Spot The Fatty

Courtesy of a contribution from GLPiggy’s comment section, here’s a photo of an office Christmas party circa 1925. Can you spot the fatties in this picture?

she's in there, squeezed between all the thin women

You’ve gotta strain a bit to find her (second row, seated, in front of tree), because she’s squeezed between a roomful of thin women (and thin men for that matter).

That’s right folks, there is exactly ONE bona fide fatty in this office party from 1925. One.

Now let’s look at the typical American office party circa 2012.

pfffft

Where is everybody? The dark side of the fat chick’s moon?

Most of the women in the 1925 pic are dogs (except that cute one sitting next to the desk in the striped blouse and flirty smile), but at least they’re thin. Can the same be said for the modern American office party? Not if the overweight and obese percentages are any indication. You’re more likely, based on the numbers, to have to navigate around 70% of your female co-workers to get to the 30% who aren’t biodiesel dirigibles.

And people wonder why the (white) fertility rate is dropping like a stone. Would you want to have regular sex with a shambling mound? Stick around to help her raise the fat brat? Didn’t think so.

In the spirit of the holiday season, her’e some dietary advice from the NIH:

fatty is as fatty does





Comments


  1. Hahahaha. I love the forest gump thing. Bang on!

    Like


  2. Damn, ain’t that truth…Makes life easier for the thin though….

    Look to synthetic hormones as one root cause.
    Drink a soy latte three times each day and then weigh yourself at the end of that month.
    That’s your girlfriend’s (s’ ?) hips and thighs on ‘the pill’ (or progesterone shots).

    Like


    • on December 6, 2012 at 1:42 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Soy, yes. The Pill? I don’t know. When I first went on it, I gained three or four pounds…but by the third month I was on it, the weight just came off. I didn’t do anything differently.

      I’m more inclined to blame the FDA’s hilariously misguided Food Guide Pyramid, which indicates that the bulk of our diet should consist of grains. Don’t get me wrong, I love bread, but you might as well sit in it as eat it based on what it’s going to do to your butt.

      Throw in the fact that most Americans live a very sedentary lifestyle. Most of us have desk jobs, and don’t live close enough to them to walk or bike (and even if we did, most American cities aren’t designed for walking or biking). So for most of us, the only way to burn calories is to work out in a gym or at home. Which turns it into just one more chore, instead of a seamless part of life.

      And there ya go. Everybody’s fat.

      Like


      • I think it depends on the individual, RD.

        I’ve known women who gained 40 pounds in less than a month on the pill (and they were skinny before, and the doctors told them it was all in their head), and then lost it within 3 weeks when they went off. In my case, I was put on synthetic hormones because my body fat was below 10 percent and I had amenorhea (at age 15). I was on it for about five years and it seriously screwed up my life (emotionally, I was a basket-case, those little seemingly innocuous tablets can really make a personality diff). I was still thin (by current standards) but lost ten pounds literally overnight when I stopped taking it.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 2:25 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        You must be one of the women who just don’t tolerate the Pill well. I’m glad you’ve been able to get off it and get some balance back.

        Like


      • Thanks RD! I know it helps some women a lot with health issues, but it was the opposite with me.

        Like


      • But if you’re not on the pill,you wont spread those lovley legs for beta males ,as the pill seems to incline women like yourself to feel all moist in the panties for those of us in the 80%. (20% being alpha,natch)

        Like


      • I’ve always wondered about the effects of that. It can’t be healthy to put a still-growing teenage girl on hormones of any kind. I mean, I know there are girls with health problems, but aren’t those usually just really weird periods? I had that. It stabilizes on its own after a few years, even without the pill. Forcing synthetic hormones on a girl whose body is still growing and developing just seems like a recipe for disaster later in life. Glad you’re okay now.

        Like


      • Weight gain is the least health concern I would have for women on the pill.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 2:06 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        OK, I’ll bite: What would be your most pressing concern?

        I went on it for medical reasons, and it really helped a lot.

        Like


      • This stuff. I think the pill is the root cause of most breast cancer.

        Medical side effects: The birth control pill increases the risk of breast cancer by over 40% if it is taken before a woman delivers her first baby. This risk increases by 70% if the Pill is used for four or more years before the woman’s first child is born. Other side effects that women have experienced include the development of high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke, heart attack, depression, weight gain, migraine, dark spots on the skin and difficulty with breast-feeding. Diabetics who take oral contraceptives may note increased sugar levels. Some women who stop taking the Pill do not have a return of their fertility (menstrual cycles) for a year or longer. Although the Pill decreases ovarian and some uterine cancers, it increases breast, liver, and cervical cancer. At least three studies have noted that the AIDS virus is transmitted more easily to women who are taking the Pill and whose partner(s) has the HIV virus. The cost of using the Pill for five years is over $1,000.

        http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/life-and-family/sexuality-contraception/what-a-woman-should-know-about-contraceptives/

        Like


      • I also don’t think most big pharmaceutical companies have our best interest or health in mind. They need a perpetual sick population to make money.

        The pill is one poison which leads to cancer and other ailments which you will have to take pills to ward off that. Ergo you spend a lifetime paying for pills.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 2:23 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        All of that stuff except the cancer stuff is right on the information sheet that comes with the pillpack. I actually did get the “dark spots.” They’re called melasma, which is otherwise known as “pregnancy mask.” It’s skin discoloration that results from pregnancy hormones…and the Pill uses synthetic hormones to mimic a pregnancy. That’s how it works; it suppresses ovulation because your body already thinks it’s pregnant. Melasma’s harmless, but it is ugly, and I’ve had to undergo three laser treatments to get rid of it.

        The cancer stuff, on the other hand…well, your cite is coming from an organization that vehemently opposes contraception. Every single GYN that has prescribed me the pill has insisted that there’s no evidence that it contributes to breast cancer.

        Like


      • Blood clots (other than weight gain) are the second most serious concern. But speaking anecdotally, when you are forced to take these things for ostensible “medicinal reasons” especially as an ignorant teen, the weight gain and emotional issues are the worst. I’m convinced the pill causes divorce.

        Like


      • don’t forget polluting the water supply we all use.

        Like


      • “The cancer stuff, on the other hand…well, your cite is coming from an organization that vehemently opposes contraception.”

        I know the organization that cited it is against contraception…but you can’t tell me there is truth to it. Overall the pill for women destroys their health. Physically and/or emotionally. You are messing with hormones and fertility. It is the one pill women take to stop something that happens naturally.

        I mean look at guys with low T…that is where the manboobs, herbs, and manginas come from.

        Like


      • Saw some additional studies suggesting most of the increased cancer risk is for women who are on the pill AND smoke.

        Very proud of my wife. High 8 before the kid: doc put her on a nursing-safe pill and she blew up like a ballpark frank, down into 6-ville. She ain’t all the way back yet, but I can already start showing her off again (which she loves), and it’s 99% her own effort and initiative. Sign of a keeper — effort rather than excuses.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 5:03 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, it’s all a moot point for me now anyway. I had Essure about two years ago, so I don’t have to worry about any of that stuff ever again…but I disagree with the conclusion that the Pill causes breast cancer, and so do all of the gynecologists I’ve spoken to on the matter.

        The argument about how it finds its way into the water supply, and what that might be doing to the male population, on the other hand, looks much stronger. We know that male fertility rates have been steadily declining in a way that seems to track pretty closely with Pill use.

        Like


      • Did you know that most modern women menstruate about 400 times during their childbearing years? Did you know that this is ABNORMAL? God intended the ovaries to have resting times through pregnancy and lactation. Did you know this is one of the reasons why there is such an epidemic of ovarian and endometrial cancer?

        Did you know that a hundred years ago women only ovulated about 100 times in their entire lifetime? Did you know that this is NORMAL for the female body? Did you know that every time a woman gets pregnant and bears a child, her lifetime risk of ovarian cancer drops 10 percent?

        Did you know that women in their childbearing years are meant to be predominantly “suckling mothers” rather than “menstruating mothers”? This is far kinder to their female body and how God intended it to function.

        Malcolm Gladwell quotes Drs. Coutinho and Segal when citing an anthropological work by scientist, Beverly Strassman in Mali, Africa. “Incessant ovulation serves no purpose except to increase the occurrence of abdominal pain, mood shifts, migraines, endometriosis, fibroids, and anemia.” And again, “Ovarian and endometrial cancer are characteristically modern diseases, consequences, in part, of a century in which women have come to menstruate 400 times in a lifetime.”

        Like


      • on December 7, 2012 at 11:52 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, White Woman, what happens on the Pill is that *you do not ovulate*, and you don’t really “menstruate,” either. Your body is tricked into believing that it is perpetually pregnant. (Just like “God intended!”)

        That’s why being on the Pill is a proven protector against ovarian and endometrial cancers. Don’t take my word for it.
        http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/oral-contraceptives

        I’m really sick of the stupid scare tactics that are deployed against those of us who have chosen not to reproduce. I may indeed die of cancer one day, but it won’t be because I took the Pill or because I had titanium/nickel implants placed in my fallopian tubes.

        Like


      • White Woman needs to distinguish between “normal” and “typical.” Medically, one of these things is not like the other.

        Like


      • Rappaccini’s Hamster sure takes the pro-reproductive medical literature to heart. Butthurt much, sweetheart?

        Like


      • on December 7, 2012 at 1:10 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Butthurt? Not as bad as your mom after I come over to see her with the strap-on, Revo.

        Like


      • more ovarian cancer…

        ahhh! the benefits of modern life and feminism!

        Like


      • “Not as bad as your mom after I come over to see her with the strap-on”

        I thought your clit was long enough…
        Nevermind.

        Like


      • Yeah, I was on the pill for years and never suffered any weight gain. I was on a fairly popular one too. I am not saying it doesn’t happen, but i think a lot of women use it as an excuse. Thankfully I was able to go off it and get knocked up pretty quickly but I wouldn’t recommend being on it for so long.

        Like


    • on December 6, 2012 at 2:51 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      People who drink soy lattes deserve soy latte enemas. And probably want them, on some level.

      Like


    • Soy? Oh, heck yeah. I have severe reactions to it, especially in the behavioral realm (it makes every day like the worst PMS ever). It exacerbated my mom’s menopausal symptoms to the point where my father was threatening divorce. One reason I’ve stayed as far away from the pill as possible. You just never know what those additional hormones’ll do to you.

      But have you seen what it does to men? All that plant estrogen?

      Like


      • Not pretty.”Would you be so kind as to lift up my belly and check to see if my dick is still there?”

        Like


      • I blame elevated soy intake for the general femininity one sees in certain Asian populations (like Japan). No way of proving it, though.

        Like


      • The jury is still out on soya making men more feminine, but we know something in soya imitates some female hormones

        I rarely drink or eat soya because of that

        Like


      • Yes, you would be correct. Soy contains phytoestrogens which is nerd talk for saying it’s a plant that mimics estrogen in your body. It’s not bad if you have soy sparingly in your diet but if you over ingest it, you can get gynecomastia (male breast development) and mood changes (more hormonal, etc). I did a presentation on this at a health conference. The problem is that it is a lot of items because it is a cheap protein additive so you need to check your nutrition labels.

        Like


      • my wording is a little off because I typed that on my IPad but it’s supposed to say “the problem is that a lot of food items add soy because it is a cheap protein additive…”

        Like


      • I knew I had heard something about that somewhere

        Thanks for the information!

        Like


  3. Makes me want to build a time machine and go back to The Great Depression.

    Sure most people were poor…but they were in shape. And with game who needs a lot of money anyway.

    Like


    • Still,as CH noted,these women are pug ugly. Broads today,even allowing for the fatties,are hot.

      Like


      • They are only ugly because they aren’t wearing loads of makeup, push up bras, or other devices women use to lie. They look feminine to me.

        Give them that plus a modern hairstyle and they would clean up against all the fatties and tank girls in this day and age.

        Like


      • All the WORKING women in 1925 are indeed ugly. That’s why they NEEDED to work.

        In 1925, the hotties snagged a husband and became HOUSEWIVES.

        Like


      • SMH, BIG guy!! You surely know pug ugly! &you have something other than women to think about!! Namely, heart disease, diabetes, and don’t look now, but that impotence you are experiencing? Is likely one of the symptoms of your undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes. jus’ sayin’..

        Like


  4. on December 6, 2012 at 1:15 pm Matthew Walker

    Fat prole females breed like rabbits. It’s the thin girls who don’t have kids.

    Like


  5. I’m pretty certain that connection you’re trying to make (greater obesity -> declining fertility) is bunk.

    [Heartiste: So certain are you? Obesity linked to infertility in women.]

    For one, decreased fertility is not because people are having less sex.

    [Hasn’t the blogger Agnostic been showing that sluttiness and teen sex are down over past 30 years? Anyhow, I didn’t say obesity was the only cause, only part of a panoply of causes for lower fertility. Maybe desperate omega males are dumping fucks in fat chicks, but they aren’t happy about it. And that unhappiness tends to depress fertility through a variety of related channels.]

    Second, Conservatives average far greater fertility than do liberals. Now, just by taking a quick cross-section of Whites in America, who is more likely to be overweight?

    [Define “conservative”. A lot of fat black women would qualify, but I wouldn’t call them conservative as I accept the term.]

    Like


    • “So certain are you? Obesity linked to infertility in women.”

      I wouldn’t be so quick to put faith in that one. For one, their sample is necessarily restricted because they were culled from women who were having fertility problems to begin with. It’s unclear whether (and probably isn’t) this sample is representative of the population as a whole.

      Second, as it mentioned in the study, it cannot control for confounds such as male fertility or (in line with your thought) intercourse frequency.

      “Hasn’t the blogger Agnostic been showing that sluttiness and teen sex are down over past 30 years?”

      I’ve seen this. If so, this may be the result of evolution. Apparently, a lot of the free love people bred themselves out of the gene pool early.

      Define “conservative”

      My previous inquiries in the matter relied on the POLVIEWS question in the GSS, so the conservatives were self-identified. I’ve restricted things to Whites only. Among American Whites, there is no question that obesity rates are highest in Red States in Middle America (well, more accurately, in the Midwest and the Old South in general).

      Like


      • I’m no doctor, but I do think that there has to be some physiological linkage between obesity and infertility – can a woman really have dozens of pounds of fat squeezing her uterus and have that organ functioning perfectly fine?

        Also, OT, but fun. According to my sister in law, who is a doctor, research is beginning to show that the physical condition of the mother’s while the baby’s in the womb can have lifelong consequences for that child once born. Fat mothers will give birth to children who, all other factors accounted for, will be at much higher risk for obesity for the rest of their lives.

        Like


      • “Fat mothers will give birth to children who, all other factors accounted for, will be at much higher risk for obesity for the rest of their lives.”

        Useless. No control for heredity, and BMI is 80% heritable.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 5:34 pm Spoos in August

        So… Fat people shouldn’t have children, is what I’m hearing.

        Well played, well played.

        Like


      • Should you have children?

        Like


      • We should sterilize low IQ people

        I know this might seem like a horrendous horrible inhumane thing to do but that is EXACTLY what happens in nature

        if a zebra has a stupid baby zebra, so stupid that they don’t stay away from predators, they get eaten and never have a chance to reproduce

        Animals that are more stupid than the rest die young and do not transmit their stupid genes

        animals who are born with defects or diseases ; same thing

        this is why there are no too stupid to survive, ugly, obese or malformed zebras, antelopes or lions and they do not need to take pills or wear eyeglasses; only the fittest survive

        it is completely natural.

        no matter if one believes in Intelligent Design or in Charles Darwin’s theory, this is how things are and have always been

        it is completely natural,

        Maybe it was God who wanted it that way, maybe it was nature that evolved to be that way, it does not matter, either way that is how it is, has always been and will always be

        it is completely natural

        we humans have messed everything up that was natural and we are increasing the number of dysfunctional humans

        I know this is heavy stuff, even shocking stuff, I know, I know

        Like


      • Like I said, my sister in law’s a doctor (geneticist, actually). She’s researching this right now. Heredity is important, but they’re noticing other factors in development impressing upon the kids.

        Like


      • I’m looking forward to seeing her research. I’d especially like to see how she goes about controlling for heredity.

        Like


      • The infertility obesity association is mediated through insulin. The fatties, eating high carbohydrate diets and not exercising, get a resultant rise in their resting insulin levels which disturbs ovarian functioning and ovulation becomes impaired.

        Like


    • as we careen towards idiocracy, not being obese is a sign of being on the right side of the IQ curve. The comment also reminds me of the boner popping that DC allegedly had more single girls than most cities. Yes, because government cheese hippos are counted too, you white racists.

      Like


    • Second, Conservatives average far greater fertility than do liberals. Now, just by taking a quick cross-section of Whites in America, who is more likely to be overweight?

      [Define “conservative”. A lot of fat black women would qualify, but I wouldn’t call them conservative as I accept the term.]

      Haha. Turns out that black women, after about age 25, have fewer children than non-Hispanic white women. It’s all there on the CDC / NCHS statistics. Asian women are tilted more toward having children in their 30s, while white women peak around 30.

      The take-home from that is that black and Hispanic women spit out their kids at younger ages than white and Asian women do. And guess which races’ women are majority seacows by age 25? And which races’ women are more likely to keep their figures presentable into their 30s?

      Obviously… black and Hispanic men knock their women up when they’re still young and relatively thin and curvy, for the most part.

      Like


      • Um, r/K theory?

        Like


      • A few months ago, ABC News ran a segment on girls starting their menstrual cycles earlier than ever.
        Black girls leading the way at age 7, followed by Hispanic, then White.
        (East) Asian girls came in last, age 11.
        In this area , which is about 50% Hispanic, if she’s over 16 and even just a little bit cute, she’s almost guaranteed to have at least 1 kid.
        A teacher friend of mine has a 13-year old in his class who has 2 children.

        Like


      • Yes. This, I suspect, is most likely due to better nutrition. Beyond that, it’s probably evolution.

        Like


      • I live in the northern subs of chicago. lots of mexicans around here.Most of the cute Mex girls do NOT want to get preggers,and are at least trying to get edumacation. The mex girls I know would roll their eyes and grimace at the thought of a teen with kids. EEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLOSER!

        Like


      • Diet’s a factor, but the biggest offender is dairy (I suspect hormones in the milk, but I don’t know if anyone’s ever backed that up, either way). Japanese girls are starting to develop heavier breasts and fuller hips, correlating to the increased amount of dairy in their diets.

        Like


      • I’m pro Japanese girls with heavier breasts.

        Like


      • Japanese men who live in Japan and consume a traditional Japanese diet have some of the lowest %’s of prostate problems worldwide.
        Americans of Japanese descent who livein the US and consume a modern American diet have almost caught up to their non-Asian compatriots in that regard……

        Like


      • Yes Japanese women with larger breasts and rounder hips, I am all for that!

        I prefer Caucasian women but Japanese are a close second

        all other races need not apply

        Like


      • @Wolfie. Good point with the Japanese guys. Along those lines, guys in India have practically no colon or rectal cancers (very low incidence compared to America). It most likely has to do with their added seasonings added to their diet.

        @Canada, check this out http://www.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment_300/335_top_10_list.html

        Like


  6. This was sharp! Keep up the good work.

    Like


  7. I also hate those feminist debates about women being more curvier (read: fatter) back in the day or curvier women being more celebrated. Funny enough, the way dresses where sized was different, but they would never mention that. They talk about Marilyn iltimate sex symbol munroe being a size 12 when by today’s standard she was probably an 8 tops. Part of the feminist “love me no matter what I look like” propanganda though.

    Like


    • ultimate*

      Like


    • on December 6, 2012 at 2:09 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Not even an 8. Marilyn Monroe was, by any objective standard, tiny.
      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-24/hollywood-auction-ends-myth-of-zaftig-marilyn-virginia-postrel.html

      Like


      • Tiny, and a stone-cold 10. Still the hottest woman ev-ah.

        Like


      • Aww, hell no. She was a 7, and objectively speaking wildly outshone by Audrey Hepburn.

        Monroe made up for it by being a natural at the female version of game. It was something she turned on and off at will. As several biographers noted, she could go from completely invisible to head-turning meteor within three paces.

        Like


      • And Hepburn was outshone by Grace Kelly, who had flawless classical beauty.

        Like


      • No argument; it’s just really weird when guys fall for Monroe. She was a “you had to be there” kind of gal.

        Like


      • Grace then Ingrid then Audrey. Thanks for playing.

        Of the new crop, only Amber Heard, Eva Green, and Yvonne Strahovski have the physical chops to compete but none of the aura. (Angelina Jolie, Diane Lane, and Kelly Preston once had a shot.) But how could they, in this day and age? Their potential glamor has been polluted by the cultural smog, so they each carry a fishy whiff of the skank, which knocks them down an entire category.

        Matt

        Like


      • I thought both Grace and Ingrid committed adultery. Beautiful women are rarely faithful, then or now.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 9:59 pm Mr. KIssyface

        Grace had the reputation of not fucking just anybody. She fucked EVERYBODY. Makes sense to me, that exquisite face, it’s like owning the Taj Mahal, to be humanitarian you really should let everyone in to see it.

        Like


      • I don’t care what her dress size was, I always found her to be near-zaftig, especially the hips:
        Here’s the way I remember her, from Bus Stop:

        And check out 1:36 from the paddle ball scene in Misfits:
        http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xhr332_paddle-ball_shortfilms#.UMEKsazc_zo

        Audrey Hepburn? pfffffffft

        Grace Kelley? Cute, and I heard she was quite forward in real life… but her screen image always make me think of an Ice Princess.

        Naw, for raw sexuality without being a skanky slut, it’s Marilyn all the way.

        Like


      • There’s more to sexy than curvy. And the flavors aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive. There aren’t enough different women in the world to satisfy my diversiform tastes, and no singular woman could contain them all without contradiction.

        Make Audrey the amuse-bouche, Ingrid the palate cleanser, and Marilyn the high-carb dessert. But for the main dish? The pièce de résistance? Always the delicate and ineffable beauty of Grace.

        There are good girls, there are sexy girls, there are gifted girls, and there are complementary girls. But they all reduce to zero in the sight of grace personified — the kind of heart-stopping “beauty the great poets dream about but describe most poorly and inadequately.”

        We are subject to a visual glut unlike any men in history, our eyes are jaded by a surfeit of beauty everywhere from every direction from all media. So we defensively withdraw our contemplation of a single instance, to save our hearts from bursting, and allow the surge to wash over us like saccharine water. But every man has seen the perfect vision come to him at the moment of maximum attentiveness, and those fleeting snapshots blow away every idiosyncratic preference and remain with us forever.

        That’s Grace Kelly to me, the exemplar of a handful of irretrievable and inimitable personal experiences I’d literally kill and die to sustain. Evanescent hints of the beatific vision come to earth, then gone.

        But Marilyn invented the upskirt, so there’s that.

        Matt

        Like


      • I can see how men are entralled with Grace Kelley… I just like my women a bit zaftiger and with a less refined air.

        What can I say, I’m Jaws in a Bond world.

        Like


      • Just googled grace again just to be sure..
        I’ve met hookers in Eastern Europe who are way more beautiful than her. And given her reputation, comparing her with hookers is fair-play.

        Like


      • Anon, you’re not discounting for the distorting effects of the two-dimensional medium versus real life. I too have seen many more angles of more beautiful women in context — that’s the nature of beauty. It is dependent on context and beholder in more ways than are objectively verifiable. The easiest test of this is to compare some glamorous lady posing on the red carpet to that same woman emerging pantiless and scowling from her limo, the “truth” captured by paparazzi.

        And Grace is an exemplar of an ideal, not a flawless angel bursting with transfigured beauty from every side, objectively superior to every other female instance. The tragedy of beauty means it comes and goes in a flash, and many varieties (blonde, red, brunette) can offer the equality of infinitude.

        No, Grace is the nearest reminder of a certain kind of personal experience that 1) is well known and accessible enough to others (i.e., she’s not the cute shopgirl down on the corner the whole world hasn’t gazed upon) that we may discuss it in common, and 2) provides to my eye more contextless angles of beauty than anyone else similarly limited by the medium of conveyance.

        Matt

        Like


      • I agree Marilyn Monroe was a 10 – she is the best ever – but after having recently seen many more photos of her, I was reminded of that song by Pursuit of happiness ( if memory serves ) in which he says ” she ain’t pretty, she just looks that way”

        NO! I am NOT saying Marilyn was not really pretty
        that is NOT what I am saying
        BUT without make up and with her hair a different color or style and in more plain clothes she was maybe a 7.5 or 8

        she was not a 10 as God or nature made her, she became a 10 with the help of make up, hair coloring, sexy clothes et cetera…

        If you look at her early photos, with her plain brown hair, little make up, plain clothes and being a bit on the skinny side – not curvacious enough -, she was a 7.5 or 8 at best

        and even her nose seems a bit different, maybe she had it done?

        in the end she was definitely a 10, the ultimate 10 of all times, she is my favorite, but in my opinion she had help in becoming a 10

        Like


      • on December 7, 2012 at 4:04 pm Matt Strictland

        Not eve. I wouldn’t kick Tim Traveling Marilyn Monroe out of bed for eating crackers but she was a 7. I agree with happy crow.

        Heck her contemp, Bettie Page was probably a solid 7 too if you factor in charm, 6 otherwise as was Robey from the 80’s (sexy voice plus red hair)

        As for Amber Heard, not so much. She has cold sick eyes. Yvonne however, holey crap. if she had a bit more precense and another 10 lbs (too skinny) she could hit an 8

        Still this isn’t actually objective so Non Disputandum and all that

        Like


    • BMI and waist-to-hip ratio are not one and the same. The latter appears to be more important than the former (and a better definition of curvier, when breasts are added in).

      Like


    • I watched this with my steady girl the other day
      http://www.vice.com/en_uk/fashion-week-internationale/rio-fashion-week-part-3
      She insisted that the dancer’s bodies (start at 1:50) are uglier than the models’ (at 5:20) or the presenter’s. Specifically she said their legs are too thick and their asses too big.
      I actually saw the presenter on a nightbus here in London on Saturday and I didn’t find her attractive.

      I was really shocked by my girl’s reaction. Those dancers are amazing (bodies are high 9s for me – hard to tell from the video how much is due to plastic surgery though, a couple definitely look like fake tits) while the models’ bodies I find boring. Arguably the main reason I chose this girl is because of her ass, yet she is undereating trying hard to lose weight off her ass and legs, and I am trying to get her not to.

      So while I understand obesity is a big problem especially in the states and I like a girl to stay in shape there is also more than a grain of truth to the idea that there are false beauty standards pressuring girls today.

      Like


  8. Spotted right away. Oh boy, what I could do with a No-fatty sniper rifle.

    Like


  9. Social conservatives are thinner than social liberals, as a whole- I’m not talking about professional people (although it’s probably true there) but lower-class people. Fat women who need sex will go to a black guy before they go to an omega.

    Like


  10. Only one good looking one? Ahhhh c’maaaannnn!

    The one far left by the back door is totally cute.

    The one right above the girl in the stripes is exotically good looking. Give her long hair and she’s possible even beautiful.

    The one behind and to the right of stripes is also very cute.

    The one sitting in front of the desk, while older, is very attractive.

    One or two others are possibly victims of bad hair or a bad photo moment (second from left against the back wall seems to be caught in a bad face). And the one in the front row, seated, far right, has potential. And what a come-hither look on her face!

    Oh, and the one left of center, kind of hidden, could be very attractive (the guy behind her has a wicked smile, like he’s got his hand on her ass).

    And ok, many of the rest are flat-out pugs. But as you say, so thin! I suspect a lot of small breasts, flat stomachs, great legs and hard asses. To say nothing of proper feminine modesty and, while all working girls, very little pretense of being “the man” in a relationship.

    And hell, 1925 in D.C.? Still in the midst of the insanity of Prohibition (thank you, meddling wimmin!), but probably some wicked good speakeasys to take a girl to and listen to the negro music. And if F.Scott Fitzgerald is any guide to social mores (and he is), getting a little something-something from these dames wasn’t as difficult as you might think.

    To say nothing of a booming economy (thank you, President Harding!) not yet deliberately destroyed by the Globalist Banker vampires, as it soon would be.

    Like


  11. There was a lower percentage of fat people then, but also less of a chance that a fat woman would get an office job.

    [Heartiste: There’s less of a chance a fattie will get a job today, too.]

    Like


    • “also less of a chance that a fat woman would get an office job.”

      Which is also a reason for declining fertility now relative to that time!

      Like


  12. WTF is up with that picture of the Helsinki club?

    That’s disgusting, if it is actually in Finland. If so, I just lost respect for Finnish men.

    [Heartiste: Finland, like most of the white West, is currently undergoing a serious bout of self-annihilation syndrome.]

    Like


    • To be mean about it, there are clubs in some cities where there is a time turnover, where the bar is a white bar from happy hour – 8pm and then goes dark after that, this may be the thing going on here. Notice that there’s no mingling.
      Second, why would the white Fin’s mingle with them when the black’s girls will throw acid on their faces?

      Like


      • anononononno, it’s a popular hip-hop club calle Club Swagga.

        If you do a Google image search, you’ll see plenty of mingling at the club.

        Like


    • North American whites of anglo-germanic origin have little in common genetically with Finns. Check the haplogroups

      You guys probably have more in common in your haplogroups with lighter skinned north american blacks like e.g. Ice-T than with Finns.

      Like


      • Well, haplogroups don’t mean a helluva lot, then. I’m of Northern European ancestry, and I find the Finns far more sympatico than Ice-T.

        Like


      • I see my “haplogroup” components are doing just fine, as I am not an American mutt of any kind. Iced-tea-colored Ice-T can suck my big white Rus dick. They over-egged his genetic pudding with everything they had in the kitchen. That means he shares from my stock, and I’m only kin to the diluted chlorine still lingering in the shallow end of his gene pool.

        Like


    • This is what should make you lose respoect for Finnish men:

      http://irishsavant.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/this-is-at-helsinki-university.html

      Like


      • Should Finnish men be hung from trees?

        Like


      • Then they’d really be finnish.

        What next? Head to Prague and cancel some Czechs?

        Like


      • Thats it, Im leaving.

        I can’t even do my act with you in the club.

        Like


      • My bad, bro… didn’t mean to Dutch Uncle ya.

        Like


      • Greg tu es impayable!

        A play on word that can not really be translated and me paying you a compliment

        impayable can mean; fantastic and very funny

        but it usually means can not be paid ( re;canceled Czechs )

        Like


      • ‘Unbezahlbar’ in German.
        ‘Priceless’, peut-etre?

        Like


      • Often I’m the type of guy who can’t get arrested.

        They have that expression up north there?

        Like


      • Wolfie,

        close but something is lost in translation

        nothing is the same as the French word “impayable” (as far as I know )

        you know a bit of French and German or you used Google?

        Like


      • can’t get arrested?

        you have diplomatic immunity or what?

        if it is an expression I am not familiar with it

        oh and I Googled “zaftig” and got zero results…

        what is a woman with zaftig?

        Like


      • Zaftig is a German word, often mistaken as yiddish, that means “juicy”… used to describe women that are buxom, curvaceous, whatever.

        If you googled it and got squat, you spelled it wrong.

        “Can’t get arrested” means having bad luck or can’t catch a break or any sort of attention… as in, the police wouldn’t even bother with you.

        Geez, Canadian, it’s becoming a full-time job putting you wise to the parlance. 😉

        Like


      • yeah I am asking too many questions

        I should give you a break

        zaftig is the type of woman I like, with womanly curves, not young boy legs, hips and butt

        Like


      • Oman, jamaican me crazy, are you syrias? It’s hard to belize you’re ghana go russian to Prague kosovo couple of czechs. Are you haitian the chile winter in Finland? There’s norway I congo with you. Iran a pak of slovenely nigers up a tree. Kenya kuwait togo till we thai the rope?

        Like


      • The soul of wit is brevity, my man… you set off the nuclear bomb of puns.

        We’re especially interested in the PUA’s stories when him a-layin’.

        Like


      • @Canadian Friend – Fluent in German, my French is a li’l rusty, you don’t get to use it much (or at all…) in the US, mais j’aimais beaucoup Quebec.
        @Greg Eliot – Incorrect.
        The German word for ‘juicy’ is indeed ‘saftig’ with an s.
        ‘Zaftig’ is a Yiddish (= the German spoken in Jewish ghettos) word meaning something like ‘tits & ass’.

        Like


      • saftig in german is also used to describe if something or someone is ripe for the picking…

        Like


      • I thought the yiddish variation was more zoftig… I know the Germans describe women as zaftig, and the root does indeed mean juicy, though you’re correct that is with an s, saftig.

        Definition of ZAFTIG
        of a woman
        : having a full rounded figure : pleasingly plump
        Origin of ZAFTIG
        Yiddish zaftik juicy, succulent, from zaft juice, sap, from Middle High German saf, saft,

        Like


      • Wolfie

        My mother is fluent in German

        she learned it in school but we have some vague “clues” that we have German ancestry

        of course we have mostly French ancestry but we were never able to “complete” our ” arbre genéalogique ” ( don’t know in English ) but it seems we had some German ancestry, a few , links are missing but some had German first names which are rare in Quebec in the 1800s.

        So you have spent time in Quebec?

        A lot of people say we have a high rate of beautiful women and that we are very ” warm” people, would you agree?

        Like


  13. On a related note, check out the map on this article and ask yourself why Eastern European and Russian women are so popular?

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/07/daily-chart-11?fsrc=scn/fb/wl/dc/adventdec4

    Like


  14. Most of the women in the 1925 pic are dogs

    Eh, some of it might be just bad hair and bad fashion. BUT, we might formulate a working hypothesis about why this photo might be packed with the left hand of the bell curve. Mine is this:

    In the pre-carousel days, the hot ones attracted good men and are at home with their kids.

    [Heartiste: Good point.]

    Like


    • Indeed. Average age of marriage for women in 1920 was 21.2. In 1930 it was 21.3. Many are home with baby.

      Divorce rates were only between 10-15%. But this was a hey-day of women’s rights as well, with Jazz Age flappers acting out and shocking their parents. The social blow-back from the Great Financier War (aka WWI) was still causing societal turmoil.

      And don’t forget, in 1920 the 19th Amendment (aka the “Death Knell Amendment”) was passed, giving women the vote. So men were starting to lose it even then. At least they still had their shit together on racial matters.

      Like


    • +1
      Good looking girls did not become office drones in 1925.

      Like


      • Good looking girls with home skills don’t become office drones in 2012 either. You never get the chance to. As soon as you get someplace with a lot of available men, someone marries you and gets you pregnant.

        Like


  15. I don’t think white people have babies any more because it leads to icky things like becoming a republican. You have to go pretty far north or west of 495 to find the rarest thing on the east coast, white babies. Is it because white girls are fat? meh, on one hand, the mothers of the white babies I see running around in, say, Reston or Hunt Valley are owned by very nice thin mommies who seem to have enough free time to roam target midafternoon. On the other hand, the other problem is that a lot of grrrl power types spend their glory days monetizing their looks until they go.

    Like


    • According to liberal women, babies are:
      -parasites
      -annoyances
      -punishment
      -the completely unfair result of sex that women have to bear, and therefore, incompatible with one’s feminist views
      -irritating blobs of not-quite-people, whom we should be able to exterminate even post-birth (seriously, there have been papers written about this)

      Nowhere do you ever see, in feminist literature, the mention of bearing children as woman’s greatest gift to the world, nor being a mother something to aspire to. They don’t consider birth control to be a recent, artificial, chemically-induced form of female castration, but a “human right” that should be fully funded and supported by the world’s governments. These people don’t value offspring, they despise them. And normally for selfish, selfish reasons.

      Like


      • Sometimes, it seems like the pill for women is like porn for men. Something that ruins your ability to do what you were born to do. The greatest joke is that as women go off the pill, their individual taste in men changes. So, the guy you shack up with turns out to be mr. wrong when it’s time to make babies. in your mid 30s.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 7:52 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I’m the furthest thing from a liberal, and that’s pretty close to how I feel about childbearing. I honestly don’t understand why anybody would put themselves through it. I mean, good on ya for continuing the human race and everything, but…no thanks.

        Like


      • You have to stop taking testosterone. How long has your clit gotten?

        Like


      • on December 7, 2012 at 12:05 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        What, is it not normal for me to hang a towel off of it?

        In all seriousness…Fetal testosterone, Matt. It happened while I was still in the womb. (Nobody knows why; it may have a genetic component.) I don’t take supplements past a one-a-day vitamin.

        And, hey, you asked: my clit is actually on the small side.

        Like


      • What, is it not normal for me to hang a towel off of it?

        Wet or dry?

        Like


      • on December 7, 2012 at 12:40 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Wet, duh.
        No need to hang a dry towel, is there?

        Like


      • Well, on the way to the baths. 😉

        Hanging the wet towel afterwards is infinitely more impressive, though. 😀

        Like


      • Ha. I dig you and your reverse tranny game. You put off the vibe of a tarted-up dude in a dress, and then when your bicurious target unwraps his prize, he finds the cutest little pink love button there can be, rather than an angry red dong. “But, but … the manjaw! And, and … the digit ratio! And the hunting stories!”

        Heave, ho, push, pull, PUSHHH. Your bait and non-switch will rescue many a curious man flirting with the dark side from drunken regret and suicide. I think it’s your duty to go out and save those kind of men from themselves.

        Seriously, the most non-feminine thing about you is your inability to be dishonest about yourself. Bravo/a.

        Matt

        Like


      • I respect your position, I really do, but this is what I’m saying – biologically, no female on the planet has the right to make that choice. The pill’s given us an out nature never intended to allow. Sure, childbirth and child rearing is hugely inconvenient for the woman, but it has to happen or the species dies. The fact that the majority of American women would choose extinction over a few months of pain boggles my mind.

        Like


      • on December 7, 2012 at 2:20 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I respect you for choosing to bring children into the world. And based on the way you write, which I acknowledge is a poor way to filter for a person’s real-life behavior, it sounds like you’re committed to raising them properly. And I respect that even more.

        But I (respectfully) disagree that we don’t have the right to make that choice. Our gift as human beings is free will. We make our choices, and we live with them. I never wanted to bear children. Had I been born in the year 1200, I would have become a nun and lived a life of celibacy. Because I was born in this era, I have the opportunity to enjoy sex without pregnancy.

        But you shouldn’t worry overmuch. Although people like me–people who would eat a gun before they’d give birth–do exist…we are rare. Statistical outliers. With seven billion people on the planet, there’s little possibility that the human race will be extinct anytime soon.

        Like


      • If the kids are boys, for the sake of all that is holy, do NOT raise them as ‘Nice Guys’ or ‘Gentlemen’!!!

        Like


      • It’s not a few months of pain, it’s a lifetime of commitment and sentencing yourself to 20+ years of torture.

        Like


      • … it’s a lifetime of commitment and sentencing yourself to 20+ years of torture.

        Apart from the pregnancy and giving birth, it is even worse for the father, if you break up, the government forces him to pay for the both of you for years and years!!!

        Like


      • My risibility has been cribbled.

        Pity that Big Mama Rappaccini didn’t feel the same way.

        Like


    • White people are still having plenty of babies. It is the Republicans who have the most, though…

      Like


      • I’ve been quietly observing you for a little while now, and I generally don’t call other posters on the carpet until they just offer nothing of significant contribution here over enough time. Query: Have you ever, even once, set foot into this place we live in called Objective Reality™?? From what I can see, you either have part of your frontal lobe removed, you are a raging libtard (see option 1), or you simply like to troll for the sake of. Doesn’t really matter which one as you appear fairly useless in the general sense of the word.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 7:18 pm immoralgables

        We could use more people like you here

        Like


      • Haha…let’s see where to begin:

        The best ridiculous comments are the ones that bury themselves with their wrongness further and further as they go on.

        For someone who has been following me right along, it’s interesting that you somehow haven’t bothered to follow any of my links or read any of my writing. Feel free to correct that now.

        You talk about “objective reality?” Bringing to light objective reality is what I do and what I have done while posting here, something that is sometimes sorely lacking.

        Everything I’ve posted here I’ve written here I have supported. Once again, feel free to look and see for yourself if you doubt my statements.

        It’s called “badassitude” as Neil deGrasse Tyson put it— that is, “the state of knowing you’re right because you did the required research to justify it.” I have, sorry if you haven’t.

        Never confuse “objective reality” with “what conforms to your worldview”. The two are not one and the same, and I’m sorry if sometimes former disturbs the latter. I can’t say I’m sorry if you discovered that by reading me.

        Like


      • Jay in DC
        I’ve been quietly observing you for a little while now,
        ————

        This is Jays opening line, he pulled it on me last month; I guess its supposed to be intimidating or something… “Im so skerrrrd!”

        Like


      • I’m keeping an eye on you too. :-p

        Like


      • While you contribute very little of merit as well, you have since proven yourself to at least be a good Sambo like entertainer so you have value as the comedic sidekick. I imagine a day when you and Greg Eliot will meet face to face, shed a tear for your bonds of comraderie you’ve developed and then tear each other to pieces in a perfect Greek Tragedy. This guy on the other hand, just seems to be living in some warped alternate reality and is contrarian for the sake of. Hence either a very poor troll or just a dumb ass. Either way, no intrinsic value.

        Like


      • Naw, no blood between us.

        Thwack one day will come to the docks where I’m holding his boat ticket back to his people’s homeland, we’ll shake hands, and once he arrives across the pond, we’ll set up some teleconferencing equipment in our respective night clubs and continue the fray.

        Like


      • shed a tear for your bonds of comraderie you’ve developed and then tear each other to pieces in a perfect Greek Tragedy.
        —————-
        Listen Jay, you should try to be more like Greg instead running around saying “I been watching you…” You come across as the sorriest kind of white man; bitter, boring, no cleverness or comedic skill… you have yet to make a comment that was interesting. You just lurk around until you can muster the courage to call somebody a name and then you disappear. Its kinda sad. No wonder you can’t get any pussy

        (((shakin my head)))

        Like


      • thwack- You mistake me for someone who gives a fuck. About, well, all of it. 1) CH is about 20th on my list of priorities now, particularly since the ‘Death of the West’ (props PJB) is in full effect. I come here to blow off steam mainly since I’m a fairly busy man these days. What is Jay busy at?

        2) Planning next steps; Talky time is coming to an end for men with a working sack. Action time is coming next, and many entities need to become organically linked to one another, as they all have the same goal using different methodologies.

        3) Comedic skill is for fat white boys and niggers. I am neither. Entertainment of humans is not my forte, entertainment of sub-humans (read: you) is a negative priority for me. My forte is, ahh, how do I say? ‘Education’. You needn’t look far through cyberspace to find out who I am and what my job title was for many years. Hot tip; I use to house and beat monkeys for fun and profit. True Story.

        4) Greg Eliot classifies himself as a WN, which by the way, I do not. Yet, he will send you off with a kiss and a hug back to Africa in some absurd fantasy I suppose. I’m a realist. This will never happen. A European nation-state can be created inside the continental US, think “secession petitions” (hollow in action but deep in ideology) but with teeth, where Europeans circle the wagons against the victim classes to include; feminists, nig-nogs, latinos, and fags, respectively.

        5) I’m a morose motherfucker, always have been, and likely always will be. I also have a few things that true leaders require, none of which would be mustered by any “non-liberal” in recent history. I’m a pathological liar and a borderline sociopath. I work in a place so filled with minorities who I have personal relationships with, that their jaws would literally drop open when they realize what I’m truly about. Sadly, if that day ever came to pass their jaws would also receive 5.56 around that same time. Imagine the shock that one of the most racist agent provocateurs was your co-worker.

        6) Yes, you caught me, I get no pussy. No sociopath has ever gotten ass. Ted Bundy, Jooran VanderSloot, et. al.

        7) I’m probably making up 1 through 6 to be an internet tough guy while quietly being a bitter white dude who “gets no pussy”. You have called my bluff! Whatever shall I do now?

        Like


  16. Female profeesioals have amazing bodies

    Like


  17. but back to H’s point. Go to a museum, look at clothes from people in olden days. I would be that the average coat size for men would be a 36R. As someone who lifts weights, people back then probably would’ve seemed puny. On the other hand, if you’ve been to London, you’ve seen King George’s suit of armor. He was the size of today’s offensive linemen. So…?

    Like


  18. “Finland, like most of the white West, is currently undergoing a serious bout of self-annihilation syndrome.”

    Of course, the Talented Tenth blacks in this ‘sphere openly cheer this war on the very white men who create and sustain said Talented Tenth’s very existence.

    Like


    • The *actual* Talented Tenth are too busy making shitloads of money to care about any of this. I work for one of them, and he’s bar-none the best boss I’ve ever had in my life.

      Like


      • Yeh they should but aren’t. Gimmedats, not even with superficial introspection. Typical.

        Like


      • Sorry to bust your little bubble, man, but you don’t know my boss. “Gimmedat” or “lack of instrospection” don’t apply. This dude makes three times more than I ever will, and deserves every cent. I’m a Machiavellian, low-social-trust kind of guy, and don’t give respect easily; he’s one of the very I’ve worked for who’s earned it.

        Like


      • Susan Rice is married to a cracka. Her kids are white appearing. (She,it must be said,is ugly as hell) No doubt they will cash in like crazy on being “niggers”;Harvard,Yale etc. Probably will never have a conversation with a real life nigger in their entire life. So crazy.

        Like


      • Excuse me but Susan Rice is a cracka; a Grahm cracka. The dude she married is a saltine

        Tiger woods is a rice cracka.

        Like


      • Tiger woods is a rice cracka.

        After earning his first 10 million, he became a Ritz cracker.

        Like


      • *applause*

        Like


    • Of course, the Talented Tenth blacks in this ‘sphere openly cheer this war on the very white men who create and sustain said Talented Tenth’s very existence.

      In general, the “Talented Tenth” of blacks is 3/4s to 7/8s [or more] white, thanks to the ancestors of PUA alpha horndawgs like Strom Thurmond.

      Without all that white admixture, the “Talented Tenth” of blacks would be genetically illiterate and innumerate.

      Anyway, you are entirely correct to observe that the “Talented Tenth” of blacks was created by white men.

      Like


    • What about the talented 9 16ths?

      Like


  19. Wow… Paglia’s hamster in full-throttle rationalization as the body count from second-wave feminism leaves her up to her cankles in putrid decline. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/taylor-swift-katy-perry-hollywood-398095

    Like


    • I’ll accept her criticism of Taylor Swift and Katy Perry on the blandness end of things – little girls really do need something better as role models than empty pop stars whoring themselves for fame. Why do you think women accept the cock carousel to begin with? They equate that sort of thing with personal success. And it is a shame Hollywood doesn’t have more intelligence actresses and roles for them, but in an industry driven by sex appeal, you aren’t going to draw those sorts of women who could play those sorts of roles. Female entertainers have always been whores.

      However, Paglia misses a couple of important points. Beauty does, has, and always will matter. And female actresses were whores in the 1950s too, but flaunting that in public was strictly forbidden by the culture. What Paglia really wants is a return to the 1950s, where sex appeal was classy and actresses kept their personal lives out of the media. Funny how self-control and restraint is appealing even to a second-wave feminist like her.

      Like


      • I forgive Paglia a lot for being one of the first to publcly expose Madonna for the hideous unfeminine psychopathic cyborg that she is, and that’s an example of it — her “this is Madonna, and THIS (some other lady) is an actual feminine woman” schtick is something she’s been pretty consistent about.

        Like


      • (hrm… had a reply that didn’t make it) This is something Paglia’s been consistent about long before the Wall overtook her, though. I still fondly remember the thrashing she delivered to Madonna, as she compared that soulless cyborg to some latin american chick who was actually made of woman.

        Like


      • Ah, yeah, that makes it a bit different. But then, Madonna was the gasoline on this slut-fire of pop culture, wasn’t she?

        Like


      • on December 6, 2012 at 11:57 pm Johnny Caustic

        Daniela Mercury.

        http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/mercury_2/

        Paglia may be a sort of feminist, but there are big chunks of feminism she rejects, especially its aversion to femininity.

        Like


    • Yeah, that Paglia article is pretty bad. As an aside, referring to the 1950s or 60s as the “conformist” decade and the “liberation” decade has become an anachronism over the past decade or so. Paglia is still trafficking in those dated cliches, and they most likely fall on deaf ears.

      Once you turn forty, you can see the passage of time and rise & fall of trends and zeitgeists within your lifetime. As late as the early 90s, everybody evoked those two decades. Today, 50s and 60s are ancient history.

      Today, fifties aren’t really on anyone’s radar. Sixties evoke cheesy smelly hippies. And that conservative decade, the 80s, seems to be recalled (or imagined, if you’re young), fondly. Everybody loves the eighties. And yet back then, butthurt libs couldn’t get enough of calling it the “me decade” and hating Reagan.

      Nineties is when America fell apart. Eighties were the last good decade.

      But early nineties did have some good music. Love Grunge and alternative rock of from 1991-1995. It was the last time music had emotion.

      Like


      • I wasn’t alive for most of the 70s but between Carter and inflation they sound pretty nasty.
        The 80s were when Wall Street’s takeover and destruction of America really got rolling (see “Liar’s Poker” among others).
        I have fond memories of the 90s (as someone once described them, “a holiday from history”) but that also seems to be when the political correctness/affirmative action/feminazism/thoughtcrime hysteria really got rolling.
        The 00s were the worst (I refer to it as the new “Low Decade”), when Georgie Bush was rolling back our civil rights and spreading our legs nice and wide for hordes of illegals to pour in, and we had to suffer through the biggest and dumbest housing mania in world history (which not only hasn’t been fully popped but shows every sign of reinflating rapidly).
        Of course, with the Messiah’s re-election, I don’t have real high hopes for the teens either.

        Like


      • You ever talked to a 20-something year old college-educated woman about what she thinks of the 1950s? It was the Dark Ages, where women were chained to stoves and raped pregnant every nine months and were treated no better than cows… Nobody uses the 80s to scare their classroom about the dangers of conservatism, unless it has to do with Margaret Thatcher, and even that’s a little advanced for most state schools.

        Like


      • Naw, they didn’t mind being Harriet… they just have rather been married to Peter Gunn instead of Ozzie.

        Like


    • I love everything about Taylor Swift. Whitebread “blandness” is what young women are, the undamaged ones anyway. They are nothing without their contrived dramas and spoiled-rotten understanding of things. It gives men purpose to forcibly correct them and introduce them to the real world. Save the dark exotica for niche porn. I want to hear the sweetness of a naïve voice that reminds me of puppy love. We have plenty of the dead-eyed and throaty, face-fucked, worldly whores shoved into our purview as exemplars of the new “sexy.”

      Paglia is hit or miss, bullseye or self-injury, hot or cold. I like her pop-culture conservatism if only to point out the essential phoniness and malignity of what passes for art today. But she has a bisexual’s understanding of beauty, which warps every part of her thinking. Nevertheless, her idiosyncrasies are easy enough to correct for. We need someone challenging the leftist commissars, and it’s good to see pushback from an apostate in their camp — all by herself she constitutes a one-dyke fifth column for the cause of aesthetics.

      Matt

      Like


      • Taylor Swift is cute, thassboudit.
        She can’t sing worth a shit, plays guitar like my 7th grade religion teacher and if she was the ‘plain’ girl in school (‘She wears short skirts, I wear sneakers’), I’m the pope.

        Like


      • Pleased to meet you, Your Holiness.

        I never thought she was all that cute. She’s young, skinny (too skinny), and has good teeth, thassboudit. I don’t care what her guitar skillz are. She has two distinct singing voices, both of them better than every other pop or country “singer” out there, both comparable to the singular voices of Alison Krauss, Natalie Maines, and Amy Lee. She captures an auditory platonic form of unspoilt peak-value femininity.

        I beg your pardon, Most Holy Father, but Miss Swift fuckin rules. The cloying, insufferable, and naïve lyrics are the point.

        Matt

        Like


      • A couple years ago at some award show Taylor Swift sang live with Fleetwood Mack legend Stevie Nicks

        Stevie Nicks for a “rusty” old lady sang damn well but Taylor Swift was badly off key half the time, it was awful , no it was horrendous!!!

        Stevie Nicks was barely able to hide a look of horror on her face while Taylor Swift was having the time of her life as she was totally oblivious to being so badly off key.

        With all the magic they can do in recording studios, almost anybody can sound great, as if they had talent, I know, I have done a little work in recording studios.

        it is in a live performance that you can tell who has real talent.

        Like


  20. not in all industries .. http://imgur.com/EJ1xS

    Like


    • Is that Roosh in the back?

      Like


    • You think that’s a representative sample of who works at that company? For every one of those cute, thin, young girls, there are probably four or five ugly, fat, or old ones somewhere else in that building. You know they were cherry-picked for that photo.

      Like


  21. on December 6, 2012 at 3:49 pm Robert in Arabia

    Like


    • Are you going to post this clip on every thread?

      I already explained that nigger needs and wants are what gives value to all the things white people own and control such as real estate, medicine, education…

      Money is debt, niggers are money; guess who has all the money?

      Like


  22. The reasons why America is fat and getting fatter by the day:
    a)They eat crap. Eliminate everything that has the words ‘hydrogenated’ and ‘corn syrup’ on it and grocery store shelves would be as empty as in East Germany, circa 1963. Eliminate fast food- and ‘family’ restaurants and American cities would resemble scenes from Mad Max – Beyond Thunderdome.
    b)They eat LOTS of crap. All-you-can-eat buffets, ‘family size’ packages, free drink refills, the average so-called ‘entree’ in a US restaurant weighs in at an impressive 2-3,000 calories a platter.
    This may have changed, but I do not remember seeing ANY all-you-can-eat restaurants growing up in Europe, the largest milk container my mom ever bought was about a pint, the largest cereal box I ever saw about a quarter of what they sell here, there’s no such thing as free refills on anything (not even coffee) and the concept of the ‘doggie bag’ is (or was) virtually unknown. And unnecessary. Granted, food – like everything else – is also significantly more expensive in Europe.
    3) They don’t move. The average European gets from point A to point B via a combination of walking,biking and/or public transport. Everyone. The housewife, the school kids, the construction worker, the office guy/girl, the cop, the store employee, the young, the old – you get the idea.
    The vast majority of Americans view the 10 steps from their car door to the mall entrance as a hardship.
    It is true that public transport is a jocular afterthought in most of American localities, and that distances between the aforementioned points A & B are double, triple or more than their European counterparts, but if you live within, say, 10 miles of your job/school/stores/errands, you can bike it.
    Trust me.
    I’d follow this up with my ole standby bike-related Date Challenge to the guys, but this post is already long.

    Like


    • Americans don’t bike or walk because most have to live in suburbs at least half an hour from black and mexican no-go zones around the city centers where they work. Eurabians wil understand in a few years.

      Like


      • I’m 100% White and bike/walk through Mexican ‘no-go’ zones several times a week. Including at night.
        Not a problem.
        There aren’t enough Black people here to have their own ‘zone’, but there’s Hookerville and the Gay Ghetto, right around then intersection of Used Condom & Coverless Syringe.

        Like


      • Tap dancing on a land mine can be quite invigorating… for awhile.

        Like


    • You have some points here, but you can’t compare the US to Europe in certain aspects.
      Everyone in Europe uses public transportation. We do it because it is mostly safe, clean and reliable. But the most important point is you can reach your destination as fast by public transportation as by car, if not faster as is the case in most bigger cities. The same can not be said for the US.
      When i visited the US several weeks ago i had the chance to experience american meal portions. After the breakfast i was done for the day…
      I had the audacity not to park directly in front of the store and i decided to walk the distances between the stores in a shoping district rather than using the car. I was immediately identified as an alien.
      All you can eat buffets are emerging, the same can not be said for free refill, sadly. I don’t think those things are to blame for rising obesity rates. No one forces you to eat and drink till you burst. It is always up to the individual to make the right choices.

      Like


    • I was talking about this with my husband….and I believe there is also a point of no return. I don’t think any fatty wants to be a fatty, but after you reach say…20-30 lbs overweight you are done. You can come back from that but not much further.

      People that lose more than 30lbs have to deal with loose skin, saggy titties (men too), saggy face, jowls, and also a very strict caloric defecit.

      So you’re 50 lbs overweight. Are you going to truly sacrifice, so you can be not disgusting? Because HOT or even CUTE is out the window.

      THAT’S why we have so many fat people. They ruined their bodies, and the alternative (lumpy, stretched out skin, deprived of food) is not THAT much better than being fat- certainly not worth it enough to lose the weight.

      LESSON: DONT GET FAT. NOT EVEN ONCE.

      Like


      • on December 7, 2012 at 12:28 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I approve of the “don’t get fat” message, but let’s not discourage the folks who really have it in them to succeed.

        I have a friend who lost 75 lbs. She had to have a breast lift after it was over, but she looks great now. Really great. A little bit of looseness around the middle, but less than the average muffin-topped 22-year-old.

        Like


      • Wow, thats really great of your friend and good for her. However, did you know that factually, you are 25 times more likely to survive a gunshot would to the head (TO THE HEAD!) than keep a large amount of weight loss? Of course there are outliers and your friend may be one of them, but the fact of the matter is that if a gunshot to the head is usually fatal, obesity is usually incurable. Anything more than 20 lbs and it’s usually incurable. INCURABLE.

        I just ate ChickFilA and Cake today so this reply is as much for you as it is for me, lol.

        Links:
        http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/74/5/579.full
        http://fatfu.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/weight-watchers/
        http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bal-te.brain05oct05,0,2310918.story

        Like


      • Don’t you know that every time you eat some Chick-fil-A a gay person dies?

        Like


      • NOM

        Like


      • Had to Google NOM and it means No Offense Meant

        not sure what you meant by that

        but I know I did mean to offend those heinous gays who tried to hurt the Chick Fil A business for no good reason

        Like


      • You are 25 times more likely to survive a gunshot to the head than maintain a big amount of weight loss for a long time (a large amount being over 20lbs).

        http://fatfu.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/weight-watchers/

        http://www.ajcn.org/content/74/5/579.full

        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1580453

        and just for fun: http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/fat-officially-incurable-according-to-science/

        Like


      • Wow, those sure were depressing to read. I’d like to lose 30 pounds and keep it off but I know the statistics are against me apparently.

        Like


      • I work in the fitness industry, our peak season is coming up shortly. January and February will, as always, see a run on gyms, personal trainers, weightloss centers, etc.
        By April or May, 75-95% of new clients will have quit, even the best trainers do not escape this sobering statistic.
        Only very, very few people are willing to make the necessary lifestyle changes that HAVE TO accompany the workouts and the diet.

        Like


      • A big part of the problem, from my research on the matter, is that when you are fat and become thin you actually have to eat less to maintain the same weight than if you’d never gotten fat in the first place. For example I can maintain my weight at around 1500-1700 hundred cals a day, but if I gained and lost say 60lbs, I’d probably have to eat around 1000-1200 JUST TO MAINTAIN…..so it does become too much for people.

        It is really a shame that people do not have access to this information as the MSM just likes to push egalitarianism to the nth degree, even when it goes against basic biology and aesthetics (and taste and decency).

        Like


      • You ever hear of this thing called a low carb lifestyle?

        You see the reason that you gain all that weight to begin with is that most people can’t handle the horrible effects of pumping your body full of sugar.

        So you go on the low carb diet and stay on it, guess what you’re not fat anymore.

        Calorie defiect is bullshit because again when you pump too much sugar into your body, your hormones go ape shit and tell you to keep eating. When on the low carb diet you at the very least have your body chemistry under control, not telling you to eat every second. You simply have the hard but managable task to stay on a diet that’s isn’t that much fun.

        You are simply an overweight woman that has bought into the lie so you can live with your existence.

        Gary Taubes already has made a petition detailing his issues with the very studies and reasons that you have for justifying being a land whale:

        http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/response-to-nytimes-the-fat-trap

        Like


      • FurriousFerret is right

        AVOID sugar!

        sugar makes us hungry and makes us fat

        it also makes us sleepy and lazy = we burn less calories

        avoiding fat is bad because fat is what gives you the feeling of “fullness” that sugar can not give you

        on a low fat diet you will always be hungry and you may compensate by eating sweets…

        hard to believe but adding a little olive oil to your food will make you feel full and curb your appetite and then you will start losing weight

        Protein and fat are good, sugar is bad, it is that simple

        artificial sugars should never be used; they make you more hungry and are associated with heatlth problems

        Like


  23. Actually, a lot of these girls would be pretty cute if you gave them modern clothes and hairstyles.

    Like


  24. I remember a theory that postulates that when girls get sexually abused they put on weight to repulse their abusers so they won’t sex them no more. It sounds ar fetched to me. The case of Oprah Winfred, however, may support this argument. She was a life-long fatty and as a child regularly got it on with her uncle. While arriving at a different conclusion, Oprah herself mentioned a link between the overeating and the child sex, albeit in her dramatic, pathos-ridden way (“I eat comfort food to fill the hole in my heart caused by child abuse…” or something like that).

    But unless there was a massive increase in fathers boning their daughters in the 1960s, I’d say the more likely culprits are processed foods and, more particularly, the modern lifestyle and the apathy it encourages. People don’t care anymore, they are just happy to sit there with their gadgets and be a fat cunt.

    Like


    • Wow as if that doesn’t sound like rubbish. I’d be more inclined otherwise if there was some evidence…

      Like


      • It is rubbish. Sexual abuse survivors who would go the route of reactive body modification would do things to make themselves stronger, not simply fatter. So they might be heavier on average for the same reason many strength athletes tend to be heavier, but this wouldn’t explain being fat to the point of mobility problems.

        Emotional abuse in general can cause people to become depressed and not take care of themselves in many ways. It doesn’t need to be specifically sexual. Constantly telling a person they’re ugly can make them believe it, and it becomes a kind of self fulfilling prophecy.

        If there are emotional reasons for a rise in obesity, I don’t think unrealistic media images are doing as much damage as higher and longer term sexual competition between women. When people married at a reasonable age and stayed that way, a girl shifted from competing with her peers to pleasing her husband, and older ladies remained off the market. Now, women over 25 as well as women who are on the carousel have more interest in soul killing their younger or more loyal/chaste competition.

        High school and college girls will gang up on a girl for merely having a “breeder” shape and wifely personality. They’ll call her fat and tell her that the reason guys aren’t interested in her is because she’s fat and ugly (not because she’s obviously not putting out or at least not interested in doing someone she’s not in a relationship with). It will seem to be true if she doesn’t have people in her life who aren’t screwed up.

        This might not make someone fat specifically, but it can lead to general lack of willingness to care for themselves since they’re convinced there’s nothing to care for.

        Like


  25. I love the look of the guy in the front with the suit and jacket. He must be the boss….legs at a wide stance, cig in hand…I’m sure he’s boning half those dames!

    BTW…when the crackwhores in your town are obese, it’s time to leave.

    Like


  26. You’ve got to go to Shorpy and click on the full-size image of the office party.

    I would definitely want to talk to the girl in front who brought the can of lube – what’s that about?

    I think a lot of the “dogginess” relative to modern girls is due to what we would call bad hair, lack of make-up, and lack of modern orthodonture. But as mentioned above, these are probably unmarried girls for the most part (I see one left hand with a ring). The catches were already caught, and the cutest appear to be the youngest.

    I think there is another plus-size under the police hat, and probably the girl kneeling behind the desk next to cutie would qualify. One of the men is clearly rotund, and a couple more have chubby faces.

    Like


  27. I don’t know, the chick up front with the wavy hair (appropriately sitting in from of the lube dispenser) may have a little ugly in her, but I’ll bet she loves anal. Look at that dirty girls face on the large res pic.

    Like


  28. Just read the Paglia article. What a dippy broad. She can deliver really good social commentary at times, but then she goes totally off the rails with shit like the above. All you need to do is say “The fifties” to her, and all sense, all logic, even all of her previously stated positions, go out the window. She’s way, WAY overinvested in the myth of the 1960’s. Too bad, she’s demonstrated that she can actually think, as long as you keep her away from her hobbyhorses.

    Like


  29. I want to hear what Heartiste has to say about Nadia Cho (UC Berkley slut who wrote about her sexcapades in a school newspaper). She wrote about having public sex with hot guys and attending orgies.

    Looking at her pic, she quite plain. Her male equivalent would likely be incel.

    Like


  30. The problem is that many men settle for fatties, so women who are fat have no incentive to lose the weight. Because guys will still sleep with them.

    Like


    • on December 6, 2012 at 7:17 pm Pray for Plagues

      People are also afraid of shaming fatties. I know plenty of dudes who post pictures of them kissing their fat tubs of lard on facebook. No one, not even I, would dare to make fun of them publicly or privately. Stating facts is now a social crime, even in private. Their have been many times when other men got mad at me for not appreciating a fat girls ‘personality’.

      Like


      • Ha! That is funny! Personality! I am telling my bf about this one. Although personality does matter in a relationship it is not the central aspect of the relationship. I will never understand men who settle for a beta girl. Knowing that my bf would never approve of me becoming fat, it motivates me to even be better for him in turn. As my bf isn’t a fatty either. So we both motivate and complement each other, it is great. I always wonder when I see these fat girls with dudes with six packs, mind boggling.

        Like


      • Men with higher testosterone and who are stronger are less intimidated by size and strength in women. Sexual dimorphism is crucial in attraction for most people, and though socially a small nerdy guy might seem the better match for a fat woman, the strong man is a better match both physically and in terms of relationship stability.

        Also remember that most men are beta in terms of social standing. Most aren’t rich either. Social status and adeptness for men is what beauty is for women. They aren’t getting the alpha girls, so what’s left to do?

        Like


      • Agreed! 🙂

        Like


      • People are afraid of shaming fat people for the same reason they’re afraid of shaming anyone else they might need later. Most people can’t afford to be dicks and get away with it.

        Like


    • But it’s too strenuous, like fucking uphill.

      Like


  31. There are two fatties Heartiste!
    Look! Look! See, the fattie, second girl from the left! I wouldn’t do her, and she looks old too (probabily she wasn’t this fat when young).

    Like


  32. Hmm, OT: Liberal women’s greater sexual appetite can be attributed to a lack of transcendence in daily life…but they fall short of achieving it through sex and sink deeper into dissatisfaction. (From the guy who brought you scientific evidence against gay parenting.)

    http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/12/06/liberals-cant-get-no-satisfaction/

    Like


  33. time for an extended epistle re fembots!i

    Like


  34. As for their “looks” vs. modern gals keep in mind that women’s facial makeup only started taking off in the 1920s and was probably frowned upon by serious office managers, like Mr. Alpha posing with the suit and cigar.

    Like


  35. I had to click on the link and the full-size image to actually see how good-looking the women are. Can you really tell at the resolution in this pic?

    Like


  36. White women aren’t having children because they are unapproachableand/or unbearable cu ts.

    Like


  37. […] Where is everybody? The dark side of the fat chick’s moon? Most of the women in the 1925 pic are dogs (except that cute one sitting next to the desk in the striped blouse and flirty smile), but at least they’re thin. Can the same be said for the modern American office party? Not if the overweight and obese percentages are any indication. You’re more likely, based on the numbers, to have to navigate around 70% of your female co-workers to get to the 30% who aren’t biodiesel dirigibles. And people wonder why the (white) fertility rate is dropping like a stone. Would you want to have regular sex with a shambling mound? Stick around to help her raise the fat brat? Source: Chateau Heartiste   […]

    Like


  38. ‘Shambling Mound’? Has the dark lord actually dropped a D&D reference?

    [Heartiste: Artistic cross-pollination. About the only thing those funny nerd terms are useful for.]

    Like


  39. The best would be if Obama were caught cheating on Michelle with a Fat White Woman. Here are the reactions:

    Normal non-black women (internally): “What a beta. He’s a left-wing, cool black president and that’s all he gets? Romney would’ve gotten way hotter if he’d cheated. So would have W. He does sort of seem like Urkel now.” (vagina goes dry)

    Normal non-black women (externally): “This just shows how body shape doesn’t matter! Hooray for inclusiveness! Anyone who criticizes him for choosing her is a racist! Ohh…I mean, he broke up his family, how bad. And was mean to a woman. But he kept abortion legal, and the presidency is a tough job, and he doesn’t go to church, so he’s no hypocrite! This is all Republicans fault!”

    Red-pill taking men: “Nigger goes fattie diving, film at 11. Hey, anyone notice the economy’s in the tank and our embassies are on fire and this guy has made it all worse? Anyone? Ah, fuck it, you’re not listening, c’mere hottie and suck my cock while the world burns.”

    Blue-pill taking men: (Wait 5 seconds till they hear what normal non-black say externally, repeat as a mantra. If necessary, Cut off penis to show support.)

    Niggers: “Whoo-hoo! Big booty white hoes! Dis prez is king! Obama! Obama! Obama! Where my welfare check, malt liquor, and Affirmative Action ‘position’ at?”

    Black women: “Hang that nigger from a tree. Honestly, where da Klan when you need them? “

    Like


  40. Best part is: this was the 1920s, when people were imbibing liquor of questionable origins and quality, and doing so nightly, and the economy was roaring.

    In other words, people had money for lots of overeating and a definite bent towards over-intoxication and heavy drinking.

    And yet….no fatties.

    So blaming this all on “heavy drinking” and “food being too cheap/plentiful” isn’t true.

    Like


    • A lot of factors contribute to making people but mostly women fat, including in no particular order,

      processed food which they did not have back in the 1920s ( or was barely processed )
      hydrogenated fats, etc that are more fattening and less healthy

      appliances such as washing machines ; women used to wash things by hand and would burn a lot of calories doing things like that

      the pill which affects a lot of things in a female body

      there are other factors but…

      last but not least

      eating like pigs was considered immoral if not a sin and so were things such as laziness

      people had more pride and honour back then

      today’s fatties have no sense of shame thanks in part to feminism

      Like


      • Actually, it’s mostly the pro-carb/anti-fat /anti-masculine diets. Your factors do increase it, but only at the margins. The main culprit is fat. Just like poverty exacerbates crime, but the major cause in this country is black people.

        Like


      • OK, but if you don’t hang the white people who brought black people here, they will just bring more of them right?

        Like


      • Geez, man… over 600K white men already died over the pricks that brought your ilk over here and didn’t have the sense to send them back when the chance arose… give the trees a break now.

        Like


      • Yes those 600,000 WHITE men who died in the civil war, who died to free the BLACK slaves are conveniently never EVER mentioned by blacks and white liberals

        it would not fit the white-man-is-bad-let’s-make-him-pay-for-his-past-sins agenda

        far more whites died for blacks than blacks died by hanging from trees at the hands of whites…

        but hey! who cares about facts?

        re-writting history is much more fun right?

        Like


      • but if you don’t hang the white people who brought black people here

        —Nigs, I’m sorry to inform you, those people are already dead. It’s been a few years since you sub-humans came in.

        Like


      • If I were into ” hanging people from trees” it would be some white liberals that would hang

        other non whites would be strongly encouraged to go back to the country of their ancestors

        and why would they not since living among racists and ” white supremacist” is so awful?

        Like


      • Why not just everybody who isn’t Native American get the fuck out? That would be great for me.

        Or how about people stop riding the coat tails of or making excuses for their dumbfuckery based on statistics and learn to get along and pull their weight as individuals?

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        other non whites would be strongly encouraged to go back to the country of their ancestors
        ———————-
        What if they won’t take us back?

        Years ago the jews tried to deport a palistinian and nobody would take him so they sat him in the desert between the two countrys with a suitcase for quite a while. Can you imagine anybody other than the jews getting away with something like this?

        Like


      • Nicole

        pulling their own weight?

        I agree but you should tell that to the 57% of Mexicans in the USA who are on welfare ( and it is a growing percentage every year)

        http://www.examiner.com/article/fifty-seven-percent-of-mexican-immigrants-on-welfare

        Like


      • If Blacks in Africa refuse to take you back will you accuse them of racism and of Black Supremacism?

        Like


      • Canadian, they’re on welfare in a system created by White people. Why exactly should I give a shit what self inflicted problems you have? Unless you assimilated to a Native American culture, you’re all parasites. Nitpicking over who’s more a parasite is mental masturbation.

        Like


      • Nicole,

        they are not self inflicted problems,

        the white liberals imposed them on us

        Like


      • What if they won’t take us back?

        Not take you back? Well…. I’m confused now… don’t y’all coloureds always refer to each other as bruthuhs and sisthas?

        Or is that just Mau-mauing for the flak catchers?

        Remember the Jack Nicholson monologue that opened The Departed?

        Like


      • Canadian, you impose it on yourselves.

        What if I told you that you that if you were doing things right, nobody would need money to live?

        Red pill or blue pill, you’re still taking a pill to fix your problems. So this game of plantation politics annoys me mainly because regardless of color or ethnicity, American culture is one in which if most could, they would live in a pod. Your dream is to profit without working.

        Like


      • Welfare is a trap to entice the poor to remain or become currency dependent. The most elitist of conservatives could not have come up with a better way to enslave those who would normally just find other better ways to survive lack of currency.

        Like


      • Nicole

        either you are lying trough your teeth (and you know better ) or you are extremely ignorant because welfare is something that the left supports far FAR more than conservatives do.

        Conservatives are for personal responsibility and only approve of welfare in extreme cases

        Here is a bit of historical facts;

        It was President Lindon Johnson – a liberal – in the 1960s who made it much MUCH more easier to be on welfare and this is when the black community began falling apart; from that point on to this day there has been an increase in the rates of teen pregnancies and single motherhood among blacks, of unemployment, of illiteracy, of drug use, of crimes etc etc

        and again it is a liberal – this time Obama – who wants to again make it even easier for ” minorities” ( which we all know means primarily blacks but hispanics too ) to obtain welfare and other free stuff from the government

        it has always been liberals that have been pro-welfare , that have been all for giving a lot of free stuff to the poor,
        and it has always been conservatives who have demanded that welfare was not easy to obtain
        because when you make life too comfortable for the poor, they have no reason to go look for a job

        Everybody knows that.

        are drunk?

        did you hit your head?

        are you kidding?

        was this a typo and you meant liberals?

        these facts are easily verifiable

        Like


      • Canadian, my point is that whether you are liberal or conservative, neither of you belong in the land you are plaguing. If you belonged there, you wouldn’t be a plague in it. You’ve done nothing good for the place.

        So your squabbles about who is more a parasite are senseless, considering you’re both doing it wrong.

        Like


      • yes

        Like


      • yes

        yes

        Like


    • You need to study your history. Most people were not living the high life you read about in The Great Gatsby. A small minority of people were very rich, a few were what you could call middle class and everyone else was dirt poor, although still not quite as bad off as during the Great Depression.

      Like


      • You need to study your history.
        —Honey, men make history, and remember it well.

        Most people were not living the high life you read about in The Great Gatsby.
        —No, and most people did not live like Paris Hilton and Britney Speaks in the 2000s. Bu the good economic times and wink-wink-nudge-nudge casual drug use of the period encouraged a lot of excess.

        Practically everyone in the 1920s indulged in”bathtub gin” or moonshine to a greater degree because it was illegal. And had lots of money to boot.

        A small minority of people were very rich, a few were what you could call middle class and everyone else was dirt poor, although still not quite as bad off as during the Great Depression.
        —Cite? And to a non-communist site, please.

        Betcha can’t.

        Like


  41. But the shoes back then were so sensible!

    Like


  42. Anyone else notice that the fatty has a ring on her finger? A ring with a rock, moreover. Wouldn’t it suggest that she was married or engaged? (shudder)

    And as long as we’re playing Where’s Walrus, notice that there are actually two fatties in the picture, not just one. The second fatty is standing up, left middle, wearing a novelty police hat tilted jauntily to one side. I wonder who her Secret Santa was.

    Can anyone spot the Alpha male in the picture? I think I did. It’s the man on the middle right, standing with no one in front of him — but several behind him half-hidden. Note the wide stance. Dude’s taking up space. A bit of a cocky look on his face. And a half-smoked cigar. And that hideous fleshy growth over his brow doesn’t seem to have affected his self-esteem. Alpha. Probably the boss.

    Like


    • You know….she could be pregnant or could have just had a kid (or four). It’s not as unlikely an excuse as it would be today.

      Like


  43. Oh, boy… this was funner than the cover to Sgt. Peppers.

    Like


  44. OT but … yeah:

    Women Love World’s Most Interesting Man

    http://articles.courant.com/2011-08-03/features/hc-shea-boomers-0803-20110803_1_interesting-man-life-and-exploits-footage

    Watch the video collection of commercials to learn all you need to know about how older men can attract women. In fact, younger men, too.

    Note — they title it the most “interesting” man in the world, not the most handsome or even the sexiest.

    Heartiste, I think you could do a post about why The Most Interesting Man in the World appeals to women and why a man with a beard who does interesting things like freeing a bear from a trap while wearing a suit or popping from a hole in the arctic ice clutching a fish embodies what advertisers believe really attracts women. One clip shows him riding a boat at night with four women seated around him.

    Sure, it’s ove the top, but there’s something primal and instinctive about why the Dos Equis pitchman is seen as the ultimate ladies man for an older man, or any man for that matter.

    Like


    • The Most Interesting Greybeard in the World is surrounded by young hotties because the ad executives who are financing the commercial hired them to stand there.

      Like


  45. […] Spot The Fatty « Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  46. on December 7, 2012 at 5:54 am Power Hydrant

    The girl above the two sitting ladies holding candy canes is by far the cutest. But there’s a good reason why there aren’t more cute girls here: cute girls didn’t work in the office in 1925.

    I like that guy at the top who looks like the son of Stephen Colbert and an Asian woman. He’d be totally cool to hang out with.

    Like


  47. on December 7, 2012 at 10:43 am Holden Caulfield

    Start a fat shaming movement. It will benefit us all in the end.

    This message a public service announcement by the “Fit chicks and dudes of America” (we’re a minority which makes everything we say carry more weight)

    Like


    • Start? Honey, get in line….

      Like


    • Love it

      Like


    • The problem is that social movements to attempt to force people to conform to a limited body type fail in a society that is ethnically diverse but socioeconomically polarized and being purposefully fattened up by large corporations and networks with an interest in keeping the population sick. Instead of shaming fat people, what you end up doing is shaming poor people.

      Shaming is the powerless idiot’s easy way of coping with problems he or she is too lazy to tackle by more effective means. Promoting healthy eating and finding ways for people to be more active would go a lot further in actually solving the problem. Start by making sure your neighborhood has sidewalks.

      Like


      • There is also the prole knee jerk reaction to anything the left, especially SWPLs like…it seems like both sides are reactionary against the others and don’t really hold ideologies of their own.

        So if these beltway liberals are thin and healthy, not only will proles be fat, they’ll be PROUD to be fat and unhealthy- as if that is the real mark of a true American.

        Like


      • The equation of thinness with health was born in leftist and feminist ideology. The idea is that you aren’t consuming more than your share, and that you agree that gender is a social construct, and women have no need to have higher bodyfat than men, or to have curves. Under their domain, men should prefer women who look more like men.

        As I said before, balance and rationality doesn’t get asses in the seats. Of course a person shouldn’t overeat or be inactive to extremes, but it is difficult to promote thinness without also promoting its companion leftism. This is why I opt out of the extremes and plug away with the eat natural food and exercise, despite its lack of mass appeal. I am unwilling to shame anyone towards the operating table or a circle of soy latte vegan hippies. I’d rather tell them their fat ass is nothing to hide so long as it’s moving, and see them on a hiking trail with a barbecue at the end of it.

        Like


  48. Front left, sat in front of cupboard, looks like Harriet Cohen.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Cohen

    Like