Sexbots

Forget flying cars and interstellar travel, the next big thing to radically transform society will be sexbots.  Japanese girlfriend substitutes, lifelike dolls, porn saturation… all signs are pointing toward a technological coalescence of immense implications for relations between the sexes.  It’s a horny new world on the horizon of men having sex with the artificial women of their dreams.  Mein Gott.

Much has been written about the sexbot phenomenon, with the skeptics focusing on the technical limitations (men make this argument) and the insistence that sexbots would not satisfy male sexual desire like real women would (women make this argument).  It’s possible the technical hurdles to creating a sexually pleasing mechanical woman that could compete with real women might be too high, but assuming those hurdles are jumped, I offer the following future scenario.

A robot that is an exact replica of your favorite supermodel and that has feedback to sound and touch (for example, she’ll move her limbs and gyrate during sex as well as talk dirty and respond to commands) would supplant all other masturbation tools as the preferred method of getting off for men who can afford it.  Once sexbots become affordable, internet porn consolidates to one or two websites for spank snobs who insist on “authenticity” and proles who must suffer the humiliation of not only being too poor to afford real women but fake ones as well.  But, outside of self-pleasure and procreation, would sexbots replace real women?

For some men, yes.  The replacement would be total, at least until the dating market adjusted to the new reality.  For other men, sexbots would be a part-time replacement.  The result will be a shift in the mating landscape that will put selection pressures on humanity equivalent to a massive plague or a catastrophic famine.

Sexbots are a very real threat to the established order because men’s sexuality is so visually driven.  Compared to women, it is a rather simple affair to create an alternative sexual outlet for men.  Think about romance novels which are the porn equivalent for women.  It’s a mentally-taxing affair to write a book, even a trashy, plot-by-numbers one.  But displaying photos of naked women for the consumption of men takes a few mindless seconds.  Now imagine a Natalia Vodianova sexbot in every bachelor pad.  The raw visual and tactile appeal of that will keep men holed up in their bedrooms for weeks straight.

Some of the changes I foresee:

Omegas (geeks, nerds, dweebs, trolls, dregs, dullards, bums, street filth, etc.) – will finally have a satisfying release for their pent-up horniness.  Crime will likely drop as a result.  So will rape.  Widely available sexbots are analogous to cheap, legal prostitution, minus the STDs and needle tracks.  On the whole I think it is a social good to distract the losers from their grinding misery.  Since these guys weren’t getting laid anyway, availing themselves of sexbots won’t have much impact on the dating market.  Sexbots could also be compassionate.  Giving a homeless guy a sexbot will do more for his happiness than $5 for liquor or a sympathetic smile from a cute soup kitchen volunteer.

Betas (niceguys with a heart of gold and zero sex appeal) – the more frustrated betas will retreat from the dating scene to be with their sexbots.  They’ll not opt out completely, though.  Having a decent job and a willingness to help raise a family is still a form of buying power.  I see sexbots for betas dissuading them from learning the art of seduction, thus making them even more ineffectual in the field as their already-meager skills atrophy.  He might think to himself, “what’s the point of dealing with the frustrations and delayed gratification of dating mediocre looking women for subpar sex when I have a Rachel Weisz sexbot waiting at home for me?”  A big negative feedback loop could result, where the lower status betas exercise their sexbot option with increasing regularity until they have excluded themselves completely from bothering with meeting women.  This will open up room in the dating market for

Aspiring Alphas (betas who know a thing or two) – As low status betas and omegas retreat from the dating scene to be with their sexbots, aspiring alphas will be more in demand than ever.  It’s a simple numbers game — more women for every man willing to expose himself to the whims of dating and rejection from real women means these men will have an easier time honing their game and achieving sexual satisfaction.  Even a guy willing to put in minimal effort shaping up his game will find the pickings easy.  The consequences?  Less commitment, more casual sex, and more partners.  Not to mention more first date anal.  You can stop taking salsa classes now.

Alphas (guys who won’t have to martyr themselves for 72 virgins) –  will reap a tremendous beaver bounty.  The direct and indirect benefits of the sexbot revolution will flow to the alphas.  The direct benefit?  Although he is the guy who won’t need sexbots because he gets plenty of quality real ass for little investment, he will probably have a few in the closet for those times when his girlfriends have a collective headache.  Plus, the off button is very appealing to the inveterate womanizer.  The indirect benefit?  More women vying for his seed.  I predict that over time the smothering ego-boosting attentions of the fangirls will make the alpha soft, paving the way for lower ranking males to usurp his position in the bangarchy.

Ugly Women – drop out entirely.

Plain Women – put out on first dates.

Beautiful Women – choose harem initiation with a super alpha.

Marriage – uncertain.  Either marriage will take a bodyblow from which it will never recover, or paradoxically divorce will decrease as husbands inclined to stray fulfill their cravings for variety with non-human mistresses.  With the sequestering of betas to their sexbotatoriums, the price of alphas on the market will skyrocket.  They will call the shots in matters of marriage — I see a regression to sanctioned polygamy and overt adultery.  This will herald the end of Western civilization.

Love – The virus in the borg.  Love may save the day.  A man’s need for love will keep him in the game.  But not in the same capacity.  He’ll be roused to go on a few dates but he’ll feel no pressure to get laid and will probably have unrealistic expectations about what kind of women he deserves based on wistful comparisons with the hot robot he fornicates with daily.  Ladies, if you think guys are selfish, egotistical pricks now, just wait until they start showing up to dates basked in the afterglow of sex with their Jessica Alba robots.  It is going to take a lot more to win over a guy who is that sexually satisfied.

Conclusion – The entire market structure of dating will shift seismically in the direction of men becoming choosier and less willing to please and women becoming looser and more willing to please.

The basic premise I have outlined above rests on a simple observation — the more physically satisfying choices men have to sate their lust, the less needy they will be with women.  And non-neediness translates into a slight downgrade in the asking price of single women.  Because women are more loathe to settle than men, there will be a rush to the top as the dwindling number of acceptable male prospects commands the attentions of an ever-growing pool of women.  Polygamy will rush in to fill the need.





Comments


  1. I wonder if similar sexual market conditions haven’t already been played out in England and France after WW1, when millions of young men and virtually no women were killed.

    Like


  2. I wonder if similar sexual market conditions haven’t already been played out in England and France after WW1, when millions of young men and virtually no women were killed.

    One consequence was a rise in what might be termed opportunistic lesbianism. If I’m not mistaken it was most prevalent in France, not so much in Britain or Germany.

    Like


  3. Sorry about being off-topic, but to anyone’s knowledge, are there benchmarks for the 1 – 10 scale of women’s attractiveness?

    Assuming women of a young age, say, 20 through early 30s, and that disfigured or otherwise defective appearances are not figured in, how about this set of benchmarks:

    1: grossly overweight, extremely tall or short, coarse and mannish face, bad skin

    2: very overweight or bony, dull or otherwise unpleasant face, bad skin

    3: overweight, unremarkable face with somewhat healthy skin

    4: overweight but generally healthy-looking; alternately, scrawny; unremarkable to somewhat pleasant face

    5: completely unremarkable figure and face; no sex appeal but not visibly unattractive

    6: thin, plain girl; alternately, a slightly chubby girl with a somewhat pleasant face

    7: attractive figure without any obvious flaws, unremarkable but pleasant face

    8: very good figure, pretty face; evokes desire at a glance

    9: very strong sex appeal, flawless figure, attractive but not spectacular face; a head-turner

    10: Blindingly beautiful; even advanced alphas lose their poise when talking with her

    Like


  4. I am pro-sex robot as I’d benefit greatly from the sex robots.

    In terms of what will happen in the future, I suspect polygamy as practices in ancient civilization will not develop due to the fact that women are able to work and support themselves, and I don’t see alphas marrying women. I think what may happen is that men and women may enter into platonic relationships where the male’s sex needs are met by the robots and the women date the alpha males. We’ll probably also end up with a system where alpha males father the majority of the children, but where the beta males end up taking care of them in some indirect way.

    Also since beta males won’t need women, we’ll finally end that mess of the bitter beta male since he’ll finally have a sex robot.

    Liked by 1 person


  5. i am too insecure to comment on your comment

    Like


  6. “They made us too smart, too quick, and too many. We are suffering for the mistakes they made because when the end comes, all that will be left is us.” – Gigolo Joe, A.I. (2001)

    Like


  7. Polygamy is already coming back. See eg. Big Love and Girls Next Door. Watch for a couple of high profile “scandals” in the coming years, followed by re-adoption of the principle by Mormons, followed by more widespread practice in the west and then pro forma legalization.

    Like


  8. Did you read a lot of sci-fi growing up?

    This will never happen, just like nothing has really changed in the mating practices of men and women in the past 50 years, despite shifts in cultural norms and legal codes.

    Why won’t it happen? Because men, just like (if not more than) women, are really emotionally needy.

    But I applaud your predictions and am amazed by your imagination. It’s kind of hot.

    Like


  9. on August 17, 2007 at 10:38 pm Cynically yours

    But what about women’s use of the same technology? They already have far more functional sexual man-substitutes than the other way around, and why wouldn’t that trend continue? The male sexbot could also serve as an awesome insemination device (at the recipient’s leisure), and at the point of being capable of providing realistic sex, it would be able to beat up any alpha around too, however cocky they may be. The perfect gentleman.

    To reduce the suffering of the poor befuddled men, yet retaining conventional sexual reproduction, I’d also suggest extracting the genetic information from every suitable male fetus and using suitably edited versions of this DNA as the core of artificial sperm (simply spermatozoic but empty delivery devices that are primed with suitable DNA), DNA which can be stored at a sperm bank and delivered to interested buyers. The fetus has little utility after that point and can then be aborted; some of them will of course still be the most magnificent alphas (reproductivel speaking).

    Like


  10. Raise your hand if the massive influence of porn has already largely made most women seem boring and tame

    (raises hand)

    Polygamy is already coming back. See eg. Big Love and Girls Next Door.

    Except Hugh Hefner has been doing this for years and nobody cared.

    As for polygamy, I don’t see it being legalized any time soon even without the development of sex robots. The big change between then and now is that women can earn their own income that rivals that of men. In ancient times, women needed the protection of the alpha males to keep them safe and maintained. In contrast, today, a woman can easily make six figures, and depending on location, can buy a 9mm handgun.

    As I’ve said before, once you take the sex out of relationships, relations between men and women will blossom as the weird awkward feelings between both sexes will be eliminated. I may be picky in terms of my potential sex partner, but not for my female friends. I’ve had a lot of fun and great experiences with my female friends, and I wouldn’t trade it for crappy sex. Sex just gets in the way of friendships between men and women. In fact, I presume that the ugly women will benefit since men who once rejected them before won’t mind befriending them in platonic friendships.

    Leave the sex to those who specialize in sex, and leave the emotions to those who specialize in emotions.

    Like


  11. on August 17, 2007 at 7:20 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    I think he has a point here — and it’s borne out by the fact that the sex toy industry is already booming when it comes to women. Passion Parties, Slumber Parties and the like have all exploded in the last few years, selling what basically amounts to robotic penises to women.

    It’s only a matter of time until this comes to men. I’m less concerned on what effect this will have on alpha, beta males, etc. What concerns me is the fact that, like most male pleasures, someone will act to make all this illegal. The fundies and feminists will probably band together — like they did on the “porn menace.”

    Finally, I’m amazed by the fact that men are now being characterized as “emotionally needy.” Until recently, men were “emotionally unavailable.” Which is it? This is like women who complain men simultaneously “want to be mothered” and “prefer only young hotties.” It can’t be both! Which is it? Whenever women make blanket statements about men, it’s a sign of insecurity, whcih means he is onto something!

    Raise your hand if the massive influence of porn has already largely made most women seem boring and tame, and marriage seem totally unworkable.

    Like


  12. But I applaud your predictions and am amazed by your imagination. It’s kind of hot.

    That’s the whole point of conversations like this. If you read 2blowhards, Michael has made this point often about French intellectual gobbledygook — only the clueless Anglos take the stuff seriously, while for the French it’s just a way to civilize raw flirtation.

    Especially when you say something that will get the female readers all riled up, making them feel like they’ve got something to prove. Half-Sigma does that a lot, but I don’t think it’s for the purposes of flirtation.

    If the widespread popularity of sexbots makes guys less interested in real women, then they’ll just have to choose not to enter the sexbot culture.

    And to make the guy “technical” comment, sexbots will never replace good flirtation or whatever, because much of the excitement of flirting is the spontaneous back-and-forth, cocky, mock-confrontational banter. Human language is so complex, forgetting even how we carry it out in real time, that no one’s been able to build a robot that can converse as a real human. That’s a long long while off.

    Here’s one prediction that will come true, though: sexbots will principally be bought by 30-something or older men, a bit less by 20-somethings, and no teenagers. Assume they are cheap, so that’s not the issue. Sex toys and kinky paraphenalia in general only appeal to those so aged that their youthful passion has been exhausted. You’ve never seen a KY “personal lubricant” ad with young people, but instead 35 year-olds, for a reason.

    Like


  13. You’ve never seen a KY “personal lubricant” ad with young people, but instead 35 year-olds, for a reason.

    Younger women generally produce enough natural lubrication to make artificial lubricants unnecessary. As women get older, especially after menopause, nature sometimes needs a helping hand (so to speak).

    Speaking of lubricants, I’ve heard that Crisco is the substance of choice among men of the non-straight persuasion.

    Like


  14. And to make the guy “technical” comment, sexbots will never replace good flirtation or whatever, because much of the excitement of flirting is the spontaneous back-and-forth, cocky, mock-confrontational banter.

    Except that flirting is annoying and tedious and filled with pointless banter designed to attract a female. Why bother with that when you can have a sexbot where you’re guaranteed sex done in way that you desire it.

    Like


  15. What concerns me is the fact that, like most male pleasures, someone will act to make all this illegal. The fundies and feminists will probably band together — like they did on the “porn menace.”

    Yes, because they did such a good idea on that. There’s just nowhere to get pornography these days. This will have to go in my chronicles about how darn tough it is to be a man in this country…

    ~trumwill
    Hit Coffee

    Like


  16. on August 18, 2007 at 7:33 am Days of Broken Arrows

    The above poster identifies himself as “feminist” on his blog. This is my response to his response to my post.

    Last I looked, there were two million men in prisons, and a fraction of that number were women behind bars. It wasn’t always this way, so I think it’s not a stretch to say many laws are designed as anti-male.

    Women do, I believe, 40 to 60 percent of the prison time men do for committing the same crimes. When they get convicted at all.

    Clearly, the feminists and fundies did not succeed in banning porn, but they wasted a lot of people’s money and time.

    The reason feminists have largely succeeded in their attempts to pussify everything from the military to the workplace is because of men like this, who side with women, instead of other men. See if the women ever stick up for you if you’re in the trenches, buddy.

    Explain why the majority of moeny on healthcare goes to women, and why there are entire hospitals devoted to them — yet men die seven years sooner in the US.

    Like


  17. That also has to do with estrogen effects on cholesterol levels (though I am no friend of feminism).

    objective stuff for 1-10s: naah. Men use it to describe a woman’s attractiveness to them, but some men are more prone to hyperbole than others (some men’ll call every reasonably hot girl a 10 whereas others will never use the rating), different men are attracted to different body parts (leg men, butt men, breast men), etc.

    Like


  18. “I may be picky in terms of my potential sex partner…” — David Alexander

    What sex partner?

    Like


  19. The above poster identifies himself as “feminist” on his blog.

    Actually I took an Internet quiz that called me a feminist. I pointed out that the quiz was flawed with an overly broad definition of feminist.

    Women do, I believe, 40 to 60 percent of the prison time men do for committing the same crimes. When they get convicted at all.

    I can agree that if you’re going to commit a crime, it is better to be female than male.

    The reason feminists have largely succeeded in their attempts to pussify everything from the military to the workplace is because of men like this, who side with women, instead of other men.

    I’m not going to side with men simply because they are men. I will side with them when they’re right and a woman is (or women are) wrong. For example if a woman were to characterize all men as thinking and behaving like some of the men here do, I’d take great exception to that!

    Explain why the majority of moeny on healthcare goes to women, and why there are entire hospitals devoted to them — yet men die seven years sooner in the US.

    Women have babies and men don’t. Men are less likely to go to the doctor for minor (or sometimes major) ailments. There may be other reasons, those are just off the top of my head.

    ~trumwill
    Hit Coffee

    Like


  20. Polygamy is already coming back. See eg. Big Love and Girls Next Door. Watch for a couple of high profile “scandals” in the coming years, followed by re-adoption of the principle by Mormons, followed by more widespread practice in the west and then pro forma legalization.

    I lived in the Mormon west for a couple years and let me disabuse you of the notion that the Mormons even want polygamy to become legal again. Just as there is no evangelist like the former sinner, there is no group of people I’ve ever met more fixated (negatively) on the issue of polygamy than Mormons. They are really baffled by the splinter groups in southern Utah and northern Arizona that haven’t given it up.

    Like


  21. “Speaking of lubricants, I’ve heard that Crisco is the substance of choice among men of the non-straight persuasion.”
    Where? On the playground in 4th grade?

    On topic, I just can’t see this being a big deal. How can blowup dolls and Real Dolls be for losers, while Sexbots are perfectly acceptable in the mainstream?

    Like


  22. This is a fantasy, as these “robots” will not be available for a long time. Blow up dolls are still around now; no one is using these as an excuse for women. The “beta” men on these websites are always complaining about “alphas” monopolizing the women. While this is somewhat true (mostly due to women’s AND men’s unrealistic standards), we have to understand the causes for the situation – from a very liberal Supreme Court to increased opportunities for women to the complete failure of the men in charge in the 60’s and 70’s to stand up for traditional values. Average men have no voice in Washington. Women do, gays do, blacks do, businesses do, unions do, etc. Until more men realize the situation and mobilize, nothing will change. The amnesty defeat, I think, was a first shot – I have a feeling that average men were the main people outraged at the situation and did something about it. I hope they start to assert themselves on other issues. This is not about me personally as much as it is about how much the society which you all describe scares me. A society with the ultra rich and vast poor, with many celibate men, cannot sustain itself. And to be honest, there probably isn’t much time to reverse the trends. I wonder if Hillary winning would be good in the long run – a Hillary-Pelosi radical feminist takeover would be so loathsome that beta men would be forced to act.

    Like


  23. Women do, I believe, 40 to 60 percent of the prison time men do for committing the same crimes. When they get convicted at all.

    I can agree that if you’re going to commit a crime, it is better to be female than male.

    Part of the reason is that in drug offenses, which account for the largest share of prison inmates, women are more likely to act as supporting staff (so to speak) rather than ringleaders. When women commit violent crimes, the victims generally are friends or family members rather than strangers, and rightly or wrongly the criminal justice system often treats “stranger” crimes more seriously.

    The “beta” men on these websites are always complaining about “alphas” monopolizing the women. While this is somewhat true (mostly due to women’s AND men’s unrealistic standards), we have to understand the causes for the situation – from a very liberal Supreme Court to increased opportunities for women to the complete failure of the men in charge in the 60’s and 70’s to stand up for traditional values.

    I don’t quite follow. It seems more likely that independent women with ample economic and other opportunities would be less drawn to Alphas than are more traditional women.

    Like


  24. This is a great post. I love the logic.
    Please help me with this phenomenon: my hot, alpha male friends, the ones who eschew relationships and have the mentality “why have a girlfriend when i can spank off to a different porn woman every night?” always seem to eventually fall in love and consequently want the relationship with the woman who does not want him?

    You’re saying the advent of the “perfect get-it-when-you-want-it sexbot sex” will miraculously eliminate the innate human desire to seek that which we cannot obtain? Fascinating.

    Like


  25. I don’t understand you. You get all mean when I contend that certain underdog guys who complain about women not wanting them don’t really want relationships with women, but are just angry that they don’t get no-strings sex with the top ones, and will dispose of their successes quickly and treat them with contempt. Then you write posts where you totally support my contentions.

    It appears that we are in complete agreement about how men view women. Why the hostility?

    Like


  26. Average men have no voice in Washington. Women do, gays do, blacks do, businesses do, unions do, etc.
    Oh God. Poor disenfranchised white men. Blah blah blah. STFU.

    Like


  27. I think I’m innately naive/optimistic because the first thing I thought when I saw your post was ‘Yay! Sex is taken out of the equation in real relationships!’. Do I say this because I, at best, think I’m a… 6?

    Then I looked at your reasoning and got depressed. I seriously do not want to look at men the way you do. It’s horrible, it seems to say everything they do when it comes to girls is motivated by sex. I’m so scared that it actually may be fundamentally true.

    As far as the poor people problem goes, you could always solve it with Rent-A-SexBot services.

    I think a post about romance novels one day would be cool: Do do all your hook-ups “secretly” read romance novels? Do they have a bad image? Do they spice things up? Do they apparently create silly expectations (*rolls eyes*)?
    Can you use them & other literature in your game?

    Like


  28. OK, then, what does this have to do with sexbots?

    Well, sexbots expand the supply of pussy and represent a threat to the feminist cartel.

    The only thing they will have left then is the monopoly over reproductive capacity, but that will eventually fall too.

    Like


  29. Jack got it right.

    I spoke in comments earlier about the distinction between “dyadic” and “structural” power. Dyadic power is best summarized as one of my late work colleagues did “This rules the world”, making a crude representation of a vagina with thumbs and forefinger. Every man knows this, no feminist will ever admit it. There isn’t a female alive that cannot find a sex partner on demand, period. No man, even the most alpha among us, cannot do that. However, this has been until now an immutable aspect of biology. The advent of sexbots changes all that, as he points out.

    Because female sexuality has great value and male sexuality has none in the marketplace, we have a situation where we have a relatively unregulated market with females as sellers and males as buyers. Needless to say, the service being sold has great variations in quality (presumably reflected in price) and supply and demand levels, which can differ among locales and over time.

    Still, the thing to remember is that the market is still relatively free. The goal of the feminist cartel is to restrict the supply of pussy by raising the price paid and the risk taken to obtain it. That is what explains sexual harrassment hysteria, and such legal/policy obscenities as VAWA, IMBRA, CEDAW, and Title IX. If the price and risk are high enough, many young men on the margin will just say the hell with it–and maybe that explains the large numbers of singles in our bluest metropolitan areas. As we say in economics, the demand for pussy is not perfectly inelastic–it can’t command an infinite price.

    On the other hand, the job/economic/political power market is not free, and the outcome THERE has long been fixed in women’s favor to the extent that they outearn young men in many major metropolitan areas (as has just been reported in the NY Times). Thus the price of pussy rises even as men become ever less able to afford it.

    In a world in which the balance of dyadic power is immutably in females’ favor, but the balance of structural power is fixed by policy and, as Jack says, the failure of men in charge in the 60’s and 70’s to suppress this shit most ruthlessly, we will indeed experience the situation he described. It will be a world of the primacy of feelings over objective evidence, where women will never be held responsible for their crimes and in which men will be held responsible for crimes they never committed.

    Like


  30. Polygamy will not return while the welfare state, and its system of free money for single mothers, still exists. Women don’t need to marry a man who already has a wife (to support the children she really wants to have) because she can just get knocked up by some underclass zeta and then marry the taxpayer.

    Like


  31. Peter, I’m 29, so I see “alpha” as mostly based on looks. More successful women are more shallow, because they don’t need the support of a man. Now of course they still aren’t going to date a garbageman, so they’ll hold out for the guy with it all.

    It’s not like I think all is lost, but what I’m saying is there are bad things going on here. Female teachers sleeping with little boys? A woman murders her husband in TN and gets a couple months in jail?

    I don’t want a return to the 50’s, what I want is men to defend their interests like everyone else does.

    Like


  32. Trumwill that’s some real pretentious shit right there.

    What makes you think that you are any better than the some of the men on these boards? You didn’t say it outright, but taking offense to being lumped in with some of the guys on this place is not a positive thing.

    Like


  33. What makes you think that you are any better than the some of the men on these boards?

    I consider the attitudes presented here towards women and relationships to be seriously warped. Most men do not have such a warped perspective. I would take offense at any woman that used this blog as an exemplar of how men “really think”. I feel the same about some feminist sites.

    I’m sorry if my presentation of this series of observations was a bit glib. I don’t know anyone here to know if I am a “better” person on the whole. I do consider my views on women and relationships to be less unhealthy, though.

    Like


  34. Peter, I’m 29, so I see “alpha” as mostly based on looks.

    BZZZZZT!! Wrong answer! It’s off to the re-education camp for you!

    /note to self: create gulag for misguided betas. Become billionaire!

    Like


  35. Trumwill, most men don’t get laid as much as well.

    So in a risk/reward learning system, which is the correct approach? This warped perspective that gets rewarded or your perspective that gets punished?

    Like


  36. You sound like an insane person. Publish this in a book or movie, call it Stepford Wives 2025, and profit. But blogging it for no profit just as an excuse to hate on women, shameful.

    Like


  37. Sexbots sound like a good idea, until you think about having to disassemble on and clean it out. Yech!

    Like


  38. I cannot imagine that anything will change. Sexbots are just that, robots. I like real women. The idea of “doing it” with any kind of robot, no matter how life-like, really creeps me out. I think men will prefer real women over sexbots for the same reason the above average woman you see in the gym or bar turns you on way more than the hot 9 or 10 you see on the street. Same reason why the “girl next door” or “natural ametuers” are hotter than the ideal physical beauty.

    At least thats the way I see it.

    Like


  39. Sexbots are just that, robots. I like real women.

    what about real ugly women?

    Same reason why the “girl next door” or “natural ametuers” are hotter than the ideal physical beauty.

    the girl next door is totally do-able.
    where sexbots will have the greatest impact is with those men for whom sexual relations constitutes rutting with a typical dumpy haggard american housewife.
    the heidi klum android is gonna seem like a giant trade up for these guys.

    Like


  40. Sexbots sound like a good idea, until you think about having to disassemble on and clean it out. Yech!

    They’ll be self-cleaning, but they’ll make disgusting slurping sounds when they do so. After hearing that once, you’ll put your sexbot away in the cupboard for good.

    Like


  41. Wow, what a bunch of lunatics!

    First of all, this is just a ploy from some undesirable (read: fat & ugly american white man) to make women jealous. Guess what? We don’t care if you pork a bot, since the only guys who will need to do this are totally undesirable in the first place. And HAHA! how funny it will be when your bot malfunctions and bites your 2 inch dick off. Then what? Well, THEN you’ll come crawling back to the women you shot down in favor of your now-defunct robo-cunt… and know what? They are gonna spit their latte in your face and tell you to go stick your mini-manhood in a toaster oven.

    AHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! Can’t wait to see you tards get pwned by your own bastard creations!

    Like


  42. 53 WTF:

    Wow, what a bunch of lunatics!

    First of all, this is just a ploy from some undesirable (read: fat & ugly american white man) to make women jealous. Guess what? We don’t care if you pork a bot, since the only guys who will need to do this are totally undesirable in the first place. And HAHA! how funny it will be when your bot malfunctions and bites your 2 inch dick off. Then what? Well, THEN you’ll come crawling back to the women you shot down in favor of your now-defunct robo-cunt… and know what? They are gonna spit their latte in your face and tell you to go stick your mini-manhood in a toaster oven.

    AHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! Can’t wait to see you tards get pwned by your own bastard creations!

    Hi Dizzy. How they hangin’?

    Like


  43. i’m not a sci-fi fan….but talk of “this won’t happen for a long time” and blah blah blah….look at how radically changed our society has become just b/c of the internet….technology truly increases at a frightening rate each and every minute of every day around the world…..i don’t think it will be soon, but you’re kidding yourself by hiding under the bed/crossing your fingers and chanting “it will never happen!”

    Like


  44. 53 WTF – your logic that only undesireable men would do a sex robot shows that you honestly don’t know sh*t about men. desireable men watch porn, go to strip clubs, frequent escorts, have affairs, womanize etc……desireability on the part of men has little to do with their sexual behavior.

    Like


  45. It is not only sexbots that could emerge within 15-20 years.

    Holographic porn, sensor-covered body-suits, and AI programs that speak to a user in the language of love are all quite possible.

    Western Women are currently at their peak of power. The combination of technological change and Islamic advances will send them into a precipitous plunge.

    Liked by 1 person


  46. Again, 3-D holographic videogames and tactile-immersive VR will happen a lot sooner than sexbots do.

    Robotics is a slow field. There is not yet a good robot to do household chores. A sexbot will be much more technically complex than that.

    Furthermore, even a supermodel sexbot is the same everyday. All men want variety. A holographic video game/VR system affords that.

    So holographic VR/video games will happen much sooner (10-15 years) than sexbots.

    Like


  47. As a woman, I am just going to say that I am not threatened by these sexbots. Frankly, if these very scientific (ha), well thought out (ha ha), and unbiased (LOL) predictions are true, and men that buy them stop dating/etc., AMEN! These robots can be the saving grace of straight women!

    No longer will we have to try and weed out the childish idiots who only want their sexist fantasies fulfilled; these robots will do it for us! Hallelujah!

    (Although, they may just breed more of the ignorant douchebags who think they’re entitled to a woman’s body. Since that’s all we’re good for. Do you hear that? It’s the sound of history repeating itself…)

    Like


  48. A robotic woman can satisfy the desires of men, but robotic man cannot provide economic support like a real man could. That is why a change of sexual interaction has not occurred with woman and their as of now superior sex toys. I forsee woman having to become what every man wants to ensure securing a man. Mother, hottie, cook and housekeeper.

    Like


  49. Lots of industries are going to lose out when sexbot technology hits.

    Mortgage lenders, home builders, jewelers, bars, nightclubs, dating services, divorce lawyers, and the bridal industry are gonna get their asses kicked.

    Like


  50. Porn is already a substitution. Its all around porn tech that is the issue. This has been unnoticed because of the fat counter attack taking hot women off the market that is worse than rampant female infanticide. However I am sure omegas and betas are already dropping off.

    The fat counter stroke did not occur in Japan.That is why grass eater is an issue there.

    Like


  51. When it comes right down to it feminism was about money and masturbation. Here in Australia a million vibrators are sold each year so sexbots will just even things up. The only people bothering with ‘relationships’ will be the ‘truly needy’. A world of wankers? It certainly has advantages except who is growing to be protecting the women when the shit hits the fan?

    Like


  52. I can see the huge market for these devices in the future.
    Myself, I would look it a sexbot the same as a fake pussy or similar wanking aid. I do this by hand, its easier and free.
    Actually spending money on this sort of thing is a bit shameful to me, but I’m not ugly or disabled, so I can see this happening in the future.
    There was a good french film made about this, he dresses her, gives her a room in his house. He keeps her private.
    I like the idea of a real woman because she maintains herself, has an unpredictability and flaws which would not be programmed into a sexbot, not free anyway, and can cook and clean.
    For a man these are things that a woman can do for me to keep my interest. If she is a willing servant as well as a sex partner, if she makes my life more enjoyable and easy, I’ll put up with her longer than her hot friend.
    Women would all prefer to be men, never forget it.
    We have the power, we are fucking awesome.
    This need not be a secret any longer. Tell other guys.

    Like


  53. Corollary: once v sex becomes a reasonable substitute for a real woman, the demand for higher quality plastic surgery will skyrocket, which will eventually help balance things out

    Like


  54. but do they run linux?

    Like