in the eye of God, while eschewing everything else written in the Five Books of Moses, such as worshiping the Creator and only Him, as opposed to a flesh and blood phony, called Jesus. However, in order to sell it to the pagans of Europe, they had to water down Judaism and create a phony god like Jesus who’s going to be more accepting of the pagans’ transgressions. Otherwise, good luck getting the low-spiritual pagans to worship him.

        Yet, even watered down Judaism (very watered down as Christianity is), couldn’t control the savage pagans of Europe. It took almost 2,000 years (from the 19th century on) for the savage pagans to become civilized. Actually, Europe being civilized is quite debatable if it bore someone as despicable as the leader of Deutschland. And what’s even more outrageous, the savages of Europe now want to shed Christianity altogether and go back to worshiping their useless pagan gods because they feel their culture has been too Judasized. LOL. Too Judasized? They should be thankful their culture has been influenced by the genius and spirituality of the Jews. Without borrowing so much from Judaism 2,000 years ago, and stealing its concepts to place on the head of the imposter Jesus, Europeans would still be sacrificing their kids to their gods, or throwing their friends to the lions at the coliseum. Thank God, someone 2,000 years ago recognized the genius of the Jews and the goodness of their religious practices and borrowed them.

        Yeah, I know; it’s painful to have to face the reality that your culture is a poor imitation of one much greater, more intricate, and more advanced than yours.

        It’s painful to have to face that your religion is a copy of a masterpiece original unlike any other on earth.

        Oh, and it’s painful to have to face that your god is an imposter and that the Original and His people are still around and controlling everything, and influencing your culture so that the earth doesn’t stink of immorality and God’s wrath isn’t upon you.

        You’re welcome 🙂

        Like


      • Thus, religious Jews are not the enemy. They are the example. Yet, for people like Matt and Greg, the Jews (all of them) are the ultimate enemy because they don’t believe in the Roman forgery called Jesus,

        As per Scripture, the simple test of wheat from chaff, of good from evil, of saved from doomed, is what they say about Christ.

        You stiff-necked, impious (as in whitened bones in a grave, giving the appearance of reverence but rotten to the core) Jews who desecrate the name of Christ, in your frustrated pride at not having a Super Jew come to smite the Gentiles, are in for a world of surprise if you don’t at least shut up with your blasphemes… you’ll at least have a chance to come late to the game when the scales fall from your eyes and realize Jesus Christ was the true Savior.

        Like


      • Oh, and it’s painful to have to face that your god is an imposter and that the Original and His people are still around and controlling everything, and influencing your culture so that the earth doesn’t stink of immorality and God’s wrath isn’t upon you.

        Heh, heh… I see the mark of “His people” every time the credits run on the filth spewed by Hollywood, the MSM, and every skullduggery in politics…

        You are of your father, the Devil, and the lusts of your father you continue to do… because, like your father, you’re so prideful and corrupt that you’d just as soon take the world down with you than honor God according to HIS will instead of your own.

        Now avaunt, you impious fool… the foetor Judaicus is befouling the chateau.

        Like


      • Judaism is a state of mind, not a religion per se.

        Like


      • Anoymous up above is a liberal atheist masquerading as an Elect.
        A real member of the Chosen would have not revealed himself. 😉

        Like


      • “As per Scripture, the simple test of wheat from chaff, of good from evil, of saved from doomed, is what they say about Christ.”

        He’s no christ. He is idol worship. No one chose him for anything except his delusional followers who fed everyone a fairy tale about his supposed deeds. They sold everyone a bill of goods and pushed this forgery on the west. There’s only ONE God and he ain’t Jesus. Jesus is just an acceptable form of god for the pagans of Europe to follow. If you had any sense, you’d know.

        This is your typical response Greg – namely anyone who doesn’t believe in your god is evil. You’re an atavist, Greg. Even cavemen back in the day had more sense than you.

        Anyway, what are you doing at the chateau? Shouldn’t you be getting ready to celebrate your idol’s fake birthday? Or, are you celebrating the winter solstice? I hear many gods have the same birthday lol.

        Like


      • Be made wise, Yiddler.

        Proverbs 19:29: Judgments are prepared for scorners, and stripes for the back of fools.

        Like


      • Proverbs is of a yiddler origins, Greg. You’re just proving my point. Your Germanic/Roman/Greek ancestors stole such marvelous verse from the yidds. Your ancestors were too stupid to come up with such heavenly language of their own. They had to steal it and the religion to which it belonged to pretend legitimacy.

        As I said, Jesus is a forgery/fake god. Your ancestors lied to you. They stole the concept of King of Kings from the yidds and placed it upon the head of a nobody who got crucified by the Romans the way the Romans killed all their convicts and political opponents. He was killed like a dime a dozen in his day – political opponents, slaves, men claiming to be messiahs of the Jews, or anyone refusing to bow down to Rome. There were multitudes of such people. He was just one of many. Only the Jews know who and what God is. They wrote the book on him. Show some respect to your elder brother; he’s smarter than you in all maters, including the Almighty.

        Like


      • I think philosophically, you and I are on the same page. So I have a serious question. You seem to be a more moral man than I. I also think you probably beleive in God, and I further suspect the God of Christianity. Am I right?

        If so, given the situation and climate we live in today, does it seem at all like a good idea to tear down individual belief systems so long as “all roads lead to Rome”?

        I see this shit other places besides here where game / PUA is not at all part of the forum. And I always marvel at how easily Europeans will split and fracture on some perceived fault lines. It is little wonder then why the vast monolithic victimology groups are having such an easy time with it.

        “Southerners are (insert stereotype here), oh fuck the Irish who needs them, Italians are half-ni66er”, etc.

        This is the sort of thing that makes “taking back the fort” nigh impossible. Splitting hairs about various religions strikes me in the same was as basically having a massive circle jerk about how to interpret some Bible passage while the hordes are burning down the gates.

        Like


      • He doesn’t believe in God Jay.
        See above. He admitted it’s all to keep the lower classes in order.
        The problem is their interpretation is skewing towards literalism, and they’re embracing the poor wretches of all nations.

        Like


      • So I’ve reduced you to simply making shit up now?

        I don’t believe in God? Show me where it was even possible for you to infer as much, since you won’t find an explicit reference.

        This is the weird result of your attempt to understand me/explain me away, nothing more. (Though, admittedly, I have seen more random conclusions when a nitwit is at the end of his powers).

        Like


      • I’ve already told you I’m done with your reframing nonsense, little girl. Funny now you want evidence for something…
        It’s no surprise you’ve picked Catholicism. I would have picked it also if I were on your mission. They may not know yet, but you’ll slip eventually.

        Like


      • How can you be such a pompous windbag?

        I’m so alpha I can’t stand myself sometimes.

        Like


      • Pomposity and religion have quite a synergistic effect, creating the vision that there is real power behind it. Have you never walked into an old-school cathedral and not felt reverence?

        Our common unifying quest here is why does pussy act the way it does and how should we react? I don’t gather here much, but I observe that CH is aligned with the God of evolution and the Dark Triad, Matthew with the lurking sin in women and the Holy Trinity, and GBFM is the court jester mocking you all as blind fools while someone steals all you have. Matthew faults us for not being men in God’s eyes. CH faults men for not being Gods in women’s eyes, and GBFM faults us for not being feared Gods in the eyes of the Juice.

        This competition among the trinity ideas is vigorous, which is great. Maybe something will come of all this energy. The common problem identified by all three is the ability of the enemy to engage in groupthink of feminism which has so easily emasculated the once great culture. We are not groupthinkers, but individualists, therefore we fight, unlike the herd, which follows. We fight a common enemy, but disagree mostly on the cause and solution.

        tldr; Matthew uses pomposity as a symbol of the power of his aligned ideas on the interwebs in congruence with tradition.

        Like


      • The truth will always strike the ignorant as “pompous.”

        That said, I am multilingual. I dine with prostitutes and publicans. I sing Latin at High Mass. I can make small talk about Andy Reid and Harry Reid and Lou Reed. The dialects are not exclusive of each other, no matter how much the ignorant wish they were, because then we would be equal.

        But you can’t discuss high-minded abstractions in Gullah. There is no translation of the word “epistemology” into Ebonics. Because of that disconnect, the ignoramus’ only recourse is ridicule to cover up a deficiency. Why you talk so white? You a Uncle Tom? So much avoidable negro tragedy is bound up in that insecurity. But while they are the most obvious practitioners, suspicion over “pomposity” is universal to all “low information” cultures.

        Matt

        Like


      • There’s a great tradition that spans cultures and societies known as the Trickster. In your primary language, I believe Jacob is regarded by some theologians as a Trickster character and is celebrated in the good word. The ineffective pompous don’t really ever quite get that the Trickster easily can ally with the “low information” cultures to bring down the pompous for the reasons you state. Everyone loves the failure of the pompous. Better to ally with the Trickster as English Kings did. They can deliver the messages they are blind to effectively regarding their vulnerabilities. Nobody is better at sniffing out weakness than the Trickster. It’s a societal, perhaps evolutionary shit-test for those who propose to lead.

        When immune to the whims of the Trickster, the elegant cathedrals serve their intended purpose. But you can always view them as lesser-than-thou if you choose, even though they are immune to such ploys and indeed derive much glee from them when the pompous succumb to their weaknesses.

        I’m quite sure CH is chuckling at your reply.

        Like


      • Occam’s razor says nah.

        If I’m writing for CH’s eyes, it is only incidentally, and I am interested in reader reaction only insofar as it allows me to cull yes-men and mimics and ciphers like you away from my concern. You are all so enthusiastic about showing your ass: I appreciate your self-selecting assistance in that regard.

        Like


      • Ha, you got the same vibe that I did, ZM.

        Like


      • Matt-vs-World is almost as fun as raging Matthew. Greg must be weeping tears of adoration. Martyr complexes are exceptional deflections for lack of ambition, no?

        Like


      • The continued usual suspect attempts at shaming language… by those allegedly red-pilled rough-and-ready rugged individualist alphas.

        Go play in traffic, boy… ya bother me.

        Like


      • Oh noes, I’ve tweaked Greg’s emo sensibilities again!

        Like


      • The only thing you’re tweaking is your own nose… if I could reach through the screen I’d do it for you.

        Proud to be an annoying asshole is no way to go through life, boy… regardless of what South Park has imbued into your Weltanschauung

        Like


      • You’d tweak my nose, Greg?

        Does this mean you don’t feel as weak and “weary” as you did? Trust me, stay behind the keyboard in bed until you recover fully or you might be feeling “sick unto death” again.

        Like


      • The smartest thing you’ve ever said here. Period. *golf clap*

        Like


      • My first “fan.” This could so go to my narcissistic head.

        Like


      • High praise, indeed. lulz

        Like


      • You never really tire of allowing others to define or mold you, do you? I wonder if you have the ability to create something you can truly call your own or if all this discussion is lost on you. It’s ok to follow, just try not to be so obvious.

        Like


      • Now you change over from the inane shaming language to the flat-out nonsensical rhetoric of the likes ones hears from the proverbial “intelligent negro”, once he’s been taken to the “end of their Latin”, as it were?

        Just what the chateau needed… a student of Nicole. :rolleyes

        Like


      • Yes, definitely lost on you.

        Like


      • ” … Matthew faults us for not being men in God’s eyes. CH faults men for not being Gods in women’s eyes,… ”

        Very well put.

        Like


      • Are the eSermons preached from all the comment section by the delusional wannabe messiahs having any effect on the behavior of women or anything else in the real world?

        Yes.

        Before the first weighted brick shatters into a thousand pieces the glass house protecting our traitorous elite a million written words will have to conceive, gestate and finally give birth to that brick’s most righteous trajectory.

        We are now in the third trimester, the fetus is gaining weight rapidly, the skin ridding itself of lanugo hair, tightening, but not full term yet. As GE quipped: It’s too late to vote and too early to shoot.

        Personally, I cathartically wage war against our lords and masters through imaginative fiction in addition to consuming the words written by others in support of my mission.

        Like


      • Remember the theory I had the other day, Zmbiklr?

        Like


      • Yes. I ask myself whether I’d play a high stakes game of poker with him, assuming he used his brain to memorize the odds, but you could be right.

        Like


      • You really should stop attempting to bandy words with or about the likes of Matt… it reads like the equivalent of a ten year old punching at a heavyweight boxer and challenging him to fight.

        Except in the case of the spunky 10 year old, it can be cute…

        With you, it’s merely douche-chill inducing.

        Like


      • You’re truly the emo Elmer Fudd of this place, but what is this passive-aggressive nonsense? You seem awfully butthurt.

        Like


      • If he would even debate you, which is unlikely unless your idea of debate is him typing a ten page psychological analysis of why you dare to dissent with him. Notice there’s a strange reverence of every move he makes by some here.

        Like


      • I think he’s a garden variety narcissist, which would explain why he won’t debate, but is willing to write the deflecting diatribes. It’s ironic given his thoughts on the dark triad. It’s also too bad, because he’s quite brilliant, but the emperor has no clothes. I think you’re right, he doesn’t know what his gut convictions are. He needs to get out more, or he’ll explode one day.

        We haven’t adapted to the lack of bloody wars too well.

        Like


      • My personal idea is that the comments here speak volumes of the reality of the situation metaphorically. For all the arguing and mudslinging going on, has anything changed in your day to day life? Are the eSermons preached from all the comment section by the delusional wannabe messiahs having any effect on the behavior of women or anything else in the real world?
        It’s laughable watching them scramble around desperate to hatch a plan when it’s too late, all the while the water swirls around the bowl, ready to swallow used tissues and turds alike.
        The collapse of the West will occur, nature always corrects itself. Better to enjoy today and prepare for the inevitable end then try to correct the inevitable path we’re on. The information on how to enjoy the current situation and survive during the coming apocalypse is posted a few times a week here, but most of the readers will never understand.

        Like


      • ” … For all the arguing and mudslinging going on, has anything changed in your day to day life? … ”

        Damn I wish English was my first language so I could better say this, but for me, and I would think for many of us the arguing (and even a little of the mudslinging) is for our brain the equivalent of what going to the gym and lifting weights is to our body: a form of exercise to become better.

        When we disagree and we debate, we use our mind to analyze what our “opponent” is throwing at us, and we use our mind to come up with the best argument and the best way to deliver it, no matter who wins, in the end both sides have learned something , it may be something about women, politics, sex, religion, it may be something about yourself, but we all come out of this a little better than we were coming in.

        It is training for our minds.

        Like


      • This crop of sheltered messiahs and whiny emo-fags won’t save western civilization, that’s for sure. We need to cull some defective DNA. In the meantime, there’s enjoyment to be had.

        Like


      • Canadian,
        Your English is damn impressive for a second language. Good job.
        Mudslinging means insulting, like throwing insults. It can be fun and a good exercise, like roughhousing, but sadly, some honestly believe they’re going to fix our broken down dead culture. It isn’t bad enough right now for most people to want a change. Most people won’t wake up until they have to, and it’s too late at that point. Luckily for us we see it coming.

        Like


      • Thanks Patriarch.

        I will accept the compliment because I have worked very hard to reach that level ( my English is mostly self taught )

        but I am still learning everyday, I have “ways to go” as they say

        Like


    • Here’s an ugly truth nobody wants to hear.

      Sinfulness weakens the man, and strengthens the woman. Neither of which is a good idea for those genders.

      Like


      • > “Sinfulness weakens the man, and strengthens the woman. Neither of which is a good idea for those genders.”

        If we could get a good neo-latinate translation of that – or, better yet, something in a Greek script – then that could be the bannerhead slogan for not only Chateau Heartiste, but maybe for the entire Dark Enlightenment.

        Like


    • You may salvage (pick one):

      1. your race-mixing religion
      2. your race

      Like


      • Being spiritual equals doesn’t mean you have to race mix… and who wouldn’t want a world where the “good” from every race lived in harmony within their own nations (true diversity, as God originally planned), and the dregs of every race were eradicated?

        Like


      • Whereas explicitly proscribing race mixing follows from particularising one’s own people in the religion, spiritual or metaphysical system. Burning eternally in Christian hell is far too good for the friars who consecrated marriages of Spaniards to Indios creating the genetic underpinning of a large part of the problem we have today. They should be perpetually interred in MacArthur Park and repeatedly and eternally asked after catching the denizens there scrawling gang graffiti, “watchoo doin on my turf, ese”?

        Like


      • The Jews have a homeland – it’s called Judea.

        The Africans have a homeland – it’s called Africa.

        The Mexicans have a homeland – it’s called Mexico.

        Send them all home to their respective homelands, which their Creator created for them, and we won’t need to build any Auschwitzes to burn them all to crisps, and it’ll be a win-win-win for everyone involved.

        Like


      • so…..then whites are going back to Europe?

        Like


      • I just wish they would get off Uranus

        Like


      • Them Klingons you have on Uranus ain’t white.

        Like


      • on December 16, 2013 at 11:37 am haunted trilobite

        Just for the record, when speaking about homelands, America, Canada, South America, South Africa and Australia certainly aren’t home sweet home for the European, and predominantly English-speaking, white man. Talk about leaving a few gaping holes in your argument.

        Like


      • True. As far as it goes. But what we associate with those lands is entirely a European creation.

        Like


      • ya. i imagine there will be some sort of manifest destiny/we conquered this land counter argument, but then the counter to that counter is — well, if those durned meenoretees “reconquered” this land by the means at their disposal, how would it not also become their valid homeland.

        it’s just a lot of nonsense.

        Like


      • Mexicans were never here to begin with. The whole Reconquista argument is entirely bogus.

        Like


      • …neither were whites? and actually my argument was equally applicable to any other minority routinely described as ‘strong-arming’ their way in (either through dealing with the shady ‘eliiiiiites’ or otherwise).

        Like


      • Well DUH!

        The story of history is conquest… and whoever can hold onto a piece of land is the rightful owner.

        Nobody (here at least) ever said otherwise.

        When Western Man feared God, he held sway over 80% of the earth’s surface…

        When he abandoned Him, entire empires were lost in less than a generation… and our erstwhile courage no longer screws to the sticking point.

        Alas, Babylon!

        Like


      • I’m sorry, I thought that you used the word “reconquered” to actually mean something.

        Like


      • Oh, I did. But hey, not everything was meant for you to get, my dudebro.

        Like


      • Well, then, what did you mean? What was I supposed to read between the lines? That some other group has as much a right to a place as the people who made the place what it is (and into what that other group wants)? And has the right (as we assume they will) to screw up all the good shit that makes them want to come here to begin with?

        Seriously, come out and say what you mean. I’m a smart guy, but I don’t read minds.

        Like


      • Appropriate punishment for 15th Century Spanish priests who performed xenomarriages:

        1. to burn forever in Christian hell
        2. none– nothing to avenge, as none of Yahweh’s/Paul’s/Jesus’ rules were broken
        3. eternal confinement in MacArthur Park where the denizens repeat over and over, “Hey, ese, watchoo doin on my turf”?

        Legal equality and race mixing follow from spiritual equality. Proscription of such things follow from a particularist religion.

        Like


      • No it doesnt but holding Our people as sacred and spiritually distinct would absolutely preclude race mixing. A religion with a precept of spiritual equality is necessary to what we have now.

        Like


      • I found the below bible quote, sometime ago, that, for me, proved God was a segregationist.

        Acts 17:26:

        And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.

        Like


      • If that is truly prescriptive rather than descriptive, then White men should never have set foot in Africa or America.

        There is no punishment prescribed there nor anything there or anywhere else in the text specifically proscribing xenomarraige.

        Whatever god said or implied that Hottentots are spiritually equal to Nordics was wrong. Nordics are spiritually unique and unto themselves. I don’t care what your book says.

        Like


      • Okay, so where in Paul’s brief description of what God laid out is the punishment provided for? That quote looks descriptive rather than prescriptive to me. And nowhere in the text is there any punishment or proscription of xenomarraige.

        Hottentots are not the spiritual equals of Nordics. I don’t care what your book says on that matter.

        Like


      • The story of Babel and the sons of Noah becoming their own nations make it explicit that Man was not meant to blend into one coffee-coloured hodgepodge.

        Mainly because, as we see to this day, it only leads to a sinking to the lowest common denominator, not a raising to “the best from all diverse sources”.

        Like


      • The negro Ali seems to understand:

        Like


      • Regarding Pauls writing you quote, if his second-hand description of how God laid things out is prescriptive rather than descriptive, then White men should never have set foot in Africa or America and the priests in the New World were “sinners”. There is no punishment prescribed there nor is there anything there or anywhere else in the text specifically proscribing xenomarraige.

        Whatever god said or implied that Hottentots are spiritually equal to Nordics was wrong. Nordics are spiritually unique and unto themselves. I don’t care what your book says on that matter. I am sure that if you point that passage out to the appropriate Church officials, nothing will happen and all major denominations will continue on their present course.

        Like


      • Now you’re starting to understand what all the Bible thumping around here is about. You smell latkas cooking?

        Like


      • I don’t think the bible beaters are shills (at least not most of them). They are sincere for the most part. Wrong and cognitively dissonant but sincere (as one can see from non-answers to anyone pointing out the fundamental and glaring problem with Christianity as any kind of bullwark against miscegenation and mass xenoimmigration). I think there is a big impediment to us getting on the same page though — we are “of the Devil” and they have a higher loyalty than to Our sacred people.

        Like


      • Some say God made black people to serve white people, and white people to serve God. This could be true; there is much evidence to support such a position.

        But white people have decided NOT to serve God and instead SERVE THEMSELVES. This could be true; there is much evidence to support such a position.

        So the question for the black man is one of whom to serve:

        White people?

        Ourselves?

        or

        God?

        Until we figure out the correct answer to this question, we can’t solve any problems without causing more problems.

        Who here needs more problems?

        Like


      • Well-said, thwack… credit where due.

        Like


      • Elitism.
        I like it.

        Like


    • Referring to St. Matthew as “matt” is like calling Jesus “J-sizzle”.

      Very disrespectful.

      Like


      • Look out. I refer to Genesis as “Gen,” the Corinthians as “1 Cor” and “2 Cor,” and Revelation as “Rev” when I’m abbreviating scripture references, too.

        Like


    • Darkness, violence, upheaval, hardness, “bile,” confrontation, aggression

      These traits and actions upset people in general. To act like feminists are responsible for defining “evil” in this way is misleading — if it were anything but misleading, the entire concepts of “just war” and “righteous anger” would lose all appeal. Humanity has never accepted such conduct as “manliness.” And the concepts I mentioned are justifications — limited exceptions to the general rule of per se evil.

      There are few situations where an individual can apply power correctly. To do so requires considerable wisdom. If power is already scarce among the male populace, then wisdom is a ghost. The combination produces justice; a mismatch produces chaos.

      Like


      • You are a child of feminism and an excellent sample. “These traits and actions upset people in general.” The feminine ethos universal is so ingrained in you that you cannot imagine a possibility otherwise.

        You are a man divided against yourself. (Mulatto, right? j/k (if I knew how to make a wink emoticon, I would.)) Your nature can only be so suppressed by ideology and sheer cultural ubiquity before you feel an urgent need to manifest it. The scifi guys and feminists call it a mere chemical: “testosterone.” It cannot be eradicated, only channeled. Hence your love of game, where for the first time you have tapped into unabashed manliness despite your upbringing.

        Hence a boy’s addiction to Call of Duty. Hence the NFL, MMA, and boxing. Hence fraternity behavior. Hence, hence, hence.

        But I’m glad you bring it up for the opportunity to be clear. What you espouse Nietzsche called “slave morality,” a concept misapplied by self-declared anti-Christian coolguyz everywhere. I recommend The Genealogy of Morals as a primer, just to get the reference, but be warned it is a dangerous book that more often than not leads to Delusions of Übermenschean Grandeur.

        Hegel defined the master/slave relationship as the man who, in struggle with another man, prefers bondage to death. In Nietzsche’s telling, the slave began subverting his masters by redefining “the good” and convincing the naturally strong that their strength was “evil,” first in the morality of Socrates who perverted and corrupted the young wrestler and “blond beast” Plato (or “broad” shouldered), who made popular a foundation for Christianity or “Platonism for the people.” Nietzsche called it “the slave revolt in morality.” Proceed to Beyond Good and Evil for the full story.

        This corruption has come down to you as “per se evil.” But intrinsic evil is not bound up in certain qualities so much as in the excess and debasement of a virtue. Too much or too little of a good thing. Evil is an absence or an overabundance. The margins on either side of the golden mean. Let me clarify specifically:

        Darkness. Partial views, concealment of the whole, mystery, and ambiguity are not per se evil. Shadow makes us more attractive: candlelight, the darkness of clubs and bars, the long shadows and contrast of the “golden hour” in film making. “The difference between art and pornography is the lighting.” We imagine light to be a disinfectant and ally of truth, and yes, we do require light to see. But too much light blinds more, and more permanently than too little.

        Violence. “Pain is weakness leaving the body.” “Out of life’s school of war: What does not kill me makes me stronger.” Violence per se is not evil. Even you would not imagine violence in self-defense or to protect the innocent is inherently wicked. Violence is a tool. Violence is an expression of strength, which is the essence of life, most acutely the case in men.

        Upheaval. The grand struggle is not evil per se, unless sports and competition is evil. There is a reason men and the manly are drawn to athletics. Competition is like fire tempering steel. But fire is hot! cry the women. We sublimate our ineradicable instinct for war into sports and simulations. Game is a high refinement of this struggle, the War between the Sexes. Women want peace, we want play.

        Hardness. Denying hardness to be a universal masculine good is your biggest feminist tell. The plush-pillowed, terrycloth and silk world of bubbles and bath salts is okay if you are the weaker sex. You want a soft world, not a world of testing. The female domain is safety and rounded edges, for nurturing the next generation. Is that fairy-tale tranquility good or evil per se? Neither. It depends to what and to whom such qualities are applied.

        Bile. Not my word, but illustrative nonetheless. The harsh language of the Drill Instructor, who improves the recruit through bilious invective, prepares a psyche to withstand conflict. The violence of words can be a corrective against the verbal subversions of the wicked — a corrective which CH above calls “righteous.”

        Confrontation. Our culture’s downfall (and yours in particular) is acquiescence to evil. To stand for the good in a fallen environment requires confrontation. The peace of totalitarianism is the peace of death. Women are known to prefer “cooperation” over confrontation, but this is just a euphemism for their natural cowardice, a propensity against standing firm in the right. They would tolerate evil rather than stoke the “bad feelings” of disagreeableness.

        Aggression. Life itself is an aggression. Exercising one’s will is an aggression against what was existing before the fact. Approaching a woman is aggressive. Penetrating her repeatedly is aggressive. This trait should be more familiar, more intimate with your nature, than all the others. To imagine this as “per se evil” is to fantasize about self-castration.

        I would expound on how none of this is anti-Christian in the slightest, but the thread is dead, and it is of no relevance to your concerns. I will just say that, for twenty centuries, we Christians are the scientists of good and evil. We study and apply it daily. We know it like engineers know calculus.

        Most important to the renaissance of manliness, which you have enjoyed so much in the revolution of game, will be the realignment of good and evil to its proper form of temperance in virtue (from the Latin “vir,” or “man”) rather than discrete qualities plucked by those in cultural command, mere preferences relabeled versus the balance of various forces.

        Matt

        Like


      • Accepting all that you say as true, let me point out where I have trouble following. The qualities, in the states you described them, are evil vis a vis where they sit on that line between deficiency and excess of virtue.

        For example, darkness is mystery taken to an extreme, which makes it evil.

        Similarly, the word violence denotes force without moral grace — disproportionate in its application, at the point where an intent to harm overrides the intent to stop evil or do good — ferocity or forcefulness taken to an extreme.

        Upheaval suggests change without due respect for current order — change taken to an extreme.

        Hardness — resilience taken to excess.

        Bile is also sternness taken to excess.

        Confrontation and aggression are fine (I copy/pasted too many traits).

        All that masculinity is, to me, is Hector. What you write about suggests Achilles — to me, at least.

        Like


      • Well, now we are splitting semantical hairs, which means we largely agree.

        Virtue is the mean between extremes, which is exemplified in the virtue temperance or moderation. Where precisely along that continuum the golden mean lies is a matter of two other cardinal virtues, wisdom and justice. Making the virtue real in the world is the purpose of the final of the four virtues which allows all others, courage.

        Feminism denies the very idea of a continuum and asserts the static righteousness of certain qualities. All this does is shift the center radically so that the extremes become betatude and omegatude, different species of antimanly weakness. Feminine preferences become the default mean from which all other principles are defined, making alphatude drop off the charts into that abyss of wickedness which to even gaze upon would make the ladies faint.

        Or, to drive the point home pop culturally: there are no women in Fight Club.

        Matt

        Like


  28. This place attracts way too many weirdos and derelicts…

    Like


  29. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kylesmith/2013/04/04/its-time-for-companies-to-fire-their-human-resource-departments/

    The horror! HR departments staffed by women discriminate against pretty women applicants! Whooda thunk it?!

    Like


  30. The key to getting the most enjoyment out of Matthew King’s posts is to imagine them being read aloud by Dr. Smith:

    Like


  31. In the 16 commandments, it reads: “In the same manner, when she has displeased you, punish swiftly”.

    What kind of punishments? The risk is (in my mind) coming across as butthurt. Withdrawing affecting comes to mind, but in some contexts it appears as pouting. So, direct chastisement? Directly but calmly telling her she’s displeased you? Any insights from the Chateau much appreciated.

    Like


  32. This is quite possibly the single largest piece of Real Talk I’ve seen in MSM in a looooong time. By a woman no less…

    She 100% understands that the entire platform upon which the West sits was built by men and when men opt out, en masse, that platform will disintegrate like so much dust into a strong wind. She also understands what comes next…

    http://ideas.time.com/2013/12/16/its-a-mans-world-and-it-always-will-be/#comments

    Like


    • on December 16, 2013 at 12:27 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Meet Camille Paglia, an Ann Coulter for the academically inclined.

      While we’re on the subject, pull them up on a GIS and take a good look at their jaws.

      Like


    • I read Paglia’s piece earlier today, great stuff as always. She’s a lesbian of course, of the kind more oriented towards logic, and it shows in her writings. She’s generally consistent, well versed and on our side in most matters, and brilliant as hell since she can parlay her feminity-lesbianism into a shield to deflect blows from the Left before they are ever thrown.

      Like


    • Whoa. It’s even written with hyperbole on par with red pill sites. Nice.
      Behind all the near cartoonish calls for war of one kind or another and the apocalyptic pronouncements, what the guys here want isn’t so much. Just recognize the problem with this wave of feminism/civil-rights-ism/whatever-ism. People never know when to quit. Roll it back a tad.

      Like


      • Also, http://www.munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century — her side still lost. But the reason she lost is because, altho most people still agree with her, the other side gained 28% (have no clue how those ppl judge debates lol)

        Like


      • You understandably fear a collapse of the current structure. Most rational humans would because chaos and anarchy aren’t much fun. You however have fear above and beyond that because unless the ship rights itself as you said by “rolling it back a tad” the pendulum will once again swing far in the other direction.

        This is bad news for you on a personal level, so again, I understand your fear of such an event. I’d feel the same in your shoes.

        The problem is, I don’t really see this “roll back” occuring at this point. You may think we first for apocalypse, I for one, do not. I think most of the people you are calling cartoonish simply see with the same set of eyes that I do. Nothing -short- of collapse can right the ship at this point.

        But I wouldn’t be up nights. I strongly doubt you will see this place fully implode in our lifetimes. This carcass is very large and has plenty of chunks of raw meat left to be torn off for decades to come.

        Like


      • first of all, it’d be worse for most everyone — that’s the blindspot people with your set of “eyes” have. Most men, white and otherwise, have contended with the same forces throughout history. Most have had a raw deal. The fear you attribute to me is equally well-suited to you. Superiority of “your kind” — where I assume you’re saying that pendulum will swing — is just another belief that those on top fed to those on bottom. Everyone wants to believe that he or she is a plantation owner…but yannow, most everyone isn’t.

        Second of all, I see the rollback starting to occur. From scientific studies to an increasing amount of real talk to the fact that teen sex is now on the decline. That = one generation fucking up while following the rules of feminism and the next being warned about the consequences.

        Like


      • it wouldn’t be worse for everyone….. only those swpl that have sadly let real human nature, the brutality that is required to survive, be bred out of them with technology and can’t imagine a Frappuchino free world.

        for those with superior commitment to their survival….well, it becomes like a player and an AFC…..one profiting and 9 others paying the priveledge to have him fuck their girlfriends.

        we ain’t that far out the cave homie.

        Like


      • nah…the elites will always be okay. If we let the conspiracy logic play out, then SWPLs have more killer instinct than ya’ll. They are (according to many here), after all, willing to push race extinction to better their own insular ranks. The leap from that to stripping your bones when famine comes seems….small.

        it’s more like the average PUA and Brad Pitt. Brad Pitt can parrot every single beta belief in the world — why? Who gives a shit, nothing will lower Brad Pitt’s value and the more people who behave beta, the more there is for Brad Pitt. Even if PUAs managed to somehow rid the world of Brad’s beliefs….the Brad Pitts will win in the end. Elites are permanent residents, and they’re immune to revolution, kids.

        Like


      • turn the lights off and we can see.

        Like


      • Negroid quater breed said—
        nah…the elites will always be okay. If we let the conspiracy logic play out, then SWPLs have more killer instinct than ya’ll. They are (according to many here), after all, willing to push race extinction to better their own insular ranks.

        ^^^— This. You have to understand what a fucked position this logic has always put me in since many years ago. Real talk, was spawned utterly by, literally, homicidal but eyes wide open ni66as, none can deny this.

        And it is why, and this may surprise any reader here. “Jay in DC, you racist CUNT! Fuck yo’ couch nigga…..”

        As Greg Eliot said, we are not -quite- ripe for the shooting war. BUT, when it comes, and I think it will at least in our children’s lives.

        Who dies first? Nig-nogs? Hardly… My guns, even if inherited long after I die are trained on White People. I will, in DC, have expended more magazines on whites than any darkies. Like the Civil War, africans don’t understand how much Euros are willing to sacrifice for them. Mainly in the name of repatriation…

        Like


      • give it three weeks of no menthols and a realization that sugary carbs are going away for a while…….it’ll look like a Jim Jones revival for our pigment-ally gifted friends.

        Like


    • Paglia is a glorious atheistic dyke who will rip the lungs out of anyone she judges to be wanting.

      She’s an excellent example of the kind of camaraderie the manosphere has to adopt if it isn’t going to drown itself in internecine nitpickery before it is even viable.

      She is a Catholic apostate who “married” a woman, an unabashed feminist lesbian, celebrator of porn, registered Democrat, and pro-pedophile amoralist. My antithesis, right?

      But only a warrior of truth could write such a devastating piece like the one linked above. You can’t fake that kind of fidelity to veritas. It doesn’t matter that what she does with her old gray muff makes me want to puke, or that in other circumstances we would be nemeses. All that matters is that she has got the most important thing right and has the testicular fortitude to preach it.

      What man would look at her blunt, righteous presentation of the La Différence in that Time article … and then whine about her atheistic faith? That’s precisely what the small-minded, narrow-vision spastics do on this forum and everywhere in the manosphere — fixate on what divides rather than what unites — which is why your movement is already stillborn. To have a preponderance of monomaniacal ideologues is bad enough; to have them in leadership is devastating.

      Matt

      Like


      • At least you admit why you are here.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 7:13 am RappaccinisDaughter

        What’s glorious about Paglia is that, unlike Coulter, she doesn’t preach to the choir. She gets ink in Time, The New Yorker, and other publications that liberals who think of themselves as smart actually read. For many of them, this is the one and only time that they’ll be presented with a viewpoint different from the one that’s been spoon-fed to them since they were preverbal…and they’re receiving it from the type of messenger that they’ve been trained they cannot dismiss automatically.

        Like


    • “She 100% understands that the entire platform upon which the West sits was built by men”

      Betty Jean Newsome was putting this insight into lyrics back in 1966.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_a_Man%27s_Man%27s_Man%27s_World

      Like


    • Much has been said about the dangers black men face in our modern society. The Trayvon Martin incident helped to amplify this focus,…

      The lead-in picture was enough of an affront, but I definitely stopped reading after this…

      Like


      • The mulatto author of the article is especially irritating. More irritating are the purple pill white fucktards who inhabit the comment section.

        PS I was banned from ROK for the crime of disseminating hate truth.

        Like


      • And right after this first absurd lie, in the same paragraph he claims the media presents negative stereotypes of blacks!

        He must be related to Thwack…

        Like


      • Its a discussion that must be had among blk men because we are taught and fed this from blk women; moms, sisters, wives, girlfriends…from day one:

        “white women are dangerous and will cause you to end up dead or in jail…”

        But when you breakdown the stats like a shot gun you find most blk males in the cemetary or prison were put there by black women.

        Like


  33. A review of this blog to see which regular commenters spend all weekend here commeting lets me know who not to take seriously. Some of you tools are pathetic. You are fake alpha keyboard commandos, like YaReally says. I’m divorced with 2 kids and even I have a social life when free from work. My comments here are only when I’m stuck at the office (getting paid a lot of money to do nothing, because I earned my way into this type of position).

    I’m pissed off at myself for taking the advice of some of you keyboard commandos in the past.

    In short: get a life.

    Seriously. I’m divorced with 2 kids and even I don’t have time to come here and comment on weekends. I’m either with my kids or with whatever women I’m gaming (as best I can).

    lozlzozlzzozozlz There are 4 tools in particular who apparently literally never log out of this website 365 days a year.

    Like


    • Grim

      A review of this blog to see which regular commenters spend all weekend here commeting lets me know who not to take seriously
      ————————————————————————————————-

      If I go more than 50 feet from my house, I gotta go back to jail.

      I don’t know what these other guys excuses is.

      Like


      • If I go more than 50 feet from my house, I gotta go back to jail.

        LOL! Thug life game, FTW… ankle monitor is a bitch ain’t it? 🙂

        Like


    • My job bouncing at the chateau is a full-time endeavor… more’s the pity.

      Because the Casstein shills, South Park snarkers, shuck-‘n-jiver muh-dik’kers, and general wretched refuse of antiWhite and/or antiXtian dweebs don’t seem to sleep either.

      Luckily, I have a steadfast ally called Insomnia… and no big moosey, big cheesebread bro of an encounter group to pour out my troubles to.

      Like


  34. easy solution.

    all single men from here forward can only entertain or attempt relationships females under 30. 31 yo plus broad…..you get nothing.

    you watch how quick those girls in their 20’s jump. all of em. en masse, and with never a carousel to be found again.

    its the right kind of peer pressure and it costs men a hell of a lot less than whats been paid to date.

    we can call it “Logan-ing” a broad after Logan’s Run except we just exclude em, not kill em. lett em suffer and let the young ones watch em suffer.

    Like


    • An idea whose time has come…

      Unfortunately, from what I see to this day, the minute a woman is willing to have sex, it’s almost as if her age and looks don’t matter… there’s always a pack of swinging Richards that will put that ho before bros… and all else.

      Like


      • Thus it is, thus it ever was, and thus it shall always be. Trying to deprogram 100,000 years of evolution is as absurd as the feminazis attempting to do it right now with their gender neutralization campaign.

        Reptile brain >> all.

        Like


    • problem of externalities means some men won’t stick to the rule. same reason biglaw firm associates can’t all “strike” to work only 1800 instead of 2200 hours a year…..some tool will show off and break the pact

      Like


      • except the more that join the fight, the more profit from the fight itself. jumping ship has a natural negative, unlike your example.

        Like


  35. “I propose that we resurrect the memento mori for the hot young ladies in our society.”

    As a 45-year-old peri-menopausal woman just itching to educate these fools, let me pile on here: “Here’s what you need to understand about being ‘hot’. First, no matter your level of natural beauty, once you hit 35 or so, you will not be anywhere near hot unless you work very, very hard at it. We’re talking diet, exercise, cosmetics, and possibly plastic surgery level of difficulty, and even with that, it’s possible that bad genes or a bad youth will make this all for naught. Second, even if you are hot when you are 35 or 45 or 55, that WILL NOT MAKE YOU HAPPY the way it did when you were 20. Love and family and friends and security and a good attitude will make even the ugliest 55-year-old happy, and lack of these will make even the loveliest elderly woman miserable. Beauty is not an end, it’s a means, and you had best use it while you can.”

    Like


  36. Memento rape! 😛

    Like