Comment Of The Week

Jaquan writes:

I dont agree with that IQ shit. Im from the hood and very smart in math and physics my favourite subject. Trust me tho homie when it comes to getting hotties im a monster and I respect all your games cuz im a player too and I learned alot from you these last few days. Being smart is a part of so you can mindfuck girls mathematically and keep them coming like a black hole in the universe lol. Just pointing out that science oriented guys got game too especially us from the hood. Shout out to the slimes. Harlem all day.

You laugh but the guy has a point. Combine intelligence with street smarts and thuglife attitude and you may as well sign your paperwork “Thee Most Honourable Sultan of Snatch, Ph.D. in Harem Studies, Pimp, Daddy & Daddy, BigLove Firm, LLCmeswoopyourho”.





Comments


  1. That guy’s my idol.

    Like


  2. Human cognition has multiple facets. Those tests are not able to fully evaluate intelligence. Asians, for example, seem to be genius in math/logic and retarded in social/emotional intelligence.

    Like


  3. Those tests are not able to fully evaluate intelligence

    Unfortunately, they do, even if it hurts some delicate sensibilities.

    Like


    • I’m really not sure at this point that the tests do fully evaluate intelligence.The bell curve stated that 2% of people with IQ >125 live in poverty and that 2% of people IQ>110 are chronic welfare recipients. WTF?

      Like


    • Nah, she’s right – even if it hurts some rationalist aspergoid sensibilities.

      Like


    • Yes. They don’t measure all talents but they do measure logical thinking and planning ability well.

      Blacks not only have a much lower mean IQ of 85 vs. the white 100, they also have somewhat narrower standard deviation or variance. La Griffe du Lion says the SD of their IQ variance is 12.5 versus 15 IQ points for whites. The two together mean that damn few blacks are really smart. I think it’s even more important for people to understand this.

      Using Excel’s normdist statistical function (which I’ve long since set up in a spreadsheet to work these kinds of calculations for shiites and giggles) while 4.8% of whites have IQ’s of 125 or above, pretty much the threshold (and it helps to be a good bit higher) to be an elite level doctor or lawyer or a really top level political pundit, only 0.07% of blacks do. As for the threshold of genius at 145 (some would put it at 160), 0.14% of whites are at that level but only 0.00008% of blacks are, trace amounts, i.e. virtually none. Pretty much only in the case of one drop of black type blacks.

      However there are decent percentages of blacks who can come off decently smart. A bit less than 1% are at 115 IQ or above. 11.5% are at the white average of 100 or above.

      All of the members of House’s super star diagnostic medical team are meant to be at genius levels of intelligence (except maybe slightly lower than that for the white surgeon from Oz, Chase). Now tell me how likely realistic do you think it is that jet black Foreman is the intellectual superstar of that team, replacing House when he gets in trouble and so on. It’s just a total lie is what it is.

      The same thing goes on all the time these days in TV shows and movies. Lies, lies, and more lies. Oh and all the absolutely routine all over the place closest buddies between black and white men. Yeah right.

      Like


  4. He’s stupid, because he doesn’t understand that generalizations are not disproved by anecdotes about outliers.

    So he isn’t even the outlier he claims he is.

    Like


    • Yeah he is stupid, but so is David Beckham, And he lives in a castle with a fleet of cars and 3 sons from an ex pop-star.

      If “smart” guys wanna get themselves some credit they should stop sneering and actually talk to the cute girl behind the counter. I speak from experience.

      Like


      • I did that the other day. She seemed to dig it. Going back this weekend to ask her to lunch.

        WHITEPOWER! ….. except she’s a Jew. LOLZOZOZOZO

        Like


  5. I can’t wait for the computers to take over. Intelligently directed asexual reproduction ftw.

    Like


  6. Damn, it’s good to be a gangsta. It’s cute that the IQ thread had so many black folks pretending to be good at math and chemistry. So, does Jaqwan derive equations with same ebonic tilt with which he writes?

    Like


    • Not that there aren’t black scientists and mathematicians, but it IS funny every black person is suddenly is a math-science person.

      The average thug ain’t so smart, but the local drug lord thug is likely very smart AND ruthless. But something tells me Jaquan is just an Urkel getting his lunch money punked by stupid thugs.

      Like


      • nothing is funny but you and guys that think like you. so for your information i am the Batman version of the street. real outside and yeah i am still a Blood piru member but yet i run all my white and asian classmates in my physics courses. they call me Imhotep not Urkel. never been a pussy in my life because my hood would never let me. beside just cuz i said im a math-science person does not mean all black people think like me. One! slime.

        Like


      • I’d still make a tree ornament of ya.

        Like


  7. on December 5, 2011 at 12:13 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)

    bring da movies

    zlzlzozzllzzllzzozlzl

    and please dis time pring dat movie pi lzozozozozl http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138704/

    pi = 3.141zloozozozozozoz

    pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679lozozlzzozlzlzozo8214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196lzozlzzlozozozozlz4428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273lzozozlzoozlzlzoozozz

    bring da movies zlozlzlzozoz

    and i go splooogieeiei eieiegeiegeigei

    Like


  8. on December 5, 2011 at 12:20 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)

    for every actions der is an eqlal an opposite reactions zlzlzzzzozozzzl i lick her and she gets wet humidd zlzlzlozozozozoz

    an obeject in motion will tend to stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force such as my ten foot lock cocockass running outta room and having to stop and mvovee backewardds zlzozzzoz

    ya science is googsdd for osocosisngsz lzozl

    Like


  9. Aka Justin Timberlake. He can combines The cleverness and the cold blooded mind of white people with the douchebagness and effortless coolness of.black.

    Like


  10. Major in Pimpology and Minor in “Bitchez Ain’t Shit.”

    Like


  11. If Iceberg Slim had grown up in a different environment, he would have won a Nobel Prize or two.

    Like


  12. I smell bulls**t. This guy either isn’t black, or if he is, he doesn’t know what math and physics are. No black brother from Harlem’s favorite subjects are math and physics — unless he’s talking about what he should have learned in elementary school, but didn’t even learn in high school. This guy’s comment is a crock.

    Like


  13. Stupid FAIL.

    “Ghetto pimpin'”
    (fuck me, Jesus, what a dumbass phrase…)
    forgets to include the variable of a Ghetto Ho
    who’s level of comparable intelligence determines
    the goal of absorbing a load of dick snot for a welfare check

    Like


  14. So true.

    The reason why academic / east coast affluent liberal types get all butthurt over the reality that IQ is unevenly distributed and most likely genetic is because IQ = status in their bubble world. They are narcissistic and assume everyone would like to be as sophisticated and intellectual as they are, and the fact that some people can’t by dint of genetics disturbs their egalitarian pretensions.

    In the rest of the world, practically NO ONE gives a shit about how smart you are. It’s all about what you can DO, and whose ass you can kick.

    Like


    • he fact that (most) people cant is their greatest joy and satisfaction!

      Like


    • I think it has more to do with the fact that academic/affluent liberals tend to go to college/private schools, and all the minorities they meet there are similar in intelligence to themselves or atleast not as stupid on average as IQ studies would indicate. If statistics contradict (perceived) reality people are inclined to go with what they can see. Which isn’t even such a stupid idea when you keep in mind the ease with which statistics can be manipulated. So when someone attacks a group based on one of the studies they will compare the claims with the experiences they had with minorities, who probably are quite decent people, but also outliers. Its not hard to understand why they are outraged since in their eyes you are attacking a group with which they had nothing but positive experiences with. Contradictory data will be seen as right-wing scaremongering as long as they haven’t had enough experiences to prove the contrary, which is unlikely to happen aslong as they don’t suffer from downward economic mobility.

      Like


  15. A few years ago I met a 17-year old, of middle-eastern background, who went to a largely black school in the Bay Area and said he was good in math. So I asked him to calculate 80% of 36. He couldn’t do it. Needless to say, any 6th grader could have done it in 1970.

    Like


    • yes, but isn’t math really a social construct? Your test is not able to fully evaluate intelligence or math ability.

      Like


  16. IQ is generally viewed with disfavor by women, and favor by men. Men seek to find the best advantage for both prospective sons and daughters, and IQ definitely helps there. Also, a higher IQ woman is more likely to understand she will be old and therefore unattractive to men relatively soon, and that sex NOW! with a passing sexy guy means life alone later, in a LTR with the best guy she can get.

    Women on the other hand, generally like to trade down some, getting aggression/dominance at the expense of IQ. So an Ivy League girl likes a faux-punkster musician (but with a trust fund) and Snooki likes juiceheads and gorillas and guidos. Each segment of women trading down in IQ for dominant aggression aka sexiness in men. HOWEVER, that’s a trade-off made assuming that the welfare state and safety of the Western society remains eternal. It can be a poor bet as we will see in Europe, particularly places like Greece, where Betas with money and the ability to provide protection will be in the driver’s seat at least for a while. Women like sexy aggression, men generally like faithfulness and higher IQ. This accounts for a definite predilection for Black guys by White women, adjusting for class/socio-economic status, and really none at all for Black women by White guys (lower IQ/higher aggression is not a desirable trait in women as it is in men).

    Like


    • Whiskey, you always provide an interesting perspective. However, in this instance I feel you are letting your own preferences cloud your perceptions of the way in which males and females view IQ in partners.

      “[Men believe a] higher IQ woman is more likely to understand she will be old and therefore unattractive to men relatively soon, and that sex NOW! with a passing sexy guy means life alone later, in a LTR with the best guy she can get.”

      This couldn’t be further from the truth. Women act entirely on impulse and think nothing of the past, present or future and the consequences of her actions within. If it feels good she will do it and then rationalise the doubts that she may have away and the problems that may occur from it later. [E.g. women not including ‘shitty’ boyfriends/black men/ONS in their count of lovers and failing to acknowledge that one should be held accountable for ones actions and choices.] An IQ of a 70 or 170 will not change this. For example, many of the media types who bought hook, line and sinker the Sex and the City myth are both highly educated and have high IQs (see the journalist Kate Spicer), but they are some of the most deluded women you’ll meet. IQ in women is not an indicator of rationality, forward thinking and faithfulness. It is why game works best on more educated women. Few men around here would put value on the IQ score of their women as indicators of her being a suitable partner.

      With your second paragraph, you’ve had a rant at the injustices of women choosing ‘dominant aggression’ over high IQ. This is not an indicator of women ‘trading down’ and not valuing IQ, it is an indicator of attraction triggers within women. A high IQ does not indicate a man can, will or (as you suggest) be entitled to hit these triggers. IQ is irrelevant in the pursuit of pussy. The animalistic desires in both men and women are much more relevant. That and social intelligence trumps IQ smarts any day. Also, IQ and dominant aggression are not mutually exclusive, most of the interesting posters on here and CH himself are both dominant and would score high on an IQ test. Finally, my suggestion would be to not bemoan this, but realise that this is the way women work and think of ways that you can use this knowledge to work for you.

      Like


      • IQ is irrelevant in the pursuit of pussy.

        It’s not irrelevant it’s just not all important. A high IQ helps greatly in gaining high status,but the leadership dominant kind of high status in various flavors also tends to require a good lot of testosterone and dominance drive.

        Girls tend to not be attracted to guys with IQ’s more lower than theirs, esp. for relationships. Maybe for only sex sometimes, among the slutty ones.

        White girls who go for black guys tend to either be lefty and super slutty or way down in the SES and in looks. Poor white fatties, whose only white alternative is a poor fat no game or dominance loser. Occasionally way way lefty girls do too, but they also tend to be slutty if not always super so. The American white women who were the first non working girls to get with black guys in the 1930s were about all communists. Literally. No it did not happen on plantations in the deep anti-bellum South, contrary to the super trashy movie and I think book Mandingo.

        Like


    • Once in secondary school we had this comedian visit that performed a show with the main theme being gender differences. He asked the audience to hum if they agreed with his statement. First he asked the females that prefered a mate that was more intelligent than themselves to hum. A loud high pitched hum was heard through the school theater. Then he asked the females that prefered a mate that was less intelligent than themselves to hum. The result: dead silence. He repeated the same questions but with males. A few hummed when asked if they prefered a less intelligent mate and a few more hummed rather uncertainly when asked to hum if they prefered more intelligent mates. Overall the participation rate when it came to humming was very high among females and very low among males. The general attitude of males was best described as indifference.

      This corresponds with general evolutionary theories that state that females are more discriminating when it comes to their mates while males are less picky due to not investing as much in reproduction as the female. The troubling thing is that the people in the theater room all belonged to the 80th percentile and higher due to classes being segregated based on a SAT like test taken in elementary, and nearly all of the females still wanted a mate that was more intelligent than them. So if the same pattern remains among people in ‘lower’ groups it will lead to a lot of dissatisfied females if people are monogamous and a lot of dissatisfied males if people are polygamous. While a group of 150 people or so is hardly reliable, the comedian said that the result was rather typical, and since theory and my personal experiences point in the same direction I have little reason to doubt the truth of his statement.

      Like


  17. The reason why academic / east coast affluent liberal types get all butthurt over the reality that IQ is unevenly distributed …

    I think the reason is something quite different. In American mythology, the Great Accomplishment was the emancipation of Negroes from official oppression. The Civil War didn’t quite do it, of course. The final victory was the tandem of Brown v.Board (1954) and the early ’60’s marches, leading to the Civil Rights Act. Now, today’s lefties are too young to have participated, right? So how are they gonna claim some credit for the GA? By stamping out stereotypes. To recognizing that blacks on average are not as bright as whites or asians is kind of like having an Orval Faubus zombie get up out of the grave. So they’re gonna make sure the gravestones stay firmly in place.

    Like


  18. Jaquan’s grammar clearly betrays his intelligence claim. He is a fool. There is no doubt about it. I’m sure his aspiration for education centers on the actual credential, not the learning itself, which is characteristic of the African diaspora.

    A ghetto attitude, in the adult world, will severely reduce one’s SMV. It’s a sign of low IQ – intelligent people implicitly understand this.

    Like


    • intelligent, rational people might implicitly understand this,

      but we are talking about women here.

      Like


    • i said i was good in math and physics not an english teacher Dumbass. who cares about my grammar did you just get the meaning of the post? that is the point not being black or white. the ghetto attitude as you define it is different from our view of it dawg. we just view the world as the real homie in this blog said: we just dont give a fuck (including grammar errors btw.) and yes we have a language of our own in the hood. when it comes to the females which is the only reason why i am here to see if yall got game too im telling you cuz we are real. and yeah ch is the realest white man i saw so far beside James Bond. jk. One.

      Like


      • on December 6, 2011 at 1:06 pm albert mangus

        Define “good in math and physics.” For instance, what was your math SAT score?

        It doesn’t take much knowledge of physics or math to be smarter than your average 20 year old girl (who is not in the 1% who are engineers or scientists) especially in the hood, so I guess it doesn’t matter.

        Like


  19. Our host has bitten onto some troll bait. Certainly is possible but the comment reeks of fabrication.

    Like


  20. on December 5, 2011 at 11:05 pm Do you really think so?

    So if a man was on a first date with a woman and he started illustrating his extensive knowledge of a pedantic subject such as geometry combined with street talk/smarts, how exactly would that turn her on? How do you forsee that coversation going?

    Man: “Yo, babe! Do you know what a hypotenuse is?”

    Woman: “No.”

    Man: “A hypotenuse is fo’ real: it’s da the longest side of a right-angled triangle, the side opposite the right angle. Da length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle can be found using the Pythagorean theorem, naumsayin?”

    Woman: “Oh, how incredibly sexual! Want to fuck?”

    Like


  21. Fuckin statistics. How do they work?

    Liberals and the unintelligent never seem to grasp this concept.

    Like


  22. One semi-literate ghetto troll claims he is “very smart in math and physics my favourite subject”, and ch bites.

    Seriously?

    Like


    • The hood rat’s responses are even funnier. He claims to run asians and whites in math and science but can’t string a coherent sentence together, does not understand the basic law of statistics, etc. I guarantee you that this guy is completely mediocre, possibly even really dumb, but in the cesspools that pass for inner city American schools these days it’s easy to look good by comparison. Especially with the SWPL liberal female teachers tripping all over themselves to boost the sky high self-esteem of Dion and Mercedes, by lying to them about how great they are. The average pupil can barely do anything but sing along with rap lyrics.

      Here’s a principle for you: You are only as smart as your actions. If you claim to be an undiscovered genius, and yet your actions are to run around with slimy ghetto whores and be in a lowlife street gang (and brag about it of course) then you are a fool.

      Like


  23. Who knows if this guy is legit or not, but assuming he is, he isn’t an outlier. This is something all the libtards don’t get. Given a normal distribution curve, there are going to be significant numbers of black people with IQs above 110, even if the mean for the population is 85. They are going to be more mathematically rare than whites or asians, but given the amount of european dna in the african-american community, they aren’t outliers.

    I’m sure everyone on here knows of white people in the top 5% IQ distribution. They make up your engineers, doctors, (most) lawyers, (most) professors…the professional class. That’s probably somewhere in the ballpark of 120 and up. The top 5% for blacks may be 110 and up, which is still significantly above the white 100 average. That there are significant numbers of intelligent african americans is not inconsistent with the IQ mean being below that of whites and asians.

    Like


    • I’m gonna repeat here most of what I said above since you apparently didn’t read it. The top 5% of whites by the is those with IQ’s at 125 and above. The top 5% of blacks have IQ’s that are at or above 105-6.

      Blacks not only have a much lower mean IQ of 85 vs. the white 100, they also have somewhat narrower standard deviation or variance. La Griffe du Lion says the SD of their IQ variance is 12.5 versus 15 IQ points for whites. The two together mean that damn few blacks are really smart. I think it’s even more important for people to understand this that the different mean IQs’.

      Using Excel’s normdist statistical function (which I’ve long since set up in a spreadsheet to quickly and easily work these kinds of calculations for shiites and giggles so that all I have to do is plug in an IQ number and I get percentages of the population for blacks, white, Hispanics, NE Asians, Ask. Jews, white males and white females-same ~SD as blacks) I get these results. While 4.8% of whites have IQ’s of 125 or above, pretty much the threshold (and it helps to be a good bit higher) to be an elite level doctor or lawyer or a really top level political pundit, only 0.07% of blacks do. As for the threshold of genius at 145 (some would put it at 160), 0.14% of whites are at that level but only 0.00008% of blacks are, trace amounts, i.e. virtually none. Pretty much only in the case of one drop of black type blacks.

      However there are decent percentages of blacks who can come off decently smart. A bit less than 1% are at 115 IQ or above. 11.5% are at the white average of 100 or above.

      Like


  24. on December 6, 2011 at 3:14 pm John Norman Howard

    Lawdy, Lawdy, Lawdy, Mizz Claudy! The niggers on this site sho’ ’nuff be tiresome.

    Rastus Mahatmacoat be so good at de maths, he done squared a circle when he shoved a 2×2 up his azz.

    Like


  25. I used to read the verysmartbrothas site. They illustrate the combination of thuglife attitude and smarts applied to dating. They’re far from the chateau’s league but they got some interesting dating insights. And some hilarious posts too.

    I stopped reading it though because they are fools who believe that women’s sexual past doesn’t matter. And they are clueless about the pua teachings.

    Like


  26. even a ghetto thug needs to be beta from time to time

    Like


  27. The key to this case is *contrast*.

    Like