Compare And Contrast: Two Bitter Ex-Lovers

A jilted ex-boyfriend went on a scorned nerd rampage on live TV while his ex-girlfriend sat next to him.

As a YouTube commenter astutely noted:

That is the nerdiest smackdown ever. If this wasn’t C-span I could swear it was Comic Con. Probably the most eloquent way of saying “That bitch is a ho”. Although, I wouldn’t mind tapping her Yale degree because she is probably a superfreak closeted S&M mistress and that’s my kind of political maneuvering.

I’m telling ya, YouTube commenters are the new American comedy art form. More:

typical fat guy’s laugh in the background.

Funny, fat guys DO have a distinctive laugh!

What was your reaction when you watched the video? If you’re like me and most people, you felt a mix of contempt, cringing revulsion and pity. You probably thought “wow, what a loser.” You vowed never to let a chick get under your skin that badly. A fleeting moment of sympathy made you wish this spazzy nerd would learn some game and start dating girls who didn’t look like Philip Seymour Hoffman.

There’s no doubt this dude is a lesser beta, perhaps even a greater omega. And this judgment is not solely a reflection of his unfortunate looks; his attitude, mannerisms, and, of course, total lack of amused mastery peg him as the needy, desperate, no-game-having betaboy he is deep in his soul. He has failed spectacularly the live TV version of the Jumbotron test (the worst way to fail). If he fumbles with nerdo Randian women, it is because of these latter characteristics, and not because of his looks.

His exceptional intelligence cannot compensate for all his negative traits. If anything, his smarts may be working against him. It’s easy to imagine his big brain spending week after week excessively analyzing his breakup and thinking up ways to rectify his pain. In a moment of pique — her body which he once penetrated (assuming he did) now mere inches from him on a televised panel — his unruly emotions took control of his mind and steered all that IQ in an embarrassingly unproductive direction.

This is what happens when you don’t have a clue how women operate. He exhibited the opposite of amused mastery — distressed incompetence. Vaginas all over the land snapped shut on cue.

Now I want you to read the following story. See if you have the same reaction to the bitter spurned ex-lover in this news story that you did for the woeful man in the video above.

Now that her label is finally starting to play the album for select critics, it’s easy to fathom why its contents have been closely guarded, all fears of leakage aside. Some of the lyrics are startlingly candid, even by the standards of Taylor “Naming Names, Taking No Prisoners” Swift.

And listening to “Dear John,” the scorching song that is-from all appearances-aimed at Mayer, all we can say is: Joe Jonas, you got off easy. […]

And it might seem sensationalistic to focus on “Dear John” at the expense of the rest of the album if it didn’t feel like it might be her masterpiece to date, or at least the most bracingly, joltingly honest song you’ve heard any major performer have the nerve to put on record in years. Maybe not since John Lennon took on estranged partner Paul McCartney in “How Do You Sleep” has a major pop singer-songwriter so publicly and unguardedly taken on another in song. But while Lennon’s song came off as mean-spirited, Swift was motivated by vulnerability and woundedness, which makes her song far braver… and more cutting. […]

There may be those who’ll accuse Swift of exploiting her own romantic travails in this and other songs. But the extended bridge section of “Dear John” (and, at six and a half minutes, the entire song is fairly extended) packs such a cathartic punch, it really does transcend any tabloid associations. When Swift sings “I’m shining like fireworks over your sad, empty town,” anyone who ever felt manipulated or used and found the strength to move on may be cheering like it’s the 4th of July.

Taylor Swift is doing no different than Todd Seavey did to his ex-girlfriend on that C-Span panel: she is lashing out bitterly at an ex-lover who she feels wronged her. Substantively, her actions are the female version of Todd Seavey; the only distinction is the style in which each exposes their hurt and feeble stabs at revenge. (I say feeble, because I doubt very much John Mayer is going to lose sleep at being called out as a callous womanizer. The horde of groupies queueing up to sample his callous cock after hearing how he treated Taylor Swift is surely growing by the mile.) In fact, it could be said that Seavey is more admirable than Swift, for he at least lashed out at his ex while she was there to defend herself.

Here is an excerpt of Swift’s revenge lyrics:

Dear John/I see it all now that you’re gone/Don’t you think I was too young/To be messed with/The girl in the dress/Cried the whole way home/I should’ve known. […] It was wrong/Don’t you think nineteen’s too young/To be played/By your dark, twisted games/When I loved you so. […] You’ll add my name to your long list of traitors who don’t understand/And I’ll look back in regret I ignored what they said/’Run as fast as you can’

Notice how all the blame is shifted to Mayer. Swift removes any responsibility and accountability for her decision to fuck the alpha male. She is a mere womanchild, a vassal into which evil men have their way with her. (If true, can we revoke the right to vote from these womenchildren?) Todd Seavey’s bitterness flows from the same place — an inability to recognize that he bears responsibility for the impression he leaves with women.

Todd Seavey and Taylor Swift’s behavior toward exes IS ONE AND THE SAME. Their bitterness is a shared bond that crosses class, looks and celebrity.

And yet, what did you feel reading about Taylor Swift’s lash-out at John Mayer? The same contempt, revulsion and cold pity you felt for Todd Seavey? Likely not, if you’re honest with yourself. Certainly the women reading these two stories did not feel the same toward each antagonist protagonist. I bet the same women (and some manginas) who subconsciously lambasted Seavey for his bitterness were quick to offer sympathy and understanding to Taylor Swift. Just look at the way the story is told by the reporter, Chris Willman (presumably a man): “vulnerability and woundedness”, “startlingly candid”, “such a cathartic punch”. This is the reaction of someone who wants to offer Taylor Swift a shoulder to cry on. Todd Seavey will see no such shoulders offered; he will instead be cast to the icy wastelands where the tribe will mercilessly mock him from afar.

Your conflicting emotional responses to Seavey and Swift are no fluke. They are evolutionarily imprinted in your brain. All flows from the basic premise that eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap. From this premise, we subconsciously affirm that men are expendable, and women irreplaceable. One man can impregnate an entire tribe and keep the population growing. One woman is a population bottleneck that will mean the extinction of the tribe. And further on from that premise, we find ourselves offering comfort and uuuuunderstaaaaanding to Taylor Swift, while we offer nothing but sharp barbs and ridicule to the expendable Todd Seavey.

This is our reality, our world, our universe. Some human beings are worth more than others, and despite our grandiloquent litanies to the contrary, our actions tell us all we need to know, if we are willing to look with open eyes. Remember that the next time a palace guard of the old order tries to tell you what’s in your best interest.





Comments


  1. If women are worth more than men, then how should men act?

    Like


  2. You are totally off the mark. Seavey’s C-SPAN performance was awesome and hilarious.

    Like


  3. Seavey has something else going on. There’s a reason for his spinelessness.

    I think.

    And I at least also have contempt for this woman’s performance.

    Like


  4. Regarding the douche in the first example… Anyone else reminded of the Simpsons scene when snake steals a VCR while everyone is at the town-hall meeting, only to stop and remark: “Oh no… Beta!”

    Someone post a link, please!

    Like


  5. didn’t really care for the post/comparison, but what’s with the unhumanly weird looks conservatives have? Is it blue blood? Does the ideology attract those types?
    Admittedly I mostly see them on Bill Maher and I always suspected he picked the ones that look either faggy or borderline tarded (or both lollz). But apparently not… And not only someone dated her, but someone else dated her at the same time? Srsly?

    Like


  6. oh wow — best C-Span clip ever!

    I actually don’t think Todd jumped the shark until the very end of the clip with the seduction story. He seemed in control until that point, and with all of the smiling they looked like they were sort of flirting. Actually, he’s kind of hot in the clip until the end.

    Taylor — she does seem pretty innocent about people and games, despite her fame. Who knows what she’s really like, but she comes across as a kind person who wants a steady boyfriend.

    Like


  7. I think he’s cool.

    Like


  8. OT:
    So I’ve taken to asking single 30+ women (that I’m either not interested in or I have no realistic prospect of banging) to recall the best potential LTR prospect they’ve met in the last year and what makes them think that they will find a better prospect in the next year when their looks have further deteriorated.

    The answers reveal the extent of the feminist brainwashing. They all think they have improved themselves in some way (not looks) and expect that men will be more attracted to them.

    I really don’t understand why men bother with westernized women anymore, beyond pump ‘n dumps and short-term flings.

    Like


  9. On iTunes, I posted a 1-star review of “When He Cheats”, pointing out that “When She Cheats” would replace “Hey there Delilah” and “Every Breath You Take” as the ultimate stalker songs. People were not amused.

    My “whiney brat” measure always involves switching the genders of the story. Most of these “wronged women’s revenge” stories would get a man put in jail.

    Like


  10. As a YouTube commenter astutely noted:

    …I wouldn’t mind tapping her Yale degree because she is probably a superfreak closeted S&M mistress…

    I had to choke back a sniffle – such comraderie,when found gets me all choked up.

    i have to stop posting now

    Like


  11. R is just repeating and expanding on the Lifetime TV Channel syndrome that it’s ok when a woman does it? Unsatisfied, go ahead and cheat. Man done you wrong? Go ahead and bash his car. He wants custody, accuse him of being a perv? A counter protestor shows up at your idiot feminist rally, tell the police he threatened you.

    Scorned men on the other hand can only do well by moving upward on onward (I am thinking of the Mudshovel video).

    Like


  12. Most conservatives are clueless betas like this guy.

    Like


  13. on October 20, 2010 at 1:04 pm Ascending Alpha

    I know Todd isn’t going to attract any girls with his rampage, but you have to respect the fact that he got to embarass his ex on cspan. He was like a suicide bomber running into a crowded place to destroy himself and his enemy at the same time.

    Like


  14. Just back to say hello. I see things are much the same around here, e.g. “what did you feel reading about Taylor Swift’s lash-out at John Mayer? The same contempt, revulsion and cold pity you felt for Todd Seavey? Likely not, if you’re honest with yourself. Certainly the women reading these two stories did not feel the same toward each antagonist protagonist.” Hmm. Yes and no. Seavey’s little performance made me squirm with embarrassment, and Swift’s did too, but for different reasons.

    How’s that? Well, my reaction to Seavey was more visceral: as you say, it’s acutely uncomfortable to watch a man groveling before a woman in public, even when he’s expressing his anger to her. And yes, there is probably some kind of evo-psychological reason for this. Swift’s song is embarrassing too, if based on a real incident in her life. I mean, I’m getting tired of the way women always put all the blame on men in these situations. But that’s a rational, and even, in a sense, intellectual embarrassment. Not a gut-level one.

    Final point: songs aren’t a good gauge of the sexual attractiveness of their singers, whether the singers are male or female. If Seavey were singing his pain rather than stammering it out on TV, he might just get women to adore him. Even whiney male singers (that fellow who sings “You’re beautiful” whose name I always forget) can get away with much in a song that they couldn’t say in real life without losing all sympathy.

    Clio

    Like


  15. I think the dude was spot on for calling her out regarding her hypocrisy: her claiming “socially conservative” and “Catholic”, while he hinted at her possibly slutting it up when they were dating and playing slut games as a matchmaker. I don’t think if she claimed that she was simply liberarian, or wrote that way, that he would have attacked her as such.

    Like


  16. Kelly Clarkson also wrote angry songs to her ex. Here is the infamous flop “Never Again”:

    Does it hurt to know I’ll never be there
    Bet it sucks, to see my face everywhere
    It was you, who chose to end it like you did
    I was the last to know
    You knew exactly what you would do
    And don’t say, you simply lost your way
    She may believe you but I never will
    Never again

    Ah, the angry scribblings in a sophore girl’s yearbook known as Clarksons’ third studio album…

    On the other hand, Alanis Morisette’s mid-nineties’ “You Oughta Know” was probably fictionalized and likely not personal, but it’s worth quoting as well:

    ’cause the love that you gave that we made wasn’t able
    To make it enough for you to be open wide, no
    And every time you speak her name
    Does she know how you told me you’d hold me
    Until you died, till you died
    But you’re still alive

    Like


  17. alias clio

    Just back to say hello. I see things are much the same around here, e.g. “what did you feel reading about Taylor Swift’s lash-out at John Mayer?

    you could spice things up by posting nudes, but that can’t ever happen,

    so discussing why John Mayer is a pussy Svengali will just have to do for us poor boys

    Like


  18. Popular nineties’ singer Jewel, on the other hand, did plagiarize my ex-girlfriend’s angry letter to me when she penned this heartfelt song:

    You took your coat off and stood in the rain,
    You’re always crazy like that.
    And I watched from my window,
    Always felt I was outside looking in on you.
    You’re always the mysterious one with
    Dark eyes and careless hair,
    You were fashionably sensitive
    But too cool to care.
    You stood in my doorway, with nothing to say
    Besides some comment on the weather…

    You’re always brilliant in the morning,
    Smoking your cigarettes and talking over coffee.
    Your philosophies on art, Baroque moved you.
    You loved Mozart and you’d speak of your loved ones
    As I clumsily strummed my guitar.

    She described me to a T.

    Especially the cigarette thing back in the day.

    Like


  19. Got damn, what’s he getting upset about breaking up with that UG for? That’s like being mad that you went to prison and never got gang-raped.

    Like


  20. I didnt even know Mayer had fucked Swift! Wow,to go from Jennifer Aniston to Taylor Swift,thats relly covering the bases,age wise!

    Like


  21. on October 20, 2010 at 1:23 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lzozozzllzlzlzozzzl hey roissyy!!!! great post!!!!

    hey isn’t that fat dude the cherubic cheeked jonah goldberg?!?!?! lzozolzlzlzlzlz

    that nerd’s ex girlfirned is one of the se 2’s who thinks she is an 8 because of alaloaal the attention in her male domianted classess lzozzlzlzo assoocckkcckkckccocockcockcingz lzozlzlzl lzozzlzl

    and yes!!! lzozlzlzlzlzl

    after awoman fuckas and fucks and fucks like taylor swift did lzozzozl they blame their spreading of legs outside of marriage and willfully fornincating on men zlozlzlzozlzl

    as roger devln said womenz are chidlrenzlzozlzl

    –http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/devlin_shalit.htm
    “I have come across male commentators, for example, maintaining that professors who “prey upon” female students should (in certain cases) be treated as rapists. This is a radical departure from the Christian view of women as moral agents, and the high status of women in Western society is essentially bound up with such a view. As far as I can see, if we are unwilling to hold women strictly accountable for their actions, we have only one logical recourse available: a return to the ancient Roman legal doctrine that a woman is a perpetual minor. This would involve an end not merely to contemporary “women’s liberation” but to an entire legal tradition that has developed within Christendom over centuries. For starters, it means women could no longer be permitted to hold property or enter into contracts. Although demeaning to women and inconvenient even for men, such a system is at least internally consistent. What is both inconsistent and morally indefensible is what feminism and the misguided gallantry of certain male conservatives are now combining to promote: freedom for women to do as they damned well please, with blame and punishment for men if the women are not happy with the results of their own behavior.”

    yah i thoughtaylor swift ws agood christain girl!! lzozozozlz!!! so what is hse doing fucking ad sucking and fucking and sucking outside of mariage? lzozzllzlzlzlzlzlzl

    ad ufkcing and sucking and airing er dirty laundyrry outside of marriage?

    can’t women say no to da evil cockas and mary nice boyz? lzozozzlzozolzzlzzo zozzozlzozzzl

    like can’t taylor swift marry that nice smrt man i the above video? they could talk about how they were both jilted and abused by their lovers, and then fuck and suck in a morl manner in holy matrimony with no neocon butthexing nor sercteive taped butthexing seesions even for pr weekly standatdh purproses zlozlzozzl. and they could habve jonah goldberg over to dinnver dinner and he coud bellow his fat man laugh lzozzlzzl.

    roisyy oh roissy why is not the world like this? lzozzlzlz

    Like


  22. Wow.
    My Idol – a 32 year-old John Mayer fucking 18 year-old cookie like Swift.

    She only bones celebrities -Mayers, AbFlex Stars like Lautners and all simpering Jonasii.

    And he is her equal as a star fucker.

    TLA

    America is great – Osama, we hardly knew ye.

    Like


  23. He did say the relationship was “on again/off again” during those two years. In fact, he clearly implies that she dated others when their relationship was “off.” However, he also says that those who dated her in those two years could be “surprised” to learn about his relationship with her. This really amounts to, “She didn’t tell the guys she dated the identity of her last boyfriend.” Big deal.

    The other accusations are devastating, though. He convincingly painted a portrait of her as a sociopath with the kind of really specific details that are hard to make up out of whole cloth. And she didn’t act blindsided by them. Her reputation is now very tarnished, especially with her chosen audience of social conservatives.

    But he also burned himself up in the process. And anyone who would do that much damage to himself just to do some damage to a woman who hurt him is solidly out of the “alpha” category.

    Like


  24. Obviously a beta who couldn’t keep his women, not even one who even 10 years ago clearly had marginal looks. By the way, “On again Off again” equals she cheated on him all the time and he took her back.

    Also, the fat guy was pretty beta as well, he was so afraid of even the slightest confrontation around him. He was in a perfect position to instigate it even further for the crowd’s amusement, the whole situation had taken the turn for the worst anyways.

    Like


  25. “Obviously a beta who couldn’t keep his women, not even one who even 10 years ago clearly had marginal looks. ”

    She’s like 23…

    Like


  26. Clio the evil woman said:

    How’s that? Well, my reaction to Seavey was more visceral: as you say, it’s acutely uncomfortable to watch a man groveling before a woman in public, even when he’s expressing his anger to her. And yes, there is probably some kind of evo-psychological reason for this.

    The EVIL slut gets guys and girls together solely so she can enjoy destroying their relationships by seducing the guy! Men and women need to be warned about her!

    What is Clio’s response to a man calling her on her demented evil?

    Probably shouldn’t have done that. Clio stands strong against the tide of evil everywhere…. except where it might embarrass a sister. Then she joins her fellow whores and white knights screaming about the wrongness that this evil slut was called to heel.

    Let’s stop being cowards. Spineless whores for evil bitches.

    That man just eviscerated the EVIL little slut on TV. Remember, she gets guys and girls together solely so she can enjoy destroying their relationships! Men and women need to be warned about her!

    Women like toothless betas!

    Women like people who protect their reputations!

    Women HATE betas who eviscerate their reputations in a fit of rage!

    They will say that this is “not sexy”.

    However, every bad little girl demented whore is going to think twice about *bleeping* with her little helpless little Seavey looking at her with his meek little eyes now!

    Fear the rabid wombat! He has sharp teeth built for biting!

    Fear the wombat!

    Like


  27. on October 20, 2010 at 1:31 pm Gunslingergregi

    Yea Clio pretty much same except almost all the white dudes don’t have jobs anymore.

    Other than that all good he he he

    Like


  28. I think these are the best lyrics for an ex boyfriend or girlfriend you don’t like. From Bob Dylan’s Positively 4th Street:

    I wish that for just one time
    You could stand inside my shoes
    And just for that one moment
    I could be you

    Yes, I wish that for just one time
    You could stand inside my shoes
    You’d know what a drag it is
    To see you

    Like


  29. on October 20, 2010 at 1:36 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lzozlzozzlzozo

    i swear to god i was hooking it iwth this chick 4 years ago who said that jon maywers wantsed to date her after he met her lzozllz zllzozzozzozlz

    yah right zlzozlzlzzlolzozozlzo

    she was like a 9 or 10 but like taylor swift at 19 is like an 11 or 12 so like mayher has no time for 9s and 10s and gbfm gets themwith his lotsa cocksaa lzozlzlz

    such is thecurel way of the world but my coka don’t mind so much as it gets hard and has fun for da 9s and 10s tightness but not butthexual tightness like teh neocns advcate lzozllzozozlzoz

    Like


  30. on October 20, 2010 at 1:40 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””’Remember that the next time a palace guard of the old order tries to tell you what’s in your best interest.
    ”””

    Yea like we are supposed to give a fuck about playing video games all day while the woman cooks cleans and takes care of our sexual needs because we saved money and don’t need to give a fuck.

    he he he

    I think I will be switching to when I go back only letting woman suck my cock.

    Like


  31. DC really is “Hollywood for Ugly People”

    Like


  32. […] Compare And Contrast: Two Bitter Ex-Lovers « Citizen Renegade. […]

    Like


  33. on October 20, 2010 at 1:46 pm French Connection

    While I couldn’t give a rats ass about the John Mayer / Taylor Swift breakup, the nerd in the video made me cringe. He’s the real life version of Alan from Two And A Half Men.

    Now can we please stop focusing on these babbling betas and go back to game, girls and biomechanics…?

    Like


  34. “made you wish this spazzy nerd would learn some game and start dating girls who didn’t look like Philip Seymour Hoffman.”

    To the word, what I thought on first seeing the clip.

    World Man, you seem as confused as Jilted Beta about her combination of mores and actions. But have you never heard the song Catholic School Girls Rule? Not fiction. Sweet truth. The cruel games with the other couple is inexcusable, though, and needs all the outing it can get.

    Like


  35. I actually had a hard time watching that video. All the people made me cringe just by looking at them and not purely because of their ‘odd’ looks. Their demeanor and actions were almost non-human.

    Do people who geek out that much become robots trying to be cool?

    Like


  36. BoneheadedDemocraticSchmuck

    Most conservatives are clueless betas like this guy.

    Riiiight. As opposed to clued omega like yours truly.

    Most men are in the beta range, regardless of politics.

    Like


  37. on October 20, 2010 at 1:49 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””””on October 20, 2010 at 12:31 pm Alcyoneus
    If women are worth more than men, then how should men act?
    ””””””””””

    They are only worth more because dudes become millionaires and then ask them to marry.

    If dudes became millionaires and just fucked an endless stream of them.

    They would have less value.

    Like


  38. on October 20, 2010 at 1:51 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey roissy

    woemnz may be worth more than men during their fertile years up to thirty or so by your calculations, but atfter that they become worthless as their tiny little egss dry up for all get sidiseadsed from hpv from assckeing alphas lzozlzlzlzl by your logic lzozlzlzl

    hugh hefner is still jaculating spermeezozans to pass on 2 da next genertaiosn ssozolz while tons of womenz have dried up ebrnankifed corproataided fiat fucked pumped and dumped sandpaper ginas filled with butthex dust that you would lneed a leave leaf blower to blow away all the buthex dust and there charg jars are of lube just to get your pinky in their lzozlzolzlzzzolozlzzllzlz

    Like


  39. i think i’ll pick up Swift’s album just to learn all the alpha ways he handled her.

    Like


  40. Seavey made me cringe because he took an overly rhetorical and roundabout way of calling her out. He could have made a clean stab, but he dithered. B-league.

    Like


  41. Taylor Swift has “absolved” Kanye West for his insults, saying he is “still an innocent.”

    Another alpha will now text her and say “bring da movies.”

    And she will.

    Like


  42. Being the policy nerd that I am, I actually saw this on C-Span on Saturday night. It was a situation made all the more painful by the fact that Seavey hijacked the whole point of the discussion, which had to do with resolving the inconsistencies within the Conservative movement. His rant had nothing to do with the subject at hand. I could kick myself for not being able to find it right now, but yesterday on another blog someone also wrote about this public meltdown. They pointed out how, in addition to not being able to get a date from now to eternity, the guy may very well have damaged his career mortally. Who’s going to hire a guy who could try and tear someone to pieces in public like that? I wouldn’t want to be his boss, that’s for sure. More interestingly, this same post contained a long excerpt from Seavey’s profile on match.com, in which he describes the type of woman he doesn’t want to respond. It comes across as beta to the extreme, to say the least. If I can find it again, I’ll post it.

    Like


  43. zoophile,

    That women is 23? Yikes…I figured they were in their late 30’s and that guy is still pissed.

    Like


  44. on October 20, 2010 at 2:01 pm Gunslingergregi

    Plus when you beat down a bitch.

    Well ya don’t actually have to beat them just get slightly physical and they turn into fucking disgusting scared pieces of shit.

    All thoughts of equality goes out window and they just completely turn into putty in your hands.

    It doesn’t make you feel manly it is just disgusting.

    Why your dad told you never to fight a woman just to avoid that disgust.

    Sometimes you still got to do things you don’t want to though. Sometimes bitches be stupid and make you bring the demon. They always wish they hadn’t though.

    Like


  45. on October 20, 2010 at 2:01 pm Junior Gorilla

    The audience laughter slowly goes from amused, to polite, to awkward, to nervous, to completely embarrassed on Goldberg’s part with his fellow panelists.

    I’m sure this will lead to millions of hits for Seavey’s blog, although possibly nothing sustained.

    Like


  46. Some asshat said:

    One woman is a population bottleneck that will mean the extinction of the tribe.

    Let’s get pratical. You like practical, right? So let’s talk practical.

    One tribe has 20 men and 4 women.

    Another tribe nearby has 4 men and 20 women.

    Which tribe will do better?

    Well, the answer is so obvious that I’m surprised you even need to ask!

    The first tribe will walk over to the second tribe, kill all the men, and enslave the women!

    So the first tribe will do better than the second.

    Like


  47. I guess i should have clicked that first link before posting. That’s the blog I was referring to.

    Like


  48. on October 20, 2010 at 2:09 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey roissy

    you write: “This is our reality, our world, our universe. Some human beings are worth more than others, and despite our grandiloquent litanies to the contrary, our actions tell us all we need to know, if we are willing to look with open eyes. Remember that the next time a palace guard of the old order tries to tell you what’s in your best interest. ”

    lozozlzzo hey man i totally agree

    see what the fiat matrix is doing is 2 things

    they are presenting the eveeoloitonry order to wmenz and saying it is ok to fuck and suck and fuck and suck

    aand then they are trying to make men serve the old order wherein men have to maryy the assocked beatsts deosuled bernakified womenz as jonah goldberg bellows his fat man laugh and screams “WOMEN TAME MEN NUIFF SAID!!! :” Zlzozozlozzozozozozo

    youz writes: “Your conflicting emotional responses to Seavey and Swift are no fluke. They are evolutionarily imprinted in your brain. All flows from the basic premise that eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap. From this premise, we subconsciously affirm that men are expendable, and women irreplaceable. One man can impregnate an entire tribe and keep the population growing. One woman is a population bottleneck that will mean the extinction of the tribe. And further on from that premise, we find ourselves offering comfort and uuuuunderstaaaaanding to Taylor Swift, while we offer nothing but sharp barbs and ridicule to the expendable Todd Seavey.”

    yah man but other things are imprimeted in the better aspects of our brainz lzozozozlozozlz like rationality love truth honor marriage duty kindness lzozzlozzl

    nd i agree that left 2 tehir own devices womenz spit on and shit on ideals and publish fund fuck and repeat the lies of short secrtieve tapers of assckocjing sessions like tucker max rhymes iwth goldman sax lzozzllzozzozz

    so womenz take greta pride in tehir base fucking nature and fuck and fuck and then blame it on men and legislate against men so as to empty the walltes of betas–alpha fucks and beta bucks is the basic philosophy of al feminisms zlozozozozlzozlzolzzlzlzol

    but, if they relly want to go the evolutionary route that women are more valuable then men, then women really should be honest about it and stipp using things produced by men, since western culture has repressed us with

    running water
    buildings sckysscrapers
    roads
    cars computers
    cellphones
    twitter/twatter/clitter lzozllzozl
    facebook
    coffeee
    airplanes
    international trade
    lightbulbs
    electric power
    hair driers
    law
    property rights
    freedom
    liberty
    lzozlzozoz

    i mean if men are evil and western culture opporssesses than lzozzoozlzozl just ditch em and take the cocka of criimals and druggies lzozozol but stop using all the thing the engineers msart boyz created zlozzlzlzl buttehxhxusujalla

    Like


  49. I actually felt more… well, not sympathy, but definitely a feeling of justice watching Seavy’s breakdown than I did for Taylor Swift. I got the same immediate response that Roissy did for her.

    As for Seavy, well, I didn’t care for his emotional baggage. I guess I just can’t relate to his situation… I’ve never been that angry at a girlfriend. But it’s just so rare that people who bald-facedly propagate lies and self-serving BS like Ayn Rand there get called out on it. In my real life, it takes shit literally hitting the fan before anyone so much as utters a single word of disgust for some of these peoples’ behavior.

    I don’t know why this is. But if someone can just prove their alpha-ness to the right couple of people, nobody will raise a finger against them. And woe be to the person who is not alpha, who apologizes and feels bad about doing wrong. Who has some sort of principles keeping them from just pushing only for their own interests. They will be crushed.

    Like


  50. I’ll go you one better Roissy, listen to this:

    http://twiturm.com/2ju2p

    Compare and contrast this couple. Before you listen to this, be aware of the chemical reaction percolating in your bloodstream as the inevitable end comes. Then be aware of how you physically feel afterwards.

    I admit, I got an adrenaline rush out of that. Kind of like watching a car wreck in slow motion. However, I find that kind of ironic since any number of daytime shows (i.e. Tyra Banks, et. al.) have been basically doing the same shit for decades now. A lot of guys acknowledge the power of the chemical rush, but it’s only episodes like this that make it real for them. I’m sure most of the guys hearing this felt it; the high of adrenaline, endorphins, dopamine, etc., this is the chemical cocktail that women come to crave. I’ve read the chemical profile is very similar to that of heroin. Indignation triggers it in the same way sex and death trigger it.

    There are a lot of elements to the whole incident. There’s so much at play in this, it’s hard to know where to begin. It’s interesting to read the responses to gauge what impacts people first. Women naturally lean toward the guy being classless for opting to hash this out in a very public forum, yet feel fully justified for doing it themselves for decades. White Knights will come out of the woodwork to defend the indefensible in spite of the circumstance responding viscerally to a woman weeping. We can pour through the reasons why the guy was a chump to have been living with her for as long as he did.

    Funny how even when a woman confesses to her infidelity we’ll look for ANY angle available to still cast her in the victim’s role. We’ll readily analyze the guy’s history, we’ll euphemise her misconduct as a “mistake” (or she’ll do it for us), and we’ll speculate “where her heart is really at.”

    This is the essence of the male double standard, the male Catch 22; For a man to publicly chastise a woman’s infidelity he becomes less of a man, but a woman becomes a hero for doing so.

    The feminization of the past 60 years has built in the perfect Catch 22 social convention for anything masculine; The expectation to assume the responsibilities of being a man while at the same time denigrating masculinity. What ever aspect of maleness that serves the feminine purpose is a man’s masculine responsibility, yet any aspect that disagrees with feminine primacy is labeled Patriarchy and oppressive.

    Essentially this convention keeps beta males in a perpetual state of chasing their own tails. Over the course of a lifetime they’re conditioned to believe that they’re cursed with masculinity (Patriarchy) yet are still responsible to ‘Man Up’ when it suits a feminine imperative. So it’s therefore unsurprising to see that half the men in western society believe women dominate the world (male powerlessness) while at the same time women complain of a lingering Patriarchy (female powerlessness) or at least sentiments of it. This is the Catch 22 writ large. The guy who does in fact Man Up is a chauvinist, misogynist, patriarch, but he still needs to man up when it’s convenient to meet the needs of a female imperative.

    Like


  51. She was obviously too much man for him.

    Like


  52. Trying to “get back” at your ex publicly through weepy, emotional, estrogen laden, Womyn’s Studies VagRock songs is idiotic.

    But the guy looks like a bigger loser. If that was spontaneous, he comes off looking soft and squishy. If that was his best shot at an “ambush”, ie, that he planned it-then he’s really pathetic.

    If he were more alpha, and planned it, he would have made some kind of wise ass crack that would have enabled a pan shot to a very hot girlfriend in the audience or something like that.

    Like


  53. on October 20, 2010 at 2:22 pm Blessent mon coeur

    N.B. Speavey’s meltdown story penned by a woman, Mary Katherine Ham.

    Like


  54. on October 20, 2010 at 2:22 pm Junior Gorilla

    Nevermind, toddseavey.com is has now been made private with Blogger. Must be some major league meltdown if he took down the blog too after rehashing his CSPAN comments online.

    Like


  55. on October 20, 2010 at 2:25 pm Gunslingergregi

    Yea the first vid wasn’t that bad.

    Except for him talking about not wanting to box and brawl which is at least manly but then he wanted to verbally spar with a bitch.

    It throws his wanting to verbally spar with a woman in sharp contrast when he says basically he is afraid to physically fight a man.

    The thing about the health care plan is it might actually make men and woman equal.

    Woman already get free health care when they have a kid.

    So if everyone gets health care at least poor men will also be able to go to the doctor.

    And also people with businesses will get health care as well.

    The chicks called health care charachter building but at the same time how do woman get to build character then? he he he

    Like


  56. on October 20, 2010 at 2:25 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey fellas lzozzl

    i hope that all of you relaize that feminism is a scheme of property transfer and detah conceived of by the central fiat banksters zlzozlozlzozozzozlzlzzzozlzozlzl

    see, once upon a time gret men relized that a fiar and just society had tenetes sushc as “though shalt not steal” and “thou shalt not ocmmit adultery” and “thou shalt not covet” lzozoz moses rocked fuckyeah!!! then other great men came alonhg and wrote “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.”

    FUCK YEAH TOMMY J!!! lzozzlzlzozo

    but then the butthex fiat masters came up with the idea of promoting the coveting of en’s property and promoting butheixng and adultery and promoting stealing via the inflation tax and lieying via fiat currency creating money form thin air.

    and then they tuaght and train women after deosuling them inbuttheixng seesiossn in colege secrtievely taped for neocon fun and profit lzozozozzol they teach women to seize property form men and transfer it to the bernanke goldman sax rhymes iwth ytucker max sstate lozozozllzozoz

    seee “all men creted euql” and thaou shalt not stelal nor lie nor commit audltery like taylor wift did by fucking john mayer outta wedlock were concpets and ideals created by great men. and the fiat butthexing banksters aren’t all theat greta lzozozoloozoloz

    the bankstersz seized on the unidealistic, socialistic, devious, murderous, witching nature of womenz and used it to transfer trillions of dolars form honest men in the forms of welfare divroce warfare, while also trianing the women to lead the crusade on the unborn the preempitive war on the unborn killing over 50,000,0000 fethuetss lzozlzoozozlzlzlzlzlzozozl

    and then its all john mayers’ fault zlzozzlzozoozoz

    Like


  57. Damn that John Mayer just leaves the trail of tears and vagina everywhere he goes.

    I think Swift is his best looking conquest. Jennifer Aniston does not have a nice face (but perfect body). Although Roissy is right that Mayer had Simpson in her peak. Who would the guys here choose? Swift or Simpson?

    Like


  58. For the record, I’m shocked to discover that Taylor Swift has an actual vagina. All this time I’d assumed it was just a smooth, solid plastic bump with no genitalia, similar to a naked Barbie doll’s.

    Well done Mr. Mayer, consider the trail blazed.

    Like


  59. on October 20, 2010 at 2:33 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey fellaz,

    i hope that you realized that if this were a truly christain country or a joudeo christian country womenz wouldn’t be wlloed to initaite over 80% of divroces and take your property zlzozlzoz

    if this were a truly good religious country womenz wouldn’t be allowed to fuck and suck other dudes before during and after mariage while you hardworking menz had to fund it zozozozoz

    see whant joagoldberg neans “by women tame men” is that the fiat fasters assock teh womenz on teh cokc carosoule in college and deesoul them and make them worship their materilaistic womenz nature and forget about god and the better angles of tehir osulzlzzozzozoz and once assocked and pumped and dumped, the unleash womenz on the world to seize mor epeortey and transfer wleath for tema beranke lzozzozllzozozoz

    marriage only works when

    1) a women is 100% loyal to one man
    2) her gina cannot be fondled and ramrodded and butthexed before during and after marriage with no fault divorce allowing her to take all your assetss after being banged in her assettss zlzoloozlzlzlzozozo by a neoocn secrteiev taper of butthexual heroes lzozlzozo
    3) men arent required t fund a wlefare state which pays owmenz to bang druggies lozeers zlozzlzooz and pay for tehir shcool lunches lzozlzozozoz

    so u can see that mariage is for chumbs as da great roissy says zlozozozllzozzlzl

    alpha fucks and beta bucks is on the t=-shirt most college sorrosistites are waering these a dayzz zlooozozo

    Like


  60. Here’s the extract from Seavey’s singles ad:

    Oh, but one last thing — and this is very important. Are you the sort of person who says “yes” when asked to do something with a fella, regardless of whether you actually want to go out, then simply keeps rescheduling instead of definitively and finally canceling the date or saying no? Do you do this despite having attained the age of legal adulthood? Do you tell yourself that you’re nonetheless a moral person — even the hero in life’s little narrative — because, each and every time you rescheduled and feigned enthusiasm for getting together “first thing next week” (or maybe even later that very night if you’re a particularly brazen and skilled actress), you thought, “I’m faced with an awkward moment, so I’ll just keep turning it into a positive one, for the time being, by lying…over and over again! That’s the thing to do!”

    I don’t really care if you vow never to do this to me — that isn’t good enough. If you’ve ever done this to anyone — wasting not only your time and the fella’s but the time of all the other people whose schedules were disrupted by your lies, from restaurant staffs dealing with canceled reservations to other people who might have met with the fella on the nights blocked out for your illusory outings — you are, I am afraid, a terrible, selfish fiend of a human being, and I really don’t want you as a friend, let alone a date or girlfriend. Yes, that’s right — you are evil. How does it feel — the evil, I mean? Bet you thought being a Hitler or a Jack the Ripper would feel a lot different than being you. But it doesn’t. You’re living the being-evil experience. Please live it without me, though.

    I don’t care if you’ve been declared by numerous glossy magazines to be the most beautiful woman not only of our era but of all time. I don’t care if your intellect is so vastly superior to my own that mere moments of conversation with you would fill me with awe and wonder. You are still, as noted above, an immoral, inconsiderate fiend. I can do better, thanks. And when I say “do better,” I don’t even mean that there’s necessarily a woman on the planet above this sort of time-wasting, juvenile behavior. Maybe there isn’t — but I would still be doing better, you see, by living out the rest of my days alone than by dating you. So please, please — please! — if you lack ethics, stay very, very far away. And while you’re there (far away, that is), think about what went wrong in your upbringing, your genetics, or the culture at large to turn you into the monster you have become. It’s dealing with jerks like you that inspires serial killers and misanthropes, you know. Can you really blame them?

    Non-monster lady, on the other hand, if you’re out there, drop me a line. If you’re smart, you know how necessary this personal ad’s various complaints are and won’t be put off by them. If you’re not smart, well, a universe of singles bars and online dating sites awaits you, so go to it, missy, and good luck!

    Sounds like Helen whats-her-face was his only ever lay.

    Like


  61. Seavey’s speech reeks of a very recent rejection. I’d like to know what transpired in the hour or so before Seavey and the Yale chick got up on that stage. I think he clumsily tried to rekindle something and she shut him down. What a loser. That’s just shitty, to publicly lash out at someone to punish them for rejecting your crew-cut ass. If the roles were reversed and the blond was calling out the guy, it would be even more pathetic. It’s all passive-aggressive bullshit. I don’t believe a word he says. If she’s so batshit crazy, he should be laughing at her, not seething with impotence.

    Taylor is a different thing altogether. She is just singing a plain vanilla love song. He dumped her, she cried all night, blah blah blah, we’ve all been there. She’s not hurting his market value or tearing him down by telling his dirty secrets. She admits that she loved that bad boy big dick and he hurt her bad. Which I’m sure is the honest truth. No douchery here, that I see.

    Like


  62. “The other accusations are devastating, though. He convincingly painted a portrait of her as a sociopath with the kind of really specific details that are hard to make up out of whole cloth.”

    Not that the guy doesn’t have a ton of issues and rightly deserve scorn, but you have to give him props for taking down what appears to be a genuine sociopath. I’ve come across her type before once or twice and have a feeling she fully deserves everything that’s coming to her.

    Like


  63. on October 20, 2010 at 2:44 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    from TIME:

    http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2010/10/19/will-the-federal-reserves-next-meeting-lead-to-civil-war/

    Will the Federal Reserve Cause a Civil War?
    lozozlzozllzlzz

    zlzozozlzlz how much butthexing can all you felleas tak lzozllzoz

    to see your furtuere wiveves assocked and ridden and pumped and udmbeped lzozozzlzlz. i’m just kidding!!! poepel rwho read roissys blog and undertand it are not getting married lzozozzlzozzzzl

    yes bernanek’s assocking of western civilizatin ereached its limit when mensaid “no i don’t think iw anna get assocked in dicorversce ocutrrt zlozozozlzoz so i am not gonnna propose lzozozzzzozoozo””

    roissy is a true genius and GODDAMAMAAITTTTTTT ROSISSY!!! I WANT TO READ YOUR BOOK ALREADY!!! IN THE BOOTKSTORES ON MY KINDLE OAND ON M Y IPAD AND ON THE GIRLS IPHONE AFTER SHE SUCKS MY OCKA AND GOES TO SLEEP WITH MYGUIZ ON HER HIN LZOZOL HOPEFULY NOT INHER WOMB AS A OWMNA”S WOMB IS SEEN AS A TOMB FOR A MAN’S FUTURE BANK ACCOUNT WHERE EBRNAKE AND HIS FIRENDS CAN BURY A MAN’S FUTURE EARNINGS VIA THE CHILD SUPPORT FIAT BERNAKELAWS FOLGDAMNAN SAX RHYMES IWTH TUCKER MAX LZOZZLZZ AND THERE ISOTHING 2 DO BUT READ!!!!

    Like


  64. Here are some bitches talking about whether it is really responsible to air bitch behavior:

    http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/10/20/letting-the-material-make-my-point-oct-20-2010/

    So I ask the trained dancing monkey’s of Roissy world, what is wrong with men who will air female abuse? I take a upright stance, as I’m sure Clio does, that while such things as beating on a man with the Police State protecting you is perfectly fine, discussing or showing it is pretty bad.

    Evil Women, like Clio, what say you?

    Like


  65. Seavey’s blog is now password protected, but here is a good chunk of his post responding to the C-Span incident, thanks to Google’s caching facility:

    Welcome, New Readers! (About That C-SPAN2 Helen Rittelmeyer Thing…)
    It’s amazing how much media attention two people’s lovelives can get even without me mentioning that a friend of mine went to a Nouriel Roubini party a couple weeks ago and watched that influential economist and Clinton advisor being whipped by a dwarf.

    This is a different story, though: I’m a libertarian who has written, among other things, an essay on “Conservatism for Punks” (the slogan and at least occasionally the theme of this blog) for the book Proud to Be Right, which is a collection of essays edited by Jonah Goldberg. In it, I espouse a sort of “fiscally conservative, socially liberal” worldview, urging that the government be kept small and unobtrusive to foster both prosperity and the space for experimental subcultures to thrive. I was part of a panel discussion featuring contributors to that volume, during which I hit on a few of my favorite themes, including markets, punk, sci-fi-like technology, and skepticism about supernatural claims. The whole ninety-minute discussion can be viewed here thanks to C-SPAN2 — and you should certainly order the book, which, as the subtitle puts it, features twenty-three “Voices of the Next Conservative Generation.”

    (You might also contact me about the monthly Manhattans Project social gatherings I host for politics and media people, now that I’m no longer organizing debates at Lolita Bar. And you should read this blog, which has some broken links and other flaws at the moment, having recently migrated to Blogger, but I’ll fix those things. It has been a time of transition.)

    But the brief clip from the panel discussion that went viral yesterday (you’ll find a long list of links to that clip and to articles about it below the break) featured me criticizing my fellow contributor to that volume, Helen Rittelmeyer. Though Helen broke up with me about three days before we found out we would be co-panelists, after a tumultuous two-year relationship, I was not (as a few of the less-careful online observers have implied) criticizing her for not dating me (a choice some 3.5 billion women make every day, after all). Rather, in my comments, I alluded to the fact that Helen’s ostensibly Catholic-conservative philosophy is actually an ironically-veiled, far darker philosophy, a sort of Nietzschean valorization of cruelty for the sake of cruelty that even Nietzsche would not endorse.

    The only manifestation of her philosophy that I revealed in my comments that was not already publicly known was her willingness to engage in cruel personal gamesmanship, as for instance by playing matchmaker for a couple, planning in advance to break them up later by seducing the male, in part to raise and dash the hopes of the female (an accusation that she did not deny in her later comments to Daily Caller, tellingly). That action of hers is horrible enough by any conventional moral standard, including Catholicism, but Helen, if she’s reading this, knows there are countless other examples I could give of the way in which her dark thinking is paralleled by dark behavior. I don’t want or intend to say any more about such examples, though, even though I know I risk being thought by many to be merely griping about an ex for light and transient causes.

    Rather, because I believe in loyalty and in the possibility of redemption, it is my sincere hope that Helen — instead of making revealing jokes about wanting to beat me up (as in her statement to the Daily Caller, which really got the viral ball rolling, to mix metaphors) or feeling that she is the put-upon party — will seize this opportunity to examine her life and adopt a code of ethics and personal behavior rooted in kindness, not another layer of irony disguising darkness and cruelty. Reform, Helen. Reform. Make this the most positive turning point in your life and everybody wins.

    Some think me a bully, but in fact I have shown incredible restraint (and a generous willingness to take a small reputational hit by appearing cruel myself), engaging in a sort of public intervention in perhaps the only way open to me that is likely to alter Helen’s behavior. Nothing would make me happier than to learn that it had been effective, that she was thankful for it, and that her life had been transformed for the better on multiple fronts (rather than that she’d simply begun urging people to take her “side” over mine, a battle that would not likely leave her looking good in the panopticon of public examination, if either of us were pressured into more detailed explanations). I really don’t want more beating up of Helen, though, and hope to move on to fresh topics tomorrow, both online and in my head.
    Please stick around.

    And now, just a handful of yesterday’s dizzying array of links (and I’m not even on Facebook, Twitter, or any other social networking systems where I assume much of the action is). Most of these feature the controversial clip (which came from about 40-47 minutes into the full ninety-minute program linked above):
    Read more »

    What’s amazing about this guy is he blames others for his amorous failures. Perhaps he’s got ovaries?

    Like


  66. Digby shitted:

    That’s just shitty, to publicly lash out at someone to punish them for rejecting your crew-cut ass.

    So Dicky, is it shitty to, you know, get some people together planning to sleep with the man latter to hurt the woman shitty or not?

    Cause Dicky, I’d really like your laser like morality to tell me.

    Like


  67. his is what happens when you don’t have a clue how women operate. He exhibited the opposite of amused mastery — distressed incompetence. Vaginas all over the land snapped shut on cue.

    I totally disagree – he was funny.

    Like


  68. on October 20, 2010 at 3:07 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lozozolzozozozolzoozzllz

    hey jonah goldberg’s libertarian dude who dates ugly womenzand till gets his heat bokem=n

    hey if you’re fucking and sucking outside marriage, it is nt

    1) catholocicism
    2) buddhism
    3) christinainkty
    4) muslimism
    5) judaism
    6) hunduism zlzozlzzzz

    zlzozlzlzlzl

    all you fucktards have to now that the amrriage of the physical act of sex to theabstratct principel of marriage is the cenetr and circumference of every major religion lzozozlzo

    get rid o that
    and all bets are off

    as it transfersz all da risk to man

    and all the wleth to thefucking and sucking women

    which is why the left loves fmeinism and hates the great books and classics written by menz lzozlzlzzo

    ad with fucktwat nerdy boyz crying over spilled ugly milk caggin beatches entitled uglies evil schemining bitches amd bellowing fat man jonah goldbergs screaming women tame men, i seems like western civ has no hope but for wroissyroissy zlzozol chateau don;t y know.

    Like


  69. on October 20, 2010 at 3:10 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””engaging in a sort of public intervention in perhaps the only way open to me that is likely to alter Helen’s behavior. ””””’

    Yea see he didn’t even see the option of whooping her ass.

    ”””Rather, because I believe in loyalty and in the possibility of redemption, it is my sincere hope that Helen — instead of making revealing jokes about wanting to beat me up (as in her statement to the Daily Caller, which really got the viral ball rolling, to mix metaphors) ”””’

    Yea and if she would try it and he whooped her ass. I guarrantee she would be wanting him jailed or maybe not. he he he

    Fucking bitches what ya gonna do.

    Like


  70. on October 20, 2010 at 3:11 pm Gunslingergregi

    The best way obviously to hurt them is to just not care at all.

    All the ones who still are in love the guy didn’t make a big deal he just moved on to another bitch.

    He didn’t care if he hurt her he wasn’t trying to.

    He just didn’t care.

    Like


  71. @Thunear

    Here’s the extract from Seavey’s singles ad:

    While Seavey will never have sex again (aside from pros) with that attitude, at least he is willing to shut women out entirely. Better to ghost than be a mangina.

    Like


  72. I couldn’t get through the first video.. those were the least attractive and least charismatic people I’ve ever heard. Watching them sit around talking is a torture I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy.

    Swift is at least cute.

    Like


  73. The woman in the red blouse looks like she has down syndrome.

    Like


  74. People should stop dumping on Helen thingy. For one thing, she’s the one who is handling this like a man. For another, you only have Seavey’s word for it, which, given the guy is such a screaming queen, is suspect.

    But mostly, because she is only doing what she does. I used to know a few of these conservative think-tank type women. They were all promiscuous. They all had off-again on-again relationships with nerdy policy wonk guys. During the off times, they would fuck around.

    I don’t really know why this pattern exists amongst these conservative wonkettes, but here’s a guess:

    – these women are intelligent and intelligent women tend to be more promiscuous for some reason

    – the nerdy guys they were around were not attractive to other women (any women?) so tingles in the gina of said wonkette would soon be killed off

    – any flings would be with other policy wonk beta boys. Gina tingles would not be maintained with these.

    – the women, not being overly attractive themselves, had limited options, so would find themselves gravitating back towards previously rejected policy nerds

    If this Helen woman is in the same milieu, that’s probably what they are all doing and Seavey is just a twisted loser.

    Like


  75. I am glad to see this covered here. I did post something about it but got few hits. I was looking forward to the blogosphere’s take.

    Some quick points:

    – Goldberg, a Randroid, and a liberaltarian. It is a pity they all can’t lose.

    – More traditional forms of conservatism might see more traditional forms a masculine and feminine.

    – The woman in question not only sounded Randian, she looked a little bit like Ayn Rand.

    – The guy was doing OK until he brought the relationship woes into it.

    – As Reagan said of another time and another group of youngsters: if this is the future than I will sell my bonds.

    – Speaking of Reagan, can you see him pulling this crap?

    – As always the beta guy gets the shaming. I have seen few comments critical of her alleged behavior.

    – Rittelmeyer: Evil cloning of Poetry of Flesh and Wendy Schwartz?

    [Editor: There’s the rub. It was alleged. Who knows if what he said about her was true? All we have to go on is his word and her sitting in a seat acting cool as a cucumber. That said, I suspect it is true, for the reason spelled out by the above commenter. These weirdo nerdy Randian girls are some of the biggest sluts in recorded history. And she’s a 4, ferkrissakes! Regardless, this post was about perceptions — what the average viewer is going to see in this video, and how that will reflect on Seavey. The deck is stacked against bitter betas males in a way it isn’t against bitter beta females. They had better learn quickly how to play the game or get swept under the rug like so much sad useless lint.]

    Like


  76. If this guy had been a Liberal the Chateu would have expounded on how his betaness was due to his Liberalism.

    Like


  77. I immediately disliked the blond bitch Helen Rittelmeyer, and was glad when Todd Seavey put her down. I wanted to give him a high-five.

    Like


  78. “Damn that John Mayer just leaves the trail of tears and vagina everywhere he goes. ”

    I used to feel bad about all the ex girlfriends I left short-circuited in the head, but then I see the opposite in this Seavey guy and I’m proud of all the scornful looks, nasty shit-talk behind my back and evil eyes I get from my exes for kicking their sorry asses to the curb once they started being a negative force in my life. That includes my baby mama, two ex-fiances from my beta days, and several one night stands recently.

    Like


  79. Todd may be a beta or an omega, clueless about women. And yes, he directed all that erudition and brainpower toward a cringeworthy goal. But it was kind of deft and funny as intellectual performance art. Slamming the ex who dumped him by undercutting her conservative intellectual consistence and self-described worldview. For shit she did while she was dating him. For people like that (who end up on C-SPAN panels), oddly, the intellectual pedigree matters a lot more than it would to most people. But “oddly” is the operative word – those people are all a little odd. It’s obviously possible to be *too* bookish, and this crowd is well over that line.

    @GBFM- what was it like to see your nemesis Jonah Goldberg, in the pixellated flesh? Hmm? What role did the fiat masters have in creating C-SPAN? It broadcasts sessions of Congress live, so the American public can see the captive interests controlling both parties .. in real time!

    @clio- welcome back, if only for a drive by. I for one miss your comments here and your blog. Hope you’re happy and doing well.

    Like


  80. …I should add, I deal with all the shit talk and nasty looks by keeping in mind that every one of them has fully ingested my splooge.

    Like


  81. on October 20, 2010 at 3:48 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lozozozzlzozozlzozozlzozzlzoozzl

    jonah goldberg is a warmongering neocon fiat feminists lzozlzlzlzlz lzozlz

    http://eumaios.wordpress.com/2010/06/02/gbfm-code-the-symbology-and-terminology-of-great-books-for-men/

    http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/jonah-goldbergs-primal-lord-of-the-flies-savagery-tamed-by-his-beuatiful-wife/

    Jonah Goldberg’s Primal “Lord of The Flies Neocon Savagery” Tamed by His Beuatiful (lozl) Wife!!

    omg lozlzl chekc out jonah goldberg’s wife!!

    “nuff said!” lzozlzl!

    a most civilizing force that tamed the savage, primal jonah goldberg!!

    jonah writes:

    “March 10, 2010 12:00 A.M.
    Where Feminists Get It Right
    Women civilize men. ’Nuff said.

    “nuff said!” lzozlzl!

    The reason strikes me as fairly simple. Women civilize men. As a general rule, men will only be as civilized as female expectations and demands force them to be. “Liberate” men from those expectations, and Lord of the Flies logic kicks in. Liberate women from this barbarism, and male decency will soon follow.

    –http://article.nationalreview.com/427383/where-feminists-get-it-right/jonah-goldberg

    without jonah goldberg’s wife’s arresting beauty (lozllz!), neocon woman expectations, and neocon woman demands (lzozll! omg lozlzlz!), jonah goldberg would be out playing lord of the flies, running around with no shirt on down K street, rockin’ out with his goldberg neocon cock (neocock) out, ducking into bars to ravage all that his rightfully his as an untamed beta-male neocon. lozlzlzl!

    why do neocons think that we are all like them?

    also, throughout the history of mankind, it has been men who have laid down the law–from homer and moses on down–not pussified neoconning goldberg’s wife & her feminist friends. lzozll! i mean lookw hat the fmeinist movement has done to the family lzzozlzl! WTF is goldberg thinking????? Single mother familes r good?? Have you ever dated a few chicks with no fatehrs goldberg? If so, and you still wnat fatherless families, where teh neocons repalce teh father with debt-based fiat dolalrs, you hate women & love ur kinky kink & shiznit yo.

    The cherubic, fat-faced Jonah Goldberg writes,

    “March 10, 2010 12:00 A.M.
    Where Feminists Get It Right
    Women civilize men. ’Nuff said.

    The reason strikes me as fairly simple. Women civilize men. As a general rule, men will only be as civilized as female expectations and demands force them to be. “Liberate” men from those expectations, and Lord of the Flies logic kicks in. Liberate women from this barbarism, and male decency will soon follow.

    –http://article.nationalreview.com/427383/where-feminists-get-it-right/jonah-goldberg

    hahahahah! what goldberg is saying that is if his wife didn’t lay down the law, he would be a beasty man alpha male, smacking women around, rocking out with his cock out, as that is in Jonah Goldberg’s true, deep, neocon nature. lozllz! he admits it! and then he projects his neocon nature on the entire world as neocons do to justify their pre-emptive, illegal, unconstitutional wars! lzozll!

    you guys do understand that feminism is an illegal, pre-emptive war waged against men, the family, and children to profit the fiat neocons, right? lozlzl!

    http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/

    for they make their profits by debauching currencies and cultures. lolzlzl! neocons r funny!

    jonah goldberg states we don’t have enough feminismlozllzlz! how many more families must be destoryed by feminism. how many more babies might be murdered by the neocon’s/feminist’s abortion regime?

    how many more fathers must be incarcerated by teh neocon fiat state and have tehir children taken from them by goldberg et al.’s feminist police state, before it is enough for goldberg?

    does the neocon’s lust for debauchery, destruction, and dehumanization know no bounds. or what? lzolzl!

    everyone ought read this book!

    http://www.amazon.com/review/product/1581825943/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt/104-4861295-3739101?_encoding=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

    “59 5-Star Reviews on Amazon: “totalitarian,” “reign of terror,” “Nazi,” “bolshevik,” say readers about the divorce machinery” writes baskerville @ http://stephenbaskerville.blogspot.com/

    OMG! LZOZLZLZLL!!

    bolshevik!! that is soooooooooooo neoconnish!!

    google:

    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=neocons+bolsheviks

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104×721862

    “Neo-cons: the modern day Bolsheviks”

    Jonah Goldberg is soooooooooooooo Bolshevik. lzozllz.

    “To say that liberalism is rooted in fascism because Mussolini had once been a socialist says that Goldberg’s …neo-conservatism must be rooted in Communism. Look at the roots of prominent neocons: Irving Kristol is a former Trotskyist and Josh Muravchik is a YPSL alum. …Jonah Goldberg …therefore Bolshevik Conservatives? … ” –http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/117981

    finally, check out on how the fiat masters re-engineered women via feminism–the feminism jonah goldberg exalts lzozllzlz!!

    http://www.savethemales.ca/001904.html

    Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media (i.e. propaganda.) to control society.

    In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.

    –http://www.savethemales.ca/001904.html

    Goldberg sees depopulation and the decline of birth rates as a good thing. lozlzlzlzl !!!

    “Forgetting the question of decency and morality for a moment, there’s the matter of national interests. Female equality seems to be a pretty reliable treatment for many of the world’s worst pathologies. Population growth in the Third World tends to go down as female literacy goes up. Indeed, female empowerment might be the single best weapon in the “root causes” arsenal in the war on terror.” –http://article.nationalreview.com/427383/where-feminists-get-it-right/jonah-goldberg?page=2

    as a neocon it is jonah goldberg’s DIVINE RIGHT to plan and effect the world’s population. lozlzl!

    is it any wonder the trotskyite, power-hungry, neocons had to kill the memory of edmund burke, moses, jesus, homer, and russell kirk? lozlzlz! to make room for jonah goldberg’s chubby face & endless neocon betamale prattling, as his wife keeps him tame, dulling his true, inherent, lord of the flies nature? lozlzl

    Like


  82. This disparity seems to live quite comfortably with the double standards the Chateau endorses. Your theory is that an increased number of partners is a positive thing for men and a very negative thing for women, and that women also lose market value faster than men. Taking these as true, a woman is far more harmed being dumped than a man. This is assuming there’s no exchange of property/kids, of course. This double standard seems like a fairly natural outgrowth of the one you endorse.

    Like


  83. Are you the sort of person who says “yes” when asked to do something with a fella, regardless of whether you actually want to go out, then simply keeps rescheduling instead of definitively and finally canceling the date or saying no? … Do you tell yourself that you’re nonetheless a moral person — even the hero in life’s little narrative — because… you thought, “I’m faced with an awkward moment, so I’ll just keep turning it into a positive one, for the time being, by lying…over and over again!

    it’s amazing that someone can have this sort of keen insight into female behavior and, at the same time, be completely clueless as to how to handle said behavior.

    Like


  84. I actually don’t agree with your initial reaction to him. He’s definitely bitter, but he’s taking a couple cheap shots at her while also making a fairly legitimate point about her ideology. He’s not crying to himself in a corner, nor does he seem all that upset by not continuing to date her. Maybe he is, maybe he’s not; I don’t think it can be inferred.

    A guy could be mad at a chick because he was in love with her and she dumped him for some badboy. Or he could be mad at her because she set his house on fire, and he wouldn’t touch her again with a ten-foot pole. The mere fact that he mentions they had a relationship hardly means he regrets losing her.

    Like


  85. Word on the Internets:

    John Mayer is packing major heat in the pants. Big time.

    So when you see all those crying hot ex-es, keep in mind it’s not just his soulful gaze they are missing.

    Like


  86. Seavy was being professional until she humiliated him twice with those laconic out of turn comments of “it builds character” and “I’m catholic. Seavy defended himself by bitch slapping her character while never making eye contact with her and talking about he in the third person. That twat was drenching the seat as she squirmed.

    But yes, beta at greatest and still very hurt

    Like


  87. on October 20, 2010 at 3:58 pm Philly Beer Guy

    @Chainring:
    “So I’ve taken to asking single 30+ women (that I’m either not interested in or I have no realistic prospect of banging) to recall the best potential LTR prospect they’ve met in the last year and what makes them think that they will find a better prospect in the next year when their looks have further deteriorated.”

    Please tell me you actually do this and that you’re going to try and get some responses on video for this site.

    Like


  88. I used to know a few of these conservative think-tank type women. They were all promiscuous. They all had off-again on-again relationships with nerdy policy wonk guys. During the off times, they would fuck around.

    I don’t really know why this pattern exists amongst these conservative wonkettes…

    part of it is that these are very male-heavy social circles. the girls that travel in these circles have their market value bid up way past what it would be in the rest of the world. you have basically unattractive girls being constantly complimented, flirted with and propositioned by guys.

    imagine how you would react if you were transported to some bizarro world where a whole cohort of women, equal to or better-looking than yourself, were constantly making themsleves available to yourself. you’d probably “date” the best ones and take frequent “breaks” to avail yourself of the rest.

    Like


  89. on October 20, 2010 at 4:01 pm Steve Johnson

    The political dimension here is actually hilarious in itself.

    The guy is spineless and passive aggressive if he can muster up any grit at all.

    The girl is confused (she is a girl after all) but bright and instinctively knows there’s quite a bit wrong with Will Wilkinson style “liberaltarianism”.

    Of the few points he makes he repeats that she thinks that men should be able to settle disputes with their fists without the law being involved. He thinks this is so absurd and dangerous a concept that the mere mention of it will cause the audience to turn on her it.

    He has the exact same attitude as any PC enforcing old barren woman; the matronly scold – “THAT IS OFFENSIVE!” but he knows as a man that under a more rational (and traditional, btw) system he could actually get called out for that type of behavior and have to risk his (very weak looking) jaw if he wants to control the opinions of men.

    This is why he’ll go far as a mainstream “conservative”.

    Her? She’s a woman surrounded by men who are so very weak and is just disgusted by it – bring back some cruelty – I need to see MEN, not spineless pussies everywhere! her subconscious screams. She behaves badly, like a puppy that is completely untrained.

    He’s evil, she’s pitiable.

    Like


  90. John Mayer plays the guitar. He has a purpose; a passion…..He is focused, therefore, he gets!

    Like


  91. dream puppy

    Who would the guys here choose? Swift or Simpson?

    that one whos the dumb blond

    Like


  92. Roissy, this writing is not worthy of you:

    “She is a mere womanchild, a vassal into which evil men have their way with her. ”

    Your ghost writer does not even know the difference between vassal and vessel, and the grammar is terrible; containing a double (redundant) object.

    Like


  93. @Karl- you setting up franchises.

    @Anon- yeah, I think that character does matter with politicians, so you could rationalize that he was making a valid point. She is definitely of low morals.

    Like


  94. RE: Mayer- Roissy I guess you were right about chicks and men who play guitars.

    Like


  95. @Dreampuppy, I got one ex who I broke up with in ’08. She was older than me and I traded her in for a 21 year old. The older ex still spreads the word of how horrible I was. In August, she was telling two bytches I know about it. I banged one of them about 2 weeks later.

    Like


  96. on October 20, 2010 at 4:23 pm Willard Libby

    Rarfy

    I couldn’t get through the first video.. those were the least attractive and least charismatic people I’ve ever heard.

    That’s because you’ve never heard of bloggingheadstv where hellaciously ugly Jewish guys go to give their nerdy opinions about things no one cares about.

    These dorks have a regular link in the NYTimes.

    Like


  97. Funny, I was connected to the VPN to my university’s network…

    I typed in “Roissy” on Firefox’s address bar to get to this site, but oddly, didn’t get here.

    Instead I got to the “Roissy” web server on my university’s network!

    Maybe the network admin is a fan.

    Unrelated,

    “What’s the chance you will have sex or have a relationship with someone from a speed-dating event?”

    http://www.bakadesuyo.com/whats-the-chance-you-will-have-sex-or-have-a

    Like


  98. Hey Gorb,

    Do you think you could help me out with a certain situation? My roommate invited his cousin’s friend over for dinner for next friday. The girl is from China, 22, just arrived, not many friends, semi-fluent english. He would like me to “teach” her english, and in the process get in her pants. How should I game her? I’m afraid most of things I say will just fly over her ahead. I’m Chinese myself, so I can speak Chinese, but not terribly well. What do you think man?

    Like


  99. dream puppy,
    John Mayer definitely must have a way with women since they seem to love him.

    Like


  100. on October 20, 2010 at 4:38 pm Cannon's Canon

    i got a nice hearty chuckle out of the nerd love.

    on the other hand, the hollywood b-list resembles a bret easton ellis novel more and more. everyone banging everyone, including the dudes. how can such faggotry not inspire contempt?

    another HIV outbreak in the porno world this week: a “bisexual” twink pozzed his anal-loving fuck-buddy girlfriend, who then “performed” in a MMMFFF orgy. now everyone’s quarantined for fag cancer. how long til this hits hollywood?

    Like


  101. @ Philly Beer Guy

    Please tell me you actually do this and that you’re going to try and get some responses on video for this site.

    Here’s a sample from an email exchange:

    Chainring: But consider the most attractive man (‘attractive’ in terms of what you value) you’ve met in the last year or two who was potentially willing to commit to you. Do you really think that you will find better in the next year or two, as your looks fade? You have the benefit of starting off beautiful, but the reality is that you cannot compete with yourself from 5 years ago.

    Delusional-feminist-doctrine-guzzling-and-heavily-projecting-female (her typos are hers alone): I think if you feel love and respect for someone it takes precidence over looks. I dont think looks are the top thing but I would like to be attracted in some way to the man that I am with. Quite honestly, I feel that I have become a better person with age…not necesarily in the looks category but I think I have accomplished and given my best self to others to become a better person.

    I’m open to suggested responses . . .

    Like


  102. “There’s no doubt this dude is a lesser beta, perhaps even a greater omega. And this judgment is not solely a reflection of his unfortunate looks”

    He came off as articulate and at least a little bit funny, so I have to wonder if the man had been handsome would it have been perceived differently. I’m guessing it would have.

    I really wonder if half of why Taylor Swift gets sympathy is because 1.) women can identify with her situation, and 2.) men want to give her the hot meat injection. Whereas beta-boy has nothing really going for him. Oh I’m sure men can identify with hooking up with a nutter, but we don’t typically talk about it.

    Like


  103. on October 20, 2010 at 4:50 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    gbfmify your posts!!! lzozlzzl

    ^^^^^

    Chainring: yto nicth But consider the most attractive man (‘attractive’ in terms of what you value) you’ve met in the last year or two who was potentially willing to commit to you an not just butthex you and secrteievly tape it aas the nocnecons reward with lotsa fiat cash hundreds of thousnandsz of fita dollarz zozzl. Do you really think that you will find better in the next year or two, as your looks fade and your gina dries up and gets coversed in crusty butthex dust requiring new suiotors to pring over distbusters and vaseline jars of gallons of lubricant just 2 lick your dried up clit zlzolzlzlz? You have the benefit of starting off beautiful, but the reality is that you cannot compete with yourself from 5 years ago wiyth your stretched out shit stained gina form all da asscoking cokasass that peneterate your drying up ginaholez lzozozzzlzlzzoozolz zneocn buttehxers getting lotsa bernankeacash from simon and shcusteer s jonah goldberg scream womenz tame men nuff said! lzozozozlz like da fat fcaed neocn wamromeoegerer he is zlzozlzozlzlzo butytehehhxhxhxxh.y

    Delusional-feminist-doctrine-guzzling-and-heavily-projecting-female (her typos are hers alone): I think if you feel love and respect for someone when their cockas is deep in your anal hole lzozlz omg dat feels good, it takes precidence over looks. I dont think looks are the top thing but I would like to be attracted in some way to the man that I am with like a ten foot long dong o lotsa beta bucks 2 fund my alpha fucks and sectriev tapings of aneocon assockings zlozlzlzl. Quite honestly, I feel that I have become a better person with age as my gina dried up and gathered buttheex dust…not necesarily in the looks category but I think I have accomplished and given my best self to othere when i was younger hotter tighter to become a better person and now the beta who proposes 2 me will be rewarded with my better personesnnses improved perosness and stretched out gina like sleeve of a wizard dried up like three day old toast and covered in butthexdust but men are way too superficial if they can’t see though the butthexdust to my beuatiful personhood lzozozozzo and lick my clit and give me a ring and alimony too when i divocre thme to transfer assetss to da benrnake boyz bernanke class lzozlzlzlz buttehhxhhxx lzozlz

    Like


  104. @Josh,

    He wants you to get into her pants?

    She may want to acquire some male attention. I’m guessing this is the case.

    I need to know:

    Where is she from (urban/not/which city)
    What’s her background like

    BF before? If no, then hard game will run her off hard. You need to play it cool and disinterested and professional.

    teach her English. Engineer the situation.

    Half of game is social context. You have an easy in, it’s almost too easy. This is the same with, say, teaching Koreans English in Korea – it’s basically the social setting to getting busy if you do it right.

    Game: If she’s open and outward-looking, standard game applies. Same as any western girl.

    If she’s shy, you need to tone it down. You have to appear cool, disinterested, “I’ll take you if you’re good to me”, and safe. Chinese girls with no experience often bolt if you look too dangerous. It’s a fine line: You need to play the border between cool and dangerous and interesting and too dangerous and threatening.

    One thing: If you excite her sexually, as in gina tingles, she’s yours. With less experience, she has no way to fight it and will think it’s just nature running its course. Chinese girls are aggressively not conscious of the biological nature of their attraction, far moreso than western girls (sounds like being more naive, but it’s not – they’re just less aware).

    Also, WITHHOLD the Beta behavior. No super gentlemanly stuff. Only offer to pay if she says she doesn’t want to go somewhere and you suspect it’s because she has no money.

    If she’s pretty, a thousand guys are already beating down her door – with pathetic Chinese beta behavior.

    BUT

    When you’re teaching her, seem professional, but relaxed.

    The star wars line:

    “Keep your distance, though, Chewie, but don’t *look* like you’re trying to keeping your distance.
    [Chewie barks a question]
    Han Solo: *I* don’t know. Fly casual. ”
    – With thanks to IMDB.

    Make your words, your mannerisms coy but not direct.

    With actual girls from China, Direct game only works on the ones prone to being slutty anyway or who have lots of experience. Actually, if you were white, you could almost ask a girl like that to just go home with you after a certain amount of time. If she’s ever going to do it, she’ll just say yes or no. And these are often entirely normal girls – office workers, etc. You need to be able to sniff that out.

    Even if this girl is the same, she’s got no experience and is likely a little overwhelmed.

    *you can take your time*. Remember.

    You’re teaching her English.

    And you can then make it a kind-of chummy thing rather than a potential BF-GF thing, which is a huge plus for you and you should try to manage that properly.

    Be her friend, but at some distance; teach her usefully; but always keep a little bit – just the hint – of sexual tension. Never do anything directly.

    But if she smells like the direct type and she’s looking to find a man and get laid, you have to pounce while the iron is hot. Go in; get to know her; banter and joke about, …

    get comfortable, …

    And then just start making out. And once you do: DON’T LET UP. She needs to be “swept away” by the emotion and the moment. If you *let her think*, you’ll potentially lose it.

    This is how good sexual experiences are made with Chinese girls. They want the swept-away thing and you need to relieve her of any responsibility for letting it happen.

    That is, if she’s the indirect kind.

    If she’s not, …

    Then just get close, game as usual, and the first chance you get, fuck her as hard as possible and make sure she has fond memories of it. That’s a booty call that will never fail.

    Being Chinese yourself, I have no idea how that will work. But the principle should be the same.

    Everything hinges on your evaluation of the girl. Look for the signs and hints, in her mannerisms, and her stories.

    DO NOT assume that she’s innocent and pure based on how she behaves, but still, don’t put her off – in case she is.

    Fine line. Navigate with care.

    Basic skills: Build to comfort, then move in.

    Not hard work.

    Like


  105. And another thing, tards, Momma has taught you to “defend your girlfriends honor”…. that is stop your friends from telling you what a lunatic slut she is before you ruin your life by marrying her. By threatening your friends with physical violence for pointing out certain obvious facts.

    This is a good time to ignore Momma’s advice and to actively encourage your male friends… and female friends… to get talking about that woman you are thinking about marrying.

    Females, please point out that this is only fair when women do it.

    Like


  106. Blah_Blah

    Digby shitted:

    That’s just shitty, to publicly lash out at someone to punish them for rejecting your crew-cut ass.

    So Dicky, is it shitty to, you know, get some people together planning to sleep with the man latter to hurt the woman shitty or not?

    Cause Dicky, I’d really like your laser like morality to tell me.

    Hey Blah_Blah, or should I call you Seavey….

    I’m not really thinking of morality, more like douchery or assholery.

    I’m totally with Thunear on this. There is no way to know if any or all of this guy’s story is true. It’s plausible. Helen really hates her girlfriend and sets her up with some guy just so she can take him away from her. Hey, that’s what friends are for!

    If it is true, this guy is even more of a douche because he was happily banging this woman, knowing of her nefarious schemes, right up until the moment SHE DUMPED HIS SORRY ASS. And then he forces the entire PolySci 220 class to listen to his crap. I hope that big bored-looking guy in the audience beat his stupid ass in the parking lot later and made him watch as Helen gave him a blow job in gratitude.

    Like


  107. As expected of from a jezebel founding editor, the scorn poured forth on the guy in question and of course, on mankind:

    Dear Todd Seavey, Now That You Have Shown Us Your Balls, A Little Advice On Where To Use Them

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/daskrapital/2010/10/20/dear-todd-seavey-now-that-you-have-shown-us-your-balls-a-little-advice-on-where-to-use-them/

    by a commenter:

    “Nice set on that Rittelmeyer broad.”

    what?!?

    Like


  108. @Josh,

    You might also want to engineer the english lessons.

    Don’t make it obvious that you’re trying to get into her pants.

    Work around it.

    Find somewhere comfortable, in public at first; open but private enough. A good coffee shop is okay. Get a booth. It makes sense for studying, too.

    Then, move on to different places. Never obviously put moves on her until she’s comfortable.

    Then you suggest getting out to see the city. Go practice somewhere neat. Take her to the commons, the harbour, check out markets. Enjoy the scenery.

    Get comfortable. She’ll look forward to meeting you – always somewhere slightly different.

    Don’t fall into a teaching routine.

    Soon, in short order, it’ll feel like dating when it’s not. This will radically confuse her brain. She’ll start to look forward to meeting you – and will enjoy it immensely. Then the happiness and joy chemicals will start to work, and you’re closer.

    When teaching her, when you’re close, you’ve proven yourself by being somewhat patient; you just wanted to teach her. This means that when you casually touch her (not in a creepy way) as time goes on you get closer and closer. She finds it natural. Of course, you’ve planned it and are looking for the signals.

    Soon, she’s yours. But you need to be very socially adept at reading her, because you also have the language barrier. Happily, this also covers up your mistakes quite nicely and lets you slide over faux pas that you may have.

    What you’ve been given is virtually a guarantee of sex if you know what you’re doing. The third time you do this it’ll get boring and you won’t want to.

    But you need to be able to determine how she responds with finely tuned radar. This is your secret weapon and it’s what you need to keep constant track of, without appearing on edge.

    Like


  109. on October 20, 2010 at 5:23 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lolozlolzlolozzzloolll

    Like


  110. I’m not really thinking of morality, more like douchery or assholery.

    So basically your thinking whatever you want to think.

    Your just making demands on everyone else to order the world the way you like it.

    I’ll be ignoring that.

    And then he forces the entire PolySci 220 class to listen to his crap.

    That is “bad”, unless I could care less about poor little children being forced to listen to a nine minute rate. Yep. Pretty sure I don’t care at all. So I’ll be ignoring that.

    Your points are like so profound, because you say they are profound. And with “what you want” backing it up, how could I just not care?

    Like


  111. on October 20, 2010 at 5:42 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””gina dries up and gets coversed in crusty butthex dust requiring new suiotors to pring over distbusters and vaseline jars of gallons of lubricant just 2 lick your dried up clit zlzolzlzlz? You have the benefit of starting off beautiful, but the reality is that you cannot compete with yourself from 5 years ago wiyth your stretched out shit stained gina form all da asscoking cokasass that peneterate your drying up ginaholez ””””””’

    DAM lolllllllllzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Like


  112. on October 20, 2010 at 5:44 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””el chief
    Funny, I was connected to the VPN to my university’s network…
    ””””

    Yea I guess it wasn’t just white males.

    What are ya studying chief?

    Like


  113. @gunslignergregi: I work for the university as a researcher, did my undergrad (econ) and masters (biznass) here too though. how about yourself?

    Like


  114. on October 20, 2010 at 5:50 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    loozozolzozozlzolzozlzolzozlzlzlzoz

    Like


  115. What is the moral of these stories? Be like John Mayer. Or more specifically, be as much an aggressive, dominant, player-womanizing A-hole as a you can be. For some, that will be Mayer levels of douchiness. For others, much lower.

    But women would prefer, all in all, to have dominant A-hole guys with as many female options as possible. Also: corollary, intelligence above average is a turn off for women. If you are smarter than average, do your best to hide it by acting like a Mayer not a Libertardian douche. Be the bad boy.

    Another corollary: women deserve no commitment, only Alpha dominance. They don’t want it anyway, and as Swift points out, crave guys about 10-15 years older than them bringing dominance.

    Like


  116. on October 20, 2010 at 6:01 pm Gunslingergregi

    ”””””el chief
    @gunslignergregi: I work for the university as a researcher, did my undergrad (econ) and masters (biznass) here too though. how about yourself?
    ””””””

    Good job.

    Good bounce back.

    So it is just the whites lol

    I haven’t done shit in over a year.

    Like


  117. on October 20, 2010 at 6:05 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    swift was so swift that mayer didn’t want to giv her morey z;zzpz;z;;z;zplozzolozzllzolzlzozlzlzozozlzlz

    pump n dump lzozozlzlz

    why dones’ swift find a nice good christian guy to settle down with zlozlzllozlzzlz

    it is what jesus would want and i know because he told me last nightzlzozozlzozozlzlzlzolzol

    Like


  118. I only have contempt for Swift and her pathetic song.

    whiskey: intelligence above average is a turn-off only if you are ugly and with no social grace.

    Like


  119. on October 20, 2010 at 6:09 pm Gunslingergregi

    I am prob gonna end up doing some research of my own and proving the theory that white trash is dangerous.

    he he he

    Like


  120. on October 20, 2010 at 6:13 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    ain’t nuthin but a white trash party! ;olalaoalllzozozlzoz

    Like


  121. Chateau—

    This is the reaction of someone who wants to offer Taylor Swift a shoulder to cry on. Todd Seavey will see no such shoulders offered; he will instead be cast to the icy wastelands where the tribe will mercilessly mock him from afar.

    Your conflicting emotional responses to Seavey and Swift are no fluke. They are evolutionarily imprinted in your brain. All flows from the basic premise that eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap.

    I tend to agree with Alias Clio on this one.

    Yes a lot of guys have protective impulses towards pretty girls hurt in love, partly as a strategy to get in on the slot opened up. But girls feel the same way if the guy is hot as in e.g. a hot singer. He runs the risk of diminishing his alphaness if he expresses too much pain but if he does it somewhat stoically and if he’s a star who’s seen as able to attract other hot women, but just has a heart, it’ll work big for a guy too. So a lot of the difference here flows from the fact that Taylor Swift is an 8 or 9 and Todd Seavey is a 4 or at best 5. Make Swift a fat 4 singing that song though and a whole lot of its appeal or at least lack of major turnoff goes away. Similarly the way that guy went after her just wasn’t artful esp. towards the end, not to mention not delivered in a cocky funny way. (Plus it doesn’t help that he looks like a dork too.)

    So I don’t know that it all really does flow from the eggs expensive, sperm cheap, premise.

    Like


  122. on October 20, 2010 at 6:22 pm Gunslingergregi

    OH shit lol

    I’m throwing quarters nichels dimes and pennies.

    Hell yea my new club shit.

    Rainin change.

    Like


  123. on October 20, 2010 at 6:22 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    loozlzozo whenone listens to goldbergs fat man fit bellow funded by fiat doollzrz inside the beltway, one can see that the neoncnson favorites heores golberg and tucker max rhyme with goldman sax are nowhere near the gretaness of ernest hemingway which is why the fed funds the doectstrucion of the great books and hmingewya while finaincing tucker max to wage preemptive sevrteietly taped wars againts buttholes and jonah goldberg to call for more war more war! jonah goldbegr screaming for more war more waR! his tafate cheruibic beltway scream lzolzlzozlzlozzo

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods19.html

    National Review’s Jonah Goldberg, for instance, who hates being told he’s not a genuine conservative (even though nothing could be more obvious), offers this justification for war with Iraq: “The United States needs to go to war with Iraq because it needs to go to war with someone in the region and Iraq makes the most sense.” Elsewhere, he writes: “Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show we mean business.”

    If you’re wondering if these are the words of a conservative, try to imagine Russell Kirk uttering them.

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods19.html

    The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring a temporary prosperity; both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists. lozllzozlzlzllz!! –Ernest Hemingway

    http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/the-first-panacea-for-a-mismanaged-nation-is-inflation-of-the-currency-the-second-is-war-both-bring-a-temporary-prosperity-both-bring-a-permanent-ruin-but-both-are-the-refuge-of-political-and-eco/

    in dante’s inferno the fiat masters were in teh same level of hell as teh butthexers!!! i ma not making this up!!! omg lzozllzlzlz

    lozlzlzlzlzlozlzllzllz

    the fiat masters were right next to the butthexers lzozlzlzl!!!

    (14), Sodomy (15-16), Usury (17)

    no wonder they hate the greta books in colleges lzozlzlzllz and prefer tucker max sectriev tapers of butthex without the girlths contehnt sodomites lzozlzl

    http://danteworlds.laits.utexas.edu/circle7.html#violence

    “those who violate nature, God’s offspring (sodomites: Inferno 15-16); and those who harm industry and the economy, offspring of nature and therefore grandchild of God (usurers: Inferno 17). Identifying the sins of these last two groups with Sodom and Cahors (Inf. 11.49-50), Dante draws on the biblical destruction of Sodom (and Gomorrah) by fire and brimstone (Genesis 19:24-5) and the medieval condemnations of citizens of Cahors (a city in southern France) for usury. Dante’s emotional reactions to the shades in the seventh circle range from neutral observation of the murderers and compassion for a suicide to respect for several Florentine sodomites and revulsion at the sight and behavior of the lewd usurers. ”

    lolzozlzlzozozlzlzlzozlzzlzlzzozlzlz neocons hate dantes infrmnoo oolzozlzl

    the raison dat roissy and i gets along so wells is dat i play the striaght man to his funniness lzozlzllz

    like he talks about all teh light hearted subjsted like game and betaherb h8ers lzozlzlz and i cover all teh dark things descening into hell like dante did in the inferno and shuddering at all teh secretive tapers and tapinsg off butthex underway.

    hey you know whas funny?

    i dant’es inferno the usuers were in the same level as heel as the butthexers.

    while unlike real men like ernest hemingway and thomas jefefrson and ludwig von mises, tim ferriss and tucker max and jonah goldberg and charlotte allen never speak out against fiat currencies and their fed and butthex lololollzozlzllz and in fact hype and promote it lzozlzlzlzl alongside unsubstantiaed fiat lies serving the fiat masters of ny including trying to pass tucker max off as a six foor tall butthsecual hero when he’s s ahort short butthexer douchetard, it will interest you to knows that throughout histroy the greatest of teh greats, who teh fiat masters must take down on a diakly baisis lzozllzzllzlz always were cirticital of the immorality adn seeidness and sin of theft via fiat inflation and fiat butthexing the poeple lzozllzlzlzlzlzlz.

    i just want u guys to know taht there was a time when conservatism and manhood and turh and honor were baout the ocnstitution and the classics and honesty and the gold standrad and not about butthex and welath transfer to the fiat cabal via the fmeinist movement which exisst to sezie property from men while destorying and sdeosuling womenz menz and childrenz so that tehre is more business for teh neocon drugg gcompaniesl zlzozllz

    but anayways here’s yas goes–proof that great men once did walk this earth though the eneocns sell us trucker max and tim ferriss and jonah goldberg as ther master alphas when they are jyust master betas lzolzlzlzlzlozlzl

    The directors of such companies (joint-stock corporations), however, being the managers rather of other people’s money than of their own, it cannot well be expected, that they should watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners in a private copartnery frequently watch over their own …. Negligence and profusion, therefore, must always prevail, more or less in the management of the affairs of such a company? –Adam Smith, The Wealth on Nations, 1776

    If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. –Thoms Jefferson in 1802 in a letter to then Secretary of the Treasury, Albert Gallatin

    Fair dealing leads to greater profit in the end. –Homer’s Odyssey

    Thou shalt not steal. –Moses, Exodus

    The boom produces impoverishment. But still more disastrous are its moral ravages. It makes people despondent and dispirited. The more optimistic they were under the illusory prosperity of the boom, the greater is their despair and their feeling of frustration. –Mises

    The authors of the Constitution were very much aware of the dangers of inflation and the need for commodity money. Destruction of the continental dollar was vivid in their minds. The journals of the Continental Congress noted that “paper currency… is multiplied beyond the rules of good policy. No truth being more evident, than that where the quantity of money. . . exceeds what is useful as a medium of commerce, its comparative value must be proportionately reduced.” Further, inflations “tend to the depravity of morals, and decay of the public faith, injustice to individuals, and the destruction of the honor, safety, and independence of the United States.” –R. Paul, End The Fed, The Constitutional Case, p. 165

    If you are in debt, you are a slave to that debt. –Benjamin Franklin

    The second vice is lying, the first is running in debt. . . Lying rides upon debt’s back. –Franklin

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value—zero. —Voltaire

    The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring a temporary prosperity; both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists. –Ernest Hemingway

    You have a choice between the natural stability of gold and the honesty and intelligence of the members of government. And with all due respect for those gentlemen, I advise you, as long as the capitalist system lasts, vote for gold. –George Bernard Shaw
    If ever again our nation stumbles upon unfunded paper, it shall surely be like death to our body politic. This country will crash. –George Washington

    To emit an unfunded paper as the sign of value ought not to continue a formal part of the Constitution, nor even hereafter to be employed; being, in its nature, pregnant with abuses, and liable to be made the engine of imposition and fraud; holding out temptations equally pernicious to the integrity of government and to the morals of the people. –Alexander Hamilton

    I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. This issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of the moneyed corporations which already dare to challenge our Government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country. –Thomas Jefferson

    I see in the near future a crisis approach which unnerves me and cause me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations (of banking) have been enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic destroyed. –Abraham Lincoln

    History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance. –James Madison

    All the perplexities, confusion and distresses in America arise not from defects in the constitution or confederation, nor from want of honor or virtue, as much from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation. –John Adams

    The gold standard has one tremendous virtue: the quantity of the money supply, under the gold standard, is independent of the policies of governments and political parties. This is its advantage. It is a form of protection against spendthrift governments. . . The gold standard did not collapse. Governments abolished it in order to pave the way for inflation. The whole grim apparatus of oppression and coercion, policemen, customs guards, penal courts, prisons, in some countries even executioners, had to be put into action in order to destroy the gold standard. –Ludwig von Mises

    Of the innumerable evils which usually brings the decadence of kingdoms, principalities, and republics, the four greatest are, in my opinion: war, immorality, infertility of the land, and the debasement of money. For the first three, the evidence is obvious. But for the fourth, which concerns money, except for a few men of intellect, few people ever see it. Why? Because it is not in one fell swoop, but gradually, by a somewhat latent character, it ruins the state. –Copernicus

    The themes of this paper are simple—the study of economics is incomplete and quite tragic without the classical, heroic, Austrian spirit contained in the words of the Greats. Gresham’s Law stipulates that bad money drives good money out of circulation; and I contend that a fiat currency drives soul, honor, and the classical, epic spirit out of the culture; exiling Aristophanes et al., and replacing Homer with feminist lit and Grand Theft Auto—two sides of the same coin:

    I’ll tell you what I think about the way
    This city treats her soundest men today;
    By a coincidence more sad than funny,
    It’s very like the way we treat our money.
    The noble silver drachma that of old we were
    So proud of, and the recent gold coins that
    Rang true, clean-stamped and worth their weight
    Throughout the world, have ceased to circulate.
    Instead the purses of Athenian shoppers
    Are full of shoddy silver-plated coppers
    Just so, when men are needed by the nation,
    The best have been withdrawn from circulation.
    —Aristophanes, The Frogs, 400 BC

    lozlzlzlz Dante recognized that in order to prop up the false value of their fiat lzozozlzl butthex regime, the MBA must naturally commit violence and butthex assrape against art—one can see the financial motivations for the deconstruction and dumbing down and butthexing of the academy—for the butthexing removal of Zeus’ lightning and butthexing Moses’s thundering justice—for the concerted butthexing attack on the exalted, masculine soul which passes judgment on FRAUD:

    The monstrous shape lands on the brink and Virgil salutes it ironically. It is GERYON, the MONSTER OF FRAUD. Virgil announces that they must fly down from the cliff on the back of this monster. While Virgil negotiates for their passage, Dante is sent to examine the USURERS (The Violent against Art). . . These sinners sit in a crouch along the edge of the burning plain that approaches the cliff. Each of them has a leather purse around his neck, and each purse is blazoned with a coat of arms. Their eyes, gushing with tears, are forever fixed on these purses. Dante recognizes none of these sinners, but their coats of arms are unmistakably those of well-known Florentine families. . . Having understood who they are and the reason for their present condition, Dante cuts short his excursion and returns to find Virgil mounted on the back of Geryon. Dante joins his Master and they fly down from the great cliff. . . Their flight carries them from the Hell of the VIOLENT AND THE BESTIAL (The Sins of the Lion) into the Hell of the FRAUDULENT AND MALICIOUS (The Sins of the Leopard). –p. 133, The Divine Comedy (The Inferno, The Purgatorio, and The Paradiso) by Dante Alighieri and John Ciardi

    “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” Juvenal asks. “Who will watch the watchmen?” “We will!” the fiat MBA is taught to respond, as every crises they create is used as reason to expand their power, as the words of Thomas alva Edison—the hodler of 1,000 patents and founder of General Electric is exiled from the academy.

    Tom Paine has almost no influence on present-day thinking in the United States because he is unknown to the average citizen. Perhaps I might say right here that this is a national loss and a deplorable lack of understanding concerning the man who first proposed and first wrote those impressive words, ‘the United States of America.’ But it is hardly strange. Paine’s teachings have been debarred from schools everywhere and his views of life misrepresented until his memory is hidden in shadows, or he is looked upon as of unsound mind. We never had a sounder intelligence in this Republic. He was the equal of Washington in making American liberty possible. Where Washington performed Paine devised and wrote. The deeds of one in the Weld were matched by the deeds of the other with his pen. Thomas Edison in The Philosophy Paine, 1925

    People who will not turn a shovel full of dirt on the project nor contribute a pound of material, will collect more money from the United States than will the People who supply all the material and do all the work. This is the terrible thing about interest …But here is the point: If the Nation can issue a dollar bond it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good also. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money broker collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20%. Whereas the currency, the honest sort provided by the Constitution pays nobody but those who contribute in some useful way. It is absurd to say our Country can issue bonds and cannot issue currency. Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer and the other helps the People. If the currency issued by the People were no good, then the bonds would be no good, either. It is a terrible situation when the Government, to insure the National Wealth, must go in debt and submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious value of gold. Interest is the invention of Satan. — Thomas A. Edison

    If we all did the things we are capable of doing, we would literally astound ourselves. –Thomas Edison

    i mean it is so cufking abovious and truth is a treason in teh fiat butthex matrix empire of lies zlozzllzllzlzlz

    Like


  124. Josh

    Do you think you could help me out with a certain situation? …The girl is from China, 22, just arrived, not many friends, semi-fluent english.

    whatever you do
    do NOT buy her a puppy
    to win her heart

    this will end in heart BREAK for both you
    and the pup

    Like


  125. greatbooksformen GBFM

    loozlzozo whenone listens to goldbergs fat man fit bellow funded by fiat doollzrz inside the beltway…(incessent gibberish diatribe)…empire of lies zlozzllzllzlzlz

    goddam gbbfm, you is on fire
    that is your shortest post ever

    succinct, and to the point

    Like


  126. on October 20, 2010 at 6:36 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    jonah goldberg posing as a conservative is about as good as a thirty year old mba lawyer dc women with advanced degrees wearing white on her wedding day lzozlzozzozozoz or twylor swift t4 that matter lzozlzozozl john mayer gots her lotsa cokas from mayeer

    both work first and formost 4 da fiat buthexing mastsers sertcivtaprs of butthex like tucker ma ryhmes with godlman sax who gets his lies diligently rpeetead in the weekly standardth that must build the assocker serctiev taper of butthex into a hero while ignoring ture heroes dyingofn foreign shores in htier foreheegin eneocnen warz lxoxlxlxlx zlozlzozoozozozozoz

    hey a sad thing is that sometimes it seems are bravest best men are sent overseas by the fiat masterz with their hands tied to be crucified while tucker max rhyems with godlman sax hangs bakc buthexing gilrs and taping it in secrete and getting the hero’s welcome from teh weekly standadth neocons who ignore the true heroes on far off shores dying int heir foreign wars no lzozlzz ing

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Troops-chafe-at-restrictive-rules-of-engagement_-talks-with-Taliban-1226055-105202284.html

    “I don’t think the military leaders, president or anybody really cares about what we’re going through,” said Spc. Matthew “Silver” Fuhrken, 25, from Watertown, N.Y. “I’m sick of people trying to cover up what’s really going on over here. They won’t let us do our job. I don’t care if they try to kick me out for what I’m saying — war is war and this is no war. I don’t know what this is.”

    To the soldiers and Marines risking their lives in Afghanistan, restrictions on their ability to aggressively attack the Taliban have led to another enormous frustration stalking morale: the fear that the Karzai government, with the prodding of the administration of President Obama, will negotiate a peace with the Taliban that wastes all the sacrifices by the U.S. here. Those fears intensified when news reached the enlisted ranks that the Karzai government, with the backing of senior Obama officials, was entering a new round of negotiations with the Taliban.

    Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Troops-chafe-at-restrictive-rules-of-engagement_-talks-with-Taliban-1226055-105202284.html#ixzz12wPw0qXf

    instead of filing itspages celebrating tucerk maxs sodom and schsuster lies thaty he is a six foot tall buttsexual asscocker, it woul be cool if jonah goldberg and his neocons could help our troops for a change.

    yayahahayyahaayha!!!

    Like


  127. on October 20, 2010 at 6:39 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    “Firepower

    greatbooksformen GBFM

    loozlzozo whenone listens to goldbergs fat man fit bellow funded by fiat doollzrz inside the beltway…(incessent gibberish diatribe)…empire of lies zlozzllzllzlzlz

    goddam gbbfm, you is on fire
    that is your shortest post ever

    succinct, and to the point”

    lzozoozzl

    firepower, like neoocon, just erased the words of

    hemingway
    edison
    copernicus mises
    hayek
    jeferson jefferson madison
    hamilton
    adams
    aristphanes
    and so many gretas

    h8ers all!!!!!

    lzozozoozolzlzozolzlzlzoz

    deconstruct the greats & replace them with

    1) fiat butthex utopia
    2) goldbergian fiat war feminist conservatism zlzozllzz

    Like


  128. on October 20, 2010 at 6:39 pm Gunslingergregi

    Oh shit yea white trash party.

    I need to cruise trailer parks this time.

    Like


  129. Eggs may not be as numerous as sperm, but they’re still dirt cheap.

    Like


  130. on October 20, 2010 at 6:44 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    tornado beavis buthed terailer park rock on llzozozozooz!!!

    Like


  131. on October 20, 2010 at 6:52 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    welelelele

    a young healthy woman is worth a lot in the way of reproducive value lzozlzlzoz

    a mature man is worth a lot in the way of reproducive fvalue

    once upon a time a owman would trade her young helthy repruporductive years for lifelong securrity with a good man zlozllzlzlzllzlz

    now she trades those best years for secrteiev taping of enocon assckocking sessions funded supported fiancnedn by the central banking sodom and schuster cartele lzozlzlzol

    so instead of a man husband children family grandhilderen happy lifeshe gets

    a sore anuth long menaingless hours fillng out legal forms for fiat masters and more asskcoing sessiosn form douchebag mabas than she can stake a stic at zlozlzozo

    funny how when given a choice, women don’t always think so long term, as they re more dominated by gina tingles and anuth tingles than brain tingles zlozzllzzolzozzozlzlzolozzlzl

    Like


  132. on October 20, 2010 at 6:54 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    why do pseudo libertrariands like todd and all htose beltway intlletulals talk like they have seventeen fire pokers up their anuthes?

    why whwy hwyw hwy hwy whywwhwhwhwhwywyyww ? why o why?

    Like


  133. on October 20, 2010 at 6:57 pm Gunslingergregi

    Oh wait if I embrase white trash I guess it ain’t bad.

    I can get my very own house (trailer) for 6 g’s of cold hard cash.

    Like


  134. on October 20, 2010 at 6:57 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lozozozlzlzozlozlozzlzozzlzozlzzolzozlozlzozlolzolzozlozlozlzolozlozlozlolzozlozozozozlzol

    if goldberg and this dude are the ones running dc conservatis libertatairainms.

    omfg

    we’re foooooked!!

    Like


  135. on October 20, 2010 at 6:58 pm Gunslingergregi

    Ok now I get it.

    White trash no bills for college.

    Own there own house free and clear for less than cost of a used car.

    he he he

    Like


  136. @Alias Clio, Doug1

    I think it is a case of Alpha male = Beautiful chick. They both have high status and can get away with a lot.

    However, beta male does not equal ordinary (or even ugly) chick. The beta male will get away with nothing (as expected for his lowly place), but we still make allowances for the plainer woman (just because she is a woman).

    Ugly chicks can share in some of the light from their beautiful sisters. Beta males are expected to hide in the shadows of their alpha betters.

    I am not sure if this related to the relative scarcity of eggs or not. In the end it does not really matter. As the proprietor pointed out: if you are a beta male you need to know better than attempting to shame even a ordinary chick.

    Beautiful women: get away with anything
    Alpha male: get away with most things.
    Ordinary female: Lots of latitude for attitude.
    Beta male: Get away with nothing (and be grateful for it).

    Like


  137. on October 20, 2010 at 7:01 pm Gunslingergregi

    GBFM are you on the same page.

    White trash can be free from the bernakification.

    Like


  138. Ehhhh…I think you’re trying too hard to fit these two examples into your worldview and it comes out as square peg, round hole – with Seavey at least.

    Seavey’s obviously beta at best. Actually in his dreams of becoming his sexually enlightened, Tyler Durden-self, Tyler Durden is played by Ed Norton. Taking into account this moral universe, compounded by the fact that he’s an academic – he actually does alright, for someone like him. He’s taking it to this ex of his, Frumpmistress Flex we’ll call her, with astonishing mental dexterity and solid, slash and burn examples while on television, sitting next to her and in front of a room full of his peers.

    Bear in mind that guys like this already know full and well that their place on the sexual totem pole is well below half staff. The fact that someone in academia has actually had sex and dated someone is such a step up from where most of them started out in the game, that it’s actually remedial social proof in that world. I know, I know – it is ugly. But look at these people and at those throughout PhD programs throughout the country – PARTICULARLY Political Science. This is the detritus of human sexuality. The polar opposite of South Beach model parties. In such an unusual context, Seavey was moderately successful in his attack with bonus points in that he was able to tie his ex’s amorality in her theory work to nasty real life examples of her sexuality in front of her academic peers. That’s pretty hardcore for a beta nerd.

    Like


  139. “start dating girls who didn’t look like Philip Seymour Hoffman”

    I’m glad someone else noticed that, as it was weirding me out. Not just PSH, but specifically his character from the Big Lebowski.

    P.

    Like


  140. on October 20, 2010 at 7:32 pm Gunslingergregi

    So no college bills.

    Paid off house.

    Paid off car.

    Basically a free man = white trailer trash.

    I guess I won’t be able to prove violence theory.

    Shit too easy.

    Plus have two extra bedrooms to put people in that pay the left over bills.

    No wonder the hate.

    Like


  141. Beautiful women: get away with anything
    Alpha male: get away with most things.
    Ordinary female: Lots of latitude for attitude.
    Beta male: Get away with nothing (and be grateful for it).

    I concur with that. The guy in the video should have trusted his instincts. Just shut up and get out of there. Make a few obligatory remarks and move along. It sucks but there you have it.

    I said as much a few posts ago. The top layer of society is dominated by alpha males. However, just one rung below – the middle, managerial yapping class – this is dominated by females. Betas be advised. Keep your mouths shut.

    There is more freedom where I’m at, which is the next level down. Here we will find bachelors, bad boys, bad girls, misanthropes and lumpenproletariat.

    But it’s better than being a beta married to an ordinary girl who thinks she is God’s gift to mankind.

    Like


  142. Seavey: embarassing for both parties, but he got his. I liked it, had a strong streak of vigilante justice for a freaky batshit conservative.
    Swift: What once seemed like a nice girl we now know to be an irresponsible starfucker.

    Roissy, revulsion at Seavey and empathy with Swift is the expected reaction of our time. But had that happened 50, 70 years ago, and had Seavey been a little more masterful, I’m not so sure the reception would be the same. Being outed as a whore one or way the other was a little harsher then. Relapse into primitivism, yadda yadda…

    Like


  143. This clip was like something out of The Royal Tanenbaums. Did Wes Anderson dream this up?

    Like


  144. Not even beautiful women get breaks. I am pretty, but never anything over a 7 (maybe 3 months of 8) and I was once let off by a cop for drunk driving. I blew over the limit and he let me drive home after a stern talk.

    Like


  145. on October 20, 2010 at 8:29 pm Mr. Royal Mack

    John Mayer mind as well be put on the same list as Silvio Berlusconim because from what I hear all these hollywood starlets we fantasize about, HE FUCKIN THEM!!! My New Apex Alpha. Your being analyzed Mr. Mayer the GAME is strong in you.

    Like


  146. I view things differently.
    Since I am 100% loyal in relationships, I judge other women harshly in regards to fidelity.

    I found Todd Seavey rather clever in his barbs. And this is par for the course in his dating behavior.

    He chronicled the ups and downs of his relationship with Helen Rittelmeyer on his blog. Which leads me to believe she wasn’t shocked when he brought up her bad behavior during the panel.

    She’s the cheater here, plain & simple. Sympathy for him, not her.

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:XI-duMgs07kJ:www.toddseavey.com/2009_09_06_archive.html+%22helen-rittelmeyer-postscript%22+and+seavey&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    Regarding Taylor Swift, no sympathy for her. I liked her a lot more before I read those lyrics. Dramatic much ?

    Although she is still young, she has been a Type A in control professional far beyond her years for a long time.

    Total BS to whine about John Mayer playing her IMHO.

    I agree that a lot of women do get a free pass to cheat, while men are viewed harshly.

    It’s not right for either sex to cheat, but something strange in modern Western Feminista culture seems to view it as Girl Power when chicks do.

    Like


  147. “All flows from the basic premise that eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap.”

    But in a sanely-run society Seavey’s sperm wouldn’t be cheap. He’s smart. That’s rare and potentially beneficial to all of humanity, so it should be expensive.

    Like


  148. This is not a beta, alpha, male, female issue. Neither of them deserve ANY sympathy/compassion. Whatever happens between two consenting adults really needs to remain private. To publicly vent out one’s frustrations or to humiliate the one that has hurt you is truly pathetic. It demonstrates the stupidity of the individual rather than accomplishing self serving needs.

    Like


  149. “She’s the cheater here, plain & simple. Sympathy for him, not her.”

    Could someone more patience than me sum up his epic lament on her in a few sentences?

    P.

    Like


  150. on October 20, 2010 at 8:46 pm too late for romance

    “hey a sad thing is that sometimes it seems are bravest best men are sent overseas by the fiat masterz with their hands tied to be crucified while tucker max rhyems with godlman sax hangs bakc buthexing gilrs and taping it in secrete and getting the hero’s welcome from teh weekly standadth neocons who ignore the true heroes on far off shores dying int heir foreign wars no lzozlzz ing”

    Who cares? Those government welfare recipients are getting paid and no one forced them to join. They want to be big badasses and professional killers for rich old men? Suckers.

    Sheep get sheared.

    Like


  151. on October 20, 2010 at 8:58 pm Vincent Ignatius

    I hope Swift has been cutting her wrists. Any pussy that thinks it should be on a pedestal deserves to be kicked down.

    Like


  152. on October 20, 2010 at 8:59 pm greatbooks4men

    lozozozlzzl
    too late for romance = jonah goldberg ?
    lzozlzlzlzl

    Like


  153. Seavey looked quite foolish. You don’t make a spectacle of yourself over an old lover, especially not on CSPAN2. That said, if true her behaviour does sound almost unique in it’s amorality, but not surprising for a radian, given Ayn Rand’s monstrous views.

    And GBFM, agree with you on 90% of stuff, but not on Jonah Goldberg. The man is a solid conservative and funny as hell

    and liberaltarians

    Like


  154. on October 20, 2010 at 9:14 pm Gunslingergregi

    ”””””’Who cares? Those government welfare recipients are getting paid and no one forced them to join. They want to be big badasses and professional killers for rich old men? Suckers.

    Sheep get sheared.
    ””””””””

    Maybe they want to protect the country?

    Maybe?

    When there is no armed forces you think we will have borders at all he he he

    Like


  155. And liberaltarians combine the worst aspects of left and right. On the plus side, they’re vanishing as quick As Nancy Pelosi’s career

    Like


  156. What’s Seavey’s problem? Even though I put the chick at about a 4, she _is_ the one he picked out, and he _did_ get to roger her thoroughly to his heart’s content. Now, he should be a gentleman, respect her wishes with grace, and move onward and upward; after all, it’s not as if she’ll be coming after him for alimony or (presumably) child support.

    Even though he demeaned himself terribly, I don’t think he’s hopeless, especially if he’d discover this blog. With his high intelligence and steady job, he need only hit the gym 3x/week, get a shorter haircut and some better threads, and with some game, he could be pulling 7s by Christmas.

    Like


  157. @Paul Moloney

    Todd Seavey:

    “It might come as a surprise to some of you that we dated for two years, not just because we have ideological differences, but because there are probably some people in this room who also dated Helen during those two years, given how tumultuous it got.”

    Like


  158. I was talking about Seavey and Swift.

    Like


  159. @Thunear

    Here’s the extract from Seavey’s singles ad:>>>>

    Oh my, so he’s not beta, he’s a raging Narcissist.
    Still doesn’t excuse her cheating though.
    She’s a sociopath. he’s a Narc. Yikes.

    Like


  160. I hope Swift has been cutting her wrists.

    Way to avoid sounding bitter.

    Like


  161. Libertarian nerdy guy who smacked down his ex? Sure it was nerdy and pathetic – but many guys would not have had the balls to do it at all. And since we live in a world where women feel they can do no wrong and men are told they can do no right, we need more putting women and their amoral behavior in its rightful place. The guy was obviously struggling but his attacking of his ex was warranted and, dare I say, a bit alpha. In a really dorky way. Worst thing about him is that he outed himself for daying pigs.

    Taylor Swift, meanwhile, deserve no sympathy and has outed herself as a slut.

    NOW, any real man had my reaction, not Roissy’s.

    Like


  162. on October 20, 2010 at 10:32 pm Gunslingergregi

    He was just copying duke fuck list to gauge reaction to a guy doing it.

    he he he

    Like


  163. Wow they talk like NEERRRRRRRDDDSSS!! Why do they have to put in all these weird-ass pauses and inflections when they talk?

    Like


  164. imagine how you would react if you were transported to some bizarro world where a whole cohort of women, equal to or better-looking than yourself, were constantly making themsleves available to yourself. you’d probably “date” the best ones and take frequent “breaks” to avail yourself of the rest.

    Oh, so you’ve been to Thailand?

    Like


  165. I’m not gonna lie… all I got from this post was that John Mayer is this year’s alpha.

    Like


  166. …From this premise, we subconsciously affirm that men are expendable, and women irreplaceable.

    Ah, ok, but then how does fat, ugly, dolt-ish loser omega women fit into this equation???

    Like


  167. on October 21, 2010 at 12:54 am Anonymouses Anonymous

    Phillip Seymor Hoffman…my thoughts exactly.

    He’s local, so maybe if I meet him, I can introduce him to the world of PUA.

    Like


  168. on October 21, 2010 at 1:35 am David Collard

    Rollo Tomasi

    Good points about the Catch 22 men are in. I realised this years ago. If you are a man and you act soft, you will be mocked. If you are a man and you act hard, you will be denigrated. After a while, you realise that you might as well say and do what you feel happiest doing. People will always complain. (This is the point of Aesop’s fable of the father, the son and the donkey).

    There is also what one could call the Male Housework Paradox. There is no relationship between the amount of housework a husband does and the amount of nagging a woman does. She will nag you no matter how little or how much housework you do. As Roger Devlin put it, women complain “at the margins”. No matter how much you do, they will always complain.

    I would put a caveat on that though. The best strategy, I have learned, is not to do nothing around the house. The best strategy is to do a small amount, as it suits you. The woman then feels that you are “lending a hand” at least. Honour is satisfied for both parties.

    Something else I have noticed is that women have a sneaking admiration for a man who behaves in a patriarchal manner and expresses “chauvinistic” sentiments. I do this most of the time at home, and my wife and daughter still seem to love me and hold me in respect. I have noticed this even on the Internet. Women respond well to a man who doesn’t mind being a man. Woman is the forgiving sex. She enjoys forgiving. Sometimes it is a good strategy to give her something to forgive.

    Like


  169. The public meltdown humiliates him more than her. He should have just made it quick and slashing and said something like — although she espouses traditionalist values in her public writing, I can tell you from experience that she doesn’t follow those values in her personal life at all. This perhaps gives us a hint as to why self-professed “social conservatives” are so quick to ally with libertarians. Then smile and wave it off if anyone asks him for details.

    Like


  170. @ Gorb

    Thanks for the advice man. I feel like you should start your own blog.

    After talking to my roommate, she is apparently from Dalian, which I’ve heard is not a very big city. She is not a virgin, though her level of promiscuity/bf history is unknown. She is here in Canada for school, though she is 22 and starting college all over again (her family is wealthy enough to throw 2 years of education down the drain and start over again). Her older cousin is here. These aren’t actual english lessons I’ll be doing with her – she just wants to improve her english and wants to talk to a local for practice.

    Like


  171. who cares. they’re fugly

    Like


  172. Helen R. – UGLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    Like


  173. on October 21, 2010 at 4:44 am Paleo Cream Puff

    It’s funny this post came up when I just came to terms with my sociopathy…

    Like


  174. @Josh
    @ Gorb

    Thanks for the advice man. I feel like you should start your own blog.

    I like being a heckling commenter better.

    After talking to my roommate, she is apparently from Dalian, which I’ve heard is not a very big city.

    It had a great mayor before he moved on, the rock-star type in the Communist world. Dalian is a nice town, way up north; I’ve been there many times. In Chinese terms, it’s not big, but it’s somewhat cosmopolitan: there’s a Russian community, and a big Korean group (ethnic Korean Chinese and North Koreans, as well as a few South Koreans).

    Lots of foreigners, relatively, though nothing like Beijing and Shanghai, and more working-class.

    She could have had some interesting experiences, but this is hardly Sex and the City up there. I’d go for limited experience but some with depth.

    She is not a virgin, though her level of promiscuity/bf history is unknown.

    I’ll guess not much: she wont’ be looking to add numbers. She’ll want quality and will need time investment (or appear to need). On the other hand, she could likely be led out into a world of delights and shiny lights pretty easily.

    She is here in Canada for school, though she is 22 and starting college all over again (her family is wealthy enough to throw 2 years of education down the drain and start over again).

    Then she’ll also be privileged and she’ll expect you to be at least able to hold your own. Tighter game; don’t feed her sense of entitlement any further.

    Her older cousin is here.

    Be friends but easily dismiss. Irrelevant. An ally if useful, but discard this in the context of your friendship with the girl ASAP.

    These aren’t actual english lessons I’ll be doing with her – she just wants to improve her english and wants to talk to a local for practice.

    Even better, it just needs to be social.

    Arrange not frequent but fun “trips” or activities. Not too frequent, to make them a treat; and get progressively closer to her.

    Physical attractiveness might not be a major factor for her, so long as you’re not ugly. And you’ve got her fresh off the boat. So you have the field.

    Your victory to now lose.

    Like


  175. @Blah_Blah
    @Jerry
    @Gorb

    EVERYONE gossips. That’s not the point. Is PUBLIC gossip that’s the issue HERE!!!

    READ my comment MUCH earlier than yours on Contrast and Compare…..Oct 20, 8:46

    A woman actually beat you in saying the same thing!

    You guys are way toooooo smug!

    Like


  176. on October 21, 2010 at 12:01 pm David Rockefeller

    I cringed as he talked because he used adjectives and adverbs when none were needed. Like listening to someone read poorly written prose. Can’t imagine anyone listening to him for more than a few minutes before becoming homicidal.

    He needs to learn to talk like a normal human, not like a writer/orator. He’ll never give Gary Cooper or George Clooney a run for the hottest pussy, but at least he’ll meet a nice girl who isn’t completely fucked-up like that Helen chick.

    Although that stuff he posted on his match.com profile suggests his mental/emotional health is as seriously fucked up as hers.

    As for Helen — it’s bad enough she’s unattractive. But she’s also so damn masculine, macho, aggressive, hard-ass, I’d bet she’s packing twelve inches of granite hard man-meat under that red dress.

    Like


  177. “Most conservatives are clueless betas like this guy.”

    Most men in general are betas, but I’m not sure conservatives are any more so than liberals. You think the vegetarian Obama fanboys are *less* likely to be clueless betas?

    I’ll bet Edmund Burke was alpha.

    Like


  178. Paul Moloney

    “start dating girls who didn’t look like Philip Seymour Hoffman”

    I’m glad someone else noticed that, as it was weirding me out. Not just PSH, but specifically his character from the Big Lebowski.

    Good observation, but what is TRULY disturbing is that today, HE looks better, but Tara Reid can degenerate into a freak wearing a mask of stretched, blotchy skin.

    Brave New indeed.

    Like


  179. “For the record, I’m shocked to discover that Taylor Swift has an actual vagina. All this time I’d assumed it was just a smooth, solid plastic bump with no genitalia, similar to a naked Barbie doll’s.”

    –holy shit! too funny.

    Like


  180. on October 21, 2010 at 1:59 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Ha, I did have different feelings for each of the two:
    1)for the loser dude – first of all, I was impressed by his views in a negative sense; then it followed his uncalled for personal attack. First of all, you don’t do that on national television. Second of all, if you’re to do it, at least do it right for crying out loud. On the side note, Roissy, I don’t consider that woman a 4. More like a 2.5-3.
    2)for Taylor Swift – I’m not really impressed by the damsel in distress non-sense; I actually frown upon all celebrities that take their private life and make it public so the first though I had was stupid whore.

    Like


  181. We feel sorry for Swift because she’s young and this is probably the first time she’s had her heart broken by a player. “She should have known better given his reputation,” you’re probably thinking. But any PUA knows that part of his mission in life is to tailor his pitch to the target — in this case, go above and beyond to convince Swift that he’s the real deal this time. She let down her guard and he moved in for the kill.

    Now, I doubt we’d feel any sympathy for her if she spilled her heart out in some delusional rant 10 years and 30 dudes later. “She should have learned her lesson by now,” we’d think, and we’d be right. Todd Seavey looks like he’s about 40 and “should know better by now” which is why we don’t have any sympathy for the guy.

    Like


  182. rebelliousvanilla – good point. She’s far from a 4.

    Like


  183. Holy shit, she does look like Philip Seymour Hoffman!

    Sort of a self-own just by admitting he was ever with her.

    Like


  184. on October 21, 2010 at 8:22 pm too late for romance

    “Maybe they want to protect the country?

    Maybe?

    When there is no armed forces you think we will have borders at all he he he”

    What does that have to do with anything that’s happening right now regarding American foreign and defense policy? I’m with (multiple CMoH winner) Major General Smedley D. Butler, USMC, war is a racket and the only legitimate role for the armed forces is to protect the borders. You know, the ones you’re talking about.

    But it really doesn’t matter what you or I think. Reality is reality and I’m staying home and getting rich. The suckers can do as they please and if they die or go insane from some bullshit wars in far off places that’s okay by me, so long as I get paid.

    Like


  185. on October 21, 2010 at 8:40 pm Gunslingergregi

    Getting rich.

    Going to war or not that should be goal.

    Then you can have the luxury of worrying about other shit.

    Like


  186. Excellent description of Helen Rittlemeyer’s writing style, from comments on her essay:

    “You write like Dorothy Parker and William F. Buckley having awkward, thoroughly unpleasant sex.”

    Like


  187. Regarding the notion that eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap, an alpha male’s sperm is far more valuable or expensive than a woman’s egg. As Richard Dawkins writes, “it is far from cheap to make millions of sperms and successfully inject them into a female against all the competition”.

    Relatedly, an alpha with his shit together is far rarer than a beautiful woman. Women’s value is mostly tied into their looks, and beautfy is fairly common (through shriking in some parts of the world alongside mass blubberification).

    But an alpha male who’s successful, mission-driven, excellent in all domains of life, that’s rare as fuck.

    Like


  188. The woman in the video could be relatively attractive if she arranged herself better. Even more impactful would have been a change in spirit. Though genetics influence the aging trajectory of a woman, spiritual health should not be ignored in this. Her face is the one permanently altered by bitterness and sheer spiritual darkness (not unlike Dorian Gray’s protrait). Had she grown up with a sweet disposition and the ability to take joy from her femininity and treating human beings in a loving manner, she could be far less repulsive and would probably have a far more youthful looking face.

    Like


  189. […] On By With a tip of the hat to Roissy- http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/10/20/compare-and-contrast-two-bitter-ex-lovers/ and various others, as this has created a bit of a stir on the net, a man lashes out at his […]

    Like


  190. “You write like Dorothy Parker and William F. Buckley having awkward, thoroughly unpleasant sex.”

    Kinky! I’d love to see a right-wing Dorothy Parker. Well, thre was Florence King…

    Like


  191. […] “Why So Serious?“, “Fat and Happy Girl is Fat and Happy“, “Compare and Contrast: Two Bitter Ex-Lovers“, “Sarcastically Disqualifying […]

    Like


  192. Todd and Taylor are the same except one is a nearly middle aged graduate of brown university and perpetual talking head who works for Fox News and the other is a hot blond teen queen pop princess who works as a highly successful artist. He needs a firm, she makes her own firm.
    Seavey came off as a passive-aggressive loser, and it doesn’t surprise me because the man is highly insecure about his “intelligence” and existence.
    I wonder what Seavey would do if Kayne hijacked an award Seavey was being presented. It might get ugly.

    Like


  193. […] because the average woman is biologically more valuable than the average man, every girl is born perched atop a pedestal. The doctor holds it upside down, […]

    Like


  194. @askjoe

    Scorned men on the other hand can only do well by moving upward on onward (I am thinking of the Mudshovel video).>>>>

    But it’s only truly moving onward and upward when a guy doesn’t punish good, sweet, 100% loyal women for a former whore’s transgressions.

    Like


  195. your evolutionary biology’s off. true, eggs are more expensive than sperm, and a man could impregnate and keep an entire tribe going. however, the main concept of evolution is variation. genetic variation. which you cant get from one dudes sperm… kthx

    Like


  196. Chris Willman is indeed a male. I googled him.

    Like


  197. […] So what do we make of the reader’s bold contention that “groupie sluts” are worse long-term prospects than “inclusive sluts” because of the potential that a stray man meeting her Template would quickly and easily tempt her to infidelity? Should men who are seeking LTRs drop any women from consideration who express a fasciation with, say, pasty-faced activist anarcho-libertarians? Should a man who meets a woman’s template worry that he could be replaced by another, similarly templated man? Live by the template, die by the template? […]

    Like


  198. chainring: you are one bitter dude!!!

    Woman, western or not, don’t need you. It’s funny though that you probably think you can get some if you leave the country- I imagine you are implying that you either take advantage of girls in third world countries, or you pay!

    Like


  199. @GirlyGirly- wow, a critique on a woman’s physical attractiveness! That is exactly what was missing on this page! It must have taken you days to work that out. Good-for you!

    Like