The Beauty Of Long Term Relationships

All the benefits of marriage, with none of the costs.





Comments


  1. Until you procreate …

    Like


  2. The having of babies interrupts the process.

    Like


  3. the law increasingly regards marriage and de facto relationships as basically the same

    Like


  4. Unless your name is Forbes Cabot Kennedy Rockefeller the Fifth and legitimacy matters for estate planning, you are better off getting married after you father a kid. At least you are sure its your kid AND she has to work out to get in shape for the wedding!

    Like


  5. Abraham–

    the law increasingly regards marriage and de facto relationships as basically the same

    In Canada after two to three years depending on the province, yes.

    In the US, no.

    Same child support=also stealth alimony. But no chance of having to pay alimony or equally divide property that’s not in both partner’s name. Except that is in the 10 or so common law marriage states – where if you don’t tell everybody you’re married but rather have lived together for 10 years, you won’t be considered married either.

    Like


  6. the law increasingly regards marriage and de facto relationships as basically the same

    Brazilian law certainly do.

    No cohabitation needed. A trip together, regular convivence even in separate households, and a split bill of any property (say, an electric oven, it doesnt have to be a car), and the judge decides your’re married, and need to suport her.

    Its the LTR hell in here.

    Like


  7. The fact that she has less security makes the sex better for longer, esp. if you have game.

    Like


  8. on June 11, 2011 at 8:43 pm flyingsquirrel

    Everybody who thinks escaping from America means your problems with women will be solved; read Rant’s comment above.

    Like


  9. Be thankful this is still America. Pre-nup and paternity testing. She don’t want ’em, don’t marry her. Frickin’ selfish gold-digger.

    Like


  10. The more leftist the country is the more hell on men it is. And the more they cater to women’s every whim and desire.

    Like


  11. on June 11, 2011 at 9:02 pm Born Again Atheist

    Every woman is a selfish gold-digging cunt. Fuck ’em all.

    Like


  12. In California it does not matter. Cohabitate and you owe palimony.

    Like


  13. Marriage is beneficial?

    Like


  14. Prenups are pretty much a thing of the past. They are too easily overturned. Prenup is a lot like a cease and desist order… it only has force if people believe in it, and no one does.

    Like


  15. Listen up guys – marry a smoking hot women that is crazy in love with you, knows how to cook, loves kids, has no baggage, has a mother that looks great at 70, no debt, shares your religion, culture, background, financial and education / intelliectual status and you have nothing to worry about. Married a fat, short, dumb, poor slut and you are screwed.

    Like


  16. Gents, wouldn’t be so blase about the safety of LTRs. For your sober contemplation:

    Quebec Appeal Court hears ‘Lola’ alimony case

    Quebec to appeal Lola common-law alimony ruling

    Like


  17. If I do decide to have kids at the age of 40 that means I have 23 years of gaming ahead of me….
    I’ll be a beast by my 30s and I’ll be able to get the best woman to father my children.
    Or Maybe I wont’ have kids at all and keep on pimping till I die

    Like


  18. We r fuked then.

    Like


  19. Prenups help too. If the woman is unwilling to sign one you know you have a gold digger.

    Prenups allow you to twist the law in your favour, away from the anti man bias it currently holds.

    Like


  20. Honestly No.

    “Long Term Relationship” even the sound of it has a temporary meaning, it’s like a temporary state, a holding pattern while waiting for something else

    “Marriage” Has finality, weight, responsibility, meaning

    If you marry well and employ game tactics to keep an upper hand over your wife, you should have a pretty good life. Not only that, but you may find a friend.

    Like


  21. Ok I’m on Facebook right now and I’m looking at some wedding photos. I’m thinking “Divorce!”

    Now my question is…If I can tell these people are going to divorce…Why can’t they?

    Here’s the photo (one of many)….

    They are saying their I Do’s and the Girl has Her Classic Smile (it’s like an evil grimacing ewok smile that’s she’s done her whole attention seeking life…I think Roissy had a post dedicated to that smile) and the man is staring at her with his lips pursed with the expression “I HATE it when she does that!”

    Then there’s another wedding photo where the guy is leaning in to her trying to be all romantic, and she’s standing there like a dead fish.

    They are not N-Sync even on their wedding day. I know why he married her…it’s the same reason why every guy in highschool dated her. Nice ass, good in bed, skinny.

    What can you say? Stupid men deserve to get a divorce. The signs are there right from the beginning people!! Just look at the photos of you two as a couple. You’ll know the answer.

    Like


  22. wow, aspies on parade…

    Like


  23. Left hand < marriage < LTR < mLTR < defacto Harm < 72 virgins

    Like


  24. Not true about cahabitation automatically resulting in spousal type support here in California.

    Like


  25. Won’t somebody think of the children?

    Like


  26. Off-topic…

    “‘Slut Walk’ Hits London Streets,” by Marie-Pierre Ferey, AFP via Yahoo! News, 11 Jun 2011
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110611/wl_uk_afp/britainprotestwomensex

    “I think it’s important that women are not seen as disposable,” a female protestor said, adding, “I never dress like this in the daytime, of course.”

    Can’t make this stuff up.

    Like


  27. In British Columbia it does not matter. Cohabitate and you owe palimony.

    Like


  28. Any body that thinks there is benefits to being married is either a woman or has never been married.

    Like


  29. sorry…that last comment was mine

    The risk of long-term relationships: forgetting, overlooking, not practicing game….

    now that I’m in one, I am noticing two things….chicks who I had previously gamed and didn’t close for whatever reason….are suddently super keen….and….make a point of acting weirdly awkward when I chat them up an my gf is nearby.

    They also seem to feel freer to completely flirt.

    When I was single and gaming them, in the cases I’m thinking, I hit a wall.

    It could have been over-gaming.

    But now that I have a cute gf, girls in my social circle are very discrete.

    In one case, a girl I gamed went on vacation. I asked her to get me something. I said I would pay her back. “Pay me back? Just take me to dinner or something” she said….

    And she made sure she didn’t bring that gift out when she knew I’d be out and about with my gf….

    The beauty of lt relationships? Access to more hot women.

    Like


  30. True story

    Like


  31. on June 12, 2011 at 3:04 am Joshua Paul

    Hey shitface, use real logic for once so we can tell you’re not mentally ill or brain damaged from all the steroids

    Like


  32. The truth is,once married,men live longer lives and women shorter ones. So long live female monogamy.

    Like


  33. on June 12, 2011 at 3:34 am Joshua Paul

    Fuck you brain damaged sociopath. Did you know that evry single alpha male trait you listed also is a trait of a sociopath? Look at the fucking diagnostic manual for mental illnesses , shitface. You fucked up my dating life. I can’t fucking believe there is anyone stupid enough to listen to your shit.

    Like


  34. JP, I gotta say, if anyone is mentally damaged, it seems to be you.

    Like


  35. Drugs are bad, m’kay?

    Like


  36. I just want to say that I am not the same person as the butthurt Joshua Paul, who who is clearly some aspy nerd who does not know what calibration is.

    Like


  37. on June 12, 2011 at 4:19 am Joshua Paul

    So you can’t find any scientific evidence to prove me wrong. Okay then, I knew you were all a bunch of reactionary losers incapable of using pure logic.

    Like


  38. lol don’t take roissy’s advice

    this is an entertainment blog

    i pity those who think what is written here is non-fiction

    Like


  39. on June 12, 2011 at 4:29 am Ryan Donovan

    I have to say that all of you need to calm down and have a cup of tea. You sexy bastard Roissy I want to bend you over my desk and fuck you hard.

    Like


  40. “Abraham

    the law increasingly regards marriage and de facto relationships as basically the same”

    True worldwide at least as a trend. In Italy feminists and communists tried that, some years ago, with the idiotic excuse of the omnipresent gay couples. The true motive was extort alimony to ex boyfriends too, not only ex husbands. Until now, the stuff was not implemented, but for sure they do not forget it.

    Like


  41. JP: My apologies.

    Joshua Paul: sorry, looks like your meds aren’t working. Try again.

    Like


  42. on June 12, 2011 at 6:26 am hauptsturmfuhrer

    For some individuals, knowledge of game may be too much to handle. It seems like Joshua Paul is a prime specimen.

    I’m sorry you couldn’t handle it, Joshua.

    Do you, by any chance, have asperger’s syndrome?

    Like


  43. When you say LTR do you mean de-facto (living together) or separate dwellings?

    In Australia, de-facto relationships greater than 2 years are subject to the same property settlement laws as marriage.

    http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Families_NewDeFactoPropertyRegime?open&query=de%20facto%20property#d1

    Like


  44. Listen to this nerd…

    Like


  45. “All the benefits of marriage, with none of the costs.”

    Some of the benefits of marriage, with some of the costs. You don’t get the increased social status of being married, and depending on where you live you may have to support the woman after a split. In some places men have even had to pay alimony to their mistresses.

    [Editor: This is only because the elites, and the legal apparatus they control, recognize that loving but unmarried and thus legally unbound LTRs are a serious threat to the indentured beta male servitude that scaffolds the social order through the institution of marriage.
    i.e. they know a dangerously enticing alternative when they see it.]

    Like


  46. @ London slut walk

    Can’t believe that is still going on. If I leave my keys in my front door when I leave the house I’d expect to take some of the blame if I returned to find the door wide open and everything missing. Why has a policeman telling people to take as many precautions as possible caused such a fuss?

    Like


  47. @Joshua Paul

    Simple really bro, Men in good health, who are financially secure, have a good quality of life and with good genetics are much more attractive marriage material. These same factors also increase life expectancy.

    How many of those unmarried guys are incarcerated/criminally insane, homeless, drug addicted, mentally ill, disabled or just plain died in a car accident or war etc before reaching a marriageable age/stage of life?

    Like


  48. on June 12, 2011 at 8:14 am j4cksincl4ir

    Cuckold investigated by the police after he posts information on his wife’s hypergamous affair online. Now freedom of speech is sacrificed for women’s romantic and materialist imperatives.

    ‘Cuckold’ case will test the limits of the internet

    Plumber whose wife had a 10-year affair was investigated by an elite serious crime unit and faces charges for pursuing his grievances online

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/12/puddick-harassment-internet-law

    Like


  49. on June 12, 2011 at 8:31 am j4cksincl4ir

    I know of two people to insist on pre-nups – both were women.

    Like


  50. Laugh out loud at Joshua Paul. Modeling your behavior on antisocial personality disorders is actually a pretty good way to achieve success if you aren’t a thin skinned little bitch. Antisocial behaviors including superficial charm are considered attractive by women. Low anxiety and low remorse also reflect qualities that women love in a man. However actually having an antisocial personality disorder can be crippling to long term success, which is why often you’ll meet some guy who can get 40 phone numbers a night and makes out with hotties all the time but only ever ends up dating ugly chicks or old women. They lack the interpersonal skills to keep high quality pussy interested.

    There is a huge difference between an actual psycho and the DSM diagnosis of one. Mainly because psychologists are wildly incompetent, and have the highest rate of unemployment from any of the mental and physical health disciplines that land you with a Dr. before your last name.

    From the Hare Psychopathy Checklist wiki.

    “Among laypersons and professionals, there is much confusion about the meanings and differences between psychopathy, sociopathy, antisocial personality disorder, and the ICD 10 diagnosis, dissocial personality disorder. Hare takes the stance that psychopathy as a syndrome should be considered distinct from the DSM-IV’s antisocial personality disorder construct, even though ASPD and psychopathy were intended to be equivalent in the DSM-IV. However, those who created the DSM-IV felt that there was too much room for subjectivity on the part of clinicians when identifying things like remorse and guilt; therefore, the DSM-IV panel decided to stick to observable behavior, namely socially deviant behaviors.

    As a result, the diagnosis of ASPD is something that the “majority of criminals easily meet.” Hare goes further to say that the percentage of incarcerated criminals that meet the requirements of ASPD is somewhere between 80 to 85 percent, whereas only about 20% of these criminals would qualify for a diagnosis of what Hare’s scale considers to be a psychopath. This twenty percent, according to Hare, accounts for 50 percent of all the most serious crimes committed, including half of all serial and repeat rapists.”

    In summary, behave antisocially to succeed short term, and behave like a human being occasionally to keep them interested.

    Cry more troll.

    Like


  51. What happened to this perfectly reasonable post and thread? Where are the normal men who usually post here?

    Like


  52. Joshua Paul is just trolling and testing the community here =p

    It was just a matter of time until someone would arise to dump all blame of his fuckedup life on this website..

    Like


  53. Another cool dude, like the writer of this blog.

    Like


  54. joshua,

    women cream for sociopaths. if you tried following heartsie’s advice but it ruined your dating life, it’s because you weren’t sociopathic enough.

    be a man – figure out what exactly you did wrong, correct it and try again. whining about failure and blaming others is what little girls do.

    Like


  55. Around 2005, I created a comic “contract to be involved with me.” It was 100% joke, but I handed it to women I dated, friends I hung out with (male and female) and people I did business transactions with. It’s basically a relationship “pre-nup” and I constantly think about resurrecting it and making people sign it in front of a notary.

    Some parts:

    Friends: “Don’t ask me for a deal at my businesses. Paying full price allows me to spend time with my friends and pay my staff. Don’t you hate doing work for your boss’s friends?”

    Women: “I expect you to be on consistent birth control. If you get pregnant, I consider it fraudulent and expect a lump sum payment of $50,000 for the theft of my seed.”

    Business: “Don’t ask for a deal unless you’re ready to close on it. The price goes up quickly.”

    Etc, etc. It might not hold up in court, but at least it puts out there what I expect — and what the penalties are for violating the contract.

    I am very specific about not saying “my girlfriend” about any woman I date. I trust the law as far as I can throw a lawyer — and one can never keep up on changes to it. If a woman wants to be my girlfriend, officially, she better earn a load of cash, not carry debt and not have addictive behavior. That’s 1 in 10,000, so a rare bird indeed.

    Like


  56. Really, chicks dig psychopaths… hypergamy knows no restraint or consequnces. It’s all fun and games until someone gets their liver eaten with fava beans and a nice chianti.

    Like


  57. P.S. Joshua Paul, chill and get a life… it’s just a blog.

    Like


  58. in ontario, after either 3 years of cohabitation without a child or any relationship of some permanence with a child, rights to spousal support arise. property division rights (i.e. half his shit made during the marriage) don’t – the spouse must sue based on common law trust doctrines. rights to child support of course arise independent of marital status.

    Like


  59. azuzuru said: “Incredible…

    http://www.doccool.com/cheated-on-husband-for-better-genes/

    Damn. She’s just a… like Santa said, “Ho! Ho! Ho!”

    Wants hubby’s bank, but get bred by two different alpha dudes, and lovin’ it.

    Like


  60. Have to disagree with this one. Just watch a few episodes of “Judge Judy” to see how costly “none of the costs” can be.

    Like


  61. on June 12, 2011 at 1:55 pm The Specimen

    @vivi

    Nobody’s condoning rape anymore than they’re condoning muggings. The idea is be smart and don’t put yourself in bad situations. You don’t see any guys marching for their right to walk down dark alleys in the dead of night in custom suits and not get robbed.

    Like


  62. Got bored again, therefore it’s time for another over-analytical comment. (Day off. Deal with it.) Except I’ll kick-off with what I’m simply inclined to say on a knee-jerk reaction:

    Just look at Lebron. Dishonorable approach to sports; respectable treatment of women. His 9-year baby mama remains strictly his committed (“down-ass” if you will) girlfriend. The man’s apparently well aware of how risky and impractical marriage would be for him. He’s clearly got a strong handle on the proper way to deal wit deez bidges. (Hm… unless the rumor about Rashard Lewis and James’s girl is true, although it evidently isn’t.)

    But after more thought, what I honestly will say:

    The true greatest benefit of marriage is that it enables the flourishing of civilization* while the majority of men unite out of defense for the fragile fruit of each’s own refreshing, lifelong-assured feminine loyalty. Once inherently open-ended/voidable LTRs replace marriage, men (rightly) will grow distrusting and demotivated as they lose the virtual social guarantee of familial legacy that’s necessary in order for them to move en masse, beyond intrasexual competition, and inevitably into the self-sacrificial labor required for building sustainable high-culture and death-facing armies. (E.g.: the Jews (sans armies, that is); post-Renaissance Christian Europe; early-/mid-20th century, Industrial, WW1-through-WW2 America; the movie 300; etc. ad infinitum.) Plus, as we all intuitively know, untamed hypergamy destroys fraternity. (See: a club; a bar; a co-ed school; the existence of the AMOG; Mystery Method; etc. ad nauseam.) And the fact is: labor minus fraternity is mind-numbingly painful, depressing, and beta-inducing. (See: your job.)

    In consequence of the sexual market-transition, due to these tragic truths, both the economy and military will collapse as swiftly as the backbones of the now-emasculated ex-men. Cultural achievement & governmental authority will fall about as low as the general opinion & sexual attraction a majority of women will have toward their dispirited natural leaders. Society’s former-“ladies” will finally drop their ill-humored commitments to a masculine creative power that they could only embrace after they’d dropped their red-laced thongs to fleeting fashions that bore illusory strength of elusive style. Soon enough, any naively persistent present-“gentleman’s” marriage is divorced from all sex in toto. Ultimately, our beautiful, beloved and fancy freedom is divorced by & from its sole protection.

    My fundamental point is that, eventually, you will get what you pay for. Well, unless — as many morons must repeatedly learn — you indiscriminately toss out the money for anyone or anything. With the promise & expectation of returns you don’t get. And never will get, if you fail to enforce reimbursement, ending up actually paying for just, say, some self-righteous, politically-correct public image.

    With a corrective reflection on recent bank disasters, men simply have no interest in approving LTRs over marriage; and that’s precisely because modern bitches are gluttonously demanding such obese figures to back up and foolishly compensate for their “independent”, still-unfounded credit worth (while willfully ignorant of its poor collective history). A society that rightly encourages marriage empowers a man and woman; but one that mostly advocates LTRs will gradually come to empower a woman alone. The parallels are tragically ridiculous, yet hard to deny: LTR-acceptance would ultimately be tantamount to either our state’s perpetual give-away of stolen handouts (i.e., self-aggrandizing charity for the elite), or its recent redistribution of socialistic bailouts (i.e., flaunting of the elitists’ power to charm the rest into forgiveness while re-investing in their “all-inclusive, now-reformed” ways). Men, please, stop falling for and imprudently maintaining pretty lies. Or blindly perish.

    *I mean, obviously, patriarchal civilization, i.e., the only tenable** sort.
    **Either argumentatively or militarily.

    Like


  63. Off Topic P.S.: Perhaps you’ve seen the following story in the news, Roissy.

    http://www.truecrimereport.com/2011/06/angela_voelkert_tries_to_frame.php

    At the least, he deserves our recognition and respect. I say he’s a candidate for some kind of site-award. (I first read about the case after seeing it headlined on AOL’s new, more-deviously-Leftist HuffPost, which initially valorized the ex-wife before being compelled later to attach an update explaining how the man’s only real “crime” was to be more clever than his comically predictable ex.)

    Like


  64. on June 12, 2011 at 2:17 pm FirstComment

    I find it surprising that this blog hasn’t discussed the Weiner brouhaha, leading me to believe that Weiner reads this blog and had consulted in the past with the author of this blog concerning game and that the author of this blog promised to never mention him on the blog.

    Like


  65. Long time lurker, 1st time poster. I have to say thanks for this site.

    Quote from London SlutWalk:
    Several men joined the protest, among them Andy Fell, a 27-year-old sound engineer.
    “I came to show my solidarity with my girlfriend, and with the issue as well,” he said.

    – sounds like a beta-provider. Not sure if he is in possession of his own balls

    Like


  66. Don’t worry, butthurt Joshua Paul. This blog will end once Roissy/Chateau/Heartiste gets married.

    Like


  67. I donno man, to much getting away with something in that thought. What are you running from? Cmon, I know you can outtalk any woman in her marriage traps, kid traps, whatever.

    Like


  68. @born again – “Every woman is a selfish gold-digging cunt. Fuck ‘em all.”

    Do you mean like literally fuck em all? Cuz wow, that’s quite a goal, I’m impressed.

    @Doug

    In Canada it can be considered legal as early as six months but for sure by 1 year. I will never marry because I want to the sex to be good forever…call me selfish.

    Like


  69. *the sex to be good forever. (I was so excited to be typing about sex I tripped my fingers over my keyboard)

    Like


  70. Hey Vivi, there was a chick here walking home at 3AM a couple of weeks ago and had the misfortune to find a baseball bat upside her head and her purse stolen. Apparently he wasn’t stopping the beating until she played dead. Even though she SHOULD be safe WALKING ALONE at that time, chances caught up with her. So it goes with the women who dress slutty. Sure they won’t get attacked or raped but when everything falls into place, the starts are aligned or whatever, they might find themselves on the wrong end.

    Like


  71. Pippa is single.

    Like


  72. Vivi, it’s a person’s own responsibility to do everything in their power to prevent harm coming to themselves. That includes NOT walking along at 3 in the morning and also NOT dressing like a slut. Until feminist and women realize that they are responsible for their own well being, they’re going to get hurt. Especially as they continue to burn bridges with men and those same men do nothing to help them out. That’s your warning and you better realize that no amount of laws or police can save women all the time.

    Women are playing with fire and they’re going to get burned.

    Like


  73. Vivi, last I heard it’s illegal to beat someone with a ball bat in the head. Tell that to the perp in the article as he didn’t run away when finished, but casually just walked off.

    Laws are there as a form of punishment but in no way should anyone depend on them as a way of prevention.

    Like


  74. on June 12, 2011 at 5:18 pm Emma the Emo

    Not living in the same apartment also helps. Less opportunity to drive each other nuts.

    Like


  75. Wow.

    77 comments for a “2+2=4” quality post.

    Nothing like just phoning it in…

    Like


  76. Azuzuru, thanks for that link. The anonymous adulteress interviewed there is methodical and rational in her amoral justification for her behavior, not unlike Patrick Bateman. If she were male, she would be a serial killer and/or rapist.

    Like


  77. on June 12, 2011 at 6:06 pm majestimomo

    Being that comments are closed on the posting, “Black Men, White Women”…I shall have to post my belated comment cheerio my dear…allow, hmmm?

    Quick descript/background: African American Female of Creole descent New Orleans, La. cute, petite, thick super curly kinky hair in a funky ‘fro…5’1 100 lbs, light tan color (not mixed per textbook definition), dancer’s body, intellect’s mind, urban soul…housewife married to tall, dark brown, thick lipped, muscular, ex-football playing, black man…blue collar, breadwinning, comedian father, thuggish appearance, teddy bear soul, tats on face, squeaky clean background, heavy urban “street” accent/dialect, friend to any “real man” of any race.

    Oh, honey bunny, we just read this retort together…and though my hubby just smirked and grunted a bit…I thinketh me can sum up what we both thought of it! yay me!!!:)

    White men: talk too much! your brain is just thinking and thinking and complexing and analyzing and coming up with just the most clever way to rape, swallow and then regurgitate the english language. every.single.one. we come across, from our friends to the tight ass manger at the local walgreens, white men, talketh tooeth mucheth! we get it, you have a freaking super awesome grasp of the english language and you intertwine it with your references to 1800s literature and the recent southpark episode followed by the crass and ludicrous spin on the human psyche with just a hint of the satanic spewing of an atheist trapped in a protestants body! Oh my!!! All those words come across such awesomely thin lips…unless, of course, your lips happen to be full, then you will pout them often while you shake your bangs off to a sideswept…and that, my dear is why. but you get it from your mothers. so its okay. just please, don’t shoot a room of innocent people just because you cant talk your current physician into filling or refilling the prescription of your liking. *wink*

    Black men: when you are placed on the exact same footing as…and when i witness a competition between, and in any sector, of any aspect…if the footing is equal…you excel…with absolutely no hidden mommy issues, and without such thinly veiled biases that your whatever you do reek of resentment…its just your beautiful truth and ability…and oh how i respect that my dears…you know, the good ones…the great ones…the ones that make them want to shoot up a room…ahhh, how lucky we are to get you…how lucky i am to have mine.

    Susan bakos: i live in a community out in Vail, Az…98.9% anglo….so I believe you that your options are truly open because most of the wives in this neighborhood look something like you. It only takes one to live amongst a bunch of white folks to know that the majority of the “wives” look not much better than Ms. bakos. so if you or your kind happen upon a white man such as the author of this peachy wordpress, forgive him his words of hate toward all of the average, stocky, thin lipped, pale, blase’ white women…as 80% of you are much like yourself my dear…though roissy would have us believe that “us white men only go after hot babes so thats why you are with black men…cause we wont have ya! no we just wont have ya!” it is not true…just imagine this country in roissy’s mind with mostly attractive white women being chosen by privileged (though talkative) white men, leaving the picked over average and below average ones to the likes of non-whites…in that world, almost no whites would have mothers. you are forgiven, by a black female, my dear.

    Black women: we all fear you. even me. as a black woman. i behave myself around you. i would never let you see my slipping. i know your standards and i know…i cant fool you with all the clever words in the world. and thats exactly why most of you (us) dont go for white men.

    ouch. i know. i sowwy.

    ps: bakos hurt your feelings, i know…she made you feel like, “how dare that cow! why she isn’t even pretty…how dare her insult our white manliness and lift a black man aboveth us!”…and with all the college level thought you put into your super clever post…it all boiled down to another white boy calling a woman fat and ugly. and i bet you thought you’d get “sistahs” to side with you on this rant? not the ones like me…the ones whom you’d never be so lucky to come into contact with. not the ones you quickly compartmentalize within your dimwitted brain as ghetto ugly fat and easily discarded. just think of my hubby and i as the next door neighbor version of will and jada smith…the type of blacks you quickly smile and avert your eyes from as you pretend we never existed.

    Like


  78. on June 12, 2011 at 6:35 pm Emma the Emo

    Vivi,
    Yeah, rape is a crime and the rapist is to blame. Blaming the victim is not gonna help catch the criminal, or make the trauma better. A woman being dressed like a slut doesn’t justify rape. But knowing this won’t make me feel safe walking around alone late at night, dressed in a revealing dress and jewelry. What’s wrong with telling people to be more careful for their own sake? It’s about prevention, not about whom to blame afterards.

    Like


  79. What was the point of this post?

    A question of LTR?Im lost.

    Like


  80. I have noticed that I can go weeks without checking this blog and not miss anything noteworthy.

    Like


  81. (point being, it didn’t used to be that way)

    Like


  82. Honestly, Half Sigma said what was on my mind: http://www.halfsigma.com/2011/06/the-myth-of-the-high-divorce-rate.html

    Main points: more educated, higher IQ non-prole people have much lower divorce rates even in the United States. Go overseas and you will see many examples of societies with intact marriages. Not perfect, but somehow plenty of people make it work.

    So really… if you are talking solely in terms of financial cost where a wife takes half your income in palimony, ect, then this statement only makes sense for those from a lower class background or who seek lower class women.

    [Editor: Proles aren’t the only ones affected by divorce theft. 15% is still too high to risk on something for which there is a pleasant alternative that is cost-free.]

    Like


  83. no hot 9-10 who is sane/mature/conservative would agree to such an arrangement. intelligent and sane women know perfectly well that their beauty is fleeting and would never squander it on a feckless man afraid/unwilling to get married. I spend lots of time having frank discussions with quality 19-25 year old women and they only want one thing and loathe men who take them for a ride.

    Like


  84. Rant Casey is right. The socialists who control Brazil have pretty much decided to make men second class citizens. Even SMS can be used against males.

    Oh, and the child doesn’t even have to be yours in order for you to pay. There is this one incident in which the DNA has shown that the kid belonged to another man, but even so, the guy was forced BY THE FREAKING LAW to pay forit.

    What’s more, the woman/girl/slut may be receiving the money WHILE NOT LIVING WITH THE KIDS for whom the money suposedly is.

    Brazilian people are very socially conservative but the socialists control the machine.

    Like


  85. whiskey

    In California it does not matter. Cohabitate and you owe palimony.

    Wrong as usual.

    Cohabitate in California and you have some small risk of being deemed to owe “palimony”.

    What California did in the palimony Lee Marvin case back in the 70s was to decided that pillow talk oral promises of taking care of a woman for the rest of her life, created an obligation to do that through alimony, if the jury could be convinced that promise had been made. There haven’t been many successful palimony cases since the Lee Marvin one. Though it is something divorce lawyers representing women use to get settlements from rich men in California.

    If you very simply put in writing that whatever you say or is claimed you say in the heat of desire, you don’t make any such promises you each intend to have legally enforced, and that’s mutually agreed until this is changed in mutually signed writing, you should be ok in Cali.

    Consult a Cali attorney. But this is the general idea.

    The point is the Lea Marvin decision was essentially a contract one, that was yes feminist motivated. But that’s the hook in anglo saxon common law they used.

    Like


  86. Somethings are worth risking. : )

    Like


  87. “intellect’s mind” – pretty much says it all about that troll.

    Like


  88. “All the benefits of marriage, with none of the costs.”

    That is a rather naiive statement.

    Perhaps not as potentially costly as marriage can be but as a wise man once said.

    The sex you pay for usually ends up costing you less.

    Like


  89. you’re common law married in colorado after two weeks of cohabitation & a joint checking account.

    Like


  90. hmm said: “you’re common law married in colorado after two weeks of cohabitation & a joint checking account.”

    No joint checking accounts then… separate finances, woman!

    Like


  91. @Rollory: Agreed, but as long as GBFM is still posting in the comments, there is still hope.

    Like


  92. I know of a guy who is a very successfull businessman in Melbourne Australia who apparently got around having to pay out his former wife because he had already been paying her as an employee of his company.

    Smart move when you think about it, even if was paying her 100k per year and they were married some 10 – 15 years, it only cost him (his company) $1-1.5 mil over that time.
    Sound like a bargain compared to what he could have paid had it been a typical payout decided by the Family Law Court.

    Like


  93. In the (Lee) Marvin v (Michelle) Marvin case in CA, the posters have it wrong. The first case was decided by the CA supreme Court in 1976. It reversed the trial court’s decision in favor of Lee but only to the extent that a new trial was permitted. In the second trial, the lower court awarded Michelle $104,000 whic was reversed on appeal in 1981. Not only did Michelle get nothing, she had to pay the 1981 appeal’s costs.

    Now, those are facts. You could look them up.

    Like


  94. A book for y’all…

    http://www.amazon.com/When-Women-Cheat-infidelity-jealousy/dp/1456343246/

    When Women Cheat: A Book About Infidelity, Female Power, Jealousy and the Modern Beta Males, by David Nicosia Longhi

    Says the bottom of the back cover: “The traditional ideals of love such a fidelity, coupledom and loyalty are often dashed against the rocks of brutal reality– with lies, deceit, lack of validation and infidelity. What if you were told that women are encouraged to neither need nor want to be monogamous. That the modern man is actually in the same drawer as the men who willingly become cuckolds. That the women is the alpha and the man is the beta? That mainstream thought for future generations will be that eternal love does not exist and that fidelity is about being true to yourself and your own desires rather than to your partner.”

    He’s from Denmark where things are a little farther gone than they are here in the States but not by much.

    Like


  95. @what

    Somethings are worth risking. : )

    What, what? What what what?

    @aoefe

    *the sex to be good forever. (I was so excited to be typing about sex I tripped my fingers over my keyboard)

    Try the real thing instead of daydreaming abou tit.
    As for your not getting married, you have your hamster well oiled. Sure thing, rationalize as much as you please to get over the fact no one in these times will marry you.

    Like


  96. @majestimomo

    Try Zulu next time, instead of English. Perhaps it would read better.

    Like


  97. Brazil, boy, what a basket case! There was even a movie made by that same name. The topic was slightly different but the common denominator was present–derangement.

    You guys there in BR, can you do something about them lefties? People shoot horses too.

    Like


  98. aoefebuttox,

    If you get excited by that, I have a treat for you.

    It will be your honor to…..

    ……(wait for it, wait for it)……..

    Detox my Buttox.

    As it is summer, you will be using a lavender essence, along with Nordic Mist.

    Now quit talksin’ and start detoxin…..

    Like


  99. Upper message to aoefebuttox from GasButtox.

    Like


  100. Girly Girl, there are lies, damn lies and statistics. The methodology in that piece is flawed, and I predict that in 5-10 years, there will be almost no difference, the rates would read nearly the same across social strata.

    This happened several times throughout the human history. Hypergamy full runner. It always ended in a full unadulterated disaster. My pet theory is that it was always the surviving women that pushed the most for the patriarchal society paradigm.

    These women weren’t usually from the upper class (priestesses and other lech types). Rugged women that were not afraid to get their hands dirty n that understood the meaning of “I have your back”.. The “educated” women tend to absorb bullshit with no filters whatsoever. And bullshit they were fed, during the last 50-60 years. They can rationalize as they want, but they live on a borrowed time.

    Like


  101. What happened to this blog? Two years ago it was the hottest thing on the internet. Now its dying a slow death. Looks like the host lost interest in it.

    Like


  102. [email protected]

    no hot 9-10 who is sane/mature/conservative would agree to such an arrangement. intelligent and sane women know perfectly well that their beauty is fleeting and would never squander it on a feckless man afraid/unwilling to get married. I spend lots of time having frank discussions with quality 19-25 year old women and they only want one thing and loathe men who take them for a ride.

    Yes, you are correct that men and women have competing sexual agendas. But if you are looking to make accurate descriptions of how reality is, and not trying to create powerful proscriptions on how reality should be, then you’ll note that men often win the battle of the sexes, and do take sane/mature/conservative nines and tens for a ride. We call those guys alpha males.

    Like


  103. Rollory

    I have noticed that I can go weeks without checking this blog and not miss anything noteworthy.

    I was amazed at the run of consistent quality while it lasted. I’ve always understood that the muse doesn’t stick around for long. That it stuck for the few good years here was an amazing anomaly.

    Here’s hoping the muse isn’t a monty python parrot, and is really just resting.

    Like


  104. @majestimomo

    did you mean to say the following?

    “white men: Thanks for this internet medium of communication, the english language that i speak, the blue collar jobs you created for my family, the sports you created and also the wealth you created to make these trivial pursuits profitable for dumb blacks, thank you for creating safe societies for us to live in(and sorry for ruining them!) and thanks for the slave trade to bring us to these sweeter shores….”

    ^^Any comment disparaging white men from a nigger, really should pre-fixed by the above statement.

    Like


  105. better yet, if you want the comments disparaging white men to hold any weight, they need to be made directly from Africa.

    Like


  106. on June 13, 2011 at 7:14 am I came back after two years and ...

    … What the holy hell has happened in the comments section? How has this place gone from a lively, rollicking peanut gallery to Jr. Spearhead Spectrum Fest?

    Oh no.

    Like


  107. Cadnerd
    @what
    Somethings are worth risking. : )
    “What, what? What what what?”

    Cadnerd,

    what? what? what? !!! hahha!! what what? lol!!

    Like


  108. on June 13, 2011 at 7:27 am six pack joe

    you guy associate lefty countries with hell for men. sorry… visit scandinavia and their liberal policies, then effortless be picked by a hot blonde girl and we talk about it again.

    Like


  109. six pack joe, yea, Assange could tell a story or two about that. God forbid that you’d go by some mistake to Malmo, you may be picked easily by an entirely different group of people, for entirely different reasons.

    As one Sverige politician declared: “We think that if we are nice to them, they may be nice to us as we age”.

    Hahaha, dream on!

    Like


  110. Which is why a cunning woman shouldn’t move in with a man until they are at least engaged.

    Like


  111. You suck Roissy. Start making decent posts again.

    Like


  112. I say eat da poo poo!

    Like


  113. on June 13, 2011 at 9:13 am John Norman Howard

    Lawdy, the nigger-babble on this site!

    Like


  114. Haha, Hanibal and Ice tea have the best quotes!

    Like


  115. Note, there was a famous Chateau post that said that LTRs could mostly only go up to the woman’s 30th birthday after which the man just has to let go of her, for her own sake, so a really good beta provider would still want her (and usually because she would have set the deadline of his fishing or cutting bait by her 30th birthday).

    That was one of the more profound posts I’ve read here.

    What it means long term is that an alpha is doomed to gaming the nurses at the old age home (he isn’t doomed to not having children because that is a matter not necessarily related to getting married).

    I’ve seen it done. Contrary to what feminists and White Knighters will tell you, an older guy who stays in shape (think John Travolta or Steven Segall) can keep attracting beautiful women at least into his 60s (after which cash is accepted).

    My uncle died of a heart attack at age 75 in a college dormitory. He died after having “over-exercised” long before he needed a nursing home. He was married but he didn’t have to be. It looks like he could have gotten along just fine if my aunt had just been his best friend, maid and cook.

    Like


  116. on June 13, 2011 at 10:14 am A. Nonny.mous

    In other news, why feminists fear paternity testing: http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/uniform_commitment/

    Army paratrooper gets child support removed because he is NOT the father (read down, it’s an anecodte in the article). Lucky Ken.

    Like


  117. Note my uncle had the wife and (grown) kids and the villa, but he still died in bed with someone else, on a cheap dorm cot in a cheap dorm room he’d have slept in when he was in the Army 57 years before.

    Like


  118. But if you are looking to make accurate descriptions of how reality is, and not trying to create powerful proscriptions on how reality should be, then you’ll note that men often win the battle of the sexes, and do take sane/mature/conservative nines and tens for a ride. We call those guys alpha males.
    >>>

    a sucker is born every minute. generally the women who get victimized are dating men out of their league or immature in the long shot hopes he’ll settle. so they are rolling the dice. i don’t like this because 9/10 conservative girls will date men beneath their level if they think this one is marriage potential. I’d rather marry a much younger 9-10 than swap 8-9’s for years in deadend emotional black hole relationships. Being single is like going to a casino…. what matters is knowing when to leave the table when you are up. If you get a girl out of your league who loves you… and you aren’t getting any better, lose the manic single boy nihilistic edge and tie the knot.

    Like


  119. I would hope the married guys here at least got someone “out of their league” that remains, after all these years, “out of their league”. And preferably she’d have a gorgeous mother still looking great in a bathing suit in her sixties.

    My experience is that fading looks take the younger woman back “into his league” within a few years.

    The casino analogy compares chips, the value of which doesn’t fade, with women, who’s sexual value does (best friend value can be utilized without marriage).

    Also, especially reading blogs like this, a man is actually going to be getting better than he’s ever got, possibly well into his 60s. I’ve had better sex in the past year than in any of the previous 30 years. If I’d gotten married before reading this blog, then maybe I’d be hanging out here with “buyers remorse” trying to rationalize my previous decision by trying to tell readers “don’t look at what’s behind that curtain. It couldn’t be as great as what I’ve got now”. Maybe I would have swallowed an ideology that says I did the right thing “for the big picture”.

    Over time, your game as a single needs to get better, but it probably will. Other resources need to be accumulated, but they probably will. Knowledge needs to be accumulated, but it probably will.

    Like


  120. If you get a girl out of your league who loves you… and you aren’t getting any better, lose the manic single boy nihilistic edge and tie the knot.

    No.

    The anonymous that you were replying to is me. If women didn’t age, your advice might make some sense. As their age affects their dating value more negatively than it does to men, it is not helpful advice. That’s like telling me with options to take a loss, otherwise you won’t respect them.

    There are guys who date virgin girls way out of their league, for the best years of their lives, then move on. There are loads of them. Reality is like that.

    That’s my reality.

    I like it like that. I’ll keep doing that as long as I can.

    Because I can.

    Like


  121. The “woman” making the claims in the cheating for better genes piece is clearly a man having some fun trolling the forum in question in that piece. No woman would ever be able to lay out a logical argument to defend their being a whore.

    Like


  122. @Xsplat

    There are guys who date virgin girls way out of their league, for the best years of their lives, then move on. There are loads of them. Reality is like that.

    That’s my reality.

    Exactly.

    If a married guy counters with “but you could start looking old or get hurt and end up in a wheelchair and then no woman, much less a cutie, will want your creepy ass” just take a look at this video:

    Game can counter even being a paraplegic.

    Of course, a man doesn’t want to lose his voice.

    Like


  123. White Knighters reading the Daily Mail dominate the voting up or down of comments on this article about a slut cuckolding her husband with his brother, a famous British footballer:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2002655/Ryan-Giggs-gave-Natasha-500-abort-lovechild-married-brother-Rhodri.html

    Like


  124. The Specimen

    The idea is be smart and don’t put yourself in bad situations. You don’t see any guys marching for their right to walk down dark alleys in the dead of night in custom suits and not get robbed.

    Yep – be smart.
    Funny how
    I can walk around in a $3000 suit
    and NOT be robbed…in areas where whites predominate.

    Like


  125. A lot of problems just go back to the fact that we have old and new systems running in parallel. It’s Sex and the City for women and alphas, duty and puritanism for betas. Like a lot of people that post on these blogs, I think the old system was much better but either the new or the old would be preferable to the hybrid system we have now. A women can walk away from her marriage at any time for any reason. She can cheat on her husband and still divvy up his assets and receive alimony. Women don’t have any skin in the game anymore, it’s zero risk, all benefit. Maybe it’s time to do away with marriage and child support entirely. Just flush any and all coercion out of the system entirely. Women could be completely free to do what they want but they would also bear all responsibility for any decisions. Most men will voluntarily invest in their biological family, for most men this will vary according to how they are treated and some men won’t invest at all. Women will then have a strong incentive to choose wisely and treat their men well.

    Like


  126. A lot of problems just go back to the fact that we have old and new systems running in parallel. It’s Sex and the City for women and alphas, duty and puritanism for betas. Like a lot of people that post on these blogs, I think the old system was much better but either the new or the old would be preferable to the hybrid system we have now. A women can walk away from her marriage at any time for any reason. She can cheat on her husband and still divvy up his assets and receive alimony. Women don’t have any skin in the game anymore, it’s zero risk, all benefit. Maybe it’s time to do away with marriage and child support entirely. Just flush any and all coercion out of the system entirely. Women could be completely free to do what they want but they would also bear all responsibility for any decisions. Most men will voluntarily invest in their biological family, for most men this will vary according to how they are treated and some men won’t invest at all. Women will then have a strong incentive to choose wisely and treat their men well.

    Like


  127. tyrone evil

    Like


  128. Aaron
    …do away with marriage and child support entirely. Just flush any and all coercion out of the system entirely. Women …would also bear all responsibility for any decisions.

    Now there’s some really neat, practical ideas. When Hell freezes over, don’t forget to wish for a million dollars a year – Hope and Change, and that free health care.

    Like


  129. Firepower you’re right, it is damn near utopian. But perhaps pushing for this would make society rethink the double standards they are trying cram down our throats. All of these changes are always framed as freedom or liberation or whatever. What about freedom for us? I’m sympathetic to social conservatism but maybe its time is over and it just needs to bite the dust. Women are just not going to go back into the kitchen so we need a true free for all, rather than the selective anarchy that we have now.

    Like


  130. @Aaron
    a male birth control pill will get us there. No baby no CS. No need for marriage with women trying to normalize slut for girls. (slut walk) Pump and dump a new a younger model will be coming tomorrow. ” You like that one?” pump longer and in more holes and take pictures. New model will be along shortly.

    Like


  131. Off-topic, but the so-called “Slutwalks” have been making the news in England over the past two days. Large numbers of women, many of them sponsored or agitpropped by the Socialist Workers’ Party (yep), parading through the streets of London and Manchester dressed like whores to assert their right to do so without being raped.

    The whole thing is a farce. No reasonable man or woman believes that a woman deserves to be raped because she is dressed provocatively. I don’t believe anyone has ever made this argument. What they have said is that male sexual urges being what they are (not to mention the effects of alcohol), if women do dress like whores then they are likelier to put themselves in danger than if they dress modestly.

    What the hell goes on in women’s brains (rhetorical question round here, I know)? Saying that things ARE a certain way is not the same as saying they SHOULD BE that way. Do they really not understand that? I don’t walk through the ghetto yelling into my iPhone and flashing my Rolex because that significantly increases my chances of being relieved of said items. Doesn’t give anyone a right to rob me, but it makes it likelier to happen. So for my own good I modify my behaviour.

    Pah. Of course they understand this perfectly – they just want to the centre of attention for a day.

    Like


  132. Roissy,

    Random question to you and anybody concerned: is Gerard Butler alpha?

    Like


  133. greyghost, I dunno I kind of like the idea of having children. I also don’t like the idea of demographic collapse. Plus this kind of niche thing doesn’t quite seem to be doing the job as far as social transformation. After all condoms are a sort of male pill and we’ve had those for a while.

    Like I pointed out before, it would be huge leap from where we are now, but who knows it could happen. At a minimum, this whole proposal could be a thought experiment to use against feminists, sort of by pushing their own liberation thing to a universal level.

    Think about the benefits, you could stay with a girl, raise a family with her but be secure in the knowledge that if things get bad you can always walk and the worst she can do to you is walk (but not take your money). It’s caveman 2.0. Condoms don’t offer this now and I don’t think the male pill would either.

    Like


  134. Aaron

    Firepower you’re right, it is damn near utopian. But perhaps pushing for this would make society rethink the double standards they are trying cram down our throats.

    You’re being nice, so I’ll just simply tell you that you and your vision won’t get off that easy.
    You’ll have to rely on your own special interest group to get to that hallowed place you envision. No rival group will make it easy.and help you; in fact, they’re gonna make it HARD and you’ll have to get dirty. Maybe even earn a guilty conscience.

    There will be no more polite niceties in the escape hatches of “perhaps” and “woulds” where you’re going.

    Like


  135. “Any body that thinks there is benefits to being married is either a woman or has never been married.”

    So simple, yet so profound.

    Like


  136. Anonymous–

    In the (Lee) Marvin v (Michelle) Marvin case in CA, the posters have it wrong. The first case was decided by the CA supreme Court in 1976. It reversed the trial court’s decision in favor of Lee but only to the extent that a new trial was permitted. In the second trial, the lower court awarded Michelle $104,000 whic was reversed on appeal in 1981. Not only did Michelle get nothing, she had to pay the 1981 appeal’s costs.

    Thanks for that.

    However the Supreme Court’s providing for a retrial rather than a dismissal suggests that a palimony type oral promise would be enforced if it was believed. That she ended up getting nothing suggests it’ll be hard to get juries to believe such claims.

    As I said a simple written agreement that no promises of support after breakup or a splitting of separately held property is agreed to, and further the can’t be changed except by a subsequent written agreement between the cohabitors, should take care of the faked oral contract exposure for good and all in California.

    Like


  137. Anonymous–

    Do you know if anyone has ever ultimately had to pay palimony in California?

    Like


  138. Ave Veritas said: “No woman would ever be able to lay out a logical argument to defend their being a whore.”

    You, my friend, have either never heard of the Rationalization Hamster or are a woman.

    Like


  139. Firepower, so lets assume that this will never happen and is purely used as a rhetorical device to highlight the contradictions in the current hybrid system. If someone is really concerned about children, then not why go back to patriarchy since that system was optimal for families? If your concern is really about fairness, then why not go over to caveman 2.0 free for all since that system is optimal for fairness?

    Like


  140. @cadnerd “Try the real thing instead of daydreaming abou tit.”

    I don’t daydream about tit, I’m totally hetero, although sometimes I wish I was into girls.

    Like


  141. aoefe, that was not a freudian slip, that was a typo. Daydreaming about sex, that was your sin. All you need to do is acknowledge it and sin more.

    Like


  142. @cadturd – “aoefe, that was not a freudian slip, that was a typo.”

    No really? (sarcasm intended, just in case you miss it)

    Like


  143. I typo’d your name wrong….crap. I mean ooops. I kid….

    Like


  144. Sometimes I read this blog and become so frustrated that a bunch of wanna-be good’ole-boys idiots who can’t even spell properly much less you use basic English grammar have the nerve to say things like “women aren’t going back to kitchen.” Then I laugh and remember that the level of misogyny evidenced in a comment in this special little bastion of “intellectualism” is directly proportional to the commenter likely being a small-dicked, greasy, low class, pockmarked, tubby loser who has been rejected by more women than he has sperm.

    I then also remember that I’m a hot 21-year-old about to complete an Ivy League education at a great school with great friends and a great relationship, and that I epitomize and take for granted everything these losers lust after. And I will make more money than you. ALL of you.

    For a final laugh, I think of how many pissy, unrelated, pseudo-intellectual responses there will be to this comment, and how these commenters, like kittens trying to claw a piece of string you keep pulling out of their reach, just won’t “get” it, and how I won’t respond to any of them because I’ll forget I even wrote this in a few hours, and the same when I go out tomorrow, and when I go out again the night after that.

    By the way, I’ll make more money than you. And did I mention I’ll make more money than you? And your dick is small.

    Like


  145. “Roissy,

    Random question to you and anybody concerned: is Gerard Butler alpha?”

    With actors you often need to differentiate with them as a person and the roles that they play as an actor.

    Gerard Butler seems like quite an alpha.

    In his role as King Leonidas in 300 he was Uber Alpha.

    Like


  146. @Anonymous

    Intellectually speaking, Aaron’s reference to “not going back to the kitchen” was about the issue of excessive child support and alimony. An Ivy League student would normally be expected to respond to that with a cohesive argument in favor of female judges telling men how much money they need to be relieved of every month rather than letting men decide on their own, the way they would have for most of history.

    Where I come from, your average 21 year old woman already recognizes that the 5 years of her life in which she will have been the hottest, are already over and a sharp downslide of male interest is about to happen. So she wouldn’t dare make the “I’m hot and you men all want me” comment at such an advanced age. It’s not misogynist to point that out nor, with a non-feminist trained young woman, would any man pointing that out cause her to dislike him. I say the above all the time and it gets me dates because the young woman knows it’s true and admits it.

    I just saw a 22 year old waitress at a resort yesterday whom I’d lusted after a year ago when I was previously at the resort. She had been stuck up then. She was a solid 9 then.

    But now she’s already overweight. I remembered her name as I walked past the restaurant and she came out to talk with the man who had remembered her name. Now she wants me to like her, to pursue her. But I could also see in her eyes that she knew her time had passed in the last year. I didn’t linger long in the conversation.

    Feminism trains young women, who are still temporarily attractive, to dislike men for having an opinion different from the party line, especially if he’s pointing out her biggest weakness: that time is not on her side sexually. This is sad because most attractive young women need to be reminded of the limited length of their attractiveness.

    Your being thus ruined by feminism, only matters to men for as long as you don’t get cellulite on the back of your thighs. After that, most men would just be concerned about your spreading your poisonous ideas to your younger sister or if you send too much money to the NOW.

    That said, I would agree with you if you grimace whenever you see someone on this forum display a wish to “return” to a “social conservative patriarchy” where premarital sex is shamed by the culture. I get sickened when I see betas here wishing they could create a world that alphas would hate and would violently fight against happening (US troops are now killing social conservative Muslim men who want a world where women can’t have premarital sex)..

    That kind of thinking would force men to marry again, which is precisely what alpha males do not want.

    If you’re an intellectual Ivy League 21 year old female, it would be great to see you ridicule the way half the people on this forum seem to want to return to a world where all the men are married betas. But, then again, you’d only be arguing on behalf of alpha males and not in your own interest. The beta males here are arguing in your own interest.

    But you’d probably lose if you tried to defend feminist laws like VAWA or IMBRA or the Nuernberg Laws of Germany that made it a capital crime for men to have sex with Russian women.

    And you cannot argue that the well-educated men here would be attracted to you much past your 24th birthday, unless you brought a better attitude and cooking skills to the table.

    You do realize that money has nothing to do with how attractive a woman is to a man, right?

    Your money would only be a plus if you paid a hottie to cook for you and your date on weekends and then maybe join in a threesome.

    Like


  147. Awwww the young and innocent.

    Hun, you just wait until life throws it in your face and you don’t get what you want. How you deal will that will define you as a man.

    Like


  148. aoefe, if you were a man, I’d say you’re a dick. Now what would be the equivalent for the other gender I wonder… Not sure why you’re so defensive. Thought better of you, for some odd reason.

    Like


  149. Anonymous, quite possibly you may make more money than most of us. Though it may be a temporary arrangement. When the economy tanks (and it is not a question if, it is really when), your ivy league diploma may mean precisely zip. People that are able to produce tangibles will be in demand.

    But say that by some miracle, the economy will turn around. Just for the sake of entertaining your future trajectory. I presume that you are a male. I am looking forward to the time when you’re taken to cleaners by your X. It will precisely happen because you think it won’t.

    Like


  150. re Anonymous of the Ivy League:

    You have a lot to learn.

    Like


  151. Guys,

    Anonymous is clearly presenting herself as a female 21 year old. I bet she’s 31, because of the bitterness, but that would be too bad because it would be mostly too late for her to learn. Assuming the older feminists taught a real 21 year old to use sex as a weapon to try to force men into thinking “properly,” the best argument to her is that, in order to maintain that Sword of Damocles over men’s heads, then every 5 years a “new generation” of hotties needs to agree to join the blackmail conspiracy she’s implying exists to keep men thinking properly.

    Because all it takes is for the majority of women aged 16-25 (or even a significant minority)
    to laugh at the bitterness of feminism and laugh at the foolishly short-sighted concept of denying sex to men who reject anti-male feminism, and the entire house of cards this 21 year old has built in her mind will come crashing down, especially 4 years from now when 9 years worth of younger hotties will be in direct competition with her.

    While women can learn game (get a personality and a good attitude) to slow the decline of attractiveness toward the opposite sex, men have the chance to develop game to actually increase their attractiveness over time. Money provides zero added value to a woman’s sexual market value, unless she uses it for a gym membership. A man can work on a North Atlantic oil well for ten years and come back to civilization with an immensely augmented sexual market value.

    Something very ironic: Anonymous was clearly projecting her own attraction to money (men with money) in her polemic, implying that men were also attracted to women with money. She was saying she’s a 21 year old sexually attracted to men with money.

    Remember what I keep saying about young women having whore fantasies? It doesn’t matter if they are professed feminists or not. The above, allegedly young, feminist is deeply attracted to money. It drips off her rant like fat off a rotisserie chicken.

    Like


  152. Feminism must be perpetually taught to the youngest adult women or the entire house of cards will come crashing down in just a few years.

    Think about it.

    We can defeat the monster in less than 5 years. All we need is one billionaire on our side and one or two foreign leaders who are willing to directly criticize the west for its feminism. With the youngest women no longer indoctrinated, nobody cares if their older sisters are indoctrinated.

    Like


  153. I presume that you are a male

    no man would describe himself as a ‘hot 21 year old’. could be a troll, though.

    Like


  154. @Anonymous, 2:14 AM

    lol that’s a real cool story bro. This troll could have been better if you had talked about your own sexual adventures and how that shit was “SO CASH”:

    http://ohinternet.com/So_cash

    Like


  155. on June 14, 2011 at 10:02 am John Norman Howard

    I then also remember that I’m a hot 21-year-old about to complete an Ivy League education at a great school with great friends and a great relationship…

    That’s great… just great! 🙂

    Like


  156. @cadnerd

    If this were failblog I’d be at the top for epic fail of humour. Waz trying to be funny, not defensive. True story. 🙂

    Like


  157. Marriage is a completely outdated concept that benefits no one, not even children. Anyone still determined to marry should not marry anyone you think would behave badly during divorce proceedings. In a long term relationship, exercise common sense. Fears of palimony are unfounded even in CA where I reside. Protect your assets and don’t live together.

    Women understand their prime years are in their teens and 20’s. An intelligent woman will develop other qualities to fall back on as she gets older. A personality, some feminine qualities, ability to talk about something other than herself or celebrity gossip. Real women want real men, the men this blog refers to as alphas. A real woman will submit to a man she trusts and respects. Feminism is good for voting rights, equal pay, ability to own property, working in a traditionally male dominated field, etc. It has no place in a personal/sexual relationship between a man and a woman.

    [Editor: All those things that you listed feminism is good for have repercussions on personal/sexual relationships, whether you want them to or not. Much of this blog is devoted to revealing those unseen connections.
    ps equal pay is a myth.]

    Like


  158. Excellent post by Susan.

    Like


  159. Aaron

    Firepower, so lets assume that this will never happen and is purely used as a rhetorical device to highlight the contradictions in the current hybrid system. If someone is really concerned about children, then not why* go back to patriarchy since that system was optimal for families? If your concern is really about fairness, then why not* go over to caveman 2.0 free for all since that system is optimal for fairness?

    You’re mistaking me: I do not care about fairness – it does not exist. Nor, do I care about children. At all.

    What you envision is purely theoretical. The reason why not go back to patriarchy is you will have to deal with 100 Million screaming American women opposing your wishes. And, another 100 Million white knights. You’ll have to also “hope” for a way to crush their opposition.

    I agree with your premise – but not with the practical realities of how you accomplish it in the America of today that’s scared of blood.

    “Why not return to patriarchy?”
    Why not wish to be a Jedi.

    Like


  160. Firepower, when arguing with people who are defending the status quo they may make their argument based fairness or families. All I’m saying is that you can point out to them that there are better systems that prioritize on family (patriarchy) or fairness (caveman 2.0), not that that we will ever necessarily adopt those systems. We’re no longer about it in terms of “we should do X”, just observing that “if you really cared about X, then Y would be the most logical system”.

    Like


  161. Logic has nothing to do with societies/cultures taking the most prudent action.
    Actually, logic does not even prevent them from taking the most harmful path. If it DID, we’d elect the smartest to high office.

    Argument has made no sense for a while; merely disagreeing seems fruitless, now.
    Further on down that path, evem “pointing out” any reasonable alternative to adults indoctrinated in rigid, fundamentalist PC American education systems appears a waste of time.

    Like


  162. aoefe

    @cadturd – “aoefe, that was not a freudian slip, that was a typo.”

    No really? (sarcasm intended, just in case you miss it)

    pls stop stealing MY game tactics ma’am.

    Like


  163. on June 14, 2011 at 12:59 pm William Shakespeare

    @Anonymous 2:04 am

    I am Constant as the Northern Star
    I could be well moved, if I were as you;
    If I could pray to move, prayers would move me;
    But I am constant as the northern star,
    Of whose true-fix’d and resting quality
    There is no fellow in the firmament.
    The skies are painted with unnumber’d sparks;
    They are all fire and every one doth shine;
    But there’s but one in all doth hold his place.
    So in the world, ’tis furnish’d well with men,
    And men are flesh and blood, and apprehensive;
    Yet in the number I do know but one
    That unassailable holds on his rank,
    Unshaked of motion; and that I am he,
    Let me a little show it, even in this;
    That I was constant Cimber should be banish’d,
    And constant do remain to keep him so. (3.1.7)

    Anyone remember what happens next?

    Like


  164. @Firepower

    You taught me everything I know. 😉

    Like


  165. let me see whether this one will stick

    Like


  166. Aaron

    Firepower, when arguing with people who are defending the status quo they may make their argument based fairness or families. All I’m saying is that you can point out to them that there are better systems that prioritize on family (patriarchy) or fairness (caveman 2.0), not that that we will ever necessarily adopt those systems. We’re no longer about it in terms of “we should do X”, just observing that “if you really cared about X, then Y would be the most logical system”.

    Insightful.

    Like


  167. ps equal pay is a myth

    yep. and so is working in a ‘traditionally male dominated field’. males typically dominate these fields not because they’re trying to keep women down, but because they are simply better than women at these jobs.

    men are the engineers, the architects, the protectors of civilization, and always have been. accordingly, mother nature’s equipped us with the tools we need to do get it done. greater physical strength, higher capacity for logical thought and problem solving, etc.

    Like


  168. “Feminism is good for voting rights, equal pay, ability to own property, working in a traditionally male dominated field, etc.”

    Huh? Since when were women not allowed to own property in the U.S.?

    Feminism is a scam as is the “equal pay” myth.

    Like


  169. “yep. and so is working in a ‘traditionally male dominated field’. males typically dominate these fields not because they’re trying to keep women down, but because they are simply better than women at these jobs.”

    And how many women want jobs like garbage man, construction worker, plumber and truck driver? All pay very well but require hard work with long hours.

    Better to be an overpaid/underworked secretary and complain about sexism and “equal pay.”

    Like


  170. aoefeansar

    @Firepower

    You taught me everything I know. 😉

    dont ruin it
    by telling
    your hubsband

    Like


  171. xsplat kissied:

    Insightful.

    vengeful

    Like


  172. @Anonymous

    “iv’e got more money than you and you have a small dick”

    this is only an effective(slightly) put down from a man, and even then it’s recognisable as the lowest and most obnoxious form of hubris to anyone with a modicum of common sense, insecurity is often the blatantly transparent source of such boasting.

    Missy, Do you expect me to be jealous that you have more money and a larger penis than i?

    Only question on my mind is if you are really worth a fuck.

    Like


  173. on June 14, 2011 at 3:00 pm N.M. Rothschild

    Feminism is re-packaged communism, ….nothing more.

    Like


  174. Firepower, vengeful why? I didn’t post in anger lol. I simply thought it was an interesting way of looking at our current situation and possibly providing the seed for a good argument against state feminism. Or maybe I’m totally wrong, but not vengeful.

    Like


  175. @Firepower

    aoefeansar:

    @Firepower

    You taught me everything I know. 😉

    dont ruin it
    by telling
    your hubsband

    She daydreams of sex. Her husband may be of the same material as imaginary friends are.

    Like


  176. @Aaron:
    Comment not directed at you. Comment directed at the suckup.
    ========
    @Cadnerd

    be careful aoefe
    WILL beat you up
    she has a foul temper.
    but, I’ve inadvertently
    scared her away
    she’s shy

    Like


  177. @Firepower

    I wish she’d try.
    I’ve 2 pairs of boxing gloves.
    What a marvelous opportunity!
    She pays the plane ticket to get here.
    She’d get a clinch I did not have a chance to try yet.

    Like


  178. Boys, boys. First, I do have an imaginary husband, so imaginary I’ve never met him or even said I had one. I am terrific with leg locks if you want to leg wrestle, I’m not great at upper body strength so if you go for a choke hold, you’ve won. I have a line in my contract that says I never pay for the plane ticket, so pony up.

    Like


  179. aoefeansar,

    Your picture reminds me of Robin Williams from Bicentennial Man.

    If you could overcome your desire for attention and take it down, many men would appreciate it.

    I suppose a compromise would be a body shot, but then you would be tempted to prove that it is yours with a face shot.

    Like


  180. aoefe, I know you’re hubbyless (or hubbyfree, whatevah fits your paradigm), I am able to remember even the most inane posts’ essentials, which is more of a pain than gain, really.

    Plane tickets… the only girls that yes they can pry it outta me are me two daughters. That ’bout covers it. So aawww, shuck, you’re SOL. Your loss.

    Like


  181. @Michel
    I had to look up what Robin Williams looked like in that movie. I laughed. Good one, thanks. Heck no I’m not removing my picture, all men want the visual haven’t you been reading along? I have enough body shots on my own site to prove I’m moi. Just sayin’. (as far as attention…duh…I’m a woman on a predominately male site so whatchu talking bout’ willis?)

    @cadnerd
    I’m glad I made an impression (I think?).

    Like


  182. Right, aoefe, you’ve got your 15 minutes. As they say, there’s no such a thing as bad publicity.

    Like


  183. Cadnerd

    @Firepower

    I wish she’d try.
    I’ve 2 pairs of boxing gloves.

    well, it’s hardly fair
    if you have
    4 hands

    Like


  184. @Firepower

    You are
    forgetting her great advantage of 15 pairs
    of shoes

    Like


  185. I love these blog comments because it is the ONLY place that I have ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever read a woman making a cogent argument or giving an intelligent opinion. The smart analysis draws some smart women.

    That being said, it doesn’t happen often and the “anonymous 21 year old Ivy League graduate” (maybe) isn’t one of those informed arguments.

    Instead, its of the 95% typical “you are speaking against my self interest and, therefore, you are a small dicked misogynist” variety of statement (I can’t call it an argument) that EVERY TIME validates the opinion that 95% of the time women are intellectually incapable of even grasping what makes a legitimate intelligent argument and what would gain the respect of the people that will further help shape the laws that will benefit or detract from her self interest. If she’s an Ivy League student, then the quality of accepted applicant has no doubt dropped. She shows no awareness of the people that she is arguing against, where their opinions come from, or that her statement makes her look incredibly emotional and illogical.

    And there are a lot of bottom rung Ivy League graduates that don;t make much. i would love to hear what will qualify her to make a lot of money. I’m guessing that her estimation is off a wee bit, given her demonstrated level of cognition and emotional response.

    Like


  186. greyghost–

    a male birth control pill will get us there. No baby no CS.

    Male controlled birth control will come first through easily reversible vasectomy “plugs”. There are being clinically trialed in several countries now. A specially formulated plastic plug is inserted into the male vas deferens, which can be dissolved by microwave energy applied to the pelvis, at the right frequency. The trouble though is that when semen isn’t delivered out the penis it is reabsorbed into the body, so in something like half of long term vasectomies of whatever type, antibodies against semen develop such that he is effectively infertile then, or has low fertility.

    The pill and other female hormonal birth control works by a rather simple basic idea and mechanism. Mammalian females have a mechanism, an hormonal mechanism, that prevents them from becoming follow on pregnant while they’re currently still pregnant. Hormonal birth control mimics that in non preggers girls by changing her hormonal balance in that manner. Voila.

    Nothing comparable exists in men. That’s not to say it’s impossible to come up with some type of male pill that will stop the ability of sperm to impregnate without stopping his sex drive or otherwise seriously poisoning him, but it’s FAR, FAR harder, and very uncertain of success.

    Like


  187. @Doug1,

    You’re killing me.

    There IS a wonderful form of male birth control, that has been studied, and confirmed to work.

    Good old injectable testosterone.

    Keeps you shooting blanks, lowers bodyfat, larger muscles, slows aging, thicker harder sturdier erections, higher sex drive, more self confidence etc…

    Think of it as INJECTABLE ALPHA. Ohh high testosterone on its own may not be enough, but add that to game, and you are the fucking juggernaut of tearing up pussy.

    Like


  188. “All the honey of matrimony, but none of the sting, friend.”

    Like