Wives Should Submit To Their Husbands

This was the advice of an Italian female author of a bestseller book titled Cásate y sé sumisa – “Get Married and Be Submissive”. The book is now a hit in Spain, where the fertility rate of the native Spaniards is very low as one prime fertility generation of women after another squeezes into the crowded and expensive cities to pursue the accumulation of alphas and gadgets instead of betas and cherubs.

Naturally, Spain’s feminists (is there no Western nation safe from the shrieking of the clams?) are outraged, OUTRAGED I tells ya, by the book’s premise, and are, as is the wont of this subspecies of open-minded and tolerant leftoids, calling for it to be banned.

The book, which was a bestseller in Italy, preaches a message of “loyal obedience, generosity and submission” on the part of the new wife and offers nuggets of advice for the newly-wed on how to please one’s husband.

The book currently appears at number 15 on the Amazon bestseller list in Spain but has raised the hackles of modern-minded Senoras who even staged a public demonstration against the tome, where they tore up copies.

Women’s groups are considering legal action to get it banned arguing that it promotes gender violence.

Here is a photo of the Italian authoress, Costanza Miriano, advocating a wife’s submission to her husband:

Here is a photo of a group of Spanish feminists tearing apart copies of the book:

I could drop the mic right here and walk off stage, confident that the argument against the feminist position, such as it is, remains incontestable. But tragically there are still people in the world who believe raw ugliness exerts no influence upon one’s warped beliefs or bizarro worldview, so the shivvings will continue until morale improves.

One passage suggests: “We [women] like humiliation because it is for a greater good.”

The Story of Oaths. Women in traditional marriages are happier than women participating under more “egalitarian” marital auspices. Lovely Costanza is correct; the nature of women… unchangeable, sculpted in the crucible of a millions-year old mating environment that has bred in them an instinctual adoration for the powerful man who by force of will extracts from his lovers a damegeld, i.e., submission to his prerogatives… is a wild beast that needs a dose of loving humiliation to remind it for whom it ploughs and pleases.

Miriano has touched on something important here, something very dark and naturally suited for examination by the learned scribes of Chateau Heartiste. A woman seeks her submission to a better man, belying her own socially greased words to the contrary, and will take the measure of a man in part by his willingness to indulge in humiliations, usually small, sometimes great, as proof of his worthiness.

What does Miriano mean by “for the greater good”? I believe she alludes to an idea articulated at CH in the past: the idea that women’s unbridled sexual nature is wilder and more dangerous than man’s sexual nature, and that leaving women’s ravenous desire to its own devices — that is, giving women the freedom as demanded by feminists to hunt in an endless chase for perfect romantic fulfillment, no matter the consequences — will in the end breed deep discontentment, and the restless queefly quest that can never be quenched will transform the ancient courtship rituals into an acid bath disintegrating the last fibers of social connectedness.

Women, slave to limbic compulsions far beyond the mere abilities of prefrontal willpower to contain, need a man who will stop them embarking on this quest, whether embarking in reality or fantasy (both are caustic to social and familial bonds in their own ways), and the only assurance that a woman will be satisfied leaving the quest behind is if a man wrests her from pursuing it.

The author claims the book is based on the teachings of St Paul and that a perfect wife should be submissive.

Paging Matt King…

“It’s true, you’re not yet an experienced cook or a perfect housewife,” she writes. “What’s the problem if he tells you so? Tell him that he is right, that it’s true, that you will learn. On seeing your sweetness and your humility, your effort to change, this will also change him.

Smart women understand that men won’t move heaven and earth for unfeminine shrikes. Even an ur-leftoid like Maureen Dowd, by way of a fortuitous brush with brotherly reality that would have made her a wiser woman had she heeded the unmissable lesson instead of lied to herself her whole life for status whoring points at her New York Beta Times cocktail circuit, comprehends that feminine niceness, and nothing but feminine niceness, is a balm of which men will never tire.

The sassy, snarky, arch bitch inspires the competitive instinct in men, and weakens their protective instinct. Men won’t feel motivated to change for a woman who isn’t capable of evoking vulnerability and, yes, submission. Men will fuck the invincible modern woman, and then leave her unloved, untroubled that such a woman softly weeps herself to sleep at night.

Granada’s Archbishop Francisco Javier Martinez, who chose to publish the book has defended its content and insists that the furore surrounding it is “ridiculous and hypocritical” in a society that allows abortion, which he argues is a much clearer example of violence against women.

The Fifth Wave Feminist: Keep hacking at those fetal limbs but zero tolerance for awkward nerds committing microaggressions by telling dongle jokes.

The present condition of Western elite thought is unsustainable. Something will give, soon. And then those who always felt the Western world was amiss but were too cowardly to say so without twelve layers of sniveling PC ass-covering will embrace the wrought iron door to the Chateau and enter, imbibing its teachings without apology, without reluctance, and with only regret at having not arrived sooner.





Comments


  1. Yes.

    A man must be a master. A master of himself. And a master of his woman’s tantrums. They are like a sea. And he must navigate her, lead her, guide, her, break her spirit, tame her

    Like


    • Fairly eloquent defense of her book here (considering that her English is not good)

      Like


      • on December 16, 2013 at 9:16 pm Flashing Lights

        She’s on “Lesson 2 of English” and responded like that??

        Damn.

        Like


      • Moderately off-topic, but Rehab Victim Game FTW:

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2524881/Boston-bombing-victim-James-Bim-Costello-proposes-nurse-met-rehab.html

        In fairness, though, the dude looks pretty dadgum manly in the photos.

        He sure ain’t curled up in the fetal position with his tail between his legs sucking his thumb after things went all to hell.

        Oh, and for all you GZ haters at the Chateau, check out the going price for his first painting:

        http://www.ebay.com/itm/111239922810/

        Bad Boy Bust-A-Cap-In-A-Nigger Struggling Artist Game FTW.

        Like


      • Holy jumpin’ Jesus… the painting is ridiculously average. 100 stacks for that?! Shit he will be a millionaire in a few months if he keeps that up.

        So all I gotta do is lullaby thwack and get on TV while doing it is what you are saying?! 😉

        Like


      • a bid is not a sale.

        Like


      • Holy fuck

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 10:18 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozo

        zlzozozoz

        Like


      • Feminism was and remains their most effective weapon in the planned destruction of Christianity and White nationalism. More effective than mass third world immigration, moral degeneration, ‘hate’ laws, debasement of art and literature, bogus equality theorising.

        You see, once you destroy the family all else follows…..

        Like


      • > “Feminism was and remains their most effective weapon”

        That’s a tough call.

        Maybe you could argue that feminism was a necessary antecedent of “Jungle-Fever-ism”.

        I.e. the Frankfurt School first needed to emancipate women before they could then start promoting Paul Robeson and Sidney Poitier as sex symbols aimed at the badly deranged little white girls, like Stanley Ann Dunham, who had been emancipated by feminism:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Robeson

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Poitier

        http://isteve.blogspot.com/2008/04/time-magazine-on-mama-obama.html

        But do not misunderestimate the power of the “Jungle-Fever-ism” [qua “Jungle-Fever-ism”] amongst the True Believers [vis-a-vis the power of Feminism proper].

        Along those lines – all of the White Unitardian Nihilists in these parts sport one or more Obama stickers on their cars’ bumpers.

        Every big White Unitardian Nihilist parking lot – Whole Foods, edumakashunal facilities, SWPL sports facilities – is filled with the damned things.

        But here’s the weird part – I went to a MASSIVE Frankfurt School funeral recently, with hundreds of cars parked all up and down the road after the Frankfurt School cemetery parking lot had overflowed – and NONE of the Frankfurt School bumpers had “Obama” stickers on them.

        It was as though the Frankfurt School understands that the cult of Obama is a form of idolatry which was created purely for Shkotzim [Unitardian, Jesuitical] consumption, but that they themselves need not worship that particular False God.

        Very, very interesting.

        Very, very thought-provoking.

        Like


      • You went to a Jewish funeral and nobody had an Obama sticker? I don’t believe you.

        Unless they’re Orthodox, in which case they probably don’t vote for him and think the whole Frankfurt School is as stupid as you do.

        Like


      • True. Never underestimate the effect of feminism on making men so demoralized they won’t even try to fight back against the leftoid agenda.

        Like


      • But what does it say about Western males that so many of them are so easily demoralizable?

        Or at least WERE.

        To the extent that Dark Times are very apparent on the horizon, we may yet come to discover that Western males do not remain quite so demoralized when it finally becomes an absolute question of eat or be eaten.

        Like


      • Yup. I refuse to date Jewish women long-term. Though it’s fun to string them along and then reveal my actual beliefs. Just start talking about HBD. It really messes with them. 😉

        Though not one has ever known what the Frankfurt School is. I think that meme is overblown. Or maybe they’re up in some media stratosphere I don’t have access to–I would believe that, I’m no longer anywhere near NYC anymore.

        Like


    • on December 17, 2013 at 9:34 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozoozozo

      DA GBFM’S BRIEF HISTORYZ OF RELIGIONZ

      in da beginigzgz everyoenz went
      ooga booga ooga boogaz and danced aorund da jungelzozlzoz
      da lotsotatas cockasz would get der lostsas cockas in da biggest butt oogga booggag bunghzlzoe and gina hoellisz
      then, one day a man began to think
      and ponder
      and invent
      and build
      and create
      while da womenz kept goingz ogaga boogzesz and following der gaina tingelelzz bunghoelz tingzlzzol onto all da ooga booga cockeasz zlzozlzo
      and so the thinker, creator, inventor
      left the tribe
      and built civilization
      and came up with the idea
      that if men and women wanted to participate
      in his wealth liberty and freedomz
      they would have to stop going “ooga boga ooga boogaz”
      because it was distracting
      and da womenz couldnd ride da ooga boogagas lotasasa cockasz caroleleuz
      as it undermined PROPERTY RIGHTS
      and stole from teh invetors/creators/good guys
      who were cuckholded and forced to slave away
      to raise other menzzlzozozoz ooga booggasz spawn.
      and so,
      after noting womenz inherent lust for lostsas cockas and her
      matericiatstic naturesz and her
      generla inability to follow HONOR, REASON, and TRUTH
      over BUTT AND GINA TINAGLAOZZOZ
      after noting her predilection for the LOSTAS COCKASZ SEPRENT
      over GOD AND REASON,
      the thinker, cretaor, invnetor
      penned GENESIS:

      http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+3

      “16 To the woman he said,

      “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
      with painful labor you will give birth to children.
      Your desire will be for your husband,
      and he will rule over you.””

      the thinker, cretaor, invnetor
      penned GENESIS so they
      could GET SOME FUCKING WORK DONE
      WITHOUT HAVING TO WORRY THEIR WIFE
      WOULD JUP ON ALL DA LOTSA COKASZ EVERY TIME HER BUT OR GINA TINGELLDLDL ZLZOZLOZZOL:

      the thinker, cretaor, invnetor
      instead of saying to womenz
      “ALL YOU WANT IS LOTSAS COCKASZ
      ALPHA FUCKS AND BETA BIUCKSZ ALL YOUZ WANTZ
      IS LOSTAS COCKAS ALPHA FUCKSZ BETA BUCKSZZZ
      the men invented
      mythology and the story
      of ADAM AND EVE
      and the thinker, creator, inventorz
      wrote,
      DA GREAT BOOKS FO RMEN MNEZ.

      Then, thousands of years later, the bernankifieresz relaized they could conquer da WEST and enslave men en masse by libertaing womenz to follow their ooga booga butt and gina tingslzlzlzozloz, and so the cnetral bankers funed fmeinist studies departmentz to deconstruct the GRETA BOOKS AND AND CLASSICSZ and ERADICATE DA GRETA BOOKSZ FOR MENZ and replace them with ooga booga musics zlzozl so they could rule suprmerez zlozoz

      MORE SOON! MUST GO DONATET SOME OF MY LOSTAS cOCCKAS TO A LIBERATETD OWMENZ BACK SOONSZ! LZIZIZZLZOZLZO

      Like


      • Good Professor GBFM, I don’t often disagree with you, but no point in human history have the wiminz desire for da ooga booga cockaz ever been extinguished. It is men who have strayed from truth, justice and the American Way. Because if the majority of men still followed the old code not even a billion bernankes and tucker maxes could have implemented alpha fux beta bux.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 10:09 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        YES!!!

        DAT IS WHAT I AM SAYINGZ!!!

        MENZ ABANDONED DA GREAT BOOKSZ FOR MENZ
        AND THEIR NOBLE CODE OF HONOR
        AND INSTEAD TRIED TO SHOEHORN
        GAME INTO CHRISTIANAITY
        LUBING UP THE BUNGHOELEZ OF THE CHURCH
        TO SLIP DA FURRY HAT GAMEZ IN ZLZOZOLZOZOZ

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 10:10 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        how da university works: feminism = debt & debauchery & divorce & Desecration machine/army lzozlzlzlzlzlgh weo

        lzozlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzozllzlz

        univeristies are at the tip (tit lzozlzlzoz) of our debt empire

        over the past thirty years or so univeristies desouled women in prima noctae assocking sessins (some of tehm secretly taped iwthout thei girls conthent as the neocons like it best) and they sent the army forth to 1) transfer assetts form menz, 2) destory the family, 3) murder 50,000,000 unborn innocent souls, 4) hype and sell sub prime loans while wearing short skirts lzozlzlzlzllzlzlz 5) lure men into marriage iwth their coconpirators the ministers who front the legal system that does what no pimp would wever do–charge men for past use of a pussy lzolsoslslslslslslslslsls

        the fembot army;s main corporate state job is to create debt debauchery destiutution debt divorce deconstruction and devastation lzozlzlzlz

        and they have succeeded!! lzozlzlzlzlzlzl

        today our debt deficit will be greater than the gnp!!!!1

        the feminsimt movement cooinnded with the largest greatest increase of debt ever known to namankinds lzozlzlzlzl this is because womenz who stamp their little feet and bitch and complain and tranfer and destory welath and say “me me m em e more material welath for me me me me for my gina!!!! it’s for the children (even though women aborted/killed/vacuumed 50,000,000 fetuss by their choice alone) lzozlzlz it takes a village–fund my village where we get to bang alphas and the betas pay for it whether we cuckold them in tehir homes or via the welfare state zlozlzozlzzlzl” and they bitch and complain and talk about handbags and butthex and twilight vampires and enocurage girls to long for and lust after undead bloodsucking vampire twilight monsters and butthexing douchebags and otehr things which make their bginas tingle repalced menz at univeristies menz who built invent iengineer buuikld invent reason truth write great books read great bookz think lzozlzl eb=engineer lzozlzlzozlzl replaced exaltation eand greatness with bdebt debuachery destitution lzozlz

        short beta men rose fast in teh unievristy as they were handed fiat bernanke cash fronm helicopter ben and they used it to surrpound themselves with syocphantic harems of womenze as all teh betas love honor worship tucker max their ultimate master because he rhymes with goldman sax and also he butthexes girls and films it woithout teh girlths ocnthent and the weekly stanadrd neocns repeat his lies lzozlzlzlzzl that he is six foot tall zlozzlzllzlzlzlzl honoring their #1 butthexual hero lzozlzlzl

        so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:

        http://community.feministing.com/2009/09/why-are-female-executives-publ.html

        Why are Female Executives Publishing Tucker Max?

        Saw this floating around. good question!

        MCCOY MOUNTAIN
        ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

        Ms. Priscilla Painton

        Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief

        RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

        Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

        “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

        Dear Ms. Painton,

        I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

        http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

        “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

        Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

        http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com

        http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

        Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

        “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

        –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

        Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

        http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system

        Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

        –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/

        “OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml

        Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

        Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

        “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

        Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

        Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

        What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

        Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/

        It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

        “Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

        So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

        “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

        Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?

        ” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

        For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.

        “Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

        Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

        http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/

        “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”

        It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .

        Best,

        McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD

        –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

        Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?

        the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

        What’s up with women these days?

        It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

        Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster

        http://gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster

        Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?

        Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?

        http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

        Does she get off on this?

        “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”

        Is that supposed to be funny?” –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

        Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

        Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:

        http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html

        http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html

        http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml

        “11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

        [I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

        [To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

        [To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

        [To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

        [To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

        11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

        Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

        ‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton

        http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html

        “What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”

        See? That is the clever banker ruse.

        Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.

        http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

        “A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
        and Government’s War on Fathers”

        “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

        The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

        –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

        Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
        –Vince Vaughn

        When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

        “My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

        Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
        “I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

        What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

        End the Fed: Ron Paul, Bob Craig: Amazon.com: Books

        End the Fed: Ron Paul, Bob Craig: Amazon.com: Books

        Buy from Amazon

        Review for End The Fed
        “Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
        –Arlo Guthrie

        “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
        –Vince Vaughn

        Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

        The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

        Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?

        And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

        “Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

        http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 10:13 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzoozozo when the dollar collapses and the FED can no longer fund welfare, warfare, abortion, and physical property seizures, men will again rise lzzllzzzlzo

        lzoozozo when the dollar collapses and the FED can no longer fund welfare, warfare, abortion, and physical property seizures, men will again rise lzzllzzzlzo

        zlzlozzozooz

        in this video, dr. helen talks about how women see the state as the husband where they get all their money:

        the state taxes men and places men in debt and taxes them again via the inflation tax

        if you abolished the fed and ended the irs, women would no longer be able to butthext with abandon.

        ben bernankiferierze et al profit massively off the base female desire for alpha fucks in the butthole and beta bucks, seized at gunpoint, to raise their thug offspring.

        the welfare/warfare state is a big wealth-transfer business from men to women, and so naturally the fed funds it, as they must convert their worthless debt into physical property, which they do via feminism/alimony/sexual harrassment cases/welfare, all of which da ebernififiersz get a massive cut of.

        the federal reserve created and funded the feminist movement to seize assets form men, while also seizing their future wive’s assess and ebebenrnakifying and deousling them in collegz lzlzozozozolozlzo

        It’s funny how Dr. Helen never mentions
        that the whole purpose of psychology
        was to
        deconstruct and debauch
        and undermine
        western civilization
        and culture
        and christianity
        as freud considered himself a hannibal
        a bernankifierz of womenz
        a debaucher of western civilization
        as freaud preached that every exalted principle
        every virtuous act
        was but
        “repression”
        and freud the savior came to liberate us
        from the law of moses and jesus
        and set us free to butthext
        hich is why the churchian today
        hates moses and jesus
        and loves freud zlzoozzo
        and ciopiius amountz a of butethxt
        on demand

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 11:17 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozoozoz

        Bring Back Prima Noctes! Braveheart: “Grant them prima noctes. First night, when any common girl inhabiting their lands is married, our nobles shall have sexual rights to her on the night of her wedding.” lolzlz!

        “Longshanks: Nobles. Nobles are the key to the door of Scotland. Grant our nobles lands in the north. Give their nobles estates here in England, and make them too greedy to oppose us.
        Advisor: But sire, our nobles will be reluctant to uproot. New lands mean new taxes, and they are already taxed for the war in France.
        Longshanks: Are they? Are they? The trouble with Scotland is that it’s full of Scots. Perhaps the time has come to reinstitute an old custom. Grant them prima noctes. First night, when any common girl inhabiting their lands is married, our nobles shall have sexual rights to her on the night of her wedding. If we can’t get them out, we breed them out. That should fetch just the kind of lords we want to Scotland, taxes or no taxes.
        Advisor: A most excellent idea, sire.
        Longshanks: Is it? “

        –From Braveheart

        I wish they would bring Prima Noctes back!!

        Imagine just one other man having rights to your wife, for one night, before you got her.

        That would rock!!

        Today the master fiat class gives the first rights of your wife to an endless array of douchetards, starting in elementary school, commanding her to see lying, peacocking, manipulative, girly beta males as alphas, while seeing manly alphas as betas; as her mother exiled her true father long ago, under command of the fiat masters.

        From an early age they teach her that her ginatingles rule the world, not Jesus, nor Thor, nor Zeus, nor Moses. When she gets knocked up, they reward her with fiat dollars which Ben Benanke hand delivers in his helicopter.

        Today, when she kisses those kids and sends them off to school, she leaves traces of dozens of other men on their cheeks.

        Make no mistake–she is working for the Fed, and if you question any of this she will take your children away and the feminist police will search your home to determine how many assets of yours she will get. For again, all the Fed can do is create debt, and to convert this debt into physical wealth, they need men, like you, to work and labor for it. lozlzlzl!

        You know you tasted it when you kissed her a couple times on those early dates–that salty prima nocta form those who violated her orfices a few minutes before. And now she pwns u, the kids, and the home! And you have to pay 4 ur own cuckolding!!

        lozlzl!

        lzozlzozlzozlzlzoz

        Like


  2. The feminists may not be quite sure what this “humor” thing is, but I think there are a lot of them that are starting to worry that CH has more of it than they do.

    Like


  3. @Yareally

    Finally sent my first reach out text to married club girl this morning with your approach. Like I said Secret Society game is new territory (“consciously treaded” territory that is; I’ve banged married and engaged chicks before, but none who basically came to me and explicitly said “I secretly fuck guys behind my husband’s back”.).

    Although I wasn’t really over-eager to text her, I was admittedly feeling kind of worried that she might not remember me. The interaction was brief, the club was filled with people, the scene was a little chaotic. You thought otherwise, though, believing she would remember me, pointing to the telltale sign that unloaded some super-intimate stuff that she wouldn’t tell just anyone.

    Had I devised my own game plan, I probably would sent a reach out text that 1) started off by reminding her who I was, “hey it’s me from X club the other night.” and 2) was stylistically playful and a sexual, “well you certainly have a stripper name.” Glad you proposed the alternative “save my name as Anna” strategy for this scenario. Think one of the flaws with my initial text strategy is that it inherently assumes I never left a strong enough impression during our interaction, and also that I still needed to “win” her over via text with personality.

    The text frame you embraced assumed the sale – hard. Conversely, the text frame I was pondering initiating assumed she had gotten excited about the sale, but since time had passed her buying temp had diminished, and she needed a reminder of the quality of the product. First strategy telegraphs “I’m Secret Society”; Second strategy telegraphs “I’m just one of countless club pick up boy trying to run game that haven’t reached Secret Society status yet.” Second way is a great way to be incongruent with her initial perception of me and deflate her libido.

    BTW, here’s a simple rule we can extract from the averted text pitfall: reminding women who you are over the reach out text = I didn’t leave a strong enough impression when we met = not preselected for sex = total mood killer for the girl if she was indeed once thinking about you sexually because now she thinks you view yourself as not preselected for sex.

    Anyway, fired off first text, telling her “it’s Darkhorse, save my name as Anna”. Was pleasantly surprised to see her text back literally two-minutes minute later. “Darkhorse from X club??? lol”. (Wow that was fast. Faster than the hour or so Yareally gave a signal of strong interest. Cool). She remembered who I was, seemed somewhat happily surprised that I actually reached out.

    Like you recommended, I went super direct. “let’s hang out at Y time”. Turns out she’s currently in Florida on Xmas holiday for a bit (out of town). Says it’s “unfortunate” we can’t hang this week and says she’s back the Xth day of Dec. I don’t respond, since don’t want come off as clingy/desperate given that she wants a NSA bang. Not sure, but think a really clingy for a lay would have immediately proposed an alternative meet-up time when she gets back to set up the lay.

    Thoughts are the bang is just a matter of 1) getting logistics right and 2) not appearing clingy. I’m thinking maybe waiting even a two week to get back to her after she”s back in town. Her openness to discreet one-time bangs isn’t going to change any time soon, so no need to push for a meet up time IMHO. And up to a certain point, the more patient I appear, the higher value I seem since she clearly hates clingy guys. Wondering how to progress with this, YR. I want to keep the Secret Society frame strong, but also not be so aloof that the bang doesn’t materialize.

    Like


    • are you willing to never talk to this girl again? drop of a hat walk away?

      cause if you aren’t then just by what you are writing above you are already way too clingy.

      Ya is being nice to you because he is genuinely supportive and believes that men can learn to get better with a ton of practice. I prefer blunt reality.

      Like


      • of course I’m willing to walk a way at the drop of a hat. wouldn’t care less. this is fun. I’m documenting the thought and feeling process because I believe it helps to internalize the learning/growth process and also because I imagine some other guys out there might face similar situations, experience similar emotions and can grow from my experiences too.

        Like


      • then have fun with it as and tell yourself that its an experiment. tell yourself that every time you interact with her and good luck.

        at least the challenge is the interaction and not the girl/outcome and that is critical to success.

        Like


      • Are you really willing to stab a bro in the back for some ass of questionable quality? God’s helping you out here. Don’t spit in his face.

        Like


      • Get off your high horse, hoe

        Like


      • Pearls before swine Charlie Chan.

        Like


      • Did you get that hat at Burger King? Let me see if you can understand this. If the married woman were truly DTF, she’d have done it. They don’t have a lot of time to dawdle and get caught. When they want to fuck around on their husbands, they just do it. She only wants validation and chasing after her makes him a chump.

        Like


      • DarkHorse will bang this girl and you will grovel from thereon.

        Like


      • “A man without honor…..

        Like


      • Better than a man without field experience. Great quote by Dark Horse by the way. It’s part the reason why I post my FuckUp Reports here. So I can learn and so others can learn:

        “I’m documenting the thought and feeling process because I believe it helps to internalize the learning/growth process and also because I imagine some other guys out there might face similar situations, experience similar emotions and can grow from my experiences too.”

        Like


      • You [email protected] dweeb, you have the gall to call better men than you’ll ever be “hoe”?

        And laugh at the concept a man of honor?

        Boy, if your head was any further up your ass you’d be wearing that Goober Bling cap as a tampon.

        Like


      • @Carlos
        She couldn’t do it that night cause her hubby was coming home and she didn’t have his # till he txted her and she’s out of town.

        Jesus, did you even read his FR?

        @darkhorse
        Basically ignore everyone but me on this one, in general lol

        Like


      • “cause if you aren’t then just by what you are writing above you are already way too clingy.”

        Counting calories to get a 6-pack doesn’t mean you have anorexia. Eating protein after your workout doesn’t mean you’re a roid-junkie.

        Relax lol dude is in a good headspace, he clearly doesn’t give a fuck beyond experimenting, he’s just trying to wrap his mind around a new area of game he’s found himself in and analyzing out-loud for the benefit of other guys reading.

        Like


      • yeah i caught that and gave him props for the social experiment downthread.

        Like


      • @YaReally, Hell yeah, game experimenting is fun as hell, even for a married dude. Went to an upscale bar a few months back where the waitresses are all hotties, wearing tight fitting jeans and shirts (upscale but hip, un-uptight atmosphere). Our waitress was a solid eight, short, big Cs, and an Apple bumm ass like the sistas have, but not quite as big – perfect. She was one of those girls that didn’t have to wear hardly any makeup at all and still is hot. Fair skin, girl-next-door look, 24 ish. Anyway, she came to the table and asked what we wanted, then asked for id’s. One chode of the bunch gave his happily. I was about to give her mine, but she looked at me, looked me over a bit, and said, “You’re okay.” Now, I’m 41 and have some gray wings developing on the sides of my hair, but it’s definitely some cool shit (probably the only thing besides more money about getting older that’s cool). All the reading I’ve been doing perhaps, but something snapped and I decided I had to try some game that day. (also, I doubt she was trying to diss me here. I was better looking than most of the other dudes anyway). I said, “Hold up, did you just look at my gray hairs before you said I didn’t need to show ID?! That’s pretty fucked up and mean!” (everything I say is with a small smirk and raised eye brow so they can’t quite determine if I’m serious or not. That’s my vibe). She instantly qualifies herself, “No, no I just blah blah blah.” She was all smiles though and took the ribbing and our order. Each time she walked into the area and I met her eyes she smiled. Matter of fact, I didn’t have to ask once to get another beer the whole night (she could just be a good waitress, but most of the time I have to ask for that shit). The next time she put a beer on our table I noticed a tattoo on the curved part of her thumb where it meets the pointer finger. The game voice said, “Keno time.” I grabbed her hand as she was walking away and said, “hold up, what do we have here? I slowly rubbed my thumb along her tattoo as I read it, “LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL.” I held her hand and replied, “It is isn’t it?” but I said it in a way that said, “You are a hot little minx aren’t you.” She ate it up. Now if I was single, I could have done a 504Danny and asked if her boyfriend approved of her tattoo and taken it from there.
        The geekie chode at the table kind of rolled his eyes. I didn’t care. I was having fun interacting with her. When she brought more beers I thanked her by name (another small thing I didn’t do pre pill). When we cashed out, we all thanked her and I followed up with, “Just so you know, I’ll be thinking about you later.” She smiled and said, “Oh really,” I said, Yeah, I’m dying my hair tonight.” She laughed and offered color suggestions and shit – I laughed and she laughed and we left. The geek said, “Man that was creeper.” I brushed it off playfully replying, “Shit, she’ll remember me tonight, she won’t remember you though.” So, yeah I didn’t get a number and I didn’t get laid, but game improved my night and gave me a fond memory. I”m sure Ya and CH could have worked something better, but that’s not the point. Game is a self improvement experiment that works and is fun. Shit works at work too – just got a bonus.

        Like


      • Ok, so you’re trying to play the lets fuck a waitress/bartender game. First off, you went wrong when you acknowledged this bitch every time she came over to do the job she’s supposed to do. Secondly, if this is your first time with this bitch NEVER thank her especially by name. This behavior is exactly what they expect from every old beta dude.

        So how do I fuck this bernankified hoe Mr.Oogabooga, well instead of yareally wasting your time rattling off some bullshit from a guy named mystery, imma give you the short and sweet. If you’re a regular at this bar start to develop a reputation there. First off, dress slightly better than the average clientelle there. Get yourself a gold money clip loaded with bills, hoes be lovin them dollas, also a nice watch is in order. Come in with attractive women or flirt with women already there. Most importantly treat the help at these bars like the non-entities they are. This is important because these hoes expect every 40 yo dude whose drunk to go gaga over them. Once you

        Like


      • Continued

        develop the reputation as a man about town these hoes will start approaching you. Also, another untalked about aspect of bartender/waitress game is those hoes be loving their drugs. If you got the connect for that booger sugar, xanax, vicodins etc etc those hoes gunna be up all on you. For style advice and how to order a more sophisticated drink then bud light hit up laguna beach fogey’s blog that nigga a boss.

        Like


      • “Ok, so you’re trying to play the lets fuck a waitress/bartender game”
        You didn’t read what I wrote. I wrote “fuck with” a waitress.

        “you went wrong when you acknowledged this bitch every time she came over to do the job she’s supposed to do” I’m sure she passed me many times without me lookin’ as I’m talking to my buddies, but I happen to glance at her enough to see she eyed me back.

        “Secondly, if this is your first time with this bitch NEVER thank her especially by name.” I disagree, especially when I say it in a non-needy way.

        Dress well – done. Money but no gold clip my brotha. Come in with an attractive woman – impractical advice, seriously man. I never went gaga over her, that’s important. No needy in me.

        Like


      • No hate towards you newly aloof your post made it seem to me like you were doggin this girl the entire time. I’m glad to see you got confidence and if you ever want to make wifey jealous you know you can. I’m glad that as a married you don’t screw around on ur old lady, unlike that pos yareally who’d fuck his best friends mom if the opportunity arose. et urself a nice money clip the hoes love it.

        Like


      • ah shit, ooga’s got me.

        I would have suggested stuff like “talk to her” and “say things that make her emotionally respond to you” but that’s dumb. You can’t get girls by just being a normal flirty fun guy. You gotta’ go blow half your savings on a suit, a watch (make sure you get the right name brand, of course), go to the place regularly for weeks (clear up your schedule, time to become a bar-fly there, you couldn’t possibly get her in one conversation! That only happens in movies), bring in a bunch of Playboy models (’cause you have a bunch of those you can snap your fingers and bring out, right?), and whatever you do DON’T talk to her. EVER.

        Seems solid to me lol

        Like


      • Ok YaReally because bartenders, hooters girls/Tilted Kilt, waitresses etc etc don’t get flirted with by every tom, dick, and harry. But because you’re such a special snow flake these jaded girls who get oogled by drunks for a living are just gunna spread their legs for you? Its called developing a presence about urself that distinguishes u from the other drunks. If u got money to blow at an upscale bar u got money to blow on clothes. Much better comment length at least i didn’t have to scroll down 20 pages to get to the point.

        Like


      • “because bartenders, hooters girls/Tilted Kilt, waitresses etc etc don’t get flirted with by every tom, dick, and harry.”

        Oh they DO…but not WELL. And that’s kind of the point: All those Tom, Dick and Harry’s are running shitty game.

        “Its called developing a presence about urself that distinguishes u from the other drunks.”

        You don’t need to blow your $ on a nice watch and go to a bar 50 times with models on your arm in a suit with a golden money clip to do that…you can do it with just some solid game. And having a nice watch doesn’t make you attractive if you don’t have any game to back it up…if a money clip was attractive to her she would just buy one and fuck herself with it.

        It doesn’t hurt to have that stuff, it’s just not necessary to have it and isn’t worth the time/money/etc investment that a random Joe would have to sink in to get those things. She might compliment your watch but you still need to have enough game to be attractive to her.

        Like


      • Again snowflake you miss the point nowherez did i say yeah yareallyz u don’t have to act like a mack while dressing like one. if u were able to readz between what i wrote ud realize that im saying trying to fuck a bartenderz, hooter hottiezzz with ur standard azz bs game advice jus aint gonna cut it. A dude at 40 trien to holler at a hottie bartender got look the don draper part. Also homeslice a dude at 40 tryna be hoppin around like your add ass botherin a bitch while she workin jus aint gunna cut it. But then again u that special snowflake whoz game is so tight that he can fuck all the hottie hottiez 10+ even though ize seen plenty alphaz strike outz . Suck my lotza coccckkazzz.

        Like


    • Just reading your post, I can feel the lack of confidence. You are walking on egg shells. What’s even worse, you pretend that “Secret Society game” (what the fuck is that, come on) requires you to “be patient”.

      A cheating whore shouldn’t require so much investment from you. Ideally you don’t want this kind of girl at all. Move on to well-adjusted girls (pretty and humble), that’s how you learn the ropes of game. You will only learn gimmicks and lame tricks from your interactions with cheap girls.

      Like


      • Agree, for a newbie just starting out with game, a married woman is a bad bet. SHe’ll love the attention, rarely be available and be more ego crushing than anything else.

        You won’t learn anything from this interaction and it will lead no where.

        It’s like learning to drive a car with a flat tire.

        Like


      • thanks bob. my primary girl is a pretty, humble, well-adjusted girl. I also like variety.

        Like


      • Every time I want to give this website a try its comments like this that reinflame my disgust.

        Like


      • Like


      • Dafuq? You come to a website about “game” and you are disgusted that men are slicing off from both sides of the turkey? Does… not… compute.

        Try this instead– http://dalrock.wordpress.com/

        A little more your speed.

        Like


      • I disagree. You cannot learn calibration by avoiding this type of girl or that type of girl. He’s gotta take every opportunity. Besides, she sounds hot. What’s the harm?

        Like


      • > “What’s the harm?”

        Uhh, hhmmm.

        Let’s see here.

        Okay, maybe:

        1) Her husband owns a 12-gauge shotgun?

        2) Her husband’s favorite round of ammunition is the 00-Buckshot @ 1600 fps [cf the Hornady Law Enforcement catalogue]?

        3) Her husband finds out about this shiznat?

        4) Her husband & his 12-gauge shotgun blow [what had been] your fucking head right off of your shoulders?

        Rage Game FTW.

        Like


      • 15 Rules to Being the Other Guy, Zombie Shane.

        Shit this is on the Sidebar at YaReallyArchive. Come on man, you’re better than this!

        http://yareallyarchive.com/2012/3/#comment-heartiste-320044

        Like


      • Uhh, have you read through that thing?

        I just did.

        It appears that Ya Really is eminently well aware that his ass* could end up precisely like Tony Blundetto [Steve Buscemi] on that porch.

        It’s a shame that the Frankfurt School and the Mossad now pwn the CIA and the NSA, because there’s no doubt but that the CIA and the NSA could use a few sneaky little clandestine fuckers like Ya Really, with real world experience in actual life-threatening danger.

        *Or, more precisely, his skull.

        Like


      • if her husband was a gun owning badass willing to shoot another man for trespassing his property (wife) then I highly doubt she would be cheating in the first place.

        Like


      • Old School Game FTW.

        Like


      • lol this IS actually a part of it. If you extrapolate what that tells us about him and their relationship further, you get into why it’s not really a big risk and why he’ll be mad at a lot of other people (including himself) before he’s mad at the other guy.

        Like


      • > “If you extrapolate what that tells us about him and their relationship further, you get into why it’s not really a big risk and why he’ll be mad at a lot of other people (including himself) before he’s mad at the other guy.”

        And if you study probability theory, and learn what independent random variables are, and if you were to

        1) Assume that the binary variables “Husband will kill dude who fucks his wife – TRUE or FALSE” are independent over all husbands, and

        2) Assume that the probability of “TRUE” is constant over all husbands, and equals “1/n”,

        then the probability that you do NOT get killed is

        FIRST TIME: 1 – (1/n)

        SECOND TIME: (1 – (1/n))*(1 – (1/n))

        THIRD TIME: (1 – (1/n))*(1 – (1/n))*(1 – (1/n))

        … [“ellipsis”]

        Mth TIME: (1 – (1/n)) ^ M

        Now if you plug in some actual numbers, like, say:

        n = 25 [only 4% of husbands will kill your ass]

        1 – (1/n) = 0.96 [96% of them will let it slide]

        (0.96)^0 = 0.96
        (0.96)^1 = 0.9216
        (0.96)^2 = 0.884736
        (0.96)^3 = 0.84934656
        (0.96)^4 = 0.8153726976
        (0.96)^5 = 0.782757789696
        (0.96)^6 = 0.7514474781081599
        (0.96)^7 = 0.7213895789838335
        (0.96)^8 = 0.6925339958244802
        (0.96)^9 = 0.6648326359915009
        (0.96)^10 = 0.6382393305518408
        (0.96)^11 = 0.6127097573297672
        (0.96)^12 = 0.5882013670365764
        (0.96)^13 = 0.5646733123551133
        (0.96)^14 = 0.5420863798609088
        (0.96)^15 = 0.5204029246664724
        (0.96)^16 = 0.4995868076798135

        Then as of about your 16th escapade, you’re living on borrowed time.

        And if you move the probability all the way down to

        n = 100 [only 1% of husbands will kill your ass]

        1 – (1/n) = 0.99 [99% of them will let it slide]

        Then you’re looking at:

        (0.99)^0 = 0.99
        (0.99)^1 = 0.9801
        (0.99)^2 = 0.9702989999999999
        (0.99)^3 = 0.96059601
        (0.99)^4 = 0.9509900498999999
        … [“ellipsis”]
        (0.99)^65 = 0.5151371174238033
        (0.99)^66 = 0.5099857462495653
        (0.99)^67 = 0.5048858887870696
        (0.99)^68 = 0.4998370298991989

        And as of about your 68th escapade, you’re living on borrowed time.

        Now the cynic – which is to say, the empiricist – would try to tally up all of the “love triangle” murders each year, and also make an estimate of extramarital flings by the married ladies each year, and then work backwards so as to figure out the correct values for “n” and “1 – (1/n)”.

        At any rate, the Bottom Line, at least from the Playa’s Point of View, is:

        ELLIPSIS GAME FTL.

        PS: Those same kinds of basic probabilistic calculations [ASSUMING INDEPENDENCE] also work to calculate the probability that you will NOT come into contact with a venereal disease.

        So that, if, say, there’s a 4% incidence of venereal disease amongst the candidate population for your would-be lady friends, then after about your 16th lay, your dick is already living on borrowed time.

        Like


      • Well Zombie, That would be enuf to ruin my day

        Like


      • I could tell you how and why most husbands ACTUALLY react when they find out their wife has been cheating on them, and I can tell you the general psychological manipulation that wives use to turn everything back around on the husband till he blames himself instead of the other guy…but it would depress you too much because you’re very clearly happy living in your fantasy Hollywood world.

        It’s a risk, but it’s a very low risk. Just like when you start talking to taken girls and realize every boyfriend ISN’T going to shout “stay away from my girl!!!” and slug you in the face.

        I’m not saying her hubby won’t kill him, it’s just a really minimal chance. He could get killed by a jealous friend-zoned Orbiter for hitting on a single girl too tho, so really unless you’re just staying in your basement avoiding women entirely, there’s always a risk involved.

        Also @darkhorse read that 15 Rules shit linked above.

        Like


      • > “I could tell you how and why most husbands ACTUALLY react when they find out their wife has been cheating on them, and I can tell you the general psychological manipulation that wives use to turn everything back around on the husband till he blames himself instead of the other guy…”

        But that’s precisely SWPL beta herbling manboob brow-beaten broken-souled culture-of-guilt nice-guy loser-ism in a nut shell.

        Two things which would be really fascinating:

        1a) A formal psychological profile of dudes who will NOT kill you if they find out about you.

        1b) A formal psychological profile of dudes who WILL kill you if they find out about you.

        2a) A formal psychological profile of BITCHES who WILL cheat.

        2b) A formal psychological profile of BITCHES who will NOT cheat.

        My guess is that you [YaReally] would say that 1a) & 2a) are largely married to one another, and that 1b) & 2b) are largely married to one another

        I guess what would be the most important for the sneaky little snake-in-the-grass mother-fucker would be to develop a solid highly-accurate psychological profile of bitches who like to marry killer-dudes but whose addiction to danger is so strong that they still can’t resist the urge to cheat.

        Like


      • I know what Secret Society is, thank you very much. Problem is, as you can see, it gives newbies an excuse for an half-assed approach: “I have to make sure she knows that I know, let’s take it slow!”. When in reality this Secret Society is highly idealised (you gotta sell that dream man), and not as present as it is described by TD. It’s a terrible concept for a serious approach of game, but I’m sure it’s great marketing (literally gaming your customers).

        Like


      • @darkhorse
        All the negative replies like this are WHY you’re high-value to her. Because you “get it” while the other guys are focusing on all the things that could go wrong and all their personal baggage and not calibrating to her situation (“don’t take it slow, just plow through!! Slap her in the face with your dick and say suck it bitch!!!!!!! and if she’s like “oh I’m in bed with my husband right now” just say “gay” and next that slut!!!” lol) instead of just assuming this is all fine and natural and it’ll be a fun time both both parties…which is the attitude that a guy who does this a lot has. 😛

        Like


      • Thank you for that link. It explains much.

        It’s like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion or The Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk for the game community. Truthers, birthers, anti-inoculators, Crack Was Invented by the CIA, now this. High paranoia devoured by chodes gazing from behind the velvet rope. And an anti-criticism defense built right in! If you laugh at the absurd conspiracy, that just means you haven’t been invited.

        Fifty-two percent. Which means Amanda Marcotte, Whoopi Goldberg, and Honey Boo-Boo’s mom are members, but not 96% of men.

        The problem with “secret societies” is that people love to spill secrets. And the first truther from a society that makes up over half the population is one formerly mulleted Owen Cook from Moose Falls, Saskatchewan.

        I understand that it is a learning tool to motivate the denizens of Rising Chumpistan. To make a student strive for acceptance in a club that wouldn’t have him can focus the mind. But the premise is so absurd that it plays better as satire, and anyone with half an ounce of unborrowed confidence is going roar his head off with laughter.

        The reconstructed omega is supposed to transcend the very idea of insiders and outsiders, to found a new sphere of influence, rather than grovel for the acceptance of others (especially flaky broads), and most of all, not sublimate that bad old paranoia into new forms.

        The kind of people who dream up these fantastical exclusive clubs are those who have been psychologically branded in their formative years by being excluded. The rest of us understand implicitly that the need for “secrecy” at the highest levels is superfluous and a bother. The lower classes exclude themselves, and the “new money” social strivers who were not to the manor born stick out like the oblivious impostors they are.

        A “player” would enter that scene and blow it right the fuck up, not seek ways to become a court eunuch serving at the pleasure of a gaggle of bitches whose intrasexual dynamics couldn’t sustain a secret — much less a society — any longer than it normally takes one broad to backstab another in pursuit of a man, which is to say, at the speed of a smirk.

        I am sure the coolguy applicants-in-waiting will fill me in on what I’m missing.

        Matt

        Like


      • You’re just showing your hand again Matt lol Stick to the religion debates.

        Like


      • Yeah, and you think you can bluff me out of that hand full of aces.

        Know when to fold ’em, son.

        Like


      • Heh, heh… imagine that… goober-bling-cap shilling for the Secret Society of All-Dees-Bishes-Fuck-Everyone-But-YOU!

        Do the guys get to wear a fez, or is that ridiculous lid he wears the club’s trademark?

        At least the Protocols make sense and, as the late great Henry Ford once remarked: “They fit!”

        Like


      • Sorry, but I’ve crossed paths with the “Secret Society” crowd several times, enough to believe that there is a sub-sub-sub-strata of society which is disgusting beyond our wildest nightmares.

        The couple swapping is what really sickens me – I’ve even heard about the swinging couple-swappers crowd arranging their hookups in one-anothers’ private residential homes, with the little children asleep in their bedrooms down the hall.

        Those fuckers – who endanger children – should all be summarily executed.

        Also, there is a version of couple-swapping where instead of a hetero-swap, the wives go all dyke on each other and the husbands go all sodomite on each other.

        It’s similar to a phenomenon which I was warning somebody about recently[YaReally? Scray? YeahOK?] – that if you hang with these “Super Alphas” who can’t keep it in their pants, and who insist on banging two or three bitches a day, then eventually you’re gonna discover that those dudes will get bored with the poontang and they’ll only be able to get it up at the thought of buggering their wingman in his posterior.

        In politics, you saw just a glimpse of this in the 2004 Illinois Senate race, when Axelrod got one of his Jew cousins in California to open up the sealed divorce proceedings of GOP candidate Jack Ryan and his trophy wife, actress Jeri Lynn Ryan [“Seven of Nine”] – Jack had been trying to get Jeri to work the “Secret Society” racket with him when she divorced him:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ryan_(politician)

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeri_Ryan

        Ryan dropped out of the race, a state senator named Barack Obama cruised to victory, and the rest is history.

        The supreme irony there is that we now know that it was Barry [and his wingman, Rahm “The Ballerina” Emanuel] who was part of Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity Church posse of “On-the-Down-Low” swingers at Man’s Country Chicago.

        And that Trinity Choir Director Donald Young had to be murdered to keep it all hush-hush:

        http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?id=5854125

        I’m beginning to suspect that the Bush family might actually run in these circles, as well.

        That there might be something to all these rumors of the Skull-n-Bones crowd paddling one another in the nude at Yale.

        That it might not be a coincidence that GHWB-41 appointed the known sodomite David Souter to the Supreme Court, and that GWB-43 then appointed the known sodomite John Roberts as Chief Justice.

        That there might be something to the rumors of all these old white dudes running around naked and barking at the moon during Bohemian Grove.

        That the reason Barbara Pierce Bush has never had a boyfriend is that she caught the “Jodi Foster” disease at Yale [or maybe she had the “Jodi Foster” disease before she even arrived at Yale]:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Pierce_Bush

        Finally, see also “Super Alpha” Dick Cheney’s bulldyke daughter, Mary:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Cheney

        Plenty of “Secret Society” filth right there in broad daylight, if only people care to notice.

        Like


      • If you’d like to learn more about this secret society, just click on this link and receive a special 50% off!

        Like


    • If you want some Secret Society cred and she’s near Tampa, tell her a guy you know and his stripper girlfriend are going to Eyez Wide Shut swingers club Thursday night for his birthday, and are willing to show her around the club, and have her shoot me an email at [email protected]

      Like


      • Also don’t use details like that she’s going to Florida when you do these Field Reports. Just say she’s out of town. We don’t need to know where exactly she is because shit like this happens…I’m sure Dirk is probably some nice trustworthy dude, but it’s not your place to bring any other people into her shit. And you never know when someone will be reading and go “hey, my buddy’s wife just went to Florida for xmas…….” and start digging.

        Make the specifics vague, you’re fucking with a marriage here.

        Like


    • @darkhorse
      “First strategy telegraphs “I’m Secret Society”; Second strategy telegraphs “I’m just one of countless club pick up boy trying to run game that haven’t reached Secret Society status yet.””

      Right. There are times where it’s appropriate to remind her who you are and stuff, but when she views you as Secret Society it’s like meeting a girl at a super high-end exclusive club…you don’t have to DHV like you would at a normal club because just BEING THERE is a DHV. Just BEING Secret Society in her eyes makes you higher value than 99% of the men she met that night, so she won’t forget you and you don’t have to do as much work, you know?

      “Wondering how to progress with this, YR”

      Text her back ASAP: “cool, we’ll hang when you get back”

      Don’t play hard to get, you’re not woo’ing a single girl who has a bunch of options to play off eachother…she doesn’t offer this to every random guy she meets ’cause normal guys would freak out and bring her drama and judge her etc., she knows you’re Secret Society so she needs to know if you’re in or out.

      But the txt I wrote above is also ambiguous, it assumes the sale (“we WILL hang” VS “do you want to hang out when you get back?”) but it’s not specific enough to be too needy (“you get back on the 12th? can we hang out on the 13th?? is the 15th better?? let me know! :)”), and it doesn’t specific who’s supposed to contact who when she gets back (vs “I’ll txt you when you get back!” or “txt me when you get back!”) which leaves her hanging when she gets back because she’ll be thinking “am I supposed to text him now? what if he doesn’t text me? maybe he’s moved on…but he would’ve been a good lay…I’ll just send a little text to let him know I’m back and see if he takes it from there.”

      So when she gets back she’ll send you a “hey I’m back in town lol”

      Don’t expect to hear from her while she’s gone, like you probably won’t hear from her till a couple days after she gets back, maybe even a week, December is a busy month for people so it’s hard to guess…you may not get the lay during Dec, depending on how the season fucks with her emotions/guilt if she does family shit with her hubby etc. But if that happens, it’ll pass in Jan and she’ll still be horny and txt you again lol

      Anyway, when you get that “hey i’m back in town” text, you wait an hour or two (not too long, since she’s going to txt you when her hubby isn’t around, so like don’t wait a day or two), and see when she’s free with like a “cool welcome back.” and try for a meet-up.

      You can probably go a bit flirty and throw in an “cool welcome back. I talked to Santa while you were gone and he said we’re (the “we’re” is setting an “us VS them” frame) on the naughty list.” and calibrate to how she responds. If she lol’s and plays along flirting back, that means you can be flirty/sexual with her over txt. If she lol’s but brushes it off without playing along, that means no more being sexy, stick to just arranging a meet-up like a business transaction, ’cause that goes back to calibrating to whether she’s cautious about her text conversations or not…I’d guess she’ll like flirting ’cause she’s done this before so she’s pro at hiding her txts from her hubby by now I’m sure. One of my girls used to txt me dirty shit while literally sitting on the couch beside her hubby watching TV together lol

      So to recap:

      1) respond with “cool, we’ll hang when you get back” right now

      2) don’t txt her while she’s on vacation, she’s doing other shit right now, but she DOES want to fuck ’cause she said it’s “too bad” you can’t hang out. That’s the signal that she wants to bone ASAP (also the faster you guys bone the less chance of her getting strings attached aka feelings, so you can move efficient on this, you don’t need 2hr txt convos building comfort/rapport etc.). She’d probably sext with you while she’s on vacation, but that doesn’t benefit you in any way…that’s just you having to type a bunch of shit with no chance of getting any actual lay out of it, AND risk triggering ASD or giving away the milk for free, so don’t do it. If she tries to initiate sexting (it’s possible), get into it a little bit, but then leave her hanging with a “we’ll finish this story in person when you get back. 😉 I have work to do and you’re a distraction…but a fun distraction lol”

      3) don’t expect to hear from her till a few days after she’s back (the closer to when she gets back that she txts you, the hornier she is, the more aggressively you can push for a meetup)

      4) when you hear from her, throw her a “cool, welcome back. I talked to santa while you were gone and he said we’re on the naughty list.” to test for flirty/sexual texting (it’s okay now because she’s back in town so it can lead to a meet-up, whereas on vacation you can’t physically arrange a meet-up so it’s a waste)

      5) push for the meet-up ASAP and have fun. Be smart, be safe, don’t reveal anything about yourself that you don’t have to, and just act like you do this all the time and it’s no big deal.

      If she rejects meeting up it’s only because she has to work around her hubby and she just needs you to be cool with not freaking out or getting butt-hurt or guilting her or pushing too hard if she can’t meet up or has to flake. Just brush it off as “cool, it’s all good, we’ll try again next time you’re free” like you totally understand that she has an unpredictable schedule to juggle to make this happen.

      Like a lot of guys will push hard like “let’s meet friday” “I can’t my hubby’s here” “gay. just sneak out” because they read that you have to push for the meet-up with girls and don’t calibrate to her situ, and INSTANTLY they’re done in her mind, because that tells her “okay this guy doesn’t GET that I have to be sneaky about this”. Maybe if you were Brad Pitt but 1) you’re not and 2) even then she’s weighing one bang (that might not even be any good) against the complete chaos and drama implosion of her everyday life, so it’s a low % play.

      You want to be that guy that’s like “you’re free this weekend? cool, we’ll hang. oh your hubby came home and you have to flake? all good, we’ll try again another time”. Like you’re always assuming it’ll EVENTUALLY happen (vs “look if you don’t want to meet up you can just say it” or “gay” or “it’s okay, do you want to try again sometime?” or “what about tuesday? wednesday? next weekend maybe?”). Just vague and open-ended until she lets you know she’s free and then you make it happen.

      This is still all a green-light to me. I don’t forsee any problems banging her, probably the weekend that she gets back, depending on when her hubby is away…he may go away to visit family for xmas or something, who knows? She’ll let you know when she’s available…

      Ordinarily you don’t meet a woman on her terms because it’s a trap (she invites you somewhere where she has a bunch of Orbiters etc.) but this situ is different because she’s cheating and she just wants reliable drama-free cock, not to play mind-games like a ditzy 18yo single club-girl lol

      Like


      • @yareally

        Thanks. Followed your advice. she followed up minutes later, sending me a picture of where she’s presently staying, showing me it’s beautiful weather.

        On the surface that’s a neutral response, but I took this as a sign she’s investing more into the conversation now, so dropped a little sexual innuendo about the sunshine. She totally ate it up. Said her body needs a lot more than a sun tan. I told her to watch out because Santa might bring her a bigger packaged than she expected. She said she was on the naughty list so that’s fine. I could amp it up a little more, but for now I’ll just wait for her to text when she returns and she can have something to think about when she’s on vacation.

        Like


      • Solid. Beautifully done.

        I suspected you could go a little flirtier because her txt naming the club would’ve been something like “darkhorse? From last weekebd?” Where it could be ambiguous if intercepted (maybe it’s her friend’s brother she met at their luncheon etc), thus my recommending dropping a naughty Santa like to test the waters.

        Wasn’t expecting her to keep the convo going so soon so that’s a huge ioi and you did good calibrating to that and not ignoring her, and escalating things. Perfectly played.

        Now do exactly as you plan to and wait for her to get back instead of getting into a sexting thing. You could probably get her sending naked pics…her sending a scenery pic is her way of saying she’s cool with sending pics which means you could have dropped an “I’m sure there are more interesting things there that you could be sending me pics of…”, BUT:

        1) pics are amateur hour, you want sex not a long distance text-fest. Don’t waste your time with that shit cause it gives her too much validation and can trigger ASD when it comes to actually meeting up, and it makes you look desperate VS “don’t you want a pic of my pussy?” “I’ll see it in person.” where instead of jumping at it like every other guy would, you come off more like a guy who’s already seen a thousand pussy pics and is almost bored of it.

        2) getting her off releases the sexual tension. That’s the cow giving the milk away for free. You’re her FUCK-buddy, not SEXT-buddy or phone-sex buddy. The less you give her, the more she’ll be dying to see you when she gets back.

        3) girls love laying around sexting all day cause they get off on text/imagination (thus 50 Shades selling like crazy) but guys want to actually be in the same room fucking. So when she’s on the other side of the country sexting you, which of you is getting what they want and which of you isn’t, you know?

        Anyway, solid stuff all around. Don’t build a bunch of comfort and tell her personal shit about you that can be used to track you down if her hubby reads her txts, she’s attracted enough to bang you already. And for the love of god don’t send her any pics, dirty or otherwise.

        Like


    • Uh dude, why are you worried about appearing clingy to this adulterous slut. I’m going save you from having to read yareallys 20 page arm chair general report, and tell you how to fuck this hoe no ifs ands or buts. If you’ve been paying any attention to CH, you’ll recall he talks about The Dark Triad. The one often overlooked trait is machiavellianism, if this hoe starts to push one week into two weeks or claims “OMG ur too clingy”, send this bitch a text reminding her you have incriminating texts of her planning to cuckold hubby and if she don’t take your dick you’ll ruin her. Now you’re running real secret society (fbi, cia, illuminati) game.

      Like


  4. Moe, Curly, and Shemp.

    Like


    • But without the nyuks.

      Like


      • I wonder if these womyn have avatars on second life? hot babe avatars where they run around getting fucked and treated like whores…maybe technology will save them from their sick, angry existence..isnt that the real issue? thier invisibility to any man of value?

        Like


      • > “their sick, angry existence… thier invisibility to any man…”

        I know that Heartiste is working on this Darwinian thesis which holds that

        HIDEOUS => EVIL

        But I’m a romantic. I feel like

        EVIL => HIDEOUS

        I’d like to believe that even the more homely of these chicks could score a husband [and plenty of children by him] if she kept herself in shape and if she was a good cook, and if she had a warm, kind, gentle, loving heart.

        And, of course, if she fucked like a tigeress in heat.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 9:00 am The Burninator

        Since they passed away America has seen a large amount of nyukular disarmament.

        Like


      • Most droll.

        Like


  5. Does anyone actually listen to these feminists anymore anyway?

    Like


    • Politicians do. Every time they come up with some new definition of DV or rape, no matter how abstract or absurd, it becomes law.

      Like


    • the whole Cathedral, including academia and education.

      Like


    • The comments sections on a lot of NY Post and other outlets read by “normal” people seem to be filled with real talk these days, in particular they’re giving Kubrick’s 2001 “monkey + bone” treatment to feminist subjects.

      Like


  6. Another article underscoring this point by Camille Paglia – always provacative.

    “It’s a Man’s World, And It Always Will Be”

    “The modern economy is a male epic, in which women have found a productive role—but women were not its author.”

    “Is it any wonder that so many high-achieving young women, despite all the happy talk about their academic success, find themselves in the early stages of their careers in chronic uncertainty or anxiety about their prospects for an emotionally fulfilled private life? When an educated culture routinely denigrates masculinity and manhood, then women will be perpetually stuck with boys, who have no incentive to mature or to honor their commitments. And without strong men as models to either embrace or (for dissident lesbians) to resist, women will never attain a centered and profound sense of themselves as women.”

    http://ideas.time.com/2013/12/16/its-a-mans-world-and-it-always-will-be/#ixzz2ng4zpa9w

    Like


  7. Unleashing female power weakens everybody. If it submits to masculine power…it strengthens everyone.

    War and peace.

    Like


  8. Imagine that… I thought only the Nah-zees and bigoted Xtians destroyed books.

    Like


    • Muslims too. Along with burning the authors…

      Like


    • on December 16, 2013 at 3:38 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      You’ve touched on something rather important here, Greg: the great liberal mental illnesses of solipsism and projection.

      Liberals love to accuse conservatives of banning, censoring and destroying books, despite the fact that here in the U.S., with the protection of the First Amendment, it pretty much never happens. So why do they talk that way? Because, given the tiniest chance to do so, *that’s what they would do.* That’s why they assume you’d do the same.

      It’s not just books; it’s everything. Got in a gun-control discussion with a male liberal a couple of months ago, who was arguing that concealed-carry laws will result in lots of random murders. Now the facts show the exact opposite—every single state that has passed a CCW law has seen crime rates go down—but instead of telling him that, I asked him why he thought so.

      “Because,” he explained, “the next time some guy gets mad at me in traffic, he could just shoot me.”

      “Why do you think people would shoot you over a minor traffic dispute?” I asked. “Would YOU shoot somebody for cutting you off, or flipping you the Bird?”

      “Well…no…but I’ve wanted to…”

      They can’t control themselves. They can’t control their tempers, their need for power, their desire to silence their enemies…so they assume we can’t either.

      Like


      • Shh. All ideas are okay except for the ideas they don’t like. But those are wrong, and nobody should have access to them anyway. Shh. They’re here to help.

        Like


      • I agree. It’s projection.

        Like


      • I posted somethign like this a month or two ago- American-style lefties have a lot more in common with Bolsheviks than they think they do. Once you’ve convinced yourself that your ides, and yours alone, will create Utopia on earth, a City on a Hill, then any steps to stamp out dissenting ideas is justified. All you need are a few million deaths in frozen labor camps to get there.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 1:17 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

        “more in common than they think”
        Is it that they’re all cousins?

        Like


      • Steve Sailer summed up the “that’s what they would do” observation nicely:

        The Left’s big worry is that their repressed feelings will avalanche if triggered: “If [ politically inconvenient but true fact ] turns out to be true, then…oh, no, the Nazis were right! So if Americans ever become embarrassed by the insipid political correctness we instruct them to spout, they will immediately thaw out Hitler’s cryogenically preserved brain and elect it president. Or something.”

        Like


    • The most amusing political movement today is Boko Haram.

      Like


  9. … and yet, many of these feminists have copies of “50 Shades of Grey” under their pillows.

    Still, the “women like humiliation for the greater good” passage is much too strong to resonate with many women. I wonder if “humiliation” is a fair translation of what she wrote… as opposed to “led” or “dominated”.

    Like


    • on December 16, 2013 at 4:57 pm Theodore Logan

      50 shades of rape. heh!

      Like


    • Or ‘humbled’.

      Like


      • Yes! Humbled is much better.

        Like


      • As CH quoted in the OP, the author (or at least the translation of the author) is referring to ‘humility’ as a quality women should aspire to. Logically, ‘humiliate’ should be the verb form of ‘humility’. But in the way we connote the words, ‘humble’ is a better verb for ‘humility’ than ‘humiliate’.

        Like


    • I openly stated in my online dating profile for the first time this year, in a clear but decorous manner, that I practice a dominant style sexually. Response rates immediately tripled. Even the women I’ve dropped have returned, and returned again, and returned yet again. Now, my dating cohort is educated and professional. I would say that almost all of them would loudly protest any call to behave submissively or in any subordinate fashion to a man. But if sexual behavior is the truest metaphor, there’s a freight car of meaning here.

      Like


      • Interesting. From a female perspective, it’s “safer” to respond to a man who says he’s dominant sexually than to a man who says he wants a submissive woman. Even though I know men generally want a submissive woman, I’d be hesitant to respond to a profile that put it out there so bluntly. “Submissive” can mean different things to different people.

        Like


      • My guess at this:

        Him saying he’s dominant = your fantasy (ie – he’s the fantasy for you)

        Him saying he wants a submissive woman = his fantasy (ie – you’re the fantasy for him)

        It’s “safer” for you to respond to the first guy because the visual you imagine of the two of you matches whatever fantasies you have about a man being dominant so it feels like you know what to expect and it’s exciting instead of scary.

        With the second guy, you don’t know what he thinks submissive means so you don’t know what to expect and it’s more scary than exciting because what if he’s into fucked up shit lol

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 11:39 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Yes…him stating that he is dominant sexually doesn’t mean that he’ll attempt to dominate you in other areas of your life. When I hear “I want a submissive woman,” I get a mental image of a guy who thinks his wife ought to walk three steps behind him.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 12:13 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Snerk.

        But yeah, that’s pretty close to the mental image I get.

        Like


      • You just know that thwack thinks there’s a n166er in that woodpile.

        Like


      • You just know that thwack thinks there’s a n166er in that woodpile.

        It’s a picture from Albania, so it could very well be true.

        Like


      • I propose a new word: Ger, pronounced ’gər, as shorthand for the more offensive and somewhat comical ‘n166er.’

        It can be employed in noun or gerund form:

        Examples:

        There’s too many ger(s) here, let’s bail.

        Damn ger stole my bicycle.

        These whiggers are gering the place up, load my shotgun.

        thwack, is there, in fact, a ger in the woodpile?

        Like


      • Unnecessary reinvention of the wheel.

        I offer defintion #7 for your perusal.

        http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dan

        Been around a long time and gets the job done nicely. Use to run that shit @work with impunity when I was surrounded by DAN.

        Like


      • Pluviophile:

        Actually, a “ger” is a convert to judaism. You know, like whiskeysplace, nicole, and lily.

        Like


      • Nicole may be a convert… assuming her blog is real (big assumption, when it comes to the cogdis Sunstein sundowners)… but them other two are dyed-in-the-wool, to-the-kibbutz-born usual suspects.

        Like


      • For the record, I did not convert. People in Israel have the right to marry people of different faiths in countries where there is civil marriage. Official marriage or not, cohabitants have the same rights as spouses if they are able to make a case for it.

        …not saying it will be problem free, but still.

        Like


      • And that’s the stain of feminism writ large on nearly every woman’s conscious today. The equating of a submissive woman to a doormat, instead of the formerly understood concept of a woman in a relationship where the man wears the public face of the relationship.

        Most of those guys we hear terrible things about from the 1950’s and prior would have their hind ends chewed off by their “submissive” wife if he put his feet on the furniture or tracked mud into the house, and of course he’d be beaten with a rolling pin for coming in drunk at midnight (just think back to the stereotype we all know), yet when out in public he was the face of the family that was dealt with. Submissive did not mean being weak and powerless. Different roles in different contexts. A family with 2 different public faces is not a family it’s a budding hydra with conflicting constantly battling heads.

        Like


      • Yes. Submission has become an unbelievably loaded word. I’m submissive in relationships and that’s what I want, but even I have trouble just coming out and saying it, because I’ve been taught to believe that it’s degrading and I’m inviting abuse. That’s the indoctrination.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 12:22 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        All good points, Burninator, the only (very minor) quibble being that it’s not written on nearly every woman’s consciousness…it’s on her subconscious. Down deep, the place from which mental images like mine spring.

        And what’s interesting, what we can pick apart here, is that many of these feminists would have no problem at all with the relationship framed in a purely sexual manner—the relationship between a dom and a sub. When you frame it that way, you’ll get “It’s nobody’s business but theirs, if that’s what they like to do.” Which is all well and good. But re-frame it as a way of life, and they start destroying books in public.

        (Which? By the way? Dumbest protest ever. Do they not realize that the author gets paid for those books no matter what they do with them? That the sight of that picture probably sends her weeping all the way to the bank?)

        Like


      • this comment sums it up nicely.

        Like


      • I’ve known many marriages in which the wife wore the pants. I can say that without exception those woman were not happy in their relationships.

        Like


      • oooo, better response. I was thinking purely sexually lol

        Like


      • When I hear “I want a submissive woman,” I get a mental image of a guy who thinks his wife ought to walk three steps behind him.

        Apropos:

        Then you’re “imagining” us wrong. Who said anything about “against their will”? You are a pristine case of feminist mind-rot, running from the phantoms of your fears rather than considering the actual deal in front of you.

        Indeed.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2013 at 11:33 am RappaccinisDaughter

        I don’t have a problem with people living that way, if it’s what they want. It’s none of my business and—what’s more—I wouldn’t be able to find a shit to give even if it was.

        As for myself, I have indeed considered the “actual deal” in front of me. I decline.

        Like


      • Submissive girls are objective forms, irrelevant to the relation of dominance. Men are to dominate the relationship or both are to suffer the consequences as nature panics that its male counterpart is superfluous. Achilles was submissive to Agamemnon, even if grudgingly, because of the status as a titular head. Achilles from any objective standard would not be considered submissive.

        Like


      • I’ve dated two feminists in my life. First one was the only girl I’ve been with who requested that I simulate raping her. She was hot. Second one was in bed with me when she saw the first one’s sex toys and lost her shit that I was with another woman. She left that evening, but then she hounded me with phone calls rationalizing why we needed to be together, trying to win me. These were “educated” professional women as well.

        Like


  10. Mama Mia!!! Pasta Fazoole!!!

    Like


  11. May the collapse happen soon.

    Like


  12. Here is a link to the guy who says “A Man Wants a Wife, Not a Co-Worker” :

    http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/02/20/a-man-wants-a-wife-not-a-co-worker/

    Like


  13. women behave like this naturally if they believe you are high value. Either increase ur value or leave the relationship if they aren’t behaving this way.

    Like


    • This is a myth. Screen carefully if looking for a wife. Look at Hillary/Bill. It’s one reason men take mistresses.

      Like


      • correct. once you attain value it becomes yours forever and you can waaaayyy over do it. like a man who makes money once always knows how to make it again. Bill’s been a baller his whole life, and as far as partners go Hillary aint bad but he ain’t digging her cankles. But he ain’t getting those bangy-bang feelings for her.

        Watch House of Cards fro how this is done properly.

        screening for the actual value in a female already assumes yours and instead focuses on tangibles for a good partnership. romantic feelings are a byproduct of a good union at best, a sophomoric Madonna/whore-American college campus-true love circle jerk at worst.

        mistresses are for the lust/love, wives for the kids and longevity. who knows though, you might get both if you are lucky.

        of course, this was understood in every culture prior to the last 60 years or so, and the philosophically challenged need to swallow the red one all the way down and let it do it’s necessary buzz saw damage to their ego’s, expectations, and views of reality.

        Like


      • I find Hillary revolting. But you make a good point, you have to screen for a good mother too. Your kids will appreciate it, eventually.

        Like


      • Yeah I guarantee Bill is henpecked to death.

        Like


      • lol they have a purely business/contractual relationship. I doubt he even sees her more than 30 nights a year. at functions.

        Like


      • what, exactly is the myth? you disagree that when a women believes her man is higher value she will defer to him?

        Like


      • Sure, women defer to men who assert themselves. Even a sweet, deferential, submissive, thin woman can drive you batshit insane, from something as innocuous as incessant babbling. You have about a 10-15% chance of ending up with this. I suppose you can go the bitch-smacking route to find some sanity, and that’s what some “Alphas” do. It’s so easy to avoid though. It turns out that certain personalities don’t get along well in the long run despite your Alpha. Study Jungian personality, specifically Socionics. I don’t even bother with most types, which narrows my choices to 10-15% of the bangable population if looking for a long term. Short term, any personality is fine. Just know ahead of time whether she passes this screen. Yet with practice you can become a connoisseur, as some types you’ll find delicious. When you do, you still have a plethora, because they are predictable and easy to spot, and with experience, easy to bed with precision game munitions when you know her special snowflake type. You just have to have the will to turn her away when the time comes, if not a match.

        Also, never believe you can alpha/dominate a woman into total loyalty. The only difference between Alpha/Beta on that score is that a woman will rather brazenly cuckold a Beta in disgust as CH points out and hide an affair from an Alpha out of fear. The reason is she feels the same conflict of a clashing personality, in my opinion, even though she already has alpha. Trust me, there are some very clueless Alpha husbands out there and hypergamy affects them too, and not in meaningless ways.

        Like


      • be kind.he is learning.

        Like


      • ya but this is just you talking about oranges when im talking about apples. there are other qualities besides submissiveness, shure…but submissiveness is the quality we are honing in on. And from what I read here, it seems as tho u agree that women will defer to a higher value man. whether that woman’s basic personality is something a man can put up with is another story altogether.

        Like


      • I disagreed that there are circumstances a woman will not defer to her man and wholly submit even if she perceives him as higher value, and I told you what some of them were. Take it or leave it. This is hard-won experience, but go ahead and re-invent the wheel. Alpha is a great thing to be, but it’s not everything you apparently think it is..

        Like


      • Take it or leave it. This is hard-won experience, but go ahead and re-invent the wheel. Alpha is a great thing to be, but it’s not everything you apparently think it is..

        Interesting point.

        Like


      • I have to agree, there is no such thing is “marriage game”.

        Once you get married, you’re a beta.

        Like


    • Out, damned spot!

      Like


    • Yep.

      Here is a Top 10 List of Tells for When a Woman Believes a Man Has Higher Value. Feel free to add, based on your experience.

      1) Will cook for him and think of new meals he will like. She will spend a fair amount of time trying new things and getting feedback from him.
      2) Will be down to watch whatever movie with him that he is into. Even if it is the 3rd gangster flick in a row
      3) Will try on new lingerie for him at his request
      4) Will try on new lingerie for him without his request
      5) Will constantly want validation to see if what she is doing is OK. For example, if the man affirms that the woman cooked a great meal, it will have made her day.
      6) Will never turn him down for sex unless she is on her period
      7) Will always be down for a blowjob and will feel bad asking for some reciprocation. She doesn’t want to appear demanding
      8) Will not be able to articulate when she is upset with her man. She doesn’t want to say the wrong thing to upset him so the man has to read between the lines carefully.
      9) Will remember minutia about the relationship such as the date they first met, the type of shirt he first wore on the date, and trivial details that he needs to be careful to not be mistaken on.
      10) Will justify her lust and attraction for her man to her friends who may disapprove. This leads to some qualms as she wants to elevate the status of the relationship but is scared that the man will leave her if she presses to far.

      Like


      • I think that’s about right mate, all of em.

        and it’s so damn cute and endearing when girls act like that.

        bonus11) your dick is her personal playtoy and neither of you would have it any other way nahmean

        Like


      • immoralgables: “Will never turn him down for sex unless she is on her period”

        And she ain’t too bothered about that either.

        Like


      • And these are also (some of) the rules for being a good girlfriend/wife. Except 9– unless I misread it. We don’t expect the guy to remember little milestones and details, so he doesn’t have to be careful he’s not mistaken about them. That’s completely girl stuff.

        Like


    • This is what I wan’t to know. Is it always up to the man and his dominance to make the woman submit, or does it depend on the willingness of the woman, which can be affected by her feminist beliefs for example, to submit to her man regardless of him being alpha or not. Optimally an alpha would be more successful at creating submission in a woman, but what if the woman has these “girl power” beliefs that keep her from submitting. If it’s always up to the man then a better book should be titled for example: “How to marry an Alpha male and keep him by being submissive”

      Like


    • This is what I want to know. Is it all the man’s responsibility to make the woman submit to him, or does it also depend on the willingness of the woman, which can be negatively affected by feminist beliefs for example, to submit to the man regardless of him being alpha or not. Can her “girl power” beliefs prevent her from submitting to a guy even if he is alpha?

      Like


      • Yes, but you don’t present it that way lol, at least not initially. If you display it as “I am alpha, and you will submit, wench!” then you will scare the girl away.

        Remember, alpha is a state of mind. There are certain things you do, certain shit tests you pass, certain times you walk away, certain sexual moves she won’t forget and sure enough she will be yours.

        Like


  14. Not sure the fertility link and general submissiveness is so strong. Consider Japan.

    Like


  15. I come to CH for the inside lingo. Those short statements are better than the ones that involve so much wordsmithenship to justify using the word queefly.

    Like


  16. My take on it is that as the EUSSR economy gets worse this viewpoint will make a comeback. Men are able to work harder, longer hours and even do physically demanding tasks, much much easier than women. Anyone ever spent time in an office full of women that was truly productive? Only if there was a somewhat-alpha male manager around. And even then, physical jobs like bringing in the boxes of paper for the copier or lifting anything was done by whatever men were around.

    Like


  17. Interesting that Spain is being repopulated by the offspring of previous Muslim conquers. Soon the fems will be in a different position (no pun).

    Like


  18. No wonder the women in the second picture are destroying the book. If they submitted, they’d be offing themselves.

    Like


  19. “Something will give, soon.”

    without doubt.

    Like


    • And when it does,
      The only thing that’s gonna matter is supplies and lead.

      Like


      • and the capacity for unsqueamish high order violence.

        Like


      • You get the vibe that some people could use less theorizing and more training?
        When the fall finally comes it’s going to be the law of nature.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 1:17 pm The Burninator

        I suspect many here do not have that capacity. Could be wrong, hope I am, but suspect I’m not. A few sociopaths perhaps, and ex-military (or current military), maybe some of the martial arts inclined (jury out on that one) possibly. Too many today think that violence is that thing you do in Modern Warfare 4 before you go to eat dinner.

        Like


      • In the scenario being described, it wouldn’t really matter because violence -will- find you one way or another. So you learn quickly or perish. Thus it has ever been since the beginning.

        Like


      • Some of us have actually fired the weapons from that game, believe it or not.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2013 at 5:31 am The Burninator

        Yeah Patriarch, myself for example. I was commenting on others. Personally, I’m former military and accept the necessity of violence in some situations. It’s why I carry in daily life actually.

        Plus, I do in fact own some of those weapons, heh. Tommygun, 91/30, Stg58, 1911A1, etc. Great fun.

        Like


  20. Honesty is best. If your girl’s eating habits become concerning, her breath less than satisfactory, the smell of her pussy too intense….Then micro-shame her into a state of submission. In my experience it doesn’t require much of a psychological prick to initiate a behavioral change in these creatures.

    Like


  21. I could have written this.

    Maybe I did. Dot dot dot

    Like


  22. I propose a memento mori to the feminist shrikes:
    Let a young, beautiful nubile girl walk behind and whisper in the ear of a phat, bitter domineering feminist cunt, the words “remember that even while you deny it, you need dick once in a while to feel good, so stay warm and friendly towards men lest you are denied that joy forever”.

    Like


    • Lol didnt you know hot girls actually do this already?

      Girls who get good dick know amongst themselves the ones who aren’t,
      Just like how women can smell your desperation a mile away. Most girls don’t even show up to the game because they know they’ll lose.

      I would feel sorry for feminists….if they didn’t preach from the altar of the devil. What they have done to bring about the ruination of the modern human family unit is so horrendous only the pure evil would endorse it.

      Anyways, women’s biggest enemy is other women, and when a woman can’t compete she puts the hatred on men (not their rivals) Online.

      That’s another thing, being online makes all of this hatred quite visible to us.

      Like


  23. Afterwards she wrote another one, “Sposala e muori per lei” (http://www.sonzognoeditori.it/varia/libro/4542533-sposala-e-muori-per-lei) (Marry her and die for her). Your mileage may vary. Its motto is “Uomini veri per donne senza paura” (Real men for women without fear).

    btw, “Cásate y sé sumisa” is the Spanish title, we filthy foreigners speak many different filthy foreign languages.

    …just teasing my American friends. Wouldn’t dare to piss off our monoglot overlords.

    Dang, there I went again, sorry…

    Like


    • on December 17, 2013 at 4:57 am The Burninator

      The need to speak various languages in these united States is non-existent. Human beings generally try to act rationally at a cultural level, there is simply no benefit to everybody being a polyglot when you can talk in Vermont and be understood in Montana. To consider this somehow as a weakness is rather absurd. Those who travel with any frequency generally pick up other languages out of necessity over time, just as Europeans do.

      Like


  24. Spain seems to me to be the the most fertile ground for The Cathedral in Europe.

    There is a proverb in Bosnia among the Christians that says: “The convert is always worse then the Turk.” There is a country in the heart of Europe that was fascist in the eyes of the entire “civilized” world until 1973. Like a new believer who has to sacrifice much more than any average Turk to prove his submission to Allah, so must an elite of an ex fascist and predominantly Catholic nation do much more to prove their submission to Harvard. I’m too lazy and tired too search for the links, but aren’t the Spanish the first who came to the idea of giving human rights status to monkeys, and arresting the Pope on charges of historical crimes? In France all the cool kids were commies since 1945. Britain – even BBC in 1968. was openly communist. When you’re so damn late to the party, you must do something really cool to be invited – and the Spanish are doing it really well.

    The most fanatical communist (and the biggest beta) I have ever met is a mathematical prodigy from Spain, child of university professors. He married a pregnant foreign woman, and accepted another mans child as his. After a few years, she dumped him, threw him out of his apartment and her new boyfriend moved in (20 years older, a retired cop, cold stare, left her in the end). Not only he pays her alimony, she uses him as a babysitter and an ATM machine for everything the kid needs. He insists that it’s her right, and becomes furious at every criticism of his behavior. There is no aspect of political correctness this guy won’t accept as true faith. None. He quotes Paul Krugman like a saint and has transgendered lefty journalists for friends. You can say that this guy might just be the most extreme example, but it’s more likely a symptom of the whole bell curve of political opinions shifting extremely to the left, and not just an individual lunatic.

    Like


    • I think that’s unfair to Krugman, hasn’t he restricted his comments to the need for easier monetary policy and higher taxes on the rich, and other economic topics? For that matter, much as I like GBFM writingzzz, I don’t see how Bernanke is such a bad guy either, he’s helped a lot of people keep their houses.

      Like


      • Bernanke is merely a symbol or avatar for the Fed in GBFM lore. I don’t think he bares any of these guys personal animosity. He realizes they are merely the pawns of greater powers. Read up on the Rothschilds and Illuminati to really get GBFM.

        Like


      • I am way ahead of that, not only have I read the internet stuff about the Rothschilds etc. like everyone else on the internet, I actually know what the Fed does at least in formal terms, unlike almost everyone else.

        Like


      • You need to look higher than the Rothschilds and Illuminati to find out who is really in control.

        Like


      • I didn’t think you believed in God. Supposedly, the Illuminati worship Lucifer if that’s what you mean. Otherwise, they control all the world’s central banks most of its resources, and most of its industry and media. It’s hard to get more control than that. Please explain.

        Like


      • I don’t believe,
        And neither do they. They’re a front group for their real masters, Legion. The Ones who won’t be named. The Frankfurt School…
        Take your pick. They are all the same and have been running Europe and by extension her colonies for a long, long time. They’ve been at the art of manipulating since the days of Constantine and they aren’t done yet. They play both sides of every fence they come across, and yes, they are watching the manosphere, being active participants of it.

        Like


      • Legion. Frankfurts. Those who shall not be spoken.Take your pick. They are all the same and have been running Europe and by extension her colonies for a long, long time. They’ve been at the art of manipulating since the days of Constantine and they aren’t done yet. They play both sides of every fence they come across, and yes, they are watching the manosphere, being active participants of it.

        Like


      • Bernanke? Two words: food inflation.

        Like


      • jesus fucking retard.

        what a grasseater.

        Like


      • Krugman is the saint protector of the Cathedrals Holy Order of Inflation. The guy I was talking about sees him as a bringer of wisdom, hope and light in this fallen capitalist patriarchal world, a sort of John the Baptist paving way for New Jesus (Obama).

        Like


    • Like a new believer who has to sacrifice much more than any average Turk to prove his submission to Allah, so must an elite of an ex fascist and predominantly Catholic nation do much more to prove their submission to Harvard. I’m too lazy and tired too search for the links, but aren’t the Spanish the first who came to the idea of giving human rights status to monkeys, and arresting the Pope on charges of historical crimes?

      They were also the first Southern European nation to approve gay marriage. (Neighboring Portugal, which like Spain was run by a Catholic military junta until the 1970s, was the second.) Quebec is another ex-Catholic nation that has gone crazy leftoid.

      For whatever reason, Italy, Poland, and Austria have not so much; most people there still believe in God and gay marriage hasn’t made any headway. And in Belgium, the Flemish are more Catholic whereas the Walloons are mostly leftoids. Perhaps a history of tangling with commies makes a nation of Catholics less tolerant of their idiocy, whereas if the commies appear to be on the same side as the Catholics, or at least a poor put-upon group (as in Iberia), they’re received with open arms.

      Like


      • Italy hasn’t seen any serious non-left movement since the 2nd world war. Poland was communist. Austria an Belgium are countries with predominantly mild adaptive people who don’t give much resistance to the destruction of tradition. Spanish, on the other hand, seem to have a need to repent for their relatively recent sins and embrace every form of ugliness, perversion and social pathology that might please ideological overlords. A part of the repentance is renouncing everything that might be interpreted as a legacy of a more reactionary time. That is why a Spanish intellectual must be a bigger puritan than an Austrian one.

        This may be just a wild guess, but I see no other explanation why are Spanish so quick in spreading the Gospel.

        Perhaps a history of tangling with commies makes a nation of Catholics less tolerant of their idiocy, whereas if the commies appear to be on the same side as the Catholics, or at least a poor put-upon group (as in Iberia), they’re received with open arms.

        I don’t agree with this. It’s not only that the average folk can’t see the connection between communism they experienced and leftism creeping from the west – the ugly truth is that whenever it’s been pointed out, the Cathedral brings it’s memetic artillery and destroys any attempt of a conversation. “Oh, yeah, gays are here to destroy marriage so we could have a one world communist government… I see you’ve been watching a lot of conspiracy theories on youtube lately.” It’s really easy to marginalize people and make their observations sound like a joke.

        You can say whatever you like about commies, but they’re not idiots. Even if you point out to the most idiotic individuals among them, it still doesn’t say anything about the genius of the whole hivemind.

        Like


      • “Italy hasn’t seen any serious non-left movement since the 2nd world war.”

        Google MSI and Lega Nord

        Like


  25. Hey CH isnt that author one of your readers?

    Like


  26. Marry a smokin’ Italian broad who gives you four children and writes a book about submission in marriage. Alpha.

    Like


  27. on December 16, 2013 at 4:43 pm Hugh G. Rection

    Dumbass feminists buying the book to destroy it. Yeah that’ll show her.

    Like


  28. “We [women] like humiliation because it is for a greater good.”

    The Communistic undertone aside she basically tells us all they like teasing, negs, and backhanded compliments. They improve who she is.

    And another beta man weeps that his praise and compliments mean nothing to women.

    Like


  29. Spanish women are the only Mediterranean females who are not very feminine and attractive. The women in the picture are very representative.

    That is why Spain is so dominant in soccer. Their women are so ugly and annoying that soccer is the only fun thing to do!

    Like


    • wut? Many Spanish women are beauuuuuutiful. They get the credit for when South Americans (with much Spanish blood) are so hot. See, e.g., Adriana Lima, Sofia Vergara, etc.

      Like


  30. On seeing your sweetness and your humility, your effort to change, this will also change him.

    See, this is how women have traditionally done it from time immemorial; use their femininity to give men what they want and get what they want in return. What’s wrong with this system that feminists hate so? Is it because they have to exercise a little bit of self-control?

    Like


    • Because they don’t have any femininity to manipulate men with. I’d feel pity if they weren’t such awful people.

      Like


      • This is what I don’t understand about women like this. If it’s not working for you, find something that does. Be positive about it. Why tear everything down around you?

        Like


      • Cynthia… they don’t want a man! Or at least a traditionally masculine man. That’s what’s so devastating about what feminism has become: it’s not just a question of teaching women what works to get a man, it’s also convincing them that they actually WANT and need a man.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 1:27 pm The Burninator

        Oh, most want a man, desperately. They fight with their teachings at every moment to deny it, but most want, lust for and crave an actual masculine man. Problem is that there are not many actual masculine men about any longer, so trying to convince women that their teaching is wrong is an uphill battle given the lack of reward that they see all around them every day.

        What’s good about the manosphere is that it is at least trying to awaken one part of being a man in what can only be jokingly referred to as “the male population”. And good for the manosphere for that, though in focusing on the narrow single minded goal they’re neglecting to instruct budding young men in the other aspects of being a masculine man, and in fact in many ways actively instructing pointless nihilism in all other aspects of manliness. But this is a new movement, there is time to improve it yet.

        Like


      • Huh? Oh, no, I wasn’t talking about wanting a man verses not (although yes, feminists have fucked this whole thing right to hell).

        It’s more that the second wave feminists were clearly not interested in being part of suburban 1950s culture. So why not just make themselves an alternative? Or, metaphorically speaking, why not move somewhere else, instead of burning the whole neighborhood to make themselves feel better?

        Like


      • The grievance is a current pleasure; alternatives take work and time.

        Like


      • Because that’s what women do. It’s why they need to be led by a men.

        Like


  31. There are a couple of key points here–the second more important than the first.

    First–the feminists are in full hysteria because they know–deep down, and also on the surface–that the advice given to women in the book is useful. Otherwise, they’d laugh it off.

    Second–and this should concern every single reader of this blog–is that the feminists know they can’t beat the arguments/advice in the book. Or even try. So instead, they ban the book. Or ban it indirectly, by saying it promotes hatecrime/genderviolence/racial tensions. Fill in the blank. The purpose is to outlaw ideas they don’t like because they cannot possibly win in the marketplace of ideas.

    This has already been successful too many places, particularly on college campuses here. And this must be resisted in all places at all costs. The promoters of these laws must be ridiculed and hounded whenever possible.

    Like


  32. Anybody would be so lucky to have a wife who looks like that when she’s 41.

    Like


  33. Ha, the Archbishop’s quote + the last few sentences made me realize that we should start calling abortion a “microaggression”

    Like


    • I consider abortion to be a blessing. It saves the taxpayer thousands in the long run.

      Like


    • on December 17, 2013 at 5:02 am The Burninator

      Ah, the economy of the Leftist, where human life is always the least value.

      Like


      • We all want women to take responsibility. Abortion is a form of responsibility since the woman wont be dependent on society to play daddy.

        Like


      • I’m really not interested in your argument for murder or your making the murder of a child into an economic issue. Sorry skippy. Siding with abortion is siding with feminists, destruction of the family and destruction of the Male in society. If that’s your goal, you have nothing to say that I’m interested in. If you’re simply ignorant or stupid, well, you still do not interest me in the least.

        Now go run along and play, I’m sure you have some plans to lay down for killing everybody who gets sick over the age of 70. It goes with the territory after all.

        Like


      • Mr. Burninator, you are a very smart man. You clearly have a great moral conscience and it will serve you well in life. Maybe one day I can be as successful as you. Until then, thank you for showing me morals.

        Like


    • LBF, just read that one. I’ve quoted her on my blog before, the rare feminist that doesn’t hate men. Now if she wasn’t so obsessed with helping third worlders…

      Like


    • I always respected Paglia for her intellectual honesty. For that matter I’ve agreed with a few lesbians. They don’t believe women’s shit, and I guess they’re enough like men to call it out.

      Like


  34. Two things have made the news here in Oz this week that have been great to watch from poolside.

    1. Fashion designer tells young girls to put away their burger bellies. Fem-cunts say don’t tell us what to wear.

    http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/collette-dinnigan-muffin-top-talk-sure-gets-a-rise-out-of-beck-welch/story-fnihsrf2-1226783621005

    2. The first season of LFL kicks off in Australia over the weekend. Fem-cunts, their hamsters in overdrive, claim it exploits women.

    https://www.change.org/petitions/stop-the-lingerie-football-league-in-australia

    Don’t tell us what to wear! But we’ll tell girls who freely choose to play LFL what to wear!

    Feminism is the name, cognitive dissonance is the game.

    Like


    • In the ‘states, LFL became (iirc) Legends Football League and they now wear pads and normal uniforms. 😦

      Can I be the equipment manager for one of your LFL teams? 🙂

      Like


  35. After being in relationship with him for nine years,he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to someone online and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he
    cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that
    he was so sorry for everything that happened, that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him, that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem and who is different from all the fake ones out there. Anybody could need the help of the spell caster, his email is ([email protected]) you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or anything.

    Like


  36. Dr. Toben says:

    When a Judge loses his objectivity, then the truism applies:

    Everything is religious, everything is political.

    Truth is no defence and legal railroading and a witchtrial mentality manifests itself – legal persecution, with which especially “Holocaust” Revisionists are familiar. This is illustrated in the following court transcript selection, so please, read on…

    http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/newsletters/Newsletter%20727.pdf

    Like


  37. You have to love the Russians. When the feminists tried to sue for sexual harassment in Russia, a female judge ruled that sexual harassment is necessary for the propagation of the species.

    Russian women had communism. They have no desire to be a man.

    Like


  38. Nothing like free advertising.

    Like


  39. The author is no knockout, but if my wife (yeah right) looked like that at 45 or so and was kindly sweet to me with simple things like cooking and affection, I could definetely see myself going full beta on her with daily affirmations of my undying love and the occasional shiny bauble.

    Like


    • on December 17, 2013 at 6:41 am The Burninator

      Going all “daily affirmations, shiny baubles” and “full beta” would immediately kill her desire to lavish you with kindly sweet things like cooking and affection. You’d be betting against her own perception of her degraded SMV at that point, and even if she stayed with you, you could expect basically a sexless marriage to a shrew who loathes you.

      Never go full retard…er..beta.

      Like


  40. on December 16, 2013 at 9:28 pm Flashing Lights

    Occasionally I’ll broach the top of feminism to some of the girls in my circles (ranging from feminine 6’s to 8’s).

    Usually in a roundabout way or I’ll focus on a feminist talking point if it comes up naturally in a conversation. So if we’re talking about our jobs I’ll jokingly bring up “oh boy, here comes miss feminist, always has to make more than the men around her!”

    Or if we talk about cooking, “better not set foot in my kitchen, they’ll revoke your feminist card!”

    What’s funny is the look on their faces, can’t quite place it, but I can tell that they don’t want to be thought of as “that kind” of feminist. You know, the ugly, loud, abrasive kind.

    The attractive, feminine girl want to be the politically correct feminist- women can have jobs, they can vote, etc. But they shy away from the extreme. You can see the… well, the almost panic in their face when they think you’ve placed them as she shrieking man-hater.

    They hurry to recover- “oh no, I like cooking, have you ever made XYZ? It’s really easy and fun, we should make it some time.” Or “well no I’d much rather be in a fulfilling relationship than chase after money” or some other quick recovery.

    Attractive, feminine, “high value” women who are looking to get commitment from the high value man know the trick is to be, well, feminine. Maybe not necessarily outright “submissive,” but at least to defer to the man (it’s funny how many girls will turn a question back around on me, see what my response is, before responding themselves, usually in agreement with me on at least some level).

    Women want masculine, high value, alpha men. And they know that these men want women. So they know instinctively to act womanly or they won’t get men.

    And the girls who don’t try to clean up their act/behavior (dress and act feminine) aren’t going to get any guys, and that’s probably why they’re so bitchy. And the high value girls don’t want to turn into that, which is probably why they’re so afraid of you placing them in the angry feminist category.

    Like


    • That is a great idea, Flashing Lights! Shame the hamster on the limitations of being liberated per its own feral bias. Fucking great reframe.

      Like


      • “Attractive, feminine, “high value” women who are looking to get commitment from the high value man know the trick is to be, well, feminine. Maybe not necessarily outright “submissive,” but at least to defer to the man (it’s funny how many girls will turn a question back around on me, see what my response is, before responding themselves, usually in agreement with me on at least some level).

        Women want masculine, high value, alpha men. And they know that these men want women. So they know instinctively to act womanly or they won’t get men.”
        ______________

        Yes, this is exactly right, although obviously not all girls quite get it. Or they don’t follow through. It’s one thing to say you like to cook, it’s another to make things for a guy, unasked, because you want to do it. And few girls are going to admit outright they want to be submissive, but there are a thousand small demonstrations of it that should be natural for her to provide to you.

        Like


  41. “at having not arrived sooner.” It’s so nice to see someone else use sentence structure intelligently and not put the ‘not’ immediately after ‘at’. It’s a world of difference.

    Like


  42. “I could drop the mic right here and walk off stage”
    Thank you for the belly laugh I got from that.
    Coupled with the picture, that shit was priceless.

    Like


    • That website should be called Daily Hamster.

      Like


    • Loved this one in particular: “Fat chicks bang hot guys… ALL. THE. TIME.”

      Yes, they use them as cum dumpsters. Seriously, the crazies have taken over the asylum in the Australian MSM. Clementine Ford of the Daily Life, in particular, is a massive psycho fem freak.

      Like


      • Yes.

        Also… “A guy can pick you up off your feet, and it won’t break his back…
        This just happened to me for the first time in… six years? I’m considerably heavier than I was six years ago and so when I ran up to my friend Eric for a hug and he picked me up with my heels in the air… it left me breathless. I had forgotten that it was possible; I had accepted a life void of being lifted. So exhilarating. Eric didn’t suffer any injuries and walked away unscathed.

        It left her breathless because the poor bastard had to gain a strong enough hold on the fat cow should he mishandle her mass and sustain injury when she landed on top of him. The “lift” was probably less than 6 inches from the ground before he realized that he needs to go to the gym more often.

        Like


      • lol +1

        Like


    • on December 17, 2013 at 7:54 am RappaccinisDaughter

      “Everyone has rolls when they bend over. EVERYONE.”

      Yes, only mine are made out of skin and the small amount of subcutaneous fat that all women have. Hers are made out of mayonnaise and sadness.

      Like


  43. It is sad that Spain’s birthrate is so low. And let this be a lesson: Religion will never solve any of our problems. Organized religion is in fact an enemy, a whore following the masters in the media just like it has always allied itself with whoever is in power.

    Which country in Western Europe has the lowest birthrate?

    Italy, Catholic to the core.

    Which countries in Western Europe have the highest birthrates?

    Protestant, secular Iceland, and Ireland – which is nominally Catholic but far more secular than Italy. (Stay in Ireland for a while and you won’t see anything Catholic about it, not at all like in Italy.)

    Religious people did some good things in the past – because of who they were, not because of religion. Religion weighs us down, shackling us with what Nietzsche called the “slave morality” that tells us the high is bad and the low is good in every category. A suicidal attitude that makes people abandon duty and allow their countries to sink in the mud. In the name of socialism and Christianity, which have the same end result.

    Like


    • Arbiter, Italy is filled with Catholic athiests. By comparison Ireland is more devout by far. This is a new paradigm, a few decades ago (before WWII) when Italians were relatively devout families were very large. The birthrate problem has nothing whatsoever to do with organized religion. If anything, it’s the dumping of religion and replacement with total self-absorption in the here and now that has led to this problem.

      Like


    • on December 17, 2013 at 5:47 am The Burninator

      *cough cough* South and Central America *cough cough*

      Oh, sorry, had a bit of something in my throat going on.

      Like


    • Modern technology…not religion…is the reason why birthrates have gone down. People care more about having stuff than birthing more humans.

      Imagine what the rates would be like if countries didn’t have access to birth control or modern technologies. But then the elite overlords would have a harder time controlling a larger population.

      Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 6:35 am The Burninator

        Not to mention the mass murder of the millions of babies sucked out of modern womens’ wombs. But that too relates to technology, I guess.

        Like


      • Kids cost money in our society. In a farming or heavily industrial society, more kids means more income. That’s why the most stupid among us are having kids in modern society.

        Like


      • Be sure to sign your mother’s and father’s day cards with that.

        Don’t you have some you-go-grrrrrl group hug fest to attend over at jezebel?

        Like


      • Spoken like someone without kids or money.

        Like


      • And a lot of unused intracranial space.

        Like


      • I live rent free in his head.

        Like


      • Mac,
        I see the point you are trying to make.
        In the Western world, children were used as a source of income on farms, being extda laborers.
        Now days, children are a source of income as each child is another share of foodstamps and welfare checks.
        The ignorant know this, and breed with this intent, at the expense of the economy.

        Like


    • You don’t know what you’re talking about.

      First of all, Vatican II pretty much gutted real Catholicism completely.

      Nietzsche was also wrong about the “slave morality”. It sometimes seems that way because ambitious Dark Triad types would actually seek out high office and positions of power, whereas the good tended not to out of some misguided sense of being unworthy for the office. But being humble does not mean to shirk your duty to your people, if you have a talent for leading them. I foresee a shift in this attitude as better people realize that as they’ve refused to make a run for positions of power, that they’ve left them wide open for the evil people.

      Also, you’re not correct about Italy’s low birth rate. According to Wikipedia, which actually does use reliable sources for this purpose, Italy’s TFR is 1.43 children per woman. Spain’s is 1.32.

      Ireland is not any more secular than Italy. Both still have solid Catholic majorities who actually still believe in God, unlike, say, France.

      France has a relatively high birthrate because it imported muzzies ‘n groids by the truckload. Germany, which didn’t but is about as secular, has a TFR of 1.38.

      Like


  44. Equating Christ with Marx.

    How edgy.

    Like


  45. on December 17, 2013 at 6:58 am The Burninator

    Pretending for just a moment that any of those snarling, obese animals were even remotely interested in marriage to an actual man, one has to wonder what precisely is going through her mind? What can she possibly believe she has to offer to even the most pathetic omega dork or beta schlub?

    “Well sure, I’m not thin and fit, he’ll just have to accept me for who I am! I hate lookists! Big is beautiful!”

    coupled with:

    “He wants me to be feminine and kind?!? Well he can just kiss my big stinking crusty fat ass!”

    So she has no looks, wants to be accepted for “who I am!” while “who I am!” appears to be an angry, bitter, snarling ball breaking feral animal.

    As I say though, we’re just pretending here, surely no one of these…heh…women…can seriously entertain entering into a relationship with even the most beaten down of male.

    Like


  46. http://www.ajc.com/weblogs/get-schooled/2013/dec/16/hugs-and-kisses-schools-are-student-suspensions-wa/

    Male high school senior hugs a female teacher (video in link), gets suspended for one year, won’t graduate on time.

    Common sense says to not hug your teacher – regardless of innocent intention – but that discipline is way over the top. The Cathedral, man…

    Like


    • Teachers are almost always Dim libtards, and hence, feminazis.

      Like


      • on December 17, 2013 at 1:28 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

        Thankfully skoool is compulsory. The thought of a boy NOT chained to a desk for the duration of his youth, while suffering steady low-intensity emotional warfare from an obese cat owner fills me with dread and horror.

        Like


    • Innocent intention is doubtful… just some wiseass jazzbo thinking white women are open season.

      My theory has long been that the increase in “rape culture” awareness and more laws in re sexual harassment and such is that, the more negrified our culture becomes, the more appalling the effrontery becomes to white women who otherwise are not impressed by the ooks and eeks of the hoi polloi.

      Like


  47. My wife is a simple, plain-ish looking girl (not flawed but not spectacular, a 6 or 7 realistically) who keeps herself thin, speaks with a soft sweet voice, and tries to make me feel like a king. In the modern west, with the majority of women behaving the opposite way, that’s all it really takes for a woman to get men to fall in love with her. When she is out and about it is interesting how others interact with her socially – the majority of men of all ages instantly soften to her, pothead and stoner type of guys are always rude to her, other feminine women are sweet and maternal towards her, and the masculinoid type of modern woman being produced in greater frequency nowadays are always incredibly rude. Many times, even when heavily pregnant, they will do things like butt in front of her in lines, push her out of the way in busy malls, respond to her rudely when she asks a question, etc. Masculine women really hate feminine women. There was a recent news story about a womans rights activist who was found to be paying her nanny/maid $3 an hour. Being out in the world, working and competing, makes women masculine, I believe. My wife is very thin-skinned and sensitive, I believe because she stays at home with the children, as opposed to the many female coworkers I have had, who have all been very crass and make attempts to be funny and to be seen as “one of the guys.”

    Like


    • The point I was trying to make is that femininity and vulnerability is powerful in the sense that it brings out the best in men – for such a woman, who seems unremarkable to the world, that uses her feminine strengths and shows that she cares about being a good wife and mother, will bring out the best protective instinct in men and make them want to fight and die to protect her. I haven’t read this woman’s book, but any literature that encourages women to emphasize their femininity and be WOMEN is worth a million times more than the faux intellectual scribblings of any ugly dick-starved feminist.

      Like


      • Absolutely. Had a great girl exactly like this for approximately 2.5 years. In part what fucked it up were her bitchy friends who while objectively hotter, were absolute pains in the ass who couldn’t stand it that i completely ignored them and they weren’t getting their ‘due’ (i.e. at minimum, attention).

        They were mulattos (part Papua New Guinean) with ghetto attitude/mouths whose hamsters went into meltdown when I looked past them to a girl who inspired in me a desire to protect. She acted like a lady in public, was gentle, didn’t swear, was always smiling, friendly, was not a ball buster, cared about my parents and nieces. She gave me loads of blowjobs and cooked because she wanted to please me. She would cry in happiness when i would get her random gifts like small teddy bears. Despite barely hanging out with them in 2.5 years, the friends continually shat on me behind my back because the cognitive dissonance was too much.

        Like


    • on December 17, 2013 at 1:29 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

      “pothead stoner type”
      dudewtfwowjustwow

      Like


    • That women’s rights activist is Devyani Khobragade, from the official umbrage she sounds connected. Fight the patriarchy, lol.

      Like


  48. […] This was the advice of an Italian female author of a bestseller book titled Cásate y sé sumisa – “Get Married and Be Submissive”. The book is now a hit in Spain, where the fertility rate of the native Spaniards is very low as one prime fertility generation of women after another squeezes into the crowded and expensive cities to pursue the accumulation of alphas and gadgets instead of betas and cherubs. Naturally, Spain’s feminists (is there no Western nation safe from the shrieking of the clams?) are outraged, OUTRAGED I tells ya, by the book’s premise, and are, as is the wont of this subspecies of open-minded and tolerant leftoids, calling for it to be banned. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/12/16/wives-should-submit-to-their-husbands/ […]

    Like


    • I’m sure it was “just a hug”… I’ve seen these Sambos and their tricks even back when I was in school.

      It’s on record that he’s been a discipline problem before, and the teacher in question has warned him in the past about his unwanted affections.

      What are the odds she’s white? Any takers.

      Better odds, still, on thwack or Nicole chiming in to say she egged him on.

      Like


  49. on December 17, 2013 at 11:17 am North Vinlander

    Great rock song with red pill lyrics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNmHR0m9Skw

    I think you folks will like this one.

    Like


  50. I’m in love

    Like


    • Great list, absolutely agree, except for this little tidbit of 1920’s proto-feminism thrown in:

      “Men, in the last analysis, are but over-grown children.”

      To the lady beyond the grave: You were wrong, and somebody instructed you incorrectly. Learn and do not make the mistake again in a future life, if there were such a thing.

      The list itself is absolutely spot on though and full of basic Red Pill axioms written in a no nonsense, direct way.

      Like


  51. Feminism was and remains their most effective weapon in the planned destruction of Christianity and White nationalism. More effective than mass third world immigration, moral degeneration, ‘hate’ laws, debasement of art and literature, bogus equality theorising.

    You see, once you destroy the family all else follows…..

    Like


  52. So
    You finally have a women who’s hamster is standing, scratching its head and looking around.
    Guess what?
    You show it to females and their hamster starts running: “Wait, its true but what about…” (fill in the blanks). I discussed female bad behavior with a good female friend of mine, and while she agrees, she could not talk about it much – it made her feel bad.
    This book is a best seller because woman buy it. So you get an idea out there, and as any marketing pro knows “As long as they spell your name right…”. So this gets a lot of PR. So you may see some adoption, but the hamster will start spinning.

    However, on the bright side – the more you have these ideas in the mainstream, the more people MAY adopt them. Therefor increasing the likelihood of Mannosphere ideas adoption.

    Eurythmics: “Some of them want to use you; Some of them want to get used by you;
    Some of them want to abuse you; Some of them want to be abused”

    The Brain

    Like


  53. The sad, sad women of Gen X are so completely and utterly fucked up and confused. I’ve been trying to lead a couple lately. It’s really tough to do. They are completely HuffPosticized. It goes back to what we have discussed here: today’s women are not forced by law or pushed by social mores to feel bad about not being married after age 28, which is what they should feel. They are “independent” women (who live either at home with their parents, with 3 roommates, or with some dude) with their fancy $35,000 salary but they no longer feel shame for being spinsters. In fact, it’s the opposite. MSM shames them for *wanting* to be with a decent man in a one-on-one adult relationship.

    I’m having more success with latinas. It’s not that I’m pathetic. It has always been that the force of LAW forced women into monogamous relationships. Today’s North American white girls don’t need men (thanks to the state) so usually don’t want them until after the wall and 15 years of the cock carousel.
    South American women are still more traditional and sometimes need a man, so they will be nicer.

    Like


  54. on December 17, 2013 at 1:42 pm thecivilizationalist

    OT:
    CH – You once wondered in a different post what would happen if robots took over all production and the majority of humans (except the super smart geeks) became jobless.
    My take on it – the chicken’s tale

    Like


  55. Wives Should Submit To Their Husbands…

    Men should dominate their women such that:

    Wives Will Submit To Their Husbands.

    Like


  56. […] Women, slave to limbic compulsions far beyond the mere abilities of prefrontal willpower to contain,… […]

    Like


  57. I should note that if the book is a “hit” in Spain, that teh feminasties aren’t as popular there as they think they are.

    Like


  58. […] Treat them mean. Related: Chicks despise nice guys. Related: Game: Biting. Related: The degradation of the age. Related: Women’s desire to be roughed in the bedroom is a perversity of true submission. Related: Wives should submit to their husbands. […]

    Like


  59. the restless queefly quest that can never be quenched

    Aah, beautiful.

    Came for the Game, stayed for the Race RealTalk, but it’s poetry like this that keeps me coming back.

    Thanks, man.

    Like


  60. I find waitress always seem sweeter and happier than they probably are outside of their work-life. This being due to the submissive nature of the occupation.

    Like