The Assange “””Rape”””: A Case Of Spurned Groupies

So let me see if I have this straight.

Four months ago, fame-whore Anna Ardin had a few telephone and internet conversations with WikiLeaks badboy Julian Assange, a man she had previously only known as a name in the news.

A few telephone calls with an alpha male she didn’t know from Adam is all it took for her vagina to vibrate like a tuning fork. She invited him to stay at her unattended (!) place in Stockholm. She would be away on business.

When he arrived in Stockholm, the radical libertarian Assange “held court” at a local pub with like-minded admirers. The vagina tingles reached critical mass.

Assange’s alphaness must have been so powerful it was telepathic, because Ardin picked up on the disturbance in the electromagnetic spectrum from far away and returned home a day earlier than she had planned. SETI could not locate an extraterrestrial signal so precisely.

Assange was still at her place when she returned. She decided he could continue to stay. Scientists are baffled.

Within mere hours of returning and meeting this man in the flesh for the first time in her life, Ardin and Assange had sex. She is not a total slut, though. She would like you to know that they had dinner beforehand.

During sex, the condom broke. Both confirm this.

The two lovebirds were happy and friendly the next morning, as can be discerned by the fact that Ardin threw a party for him that night.

At a seminar that day, woman #2, Sofia Wilen, felt a strong rush of tingles for Assange because she read about him in the papers.

Wilen set out to meet Assange, by stalking him introducing herself:

[Sofia] would later tell police that she had first seen Assange on television a few weeks before. She had found him ‘interesting, brave and admirable’. As a result, she began to follow the WikiLeaks saga, and when she discovered that he was due to visit Stockholm she contacted the Brotherhood Movement to volunteer to help out at the seminar. Although her offer was not taken up, she decided to attend the seminar anyway and took a large number of photos of Assange during his 90-minute talk.

Lesson: A woman will move heaven and earth to meet an alpha male. When a man does the same thing to meet a woman he likes, he is slapped with a restraining order.

Assange and Wilen went to lunch together with Assange’s friends.

They flirted.

The attraction was mutual. Scientists, still baffled, wonder how an ugly but infamous mofo like Assange could be considered attractive by a cute babe.

After lunch, Assange and Wilen went to see a movie. But Assange had to part early, to attend the party that Ardin was throwing for him that night.

After the party, the future rape accuser Anna Ardin Tweeted that she was “with the coolest people” and that she felt “amazing”.

There were other Tweets of this nature that suggest a state of mind very unlike what one would imagine a recent rape victim would possess.

A couple days later, Sofia meets Assange in Stockholm. She then pays for his train ticket to her home in another Swedish town. Scientists, now knee-deep in bafflement, wonder why a young woman would pay the way of an ugly and poor but infamous libertardian badboy claiming he can’t get money because the CIA tracks his credit card transactions. Sofia’s hamster is about to collapse from exhaustion.

Maxim #21: Betas pay, alphas split, super alphas profit.

Later that night, the two self-satisfied, egomaniacal “activists” make sweet rebellious love as the world burns down around them. Assange wore a condom at night, but raw dogged it in the morning.

Sofia Wilen would later claim that she had asked him to wear a condom in the morning, but he refused. She opened her legs anyway.

On Tuesday, the following day, Wilen and Assange had lunch. She paid for his train ticket again.

Assange forgets rule #1 of successful womanizers: Do NOT concurrently bed mutual acquaintances, particularly those who are proud to call themselves feminists. Wilen calls Ardin, and the two women conspire a false rape charge to exact revenge against the man who treated the purity of their love so cavalierly.

At the police station, the women are interviewed by a female police officer. Charges follow. No, not charges of “cruel and unusual fits of jealousy” but charges of rape and sexual molestation against Assange.

Assange, a figure of ambivalence at best, has as a result of his recent arrest in Britain, epicenter of self-loathing, self-annihilating Westerners, earned street cred with REAL liberty loving men.

What scores of powerful governments around the world have been unable to do, two spurned groupies and a female police officer, along with the backing of the feminist establishment, have been able to orchestrate unhindered.

******

I think that’s the story. What can we learn from this? Let me be blunt.

If Assange is convicted of rape,
then we are all rapists now.

Every man who’s ever had a condom break, or who had condomless sex with a woman who agreed to the sex despite her misgivings, or who has slept with more than one woman in a weekend, is now a rapist. By these standards, half the men in the world would be locked up on rape charges. This is the logical conclusion of feminist thought. I’m sure they secretly love the idea.

Feminists and feminist enablers (you know who you are, you pasty-skinned sunken-chest droopy cartoon muscled faggy-faced white knighters who wear T-shirts that say “this is what a feminist looks like”), here is word from the Committee of Helpful Reminders:

Sex with a woman willingly spreading for a man despite his refusal to wear a condom, and then feeling regret about her sluttiness the next day, is not rape. It is not even rape in emasculated Sweden. Similarly, getting pumped and dumped is not sexual molestation. Hope this helps.

Anna Ardin’s ego was bruised, and her sluttiness broadcast to all her friends. As a result, she set out to seek vengeance against the skirt-chasing man she fell in love with over a heady late summer weekend. She even had a website devoted to plans for exacting just such a revenge scenerio.

Earlier this year, [Anna] is reported to have posted a telling entry on her website, which she has since removed. But a copy has been retrieved and widely circulated on the internet.

Entitled ‘7 Steps to Legal Revenge’, it explains how women can use courts to get their own back on unfaithful lovers.

Step 7 says: ‘Go to it and keep your goal in sight. Make sure your victim suffers just as you did.’

In a normal, sane society with a firm grip on what constitutes fairness and justice, hypercunty feminism-soaked revenge fantasists would have to consign themselves to acting out their aggression in their fucked-up heads. The only people who would suffer from their delusions would be the hapless also-ran beta boyfriends competing with the lingering memories of badboy alpha cock like Assange’s piercing the grateful labia of these heartbroken shrikes.

But we in the West don’t live in a sane society. Not anymore. Rabid attack cunts like Ardin and Wilen can now see their revenge fantasies breathed into life, aided and abetted by the feminism-industrial complex, cultural PC-ism, an allied media, and women in positions of influence where their natural inclination toward favoring social cohesion and grrlpower at the expense of justice makes a mockery of the institutions they claim to represent.

By the way, is there anything more repulsive than a “Christian feminist”, as Anna Ardin calls herself? At least you can enjoy a piece of ass with regular secular feminists, which helps makes their inane little opinions tolerable. But a Christian feminist is the worst of both worlds — teeth-gnashingly insipid and prudish. Wow, sign me up! Anyhow, it’s been my observation that self-professed Christian feminists are some of the worst man-hating cunts alive, truly devoid of any sense of empathy or even a rudimentary grasp of fairness. Anna Ardin, in all her glorious hamsterized self-rationalizing hypocrisy, fits the mold perfectly. This is how the Daily Mail describes her job in life:

While a research assistant at a local university she had not only been the protegee of a militant feminist academic, but held the post of ‘campus sexual equity officer’. Fighting male discrimination in all forms, including sexual harassment, was her forte.

If there is something more pointless to do with one’s life, I can’t think of it. The obvious pointlessness explains some of the resentment that people like Ardin nurse against the outside world, and against men specifically. The humanities departments of academia throughout the West have turned into mills for churning out ignorant, man-loathing fascists who envy and hate the inherent freedom of male desire. They are pinkshirts on the prowl for “incorrect thinking”, who see rape in the frosting on a birthday cake. Imagine a high heel stomping on a nutsack, forever. Why do men put up with this shit? Probably because they think assuming a posture of prostration will get them laid. Nominal alphas may have supported feminism in the past as a quick and painless route to easy sex, but today they are in the gun sights as much as any beta. To win at this war, you need true insight into the female mind.

Sweden leads the way in this fembot festival of absurdity, but the other Western (white) nations are not far behind. China will catapult to superpower status this century, not least because they have their heads on straight and see modern feminism for the productivity and innovation sapping insanity it is.

I’ve written before that false rape accusers ought to be punished the same as actual rapists, with jail time. It is as evil as real rape. Their lies destroy lives. Tossing them in jail for years will send a valuable message to women everywhere that they will not escape the consequences of smearing a man who didn’t fulfill their romantic expectations.





Comments


  1. Those hamster keep a rollin, rollin down the line.

    Women love those hamsters spinning in their minds.

    Like


  2. I’ve been searching diligently for the feminist response for weeks, now.

    Nothing.

    I wonder why there’s no feminist analysis of this event; no women up in arms and using this as an example of how even progressive heroes can be evil – another example of the basic Evilness of Males.

    Either he’s getting a pass because he hates the US, or even feminists realize how revoltingly vapid the entire process is.

    Anyone notice anything?

    I’m not used to this absence of revolting hypocrisy.

    Like


  3. While some of your posts are tedious explorations of alpha-beta minutae, this is the best writeup on the Assange episode I have read.

    I like your word-play : “vibrate like a tuning fork”, and in an earlier post “plunged like a backed-up commode”. Funny visuals.

    Like


  4. Feminists are their own worst enemy.

    Details of these false-rape charges are going to become public, and I believe that even the most conservative, national-defense loving Republicans will be forced to admit that Assange is innocent. At least, innocent of rape.

    Like


  5. BTW,

    In China, the only reason it’s not like here: The scale of feminism takes second place to the scale of power.

    Guys get off charges like that only because they’re powerful. Women do, too. It’s not about freedom.

    They don’t have the insanity of Sweden – *yet*. They’re moving there fast.

    Remember, in Asia, China is the country where women are most “liberated” – most women work, unlike Korea (50%) or Taiwan, and most of them study hard, do well and often work as engineers, doctors and the like. There are large, active women’s groups and Women’s Equality is enshrined in the Communist Party. Women made up the backbone of the push for social reform there.

    Place no great hope in China for re-manning the world.

    Like


  6. Assange is a truely replusive anti-Western dick, but he doesn’t deserve this – it’s an affront to all men everywhere. When it comes to the various secret services of the world feeding him into a wood chipper feet first, I have little sympathy (I mean, the guy pissed off Vladimir Putin – that’s as close to “suicide by cop” as you can come, internationally speaking). But this “rape” business is a bunch of crap. I personally hope that Assange beats the rap – and that Mr. Putin will then do his duty…

    Like


  7. Outstanding post.

    Like


  8. ASSANGE IS A FUCKING LIBERAL. A FIRE-SPEWING LIBERAL.

    Not a libertarian, as your wish fulfillment will have it.

    Like


  9. Fighting male discrimination in all forms, including sexual harassment, was her forte.

    Wow, her forte is fighting male discrimination? What? That’s a job, like a plumber she rolls up to a sight of male discrimination and cleans it up? Let me guess, her job is doing lectures on how women are the purest form of victimhoodism (except for her new Islamic overlords).

    Yeah, Assange is a dick, he’s doing something that us Americans consider wrong, but this isn’t getting Capone with tax law…this is just wrong. But, maybe shedding light on the idiocy will help the post-western, pre-Islamic world get over itself.

    Also, apparently today is the DREAM act cloture day. So, pour a 40 or something to commemorate the surrender of the country, in a lame duck session, to lib’s other favorite victim class.

    Like


  10. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned……

    Like


  11. Oh, Assange has been a dick, but the funny thing is is that his leaks have really just illustrated how over his head Obama is and helped Isreal. That is, it’s revealed that gee the Saudis don’t care about Isreal, really, they just use it as propaganda to keep their own people down. They’re skeered of Iran though which the libs have claimed was just another Bush lie. ooops.

    Like


  12. Spectacular post!

    Like


  13. Hey, Gorby, what’s the effect of one-child policy? Aren’t there less wimmins running around…so they got less power to be all feministing but they also gold plated because it’s a seller’s market?

    Like


  14. Assange, a figure of ambivalence at best, has as a result of his recent arrest in Britain, epicenter of self-loathing, self-annihilating Westerners, earned street cred with REAL liberty loving men.

    Such a poorly constructed sentence. Good post though.

    Like


  15. The Western response to this Wikileaks business is yet another chapter in the long story of feminized decline of once great societies. “CIA monitoring his credit card transactions…”! How lame is that? A real secret service, like the KGB or the Cuban DGI or Mossad or the 1950’s CIA would have pitched the little douchebag out a 12th story window in Stockholm, or pumped him full of conotoxin and left him twitching in his own filth, if he had revealed state secrets that could cost lives or endanger ongoing military operations. Today, we assign it to the vaunted “00” section of the Finance Branch of the new, sensitive feminized CIA, which will coldly and ruthlessly cancel his credit rating and deprive him of his frequent flier miles…

    Like


  16. It’s crazy the lengths women will go to protect their egos… Cool post.

    Like


  17. We all know these are trumped up charges. Let’s face it, Assange has pissed off the wrong people. By this time next year, he’s going to be sitting in Guantanamo or some other black site that they disappear people to.

    Like


  18. Here is a link to a google-translated cached version of Ardin’s infamous sjustegsmodell (seven step model) for legal revenge:

    http://bit.ly/fjRcYY

    Like


  19. Oh … one of the accusers knows peeps in the CIA.

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/assange-rape-accuser-cia-ties/

    Conspiracy?

    Like


  20. A more experienced “superalpha” (as opposed to a nerd-on-a-power-trip like Assange) would have known to avoid this kind of psychotic groupie situation.

    Like


  21. @peckerwood,

    China isn’t Taiwan or HK. Traditional Chinese values are dead and gone. In urban centers, Chinese women are relatively “liberated”.

    Men can still be dicks – but there it’s not a male-female battle.

    It’s about how well-connected or powerful an individual – or her family – is.

    If a woman is a total slut, with no connections, and gets raped – she *might* be able to do something about it. If she’s better connected than the guy, he’s fucked. It’s never even remotely about justice.

    However – men don’t rule the roost – as men. They rule because they’re connected.

    On equal terms – when this is possible – the vote always goes with women.

    There are lots of well-connected, powerful women in China. Fuck with them at your peril, if you’re a dude.

    Like


  22. Calling these accusations false is to pretend Sweden is still a civilized country. It is not. That is rape in Sweden. The Swedish justice system is the culprit here and that cannot be emphasized enough; not the girls, who are merely telling the truth and using the system. Calling for jail time for them is also missing the point and legally impossible.

    Furthermore, Sweden is now considering going one step further and defining all sexual activity as rape unless the man can prove he explicitly received consent:

    http://www.samtycke.nu/2010/11/17-argument-mot-samtycke/

    Though I suspect that won’t pass since Sweden is now the laughing stock of the world for its already absurd definition of rape.

    Like


  23. I am impressed with his academics: Expert computer programmer. One of australian most infamous hackers. 14 criminal charges against him when he was only 16years old. Apart from mastering computer programmings. He also studied physics and mathematics at the university of melbourne(top australian university.). Good enough at it to compete in national australian physics competition.
    When he was done with that, he then turned his attention to study neuroscience and philosophy.

    In a nutshell: computer programming, physics, mathematics, neuroscience and philosophy. Clearly a borderline polymath.

    he invented the rubberhose denial encrytion program. this guy is dangerous, a menace.

    He created one of the very first public australian internet service providers. He is like marc andressen meets bill gates all incubated into a fullblown mikhail bakunin(nasty anarchist). Minus bill gates thirst for money.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange

    Like


  24. I figured Assange’s ultimate fate will be to commit suicide by shooting himself in the back of the head two or three times.

    Like


  25. Given Assange is a leftie, I think it is highly probably that he is a ‘feminist’ and is in many ways a beta and a classic mangina. So from afar, he looked like an alpha to these women, but when they met him, they couldn’t cope with his obvious beta-ness in person.

    @Arpagus: I really do hope that Sweden is the laughing stock of the world. What I don’t understand is a) why don’t all Swedish men just leave and b) why aren’t the ones who stay gay by default?

    Like


  26. “betas pay”

    I see you’re shaming whoremongers again. Nothing wrong with paying for sex. Go in, get the deed done, and move on to more masculine things.

    Today’s dollar is the equivalent of yesterday’s club. Do you think that our ancestors spent hours upon hours catering to female whims in order to get their dicks wet? No. They clubbed ’em and then fucked ’em.

    I club women with my dollar and then fuck ’em. And then I play tennis, cycle, work out, box, travel, hike, read, discuss politics, etc.

    That’s alpha.

    Spending time with women and playing the role of court jester just for some vadge = beta

    Plus, sex is overrated. It’s the not the quantity, but the quality.

    I fuck once a week, but I fuck like my distant ancestors fucked–savagely, passionately, quickly and egoistically.

    The key is to not masturbate and to fuck infrequently. That way your every fuck will be like your first fuck ever.

    The Spartans understood the negative effects of sexual satiation and cohabitation. That’s why even married couples weren’t permitted to cohabit the first several years, all in the name of virility and fertility.

    Like


  27. Tschafer, this is not the 1950s anymore. Information now gets around much faster and it’s much harder to ‘control the narrative’ (Operations from Nikita). Besides, even then the most famous dissidents weren’t touched by the KGB – the diplomatic outrage that would ensue was not something even the Soviet Union could tolerate.

    Like


  28. While I don’t agree with Assange and his publications, the charges against him are idiotic. I cracked the first time I read the famous “without a condom” line in the newspaper.

    Like


  29. on December 8, 2010 at 1:08 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Check out this Counterpunch article from Sept. that contained this gem about accuser Anna Ardin:

    “A Swedish forum reports that she is an expert on sexual harassment and the male “master suppression techniques”.

    Once, as she was lecturing, a male student in the audience looked at his notes instead of staring at her. Anna Ardin reported him for sexual harassment because he discriminated against her for being a woman and because she claimed he made use of the male “master suppression technique” in trying to make her feel invisible. As soon as the student learned about her complaint, he contacted her to apologize and explain himself. Anna Ardin’s response was to once again report him for sexual harassment…”

    Read the rest here:
    http://www.counterpunch.org/shamir09142010.html

    Like


  30. Gentlemen, for those of you in LTRs, you would be wise to point out the absurdity of this situation to your woman. I have been discussing the excesses of PC/feminism with my woman for years, and she, being mostly pliant and agreeable, sees things as I do. Her own negative personal and professional experiences with women over the years have caused her to increasingly view her own sex with suspicion, but I reinforce the point at home. If your woman doesn’t understand the gravity and unfairness of what’s going on in the larger culture, you need to reconsider your commitment to her.

    Like


  31. It may be in Assange’s interest to get sent to Sweden to face trial for these ridiculous accusations. Somebody correct me if I’m wrong, but I think Sweden is a lot less likely to extradite him to the US than the UK where he is now being held now. Facing a false rape charge will be nothing compared to what the US will have in store for him in Guantanomo, or even at a normal trial in the US.

    If rape is a serious crime (and I think it is) then an obviously false rape claim is just as serious. Apart from wasting police and court time in minimises actual rapes when they occur, and trivialises the whole issue. I hate feminism, but I don’t even see how encouraging false rape charges or promoting the meme that “all heterosexual sex is rape” helps their cause. Even though it seems most of the hard core feminists are lesbians.

    Like


  32. […] The Assange “””Rape”””: A Case Of Spurned Groupies « Citizen Renegade. […]

    Like


  33. Note to self – Stay the HELL out of Sweden.

    Like


  34. Paraphrasing of Orwell: “Imagine a high heel stomping on a nutsack, forever.”

    Like


  35. Can we be sure that Assange is truly an Alpha, and not just a target of feminists who abhor anything less than a matriarchal totalitarian state? Given the history of how States have employed women to fuck for der fatherland, it seems to me that this is more an instance of the state being the biggest alpha of them all. That’s like feeding crystal meth to her rationalization hamster, with similar effects on her tuning-fork vag.

    Like


  36. Blog post of the year.

    Like


  37. Whatever this was, it was nothing even remotely like rape, sexual molestation or assault.

    I’d like to hear any feminist try to make these charges stick. Or to defend them for even one second.

    Not a peep from a single one on the internet.

    Fascinating. Maybe they have a collective brain after all?

    Like


  38. Damnation! A cool dude like Assange gets tangled up in the Feminatrix. When will it end, Lord?

    Let this serve as a warning to all Alpha wannabes out there.

    Boys, remember, we’re talking about WOMEN here, for fuck’s sake.

    An obsession with sex is BETA all the way, and this includes the greatest Alphas, as well as cool guys like Assange.

    True Alphas have too many plans, businesses, plane tickets, travel plans, and ideas in their (big) heads to think constantly about picking up the truly weaker sex (with their little heads.)

    I mean, look, women are basically amoral, spineless, drivel-filled blobs of idiotic protoplasm. I got too many interesting things going on to deal with THAT bullshit obsessively.

    Focus on YOUR plans, YOUR dreams, YOUR businesses, and YOUR overall stud-stardom, and I swear, you won’t be able to keep them off you. Why? Because every woman on the planet is a FOLLOWER, not a leader. They are inexorably drawn to self-possessed, sang-froid, testosterone that has good intentions toward the universe. Period. Assange is in the hot-water he’s in right now because he let “the little head” take command from his intelligence. Damnation! Damn shame!

    For THOUSANDS of years, for example, their sex has yet to produce a single great painter. They are incapable of doing so. They are incapable of evaluating social trends and dangers. They’re just not wired that way.

    They’re wired to make little cavemen and to keep the cave warm. That’s it, and don’t ever let a fembot or (worse) mangina tell you otherwise.

    Nikola Tesla never married. He was so brilliant a cult developed around him claiming him to an ALIEN from another planet. (True, true, true! Read about it)

    He could of scored gazillions of chicks. His response? BAH-HUMBUG! I’VE GOT WORK TO DO –

    Get it?

    Like


  39. I’m not quite understanding all the hate on this guy.

    He’s spilling how we’re rimming every shithead leader in the mideast, while failing miserably at ‘nation building’/imperialism ‘lite’ while further empowering and enriching the military-industrial complex. On my nickel.

    Fuck these guys. The US should either be Rome or stay home.

    As far as the leaked cables on personal foibles of Putin, Burlusconi, and Sarkozy, I’m shocked, just shocked.

    Like


  40. I think the law should emended: If the woman is not satisfied in perpetuity after a sexual incident, the man should be villified as a slut. LOL

    Like


  41. Assange is a two-bit faggot with no life outside of getting revenge on people who never did him harm. He deserves to be removed like every other enemy of freedom, but this is just lame. Like was said before, if you want to take care of this guy, pop him one or send him on a one-way trip to the bottom of a lake, don’t get some chick to claim Whoopi rape.

    Like


  42. Excellent post.

    Check out this Mr. Rudd. I saw this online first then Foxnews was talking w/ Rudd this morning. I have not seen Foxnews file the report yet.

    This is the youtube vid of Mr. Rudd defending JA. Rudd says that JA is presumed innocent and America’s security/document leaking is their own fault, not JA’s.

    These rape/molestation charges are lies! I said so months ago and will stand by my words.

    Like


  43. Nein, Harmonica…

    Did you see the pic of JA in that black leather jacket, hair slicked back? Then below that was the women’s faces are blobbed out? I think that was the times online or daily mail version. Anyways, he looks good.

    Thanks to the media, JA has ultra hot alpha male status. These women just made him a handsome victim.

    Seriously!

    Like


  44. And he’s not an alpha after getting locked in this. Ardin’s smoking hotness is commendable, but she’s a fucking nut and the guy who is supposed to know all the world’s secrets didn’t think she’d go crazy after getting fucked? Moron. Beta, at the very least.

    Like


  45. on December 8, 2010 at 1:31 pm Good Luck Chuck

    Things like this make the pretty, feminine women in corrupt third world shitholes look that much prettier.

    Like


  46. @999

    Thanks to the media, he’s been given alpha status. But his actions show otherwise. Maybe greater beta due to the PR? But the man sleeps with the world’s biggest bitch of a feminist. That’s a major mistake. Our own Roissy has nailed feminists with gusto and style and made sure they question their ideology after. Our boy Julie got his feminist to call rape on him.

    Guys… know who you’re fucking!

    Like


  47. Look, we need to know about the banks taking this country to hell – We are ran for and by the banks. JA is sitting in jail over trumped up charges and bitches on HLN are praising this. B/c our own country tells its girls and boys that rape is all men do.

    I have made the point (which I read on Vox Day) that JA has not put anyone in any danger that Pres’ Bush and Obama already did over the past 10 years. So….JA is shining light on the darkness of deeds that are injuring our country. Forget the war docs, this is about the banks and the insurance companies ruining the markets in fracked up schemes. We will have our proof, we already saw some of the docs.

    The banks – foreclosuregate, the derivatives, the insurance companies….Bank of america is rumored to be up next.

    Meanwhile, Sen Joe Lieberman wants to shut down the web! Net Neutrality, the creeping incrementalism…

    Like


  48. DBA,

    I didn’t see that before. That quote is huge. Not looking at a woman is sexual harassment. But looking at her is obviously harassment too.

    “A Swedish forum reports that she is an expert on sexual harassment and the male “master suppression techniques”. Once, as she was lecturing, a male student in the audience looked at his notes instead of staring at her. Anna Ardin reported him for sexual harassment because he discriminated against her for being a woman and because she claimed he made use of the male “master suppression technique” in trying to make her feel invisible. As soon as the student learned about her complaint, he contacted her to apologize and explain himself. Anna Ardin’s response was to once again report him for sexual harassment, again because he was using the “master suppression technique”, this time to belittle her feelings. ”

    Everyone else, don’t be fooled into thinking feminism is a leftist thing. It’s just as institutionalized on the right, and even more hateful there. Anna Ardin is a right-winger. Right wing women here might not be hate-mongering feminists quite yet, but they will be soon.

    Like


  49. Harmonica…I’ll concede he hooked with a couple crazies bitches and he should have known better. But those women pulled a police state tactic on him. And that is INJUSTICE.

    The pictures of him via the media are sexy, strong, interesting, unique. The one woman paid for his ticket…that is cool. He had the presence or the power to make her do that.

    That says something.

    Like


  50. Assange founded Wikileaks but did not release the data itself. To be clear.

    Transparency is the first step towards lack of corruption. You want civilisation to go backwards, start censoring everything and allow hidden agendas.

    See: Africa, Iraq.

    Part of what pushed Assange into the direction of increasing transparency was a child custody case with his ex-wife, causing him to form a database called ‘Parent Inquiry Into Child Protection’ with his mother in 1999.

    Basically there’s good cause to believe that one of the most personally important reasons for him to believe in the right to public to information was caused by the state of modern feminist-friendly politics, rather than simply modern politics.

    That is, you can blame feminism for Wikileaks.

    Like


  51. He kept company with the known man hating slut who leaches balls with acid. What do you expect keeping company with a she mantis? This is what you believed in, and now enjoy it Mr Ass.

    Like


  52. No wonder she loved this guy. He looks like a rode hard, 10 years after, pump and dump version of herself.

    Like


  53. @ 999

    Wow. We can see inside the world’s banks and governments. We can see that we’ve been telling the truth on our FP for years, according to the leaks, and that the Arabs are doing exactly as every person who follows the Iran crisis already knows. Assange isn’t a hero. He’s a threat, and a beta threat at that. You can get wet all over his pictures if you want, but to me the man looks like a knob with a suit. While I don’t agree with every decision our government makes, I also don’t agree with Vox that any power is bad power and every rat is a good rat. Vox has some ideological problems he needs to work out if he’s going to survive the depression he has predicted. His books are awesome, btw, I am a fan of his for the most part. But when it comes to integrity of information, it is paramount that we make sure this shit doesn’t happen again. We are heading for a very bad time in the world and having this happen will doom us to domination by the other powers.

    Like


  54. Interestingly, Assange seems to have had some experience dealing with Christian feminists before:

    “After my state sponsored stay at ANU, I ended up at a backpackers filled with some of the 900 Christians from the Australian University Christian Convergence. Most were young women and I turned, somewhat disgracefully, into a sort of Chesterton’s Hardy, the village atheist, brooding and blaspheming over the village idiot, while they, for their part, tried to convert me with the rise and fall their bosoms.

    One of the devout was the lovely daughter of a New Castle minister. At some point in my unintended wooing of her, she looked up, fluttered her eyelids and said ‘Oh, you know so much! I hardly know anything!’.
    ‘That is why you believe in God,’ I explained. This conversational brutality took her breath away and she swooned. I was exactly what she secretly longed for; a man willing to openly disagree with her father. All along she had needed a man to devote herself to. All along she had failed to find a man worthy of being called a man, failed to find a man who would not bow to gods, so she had chosen a god unworthy of being called a god, but who would not bow to a man.”

    http://web.archive.org/web/20060712184552/http://iq.org/index.html

    Like


  55. “Imagine a high heel stomping on a nutsack, forever” – very nice, very nice!

    Like


  56. Tony Ryan– It’s crazy the lengths women will go to protect their egos… Cool post.

    What’s crazy is the power and nearly always benefit of any doubt the law (worst of all in this area in seems in Sweden, but with the Anglosphere not far behind) now allows women, but not men, to go to protect their egos.

    Like


  57. The nasty feminatrix got its cover blown with Assange’s Wikileaks.

    Hillary the sado-masochist ordered all sorts of spying, DNA samples, credit card numbers and Internet search records on all U.N. delegates. All in violation of the very international law she worships. Wotta BI-OTCH. Hey, I thought women were the “kinder, gentler, sex?” ROTFLMAO.

    So now, the sadistic Feminatrix wants to exact revenge on Assange. Is this all really that surprising?

    Like


  58. LMAO,..such rich irony here.

    Anger at Asange’s “liberalism” is superseded only by the indolence of his feminist accusers’ contrived conspiracy against him. What a rich paradox. Defend the “enemy of the state” against the predations of third wave feminism while simultaneously avoid any association of sympathy for his action.

    Like


  59. @yes man!
    He created one of the very first public australian internet service providers. He is like marc andressen meets bill gates all incubated into a fullblown mikhail bakunin(nasty anarchist). Minus bill gates thirst for money.

    I’m pretty impressed with JA. You can dislike his politics, but you’ve got to admit: He’s bright, he’s industrious and he’s enterprising. Getting charged at 16 for hacking and then physics and math and then internet terrorism and government secret defiling–

    No matter what side he’s on, he’s got something. He’s used to giving the world the finger. I like the guy.

    As far as taking him out – well, left or right, I think most government secrets should be outed. WTF are we doing in Afghanistan, anyway? Or Iraq? We’ve utterly fucked up both situations and have no-one to blame but ourselves.

    Our politicians hide behind secrets and anonymity. And I do believe that Wikileaks publishes almost everything – left or right, harming any side of any secret.

    I say props to the guy. And I’m no leftie.

    As far as this is concerned – a bunch of fake, trumped-up and disgusting rape accusations by two self-entitled and slightly unbalanced man-haters is the real issue.

    He should go back to Sweden and face trial and busy these two useless pieces of female garbage.

    The two of them should both be in jail.

    Sweden is a laughing stock. What a bad joke: Sweden.

    Like


  60. @ Rollo

    Not irony. Maturity. Try to get Julieboy to defend America against third world dictaorship. Or any other liberal to defend right against wrong.

    Like


  61. Assange made one crucial miscalculation.

    Women are born fascists. They will always choose security over freedom.

    They will always run to Big Daddy-D*ck Government when Kupcake feels *hurt* after a fling.

    End of story. (Damn, I’m pissed Assange couldn’t control his pecker in all this.) **sigh**

    Like


  62. Karl’s link:

    One of the devout was the lovely daughter of a New Castle minister.At some point in my unintended wooing of her, she looked up, fluttered her eyelids and said ‘Oh, you know so much! I hardly know anything!’.
    ‘That is why you believe in God,” I explained. This conversational brutality took her breath away and she swooned.

    bwahahha

    I was exactly what she secretly longed for; a man willing to openly disagree with her father. All along she had needed a man to devote herself to. All along she had failed to find a man worthy of being called a man, failed to find a man who would not bow to gods, so she had chosen a god unworthy of being called a god, but who would not bow to a man.

    haha the man’s a poet.

    Like


  63. Assange is smart enough to outwit every Western intelligence op to achieve his ends,

    but he’s stupid enough to fuck rabid Liberal Feminist twat…TWICE.

    He has my full support for the leaks, but zero on his choice of sperm receptacles.

    lmfao… and a big wish for Holiday Cheer

    Like


  64. Under Swedish law, there are legal gradations of the definition of rape. ***

    And below that there is the idea of ‘unlawful coercion’. Talking generally, and not about the Assange case, this might involve putting emotional pressure on someone.

    The three categories involve prison sentences of 10, six and four years respectively.

    WTF????? Putting “emotional pressure” on someone can mean anything. You mean if the girl knows the guy will probably drop her if she doesn’t put out pretty frequently, that’s RAPE??? Meriting 4 years in jail, a felony conviction, and sex offender status??????

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11946652

    So does this mean that having sex with a girl who’s under emotional distress about having a hard time meeting her rent payments and is in great emotional distress about that, but the guy wants to help her out as part of their intimate relationship, is a degree of rape in Sweden if she decides down the road to get pissed at him?

    Naturally there’s no cause of action for e.g. extortion in Sweden if a woman demands that in order to keep having sex with her, he has to marry her, or pay a certain amount of her expenses a month or just pay her directly.

    Like


  65. It was about time for that traitor to get caught. I’m sure the women got paid off by CIA or whatnot to falsely charge him, just so that he can be put on the list.

    CIA 1 vs. Assange 0

    Like


  66. Yo Firepower –

    Totally agree. It just burns me up to see a good man like Assange turned in by his d*ck.

    Why couldn’t he have “held court” in a bar in Latin America? Hell, he’d have those Latin cuties writing him love letters right now, pining for his return.

    Instead, he’s facing extradition to a U.S. court on rape charges. NOT a place you want to be.

    Like


  67. As we speak, Roman Polanski is setting up a three-way date between Ardin, Wilen and Van der sloot. It’s on Polanski. Assange will chaperone.

    You heard it here first.

    Like


  68. Sweden is pure HELL as a society. Imagine women running everything with the full power of the State behind them.

    There’s two kinds of women in Sweden. Women…and men.

    Any as*hole man who would put up with that Satanic nightmare of a society is no man. It’s a pussy-fied sorry-ass excuse of a man, who is either gay, castrated, or both.

    Like


  69. Firepower–

    It’s the extreme overreaching of Swedish law and apparently the way it’s interpreted that gives these Christian radical feminists the power to make what in Sweden seems to be a credible case.

    Focusing on his judgment in screwing these two particular girls is widely not the point, and takes the focus off of pressure to change laws like this and their interpretation.

    As well he probably had no idea they’d be the way they’ve proven to be. Probably virtually all the women attracted to him given the world he swims in and his claim to fame, are feminists of one degree or another. These being Christian ones might well have seemed milder to him. Turns out they felt both feminist entitlement to try to bring a man down (or at least greatly mess with him, what with maybe many court appearances a half a world away from where he lives, Swedish attorney’s fees, etc.) under absurd interpretations of an absurdly overreaching law, and a perhaps Christian related sense of betrayal even though he’s only slept with each of them once and had hardly committed to either in any modern understanding (outside perhaps of some Christian circles — though I find it nearly impossible to believe that either of these women were virgins or very close to that).

    Like


  70. Roissy for congress. Now.

    This is not about Julian Assange – it is about the rights and justice men deserve for being humans in a world that pretends to be modern and equal. Assange is just one out of hundreds of thousands of men who were directly damaged by the extreme legal power feminists (or more like the governments and male politicians who let feminists gain control over the laws and the economy in the first place) supply to women all around the world, freely allowing them to screw with innocent men’s lives “for the lulz”.

    When people ask me why am I against feminism and why am I so antagonistic towards feminists, I say it’s because I support equal rights for men and women. Feminists do not want to be equal to men, they want superiority over men – one has to literally close his eyes in order not to notice this.

    Many men think of the feminist overpowering issue as something far from them, something that happens over there in the government and can’t possibly damage them. News flash – feminists are directly affecting our everyday lives, most likely in more ways than we can imagine, ranging from subtle favoritism to right out framing people for rape and destroying their lives.

    What can we do to stop it? good question. I’ve yet to find the answer, though I’m still looking.

    Like


  71. The women involved here with Assange are absolutely LOVING this controversy and world-wide media coverage.

    I can guarantee you that.

    They’re all media-attention-whores. Every last one of them.

    Like


  72. bitch changed her mind two days later should be a defense to these kinds of charges

    Like


  73. I’m guessing this broads had buyers’ remorse. Ardin especially since she’s supposed to hate cock.

    Like


  74. on December 8, 2010 at 2:45 pm Erik_The_Stryker_Slyker

    Great article.
    Chateau, do u have a list all your stated Maxims? How many are there?
    Can someone direct me to a link?
    Help a player in need.

    Like


  75. Actually, I hope he butthexed Ardin.

    Like


  76. Hahahaha. Assange is funny.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20060712184552/http://iq.org/index.html

    Check this post out: Dominating women:

    “After my state sponsored stay at ANU, I ended up at a backpackers filled with some of the 900 Christians from the Australian University Christian Convergence. Most were young women and I turned, somewhat disgracefully, into a sort of Chesterton’s Hardy, the village atheist, brooding and blaspheming over the village idiot, while they, for their part, tried to convert me with the rise and fall their bosoms.

    One of the devout was the lovely daughter of a New Castle minister. At some point in my unintended wooing of her, she looked up, fluttered her eyelids and said ‘Oh, you know so much! I hardly know anything!’.
    ‘That is why you believe in God,’ I explained. This conversational brutality took her breath away and she swooned. I was exactly what she secretly longed for; a man willing to openly disagree with her father. All along she had needed a man to devote herself to. All along she had failed to find a man worthy of being called a man, failed to find a man who would not bow to gods, so she had chosen a god unworthy of being called a god, but who would not bow to a man.”

    Like


  77. @Bhetti – good point with the child custody case.

    The anti-feminist movement may just have gotten a very powerful ally in Assange.

    Like


  78. The_King–

    It was about time for that traitor to get caught.

    First of all, I don’t like what assange did one bit.

    But he’s not a traitor to the US. He’s a citizen of Australia. It’s not even clear he’s violated any US laws, from what I read. Why did the NY Times not do so in leaking the Pentagon Papers, which were far more damaging to US foreign policy and helped to cause us to eventually withdraw and lose that conflict? The US Supreme court decided the Times did not act illegally (thought the leaker might have). The editors of the Times involved were also citizens

    There is a traitor, or at least a violator of our secrecy laws, who’s an intelligence lieutenant I believe in our military, stationed in DC, who apparently had access to the state department cables as part of his duties. He’s been arrested and is likely to be convicted, on the information out there in the press.

    Among the things I don’t like about what he did is how indiscriminate his leaking was. Most of the state department cables which he internet published, which are routinely secret and I believe encrypted when sent over the wires, were merely embarassing to us and others around the world — often because they contained critical personal comments about higher ups in other governments, and so on. It wasn’t like their revelation might help stop what some or many or most would regard as a moral atrocity. In other words there’s scant justification for their leakage. It merely makes it harder to trust us.

    Of course our classified info should be kept more secure. But it can’t be kept secure from those in our military and other intelligence communities charged with analyzing it for patterns dangerous to US security, including terrorist plots.

    That’s how leaked it to Wikileaks, a low level member of US military intelligence. How do we keep that sort of casual leaking for no very good reason even from happening in the future? One way would be to execute the asshole. Well at least jail him for a damn long time. Message to others. But jail the guy who had the duty not to do the leaking.

    Like


  79. It’s amazing to watch Americanist men defend their Matriarchy to the death, calling for Assange’s execution.

    Executing Assange is like treating a runny nose, hoping to cure cancer. The disease is systemic, people. Assange is the solution, not the problem.

    The U.S. matriarchy is going down, with or without Assange. Don’t believe me? How many millions are on Foodstamps? Welfare? Cushy, do-nothing gubmint jobs? How’s our debt-to-GDP ratio been lately?

    Defend “our” nation’s honor all you like. The banksters in London are laughing in your face.

    Like


  80. Gorbachev–

    As far as this is concerned – a bunch of fake, trumped-up and disgusting rape accusations by two self-entitled and slightly unbalanced man-haters is the real issue.

    NO!!!!!!!!

    The real issue is that with so transparently trumped up accusations obviously motivated by hurt over being each of them being “two timed” on their respective apparently sacred one night stands, a combination of ridiculously overreaching Swedish rape law, and a policy of ridiculously leaning over backwards to believe a woman making an accusation, that he’s being demanded to return to Sweden.

    Actually, I don’t think Britain can extradite him to Sweden, since Sweden hasn’t actually brought charges against him. They can’t compel that by extradition. In the US they can’t compel it at all (except informally by threatening to go after the potential defendant for other things).

    Like


  81. Bhetti–

    Basically there’s good cause to believe that one of the most personally important reasons for him to believe in the right to public to information was caused by the state of modern feminist-friendly politics, rather than simply modern politics.

    That is, you can blame feminism for Wikileaks.

    Excellent point and insight. I haven’t seen anyone else make or have it.

    Like


  82. Wake up white man…

    Like


  83. on December 8, 2010 at 3:10 pm Christopher Paul

    Assange is not a lefty or a liberal. He is, as our host says, an anarcho-libertarian and a shining example of why his ilk can’t be trusted with power.

    Like


  84. Welcome to Sweden at its best, im somewhat glad this happens though because many swedish people raised their voice this time and also, Swedish government face obstacles due to some files that wikileaks sent out, it was just about Sweden wake up from its lullaby and lies.

    Like


  85. In summary, libertarian = alpha.

    Like


  86. Bhetti–

    Transparency is the first step towards lack of corruption. You want civilisation to go backwards, start censoring everything and allow hidden agendas.

    See: Africa, Iraq.

    I agree with this completely. But …

    That doesn’t mean there should be transparency about everything. There are privacy considerations. Both personal and institutional. It’s a balance.

    Should the full school records of every student, including any misbehavior or accusation not proven, every grade, every personal evaluation, be made available to everyone in the world who might ever develop an interest? How about every conversation in a marriage, if wikileaks or someone leaking to them manages to plant a listening device?

    Should every detail of every deliberation within the US or British government be made public on the net? Do you think that might chill frank weighing of alternatives much, or dissenting views, or encourage playing to one popular prejudice or another, however ill informed (even if the info’s out there few will take the time to get a balanced view).

    Should every strategy session at all levels of corporations or legal firms be made public for their rivals to learn?

    There really does have to be a balance. Transparency yes, but not with regard to all the inner workings.

    State department cables are supposed to be private, like a private meeting between subordinate and supervisor within the department, but at a time saving and information quickening distance. Foreign office secret dispatches orginally in sealed embassy pouches, have been part of the international order for at least the last 200 years and I imagine much longer. It’s supposed to be as inviolable a principal as the extraterritorial integrity and to a large degree micro sovereignty of embassies in foreign countries. That’s as true of the Qatar embassy in Washington DC as it is of the US embassy in Qatar. The same is true of sealed diplomatic pouches with information,etc. Now admittedly embassies do get bugged, but it’s always an embarrassment to the bugging country to get caught at it.

    Like


  87. Assange is in trouble in Sweden because he didn’t follow proper rape procedure. In Sweden it’s only legal to rape if you look like one of the Muslims at the end of Rode’s excellent cartoon and if you beat your victim black-and-blue. Or you must do more than one chick at a time. Maybe Assange just forgot to give these wymyn black eyes, which might have been what they were after like that white do-gooder black studies professor who got raped in Haiti.

    Anyways, the butt-hurt about him with the Zionist press is hilarious considering all the leaks the JYT did during the Bush years. Also, Sandy Burglar was never punished for anything. Anyone know how John Stuart Leibowitz responded?

    Like


  88. BHETTI.

    It has little or nothing to do with your argument.

    the assange guy had 14 criminal charges against him when he was barely 16. He has, and always been, an irreverent motherfucker. All his hackings were devoted towards divulging classified information. He started this way before he even lost his virginity. He was a born anarchist with a strong science bent. He could have become multimillionaires/billionaires given some of his inventions and programs like bill gates or steve wozniack or steve jobs. I mean, he created one of the very first internet providers for Australia; he was soo smart that he represent university of melbourne(top school) in australian national physics competition. He wrote incredible decryption/encryption softwares, and then release for free to fight the government(instead of making shitloads of money on them). He degreed in physics, mathematics, neuroscience, philosophy and computer science. The guy could have become any of the fortune 500 CEO of a tech company, instead, the guy chooses to see ROME burn.

    Oh yes, he takes perverse pleasure in bedding religious girls, especially, if they are politicians daughter. He chronicled his sexual adventures. This is just who he is: an arsehole. An anarchist, irreverent asshole.

    Like


  89. @Bictopia,

    I would love to know what life is really like there for men.

    As a woman, share your opinion and tell us more stories of the absurd.

    Like


  90. @Doug1

    I see your point about balance, but private enterprise and private lives is one thing, while government, which is paid for by our tax dollars, is quite another.

    We have a RIGHT to know what our government is doing. (Abraham Lincoln’s government of, by, and for the people- remember?)

    Hillary Clinton is collecting DNA on UN delegates. She may very well run for President in 2012 or 2016. Do you want her to collect YOUR DNA?

    Should her desire to do so be “kept secret” as part of your “balance?” Puh-leez…..

    Like


  91. Gorbachev

    @Bictopia,

    I would love to know what life is really like there for men.

    As a woman, share your opinion and tell us more stories of the absurd.

    I don’t know about you, but I would rather she walked around in a tight skirt and high heels.

    Like


  92. Gorbachev—

    I’m going to try that again, since I made a hash of it in my first mad keyboard poundings.

    The real issue is that with so transparently trumped up accusations, a combination of ridiculously overreaching Swedish rape law and often interpreting that law ridiculously broadly, and also one of leaning over backwards to believe a woman making an accusation (at least if feminists groups are pressuring), that he’s being demanded to return to Sweden for more questioning. These two women are obviously motivated by hurt over being each of them being “two timed” on their respective apparently sacred one night stands. Both of them acted pleased as could be with Assange the next day after sex with him, until they each learned he’d been with the other.

    Recall or learn that he was already questioned by Swedish authorities on these accusations while he was still in the country. After hearing his statement and that of the two female accusers, the Swedish prosecutor declined to bring charges and left him free to leave the country, which he did. It was only after these two women with feminist groups support brought appeal of the initial prosecutor’s decision not to proceed within the prosecutor’s office, and higher ups changed their minds under the pressure, that the Swedish government’s demand that he return for more questioning went out. Not, they haven’t filed a case against him.

    Like


  93. on December 8, 2010 at 3:37 pm Erik_The_Stryker_Slyker

    Sorry for the bad grammar I wrote this from my smartphone.

    Rosenberg , I like your statement about the Spartans and sexual restraint.
    to train hard, to compete in Alpha activities, there is no time for bitches.
    Especially stuck up snobby selfcentered sluts (all north american women)
    I’ve only got time for Money and training.
    When I chase money, wealth and physical success I set myself up for way more(too many) women in my future. I get pussy now but never at the expense of training

    M.O.B Money over bitches.
    All you got do to become alpha, is hustle. Make mistakes, feel the pain, get forgiveness, don’t do the mistake again.
    People who are jacked, rich and successful with women just put in years of hard sweaty painful work to get there.
    I was once a scrub. A beta. But once I realized what I was I began to change, hit the gym, pick a career, and hustle towards those lofty expectations.
    I’ve always been good looking, white northern european so that’s an advantage. But my looks didn’t help me get pussy when I had no game. Its a learned process.

    Like


  94. Didn’t sound like Roissy, but the writer used Libertardian, so it’s hard to say.

    If Assange is a rapist for poking after the condom broke, what do you call a chic who ‘forgot’ to take birth control?

    Victim.

    Not sure why, but be aware of it gentlemen.

    Like


  95. Well i haven’t lived there for ten years, and i am not a man, but let me tell you an uncomfortable experience my friend had.
    Well, he was charged for raping his wife in Stockholm, he got jail for raping her 350 times or so, never did the court being able to prove violence, but things like, if she didnt want to have sex with him, he would be grumpy the next morning and not helping out with the kid, one rape was in a toilet apparently she was sitting on top of him, i cant get how that can be rape, on the other hand, she had already charged her father and teacher for rape. My friend got 4 years jail for it, i cant imagine any worse inhumane thing to do. Oh and yes, the whole thing started with that she wanted to divorce and have lonely custody of their child, so i guess her problem was easily solved to send the father to jail, sorry i get upset every time this is mentioned.
    For what i am concerned, i love Sweden and it hurts to see that every time i go back there, things are even more entangled in lies and fake morals.,

    Like


  96. on December 8, 2010 at 3:42 pm Erik_The_Stryker_Slyker

    Thank you chateau for the creation of this blog.
    Its a encyclopedia of Game.
    I have read some really funny articles that I re read to my brothers for a hard laugh.

    Like


  97. on December 8, 2010 at 3:49 pm rebelliousvanilla

    If I was Assange, I’d press rape charges against them too. In Norway, a woman was convicted for rape because she started giving a blowjob to a man while he was passed out. He woke up, told her off and pressed charges and she got 6 months in prison. lol

    Anyway, Assange should do this. He should say that he didn’t want to have sex with the 2nd one, but she spread her legs for him and persuaded him to do it against his will. He should also tell that the woman who attended his seminar stalked him. If I was in his position, I’d make Sweden look like a place of insane crackpots in the eyes of everyone in the world. And if they refused to prosecute the two sluts, I’d simply talk about discrimination and sexism and how unequal Sweden is. If you want to piss off leftists, begin rambling about unequal treatment.

    I’m glad I live in a country where the police would laugh out loud at these two idiotic whores. Unless they’re politically connected, they wouldn’t do squat. Maybe not even then.

    Like


  98. I personally am not that worked up about this most recent batch of Wikileaks stuff – if anything, it actually makes the U.S. look pretty good, compared to other countries, and it actually achieves what a lot of people would have thought impossible – it at least partially rehabilitates George W. Bush. I mean, it looks like the much-derided “Axis of Evil” really exists, Obama really is obsessed with the Palestinian situation, even though no one else in the Middle East gives a shit, The Arabs want us to bomb away, The Iranians really were aiding the Iraqi insurgency, Hillary really is a control-freak, etc. So Assange actually made W look good. Given his political predilections, that is probably almost punishment enough for him…

    It’s the previous stuff, the Afghan stuff, the stuff that could lead to American soldiers and those Afghans who are foolish enough to trust us getting killed, that I object to. Embarassing people is one thing – giving aid and comfort to the enemy is another. Incidentally, aren’t there some Australian troops in Afghanistan?

    Like


  99. Days of Broken Arrows:

    “Check out this Counterpunch article from Sept. that contained this gem about accuser Anna Ardin:”

    Well if he went to listen one of her lectures, he deserved it.

    Like


  100. Lets be honest what this case will do. Like the budgetary crisis in Europe and the US, it will explode assumptions and destroy the structure that supports it. Feminism and the “rape” charge is merely the HATE HATE HATE women have for beta males. Assange faces rape charges because the women regret sex, he was not Alpha enough. Their complaints? He was more interested in his computer than them. Charlie Sheen could have had a coked out, violent encounter with ten hookers and skated, because he’s Alpha. [I.E. he’s not nerdy, not very smart, is uber-famous, and acts like an asshole all the time, which is entirely what women want.] Concurrent with the HATE HATE HATE of beta males, is the female desire to make all betas into Gays. [Sundance’s “Girls Who Like Boys Who Like Boys”]

    Assange deserves punishment, because he’s a threat to the West (basically destroying the US ability to keep the lid on the ME and thus oil prices below the Iranian/Russian target rate of $200 a barrel). That he will now have his anti-Western, Libertardian supporters smack up against Feminism and the expression of female power magnified X 100 is even better. Like the lynching of Reginald Denny at Florence and Normandy, this is a public wake-up call. Not the least of which is that “nice” women are all like the two here: celebutard obsessed, willing to have sex at the drop of the hat with any guy that has a modicum of fame, no matter how creepy or loser-ish. With a string of lovers.

    The fall-out is likely to be awareness on the part of beta men on just how much their female peers hate them, and the uselessness of their peers as anything other than pump and dump. You cannot push on a string, and from Ben Bernanke trying to push strings by shoving money into the world, or feminists pushing rape charges because they regretted the sex, all this does is push safe-haven behavior. Gold and Silver prices soar, porn usage increases.

    Assange deserves to be punished. Leaking US secrets while preserving Russia’s, China’s, Iran’s, and AQ’s is evidence of who’s side he is on. That his punishment will consist of fighting bogus feminist rape charges that they now regret the sex is ice cream with cherries on top.

    Like


  101. I love the neat George Orwell 1984 paraphrase in there:

    “Imagine a high heel stomping on a nutsack, forever.”

    LOL.

    Seriously though, I wouldn’t be surprised if Assange is a CIA or Mossad patsy.

    Was anyone surprised by any of the latest leaked “revelations”?

    No, me neither.

    Like


  102. Gorb, some feminists are writing about it.
    http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/12/06/condomgate-for-wikileaks-founder/

    Have a trash can nearby in case the urge to vomit strikes.

    Like


  103. on December 8, 2010 at 4:08 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Tschafer, it’s not like the US has anything to do anywhere in the world besides America. So I support any information he leaks. Besides, he’s not American, so why would he have any loyalty to what the US does?

    I’m amused by people who say he commited treason. Right. He didn’t swear allegiance to anything.

    Like


  104. Afghanistan = “where empires go to die”

    You wanna save American lives in Afghanistan? Talk to the Soviets – and GTFO.

    If Wikileaks can be the impulse that starts withdrawal from Aghanistan, Assange will have SAVED thousands of American military lives.

    I mean WTF are we doing there? Teaching sheep-herders about the land of Great PX? Where millions of brain-dead Americans buy useless Chinese trinkets and max-up their credit cards?

    WTF, are you kidding me?

    Like


  105. Orwell messed up with his vision of a big brother,
    behold the big sister:

    http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/bigsis.html

    Like


  106. “I mean WTF are we doing there? Teaching sheep-herders about the land of Great PX? Where millions of brain-dead Americans buy useless Chinese trinkets and max-up their credit cards?”

    Teaching women their rights.

    Like


  107. After reading how J.A. handled these two women, ginas are tingling for him all over the world right now.

    Like


  108. @HUX – I find myself in agreement with your comments here. I’m always amused by how clueless the Republican commenters here are. As if the Republicans have done anything for this nation’s citizens. Both parties are two sides of the same coin. Both support an unconstitutional fourth branch of government (which means enormous levels of taxation without representation as your wealth is clandestinely stripped away by inflation). Both support feminism. I could go on.

    Wake up, Republitards.

    Like


  109. Assange is an anarcho-Left-libertarian. There is a difference between that and an anarcho-capitalist ala Rothbard. The anarchist-Left believes if they abolish the government and capitalism then they will have a utopian communitarian society that revolves around social justice. Assange himself has said this.

    Rothbard’s anarcho-capitalism argues that if you abolish the government then you will get the pure free market.

    IMO, the only viable strand of libertarianism is Minarchism. Minarchist believe in a government limited to the police, courts and armed forces and that’s it. No welfare state, no regulatory state, no victimless crime laws, no public education, etc.. This seem to me plausible. Anarchism seems to be the mirror image of Communism and a pipe dream.

    The libertarian label should really be dropped. Anarchists should call themselves anarchists (and specify which type). Leftists should call themselves Leftists and not liberals. Conservatives should call themselves Conservatives (and specify which type – Roissey for example is a secular Bio-Conservative – he accepts every major Conservative philosophic premise he just rejects god) and Classical Liberals and Minarchists should call themselves Minarchists. This would add a lot of clarity to the political spectrum and political thought in general.

    Assange was an anarcho-Leftist. Far better to call him that than the meaningless term “libertarian”.

    Like


  110. @chainring.

    You are asking too much. The worshippres of mammon cannot raise their eyes.

    Like


  111. @CHAINRING

    Thanks, but as you well know, the programming runs deep. It’s tough to take the red pill and wake up. People are comfortable with their blue pills – you know, widescreen TVs, video games, sports, alcohol, and porn. We’re a nation of addicts, and damn it, we like it that way.

    The Masters have put up the false paradigm of REPUBLICRATS to keep us believing something that deep down we know is a scam. We don’t ask too many questions, because you know, that would be a pain, and hey, we might have to change our lives. Ain’t gonna happen. The human capacity for self-deception and laziness is pretty much unplombable.

    Because we’re a nation of pussy-fied betas who won’t get offf our asses…..

    Bottom-line? Save every last nickel you have and GTFO of the USA, while you still can….

    Like


  112. biktopia–

    Well, he was charged for raping his wife in Stockholm, he got jail for raping her 350 times or so, never did the court being able to prove violence, but things like, if she didnt want to have sex with him, he would be grumpy the next morning and not helping out with the kid,

    Thanks for sharing that with us.

    That’s beyond outrageous. That shouldn’t deserve even a reprimand. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with it. And he got 4 years???!!!!

    Women both withhold sex to get men to do things, and can get pissy for periods of time when they don’t get it when they want it, all the time, anyone who talks to people can tell you.

    I guess that’s how Sweden interprets this part of it’s graduated punishment rape law (all the way down to 4 years):

    And below that there is the idea of ‘unlawful coercion’. Talking generally, and not about the Assange case, this might involve putting emotional pressure on someone.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11946652

    Like


  113. Anyone know anything about applying for Canadian citizenship?

    Like


  114. I was expecting a huge debate on whatever Assange is an alpha or not. My gut tells me that all this “leftie/anarchist libertarian” debate is just that.

    A guy with those political tendences, a little hacker punk that the manly readers at Roissy’s could beat up can’t be an alpha (and get laid more than them), right?

    Heh.

    Fun aside, I honestly hope that th¡s wakes up the guys that say “I’m a master PUA and only losers get false rape accusations” to the fact that they aren’t inmune to Big Sis.

    The so called “Christan Feminists” (no such thing is possible) have the biggest rationalization hamsters and they really hate men. Brrrrrrrr.

    Guys that live in Sweeden tell me that is pretty horrible there. This makes even the US look tame (for now).

    To all the guys that want Assange’s head: You will be next. So don’t cheer, dumbasses.

    Like


  115. I came here to post about that story – and it was the first blog entry shown. Ahead of the curve as always CR…nice work

    Like


  116. whiskey–

    Feminism and the “rape” charge is merely the HATE HATE HATE women have for beta males. Assange faces rape charges because the women regret sex, he was not Alpha enough.

    As usual you get it wrong to fit it into your agenda.

    Assante seemed like an alpha to both these groupies. That’s what the were, liberal agenda groupies to his headline grabbing, poking sticks in the US eye, bad boy stardom.

    They didn’t get pissed because they regretted sex the next am. Read Chateau’s summary again. They were both pleased as punch the next day after sex. What pissed them off was to learn he’d shagged the other, and hence neither was his exclusive one night stand on his trip to Sweden to champion his anarchist speaking leaks to power crusade.

    Like


  117. @PAUL

    Canada? Canada? Canada is the beta-test for what’s coming in the U.S. Canada has the bitchiest, most-princess-mental snot-fiendish females in the universe.

    It’s Sweden on estrogen. Wrong direction, my friend.
    Head SOUTH.

    Where both the weather and women are warmer.

    Like


  118. rebelliousvanilla–

    Anyway, Assange should do this. He should say that he didn’t want to have sex with the 2nd one, but she spread her legs for him and persuaded him to do it against his will. He should also tell that the woman who attended his seminar stalked him. If I was in his position, I’d make Sweden look like a place of insane crackpots in the eyes of everyone in the world. And if they refused to prosecute the two sluts, I’d simply talk about discrimination and sexism and how unequal Sweden is. If you want to piss off leftists, begin rambling about unequal treatment.

    Well put. I’ve been thinking along similar lines.

    He should also say he agreed about the condom thing (he apparently used it the first time with each, but not the next time in the morning) and asked them each to remind him or put one on him if they had sex again in the morning. But then in the heat of their mutual passion SHE DIDN’T DO EITHER, and so caused him emotional distress as to rape him!!!

    Like


  119. Damn hormones.

    The fembots got another one.

    Like


  120. […] Roissy has the details:  The Assange “Rape”: A Case Of Spurned Groupies […]

    Like


  121. “pinkshirts”

    Say more.

    Like


  122. yes man!,

    In a nutshell: computer programming, physics, mathematics, neuroscience and philosophy. Clearly a borderline polymath.

    I have to say that even though I don’t like the guy, I’ve gotta respect him. I wouldn’t even qualify “polymath” with “borderline” (it takes one to know one…) unless you mean the personality disorder.

    Like


  123. The moral of the story is: guys…don’t just fuck anyone. The consequences can be massive. It’s not worth that 20 mins ( or more ha!) of fun. Remember the movie: FATAL ATTRACTION.
    Anna Ardin. Pointy, longish chin, thin lips, and the flat tipped fingers..alll signs of a nasty female whom you can’t trust….. according to Chinese fortune telling.

    Like


  124. I was heading out to a meeting earlier and wasn’t able to post on the Spain thread a rant about Christian Feminists in relation to Anna Ardin in the Assange case. The reason why I respect this blog so much: the host seemed to read my mind and posted a rant about Christian Feminists for me.

    Christian Feminists are the most dangerous because they are taking control of right wing parties in democracies in order to solidify feminist control (not to mention bring about world government).

    They are also the nastiest, coldest people I’ve ever known or dated (dating one was more of a reason for me to turn against religion than 9-11).

    Christian Feminists excel at the following agendas:

    1) False Rape charges – Because they don’t like premarital sex and want men to learn that its best not to have it

    2) Sexual Harassment laws – Because they don’t want younger women having sex with older men (the real or hoped for boyfriends or husbands of the older feminists).

    Hillary supporters used the Monica Lewinsky “scandal” to take over the Republican Party while idiot men condemned Clinton for doing the only thing he did right (impaling interns).

    I hired a Christian woman for a company once and she repaid my kindness by reporting to the owner that some virus pop-ups on a computer I used that featured porn were sexual harassment of her by me. The owner realized that all the computers had gotten a virus and I was not to blame at all.

    3) Stealth Alimony + Domestic Violence Laws + Paranoia Over Stalking

    Sarah Palin hurt her former brother in law over these issues and she used the courts to force Levi Johnson to pay Bristol a whopping $1700 per month child support when he was only 20.

    In 2008 Sarah Palin accepted an award from a NOW branch leader and basically said she supports the NOW on most issues (except abortion).

    4) “Human Trafficking” propaganda – Because they don’t want younger women having sex with older men – While there might be some sex slavery happening among the Mexican cartels now, the Washington Post and many in the Men’s Rights Movement have been reporting that Sex Trafficking is exaggerated by a factor of 100 by those with an anti-prostitution agenda.

    You’ll know you’re dealing with a Christian Feminist when she tells you that 100% of all voluntary prostitutes are “Trafficking Victims”. Much of the exaggeration about “Human Trafficking” comes from stats about victims that include all prostitutes in a given country (like Germany was said by Condi Rice to have 50,000 trafficking victims during the 2006 World Cup, which meant only that Germany had 50,000 prostitutes overall).

    I think a lot of American men sensed something was seriously wrong with Bush + McCain’s Republican Party when they refused to vote in 2008. I really hope the new Tea Party women aren’t a continuation of the problem. The Tea Party Express organization that proposed Christine ODonnell for Delaware seems to have been run by mangina types.

    We need to see that Congress does not pass the iVAWA within the next week or in the new year. iVAWA would authorize the US to fund feminist groups internationally.

    Hopefully Assange will recognize and help publicize the Men’s Rights Movement. It would be in his interest to do so. He has the Bully Pulpit.

    If he fails to do this, he deserves his fate.

    I can’t blame him for getting seduced by Sophie from Enkoping (beautiful town, decent looking girl). But what the hell was he thinking with that 30 something Anna?

    If he was seduced in a honey trap, he wasn’t being Alpha, however I thought it was very Alpha what he said to the minister’s daughter in Australia.

    I always challenge Christian girls that they shouldn’t be putting Jesus before me in priority. They react positively to that overall (even if they don’t admit to this). My experience has been that, if a woman sees you as respecting her religion too much, she will consider you beta (in the same vein, you should only slam her religion once or twice and not every time you talk with her).

    Christian men reading this: Chase the feminists out of your religious organizations and do so loudly. Then even I might consider going to church again on Sundays.

    Progressive Christianity + Feminism = World Government

    Like


  125. Wait a second. Stop the insanity. How is Assange “a threat to the West” in all this? What “West” are you guys talking about?

    Um, if you hadn’t noticed or have forgotten whilst listening to right-wing patriotard blabbermouth, the power elites in the “West” don’t give a fuck about White men. Not one bit!
    But these treacherous power elites are the “West” which the sucker patriotards are defending, not the interests of White men.

    Assange has revealed much about what is happening behind the curtain in Oz (the global powers-that-be), so that you and I can look and finally accept the reality that we have been lied lied lied to about so much by “our own governments” that revolution is justified. Have some goddamn gratitude and try using your own brains, people!

    Roissy here has pointed out that the fact that the “West” chose to go after him with trumped-up sex-crime charges has opened up a powerful opportunity for men to fight back. This is the time to fight the insanity of feminism while at the same time standing up for freedom and against the drive to transform “the West” into yet another region of the Third World-style globalist plantation. But don’t expect the Right Wingers to tell you that…they are just as much bought off corrupt stooges as today’s Left. It should disgust you that even on Stormfront, where they should fucking KNOW better, a huge chunk of the members are lining up behind the neocon scum who call Assange a traitor who should be executed. I tried to warn them not to fool themselves and become tools for right-wing patriotard phonies. But they couldn’t resist the appeal of “being mainstream conservatives” long enough to recognize/remember that Whitey LOSES when the “Western” traitor-elites win. Goddamn, is there any difference between a Stormfronter and a Rush neocon dittohead anymore? Too little difference to be considered significant, apparently. Of course, this tragic course happens just as Stormfronters became more and more corrupted and subverted by feminism (mostly of a “Christian” variety, indeed).

    Hail Wikileaks. Hail Assange.

    Like


  126. Reading a post like this an amazing cathartic experience. I’ve been reading the femnazi’s reaction to Assange the last few days and was hoping Roissy would react. Thank god he did. This post should be framed and given to every man.

    Like


  127. “Once, as she was lecturing, a male student in the audience looked at his notes instead of staring at her. Anna Ardin reported him for sexual harassment because he discriminated against her for being a woman and because she claimed he made use of the male “master suppression technique” in trying to make her feel invisible. As soon as the student learned about her complaint, he contacted her to apologize and explain himself. Anna Ardin’s response was to once again report him for sexual harassment…”

    haha wtf. this can’t be real

    Like


  128. Gorbachev

    I’ve been searching diligently for the feminist response for weeks, now.

    Nothing.

    I wonder why there’s no feminist analysis of this event; no women up in arms and using this as an example of how even progressive heroes can be evil – another example of the basic Evilness of Males.

    Either he’s getting a pass because he hates the US, or even feminists realize how revoltingly vapid the entire process is.

    Anyone notice anything?

    I’m not used to this absence of revolting hypocrisy.

    So far he’s mostly getting the same pass from feminists given to President Clinton. After all, Assange is sticking it to the Man and bringing it all down, sister, and that takes priority.

    Like


  129. Rosenberg said:

    The key is to not masturbate and to fuck infrequently. That way your every fuck will be like your first fuck ever.

    The Spartans understood the negative effects of sexual satiation and cohabitation. That’s why even married couples weren’t permitted to cohabit the first several years, all in the name of virility and fertility.

    General Jack D. Ripper: Well, I, uh… I… I… first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.

    General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue… a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I… I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.

    General Jack D. Ripper: I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh… women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh… I do not avoid women, Mandrake.

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: No.

    General Jack D. Ripper: But I… I do deny them my essence.

    Like


  130. “ASSANGE IS A FUCKING LIBERAL. A FIRE-SPEWING LIBERAL.

    Not a libertarian, as your wish fulfillment will have it.”

    Quite so, but he is the enemy of my enemy. He is a member of the non ruling left, an enemy of the regnant left, an enemy of the state.

    What took down the Roman Catholic theocracy was not the light of reason, not the enlightenment, but bigoted religious zealot theocrats like Martin Luther, who were rebelling because the Church was not theocratic enough. Julian Assange is one of those rebel theocrats, rebelling against the holy Church of political correctness for not being politically correct enough.

    Like


  131. BH

    Facing a false rape charge will be nothing compared to what the US will have in store for him in Guantanomo, or even at a normal trial in the US.

    Are you kidding? If there was a United States vs. Assange, it’d be the U.S. who wouldn’t get a fair trial. He’s a hero to a large percentage of leftwingnut Americans and he’d get a top legal team for free that would rival O.J.’s. Besides, Guantanamo is like a five-star resort and a lifestyle improvement for the asshats who have been taken there.

    Like


  132. Jr. Gorilla said:

    Everyone else, don’t be fooled into thinking feminism is a leftist thing. It’s just as institutionalized on the right, and even more hateful there. Anna Ardin is a right-winger. Right wing women here might not be hate-mongering feminists quite yet, but they will be soon.

    Don’t make shit up. There is nothing right-wing about Ardin. She’s even described herself as being on the left.

    Like


  133. PRCalDude said:

    Assange is in trouble in Sweden because he didn’t follow proper rape procedure. In Sweden it’s only legal to rape if you look like one of the Muslims at the end of Rode’s excellent cartoon and if you beat your victim black-and-blue. Or you must do more than one chick at a time. Maybe Assange just forgot to give these wymyn black eyes, which might have been what they were after like that white do-gooder black studies professor who got raped in Haiti.

    rebelliousvanilla said:

    If I was Assange, I’d press rape charges against them too. In Norway, a woman was convicted for rape because she started giving a blowjob to a man while he was passed out. He woke up, told her off and pressed charges and she got 6 months in prison. lol

    Lol!

    Like


  134. what said:

    The moral of the story is: guys…don’t just fuck anyone. The consequences can be massive. It’s not worth that 20 mins (or more ha!) of fun.

    You usually only get about 20 minutes? Poor thing.

    Like


  135. @Roissy “Assange, a figure of ambivalence at best”
    No ambivalence here: The man is a hero. Any man who can simultaneously piss off the Snoopmeister General (aka U.S. government) and a pack of man-hating feministas not only is not all bad, but is pretty goddamned close to all good in my book.

    Like


  136. Jerry–

    I can’t blame him for getting seduced by Sophie from Enkoping (beautiful town, decent looking girl). But what the hell was he thinking with that 30 something Anna?

    He didn’t exactly pursue her. She came to the place he was staying and jumped into his bed.

    She had made some arrangements for his talks in Sweden and offered over long distance to let him use her place since she’d be away on business. She came home early while he was still there and within hours they were shagging.

    Wait that’s (Swedish) RAPE. She used emotional pressure on him to get him to screw her. He was understandably enough worried that she’d throw him out if he turned her down!!! RAPE!!!

    Like


  137. I hold no brief for our friend. His site included the names of Afghans who assisted the US.

    That as a result innocent people would face the savagery of the Taliban didn’t seem to bother him at the time.

    Funny though that a man who has spent his life glorifying insane left liberalism is now brought down by the twisted laws his chums have enacted.

    Like


  138. Ardin may be a feminist but I bet anything she shaves her tiger.

    Like


  139. Oookay, so Sweden has basically adopted College Campus PC Rape Law. You just can’t make these things up, can you?

    My prediction: there will be a deafening official silence on the whole subject of ridiculous and unjust rape laws, then after a brief but decent period the grand project will, all now forgotten or conjured away, resume its grinding of society into dust.

    Like


  140. Why would Ardin want to exact revenge against unfaithful boyfriends? Isn’t the feminist conception of the world free of gender normed relationships? Don’t they foresee a future where sex is freely given and taken without constraint?

    Like


  141. Holy shit. Now minorities want laws interpreted differently for them because they’re different. Like murder and rape and child trafficking:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101208/ap_on_re_us/us_cross_cultural_lawyers

    Like


  142. Surprised that any judge or prosecutor would allow the case to go forward, since both of the “ladies” were very friendly to Julian after their ordeal.

    Moral of story: When porking feminazis, have it on camera and don’t use thin rubbers

    Like


  143. Tschafer
    “Assange is a truely replusive anti-Western dick, but he doesn’t deserve this – it’s an affront to all men everywhere. When it comes to the various secret services of the world feeding him into a wood chipper feet first, I have little sympathy (I mean, the guy pissed off Vladimir Putin – that’s as close to “suicide by cop” as you can come, internationally speaking). But this “rape” business is a bunch of crap. I personally hope that Assange beats the rap – and that Mr. Putin will then do his duty…”

    This and other related comments here are treasonous, communist, authoritarian 3rd world evil and their authors deserve to be metaphorically spat upon by any true Westerner, autonomous adult male, or lover of liberty. You may love licking the jackboots of power, but just remember that the US Founding Fathers started a war specifically to overthrow and kill scum like you.

    Vladimir Putin is a controlling power-hungry de facto ruler of a poor, corrupt, violent 3rd world country that has killed more people in its bloody history than almost any other. A country that for a century was the most dangerous and oppressive enemy of the Western world. If you want to suck tyrant cock, then why don’t you fuck off over there, you effeminate compliant slave?

    Guys like Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, Thomas Jefferson must be turning in their graves hearing so many so-called ‘Americans’ stab their country’s ideals in the back like this. History will judge you much as Joe McCarthy, GW Bush, or Benedict Arnold are judged.

    Like


  144. @HUX

    It’s amazing to watch Americanist men defend their Matriarchy to the death, calling for Assange’s execution.

    Executing Assange is like treating a runny nose, hoping to cure cancer. The disease is systemic, people. Assange is the solution, not the problem.

    The U.S. matriarchy is going down, with or without Assange. Don’t believe me? How many millions are on Foodstamps? Welfare? Cushy, do-nothing gubmint jobs? How’s our debt-to-GDP ratio been lately?

    Defend “our” nation’s honor all you like. The banksters in London are laughing in your face.

    One hundred percent on target. All this flag waving horseshit is for morons and suckers. Let them and their families go down with the ship, so long as I make a profit from the “disaster.”

    Sheep get sheared.

    Like


  145. “Fubsy
    Krauser PUA thinks Assange is a beta:”

    The dude, like him or loathe him, managed to bag two 7-8/10 Swedish chicks – who are actually friends with each other – in the space of 48 hours, bareback, within hours of meeting them. He got one of them to PAY FOR HIS FUCKING TRAIN TICKETS. If that isn’t alpha, then Bogart, Caesar, and Genghis fucking Khan are lesser omegas.

    Stop being so fucking pathetic and jealous. Recognise a game-changing master pimp when you see one. The fact that he looks rather weak, spindly and effeminate just makes his AMOG game even more impressive.

    Nothing like whining beta bitches trying to gain status pathetically by putting down an alpha. Enjoy stroking your little dicklets, chumps.

    Like


  146. Alpha?

    This post is true tongue-in-cheek comedic genius!

    Regardless of his intellect or skills, he’s just a sociopath fuck-up… he’s proven as much throughout his entire life.

    Why you chose to even post about this betatard,
    reject-villain from a bad spy film is an even bigger joke.
    AND, that’s all topped by giving a fuck about Fem-leftists bringing about the fall of civilization.

    Bottom line: he should have shot his load on their tits, wiped himself off on the drapes and made his exit.

    Like


  147. Britain, epicenter of self-loathing, self-annihilating Westerners

    Seriously, you have no idea of the extent of it. The anomie in this country is unbearable. It’s more apparent if you’ve travelled around Europe for contrast. Hell, I came back from a weekend in Sweden in March and indeed saw the emasculation you spoke of (and just about every other sign of Social Democratic hegemony observable to a tourist), but at least they can do an ostensibly good job of this socialist utopian shit.

    The Left has tried to do the same with Britain but with mixed results. The bourgeoisie are for the most part becoming emasculated SWPLs, but the proles are breeding far too exponentially let alone be expected to care for bourgeois status-games. What we have is a worst-of-both-worlds scenario: a mix of emasculation and primitive notions of masculinity. Conflated of course by mass immigration and the remarkable degeneracy of British proles, which is a whole issue in itself. You can imagine the tensions and whatnot leading to serious anomie.

    Like


  148. “Assange should do this. He should say that he didn’t want to have sex with the 2nd one, but she spread her legs for him and persuaded him to do it against his will.

    ….

    I’m glad I live in a country where the police would laugh out loud at these two idiotic whores. Unless they’re politically connected, they wouldn’t do squat. Maybe not even then.”

    So you would knowingly perjure yourself to try an convict people of a crime they didn’t commit, and you are glad you live in a country where rich people can corrupt the legal system to buy justice. I suggest you google “rule of law”, and ask yourself why it’s only in impoverished 3rd world countries where corruption and miscarriages of justice as still viewed as normal behaviour. Meanwhile back in the west, we’ll carry on trying to hold criminal scum to account via the legal process – especially if they are whacko feminazis, corrupt government officials, or rabid neo-con big government statists.

    Where the government squelches that by unfair means, we’ll go outside the law to hold them to account to us, THEIR MASTERS. Get it? We rule the government, they don’t rule us. If they forget that fact, we start fucking with them through the media and at the ballot box. If they don’t respond to said fucking, we start a revolution and turf the bastards out. Maybe you should try it back home sometime – when you get the balls to do so, we’ll be happy to welcome you into the society of relatively free countries. Until then – physician, heal thyself.

    Like


  149. A note on Christian feminists:

    I dated one once (er, well, “dated”).

    While she slept with me, and was soundly judgmental about sluts (irony of ironies – it was first-date sex with us), she was also rabidly feminist.

    I’ve found that white nationalist women, racist women and conservative / religious women (not all the same, but these intersect) are often the most fanatically feminist in the worst way.

    [Editor: I do not notice any white nationalist women espousing feminist beliefs.

    ps build a wall! ;} ]

    Entitled – morally judgmental – without the slightest bit of mercy – vengeful in the extreme. It’s the same thing with religion: Anything is justified, anything at all, in the name of (insert rabid belief).

    Hard-core lefties are the same with their various new religions (environmentalism, Yoga-nism).

    But no-one is as viciously pitiless towards men as conservative feminists scorned or dissed. They’d eviscerate men and eat them alive if they could. Also their female rivals.

    One of the dangers of the breed. Hence the pathetic hen-pecked look of white nationalist men and many Republicans (no relation to each other, of course). Same effect: Ball-busting nasty Conservative hypocrite women.

    Like


  150. The fellow is alpha because he gets loads of tail, albeit lefty feminazi tail.

    Still, he has done a great deal of damage. The only winners from the leaks are the Islamofascists and enemies of the west.

    Like


  151. OneSTDV–Why would Ardin want to exact revenge against unfaithful boyfriends? Isn’t the feminist conception of the world free of gender normed relationships?

    One night stand “bf” who was shortly leaving the country.

    It apparently has something to do with her being a Christian feminist.

    See Jerry above in one of his comments.

    Like


  152. It used to be that post-apocalyptic scenarios used to be reserved for sci-fi writers and conspiracy theorists.

    Now economists, historians and journalists are facing the facts.

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/06/america_collapse_2025

    Like


  153. Gorbachev

    Cuntish behaviour isn’t confined to the extreme of the political spectrum. Worst one I ever knew was a self styled moderate.

    Like


  154. I think all conservatives think the charges are bogus — and hope Assange gets the death penalty for them.

    Like


  155. @R.Sole
    “Fubsy

    The dude, like him or loathe him, managed to bag two 7-8/10 Swedish chicks

    Well, 6-7, if you want to be straight; and see a more recent picture of Ann Ardin.

    – who are actually friends with each other

    Check.

    the space of 48 hours,

    Check.

    bareback,

    Check.

    within hours of meeting them.

    Check.

    He got one of them to PAY FOR HIS FUCKING TRAIN TICKETS.

    Check.

    If that isn’t alpha, then Bogart, Caesar, and Genghis fucking Khan are lesser omegas.

    it IS an impressive performance for a 38-year-old guy, even with his profile. Make no mistake: We seek out fame and fortune to bad chicks. This is Maleness at its most refined. And chicks seek out suck males like bees seek honey (or pollen).

    So Props to JA. It deserves a bit of an Alpha award. I hope his response is properly Alpha.

    I’ll bet hard cash he has women wishing they could get a piece.

    Stop being so fucking pathetic and jealous. Recognise a game-changing master pimp when you see one. The fact that he looks rather weak, spindly and effeminate just makes his AMOG game even more impressive.

    It’s all about leveraging what you’ve got. And he did. And does. Pretty smart.

    Nothing like whining beta bitches trying to gain status pathetically by putting down an alpha. Enjoy stroking your little dicklets, chumps.

    I wouldn’t go that far. Remember, as a left-anarchist, and I can at least respect the “anarchist” part of that, a lot of people hate the bastard.

    But you’ve got to give it to the man: he’s a Man.

    Like


  156. The cat’s outta the bag–and it’s wearing a yarmulke!

    WikiLeaks ‘struck a deal with Israel’ over diplomatic cables leaks

    “Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva earlier this year and struck the secret deal. The Israel government, it seems, had somehow found out or expected that the documents to be leaked contained a large number of documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza in 2006 and 2008-9 respectively. These documents, which are said to have originated mainly from the Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut, where removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, who is the only person who knows the password that can open these documents, the sources added.”

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/08/wikileaks-struck-a-deal-with-israel-over-cable-leaks/

    Like


  157. Roissy,

    OT, but you’ve got to check out this site: Make Love Not Porn and woman who runs it. 50 yrs old, dresses like a hooker, has sex with guys in their 20s. Menapausal woman game?

    Like


  158. @Sargon

    Gorbachev
    Cuntish behaviour isn’t confined to the extreme of the political spectrum. Worst one I ever knew was a self styled moderate.

    True. But it’s the conservatives I’m afraid of.

    But there are some pretty cuntish lefties, too.

    Like


  159. As much as I’d like Assange to be made to “Squeal like pig, boy!” by a large inmate for his WikiLeaks sh*t, this “rape”crud is so cowardly and gay it takes away from and counteracts that. Douchebaggery thy name is woman.

    Like


  160. So why would Assange make a deal with the Israelis ?
    As if they are any “cleaner” than the US in their dealings.

    Or did the Israelis make him an offer he simply could not refuse , like a visit in the middle of the night to deliver a bullet to the back of the head?

    Or is the whole thing another made up load of BS ?

    Like


  161. Assange is a hero. Most people posting here are contemptible, comfortable cowards, who would be happy licking boots and heil-hitlering to a fascist regime if it shared their disgusting political views.

    I’ll respect the government’s privacy and that of its collaborators when it respects mine. End of argument.

    Like


  162. I think JA is one of the anti-West fifth columists unwittingly giving the barbarians a hammer to bash us with. But nonetheless, fabricating a false rape charge against him is despicable and he should be supported in beating the rap.

    I call him beta because he looks and acts like one. He is just a dwarf on a mountain – he was able to pull a “situational alpha” stunt in Sweden on the back of his fame, social proof, and the fact his groupies were disgusting messed up whores. As Roissy has posted before – Herbs can become very confident when they are actually getting big-time IOIs or dating a girl. It doesn’t take an ounce of alphaness to hold court with a bunch of admirers.

    The fact they conspired to take him down is another sign of betaness.

    It’s really no accomplishment to bang a pair of disgusting whores. Really. It’s not like swooping on a sexually inexperienced 10 in a nightclub and whisking her away from a crowd of sportscar-driving higher betas.

    Good post though.

    Like


  163. Fantastic post, really good comments.

    I have to go on the record to say that Assange deserves a medal.

    Like


  164. on December 8, 2010 at 9:09 pm Woman of honor

    I defend Assange. I believe these charges leveled against him are unjust and didn’t need this over the top article to sell sell sell hatred. I believe vengeance is the motive and I abhor the abuse of said charge as much as the original poster.
    I also abhor the original poster guilty of the same exact crime of false charges of rape. Women do not disgrace men, men disgrace themselves as the OP has done in this article. Competing brands of chauvanism leaves honor as collateral damage. Real men aren’t sharks grazing on humanity at will. Interesting definition of manhood you’re living out, for however long you think it will last. I certainly am relieved that I have a second amendment right to keep you off my porch and a first amendment right to let you know what a bottom dweller you truly are.

    Like


  165. this is a war against freedom of speech!

    Like


  166. HUX:“I mean, look, women are basically amoral, spineless, drivel-filled blobs of idiotic protoplasm. I got too many interesting things going on to deal with THAT bullshit obsessively. “

    Lulz. Hux is my new favorite roissy comment hero. It’s true that too much brainpower is spent chasing vaj. IMO, one of the reasons our era sucks so badly is people are wasting their time and precious bodily fluids on mindless hookups and choking it to porn. Isaac Newton likely died a virgin; dude invented physics, modern mathematics and was head of the mint. While nobody should have to die a virgin, wasting your time on the petty machinations of slags means you’ll not accomplish much in life. Assange is a decent example of this. He managed to defy the entire world’s governments, but was brought low by playing hide the salami with a couple of insipid, worthless hagfish. They ain’t even that cute.

    Like


  167. An excellent example of the high cost of “free sex.”

    These days, there is no excuse for starting smoking or getting married. The science is, shall we say, settled.

    When is the last time a prostitute brought rape charges against a client, as long as he paid the fee?

    Like


  168. […] wisdom from Jerry at Citizen Renegade: I was heading out to a meeting earlier and wasn’t able to post on the Spain thread a rant about […]

    Like


  169. Doug1

    …that he’s being demanded to return to Sweden.

    Actually, I don’t think Britain can extradite him to Sweden, since Sweden hasn’t actually brought charges against him. They can’t compel that by extradition.

    I’m confused. Who is demanding that he be returned to Sweden?

    Like


  170. HUX:

    @PAUL

    Canada? Canada? Canada is the beta-test for what’s coming in the U.S. Canada has the bitchiest, most-princess-mental snot-fiendish females in the universe.

    It’s Sweden on estrogen. Wrong direction, my friend.
    Head SOUTH.

    Where both the weather and women are warmer.

    Amen brother.
    Canadian women they are the shits.
    They have no ass they have no tits.
    They whack you off with a pair of mitts.
    and then they call the cops and cry rape and take your house, car, job, your liberty. Well you get the picture.

    Like


  171. “” I call him beta because he looks and acts like one. He is just a dwarf on a mountain – he was able to pull a “situational alpha” stunt in Sweden on the back of his fame, social proof, and the fact his groupies were disgusting messed up whores. As Roissy has posted before – Herbs can become very confident when they are actually getting big-time IOIs or dating a girl. It doesn’t take an ounce of alphaness to hold court with a bunch of admirers. “”

    Correct ; In that situation and context , he was an Alpha by proxy.

    Like


  172. “It doesn’t take an ounce of alphaness to hold court with a bunch of admirers.”

    But of course it takes an alpha to have admirers in the first place. Assange is decidedly alpha.

    Like


  173. if assange is convicted, the violent revolution begins. i am not kidding

    Like


  174. It could be said that Assange is alpha in his ability to attract female admirers, but beta in his handling of them.

    See also: Tiger Woods.

    Like


  175. this post was about ten THOUSAND times better than the last 3 combined

    Like


  176. @el chief:
    Sadly, the population would take his conviction lying down, just like it is taking the new TSA screening lying down.

    We are more than ready to trade liberty for security. And we will richly deserve what we get.

    Like


  177. Spot on!

    I am from Sweden and I follow the Assange case in the news, the media (government controlled leftist propaganda apparatus) hasn’t reported anything concerning the truth in the allegations against Assange. Instead our newspapers write stuff like ” Is Sweden USAs lapdog?” Will Sweden extradite Assange to the US and a pending jail sentence?” To read this post was great!

    I have no love for that Assange character though, his work only corrupts the free worlds (the US in other words) attempt to control and restrain crap nations like North Korea and Iran and fight terrorists by undermining the will to fight. His Wikileaks is not democracy or freedom of speech but treason plain and simple.

    So it is with great joy I see the leftist ideology bite itself like a two-headed Kerberos hell-hound. Assange a self hating white who wants to see the fall of the west getting bitten by feminazis with rape charges so ridiculous that not even a court in Soviet Union would have thrown such allegations against its most hated dissident, but in Sweden it is “ay ok!”

    I saw a comment that said “There are two kinds of women in Sweden, women and men”….sad but true, for the record: my parents are Finns.

    Like


  178. oh also, Canada is awesome

    Like


  179. El Chie

    The interwebs is not the the same as real life. Getting confused about that can lead individuals into the deepest kind of shit. The military guy who passed the cables? He will never see the world again except thru the TV in the Rec Room. Assange will be convicted of many things by many governments and will wear pajamas for the rest of his life and will never get near another cell phone much less a computer terminal.
    Decades from now when he a shuffling old inmate he will have forgotten what the internet ever was. The Aussie government wants this as much as anyone in Washington or Whitehall. The fact that he is an ego-maniac will not, at the end of the day, be much of a defense against the entities he has attacked.
    Buy the ticket; take the ride.

    Like


  180. @Jr. Gorilla,

    Any SERIOUS ‘heil-Hitlering’ folks (not the latter-day cosplay fringe, nor the Stromfronter conservative patriotard moderates…I’m talking about the very few serious 21st Century National Socialists of the Dr. William Pierce/ old National Alliance type) would be very impressed and supportive of what Wikileaks has done.

    What you are talking about is the fact that both the main forces of the Left and the Right are authoritarian bootlickers of STATUS QUO (they just want a little reform tweek here and there, but they LOVE and DEFEND the current system above any other possibility).

    James A Donald hit on a good point about a minority of non-ruling dissent Left-oriented rebels. Many are good folks who are caught up in BS ideological contradictions, but sometimes it is in their attempts to honestly think about and pursue their agenda that they discover the fraud which Mother Leftism actually is. I used to be one of those free-thinking Leftists, and it was through seeing/experiencing the Left for what it was that I rejected them. Its the very same fucking thing on the Right, just wrapped up in patriotard trappings and crucifixes instead of rainbow flags and sickle/hammers.

    Our enemy includes both Left and Right wings of the beast ‘elites’ ruling our countries. Smash the entire political class, clear out all sides of the aisles, bury the current System in all its guises, then and only then can we rebuild healthy free and strong nations dedicated to the survival and advancement of their own people again.

    Rosenberg said something about the Wikileaks thing wearing a yarmulke. Now I’m no fan of the Jews at all, but I call bullshit and believe this bullshit to be yet another baseless right-wing conspiracy-nutjob crank on the part of Stromfrontesque patriotard types. The “rape”/”sex crime” charges against Mr. Assange should be the first clue that this deal-with-Israel crap is either entirely phony or being played out of context and proportion to reality by knee-jerk right-wing patriotards. Lemme get this straight: Julian is supposedly a Jew tool, yet they used trumped-up “rape” charges against him and have gone full-out to destroy his reputation based on these charges in the mainstream media (and you Jew-aware folks should know how much heavily disproportionate influence a certain special chosen tribe wields in that media in the “West”)?
    Where is the benefit for Mr. Assange in this supposed relationship? He has major (Israel-friendly, AIPAC/ADL approved) Democratic and Republican political figures in the USA calling for his imprisonment, torture or assassination…yet he is supposed to be a Jew tool?
    Come on folks, use your own brains. If the powers-that-be bring “rape”/”sex crime” charges against you, they are trying to fucking destroy you and they are trying to effectively alienate you from everyone who otherwise support you. You want to see real “Jew tools”? Just look for any major figure on the Right or Left anywhere in the First World who isn’t getting hunted around the world or thrown in prison for their expressions of dissent or inquiry or revelations of controversial truth. Just look at the entire class in every government in the world except those “rogue” ones that the US government has squarely and immedately in its crosshairs and which the mainstream media is incessantly beating the war-drums to encourage us to “intervene”. Then look at your lemming friends and neighbors…they sit back and permit it, they go to the polls and vote for the scum in power, they cheer for the TV shows and the movies.

    Who are the real Jew tools? Everyone who gave up, sucked up, went along and stupidly allowed ourselves to descend so low, and even the ones who whine about “Jews” but didn’t dare do a fucking thing about it and yet who freak out the minute anyone actually dares to raise their hand or voice in serious resistance, cowardly denouncing the brave fighting few as “crazies” and “traitors” while they show their ‘mainstream’ cred by waving the star-spangled banner and their Jesus symbols. Don’t just blame the Jews for taking advantage of our stupidity and seeing for themselves a golden opportunity at the expense of a bunch of pathetic soft lemming goyim who lost their souls to crass materialism/cosmopolitanism and totally forgot what being White was really all about.
    Jews did what they have always done when given such an opportunity amongst a host population of corrupted and ripe rubes…and we stupidly gave that opportunity to them by forgetting who we are and what was really important. There are no genuinely innocent victims in this story, and it isn’t some simple good versus evil conspiracy plot. We have to pull the log out of our own eyes first. Our great sin is that hardly any Whitey can give you a good fucking serious fundamental reason (as opposed to petty or peripheral bullshit) —in their own words— for why our race should continue to exist. Don’t blame the Jews alone for that…where were their parents, teachers, preachers, local leaders and exemplary mentors/role models? Oh, that’s right, they were busy watching TV, shopping at the malls, stuffing their faces, and keeping up with the Joneses in pursuit of the latest fads, going to church primarily for the social aspects and benefits, and only giving a shit about the kids if they “got into trouble” because it inconvenienced THEIR OWN lives. It’s these kinds of people who forgot what being White was all about, and who mis-taught the kids by example of their own lives. SWPLs come in Left and Right wing varieties—but it is really just flip-sides of the same disease! If you wonder why so many White “Americans” aren’t happily waving the flag and eager to serve/defend the powers-that-be in the US, wonder no more. “America” doesn’t belong to us, “America” never was about us, “America” never gave a shit about us except as the butt of their jokes, the scapegoats of their historic narrative, the bearers of their burdens and debts, and the consumers of endless junk commodities/services we don’t fucking need.
    Whitey, where the fuck is this “America” you speak so highly of? You say you love “America”, but does “America” honestly ever love you? Does “America” even give you one iota of respect? Or are you just a nationless tool, just an interchangable disposable cog in the machine, just another target for advertisers and predatory manipulators, just a statistic to be used for someone else’s purposes, just another lemming mindlessly parroting the same platitude-filled orthodoxies and perhaps breeding one or two kids be slaves to follow along in your footsteps?

    I know some are thinking that PFC Manning is a traitor. Can you give a single good reason why he and other young Whites should be loyal to this “America”? Why, so you can continue living relatively comfortably the way you have…to hell with the truth, to hell with justice, to hell with the fate of the future White generations of this country? That is the message I am really getting from these Status Quo defenders on the Left and Right. They sell us out for 30 shekels of silver, and then they whine if we seem too “disloyal” to going along with the currently scheduled program of ease and comfort at our expense. Fuck you, greatest generation. Fuck you, hippie generation. You killed “America”, led the “West’ to commit suicide, and seriously fucked up by conditioning your kids with insanity or by neglecting them and yet expecting them to take care of your fat self-centered superficial unworthy over-entitled asses. Payback is gonna be bitch, and you ‘Americans’ will be lucky to get a gravestone marker (though we might want one for future generations to ceremoniously piss on and symbolically remember appropriately as “the Dark Age”). Every Third World immigrant taken into this country represents the powers-that-be and the older relatively comfortable generations giving and allowing a middle finger salute to their own children. Don’t be surprised that some of us younger Whites will return that message back with what you see as “disloyalty”. What did you expect?!

    Like


  181. @DOBA

    If the student who had the temerity to look at his notes while Ardin lectured was Muslim and she pulled that shit on him, she would have been cut open and her body left stuffed in a duffel bag somewhere in the swamps of Sweden.

    Like


  182. on December 8, 2010 at 11:46 pm Erik_The_Stryker_Slyker

    I’m from calgary alberta where all oilsand money is at, and wow do I have to deal with stuck up materialistic cunts . I don’t date these women. Strictly pump and dump. The hotter the girl the dumber the woman

    Like


  183. @mschro

    Good thing you blog about food and recipes, because your ignorance about just about everything else is both appalling and laughable.

    Like


  184. Assange has openly tried to extort control over the US and Western Governments by his threats of more releases. Since comply-ing to such blackmail will only lead to more blackmail – and governments generally understand this – how does Mr. Assange expect this to turn out?
    He may have admirers among the hacker-world but none of them, I bet, are willing to actually die (you know, as in lying real still as your body cools to room temperature) for his cause.

    Like


  185. on December 9, 2010 at 12:05 am Erik_The_Stryker_Slyker

    the worst thing a male human being can do for alphaness is tug one out on to a kleenex.
    The gov wants to keep us men weak so they saturate our society with porn and the obsession of sex, feminism , homosexuality.
    . As a teenager growing up masturbation was part of life. Little did I know how weak and twitchy I was. Now I have broke a bad lifelong habit that most western men have. The results have been tremendous,
    Increased focus, drive, and vigor, extreme alpha fitness, vitality. Immense powers of concentration and contemplation of the universe. People around me, can sense the difference, the raw power. We all gotta bust a fat nut once and while, you know, raw dog some dirty slut, but that’s not my obsession anymore.
    Save your man seed .
    Its not just some useless fluid. Every time you drain your balls you suck your cerebral spinal fluid out of you brain.

    Like


  186. [Editor: I do not notice any white nationalist women espousing feminist beliefs.

    ps build a wall! ;} ]

    Then you clearly don’t know any white nationalists.

    When I used to post on Stormfront (5 or 6 years ago – and no, I’m not proud of it), there was a large, very vocal group of feminists posters there who harassed anyone expressing sympathy for Men’s Rights. I almost got banned for disagreeing with one of them. The overall attitude at that place was “these women have white skin, so they’re inherently pure, how dare you criticize them.”

    The women with casual WN views were generally OK, but the ones who were seriously into WN and made a lifestyle of it were complete harridans.

    Like


  187. I can understand a knuckledragger like Huckabee hating Assange, but I’m not sure why so commenters here dislike him.

    The government is already violating our rights and spying on us; Assange is merely turning the tables on them. What’s so bad about that.

    Like


  188. on December 9, 2010 at 12:27 am rebelliousvanilla

    R Sole, yet Russia never ethnically cleansed its people.

    Like


  189. Great, great post.

    Also, Rosenberg’s first comment was great. There is no truth to the rumor that may be going through some of your minds that I am Rosenberg but using a new alias; I like my alias way too much to do that – he must be a protege of mine.

    As far as Rosenberg’s second comment, I’d stay skeptical on believing the Duff website, which provides no names or dates and links only to a website written in Arabic and provides no names or dates. In a recent prior post, Duff said the absence of evidence that Israel is involved with Wikileaks would be conclusive proof it was involved with Wikileaks. With or without evidence, Duff had already reached his conclusion. I’m waiting to see more of the remaining 99.7% of cables not released yet before attempting to draw conclusions about what powers – if any – are behind Assange. And so far, I’m a lot more inclined to believe the Saudi royal family is behind Duff than that anybody at all to speak of is behind Assange.

    Like


  190. @Expat

    I have no love for that Assange character though, his work only corrupts the free worlds (the US in other words) attempt to control and restrain crap nations like North Korea and Iran and fight terrorists by undermining the will to fight.

    LOL! The USSA is free? Think again. We have traveled a long way, down a shitty road, from what the Founding Fathers intended for the USA.

    Terrorism is a poor man’s war and war is a rich man’s terrorism.

    Like


  191. Boot-licking conservatives who want Assange buried for no other reason than his politics (left-liberal ,for sure) are fascist idiots.

    No matter what his politics – he’s a hero for crusading for public access to information.

    When I was being investigated for a security clearance a decade ago, one question was asked:

    “Would you sell secrets for money?”

    I answered, “No.” What I didn’t say was the reason.

    I wouldn’t sell state secrets. I’d give them away.

    Bastard governments spend most of the times screwing the little guy. You and me.

    Assange even made the right move: Asked by the Israelis not to damage their international efforts, he backed off. Right call.

    You might hate Jews, right? Well, in the eternal war between Muslims and Jews, or Arabs and Jews, I’ll side with the Jews every day. The, ahem, non-genocidal Jews versus the genocidal Arab Muslims.

    Assange is a hero.

    Like


  192. Actually I believe a person can charge another with whatever they want, whenever they want. Whether they’re willing to pay for the costs and whether they’ll win is another thing. Howver there’s something to be said about those who will sue others not on the basis they’ll win but that they will negotiate a out-of-court settlement because it’s cheaper than winning and with court costs. I remember reading an article about someone succeeding against a real-estate and the legal commentator said that it makes the business look guilty but they ‘t willing to pay the court costs.

    Like


  193. @Expat

    I saw a comment that said “There are two kinds of women in Sweden, women and men”….sad but true, for the record: my parents are Finns.

    Finnish journalist I met in Korea told me last year that guys in Finland are the least manly of any shed seen anywhere. They tend to be quiet, retreat to basements and are receding. Women there get married young, but lots stay single more or less permanently. Because the men are unmanly.

    Sounds very Scandinavian to me.

    Where the hell are the dudes who fought the Soviet union, conquered most of the known world, and traveled in open boats across the Atlantic to beat the crap out of Skraelings?

    I mean, some of these guys raided towns in southern Russia, traded in Constantinople and ended up homesteading in Iceland – or Newfoundland, while exploring the coast of Maine and possibly Virginia.

    Where the hell are these guys?

    Like


  194. @anon
    oh also, Canada is awesome

    Seems pretty neat up there. Except for the icebox winter and the fact that you’re all a bunch of commie bastards.

    I mean that in the nicest way.

    Like


  195. Again, if Assange were Alpha, the two women knowing about each other would not have been an issue. It wasn’t for Mick Jagger, or heck Russell Brand. Their complaints:

    “He was more interested in his laptop than me.”

    “The sex was not that great.”

    Are the mark of a guy jumped up into Alpha status but who remains BETA. An Alpha like Brand would have had both thinking they were LUCKY to have had five minutes of his time. Like Tucker Max, or Mystery, or other guys of that ilk. This is like that Duke woman who disliked the guy who treated her just as a disposable sex toy. After the sex.

    They wanted the “boyfriend experience” with a big shot.

    Like


  196. Here is a video

    http://trailmeme.com/walk/WikiLeaks_Developments/1014309419?

    The women are at 3:38 and 5:50

    Here are some picture. Two Dutch journalist pieced the story together too.

    http://nos.nl/artikel/203803-twee-zweedse-vrouwen-vs-julian-assange.html

    Like


  197. if the wikileaks guy was alpha he would have made the two chicks do eachother while he taped it.

    Like


  198. Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut

    Hahahahahahaha

    Like


  199. @whiskey

    “They wanted the “boyfriend experience” with a big shot.”

    First time I’ve seen that phrase in print. Funny. Thx.

    Like


  200. “I mean, some of these guys raided towns in southern Russia, traded in Constantinople and ended up homesteading in Iceland – or Newfoundland, while exploring the coast of Maine and possibly Virginia.

    Where the hell are these guys?”

    On this page, calling Julian Assange an Alpha.

    Like


  201. Seeing that my comment above got syndicated (thanx), I forgot to mention 3 more big Christian Feminist agenda items:

    #5 – They work tirelessly to declare porn illegal – as in not free speech at all but a pollution like cigarette smoke where men who look at porn will damage the minds of innocents around them with the attitudes they get from having looked at it.

    I’m not making their reasoning up. Robert Bork, in his famous book “Slouching Towards Gomorrah” laid down the current Christian Feminist reasoning in pretty much those exact words (he used the cigarette smoke analogy).

    #6 – They work tirelessly to mandate background checks for all men using dating sites. When IMBRA was passed on the basis that all men who seek foreign women were suspected criminals requiring background checks, the Bahai Feminist group Tahirih Justice Center (TJC) and several Christian organizations released a statement stating that this was a first step in making the Internet a “safer place.”

    In court, when the otherwise incompetent plaintiffs said that IMBRA violated the 14th Amendment because it didn’t regulate all dating sites, but just the “mail order bride” ones, the TJC lawyers (from Arnold & Porter, the same DC law firm that tirelessly works for gay marriage) one the case by stating (I paraphrase) “this law is just the beginning, the Congress intends to extend government mandated background checks to all dating sites and there is court precedent for allowing a law when it is intended by Congress to be a first step in a trend.”

    Note that 4 of the 5 conservative justices of the Supreme Court tried to uphold the Communications Decency Act which would severely curtailed the right to anonymity on the Internet and made Roissy responsible for the content posted by others. Only Anthony Kennedy has saved us from a completely different world (Kennedy also saved us from the 4 conservative justices declaring that no porn could be allowed depicting grown women in school girl outfits).

    I wonder why I’m a Republican. I guess that its because Americans have a choice between Scylla and Charybdis.

    #7 – Despite the fact that only oppressive Islamic states like Saudi Arabia, Iran and (recently and increasingly) Turkey consider 18 as the age of consent, US Christian Feminists are doing everything they can to make the USA “progressive” by raising the age of consent from 16 to 18 in as many US states as possible and, via the Protect Act, have made the USA the first country in the history of the world to extra-jurisdictionally regulate their citizens’ lives overseas by giving US citizens a worldwide age of consent (they tried to make it 18 but federal judges legislated that back down to 16 – from the bench).

    Delaware (where Christine O’Donnell comes from) has a new Christian Feminist law that says that the age of consent remains at 16 unless the man is 30 or above, in which case its 18. This means that, if the college football coach observes his entire team and young assistant coaches gang-banging a 17 year old groupie, he goes to jail and gets labeled a sex offender for life.

    This is where the minds of Christian Feminists are at.

    In Sweden, they would never have gotten the following laws passed if the likes of the good Christian Anna Ardin were not influencing the “conservative” politicians:

    1) They castrated the lion in the Swedish Army coat of arms. Female soldiers had said the schlong intimidated them.

    2) Sweden’s feminists are most famous for passing a law declaring all men criminals who pay for sexual activity because that makes the women victims of “human trafficking”. Mangina cops in hotel bars use Russian decoys to try to entrap businessmen.

    3) The right wing politicians in Sweden were about to vote with the left on a law making it illegal for Swedish men to marry Russian women (any woman from Eastern Europe) but, unlike what happened in the US with IMBRA, a Swedish human rights panel stopped the law because they said it “might” violate the human rights of Swedish men.

    Every man interested in fighting feminism has to realize that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” The #1 agenda item for feminists is controlling men’s sex lives.

    Therefore, anyone who has argued with me over dating Russian women (calling that beta) or occasionally buying strip teases (calling that beta) has to look at the bigger picture: My positions are hated, absolutely hated, by Marxist and Christian feminists alike.

    So on this blog, discussing Alpha/Beta is fine, but getting emotionally riled up against men who might buy a strip tease now and then really has to be eliminated from all PUA/MRA blogs for the simple reason that it helps the feminists with their shaming campaign against the #1 thing they hate (men occasionally choosing alternatives).

    PS: The Ba’hai “faith” is a feminist religion. Bush’s outrageous “Faith Based Initiatives” program gave federal funding to feminist groups like the Tahirih Justice Center that pretended to be adherents of Ba’hai.

    That’s why Obama announced on his second day in office that he would be maintaining the “Faith Based Initiatives” Program.

    Like


  202. Gorbachev

    It is not being a fascist idiot to point out that the names of secret friends of the west in Afghanistan were exposed in the leaks, and that the man didn’t seem to care that people were. facing death because of his actions.

    And Governments do have the right to conduct some business in private, just like lawyers , doctors, clergy and accountants. This should be limited, of course. But To think that there should be no secrecy in military or diplomatic affairs is juvenile

    I think these charges are a crock of crap, and a
    miscarriage of justice. It’s a fair bet that the English will refuse extradition in this case

    Like


  203. “Editor: I do not notice any white nationalist women espousing feminist beliefs.”

    http://www.inmalafide.com/2010/04/09/white-knight-nationalists-and-the-decline-of-the-white-american-woman/

    Like


  204. Assange is a CIA agent. No information in leaks are worth for any use. WOrthless information to be thrown to dustbin cannot be considered a revolutionary work. It is US and its conspiracy for something big which no body knows or can guess!!

    Like


  205. […] I’ve written before that false rape accusers ought to be punished the same as actual rapists, with… […]

    Like


  206. on December 9, 2010 at 6:56 am News From Nowhere

    Assange turned himself in because he wants a public court. He knows he has a good chance at beating this case and he wants to turn it into a big PR event for WikiLeaks. If he wins, then it looks good. If he loses in a kangaroo court, it looks even better. He turns himself into a martyr for his cause, the poster boy for the Evil Empire beating down the virtues of truth and justice.

    WikiLeaks is hurting badly, the media they expected to rally around them has turned against them instead, and many of their backers have turned on them as well. They need this to get a PR turnaround. Assange is taking a fall here because he is making a last ditch effort at turning himself into the glorious hero he had envisioned himself as when he started this whole thing.

    Like


  207. Assange must be a tricky one for the self-righteous left-liberals. On the one hand they love the whole “fight da powah” thing he stands for but their feminist side says he should be reprimanded for ‘rape’. That, or they believe it a smear campaign by the powers that be, and not the resentment of two litigious bitches.

    @Gorbachev: I’ve found that white nationalist women, racist women and conservative / religious women (not all the same, but these intersect) are often the most fanatically feminist in the worst way.

    Are you sure? What kind of feminism are we on about here? A lot of WN women make an effort to look effeminate but in a very sort of traditional way, many of them grow their hair super long to look like some kind of valkyrie, but have this nasty, very manly type of aggressive discourse. Any view that is intrinsically unfeminine or values ‘hardness’ is gonna bring up them testosterone levels or draw in those with high testosterone. The result is troll-like, psychotic warrioresses. Even a HBD-realist, Darwinist and casual misanthrope like me is put off by women so hateful. I can’t remember the last NW-Euro (descended) white nationalist woman I saw who was attractive.

    Finnish journalist I met in Korea told me last year that guys in Finland are the least manly of any shed seen anywhere. They tend to be quiet, retreat to basements and are receding. Women there get married young, but lots stay single more or less permanently. Because the men are unmanly.

    Sounds very Scandinavian to me.

    Where the hell are the dudes who fought the Soviet union, conquered most of the known world, and traveled in open boats across the Atlantic to beat the crap out of Skraelings?

    I mean, some of these guys raided towns in southern Russia, traded in Constantinople and ended up homesteading in Iceland – or Newfoundland, while exploring the coast of Maine and possibly Virginia.

    Where the hell are these guys?

    Scandinavia is a safe enclave of Europe, so their societies haven’t found the need to select for hardmen (mind, there’s still that genetic strain given the number of World’s Strongest Man contenders they’re still producing), whereas Eastern Europe has lived under much adversity in the past century at least, which seems to have produced a lot of resilient hardmen. Progressivism is the stuff of safe nations out of touch with harsh realities. Scandinavian nations never suffered the hard communist totalitarianism with which they could rebel against. Many citizens of former-Soviet countries are proud ‘racists/bigots’ because they were so fed up of the left propaganda shoved down their throats. In the West the Left is more perfidious and have managed to soften people’s minsets into docility.

    Like


  208. on December 9, 2010 at 7:10 am Vincent Ignatius

    The Swedish justice system is the culprit here and that cannot be emphasized enough; not the girls, who are merely telling the truth and using the system.

    Bullshit. The girls should know using the system against Assange is wrong when the system is obviously built to violate the rights of men. These two scumbags deserve to be thrown into a MEN’S prison.

    Like


  209. Having watched a youtube video of Arrange speaking in public about climate change, I conclude that he does not have a natural alpha male personality, more that of an insipid nerd. Nonetheless, he has high status due to his talents and that made him seem alpha enough for these two women to spread their legs for him.

    Yes, the rape claims are ludicrous and given a full explanation of the details I would expect that 95% of men, cultural renegade or not, would agree. Nonetheless I prefer not to make a fuss about this particular case because Assange does not meet with my approval, and I am fairly happy to see him get his come-uppance even at this cost.

    Whilst I am not a supporter of our Western governments, I would prefer unaccountable internet nerds not to have the power to interfere in people’s privacy or the functioning of government, unless they are exposing outstanding corruption or evil which Assange is not. 4chan-gone-large prankery won’t make things better, on the other hand the freedom to spread ideas on the internet may do so.

    Like


  210. Gorbachev,

    Would you be celebrating the leaks site if they published your bank details? Thought not.

    A society without secrets is a totalitarian one. If everyone knows everyone else’s business, then freedom is impossible.

    People have the right to privacy. Lawyers, doctors accountants bankers and priests all require confidentiality to do their jobs. Likewise diplomats and the military ought to have a reasonable right to privacy in internal documents. And people helping the west in secret have the right not to be exposed.

    It’s juvenile to say otherwise.

    [Editor: Agreed in principle. Assange’s logic taken to its conclusion would mean public exposure of people in witness protection programs. Also, there is the whiff of hypocrisy in Assange’s lefto-anarchism. Where is his righteous leaking of Russian, Israeli, or North Korean docs? The guy is a coward who gets off on hunting easy prey like the US whom he knows won’t send agents to poke him in the neck with a polonium laced umbrella tip.
    Nevertheless, while I love reading the juicy gossip state dept officials are dishing about foreign leaders and I relish the rich irony of the personal data collecting, privacy violating US government getting hoist by its own petard, I loathe Assange for putting American soldiers and their Afghan cooperators at risk. (And I say this as someone who thinks we shouldn’t be in Afghanistan to begin with.) In the not too distant past, guys like Assange were strung up for high treason. We should be going back to those ways.
    Yes, I know Assange isn’t American, so this is all moot. He’s just a medium. The real lynchpin in all this is the private who worked at state and released the cables. He is a genuine traitor to his country.]

    Like


  211. “Sources within the Wikileaks organization” are saying that Assange is in trouble for refusing to take an HIV test.

    One might conclude that, for the protection of his reputation, he would have just had that test once the Swedish police were involved…no matter how infuriating it was to be asked.

    Its laudable to stand for one’s right not to be forced to take a test, but how many guys here would stand their ground on not taking a test if a female blogger threatened to ruin his reputation if he didn’t? Then again, maybe most of us wouldn’t. Its a pain in the ass going to get a needle stuck into the crux of the arm.

    The precedent the Swedish are trying to set is that a woman can use a government and even Interpol to force a man to be tested for STDs if she starts having second thoughts about activity that she’s had with him.

    Men can be forced to have needles stuck in them and blood drawn.

    Worse, they would now be saying that his refusal and the passage of time has escalated his crime.

    This particular guy, skinny frame and pale face, would cause me concern if I’d known he slept with my sister and she started to worry about all this.

    However, the idea of forcing anyone to get tested after the fact is quite fascist. There would have to be a valid cause for concern other than that he was an Alpha male (or opportunistic male) who clearly wasn’t monogamous in nature.

    But that seems to be what they are saying:

    Non-monogamous males are now highly suspect of being infected with HIV and need to be forced into being tested.

    Interpol can be alerted. Worldwide manhunts will result.

    Like


  212. Assange’s story is a lesson to all those PUA guys who raw dog. Women are not assholes that would leave creeps like him to enjoy without the consequences. There are consequences for everything and PUAs have to pay for it.

    PUA cannot complain for unfairness for the reason they are the master of unfair activity.

    Point is do you guys have a solution to get rid of such a situation?????

    Like


  213. All you Sweden-bashers with your fat, whiny, needy American chicks can shut the fuck up. Swedish women are no worse the any else: in fact, quite the opposite. They might be equal, share the housework and professionally successful and whatnot, but they are down-to-earth and humble as well, and if you would ever be stupid enough to want to pay for food they will insist to share the bill. The feminist factor is high, true, but the bitch factor is slow, while they are easily the most beautiful and skinny and sexually open in the western world. The means that even a beta can fuck his beautiful girlfriend in the ass every night.

    Come back with your bullshit when white American women aren’t a bunch of greedy, hypocritical, fat bitches.

    Like


  214. From the Guardian today:

    “A personality like Assange, who is known throughout the world, in the media every day, has a huge attraction to women.
    A lot of women invited him to their beds and he took that opportunity too much … all the time.

    “I spoke to him about this. I warned him that it was not a good way to behave ethically and also in terms of his security. His weakness was – is – women. I warned him it would cause him trouble.”

    He said women responded to him in the way they might respond to meeting Mick Jagger.
    “When you attract that many women you have to think about how you behave,” he said.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/08/julian-assange-rape-allegations

    [Editor: If a man would have a weakness, women is the best one to have. Followed closely by beer.]

    Like


  215. Bill Lynch’s blog provides the freshly written words of the good feminist Naomi Wolf (author of “Fire with Fire,” a book that attacked “victim feminism”):

    Thank you again, Interpol. I know you will now prioritize the global manhunt for 1.3 million guys I have heard similar complaints about personally in the US alone — there is an entire fraternity at the University of Texas you need to arrest immediately. I also have firsthand information that John Smith in Providence, Rhode Island, went to a stag party — with strippers! — that his girlfriend wanted him to skip, and that Mark Levinson in Corvallis, Oregon, did not notice that his girlfriend got a really cute new haircut — even though it was THREE INCHES SHORTER.

    Terrorists. Go get ’em, Interpol!

    Yours gratefully,

    Naomi Wolf

    Like


  216. @Swedish has a point. On the ground, there are so many beautiful looking women in Sweden, and so many of them aren’t involved in the politics, that I’ve always enjoyed going there. There’s a spa in the city center filled with the most luscious babes you will ever find anywhere and they are friendly and outgoing and speak English and, best of all, I haven’t met a leftist or fembot there yet (I know I’ve been lucky). Don’t cancel travel plans.

    Swedish men still need to be castigated for allowing all those laws to be made. They and Americans represent the first dominoes.

    Like


  217. on December 9, 2010 at 8:37 am Cannon's Canon

    I wouldn’t sell state secrets. I’d give them away.

    Bastard governments spend most of the times screwing the little guy. You and me.

    Assange even made the right move: Asked by the Israelis not to damage their international efforts, he backed off. Right call.

    You might hate Jews, right? Well, in the eternal war between Muslims and Jews, or Arabs and Jews, I’ll side with the Jews every day. The, ahem, non-genocidal Jews versus the genocidal Arab Muslims.

    you really cannot make this stuff up, folks

    IT’S GOLD, JERRY!

    Like


  218. Remember its mostly the older women who take over political parties and force these laws through, mainly as a way to regulate their husbands as they, the women, age.

    So a lot of 18-23 year old Swedish women will be blameless and open to meeting great guys who know the score about feminism.

    Its also great news that, the moment the Tipping Point is reached in terms of forcing Gender Studies Programs to include MRA material in first year courses, and countries like Sweden reversing some of their more obnoxious laws, etc, every year there will be a large batch of 18 year old women who aren’t and won’t be tainted/ruined.

    From that point, the feminists and their views will just get older, with their political representatives stopped short by court rulings telling them to, in effect, STFU.

    Feminism is like a shark that has to keep swimming in order to breathe. The moment it stops or slows down too much, it will be overwhelmed by a new generation of women who won’t buy into it and the younger women will, of course, be more relevant to men.

    Assange swam with sharks in his leftist world. I don’t think he knows how to avoid the infection from the shark bite now. He and his lawyer have not mentioned the word “radical feminist” in the past 24 hours.

    If he refuses to attack feminism as his defense, fuck him.

    He needs to become a men’s rights advocate now.

    Like


  219. I think Julian Assange is very attractive looking…but I have friends who think I am crazy to say this. I think he has a serious, intelligent, sensitive face. But to be honest, now I’ve heard about these allegations, I don’t really like him anymore. Not because I actually think he raped them, I don’t think he did. But because it wasn’t cool what he did regarding the fact they were friends, he didn’t wear condom, he made them pay for tickets, he used them basically… now I think of him very differently.

    It’s not nice to not wear a condom if a woman asks. Of course it’s not rape if she still consents…but you could have anything and so could she. And also when a guy does that, it’s like he doesn’t mind you getting pregnant. I always find it weird that men wouldn’t wear one in a fling…very stupid.

    [Editor: Weird? No. Skin on skin feels a lot better than latex.]

    Like


  220. It is sad that Assange is now doing what the MSM used to do. How far we have fallen.

    Like


  221. “The feminist factor is high, true, but the bitch factor is slow, while they are easily the most beautiful and skinny and sexually open in the western world.”

    Swedish women run to the police and cry rape far more often than women in any country of the world except Lesotho. This does not exactly suggest low bitchiness or permissive attitudes towards sex (unless Swedish men are truly awful).

    The statistics for rape accusations can be found here (thought the text is in Norwegian):

    http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/verden/1.7235891

    Like


  222. @Cannon’s Canon

    I didn’t write that about giving away state secrets, etc. It was @Gorbachev who would probably be glad to debate someone who thinks one sentence rebuttals work around here. 😉

    If you’d like to attack what he wrote and how he thinks, its best to provide your counter-argument point by point.

    I’d possibly agree with you, such as on the point about giving state secrets away, but you’d have to make your case to agree with in the first place.

    Like


  223. @Swedish

    Dude, you are mistaken. Most American guys have given up on American Kupcake. The “Marriage Strike” is in full swing.

    The job of “wife” has been outsourced to foreign countries.

    Millions of American guys now know something CRUCIAL:
    Do NOT to marry a girl whose native language is English.

    Why? Because English is the language of the Culture of Death. The Culture of the Fembots. The Culture of easy divorce, false rape allegations, arrest, jail, and bankruptcy.

    We now know that a girl who grows up speaking a language OTHER than English cannot AS EASILY assimilate such poison. (Catastrophically, that is changing quickly, that’s to that God-damned MTV and television in general.)

    Millions of American guys are getting on airplanes and flying to South American, Asia, and the Philippines for a SINGLE date.

    So take your atheistic, post-modern Nazi blue-eyed, blonde hair Elin-Nordegren-clone English-speaking fembots and engage in sodomy all you want. Tiger Woods got one of your Swedish kupcakes and quickly figured out that Siberia was warmer.

    So go for it, dude. But millions of American guys are WAYYYYYYYY ahead of you.

    Like


  224. Mission Accomplished: US managed to smear Julian’s name to fully live up to its reputation as a banana republic, out of control rogue psycho state of 9/11 cry babies.
    December 9th, 2010 by maxkeiser

    Like


  225. I think Julian Assange is very attractive looking

    He has that soft but intense face that my gut usually red-flags as untrustworthy. It’s the face of Cassius that made Julius Caesar nervous:

    CAESAR
    Let me have men about me that are fat;
    Sleek-headed men and such as sleep o’ nights:
    Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look;
    He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.

    ANTONY
    Fear him not, Caesar; he’s not dangerous;
    He is a noble Roman and well given.

    CAESAR
    Would he were fatter! But I fear him not:
    Yet if my name were liable to fear,
    I do not know the man I should avoid
    So soon as that spare Cassius. He reads much;
    He is a great observer and he looks
    Quite through the deeds of men: he loves no plays,
    As thou dost, Antony; he hears no music;
    Seldom he smiles, and smiles in such a sort
    As if he mock’d himself and scorn’d his spirit
    That could be moved to smile at any thing.
    Such men as he be never at heart’s ease
    Whiles they behold a greater than themselves,
    And therefore are they very dangerous.
    I rather tell thee what is to be fear’d
    Than what I fear; for always I am Caesar.
    Come on my right hand, for this ear is deaf,
    And tell me truly what thou think’st of him.

    Like


  226. Wait a minute, brothers. This Assange caper is changing dynamically.

    Check the link:

    ASSANGE CO-ACCUSER HAS STOPPED COOPERATING WITH OFFICIALS IN INVESTIGATION

    http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/12/one-assange-accuser-may-have-stopped-co.html

    Looks like Kupcake is having third thoughts…..

    Like


  227. Come on guys, Julian Assange is blatantly Alpha.

    He arrives in Sweden and fucks 2 woman in a couple of days.

    In his day job he fucks governments.

    He’s got big balls plus some b/madness working for him.

    Like


  228. on December 9, 2010 at 9:30 am Cannon's Canon

    jerry,
    i wasn’t talking to you. you should know the memes of your fellow tribesmen.

    Like


  229. See reply #26 in the following thread for info on Sweden’s dark underbelly: http://mgtow.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=4233

    Like


  230. Russia is attempting to nominate Assange for the Nobel Prize. I guess Medvedev and Putin don’t think much of the sex crimes allegations: http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/09/latest-updates-on-attacks-by-wikileaks-defenders/

    On another note, Roissy wrote: “I’ve written before that false rape accusers ought to be punished the same as actual rapists, with jail time.” I’d one up that. In a case of intentional false rape accusations, where the falsely accused did not even have sex with the accuser, as part of the sentence, the falsely accused should be allowed to do the crime and have his way with the accuser sexually. I like creative sentencing, and it seems to me like perfectly fitting justice.

    Like


  231. Clueless Vanilla,

    “R Sole, yet Russia never ethnically cleansed its people.”

    Definition:

    Ethnic cleansing “is a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas. – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing

    : the expulsion, imprisonment, or killing of an ethnic minority by a dominant majority in order to achieve ethnic homogeneity – http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ethnic%20cleansing

    “The partial removal of potentially trouble-making ethnic groups was a technique used consistently by Joseph Stalin during his career:[8] Poles (1939–1941 and 1944–1945), Romanians (1941 and 1944–1953), Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians (1941 and 1945–1949), Volga Germans (1941–1945), Ingrian Finns (1929–1931 and 1935–1939), Finnish people in Karelia (1940–1941, 1944), Crimean Tatars, Crimean Greeks, Kalmyks, Balkars, Karachays, Meskhetian Turks, Karapapak/Terekeme Turks, Far East Koreans (1937), Chechens and Ingushs (1944). Shortly before, during and immediately after World War II, Stalin conducted a series of deportations on a huge scale which profoundly affected the ethnic map of the Soviet Union.[2] It is estimated that between 1941 and 1949 nearly 3.3 million were deported to Siberia and the Central Asian republics.[9] By some estimates up to 43% of the resettled population died of diseases and malnutrition.[10]

    The deportations started with Poles from Belarus, Ukraine and European Russia (see Polish minority in Soviet Union) 1932-1936. Koreans in the Russian Far East were deported in 1937 (see Deportation of Koreans in the Soviet Union).” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_transfer_in_the_Soviet_Union

    As usual, Vanilla, you don’t know what the hell you are talking about…

    Like


  232. The backlash against feminism is starting to go mainstream, at least in England:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1336905/Jet-set-housewives-Id-daughter-marry-rich-man-career.html

    This is about Mrs. Brand (and I think he’s one of the biggest self-made alphas around, because he seems to self-aware to be a natural):
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1336926/Katy-Perry-reveals-wants-Russell-Brands-Ellen-DeGeneres.html

    Like


  233. You guys are all evil misogynist patriarchal oppressors! Women deserve everything! Even special MRI machines!

    http://tinyurl.com/24m9ftq

    Everything is YOUR fault, you white devil western patriarchs!

    Like


  234. HUX said: “Assange is the solution, not the problem.”

    Thank you SIR.

    Like


  235. good post. keep it up. A bit rant-y tho. But I guess the theme deserves some strong emotion.

    Like


  236. I’d like to see Assange publicly offer to settle all legal matters involving these two women if they agree to a threesome.

    Like


  237. […] roissy: Every man who’s ever had a condom break, or who had condomless sex with a woman who agreed to the sex despite her misgivings, or who has slept with more than one woman in a weekend, is now a rapist. […]

    Like


  238. Sara

    I think Julian Assange is very attractive looking…but I have friends who think I am crazy to say this. I think he has a serious, intelligent, sensitive face.

    Now, why do girls
    all think this
    about famous men

    Like


  239. Amen, Roissy. Smartly expressed, as usual.

    To the list of media figures we suspect read your writings, can we add Greg Gutfield?

    Assange is guilty of being a creep, sure. But if being a dude who uses status to bed girls is against the law, then mankind should be under house arrest.

    http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/12/08/wiki-creep-in-sum/

    Like


  240. @Firepower

    Girls go crazy for famous men simply because they want what they think others want. You always have to remember that women have ZERO originality. That’s why they’re such lousy comedians, artists, poets, writers, social critics…etc. Need I go on?

    To understand this and leverage it to your advantage, is really the crux of managing women, whether it be your girlfriend or wife.

    To find a girlfriend, hit on the friend who came with her. If you can get a positive response out of THAT friend, you’ve got the jealously ball rolling. Manage the situation from there, always aloof, always communicating your exciting plans, travels, humanitarian missions (that have NOTHING to do with either of them, of course), and proceed from there.

    If it’s done smoothly and with a smile, getting their attention is like shooting fish in a barrel.

    Like


  241. Not to mention Julian Assange looks like a vampire. Like one of the really scary ones from Castlevania

    Like


  242. I know this might seem like it is off-topic, but I think in the big picture it is directly relevant to understanding today’s “rah rah America can do no wrong…kill Assange” Right.

    [url] http://www.newsweek.com/2010/12/09/one-nation-under-god.html [/url]

    Yeah, I AM SURPRISED to see any mainstream outlet such as Newsweek actually had someone insightful and studious enough to get it so right about the Right, right now. The only think they forget to put in was the title of the new religious Right writ— “The 5000 Year Leap”—which Beckites/912ers have been promoting as their ideological gospel source. That book’s message is precisely what that Newsweek article describes. Precisely.
    Newsweek also nailed the two names of the new Religious Right’s top 21st Century patriotard public messengers.

    In the name of God, they will sell you out Whitey…and you’ll be standing there, stupidly smiling and wagging fingers at “Muslims” and yapping about Jesus and waving a star-spangled flag during the whole thing….while totally ignoring the millions of non-White immigrants they let in under the guise of “saving their souls” (that was also what the Puritans used to say about the silver lining in the Negro slave situation, by the way). Talk about a flock of lost sheep! What a fanatically suicidal cult it all is!

    Churches love immigration because instead of going out into the Third World on dangerous evangelical “missions”, they can stay here in ease and comfort, take in hordes of immigrants, increase their prestige both among the replacement and the aging populations, and have YOU foot the bill for it all instead. That ain’t Jesus hanging on a cross at these churches…symbolically, it is YOU, White boy.

    And now they are figuring out how to fuse the patriotards Christian wackos with the liberal Puritan Church wackos into a One-Nation-Under-God Taliban-like alliance. Newsweek got it wrong here…those liberal preachers aren’t trying to take down the Religious Right, but rather to figure out how to join in alliance with their own flocks and a few of their favorite universalist/we-love-immigrants/gays-are-okay fetishes included in the agreement. Watch the Right sellouts and the Left sellouts come together “under God” (redefined Jesus+political correctness orthodoxy/fetishes+rank patriotardism+sacred sanction of the status quo), and watch their sheeple not even take notice and go along for the ride to the slaughterhouse. People will give up their freedom, heritage and future under the poisonous sway of snake-oil preachers. Orwell was right, though perhaps he understated it: “Fascism” (his term for it) will come to America under the cross wrapped up in an American flag. I add that it’ll be an “American” Church where Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Jon Steward Liebowitz, Joe Lieberman and the next “Magic Negro” national figure (or possibly Obama himself) attend together. This Church will preach a blend of “5000 Year Leap” Puritanical patriotardism plus current popular Pentacostal and Evangelical Lutheran themes. If there was a Devil Incarnate, even He would be impressed by the diabolic toxicity and shameless double-speak oozing out from this Church.

    These are the a-holes who cry that Assange is a left-liberal atheist terrorist anarchist in league with the Devil who should be killed. These are the hijacking a-holes who work hard to make sure the Tea Parties don’t stray out of bounds and actually become a challenge to the System, instead safely channeling and corralling the energies into the System’s approved political entities and media outlets.

    Who are the heretics and witches of the 21st Century? It is YOU, free-thinking dissident White men who don’t submit, don’t comply, and fail to show enough passionate homage to the “American’ orthodoxy like the rest of the sheeple. YOU are the witches this time, and there certainly will be a fanatical witchhunt, beyond the wildest wet dreams of the Bolsheviks BECAUSE it will be carried out in the name of “God, America, and apple pie”.

    Sadly, even many self-identified racialists such as those on Stormfront will fall under the sway of this religious-patriotard BS, and will choose to sacrifice their race for their new-and-approved patriotard”Christianity”. If you doubt that, just go visit Stormfront (you can visit anonymously as a guest) and read the message underlying the conversations there. You’ll see how many of those fools are easily sold now on the Religious Right patriotard BS. And you’ll see a quixotic frustrated few voices of reason there trying to resist it, but failing to stop the sweet-lil-baby-patriotard-Jesus madness. Whitey, one of your last lines of defense is falling, and those troops are deserting to jump into bed with the preachers. Last time anything like this happened, it was in the late 70’s when the White racialists crumbled to dust underneath the Religious Right gone ga-ga for Reagan and rapture. WN failed to hold its own and prevent history from repeating itself (but this time, the religious Left AND Right will fuse into an ecumenical mainstream patriotard “unholy alliance”… pun intended). That’s what happens when you think almost exclusively about the short-term, focus too much on winning popular mainstream approval/ elections, and begin compromising your principles and the hard uncomfortable inconvenient truths to get in good with “allies” (who aren’t even making any such compromises for you). You can see this happening in most Euro-nationalist parties and on most major “moderate” White racially-oriented websites. Now they are practically dependent on and kept alive by “religious conservatives”, but the “religious conservatives” really don’t need the WNs and won’t compromise with them in the slightest. Any useful idiot WN suck-up who later starts balking when their Religious Right partners increasingly out-and-out embrace Third World immigration and White-hating/shaming Hebrews is going to get a shock about prevailing priorities and realpolitik from his “Christian friends”. What then? Will he break it off? Yeah right…bought and paid for, too scared to rock the boat especially now that he has a vested stake in it. And this is how the White race gets shafted even by its supposedly “aware” advocates who get corrupted after they taste a few crumbs of the good life and get a little pat on the back at the System’s table. To cover up the sellout of their souls for power and privileges, they will accuse their critics with being “atheists” who “hate America”. Well, that will become a self-fulfilling prophesy, after seeing how both “God” and “America” have been so widely profaned to unprecedented depths by corrupt men. In the very near future, those two words will make any remaining perceptive decent White man (or woman) taste vomit in their mouth.

    I think I can see it now…the three men nailed side-by-side on crucifixes this time around will be… Mel Gibson, Justin Assange, and Stephen Hawking. Who do you think it would likely be?

    Like


  243. on December 9, 2010 at 1:24 pm Obstinance Works

    @Dirk Johanson

    Russia is attempting to nominate Assange for the Nobel Prize.Again, more points for Russia. Maybe I should just pack my bags right away. And this changes my opinion of Putin a bit.

    Like


  244. on December 9, 2010 at 1:26 pm Obstinance Works

    Again what’s love money got to do with it? Alphahood + game = cherries.

    Like


  245. on December 9, 2010 at 1:45 pm Phillips Exeter

    But more importantly the new Uncharted game was announced for PS3:

    Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception.

    Like


  246. HUX

    Yo Firepower –

    Totally agree. It just burns me up to see a good man like Assange turned in by his d*ck.

    Agreed.
    It wasn’t his game that did him in, rather, he was gamed by the females and a male in his position must be more prudent.

    It’s as if he went blindly into a gladiator battle armed only with nerd skills.

    His imprudence in matters like these is inexcusable when you consider his careful planning in outmaneuvering entire governments.

    Like


  247. False rape charges are the new occupational hazard of men who attract groupies.

    It used to be false paternity allegations, but DNA testing has made Michael Jackson’s greatest song obsolete.

    Like


  248. HUX said:

    The women involved here with Assange are absolutely LOVING this controversy and world-wide media coverage.

    I can guarantee you that.

    They’re all media-attention-whores. Every last one of them.

    They may not be LOVING it as much now after Ferdinand published there address and phone numbers on his blog.

    Check it out HERE

    Like


  249. Maybe it’s a good thing that Sweden is filling up with Muslims. Feminist man-haters like Ardin will soon learn the real meaning of rape.

    Like


  250. If he was a muslim, he’d walk, even if it was rape rape. He’s not a muslim, and he’s not walking.

    Like


  251. Damn, does not html work here. that was supposed to open in a new page. target=_blank is still html for open in new window is it not? Sorry about that.

    HERE

    Like


  252. scatmaster

    Damn, does not html work here. that was supposed to open in a new page. target=_blank is still html for open in new window is it not? Sorry about that.

    HERE

    Once again, your contribution here is only surpassed by your quick wit and intelligence. With you on our side, the end is in sight.

    Like


  253. I just reviewed the CNN interview with Assange where he got sullen and walked off the set when the woman asked him about the above allegations.

    He said something really lame like:

    “I’m going to walk if you’re going to contaminate us revealing the deaths of 104,000 people with attacks against my person.”

    Actually, that’s verbatim. He then did walk. (I suppose one could say it was a hell of a way to neg CNN).

    My impression is that this guy is too socially awkward and too far left wing to ever become an MRA spokesman. His best way to defend himself is getting the world’s men on his side. He needs to mention the word “feminism” in a bad light. Then again, maybe he’s thinking that he needs their silence just about now like Clinton needed them to shut up.

    When his 15 minutes are up, I can’t see him ever again achieving the likes of the young Sophie of Enkoping.

    Like


  254. read the feminist bitches on this:
    http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/12/06/some-thoughts-on-sex-by-surprise/

    http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/cmon_we_can_do_this_acting_like_grown_ups_thing/

    It is fucking amazing. what i dont fucking get is how it is not the responsibility of the woman to know that a man is or is not wearing a condom. (2)If you have two fucking eyes, how can you not fucking see whether he is wearing one or not.

    Like


  255. Alex,

    If you think America is bad for Western man, and our glorious heritage, think about those nice terrorists from the middle east.

    Anti-Christian White nationalists like you are the most deluded folks of all. You would destroy the bulwark that held back the commie and wahabbi terrorist tide.

    Like


  256. A debate on a feminist blog. I make some basic points, and one reader immediately calls for me to be banned. Nothing I said was unreasonable.

    You might want to jump in or follow. Be respectful. But make some points

    Here it is:

    http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/12/06/some-thoughts-on-sex-by-surprise/

    Comment 196. First thing a woman says: Ban him!

    So predictable. It’s almost disappointing.

    Like


  257. “If you have two fucking eyes, how can you not fucking see whether he is wearing one or not.”

    She might have seen it, but was not able to ask him to stop.

    Yeah, that can be used as a legal defence too:

    http://www.australian-news.com.au/Daniela_Dawes.htm

    “Nothing I said was unreasonable.”

    your fatal error.

    Like


  258. Gorbachev

    A debate on a feminist blog. I make some basic points, and one reader immediately calls for me to be banned. Nothing I said was unreasonable.

    Comment 196. First thing a woman says: Ban him!

    So predictable. It’s almost disappointing.

    It is predictable. Funny how you incited her to ban – while she was nearly out the door…to do shopping.

    Your argument was way too complex and intellectual for a female of that sort; those Fascists are not the type of sweet meats we get here.

    Simplify your points. Imagine you are speaking to 8th graders or raw military recruits. Realize this is why women can never make effective combat soldiers. Women are not patriots.

    You’re a man and still I even kept my points to you here down to a few sentences.

    Like


  259. “I’m sorry if this offends anyone, but let’s examine some scenarios”

    har har, once you start with this line, you have already lost 90% of their attention.

    Like


  260. namae nanka

    “I’m sorry if this offends anyone, but let’s examine some scenarios”

    har har, once you start with this line, you have already lost 90% of their attention.

    I think it was proper he introduced himself to a foreign (hostile) audience – as preparing to make a rational point that would be controversial.

    Hell, he’d even get the same reaction from the Ladies over at The Spearhead.

    Today’s children-in-adult-bodies hate any messenger that tells them they can’t put their 36th place T-Ball Participation Trophy in a place of honor on the XBox.

    Like


  261. Gorbachev: The old saying “don’t cast your pearls before swine” is appropriate here.

    I also left this comment in that thread to yank their bitch chains a bit, but I’m not sure it’ll make it through the moderation process. lulz

    Like


  262. “I think it was proper he introduced himself to a foreign (hostile) audience – as preparing to make a rational point that would be controversial.

    Hell, he’d even get the same reaction from the Ladies over at The Spearhead.”

    probably, that got him through the moderation. spearhead will simply down vote lol.
    None of my comments over at feministe saw the light of day. But then again most of them were snarks against idiots peddling their sense of moral superiority.

    Like


  263. I got my todays dose of unintentional comedy. Julian assage = “super alpha” lol. Me thinks someone is mistaking a mirror for a window.

    The man is far from a “super alpha” if he cant even have the common sense to avoid a garden variety honey trap, when he knows half the world is out to get him. How stupid can you get hmm?

    Like


  264. @Doug1
    “That doesn’t mean there should be transparency about everything. There are privacy considerations. Both personal and institutional. It’s a balance.

    Should the full school records of every student, including any misbehavior or accusation not proven, every grade, every personal evaluation, be made available to everyone in the world who might ever develop an interest? How about every conversation in a marriage, if wikileaks or someone leaking to them manages to plant a listening device?

    Should every detail of every deliberation within the US or British government be made public on the net? Do you think that might chill frank weighing of alternatives much, or dissenting views, or encourage playing to one popular prejudice or another, however ill informed (even if the info’s out there few will take the time to get a balanced view).

    Should every strategy session at all levels of corporations or legal firms be made public for their rivals to learn?

    There really does have to be a balance. Transparency yes, but not with regard to all the inner workings.

    State department cables are supposed to be private, like a private meeting between subordinate and supervisor within the department, but at a time saving and information quickening distance. Foreign office secret dispatches orginally in sealed embassy pouches, have been part of the international order for at least the last 200 years and I imagine much longer. It’s supposed to be as inviolable a principal as the extraterritorial integrity and to a large degree micro sovereignty of embassies in foreign countries. That’s as true of the Qatar embassy in Washington DC as it is of the US embassy in Qatar. The same is true of sealed diplomatic pouches with information,etc. Now admittedly embassies do get bugged, but it’s always an embarrassment to the bugging country to get caught at it.”

    The lie is like air to the Evil: without the lie, the Evil dies.
    The truth is like air to the Good: without the truth, the Good dies.
    There is no such thing as lying in the service of the Good.
    No more secrets. No more lies.

    There is nothing anyone can say about me – that’s TRUE – that can harm me in any way. (Do you not want to be held to that standard? Awww, poor babies.)

    Like


  265. If even a died-in-the-wool liberal like Justin Raimondo of antiwar.com is willing to tell the truth about feminist “rape” – that it is not about human rights for women, but an attack on heterosexuality – then the Misandry Bubble is getting close to poppin!

    http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/12/07/julian-assange-in-the-honey-trap/

    Like


  266. The U.S. citizen who released these cables to Wikileaks is a hero and a patriot. He is doing what’s best for his country and the human race, instead of obeying the clusterfuck of psychopaths who hijacked our country the moment the bullet entered the front of JFK’s head.

    What about the American soldier’s and their afghan collaborators that are now at risk? But you feel nothing for the 100,000+ innocent men, women and children our “heroes” have murdered in just the last nine years.

    Like


  267. […] The Assange "Rape": A Case Of Spurned Groupies « Citizen Renegade File this one under "politically incorrect but likely accurate" – women seeking attention, later spurned Dec 9th, 2010 by kevin. ← links for 2010-12-08 […]

    Like


  268. Gorb, you were very reasonable in your posts at Feminste. It’s like debating with children. Logic and reason count for fuck-all.

    I left a comment there which will never make it past the censors, who are, no doubt, on high alert after your posts. This is the modus operandi for feminist sites – heavy-handed censorship is necessary because allowing in any logic causes their silly (but dangerous) ideology to go up in smoke.

    Like


  269. on December 9, 2010 at 7:17 pm Phillips Exeter

    Well Gorbachev your comments were too long, but still, you made incisive points that couldn’t be answered. Exposing some of them to truth and logic is like throwing water on the Wicked Witch of the West. Or, the light of truth burns them as it would a vampire. or the garlic of truth. something like that. you get the idea.

    Like


  270. “” Assange even made the right move: Asked by the Israelis not to damage their international efforts, he backed off. Right call.

    You might hate Jews, right? Well, in the eternal war between Muslims and Jews, or Arabs and Jews, I’ll side with the Jews every day. The, ahem, non-genocidal Jews versus the genocidal Arab Muslims. “”

    Hey , so what would YOU do if you were a Palestinian ?

    Who knows what the real reasons are for Assage backing off from the Israelis.

    Maybe Assange has the smarts to realise that if he posed a real threat to the Israelis , they (being a paranoid , seige mentanlity state) would not hesitate to deal with him in the most brutally effiecient means necassary and pass it off as a “threat to national security” in the way that those fun loving Israelis love to do.

    The US might be an elephant that you can sneak up on when its not looking , kick in the ass and run away and hide; but Israel is more like a Hyena …. living off the proceeds of bigger predators , hunting for itself when it can , but is still capable of biting your fucking head off should you mess with it.

    Like


  271. @Phillips Exeter
    Well Gorbachev your comments were too long, but still, you made incisive points that couldn’t be answered. Exposing some of them to truth and logic is like throwing water on the Wicked Witch of the West. Or, the light of truth burns them as it would a vampire. or the garlic of truth. something like that. you get the idea.

    The commenters there still don’t get it. I was pretty reasonable. If you disagree with me = You’re Evil.

    @chainring
    Gorb, you were very reasonable in your posts at Feminste. It’s like debating with children. Logic and reason count for fuck-all.

    They really don’t seem to follow it. Was it me or are they just irrational?

    I left a comment there which will never make it past the censors, who are, no doubt, on high alert after your posts. This is the modus operandi for feminist sites – heavy-handed censorship is necessary because allowing in any logic causes their silly (but dangerous) ideology to go up in smoke.

    They’re all heavily censorious. Feministe no less than others.

    It’s like a big Yes Factory. They’re just not used to divergent opinions or diversity.

    Like


  272. Jeffrey,

    You’re an idiot. It wasn’t the NATO soldiers who killed the civilians, it was Al Qaida and the Taliban. US soldiers are the only shields these people have. Of course, if we were living under the caliphate, all your freedoms would be respected.

    Bradley Manning is a traitor. He violated his oath to the Constitution. Out of pique. Beneath contempt.

    And JFK was a drugged out, mobbed up creep:
    Easily as corrupt a president who ever lived. And he started Vietnam. Remember that

    Like


  273. Arguing online with a feminist is like being a participant in the Special Olympics.

    Even if you win , you are still retarded.

    Like


  274. Spot on article. The good news is that no matter how much propaganda we get in the state schools or from the academics or government, most people know instinctively that this PC shit is just that – shit. It is time that men and classically feminine women stand up against this sort of nonsense, unless of course all the birth control pill residue in the water has permanently shriveled our collective testicles.

    Regardless of what you think about Assange (as a conservative libertarian-leaning guy, I like the free-flow of info), this charge is bullshit. The beta males and feminists are running the world…if you don’t believe me, just so much as sneeze in an unpopular way, and see how quickly these PC whiners fine you or throw you in jail.

    Like


  275. @ Mr. C

    That’s special olympics quip is one of the best quotes I’ve heard in a while. Definite t-shirt material.

    Like


  276. @Sargon:

    Bradley Manning is a traitor. He violated his oath to the Constitution. Out of pique. Beneath contempt.

    Is not every President and every Senator and every Congressman who have supported the unconstitutional fourth branch of government, the Federal Reserve, a traitor?

    Like


  277. @Gorbachev:

    They really don’t seem to follow it. Was it me or are they just irrational?

    Have you ever met a rational feminist?

    Men are rational. Women rationalize.

    Like


  278. @chainring

    Go live in Pyongyang why dont you.

    Like


  279. @Gorbachev

    Finns are quiet, they like to fight with knives, drink Koskenkorva (vodka) and drive fast while drunk.

    Cavemanstyle

    The guys you described sacking Constantinople converted to Christianity and after a while converted to betaness (social democracy, a leftist agenda)

    Like


  280. Sargon,

    Ha! Maybe if you’d have left the Germans alone and kept your damn noses out of WWII, you’d not have had a commie problem after the 1940s! But oh, you had to white-knight, and for your troubles, half of Europe was enslaved by communism (not to mention the fact that the commies gain enough momentum and prestige after WWII —thanks to the “West” Allies—to expand far into the non-White world ).

    If you’d have left the Germans alone, there wouldn’t be an Israel in the Mid East stirring up the hornet’s nest. Jews would have been shipped to Madagascar, or to that former Soviet territory which was especially established for Jews there, or heck, if you really loved the Jews so much …you could take them in en masse. I can’t really say if the Arabs or Persians would have given the NS German Reich any problems later on, but I can presume that they had the will and the means to take care of business and then some IF they had needed to, and we wouldn’t have any Islamification of Europe threat from mass Arab immigration to deal with right now, would we?

    Besides, I’ll bet that if we had left the Germans alone, the churches themselves would still have a meaningful role to play that wouldn’t harm our own people’s interests. Their gospel would have gradually evolved/reformed into what was called “positive Christianity”…a Nature-revering religion of blood and soil (and science) expressing itself through folk traditional stories and art forms (including many of those popular under the sway of the Church), rather than the internationalist Nature-adverse gospel of eunichs and egalitarians preached today.

    When the Swiss this year simply tried to stop the construction of any more minerats in their land, can you guess who freaked out on them and scandalized about it?
    Sure, the Muslims and the Jews made lots of noise as usual…but SO DID THE CHURCHES!!! Where is the Christian bulwark against Third World immigration? Uh, those priests and preachers are too busy embracing the loads of immigrants arriving, and then waging their fingers against “haters” who might not be loving “all of God’s children” sufficiently enough.

    The bulwark you imagine Christianity to be must have died long long ago. Now, it is a significant part of the problem.

    One last thing on the commies: Take a comparative look now at the lands formerly held by commies, and then take a look at the “West” now.
    –The East has MEN and WOMEN. The West is full of chicks who act like they have dicks and girly-men.
    –The East is fit. The West is fat.
    –The East is overwhelmingly White…Moscow is possibly the Whitest major metropolis on Earth today. The West is…not so White anymore, is it?
    –The People of the East are usually proud of their unique roots and folks traditions. The People of the West mostly stopped giving a fuck about their heritage and traditions, trading that ‘old stuff’ in for mass-produced Hollywood garbage culture.
    –I dare say that the People of the East may appreciate and value freedom —because they recently experienced having to fight for it themselves in their own homelands—more then the People of the West who have had it relatively easy, stable, and were permitted illusions of freedom for many decades. The People of the East KNEW they lived under a dictatorship of the few, while the People of the west continue to foolishly deceive themselves.
    –In the East, you have adult responsibilities and adult freedoms much earlier than you have in the West. Why? Because the People of the East can handle it, but grown-up spoiled brat children and the prudes in the West can’t handle it.
    –Oh, and last but not least, in the East, the kids go to school, get serious, and get educated to be someone valuable! They appreciate and cultivate brains in the East! But what about the kids in the West? Need I say anything about this when it is so obvious? What do the Western kids learn? Mostly, to be politically correct service-industry bitches or globe-trotting mercenaries or office paper-pushers, who drink and drug themselves silly to evade the reality that their whole System betrayed them to the ‘global economy’ and ‘diversity’ and thus flushed down any once-realistic possibilities for a better future.

    Conclusion: In the end, as despicable as Communism is, the hard life was good for the People of the East. The didn’t get too soft and too stupid, like in the West. They maintained their ability and worthiness to survive in most key areas…they just need to pick their birthrate up and get the West off their backs. Ironically, if there is to be anything like the old American freedom-loving pioneer spirit finding fertile ground in the next century, it will most likely happen in Eastern Europe. The East learned many hard lessons and grown through it…the West hasn’t yet, but I think that they will be getting their comeuppance for stupidity soon.

    Like


  281. Chainring,

    Bit of a difference between running a supervisory banking system ( and I’m not getting into a pro and con on the Fed) and giving the enemies of the west a staggering windfall which exposes our troops and agents to death.

    Like


  282. @Sargon

    Dude, you’re on some serious crack. The U.S. Government defending the Constitution?

    WTF, are you kidding me? The Constitution and Bill of Rights are FLAT on their back right now.

    Pvt. Manning blew the top off our corrupt-to-the-core government that loves nothing more than a free-hand and total secrecy to destroy what’s left of America.

    Always remember that every soldier has a DUTY to disobey unconstitutional orders. Yes, the word is DISOBEY. And that takes balls that you clearly ain’t got.

    Please don’t be another Republitard whose eyeballs are glued to FOXnews…..Wake the f*** up.

    Like


  283. I take the middle road: Let Assange go free for now (unless he fails to condemn feminism and specifically speak out for men’s rights, in which case the feminists should have his hide).

    Execute Manning by firing squad tomorrow morning.

    Like


  284. Anna’s contradicting herself now:

    On Wednesday she wrote on Twitter

    CIA-agent, rabiat feminist/muslimälskare, kristen fundamentalist, flata & dödligt förälskad i en man, kan man ens vara allt det samtidigt?

    In Swedish she’s saying, among other things, how can I be a rabid feminist and Christian fundamentalist at the same time?

    However, she’s famous for saying that the term Christian Feminist is not only not an oxymoron but the two have to logically go together.

    Like


  285. She’s also prevaricating and obfuscating by saying in that tweet “how can I be a Muslim lover and hate and love a man at the same time?”

    Like


  286. Hux,

    Not a republican, or a democrat. Not a fan of fox news either.
    One thing I do know, outside of your paranoid little world that there is a war going on. Between a bunch of decaying, imperfect but basically democrat states and the most twisted and hateful neo-medieval ideology the world has ever seen.

    And your friend just gave half the playbook to
    the enemy.

    Like


  287. And by the way Hux,
    Fuck you

    Like


  288. The bottom line is that Sweden wants to establish the precedent that women, upon having second thoughts about going unprotected, can use the power of the state to force a man to have an HIV test. It doesn’t matter to them that both women were friendly with Assange after the “rapes”.

    People also forget that Anita Hill followed Clarence Thomas (now a US Supreme Court justice) to another job (appointment) after he supposedly harassed her.

    Clarence’s wife had every reason last month to once again ask Anita Hill to apologize for the outright bullshit of the allegations she made during his nomination process.

    In other news: Idaho is going to update its rape laws in January to say that you can’t trick an unmarried woman into thinking she’s doing it with you, her boyfriend, when its really your buddy whom you owed a favor to. Sounds fair to me.

    More news: the porn actor who got a positive HIV test within two months of joining the industry turns out to have gone more often for gay scenes because “its hard to find work in the straight part of the industry because they keep wanting to work with only a few men”.

    Apparently they don’t test guys every month in the gay part of the industry because they have to wear condoms. But condoms break and its insane that the same guys are accepted for scenes by straight production studios in the same time frame. Some advice to them: find first timers for every scene and, at least, don’t allow cross-overs.

    Like


  289. Here’s a funny video on the Assange Affair:

    Like


  290. @Sargon:

    Bit of a difference between running a supervisory banking system ( and I’m not getting into a pro and con on the Fed) and giving the enemies of the west a staggering windfall which exposes our troops and agents to death.

    If you’re going to call out low level traitors, why not call out the highest level traitors?

    As Hux notes, an American citizen has a duty to defend the Constitution, NOT the choices of government officials. The founding fathers foresaw the possibility that the people would need to rise up against an out-of-control government.

    As for exposing troops and agents to death, I think the White House and Congress are the masters of that.

    Like


  291. woops, fucked up the blockquoting.

    Like


  292. Chainring,

    I’ll get worried when they try to repeal the Second amendment.

    The Government might be a pain in the ass, but it’s not reached commie levels yet.

    There are far less free places, and Manning gave these pricks an early Christmas present

    Like


  293. Jerry, re: porn – they can’t use new guys for every movie because not a lot of guys can perform on demand under those conditions. But I agree that using gay for pay guys in hetero scenes is unnecessarily risky. But it’s not the producer who takes the risk. Some girls refuse to work with guys who have done gay for pay, while others don’t have a problem with it.

    Even Peter North, one of the most legendary male porn stars, has done gay for pay.

    Like


  294. Anita Hill was as weird as it gets

    Like


  295. Jeffrey of Troy = Commie Shill

    Like


  296. Can someone tell me for once and for all how to do block-quoting? Make it clear this time.

    Like


  297. @Sargon:
    There won’t be any need to repeal the 2nd Amendment. They’ll just follow the path of many states and make firearm licensing onerous and expensive. Consider the percentage of today’s citizenry that is armed relative to, say, the early 1800s. Consider also the relative disparity of government weaponry to citizen’s weaponry today vs. 1800.

    We are extremely vulnerable to the ever growing and increasingly powerful state. This is by design.

    Like


  298. @Jerry:
    Re: blockquoting, start and end your quote with *blockquote* and */blockquote*, but use instead of **.

    Like


  299. Argh! Use ” instead of *.

    Like


  300. Oh this is fucking annoying. I guess I’ll have to describe the character instead of using it.

    ‘less than sign’blockquote’greater than sign’quoted text goes here’less than sign’/blockquote’greater than sign’

    If that’s not clear, shoot me an email – chainring.mgtow at gmail.

    Like


  301. So let me get this straight:

    An Australian is arrested in England for having consensual sex without a condom in Sweden, but he doesn’t want to be extradited to face the $700 fine for this because the USA might render him there.

    How did James Bond get off scott free so many times?

    Like


  302. You didn’t get that straight. The possible charge now includes rape as the Swedes defines it. The MINIMUM sentence is two years.

    Like


  303. If Medyedev just announced that Assange should get the Nobel Peace Prize, does that mean Russia got through to him about any possible leaks of Russian documents?

    Or was that a really friendly warning to him that its a good idea for him to be buddies with them considering he doesn’t have too many powerful friends in the west anymore?

    Like


  304. By the way, a lot of countries define sex with a sleeping woman as rape, and this he is accused of. Apparently Sofia woke up to him penetrating her (without a condom). The great thing about this case is not just MRAs but a lot of people are standing up and saying we don’t accept this definition. This has implications for rape law far beyond Sweden. Men are not going to accept living under a regime where if you touch a woman you are sleeping with while she is asleep you are a rapist.

    Like


  305. During a rape trial every bit as ridiculous as the Assange case I attended here in Norway, it came up that our supreme court has clarified that if a woman consents to sex and falls asleep during the act but you continue then it isn’t rape, but if she consents/goes to bed with you intending to have sex, falls asleep and then you start, it is rape.

    We are not going to be discussing the subtleties of feminist rape anymore. The world is now rejecting the feminist framework wholesale. This is a major backlash.

    Like


  306. @Arpagus

    Men are not going to accept living under a regime where if you touch a woman you are sleeping with while she is asleep you are a rapist.

    Apparently men do accept it. Case in point: Sweden. And you better believe feminists from all over the west are looking to Sweden as a shining example of female-friendly rape laws.

    I think it more likely that US/UK/etc. rape laws become broader than Swedish rape laws become narrower.

    As an example of this broadening trend, look at the ever expanding definition of domestic violence. Now, you don’t even need to hit her to get charged with DV. Excellent write-up on this over at The Spearhead: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/12/09/yippee-we%E2%80%99re-all-abusers-now/

    The reason we keep sliding down that slippery slope is b/c it’s easy to paint objectors as misogynists, and that is political suicide in our culture.

    Like


  307. @Arpagus

    They’d probably win on that if she had cried rape at that moment by the definition set forth in the Book of Deuteronomy in the Bible (woman in the city must cry out or be stoned with the man).

    That Bible passage, by the way, was wildly fascist (it basically said that, if the parents had betrothed a woman, no man could lay with her or else he and she would die – unless she cried out – for instance if someone saw them – in which case only he would be killed by his fellow Jewish community members).

    But this at least established a sound precedent that rape has to be cried out at the time.

    Sophie, in fact, spent a lot of friendly time with Assange after the fact and there’s no reason to believe she didn’t enjoy the act of course either. His word vs hers should equal case dismissed.

    Crying out (phoning out) in distress should have been the only way for this to even be considered a possible crime.

    Doesn’t the British Prime Minister have the power to say “Sorry Sweden but we didn’t join the EU or Interpol for this nonsense”?

    He might still retain Assange for getting British troops killed if that happened and there’s a law against that.

    I will repeat that, if Assange doesn’t highlight that victim feminism is part of his problem, the Hell with him.

    Like


  308. And it has a lot to do with the idea that the state can force an HIV test if the woman starts to worry after the fact.

    Like


  309. German males know about this sort of thing all too well.

    Andreas Türck was a popular TV producer in Germany in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

    In the early morning hours of August 25, 2002 Tuerck was with two friends and a drunk floozy he’d picked up at a bar name Katherina who worked as a teller at a bank in Frankfurt.

    In front of his male friend and one of her female friends (impromptu double date after the bar closed) they stopped on a bridge while she gave him a BJ. Her own friend would later testify that this was because she wanted to. After this he was embarrassed and she was just a happy drunk. She was brought home.

    She then telephoned a male friend and said she’d been raped. But he, a drug dealer under phone surveillance by the police, didn’t believe her because she said that kind of thing all the time. It was part of her crazy personality to say that.

    But the German police are manginas.

    They took this seriously, identifying her phone number.

    But they couldn’t act immediately on the “rape revelation” because they were trying to catch the friend as a drug dealer and that would take another six months.

    Six months later, they visited Katherina and confronted her with the rape charge she had told a friend over a wiretapped phone.

    — Are you with me here folks, because I’m not making this up ——

    They then forced her to make a formal charge against the famous TV producer.

    This was now March 2003. As they moved to arrest him, his life was about to be destroyed. (continued)

    Like


  310. Doesn’t the British Prime Minister have the power to say “Sorry Sweden but we didn’t join the EU or Interpol for this nonsense”?

    The British PM and everyone else of importance in Western Europe *like* what’s going on in Sweden. It’s just that Sweden is more brazen, or has a more favorable cultural climate, to implement certain types of leftist laws faster that the UK and other EU countries.

    Like


  311. Former U.S. Army TIER-1 Special Operations Soldier turned Radical Leftist Evangelical Christian Feminist, Stan Goff supports Julian Assange’s Wikileaks activities but still opposes him as a rapist, even as the evidence mounts against Ardin and Wilen.

    http://www.feralscholar.org/blog/index.php/2010/12/02/wikileaks-and-sex/

    He even goes so far as to link to various MRA blogs and call them disingenuous for supporting the culture of rape and supposedly perpetuating the MYTH of male victimization under misandry.

    This just goes to show you how complex and fucked up the issue is becoming.

    Like


  312. The police had told Katherina that they would charge her with making a false rape accusation (over a phone to a friend who didn’t believe her while both didn’t know the police were wiretapping his phone for other reasons).

    This is Germany folks – a country that really hasn’t learned its lesson on such matters.

    Now I said above that this famous man’s life was about to be destroyed.

    Not quite.

    You see, the slow way police in most mangina countries leave nonsense cases of supposed rape open meant that Andreas went a full year of his life without his employers or others knowing about the stressful threat to his life going on with the Gestap – I mean the Frankfurt Police.

    But one year later, in March 2004, someone at a small TV station who probably wanted to make room for himself to rise in the TV world, broke a story of “an innocent young woman being raped by the famous Andreas Tuerk in front of a restaurant”.

    Suddenly the German media went wild. The famous Bild, newspaper (supposedly conservative and like the New York Post in appeal), reported (made up out of thin air) that “police had said” he had pushed her into a side street and on the ground where he jumped on top of her and brutally raped her.

    Remember this kind of reporting about the honor of German women was happening in Germany in the 1930s and false accusations were still being perpetuated by the German media in 2004.

    And its said to this day that the Attorney General for Hessen protected his office from later being forced to pay defamation charges by deliberately getting the media to do the defaming in the first place (Andreas couldn’t later say his office started the defamation because there would be no proof).

    This was kind of like the way Jews were made to pay for the damage inflicted against themselves on the Night of Broken Glass.

    The “conservative” Bild hated Andreas because he had become the German Jerry Springer with a very successful TV show.

    He was suspended by ProSieben immediately.

    The “conservative” Bild then went to town totally destroying his reputation with yellow journalism headlines like “Does Tuerck Get Angry When Women Say No”?

    He was soon to be fired altogether. (continued)

    Like


  313. namae nanka

    Hell, he’d even get the same reaction from the Ladies over at The Spearhead.”

    probably, that got him through the moderation. spearhead will simply down vote lol.

    I am SHOCKED there by the number of shrieking he-bitches boys that are so super-sensitive to criticism.

    Over-sensitivity is a woman’s trait. Real Men dgas.

    Like


  314. As the years of the trial dragged on the German tabloids were forced to print big stories of the “accuser’s” own friends testifying against the possibility of a real rape (remember the accuser didn’t want to go through with this – it was the police that forced her to press charges).

    But the conservative White Knighter journalists and the Marxist feminists hated Andreas Tuerck for his Jerry Spring type show. They printed stories about how his general attitude toward women got him into the sordid affair in the first place.

    In other words, they hated him because he was an Alpha on the bridge that night.

    The final Bild headline “The Victor is Tuerck – But Will He Ever Be Happy Again?”

    Here’s a kicker: More German women than men were willing to believer Andreas was innocent. When I spoke of German men remembering this case, I meant “Real German Men” as opposed to the majority manginas.

    An American movie called “Raw Deal” similarly documents how American men were less likely than women to believe accused rapists were completely innocent when a woman who regretted sex (a gang bang) lied that it was rape.

    Like


  315. In Sweden if you test positive for an STD they will track down and forcibly test and treat people in your sexual history (not just for HIV, but also less serious infections like chlamydia). However, I didn’t think they could force someone to be tested merely because a woman is worried after unprotected sex. Apparently the ostensible reason for talking to the cops in the first place was asking for advice about maybe getting him tested anyway, and then the prosecutor decided it was rape too. It is completely normal for Swedish cops to trump up rape charges without even an accusation from the woman. Women can often not understand that they have been raped without being lawyers since the definition of rape is so absurdly broad.

    While treatment for STDs is probably in your best interest, coerced health care is not compatible with a civilized society, in my view. This is another symptom of a police state. They can also do this in Norway but in practice they won’t track you down with blue thugs for suspicion of chlamydia like they do in Sweden.

    Like


  316. That blog I commented on went down for comments again – and my response to one woman’s fears that she was raped were modded out. Of course.

    Anyway, the blog and comments are here:

    http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/12/06/some-thoughts-on-sex-by-surprise/

    This was the comment that should have gotten through moderation, but didn’t.

    REALLY sensitive to disagreement, aren’t these women? AGREE OR GET OUT. NYAH NYAH NYAH. I don’t think they see how stalinist they are.

    This is what I posted. It should be in the comments right after 226. And then, comments were closed.

    How interesting.

    This is what RD wrote:
    RD 12.10.2010 at 1:11 am

    Trigger warning.

    To the asshole who said, “you can feel the difference and if you can’t you have nerve damage”…fuck off cuz I’m guessing this has never happened to you.

    And to the other asshole who said it devalues “real rape,” listen. I can think of three situations I’ve been in that are relevant here. In one case, I was recently homeless and this guy was offering a place to stay in exchange for doing shows, meaning masturbation shows. He lied about the nature of his “business”- it was prostitution. I had flirted with him a bit when I met him. I posed for pictures. He bullied me into doing some sexual stuff. Then he escalated to sex when I was turned away, but he also led me to believe that he was wearing a condom. I do not think this was consensual in the first place, I didn’t fight it but I don’t think I had a choice. I didn’t want it at all. I wasn’t expecting it. I had told him earlier that I was not going to have sex with him and he said he “didn’t mix business with pleasure.” But when I saw that he was not wearing a condom I felt like I died a little inside. I just turned over and got a little teary, and when he came I felt like I couldn’t move. He wiped me off and put me in a room with a customer basically right after. I wound up running away. I think the no condom thing was a violation…I actually started peeing blood the next day and I think it was related to the lack of condom. The second situation, a client paid me to stay the night, we had protected sex. I woke up in the night to him fucking me without a condom. The no condom, was a violation. The third situation was that I withdrew consent when things got rough.

    It is a terrible violation and it does not diminish any fucking thing. “Real rape” is something rapists made up so they could go on thinking of themselves as not rapists.

    And this was my response:

    @RD,

    What I am going to do may seem harsh and unfair. I want to in a kind of cold, impassionate and purely analytical attitude needed for legal analysis. It’s important. Rape isn’t something you should look at emotionally: when determining whether a crime happened or if there was guilt, you need to divorce yourself from emotion and look at intent and response.

    That sounds awful. I want to fully respect you and understand that you were extremely vulnerable. Leaving the place would have left you homeless. The guy took advantage of you.
    BUT: virtually all people in the world don’t find themselves in your situation. Most people have a few partners, aren’t involved in the sex trade, and deal with BFs or husbands or wives and GFs, as well as occasional lovers. This is no judgment call on you. It’s just different, is all. A college guy and girl getting drunk and frisky is a different scenario; a husband and wife is a different one again. Second, the situations you’ve described are extremely high-risk: You’re exposing yourself to massive amounts of risk, out of necessity or carelessness or more likely a bit of necessity and lack of options. I’m going to assume that putting yourself at risk at all is not what you ever want to do: That you would prefer to play it safe at all times, steer clear of the sex trade (a morally ambiguous grey zone if there ever was one – how consent is even defined in these circumstances must be a byzantine and baffing game), avoid difficult circumstances and deal with predictable, controllable sexual behavior in comfortable situations where everything is understood and spelled out clearly, as far away from the sex trade as it’s possible to get. I’ll assume that for now.

    So here’s a breakdown of what you’ve written, from the perspective of cold and impersonal thought and not taking into considerations your feelings or anything extraneous.

    Bear in mind this assumption:

    All accuseds are considered fully innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow if a doubt. This is a basic right that must always be afforded to all people, male and female, young and old. It’s the state’s duty to prove both lack of consent beyond a shadow of a doubt and that this was understood on the man’s side, as well, to prove intent. That’s key for both a finding of guilt and for sentencing. That goes for all crimes, ever, not just rape.

    It’s especially important in a murky case, where you may have indeed been raped or sexually violated against your will- with the experiences being very unpleasant and dangerous at the very least, if not actually criminal.

    So, here we go.

    In one case, I was recently homeless and this guy was offering a place to stay in exchange for doing shows, meaning masturbation shows. He lied about the nature of his “business”- it was prostitution.

    You had the freedom to walk at any time, as far as he was concerned. Your own situation is immaterial for the determination of his guilt.

    I had flirted with him a bit when I met him. I posed for pictures. He bullied me into doing some sexual stuff.

    AH – you might have something. Bullying is like a hard sell: If it involves serious coercion and force, then that’s rape. If it’s just harassment and insistence, then it’s like being sold a house you don’t want to buy – damn, but you’re not getting your deposit back. The nature of the bullying here is everything, as well as the specific nature of your response. You need to establish that he’s not just aggressively trying to convince you, but that he’s actively threatening you with odious consequences (ie, threats of force: Bullying). Bullying is a vague word in these circumstances, because it can mean a lot. But if he was being manipulative and pushy, he’s off the hook. If he was threatening and scary – which bullying implies -then you have him, and that’s rape.

    But bullying can mean a pretty big range of things, so I can’t judge on that score.

    I do not think this was consensual in the first place,

    You have to be sure that he fully and clearly understood this for him to be guilty of rape. If he genuinely thought there was consent – or that he had sold you on sex – and no clear and firm attempt was made to deny consent, it may have been rape: but if he reasonably could have presumed consent, and there was no counter-indication, then even if it was rape, he isn’t criminally responsible. Intent matters. This is as true for rape as it is for all crimes. Fully articulating your wishes – at all stages – is paramount. That’s a personal responsibility thing.

    I didn’t fight it but I don’t think I had a choice.

    Did you make this clear to him? The operative actor here is *you* didn’t think you had a choice. It doesn’t say anything about his state of mind. You could have chosen not to be there – no matter how terrible a choice that was to you, given your economic state and the need for a place to stay.

    In that case, it was an exchange – and unless you said, “NO sex”, then he can’t be guilty of rape simply for taking advantage of your precarious position. If that were the case, then any vendor selling a necessary item might be considered acting in bad faith. For example, when my car ran out of gas, I desperately needed a gas can to bring gas back to my car. After a 1-hour walk to the station, it cost 5x the normal amount – because the station’s owner knew anyone buying it was desperate, so he took advantage of the desperate. Was it criminal? I fully consented to the purchase, because I needed it. It’s a small bit of brutal and savage logic – but it applies here. You basically were forced by your *own* situation to consent to something you didn’t want to do. Technically, no matter how you may be disgusted by such a man, he’s not in the wrong on that particular point. The situation is just totally awful. An outside force made you feel obliged to consent.

    Note the operative there: Your consent. You were blackmailed by your own terrible circumstances, but at worst, given such, he was guilty of essentially paying for sex – an exchange. You shoud be angry at life for dealing you such a terrible hand. But rape? Not quite – if this is the only factor.

    Again, I apologize if this seems trite, but you need to follow the logic. I don’t mean to belittle your experience in the slightest.

    I didn’t want it at all.

    Then it was your legal duty to make this abundantly clear and if he proceeded anyway, then you had a clear case. Whether or not you wanted it is immaterial to the legal logic: it’s whether or not you consent as he understands it and any reasonable person would understand it, and if he understood he was proceeding against your will. I didn’t want to buy some stupid gas can: I had no choice. I never used the gas can again. It cost a lot of money. Not wanting it may hurt your feelings, but it doesn’t impact his guilt in the slightest. it’s your actions and his reactions that matter – not how you feel about it – that determines his guilt.

    We’re trying to determine whether it was rape and he is guilty – not how you felt about it. That’s massively important. It’s a crucial distinction.

    I wasn’t expecting it.

    Again, immaterial for the determination of his guilt. But very bad for you.

    I had told him earlier that I was not going to have sex with him and he said he “didn’t mix business with pleasure.”

    You might have a case here, but he could constructiveley argue that people change their minds: the environment got sexual, etc. That happens often. I’ve said Not Tonight before, and then changed my mind – often. You need to indicate lack of consent at the time. IE, when he tries to penetrate you, … tell him off. Move. Say – NO. If he proceeds, clearly rape. Say nothing, … then you’d already been sexual, and he upped it. You didn’t stop. That’s presumed and assumed consent, and making that illegal would make almost all heterosexual sex illegal. It’s virtually always the case that someone wants sex more, more often, or differently than someone else. Or even wants it at all. In many case, both men and women never want to have sex with their spouses – but they do, out of duty, loyalty or just giving in to pressure. Seduction is part and parcel of male-female sexuality – take it away, and no woman will be happy with a man. You have to legislate in this zone with extreme caution. You could just kill all heterosexual (or even gay) sex. I would err on not even wading in.
    And:
    If “no means no”, then it implies that No must be said and understood.

    But when I saw that he was not wearing a condom I felt like I died a little inside.

    Your feeling of dying inside indicates a mortifying experience, but again – that’s deception, not rape. You were having sex. The condom presence doesn’t determine rape, the act of sex does. And your feeling of dying inside makes me want to weep – but again, immaterial to the determination of whether or not a man is guilty. Has no bearing at all.

    I just turned over and got a little teary, and when he came I felt like I couldn’t move.

    See last comment.

    He wiped me off and put me in a room with a customer basically right after. I wound up running away.

    (*aside: Good for you. Sad that you had to be there in the first place, but good for running.)

    Again, this doesn’t make it rape. You were free to leave – and you did.

    If you WEREN’T free to leave, … then that’s several kinds of bad (forcible confinement, sexual assault (by the john), kidnapping if it applies, etc. – lots of charges to go around, all of them reasonable).

    I think the no condom thing was a violation…I actually started peeing blood the next day and I think it was related to the lack of condom.

    A violation, yes: rape, no. I might go for assault, especialy if he had a disease. If you caught anything from him, then it’s not rape, per se, but it *could* be a kind of attack. This goes for anyone ever having sex. We don’t have a law like that, and it wouldn’t be rape, but it makes sense: If I knowingly infect someone with a disease, key being “knowingly”, then that’s a kind of assault causing bodily harm, possibly even death.

    The key there is “knowingly”.

    It’s a violation, but not quite rape. I do think some jurisdictions have interpreted knowingly infecting someone with a disease as either manslaughter, criminal negligence causing something or assault. I read about verdicts like that. One guy was convicted of knowingly infecting people with HIV, though not on purpose – just not caring; he died of AIDS in jail; another was a woman who deliberately infected men with HIV, some through sex, once through an injection. It was on purpose. Both were assault,I think.

    While definitely not a call for rape on its own, for assault – if you got infected and he knew you were likely to be, then yes. Same as attacking you with a knife or pushing you out of a bus or some such thing. I totally go for that call.

    The second situation, a client paid me to stay the night, we had protected sex.

    So you had a sex-money exchange: the relationship is established. And you stayed the entire night. Further sex was probably either assumed or negotiated? That bears on whether or not it was rape. Even so, it doesn’t sound rape-ish.

    I woke up in the night to him fucking me without a condom. The no condom, was a violation.

    I agree, if you insisted on a condom: It’s not *rape*, which is forcible or non-consensual sex, but it is some kind of violation. You could be considered to have consented to sex (with a condom), and the lack of a condom could be argued (both ways) as either breaking consent or “stretching it”. A lot of people will go either way on that one – unlikely any jury would convict, for good reason. Best gambit: Don’t be in that situation.

    It isn’t assault if there were no side-effects. If I move to punch someone but don’t, it’s not an assault. If you emerge unscathed and disease-free, then there was no assault. If you emerge with a disease, then it might be. If he didn’t know he was infected and had no reason to suspect it- you were assaulted but he’s not guilty, as there was no intent and he believd himself uninfected or at no risk of giving you the disease.

    If he knew he was infected, Blammo, you have an assault causing bodily harm. Criminal negligence at best. Vicious assault at worst.

    But – the point being: A *rape* charge is not the way to play that. It’s not *rape*, per se. You’ve got to be careful about that sort of thing – it’s what confuses everything.

    It’s a violation in the same sense that a guy walking up to me and beating me over the head is a violation. It could be on the same scale, too: Causing permanent injury. But the guy doing that isn’t raping me, he’s assaulting me.

    Again, you need to prove 1) Intent and 2) effect to establish that he’s actually guilty. A guy who looks like he wants to beat me up but who doesn’t hit me (ie, sex but no disease infecion) isn’t guilty of beating me up.

    The third situation was that I withdrew consent when things got rough.

    Then you’ve got a clear case; You SAID NO, you SAID STOP, IT’S DONE, and insisted. In that case – blammo, you’ve got it. Rape.

    While the other two are dodgy, that one is cut-and-dried. It’s rape. You have a rape case, and the guy would have to come up with a good one to defend against the clear and certain knowledge that he had defied your consent.

    I hope you’re not offended by this.

    I just want to point out: It’s not how badly you feel about it that determines if it’s rape. Rape isn’t a catch-all charge that should be leveled when sex goes wrong.

    Rape is about provable non-consent and forcible confinement. It’s not about manipulation or deceit or trickery or gullibility or anything else.

    For example, the recent conviction for rape of an Arab Israeli man for having sex with a woman and lying about being Jewish and rich was revolting for the very same reason. He lied to her, but his lies established that she would have sex with him. She then did so. Buyer beware: It’s deceitful on his part, but she consented.

    If you criminalize deceit in sex, then no-one will ever have sex. How many women have I dated who lied about their age? How many men lie about how much money they make? How many people like about being married, having kids, etc.?

    If anything, the Arab guy was guilty of fraud – not rape.

    Actually, this was obviously an ethnic thing – some Arab playing with Our Women – but for rape to actually mean anything in court (see how few Swedish rape cases ever get convictions), and anything at all, actually, except for disgruntled women or men being unhappy – then you’ve got to tease out these other things and make rape about, well, rape.

    Forcible sex without consent.

    Consent is troublesome. But the tendency to expand rape to cover everything undermines the work done to actually make a meaningful class of criminal behaviors illegal and punishable.

    Human sexuality involves thousands of different situations, as many motives, and an endless series of actors, emotions and patterns. Some of them run against the grain but are deeply programmed – women wanting to be overpowered by strong men, men and women wanting sexual power and ownership, men and women using sex as a bargaining chip or negotiating tool or for economic exchanges – and most of this is treacherous, storm-filled waters as far as coming up with hard universal lines is concerned.

    Which is why the old definition of rape was so good. Expanding it like Sweden did was foolish. It made the actual crime meaningless and unprosecutable – because it might make human sexuality criminal in many situations where it wouldn’t otherwise be. The simple feeling of regret or even the economic situation of a putative victim might make it rape on one case – but not rape in another.

    Such inconsistency and fluidity makes it arbitrary as to what gets prosecuted and what doesn’t, and means that “rape” ends up meaning nothing at all.

    That does a disservice to anyone who is forcibly made to have sex against his or her will.

    Like


  317. Jerry

    The final Bild headline “The Victor is Tuerck – But Will He Ever Be Happy Again?”

    Inform Der Deutsche Socialists that Scott Peterson gets more action than all American betas and most puags.

    Like


  318. This was her final response to everything.

    Jill 12.10.2010 at 11:30 am

    Well, I’m officially tired of reading comments telling me I’m a dumb cunt and saying that women generally are horrible false rape-accusers, so I’m closing comments on this thread.

    I’m a little suprised. Nobody called her dumb, or even insinuated it; and certainly she was never called a cunt, or was this even hinted at.

    Wow. Touchy and irrational. I didn’t even have to point out anything, she just jumped into the irrational – emotional supersensitive box without being pushed. Are they really this easy to intimidate?

    Like


  319. on December 10, 2010 at 1:45 pm Professor Woland

    With changes in the culture and marriage rates plummeting, it is progressivly harder for women to gain legal and financial leverage over their male partners. We have gone from life time marriages, to short term serial marriages, to live in arangements, to one night stands. Unless there are children that result, once the two parties part ways there is nothing that either can do to the other. The freedom to chose and only do what one pleases comes with a price tag and female hypergamy dictates that men should always be the ones who pay that price, even if there is no good reason.

    Enter false rape & DV charges. Having gone through the mother of all custody battles where I have continously had false dv and child neglect charges leveled at me I can identify with Assange 100%. As scummy as I think he is, he is clearly a hot property right now and riding the crest of fame. Some frustrated nag like Anna Ardin needs to try and cash in on that fame. This is her one chance to grab the brass ring and she probably will not have many or any opportunities like this ever again.

    Like


  320. @Gorbachev:

    Wow. Touchy and irrational. I didn’t even have to point out anything, she just jumped into the irrational – emotional supersensitive box without being pushed. Are they really this easy to intimidate?

    Once you realize what an emotional powderkeg women are, it becomes clear how dangerous it is to arm them with overly broad rape laws and even the ability to falsely allege rape and ruin a man’s life (with very low risk of legal ramifications for themselves).

    Would society choose to arm insane asylum inmates with weapons? Yet we happily hand women shotguns pointed at men’s balls. Alpha or beta matters not here. In fact, maybe alphas are worse off – they have more opportunities to get their nuts shot off by a spurned lover.

    It’s something I’ve been thinking about for some time, but the Assange case is crystalizing for me that I probably need to start recording my sexual activities. Just in case a woman later decides that she didn’t like how I pumped and dumped her.

    Like


  321. @Chainring,

    Watch out.

    Recording your sexual activities without telling her just to protect yourself from rape might actually be rape itself.

    Also, it depends on how she feels about it. One incident which is rape might not be rape with another woman – even if everything was identical.

    Rule: Sex with women is a minefield and they now have total control over your life. As Assange shows, if they want to destroy youm they can do it – with no repercussions for them.

    Be careful.

    At some point, talking to a woman will be rape.

    And don’t even get me started on restraining orders. They’re given out with the slightest bit of evidence. Another standard tactic: lawyers tell all women (and many men) to get restraining orders in divorce cases, just as a good measure. Gets the guy (or the woman) out of the house, right?

    Unbelievable.

    Chainring is right. Giving women this kind of power has made any sexual relations with women amazingly dangerous.

    Like


  322. Meanwhile “Republican” commenters are happy that John Edwards won’t be allowed to speak at his wife’s funeral because he had cheated on her:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/10/earlyshow/main7137248.shtml?tag=nl.e883

    I haven’t paid much attention to that story, but I did notice that, in her dying days, she didn’t seem to say anything nice about him or how people should talk about him after she’s dead. I didn’t see that as very Christian and felt annoyed the MSM was making her out to be a saint while she seemed to pointedly ignore any expectation that she’d be forgiving in her last days. Then again, I may be wrong. I didn’t spend any time on this story.

    Did he want to walk away last January or did she, dying of cancer, push him away and get a separation after learning he’d had a baby with that mistress? If I had cancer and no prospects of finding a replacement spouse to hug at night while I slowly died, I don’t think I’d hold a grudge if the other person wanted to be at my side.

    Like


  323. @Gorbachev:

    Recording your sexual activities without telling her just to protect yourself from rape might actually be rape itself.

    No, it wouldn’t be rape. But it is a crime. But I would only reveal the recording for use in my defense if I was being charged with rape, opting for a misdemeanor conviction (I believe non-consensual recording but NOT for the intent of selling or otherwise distributing is a misdemeanor in most states) rather than the felony.

    Like


  324. @Chainring,

    Watch it.

    If she feels violated, … it might be rape.

    Because the only consistent determiner for whether or not sex is rape seems to be “her” feelings.

    Like


  325. BOTM Nominee:

    British rocker Paul Young (1980s hit “Everytime You Go Away (You Take a Piece of Me With You”) was abandoned by his wife for an Alpha who apparently moved into his (Paul’s) mansion with the wife as Paul was sent packing.

    Now, it seems the Alpha has kicked her to the curb with his biological baby and Paul is only too happy to take his wife back, move back into his home and take care of the other man’s baby:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1337256/Why-Paul-Young-taken-wife-TWICE-NOW-raising-love-child.html

    He’d even worked at a restaurant for his estranged wife and her new lover.

    I’m obviously not making this stuff up.

    Like


  326. Jerry

    Meanwhile “Republican” commenters are happy that John Edwards won’t be allowed to speak at his wife’s funeral because he had cheated on her:

    http://www.cbsliberalnews.com/stories/2010/12/10/earlyshow/main7137248.shtml?tag=nl.e883

    Um, did you ever think that getting “news” about “Republicans” from CBS… is like getting news about us here…from fucking Cosmopolitan?

    Like


  327. The comments about John Edwards being “scum” are predictable and outside the control of CBS (which isn’t deleting comments to their articles).

    Mrs. Edwards would have predicted this would happen at her death, but I didn’t see any statement by her not to let it happen.

    I may be wrong but, along with Sanford’s wife (or ex-wife), I’m seeing a pattern of these particular media-loved southern women not being all that forgiving, even unto death.

    Sure CBS wouldn’t likely turn a woman into an angel who stood by her husband after he had a fling.

    Like


  328. I’m a self-declared feminist and I don’t agree with ANY of these women’s actions. I am disgusted by their actions. Please don’t generalize their thought processes to those of all feminists.

    Like


  329. It is naive to believe recording will exonerate you under feminist rape law. It will only work if the accuser is equally naive and thinks she has to make up some story about being raped in the traditional sense. Fortunately, many women still think so, but in fact regretting normal sex will suffice in a Swedish type kangaroo court. As we have seen, it also doesn’t matter how friendly the accuser was with you after the “rape,” so documenting this won’t help you either.

    Like


  330. @Gorbachev:

    If she feels violated, … it might be rape.

    Because the only consistent determiner for whether or not sex is rape seems to be “her” feelings.

    Hence the need for objective evidence.

    Consider it a player insurance policy, not unlike a condom.

    The whole point is to record secretly and store it away safely, and never allow it to see the light of day UNLESS sweetcheeks re-imagines the encounter as rape once you ditch her for someone younger, hotter, tighter.

    Like


  331. @chainring,

    You should be careful. If you two-time her, she might go back and call your previous entanglement rape.

    Like


  332. @Arpagus:
    My suggestion is for men in countries not as fucked as Sweden. You’re right that a recording wouldn’t really help Assange given the ridiculous crime he is being charged with. But most of the West has not reached that level of absurdity in their rape laws, so a recording would be useful.

    Like


  333. Vladimir Putin slams the west saying its hypocrisy to talk about democracy and arrest Assange like this:

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/putin-slams-west-wikileaks-arrest/story?id=12364345

    The actual words were “If you have full democracy, then why is Assange in jail? If someone’s cow is mooing, yours better be silent.”

    His words completely dismissed the idea that any sexual misconduct took place. What I mean is there was no mention at all of the charges.

    Like


  334. Cunts.

    Like


  335. Okay, Sargon mentions Pyongyang and states that are at “commie levels”. I wonder what exactly he considers “commie level” and where he is really coming from. Let’s see if we can figure it out on our own.

    He mentions a struggle between “the most wicked and hateful neo-medieval ideology the world has ever know” which are threatening a few “democrat states”. Ah, I’ve heard this stuff before…he means this neocon “Clash of Civilizations” stuff, between Islam and “the West”. But keep your eye on his particular choice of words…”hateful neo-medieval ideology”, “democrat states”.

    He says he isn’t a Democrat or a Republican. Hey, he might be a British National Party member or a supporter of almost any of the “mainstream” Western Euro nationalist parties. I’ve often heard them say things that would give neocons a hard-on and make Fox News pundits blush.

    Then he says something about places that are less free, and mentions having a problem with anyone who might try to repeal the Second Amendment (okay…that’s a giveaway that Sargon is an “American”).

    So, the one freedom that Sargon mentions specifically in all this is the individual right to bear arms. This would seem to be the most important freedom to him, since he mentions it specifically. But it doesn’t really make sense in the context of the other stuff he said. He can’t possibly be so worried about the Islamic “neo-medieval ideology” as a threat to his right to bear arms, can he? I must admit, I’ve never heard the Clash of Civilization paradigm spun that way before. You know, even when I was in Iraq, I remember that UNDER U.S. OCCUPATION regular Iraqi citizens were allowed to walk around in public with loaded AK-47s for their personal protection…we were NOT allowed to simply shoot any raghead with a gun whom we encountered. Iraqis had to actually be pointing a weapon at us in a threatening manner in order for us to use justified lethal force according to our Rules of Engagement. Even if they were pointing the weapon at us, we still couldn’t fill them full of holes…we had to go through warning steps first. Basically, we couldn’t shoot unless they shot first.
    Now I ask you, if you point a firearm at a policemen in the United States, will he or will he not shoot you immediately? My point is that in some ways, you have LESS rights and LESS presumption of innocence until proven guilty right here in America than an Iraqi has in OCCUPIED IRAQ. You can wipe that hubris-filled “free American” smirk off your face now. Go walking down the street of your own American neighborhood with a loaded AK-47 strapped to your back (ie, not carried in a “threatening manner” or “ready position”), loudly and clearly tell anyone you encounter that is it is for your personal protection, and see just how long it takes for your illusion of freedom to crumble at the hands of the police. Ten minutes tops in most American urban or suburban neighborhoods (I ain’t talking about in the rural country where hardly anyone would see you and it takes the police an hour to get to you, Billy-Bob), and you’d have your face ground to the Earth with your hands cuffed behind your back, and you’ll probably be headlining the local evening TV news.
    You wouldn’t dare do it. You aren’t so foolish to try. You KNOW you aren’t free to bear arms like that. But Iraqis are…until they point their weapons at occupation troops or police in a clear threatening manner AND fail to lower their weapons after being told to do so repeatedly! So, it must be some other freedom which people like Sargon are so concerned about.

    Sargon mentions the “neo-medieval” nature of Islam. Well, how old is Christianity? For that matter, how old is Judaism?
    Sargon mentions that the “wicked and hateful” nature of Islam. Ever taken your time reading the Old Testament for yourself, folks? Man, Mein Kampf ain’t got nothing on the O.T.! I love hearing these latter-day Judeo-Christians talk about how sinful slavery, “racism” and genocide is, while not even a hint of irony or reflection upon what is written as the “Word of God’ in their own holy scriptures. Of course, you get those Jesus-freaks who try to pretend that everything changed when Jesus came. Ooops…according to Jesus’ own words in the New Testament, he did NOT come to repeal or change the Law of the Old Testament one bit! Jesus never said any of this egalitarian “we are all the same stuff”…so what if he was nice to some foreign chick at the water well! Paul was the one who wrote that “neither Greek nor Jew” stuff after the fact of Jesus’ death…and by the way, Jewish Christians and Greek Christians still met separately (at least most of the time) and still retained their national identities whilst in their walk with the living here on Earth. As far as “genocide” being sinful, Jesus never ever renounced a single order by Jehovah in the Old Testament to exterminate the various Gentile peoples encountered by the Hebrews in the “promised land”. Not one apology… not one shred of regret indicated! So where ever these latter day guilt-trippers get off on brow-beating and Bible-bashing against Whitey, it is not genuinely of direct Biblical origin. Taking a few select easily-misinterpreted ‘elastic’ quotes out of the original context and giving it a latter-day politically-convenient spin is what really happened (not to mention those times that latter-day men added to or changed these words of “God” themselves for their own purposes). The Bible has to be the most widely available book on Earth…so go look it up for yourself and try to prove what I said to be untrue, then come to your own conclusions. Don’t you true believers out there have any shame that an admitted opponent of the Abrahamic religions like myself (sorry, but I am not a fan of Islam at all, just in case you were getting your hopes up) would know more about your own religious writ then you –or even your favorite clergymen– do?

    Here’s what I say to those who love to talk about ‘the danger of Islam’ posed to the “West”: Fine…demonstrate the brass to kick ALL Muslims out of the historically White world. But while you are at it, have the brass to smash down the doors of ALL the Christians and Jews who demanded their admission into the “West” and who insisted they had a right to stay. Have the brass to apologize to the Serbs for what America did to them and how we helped or allowed the Bosnians and Albanians to massacre many of their countrymen. What do you mean you can’t do that? I thought that you were just saying that Islam is the greatest danger, that it is the most wicked and hateful ideology ever known? But now you can’t reach your hand out to your fellow White Christians in Serbia and say sorry for bombing the hell outta them and for backing Muslims against them?! Sounds like there is something else going on. Sounds like fetishizing and knee-jerk defense of the status quo of today’s powers-that-be. That’s NEOCON/NEOLIBERAL hypocrite shit!

    Oh, and here is another special challenge to the Christian zealots: You love Israel, right? Goddamn raghead Muslims are attacking our bestest little Jew buddies in the Mid East and all that…we should turn the Mid east outside of Israel into a glass parking lot, right? So lemme ask ya, which side are you on when it’s Jewish Israel versus Palestinian Christians or Lebanese Christians? Uh-oh…where does your simpleton Clash of Civilizations crusader paradigm come down in those situations? Go ahead and admit it; you Christians will suck Israeli cock with a great big smile in such situations— even as they are killing your fellow Christians— since Israel and Jews can never ever ever do any wrong in your eyes and are supposedly “the chosen people of God”. Am I right or not? Please please please try to tell me with a lying tongue that you will explicitly support the Arab Christians, IN PUBLIC and IN CHURCH, against Israel.
    If you can’t even lie about it and MUST give support to Israel/Jews under such circumstances, then only two conclusions can be drawn:
    a) you are a zealous suckup to the Jewish “chosen people” and their state of Israel…and thus a RACIST.
    b) you can’t possibly stand with anyone or anything Arab, even if they are fellow believers in your religion, because you are RACIST.

    Don’t tremble like a leaf, Christian soldiers…everyone else and every people-group who ever lived since the emergence of man are/were at their core “racist” too. They just don’t/didn’t have such a hard time getting around a guilt-tripping ‘anti-racist” mindfuck and blatantly admitting it. Tell me, what is the difference between wanting to make your people a “master race’ and wanting to have your people regarded as a ‘special chosen people’? And fundamentally, what is supposedly so wrong with that viewpoint, in your opinion? My opinion is that it is a perfectly natural healthy attitude to have toward one’s own people, and I’m not “offended” when I see it expressed by racial foreigners toward their own people. Hell, I expect them to love their own people MORE…otherwise, I’ll think there is really something wrong with them or that their words to me are full of patronizing bullshit. I expect the Mexican to want his people to be more and have more. I expect the Jew to want his people to be more and have more. Same goes for the Arabs, the Asians, the Blacks, etc.
    THE SAME GOES FOR WHITEY—otherwise he is sick in the head & heart, or a lying sack of shit.

    Don’t worry about the foreigners who talk shit about our people and express resentment toward us. Worry about those first “nice” non-Whites that come into town, sucking-up and getting everyone to drop their instinctual defenses for their own kind. Oh, he is a nice Jewish boy. Oh, they are nice hardworking family-oriented Mexicans. Wow, this new Black middle-class family remind me of Bill Cosby’s Huxtables. But then, of course, their fellow kinfolk follow suit, move in with larger and larger numbers, terraform/transform the communities, and drop all those nice pretenses. Now, you are the stranger; you are the minority; you are the one sucking up and acculturating to the new non-White majority or running for the hills. And those formerly nice non-Whites are the ones raising hell about how bad Whitey treated them back when they first arrived. They demand special this and special that in return. Whitey loses, because Whitey has been so thoroughly disarmed as to not even have a way to express in his defense: “hey, this is MY goddamn community and homeland for MY people, MY children, and MY way of life…if you can’t accept that basic premise and you don’t like us, stay the fuck out!”

    But, oh my goodness, isn’t that an un-Christian attitude?
    Let’s see. According to the Bible, God himself distinguished and then outright separated the various kinds of men…am I right? The Bible says that God himself dispatched all these various peoples into their own alloted territories and times…am I right? Does that sound like the kind of deity that wants us to be scrambled back up into a coffee-colored soup in one big global mixed-up melting pot? Where in the Bible does it say that God wants us to ELIMINATE all the national/racial distinctions in one big melting pot? Doesn’t that “one big mongrelized universal human family” concept totally contradict the idea of a “special chosen people/tribe/nation of God’?
    Or perhaps there are certain rules for the goyim and other different rules for the Jews, codified in the Bible? And if that latter situation is the actual case, doesn’t that make the Bible a racial supremacist doctrine by definition?
    You see, one way or the other, it’s RACIST. You can’t get around it and still be true to the actual text. If you disagree with the text itself, then according to Christianity you are defying God’s word and will…in fact, you are putting your own opinions above that of your supposed God. Even worse, many Christians just put whatever THEY believe into the mouth of their God, as it suits THEM, despite what their Bible says…so they are self-serving liars too! Man, I just love when an ‘anti-racist’ comes with his Bible and his Christian “Good Guy Badge’…I really love feeding his self-righteous self-centered lying hide to the lions (and amusing the public audience in the process). I’ll slay him with his own weapon, and crush him under a landslide from his own high moral ground, then take his now-dimmed halo off his head and toss it like a frisbee! I might even make the horn sign with my hands, just for a little added flair and fun…and as a sign that when so many holier-than-thou ‘good guys’ have gone so rotten and so full of shit, what we need is a great rebellious freethinking heretical “villain” (and bold master of Game) to save us. Today, a great man must aspire to become a rebellious Devil in the flesh, worthy of the contempt of all these wicked holier-than-thou ‘good guy’ bastards and bitches.
    Whitey needs a new role model if he is ever gonna get his mojo back!

    Like


  336. “PS: The Ba’hai “faith” is a feminist religion. Bush’s outrageous “Faith Based Initiatives” program gave federal funding to feminist groups like the Tahirih Justice Center that pretended to be adherents of Ba’hai.”

    Baha’i is not a “feminist” religion. It is a religion that teaches true equality, and that is not feminism, at least as currently construed.
    It started in Persia in the mid-1800s, so its teachings of gender equality seemed “feminist” relatively speaking. It does encourage education of females and predicted great female accomplishments in every realm of intellectual and social activity in the future (which is yet to come). It did NOT say women could rule and commit the same injustices they have been through in the past. It actually teaches equality, and the grandson of the founder, Abdul Baha, c. 1912, warned against the western world’s tendency towards women being “too domineering” or something like that. In fact, some “feminists” would be offended by the fact that the Baha’i elected body, the Universal House of Justice, must be entirely male. As far the Tahireh Justice Center, it started when a Baha’i refugee (Iran has severely persecuted Baha’is) assisted an African woman refugee. It’s a D.C. local, circumstantial group, not part of the religion.
    By the way, in response to one commenter’s low regard for female achievemtn. There are a number of women painters whose genius has been held in very high regard. They date from the Renaissance to the 19th century, so the comment that there have never been any great women painters is an odd one. But being a student of culture and history, I am very aware of these things. Claims that there are no women who have done great things in science or the arts has always puzzled me. Certainly have (yet) been on the level of DaVinci (is anybody here on that level?) but there are many who have achieved considerably, and in the past century there have been more than anyone would have thought possible. While I sympathize with the male pov in recent years, I do think there is (perhaps justifiable) insecurity at play here.
    As far as the Assange thing, obviously this is ridiculous, Sweden is being “femo-fascist”, and he might want to try accusing them, or suing the women for breach of promise–the promise being to just have casual sex and move on, I guess.
    Anyway, Assange might be the Roe vs Wade case that will change these sorts of laws in Sweden. Keep your points up.

    Like


  337. Gross. Columbia University professor charged with incest for sleeping with his 24 year old daughter:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/12/09/2010-12-09_columbia_professor_is_charged_with_incest_accused_of_bedding_young_relative_for_.html

    But apparently she hasn’t been charged with the same crime.

    This fits the gay marriage definition of consenting adults?

    Note the Daily News didn’t bother to say it was his daughter. The MSM is getting lamer and lamer.

    Like


  338. Are you sure you have the correct facts on the Assange case? Some people are reporting it differently:
    http://jezebel.com/5711600/how-aol-news-started-the-sex-by-surprise-lie

    Like


  339. Christine these are the charges:

    “Gemma Lindfield, for the Swedish authorities, told the court Assange was wanted in connection with four allegations. She said the first complainant, Miss A, said she was victim of “unlawful coercion” on the night of August 14 in Stockholm.

    The court heard Assange is accused of using his body weight to hold her down in a sexual manner.

    The second charge alleged Assange “sexually molested” Miss A by having sex with her without a condom when it was her “express wish” one should be used.

    The third charge claimed Assange “deliberately molested” Miss A on August 18 “in a way designed to violate her sexual integrity”. The fourth charge accused Assange of having sex with a second woman, Miss W, on August 17 without a condom while she was asleep at her Stockholm home.”

    What do you expect?

    Like


  340. lucia

    “Claims that there are no women who have done great things in science or the arts has always puzzled me. Certainly have (yet) been on the level of DaVinci (is anybody here on that level?) but there are many who have achieved considerably, and in the past century there have been more than anyone would have thought possible. While I sympathize with the male pov in recent years, I do think there is (perhaps justifiable) insecurity at play here.”

    It is generally shit like this:

    http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/charles-lindbergh-and-amelia-earhart/

    http://hereticalsex.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-mighty-are-laid-low.html

    and madame curie and ada lovelace’s real worth, that makes me suspect of what “genius” these women had. Secondly, most of them had the support of many great men, rather than the opposite. Thirdly, women acknowledged as geniuses are rather mediocre when compared to men’s lists and for most of them you could find dozens of men who never made history.
    So it’s that women got the pussy pass, rather than getting blocked by them.

    Like


  341. How the mighty are laid low…

    I was jokingly introduced as the mistress girlfriend and of course the Swedes in this group of five, giggled. Yes, the men giggle. And then everyone introduces themselves in a typical fashion but then Þórbjörn here, says hi and gives the swedish male look. It is THE look for a swedish man interested in a woman. They refuse to accept the existence of such a look, but it does indeed exist.

    THE Swedish Male Look
    What is it? Ladies, you know the look you give a man in the bar/restaurant/party etc that you’re interested in him?
    You look at him, make eye contact, smile shyly, look away, look back at him, and turn away. That, is basically the look a Swedish man gives.

    http://lostinstockholm.com/2008/03/31/the-swedish-male-look/

    Like


  342. And Christine you posted Miss Valenti’s article!!
    She seems to have a quick eye for things like that but not when posting something on her own site:

    http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/12/10/feminists-recruiting-veteran-suicide-for-their-issue-stable/

    I wonder what she thinks of the wage gap…

    Like


  343. “and madame curie and ada lovelace’s real worth, that makes me suspect of what “genius” these women had. Secondly, most of them had the support of many great men, rather than the opposite. Thirdly, women acknowledged as geniuses are rather mediocre when compared to men’s lists and for most of them you could find dozens of men who never made history.
    So it’s that women got the pussy pass, rather than getting blocked by them.”

    You mean like Rosalind Franklin? Pussy passes? Penisy passes? Pansy passes?
    In the deathless words of Dame Edna, it’s hardly worth arguing about the past passes, Possums.
    There are evolutionary reasons why science and art has been thrust forward by mostly men.
    Men are more represented at both ends of the IQ bell curve. They are more aggresive mentally and more likely to be obsessively focused on a subject. Female style is different, not better, not worse, just different, and to the chagrin of many, society is actually moving in a “feminized” direction. This is not bad any more than a “masculinized” society was bad. It is just what happens at certain stages of human and societal development. It’s a phase. If men don’t want “feminized” societies, they shouldn’t invent stuff like cars and computers. Actually a woman or two had a hand in the latter, in the 19th century). Forget her name, naturally.
    What is bad is when men OR women use their particular powers unjustly.

    Getting back to …
    I knew someone was going to cite Curie and denigrate her–that’s the drill in sites like this. Actually, I was not thinking of her at all. I don’t trust mainstream media to tell me to whom I should give credence. Dr. Judy Wood for example. — drjudywood.com — is one of the few who has made sense in explaining what really happened in 9/11. If she was a man, she’d be praised for her “out of the box” thinking. Whatever, she’s brilliant.
    I was thinking of Dr. Mary Sherman, cancer researcher (identified as such in the WSJ after her death) found murdered in Nov.1964. Great read is “Dr. Mary’s Monkey” by Ed Haslam. Also includes the tantalizing story of a girl-prodigy cancer reasearcher who stunned the leading doctors of her day–Judy Vary Baker. She was a prodigy whatever her jaw-dropping story is believed or not. Fascinating look at what was really going on in New Orleans leading up the Kennedy assasination.
    It’s names like that that are not well known. In my travels, mental and physical, I encounter so many female names (and often that’s about all I’ve got) who have done remarkable things, and I’m awed at how much we’ve achieved over the last century. But the future is really what I am most interested in. We are going through a weird transition period. Life makes about as much sense as modern art.
    But man, this is a weird site (I was led here, like Little Red Riding Hood, by a wolfish link; I’d heard of it and thought it was pretty hilarious–and it is, though the Assange case does irritate me intensely)
    I guess it’s better you stick to things of the flesh in your discourse.
    Not really the venue for discussing human aspirations of soul and mind.

    Like


  344. Calm down mate, I can put down women’s names too, who haven’t been acknowledged but were much better than the ones I mentioned before. That’s the point.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether

    “I knew someone was going to cite Curie and denigrate her”

    No, just that after years of reading about her “discovery of radiation and radium” in school books and then realizing that she wasn’t that super duper scientist that could rival Einstein, or barely hold a candle to. How many times do you hear Maxwell’s name btw, or even Tesla’s?
    And Lovelace’s myth is simply too funny, first programmer my ass.

    “Female style is different, not better, not worse, just different, and to the chagrin of many, society is actually moving in a “feminized” direction. ”

    There is no female style, keep looking for it, human society still has to find it. These women are masculine in their disposition and that’s the reason they’d always be behind, unless of course, you artificially limit men.

    “This is not bad any more than a “masculinized” society was bad. ”

    Tch relative morals, the sign of feminized times of ours.

    “Dr. Judy Wood for example. — drjudywood.com — is one of the few who has made sense in explaining what really happened in 9/11. If she was a man, she’d be praised for her “out of the box” thinking. Whatever, she’s brilliant.”

    umm are you fucking kidding me? A woman with good work is much more prone to get publicity than a man.

    “It’s names like that that are not well known. In my travels, mental and physical, I encounter so many female names”

    Doesn’t that make you wonder why you don’t hear names of men?

    “I guess it’s better you stick to things of the flesh in your discourse.
    Not really the venue for discussing human aspirations of soul and mind.”

    Prejudices my friend, leave them at home. I can see how feminized the society is from your example. Things of flesh, haha, I’ll remember that one.

    http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/

    Like


  345. ” society is actually moving in a “feminized” direction.”

    I think it has reached or rather crossed the tipping point.

    “This is not bad any more than a “masculinized” society was bad.”

    I don’t know how anyone can say that with a straight face.

    “It is just what happens at certain stages of human and societal development. It’s a phase. If men don’t want “feminized” societies, they shouldn’t invent stuff like cars and computers.”

    Kinda funny ain’t it, god makes man and man takes god’s place, then man’s own creations are threatening to make him redundant.

    “Actually a woman or two had a hand in the latter, in the 19th century). Forget her name, naturally.”

    And how many men?

    A comment in moderation before this one.

    Like


  346. How dare Sweden punish men for having sex with unconscious or falling down drunk women! This is a violation of men’s rights to violate women’s rights everywhere! It is SOOO hard to be a man – we only make $1 to every $.71 women make!

    Like


  347. I smell pickled herring in the Assange case.

    The sad part is this will degrade and make it harder for women who have been raped to pursue charges. These two women have made a mockery of the legal system and themselves.

    Like


  348. […] Book Dedications“, “Is Spain the Worst Country in the World for Players?“, “The Assange “”"Rape”"”: A Case of Spurned Groupies“, “A Man Stops Saying Insecure Things and Finds Success with Women“, “The […]

    Like


  349. Nice metaphors, but too intellectual. Things should be painted black or white. Is Assange victim of revengeful feminists (and we should empathize with him) or a terrible anarcho-liberal (to be hated)?

    Like


  350. Here’s evidence that the MRM is wrong about saying mothers shouldn’t get custody of children automatically (not):

    http://www.freep.com/article/20101212/NEWS04/12120525/1006/The-mom-who-faked-her-sons-cancer-for-cash

    Note on page 4 they say the last husband died under suspicious circumstances (should have been the headline but whatever).

    Regarding that NY Daily Beta News article about the Columbia University professor being arrested for Incest: I just realized that they didn’t identify it was the 24 year old daughter because the NY Daily Beta News would consider a grown adult woman an innocent victim in such a case and they wouldn’t want to destroy her future job prospects by publishing her name and photo like they did with the professor himself. You can be sure if it was a similarly disgusting son mother relationship, the son’s name and photo would be on the front page.

    How dare Sweden punish men for having sex with unconscious or falling down drunk women! This is a violation of men’s rights to violate women’s rights everywhere!

    If Sophie had called the police immediately after being supposedly entered while asleep, she’d have a case. All western rape law, since the book of Deuteronomy was written, says that the woman must cry out immediately or it isn’t rape.

    Also, there’s too much evidence that she simply had second thoughts about unprotected sex and got pissed when the man she just had sex with didn’t remain her close friend and take an HIV test when she asked. It would have also alarmed her to learn that he’d slept with another woman in the same time frame (her hamster would have assumed she was the only one he’d been active with while on his short stay in Sweden).

    We can’t allow any government to force HIV tests because a guy had behaved like an alpha for a few days.

    It is SOOO hard to be a man – we only make $1 to evry $.71 women make!

    This isn’t true (the stats don’t compare equal jobs) except in cases where men have negotiated better (more aggressive). Often a woman, wanting to be close to her man, won’t have the mobility to refuse a job offer and go somewhere else. She’ll have less negotiating power in such cases, not because she’s a woman directly, but because the employer knows she wants to live within a certain distance range of her husband/boyfriend.

    Its best for a woman not to mention this lack of mobility when negotiating.

    Like


  351. The Assange story seems likely. The women seem to have problems. It’s ruined by your hatred of women though.

    Like


  352. incidents like this are the CAUSE of everyone’s hatred of women, you dumb hole

    Like


  353. If you want some of what Julian Assange got you can try their mobiles:

    Anna Ardin 073-390 70 17
    Sofia Wilén 076-716 16 09

    Who else have slept with them? Come forward with your stories.

    Like


  354. Assange may just be a douchebag, but women doing things like this are why there’s misogyny.

    Like


  355. Slightly different topic, but guess what, Swedish police says it looks like it is a single man behind the attack pft,,

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11978389

    Like


  356. hur kom du över deras mobilnr?

    Like


  357. om de nu inte är riktiga ihopkok…

    Like


  358. on December 12, 2010 at 1:40 pm Phillips Exeter

    I don’t think the Chateau hates women. Sure, they be can harsh in their words, but it’s more of a hatred of a feminist culture that allows things like this to happen to Assange and other men throughout the west, and all the other shitty stuff that happens to men thanks to feminism.

    Actually it’s quite the opposite, this entire blog is written in the first place because the Chateau likes, loves even, women.

    They are often just as harsh on men. Notice no commenters ever call Chateau a misandrist. Don’t mistake brutal honesty and political incorrectness for hate.

    Like


  359. James is right, the most hard-core WN chicks are hard-core feminazis. Complete psycho bitches.

    Like


  360. @Svigor,

    This is why I detest white nationalists. The men tend to be losers in every sense of the word, and whipped beta pussies at that. They worship at the altar of their fat, stupid white women. The men and women are almost always the worst white people have to offer – maybe People of Walmart plus one baby step. All of their rhetoric is poisoned by a mindless worship of white women, and a white-knighting chivalric excuse-making-attitude. They seem genuinely threatened by the masculinity of black men. The irony is they don’t have to be: white men can be just as masculine and more competently so. But these manginas and pussies with dicks can’t, of course, and hide behind facile racism and ideological obscurantism. Same deal with losers in the Arab world who need to blow themselves up to get virgin pussy. They’ve mostly failed in the quest for female attention or power in relationships so they need to justify this to their testicle-starved life.

    There’s as much useful vitality in their blood as testosterone. And there isn’t any testosterone, for damned sure.

    Like


  361. Regarding hard-core feminazis, while Alex above made a lot of interesting points, the idea that the Third Reich should have been allowed to defeat communism would have also meant leaving the German female Nazis in control of their own men.

    The Nuernberg Laws of 1935 make it clear in retrospect that the German women were telling German men that they couldn’t have sex with Russian and Polish women under pain of DEATH.

    Considering how hot the women were on the Eastern Front, only a mangina German would have accepted the Nuernberg Race Laws.

    If the Americans hadn’t helped the Soviet Union, there would have later been a massacre of young slavic women orchestrated by older German women, which would be much worse than what’s happening today as older western feminazis just try to belittle slavic women and rebuild the Iron Curtain with laws and shaming tactics so western men won’t date them.

    Regarding “Blood and Soil” religion…the Hakenkreuz was scheduled to replace the Christian cross on churches across Europe in 1961. As much as I no longer identify with religious Americans (see my post above about how Christian White Knights are upset that a Colombia professor might have slept with adult students – oh the horror – in addition to his daughter), I am sure they would not have sat back and done nothing as the Christian cross was replaced by the Hakenkreuz everywhere in Europe.

    But, by then, it would have been too late. Berlin would have been a nuclear power by 1961.

    Like


  362. @Jerry,

    Jerry
    If the Americans hadn’t helped the Soviet Union, there would have later been a massacre of young slavic women orchestrated by older German women, which would be much worse than what’s happening today as older western feminazis just try to belittle slavic women and rebuild the Iron Curtain with laws and shaming tactics so western men won’t date them.

    Female Nazi prison guards, as well as female nazis, were among the most sadistic and brutal killers. And you’re right about one thing: Nazi women were obsessed with making sure German men stayed away from other women.

    This is the same instinct that plays out in unions or among black women pissed that there are so few black men and the good ones often date white women or Asians.

    It’s nothing more than racket protection.

    Regarding “Blood and Soil” religion…the Hakenkreuz was scheduled to replace the Christian cross on churches across Europe in 1961. As much as I no longer identify with religious Americans (see my post above about how Christian White Knights are upset that a Colombia professor might have slept with adult students – oh the horror – in addition to his daughter), I am sure they would not have sat back and done nothing as the Christian cross was replaced by the Hakenkreuz everywhere in Europe.

    Jerry, I’d love a reference to this. I had no idea there was such a plan.

    Like


  363. The Wehrmacht generals, on the other hand, issued belt buckles that said “Gott mit uns” (God is with us). The soldiers in the field often didn’t know they were fighting for an occult “New Age” organization.

    Like


  364. And a top Wehrmacht general flatly refused to arrest the Pope on Hitler’s command.

    Like


  365. Modern feminists have been doing everything they can the past 65 years to hide the fact that the founders of the “New Age” movement from which most of Nazi ideology was based, were aging females like Helena Blavatsky and Alice Bailey. Helena had been abandoned by a husband and left to fend for herself and her kids in California in the late 1800s.

    One would get the impression that the modern “New Age” types in California were/are the total opposite of Nazis.

    But one only has to do a google search for the influence of Blavatsky and Bailey on Hitler and other occultists who ended up doing severe damage to German manhood.

    There’s a reason why the term Feminazi exists.

    Like


  366. http://www.okcupid.com/profile/HarryHarrison

    Assange’s OKCupid profile from 2006. Alpha or beta?

    Like


  367. I’ll leave the alpha or beta question to others, but I do like his comment, “Western culture seems to forge women that are valueless and inane.”

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Ardin and Wilens read that before pressing charges.

    Like


  368. The Nuernberg Laws of 1935 make it clear in retrospect that the German women were telling German men that they couldn’t have sex with Russian and Polish women under pain of DEATH.

    Considering how hot the women were on the Eastern Front, only a mangina German would have accepted the Nuernberg Race Laws.

    Jerry, that’s the greatest thing I’ve read here in months.

    Like


  369. The Assange cable leak has revealed more State Department concern about Mexico, prompting the following article “Like it or not, Mexico might be the USA’s Next Afghanistan”:

    http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2010/12/12/like-it-or-not-mexico-is-americas-next-afghanistan/

    Before we think of Governor Perry as a hero for his tough talk that might offer solutions to rampant drug cartel violence, however, let’s remember that this guy is also a pushover for radfems.

    As an example, Perry agreed with the radfems in Texas to establish a $5 tax on all men entering strip bars; the tax being used, outrageously, to fund rape prevention education programs (probably billboards on Dallas buses telling women to beware of men).

    The $5 tax on men was quickly overturned by judges as being against either the Texas Constitution or the US Constitution. Key was the state government’s assertion in the law that men who watch strippers were assumed to be more likely to rape a woman than other “good’ men (this is why I get alarmed when I see some PUAs get emotional about how they’re good “alphas” compared with bad and hateful “betas” in this regard).

    Like


  370. Anna Ardin now has only one tweet in her Twitter account, has deleted the rest:

    “Är så less på allt som händer, tar det aldrig slut? Vill iaf meddela teoretikerna att “den andra” var lika mycket drivande.”

    “Am so tired of all that is happening, does it never end? Want to at least inform the theorists that “the other” was just as influential.”

    I take this to mean she has major regrets about the accusations and is trying to put equal blame on Sofia.

    It is difficult to imagine her acting the part of a poor victim in court when she has already had enough. It is not up to the accusers to decide to drop the charges, though. The state can proceed on its own and this would be consistent with its feminist ideology.

    Like


  371. Rape charges are bogus. Assange needs to be executed on espionage charges.

    Like


  372. Andrea Dworkin claimed that all sex is rape. It appears that her present-day devotees are doing all they can to encode that insanity into law.

    Like


  373. Just today, Jessica Valenti of Feministing got a pro-Sweden article printed in the Washington Post (major newspaper owned by a feminist and hopefully soon to go bankrupt).

    She wants the burden of proof placed on the men (to get written or recorded consent before during and (probably) after sex.

    Luckily, her article has been immediately rebutted by a conservative male lawyer in Virginia who, unfortunately, didn’t feel it appropriate to mention the word “feminism” despite writing a semi-adequate rebuttal:

    http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/the-julian-assange-case-consent-and-rape/

    Maybe someone can write a comment using that F word.

    Its amazing how gutless these “conservative” American writers are these days. At least the Instapundit linked to this today (Glenn Reynolds is the US’s most popular blogger and he and his wife Dr. Helen are constantly linking to material that deals with MRA issues).

    From England, we have the story of a 25 year old woman who punches holes in condoms because she wants to get pregnant:

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/woman/3098623/Meet-the-25-year-old-sperm-hunter.html

    Wouldn’t she be a serial rapist by Feministing’s definition and Sweden’s definition?

    And if so, why haven’t the British police arrested her and put her in the cell next to Julian Assange?

    Seriously, why not? Why is Assange still in a prison cell?

    Are they going to charge him with something serious, like espionage, or not?

    Like


  374. You just got instalanched brah

    Like


  375. Is it true that Assange will start a new site called dickileaks.org, devoted to the plights of guys whose rubbers broke?

    Like


  376. jealousy and disappointment. one of them probably fell in love with J.A.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1337862/WikiLeaks-rape-victims-hidden-agendas—Ive-seen-proof-says-Assange-lawyer.html

    quote (Assange lawyer):

    ‘It was, I believe, more about jealousy and disappointment on their part. I can prove that at least one of them had very big expectations for something to happen with Julian.’

    He has asked for Swedish prosecutors’ permission to disclose more ‘sensational’ information.

    Like


  377. -some guy wrote: “Assange isn’t a hero. He’s a threat, and a beta threat at that.”

    a threat to whom? the federal government of the USA is the biggest threat to americans’ freedom, security, prosperity and their survival as a nation that they have ever faced: massive third world immigration from the south, pointless and endless wars sold on lies, trillions wasted, systematic corruption at all levels, all of it enabled and organized by the federal government.

    That thing is a giant corrupt corporate parasite that’s killing the once admired America. Anything that discredits and delegitimizes that morbidly gargantuesque crablouse is a good thing.

    The traitors are those running the country but you bark against some australian hacktivist that your masters dislike.

    unfuckingbelievable.

    any american who refers to the federal government’s actions using the word ‘Us’ & ‘We’ is a fool.

    Like


  378. Looks like Assange’s new Swedish lawyer, Hurtig, is the last man left in Sweden with an intact set of balls.

    Money quote:

    ‘This is not a banana republic,’ he said. ‘It’s just that when it comes to sex crimes, the police and prosecutors and members of the court seem to lose their ability to think logically.

    That said, I’m convinced that as soon as the case is heard in Sweden it will be thrown out.

    He also said that, if he were allowed by his (Swedish) government to present evidence in the British courts, the Brits would refuse extradition to Sweden.

    Read the whole thing in the link Michael provided above.

    Meanwhile Assange just leaked Vatican cables detailing a payoff to keep priests out of jail in Ireland for 320 cases of apparently real sexual abuse.

    I bet he can fire back at a lot of hypocrites who are either condemning him now or remaining silent so as not to upset their feminist constituencies.

    I didn’t see the Pope defending Assange against the rape charges in the past few days. I guess the Vatican isn’t as smart as the Kremlin which wants to be on this guy’s good side. 😉

    Like


  379. This needs to be the subject of a Chateau post:

    Father castrates a 57 year old man whom his 17 year old daughter was seeing:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/8197617/German-man-castrates-teenage-daughters-57-year-old-boyfriend.html

    The father should have the same thing done to him.

    This is exactly what MRAs are talking about when they refer to the hatred of older men desiring younger women: if a culture is allowed to frown on age difference dating unchallenged, it will lead to violence like this where the criminal (the father) actually believed he’d done the right thing and probably now thinks he’s going to get off easy.

    I can guarantee you that the victim wasn’t feeling any guilt or that he deserved to even be punched by the father.

    The father should now have the same thing done to him.

    Like


  380. […] working families from exploitation—does not apply to public employment. The guy says If Assange is convicted of rape, then we are all rapists now. (h/t Insty) Posted by Bird Dog in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects at 05:35 | Comments […]

    Like


  381. Doug1

    Firepower–

    Focusing on his judgment in screwing these two particular girls is widely not the point, and takes the focus off of pressure to change laws like this and their interpretation.

    Just because you want to stick your dick into a meat grinder (twice) doesn’t mean creating (yet another burden of) a law mandating Dick Safe Meat Grinders is preferable.

    Like


  382. The father should have the same thing done to him.

    Jerry, I’m not commenting on the violent act, but you’re an MRA, right?

    Mens Rights also includes a man’s sovereign right to head a family and the right to protect his family members, including his minor daughters from who HE considers an unacceptable mate.

    Evidently, and I haven’t read the article so I don’t have the details, the father thought that his seventeen year old daugher being fucked by sixty-year-old is not in her best interests, and that it’s his job to protect her form a predatory opportunist.

    Like


  383. More fathers should castrate unacceptable mates of their minor daughters.

    Like


  384. @PA

    You’d be right to raise the question of whether fathers should be “happy” about any PUA dating their daughters.

    But I know plenty of Alpha men whose daughters are going through that narrow “minor” age range who themselves want to date nubile young women of at least 18 and know how other men think.

    Such men would basically do to the older guy what they would expect to be done to themselves…certainly nothing involving extreme violence.

    Mostly they do nothing. My main girlfriend’s father is a tough military veteran 5 years younger than I am and he is simply kept out of the loop about who I am and how old I am and we haven’t met – but he probably has an idea.

    Older men dating younger women simply have no need to be trying to befriend a father younger than they are.

    The Chateau should do a post about this. Most MRAs would want to make sure the coward and his two accomplices (the two men who held the innocent man down) never see freedom again (never get the chance to have sex again).

    You’d agree the father was a coward for bringing two accomplices to hold the man down.

    What pisses me off is the guy and the accomplices actually thought there were laws against an age difference (the father would have known that 15 or 16 is the age of consent in that particular state of Germany).

    That’s the danger: when culture created in California, where the age of consent is 18, permeates the world and creates misfits who think their local laws and police are like they’d be in California (even Sweden has an age of consent of 15).

    I would like to see that fellow jail mates give the father what he gave the other guy. Obviously, no MRA is going to risk jail by implementing justice here.

    17 is not a minor in Germany and obviously, if one wants to say the guy messed with someone one year too young, what happened to him doesn’t remotely fit the “crime”. A citation is all any man should get for that “crime”.

    The Chateau would agree that it’s a man’s job at any age to go after beautiful 18 year olds if he can swing it.

    That defines Alpha.

    Again, I know plenty of men whose daughters are going through that narrow “minor” age range who themselves want to date nubile young women of at least 18 and know how other men think. They will maneuver their daughters away from players but not with extreme violence.

    I want to see follow-up stories about how the two accomplices who held the victim down will never be allowed to be free again to have sex themselves with a gorgeous young woman (or in their case, with the fat older women they were probably only capable of – meaning they held their superior down to castrate him out of envy).

    This scientific study would lend credence to the theory that they castrators were doing so out of envy (definitely thge two accomplices but even the father would have been pissed because he couldn’t get a young woman anymore himself):

    http://www.jsecjournal.com/articles/volume1/issue2/JSEC_Kanazawa_1-2.pdf

    Like


  385. Looks like Sweden, in the wake of a British judge granting Assange bail, wants to continue making itself the laughing stock of the world:

    http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/12/14/wikileaks-assange-bail.html

    But the bail is way too high to put on an innocent man.

    Like


  386. Jerry,
    How do you know women don’t find the father attractive anymore? He sounds pretty alpha to me, although maybe a little crazy.

    Like


  387. The fact of the matter is that a 57 year old Alpha will attract women in the most nubile age range…even more than women older than 25 (because younger women have more self confidence, they are more open, free and easier to date, even for much older guys).

    I’d like to hear more about this shocking story but I’d say the odds are that the 17 year old approached him without him “grooming” (feminist term) or gaming her other than to show DHV somewhere.

    I just had a 17 year old, whom I had never attempted to game, call me today after finding out from others what my number was. Neither I nor any other man should be victimized by a father raging over his own daughter’s hormones.

    Like


  388. @Lara

    I doubt it because he wouldn’t do to another man what he might do himself.

    And, no, alpha has nothing to do with being violent or being fixated on one of his children (an alpha can make more children – see one of the links I made above).

    At least the father, if attractive to women, should never be allowed to have sex with another woman.

    The victim might make sure of that. The victim would have every right to kill the father now and not be punished for that as much as the father should be punished now.

    Like


  389. Plus, the father was a total coward while in the act of (hopefully) ruining his own life based on a fixation with pedestalizing his own daughter:

    The father had two other men hold the Alpha down.

    Like


  390. @Citizen Renegade

    Please do a post on this castration in Germany.

    I’m assuming you’d agree with everything I just wrote.

    Like


  391. Jerry, swooping a girl sans comitment desouls her, which is why no ethical system in the history of humanity sanctioned free love. The best we can do is tolerate a little indiscretion within some very narrow bounds. A sixty year old rogering a teen is apparently outside of said “turn-a-blind-eye” bounds. At least in her fatehr’s opinion.

    I don’t hate the PUA and I was not a saint when I was single, but if you go hunting, don’t cry when you get mauled by momma bear (in this case papa bear).

    Like


  392. Was the 57 year-old roguering or sincere and well-intentioned? And why is everyone so sure he was an alpha? Even a lower beta mid-20s or higher can seem like an alpha to a 17-year-old chick.

    Where most parents and society go wrong in their thinking is when they think that that somehow their teenage daughter dating a much older guy would be dating a nice, studious, polite, sincere guy around her own age instead. Of couse, most of the time, girls like that would be part of the de facto harem of either the school coke dealer or the starting mid-fielder.

    Look for the 17 year-old to appear in a German Goo Girls video soon, licking a dozen cum loads off another chick’s face. Her father will wish she was still with the 57 year old.

    Like


  393. Jerry

    That is why it is imperative that men supply and use their own condoms. If she asks why, tell her you’ve got a preference for that particular brand.

    Like


  394. Following up on Robber’s comments just above, this is an excellent opportunity for DHV if your condom brand preference is Magnum.

    Like


  395. You also have to be carefull and take into account the disposal of the used condom.

    I have heard stories where women , in self deluded hampster wheel spinning acts of desperation have emptied the contents of a used condom into themselves so as to get pregnant.

    Flush the thing down the toilet and if she pulls you up on it , tell her you will pay for the plumber if the pipes get blocked up.

    Like


  396. PA

    Jerry, swooping a girl sans comitment desouls her

    Talk about pedestalization! Those poor, pure, innocent girls! Getting de-souled by able cock!

    Like


  397. Jerry –

    @Citizen Renegade
    Please do a post on this castration in Germany.

    The Chateau should do a post on this.

    The Chateau would agree that it’s a man’s job at any age to go after beautiful 18 year olds if he can swing it.

    Jerry, why don’t you get your own fucking blog, and go pound sand.

    Like


  398. PA –

    Jerry, I’m not commenting on the violent act, but you’re an MRA, right?

    Jerry is the kind of “MRA” who will ensure that the MRM never gets past laughingstock status.
    Do remember that his pet causes include not only this, but also agitating for an end to mandatory child support so that he has more money to spend on paid sex (yes, he actually said that).

    Like


  399. King S.

    Do remember that his pet causes include not only this, but also agitating for an end to mandatory child support so that he has more money to spend on paid sex

    And?

    Like


  400. @King of Sheba

    You’re a perfect example of a mangina (or the typical feminist posing as a male = common tactic).

    @PA made a valid point in claiming that fathers are a part of the equation. He makes his points like a man and he knows the host bangs 18 year olds.

    There’s room for a difference of opinion, especially on the issue of a father’s responsibility to look out for the personal life of someone who hasn’t reached 18.

    Men should be discrete when dating women who’s fathers are younger than he is. At the same time, fearing fathers is not an excuse to be a coward and not date gorgeous young women over the age of consent, especially if they come on to you.

    Its not a “pet cause” but a cornerstone of this blog that older men will date much, much younger women and that some males will automatically attract much, much younger women. Good game will attract women all around an older guy in restaurants and other venues, which will cause the occasional 17 year old to chase after him.

    My posting about the German castration incident was extremely relevant.

    Watch the Bill Maher video on feminism in the above link I made.

    It shows that anti-feminism is mainstream (but politically incorrect). The MRA movement is far from being a laughing stock. Its just considered politically incorrect and the presence of Google has silenced men for a decade because of this.

    Note that its OK to publicly say you thing cougars are great.

    But as Baby Boomer men get older, they will speak out more for their right to date younger women without that being considered un-pc.

    If you want to argue that overly high child support doesn’t take away from a man’s ability to date hot young women (all dating costs money), then go ahead.

    But that only means you’ve been castrated by the fems.

    Even the most “practical” MRAs want to fight overly high child support not the least “because it takes away from the father’s ability to date other women”.

    Its weak to say its only because the man doesn’t want to have to live in a basement and eat grilled cheese sandwiches.

    Then again, I wasn’t stupid enough to get married or have a child with an American woman (I love American women otherwise).

    Glenn Sacks is the leader of the MRA movement.

    He now runs Fathers & Families which has been getting Marriage 2.0 laws reversed.

    He regularly blogs about age of consent laws, VAWA/IMBRA and everything I tend to comment about (except Glenn doesn’t imply that he isn’t a good husband to his wife so he doesn’t say, like I do, that he would enjoy a good lap dance now and then).

    Like


  401. And, yes, I would look a Family Court Judge square in the face and say “Sorry Maam, but I have no intention of paying $1700 per month child support because I need to budget in something for lap-dances”.

    Seriously, someone should say that and have it televised.

    If saying that would “make a laughing stock of the men’s rights movement”, we already live in a matriarchy and the movement has no chance.

    Like


  402. Isn’t it amazing how parents will throw their kids away into ‘diverse’ public schools, Hollywood trash entertainment, and either directly or indirectly set their own kids up for a future will barely any real prospects…but oh how they suddenly become interested and concerned for their young daughters when older men come around?

    Hey, they should have thought about being a parent LONG BEFORE the old guy showed up! Where were they when their daughters were watching MTV? Where were they when their daughter was hanging out with the ‘diverse’ crew of shitbags at the mall, and doing drugs with her ‘friends? I call it what it really is: Parenting FAIL! It’s too late to come riding in after neglecting and sacrificing their own children for so long… and then the only thing they’re worried about is some old geezers! These moralizer deadbeat insta-parents really have some nerve and apparently not a lick of shame. These so-called parents should have what they have done to the old geezers done back to them and then some…because they were screwing over their own kids for more then a decade!

    You see what happens to us, Whitey? This is how we’re screwing over and destroying each other. This is how we’ll take each other down with the sinking ship …a ship that once was carrying a mighty great people. “Disgusting” is a understatement. To hell with these dead-enders…it’s time to get on a lifeboat and sail away!

    Like


  403. @Alex

    Great essay about bad parenting but bad example. A well-brought up woman in Eastern Europe would gladly date and marry a much older male.

    The bad parenting in the feminized west encourages women to date their own age…until the woman realizes that guys her own age will dump her when she’s 40 and take up with a much younger woman themselves.

    Bad parenting would have a 17 year old girl hanging out with bartender with a tattoo. 😉

    In this case the father was apparently the German equivalent of a White Nationalist and so might have been the two accomplices who held the boyfriend down (police want to know who they were and the father isn’t talking).

    While German men seem to know nothing about the concept of game, PUA and men’s rights, they seem to be running 80% along the lines of “the victim had done nothing wrong” and one wrote “the guys who don’t like age differences in relationships seem to always be the ones who put the Iron Cross on their car bumpers”.

    You’re the smartest WN here. Please take care that the reputation of the WN males is not for being prudes who would deny themselves sex with beautiful young women once they themselves turned 40.

    Like


  404. Alex, I hear you and I’m with you but unfortunately your comment is endemic of why I avoid WN’ish sites.

    Why? most such sites fall into one or the other trap. The first one is their pessimist tone. The second one is their nerdoriffic “IQIQIQ” jabber.

    In your case, you make a good point but you’re like Hudson in “Aliens” crying “game over, man!”

    Like


  405. Alex,
    I have a feeling the man who did this probably wouldn’t want his daughter dating black guys either.

    Like


  406. @ King of Sheba

    I’m sure we all agree that married guys who have children with their wives are legally required to pay child support, and I’m sure we all that – even outside of marriage – if a guy agrees with a woman that he will pay child support, he should have to pay.

    But with abortion legal, and not just legal but militantly supported by so many women, its pretty questionable a guy who isn’t married and hasn’t otherwise agree to pay for the baby should have to pay a dime – especially if the woman claims to be on birth control, is otherwise unable to conceive, has indicated she will get an abortion, or has indicated she would never pursue the guy for child support. To say a guy should have to pay child support in such circumstances is like saying that if I drive around with a girl I am seeing, she sees an open house sign, we look at it, and she buys the house, that I am supposed to have to pay her mortgage for the next 30 years because I drove her to the house.

    I would add that being reasonable one in our legal battles with women is a losing strategy. Its called triangulation. We need to start staking out our ideal positions before negotiating, so they understand what they have to lose.

    Finally, like most regular guys, something which so far it appears you are not, our disposable money, one way or another, goes to sex. That’s the way of the world. Sex is why we get up and go to jobs we hate. WTF is Jerry supposed to want to use the money for – a stamp collection?

    Like


  407. If the father cut the balls off a black guy for dating his daughter, the German legal system would put him and his accomplices away for life.

    But because it was a white male, probably Alpha (but not necessarily depending on how hot the young woman was and how much she was into him), I see the father and the accomplices getting 1-3 years each (and only losing half their future incomes to the civil suit).

    The father will get off relatively easy because he attacked a white man and because the judges are likely to be older women (or those who suck up to them) who don’t sympathize with men dating younger women.

    Like


  408. A good title for a Chateau post:

    Should angry fathers raid the Chateau and cut our balls off for pumping and dumping their daughters?

    This fits the Assange post message which was:

    Should angry women make false rape charges because some 39 year old dork pumped and dumped them?

    ————-

    Apparently Assange is still in jail on phony charges, making Putin correct, unfortunately, about western “democracies”.

    Good news: Berlusconi just survived the feminist-socialist no-confidence vote.

    Like


  409. I really don´t think Assange is alpha. I think his problem is a certain level of masochism. He behaves like a guy who is unconsciously getting into a frame where he gets crucified.

    Real Alpha males when they go to war they go for the kill. His behavior is too self-destructive for being Alpha.

    Unless he is a “creation” of someone much bigger than him and assuming he is for real he seems to be fighting a battle to get a bullet into his head one of these days and the whole Stockholm situation seems to me like the behavior of a guy who is unconsciously seeking for his own destruction..

    Really not Alpha…

    She felt attraction for him but not enough attraction otherwise Assange´s problem would be how to have her off his back begging him to marry her and/or be her boyfriend forever.

    There is a difference between a guy fucking a woman and a woman fucking a guy.

    It´s all about the frame. A real Alpha male would never, never go into the frame of a woman (or anyone else: male of woman) like he did.

    In this case she was the one to fucking him and not he fucking her as she was holding the frame of the situation since the beginning starting from giving him her apartment to coming back before the trip.

    Would have been me I would have done this:

    1. Instead of seducing the two girlfriends in separated situations I would have gone for seducing both of them together into a 3some or none of them. That is much more Alpha than having sex behind the back of two women who are friends to each other.

    2. When I travel to a foreign country i never, never arrange a frame where I would be dependent from anyone ( male or female ) in matters of my own safety and survival. I make sure that the frame is in my hands.

    3. Going to live at her apartment was getting fully into her frame. He behaved like a “boy” who wants to be adopted by Mom.

    4. What she is really pissed off to him is not the condom. It´s the fact that he was not able to hold the frame.

    The most interesting aspect in this story is that a feminist male hater basically fools herself into believing that a beta male who is going totally into her frame would be “alpha enough” for her feeling attraction for him then.. when she wakes up from her dream she begins to hate him for not being alpha enough to have control even over a condom..

    Would it be me this girl would be either NEXTED after 5 min. from our first interaction or she would be harassing me with something like 20 sms a day with.. “I love you.. come back bastard, I cannot live without you”

    Of course as a fighter for the rights of men and male sexuality I agree with everyone else that he needs to be protected against this feminist

    By the way: Stockholm is full of swinger clubs, one of the is the PIH club and girls and boys meet there at night to fuck each other like hell..

    No need to get into a feminist´s apartment to have sex in Stockholm..

    Just go here with a free minded girl you have seduced:

    http://www.pih.se/

    Ask me how I know the PIH club..

    I have been there with one of my primaries and done her in front of something like 20 people in the mirror room and.. without condom.

    No one has ever charged me for any “sex as suprise” for doing that because my primary was too busy to ask me do I love her for real.

    Why the hell a real Alpha male would get in Stockholm into the apartment of a feminist bitch male hater instead of having fun with some MLTRs of his in the PIH club?

    Well the only reason can be: he did not seduce her, he was seduced by her. He did not fuck her. He was “fucked” by her..

    Does not seem very Alpha to me.

    Like


  410. Alex

    Isn’t it amazing how parents will throw their kids away into ‘diverse’ public schools, Hollywood trash entertainment, and either directly or indirectly set their own kids up for a future will barely any real prospects…but oh how they suddenly become interested and concerned for their young daughters when older men come around?

    That’s a good observation.

    Odder still, is how those parents wouldn’t mind a bit if the older gent was an ex high profile afflete.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/sports/football/07taylor.html
    I bet the underage teen whore whom former NY Giants Lawrence “LT” Taylor paid sweet Benjamins to jizz on has parents (separated, of course) that are probably quite proud of her using her face as a spanksock.

    Like


  411. While a crime (of not noticing her bruises) may have been committed by LT, the 16 year old in the LT case did not deny that she had convinced LT that she was 18. This is absolutely critical for anyone seriously interested in men’s rights.

    More on that below.

    She was (according to her affidavit) beaten by one of those angry black pimp types and told she had to go into his room. LT would have had to have noticed black and blue marks on her. Not cool. This would be one case where the pimp could have been charged with real “human trafficking” and, if she had bruises from the pimp, LT would have been wide open for abuse charges because he should have seen them.

    However, and I repeat how critical this is for men’s rights, the pansy-assed prosecutor you see in the NY Beta Times article calling her a “very young girl” (as if she’s 8 – he’s grandstanding to the fems on the left and the socons on the right) actually tried to charge LT with something called “Limited Liability” for not having checked her ID after SHE TOLD HIM she was 18 where she testified later that he had honestly believed that she was 18.

    We can’t start forcing ourselves as men to have to check IDs all the time. But “Limited Liability” is a dangerous threat to all men because it says we must do that. Most men don’t know if their US state has that in effect.

    Worse are the few asshole US states that have “Absolute Liability” which says that, even if a woman uses a fake ID, you can become a sex offender for believing it.

    Hell, we still don’t know whether the German 57 year old ever actually had sex with that legal young woman or, and this is also critical, whether or not that “daddy’s girl” had lied about being 18 or not.

    What’s really interesting is that LT was not charged with being a john under Spitzer’s Law. I understand that this was because Spitzer violated his own law and was not officially charged with it because the fembots are worried that anti-john laws wouldn’t be upheld in the higher courts.

    In addition, the feminist media and candy-assed prosecutor types made nothing of the angry, violent pimp in the LT case, preferring to take down the pro athlete and not even for the crime he committed (not noticing the bruises and not saving her from that pimp) but for the juicier ‘crime” of not having checked an ID (as if men have to do that now).

    LT’s rep was destroyed in any case. Buying “pros” from mean black pimp types is not smart.

    ——–

    By the way, anyone could know this stuff by taking a minute or two per day to read the news on a variety of subjects and seeing things from the perspective of how politicians and special interest groups can exploit things to make new laws to regulate people.

    Outside the scope of this blog, I see big government trying to invade our lives and control us in lots of different ways.

    Like


  412. And, again, on this blog we cannot start talking like women are all “some father’s daughter”.

    Every woman the Chateau has plundered was some father’s daughter.

    Every woman that anyone of us has pumped and dumped was some father’s daughter.

    Thankfully, most fathers lose almost all interest in whom their daughter dates after she turns 18 or leaves the nest (in many countries the women don’t leave the nest until after marriage).

    That said, guys need to be careful. For instance, don’t ever call a woman from the Middle East a “bitch”. Her brothers may feel themselves honor bound to fight you (which the host has clearly claimed to be a Beta thing for them to do as its called “the let’s you and him fight syndrome”).

    Like


  413. And seeing that New York only recently raised their age of consent from 16 to 17, due to pressure from aging baby boomer women eager to forestall legal competition by a year, for the prosecutor to call a 16 year old a “very young girl” was incredibly obsequious and dishonest.

    Like


  414. Guys, I’m sorry to admit it, but the fact is that I’m quite cynical/depressed/burned-out on the future prospects of the White race at this point. Indeed, a big part of this feeling is due to my experience of the state of the WN ‘movement’ itself. I honestly don’t see how the crisis within White racialism itself is going to improve anytime soon, either.
    If the situation within WN circles is so shitty, then what basis is there for hope for the White race in general, under the leadership and influence of people who DO NOT give a damn about and often are hostile to the interests of White people?

    I hate to be pessimistic. I hate to sound ‘defeatist’. But sometimes it seems like after the death of Dr. William Pierce that the White race lost every true consistent dedicated friend it had left in the world. I can’t help thinking that Dr. Pierce expressed the most important essential message for our racial interests, and yet nobody—NOBODY, not even the WNs—wants to really take up that message. What that convinces me off is extremely depressing…that almost all White people love this System, prefer the status quo, and accept the current course, despite any expressions and postures that would seemingly imply otherwise.
    I simply cannot identify with such people at all. I realize that am too “unlike” them. The essential links seem fundamentally and irredeemably broken between they and I. Their “White” isn’t my “White”. Their values aren’t my values. I am an alien, a stranger even in the land of my birth, even when living amongst a community that is 100% composed of people of European-American descent.

    I’ll tell you the truth: I have no clue what to do at this point. I have not a clue what I will do at this point. Do I really have a “side”, besides myself? Do I really have a “cause” anymore, besides myself? Have I been wasting my life on these goddamn White people for no good fucking reason at all?
    Are people like Roissy really right…that we might as well just enjoy our lives to the fullest, because everything and everyone is descending straight to hell and there is NO FUCKING HOPE ? I really didn’t want to believe that. I’ve really tried to resist that view. But, it seems that this blog is true to its advertising as the place “where pretty lies perish”.

    Like


  415. @Alex

    Social conservatism was never anyone’s Holy Grail except for old ladies trying to hold onto their men by regulating them vis a vis younger women.

    Being a WN should never have had to mean being a socon. In fact, when I was at Stormfront, at least 50% of the males, mostly the younger guys, had no interest in American women (they wanted the hot white EE women) and they had zero interest in social conservatism (about half also had no respect for the way the Third Reich went about things even if they did respect the way the Wehrmacht got as far as it did).

    This blog was surely never meant to be a WN site, especially not for the moralizing kind and its bizarre to see socons moralize here about “proper behavior” and the need to regulate men’s sex lives (or frame relationships and sex in terms of “how do you think her father would feel”).

    But there is a schizophrenic element in the blog’s message which has attracted different types of people who clash with each other.

    You see, Roissy has implied often enough that he wishes the Sexual Revolution had never happened and that women could have been raised properly in some kind of patriarchy, in which case he would have married and been monogamous and lived like a good socon.

    If I got that wrong its because he doesn’t have a FAQ. 😉

    But he then implies that, since the above conditions were not met in his lifetime, he is just going to say “screw that, I’m going to pump and dump women, including the sensitive ones who might have been raised properly”.

    Now most guys reading this blog would take this apparent dichotomy with a sense of humor. They would think “of course Roissy would have pumped and dumped women in any century. He’s just providing an amusing excuse for doing it in our century”.

    But some people have come here and set up shop as regulars who honestly believe that the host believes, deep in his heart, that premarital sex is bad, etc. They believe the idea that, if our liberal enemies can only get defeated, Roissy will be a perfect social conservative citizen.

    They will, for instance, misunderstand the posts about how Alphas will want women to be virgins (hint: its to exploit them, not to place them on pedestals).

    When you add the fact that the host is a regular conservative politically and doesn’t like the Mexican invasion, its been the perfect storm conditions for some of the more socially conservative WNs to come here thinking “this guy wants to create a great monogamous white patriarchal culture and he wants to be so moral and righteous like we are”. That’s the opposite of what most male readers would get out of this site.

    In reality, he’s been more politically incorrect than I’ve been about tons of things including age of consent laws, etc. and he’s probably not about to become a moralistic angel anytime soon.

    That’s because so many “morals” are really about older women keeping themselves from getting abandoned.

    We can:

    1) Defeat Feminism
    2) Defeat Socialism

    The Internet is helping to do this (a long topic).

    But we cannot, nor do we want to, defeat men having sex with hot young women.

    You can take it to the bank that the host does not wish himself an old age in a culture where patriarchs successfully warn all their 20-something daughters to stay away from “dirty old men”.

    Like


  416. Another dichotomy is an Alpha blogging about how the Betas should rise up and restructure the world against the interest of Alphas.

    That makes no sense. 😉

    Like


  417. PA

    Alex, I hear you and I’m with you but unfortunately your comment is endemic of why I avoid WN’ish sites.

    Why? most such sites fall into one or the other trap. The first one is their pessimist tone. The second one is their nerdoriffic “IQIQIQ” jabber.

    In your case, you make a good point but you’re like Hudson in “Aliens” crying “game over, man!”

    The discord comes from having no “great man” of reputation to lead them – there’s no Caesar or George Washington. For example, Charlton Heston had no supporters brave enough to join him in even a peaceful organization like the NRA.

    The other problem is that it is indeed over. Liberals HAVE won the war. There is not even a country to reclaim. Name one power base they do not control.

    It is erroneous to keep viewing the situation as a war between two opposing armies. Instead, view it as an Occupation – like Nazi occupied Yugoslavia. It is my Constitutionally protected right of free speech to state my opinion that any rational hope requires Partisans with strong leaders to reconquer lost territory.

    Like


  418. “Feminism is an absolutely positively loaded word in Sweden, and even politicians from the most conservative parties label themselves as feminists. There is therefore an political pressure to follow and keep the law, and that creates a lot of attention around rape,” says Jerzy Sarnechi [researcher at Stockholm University.]

    Source (in Danish):
    http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/artikel/400110:Udland–Svensk-taerskel-for-voldtaegt-vaekker-opsigt?all=1

    Like


  419. […] White women are causing a lot of trouble for innocent white men and our race in general. Death to feminism and all those who support it, I’ve never met a nice feminist in my life, only ugly witches, walking vaginas masquerading as humans and festering, stupid, irresponsible, rotten beached orcs (and that said with the utmost respect to whales) and I opine in good company. […]

    Like


  420. The Nuernberg Laws of 1935 make it clear in retrospect that the German women were telling German men that they couldn’t have sex with Russian and Polish women under pain of DEATH.

    Considering how hot the women were on the Eastern Front, only a mangina German would have accepted the Nuernberg Race Laws.

    German troops didn’t get much opportunity to fraternize as it was. Then there was the danger of a honey trap too. Germans were too busy fighting and were usually shot for rape. Most of this conversation is about what the Nazis were going to do, versus the reality on the ground. If you read any first hand accounts, most of those so called manginas were twice the men most of us here are. Old school German women were exemplary wives too, for the most part. Yesterday’s beta was often tougher than today’s alpha, I’m sorry to say. Read some Leon Degrelle. Campaign in Russia is his most famous work. He certainly had an eye for the ladies in rural Ukraine.

    Like


  421. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden
    Police reports leaked. The ‘Harold’ character sounds like a classic white-knighting beta orbiter.

    Like


  422. […] the case of Julian Assange and the fake rape accusations, it should be self-evident to any real male that, whether or not one wants the Wikileaks founder […]

    Like


  423. […] male remembers. As much as any conservative male *might* dislike Julian Assange of Wikileaks, really conservative blogs show that no real man would agree that he should be taken down by allying with Swedish Christian […]

    Like


  424. […] (interessant dazu auch ein Artikel von  Roissy: The Assange “Rape”: A Case Of Spurned Groupies) […]

    Like


  425. Good writing.

    Like


  426. It must be so hard to be a male. You have to struggle to clear your names, against a VERY LOW false rape percentage. I feel for you fella’s.
    Imagine what it’s like to be raped, have nobody believe you. Yes, not even other women. Can you fucking imagine? Doubtful.

    Now f#ck off an move over for equality. Shut up, and sit down like all those feminists you hate have had to do.

    Like


  427. @Yen: “a VERY LOW false rape percentage”

    Count the examples (the posts), bitch:

    http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/

    And then try to tell is it’s “VERY LOW”, cunt.

    Like


  428. @Yen: Oh, and note how they’re all over the world: the States, Canada, Britain, Australia, elsewhere; the false rape accusation epidemic is global, bitch.

    Like


  429. for your interest:

    “Julian’s main criterion for woman was simple. She had to be young. Preferable younger than twenty-two. […] She has to be aware of her role as a woman.”

    “But Julian could also be very forthcoming with woman. When he met a woman for the first time, he was polite and charming. He never paid her too much attention, though, and that seemed to keep her coming back for more. His lack of interest was attractive.”

    From Daniel Domscheit-Berg’s forthcoming book “Inside WikiLeaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World’s Most Dangerous Website”

    http://cryptome.org/0003/ddb-book/ddb-book.htm

    Like


  430. Private Eye, David Myatt and Julian Assange.

    Lots of people are trying to smear Assange. Here is proof of their hypocrisy.

    ‘Private Eye’ is a magazine which expresses a particularly strong moral dislike of misogyny, anti-feminism, holocaust denial and anti-Semitism – in public that is. Behind the scenes at ‘Private Eye’, things are rather different.

    ‘Private Eye’ appeared to be so obviously concerned that Julian Assange might have caused harm to women and Jewish people, I took them at their word and wrote to Ian Hislop. My letter warned of something far more dangerous and sinister than Assange’s alleged crimes.

    For decades, a police informer called David Myatt has been churning out hate material and spreading it all over the internet. Not on hidden ‘Darknet’ sites and not even anonymously. It is all published under his own name and is easily obtainable from any of Myatt’s numerous hate sites. Here are a few archived samples.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20051022170345/www.aryan-nations.org/reichsfolk/hrising.html

    “It is no coincidence that those at the forefront of the campaign for so-called “feminism” are Marxists and Jews. Indeed, the whole “women’s liberation movement” was the creation of Jews….”

    http://web.archive.org/web/20051120093838/www.aryan-nations.org/reichsfolk/essays.html

    “This society is founded upon the Zionist hoax, or illusion, of ‘racial equality’, This was the hoax of the Jewish ‘holocaust’.”

    http://web.archive.org/web/20060114151623/www.aryan-nations.org/reichsfolk/hoax.html

    “There are several excellent reasons why the story of “the Jewish holocaust” is a fictional tale – a product of Zionist propaganda – and why the so-called “evidence” which is produced, and which has been produced, in support of this story is suspect or false.”

    Strangely, ‘Private Eye’s abhorrence of anti-Semitism and its pious concern for the defence of feminists, evaporated completely as soon someone other than Assange was being accused. ‘Private Eye’ didn’t want to run the story and no, they wouldn’t even publish a letter on the subject.

    So it seems Holocaust denial and misogyny are not the real issues for ‘Private Eye’. It is Julian Assange himself that they disapprove of.

    But why is all the hostility aimed at Julian Assange and not David Myatt? Read a little further and you will begin to see that ‘Private Eye’ is a bit more pro-establishment than it would have us believe.

    David Myatt is a police informer, with alleged links to MI5.

    http://www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/site/nazi.html

    The authorities’ failure to arrest this man, even though he has published illegal hate material for thirty years, certainly supports this assertion.

    My letter to ‘Private Eye’ explained that the hate sites are used as ‘honey traps’ to attract extremists for the purpose of ID theft. The information is then passed on to the authorities. The problem with this strategy is that, although some extremists are prompted to attempt acts of terrorism by the material, they are not always caught in time. This is what happened in London in 1999. David Copeland, heavily influenced by David Myatt’s hate material and his bomb making manual, set off a series of nail bombs before he was caught by the police. An unborn child and its mother and many others, were killed in these attacks. At the time the security services said that the police informer was not under surveillance, so they could not have prevented the loss of life. Now more than a decade later, David Myatt is still publishing his dangerous nonsense and nothing is done. So it looks as if the bomb victim’s families were lied to in 1999, because David Myatt is an informer and they knew exactly what he was up to.

    It is amazing that the security services trust Myatt to do anything, he is such a profoundly unstable character.

    http://rigorousintuition.yuku.com/topic/821/t/David-Myatt-Searchlight-article.html

    But ‘Private Eye’, the magazine which promotes itself as a fearless exposer of the truth, wont touch this story. They wont even allow any mention of David Myatt in their letters page. Yet Julian Assange is pilloried in every issue of the ‘Eye’, over allegations which at present haven’t even been tested in court.

    Could it be that for ‘Private Eye’, Holocaust denial and manslaughter are O.K. If MI5 says it is?

    Some very lucrative careers in the mainstream media have been launched on the back of ‘anti-establishment’ satirical magazine ‘Private Eye’. Next time you see a rich little guy on TV ‘defending to the death’ our right to free speech, just remember it doesn’t extend to the unborn child who was blown up before it had a chance to live.

    Like