The Nexus Of Evil And Ugly

It’s the great pumpkinhead, Charlie Brown!

As hideous on the inside as she is on the outside. A monster in our midst.

There’s a reason the ancients equated truth and goodness with beauty. They knew a solid correlation when they saw one.





Comments


  1. Genocide is looking better every day. The Simpsons Halloween last night had a bunch of giant donuts attached to helicopters to lure all the Homers over a cliff. We really should try that.

    Like


    • This atheist woman is prettier than that atheist woman.

      Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 11:33 am North Vinlander

        She’s a 7 under all that ho makeup.

        Like


      • She’s also a teenager. Her atheism is as serious as her commitment to World Peace.

        And as a teenager, not even close to a 7, with or without makeup.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 11:45 am North Vinlander

        Atheists are superior to Christians in my view (though I’m neither), but the girl is no beauty queen and probably a hardcore libtard.

        Like


      • Most atheist women are women in deep denial of reality, and it’s rare that you’re going to find anything of quality, rummaging around in that bin. Atheism is just another facet of liberalism.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 12:03 pm North Vinlander

        Not all atheists are liberal, and most liberals are Christian. Let’s not overgeneralize here. Many atheists are MRA’s, race realists, etc.

        What do you believe in, theologically? Don’t tell me you’re a Christian. I’m pretty sure most Christians have a very naive view of women as angelic, innocent creatures. I wouldn’t expect to find them here on CH.

        Like


      • Atheists are superior to none of the religious people on the planet in my opinion. It’s marvellous how religions all across the ages all separated form another derived similar messages based on the same view of life and reality as each other.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 12:06 pm North Vinlander

        “Similar messages based on the same view of life and reality”? Bitch please. Compare the tribalism of Judaism to the universalism of Christianity and Islam.

        Like


      • I have little knowledge of Judiasm and Islam, but I know quite a bit about Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, and my statement is based on my observations pertaining to those religions.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 12:13 pm North Vinlander

        Christianity and Buddhism are 2 racial suicide cults. Atheism itself is at least neutral in that respect.

        Like


      • Christianity and Buddhism are 2 racial suicide cults. Atheism itself is at least neutral in that respect.

        Christian cultures reproduce. Atheist cultures don’t. Atheism is cultural suicide. As atheism rises, so does degeneracy. I’m guessing it’s not a coincidence.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 12:36 pm North Vinlander

        1) Today, some very religious Christian parts of Europe reproduce less than some of the more atheistic, so that’s not always true.

        2) There aren’t a bunch of historical atheist cultures to make a comparison.

        3) Lesser atheist reproduction rates can be largely explained as a factor of the inverse correlation between religiosity and IQ.

        Like


      • Some more secular European countries have a significant muslim population. Look at the actual demographics. White Atheists don’t reproduce faster than they die.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 1:06 pm North Vinlander

        The main point was that none of this results from atheism. White Nationalism, high birth rates, etc are at least as compatible with atheism as with Christianity. Don’t you agree?

        Like


      • 1) Today, some very religious Christian parts of Europe reproduce less than some of the more atheistic, so that’s not always true.

        You have to keep in mind that authentic Christianity is moribund and has been since the 1960s. You can’t go by the low birth rates of “very religious Christian” parts of Europe and decide that authentic Christianity is ipso facto a suicide cult.

        Buddhism, now… yes, that one definitely is. The two biggest Buddhist countries — China and Vietnam — are also the two biggest commie countries. Coincidence? No.

        Then there’s Thailand, the third-biggest, which I guess didn’t go commie because they venerate their king too much. But it’s also below replacement and is a prostitution hub.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 1:16 pm North Vinlander

        The last debate I’m going to get into is one about what is “authentic Christianity,” but the reason that Christianity is a suicide cult is that it separates the idea of a good life from one of Earthly success.

        Ex:

        1) “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth.”

        2) “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a need than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of Heaven.”

        3) “Slaves, obey your earthly masters.”

        Christianity is beta.

        Like


      • Don’t you agree?
        Not at all. Atheism is ultimately a very empty worldview and does not in generally give any kind of support to passion, sexual or otherwise. It give no reason to act with consideration of what will happen after you die, which in a very large part takes away any motivation for reproducing, or really giving your all to a cause of any kind.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 2:12 pm North Vinlander

        Only a subhuman needs to believe in an afterlife in order to care what happens after they die. Besides, what motivation does Christianity give for reproducing? Tell that to monks and nuns.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 1:47 pm Hugh G. Rection

        North Vinlader, I wonder if you read about the theory that Jesus was invented by the Romans to pacify the Jews?

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 2:13 pm North Vinlander

        No, just the theory that Jesus was invented by the Jews to pacify the Romans. I don’t believe either. Why?

        Like


      • 1) “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth.”

        2) “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a need than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of Heaven.”

        3) “Slaves, obey your earthly masters.”

        1. I think you should look up the greek word for meek there. It’s actually great advice when you have the correct definitions.

        2. The whole context here is that no one aside from God’s help can get into heaven, including the poor. To get into heaven (or affect most any serious change) a person must be broken and rebuilt. Breaking the poor is easier.

        3. I will openly admit I have no refute to this without first assuming Christianity is correct.

        But despite #3, read the gospels and the book of acts and then tell me, is Jesus a beta? After the disciples become apostles are they beta? They were celibate, but they were also masters of social domination.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 2:22 pm North Vinlander

        1. I acknowledge that I don’t know the original meaning in the original ancient Greek text.

        2. It’s obviously an attack on the possession of wealth.

        3. Either way, that quote is probably where the ridiculous idea of the “divine right of kings” comes from.

        I care more about what kind of person Christianity teaches us to be than who Jesus and the apostles were, though voluntary celibates are the last thing we need anyone with decent genetics to be.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 2:20 pm Hugh G. Rection

        It’s kinda compelling because it works into the whole “Christianity is beta” theory. Old testament god was pretty much an asshole, while Jesus was more like a hippie.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 2:25 pm North Vinlander

        “Christian theology is the grandmother of Bolshevism.” – Oswald Spengler

        Like


      • @North Vinlander

        From what I’ve seen, there are plenty of terrible people on both sides of the theological divide, but self-declared atheists (as in, the people who willingly flaunt the label) have the same personality make-up as most liberals do. It’s not so much about religious belief as it is about a general attitude towards life. A world without a higher power is a world in which ability to choose is enshrined as the highest moral good, and that changes behavior patterns in people.

        Christianity’s another thing where you have to decouple faith from the cultural edifices built up around the physical representations of the theology, especially these days. For example, Christian theology holds that all people are fallen, that we’ve all been tainted with original sin. Churches that say women are angelic are only doing it so those women will continue to open their pocketbooks.

        Have you ever checked out Dalrock? He breaks out all of this stuff in a Christian context, and it’s really insightful.

        (I’m Catholic, if it matters, and no, I’ve never heard a priest say that women were somehow more perfect beings than men.)

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 3:04 pm North Vinlander

        Your mention of “self-declared atheists” (you’re probably thinking of “fedora atheist” types) is totally beside the point about the inherent nature of atheism itself.

        A world without a higher power has no moral implications whatsoever in itself, so you’re second point is baseless.

        As for your second paragraph, the same is true about atheism and the belief systems it’s commonly associated with today. It’s often taken as an anti-Christianity of sorts.

        No I’ve never heard of Dalrock. As for those priests, I wouldn’t expect them to say that blatantly.

        Like


      • The last debate I’m going to get into is one about what is “authentic Christianity,” but the reason that Christianity is a suicide cult is that it separates the idea of a good life from one of Earthly success.

        Ex:

        1) “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth.”

        2) “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a need than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of Heaven.”

        3) “Slaves, obey your earthly masters.”

        Christianity is beta.

        1) Meekness the opposite of wrath/anger. It is perhaps better understood nowadays as being “cool”, since “meek” bears an unfortunate resemblance to “weak”. But the two terms are not equivalent.

        2) A “rich” man is obviously one who has more money than one knows what to do with. In the USA, nowadays, the only rich people are the banksters who are running the country into the ground.

        3) I don’t remember that quote being in the bible. But Christianity is also the only religion that got rid of slavery over time.

        Only the liberal conception of Christianity that is predominant in the world today is beta. Again, authentic Christianity has been moribund since the 1960s. What you see now is not real Christianity. It’s liberalism with a Christian veneer.

        If you want a true suicide cult, look at Hinduism or Buddhism. Or for that matter, Islam.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 3:11 pm North Vinlander

        1) That’s interesting, but do you have a good source on the original Greek meaning (since the dictionary definition of ‘meek’ implies submissiveness)?

        2) That’s your interpretation.

        3) It’s in there and you can’t ignore it like that, no matter what certain Christians did (and surely you’re talking about Christian masters giving up their slaves, not slaves rebelling due to the teachings of Christianity).

        And yes, Buddhism is pretty bad. No wonder it was popular with hippies.

        Like


      • “Only a subhuman needs to believe in an afterlife in order to care what happens after they die.”

        True. But it’s better to have subhumans act right out of fear, rather than….not.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 9:55 pm North Vinlander

        You may be right about that one.

        Like


      • Where atheists lose me is when they insist that their atheism makes them intellectually superior, or that their supposed intellectual superiority is what allows them to see the truth of atheism. Being an atheist in my view means that you were rebellious enough to question what you were taught, but you didn’t have enough vision to see beyond the initial hypocricies of the man made doctrines.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 9:06 pm North Vinlander

        Sure, some atheists are also dumb and some Christians invented Calculus (2 of them did). I’m not sure what you’re getting at with the last bit though.

        Like


      • Eh; in my experience, most fellow atheists wouldn’t warrant me pissing on them if they were on fire. They are just a bunch resentful children with unresolved issues; the few in the atheist via lack of solid evidence camp are generally solid people, but they constitute a very small minority.

        Like


      • on November 2, 2013 at 8:57 am North Vinlander

        Most atheists are normal people who don’t talk about it all the time.

        Like


      • There’s a lot of stuff that would be fun to reply to here, but it’s a shame that it’s all stacked up in a line against the “right end” of the comment nesting.

        A couple of quick thoughts:

        1) “Christian” boys will probably do just fine with “Christian” girls from good families.

        What “Christian” boys will need to learn, though, is that techniques like “Game” are absolutely mandatory if they want to make any headway with the crazy chicks from the nihilistic families.

        [Although, if he’s wise enough to step back from the trees and try to see the forest for what it is, then a fellow has got to ask himself, “Why the fuck am I wasting my life chasing the crazy chicks from the nihilistic families?”]

        And “Christian” girls need to be taught that ALL BOYS ARE WOLVES.

        2) What you are seeing in European fertility rates is that the southern European papists are being absolutely decimated by the nihilism of modernity, whereas the far northern/northwestern Protestant fertility rates are doing their damnedest to hold steady.

        Which then begs the question of whether [from the “Blank Slate” point of view] Protestant culture better prepared the Northwest Europeans to deal with the nihilism of modernity than did Roman Papist culture in the South, or whether [from the Calvinist/Darwinian predestinational/bio-deterministic point of view] the Northwest Europeans are simply a very different animal altogether from the Southern Europeans, and that’s why Protestantism was able to flourish there in the first place.

        3) If Oswald Spengler really was responsible for that quote, then he was a complete fool.

        Christianity if responsible for building up Western Civilization.

        Phariseeism [and to a much lesser extent, Unitardianism and modern Roman Popery] are responsible for destroying it.

        Like


      • I’m pretty sure most Christians have a very naive view of women as angelic, innocent creatures. I wouldn’t expect to find them here on CH.

        You must be new here.

        Like


      • on November 2, 2013 at 11:26 am North Vinlander

        You’re right.

        Like


      • Today, some very religious Christian parts of Europe reproduce less than some of the more atheistic, so that’s not always true.

        You are talking straight out of your ass. There are no “very religious Christian parts of Europe” anymore, and if there were, they wouldn’t be contracepting and aborting themselves out of existence.

        I do not argue with religious zealots online, particularly those from the Church of Atheism, who do not even have enough intellectual integrity to acknowledge their inherited, never-examined, shot-in-the-dark hypothesizing as the creed that it is.

        Matt

        Like


      • on November 2, 2013 at 11:31 am North Vinlander

        There are parts of Europe where the vast majority of the population are members of (real or so-called) Christian churches. Like I said I’m not going to debate who are “real” Christians.

        P.S. I’m not an atheist.

        Like


      • “Slaves, obey your earthly masters.” Christianity is beta.

        No, dullard. Christianity is universal. For masters, for freemen, and for slaves. For alphas, betas, and omegas (Rev 22:13). For honkeys, chinks, Semites, and junglebunnies. For retards, geniuses, working stiffs, and sentient vegetables like Stephen Hawking.

        The passage from Ephesians which you tore from context (as is the wont of your typically ignorant ilk) was St. Paul’s exhortation to slaves, his instruction on how to interpret the new creed under every context, including slavery. Immediately after, he addresses masters. His instruction is subversive, if you cared to read it correctly.

        In other words, like CH attempts at this site, Paul and Jesus Christ alphaize betas and omegas by redirecting their focus not on their immediate and temporary chains (which you would have define their dignity as men) but rather on the higher freedom that Christ’s triumph has unleashed to even the lowliest captive, should they find the personal will to unite themselves to it.

        If you understood the history of liberty, you’d recognize that right there, right in Ephesians was its genesis. It is your pathetic paganism/nihilism which assumes men to be in permanent stasis. It is Christ’s declaration of universal dignity which began the liberation of omegas everywhere, including right there in your hometown, today, where you ignorantly claim the Lord’s triumph as a birthright (or worse, as something you achieved yourself), as the default state of man rather than a hard-won victory, having no idea its genealogy.

        Matt

        Like


      • on November 2, 2013 at 11:38 am North Vinlander

        “the higher freedom that Christ’s triumph has unleashed to even the lowliest captive”

        So it’s a freedom placebo for slaves.

        Like


      • +1 to Matt King.

        Like


      • on November 2, 2013 at 2:18 pm ProudFeministGirl

        -3 for Matthew, for lack of scientic counter argument against evolution, the atheist girl in the video clearly explains that Evolution makes more sense, why god get so angry at the Babel tower? we still can’t reach the heaven with skycrappers, the Burj in Dubai is 0.1% of the sky

        Like


      • “the higher freedom that Christ’s triumph has unleashed to even the lowliest captive”

        So it’s a freedom placebo for slaves.

        It’s only a “placebo” if you deny the existence of an afterlife.

        Like


      • on November 2, 2013 at 2:54 pm North Vinlander

        lol

        Like


      • why god get so angry at the Babel tower?

        Ever notice how, when a bunch of mixed folks get together, everything seems to sink to the lowest common denominator of avarice and profligacy?

        So did Jehovah.

        Like


      • On the money mathew she’s off the quality chart

        Like


      • It takes that stupid bitch 8 minutes to say “I’m an Atheist because I don’t believe in God” Women talk too much.

        Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 12:10 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Exactly. That question really never comes up, unless you want to stir up the shit.

        Like


      • No wonder women live longer. They spend so much time wasting it. Even men know to get the job done and die quick.

        Like


      • Ha, reminds me of a Dick Masterson blurb form back in the day.

        Like


      • Doesn’t it take a certain minimum ,level of intelligence to “get” Christianity?

        Also, I remember reading about Muslims during the crusades making fun of Christians for “needing pictures and statues of their God” because they were too stupid to understand concepts.

        Like


      • 37 seconds is all I could waste. If you listened to all 8:12, you have bigger issues than anyone here could ever help with. None of these people matter.
        Fat chick will be a ward of the state and probably have at least one foot amputated due to diabetes. Atheist woman will discover valtrex.
        When a civil war comes, you want these retards lined up on the other side.

        Like


      • Talk about Evolution,Big Bang, science, etc to see who is right. All of you don’t debate about that at all.

        Like


      • The gospel according to Atheists:

        In the beginning there was Nothing… then it exploded.”

        Like


      • At least the Big Bang Theory is explained as such, a theory.

        Like


      • Alas, (yet) another jest fallen flat!

        P.S. you forgot to say neener-neener-nyah-nyah… you fairy.

        Like


    • What do you mean by that? Do you think all fat women who have different opinions than you should be killed? Why would you joke about that? I’m asking non-rhetorically.

      Like


  2. gotta love the carton of food within arms reach. slow metabolism FTW!

    Like


  3. She should be in a museum truth be told. Then the kids can make disgusted faces when they see her and run back to their Mommies.

    Like


  4. Man the harpoons.

    Like


  5. PT Cruiser…yes if I’ve had a few.

    The other PT Cruiser…not with Heartise’s dick.

    Like


  6. Yes there is a problem, particularly with the stance on atheism. It is now more difficult deny the existence of the devil or a vengeful god.

    Like


    • I don’t know how you could look at that and deny the existence of Satan.

      That’s hell on Earth staring right at you.

      Like


      • Atheists deny the existence of God.
        Liberal “Christians” deny the existence of Satan.

        There you go.

        Like


      • After looking at her I know there is a devil.

        Like


      • I’m a lifelong unbeliever (I’ve mostly abandoned the term “atheist” ever since it acquired the secondary meaning “conceited leftist douchebag”) but more and more nowadays I find myself wondering how the world would be any different from what’s actually going on if the Devil was real.

        I can’t think of any differences.

        Like


      • but more and more nowadays I find myself wondering how the world would be any different from what’s actually going on if the Devil was real.

        Oh, he’s real. Why else would the world be so effed up? Why else would leftoidism have a stranglehold over the civilized world?

        Like


      • The Devil’s real, and he’s Jewish, why do you think he’s so smart?

        Like


      • Naw, he ain’t Jewish… he just likes Levi’s rye bread.

        Like


      • Sigh….Greg Eliot is back to spreading his happy cheer around. Hehe…and look who’s talking about evil, eh? It takes one, to know one, right peen-less?

        Like


      • is that a LeSigh, Lily?

        Like


      • You talk like a fag.

        Like


  7. on November 1, 2013 at 11:29 am North Vinlander

    This subject deserves a longer post. Maybe I should write my own article on the subject.

    P.S. That woman is walking propaganda for conservatives.

    Like


  8. on November 1, 2013 at 11:31 am Hugh G. Rection

    I’ll have to get myself into a church ASAP!

    Like


  9. on November 1, 2013 at 11:31 am Hugh G. Rection

    LBGTQ, there’s gotta be someone who’s aggrieved about being left out…

    Like


    • I like to call it the LGTBBQ.

      But with Pedophilia being classified as a sexual orientation now, expect a P to be thrown on there soon.

      Like


    • Totally, right? Doesn’t take into account the pansexuals, asexuals, demisexuals, panromantics, biromantics, aromantics, or platonically queer, but to name a few.

      (safest way to navigate lefty circles is to add a “plus” sign to the end of that little acronym)

      Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 12:35 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Yeah, like, totally. Also, why do they always need to flaunt those labels? It’s kinda turning into some sort of elaborate code and one-upmanship (upmanship? SOOO heteronormative!), who can think of more dumb labels to attach to yourself to distract from the fact that you don’t have a personality…

        Like


      • Like my dad said when I got into this with him, how does anybody know what they are anymore?

        I’d agree on the personality thing. Unfortunately, it’s also a way for people (especially my age and younger) to pretend that they aren’t like those terrible cishet white assholes.

        Like


      • “…some sort of elaborate code and one-upmanship.”
        Exactly. See also: “Victimhood Poker”:-http://dicklist.blogspot.co.uk/2006/07/tdl-gaming-world-series-of-victimhood.html

        Like


    • on November 1, 2013 at 11:37 am North Vinlander

      Pedos, and there’s a major overlap.

      Like


    • LBGTFO

      Like


  10. She looks like a sack of potatoes with a head on top!

    Like


  11. Why is “fat-positive” considered a good thing? Isn’t it the case that if I as a man, start talking about the joys of a keto diet which encourages the eating of saturated fats like those found in bacon, the disapproval will come out? Meanwhile this GMO-corn-fed heifer will get a pass because she “can’t help it” as if the physical laws of energy conservation have been suspended in her orbit.

    Like


    • Because in a land where every choice is a good choice, even if that’s stuffing an entire box of Twinkies down your gob, there can be no negative consequences.

      Like


    • on November 1, 2013 at 12:34 pm Hugh G. Rection

      “fat-positive” = “I love food more than men”

      Like


      • Hmm, I’ve always though

        “fat-positive” = “I love food more than men I could realistically have commit to me if I was thin”

        My theory completely based on a hunch is that most fat chicks are fat because their hypergamy is so out of control that they would rather be fat than go through the work necessary to get commitment from men they could realistically expect to commit to them if they were thin.

        Like


  12. Monstrum in fronte, monstrum in animo. We’ve been over this.

    Like


  13. Actually, I can count 5 problems.

    6 if you count the fact that I think my dick just hid inside my body.

    Like


  14. on November 1, 2013 at 11:39 am RappaccinisDaughter

    Completely off-topic, but hey, it’s Friday! Time for everyone to get a raging justice boner:

    Trust me, just like my high-school boyfriend said, it’s worth the whole eight minutes.

    Like


    • on November 1, 2013 at 2:37 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Trust me, just like my high-school boyfriend said, it’s worth the whole eight minutes.

      See that kinda joke probably gets you friendzoned a lot.

      But funny how the clip was pertinent to a discussion downthread where I mentioned fake pregnancies and miscarriages.

      Like


      • on November 1, 2013 at 3:00 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        “See that kinda joke probably gets you friendzoned a lot.”

        Yeah. Which is OK—can’t have too many friends, right?

        I don’t see your commentary…is it in this thread, or another?

        Like


      • Beta orbiters is a feature, not a bug – for femmes.

        Like


    • The fuck was that, a live recording of an abortion? Purely atrocious voices all around; I bet they all have faces fit for radio too.

      Like


    • Heard a woman’s voice and turned it off.

      Like


  15. THERE’S EVEN A BOX OF LEFTOVERS ON TOP OF HER CAR LOL!

    Like


  16. A piece of rat lice

    Like


  17. MY EYES! MY EYES!

    Like


  18. Bitch is giving atheism a bad name

    Like


  19. Mrs Garret – the younger years

    Like


  20. It’s one thing to pack on a couple of pounds, it’s another to be so fat people have to reinforce furniture for you.
    I know a family who don’t see an aunt unless it’s at someone else’s place cause she can’t get up 3 flights of steps.

    So many invitations to dine at a restaurant from my cousin get rejected, cause I don’t want to be in her presence as she tries to eats a restaurant out of business.
    Stories from people who’ve dinned with her are like folklore.

    Like


  21. Halloween was yesterday

    Like


  22. What inspires females over a certain girth to dye their hair an obnoxious and unnatural color?

    Like


    • on November 1, 2013 at 1:06 pm Reservoir Tip

      It’s peacocking.

      Like


      • Pretty much, actually. There ought to be a word for doing things assuming the opposite sex thinks the way you do–it’s why men send pictures of their dicks and women take pictures of themselves with their friends (social proof! except men don’t care!).

        I have found the unnatural-haired chicks are into the rough stuff. Anyone agree or disagree?

        Like


    • “The door-holder, who’s already proven himself to have zero qualms about confronting strangers, is looking at you. You can see him in your peripheral vision and you can feel him looking. You’re at a distance, but your hair is pretty bright and you’re wearing lipstick so you know he noticed you. Keep reading, keep looking down. You briefly wish you were less attractive or had mousy hair or had an invisibility cloak. He keeps looking at you.”

      —- jezebel groupthink

      Like


    • Cupcake frosting.

      Like


  23. I just threw up in my mouth … a lot.

    Like


  24. On the bright side, she’s handy.
    Don’t run into a lot of women these days who know how to sew their own clothes from a really ugly tablecloth.

    Like


  25. One jewish view of Christianity:
    “Christianity – and that is its greatest merit – has somewhat mitigated that brutal Germanic love of war, but it could not destroy it. Should that subduing talisman, the cross, be shattered, the frenzied madness of the ancient warriors, that insane Berserk rage of which Nordic bards have spoken and sung so often, will once more burst into flame. This talisman is fragile, and the day will come when it will collapse miserably. Then the ancient stony gods will rise from the forgotten debris and rub the dust of a thousand years from their eyes, and finally Thor with his giant hammer will jump up and smash the Gothic cathedrals.

    A play will be performed in Germany which will make the French Revolution look like an innocent idyll.”

    As to europeans spitting where once they licked, the outcome there is pretty well prophesised:
    But when the tenants saw the son, they said to each other, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him and take his inheritance. So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.
    Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?
    He will bring those wretches to a wretched end

    It is my perception that the end of Christianity in Europe will make WWII look like an innocent idyll. Christianity not fully satisfactory to whitefolk?!?? God will let them enjoy Eee-slam fully, then.

    Like


  26. From CH’s referenced post,

    “Now imagine you stomp through life as one of these howling feminists or putrid nancyboys, like Grendel disturbed by the sights and sounds of normalcy all around him. You sense, in your darkest secret thoughts, that most people are repulsed by you, want to have nothing to do with you, would be embarrassed to be seen with you. How do you think that would affect your mental state? First, you would seek out others like you. Monstrosity loves company. Then, you would lash out at anything normal, elevating the wicked and deviant while eroding confidence in the good and beautiful, twisting cherished moral standards that work adequately to sustain a normal population into bizarre, exaggerated facsimiles manufactured solely to do the bidding of your freak cohort.”

    Yes, that sounds exactly like many atheist conferences, and why I, an atheist, am sick of atheists who’s atheism is based on the rejection of a deity, rather than disbelief in any deity. Her bumper sticker may be interpreted as follows.

    “Pro-choice” means “anti-life” or “homicidal.”
    “Fat-positive” means “pro-morbidity” or “diseased.”
    “LGBTQ-friendly” means “sexually depraved”
    “feminist” means “androgynous”
    “atheist” means “demon”
    “Problem?” means “BLEAHRG! BLUBBER! ACHK!”

    Altogether, the translation reads as follows.

    Homicidal diseased sexually depraved androgynous demon says, “BLEAHRG! BLUBBER! ACHK!”

    Like


    • Pretty much, although atheists are all over the map. I think CH has said he’s an atheist. Really they hate conservative Christianity.

      Like


      • I’m an atheist, too. There are two kinds of atheists: those who hate God, and those who perceive deities as no more likely than Santa Claus. The former have serious issues.

        Like


  27. I was trying to decode the “WWSD” bumper sticker when I realized I recognized the picture. It’s a stylized picture of Carl Sagan. “What Would Sagan Do?” Well, he was notoriously good with women, so I’d guess: definitely not her.

    Like


    • Maybe satan rather than Sagan. And he obviously did her mother.

      Like


      • I was thinking:

        Satan
        Stalin
        Saul [Alinksy, “Rules for Radicals”]
        Saul [Goodman, “Breaking Bad”]

        Then I blew up the picture:

        https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/ciqbqh4.jpg?

        And when I blew it up, I immediately thought of Sagan.

        But then that begs the question of why a big fat stupid Shiksa whore like her would have a bumper sticker of a Yid conman like Sagan on her car.

        It doesn’t make any sense.

        Are we certain that this whole thing isn’t an Onion parody?

        That it’s not something that an Adam Carolla or a Jimmy Kimmel threw together as a joke?

        BTW, Carolla was on O’Reilly last night [Halloween], dishing out some uber non-PC shiznat, about the kids from the bad neighborhoods getting into minivans on Halloween night and driving to the good neighborhoods so as to loot them of their candy.

        Like


      • Adam is doing an apostle’s work. There is a reason why PC, said quickly, sounds a lot like pussy.

        Like


      • Hear, hear on Carolla. He is a trailblazer and we should all be imitating his truthtelling strategy from a financially independent platform.

        Fair use notification: I will be stealing the PC/pussy thing.

        Like


      • By all means, appropriated it; there is no need for attribution either. The truth does not require it.

        Like


      • Adam Corolla’s humor is what used to be standard fare National Lampoon.

        Like


      • Sigh, I miss that rag, and those salad days of A Visigoth Explains Himself.

        Like


  28. because those are the groups that accept her

    Like


  29. Is that the same colossal fattie from the okcupid thread on rooshvforum?

    Like


  30. WWSD=What Would Stalin Do?

    Like


  31. Is that a take out food tub on the roof of her car? LOL.

    Like


  32. Atheist women (in my experience) tend to be liberal/leftist/socialist/communist.
    But that’s just the way women think.

    Male atheists come at it (generally) from a more rational position and therefore aren’t necessarily liberal/socialist — though a fair number of those metrosexual types indeed swing that way.

    Like


    • There are generally three species of atheist: the rationalist who never had a weird molester uncle, the psychological basket case that definitely had a creepy uncle, deacon, dad/mom/ etc, or the inferiority complexed perpetual rebel (tends towards hipsterism, leftism, and other such contrary positions strictly for the purpose of brand differentiation).

      Like


  33. Concerning womens’ ideology:

    Never attribute to principle what could be better explained by fashion.

    Like


  34. on November 1, 2013 at 6:42 pm alexandrahamilton87

    Everyone should hover his or her cursor on the picture. I lol’d.

    Like


  35. Oh, God! OH, GOD!!!

    Like


  36. I bet she’s poly

    Like


  37. on November 1, 2013 at 9:03 pm Hammer of Love

    I dont know guys, she seems alright, maybe the camera got her from a bad angle. BARF, BARF , BARF

    Like


  38. You know, I don’t mind any of those things on her list, except for feminist.
    Having said that, it still comes across as “I’m gonna shove my views down your throat every chance I get. Problem? 🙂

    Like


  39. More like LGBBQ….

    Like


  40. Human size hairless hamster.
    WWSD – Wide Women Sex Defence, also affiliated with LOT – League Of Tingles.

    Like


  41. And this is why leftism is for the new religion for eunuchs, slaves, and women.

    Like


  42. Perhaps a way to the future is Atheism with strong moral values – myth, as pointed out by Alain de Botton in his talk Religion for Atheists.
    “http://www.ted.com/talks/alain_de_botton_atheism_2_0.html”

    Like


  43. I this debate between theists and atheists, it is quite obvious who has the upper hand. If you just want to see some the pretty hot atheist chick, well skip to 25 min mark.

    “http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj8sKEVs2_E”

    Like


  44. The face that lunched a thousand chips.

    Like


  45. This is for those god fearing souls that can answer any argument by invoking god, jesus, jahve, budha or alah to support their argument.

    “There is no method of reasoning more common, and yet none
    more blameable, than in philosophical disputes to endeavor the
    refutation of any hypothesis by a pretense of its dangerous
    consequences to religion and morality. When any opinion leads
    to absurdities it is certainly false; but it is not certain that an
    opinion is false [merely]because it is of dangerous consequence.”
    David Hume, 1748
    An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

    Like


  46. SPOILER ALERT: The reason none of you have a girlfriend is because you’re a bunch of cruel, heartless assholes.

    Like


    • Wha? No mention of penis size or mom’s basement?

      Sheesh, what’s this world coming to when even the opposition is starting to tire of Cathedral litany.

      Like


      • Greg, in your case you don’t have a penis. Who are ya kidding?

        Like


      • You’d do well to give more thought to circumspection rather than circumcision.

        My purple-helmed bald avenger would have you singing great Hoshanas.

        Like


    • on November 2, 2013 at 9:55 pm Basment dwelling looser

      You break my hearth Anna. Just because I’m a basement dwelling looser virgin with a small dick and with mommy issues, it doesn’t mean that I don’t need love. Come on. Even a man that is a heartless asshole believes that big girls need loving too. You wouldn’t happen to be a big girl now would you. I mean I can change, I could walk a mile in her shoes, carry a sign that reads this is what a feminist looks like. I would do anything for you so we could have a world where we could put all the restrictions that you want on men and let hypergamy rain free. We could let 20 percent of men that you ladies choose mate with you when you want of course and the rest of us could work and pay taxes so you wont have any responsibilities in case any of theses studs inseminate you. We can work together to make a world a better place

      Like


    • True…. we don’t see girls as our girlfriends, now if only those silly girls would stop seeing us as their boyfriends. ;D

      Like


  47. Problem? Me? Nope.

    I have no problem whatsoever pretending your ugly, blubberish ass doesn’t even fucking exist. (But I’ll bet she gets pissy over being ignored, though. She looks like the does solo Lesbian Dorito night binges.)

    Like


  48. She actually reminds me of someone I had the misfortune to meet in real life. That long ago chick and her equally rotund and greasy husband used to work at a store where I delivered. I’ll never forget the conversation when they announced that Cynthia had just dropped a kid unexpectedly. She went to the doctor complaining of stomach troubles after a night of eating too many spit-roasted fatted calves or something, and came home with a kid.

    How the fuck do you gestate a kid for nine months and never notice you’re pregnant?

    Like


  49. In somewhat different news, well, Israel too appears to have taken a trip into the stupid tank

    Like


  50. O her ancestors struggled for naught. She hath squandered the unbought grace of life bestowed upon her.

    Btw Noones commented on the leftovers sitting atop her fatmobile?

    Like


  51. The background to this pic is that some environmentalists decided her bumper sticker wasn’t progressive enough and so, in order to prevent her from continuing to destroy Mother Earth with her car’s evil fossil fuel emissions, decided to hide it in the one parking lot they knew it had never been in before, that of the “Athletic Club”.

    Like


  52. I don’t see what the big deal is. She will be highly prized, when the apocalypse comes and food and soap are unavailable.

    Like