Why Single White Women Vote Overwhelmingly For Democrats

I left this comment over at GL Piggy’s, on a post about election predictions. I think it is worth reprinting here (with additional commentary) because of its timeliness.

PA: “In reality, young white women’s pro-Obama leanings are a factor of their feminine/nurturer pity for a omegas for which “poor blacks,” “inner city single moms” and other such are a stand-in in their minds.”

There is this. In actuality, I think it is a confluence of three psychological factors that pushes a huge majority of single white women into the arms of Dem pols. (Single NAM women follow the gibsmedat principle almost exclusively.)

1. As PA states, women have an inborn disposition toward nurturance, and the pity is strong in them. I think women get off a little on feeling pity and sympathy for others, and feeling needed by the less fortunate. This is why so many women flock to work in the human despair services fields, like nursing or teaching. Married women also have this nurturance instinct, but it is redirected to their own families, which turns their moral focus inward to the center ring of the concentric rings of genetic distance and moral regard. This in effect makes them more GOP friendly (and more sane from a societal perspective), and we see this reflected in the polls.

2. As Whiskey states (well, speaking on the record, as *I* originally stated), single women’s prime directive is to fulfill their hypergamous impulse for the highest possible status man they can coax into long-term commitment. The party that is perceived as being pro-unrestricted female sexuality, anti-male sexuality, and anti-drone beta male is going to get their vote. You would probably not be surprised to learn that not only do single white SWPL chicks just automatically ASSUME everyone in their social circle is an Obama cultist (yours truly gets a pass because CHARMING BASTARD), the first thing that pops in their heads when you ask them why they’re voting for Obama is usually something along the lines of “Romney wants to take away my birth control”. Yeah, these are educated women saying this. Thanks suffrage!

The fact is, marriage advocacy (and earlier marriage) is bad for young women’s sexual market value leverage, (but good for older married women’s SMV leverage who, it should be noted, were the original pro-monogamy constituents and advocates). A party that embodies the single and seeking alpha cock in the city lifestyle will appeal to them. The party which is perceived (facts don’t really matter in politics) as pushing women to settle down early with a reliable company man and start popping out future video gamers is anathema to the single, economically self-sufficient, white woman sensibility.

3. Finally, and perhaps most saliently, single white women see Big Daddy State as a beta provider husband substitute. This has nothing to do with pity for the downtrodden masses and everything to do with “how much money and services I can redirect my way with an assist from the white knight contingent”. The single white woman who delays family formation finds herself battling her ancient subterranean limbic rhythms which always and everywhere guide her to seek out potential mates who could provide resources for her and her children, particularly when she is burdened by pregnancy and mostly unable (at least as would have been the case in the ancestral environment) to fully provide for herself. The single white woman, lacking the beta provider hubby (ironically, mostly by her own hand) seeks to fill his absence with the alternative — the looming Big Man tribal leader, which in modern America is the federal government, and its shaman is Obama. Women are naturally redistributionist because women are naturally self-aggrandizing and self-entitled, as befits their higher reproductive worth. And, more controversially, a very bad man like myself would say that women are naturally comfortable in quasi-harem arrangements, which is what the single woman concubine-government alpha provider relationship amounts to. And just like an alpha provider/protector, the government is very good at forcibly extracting tribute from the beta male masses.

On this last factor, the American growth industry of single moms is certainly pushing the country in a more redistributionist direction, because no demographic outside of blacks, gays and Hispanics is more generally and reliably pro-government handout than the single mom with kids to feed and no dad around to help out.

Alert the media! The stereotypes are true! Sanitization Protocol… activated.

In effect, Big Government is at once the alpha male tribal leader and the beta provider sucker who happily assumes the cuckold role as step-father to the single mom’s cadbaggage.

Now, the final, and most emotionally laden, variable in this equation is the black man angle. Both sides in this long-running debate have their points. My take from ground-level recon is that the people claiming single white women love alpha black men are overstating their case, and the people claiming single white women would never think of hooking up with “lower class, less accomplished, thug” black men are overstating theirs. White women do find plenty of black men physically exciting. And smarter white women do hesitate to date black men because of a very reasonable fear that, should a warpling issue from the union (this is always in the back of women’s minds, despite the easy availability of contraceptives), the black man will be less likely than the white man to stick around and care for her in her time of need.

As far as a I can tell, contra white nationalist hopes and dreams, single white women have ZERO concept of loyalty for their white men. Try to explain to your typical single white woman about the importance of loyalty to her men and of the idea of genetically preserving the white race’s unique winning attributes, and you may as well be a Martian spurting goo all over her. Now, in practice, one could argue that unmarried white women exercise a de facto loyalty to their men, because most white chicks date white men, and studies have shown that white women are the most resistant to dating outside their race. But how long will this hold? Census data points to a slow but inexorable increase in out-marrying and out-dating by white women (and white men). If there is some subconscious racial loyalty or primal preference acting to steer the tingles of single white women (and I believe there is), it is showing signs of withering under a coordinated cultural assault that has made even broaching the topic the equivalent of condemning oneself to the social gulag.

Btw, from a tingles-first perspective, a lot of white women thought Bill Clinton was way sexier than they currently think of Barack Obama’s sex appeal. This isn’t a looks or race thing… Bill just had more sensual, oozing charm than Barry. Chicks dig charming mofos.

Barring total collapse, I don’t see this trend:

…ending anytime soon. (Nice battering ram arms, Fluke.) So you may as well recline poolside, while the pool is still filled with water and chlorinated.

PS My election prediction:

It’s a toss-up, so I won’t bother picking a winner. I predict the popular vote and electoral college vote will split, with all that entails (yay, riots!)

I will confidently predict that most of the demographic vote ratios will remain roughly the same as they have for the past few election cycles.

Single white women will vote 60-40 Obama.
Single moms will vote 75-25 Obama.
Blacks will vote 98-2 Obama.
Hispanics of Amerindian ancestry will vote 65-35 Obama.
Asian-Americans will vote 70-30 Obama.
Ruling class elites will vote 70-30 Obama.
Libertarians will vote 70-30 Obama (such independent free-thinkers, those libertarians!).
Self-professed feminists will prove their non-conformist bona fides by voting 100-0 Obama.
Single beta males will vote 55-45 Romney (still beta, still white knighting).
Married white men will vote 80-20 Romney (this shift will be bigger than polls are currently projecting).
Married white women will vote 55-45 Romney.
Pickup artists will not vote. They got better things to do.

A lot of white men and white married couples are going to break for Romney, but the social and racial and familial demographics of the country are moving with such force in the opposite direction that the white man vote, no matter how consolidated, is going to eventually get swamped by the undertow and rendered irrelevant for many, many election cycles to come (assuming there will continue to be a country in existence that is capable of holding elections). When the white man “wakes up” to this fact, I predict secession movements will sprout up all around the country, descaling the nation to more socially and tribally congenial entities. But most of us reading this will be dead by that time. And it will be too late, regardless. In the meantime, expect populism to rise again, and tariffs to become the talk of the townhall. A billion Chinese is a lot of surplus cheap labor to churn through before wages equilibrate. There will be blood in the interim.





Comments


  1. I’m pretty sure they vote for Obama because that’s what the TV tells them to do.

    Like


    • on November 6, 2012 at 1:48 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozl hello ed gibbon i do believe u wer eonce my winghaamnz lzozozoz

      HEY HERATISTESS!!

      dis is how elctions (erectionz) work for womenz

      they get to choose between:

      1. serving honor, love, committment, god, faith, family

      and

      2. serving their butt and gina tinglez zlzozl and having productve men pay for it all as obamma da dtstate taxes men at gunpoint/prints money and gives the rproceds to sandra flukes falling demandz for conraception and any bastardz chilren that migt result ho help grow the state prison system the state daycare system and da ebebrnake fiat state.

      when given a choice beteween serving god honor logic reaosn tradition faith family children and butt nd gina tingellzozlzo, omen overwhlemningly choose serving gina tinglez.

      over in one corner we have the great books and classics and bible and homer, and over in the ther corne er we have a big, stemaing pile of buttehxt zlozozlz. women *RUN* towards the butthext and vote for obama to tax good men to pay for it lzlzozozo

      Like


  2. I will be voting in a few minutes for Obama I am an older single white full time employed non-union job college educated white male. Obama inherited the Great Recession and did as good as he could stabilizing the economy. Things are getting better-at least here in the Midwest. Obama has kept or gotten done with compromise 54% of his campaign promises. Stock market is way up Bin Laden is way down. Romney as a man of conviction and integrity? Hell no-his only motivation was to say whatever he could to appeal to whoever he was talking to at the moment if he thought it would help him get elected. You working class guys-what the hell do you think Romney would really do for you? Common sense says his focus is purely on helping upper income people. Obama is not perfect but to go back to Bush era policies is a huge mistake. Screw alpha vs.beta-come up with logical rational arguments for a Romney presidency that benefits working men, doesn’t favor the rich getting richer, doesn’t restrict women’s reproductive rights, and overall helps America and then I will listen

    Like


    • Ok, here’s one “logical rational argument for a Romney presidency that benefits working men”… it might prolong functioning society as we currently know it.

      Like


      • Ok so by inference, odds is saying that given the choice, a conservative is not electable. And I agree.

        Like


      • You said you were an older male. By siding with the class warfare rhetoric, you are saying you are on the under-privileged side of the fence and, therefore, have no status with women besides any game you might have. At least that’s the way it would come across to female ears.

        Keep in mind that, for an older guy, game plus status might help you get women who are still highly fertile. Game enough might not help, depending on how young you look.

        So you can’t vote for the guy who might help you just limp along while others like you are given equal assistance, thus nullifying any possible status increase with women. The competition for hot women is zero sum, remember? You will have to gain advantage over other men, especially if you want more than one nubile new bedmate per week.

        If you want hot women as an older male, you will have to hoist yourself out of the lower or lower middle class and you should definitely not tell any hot women that you identify as a drone downtrodden by alpha businessmen.

        Unless an older male’s left wing rhetoric is backed up by being a professor or a Democrat politician already elected to office, or he’s a left wing high tech millionaire, it’s a DLV for a man to tell women he’s an Obama fan.

        Like


      • Plenty of hot women think Romney and Ryan are douchebags and anyone voting them are douchebags as well. Saying I am a Romney fan – a candidate that favors the rich getting richer while everyone else has it tougher – is a lame way to try to score with women. This whole concept of older white males knowing what is best for women’s reproductive systems is laughable. Yes we usually know what is best for them in other areas but common sense is never DLV

        Like


      • You are right that the GOP must now stop talking about abortion. That issue has to come off the table. It just cost the Indiana senate position (Mourdock lost). Men paying for the birth control of women they don’t know should stay on the table.

        It is possible that Romney/Ryan lost tonight because of the taint of social conservatism that a GOP ticket more similar to Ron Paul would not have had.

        Like


      • on November 7, 2012 at 12:01 am Rihanna Deserved It

        We all know how much hot chicks hate douchebags… http://hotchickswithdouchebags.com/

        Like


      • no actually, older white men only claim to know what is best for their bank accounts….

        and in all fairness i agree with them.

        Like


      • Technology is changing society and the availability and number of jobs more than any politician could hope to dream of. Americans still have a desire to work and succeed-at least the vast majority of them do. Romney’s 47% remark was crude and way off base.

        Like


      • It was totally accurate and I predict that 47% is exactly what Obama gets today. It’s the hardcore. Romney knew they were totally out of reach and he spoke the truth in private.

        Like


      • Ok so you are saying everyone voting for Obama is lazy and wanting just a government handout? It is funny how no one on the right has totally defined who all the 47% are. If someone says it is the retired or disabled or veterans, the right says no he didn’t mean them. So really-you mean tens of millions of Americans are leeches? BS to that

        Like


      • You are either miserably ignorant (which is par for the course for Obama voters) or shamefully dishonest (ditto). Romney was pointing out the simple true fact that 47% of Americans don’t pay taxes, which means that for them all government benefits are “someone else’s problem” and Obama can promise whatever the fuck he wants to and they’ll happily go along voting for him because there’s no downside. This is simply true, and it’s going to destroy America. And lying shits like you who repeat obvious bullshit like you just did are helping bring it down. I hope you die in a riot when someone decides your worthless white ass has too much stuff that needs to be redistributed to the homeboys.

        Like


      • So again it comes to Romney disparaging retirees, disabled, veterans,etc-essentially ANYONE and EVERYONE who doesn’t pay taxes. And while some people exist on Social Security or SSI or what have you and don’t pay income taxes, there are still plenty of taxes they do pay.

        Like


      • Of course he didn’t mean vets or retired people. They weren’t part of Obama’s 47%. What you just wrote is silly spin. No vets or retired people would have taken offense from that who weren’t already Obama fans looking for a spin.

        Like


      • I’m a vet – Romney wasn’t talking about me.

        Everyone who supports Romney knows exactly who he was referring to – if you claim not to know you’re either A) full of shit and lying B) an idiot.

        Pick 1

        Like


      • Ok so you are saying everyone voting for Obama is lazy and wanting just a government handout?

        Yup.

        Like


      • Technology is indeed changing society and the nature of work. But the Democrats kill innovation and instead look backward to the 20th century and to redistribution.

        Like


    • “I will be voting in a few minutes for Obama I am an older single white full time employed non-union job college educated white male… (etc.)”

      This whole post could have been truncated to: “I am a liberal, and thus my beliefs are 100% sound-bitten and interchangeable with every other liberal in the country.”

      How many years do you have to be alive before you realize that this is all bread and circus, (presumably-older) Rick? Oh, sorry – I mean “GO TEAM! THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS! OUR BOY IN WASHINGTON WILL SAVE THE DAY! NO BLOOD FOR OIL! TIPPECANOE AND TYLER TOO!”

      Liked by 1 person


      • My beliefs are way deeper than sound bites. But overall, changing a center-left President to a center-right President? Yeah life would still go on pretty much the same for me. I just remember how things were at the end of Bush’s term-very frightening economy. Since then, things have been upward for me-income and 401K up, debt down. We’ll see what happens if we go over this upcoming Fiscal Cliff

        Like


      • Not belittling your conclusions/beliefs here, but in all honesty Obama continued Bush’s tack on the so-called recovery: bailing out failing banks who screwed the economy in the first place. Obama just put together a bigger bailout package than the one Pelosi and Reid came up with a few months earlier, and I have every confidence that McCain (or Romney, for that matter) would have probably done the same thing had he won.

        “Life would go on the same”…that’s exactly the conclusion I reach with both candidates so the election doesn’t much interest me. The few things I would care about: a real change in foreign policy toward wiser long-term strategies, a re-thinking of energy and the decrepit public transportation system, a rolling back of the feminist lunacy that’s destroying our schools (not to mention workplaces and everywhere else, really), a more sensible student loan scheme…neither candidate, beyond the rhetoric, seems ready to tackle any of them so if they can’t bring themselves to care about those issues then I won’t bring myself to care about the election.

        I get where you’re coming from but I just don’t really see much of a difference at the end of the day. To poolside I go, then.

        Like


      • My beliefs are way deeper than sound bites.

        You’re voting for Obama because you think taking on $5.2 trillion in new debt was ‘as good as Obama could do’ in managing a depression caused by excess debt. This is as stupid as pouring whiskey down the throat of someone dying from alcohol poisoning. You’re a fucking retard and one of the poster children for why democracies are doomed to collapse. Don’t try to defend your beliefs as being anything deeper than that.

        Like


      • Apparently DT doesn’t know that 98% of all economists on both sides of the political aisle agree with deficit spending in a time of economic crisis.

        Or maybe DT’s been drunk for four years and thinks that we’ve all been doing juuuuuust fine.

        Like


      • Apparently DT doesn’t know that 98% of all economists on both sides of the political aisle agree with deficit spending in a time of economic crisis.

        Did you really believe before posting that pulling a false statistic out of your ass would win an argument? All you did is reveal to everyone that you know less than shit about economics. Spend about a year studying Austrian vs. Keynesian economic theory, and maybe then you’ll have something intelligent to add.

        Like


      • Deficit spending, maybe. But up to 8% of GDP, no.

        Thor

        Like


      • If we have learned anything from Keynes, it’s that a massive investment is necessary to restart a floundering economy. The potential for large returns from such an investment is high. It’s worked over and over and over again in times of crisis, big and small.

        This is commonly known. Economists have been operating under this assumption for eighty years.

        It’ll work this time too. But it takes patient people — not a slash-and-burn balance-the-books-on-the-backs-of-the-poor people like yourself — to see it through. Because we need to tolerate some debt to accomplish this.

        Like


      • If we have learned anything from Keynes, it’s that a massive investment is necessary to restart a floundering economy. The potential for large returns from such an investment is high. It’s worked over and over and over again in times of crisis, big and small.

        It failed completely in the 1930’s and it’s failing miserably now. Tell me please, when has it worked? I can point to the exact opposite working in 1920-21.

        This is commonly known. Economists have been operating under this assumption for eighty years.

        Do you want me to list all of the economic meltdowns across the globe over the past 80 years? Do you want them ranked by their impact on the globe (i.e. Germany falling to the Nazis) or by date?

        It’ll work this time too.

        Oh really? What makes this time different from every other time?

        But it takes patient people — not a slash-and-burn balance-the-books-on-the-backs-of-the-poor people like yourself — to see it through. Because we need to tolerate some debt to accomplish this.

        Keynes theory harms the poor the most. Who do you think suffers the most when gas shoots to $4 and common household necessities like food and toilet paper skyrocket?

        The only time taking on debt makes sense is when you take on debt to increase your ability to produce and earn money beyond the cost of the debt. Is FedGov producing anything at all with the trillion dollar deficits? Is FedGov financing factories, power plants, new infrastructure, new farms, proven technologies…in other words, things that produce? Nope. FedGov is no different from a shopping addict opening a new credit line to help pay for the previous 5 maxed out credit cards, then going on a shopping spree for useless crap because “look! I have money now that I have a new credit card!”

        Sure it will work. It works out great for the shopping addicts to.

        Like


      • Keynesianism only works when the gov’t knows that it’s doing and invests in things that would actually grow small businesses and get the economy moving again. Throwing $billions down the hole on stupid “dig a hole and fill it back up” projects solves nothing, since bureaucrats waste most of it and what little does go into business goes into projects that don’t work (Solyndra, anyone?)

        Like


      • Most leftist are not even aware of this multi trillion deficit Obama has created in four years while Bush raised it by only one trillion in eight years

        In my experience there is basically two types of leftists;

        those who have no idea what they are talking about which is most of them ( example; they think Bush raised the deficit far more than Obama when the exact opposite is true )

        and those who know and are lying trhough their teeth

        Like


      • I’d say the same for neocons.

        Most of the Tea Party is unbelievably ignorant, while people like Bill Kristol are fully aware that the tired supply-side theory and flag-waving rhetoric iare total lies designed to enrich corporate overlords.

        Obama would certainly bring the debt down, if he could — he’s a responsible guy — but he has to wait for an economic recovery to kick in first so that he doesn’t gut necessary social programs like Medicare or Medicaid.

        The experts say that it typically takes 5 to 10 years to recover from a crash of 2008’s magnitude. Paying off our debt ain’t as easy as it seems.

        You could try to take this type of long view, but that would require patience and higher cognitive functioning.

        Like


      • You nailed it Jason I love how so many people on here just want America to become a sort of tribal feudal feral landscape. So willing to bitch about and be negative about America. Chuck Norris and his wife are the ultimate whiners-appearing in an ad saying that if Obama got re elected America would face a 1,000 years of darkness. Pretty hard to tell in that ad whose panties were in a tighter bunch.

        Like


      • No, Obama WANTS to weaken the country by saddling it with debt. And social programs are “necessary” only if you define them that way.

        I would propose a simple way to reform Mecicare: Make it like an MSA (medical savings account), where each retiree could withdraw money for medical expenses, based on how much he and his various employers had paid in on his account, thus achieving social justice. Some adjustments at the margins would be useful such as figuring out how to handle non-working spouses etc. Also allow some withdrawals to purchase medical disaster insurance. And phase out Medicaid, leave it to the states that votes for this kind of scheme.

        Thor

        Like


      • Jason – Obama would certainly bring the debt down, if he could — he’s a responsible guy — but he has to wait for an economic recovery to kick in first so that he doesn’t gut necessary social programs like Medicare or Medicaid.

        Why are you posting? You have obviously never, not even once, looked at the Federal budget. Not a budget for a single year, and certainly not any of the budget projections.

        If we completely eliminated all spending with the exception of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, and interest on the debt, the budget still wouldn’t balance. And by elimination I mean everything: no military in any form, no FBI, no departments of this or that…all completely gone. We would still run a deficit.

        The projections are worse. To keep up with Medicare our economy would have to grow at a rate of 8-10% with no recessions.

        You cannot balance the budget or start to pay down the debt without cutting and restructuring ‘necessary social programs’ like Medicare or Medicaid. And we cannot continue to borrow and print money at this pace.

        The experts say that it typically takes 5 to 10 years to recover from a crash of 2008′s magnitude. Paying off our debt ain’t as easy as it seems.

        What experts would those be? Where are their papers that we may all read them? I’m curious because I would like to know how they missed the crash and recovery of 1920-21.

        You could try to take this type of long view, but that would require patience and higher cognitive functioning.

        In the long view if we do not radically restructure Medicare/Medicaid…actually, our entire health care market away from socialism and towards a competitive open market…the Federal government will go bankrupt or the U.S. will experience hyperinflation. Pick your poison.

        Like


      • DT et al, check out “The Budget That Cannot Be Balanced”:

        Cue GBfM to tell you about the Federal Reserve and Bernankified Dollahs.

        Like


      • Yeah like you were all up in arms about the debt Reagan and Bush and W added. Conservatives-concerned about debt since January 2009

        Like


      • No.

        I’ve been concerned about the deficit and the debt for well over a decade.

        Try painting with a smaller brush, dumbsh¡t.

        Like


      • Well you are a rarity then.

        Like


      • No, not a rarity.

        Stop trying to justify your own position and realize that you are just plain wrong. Your talking points are stale (tho’ it seems not stale enough that they didn’t bamboozle our lovely electorate this evening).

        Enjoy the next four years. You’ll own them.

        “Prepare three envelopes.”

        Like


      • My positions and thoughts were on the winning side-useful and correct. Yeah time will tell. But I will NOT be predictor of doom and despair for America. America is resilient. American men used to be strong and resourceful. Now? Yeah not so much

        Like


      • “Useful and correct.”

        I enjoyed that.

        Like I said, prepare three envelopes. You’re gonna need them.

        Like


    • “not restricting women’s reproductive rights” meaning “restricting unborn children’s right to live”?
      Not taking any positions here, I’m not even American, but this kind of reframing is what makes politics as appaling as it is. Just say what you mean.

      Like


      • Hey this board is filled with guys who would love nothing better to have lots of condom free sex-Heck, so do I. Having women be able to get access to birth control, the morning after pill, and even abortions serves the men here on this board really well. This board bitches about single mothers a lot-seems logical anything to reduce the odds of more single mothers is something this board would totally support.

        Like


      • That wasn’t a logical association. What turns men off is that a particular woman got pregnant by another man besides himself. Abortion doesn’t nullify that truth, except it might make it easier for her to lie that she’s still a virgin, which is what alphas want to hear.

        Yes, an alpha will want a woman to use birth control in a feminist country where the government could force him to pay a half million, but he will never agree to pay, through his tax money, for that young woman or her friends to have sex with any other man besides himself.

        Male Obama supporters, including Obama, support being cuckolded as they are paying for another man to have sex with their benefactors.

        An alpha will only pay for the birth control of the women he is involved with.

        Like


      • So if you are bedding multiple women, you are going to end up paying a whole ton of money for birth control.

        Like


      • on November 6, 2012 at 3:02 pm Hugh G. Rection

        I think by conveniently lumping abortion in together with regular contraception you are ignoring that there are some men on here who have moral reservations at least against abortion. I don’t think contraception in itself is controversial even among people identifying as christian.

        Personally, I’m more annoyed with the fact that I don’t enjoy any reproductive rights.

        Like


      • There is a simple solution (the details will need to be worked out):
        If an unmarried woman is pregnant, she needs to contact the presumptive father at an early stage. Negotiations might ensue. But the father should have the options of:

        1) Totally embrace the pregnancy. This should make abortion illegal in this case. He would then be liable for child support (or marrying the woman,
        achieving the same effect). And he would have plentiful visitation rights.

        2) Totally reject the pregnancy. The woman could then abort or not, but not expect child support. Nor would he have visitation rights or any other rights vis-a-vis the child, if carried to term.

        3) Any other mutually agreed solution.

        Presenting a born child or near-term fetus would give the presumptive father essentially the same options, viz:

        1) Totally embrace the child – as above.

        2) Totally reject the child. As above except abortion is of course
        no longer an option.

        3) Any mutually agreed solution.

        Ideally, before getting an abortion, the woman should have to prove
        that she had contacted the father as per the first triplet above,
        but this would be hard to enforce.

        Thor

        Like


      • Number 2 is asinine. No birth control is 100% And if the women doesn’t want to go through an abortion, the man has an obligation to provide some support to the woman.

        Like


      • on November 6, 2012 at 7:02 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Rick, why does the man have an obligation to the woman if she has the option to terminate the pregnancy or give the child up for adoption? Why is her obligation optional and his obligation mandatory?

        Like


      • Her option not to go through any physical or mental trauma associated with abortion or adoption. You guys do realize the whole fuck em and dump em routine might be all well and good for some guys but then later on, other guys have to deal with women who are now jaded, more bitchy, more guarded and less caring and sexual. You fuck things up for lots of men. Not every guy can be the first or second in. You care enough to fuck a woman – you better be able to face any and all consequences.

        Like


      • Exactly. This was my underlying point.

        Thor

        Like


      • on November 6, 2012 at 8:41 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Either she wants the child, or she doesn’t. If I made up my mind, and I don’t want a child and I don’t want the responsibilities, I still have to depend on her decision. How is that fair? I don’t think the trauma of abortion measures up the over 18 years of indentured servitude.

        Like


      • yeah hit it and quit it. That’s the way to go, right? So in essence your mindset is what helped create some of the single mothers that exist now

        Like


      • Actually, no. A structure where child support is in effect voluntary (and the abolition of welfare) would bring down single motherhood to the levels of the fifties.

        Thor

        Like


      • Oh Baby Jesus, how I wish your solution was law.

        Like


      • Rick is a typical lefty, wants everyone else to be bound by what he feels is right. Something along the lines of

        “I just feel that it’s wrong for the woman to have to get an abortion if the man doesn’t want the child.”

        Overlooking the woman’s decision to spread her legs of course.

        Like


      • Overlooking the man not having a good ” What If ” talk with the woman before she spreads her legs. Knowing the thoughts on pregnancy beforehand is better than after the fact. Fuck first and ask questions later puts a guy at a disadvantage

        Like


      • on November 8, 2012 at 8:37 am Hugh G. Rection

        Rick you still didn’t answer my question. Why is it moral that she has choices after the fact and I don’t? See, I’m more pro-choice than you are.

        I think not having the potential father on the hook for support is also a useful deterrent for women who would otherwise go down the single mother road.

        Or we could just abolish all state enforced child support.

        Like


      • so do I. Having women be able to get access to birth control, the morning after pill, and even abortions serves the men here on this board really well.

        Sounds like we have an actual Obama campaign staffer here in the CH comments section.

        This board bitches about single mothers a lot-seems logical anything to reduce the odds of more single mothers is something this board would totally support.

        Get to know “this board” better

        Like


      • If access to birth control means it being payed for with tax payer money, HELL NO. They can buy their own damn birth control. On the other hand, I dont understand people being against abortion. How many criminals have been killed in the womb by poor mothers before they could be born and wreak havoc on innocent people? Abortion is a blessing in disguise.

        Like


    • Wow, could you offer a more hackneyed recitation of liberal talking points. I nearly fell asleep. If you don’t have anything original or interesting to say, why not remain silent? Come up with something of value to say and “then I will listen”

      Like


      • Personally, I think Obama is a much better diplomat than Romney would ever be, I think he can work with the leaders of the world in more productive ways…even though Romney can apparently speak a foreign language (something he’s essentially tried to hide during the campaign) and Obama apparently can’t, Romney had trouble relating to Republican primary voters in Michigan, how do you think he’ll do in Japan, Brazil or Poland? Still, that’s not nearly enough to get my vote because Obama has other faults that outweigh that positive, and ultimately foreign policy is probably going to remain unchanged either way.

        Like


      • Obama’s skills as a negotiator are irrelevant as he is hell-bent on deliberately weaken the US in any way he can.

        Thor

        Like


      • The secretary of state does most of that anyway, I mean dealing with leaders of foreign nations

        As for speaking many languages; Reagan did not speak German and he managed to get the Berlin wall torned down which by any measure is a great accomplishment ( that of course the left bends over backward to deny )

        Like


      • He started the talks, but it was George Bush senior who accomplished the fact in the end and let’s face it, the real genius was James Baker.

        Like


      • Thor, you’ve made good comments in the past, but please put down the whiskey bottle and stop watching Faux News.

        Like


      • Jason put down the kool aid

        Obama used to hang with marxists, communists and various kind of people who hated the USA and capitalism, his mentor was an anti-USA anti-white and this is the short list

        Do you know who Bill Ayers is?

        weakening the USA is exactly what Obama and his friends and mentors are all about

        Why do you think four years of Obama have only made the USA weaker ? Because that is exactly what he wants!

        Like


      • Nice job on doing a combo platter on right wing talking points-Kool Aid and Bill Ayers. So damn humorous to read how Obama wants to weaken America while at the same time during his term, Bin Laden was taken out and drone attacks have taken out many more terrorists. More tax cuts to the rich will not make America stronger. Domestic oil production is the highest it has been in 15 years-that makes us stronger. Having a healthier populace with access to affordable health care makes us stronger. And yes, it would be nice to have more good paying union blue collar manufacturing jobs here helping keep our industrial base healthy-that makes us stronger. But that last point is damn hard to achieve when capitalistic incentives such as lower labor costs result in a race to the bottom wage and benefit wise.

        Like


      • Wow.

        Obama ordered both the destruction of bin Laden and the rescue of General Motors —

        –and this room-temperature IQ pissant thinks that our president is actively weakening the US.

        Like


      • Rescuing GM looked good. However, it helped the labor unions. Maybe the US could afford such things in the 60s and earlier. With modern international competition, the current grip of the labor unions on manufacturing is not sustainable. It would have been better to let GM and its unions go down the tubes, pour encourager les autres.

        Thor

        Like


      • Yes, as he said to Medvedev, he’ll “have more flexibility after the election”.

        I am sure we’ll see an even bigger clusterfvck in the second term than we saw in the first, and that’s saying something.

        I expect to see disaster, war, etc. Dark days are ahead.

        But hey, at least Fluke will get her “free” contraceptives. Now if we can just find someone that wants to fvck her.

        Like


      • Obama can ‘relate’ to the Japanese about as well as a jellyfish can relate to a giraffe.

        Like


      • Obama can ‘relate’ to the Japanese about as well as a jellyfish can relate to a giraffe.

        Yep

        And one of the first thing Obama did in the white house was send back Winston Churshill’s bust to England…

        He also sent an MP3 with his own speeches to the Queen of England

        Obama can relate to himself only and his race only, this is not my opinion this is what his acts and behavior are “screaming” at us

        Like


    • on November 6, 2012 at 1:42 pm Reality wake up

      “Obama has kept or gotten done with compromise 54% of his campaign promises.”
      54% woo-hoo!
      The stock market is way up?
      Well if you flood the banking system with Q.E. by giving cheap money to the bankers…of course they speculate on the market on the cheap.
      I don’t think that you should be talking about “common sense”

      Like


      • And your alternative would have been what? More layoffs. more bankruptcies, more restricting lending, a Depression?

        Like


      • Instead of bailing out the bankers, stick it to the bond holders.

        Look at Iceland, they had their depression for a year or so and now they are outgrowing us all.

        Like


    • so you’re gay. of course you voted Obama.

      Like


    • That’s fairly stupid. An Obama reelection will kill Midwest recovery by killing fracking and gas, manufacturing’s return is based on cheap natural gas which Obama as tribune of the SWPL is sworn to kill. Meanwhile your job will go to a Black or Hispanic person as Obama has said, White guys need to give up their jobs so Black people can have them. The stock market is up because Bernanke is debasing the currency (flight to hard assets). As far as bin Laden goes, Obama’s hug the Muslim Brotherhood act has collapsed, as Amb. Stevens and four other Americans found out, Obama called the SEALs and they got bin Laden, they called him and were told they were expendable. A reelected Obama will be impeached and drip-drip-drip exposed via Internet on Fast and Furious, and running stingers to AQ in Syria through Benghazi/Turkey.

      Like


      • Ok first supposedly Obama wants to kill coal. Now you are saying he wants to kill natural gas. What the hell, you honestly think he wants windmills on every car?

        Like


      • 0bama is on public record saying he wants to kill coal, so it’s not simply that whiskey says 0bama wants to kill coal. You might try this thing we have called “Google”, it’s useful.

        And as for fracking, the entire Left in the US is galvanizing against fracking (and therefore against natural gas). Why? Ask why. What I think you will find is that plentiful domestic natural gas destroys all of their Statist machinations and Malthusian delusions.

        Please go back to Huffpo and hang out with your buddies. You’re obviously a garden-variety Useful Idiot.

        Like


      • IF fracking does not affect ground water and IF it is not a source for earthquakes and IF frac sand can be safely mined and transported, then fracking should have no problems continuing. And for the record, Huffington Post kicks the Blaze, the Drudge Report World Net Daily and Red State with ease.

        Like


      • You’re referring to the Fashion Section, I imagine.

        And how do you propose we prove that fracking does not affect earthquakes, given that we don’t know how earthquakes happen? Pssh. Stop being stupid.

        Like


      • There is nothing more important than owning our own future, and if that means we work out how to frack properly, then that is what we should do, and if that means a few tremors, well then, that’s a small price to pay for independence from the people that currently sell us our oil. And no random study from some random group positing that there MIGHT be a problem with tremors due to fracking (injecting liquid way, way down in the crust) is going to change my mind that we need energy independence. And if tremors ARE an issue (one study/swallow does not a season make), there is always the possibility that we could harness that energy with geothermic generators.

        “Energy independence” ≠ solar or wind (or even fuel cells, geothermic, etc.). Simply put, the K of these energy sources is far, far inferior to the K of existing petrol/natural gas sources (particularly the domestic type). So peddle that idea somewhere else, until your preferred solutions’ K rises well above current thresholds (would need to double in solar before I’d be interested).

        The idea that those on your side have a monopoly on “science” and deep thinking is quite simply annoying. I would pat your head if we were in the same room.

        Now, back to the more important discussion of bedding women.

        Like


      • Not a Monopoly-Notice the capitalized IF in my post. Energy independence is a good concept-but it can’t be done if it means the destruction of vast areas of our environment

        Like


      • Your “IF” is simply Critical Theory bullsh¡t. The idea that we cannot begin an endeavor unless we know the outcome.

        It must be tough for you, to have thoughts like this. But please don’t change. It makes my life easier.

        Like


      • Wrong. More like Proceed with Caution. Of course there will be tradeoffs. It is just common sense to minimize the negative consequences whenever possible

        Like


      • So now we have a reasonable, rational comment from you.

        It makes a change.

        Do you think that those that are on my side of this discussion do not “proceed with caution”? What sort of jerk are you?

        Like


      • Yeah that’s it Keep up the condescending comments and the insults. Whatever. My comments have been rational all along. Amazing but true people can make rational comments that are opposite of your views. Time for Obama’s victory speech Signed sealed and delivered

        Like


      • Yes, I am watching.

        “The best is yet to come.”

        I can’t wait.

        Prepare three envelopes.

        Like


      • I grew up in natural gas territory. There are thousands of wells, more wells than people in a lot of places. There’s a natural gas glut right now. We don’t need more drilling. What we need is wider distribution of technology that can allow us to burn CNG for motor fuel, etc. Then the price of natural gas will rise due to more demand. Gas is But until then, gas prices are at historic lows.

        Fracking needs to be done with care and it needs to have limits and transparency.

        There’s no reason to pollute the water and the soil for future generations.

        Like


      • “…0bama is on public record saying he wants to kill coal, so it’s not simply that whiskey says 0bama wants to kill coal. You might try this thing we have called “Google”, it’s useful. …”

        Yesterday , the day following Obama’s re-election coal stocks went down on average by 10 % ( JRCC went down by 24% ) which is a lot

        and they went down in value because people in the business know Obama wants to hurt the coal industry.

        Like


    • Right there with you Rick, but you’re poking the hornet’s nest here. Which is normally my job.

      Looking forward to keeping the rapacious plutocrats out of the White House for another four years. It’s going to be a good night.

      Like


    • The amusing thing here is you appear to think the endgame will differ either way.

      Pull the magic lever my monkeys and chose the captain of the US Titanic. This bitch is going down no matter what sock puppet you place in the captains chair.

      He can play with his Fischer Price controls all he wants the end is the same…a cold watery grave for passengers and crew.

      Like


    • on November 6, 2012 at 11:54 pm Rihanna Deserved It

      Everything about this post sub-communicates that you’re a loser

      Like


      • Yeah well my demographics are my demographics and facts are facts. But regardless, the guy I voted for won so that is what counts.

        Like


      • You voted for the guy who won by less than a percentage point, and you united yourself to the patchwork of parasite losers of the country to do so. You are a self-hating, undereducated pimple, and yes, you are now in the majority of this country.

        Unfortunately for you, my cohort doesn’t give a fuck about majoritarianism or egalitarian utopias. We have guns, and courage, and we will not go out without a fight. So suck up to the present office-holders while you can. You will get yours.

        Keep chirping, you little faggot. “The guy I voted for won so that is what counts”? On the contrary. What counts are the fights you personally engage and win, not what fights are won on your behalf. Particularly when the victories are pyrrhic, temporary, and ultimately self-destructive.

        Matt

        Like


      • Majority rule is mob rule. “Democrat” rule is simply soft Marxism. “I win/you lose” (Rick) attempts to obfuscate the Natural Rights of Man, as though whatever we decide is operationally acceptable at this time is somehow legally and morally acceptable. It’s not.

        Meet the New Boss.

        Same as the Old Boss.

        Like


      • Bitter much? Thanks for the laugh. Better get to the gun shop or WalMart early tomorrow-I’m sure lots of paranoid bitter guys will be stocking up on ammo Again lol Forward! – because I sure don’t want to go back

        Like


      • At this point we really need to ask a few questions:

        1. “Go back” to what, exactly, in your mind?
        2. Do you seriously think that folks like us weren’t already fully armed? That’s funny. You make me laugh. I personally could launch an offensive that would take down a small Central American Banana Republic. But that’s just me, perhaps. Let’s see.
        3. I’ve never seen you, “Rick”, on this site. If you happen to be coincidentally a new phenomenon, then I welcome you, as I welcome all new soft targets. Alternatively, I hope you are well-funded, for the Chateau’s benefit. Please hold forth. Please elucidate all of your wondrous ideas. I will no doubt be cowed by the sheer force of your ideas. This is of course despite having been brow-beaten with all of your stupid Dada-esque rantings for the last, oh, twenty plus years.

        Or not.

        Let’s see it. Convince me. The strength of your ideas should shine through.

        Like


      • Seriously-what are you so well armed for? Assaulting your workplace or a movie theater? I have no obligation to prove myself to some arrogant gun crazed guy I have posted on here in the past I will post on here in the future

        Like


      • Going back to just before Teddy R would be about right.

        Thor

        Like


      • It’s so fortunate that the fact that I have purchased a good enables you to avoid having a discussion with me about principles.

        That will work for you. Until it does not.

        Like


      • No matter how hard you try you aren’t going to bait me. Anyways, I am calling it a night. Here in Minnesota Bachmann is tied and the Marriage Amendment and the Voter ID amendments are too close to call. Lots of interesting results still to come. But hey, seems like I might need to visit Colorado sometime.

        Like


      • No, you mistake my motivations. I am not trying to “bait” you.

        I am merely working to expose your lack of moral rectitude. It’s just a bit of fun for me, as I sit poolside (literally).

        You haven’t thought things through. You are a water-carrier. A Fellow Traveler. A pvssy.

        Prepare three envelopes.

        Like


      • White guy in Baltimore last Friday was brutally beaten by eight youths at a bus stop a few blocks from Camden yards. Is in a medically induced coma right now. They stomped his head while he was helpless and unconscious on the ground. In broad daylight.

        Police are hoping somebody will come forward with a description of the attackers. They are searching for a motive.

        Obama supporters? Yes.

        Should the guy have been packing? Yes.

        Like


      • Criminal activity of that sort has been going on regardless of who the President is. Most of our murders are a result of blacks killing blacks. So does that mean Obama supporters are killing Obama supporters?

        Like


      • Seriously-what are you so well armed for?

        Utter incredulity about this question is all you need to know about a man. The other blanks fill themselves in.

        Like


      • Packing is illegal in Baltimore, how convenient.

        Like


      • Love the internet tough guy that comes out when ol’ King A gets butthurt. Call of Duty:Special Warfare awaits you, Matt. Better save your bile for your next multiplayer tourney instead of spewing it all out here.

        Like


  3. Romney was the best candidate in terms of elect-ability and alpha sex appeal that the Republican could muster up. Clearly he did all he could. He ran a campaign that was shrewed and calculated but in the end, he won’t be able to get past the demographic changes and wasn’t able to reframe the debate.

    Republicans would be do well to realize that they can never win another national election again. Policy changes are in order.

    Like


    • Agreed. I think Republicans are going to have to become “Gimmedat Light” if they ever want to win again.

      Like


      • But why vote for light when you can vote for the real thing?

        Like


      • +1

        The Democrats own the “Gimmedat” brand.

        Like


      • Dan’s right. This is the biggest problem we face today. The R’s are peddling Diet Coke, and the D’s are peddling “The Real Thing”. Diet Coke will lose every time. So it turns out that not teaching Civics for 50 years produces an electorate that is essentially a bunch of babies looking for their next bottle. Quelle surprise.

        “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.” ― Alexis de Tocqueville

        Or as my Father likes to say, “As long as you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul’s vote.”

        Once again, “poolside” seems to be the only viable choice.

        Like


    • “Policy changes” aren’t in order. Demographic and electoral composition changes are in order. If a Republican has to speak Spanish to win a future election, then winning means nothing.

      This was a hinge election, the last chance to begin the necessary reforms through the electoral process. Our suicidal, dependent fat-princess citizenry said no. So the revolution will begin in earnest.

      Voters are 54% female now. If you have learned anything from this website, you understand that this is untenable. Elections will not solve that fundamentally self-annihilating facet of our ruling system. Rather, an external pressure will have to be brought to bear.

      Matt

      Like


      • Your fantasizing about the coming race war is just that. Nobody wants that except the usual tiny minority, with no nukes, no firepower relative to the forces you’re up against, and nothing but rhetoric. If any kind of violent revolution comes, it’ll be long after we’re all dead and it won’t be until the standard of living in the US drops *drastically*. Everyone, including your much-vaunted white man, is sitting too cushy and has too much to lose to jeopardize their freedom. But enjoy your revolutionary fantasies if it makes you feel better.

        Like


      • Please direct me to where I referred to a “coming race war.” You are confusing me with someone else. Revolutions take many forms.

        Did you know, fat princess, that this country was born in revolution and recognizes the built-in Lockean right to revolution? A revolution which, under certain circumstances, becomes not just a right but a duty? Take Two Treatises of Government and call me in the morning with your ill-informed presumptions.

        You talk of my “fantasies,” and yet you are insulated to the point that you cannot fathom violence. The thing about violence is that it escalates quickly, and sheltered pontificators like you are shocked into disbelief at the “movie” unfolding in front of their eyes when it happens — because Hollywood forms your entire cartoon understanding of violence. We go along to get along, until we don’t. This is how the assassination of a minor figure can lead to world war.

        No, “fantasy” is imagining violence to have been made obsolete by philosophers and statesmen. As “Year One,” “the war to end all wars,” and “peace for our time” demonstrate, the deeper the delusion, the less prepared one is, the slower one is to cut it off at its source, and the more pronounced and unlimited the subsequent carnage.

        Go back to “Call of Duty” and “Halo,” twat, and stop assuming we are all at your level of sophistication.

        Matt

        Like


      • I’m not American and I don’t live in America (although I have in the past and I’ve read more than my share of American political philosophy.) So your assumptions about my weight, what I know of revolution or how much violence I’ve witnessed in my lifetime are moot. But it’s the internet, I suppose straw men are the coin of the realm here since none of us can see each other.

        I’m just surprised to see this “I have guns and know how to use ’em” pissy keyboard jockeying from you, since you’ve generally come across as one of the more thoughtful and measured posters here. But I forgot, it’s the internet, we’re all revolutionary badasses armed to the teeth here. Thanks for the reminder.

        Like


      • @spiralina
        ” Everyone, including your much-vaunted white man, is sitting too cushy and has too much to lose to jeopardize their freedom”

        What universe are you in? In the US and many other places, freedoms are being jeopardized every day, and not just jeopardized but steadily removed.

        Thor

        Like


      • Yes yes the en dis near. Prepare three envelopes. Wait, what’s in the envelopes? OK you win! I mean, not the election, I want to know that special knowledge about the three envelopes, that only special people know,that big, serious secret thing a librul can’t thnik up. Pinkos are idiots!! And all the peeps that elec ted them! Sky is falling, you should have listented to me! Think o the chilluns!

        Like


      • “If a Republican has to speak Spanish to win a future election, then winning means nothing.”

        Viva La Raza, Pinche.

        Like


    • It’s over. Probably for good, or at least until a major collapse. You might not have to wait very long. Once the majority of voters believe that they need the government to survive (most easily achieved by making it true), then you have past the tipping point – you cannot win on a program of reducing government. This is what happened in Europe circa 1948-1970.

      And now it has happened in the US. And there is no way out except through the collapse.

      Thor

      Like


      • What’s wrong with speaking Spanish? Knowledge of more than 1 language has never hurt anyone and championing ignorance as a virtue does appear to be uniquely American. At least I can’t recall anyone doing that in Europe during the first 20-some-odd years of my life. Little bitty Switzerland has 4 (count them: Four) official languages (they appear on documents, etc. together) and is unquestionably among the world’s most prosperous, peaceful, clean and stable countries. The fact that it is also among the world’s most boring countries – unless you’re a skier or mountain climber – is a different matter…….

        Like


      • @Wolfie
        “What’s wrong with speaking Spanish? Knowledge of more than 1 language has never hurt anyone and championing ignorance as a virtue does appear to be uniquely American.”

        Maybe the thread is garbled somehow. But i NEVER would write that there is anything wrong with speaking Spanish – or in general, speaking several languages. (I speak and write two with full fluency and can make various amounts of headway in at least three others). Now, although I never wrote that in this thread, I believe it to be a bad idea, both for the individual and for the greater society, to move to a new country and refuse to learn its main language, at least over time. If you really move to Pakistan, learn to speak Urdu! Seriously!

        Thor

        Like


  4. heartiste,

    why are you always so butthurt at libertarians? i’m one of those aspie DC cheap chalupa types, and among my cohorts they’re probably 40% johnson, 40% not bothering to vote, 20% obama/romney

    Like


    • mefinks he can’t tell the difference between a (neo)liberal and a libertarian

      Like


      • I agree that CH has a short circuit in his brain regarding libertarians. I think it is because he thinks that they tend to be OK with low IQ people wandering across borders. He may be right about that issue, however. Most still consider most other aspects of libertarianism better than social conservatism.

        Like


      • Hans Hermann Hoppe explains this, after a fashion. He points out that a free trade in goods happens only if there is an importer specifically wanting the goods. Not so with people, who can come on their own. I would add that imported goods does not turn around and demand social services, nor do they trigger liberal hyperinfracaniphilia. But people do, and end up at emergency clinics etc.

        Thor

        Like


      • All kinds of animals migrate. They adapt, migrate or die. So you ‘re saying you can’t compete, then, and complaining? Why should anyone care?

        Like


      • without welfare, there will be an economic disincentive to “just show up”. It’s also way easier to cut welfare than have a massive (costly) border patrol.

        Like


      • Milton Friedman and others have pointed out that you can have free immigration OR you can have a welfare state. But not bothl

        Some people, including Milton’s son David, have suggested that you let people in (to your typical Western Welfare state, from a third world country, more or less implied) but make it clear they are ineligible for welfare for 20 years.

        However, it is almost impossible to make even this work. For starters, at least in the US, the US-born children of these people would be US citizens, which defeats much of the purpose of the welfare exclusion. For another, hard up immigrants would be made poster boys/girls for how the malicious authorities stick the original deal, and the media would be raging for removing the exclusion.

        So, you can make it work in Dubay, but not in the UK, US, Canada, France etc.

        Thor

        Like


    • I would go further. Nearly all libertarians I know believe the national Libertarian Party sold out years ago and see Johnson as focused more on Ameria’s honor and power abroad than on the core tenets of non-agression and use of violence for defense only.

      Furthermore, in their more philosophically lucid moments, my anarcho-libertarian friends characterize the act of voting as a form of delegated violence and theft. For them, a refusal to vote is not just a matter of “not bothering” but a deliberate ethical statement.

      I know of no libertarians voting for the incumbent. The few voting for Romney, their self-identification as libertarian notwithstanding, reveal themselves upon closer questioning to be paleo- or Constitutional conservatives.

      My 2 bits.

      Like


  5. If Romney loses the Repubs should just pass the entire liberal platform: university admissions must reflect the demographics of the country (call Harvard and Brandeis’ bluff, they’d hate it), no more energy from oil, coal, or natural gas (the people would throw a fit), business hiring must reflect national demographics (destroy the private sector). More public unions and welfare (destroy the public finances). More transsexuals in girls bathrooms, more aid for single moms. Just burn the sucker down.

    Like


    • Come on JS -hyperbole does not add anything to a rational discussion

      Like


      • on November 6, 2012 at 1:49 pm Reality wake up

        It’s very rational.

        Why prolong the agony? Swift end to the suffering and an early start to rational (small) govenment.

        Everything he says would be said by ‘bama.

        Like


      • Liberals by nature are not very rational, so having a discussion with a liberal is a rarely a rational one.

        Liberals believe the hype from the left leaning main stream media, how can this be called rational ?

        The main stream media distorts everything conservative say and do, and embellishes everything liberals say and do.
        The average liberal simply swallows this as if it was the pure and perfect truth never ever trying to look further for the complete in context story. How is that rational?

        Despite all the facts and logical arguments we present them, liberals stubbornly refuse to see the light. How is that rational?

        We show them the numbers the feminists have been lying about for decades, the liberals still side with the feminists; that is irrational

        We show them the FBI numbers on Black on white crime, they call us racist for daring mentioning those numbers; how is that rational?

        We show them that Obama has increased the deficit way way more in four short years than Bush did in eight years; they insist the deficit is Bush’s fault and refuse to blame Obama; how is that rational?

        We show them Obama had promised to bring the troops home but in fact sent 30,000 more troops to combat, and that he was campaigning in 2008 as the “peace president” ( as opposed to McCain being the “war president” ) but Obama has increased the number of Drone attacks in which innocent civilians are killed in the middle east. But the liberal still says Bush is the evil one and Obama is the peace president; how is that rational?

        And I could go on all day.

        There is very rarely – almost never – such a thing as a rational discussion with a liberal.

        Like


      • Yes, he’s using drones — instead of spending 100 billion a year and killing thousands of foot soldiers.

        On the scale of state-sponsored violence, Obama has committed less of it — and spent less money to do so — than Bush did.

        On the other hand, Romney is itching to blow the shit out of Iran, and enrich his plutocrat buddies in the process.

        Don’t forget also that Obama ended the war in Iraq. Or hadn’t you gotten that news up in the great white north yet?

        This reasoning liberal is willing to go toe-to-toe with you, if you want to debate facts. But not until my hangover wears off tomorrow.

        Like


      • on November 6, 2012 at 7:45 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Jason, what do you think of President Obama reserving the unilateral right to kill anyone, US citizen or not, without due process? Coming from any president, Democrat or Republican, I find that very disconcerting.

        Like


      • Yes, this is a good point. I think it’s telling that Obama’s opponents hate him for all the wrong reasons, when there are very good reasons to hate him indeed, indefinite detention legislation being a big one.

        Like


      • We’ve been at war with Iran since 1980. We just refuse to admit it.

        The next four years will demonstrate that I am correct. I hope we survive it.

        The White Nationalists on here are secretly (or not secretly) hoping that a nuclear Iran means a radioactive ZOGIsrael. I personally do not wish for that future, as I have other fish to fry, and in general do not wish to see a nuclear Iran – I don’t want to see a return of the Caliphate in any way. But that’s just me, I guess.

        “Shabbas goyim!” comments from Greg et al can be found below, is my prediction. For those folks, my only question is: can you be sure that a nuclear Iran will use its nuclear warheads on Israel, and NOT on the USA?

        I am not sure of that.

        Like


      • Jay, you should know by now you can’t square this circle. Your apologetics for the champions of the opposite of everything this community stands for doesn’t work. Give it a rest.

        I realize you and your bitches are feeling peppy today, but you have to take account of the larger picture. “This reasoning liberal”? What the fuck is that? I’ve never met one. You’re all the same predictable, cliché spouting bores. At least demonstrate yourself to be different.

        Matt

        Like


      • “We show them that Obama has increased the deficit way way more in four short years than Bush did in eight years; they insist the deficit is Bush’s fault and refuse to blame Obama; how is that rational?”

        Are you kidding me? This is the most retarded thing I’ve ever read on this site. Bush managed to turn a record surplus into a record deficit in less than a year. The cost’s of Bush’s tax cuts, Iraq and Afghan wars, and the 2008 stimulus and bailout/TARP spending outspends Obama’s stimulus spending and tax cuts by a factor of 3-4. Who’s being irrational here?

        Now lets look at Romney’s economic plan. He’s going to cut taxed by %20 across the board, not take away any of the tax deductions that are popular, increase military spending by trillions of dollars , and the deficit is magically going to disappear. Irrationality at it’s peak.

        This article give very good points about why single mothers will vote Democratic. But I’m willing to bet the gender gap is much wider that it otherwise would be because when Republicans took control of all those states in 2010 they decided to launch a full on war against abortion, and because of the “rape pregnancy is God’s plan” and “legitimate rape” comments other republicans that are running make.

        I actually think Romney would be a decent president. But his party is full of ass clown zealots who want to legislate their religious views on everyone else, kind of like they do in Arab countries. I have no idea if he’ll cater to their whims once in office. If it wouldn’t be a waste I would vote for Gary Johnson, but my vote is going against the ass clown religious zealots.

        Like


      • Yeah so interesting to know that Republicans think rape is God’s plan but being gay is a choice. Seriously, how messed up are things when a man running for Senate actually believes some sort of magically hormone gets produced when a woman is raped and that it helps her to not get pregnant. And yet so many of you rip on liberals. You enjoy being associated Republican morons?

        Like


      • Bush in 8 years added 4 trillion or a trillion per 2 years

        Obama in 4 years added 5 trillion or more than a trillion per year which is more than TWICE as bad as what Bush did.

        Google it dear retarded.

        Like


      • Raising tax rates rarely raises revenue. What is needed is to cut expenditure.
        Among reasonable measures:

        Throw labor union leaders in jail for creating cartels. They should
        be subject to the same laws that businesses are.

        Cut unemployment to say six months, the way it used to be.

        Get rid of minimum wage laws.

        Roll back the whole welfare alphabet soup, with exceptions for the truly disabled.

        Make payments for personal help (e.g. house cleaning) tax deductible.
        This was done in Sweden (so called Rut-avdrag). It works.

        At some point, many now unemployed will find jobs as personal servants.
        Many others will find job in restarted manufacture, no longer burdened by unions, minimum wages and the like.

        And the US will come roaring back!

        Thor

        Like


      • Give it a rest. Democrats don’t do higher math.

        Like


      • when Bush left office the debt was about 65% of GDP

        Obama has made it go up to about 95% of GDP ( and he is planning on making it much worse )

        look at the graphs here dear retarded,

        Like


    • “Just burn the sucker down.”

      Agreed. Humpty Dumpty was more repairable than our society is.

      Like


  6. If white people are 78% of the population how can they lose by demographics? Ridiculous.

    What the Rs need to do is put a guy like Ron Paul against Obama. He was the guy that had the votes, not Romney. Some will hold their nose and vote for Romney anyway, the rest stay home.

    Ron Paul would have gotten the nomination if he was given equal time in the media, not treated sceptically, lied about, etc.

    I will not vote Romney because he is a phony piece of shit who sandbagged Ron Paul, the guy who really stands for the thing Mittens claims to stand for.

    Put the real thing out there, not conservative lite and people will eat it up.

    Like


    • “… If white people are 78% of the population how can they lose by demographics? Ridiculous….”

      The white population in the USA ( and in every white nation on the planet ) is shrinking fast for two reasons; immigration and white women having a very low numbers of children.

      That 78% is from the last census which means it is not true anymore, the actual number is probably 65 to 70 %

      It is quite simple; if democrat is the party of the immigrant and republican the party of the white man and the white population is about 5 to 10% smaller every election cycle, then eventually Republicans will stop winning elections – unless they themselves become liberals – which unfortunately they are already doing anyway.

      Like


      • Europe got it worse and you guys realize that Eurabia is a myth, right?

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurabia

        Sometimes, I don’t give the smallest credit to the “whitey’s gonna die” diatribes.

        Like


      • So census numbers are part of the same conspiracy?

        denying the percentage of whites is going down every year is insane.

        Whitey is not dying but his population is shrinking fast

        even the United nations agrees with this.

        As I said leftists are not rational people, facts and logical arguments mean nothing to them.

        If they feel something is not true then they reject reality.

        irrational…

        Like


      • Statistical error.

        The percentage is going down — but total (denominator) is going up up up.

        You have nothing to worry about. Our fair white skin isn’ going anyplace.

        Like


      • But whites are becoming more r-selected than ever.
        Don’t expect civilizational brillance when half the population are bastards.

        Like


      • NOT a statistical error.

        In 2011, France was the only European Union member with a fertility rate at replacement level, with an average rate of 2.08 children per woman while Ireland’s fertility rate declined to 2.01 children per woman, slightly below replacement level

        Germany is the most populous country in the European Union. However, its fertility rate of 1.42 children per mother is one of the lowest in the world

        The Italian government has tried to limit and reverse the trend by offering financial incentives to couples who have children, and by increasing immigration. While fertility has remained stagnant,

        By 1993 Spanish fertility declined to 1.26 children per woman, the second lowest after Italy.
        In recent years, Spain’s fertility rate has grown from 1.15 children per woman in 2000 to 1.48 in 2011

        The UK has a fertility rate of 1.94 in 2008 according to World Bank and a rate 1.92 children per woman in 2010 according to the CIA Factbook

        Like


      • One fact these satistics leave out is how incredibly crowded those countries are already, especially Germany, Netherlands and England.

        Like


      • crowded? Germany is only crowded in certain areas. Most parts of eastern Germany are anything but.

        Like


      • The White portion of the U.S. is lower than 70%…According to Wikipedia (that bastion of leftism – but facts don’t lie), 64% of the population is ‘non-Latino White’ (basically, the 78% figure includes Latinos). White includes Arabs and North Africans. While they are a small portion, this inflates the number of Whites (which most would consider to be ‘of European descent’). American Jews are considered White (80% of Jews worldwide are Ashkenazi – European – closer to 100% of American Jews) and they represent almost 2% of the American pop. The ‘White’ number is closer to 60%.

        If one separates out Anglo from the rest of the Europeans the numbers fall further.

        I don’t know what the voter preferences are for Italian Americans, but Jewish Americans are overwhelmingly Democrat.

        Factor in a bunch of single white females and the number who will vote for ‘small government’ and a roll back of entitlement programs is lower still. The entitlement society is here to stay…until it eventually collapses. I don’t know about ‘revolution’ but a government that keeps taking on massive debt is going to go under eventually.

        Like


      • on November 7, 2012 at 6:59 pm hamsterbaiter

        Canadian Friend: the birthrate in France is at replacement level – i.e. non-Whites are breeding at a level that will replace the indigenous French.

        http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/hbd-human-biodiversity/the-africanization-of-france/

        Like


    • The real thing was out there. It is up to the candidate to make his case. If his message didn’t get ” eaten up “, then his message was wrong for the majority of people out there.

      Like


      • @Anonymus – Take Oklahoma, add the entire population of California and you have an approximation of what used to be the DDR (East Germany).

        Like


      • I’m not quite sure if we are on the same page, but eastern germany had 16 million inhabitants in 1990. Nowadays it’s only 14 million. In european eyes that is not really a densely populated area.

        Like


  7. Personally i think that none of the candidates is the right one. Paul Ryan’s former economics professor said: “I want the Democrats out of my damn pocketbook, and I want the Republicans out of my bedroom.” and he has it right.

    Like


  8. Pickup artists will not vote. They got better things to do.

    Highlight of the entire post

    Like


    • lol’ed. I was literally scrolling past the article thinking “booooooriiiiing” and noticed that bit.

      It’s also probably true. We’ve already proven that we can find a way to succeed in the shittiest of shitty sexual marketplace societies…if you guys vote someone retarded into office and he fucks a bunch of stuff up, we’ll find a way to adapt and succeed at our goals just like we always do. Vote Aunt Sue for president, it’s no skin off our backs lol

      Like


      • @YaReally

        “The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn”

        -Alvin Toffler

        You’re on point. My simple take is that in any society, the best will always rise to the top. Being gifted, intelligent, & flexible no manner what the landscape will serve me & about 20% of the population no matter what your race, or gender. So I will be fine.

        I am rooting for Romney to steal (not win) the election like Bush did, we can use the controversy, but neither candidate will have my vote of approval. I only trust them as far as I can throw them.

        Like


      • on November 6, 2012 at 3:35 pm stevie tellatruth

        Amen.

        Like


      • Or as the old saying goes : redistribute all the wealth equally and in 20 years the same 5% will own it all again.

        Like


      • Only issue with that statement @Uncle Elmer is the Machiavellian methods alot of the top people use. But alot of truth in that statement nonetheless

        Like


      • What is wrong with Machiavellian methods? Empathy is what got America in this spot in the first place. If everyone was Machiavellian there would be no welfare state.

        Like


    • Exactly.

      Poondogs don’t give a shit who wins. Whether Romney or Obama wins has no effect on putting more poon on my lap. Or anything else for that matter.

      America is a diseased carcass, and it matters not who takes the reins.

      Like


  9. on November 6, 2012 at 1:45 pm Concrete Charlie

    Voting = Beta. You are consenting to someone else’s governance.

    Like


    • There’s nothing beta about consenting to governance. What is cowardly is consenting to ill-governance, I.E. Democracy. By voting you’re giving your consent to the worst possible form of government.

      Like


      • Yeah but I concur with Charlie because the republic is long gone.

        Like


      • Democracy is not entirely bad but look at it this way,

        would you let beta males and ugly women vote on which woman you can marry/ have sex with?

        well that is more or less what democracy is or rather what socialist democracy is.

        Capitalism is less egalitarian but more natural.

        Democracy ( or socialist democracy ) is good for the losers and is bad for the winners ( but as I said it is not entirely bad )

        Like


    • Voting=Alpha Having someone in office that is in agreement with your desires is better than the alternative. But I guess influencing the election through personally spending hundreds of millions of dollars like Adelson and the Koch Brothers could be considered SuperAlpha-or a super waste of money if your candidate loses.

      Like


  10. I think we’ll start to look a lot like Brazil, which isn’t so bad. Brazilians are laid back, they like to party. But there are some filthy, trashy areas. That is America’s future. Standards of living will fall, but not so far that we live in squalor. Ordinary people will still be walking around with cell phones and ipods. But the look and feel of the country will be Latin, not wasp. All in all, it’s not so bad. But that meteoric rise and wasp ascendancy from 1920 – 1970 is dead. America’s greatness is behind her I’m sad to say. Nothing lasts forever. (shrugs)

    Like


    • Brazil is a non-starter, because Brazil has no vast welfare state. What you are likely to see is an “internal revolt” by Whites migrating swiftly to an illegal, underground economy, widespread tax and other governmental evasion, as Whites who are lawful get most of their money and liberty taken away to give to Blacks/Hispanics. All those NAMs who depend utterly on welfare transfers will be in active war (alongside the State) against the White population. Not Brazil but Yugoslavia circa 1990-2000 is the model.

      Like


      • That’s why we need digital bearer bonds.

        Thor

        Like


      • … and Whiskey selling out white separatists who wisely draw the line at Jews.

        Like


      • Brazil HAS a vast welfare state!! Actually, as a brazilian citizen, I can tell you that this image you painted above is no longer true. Brazil is becoming racially divided (thanks to black-on-white hate policies by the communist federal government), has, as I said above, a HUGE welfare state (google : “bolsa-família”, “vale-gás”), has rampant vote fraud (although it is not new), and intimidation by government-aided mobs, and most importantly, this generation of brazilian people is as bad or even worse than american concerning liberal, feminist, gay-oriented agenda… Trust me, you WILL NOT WANT to be like our country. 50,000 homicides PER YEAR…

        Like


  11. on November 6, 2012 at 2:19 pm stevie tellatruth

    “Pickup artists will not vote. They got better things to do.” – Heartiste

    This doesn’t apply to PUAs only. I think most of America is swinging this way. Low voter turnout is growing and the jadedness and modern day cynicism is the zeitgeist of our times.

    now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to vote. Its raining, cold and…there’s really nothing better to do.

    Like


  12. I refuse to vote in any system where said vote is countered by the dead, adolescents, and/or unmarried women.

    Like


  13. Scary how close you are with your prediction. Just today Rush was saying, “Split the country at the Mississippi. All the dems get the west side, all the pubs get the east.”

    Like


    • Split the country at the Mississippi. All the dems get the west side

      except south of the Red River. not safe for dems and marxists (birm) and lawyers.

      Like


    • Yeah good ol Rush-nothing like being divivise and bellicose. I always am struck by the south always being so red but yet those states trail the rest of America in category after category-plus they suck up a huge chunk of federal aid. Maybe Bain Capital needs to fire them and ship them overseas to China.

      Like


      • Looks more like Dems get the east coasr, Great Lakes and west coast, Reps get what Noo Yoackahs like to call ‘fylover’.

        Like


  14. Romney’s 47% remark was crude and way off base

    That was the greatest declaration I have ever heard from any Western politician in my lifetime.

    [heartiste: indeed it was. it may not have been wholly precise (but but… seniors and medicare!), but it hit a fairly wide bullseye that needed hitting. and it struck some really sore, exposed nerves. it is a fact that takers and makers exist, and that the proportion of the number of takers is increasing while the number of makers to support the takers is decreasing.]

    Like


  15. then eventually Republicans will stop winning elections

    This election more or less settles the issue, don’t you think? I mean, Virginia is a swing state and does Colorado. Not to say anything about Florida. In Romney does not win today, the only electable platform for a Republican to follow would be Bill Clinton’s

    [heartiste: the leftward vector of the nation is in motion now, and nothing can stop it. barring a few pyrrhic victories when the wind blows just right and the angle of the hypotenuse is perfectly aligned, it will only get worse and worse, until revolt or the mass of takers starts dying in the streets. this is the power of demography. it grinds relentlessly forward, like a steaming Hawaiian lava flow, incinerating everything in its path.]

    Like


  16. on November 6, 2012 at 2:57 pm Major. Harry Wood

    Are those anal beads around her neck? Typical though for an undersexed, over educated, deadfish, closet dyke, soy latte drinking and prius driving SWPL liberal.

    R is wrong about Asian Americans, many are actually quite conservative/traditional and hate seeing tax dollars being used to support the army of deadbeat bastard children with their slut whore mothers. Especially second and first generation are small business owners and see through the hypocrisy, as well as being extremely xenophobic and hence naturally drawn to conservatism. Even the third generation Asians unless totally indoctrinated by higher education will become pro capitalist conservatives.

    The shaming of sluts are still part of many Asian culture. If an Asian daughter ever dates a “certain race”, they are absolutely done with marriage. Don’t let the facade fool you, there’s a reason why Asian women are skinny and the culture being anti immigration.

    You should do a segment on how conservative chicks are usually hotter, has street smarts and make better girlfriends/mothers. I’ve dated conservative Asians, Hispanics, Blacks and Whites and they all are 10x better… granted the liberal atheist chick was down for anal the first night. Too bad she’ snot even mistress material with that level of open mindedness. Def explains why 25% of New Yorkers have STDs.

    Like


  17. I’m skeptical of the notion that Obama has problem with white voters. He doesn’t—what he has is a problem with white Southerners. Here is data taken from a Pew poll regarding non-Hispanic white likely voters:

    REGION OBAMA ROMNEY
    Northeast 51 41
    Midwest 42 51
    West 45 48
    South 27 66

    Obama is actually very competitive among white voters everywhere but the South.

    Like


  18. Bill that should be passed:

    Diversity Act: Mandates that housing projects for underclass minorities be built in the suburbs of the upper-middle and upper class.

    Advantages:
    1) Forces the leftists and their enablers, who comprise most of the upper-middle and upper classes to live the diversity that their rhetoric praises and thus forcing their morally righteous status posturing to have actual costs rather than having all those costs (of diversity) being passed off onto the white working and middle classes.

    2) If they try and oppose it they would be contradicting and hence undermining their own ideology.

    3) It would force them to move out of those neighborhoods and into the neighborhoods of the middle and white working classes, thus raising the property values of the middle and white working classes homes, from which they can then sell at the higher price and move out of, after which new housing projects would be built in this new upper-middle and upper class suburb under the Diversity Act and the whole process can start over again. Thus the middle and white working classes would be able to use this gentrification process to transfer economic value from the hostile elites to themselves.

    Like


    • 4) By forcing the elites to bear the costs of their policies, they might actually decide to abandon them.

      Like


      • @chris

        The socialist elites are insulated from the poor even in Rio, for Gods sake, or do you think are there any robberies/murders in Ipanema and Leblon?

        It Will take 100 years before the US reaches the demographics of Rio…

        Like


      • That’s why you would need to pass legislation desegregating the elites from the poor minorities.

        Like


      • Wingwoman, gig is a Brasilian (it seems), so he’ll most likely have better information than you. Also, your story is an American story, so I am not really sure what point it is that you are making.

        Having personally seen and worked alongside the favelas for a fair bit of my life, I can say that they are another world that is almost a “paralel” world – the denizens do not leave them, and those outside of them DO NOT go inside of them. I walked through a favela once as a young American (in a suit with a briefcase no less… Christ), and my Brasilian friends were horrified and repeatedly chastised me to never ever do that again.

        Yes, Brasil is one of the capitals of the world in kidnapping. It IS a problem. Yes, there is a lot of intra-favela violence. Yes, there are muggings on the beach (of tourists… note this). But all of this is anecdotal, and not really the direction of gig’s comment. Gig is referring to the structural problem that the favelas represent to the Brasilian economy, and that the elites are far, far removes from having to deal with these people. If this poverty and violence were to start seriously overflowing into the rest of Rio, the government would call out the National Guard to stop it.

        Oh, wait, they already did that. Back in the 90s.

        The National Guard’s job back then? Put the devil back in the box. And they did so.

        Nobody tries to solve the big issues and reduce/eliminate the need for favelas. That would be crazy.

        Gig, espero que você esteja bem.

        Abs, Anonymous

        Like


      • existing local land use density restrictions in single-family residential neighborhoods and the development community would not let this happen or they would continue the practice of contributing funds to, or building units in, “affordable housing banks” (much like wetland/conservation mitigation banks) in the inner city or ring suburbs. the mirage of empathy will continue.

        off topic: S/W/F who is not voting today as what i have today, i will still have tomorrow. and stiiiilllll will be unable to legally unwind with some of that musky, good green.

        Like


      • “mirage of empathy” — i like that.

        Like


      • That’s why you would need to campaign for the passing of the bill. Anyone who disagrees with it could be denounced as racists.

        The beauty about the whole bill and campaign is you would be using their own ideology against them. Using their own rules against them. And they would have to give in lest they be destroyed by the very same cultural and ideological weapons that they themselves created, i.e. if they don’t pass the legislation they could be all called ‘evil bigoted racists’, and that they need to be more ’empathetic’ and ‘open-minded’.

        It would be a way for the right to put the left on the defensive for once while also allowing themselves plausible deniability under the leftists own ideology (which lets face it, with the help of Hollywood and the Media has become the mainstream ideology.)

        Like


      • If you need that ‘musky green’ to unwind, something’s wrong.

        Like


      • But that would undermine one of the cornerstones of upper and upper-middle class liberalism, namely the capacity to come up with or support projects that make them feel better, even virtuous, at somebody else’s expense (somebody else = working class and not-quite-upper-enough middle class).

        Thor

        Like


      • Which is the whole point of it.

        Like


    • Basically the whole point is, the elites use minorities as a sledgehammer against the white working and middle-class. Where does it say it in the rule-book that the white working and middle-class can’t use minorities as a sledgehammer against the elite? It’s time for those on the right to flip the script and think outside the box.

      Like


  19. indeed it was. it may not have been wholly precise

    Agreed. Though the composition wasn’t right, the overall number was. And people revolted in 1789 because there were 20k nobles in Versailles in a nation of 25million people… Sic transit gloria mundi…..

    the leftward vector of the nation is in motion now

    Most of the right in the US dreamns with some sort of Yugoslavia solution where the nation breaks apart. I bet your future is not Lebanon or Bosnia, but Brazil. With worse weather, uglier women and worse food.

    What I really fear is a Brazil-North armed with nuclear weapons and ruled by utopian/deranged liberals.

    Like


    • The Soviet Union collapsed because it ran out of money, it became bankrupt. The strong arm of the Soviet government was the only thing keeping the peace in the multicultural powder-keg of former Yugoslavia.

      In the US and the rest of the West the first condition of a strong armed government keeping the peace in a multicultural powder-keg is already met. The second condition of bankruptcy is also foreseeable in the future.

      It will be interesting times.

      Like


      • In warfare, it’s not the generals who surrender… it’s the accountants.

        Like


      • Something I observed in passing during my staff officer days, but never appreciated. HAC cemented it for me.

        Like


      • If there are any white folks left a century from now, every town in which they hold sway will have a major thoroughfare in his name.

        Like


      • Greg are you in the Northwest?

        Like


      • Maybe, but the accountants are merely messengers. You have to feed the troops and keep giving out ammo. And vehicle fuel. And…
        Now, the old way of squaring this circle was to live off the land. But this works poorly for a modern army. You might be able to find enough food, but the other stuff … not so much.

        Thor

        Like


      • The only thing keeping the peace in Yugoslavia was the strong arm of general Tito.

        Like


  20. Yes, its true that Heartiste said it first, re Hypergamy. And the point that White women are weakly inclined to Black guys like the picture of Sandra Fluke is well made. No, White women are not panting to screw Black guys. But they hate hate hate White beta males with a passion, and the natural inclination to in-group procreate (marriage is basically dead as an institution) is over-ridden by hypergamy and culture and the natural advantage of Black guys being both culturally regarded as more Alpha, and darker skin, greater height, and more testosterone. Where beta providers are undervalued and not important, the risk of non-provision (or violence) by Black guys is also undervalued.

    That’s an on-the-margins call, but the margins are won and lost.

    Like


  21. Can’t wait until tomorrow !

    Like


  22. I’ve had the pleasure of experiencing and listening to a wide variety of politicians from a wide variety of countries/parties/ideologies. In different languages, some of which I understand in the original, no voice-over required.
    They are all a bunch of lying, two-faced, greedy crooks. Republican, democrat, social democrat, ‘people’s partyist’, communist, neo-fascist, conservative, ‘liberal’, makes 0 difference.
    Including these 2 clowns we get to choose from today.
    Personally, I think all the polls claiming that this is a tight race are just sandbagging bullshit so typical of the predominantly democrat media. I cannot see anyone who isn’t a Mormon or a rich White male voting for Romney.
    Anecdotal evidence: The only Romney bumper stickers I see on my daily commutes are on the occasional Mercedes/Lexus in the ‘rich’ neighborhoods, the rest is wall-to-wall Obama.
    My guess is that Mr. Romney was noiminated as the latest in a series of graying out-of-touch golf course patricians whose ‘turn it was’ and whom the Reps are throwing to the wolves because they know they haven’t a prayer against Obama. It may be a little tighter than Obama vs. McCain, but only because Mr. Romney has good hair. VERY important in US elections.

    Like


  23. No presidential ticket with a Catholic in the VP slot has ever lost an election. Statistics don’t like. 269-269 electoral college tie!

    That’s my preferred outcome anyway. That way the God King is humiliated but since the Democrats will probably keep the Senate, we’d still get another four years of Onion Biden.

    http://www.theonion.com/articles/poll-workers-overhear-biden-repeating-phrase-bange,30266/

    Like


  24. I was actually plowing a Conservative chick for awhile. Total prude who hated giving head. I would neg her about her Catholic faith and make her jealous by talking about cute girls I met while volunteering at PP(escorting patients through the picket lines). Eventually got rid of her because she wouldn’t go on the pill and I gotta be free.

    Like


  25. The Soviet Union collapsed because it ran out of money

    Ha! We could teach them a lot about bankrupcy. Brazil went bankrupt almost once every decade since Independence. And the country is still going on. Planes take off and land on time, there is wifi everywhere, the upperclass has the best heart surgeons in the world, orthopedists are probably the best inthe world also..

    And we still manage to have 50k people murd.ered every year

    Like


    • There ya go….
      Since the end of WW II, Italy’s had as many or more elections than Christmases, they’re broke and corrupt to the very core of every farfalle, but life for the average Italian is, all in all, pretty good……

      Like


      • So is that why young Italians are fleeing the country? Because there is so much opportunity there?

        That country is beautiful … but just as economically calcified as the marble pillars in the Roman Forum.

        Like


  26. “… the first thing that pops in their heads when you ask them why they’re voting for Obama is usually something along the lines of ‘Romney wants to take away my birth control’.”

    I love how women are more willing to vote for a party that is pro-birth control, but also vote for a party that is willing to give them handouts if they become single mothers. If they are given easier to access birth control, wouldn’t they not need those handouts? They just want everything for nothing – If the methods to allow them to be promiscuous fail, they’re going to make sure there are no consequences and let other people (Taxpayers) pick up the slack.

    Like


  27. Brazil is a non-starter, because Brazil has no vast welfare state

    Brazil has the largest welfare state among all emerging markets, which is reflected in taxes, which are also the highest among all emerging markets and close to developed countries’ levels.

    I will post a link later of a text explaining what a local hedge fund has called “the Super Welfare State”

    Like


    • Brazil could “afford to go bankrupt” any number of times, because it has no empire of unwilling subject areas (i.e. peoples – areas have no volition).

      The US does not technically either (small spots on the map are irrelevant and also not particularly hostile to US domination). So when the Soviet Union went bankrupt, the occupied areas went independent. The US have none or trivial amounts of occupied areas. It would be interesting to see what would happen if the Logan Act was rescinded or became inoperative – we might see oil companies shouldering the burden of defending their oil fields against nationalizers – or they might go Francisco d’Anconia and just let them burn. After a few iterations, nationalization would lose its popularity.

      Thor

      Like


    • Brazil does not have the TANF, EBT, and other cash and cash equivalent welfare payments that the US has. While import tariffs are high, taxes on the wealthy and upper class are not, and most of the poor live in favelas with little to no paved streets, sewage service, electricity, clean running water, and the like. There is nothing like food stamps, or section 8, or other stuff here in the US in Brazil. You don’t see the poor in Brazil with the flatscreens, $300 sneakers, and Iphones as here.

      Brazil does subsidize fuel, and food, and electricity, but that pales in direct assistance and indirect things like paved roads and working hospitals. Various drug gangs and militias rule the favelas to a greater degree than the gangs here rule say, Detroit. Most of the welfare spending goes to political bosses, ordinary life in the favelas is horrific for even the worse off Detroit dweller.

      Setting up a huge spoils battle, over supporting a near middle class existence for the NAM underclass, and the remaining Whites who don’t want to live at NAM levels and among them.

      Like


  28. I’ve said it before, I say it again: white women are the enemy.

    Like


  29. on November 6, 2012 at 5:23 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

    Pregnant mom casts ballot for Obama while in labor:

    “Though she is against abortion, Malone, of Dolton, said her belief that women should have the right to make their own decisions prompted her to vote for President Barack Obama.

    “I just agree with more of his policies than with (Mitt) Romney’s,” she said.

    “I grew up on Sesame Street and PBS,” she said. “He wants to cut that. What will my daughter grow up on?”

    Repeal the 19th!

    Like


    • >>“I grew up on Sesame Street and PBS,” she said. “He wants to cut that. What will my daughter grow up on?”

      &#*$&!!!! Maybe she should grow up with a REAL MOTHER. What a fucktard. And she’s 21 too. Where the hell is the father?

      Like


  30. ” Pickup artists will not vote. They got better things to do.”

    Spot on as usual CH.

    As I read this I was debating between spending my evening on voting or booty call.

    My state was locked up before the polls opened anyway so it’s time for “Bring the movies”

    Yeahup.

    My political views aside , I’ve never felt like my vote mattered less than it does this election. I’d sooner vote Ron Paul or Ralph Nader than contact a germ-ridden touchscreen for either of these plastic milquetoast chodes. What bothers me most is that neither of them stand for anything.

    But just for fun, my prediction:
    Obama wins the popular vote by 4 or 5 %
    Obama wins the electoral vote by a 90 point margin.
    Dems pickup a handful of seats in the house and maybe 2 in the senate.

    Like


    • Who spends an “evening on voting”?

      Can’t you big-talking monomaniacs walk and chew gum at the same time? He’s too busy getting pussy to vote! He must be a superalpha playa PUA!

      This is a country of adolescents. The only difference is that the self-hating adolescents care enough to seize real power. And the rest of you idiōtēs just re-upped them through your complacency, a misplaced complacency you mistake for proof of your dedication to a certain pursuit.

      “Spot on,” CH!

      Matt

      Like


  31. I am replying here because I can not do it up there

    “…Hugh G. Rection

    Rick, why does the man have an obligation to the woman if she has the option to terminate the pregnancy or give the child up for adoption? Why is her obligation optional and his obligation mandatory? …”

    Because Rick is a liberal and liberals always take the side of feminists

    Like


    • on November 6, 2012 at 8:36 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Well I did ask Rick because usually you’ll then see that all the “equality” talk stops when it comes to a man shouldering responsibility.

      Like


  32. on November 6, 2012 at 7:59 pm Sgt. Joe Friday

    As Ben Stein’s father, Nixon advisor Herbert Stein, once observed, “anything that cannot go on forever will stop.”

    That’s it. One day the Chinese and the rest of the world will quit buying our bonds, and the dollar will cease to be the world’d reserve currency. The Fed will try to “monetize the debt,” and then we’ll have South American 1980s-style hyperinflation.

    By 2040 or sooner, the demographic tipping point will be reached, and thanks to our poisoned politics there’s nothing that says we won’t become a tangle of quarreling ethnic & identity factions. Right about then Social Secuity and Medicare be seriously broke, for real. Brazil? Only if we’re lucky.

    Like


  33. So Romney carries Florida, North Carolina and Virginia while Obama wins Ohio and New Hampshire and America votes for 4 more years of Hussein, the Red?

    The American Republic is done for good. The borders of Latin America now cover the entire landmass from Patagonia to the Artic Circle.

    Like


  34. So is that why young Italians are fleeing the country? Because there is so much opportunity there?

    It did just fine for as long as you can imagine. They did a mistake 12 years ago called EURO, and that mistake was only noticed 4 years ago.

    Keep in mind that the Duomo in Firenze is 600 years old, while the Forum in Rome is more than three times older.

    Then you put in perspective the current 4 years of crisis against Italian history.

    Like


    • The EURO would have worked for the Italians (and the rest of the PIIGS countries) if they had not run deficits!

      Thor

      Like


      • Not so sure that was avoidable. There’s a reason the Italian lira was worth about 1500 per $, the Spanish peseta and Greek drachma 300 per $, and Portuguese escudo some similar value.

        Like


    • History and perspective aren’t among most Americans’ strong suits.What happened yesterday is old news, what happened last week might as well have happened in the Stone Age. What have you done for me lately?

      Like


  35. >Libertarians will vote 70-30 Obama (such independent free-thinkers, those libertarians!).

    Anyone who votes for Obama is ipso facto not a libertarian.

    Why do you hate us? Because we want a society filled with superhuman capitalist overmen?

    Like


    • Yes, CH was wrong on that, but Obama might win in Florida by a margin less than the votes Gary Johnson got.

      That should tell the GOP that they have no choice but to go libertarian (small l) if they ever expect to win again, especially because it is the only way to really dig into the youth and minority votes that don’t have boners for white family values.

      Like


    • I too have trouble fathoming the antipathy, not only for libertarian thought but also for Austrian economic theory. One would think that such notions as individualism, hard money, self-responsibility, right of armed self-defense, unencumbered private property, voluntary association with or disassociation from whomever one wants based upon contract rather than coercion, and freedom in general from forcible intervention in one’s personal and financial affairs would appeal to most folks here. But apparently not.

      Like


      • I used to be a libertarian for most of my politically active life. But the disintegration of social bonds and turning everyone into corrupt, atomized mercenaries doesn’t appeal to me anymore.

        Like


  36. If Romney does indeed eke out a victory, he may well be the last ever Republican president. It is hard to deny this post’s central claim that the undertow of cultural & demographic change is turning the USA into a Brazilian style one party state. The Republican party is still captive to a parasitic neocon element, and it is hard to see how they will change course in time. A 3rd Party of the Populist Right is the only hope – of course the media elite will do its best to villify anything new that is not conformist to the strictures of PC orthodoxy. Even requiring photo ID for voting is considered a civil rights violation even in states with high % of illegal aliens.

    Like


    • On the news hour on PBS – not a right wing news source by any measure – they have just said that every election the Republican lose about 2% of white voters because there are LESS and LESS white people in the USA.

      Indeed this might be the last time a Republican is elected ( if Romney wins which I don’t think he will, even if I wish he would)

      Like


  37. the 47% is well defined. 47% of the population do not pay any federal income taxes.

    Like


  38. I hope Rick had time to go vote.

    When he gets back, I hope he has time to read about the Great Depression and its causes. It wasn’t caused by Herbert Hoover, despite what he has heard all of his life from the Democrats.

    When Obama leaves office in 2016, he will still be blaming Bush and the Republicans for the economic mess. Things are NOT getting better.

    Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it. Or, more to the point, there is no cure for stupid.

    Like


  39. Oh, about today’s election. Looks like our nation is going to give four more years to an entirely failed and incompetent CEO. Fuck that nation.

    I feel the same way towards that nation as I felt towards the Africans after the OJ Simpson verdict was followed by joyous celebrations.

    Just get away from these people (Africans and all other Democrats). They are stupid as shit but can be dangerous to themselves and others. Avoid.

    Like


    • Hey gramps-Do yourself and us alpha guys a favor and get the hell out of America you racist narrow minded dumbass

      Like


      • Heh, heh… you sound alpha. loozozzolllzoozl

        Like


      • I like a good healthy debate but damn it, stick to rational points of differences. I just lose it when comments like gramps and so forth get made

        Like


      • “Losing it” over gramps’ comments… and using ‘racist’, as if it’s a viable epithet… and referring to oneself as ‘alpha’, when no one else is… does not an alpha make.

        Keep these points in mind for next time.

        Like


      • Oh hell so what are you saying – If a group is on Facebook, let’s say it is Aerosmith instead of Tea Party Patriots, and they are able to reach out to millions of fans, that somehow makes them less Alpha? Facebook is just an option to get and spread information. To ignore a source of information due to it being somehow not Alpha is non sensical

        Like


      • The concept of Facebook in and of itself, and especially the way it’s use has evolved, could only be charitably described as alpha for a peacock, not a lion.

        Point taken, though, if you meant to say there are different types of ‘alpha’.

        Like


      • Facebook can be lots of different things. Me? I use it to be kept in touch with various groups-music, literature, politics, local news, national news, local stores, humor that are of interest to me. No peacocking whatsoever.

        Like


      • I understand many young ladies pretty much live and die by Facebook… I’m thinking of making a Facebook and MySpace consolidation, and urging them all to get onto MyFace.

        Like


      • Rick,

        I think you lost it a long time ago.

        Anger is no substitute for facts and logical thinking.

        About those Obama supporters. My son-in-law is an Obama supporter. He lives in a neighborhood of Obama supporters. He keeps a gun, and taught my daughter how to use it, just in case some of those Obama supporters break into his house.

        Working for the Feds will do that to you.

        Like


      • Yeah talking about logical thinking and facts is rich after the post you made.

        Like


      • Why are you guys responding to Rick? People like that don’t just show up out of the blue, I think he’s a regular commenter tr0lling for laughs.

        Like


      • I love when one anti-white exhorts pro-whites to ignore another anti-white.

        I also love fresh croissants and tight teen snatch.

        Like


      • Nothing more loathsome in my view than an anti-white white. Good on Spiralina.

        Like


      • I am not a anti-white white. Do I think some blacks are useless bags of DNA that should be charged for the oxygen they inhale? Yes Same thing with over the top politicians. Key is word is Some. Gramps initial statement was an all inclusive one-and that is what made his comment racist.

        Like


    • I feel the same way towards that nation as I felt towards the Africans after the OJ Simpson verdict was followed by joyous celebrations.

      Funny you should mention said celebrations… upon witnessing that spectacle on TV… especially since the raucous cheers I saw were coming from negro university students (the alleged creme de la creme of that ilk, such as it is)… I felt the indelible stamp of a dread and signature event… one of the turning points of a nation, as it were… in my heart.

      Like


  40. Gerald Celente explains why it doesn’t matter who wins the election.

    Like


  41. on November 6, 2012 at 11:27 pm Anti-Blue pill

    YAY four more years,embrace the suck people. this cuntry is fucked.

    Like


  42. Romney had stacked against him the media which went to bat in a big way for Obama down the stretch. It started with Candy Crowley and continued through the hurricane.

    That does not excuse Romney. How many Northeastern (especially New England) men have won the presidency? Romney did not stand up to the media because he was too timid.

    What would Ronald Reagan have said to Candy Crowley when she injected her opinion (yes, opinion) into the debate? He would not have stuttered. He would have put her in her place. (“I paid for this microphone!” Check that out on YouTube. Romney could never have done this.)

    The GOP is riddled with lame professional politicians but no leaders. With the new level of media coverage the GOP needs someone with personality who is not afraid to speak his mind.

    In retrospect, Newt Gingrich would have had a better chance than Romney, and Santorum was right about Romney.

    If the GOP cannot win this election, it is over for them. Court Latinos? Whatever. They lost their own Midwestern home states! These are the state that killed them. Americans still clean hotel rooms in these states. Latinos nothing.

    Like


  43. Looks like Obama won it.

    Like


  44. Romney got crushed in the state where he was governor. That speaks volumes.

    Like


    • Rick, stop tr0lling!

      Like


      • Can’t handle basic reality? So just because I hold a different opinion and offer counter points, I am trolling? I am open to learning and taking in new information but the amount of hysteria, speculation, paranoia, and name calling is amazing here.

        Like


      • No, posting a million messages taunting and baiting on a forum where nobody agrees with you is tr0lling. And it’s the internet, the land of hysteria, speculation, paranoia and name calling. If you don’t like it read a book or something.

        Like


  45. 4 more years! 4 more years! All you beta guys can bring your women to me to be properly serviced by alphas like me

    Like


    • Chanting like that ill befits a chieftain.

      Service? The only thing you could serve is high tea at mama’s weekly book club.

      I and anyone with half an eye predicted O’s reelection weeks ago on this very forum, no surprise to be had there, hence no need for exclamation laden joy.

      Like


      • Yeah whatever. Just doing a little dig, And you got yours in. The election is over. Hell lots of other candidates I wanted to win won so life is good. But life goes on -I just think it will go on a bit better with Obama as President.

        Like


      • Well, I guess you and the President have at least one thing in common. You can’t do 7th grade math.

        Like


      • It’s okay, we’re not betas. As for O winning… if anything, I’m surprised that he only got 39% of the white vote.

        Like


  46. Four more years.

    The people from the land of the free and the home of the brave can do whatever they like; as long as they do as they are told.

    Long live the Coroporate-Government Kryptofascist Kleptocracy !

    Like


  47. A male who votes for Obama is not an alpha male.

    Like


    • Better to be a winner than a loser. Look I already said going from a center left President to a center right President would not make much difference to me but hey, let’s check back in 4 years and see how things turned out. Somehow I am pretty sure America will still be America But first, need to deal with this Fiscal Cliff-that is some intense shit

      Like


    • Lol, where do you come up with this shit? All of a sudden a male is not alpha for voting for Obama? Do you really believe this? Lol.

      Like


  48. It is just hilarious the amount of wussy whining going on in the Tea Party Facebook group I belong to. Love reading all the drama queens wailings.

    Like


    • Heh, heh… Tea Parties and Facebooks… the mark of a real alpha.

      lozozozolllooozollloooll

      Like


    • The original Tea Party consisted of men who risked life and limb over a small tax but a large principle, and braved the wrath of the most power empire on earth.

      Today’s Tea Parties are for cleaning the commodes on the Titanic.

      Like


  49. on November 7, 2012 at 12:33 am Mr. Hammerhead

    This country is no longer in the hands of the white man who built it into the greatest empire the world has ever seen. It’s now in the hands of feminists, welfare queens, illegal aliens, fags and other perverts. The only reward for those of us who will go down with the ship will be the right to say “I told you so,” but that’s a bittersweet consolation prize.

    There’s no turning back now. The victory of liberalism in the U.S. must now be acknowledged. We just watched four years of incompetence and said sign us up for four more. We deserve whatever we get.

    Like


    • How convenient you didn’t mention the real gorilla in the room-our addiction and devotion to military spending. Ideally, the best and most useful thing to occur would be if about 5 or 10 million more good jobs existed. I am not for unlimited immigration. There is no need for America to have 400 million people here. But yet every damn tech job seems to need a guy from India.

      Like


      • Military spending accounts for 5% of the budget.

        Like


      • on November 8, 2012 at 9:15 am Hugh G. Rection

        If we got the government out of student loans we might have more people studying useful majors.

        Like


      • If you read the Constitution, you will have to conclude that defense is the ONLY really big-ticket item that the Feds are supposed to pay for. The rest is minimal administrative costs. So I would expect the military to be at least 50% of the SMALL federal budget.

        Thor

        Like


      • You are not for unlimited immigration?

        well you are not as bad as I thought you were

        but I am sure you will not agree with the following,

        I believe immigration to white nations should be stopped completely.

        COMPLETELY.

        Why?

        Because it is a well known and verifiable fact that immigrants use far more ” free stuff” than the white natives.

        Immigrants get to have “free” health care and welfare and a long list of things that are ” free” but in reality are paid for with our taxes.

        so how can nations on the verge of fiscal collpase afford to give more and more free stuff to more and more immigrants?

        we can unless we want to commit suicide

        Like


      • Well while I mostly agree with you if somebody really has a marketable, useful skill I say let them come in. Where immigrants fill key areas are the agricultural and manual labor areas. Even with high unemployment, whites are not flocking to pick lettuce and do landscaping-the wages are just too low and only immigrants don’t mind how low they are

        Like


      • If you abolish welfare and minimum wage, you will mostly find willing local labor.

        Thor

        Like


      • Actually no. At least not if you disaggregate immigrants based on country of origin. Immigrants to the US from China, South Korea, Japan and Northern Europe rarely come to the US to be supported by others. Hard-liners might argue that these immigrants are “taking jobs” from the pre-existing US population – and in some cases they might be right, maybe – but that is not the same thing.

        Thor

        Like


      • The largest group is Hispanics and they come to the US mostly for the free stuff

        Like


  50. If only we had voted for Ron Paul…

    Like


    • Then Ron Paul would have made a concession speech tonight instead of Mitt Romney

      Like


      • You’ve got a spring in your step tonight, huh?

        Remind me again, who the fuck are you? And why are you dropping your rabbit turds all over this forum of truth?

        I have not met a man, nor can I imagine a man, who would not only vote to re-elect that human pussification, but then to spend the evening bragging about it on this site. You clearly haven’t gotten the memo. Go read the archives, you cum-drinking cuckold.

        Matt

        Like


      • And this made me laugh even more than all your previous comments put together. Such outrage is not good for your blood pressure-better make sure you have a banana

        Like


      • Dewd, you’re just sad.

        Shuffle off now.

        Like


      • Rick were you getting paid by the Obama campaign? Quite unusual for someone like you to just show up like this.

        The O campaign has done lots of creepy social media stuff, so I wouldn’t put it past them to have someone pitch to the CH readership.

        Like


      • I do not know about Rick but yes the left pays people to do that.

        this has nothing to do with conspiracy theories.

        it is something between lobbyist and community organizer.

        The left is better organized than the right, as far as endoctrinating and brainwashing people is concerned.

        Rules for radicals by Alinsky is all you need to know to understand why the left has so much success

        Like


      • Matt, if you can’t imagine a real man voting for Obama, then you have a poor imagination indeed.

        We are long past the days when the good life was defined as a log cabin on the prarie, a plow, and the classics by candlelight. Which I suspect is where your sympathies lie.

        Whether you like it or not, in modern life, we rise and fall WITH one another (not despite one another).

        Obama is the man who best understands that. Hence Obamacare (the economics of which you may debate, but the purpose of which is noble).

        Romney may have understood it too, but his actions showed him to be a cancer of a person — lying, shifting, evading, squeezing companies to maximize profits to his shareholders.

        BTW, every time you call someone a “cum-drinking cuckold”, you debase yourself, and I start to think that your homilies are bullshit.

        Like


      • You know, for someone who recently made a truly odious snipe against one of my children, you have a lot of gall lecturing anyone else about self-debasement.

        Especially since said snipe gave the tell to your own SWPL cuckold fetish.

        Keep tap dancing on the land mine, you punk.

        Like


      • Yes, you’re right; it was a cheap shot and hypocritical. I apologize.

        But I don’t have an interracial fetish. Me likes Latinas best (not a race).

        Also, this doesn’t make you (or others here) any less of haters. And if you move to the Northwest to join Mr Covington, I advise Washington. The now-legal weed will have you arm-in-arm with some dark-skinned buddies, singing Kumbaya, soon enough.

        Like


      • King A — A better question is who the fuck are YOU??? hahaha. You cant even hide your bitterness, frustration and xenophobic undertones behind your weak prose. Leader of the Freeworld + Twice Ivy League Graduate + ALL SHADES OF WOMEN LOVING YOU = Galactic Alpha. What metrics do you use my friend that lead you to declare him a “human pussification”?? Do Tell.

        Like


      • Awesome. By your standards, Obama really is a “galactic alpha”. And the King A worship needs to stop.

        Like


      • Just another keyboard jockey. Slightly more literate than the other keyboard jockeys. Nothing to see there.

        Like


      • What needs to stop is the peanut gallery thinking they have a right to say whatever they want to their betters. Your lot couldn’t hold a candle to light the way of King A’s illuminating posts.

        It’s easy to talk disparagingly about “keyboard jockeys” from the safety of your keyboards, pismires.

        Like


  51. on November 7, 2012 at 1:44 am hamsterbaiter

    The financial timebomb is ticking. An exploding population of Medicare-dependent retirees at one end of the age spectrum, and an army of unproductive low-IQ NAMS emerging at the other, who cannot generate the wealth to support them.

    Like


  52. the best you are right,i am from Mexico and im register as a Republican from Florida,i do not like UNIVISION NEWS because of its liberal content,im allways fighting in univision forums about politics, man they always hate me because i always tell them the tru about obama,univision never talks about FAST AND FURIOUS OPERATION”and the Benghazi consulate they allways said it was a protest from a video,the democrats that i kmow are always talking about descrimination race but how many mexican americans or puerto ricans or even blacks are in obamas presidential cabinet?,at least with Bush his attorney General was mexican-american and i know that obamas attorny general is black,but mostly of obamas cabinet are white specially coming from wall street thats why the US economy is bad,democrats want everything for free thats not new news i know a white lawyer middle age here in Miami he is married to an oriental woman,he defends obama like crazzy but when it comes to woman,he is very BETA,he is been trying to have women outside his marriage and he makes mistakes like confesing his love to women before not even knowing if the woman is attracted to him,yes i do not like the fact that many mexicans belive that obama is going to give legal residence to them or people from central america i always tell them KEEP DREEMIG he did not do it the first two years of his presidency when the Congress was democrat well i have news for them the congress is republican Thanks God,so do not expect nothing new i do notwant to see a USA as a socialist republic in the future GOD BLESS THE USA

    Like


  53. LOL

    Rick is obviously a fat/ugly/old female. Note the twat’s feminist opinions. Posing as a “dude who gets laid” is a common tactic by feminist weirdos on the net. She got sent here through a manboobz.com article that attacked this one.Look how frantic she is to respond to every single post, diarrhea’ing all over the comment section. And whenever an hour goes by(she’s been posting for 12 straight hours) where someone doesn’t give her attention, she goes apeshit – note the embarrassing “4 more years” post. Not a dude in the world is like that.

    Like


    • Yeah well I am a guy so you are wrong there. And why I am commenting so much? Because you guys leave yourself so wide open to be easily counter argued with. Plus I had some time on my hands. Starting Friday I will be busy as hell extra work and offline. You guys will be able to play in your echo chamber all by yourselves then.

      Like


    • Sorry Mike, I’m a guy too, and there ain’t nothing feminist about my and Rick’s opinions — just common sense about long-term economics and international relations informing our votes.

      If you step outside the bubble constructed by Republican propaganda machine, you’ll see something different. It’s a speeding bus called Reality, and it just ran over every right-winger in America last night.

      Like


  54. The comment about pua’s having better things to do was gold. I’m in Israel and even though we vote by absentee ballot I was hooking up with a little yemenite cutie while betas were voting stateside.

    Like


  55. This is how freedom dies! To thundering applause.

    Like


    • +1.

      It is not the T.S. Eliot future (“not with a bang, but a whimper”).

      It is the Triumph of the Will future.

      The Revolution Will Be Televised.

      I should probably at this point mention “Ominous Parallels” by Peikoff.

      http://www.amazon.com/Ominous-Parallels-Brilliant-parallels-pre-Hitler/dp/0452011175

      Like


      • Sure. The Star Wars scene where princess Amydala(?) utters these words look very much inspired by 30th January, 1933. Google for Machtübernahme. Except Big Daddy-O went low key in the first four years, just crippling the economy (yes, I know it was already screwed up, but normally there would have been a serious recovery by now). Now, as he said to the Russian president, he will have more “flexibility” i.e. he can rule by decree as much as he wants. And he sure wants.

        The only way to keep the Republic alive that I can see is for the Reps to dig their heels in, refuse “bipartisanship”, and refuse to raise the debt ceiling. Holding the fort while the country suffers – but not as much as with unrestricted Obamarule, in the long run. And try for 2014/2016. But I doubt this will happen. The USA is done for.

        Thor

        Like


      • Yes normally as in the past Each recession has taken longer and longer to recover from. Technology is making a greater impact in the workforce. Globalization is a factor, Lack of unions is a factor. Lots of information out there that predicted the Great Recession would take to just about now to be fully recovered from. Anyone thinking what was going on at the end of 2008 and in 2009 would be corrected rapidly was and is delusional

        Like


      • Hindsight is easier than foresight. Thinking the recession would end in two years was – in hindsight – WRONG, but not necessarily delusional. Now voting for Obama now what we know what he is or does – now THAT’s delusional – or bordering on treason.
        .
        Thor

        Like


      • yeah treason

        I have been saying for a few years that white liberals are traitors

        what else are people who do everything they can to destroy a civilization, a culture and a race?

        Like


  56. Today was a good day to be a homosexual.

    Where’s my check barrack?

    Like


  57. “Pickup artists will not vote. They got better things to do.”

    – I LOL’d

    Like


  58. Stick to PUArtistry. Leave the politics and the predictions to the experts.

    Like


  59. All you beta guys can bring your women to me to be properly serviced by alphas like me

    `Comment of the election. Perfect description behind the mindset of the Obama voter. Alphatude born from conforming to exactly the same standards as everyone else around him: I work for an NGO/Quango or the government itself, I drink a mokaccino every morning at starbucks, I wear XXX brand that everyone else wear, I have an Iphone, a MacBook, I vote Obama an that makes me alpha.

    It feels good to vote Obama, it feels like people will like me more because I proved that I can vote Obama.

    A thousand years from now aliens will dig the ruins of the Western cities and their archeologists will date the start of irreversible decline by how many Iphones they find in each layer of debris

    Like


    • Oh hell Can’t take a little ribbing? Don’t overanalyze things-just made a dig at the addiction of being All Alpha All The Time Mindset here. And I don’t have an iPhone. That new Samsung freaks me out-touch another Samsung and you can share info? That’s wild

      Like


  60. The American Republic is done for good. The borders of Latin America now cover the entire landmass from Patagonia to the Artic Circle.

    Is that the Spaniard’s revenge for the Armada, or is it the Indian’s revenge for Cortez?

    Like


    • Too bad the Spaniards didn’t genocide the Indians like the Brits did.

      Like


      • Genocide is not the issue. The point is, the British and Swedish colonies were colonized largely by families. The Spanish and Portuguese colonies largely by single men. This guaranteed that the result would be a mostly white population in the English colonies, with or without genocide, as agriculture can support orders of magnitude more people per square mile than hunting.

        And perforce, a population in Spanish and Portuguese colonies that could not possibly have more than 50% European genes in the resulting mix. Whether that is a good, bad or neutral thing is another question.

        Thor

        Like


      • They did – just a li’l further south.

        Like


  61. LOL @ people using alpha/beta labels to talk about politics. What a bunch of clowns.

    Wasn’t there a study recently that found male democrats to be generally more masculine than male republicans? roflsssssss.

    Now stfu and go get some poon, peasants. Whining about politics is beta.

    Like


  62. A first world country , controlled by a third world electorate…

    is that what leftists call ” progress” ?

    Like


    • Chavista America.

      Like


    • 3rd world electorate? Then the question is: Why are they here? For America the land of opportunity and getting ahead and having a better life or for America the land of supposed handouts? Latinos both legal and illegal as of right now are a weak spot for Republicans

      Like


      • Why are they here? well there is two main reasons

        1- “here” is much better than where they come from… which contradicts what liberal are trying to make us believe ; ” all cultures are equal” if every culture was equal then tens of millions of white people would migrate to Sudan and Afghanistan. But only non-caucasians move to caucasian nations; our civilization is thus better and theirs inferior.

        2- They are here because it is part of the big plan to destroy capitalism, bring the USA to its knees, destroy western civilization and bring white man to his knees.

        Like


      • ” But only non-caucasians move to caucasian nation”

        This is of course false. Lots of people move from Europe to the US/Canada/Australia. And lots of people move from one country to another withing Europe, especially since the EU has made this MUCH easier than it used to be.
        .
        Thor

        Like


      • Maybe it was poorly said, remember my first language is French.

        ok let me try again with a few examples,

        millions of mexicans migrate to the us, while almost zero white americans migrate to mexico.

        within a few decades mexicans will outnumber whites in the USA

        Large numbers of blacks from Africa migrate to western nations while a minuscule number of whites from western nations migrate to africa

        I am not saying whites do not migrate, but they migrate mostly to other western – white nations.

        while non-causasians migrate almost exclusively to white nations.

        that is why most western nations have declining populations of whites ( in percentage or absolute, it does not matter )
        and growing populations of non-caucasians what some call the browning of the west.

        you are not going to tell me this is not true?

        Are you going to tell me as many white Americans migrate to mexico as mexicans migrate to the USA?

        Like


      • @Canadian friend
        ” while non-causasians migrate almost exclusively to white nations.”‘

        I don´t think you have a language problem. I think you may have some good points but are very sloppy at expressing them.

        In this case, there are LARGE migration streams within Asia and within Africa, but they are not very visible to people in industrial countries. Burmese move to Sri Lanka. Sudanese move to Chad. Zimbabweans move to South Africa. People in countries around Nigeria move to Nigeria.

        Sure, in many cases these are acts of desperation or at least stark necessity, but that does not make them less real. “Move” above could be translated as “flee” in many cases.

        Thor

        Like


    • We aren’t any different from Brazil now, except that Brazil has higher economic growth.

      Like


  63. on November 7, 2012 at 10:21 am Holden Caulfield

    http://news.yahoo.com/obama-bets-electorate-matches-2008-wins-100747098–election.html

    In the soon to be immortal words of GBFM, “women *RUN* towards the butthext and vote for obama to tax good men to pay for it lzlzozozo”

    Like


  64. on November 7, 2012 at 11:05 am crashedupderby

    come the revolution!
    and
    let there be blood

    Like


  65. Is that the Spaniard’s revenge for the Armada, or is it the Indian’s revenge for Cortez?

    Though the world would be much better if the Armada had been victorious, for this is really the revenge of reality against the Enlightenment…

    Like


    • Revenge of Reality against the Enlightenment… I like it… never thought about it in those terms, but I can think of no better sound byte. Well done.

      Like


      • Indeed, well said Brasileiro.

        Like


      • “revenge of reality against the enlightenment”?

        What kind of nonsense is this. The Enlightenment was a return of reality from mysticism of various kinds. For me, I am waiting for the revenge of reality against the Entitlement.

        Thor

        Like


      • The so-called Enlightenment, perhaps inadvertently, created far more irrationality in a purely materialistic outlook… a semblance of logic and science, bolstered by technological advances, merely masked a far more deleterious spiritual Dark Age that we see today.

        In short, the Enlightenment gave birth to a societies in which Entitlement now holds sway.

        Like


  66. Can a man vote for Obama and be alpha?

    well since leftism is pro-feminism/pro-women “issues” thus anti-heterosexual white male,

    and leftism is pro-gay thus anti-heterosexual white male,

    and leftism is pro-third world immigration ( mostly pro-black) thus anti-white male

    Leftism is a witch hunt on heterosexual white males.

    how can a man be for all of the above and claim to be alpha?

    Like


    • There are plenty of greedy alpha men out there doing very well out of liberalism – guys making millions from government contracts that would dry up under a Republican administration, to name one example. Of course they’d vote for Obama.

      Like


  67. Sorry but republicans don’t get it!

    They assume all minorities think and act the same way.

    [heartiste: blacks broke for obama 97% instead of the usual 98%?]

    There are plenty of minority women like myself and Latinos that would vote Republican b/c honestly repub’s values fit more with our value system than liberal. but I will not and cannot with good conscious vote for a party that refuses to even acknowledge me or the changing demographics in this country.

    [nice rationalization. fact: minorities are disproportionately takers, and so their desires will not ever — CANNOT EVER — align with the desires of the majority of whites, particularly white men, who represent the disproportionate share of makers.]

    Not only that Republican men come off as ANGRY, BITTER

    [reverend “goddamn america” wright would disagree.]

    and stuck in their old ways and its a complete turn off!

    [translation: “old ways” = “white ways”.]

    They cannot have a civil discussion about politics of the opposing party without resulting to lame immature tactics and name calling which is also a turn off.

    [the truth is beginning to sting, ain’t it? not even a win for your team seems to be making you feel better. that’s because realization is starting to percolate. the awakening is begun.]

    They are not savvy enough to approach a win to the White house b/c they are simply laser focused on ONE small segment (White male conservative vote) of the population.

    [i thought diversity was our strength?]

    They can’t and won’t see the forest for the trees!

    [hatchet, axe, and saw will take care of that problem.]

    Whether you like or dislike the fact that America is changing demographically (and quickly) either you ramp up and figure out a way to find those minorities and women who would be willing to vote Republican

    [you seem confused. the only way for republicans to connect with nams and single moms is to become more like the dems, and then some. the message isn’t the problem; the demography is the problem. the people are birthing more gibsmedats teat sucklers and civilizational parasites.]

    (if you actually ACKNOWLEDGED THEM

    [white people acknowledge nams all the time — by avoiding their hoods and living in de facto lily white gated communities.]

    and sought them and out,

    [for butthexing]

    instead of ignoring the reality) or you keep up with the same agenda and keep losing.

    [repubs doomed themselves when they allowed the border to get out of control. among other things.]

    Its really sad b/c the Republican party could be much stronger if they let go of their old ways.

    [translation: “if they let go of the white culture ways”.]

    But they’ll keep losing until they create a party that actually becomes savvy enough an willing to campaign to the COUNTRY and not a small subset of it who could never put them in office alone.

    [does it bother you that the only way you can win elections is by flooding the country with more people like you and relatively fewer white people? that is, does it dawn on you that your message and needs and worldview aren’t winning it for you — it’s your numbers that are winning it for you.]

    Even with 50% of WHite votes, Romney didn’t stand a chance. That says a lot.

    [it sure does: diversity + proximity = war.]

    Like


    • That Republican housecleaning was attempted about 50 years ago by William Buckley at the National Review. He kicked out the race-obsessed nutjobs — a move which set up the Republican party to dominate mainstream national politics from 1980 to 2008.

      But Buckley’s dead, a black man’s in the White House, and now the nutjobs are back in full force. So there’s a rift. In ten years, you’ll see the racial/social conservatives making their own party, and the economic conservatives making their own party.

      Like


      • Jason,

        Really? Yep you are right the 80’s belonged to the Republicans. I don’t ever recall many of them being the immature Angry bitter nut jobs we see now coming out of the party. that’s too bad they haven’t learned from history. Oh well, we will continue to see that party decline until they start facing some harsh realities and either dealing with them to stay alive or simply giving up and waving the WHite flag (as some are suggesting) by joining Democrats.

        I personally would love to see a great Republican party that I could align with. but the reality is, I’d be a fool aligning myself with the current mass of Republicans we see today.

        Like


      • The fact that nonwhites vote overwhelmingly for the Dems and big gummint and gibmedats would suggest to me that the “nutjobs” had some valid points which the politically correct cannot and won’t address. “Nutjobs” don’t just spring up out of holes in the ground.

        Like


    • Hearty wrote:

      …the message isn’t the problem; the demography is the problem.

      Spot on… guess this makes you one of those ‘nutjobs’ that alphie-who-loves-to-type keeps bloviating about.

      Like


      • The demographics are only a problem if you approach it from a standpoint of them all “being the same” and not wanting to do the work to sift through the demographics to see if there is a place where you can make a dent for your party’s goals.

        You cannot change what the demographics are now -its too late. But you can either continue to piss an moan about the demographics and keep losing, or become more savvy and try to make the most of the demographics by letting go of old out dated ideals and trying to target the middle ground demographics that can swing towards the right instead of the left.

        but based on what i can see, White republican males are not ready to even do that and would much rather throw in towel and wave the White flag of defeat. Oh well!

        All I know if you’ve got 4 years to do something b/c once Hillary throws in her bid for presidency next term, its going to be a hard fight for Republicans if they have not completely changed their way of thinking and doing.

        Like


      • Sweetheart, when 95% and up of a given demographic vote en bloc, they ARE all the same.

        Now tend to your kitchen, woman.

        Like


      • That’s because your PARTY has not even tried to break that block. See what happens when you assume? While Black people are more likely to vote tradtionally Democratic (just like poor and middle class White Southeners are most likely to vote traditionally Republican), there are still a large number of minorities and women like MYSELF who would have voted Republican if there was a good enough representation for it.

        There are a lot more people “in the middle” than the Republican party wants to admit. THAT is what I am saying. Republican men don’t want to acknowledge this because that means you have to actually focus on the people you actually despise (minorities and women) and try to find the ones who have common ground (but you don’t believe there are minorities and women who share common ground so that is why you keep losing).

        And BTW you don’t want me in the kitchen. It aint pretty! LOL

        Like


      • Woman, I belong to no party and I don’t vote… I’ve made that abundantly clear in several posts over the past few months.

        Blacks have been voting en bloc since Hitler was a corporal.

        Hispanics are a bit more diverse… they “only” go about 75%.

        Like


      • You should really know something before talking.

        The Republicans were strong supporters of civil rights long before the Democrats. The Democrats were the party of slavery and Jim Crow.

        Right now, the Republicans are the party which helps black kids in DC attend decent schools with vouchers.

        If you knew anything about the history of this country you would be ashamed of your ignorance.

        But, I have learned that Democrats are incapable of feeling shame.

        Like


      • There used to be a set of politicians called moderate Republicans. They were sensible men who were not single issue politicians and who did not shy away from bi-partisanship. The pro-life zealots drove them to extinction.

        Like


      • Anonymous,

        Can you really with good reason say why any minority or Black woman or White woman on the fence would vote for Republicans today? EVEN though we may have many values that align with the Conservative party? Honestly? You guys simply haven’t done much to appeal. Maybe you don’t want to which is fine too, but its not going to get you any further in office ignoring us.

        Honestly, i don’t mostly agree with Obama or democratic policies, but at the end of the day, they are the ones who come off as more genuine, concerned and HUMANE compared to Republicans.Either that or republicans are allowing their worst to be the representations of their party which is hurting you – not to mention how some GOP supporters act in general.

        Obama and the Democratic party has understood that it takes a charming person who comes off as humane and genuine to reach the masses. Instead the GOP still wants to deliver cold hard tactics and think this will win people over. you gotta play the game to win sweetheart. Like I said, I have more values in tune with the GOP and I know a boatload of other minority women, White women of my caliber and Latinos who also do as well. but WHY ON EARTH would we vote and align ourselves with a party that has shown no solidarity with anyone but WHite men?

        Like


      • I now live in a country where whites (such as myself) are a small minority.
        But why should I worry about it or make an issue of it? Even if I could vote here, which I cannot. Pigmentation is a non-issue for me.

        Thor

        Like


      • (Different Anonymous)

        Neecy, it’s often stated here that “hypergamy doesn’t care about ____.” Rollo likes to use that one, and who am I to diverge from Rollo? (no sarc there – he’s excellent).

        Here the response is “Bankruptcy doesn’t care about ______.” The triumph of the Left is that they are adroit at arguing only straw man and ad hominem attacks. They are very good at getting the stupid Republicans off the real issues and down into the stupid issues. Consider that you live in the Matrix. Take the red pill, and investigate our current financial situation, which is the same whether you have a penis or a vagina, and doesn’t care about your melanin.

        The free candy is coming to an end.

        Like


      • They are very good at getting the stupid Republicans off the real issues and down into the stupid issues.

        Yeah like Obama’s birth certificate and whether or not he is a US citizen when his ass already is in office? LOL Yeah people like Donald Trump don’t help the GOP AT ALL and hurts their image.

        And that to me is another major problem. republicans spend waaay too much time trying to knock Obama and win off of continuosly pointing out what he is doing badly, than making a real appeal to the masses based on what they plan to do differently. GOP thinks constantly targeting Obama and using that platform for wins is going to get them somewhere. As we can see most people are not buying this. They want to see real talk from GOP on what they plan on doing instead of acting like immature little kids in a sandbox throwing sand at the enemy and thinking that alone with win favor. When really all it does is make them look whiney and bitter with no real solutions of their own other than to constantly point the finger at “the other guy” and stomp their feet expecting a “WIN”.

        Like


    • Oooh Heartiste you asked for it!!

      Don’t give me that White people be loving them some White people stuff! The fact is Wealthy White conservatives *ONLY* care about the greater of Whites when it comes to serving their best interests – that is VOTING.

      Middle working class and poor White Americans foolishly never question who is really sticking it to them without lube – Their OWN WHITE CONSERVATIVE MEN who they blindly support.

      Somewhere the ball got dropped with the Immigration in this country and that didn’t start with Obama. Not even sure it started with Dubya Bush was in office either. but the fact is Republicans had the office for 8 YEARS and made no real strides in dealing with immigration to suit your needs. Wanna know why?

      Wealthy conservative White men benefit more from immigration than poor/middle working class Whites and Blacks. HOW? Wealthy WHite conservatives are the ones giving traditionally union held jobs that most White American middle class and poor workers held and were highly skilled in. NOW, to keep their pockets lined, many WHite corps and business owners would much rather pay a barely skilled immigrant extreme lower wages (no medical insurance) that they would never get away with paying a skilled American WHite worker.

      In all industries. FOOD industry, industrial industry, landscaping and construction industries. EVERYWHERE. Who is really subsidizing all of these “JOBS” to immigrant workers? WEALTHY CONSERVATIVE WHITE MALES who are only concerned with keeping their pockets lined! They do not care about their WHITE PEOPLE who are poor or working class! They are giving all the jobs away to either immigrants on American soil (UNSKILLED immigrants) and outsourcing jobs that could easily be done n American soil to NON WHITES overseas in other countries!

      The only thing really holding the white working class together are what’s left of the unions they created in the past to make sure they were properly paid for their skills. Those are also going by the wayside because American WHite male business owners do not want to pay skilled Non immigrant workers and don’t want to pay for their medical insurance.

      So who does immigration really hurt? POOR and working class Americans! Not White conservatives. These immigrants are not competing for wealthy conservative WHite mens jobs and taking extreme lower wages to get them. They are not moving into wealthy White conservative neighborhoods. However, they are consuming all of the benefits that were traditionally for working class and poor White & Black Americans. They are moving into traditionally working class White neighborhoods – and yes they are making thier way in great numbers to the MIDWEST and SOUTH where the bulk of poor and middle class WHite Americans made their living for decades before immigration.

      So now you have White wealthy men using “immigration” as a front because they know it gets the working class and poor Whites riled up deflecting from themselves and how they are actually the ones benefiting the most from immigration and literally screwing over the very WHites they USE to support their agenda.

      Now WHite people are paying the piper because of the WHite male conservatives who have been playing a game with you for all this time while they have been benefiting from immigration – in the working sector.

      Like


    • Now lets talk about another thing. You have Republicans now waving the White flag saying “just go Democratic” instead of doing the work to build their party back up. All because you do not want to recognize that you can no loner win elections relying on the WHite vote.

      When i look at corporations and businesses that stand the test of time, they are the corporations and businesses that go with he change and create ways to win in a changing climate. People who continue to stay stubborn and stuck in their old ways never win – EVER. Especially in an ever changing economy and society.

      Like I said. immigration has happened and unless an extreme something takes place and you are going to round up all the immigrant Latinos and throw them back over the fence, then maybe its time to deal with the REALITY of what is going on in this country and do the best you can to keep your party alive by focusing on the minorities that are straddling the fence (i.e. swingers).

      Especially Latinos. They are more apt to go with a more conservative vote because of their overall values – more likely to be harder workers and more family oriented and less likely to look for handouts.

      There are quite a bit of minorities who, like I said would be willing to go with Republicans *IF* they come with an attractive campaign that does not dis include them.

      but just as your reply to me insinuated – you all are stuck in your “old WHite ways” and frankly, that will not get you anywhere with that mentality. maybe you guys don’t want to get anywhere and that is also your choice to keep ignoring the demographics in this country no matter how it came to be.

      I for one do hope that the Republican party does some real self reflection and decides to learn to accept the changing demographics in this country and try to sift through it to find the minorities and women who they can get on their side b/c there are a lot of them out there.

      I feel this country needs conservatives and conservative values but not at the expense of simply looking out for a small segment of the population that really has shown no real concern for the overall country.

      Now a lot of minorities and women are going with the Liberal ticket b/c Liberals are not ignoring them and are making sure they are getting across to these groups to get wins.

      15 women just got elected into the Senate! things are changing and Conservative WHite men are acting like babies and pouting instead of doing what it takes o keep their party afloat.

      Lastly. I can tell you if repubs do not change something drastically by 2016, you will have an even bigger issue b/c I can guarantee you Hillary Clinton will be throwing her hat in for the Democratic Presidential race, and if Republicans don’t have their shit together, she will slide into the WHite house with no problems, further sealing the Republican Party’s fate.

      Like


    • H! 😡

      Don’t give me that White people be loving them some White people stuff! The fact is Wealthy White conservatives *ONLY* care about the greater of Whites when it comes to serving their best interests – that is VOTING.

      Middle working class and poor White Americans foolishly never question who is really sticking it to them without lube – Their OWN WHITE CONSERVATIVE MEN who they blindly support.

      Somewhere the ball got dropped with the Immigration in this country and that didn’t start with Obama. Not even sure it started with Dubya Bush was in office either. but the fact is Republicans had the office for 8 YEARS and made no real strides in dealing with immigration to suit your needs. Wanna know why?

      Wealthy conservative White men benefit more from immigration than poor/middle working class Whites and Blacks. HOW? Wealthy WHite conservatives are the ones giving traditionally union held jobs that most White American middle class and poor workers held and were highly skilled in. NOW, to keep their pockets lined, many WHite corps and business owners would much rather pay a barely skilled immigrant extreme lower wages (no medical insurance) that they would never get away with paying a skilled American WHite worker.

      In all industries. FOOD industry, industrial industry, landscaping and construction industries. EVERYWHERE. Who is really subsidizing all of these “JOBS” to immigrant workers? WEALTHY CONSERVATIVE WHITE MALES who are only concerned with keeping their pockets lined! They do not care about their WHITE PEOPLE who are poor or working class! They are giving all the jobs away to either immigrants on American soil (UNSKILLED immigrants) and outsourcing jobs that could easily be done n American soil to NON WHITES overseas in other countries!

      The only thing really holding the white working class together are what’s left of the unions they created in the past to make sure they were properly paid for their skills. Those are also going by the wayside because American WHite male business owners do not want to pay skilled Non immigrant workers and don’t want to pay for their medical insurance.

      So who does immigration really hurt? POOR and working class Americans! Not White conservatives. These immigrants are not competing for wealthy conservative WHite mens jobs and taking extreme lower wages to get them. They are not moving into wealthy White conservative neighborhoods. However, they are consuming all of the benefits that were traditionally for working class and poor White & Black Americans. They are moving into traditionally working class White neighborhoods – and yes they are making thier way in great numbers to the MIDWEST and SOUTH where the bulk of poor and middle class WHite Americans made their living for decades before immigration.

      So now you have White wealthy men using “immigration” as a front because they know it gets the working class and poor Whites riled up deflecting from themselves and how they are actually the ones benefiting the most from immigration and literally screwing over the very WHites they USE to support their agenda.

      Now WHite people are paying the piper because of the WHite male conservatives who have been playing a game with you for all this time while they have been benefiting from immigration – in the working sector.

      Like


      • Neecy,

        you have been fooled/brainwashed

        there are as many democrats as republicans who are rich white people and who benefit from underpaid cheap labor

        it is a myth that only conservatives are rich or hire underpaid immigrants

        it is a myth that the left keeps alive with the help of their brainwashing branch; the main stream media

        don’t take my word, do a search

        Like


      • Excellent point. I look at the disparity at how white males voted and it does give pause and makes me wonder a bit-Why is that? Am I missing something? But no-the Republican Party offers nothing to the average working white male. Even Republicans that were elected in 2010 to be tough on the debt hold no allure for me. Why? Because as soon as they got in, they focused on social instead of fiscal issues. Alabama gets tough on immigration and what happens? No one is around to work the crop harvest. I think one other state enacted a similar law and people in Alabama basically told them beforehand to not do it.

        Like


      • Yeah I don’t get how the average working class WHite male keeps ignoring the obvious. The wealthy WHite men in this country are not concerned overall for the betterment of all Whites or even WHite males. If they were, immigration would have been nipped in the bud quickly before it even started.

        They are concerned with LINING their pockets and using the masses of poor and/or working Whites to keep them in office and benefiting off of things like immigration and cheap labor among other things.

        i am not saying middle class Whites and Blacks need to vote Liberal but at least vote en masse Independent to get the message across that you will not be continually used while only a smaller portion of Whites benefit.

        I won’t deny that immigrants work damn hard. I live in California and immigration is serious, but they work hard. They also do the jobs that poorer Whites and Blacks do not want to do.

        Like


      • But no-the Republican Party offers nothing to the average working white male.

        And the Democrat party offers… what, exactly?? We’re white males, remember? We’re not minorities, or women, or fags. We don’t count. At least the Republicans in Congress listen to us, sometimes.

        Like


      • Spot on, if you are not a minority, woman or fag there is no reason to vote democrap.

        And no Neecy the dancing kneegrow, illegal immigrants do the jobs poor whites and blacks USED TO DO.

        Like


      • on November 8, 2012 at 9:06 am Hugh G. Rection

        The Democrats don’t really offer anything of substance either, or rather they offer far more to the white man’s competition. When it comes to discretionary government spending or redistribution, white men are always last in line, when it comes to taking they are always the first who have to pay.

        Like


    • Now, lets talk about another thing. You have Republicans now waving the White flag saying “just go Democratic” instead of doing the work to build their party back up. All because you do not want to recognize that you can no loner win elections relying on the WHite vote.

      When i look at corporations and businesses that stand the test of time, they are the corporations and businesses that go with he change and create ways to win in a changing climate. People who continue to stay stubborn and stuck in their old ways never win – EVER. Especially in an ever changing economy and society.

      Like I said. immigration has happened and unless an extreme something takes place and you are going to round up all the immigrant Latinos and throw them back over the fence, then maybe its time to deal with the REALITY of what is going on in this country and do the best you can to keep your party alive by focusing on the minorities that are straddling the fence (i.e. swingers).

      Especially Latinos. They are more apt to go with a more conservative vote because of their overall values – more likely to be harder workers and more family oriented and less likely to look for handouts.

      There are quite a bit of minorities who, like I said would be willing to go with Republicans *IF* they come with an attractive campaign that does not dis include them.

      but just as your reply to me insinuated – you all are stuck in your “old WHite ways” and frankly, that will not get you anywhere with that mentality. maybe you guys don’t want to get anywhere and that is also your choice to keep ignoring the demographics in this country no matter how it came to be.

      I for one do hope that the Republican party does some real self reflection and decides to learn to accept the changing demographics in this country and try to sift through it to find the minorities and women who they can get on their side b/c there are a lot of them out there.

      I feel this country needs conservatives and conservative values but not at the expense of simply looking out for a small segment of the population that really has shown no real concern for the overall country.

      Now a lot of minorities and women are going with the Liberal ticket b/c Liberals are not ignoring them and are making sure they are getting across to these groups to get wins.

      15 women just got elected into the Senate! things are changing and Conservative WHite men are acting like babies and pouting instead of doing what it takes o keep their party afloat.

      Lastly. I can tell you if repubs do not change something drastically by 2016, you will have an even bigger issue b/c I can guarantee you Hillary Clinton will be throwing her hat in for the Democratic Presidential race, and if Republicans don’t have their sit together, she will slide into the WHite house with no problems, further sealing the Republican Party’s fate.

      Like


      • I don’t pay much mind to politics, because it seriously doesn’t matter beans which greedy, lying crook gets to live at the White House. I’ve listened to way too many very different ones in my life, and they are not different at all.Today, for shits and grins, I watched a little of this post-election coverage and listened to a few pundits and ‘experts’ . They STILL don’t get it. I live in an area that is about 50% Hispanic. You want the Hispanic vote? Give them a candidate with a Hispanic name or Hispanic family. That simple. You want the Black vote but aren’t the Democrats? Give them a Black candidate – Boom! 98% Black vote.
        Issues don’t mean shit to the vast majority of the general public. That’s just pretty PC talk.
        The GOP seem to see the US as a sort of Boy Scout bible camp in 1950’s Kansas. Which it ain’t, not even in Kansas.
        What they need to do is nominate candidates who have a broad appeal to a wide variety of people. Call me nuts, but if Arnold Schwarzenegger would have been eligible to run, he would have wiped the floor with Obama on star power alone. How about the crazy chick from Alaska? Sarah Palin may be loony, but boy, would she cut a wide swath through the female voting demographic, which is currently (and historically) going overwhelmingly Democrat. ModernTV-rabid America WILL NOT elect a one-armed guy with ED, an old baldie who’s shorter than his wife or a golf course billionaire.
        They need a young, hot guy with hair.
        Someone from the current season of 90210 would work fine.
        Issues?
        Pffff……..

        Like


      • Hey i say we all know politics is more about who can reach the masses the best. Obama and his campaigners are well aware of his strengths to appeal more HUMAN and caring than the average GOP we see today.

        You gotta play to win. Stubborness is hurting the GOP. And I thought Romney was pretty darned hot for an older WHite guy and he still had all his hair and is tall. LOL

        I don’t even think it was *HIM* per se that lost the election, its the overall party and faces of the party that hurts any GOP candidate.

        Like


      • You might be right. You probably are. But I don´t want a politician who CARES about me. If he does, even if he is genuine about it – especially if he is genuine about it – he is likely to come up with all sorts of restrictive laws to “protect” me. I want a politician that leaves me alone to do what _I_ want, and who does not particularly “CARE”.

        Thor

        Like


      • Neecy,

        More predictable victory-dancing, but all you are really doing is parroting the MSM boilerplate that the GOP pitched themselves to white voters. Which of course is highly taboo, if not illegal, in this white-founded and funded civilization of ours.

        What you just witnessed was an entirely spontaneous alignment of white men and the white male candidate of the nominal right. Nothing more. But as usual, MSM require the myth of white racism to avoid reckoning with the massive divergence of interests of various consumer blocs divided by subspecies.

        And because of this lie, you and the rest of the MSM’s readership conveniently forget that the GOP went OUT OF ITS FUCKING WAY to lift up Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio and Herman Cain in a lame appeal for non-white votes which never would have come anyhow.

        What you are really asking of conservatives and GOP voters is to admit that they are defeated as a demographic and to become you. In other words: you demand total assimilation and a state.

        In other words, you’re a nigger totalitarian who is eager for whites to submit to non-whites in word and deed. This is something you need to understand. You do not enjoy any moral high-ground. You are enjoying a petty thrill of power in seeing your interests reflected in a popular election, and disguise your lust to rule in a bizarre hybrid of self-help and “integrationist” rhetoric.

        You come here preaching to free white men that we “had better” come to terms with a changed America — as though that isn’t what this whole fucking blog is about.

        Look, we get it: you are black and vain, like the rest of your kind. Just shut the fuck up about it from now on. We know. We don’t care. We don’t want to be your neighbor. No one does. Because you stink, and your menfolk are feral retards.

        We. Do. Not. Want. To. Be. Assimilated.

        Got it, nigger?

        Like


  68. Lots of voter fraud last night, mostly the destruction of Romney votes. We don’t have ‘free and fair’ elections when we have a Socialist Dictator for president and liberal CHEATS working the polling places and COUNTING (and not counting) the votes. Goodbye, America. It was good while it lasted. 0bama’s future for America is Civil War. Mark my words.

    Like


    • Yeah that’s right blame supposed voter fraud. Nothing prevented conservatives from working the polling places. And as if no conservatives actually worked the polling places. Civil War? Jesus you guys need some anti psychotic meds Stat

      Like


      • What do you think the guns are for you little dingleberry?

        Like


      • Shooting tasty animals and politicians who make rape babies are miracles comments?
        Joking about the second part. Those politicians get raped in the electoral sense and that’s enough.

        Like


      • Whether you realize it or no, you are attacking his religion with your statement. You don’t think a rape baby is God’s will, but he does, because his religion tells him it is so. And you chastise him for his view, as though you had the moral high ground.

        So, you are actually the intolerant one.

        I here am not supporting his view so much as I support his right to have his beliefs and religion. And you should do so as well – views with which you do not agree qualify for freedom of expression protection just as much as your views. Perhaps moreso.

        Also, I recommend that you not judge an entire cohort by a single statement made by a single person. Because that would demonstrate your lack of depth.

        Like


      • It isn’t a lack of depth to not want to tolerate someone’s warped view on rape due to their moronice religious views. It is almost to the point of being beyond comprehension why older white males have this intense burning desire to force women to not have access to abortions. At the outer edges of their rhetoric, Republicans are hard to differentiate from the Taliban.

        Like


      • Reading is fundamental, “Rick”.

        Go back and look at his original statement. He’s not talking about rape. He spoke about the child.

        Stop projecting. Conservatives do not “support rape” – this is not a discussion of the “merits of rape” or any such doddle.

        You’re Freudian slip is showing.

        P.S. I do appreciate that you seem to call out his view, which is the view of many (most?) fundamentalist Christians (that a life is a life and that it is “God’s will”) is “moronic”. I also enjoy your faulty logic that simply because one supports the life of a child that one therefore seeks to restrict the actions of an adult. Now your Orwellian slip is showing.

        Like


      • Splitting hairs to say that rape is not God’s will if a pregnancy from that rape is God’s will. You want to attack me for being a pro-choice atheist? Have at it. It is of no concern to me.

        Like


      • Firstly my distinction does have a difference, because once again if you read his original quote, he did describe rape as horrible and of course did not condone it. And anyway, he’s one guy. He’s not the GOP. And unfortunately for you, he lost. Further, just about everyone in the GOP fell over each other to denounce his comment when he made it. So your point is not a point.

        Secondly, I made no such attack on your personal beliefs. You’re like a chick – everything’s always about you. I could care less about your views, and support the idea that you can believe whatever stupid sh¡t you want to believe. In fact, I would fully support you believing the stupidest sh¡t possible, because that will make me more money.

        Carry on.

        Like


      • No not all about me-just was being a bit pre-emptive. Sure the GOP condemned him ( along with Akin ) but they still had scores of people voting for them. The larger issue is the lack of intellect these candidates demonstrated-and the lack of intellect of those voters voting for them.

        Like


      • Yes, because the candidates on the Left are such paragons of intellect.

        Lunchpail Joe comes to mind. The perfect VP for 0bama.

        Like


      • Well I will take a Lunchpail Joe- a guy who has been a Senator and a Vice President – over Joe the Plumber

        Like


      • He has a right to say that rape babies are God´s will. (Does he believe all calumny is God´s will?) But the people have the right to not vote for such a nut case. This kind of comment is what loses elections.

        Thor

        Like


  69. Can a man vote for Obama and be alpha?

    Yes, don’t kid yourself with that. See: Bill Clinton, George Clooney

    Lots of voter fraud last night

    BS. Romney got less votes than McCain. IF Democrats are so smart as to hide 3million votes, how come they lost any election in the last generation?

    Oh hell Can’t take a little ribbing?

    I have a secret for you…. Don’t believe the BS Chateau writes here. Just go for the hottest chick you can find, look into her eyes, keep your eyes on her until she lowers her stare and walk straight towards her. Keep your eyes on her head, do not get distracted by her body at this stage. Lift her face towards you, bring her ear towards your mouth and say …….. “Yes we can”.

    You voted Obama. You are alpha.

    Like


  70. Romney won white women 56-42%, and white men 62-35%. In the South I’m sure these numbers where much higher, and conversely lower in states like Iowa and Minnesota (WTF?). Romney won every single age group of white voters from 18 to 29 year olds 51-44%, 30 to 44 by 59-38%, and 45 and up 61-38%. The GOP’s relatively biggest problem is not single white women, it’s the tidal wave of immigration. For example, Miami-Dade County is where both candidates got their largest sum of votes in Florida…unfortunately for Romney it is majority non-white and huge amounts of foreign born people. If the 317,382 Romney votes and 521,329 Obama votes in Miami-Dade were removed from the Florida equation, Romney would have won the other 66 counties in the state by 3,780,690 votes to 3,624,220 and 50.5% of the vote. Romney lost by an even bigger margin in Broward county. Either one of those counties on their own provided Obama’s margin of victory. And this is in a state Bob Dole won in 1996. The county in Florida with the largest percentage win was Holmes County on the Alabama line which Romney won 83.6 to 15.3%. Considering that the county is 11% non-white, the white vote percentage there had to be over 90% in favor of Romney. Florida doesn’t have a single white woman voter problem, it has a black/brown voter problem.

    [heartiste: i can’t find data at the moment on the unmarried white woman voting results. my guess is that single white women voted for obama, but at smaller margins than did single minority women. the rest of your comment is true, but no one was arguing that nams don’t vote predominantly dem.]

    Like


    • on November 7, 2012 at 11:07 pm Lucky White Male

      What is America without great, courageous, tough, successful White Males?

      Answer: It is nothing. White European Derived Males are what made America great. Without white males in power, we become a third world country. This is what we are becoming.

      Obama’s rainbow coalition of the “Other” and his clueless, moron Gen Y Twitter imbeciles share the common proud characteristic of : Cannot Do Anything Of Any Real Significance In Life On My Own.

      They therefore need to vote for someone who will give them entitlements so government can be the Big Daddy that gets them through life.

      You are de facto Slaves and this will only become more apparent over time. This is the beginning of the destruction of the West into a small “Chosen” elite ruling mongrelized medicated stewards of the State.., used for your vote every 4 yrs

      To conquer you must destroy the middle class and the family.

      But not David Axelrod’s!

      Got that?

      Like


  71. The GOP lost because they are, quite frankly, offensive, irrational, and backwards. I cannot be more succinct. Mark a big, red “x” on the map. That is where you are as a political party.

    Don’t believe me? Go ahead, guys. Keep demeaning women, gays, and minorities. See the other half of America as your sworn enemy and treat them that way, It’s a great strategy.

    Please continue to spew outright lies and distortions that can be fact checked in under thirty seconds using any search engine. Go on and keep blaming the MSM for being too liberal. Keep blaming universities and public schools for brainwashing students with whatever scary, unamerican agenda you’ve been clamoring about, ad nauseum for over thirty years. Half-baked conspiracy theories are all the rage.

    By all means, don’t stop calling President Obama a Socialist-Marxist-Communist-Fascist because it is just comedy gold for very obvious reasons to those who know exactly what each of those terms actually means. Hint: Barack Obama isn’t any of those. Just, FYI, in case you really didn’t know.

    Be the hard-line obstructionists you have been and do not compromise, lest the GOP be considered weak and accommodating. Demand absolute party purity, move even further to the right, and double down on stupid, just like the past four years. What could possibly go wrong? Do not accept reality and stay in your hermetically sealed echo chambers. Fear and fear and fear and fear. Don’t forget to fear. Fear is good. Fear works.

    By all means, continue your long crusade to legislate all that biblical morality you’ve plainly lost. The majority of this country is still not voting for it, and nothing will bring the moderates out in droves to vote for your opposition than your war on women/gays/minorities nonsense. So, keep it up. You angry, white guys can beat a dead horse like no one else. Go, Red Team. Go.

    Look in the mirror long and hard. Accept that America is changing, has changed, will continue to change, and that it’s really not the end of anything at all.

    You have four years. Make them count for something other than what is truly played out. The clock started ticking after midnight, today.

    Goodbye and good luck, GOP. Yes, you can. In fact, we’re counting on you.

    [heartiste: yes yes, do your little victory dance now. dance while the dancing’s good. because the reckoning is coming, and when it does the dancing will stop. forever.]

    Like


    • mylittlepwny

      If a google search can fact check in 30 seconds, then you must know that the liberal bias of the media is real.

      Like


      • fact checking with a google search is how in 30 second I showed a liberal here who called me a fuckin retard that Obama raised the debt far more and faster than Bush ever did

        Bush raised it 4 trillions in 8 years

        Obama raised it almost 6 trillions in 4 years ; more than twice as bad as Bush

        Bush took it to 65 % of GDP

        Obama has taken it to 95 % of GDP

        Google it

        fact check it

        in 30 seconds you will have to admit I am right

        Like


      • Ok ok so the debt is a huge problem The solution? Cut spending and raise taxes. What’s that you say? That is what is going to happen with the upcoming Fiscal Cliff. Ok then good. Uh what’s that? The Fiscal Cliff will probably put the country into a recession. Hmmm well wonder why? Spending will be cut and revenue will be increased. Just no satisfying some people. Oh I know – let’s give the rich more tax cuts. That should solve everything.

        Like


      • I look forward to the fiscal cliff.

        Will be interesting to see 0bama’s offer. Will it be as popular as his last budget, which no one, not even in his own Party, supported?

        I’ll be watching poolside, with my assets.

        Vote Galt in 2013. I recommend a reverse application of the Cloward-Piven strategy.

        Rick, it’s pretty awesome to see how perfectly you parrot the Talking Points. You’re an excellent little robot. I once again must pat your head. Gooood robot.

        Keep those envelopes handy. You’re going to need them.

        Kisses.

        Like


      • Stick your condescending head patting hand up your ass. Fine you have assets. If anyone gets the gold medal in parroting talking points it is the right. So many braindead people taking pride in thinking of themselves as ” Dittoheads “

        Like


      • The solution is cut spending and cut spending. And unlike “dittoheads” and Romney, that includes cutting military spending. Raising taxes in a depression is stupid.

        Like


      • Rick

        If you have a basic understanding of mathematics then you should understand that the tax the rich pay – even if they are raised substantially – will barely affect the debt.

        the debt is now at a little over 100% of GDP
        which any sane person will tell you is a dangerous level and is unsustainable.

        The problem is not how much taxes the rich pay, it is ( mostly ) too much spending

        And guess which of the two candidates wants to raise spending by an insane amount ?

        Yes it is Obama

        The USA is about to crash and burn because its debt is as high as its GDP but Obama wants to double the debt.

        It is not paranoia or believing in conspiracy theories that makes us say he hates the USA

        why else does Obama wants to raise the debt when it has reached a critical point already ??? Unless it is because he wants to hurt the USA and make it lose its place as a super power?

        that would be revenge on the white man, now wouldn’t it?

        Like


      • So is Fox News liberal for hiring so many blonde woman? Nah – all strategy to get guys to watch the hot blondes and swallow anything the hot blondes say

        Like


      • We prefer when the hot blond swallows

        Like


    • What you can’t understand, asshole, is that we don’t believe in your lame ass democracy.

      It takes a little spark at the right time for the true patriots to rise, subjugate and conquer. The dems’ punk ideology will only make the outcome even more bloody.

      Keep dancing while the dragon is asleep. And pray that it will never wake up.

      Like


      • It only takes about 3% of the population to dedicate itself to a full-blown revolt… and most of their effort… leastwise in the early stages, and an ugly effort it will be… is making sure the play-it-safe ‘citizens’ mind their own business.

        Like


      • Often it is one small incident that sparks a revolt, maybe there will be one too many ” flash mob” by young black people and it will turn into something bloody?

        Like


      • Perhaps when one of the “child welfare” agencies come to confiscate the kids of a political dissident. That’s the scenario Covington uses in his Northwest novels.

        Like


      • Yea. We’ll see how willing white slobs are to part with their “sport” babas and menthol cigarettes in any event.

        Like


      • Have you been around white Americans lately? do you not understand how hollow, goofy and untribal they have become? and aren’t you Canadians a refined extended phenotype, twice as phlegmatic about your downfall as we are?

        White men would have to smoke massive amounts of rock just to not fall to pieces before grandstanding kaffir louts of sixteen. And this doesn’t bring them a jot nearer standing together, which they probably couldn’t do with guns at their backs. Jew forbid white men identity with each other and defend their common fucking interests! Oh, but they’ll line up to vote for a parasitic goy lickspittle like Romney.

        Jesus. ‘White’ and ‘revolt’ do not even belong in the same sentence, forget paired as a phrase. We’re talking about the same people who allowed all this shit to happen in the first place.

        Yesterday I watched a white “mommy” plead with her idiot seven year old son to “behave” at McDonald’s after he stuffed himself with a Happy Meal. The boy was wearing a stuffed animal hat. It was bright green with “googly” eyes and its arms hung down as earmuffs. I’m afraid my power of description is not equal to conveying just how fucking absurd this looked, but I hope you understand how revoltingly unbecoming in a boy it was, and my urge to reach out and wring his fucking neck.

        Like


      • Then you haven’t seen a 3 year old throwing a temper tantrum of epic proportions and the mother calling out to him: ” Attila behave yourself.” or another boy spitting on jackets in the same store and the mother saying to him: “Caligula, i’m very disappointed by your behavior.”. He could have burned the place down, at least that would have been name appropriate.
        But let’s face it, a nation where you can buy pain medication in quantities like m&m’s is seriously rotten…

        Like


      • Solid points, one and all… but again, it only takes three out of every hundred to screw up their courage and “reremember their blood”, as it were.

        Some time off the grid and perhaps the white man can recall who he once was…

        If not, then into the dustbin of history with us… and good riddance, as the affront to the Creator that we’d become.

        “When they first came here, their asses were like cookie dough… after a month of Fight Club, they were carved of wood.”

        Like


      • A lot white people are, for lack of a better word, decadent , it is true, but as a people we are not finished.

        I have been convinced for years now that the leftist establishment has to be toppled before it destroys western civilization, and reduces whites to the equivalent of north american indians living in ” reserves ”

        And the only way to get rid of the leftist “soft” dictatorship is trough violence as all other ways have been tried.

        A revolt is plausible and possible and might the only thing that will ” topple” the leftist establishment.

        If anyone has any other idea how to reverse this descent into leftist hell, please let us know.

        I am not saying I want this to end in violence, I am saying I can not imagine how else the leftist dictatorship can be toppled as they control everything now from the media to the Universities. and it is getting worse every year.

        PS: I do not own a gun nor a Bible, one can be anti-left, anti-liberal and anti-democrat without being a gun totting, one toothed bible thumper.
        Oh and I am not rich either, most conservatives are not rich, this is a myth your liberal media has put into your head

        Like


      • A sufficiently serious economic crash might force a reset, for better and for worse. Better than perezadruzhka, at least.

        Tho

        Like


      • So what are you saying? You want a dictatorship? Baronies? Fiefdoms? Tribal enclaves? Detail exactly what setup you feel would be optimal

        Like


      • Getting rid of female suffrage would be a good start.

        Like


      • And for the love of all that is holy, shut down legal immigration, with the sole exception of spouses of American citizens. At least the Chinese and Indians can’t swim over here.

        Like


      • Yes, yes, yes, and yes.

        Don’t like it? Then you’re not only a nigger-lover, but a nigger-loving pussy.

        Like


      • Yes, sometimes winning is not what you think it is.

        Like


      • LMFAO Revolution? A bunch of pseudo reformers, believing they are going to lead a revolution because they talk shait and are “alpha” because they read blog posts. This is why America is failing.

        Like


      • You do realize that starting a revolution will go on your permanent record?

        Like


      • Touche’… the way the white man has declined, all it will take to stop the revolution is a few Keep Off The Grass signs.

        Like


    • The only thread of truth in MyLittlePwny’s rant was that it is true that young males still see the Republicans as trying to regulate heterosexual activity. Romney was clueless about this when he wasn’t agreeing with that young feminist who stated in the second debate that women earn less than men. And they won’t learn. Marco Rubio is now being touted as the new leader of the party and for a stupid reason, because he’s latino. But Rubio is the leader to outlaw Backpage.com and would be the first to throw men in jail for speaking with a decoy girl on the street. Mitch McConnell foolishly thinks Rubio is the future of the GOP. He’s poison. So is Kansas Senator Jerry Moran who is begging to run the senate selection committee. He was the biggest Republican promoter of VAWA in 2005 when he was a Virginia congresswuss.

      The establishment GOP still has no clue and they haven’t learned from what just happened to them that they must step aside and rethink their animosity to heterosexual males.

      There will be no revolution with these manginas running the Republican Party and, thus, the conservative cause.

      Remember that Gary Johnson took Florida away from Romney just like Bob Barr took NC and IN away from McCain this year.

      Only a fool will ignore that libertarians demand control of the GOP so they can be the main opposition to left wingers. Libertarians can work with social conservatives to crush the liberals.

      Like


  72. This country has gone to shit. Too many people don’t want to work and want handouts using other people’s money. America is going to be one big Detroit in a few decades (years?)

    Like


  73. on November 7, 2012 at 2:07 pm Kevin Lafayette

    You guys should stop feeding the maginas. Logic and reason do not work on white knights.

    Like


  74. Why is everyone acting like this is a big surprise?

    I was expecting King A to be pissed off but not that pissed off… Cheer up, gentlemen, there’s still a choice between poolside and hoarding guns and gold and gtfo straight to the woods.

    As for white culture & civilization, well… I can’t make any promises.

    Like


    • I think he’s more pissed about the neener-neener attitudes… which ill-befit any alleged man… for even an adversary is a representative of our gender.

      Like


  75. Rick,
    If you are really an older white guy, you are going to regret your vote in this election. Trust me, you will. You have a perfect right to your opinion, and I hope that I’m wrong. But I’m not. When the crash comes, thanks to your envy and short time horizon, you’ll regret it.

    Like


  76. Interesting facts,

    According to Wikipedia, Obama received 60,048,411 votes (50.3 percent) and Romney received 57,368,285 votes (48.1 percent).

    Yet in 2008, Obama got 69,456,897 votes (52.9 percent) and McCain got 59,934,814 (45.7 percent).

    Note that 9.4 million of the 13 million votes “lost” were Democrats and 2.5 million were Republicans.

    Democrats lost almost 4 times more voters than republicans did…

    is this a trend? will they lose even more in 2016?

    Like


    • Two factors for the higher Obama vote count in 2008-historic candidacy and extreme anger at how Republicans had left the country after 8 years in the White House

      Like


      • Which means a cool 100 mil or so steered well clear of either one of those asswipes. Or simply didn’t give a rats’ ass. Can’t say I blame them.

        Like


      • Ok so you have your own explanation for 2008

        but why did the democrat lose MORE voters than the republicans did this time around?

        could it be that some of them can see that Obama is not doing a good job?……..

        Like


      • I am no pundit so I will just throw some things out there: Dissatisfaction with Obama, tuned out due to election overload, non-historic election, not happy with either candidate, trying to find household belongings in what was left of their hurricane destroyed house-why do you think it was what it was?

        Like


  77. […] some of the young guys can make it through a speech without waxing philosophical on rape. When  sugar daddy gets low on funds, then young women may start tingling for actual men. We may not be Sweden […]

    Like


  78. Being the opportunist that I am I started at a Romney party till it was obvious how things were heading. So I went over to an Obama party figuring their would be more opportunity. Ended up taking a lovely young lady home who took great pride in her first voting experience. (She just turned 18 last month – or so she said.) So I figured since it was her night for firsts, I gave her a couple of others to enjoy. 🙂

    Like


    • The challenge would be to pick up a HB9 at romney’s when everyone is devastated.
      What kind of game is needed to uplift that kind of mood?

      Like


    • on November 7, 2012 at 5:40 pm gunslingergregi

      nice

      Like


    • I always thought that trying to work an election party might be good fun-especially fun to take home someone from the Republican side and …well if she ended up pregnant, it was God’s will-right Mourdock? No but seriously, good job working the party.

      Like


  79. Democrats lost almost 4 times more voters than republicans did…

    is this a trend? will they lose even more in 2016?

    No. The new ceiling for Republicans is McCain 2008. The new floor for Democrats is Obama 2012. Permanent Democratic (=Parasitic) Majority

    It msut have felt good for Americans when the land of the free forced democracy in all of Latin America in the 70/80s… SO proud to be an American!!!

    Now you taste what you forced us to. Face a majority of voters who live to milk productive society.

    Like


  80. I concur with uh.
    The white woman is the problem. Forget about liberals, gays, and niggers.

    WW are the problem. Until this is understood by all the right-wingers, nothing will never change.

    Like


    • on November 7, 2012 at 5:43 pm gunslingergregi

      naa white men the problem our woman were wondering when we were gonna kill all the minorities we didn’t let em down
      so they fucking us go figure

      Like


    • on November 7, 2012 at 5:45 pm gunslingergregi

      did white men back in day leave the indians to hang around and shit naa they killed em

      Like


    • on November 7, 2012 at 6:08 pm gunslingergregi

      course going to dc i see that it is segregated for sure so i guess they do know how to do it

      Like


    • The solution? Fuck the shit out of them. They vote more reasonably when they are in the thrall of a man.

      Like


      • Pause. Let the following sink in, for evidently, despite being a man of good sense, you haven’t learned this yet:

        “Romney’s most reliant bloc the whole campaign was white men. He led by 25 points with them today. But in 1976, white men were 46 percent of voters. Today they’re at a new low, 34 percent.

        If white women had stayed in Romney’s camp, those swing states — Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire — might have moved into his column. Instead, Obama led among women by 12 points, nearly identical to his lead among women four years ago.”

        Say it with me: single white women and non-whites elected Obama.

        How many of those single white women are being fucked by kaffirs? Probably a minority. Meaning players are fucking them. And they still voted Democrat.

        The numbers don’t lie, bro. The tug-of-war is over; winner is the bitch / boolie bloc.

        We haven’t lost because a half-caste is President; we’ve lost because the American capitalist system enfranchised competing subspecies. And yes, women count as a distinct subspecies. There is greater physical divergence between man and woman than between white man and black man. Our interests overlap, but are not totally congruent. Feminism has artificially sharpened this incongruity in response to market demands. This is the result: men and women of the same “race” on either side of a massive political divide.

        You and all the self-righteous players can keep up your act, keep buying cunts $7 shots and running routines for declining returns on heavy costs. Absolutely wonderful for you. I dwell with the thought that these irresponsible nitwits are burying my entire folk with their narcissism and greed. If that isn’t an “enemy”, then there are no enemies and we may all look forward to an American future that resembles Dolores Park on a Saturday afternoon: mulattos, dykes, kikes, and pot brownies for everyone. Hooray. Big PUA victory.

        Like


      • Do I think cunt suffrage was a huge mistake? Of course. Do I think extending the vote to anybody besides white men a huge mistake? Yes. But given how PCness has strangled the world, and most people’s brains are soaked in that bullshit, if white men were to try to start a revolution, we’d be smacked down and trampled underfoot like Germany in WW2.

        My point is that married white women vote almost as conservatively as married white men, and more conservatively than single white men.

        Like


      • By whom?

        Oh right! AMERICAN WHITE MALES. AN WHOLE ARMY OF THEM AND DIRECTED BY THEM, DERIVING ITS EXISTENCE ONLY FROM THE SUPPORT OF MOST WHITE AMERICAN MALES.

        White American males are the only ones who *really* count. That’s the truth.

        However, you guys have been so thoroughly pussified that I have no hope that you will get a grip. At best, some of you will rebell and diminish the power of the United States and its army, I don’t know how… by giving up, secessionism in the mid West… abandonment of cities like New York or LA and causing its colapse.

        I don’t know shit and I don’t advise shit. All I’m saying and know is that no one can beat American white males if said males put up a fucking fight. But maybe European males will some time rebell and those American males will fight them, like they fought Nazis, or Serbia in the 90s.

        Like


  81. on November 7, 2012 at 5:34 pm gunslingergregi

    there were couple dudes on corner downtown chanting obamas name and holding a sign bout it i guess

    Like


  82. Was the comment about Sandra Fluke’s arms really necessary? Apparently we’re supposed to have Ann Coulter twigs I guess (and Ann Coulter Adam’s apples too?)

    Like


    • on November 7, 2012 at 9:26 pm Anti-Blue pill

      I Used to own books from that big government dick sucking twat, amazing what an open mind can see.

      this cunrty is fucked no matter who’s in charge, as Tony Montana would say
      “America is like a big pussy waiting to get fucked”

      Embrace the suck

      Like


    • Ann Coulter is pretty hot for a 50 year old. Don’t knock her.

      Like


      • Among political pundits, Ann Coulter is a 9.
        In real life, about a 6.5.
        I’m sure I’ll see several Ann Coulters tonight, throwing themselves at 22-year old bartenders and football players.

        Like


  83. Strawman. No one is saying women should have skinny arms…just that Sandra Fluke has large, flabby arms.

    Like


  84. The Democrats ran a campaign based on ladyparts and the American People decided to buy it, particularly American women, and like many women who choose to stay in a relationship that they KNOW is harmful the result is going to be just as catastrophic.

    Like


    • lolzolzlzlz

      good angle there. A+.

      Like


    • At the moment I’m in northern Maine, big county full of farmers and religious types, mostly “conservative”.

      Older people voted for Romney, while at the local high school, Obama won by a landslide in a mock-election. The local “Republican” newspaper ran the story with a picture two smokin’ hot fourteen year old morons smilingly dropping their votes for mandingo cock into a box.

      Long faces on the old folks everywhere I looked.

      One of them, a frazzled man in the dirty blue jumpsuit of a laborer, said he would be voting for Romney for two reasons: “He’ll be good for local business and he won’t drop Israel! We can’t drop Israel. Oh no.” — Why not? I asked. — “We just can’t!” — But why? — “We just can’t … oh no … “

      Like


  85. While all this crap about the different voting blocs is true, the real fight in the race was between a populist, and someone eager to inflict dutch disease on the United States. This interview shows the disconnect between Obama the president, and the cult that carries him to power: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFh0nIYNAyY

    I fully agree with the arguments about the characteristics of the different demographics voting patterns in this article. I strongly disagree with the assertion that Obama/Romney represent the interests of those constituencies.

    In short, I will enjoy four more years.

    Like


    • You seem to have failed to notice that no one here believed Mitt “I bend over for Bibi” Romney would have been genuinely “good for whites”. We were hoping merely for the possibility of less bad.

      However, to claim that the Democrats don’t represent the short-term interests of single white women and non-whites is absurd and disingenuous. It would be correct to say that Romney would be better for the long-term interests of white women if white women were provident and our habitat were not succumbing to the disturbances of race-replacement and black violence. Because it is, voting for Obama was actually the more sensible of the two choices for white women, there being no secure foundation for long-term interests (family, habitat continuity).

      Like


  86. Captured within this page are the labored final gasps of a demographic in its extinction phase.

    The embarrassingly off target “White Woman” analysis along with the “Romney might win” delusions are priceless relics that codify the thought processes of these old soon to be extinct fogies perfectly.

    Take a long hard look in the mirror, Then take a long hard look at the new face of America.

    Charismatic handsome deep-voiced niggers with the support of white women across the land.

    The hamster spinning rationalization that only dumb white women fuck niggers is also terribly pathetic and only adds to the hilarity.

    How out of touch can this basement dweller be? The accredited multi-degree carrying “social justice” credentialist are the main ones that fuck niggers. The white chicks that vote Obama fuck niggers, which makes it painfully obvious that the majority of white women fuck niggers. Even if she won’t be caught dead with one in public. You better believe she’s dropping those panties in a heartbeat behind closed doors.

    The white woman most likely to reject a nigger is a backwards moonshine drinking redneck in a trailer park languishing in some forgotten fly over state.

    Its painfully obvious that this analyst hasn’t been on a college campus since the late 20th century.

    The whining is the icing on the cake, all of these self proclaimed “Alphas” throwing temper tantrums as if they are menstruating. So emotional, so reactionary, so afraid. When the playing field evens out, when saboteurs, SWPL trustafarians, and hipster cronies no longer rule the day.

    The best naturally rise to the top. Propping up the talentless on everyone else back is unsustainable and America is starting to realize it.

    Enjoy the ride fellas! I know I’ll be having a good time, will you?

    Like


  87. Trends forecaster Gerald Celente has stated that the difference between Obama and Romney is that if Romney had come into power, he would have destroyed the US economically (or hastened the destruction, though the banks would still benefit) while Obama will continue to erode your civil liberties.
    Hence the surge in gun sales and the price of stocks in gun manufacturers.

    http://www.trendsresearch.com/SubscriberArea/gerald-celente-alex-jones-show-november-6-2012

    Like


    • Gun sale spikes are heartwarming but mere romanticism. Again, a government that can call drones and the Active Denial System into play completely overshadow white men with semi-automatic rifles. Everyone seems to have forgotten poor old Randy Weaver already.

      In other words, it’s an act of comfort slightly less ineffectual than curling up on the couch with a tub of cookie cough ice cream. They might as well not even bother, for in the event of use, local government would be instantly mobilized against them, as the target would be some feral groid on his way to media canonization.

      If you are white and male, there is no defense.

      Like


      • Not sure that your pessimism is completely warranted…

        Charlie and Abdul in rags with nothing more than AK-47’s and the WILL to use them made Uncle Sam and his 30000 ft bombing raids look flaccid.

        Like


  88. Again, a government that can call drones and the Active Denial System into play completely overshadow white men with semi-automatic rifles

    True, but who but white men are able to control the drones?

    Like


  89. America was a dead nation long before this election. It was dead before Bush went up against Gore.

    Like all women, White women are emotionally driven and are enamoured with fairy-tale notions of niceness and harmony and other things which are at odds with reality. Life is constant competition, and women will not acknowledge this. Nevertheless, it wasn’t the white woman vote that got Obama re-elected. Obama got less of the white female vote than Gore or Clinton and 14% less than Romney in this very election.

    Blacks voted 90%+ for Obama. Asians and Hispanics both voted 70%+ for Obama. Jews voted ~70% for Obama. Conversely, Romney got 59% of the white vote while Obama only got 39%. I’m not saying America has the finest batch of white women on earth; to the contrary, you seem to have one of the lesser, more feministy, fatter batches. Still, they can be blame for 3 out of 4 votes from ethnic cousins, whose number are surpassing yours, going to the homedog.

    Hopefully you will what a crock of shit this ‘diversity’ sales pitch is. Whites and ethnics have different plans for the nation. As children of the folk that built the nation, you want the nation heading in a certain direction; the people you have been kind enough to let in or grant equal status to want to hijack the nation your forefathers built and take it elsewhere.

    I’m actually glad this is happening to America rather than another Western nation for a couple of reasons. Firstly, being such a large nation, America’s subversion by ethnics is happening on the global stage and serves as a warning to other Western nations. If this happened to, say, Luxemburg or Latvia, the only people to notice would be Luxemburians (?) and Latvians. Secondly, if any Western nation deserves it, it is America. I’m not saying this because America bombed Vietnam or Korea or whatever; to the contrary, to be the most powerful nation on earth and not use that power would be the crime. I’m saying this because America has culturally perverted the world. It took the world from Mozart and Dostoyevsky to Snoop Dog and Stephanie Meyer. It replaced good cinema with a man sticking his penis in an apple pie. In fact, an apple pie being fucked by a Jewish kid is a telling and accurate metaphor for what happened to America over the last 100 years. The Jewish producer is probably laughing his ass off that millions of American goyim watch this but are too fucking stupid to realise what it represents.

    The Jewish people are inadvertently fucking themselves, however, as they always do. When America is more brown than white, a reality which lies only decades away, it will be far less likely to finance Israel or fly to her rescue when some neighbouring state starts dropping nukes on Jerusalem. Perhaps Israel can keep pushing Germany’s guilt buttons, but memories fade and eventually the charity will end. Those Arab women push out half a dozen kids each, and unless Israel can keep their population in check with bombing execises, as in Lebanon, she will eventually be engulfed.

    Like


    • In fact, an apple pie being fucked by a Jewish kid is a telling and accurate metaphor for what happened to America over the last 100 years.

      Now that was beautiful.

      And a great comment up to that last bleating, goyish note of false sympathy for Israelis being engulfed by Arabs.

      Like


    • ’m saying this because America has culturally perverted the world. It took the world from Mozart and Dostoyevsky to Snoop Dog and Stephanie Meyer. It replaced good cinema with a man sticking his penis in an apple pie. In fact, an apple pie being fucked by a Jewish kid is a telling and accurate metaphor for what happened to America over the last 100 years. The Jewish producer is probably laughing his ass off that millions of American goyim watch this but are too fucking stupid to realise what it represents.

      Bravo.

      Like


    • Sir,

      If I was British, I would propose you and that big dick of yours to be both knighted.

      * I was one of the goyim who laughed watching american pie. I only realised what you said now but come on! Back than I was 14 years old, and ever since my life has been waiting for the American Pie ideal. It’s good to know how and how much we’ve been brainwashed.

      Like


  90. He’s got a point with the apple pie and the Jewish nerd…..
    Israel is essentially a giant US base in a region crucial to world oil supply.
    And will be mostly Palestinian within a few generations, because Israeli citizens of Palestinian descent are outbreeding those of Jewish descent at breakneck speed.

    Like


    • And will be mostly Palestinian within a few generations, because Israeli citizens of Palestinian descent are outbreeding those of Jewish descent at breakneck speed.

      This true pretty much in every nation , non-caucasians are out breeding whites

      and we whites should shut our mouth and take it in the ass and say thank you, otherwise we are racist or white supremacists

      Like


    • Bullshit.
      The Palestinians can breed all they like; the Zionists have the weapons, the right connections and the means to continue their Israeli apartheid state.

      Unless Israel is nuked to oblivion they will always have the upper hand.

      Like


  91. It’s too easy to blame people for not voting for you. How about republicans try to be truthful and honest for a change. They accuse MSM of lies, but fox news does the same. And people still have not forgotten how they were lied to during the bush years.

    Frankly, Romney came across as disingenuous. Remarks about 47%, and endless flip-flopping did not help his cause. The days where republicans could nominate an idiot like Dubya and still win are long gone, and are never coming back. What they need is real principled leadership….you know a party is rotten when there is a dearth of good leaders. Conservatives have no power because their bastions have been corrupted with the meek and the dumb. That’s where they need to work…This is a good wake up call.

    Like


  92. on November 8, 2012 at 3:14 pm Obstinance Works

    >The fact is, marriage advocacy (and earlier marriage) is bad for young women’s sexual market value leverage, (but good for older married women’s SMV leverage who, it should be noted, were the original pro-monogamy constituents and advocates). <

    Would be interesting to see the effects of this if beta Christian fathers started to adopt this strategy and made the effort to get their girls married off at much younger ages. This probably won't happen of course, because these men are too emotionally attached and invested in the feminist prerogatives of the feminized modern American churches.

    Like


  93. I am glad that you took up this position. I find your counterfeminist ideology just as wrong as feminism, but I wholeheartedly support the ethos of your blog. Sticking up for white men is, sadly, quite necessary these days, since feminists politicized everything (including the body). I know there are others out there doing it. But I must commend you for being so strident and outspoken about it. Carry on. Don’t let anyone tell you that you are wrong. This is not about facts this is about sentiment.

    Like


  94. Speaking of which, if you compare the government to some top tribal leader (I’d say they’re closer to a mafia boss), they even have these secret rights which they partake in:

    Some video, not sure what is has to do with this blog post

    Like


  95. You’ll probably enjoy my article if you like this one.
    http://loc.is-great.net/blog/article/The_american_election_of_2012

    Like


  96. I’ll first say that I voted for Romney/Ryan, but that said I was far from satisfied with their plan. Mostly I agreed with their economic ideas, half-formulated though they where.

    Probably my biggest problem with (at this point) both parties is that they pander to everyone with ideas and policies that only view the short term. This is unacceptable to a traditionalist conservative like myself. We can look back at history and it shows that when nations and civilizations try to a) please everyone and b) do so with short term “gimmies” they begin the descent into darkness. Everyone’s so concerned with the present and what they can get quick and cheap that they don’t bother to consider that IDEAS HAVE CONSEQUENCES (thank you, Richard Weaver!) Worse, that so many ideas these days from most politicians are inherently BAD. Even more disturbing, is that the ideas from the left are the same ideas that propelled the socialists to power in Russia and the radicals in France, and we all know how that ended: hundreds of thousands dead, entire nations wasted. I’m not saying that it’ll happen here (I’m optimistic but cautious), but if the trend continues we’re in for rough times ahead.

    My question for those who say that “I would vote for the GOP if only…” is: why not give them a chance anyway? If conservative values align with your own, why not give them a chance? We gave liberal values a chance four years ago and have nothing to show for it. Isn’t it time to reciprocate?

    Of course, what passes for “conservative” anymore is more aligned with “libertarian,” which is a distant relative to conservatism in that the only thing the two share is a confidence in market solutions to create prosperity. Other than that, libertarians have little in common with conservatives. Their’s is closer to anarchy than it is to true republican conservatism. Further, we can label social conservatives “wing-nuts” all we like, but I for one sympathize with them to a degree. They (correctly) see that politics cannot solve our problems (at least not all of them, if not even a small number of them) and that to change the direction we seem to be headed, we must change our culture and return it to the Judeo-Christian, Western values that the Founders used to create us (whether or not the Founders were Christians themselves-an interesting debate in and of itself-is entirely irrelevant here: they used Judeo-Christian principles as a guide to forming the Constitution and our laws). The way they go about it, however, is laughable in its ignorance. I grew up an evangelical but after hearing some of what they say and doing my own research and prayer, I find myself drawn to the Christian Humanism of such people as Josef Pieper, Christopher Dawson, and C.S. Lewis. We cannot legislate morality-it’s a losing battle in our modern world because the world will ultimately reject it. However, we can declare our principles, our beliefs, and live by them and set an example for those in search of a rock to stand on spiritually and morally, as Christ was for Peter’s Church.

    In the end, what HAS to change is our culture. While we can’t stop people from looking at pornography, having sex out of wedlock, smoking pot, etc ad nauseum, we can show the alternative and how it is more fulfilling. I’ve found my principles in Traditionalist Conservatism, and I am a more fulfilled being because of it, Thank God Almighty. For anyone interested in this, read Russell Kirk’s “The Conservative Mind,” for a start. Thanks and God Bless!

    Like


  97. This question isn’t related to this post, but I’m interested in reading some autobiographies of alpha males…any suggestions?

    Like


  98. Why the fuck would you think Amerindians would vote 35% Romney?
    Those same people who have been fueling the inexorable growth of left wing thugs in their countries?

    You bet more than 80% of Romney’s Latino vote was from white Hispanics. They do exist. And you’d do much better if you didn’t discriminate everyone that came from Latin America as if they were savage indians.

    Look at the Cubans in Miami. Don’t you think they were effectively an asset? Compare them to the Mexicans in L.A.

    Look at Christina Aguilera in the beginning. Wouldn’t you want more of that kind of diversity?

    Well, if you alowed white Latin Americans to blend in, instead of calling them Hispanics, maybe they would just mingle with the rest of white America and disappear quietly. But no!

    What the heck, if you wanted to brand all Mexicans as Mexicans, it was ok. But then, you’d leave the rest of Latin America to act on their own and identify as they wanted. The label “Hispanic” in the US is wrong, and it is no more than a Democratic scheme to make all people of Latin America into a “disadvantaged minority”, the new blacks. That’s fucking insane.

    Call them indians, don’t call them Hispanics.

    Like


    • @alfonso
      ” Well, if you alowed white Latin Americans to blend in, instead of calling them Hispanics”

      Pray tell, who is it that is not “allowing” white Latin Americans” – or anybody else for that matter – to “blend in”? In fact, if they are “white” who would even know, whatever their intent?

      Thor

      Like


  99. here i am.. single white woman.. trying to read this thinking, “hey, why did i vote for obama, then, article? WHY?”

    all i got was “women can be swayed cuz we get defensive about birth control and we pity poor people..” bla bla bla.. didn’t care to read the rest of it cuz

    IT’S ALL BULLSHIT.

    a man must have wrote all that.. or some republican woman but really.. probably a dude. cuz they’re the ‘best’ gender. no pity from them..

    and now this article has made me just a little more feminist.

    thanks, dude.

    Like


  100. on November 16, 2012 at 3:47 am A Married White Woman Who Voted for Obama

    If only, we could vote to export neanderthals like you. You definitely don’t get laid except by that far right hand. Even if you do, you are probably the worst lay anyone will ever have. You know absolutely nothing about women. Your balls probably haven’t even dropped yet.

    Like


  101. “Teaching is a ‘human despair service.'” Really? Fuck you.

    Like


  102. […] Obama This discussion leads me to make one last point on demographic politics: Some are saying that Obama’s strong showing among [single] White women is a major cause for concern. (Obama beat Romney 55%-43% among straight never-married White women, […]

    Like