Arjuna, You Magnificent Beta!

Between the time when the suffragettes subverted America and the rise of the dykes of feminism, there was an age undreamed of. And unto this, Arjuna, destined to bear the jeweled crown of Beta Overlord upon a pansy brow. It is I, his chronicler, who alone can tell thee of his saga. Let me tell you of the days of great emasculation…

The Beta of the Year contest is over, but the disease that atrophies the balls of the gender formerly known as men continues plaguing large swaths of modern manhood. If anything, the mass sack shrinkage has reached epic proportions. As soon as I read the title of this Huffpost piece — The Art of Worshiping Women — I knew I was about to be treated to a particularly appalling case of pedestalisus dwindling testicularisis.

Meet Arjuna Ardagh, a self-declared “awakening coach, writer, teacher and public speaker”. A few choice bits of his relationship advice follow. If you had to imagine what the polar opposite of the advice given on this blog would look like, he’s your… “man”.

I’d been out for a walk with Chameli, my wife, one evening. Overwhelmed with the feeling that it just couldn’t get any better than this, I popped a little update on Facebook in celebration of the goddess I’m married to.

Try to control your puke reflex, because it only gets worse from here. As if it needed to be noted, calling a woman a “goddess” is bad game. It’s best to think of obsequious flattery like this in terms of the handicap principle. Abject betaness can be, paradoxically, an indicator of alphaness, if you are high status in some way, or the woman of your cloying cheesiness already loves you. Arjuna Ardagh sells books full of new age claptrap, and speaks to rapt audiences hanging on his every word, and so he has cashed in his high social and presumably financial status for a non-ugly wife, despite his counterproductive relationship advice. And let’s not forget that there is a conspicuous minority of dippy hippie chicks that lap up this holistic chakra new age bullshit. Framing — something Arjuna would be familiar with but will never admit to using in his personal dealings with women — is apposite. You can safely call a woman a goddess if it is wrapped and bowtied in a shitstorm of goofy mysticism.

It reflected on the wisdom of being in worship of the feminine. Not just get along with, or tolerate, or befriend, or cooperate with. Yes, I said what I meant: to worship the feminine.

Worshiping women is the fast track to involuntary celibacy. Women are, on average, biologically higher value than men, so worshiping them will only exacerbate an already skewed value perception and violate their hypergamous impulse. This is why concepts like negs and qualification are so successful; they strip women of their inborn royal decree and raise the value of the man using them.

Anyway, alphas don’t worship. They admire. There’s a difference.

Whether [Romeo and Juliet] liked it or not, they were carrying the inheritance of a conflict that they had each done nothing personally to create.

The same thing would be true today if an Israeli fell in love with a Palestinian, or if a Tea Party member fell in love with a Muslim, or if a Roman Catholic from Dublin fell in love with a Protestant from Belfast.

One of these comparisons is not like the others.

None of these meetings happen in a bubble. They all sit within the context of conflicts that have been generated in the collective. This same is true whenever a man enters into relationship with a woman. Of course, the man himself has likely never raped anybody, or burned any woman as a witch, or denied anyone the right to vote, or forced a woman to hide her face, or barred her from religious or political office, or forced her to perform subservient chores. “No, no,” such a man might say, “I’m a conscious man. I’m respectful of the feminine. I’m fully supportive that you do your thing.” Whether he likes it or not, that man still carries within himself the echoes of the collective masculine and, like it or not, every woman is an incarnation of the collective feminine.

Ah, the age old “sins of the father” tripe. Nevermind that his list of masculine “sins” never really happened the way he says, or in the numbers he believes. Nevermind too that woman have committed equally noxious sins against men that don’t get front page treatment because women tend to execute their evil without the razzle dazzle of physical violence. Cuckoldry, for instance, is a gross injustice against men that rivals serial raping in the evil sweepstakes.

The man carries on cleaning his gun and watching football, waiting for his woman to bring his dinner and his beer. The woman, still locked into millennia of enforced subservience, acquiesces, but bitter all the time, and holding back the treasures of her real love.

Lemme guess, an Obama voter? In the progressive mentality, men are forever perpetrators, women and minorities forever victims. Any other perspective would be… cognitively dissonant.

He distances himself as far as possible from the brutish behavior of his father and his ancestors and bows sheepishly to the newly emerged feminine power. The woman, now rebounding in resentment of how her mother and ancestors have been treated, becomes dominating. She becomes militant, unforgiving, and even castrating. The sad thing is, no one really enjoys this game either.

This is the Iron John bone that slimy creeps like Arjuna throw to their male readers. Don’t be fooled. Those bongo drums in the woods and guttural chants aren’t going to get you laid.

We discover that masculine and feminine are energies, not just biological genders. Every man has some masculine and some feminine energy and so does every woman. The balance we seek is not only between men and women but between the masculine and feminine energy, which are to be found everywhere in life.

What he’s talking about here is vulnerability game. But you must first demonstrate masculine alphaness — either through “leader of men” social status and domination or through “sexy lover” aloofness and cockiness — before you can move to the stage of seduction where she is open to hearing about your feminine side. It should also be noted that this “masculine/feminine energy dichotomy” that books like “Way of the Superior Man” have popularized is a bit of sloppy BS. Couples in sexually polarized relationships are the most successful — and often the most physically beautiful — that we see in the state of nature. Women aren’t drawn to sensitive men; they are drawn to masculine men who display traditionally feminine virtues, such as nurturing and emotional closeness, in a distinctly masculine form.

The feminine way is neither inferior (as we had deemed it for thousands of years) nor is it superior (as some have claimed in the last decades), but it is different. Through a synergy of masculine and feminine strengths, we find the emergence of a whole that is far, far, far greater and the sum of it to individual parts.

Nah, fuck that wishy-washy noise. The feminine way is inferior at building and maintaining civilization. It’s superior at raising brats to weaning age.

The restoration of dignity to the feminine has happened in three stages over the last century. The first took place less than 100 years ago with suffragettes demanding the right to vote. At that time men moved from denial and ridicule, to violent opposition, to acquiescence and finally to support.

And soon, back to global financial and demographic crisis.

The next wave came in the 1970s when women stepped forward to fully participate in the world man had created on his own terms. Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi became heads of state (both in a woman’s body but doing things in a very masculine way). Women became judges and politicians and engineers and doctors and lawyers and ministers and construction workers, all roles that had previously been mainly reserved for men. Again, men’s response began with ridicule in the ’50s and shifted to acquiescence and then awkward support.

Actually, women mostly became PR flacks, HR drones, and bitter single moms. Most engineers, doctors, pols and construction workers are still men. Not sure about the gender balance of lawyers, but just look at the decay that occupation is in. Didn’t Carly Fiorina run HP into the ground?

The third wave of the restoration of feminine dignity has really happened in the last few years. It is sometimes called “The Goddess Movement.” We are, all of us, recognizing that there is a feminine way of doing things just as valid as the masculine. Women are realizing that they don’t have to compete or even participate in the world that man has created on his terms. We realize that there is a feminine expression to spirituality, a feminine expression to ecology, a feminine expression to leadership, and each has a huge gift to offer.

National decline?

Women have been disenfranchised for thousands of years.

Maxim #198: Use of the word “disenfranchised” or other similar nomenclature of deconstructivist post-modern pablum automatically discredits an argument for serious consideration.

Feminine energy has been given very little respect, and we have all lost out as a result. Even if you’ve never disrespected the feminine yourself, the first step is still to say “I’m sorry. I’m sorry for what we have done. I’m sorry for what my gender has done. And I come to you with a fresh start.”

“Please accept my application for position of eunuch beta orbiter to you and your girlfriends.”

This is not the stance of shame, but of honesty and self-respect. Please take our words for it, and that of thousands of our colleagues and students: women love to hear this being acknowledged.

What women claim to love to hear and what women actually love to hear from the men they are fucking are often, if not always, at complete opposites.

The second shift that today’s man can make is to fully experience and release the hurts that he has experienced in his relationship to women. It is those very hurts, both personally and collectively, that cause men to dishonor women, if they remain banished out of awareness.

Pussy stubble chafes my shaft. End the hurt ladies. Wax that shit.

The third shift is for man to recognize how much he really loves feminine energy: how much he loves her beauty, her capacity to love, her laughter, her freedom to feel and express emotion. In some senses, she brings vivid color to his world, which can easily become black and white.

All right, this is obviously true. But appreciating and loving feminine energy doesn’t mean you have to act or think like a self-flagellating dweeb with undescended testes.

Man can discover, and then learn to worship, the feminine face of the divine. People sometimes object when Gay and I use the word “worship.” They hear the hierarchy of a subservient relationship.

Paging Robin Hanson’s forager theory. So many self-flattering “progressives” cream their panties at the thought of returning the US to some imaginary edenic past where non-hierarchical foragers with their promiscuous, communal lifestyles free of jealousy, violence and sexual competition rule the day. Be careful what you wish for.

We use the word “worship” in a completely different way, one we found in our dictionary as: “to pay extravagant respect and admiration.”

Maybe menopausal middle-aged women with desiccated pussies like to be extravagantly respected and admired by their high status husbands who could step out with younger mistresses at any time, but a guy who pulls that weak shit on a hot babe in the prime of her fertility can expect a lifetime of aching involuntary celibacy. Even the underarm hair chicks won’t grease up for a blubbery Eastern mystic sycophant if he isn’t leading seminars of captivated audiences.

This kind of worship can easily be a two-way street. Gay and Kathlyn and Chameli and I endeavor to bring this quality of extreme respect and worship in both of our marriages, and it overflows into the rest of life.

Jesus Christ, they’re aging swingers. I’m sure the sex dungeon and vat of Viagra help compensate for their loss of desirability.

Arjuna Ardagh, congratulations! You are officially designated Supreme Universal ÜberBeta (SUUB). Your balls, and the balls of men who listen to you for relationship advice, are hereby tendered to Hillary Clinton where they will feel more at home.

Thank you, mewl again!





Comments


  1. First

    Like


  2. His truth and eloquence made my mangina tingle.

    Like


  3. I don’t have time to read the whole post now, but apart from the pro-feminist slant of the article (not the post), the most disgusting line I caught was the one where the author assumed that “everyone knows” the Tea Party is all about hating Muslims instead of about wanting smaller government.

    That kind of deliberate misunderstanding is what, in other centuries or in modern Russia, got a “journalist” killed.

    These kind of writers want no discussion, no debate.

    Like


  4. props to R for wading through this dreck. My eyes glazed over.

    Any take down requires a wife-pic.
    done:http://www.soulscode.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/arjuna-and-chameli.jpg

    Also, isn’t Arjuna a girl’s name?

    Like


  5. on November 12, 2010 at 1:08 pm The Man Who Was . . .

    Off topic, but here is an excellent article on birth rates. Turns out that even Singapore’s massive pro-natalist policies to raise them have utterly failed:
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/america's-one-child-policy
    Perhaps the lesson is that only completely non-feminist societies can reproduce themselves.

    I should say that I am not necessarily opposed to a slow, graceful decline in population. I’m not one of that deranged alliance of Catholic traditionalists (Hi, Mark Shea) or techno-utopian libertarians (Hi, Bryan Caplan) who want to pack people on this earth like sardines. (Apologies to Catholic trads and libertarians who don’t want to turn earth into some version of Coruscant.) But a demographic collapse, especially among the more intelligent, doesn’t look like a good thing, and it encourages our elites to indulge in some pretty destructive policies like too much immigration.

    Like


  6. on November 12, 2010 at 1:09 pm The Man Who Was . . .

    Link here</a.

    Like


  7. on November 12, 2010 at 1:16 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lzozozozlzolzozlzolz

    nice post rosssisissysyys!!!

    teh bankers cretaed fmeinism top transfer assetts form men to banksters zlozozozl

    while alos killingteh fmaily

    and murdeirng 50,000,000 unborns souls by WOMAN’S CHOICE alone zlozlzlzlzlzlzl buteehztz

    how da university works: feminism = debt & debauchery & divorce & Desecration machine/army lzozlzlzlzlzlgh weo

    lzozlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzozllzlz

    univeristies are at the tip (tit lzozlzlzoz) of our debt empire

    over the past thirty years or so univeristies desouled women in prima noctae assocking sessins (some of tehm secretly taped iwthout thei girls conthent as the neocons like it best) and they sent the army forth to 1) transfer assetts form menz, 2) destory the family, 3) murder 50,000,000 unborn innocent souls, 4) hype and sell sub prime loans while wearing short skirts lzozlzlzlzllzlzlz 5) lure men into marriage iwth their coconpirators the ministers who front the legal system that does what no pimp would wever do–charge men for past use of a pussy lzolsoslslslslslslslslsls

    the fembot army;s main corporate state job is to create debt debauchery destiutution debt divorce deconstruction and devastation lzozlzlzlz

    and they have succeeded!! lzozlzlzlzlzlzl

    today our debt deficit will be greater than the gnp!!!!1

    the feminsimt movement cooinnded with the largest greatest increase of debt ever known to namankinds lzozlzlzlzl this is because womenz who stamp their little feet and bitch and complain and tranfer and destory welath and say “me me m em e more material welath for me me me me for my gina!!!! it’s for the children (even though women aborted/killed/vacuumed 50,000,000 fetuss by their choice alone) lzozlzlz it takes a village–fund my village where we get to bang alphas and the betas pay for it whether we cuckold them in tehir homes or via the welfare state zlozlzozlzzlzl” and they bitch and complain and talk about handbags and butthex and twilight vampires and enocurage girls to long for and lust after undead bloodsucking vampire twilight monsters and butthexing douchebags and otehr things which make their bginas tingle repalced menz at univeristies menz who built invent iengineer buuikld invent reason truth write great books read great bookz think lzozlzl eb=engineer lzozlzlzozlzl replaced exaltation eand greatness with bdebt debuachery destitution lzozlz

    short beta men rose fast in teh unievristy as they were handed fiat bernanke cash fronm helicopter ben and they used it to surrpound themselves with syocphantic harems of womenze as all teh betas love honor worship tucker max their ultimate master because he rhymes with goldman sax and also he butthexes girls and films it woithout teh girlths ocnthent and the weekly stanadrd neocns repeat his lies lzozlzlzlzzl that he is six foot tall zlozzlzllzlzlzlzl honoring their #1 butthexual hero lzozlzlzl

    so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:

    http://community.feministing.com/2009/09/why-are-female-executives-publ.html

    Why are Female Executives Publishing Tucker Max?

    Saw this floating around. good question!

    MCCOY MOUNTAIN
    ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

    Ms. Priscilla Painton

    Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief

    RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Dear Ms. Painton,

    I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

    http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

    “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com

    http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

    Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

    –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

    http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system

    Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

    –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/

    “OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml

    Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

    Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

    “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

    What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/

    It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

    “Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

    So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?

    ” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.

    “Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/

    “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”

    It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .

    Best,

    McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD

    –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?

    the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

    What’s up with women these days?

    It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

    Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster

    http://gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster

    Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?

    Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?

    http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Does she get off on this?

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”

    Is that supposed to be funny?” –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:

    http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html

    http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html

    http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml

    “11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

    [I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

    [To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

    [To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

    [To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

    [To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

    11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

    Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

    ‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton

    http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html

    “What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”

    See? That is the clever banker ruse.

    Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.

    http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

    “A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
    and Government’s War on Fathers”

    “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

    The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

    –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

    “My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

    Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
    “I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

    What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

    http://www.amazon.com/End-Fed-Ron-Paul/dp/0446549193/

    Review for End The Fed
    “Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
    –Arlo Guthrie

    “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

    The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

    Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?

    And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

    “Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

    http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798

    Like


  8. on November 12, 2010 at 1:17 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    am i crazy lzozllzlz or did the fed really fund feminism & the desturction of the family lzolzlzzl

    hows comes barrack obama and groege bush never come out or came out agianst divocre? zlzozlzllzlzozlzozlzlzllzlzllzlzlzlzlzl ms. nancy levant writes:

    http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/18889

    Let me give the women of the West a clue – “liberation” means that you are free – free to think as you choose and free to create your life according to your efforts and your beliefs. I suggest to you that the “liberation” you have achieved through the misguidance of the feminist movement is false. I suggest that Westernized women are often miserable, overworked, and suffering due to separation from their children. Think of it this way – the feminist movement actually believed they could change the fundamental meaning and purpose of womanhood, biological and instinctual gendering, and that they could culturally remove children from mothers, and call it “liberation.” You are equally liberated to destroy any children that you don’t want. Wow. I guess that means that you have a great deal of power. Congratulations. It is far greater to be a drugged laborer than a mother. Let us thank the feminist movement for making this clear to us dim-witted females.

    If you are a woman in today’s new world, I suggest you read The Cultural Devastation of American Women. None of us have come unscathed through this new world culture, for it has been working on us for many, many decades. Once read, you will begin to decipher the facts from all the dialectic fiction. Read the other side for a change. Find out why you are, in fact, depressed and unhappy as contemporary women. Find out why your children are very much the same.

    And to the world’s feminists – I say this: You are the dumbest women who have ever walked the face of the Earth. Week by week, day by day, you are losing every right you thought you invented. You fell hook, line, and sinker into the dialectic, and you are nothing but dictator pawns to the larger mission of total control over people and freedom. What a shame when arrogance literally beats brains useless. What a crime and a shame when you brutally victimize the very people you claim to represent – much like all other destroyers of human freedom. The day will come when you and your brothers in crime will be fully understood for your true missions. The day will come when YOU finally comprehend what you actually stood for – the total denial of rights and freedom for all.
    Equally, and thanks to the help of the feminist movement, “mental health” has taken center stage in the lives of women and children in the United States. It is estimated that 25 million American women are now taking “anti-depressants.” In the 1980’s and 1990’s, it became chic to seek “therapy.” Women ran in droves to see “therapists” and to tell their social circles they were taking anti-depressants. The mental health complex has now arrived in every American school, and they are now arriving in America’s daycare centers. The main impetus for the mental health “advocates” is to screen and profile America’s families to see if they are religious, procreating, and if they are mainstreaming into new government citizens. All children who fall short are then redirected to the mental health industries, which then feed the big pharma complex, which 1) drugs children, and 2) determines who will be “fit” to reproduce in the future. Let us also wonder if the mass drugging of children – and new vaccines specifically targeted to pubescent female children – will not result in future “problems” with reproductive health.

    http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/18889

    http://www.rense.com/general80/sexsl.htm

    In the Preface to “Brave New World,” (1932) Aldous Huxley wrote:

    “As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends correspondingly to increase. And the dictator will do well to encourage that freedom…it will help to reconcile his subjects to the servitude which is their fate.”

    There is an inverse relation between sexual “freedom” and personal and political freedom. The sexual “liberation” of the past 50 years is part of the Illuminati bankers’ long-term plan to enslave humanity and make us love our slavery. Whether Sabbatean, Frankist or Communist, these Satan-loving Illuminati bankers always have promoted the sexual promiscuity which is now widely accepted.

    lozlzlzllzlzlzl!! –http://www.rense.com/general80/sexsl.htm

    http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/rockefeller_admitted_elite_goal_microchipped_population.htm

    Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population
    Hollywood director Russo goes in-depth for first time on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, including his prediction of 9/11 and the war on terror hoax, the Rockefeller’s creation of women’s lib, and the elite’s ultimate plan for world population reduction and a microchipped society

    Prison Planet | January 29, 2007
    Paul Joseph Watson

    Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has gone in-depth on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, who personally told him that the elite’s ultimate goal was to create a microchipped population and that the war on terror was a hoax, Rockefeller having predicted an “event” that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan eleven months before 9/11.

    Rockefeller also told Russo that his family’s foundation had created and bankrolled the women’s liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite.

    Russo is perhaps best known for directing Trading Places starring Eddie Murphy but was more recently in the spotlight for his exposé of the criminal run for profit federal reserve system, the documentary America From Freedom to Fascism .

    Currently undergoing more treatment in his fight against cancer, Russo made time for a sit down interview with radio host and fellow documentary film maker Alex Jones in which he dropped bombshell after bombshell on what Rockefeller had told him about the direction the world was being steered towards by the global elite.

    http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/rockefeller_admitted_elite_goal_microchipped_population.htm

    lozlzlzlzlzlz!

    say it ain’t so!!!

    lzozlzlzlzlzllzzllzz

    gimme some rtialinadderollandi’ll be ten foot tall ozlzlzlzlzlzlzlz

    Like


  9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arjuna

    One of the superhero husbands of the ultimate bitch in the epic.

    Theis guy’s just waiting for other men to share his goddess following the legacy of the great man.

    Stupid fucks don’t get that the whole concept of goddess is the foremost assault of gender equality on man’s highest concept.

    More absurdities from the famous indian epic:
    http://ovshake.blogspot.com/2010/10/oh-for-normal-birth.html

    Like


  10. Knocked off her perch, literally

    “How can she slap??”

    Like


  11. on November 12, 2010 at 1:37 pm Gunslingergregi

    See it will never be equal look at all the white nights even though she slapped him first.

    Fucking amazing.

    Like


  12. god. every time I want to comment, fucking GBFM goes and fucks up the whole thread…

    Like


  13. on November 12, 2010 at 1:42 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””””””’Between the time when the suffragettes subverted America and the rise of the dykes of feminism, there was an age undreamed of. And unto this, Arjuna, destined to bear the jeweled crown of Beta Overlord upon a pansy brow. It is I, his chronicler, who alone can tell thee of his saga. Let me tell you of the days of great emasculation…

    The Beta of the Year contest is over, but the disease that atrophies the balls of the gender formerly known as men continues plaguing large swaths of modern manhood. If anything, the mass sack shrinkage has reached epic proportions. As soon as I read the title of this Huffpost piece — The Art of Worshiping Women — I knew I was about to be treated to a particularly appalling case of pedestalisus dwindling testicularisis.

    Meet Arjuna Ardagh, a self-declared “awakening coach, writer, teacher and public speaker”. A few choice bits of his relationship advice follow. If you had to imagine what the polar opposite of the advice given on this blog would look like, he’s your… “man”.

    ””””’

    Dam dude you need to write a novel like the gunslinger type shit about a beta who becomes alpha or something or do you already do that he he he

    Like


  14. Slow graceful decline in population is one thing. Population decline with massive generational theft built into the next generation’s tax structure, no thanks. Replacing the old population with bat-shit insane savages from a “culture” that is unrecognizable as such? Fuck that sideways.

    there’s a difference between immigration and colonization, England has chosen poorly.

    http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/211097/Muslim-fanatics-bu

    Like


  15. on November 12, 2010 at 1:50 pm Ascending Alpha

    I can’t believe any man would actually listen to this guy. Even in the worst of my beta days before I read Roissy’s blog I still would have laughed at this pathetic guy.

    P.S. GBFM should stop posting. I think his comments are longer than Roissy’s post.

    Like


  16. Most engineers, doctors, pols and construction workers are still men.

    I figured Guns would get a kick out of this. It turns out that because diversity is America’s most important asset, that big firms aren’t hiring white males as engineers. So, that sucks for you guys going to school now. Hope that student loan collector understands.

    But to satisfy demand, these companies have to hite Female-Indians.

    Yup, in DC, the white girls all seem to be in PR.

    Like


  17. masochistic women love the abuse.. but emotionally healthy women require… alpha up so that you can beta when the lady needs the love and for some woody allen impersonating beta posing humor.

    Like


  18. on November 12, 2010 at 1:54 pm The Man Who Was . . .

    This guy’s wife has a gummy smile, but is otherwise quite cute.

    Like


  19. on November 12, 2010 at 1:55 pm The Man Who Was . . .

    I can’t believe any man would actually listen to this guy. Even in the worst of my beta days before I read Roissy’s blog I still would have laughed at this pathetic guy.

    True, but still this kind of stuff pollutes the cultural atmosphere. We all end up breathing in a bit of it.

    Like


  20. Arjuna, You Magnificent Beta!

    November 12, 2010 by Chateau

    The only cure for Western wussy woman worship is indulging in fantasies of Sarah Palin spreak out missionary style – with her ankles on my shoulders – or banging GBFM in her anal-tunnel.

    Like


  21. on November 12, 2010 at 2:09 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    Ascending Alpha
    P.S. GBFM should stop fucking. I think his cocka are longer than my leg.

    lzozozlzozoz

    Like


  22. on November 12, 2010 at 2:10 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    Firepower

    “The only cure for Western wussy woman worship is indulging in fantasies of Sarah Palin spreak out missionary style – with her ankles on my shoulders – or banging GBFM in her anal-tunnel.”

    lzozozlzoizkzowsjxhouisgxholsxjslzozoz

    you want to fantazie that i am a woamn as you bang me in the butt? lzolzlzlzlzollzz
    z
    zzkzozozzlz

    i bet you could get a book deal from sodom and shcuetster and soem bernanke cahses !!! lzozzllz

    Like


  23. Too bad he is not like his namesake, Arjuna the great Indian warrior. His teacher was Krishna. Alpha supreme.

    Like


  24. greatbooksformen GBFM

    Firepower

    “The only cure for Western wussy woman worship is indulging in fantasies of Sarah Palin spreak out missionary style – with her ankles on my shoulders – or banging GBFM in her anal-tunnel.”

    lzozozlzoizkzowsjxhouisgxholsxjslzozoz

    you want to fantazie that i am a woamn as you bang me in the butt? lzolzlzlzlzollzz
    z
    zzkzozozzlz

    as long as it gets you off, be whatever you want

    Like


  25. This foul “goddess” meme has been circulating since the 60s at least. Thank you Robert Graves and Shere Hite and all the other neo-pagan feminazi chimps who spawned this fakelore. Shows that the feminist movement is less about equality than the undermining of men.

    Like


  26. on November 12, 2010 at 2:20 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    dude butthex don’t get me off.

    it’s your idea lzozozozlzlzlzzl

    don’t try to put your cock in my anuthwhole and tell me it’s just nature’s away of saying hello zlozlzlozozozzllz

    Like


  27. on November 12, 2010 at 2:27 pm rebelliousvanilla

    I couldn’t read all the bullshit this guy wrote… I felt like I’m going to gag and right now I feel my goosebumps on my skin due to outright disgust. I’m not even joking, sadly.

    If I could call this man a pathetic impotent wimp to his face, I bet he’d take it with pleasure.

    Roissy, I can add a lot of words to disenfranchised for your list. Sustainable, fairness, tolerance, exclusive, inclusiveness, controversial, radical, fundamentalist, the obvious ones like fascist, Nazi, racist, sexist or the more elusive ones like equitable or social justice, vibrant, diversity, enriching. I can go on with these words. Anybody using any of them lost the debate in my books, if they use them in the leftie type of way. They’re the reductio ad hitlerum type variety words. Wooden language bullshit. I’m always entertained by Westerners not getting it, but I suppose it comes with the job of being Eastern European. Maybe you need some totalitarian regimes of your own and lots of suffering until you will get it.

    Like


  28. oh yeah, Palin!
    These libtards are all about the goddess meme unless it’s Palin. Mention her name, they go back to “she’s a witch, burn her!” pretty quick.
    And Palin’s got kids, her looks, and a hubby.
    http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/09/milk/

    Like


  29. on November 12, 2010 at 2:31 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey you fuckatrds zlzozlzzzl

    the womenz psychology is it is for teh chdidlreneen

    by funding women’z studioes prorgams the bankers endlssavwved menz zlzozllz

    http://www.savethemales.ca/000180.html

    lozozozozlz byttehetxualal

    THE COMMUNIST CHARACTER OF FEMINISM

    Feminism’s roots in Marxist Communism explain a great deal about this curious but dangerous movement. It explains:

    •Why the ” woman’s movement” hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept like “equality” on a personal, biological and mystical relationship.

    •Why the “women’s movement” also embraces equality of race and class.

    •Why they want revolution (“transformation”) and have a messianic vision of a gender-less utopia.

    •Why they believe human nature is infinitely malleable and can be shaped by indoctrination and coercion.

    •Why they engage in endless, mind-numbing theorizing, doctrinal disputes and factionalism.

    •Why truth for them is a “social construct” defined by whomever has power, and appearances are more important than reality.

    •Why they reject God, nature and scientific evidence in favour of their political agenda.

    •Why they refuse to debate, don’t believe in free speech, and suppress dissenting views.

    •Why they behave like a quasi-religious cult, or like the Red Guard.

    It is hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name. Communism is designed to give power to the puppets of central bankers by fostering division and conflict. Divide and Conquer. Having failed to peddle class and race war, Communism promoted gender conflict instead. In each case they fostered a sense of grievance in the target group. Now the traditional feminine role “oppressed” women.

    The “diversity” and “multicultural” movements represent Communism’s attempt to empower and use other minorities, gays and “people of color,” to further undermine the majority (European, Christian) culture. Thus, the original CPUSA trio of “race, gender and class” is very much intact but class conflict was never a big seller.

    The term “politically correct” originated in the Russian Communist Party in the 1920’s. Its usage in America today illustrates the extent society has been subverted. Feminist activists are mostly Communist dupes. The Communist goal is to destroy Western Civilization and establish a veiled dictatorship called “world government” run by the toadies of the central bankers.

    We have seen this destruction in the dismantling of the liberal arts curriculum and tradition of free speech and inquiry at our universities. We have seen this virus spread to government, business, the media and the military. This could only happen because the financial elite in fact sponsors Communism.

    In Communism, government is the ultimate monopoly. It controls everything, not just wealth but also power and thought. It is the instrument of monopoly capital (i.e. Rothschild, Rockefeller.) Everybody from the President on down works for them.

    Like


  30. The cognitive dissonance here is all the more jarring because Arjuna is the name of the great Hindu warrior and the protagonist of the Bhagavad Gita. Krishna was his charioteer, for chrissakes.

    Like


  31. By the way, this Arjuna Ardagh is about as Indian as Sonny Liston. His real name is Nick Ardagh and he hails from that exotic realm of the Orient called Hampstead, England.

    Another self-loathing Westerner adopting oh-so-superior Eastern beliefs

    Like


  32. that guy shouldn’t be allowed internet access.

    “The feminine way is neither inferior (as we had deemed it for thousands of years nor is it superior***(as some have claimed in the last decades), but it is different.”

    ***then why put the pussy on a mystical pedestal, bro? why?!

    Like


  33. on November 12, 2010 at 2:43 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey rosisissyssysy

    tonight i am going outt to lick osme pusususysy psussy some nice hot 21 yo pussy yummy pussy i love licking eating yum yum lozlzllzlzlzlzl

    but before i go out i always go to teh bookstore on firdays to brwose teh fornt tabelss

    and i want to see your book! i want to want to wnat to1!!!!!! wsee eit now!! !lzozolzolzlz show me show me shwo me!!

    i want a orissy vbbook 1,000 pages on teh bfornt tables of banres an oble or borders before it all collapses and the three horses ride on down the white horse and end it all in bang or a whimper as i bang bang bangand she whimpers “more mor emore more!!!”zZ:Z;z;zz lotsa gbfm cockaksksks!!!1

    Like


  34. Cap’n bob

    Sure, next you’ll try to tell me the Ramones weren’t really brothers.

    Like


  35. askjoe

    oh yeah, Palin!
    These libtards are all about the goddess meme unless it’s Palin.

    liberals, like GBFM, hate Sarah P for her exquisite legs and svelte, plowable ass.

    to imagine her in black silk thighhighs, posing erotically on a Russian Sable bedspread, is to make lesbo converts of even a Patty Murray.

    if gbfm feels discomfort in being attracted to Sarah’s irresistible charms, then that is a personal issue.

    Like


  36. ” The restoration of dignity to the feminine has happened in three stages over the last century. The first took place less than 100 years ago with suffragettes demanding the right to vote. At that time men moved from denial and ridicule, to violent opposition, to acquiescence and finally to support.”

    And soon, back to global financial and demographic crisis.

    Too funny… it’s why I keep coming back – you’re the best Roissy!

    Like


  37. on November 12, 2010 at 2:48 pm Mr. Happy's Conscience

    The only way you should “worship” women is to give them multiple screaming orgasms that burn a hole in their brain.
    Everything else is just noise.

    Like


  38. Men neither buy nor read the books these guys write.

    Note that this whole industry and its magical thinking is entirely feminine.

    Like


  39. Mr. Happy’s Conscience

    The only way you should “worship” women is to give them multiple screaming orgasms that burn a hole in their brain.

    never give
    women
    gifts

    Like


  40. haha, Iowahawk nailed that one:
    http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2010/05/hi-there-neighbor.html
    “Special Guest Commentary
    by the Sarah Palin Homunculus that Lives Inside Liberals’ Heads”
    “I mean, you have the strangest look in your subthalamus. Oh…! Oh, this. The bikini. Funniest thing. Turns out once I’m inside a liberal’s head, It’s like poof! Off with the clothes. I tell ya, it’s gotten to the point that I really don’t even notice it anymore. No, don’t be embarrassed or ashamed, most of your friends don’t even give me the bikini.”
    Trying to find that iconic photo of Palin on stage looking sharp led me through too much hate-filled lefty fanatasies. This internet thing is scary, so here’s the leftwing counterpoint to sarah, the hillary bust:
    http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/G0FW0WZwVpEjJR6Y-llD7ZxjYak3cyQUYZANg51xnvo?feat=embedwebsite

    palate cleanse with what you wish your first wife looks like at 46.

    http://style.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978296892

    Like


  41. Nice Conan reference.

    Like


  42. on November 12, 2010 at 2:59 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Oh, and related to the social engineering about integration and sexism, they are like the Soviet things of changing a man too. Sure, there are no Gulags, but that was inefficient anyway.

    Gorb, I don’t think women do either. While I don’t really relate to Western women since I find most to be trash and considering that not having a penis means that I have no reason to be interested in them, I can’t honestly believe a guy can make a living out of writing that. I think that most of his money is from universities buying his books or something. lol

    Like


  43. GBFM

    You are an inspiration and a hero. Along with Roissy, you have given us much to think about regarding the Fed, feminism, cockas, and being the best alpha you can be. Part of that means seeing clearly through the bullshit that society throws at men.

    As for the naysayers on the board: fuck em.

    Like


  44. I called it first in an older discussion!

    Good that CR picked it up and ran with it for the touchdown!

    Like


  45. on November 12, 2010 at 3:05 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    “Firepower
    askjoe

    oh yeah, Palin!
    These libtards are all about the goddess meme unless it’s Palin.

    liberals, like GBFM, hate Sarah P for her exquisite legs and svelte, plowable ass.

    to imagine her in black silk thighhighs, posing erotically on a Russian Sable bedspread, is to make lesbo converts of even a Patty Murray.

    if gbfm feels discomfort in being attracted to Sarah’s irresistible charms, then that is a personal issue.

    lzoozozlz over 40 ain’t too sporty zlozlzozzlzl

    especially when hotties in tehir 20 twenties are plenties

    lzozozozlzl

    fireboawrer fanstaizzing about doing sarah palin grandmortehr and doing me up teh butt while pretending i’m a girl lzozlzlzl

    lzozolzlzzlllzlzlzllzozozo firepower is buttpwoer

    Like


  46. Dr,

    They weren’t? And there was me thinking that they were the greatest family act of all time.

    It’s funny though to see a limey Nick from Hampstead adopting all the panoply of
    dodgy eastern new age.

    Like


  47. Probably the most painful post I have ever read. Why? Because 3yrs ago, I was one of those spiritual betas who read all the works of Paulo Coelho and believed all that spiritualistic quasi religous bullshit that that tool box puts in his books. All thanks to be a complete man-bitch and being totally head-over-heels and dominated by an 8. This post and the one about getting over your “oneitis” have been the most instrumental for me. Dont be too hard guys, I was a serious beta who had no idea about my own self worth.

    Good post Roissy. Hurry up with the book mate.

    Beta in London.

    Like


  48. rebelliousvanilla

    I don’t really relate to Western women since I find most to be trash and considering that not having a penis means that I have no reason to be interested in them,

    no offense, but c’mon, you’ve never seen a penis irl before.

    Like


  49. on November 12, 2010 at 3:19 pm Anonymous coward

    I dare you to show me how a society can build and maintain civilization without raising brats to weaning age.

    Like


  50. on November 12, 2010 at 3:20 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Firepower, I see that you’re still upset about me not wanting to share picture with you. It’s been like what, now? Two months? I can’t imagine what you do when girls turn you down for sex – or you’re probably getting internet in jail where you’re locked up for assault rape. lol

    Like


  51. Every man has some masculine and some feminine energy and so does every woman. The balance we seek is not only between men and women but between the masculine and feminine energy, which are to be found everywhere in life.

    This guy thinks he’s Carl Jung. There has never been a more potent advocate for AFCism in the history of psychology than Carl Jung. Feminists wallowed in his theories like pigs in sh!t in the late 60s and early 70s, and still do today. In fact every romantic comedy ever produced finds it’s roots in Jungian ideology. He’s personally responsible for the anima / animus “theory” that popular culture swallowed wholesale in order to uniquely identify better with the feminine (which of course got him laid by his patients quite a bit back in the day).

    Carl Jung was the ultimate pimp of his era. The guy did more to promote a feminized agenda than any individual in history, but the guy regularly banged his exclusively female “patients” with his wife’s consent.

    Most laypeople have no idea about Jung’s influence on modern society, but much of what we take for granted about gender is rooted in his theory. However, most people are too lazy to educate themselves about it and think that psychology in general is all new age, Dr. Phil, psychotherapy.

    Carl Jung is the messiah of feminists because his personality theories jive so well with the agenda. But put behaviorism infront of them and they’ll tear their hair out finding ways to prop themselves back up.

    You see feminism (and homosexuality) rely on the idea that gender is taught not innate. It’s a classic nature vs. nurture paradox. And they’ll use this conveniently and interchangably. To them, little girls are little girls because society defines their gender in their upbringing (play with this pink dolly), but ask them to explain why gays are gays and it has nothing to do with their behavior or their environment, now it’s genetic – they can’t help it they, were born that way. The problem is that this contradicts itself. If gender is learned, then homosexuality is all learned/reinforced behavior, but if gender is inherent then feminism is a sham as women are fighting against a psychobiological order. They can’t help it they were born that way, right?

    So what is it? Nature or nurture? We’re still studying this and more & more it’s leaning toward nature, but that’s not to discount nurture. Our behaviors may be an expression of our own biology and this can filter down into our social structure. I can’t answer this accurately, neither can many well versed biologist or psychologist, but don’t let that stop feminists.

    Liked by 1 person


  52. These comments need some moderation.

    Anyway I don’t think it’s quite so straight forward that he’s a beta in the classic doesnt-do-it-for-me-sexually/provider beta stereotype. The question is does he believe what he says or not. The classic cult leader/bullshit peddling mystic guru is not a beta. He is a very practical con man, sometimes insane, usually the independent alpha type. “Osho” was a degenerate new age mystic and bullshit peddler with 100 rolls royces and a harem of women. By the standards of this blog he would be a super alpha (which says something about those standards). Just because this guy broadcasts this very beta shit doesn’t necessarily make him one.

    Like


  53. rebelliousvanilla

    Firepower, I see that you’re still upset about me not wanting to share picture with you.

    so…
    i wanted to see
    your boobs. Shoot me

    besides, i was merely stating you’ve never seen an angry one before: because you’re so very young

    we all were young once and inexperineced – even dana

    Like


  54. “The woman, now rebounding in resentment of how her mother and ancestors have been treated, becomes dominating. ”

    I wonder if morons who write things like this have a concept of ancestry where women are descended only from women and men are descended only from men.

    Like


  55. I was born 40

    Like


  56. ASDF raises a point, I think. There’s a difference between the cult leader, when he knows he’s a scammer, with his harem and guys like this who superficially want to be like the cult leader. Where the magnificant betas reject their own culture and glom full on to the BS.
    Reminds me of going to Bikram Yoga. Despite all the hype, it’s just a gimmick and Mr. Bikram turns out to be a tool. His followers, however, bought in.
    Sure, Bikram’s alpha.

    Like


  57. on November 12, 2010 at 3:48 pm Dr. Grzlickson

    “These comments need some moderation”

    GBFM needs an IP ban.

    Like


  58. @rebelliousvanilla
    “Roissy, I can add a lot of words to disenfranchised for your list. Sustainable, fairness, tolerance, exclusive, inclusiveness, controversial, radical, fundamentalist, the obvious ones like fascist, Nazi, racist, sexist or the more elusive ones like equitable or social justice, vibrant, diversity, enriching.”

    Ah, yes

    Sustainable = we need to be careful about resources,
    and I will be your permit Raj

    Fairness = I get to define who should have what, regardles
    of merit, productivity or anything else.

    Tolerance = we just love Muslims who want to subjugate us

    Exclusive, Inclusive: Used indiscrimately as buzzwords.

    Controversial = Way out of mainstream people I agree with
    (see also panegyric and hagiography)

    Controversial = People whom I disagree with
    (see also Rapacious, Self-serving , corrupt, and some
    of the stuff below).

    Radical (see Controversial)

    Fundamentalist (see Controversial, mainly second definition)

    Nazi, Racist, Sexist (see Controversial, second definition)

    Equitable (see Fairness)

    Social Justice (see Fairness)

    Social Justice in my vocabulary: Everybody gets to keep
    what they produce or earn.

    Vibrant (see Controversial, first definition)

    Diversity = discrimination against white men.
    (It NEVER means ideological diversity, on the contrary!)

    Enriching (see Controversial, first definition)

    Etc.

    Thor

    Like


  59. on November 12, 2010 at 3:56 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    “Dr. Grzlickson

    “These comments need some moderation”

    GBFM needs an IP ban.”

    Dr. Buttlickson needs a buttlick ban lzozlzlllzlzl

    Like


  60. dana

    I was born 40

    raoor
    too bad you’re married.

    still, i see a lot of our little rebelliousgirl in you:

    the Nordic Sisu
    the toussle of blond hair
    the gleaming riding boots
    the sneer as the Walther PPK
    is put to the back of the head

    ah, memories

    Like


  61. Roissy,

    Up until reading that article, the most beta thing I’ve ever read was this….

    xxxxxx – I love you today more than yesterday, but not as much as tomorrow. Thank you for everything you have given me…

    This is posted for all to see on an ex-girlfriend of mine’s husband’s Facebook wall. It’s listed in the info box below his profile pic. I dated this girl over 15 yrs ago and she was absolutely wild. I know her promiscuity continued at a quick pace after we split up so I’m sure she’s racked up some impressive numbers.

    It would appear, as you have written before, that as she continued to age, she had to settle for some beta that would be gay enough to write something like that and post it for all to see.

    But Arjuna has clearly taken over this guy’s crown. And yes, I know it’s kinda gamma to search for old flames on FB. On the other hand, it helps me appreciate some decisions I made early in life with regards to how some of these chicks look now!

    Like


  62. “The feminine way is inferior at building and maintaining civilization. It’s superior at raising brats to weaning age.”

    So you’re saying, if women were in charge, basically civilization resembles “Lord of the Flies”

    Like


  63. Maybe you need some totalitarian regimes of your own and lots of suffering until you will get it.

    As it is very easy to learn through means other than trauma our problem is that most of my fellow American’s don’t know who the fuck George Orwell is!

    Like


  64. Carl Jung’s anima/animus theory goes back to Weininger. But he can’t be adopted because his book will rip to shreds the whole equality canard.

    Like


  65. “So you’re saying, if women were in charge, basically civilization resembles “Lord of the Flies””

    Women have been given power over themselves, only to discover that they have no self. Women in charge is buffoonery.

    Like


  66. Actually, 2nd place goes to;

    Mayor Mick Cornett of Oklahoma City. He refuses to allow the LFL (Lingerie Football League) to operate a franchise team in the city. Now that’s a beta!

    Like


  67. Ratboy,

    Send the link. We wanna laugh too.

    Like


  68. on November 12, 2010 at 4:23 pm Vincent Ignatius

    Jesus fucking Christ! I think my testosterone levels plummeted reading that shit. People like this make the world a worser place.

    Like


  69. The only reason a man should ever put a broad on a pedestal is to look up her skirt.

    Like


  70. Here’s what they’ll be missing in OKC.

    Like


  71. An ultimate SWPL right there. God I’m fucking angry right now. Kick a leftie in the face.

    Like


  72. I have witnessed an interesting phenomena. I am sure many of you are aware of gender in language. See if you can guess what happens to boys who only hear their mother speak the gender based language. They speak in feminine form. I have little doubt this behavior is not isolated to this. With single motherhood on the rise, more pansies to come I think.

    Like


  73. Wake up white man…

    HBD, game, national denigration stem from the same urgent problem — white racial destruction.

    Like


  74. I had my girl riding me, orgasming everywhere, while I was watching Shark Week – reruns I think…shot a great big load on her as a Great White tore into something…anyway, I guess I’m not up to date with the modern trends…should I have been watching the View or Oprah instead, and then shot my load on the television??? Did not see Arjuna commenting on that…

    Like


  75. “Women have been disenfranchised for thousands of years.”

    Yeah, nature really fucked this up getting us here but we gonna fix that finally.

    “In 1934, in fact, French entomologist August Magnan and his assistant André Sainte-Lague calculated that bee flight was aerodynamically impossible.”

    I wonder when some idiot will open the flight school for bees?

    Like


  76. on November 12, 2010 at 4:52 pm Firecracker is gay

    “The only cure for Western wussy woman worship is indulging in fantasies of Sarah Palin spreak out missionary style – with her ankles on my shoulders – or banging GBFM in her anal-tunnel.”

    Like


  77. CR:

    Worshiping women is the fast track to involuntary celibacy. Women are, on average, biologically higher value than men, so worshiping them will only exacerbate an already skewed value perception and violate their hypergamous impulse. This is why concepts like negs and qualification are so successful; they strip women of their inborn royal decree and raise the value of the man using them.

    That’s basically it. The core of game. No, not just game, life. If a man understand this he’ll have considerably less problems with all women in his life, from long and short term girlfriends, to female family members, to female coworkers.

    Once you understand the fundamental truth you can add all the specifics like negs, subtle physical intimidation, agree and amplify, teasing, etc., and learn how to tailor your approach to different women.

    Liked by 1 person


  78. on November 12, 2010 at 5:02 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Thor, yes, those concepts are actually a lot deeper. Still, it’s quite amusing to see the same script played over and over again and people with the same beliefs arguing in between them – the Republicans and Democrats in the US are the same, for instance. Same universalism idiots.

    Just like Marxism and Americanism aren’t THAT different. And neither of these beliefs are that different from Christianity, if you remove the theological part from it and keep the ethics. I’d really love being an alien and observing people, just like I used to observe ants as a little girl. I’d find humans just as pathetic and laughable. But since, well, I’m human and part of the group who believes this nonsense with the most reckless abandon, I’m sadly emotionally involved into this mess. At least if I could live on an island with Nietzsche and HL Menken by ourselves… 😛

    Rollo, I disagree. Homosexuality, according to the left, is natural and should be accepted as such, while genders are social constructs. I can’t stop by laugh at how ridiculous this is – so, I can’t choose who I’m attracted to, but I will be able to choose what sex I am part of. NICE! And both Freud and Jung have made TONS of mistakes in their theories because they started out from the widely accepted premises of the time, which come from religion, not science. I wonder if evolutionary psychology will become the thing by the time I die and if society will be organized by it.

    Like


  79. “Pussy stubble chafes my shaft. End the hurt ladies. Wax that shit.”

    It’s gems like this that make this blog special.

    Like


  80. @ rebelliousvanilla

    Care to define “Americanism”?

    Like


  81. Ratboy,

    Thanks.

    Like


  82. “just like I used to observe ants as a little girl. I’d find humans just as pathetic and laughable. ”

    They would be laughing at the gross underestimation some humans have of ants.

    Like


  83. Speaking of mewling, get a load of this: http://abagond.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/are-white-women-beautiful-or-is-it-society-that-makes-them-seem-so/

    Thread has taken an HBD turn as well.

    Like


  84. @The Man Who Was . . .

    Chameli Ardagh… this man’s wife… is NOT cute!

    Bad teeth and chunky

    Like


  85. Chameli Ardagh is a solid 5, no lower, no higher. Her flaky personality would disqualify her from most high value alphas, so she has turned to “Arjuna” (aka Nick), a guy whose skin has started to sag off of his bones due to his crappy all veggie diet.

    That said, I’ll bet that she’s getting alpha dick on the side.

    Like


  86. @ Hmmmm,
    You’re probably right about Chameli cheating. And if her husband found out, he would likely blame himself, since he seems to believe that women’s bad actions and anger are the result of male oppression.

    Like


  87. This is the kind of New-Age bullshit, spoken by snake-oils salesman, only interested in making the men around them beta to create their harems that makes my blood boil.

    Fucking hippies. I’ll keep Christianity any day before that. At least the way that Christians (the old school Christian, not the weak modern ones) say that people should behave makes sense.

    Like


  88. What kind of “white man” goes by a name like Arjuna Ardagh?

    Oh yeah, the dot-head worshipping self-hating feminist new ager type.

    My God, does England these days churn out these neo-commie bastards in a mass production facility or something?
    Although I really can’t say much better for the Diverse Snakes of America, can I?

    It’s going to be us, or its going to be them. Choose your future.

    Like


  89. What happened to Thursday? His blog is gone and I haven’t seen him post for a while.

    Like


  90. Maybe this guy is a lying sack of shit and is just really good at new agey claptrap? Maybe he has awesome game in reality and is secretly running a harem of flakey new age chicks. It’s happened before.

    Like


  91. oh sweet Jesus… where do u find this stuff

    Like


  92. […] aren’t drawn to sensitive men; they are drawn to masculine men who display traditionally feminine virtues, such […]

    Like


  93. Want manliness?

    On a Paleo/Exercise note.

    My ex wife saw me this past week. We went out to a club and she was there with her friends (all single but for one, a happily married woman who I know peripherally).

    My girl and I were talking and having a nice time, and on the way out, I nodded over to my exes direction. I smiled at her, a genuine smile, gave her the Salute we used to give each other (slight head nod, finger on the side of the temple), she smiled at me, nodded, and I walked out.

    Three days later, I bumped into common friend in the mall. She was alone, so I walked over and chatted.

    I mentioned I’d seen her a few days before in (club). She said – I know, I saw you, too. You were the subject of conversation.

    My ex wife said that life wasn’t fair. I didn’t seem to be aging. In my late 30s, I look better than I did when I was 30. She’s not aging well, at all.

    I shrugged it off and sad, talk to me in 15 years and see where it’s at.

    Secret:

    I went paleo three years ago; and exercise.

    I push weights three times a week, an hour and half each day. That’s all. No aerobics.

    I swear to you, weight training is halting the aging process. Forget that: It’s reversing it.

    For the past year, I’ve felt like a teenager on steroids. More sexual energy than I had when I was 25. More overall energy than I’ve ever had.

    Weight training, and stacking, my friends. Do it.

    Fuck running and veggie diets. Meat, vegetables, fruit, nuts, no grains. No oils. I can almost eat whatever I want – just no grains.

    With a country of 20-year-olds charged with a diet like this, we could conquer a few countries a week.

    Little vegetarian guys like this Arjuna mangina just make me wonder why we bother. Are men really going to take his advice?

    Seriously?

    I hope not.

    Liked by 1 person


  94. @ GBFM LOL! Thank you, I needed that to remedy a crap Friday afternoon (which would normally be a contradiction, but I’ve had a headache all day and now that I’ve enjoyed that GBFM novel I can engage with after-work bar sluts with relish and abandon now, headache forgotten).

    Like


  95. on November 12, 2010 at 8:05 pm Gunslingergregi

    ””With a country of 20-year-olds charged with a diet like this, we could conquer a few countries a week.””’

    uhh we already can do that.

    for now.

    Like


  96. The only thing that could knock this beta back to his senses would be if a nice brown baby popped out of his wifes vagina..

    ..then again, probably not. He’d probably rise to a “new-age” level of “awareness” about it….

    Like


  97. Arjuna should turn in his Man card. I hope his wife is getting big-dicked on the side without a condom.

    Like


  98. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Debi Levine, sirfith. sirfith said: Cuckoldry, for instance, is a gross injustice against men that rivals serial raping in the evil sweepstakes. http://bit.ly/aTiJkz #p2 […]

    Like


  99. Asdf,

    True about Osho – the murderous creep literally hoovered up the impressionable college girls. Even after his little biowarfare incident.

    So maybe our friend “Arjuna” (or Nick to his friends) is doing ok for himself. He still deserves to be vilified for his message.

    Like


  100. on November 12, 2010 at 9:51 pm Blessent mon coeur

    dragnet,

    It’s worse than that. A major theme, perhaps The major theme of the Bhagavad Gita is for a young man to summon the courage to enter not merely adulthood, but manhood; to decide, to commit to a course of action –despite the necessary sacrifices, despite the seeming dilemmas, despite the seeming disloyalties and seize upon life, to join the battle, to fight, to engage. The tale is not merely of, ok, once upon a time there was this great warrior. No, the story is of a Hamlet-type young man who overcomes his state of indecisiveness and _BECOMES_ the great warrior.

    The world is not perfect. He has competing loyalties on both sides of the field of battle, brothers on the other side. BGI, 47: “Thus spoke Arjuna in the field of battle, and letting fall his bow and arrows he sank down in his chariot, his soul overcome by despair and grief.” There follows one of the great speeches of all wisdom literature, wherein Krishna advises his friend Arjuna to arise, and live. He starts by emphasizing reason and truth, to deal with life as it is, not wishing it away. He goes through various ways of living virtuously, and eventually leads Arjuna to the conclusion of seeking the Infinite, of living, of creating, of self-control, of good-will.

    “In the battle of the Bhagavad Gita there is a great symbol of hope: that he who has a good will and strives is never lost, and that in the battle for eternal life there can never be a defeat unless we run away from the battle.” -Juan Mascaro, Penguin Classics, Introduction.

    This Ardagh, to paraphrase Mascaro, does not forward true emotion, but false emotionalism; not faith, but fanaticism; not imagination, but fancy; not a true vision, but a visionary illusion.

    Like


  101. Is there really a market for this bullshit besides dildo studies majors and credulous cat ladies?

    Like


  102. on November 12, 2010 at 10:22 pm Gunslingergregi

    Well hopefully the gay thing catches on then more woman available for harems.

    Take the good with the bad.

    Like


  103. @Feh

    Yes. Marrage 2.0 buyers that will do ANYTHING that wifey says so they don’t have to go to divorce court.

    With everything, the latter is still less painful. That says a lot.

    Like


  104. Prediction

    Within 5 years “Arjuna” will have turned into a serial killer of random females.

    Like


  105. I feel like I’ve just been figuratively hot karled by arjuna

    Like


  106. “‘I’d been out for a walk with Chameli, my wife, one evening. Overwhelmed with the feeling that it just couldn’t get any better than this, I popped a little update on Facebook in celebration of the goddess I’m married to.’

    Try to control your puke reflex…”

    Too late.

    Like


  107. The Arjuna of Hindu mythology and tradition had more than 40 wives AND he was the greatest human warrior.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arjuna

    “Arjuna had more than forty main wives and hundreds others in course of his adventures. Chief wives which played some role in the epic are listed”

    Like


  108. GBFM:

    Jesus Fuckin’ Tap Dancing Christ. Did you really need to take enough pixels to scroll though three pages just to say “Tucker Max Sucks”?

    FUCK!…

    Like


  109. should I have been watching the View or Oprah instead, and then shot my load on the television???

    A waste of cum, if you ask me.

    Like


  110. Over/Under on how many uncaring alpha assholes are fucking Arjuna’s wife behind his back: 3

    I’ll take the over.

    Like


  111. Gorbachev

    Men neither buy nor read the books these guys write.

    Note that this whole industry and its magical thinking is entirely feminine.

    Meaning, this whole mangina tactic can be a workable strategy to get you laid. Preach Manginism to a following of females, and you’ll get status within their hierarchy – rather than the male hierarchy.

    Not a bad gig, really.

    Like


  112. Not a bad gig, but the quality of that p is poor. He can have all the junk he gets.

    Like


  113. on November 13, 2010 at 3:45 am johnycomelately

    A Roissy classic, take a bow, bravo!

    Like


  114. on November 13, 2010 at 4:15 am Gunslingergregi

    ””””’Study purports to show that we can see into the future. No, really. ”””””

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/10/AR2010111005500.html

    Dam so we are attacking everywhere in middle east dam.

    Then it says saudi’s attacking people too.

    I predicted I would have a 100 g’s and I did.

    Predicted we would be killing with no feelings at all.

    And yea it is turning into a video game out there.

    Bombing the shit out of all these countries and not giving a fuck. Wild stuff.

    See you can predict future.

    Like


  115. Can’t agree more, haven’t heard anything more stupid than worshiping women. Isn’t this what all the AFCs do ?. And what do they get, their penises are still shrink rapped and will be forever if they keep ‘worshiping’ women.

    +1 to roissy

    Like


  116. Sustainable, fairness, tolerance, inclusiveness, equitable social justice, vibrant, diversity, enriching…

    LOL. Ok, I see your INCLUSIVENESS and I will raise you one DIVERSITY.

    “If only we could engage in dialogue to advance our collaborative niches, then we will understand how our AMAZINGLY dynamic intersectionalisms provide a counterbalance to our own very unique oppressions; therefore it is incumbent upon all global citizens to develop new ways of building more diverse, green, equitable, and sustainable communities.”

    Top that.

    Like


  117. WTF is up with the people who put first on every post. I want to slap the shit out of all of them.

    This guy is obviously castrated, I can only imagine what his wife looks like.

    Like


  118. on November 13, 2010 at 6:12 am rebelliousvanilla

    Tim, you made me recall that dialogue, pluralism and these type of words are fairly woody too. Consensus is another one. God, the leftists butchered the English language.

    Like


  119. “I’m always entertained by Westerners not getting it, but I suppose it comes with the job of being Eastern European. Maybe you need some totalitarian regimes of your own and lots of suffering until you will get it.”

    “Bitter clingers” always save America’s (pseudo-)intellectuals from themselves; it is the genius of this country. This is nothing new. The formula = plenty of guns and a spirit of self-reliance that transcends the political winds.

    Fortunately these types are strategic morons. All they’ve done now is put the clingers on a permanent state of alert, which will end vary badly for them (think their worst nightmare, a Constitutional spending limit amendment.)

    Like


  120. on November 13, 2010 at 9:03 am rebelliousvanilla

    JB, that’s still not going to change squat. The real battle is over culture, not economics. The fact that the debate is left only in the realm of economics show how pathetic so called conservatives are. Even those people with plenty of guns and a spirit of self reliance are complete idiots in terms of social views and core values – they’re not that different from leftists, actually.

    Like


  121. Well, I look at the two as intertwined, not separate. You can’t make headway in culture wars without defunding the Gramscian monster of academia. Cutting off money is (one of) the means to the end of cultural victory. In the years of 2013-2016 there will be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth as the entrenched Marxists get crushed under the wheel of necessary budgets cuts. I also expect some version of Horowitz’s Student Bill of Rights to put the fear of God into the out of control professors.

    All they’ll have left is Hollywood. I can live with that for now while some sort of alternative entertainment industry gains steam.

    Like


  122. In fact, my prediction is that by the early 2020s the leftists will have thrown in the towel of controlling the US through its own institutions and will begin agitating like crazy for a new world government.

    Like


  123. Well, have you considered that there are many people who have relatively low sex drives? The sort of love described by this man is very spiritual. The female brain and the male brain operate very differently. It is certainly possible to see a female as different and desirable even if you have no intention of screwing her very much.

    Of course, if this sort of behavior occurred in a “lower” species, our environmentalists would not be extolling the beauty of diversity but rather blaming environmental pollution for such bizarre and non-adaptive behavior.

    But, I don’t find these people irritating anymore. Just more noise in the background. People seem to forget that it was quite possible to live a good life, even the life of a country gentleman, right up to, and beyond, the fall of Rome.

    Like


  124. Words escape me I read this slack jawed.
    The whole thing made my skin crawl and I have been into some really dubious shit, literally.

    Like


  125. I’m quite sure he’s a scam. He knows what he’s doing, has a decent looking wife, has a harem on the side, and laughs his way to the bank.

    Like


  126. VJ and others, he may not be a scam. He may purchase the shit he’s selling.

    But we all have to admit, for some people who do it charismatically, selling beta makes you alpha.

    Like


  127. And leftist socialist notions are not entirely disconnected from reality. We do all of us often have community spirit and get a sense of pleasure from belonging to and participating in a greater whole. Load up on endorphins chemically, and you become a liberal.

    Some beta preachers were beyond rock star level liberal. Consider any famous Buddhist teacher. Talk about groupies! There ain’t no groupie like a spiritual groupie.

    Like


  128. Come to think of it, don’t a preponderance of Alphas preach beta virtues? Obey me! Be loyal! Be “good” (what I want you to do).

    Never look at what anyone says. Look at what they do.

    Like


  129. on November 13, 2010 at 1:00 pm religion = game

    Agree with xsplat. Religious leaders are running tight game.

    But the proof is in the pussy, and Arjuna’s wife is a 3/10. Guess that means he’d be celibate if he weren’t baffling women with mysticism.

    Like


  130. on November 13, 2010 at 1:10 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Original JB, people don’t switch core values over night. It takes a lot of suffering for it. And I don’t see Horowitz as a conservative. He’s fairly progressive too.

    Anybody who is into ideas, instead of being centered around people is a progressive. Sure, ideas matter to how you organize your people, but you must have a people first. And Americans and peoplehood are two paralel lines. Take the student bill of rights – you’re not supposed to give the podium to others. You impose your views and crush dissent. That’s how things should go. If anything, everyone should be emulating the Marxists because they’re the ones who actually know how to do squat.

    And I’m willing to take you on that bet. I hardly see any changes. And if spending will be cut, it won’t be for the important things like brainwashing, but from defense and the like. In the same time, the government can print money, so spending cuts aren’t really needed when you can fund yourself through inflation and shaft the idiotic Chinese.

    Like


  131. Pathetic. This guy isn’t part of the problem. He is the problem.

    As for the comments here, I’ve been seeing a pattern. Everytime some chick starts yapping her mouth like she knows a thing or two, you all start according attention to her and derail the conversation.

    Thank God for The Spearhead where these creatures have no voice thanks to the rating system.

    Like


  132. This Arjuna Ardagh video

    Sounds like he is running hypnosis “game.”

    “Take you even deeper”

    uses of “As you are…”

    “the attention can go…”

    etc.

    Like


  133. xplat,
    I agree you could be right. He might be buying his own shit, in which case the problem is not him, but those who buy his shit, and there are plenty of those. Hell, I know such people as well. I once knew a guy who always referred to himself as a ‘she’ whenever he posted something on the internet. He wasn’t gay or anything, I asked him once and he said it’s just out of solidarity for his feminist sisters. Talk about undescended testicles. But all said and done, if it makes you money, then go ahead. I’m not too sure how sincere this guy is, compared to our own Roissy, who just gives us advice without asking for anything in return, and certainly not money.

    Like


  134. on November 13, 2010 at 1:59 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lzozozozlozzlozlzlzoolz

    the women’s feminist movement coincided with

    1) the exoribtant unprecedented blow up of debt lzozlzozz
    2) the record killing of 50,000,000 unborn bevcause beenrnkae wall stereret calcuclated it owuld be chaepeare to improt pre-grown labor rather than take womenz out of workforece to raise it lzozlzozlz
    3) the blow up of divorcoeoe the fmeinist movement killed killed marriage as who wants an assocked embiuttered deosuled wife who is more loyal yto her mba asscocker boss and the fiat bernake dolalr than she is to fiaght the fmailiy and her man? lzozlzozoz
    4) the death of teh unievristy as all teh ginatingler anuthtinglers were funded by bernake to deocnstruct teh rgeat books for men zlzozlzlzozozo
    5) the rise and worshii[pping of the sodomite secrteiev taper of sodomeiet tucker max whymes with godlamn sax pulblised by lead ladies pricislkla panton painton clamp on starap on and chgarloote allene neoenoccon at the weekly standardth buttehxing cartelrl ozzlzlzoz

    Like


  135. on November 13, 2010 at 2:08 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    with chaortlotee allenene repeating the fiat lies abotut the douchecock asscocking’s height which he faked for his book cover tosos pricicslelia paioninton sodom and shcuster coucld sell more books all ccaoorss the land and fund hs asscocking docuhecock otuour to pelase bernnake greenspans weekely stabdard preemeptive war slzozlzlz

    Like


  136. on November 13, 2010 at 2:37 pm religion = game

    The video that Default User linked to is instructive. He’s giving commands, inviting listeners into a world where logic is totally unnecessary (gauche, in fact), and gaining complicity. Anyone who has had success blowing bitches’ minds with cold reading and other babble should recognize this as solid game.

    Still, his wife is ug.

    Like


  137. @Retrenched

    “Over/Under on how many uncaring alpha assholes are fucking Arjuna’s wife behind his back: 3

    I’ll take the over.”

    Behind his back! Please! He watches and celebrates.

    Like


  138. @gbfm- Is it an accident, would you say, that the debt crisis was the worst in Greece, a country with a known tradition of excessive butthexing? Please expound.

    Like


  139. @Original JB

    “In fact, my prediction is that by the early 2020s the leftists will have thrown in the towel of controlling the US through its own institutions and will begin agitating like crazy for a new world government.”

    Dude, they’ve been workin’ on this since the 1920’s, where you been?

    Like


  140. on November 13, 2010 at 3:05 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    “maurice

    @gbfm- Is it an accident, would you say, that the debt crisis was the worst in Greece, a country with a known tradition of excessive butthexing? Please expound.”

    does greeceee really have a lotsa buttheixng?

    tehre is no buttheixng in the ilaid and the odsysye

    there is no sex in the champaign room only buttyheixng zlozlzoz

    Like


  141. on November 13, 2010 at 3:16 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lzozozlozlzlzolz after going to a couple iron john drum beating circiles i diecided that i preferred a chick making a circle with her hadn and beating my coklck or using her gina circle or mouth circle but not her anuthcircle en route to lsozlzzolzozzlzslppoleoeoegegegegge!!!!1

    Like


  142. I believe ‘Arjuna’ (or Arjun) is a warrior character in some Vedic text, though which one I’m not sure.

    Everything…EVERYTHING in that article and his whole worldview is counterproductive, and if somehow he manages to score new-age groupie tang on the regular, then I give you the world’s biggest example of handicapping. At the same time, while coming across eminently beta…you just can’t ignore the fact that this is being lapped up left and right.

    The average 21-year-old hot chick gets more worship in a week than the average beta male does in a decade. I’ll never fail to be amazed and thankful at just how many guys who don’t seem to notice women trending towards guys who DON’T put them on pedestals.

    Like


  143. on November 13, 2010 at 3:43 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    “The cognitive dissonance here is all the more jarring because Arjuna is the name of the great Hindu warrior and the protagonist of the Bhagavad Gita. ”

    lozozozoz yah no shit!!!

    the baggavad gita is a great book for men!!!!!

    Blessent mon coeur

    dragnet,

    It’s worse than that. A major theme, perhaps The major theme of the Bhagavad Gita is for a young man to summon the courage to enter not merely adulthood, but manhood; to decide, to commit to a course of action –despite the necessary sacrifices, despite the seeming dilemmas, despite the seeming disloyalties and seize upon life, to join the battle, to fight, to engage. The tale is not merely of, ok, once upon a time there was this great warrior. No, the story is of a Hamlet-type young man who overcomes his state of indecisiveness and _BECOMES_ the great warrior.

    The world is not perfect. He has competing loyalties on both sides of the field of battle, brothers on the other side. BGI, 47: “Thus spoke Arjuna in the field of battle, and letting fall his bow and arrows he sank down in his chariot, his soul overcome by despair and grief.” There follows one of the great speeches of all wisdom literature, wherein Krishna advises his friend Arjuna to arise, and live. He starts by emphasizing reason and truth, to deal with life as it is, not wishing it away. He goes through various ways of living virtuously, and eventually leads Arjuna to the conclusion of seeking the Infinite, of living, of creating, of self-control, of good-will.

    “In the battle of the Bhagavad Gita there is a great symbol of hope: that he who has a good will and strives is never lost, and that in the battle for eternal life there can never be a defeat unless we run away from the battle.” -Juan Mascaro, Penguin Classics, Introduction.

    This Ardagh, to paraphrase Mascaro, does not forward true emotion, but false emotionalism; not faith, but fanaticism; not imagination, but fancy; not a true vision, but a visionary illusion.”

    LZOZOZOZOLLOZLZOZZOOLZ

    AND HERE IS WHAT TEH BAGVAD GITA SAYS ABOUT WOMENZNZ<ZZ ZZZ lzozlzozlzozl

    unlike whta jonah gldberg says, women do not tame men, but women must be tamed by the bagahvavad gita zlozlozzl

    lzozlzozlzozozloz zzlzlz

    HDTVs imported from China via fiat feature financial news channels with dancing girls in short skirts to celebrate the unheralded transfer—the exchange of wealth—of life, liberty, and happiness—for fiat debt. Interest rates are cut to zero on all tabs, and the booze flows as the spiritual and monetary debt burgeons, as the family—freedom’s fundamental building block (as noted by G.K. Chesterton et al.)—declines. And the Bhagava Gita and Old Testament are exiled from all business curriculums, alongside Penelope from Homer’s Odyssey and Beatrice from Dante’s Inferno:

    Eternal family traditions and codes of conduct are destroyed with the destruction of the family. Immorality prevails in the family due to the destruction of family traditions. (1.40) And when immorality prevails, O Krishn, the women of the family become corrupted; when women are corrupted, many social problems arise. (1.41) This brings the family and the slayers of the family to hell; —The Bhagavad Gita

    LZOZOZOZLZL WHEN WONMAN ARE CORRUPTED MANY SOCIAL PROLEBELMS ARRISE!! !LOZOZZOL THIS IS WHY THE DFED NEOCONS FUCND TEH ASSCOCKING WOF WOMEN THE DEOSULING OF WOMEN THE ASSCOKINGA ND ESOULING FOR MEOWMEN BERROFR SENDING THEM FORTH TO tempt men into marriage and tehn divroce them as atm mchines to work for slaves for teh bernake tucker max assockingdeosulingstates lozlzlz

    10 Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.
    11 The heart of her husband does safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.
    12 She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.
    —Proverbs 31. KJV

    W.B. Yeats penned The Second Coming in 1919—the same year the Weimar Republic was founded in the wake of WWI—prophesying of the fate of all things fiat:
    Turning and turning in the widening gyre
    The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
    Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
    Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
    The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
    The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
    The best lack all conviction, while the worst
    Are full of passionate intensity. . .
    . . . And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
    Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

    In 1913, the same year the Federal Reserve was founded, Woodrow Wilson wrote:

    We are at the parting of the ways. We have, not one or two or three, but many, established and formidable monopolies in the United States. We have, not one or two, but many, fields of endeavor into which it is difficult, if not impossible, for the independent man to enter. We have restricted credit, we have restricted opportunity, we have controlled development, and we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world–no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men. . . If the government is to tell big business men how to run their business, then don't you see that big business men have to get closer to the government even than they are now? Don't you see that they must capture the government, in order not to be restrained too much by it? — THE NEW FREEDOM, A CALL FOR THE EMANCIPATION, OF THE GENEROUS ENERGIES OF A PEOPLE, BY WOODROW WILSON.
    (THIS BOOK I DEDICATE, WITH ALL MY HEART, TO EVERY MAN OR WOMAN WHO MAY DERIVE FROM IT, IN HOWEVER SMALL A DEGREE, THE IMPULSE OF UNSELFISH PUBLIC SERVICE)

    Like


  144. Worshiping women is the fast track to involuntary celibacy. Women are, on average, biologically higher value than men, so worshiping them will only exacerbate an already skewed value perception and violate their hypergamous impulse.
    —————————–
    I generally appreciate much of what is written on this website, however, it is not true that women are of higher value than men. It takes no ability to have children as a man or a woman as a biological function; the real value lies in what manner children are reared. In this role fathers have proven to be invaluable, there is no evidence that societies that are based upon organization other than that of kinship will thrive.

    [Editor: Proof that men are genetically more disposable than women. I don’t make the message, I just deliver it.]

    Like


  145. on November 13, 2010 at 3:55 pm religion = game

    Take a look at Arjuna’s slow, deliberate body language. His low tone and measured pace. He controls the entire interaction. Sure it’s ghey that he’s holding another dude’s hand, but Arjuna’s woman-filled audience is likely captivated by the dominant undertone. His words say, “I like you, I want to help you” but everything else he’s doing says, “I’m smarter than you, logic doesn’t matter if I say it doesn’t, I can make you comfortable or deeply uncomfortable at will, your state of mind depends on my approval.” And the subject is reduced to obedience, confusion, and approval seeking.

    Like


  146. on November 13, 2010 at 4:16 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    a fiat dollar acts just like a gold-back dollar said greenspan, except that it loses its value lzozlzlzl

    today’s conservaives ar ejust like hume and burke and russell kirk, except hey are for butthexing foreign wars on forgeign shores bigger government abd buregeoing debt and more central power, but otehr than that, they are just like kirk/jefefrson/adams/madison zlozlzoozoz

    marriage is as good as it ever was other than that today your wife can fucka nd suck win anyone with abandon and teh fed folgadma asax lawyers fiat funded feminist banskteers will alooo encourage her to take your assests after butthexing toyru in her ass wioth otehr menz lzozlzlzlzl

    back when women were motehrs and agrandomotehrs serving god and church and having loving honorable fathers husbands communities in stable marriages dutiful wicves, they were disenranchised. today they are assocked doesule dpuped and dumped and empowerwed lzolzlzlzlzlzloz and jg sends his army of asscoked deosuled shamlesess embittered conniving modern women to go forth and tame men zlzollzzlzolzllzozolzo

    Like


  147. on November 13, 2010 at 4:32 pm religion = game

    By the way, whether another man is alpha or beta is more than just an academic question. Women will think you are a chump if you widely misjudge the gina tingle generating capacity of another man. Being unable to spot the sharks from the guppies is tantamount to nominating yourself for cuckoldry.

    [Editor: A good test of whether a man is an alpha or not is…. would you trust your girlfriend or wife alone with him?]

    Like


  148. on November 13, 2010 at 4:47 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    lzozolzozlzozlzzozzo

    but roissy the thing you gotta remember about alphas is that we get so much pussy pussy pussy hot pussy that we woudn;nt want our firends wives or sisters pussy as that would be pussy with a lot of problems zlzozlzozooolzozozoz as after all there is lotsa pussy out tehre but good firends are hard to find and i wouldn’t want to kill afriendship by puttingmy cock into a firnds girls ginahole or anuthwhole even as that is proppabel what she would like as that is how the fiat masters profgram thme on tv tehse days inand in teh shcools to serve therei snuth tingles over god morlaity justice lzozlzolzozlozlolzz

    Like


  149. on November 13, 2010 at 4:50 pm rebelliousvanilla

    old guy, more like the 18th century. 🙂

    Epoche, men are irrelevant in terms of societies. If you slaughter 90% of the men of a population, they will still be able to have a higher number of offspring than the current generation. Do that with slaughtering 90% of the women. Genetically, the death of men is inconsequential.

    In terms of building societies or doing much more than having children, we are pretty much irrelevant. But evolution doesn’t have to be pretty. Check the demographics of the last 80 years in order to figure it out and you can do it within the West to begin with – only the most pathetic scum had more children. And I agree that any society that isn’t built on kinship will utimately fail. I can’t wait for the moment when it will happen again though.

    Like


  150. on November 13, 2010 at 4:56 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    “Of course, the man himself has likely never raped anybody, or burned any woman as a witch, or denied anyone the right to vote, or forced a woman to hide her face, or barred her from religious or political office, or forced her to perform subservient chores…. Whether he likes it or not, that man still carries within himself the echoes of the collective masculine and, like it or not, every woman is an incarnation of the collective feminine.”

    So it stands to reason, then, that all men also carry within them the fact that pretty much every invention and device of modern civilization was the result of a man’s work. Including the Internet, where this guy gets to write this, and the freedom of speech that allows him to say it.

    Like


  151. “Check the demographics of the last 80 years in order to figure it out and you can do it within the West to begin with – only the most pathetic scum had more children. And I agree that any society that isn’t built on kinship will utimately fail. I can’t wait for the moment when it will happen again though.”

    I’m going to have a blog post about this later today. One point to be considered: there are groups within groups, if you don’t define them carefully you’ll overlook that the more fecund subgroups of a group will come to dominate it and its reproductive rate will go up.

    Can you elaborate on what you mean by “the moment when it will happen again”? Which society specifically, and what specific event will indicate the “moment” has arrived?

    Like


  152. on November 13, 2010 at 5:00 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    hey all you fucktards stating that men arene’t as valuable as owmen or blah blah blah blha lzolzlzlzlzlzozlzl

    well what the fuck, are we loving in a fucking jungle?

    or did we evolve out of it>? lzozzloz

    i mena i thougt we havd thinsg like civility horonor love hornor soul spirit honor and a creator in freedom in theis countery a creator who cretaed all men weqlau eqlaul equal

    so all you fucktards who say that men aren’t eual are on the side of the femisniot fiat banksters who whant to hegt get rid of freeodm and our founding documents lzozlzzo and whack off to your fanboy darwin tehories which you feel empower your buttholes to accept cocks with abaondodn and no shame lzozlzoz and themn you call it suepriro game zlozlzlzzoozoz

    yes i kno iw know yes we might have evolved from apes, but eveolve we did.

    and if you want to enjoy ffeedom and liberty and texting and talptops and everthing cretaed by great men great books for men, then you gotta stop your fanboy feminsist butthexing anuthholetingle ways and respect mothafuckas zlzozlzl

    Like


  153. on November 13, 2010 at 5:15 pm greatbooksformen GBFM

    birds of a feather butthex together!!
    a bird in hand is worth two in the bush, but a bush in hand is better than a cock in a tush. lzozlzll
    no nation has ever butthexed its way to prsoperity
    sticks and stones may break my bonez but a cock in my butt wl hurt my anuthhole zlozzloz so i keep them out zlolzzoloz

    Like


  154. ebelliousvanilla

    old guy, more like the 18th century. 🙂

    Epoche, men are irrelevant in terms of societies. If you slaughter 90% of the men of a population, they will still be able to have a higher number of offspring than the current generation. Do that with slaughtering 90% of the women. Genetically, the death of men is inconsequential.

    In terms of building societies or doing much more than having children, we are pretty much irrelevant. But evolution doesn’t have to be pretty. Check the demographics of the last 80 years in order to figure it out and you can do it within the West to begin with – only the most pathetic scum had more children.
    ——————————–
    If 90 percent of the men die it is pretty consequential for their own ability to reproduce, and if other men impregnate the remaining women I dont believe that the society could be said to have survived. Another society would have taken over, I dont want to make this a semantic pissing contest but this is an important point, otherwise the men wouldnt have fought in the first place. Poverty is quite frankly the natural condition of man, no one’s children are essential to the future of the human race. Put another way, if women want certain benefits from men, they have to play by certain rules. What those rules are we are certain to disagree but the concept of fatherhood is far more important than the stupid wars in Iraq or Afghanistan IMO. I am drawing this heavily from the great libertarian sociologist Herbert Spencer in his Man Versus The State.

    Like


  155. “Dude, they’ve been workin’ on this since the 1920′s, where you been?”

    Allow me to rephrase — their work has been quite divided between controlling America from within and without. My point is that their efforts will become almost entirely focused on the “without” part.

    “Original JB, people don’t switch core values over night. It takes a lot of suffering for it. And I don’t see Horowitz as a conservative. He’s fairly progressive too.”

    What core values are we talking about here? The core values of the silent majority haven’t changed. I would describe it as “the left has snuck into power and imposed its own values.” Now there’s a disconnect between the values of everyday people and the ruling class. Americans don’t support affirmative action, or illegal immigration or any of the other policies currently being forced down their throats.

    “Anybody who is into ideas, instead of being centered around people is a progressive.”

    I think that’s a completely untenable and quite outrageous proposition. Your mistake is confusing progressivism with rationalism. Progressivism is the left-wing subset of rationalism.

    “Sure, ideas matter to how you organize your people, but you must have a people first. And Americans and peoplehood are two paralel lines. Take the student bill of rights – you’re not supposed to give the podium to others. You impose your views and crush dissent. That’s how things should go. If anything, everyone should be emulating the Marxists because they’re the ones who actually know how to do squat.”

    In America, it’s simple. In America, “the people” are those who self-identify as such. Why do you think the left has been working so hard to undermine it with identity politics? Because, in fact it was working quite well.

    As far as crushing dissent, I think the fundamental issue you’re bringing up is “how does one stop subversion?” I think the answer is “you go on offense instead of reacting.” And we will see more of it in the years to come.

    Like


  156. on November 13, 2010 at 6:32 pm Gunslingergregi

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_07.pdf
    Percent of unmarried woman 15 to 45 giving birth.

    Year Percent
    2006 38.50
    2005 36.90
    2004 35.80
    2003 34.60
    2002 34.00
    2001 33.50
    2000 33.20
    1999 33.00
    1998 32.80
    1997 32.40
    1996 32.40
    1995 32.20
    1994 32.60
    1993 31.00
    1992 30.10
    1991 29.50
    1990 28.00
    1989 27.10
    1988 25.70
    1987 24.50
    1986 23.40
    1985 22.00
    1980 18.40

    Total population woman 15 to 45 declining

    2006 88,883,483.42
    2005 91,232,878.98
    2004 92,491,692.26
    2003 93,415,873.43
    2002 92,986,599.92
    2001 91,781,340.31
    2000 91,081,470.43
    1999 89,406,064.36
    1998 87,967,716.77
    1997 85,815,099.03
    1996 82,840,530.12
    1995 81,085,536.44
    1994 78,000,003.37
    1993 80,884,543.81
    1992 81,050,420.58
    1991 80,678,176.49
    1990 83,222,622.55
    1989 84,407,106.08
    1988 87,694,491.95
    1987 90,709,597.22
    1986 93,808,160.89
    1985 97,070,885.45
    1980 97,355,755.47

    Like


  157. on November 13, 2010 at 6:37 pm Gunslingergregi

    You don’t want to know white non hispanic birth rate.

    Like


  158. on November 13, 2010 at 7:04 pm Gunslingergregi

    So it is not just the woman getting fatter there are actually less of them.

    Like


  159. Gunny, great link, just what I was looking for for the blog post I am writing. Thanks.

    Like


  160. “Epoche, men are irrelevant in terms of societies. If you slaughter 90% of the men of a population, they will still be able to have a higher number of offspring than the current generation. Do that with slaughtering 90% of the women. Genetically, the death of men is inconsequential”

    If you slaughter 90% of the men, a similar percentage of women would die of starvation soon thereafter. I suppose some would think that was inconsequential.

    There is a reason for so many betas. They have an influence on the race that goes a little beyond a woman’s basic sexual preferences. They are the civilization builders. Without them – without the Newtons and his many bachelor brothers – we would not be the technically advanced society we are. No-one reading this would exist. We would be back where we were in the hunter gatherer days. One famine and a big share of those sexy caveman genes would be consigned to genetic oblivion, along with the women who can’t resist them.

    Get a grip sisters. Your forbear mothers bent over for beta seed so they could have a piece of his kingdom. They did it often enough to ensure betatude as the dominant masculine attitude. Betas chased alphas off the plantation and back into the jungle, outnumbering them in the massive proportions that we see today.

    The basic female still yearns for her ancestral mate, but she’ll sell him down the road any day for a nice place in the city and a shiny new car. Genetic success, if it is to mean anything, is what species reproduces most, not which mate is most desired. Humanus beta ripped a new one for humanus alpha. You’ll see this all happen again soon, once female comfort and security start becoming fond memories.

    Or you could see it right now by taking a trip to Bulgaria, and watching the local girls turning their backs on Boris the Badass to be Herb the American tourist’s wife and mother of his child.

    Like


  161. Prosperity destroys everything it touches. Just enjoy it while it lasts.

    Like


  162. on November 13, 2010 at 9:09 pm Gunslingergregi

    ”””’polymathblogger
    Gunny, great link, just what I was looking for for the blog post I am writing. Thanks.

    ”””’

    Yea the data is all there showing us going over cliff.

    Like


  163. on November 13, 2010 at 9:17 pm rebelliousvanilla

    mongo, not really. In Germany after WW2, the average male age was 17. Somehow, they didn’t all starve to death despite the Allied policy to do that to them. A man can feed ten times more women. Obviously, he won’t get them SUVs and the like. The example I gave was extreme on purpose though.

    And I hardly see why I should be loyal to the bunch of pathetic whiners that men today are. At least white men. They’re a disgrace to humanity and make me ashamed of being a white woman.

    What I said is that men are genetically irrelevant. And they are – this is one of the reasons that nations don’t mind sending them to get slaughtered. I’d also like to point out that the US will have comparable living standards to Bulgaria, so all the women marrying Americans amuse me. And female comfort won’t become a fond memory – in case you didn’t figure it out, I can marry a man from anywhere on Earth, including those who provide me comfort. The truth is that men are the ones who are screwed. Men and the fatties, that is.

    JB, the core values of Americans are fundamentally different than of those of the past generation. The younger, the more left leaning. And the more non-white, the more left leaning too. Sure, if you pick a certain demographic moment, you can ramble about the silent majority, but right now, those people aren’t the majority and pretty soon, they won’t be the majority for good.

    And while most people don’t support affirmative action or illegal immigration, they support legal immigration and the idiotic concept of citizenship that America has or the Civil Rights Act(which is unconstitutional in at least two ways) and so on.

    I don’t confuse progressivism for rationalism. Universalism, egalitarianism and individualism are the three tenants of progressivism. There are variations inside the progressive ideology, but they’re all part of the same piece of rotten garbage.

    I have to point out that the people not being defined means that there is no such thing as the people. It’s like that saying about property – something that is owned by everybody isn’t owned by anyone. Propositional nationhood is the road to destruction of all empires and civilizations. There’s no civilization in history that survived:
    1)including outsiders
    2)empowering women
    We did both. Anyway, getting back to American identity, if being American is something you just declare yourself to be, I expect my US passport to be ready by Monday since I just declared myself American. It’s hilarious how people mind illegal immigration yet they have this bastardized notion of who is American. Sort of like the UKIP definition of who is British – anybody who believes in democracy and whatnot. Geez, there are 3 billion British people on Earth and I didn’t know.

    The left succeeded with identity politics exactly because being American is meaningless. If it meant something to be American, being American would have been an identity. But it’s just an empty legal fiction created by a government.

    Like


  164. on November 13, 2010 at 9:19 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Oh, and I forgot to say neither of the three progressive concepts are rational. At least egalitarianism and universalism are so amusingly absurd that only a bunch of idiots could believe in them(men believing in them is pathetic, actually).

    Like


  165. Why are there so many racists and haters out here, especially mindless male cunts like rebelliousvanilla and other neo nazis who are giving mens rights a black eye with their bullshit.

    Like


  166. The truth is that men are the ones who are screwed.

    I presume you mean in marriage and divorce, family court decisions, etc. Yes, men do get screwed, separated from their children, child support payments under threat of retaliation. This is what you mean, yes?

    It’s interesting because lately I’ve been reading Victorian literature -The Picture of Dorian Gray, Adam Bede, Vanity Fair, etc etc, and back then it was women who were shit out of luck. A woman had no right to her children, they were the husband’s property upon divorce. So women naturally took to the streets and now we are where we are. The situation reversed and now men are merely sperm donors. There is no such thing as fathers…well, only if given permission by women.

    My belief is we just have to let the whole thing unwind itself and see where it goes. For men, I recommend bachelorhood; for women, I don’t know. It’s easy for a man to be a bachelor but I’ve heard women have a harder time being alone. Not sure if that is true or false.

    Like


  167. What I said is that men are genetically irrelevant. And they are – this is one of the reasons that nations don’t mind sending them to get slaughtered.
    ——————
    the reason women arent sent overseas wholesale to be slaughtered is because of the remaining chivalry. I dont see that to be something to be taken as a given though forever though. It is a mark of parochialism or stupidity to believe that the way the world works now is the way the world has to work. Violence can be contracted for or against according to whatever rationalizations you might have at time. The values of democracy can be thrown overboard at any time for any reason similarly.

    Like


  168. Vanilla

    In the immediate aftermath of WW, ,should the Allies have given scarce food to the German Army or to starving civilians in the countries recently devastated by the German Army? They could not do both.

    Like


  169. Rum, in the immediate aftermath of WW, food was not scarce. Starving the German population was a deliberate decision by the Allies.

    It worked on the South too, and it would work on Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Like


  170. The harvest of 1944-45 was, how shall we say, interrupted by events. Transport was wrecked everywhere. American assets of all kinds were being sent to the Pacific, including available transport. There were tens of millions of displaced persons whom the Allies were trying to feed. Whatever food stocks there were, were not in the right places to feed the hungry.
    The German Army and people had maintained themselves as the best fed people in Europe during the war – by theft.
    Some of my best friends are Germans but the truth is they got off easy, all things considered.

    Like


  171. JB, the core values of Americans are fundamentally different than of those of the past generation. The younger, the more left leaning.

    Not really, the young are always more left-leaning than the old and they get more conservative as they get older. The current younger generation is less left-leaning than those who were young in the 60’s and 70s. for example.

    And the more non-white, the more left leaning too.

    Here you are absolutely right, and American conservatives need to get it through their skulls that although there will always be individuals who support conservative politics, Hispanics and Blacks will always be more left-leaning than whites for a very large number of reasons and it is therefore silly to pander to them politically. (That doesn’t mean you don’t try to appeal to them with ordinary political arguments, but changing your arguments at all or bringing in incompetent tokens like Michael Steele deserves to lose.)

    Sure, if you pick a certain demographic moment, you can ramble about the silent majority, but right now, those people aren’t the majority and pretty soon, they won’t be the majority for good.

    They will be a majority of legal voters for quite a while yet.

    And while most people don’t support affirmative action or illegal immigration,

    Which is why this is Step One for conservatives who are regaining power, and a smart place to focus politically

    they support legal immigration and the idiotic concept of citizenship that America has or the Civil Rights Act(which is unconstitutional in at least two ways) and so on.

    The Alternative Right movement is also growing in influence and there is a great deal of support for reducing legal as well as illegal immigration. And non-citizens can be oppressed legally to the point where almost all the ones we want to leave will leave. As for the CRA, if the courts keep misinterpreting the constitution to read the CRA as mandating anti-white discrimination, then the CRA will be repealed, because of the enormous backlash against the anti-white discrimination of the last 45 years (something I can sincerely thank our idiot President for facilitating).

    I don’t confuse progressivism for rationalism. Universalism, egalitarianism and individualism are the three tenants of progressivism. There are variations inside the progressive ideology, but they’re all part of the same piece of rotten garbage.

    You mean “tenets”. It is the combination of egalitarianism with universalism that is bad, either one without the other is OK (invite outsiders in but treat them as inferior, or have a homogenous population you can treat equally). And some individualism is good otherwise you get socialism.

    Propositional nationhood is the road to destruction of all empires and civilizations. There’s no civilization in history that survived:
    1)including outsiders
    2)empowering women

    Well almost all civilizations failed to survive anyway, there aren’t that many around right now are there? Though there are plenty of other indicators that our civilization is in its late phases; whether it collapses depends on what’s around to give it a push and replace it.

    The left succeeded with identity politics exactly because being American is meaningless. If it meant something to be American, being American would have been an identity.

    There is truth to this but it is more complicated. It was much more than identity politics by the left, they also did active sabotage and destruction and moral undermining and all sorts of evil stuff. The real reason they succeeded is that they took over the educational system, the media, and the entetainment industry, and waited until the people who were properly equipped to defend the old system were retired. The old guard still failed colossally by not defending against the Left, but the Left’s cultural and educational takeover explains this failure. Conservatives need to fight on this ground as well as the political one.

    Like


  172. Oh phooey, the URL to my blog got messed up, so clicking on my name doesn’t get there. How embarrassing! Let’s see if it works now.

    Like


  173. And female comfort won’t become a fond memory – in case you didn’t figure it out, I can marry a man from anywhere on Earth, including those who provide me comfort.

    Haw Haw. Good one Mrs. Haversham. But my harem at the moment is already as much as I can handle – you’ll have to apply elsewhere today.

    Like


  174. Arjuna is Hindi for “Pussy.”

    Like


  175. “It’s interesting because lately I’ve been reading Victorian literature -The Picture of Dorian Gray, Adam Bede, Vanity Fair, etc etc, and back then it was women who were shit out of luck. ”

    Does today’s literature shows men out of luck? Does literature ever show men out of luck?

    “A woman had no right to her children, they were the husband’s property upon divorce. So women naturally took to the streets and now we are where we are. ”

    http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html

    Like


  176. on November 14, 2010 at 5:48 am rebelliousvanilla

    Rum, I suggest you begin to dwelve into the real history of those times. The truth is, you weren’t better than the Nazis or Soviets.

    Polymath, I’m yet to meet those people who get more right leaning as they get older in a fundamental way. I’m yet to see a statistical study proving this, while controlling for the fact that each generation got more leftist.

    Now, about the majority of voters, right now the US is like this:
    – 65% white, out of which the left will always get 3 out of 10 votes
    – 15% ‘Hispanic, out of which the left will always get about 7 out of 10 votes(I included some other race here since they’re usually ‘Hispanic’)
    – 13% black, out of which the left will always get about 9 out of 10 votes
    – 5% Asian, out of which, it will be a split at best.
    So, the left will get at least 44% of the vote, on average. While this will depend on how likely people are to vote, which would make defeats such as the one this month happen once in a while, their voting base will be energized in the next election or two elections again. Also, considering that over half of the babies born in the US right now who are citizens will be voters in 18 years, the left will always win elections by then. I’m not really sure why this silent majority is still around – sure, it was true in the 1980s, but right now, it’s pretty silly to still claim that.

    Related to a repeal of the Civil Rights Act, that’s not going to happen. Unless you don’t make it a part of your campaign, but still, most politicians want to get re-elected and always will. Repealing that will always be unpopular and it will get more unpopular as the nonwhite population grows. You can even look at Rand Paul who had to pussyfoot it around his opinion related to it.

    Yes, I meant tenents. I’m a fan of individualism in terms of economics, so I would never support socialism. But social individualism is bad for a society and any sane society would ostracize people who are into it.

    >>>
    Well almost all civilizations failed to survive anyway, there aren’t that many around right now are there? Though there are plenty of other indicators that our civilization is in its late phases; whether it collapses depends on what’s around to give it a push and replace it.<<<
    I expected better from someone who studied logic at your level. Obviously, those two aren't the only causes of civilizational collapse, but the two always cause civilizational collapse.

    Like


  177. I can’t take it anymore, I have to call bullshit on this hateful, vile “men are genetically irrelevant” bullcrap.

    First of all, if we take any tribesocietycivilization composed for the 10% of male and the remaining 90% of women, then that tribesocietycivilization would simply be no more. Any neighboring human organization would take over in no time.

    And who would be looking after the women? Who would work or hunt for their food?

    Second, if men are genetically irrelevant, how come all the significant, relevant genius and innovators are men?

    Third, if men are genetically irrelevant, how come in many, many culture it is considered lucky to have male sons? How come the romans abandoned female babies to the elements? How come the Chinese government made the slaying of female babies legal if women are so genetically valuable?

    Concluding, I think it’s men who define a civilization. A 1% male, 99% female “civilization” would simply be no civilization at all.

    If 99% of white male would disappear today, white women would just be enslaved by muslims or someone else. So please cut this “men are genetically irrelevant” bullcrap.

    At least roissy says “women are more genetically valuable” which is by a long shot very different from saying that men have no genetic value at all.

    Regarding war, the reason men are sent to be slaughtered is because women are shit in a fight or war. If women were any good in warfare, any ruler or government would have them to fight too.

    Furthermore, men simply love war and are ready to die for their passion.

    Like


  178. @rebelliousvanilla
    “Epoche, men are irrelevant in terms of societies. If you slaughter 90% of the men of a population, they will still be able to have a higher number of offspring than the current generation. Do that with slaughtering 90% of the women. Genetically, the death of men is inconsequential.”

    Yes and NOOOO! It is – obviously – true that if a population
    suffers massive male death, it will recover more quickly than
    if it suffers massive female death. But this does not mean
    that “men are irrelevant” as actors. Another interesting
    question: WHICH men do the surviving and who does the
    dying. One can play around with models of group selection
    going on concurrently with individual selection here
    – unstable and messy!

    Thor

    Like


  179. Polymath, I’m yet to meet those people who get more right leaning as they get older in a fundamental way. I’m yet to see a statistical study proving this, while controlling for the fact that each generation got more leftist.

    In America at least there are far more people who have switched D-to-R than have switched R-to-D, the Democrats retain parity because most people start out as Democrats when they begin voting at 18. This is well-established but if you insist I will try to find a study. It is not simply based on “older voters are more right leaning than younger voters”, which could be explained by each generation getting more leftist if you didn’t have data on individuals switching.

    Now, about the majority of voters, right now the US is like this:
    – 65% white, out of which the left will always get 3 out of 10 votes

    THIS is your wrong assumption. Republicans need to tie the Democrats so closely to minorities (which is easy, you just have to provoke them properly and they will reveal their anti-whiteness) that it becomes obvious to an additional 2 out of 10 white people that their interests are better served by the Republicans. I agree that there is an irreducible core of left/liberal whites in America who would rather obtain power and wealth by manipulating and being in charge of a system which is biased on the whole against whites, but that’s at most 10%, not 30%.

    – 15% ‘Hispanic, out of which the left will always get about 7 out of 10 votes(I included some other race here since they’re usually ‘Hispanic’)
    – 13% black, out of which the left will always get about 9 out of 10 votes
    – 5% Asian, out of which, it will be a split at best.

    These numbers, on the other hand, are reasonable.

    So, the left will get at least 44% of the vote, on average.

    Your math adds up, but this becomes 31% if whites start voting their interests in larger numbers.

    Also, considering that over half of the babies born in the US right now who are citizens will be voters in 18 years, the left will always win elections by then.

    I know you meant to say that half the babies who are citizens are nonwhite — assuming your earlier math, that does give the left a 50% minimum vote among that cohort instead of 44% (instead of 30% of 65% plus 70% of 35%, which equals 44%, they would be getting 30% of 50% plus 70% of 50% which equals 50%), but young people don’t vote much and whites will be a solid majority of actual voters for the next 40 years rather than 18 years, assuming we don’t continue to let huge numbers of nonwhites immigrate here and become citizens.

    I’m not really sure why this silent majority is still around – sure, it was true in the 1980s, but right now, it’s pretty silly to still claim that.
    It wasn’t so silent 12 days ago.

    Related to a repeal of the Civil Rights Act, that’s not going to happen. Unless you don’t make it a part of your campaign, but still, most politicians want to get re-elected and always will. Repealing that will always be unpopular and it will get more unpopular as the nonwhite population grows. You can even look at Rand Paul who had to pussyfoot it around his opinion related to it.

    This requires moving the “Overton window” of politically thinkable policies to the right, you have to start with smaller steps like ending anti-white preferences in things like college admissions and hiring state employees.

    I’m a fan of individualism in terms of economics, so I would never support socialism. But social individualism is bad for a society and any sane society would ostracize people who are into it.

    Can you please give some examples to distinguish economic individualism from social individualism, referring to actual or proposed laws and policies?

    >>>
    Well almost all civilizations failed to survive anyway, there aren’t that many around right now are there? Though there are plenty of other indicators that our civilization is in its late phases; whether it collapses depends on what’s around to give it a push and replace it.<<<
    I expected better from someone who studied logic at your level. Obviously, those two aren’t the only causes of civilizational collapse, but the two always cause civilizational collapse.

    I can see I am going to have to spell this out more. I was not criticizing the conclusion that letting foreigners in and empowering women causes civilizations to collapse, I was criticizing the validity of the argument that reached that conclusion; and I was not saying that the existence of other reasons for collapse contradicted that these things cause collapse, I was saying that the existence of other reasons for collapse means that you can’t simply conclude that these things caused collapse just from their coexistence with collapse. In other words, that your thesis was unproven rather than disproven.

    They do not always cause civilizational collapse because there are non-collapsed civilizations like that now and previous civilizations could have collapsed for other reasons — that is like arguing that cancer is always fatal because in the past everyone who got cancer eventually died, even though everyone from far enough in the past is dead now anyway. You need to come up with more data showing causality (and not just correlation — if civilizations in their decadent phases tend to start empowering women and letting in foreigners, that may just be a symptom and not a cause of death).

    Again, I’m not disagreeing with your conclusion, but you should say how empowering women and letting in foreigners actually causes collapse. (Another relevant question: has any civilization which empowered women and let in foreigners ever been able to reverse either of those two steps?)

    My blog post from October 27th (click on my name above to get to my blog and scroll down, I’m not putting in a direct link in order to avoid triggering the moderation robot) is all about the declines of civilizations. Our civilization shares many features with civilizations which have collapsed, but one of the points made was that weakness is not the same as collapse, collapse usually requires an external rival which can supplant the civilization. I don’t see a viable rival around right now.

    Like


  180. on November 14, 2010 at 2:23 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Well, I made my points and it’s fruitless to go into harangues any further in order to reiterate and pick apart what others say.

    Polymath, white people won’t vote in their interests as long as they have the same identity as nonwhites – American. And my thesis is proven. There is a 100% correlation there. 🙂

    And just wait until the USD loses more than half its value and you will have people storming the streets for handouts – since this is how it ends.

    I will clarify the economic vs social individualism. Let’s pick Roissy. He is a social individualist. Any sane society, would expell people like him from its midst. Well, actually in any sane society, the father of a woman he banged will shoot him and there will be a father on the jury who will always vote innocent and hereby have a mistrial(I’d be a really cynical juror, actually, and vote regardless of what the law says lol). Same with culture – you don’t like us, pack your bags and leave. You prefer black men, go live among them, get employed by them and so on. You have dual loyalties, you’re not one of us and you will be expelled.

    Economic individualism refers to consumer choice and competition among agents.

    Steve, men go to war because they are expendable and have always been as such. They evolved to be better at war because they were sent to war and only the best returned and reproduced and over time, men got really good at it compared to women. But the reason is that societies didn’t mind losing them. China prefers boys because there you don’t have retirement benefits and men earn more than women. That’s about it. It’s a financial incentive, not a social one.

    I’d like to point out that Finnish people have only TWO male descendants. TWO! They not only survived as a group to still be around as Finnish people(unlike the Visigoths or WASPs) which means they pretty much didn’t have their women stolen, but they’re fairly numerous considering from how many of them were in the beginning(this also makes it fairly amusing considering that they’re so inbred yet their society is more or less functional, compared to any African country that is really diverse genetically and an abysmal hellhole – so much for mixing being brilliant and all that).

    On the other hand, I do agree that men define and create a civilization and prosperity. But again, that is irrelevant in terms of evolution and genetics. Neither of the two has to be pretty. Let’s pick Swedes and Somalis. Swedes are a pathetic nation in terms of evolution, while Somalis are brilliant. Obviously though, anyone would rather live in Sweden, even the Somalis.

    Like


  181. Vanilla

    You are going to have to do better than that. The only “real history” of that period that supports your thesis is the book, “Other Losses” by the Canadian fiction writer/Novelist Barque. That is it. No peer reviewed work by a working historian goes anywhere near supporting Barque.
    But I an open to enlightenment. Just what sources should one delve into in order to overturn Ambrose, et al?

    Like


  182. I’m with GBFM and Steve. The point of view that says:

    “Men are irrelevant unless that have a harem of hot women and are ALPHA, everything else be damned”

    Is the FEMALE one. And women did what, exactly? Oh yeah, making babies and latch on whatever man was convienent at the time. Doesn’t seem too hard.

    Fuck that noise. If genetic Darwinism is really the basis for all, you can all go to Irak or whatever African shithole and try to kill for harems, oh wait, you all are safe in home or work writing stuff in the confortable Internet. Yeah, who do you think that builded the whole system that allows you to do that? Have some fucking respect.

    Like


  183. Arjuna’s wife is 5/10. Hey, she probably looks better with some black balls on her chin… and likely does.

    Like


  184. […] Chateau – “The Elusive 10: Found!“, “Cocktease Asks “What Am I Doing Wrong?”“, “The Twinkies Diet Proves Fatty Fats are Fat Because They Eat Too Much“, “Arjuna, You Magnificent Beta!” […]

    Like


  185. on November 14, 2010 at 5:35 pm American Woman, Stay Away From Me

    American woman, I said get away

    Like


  186. http://maybemaimed.com/

    Beta of the year candidate?

    Like


  187. Vanilla, if you want to understand the current worldview amongst I strongly suggest reading The Liberal Mind by Dr Kenneth Minogue. Here is the highlight of the book by the Liberty Fund:

    Yet liberalism is subject to a number of illusions. In spite of its deep involvement with truth, it is, like any other ideology, prone to subject its view of the way things are to a hopeful picture of the way it would be nice for things to be. We have examined a number of these illusions: the belief in a rational harmony, the illusion of ultimate agreement, and, perhaps most central of all, the idea that will and desire can ultimately be sovereign in human affairs, that things will eventually pan out the way we want them to be.

    AS WELL AS:

    All this is true, but it states only a part of the liberal position. For, as we have already argued, liberalism is like all ideologies in that it attempts to hold together in one single viewpoint elements which are hostile to each other. The hatred of suffering and the love of freedom are equally characteristic of liberalism, and each is indispensable to it. If we seek, rather pointlessly, for some essential liberal position, then we might find it in the belief that happiness and individual freedom are always in harmony. Just as liberals believe that the good of the people may always be identified with what the people want, so they also believe that we can have variety without suffering. There is little historical evidence to support this view, and much to contradict it. Harmony obviously does not exist.
    ———————————–
    Dr Kenneth Minogue is a personal hero of mine and I think the current worldview of “rational harmony” and “hatred of suffering” is not likely to lead to anything except unlimited statism. I hope to start a discussion group around him in the near future.

    Like


  188. on November 14, 2010 at 7:39 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Epoche, I understand liberalism. It has nothing to do with rationality and the truth. It’s just Christianity for post modernists, to sum it up in a single sentence.

    Like


  189. It is important to note that Christianity shares the hope that God will one day kill the enemies of non-believers. This point is missed upon believers in universal equality

    Like


  190. Isn’t the upshot of most of these threads is that our old culture is pretty much shot?

    It is, you know. Just look at California. Just look at our evolving demographics.

    So, the message is clear. For men who are healthy and self supporting, get money. That should be the central goal in your professional life. If you marry, make sure your wife is going to be docile and subservient and bear you many children. They say to marry a younger woman from a traditional culture. Otherwise, marriage today for a man is worse than pointless. It is akin to slavery. It is hard to imagine a worse deal entered into voluntarily.

    For women? Well, ladies, the ride was fun. But, now, it’s back to basics. Big Daddy is bankrupt. Think Haiti. For example, cholera has killed 900 so far in the last month or two in Haiti. They really shouldn’t have killed off their white population. Really. Have you read about cholera? Have you had cholera? It’s like having a garden hose coming out of your ass and somebody turns it on. Damn those European misogynist beta white males who keep that disease under control.

    Like


  191. I wish you were my gramps. Really.

    And RebelliousVanilla, enough pussyfooting around. Is your persona, I mean are, um, you, an actual mudshark, or just an instigating, inexplicably bookish young lady?

    Like


  192. 100% correlation only if you ignore currently existing civilizations. Just like there is a 100% correlation between getting cancer and dying if you ignore currently living people. (I know you knew this because of your 🙂 but I am saying it to lead into my point below).

    It’s not worth going into how proven the link is, since I agree with you that letting in foreigners and empowering women is historically associated with the declining stages of a civilization, which is reason enough to worry about it and deal with it even if those things don’t make a civilizational collapse inevitable, just like cancer is something to worry about and deal with even if it doesn’t always kill you.

    You mean ancestors not descendants about the Finns. And I don’t think it’s quite as you say. There are only two men whose direct male line descendants have survived until today among ethnic Finns, but there were probably plenty of other men in the same group alive at the time whose descendants also survived and whose genes are in the current Finnish gene pool, they just did not have any descendants in the direct male line all the way to today. So their y-chromosomes, which don’t mix, didn’t survive, but their other genes would have been very likely to.

    This is especially true because of the “crossing-over” that occurs during meiosis, which ensures that non-sex chromosomes, as well as X chromosomes in generations when they pass through girls, do not get passed on as unitary collections of genes but get spread out so it is much more likely some will survive. An individual unit of gene transmission is likely to not survive (which is why most Y-chromosomes eventually die out) but when there are thousands of them rather than 46 (because the chromosomes do not transmit as units) it is quite likely some will survive for a thousand generations or more, if the group survives at all.

    There have been other studies supporting this — that almost everyone whose descendants didn’t peter out pretty quickly still has descendants today, although not in a direct male line (traceable through Y-chromosomes) or a direct female line (traceable through mitochondrial DNA).

    Like


  193. “They evolved to be better at war because they were sent to war and only the best returned and reproduced and over time, men got really good at it compared to women.”

    Fathers pass on their genes to their daughters too, and their sons get more genes from their mothers than their fathers.

    ” But the reason is that societies didn’t mind losing them. China prefers boys because there you don’t have retirement benefits and men earn more than women. That’s about it. It’s a financial incentive, not a social one.”

    “A son is a son till he gets him a wife, a daughter is daughter for the rest of your life.”

    It doesn’t really mean what it looks like at first glance.

    Like


  194. on November 15, 2010 at 2:45 am Gunslingergregi

    ””””’schfifty five
    I mean are, um, you, an actual mudshark””””

    lollllllllzzzzzzzzzz

    Like


  195. on November 15, 2010 at 3:18 am rebelliousvanilla

    Epoche, yes, but the believers of universal humanism want to kill us right now. 😉

    Like


  196. “Rum, I suggest you begin to dwelve into the real history of those times. The truth is, you weren’t better than the Nazis or Soviets.”

    Maybe I misinterpreted the flow of the conversation, but if by ‘we’, Vanilla, you mean the United States, then you’re either a bit of a dolt, or are being deliberately provocative for some reason.

    Care to try justify that statement, sweet-pants, or do you want to walk it back? I hope its the former because I’d love to give you a good spanking…

    Like


  197. Sounds to me like this guy doesn’t care if he’s ‘beta’ or not; he’s got the relationship he wants to be in…although, DAMN, that IS some serious ass-kissing he’s engaged in. I’ve loved a bunch of chicks without ‘worshipping’ them as ‘goddesses’.

    Still, if this is his writing style, I can see him making a healthy living dishing out supplication.

    Like


  198. Isn’t the upshot of most of these threads is that our old culture is pretty much shot?

    “It is, you know. Just look at California. Just look at our evolving demographics.”

    @Gramps.

    You’re already defeated when you think “demographics” is the reason for CA’s decline. Feminists/Liberals indoctrinate and cultify much better than non feminists/non liberals in that state and “reds” have no one to blame but themselves that the west coast is soo blue.

    When the only republican strategy for winning elections is to to make sure “felons” can’t vote, you can’t cry demographics as an excuse. Hollywood has a cock in the GOP’s mouth and San Francisco has a cock up their ass, yet rather than fight back, the GOP tears up like a prison bitch and acts like the situation was inevitable.

    It would have been much smarter for Meg Whitman to start a free republican elementary school to brainwash legal Mexican Catholics kids, than to waste her 160 million on fighting Jerry “Meg’s a whore” Brown. The present is lost. The future is not!

    Like


  199. I read the article. I almost puked when I read the line about him apologizing to his wife for all the wrongs men committed against women in the past. Is there anything more wussy than apologizing for something you did not do?

    I bet any money his wife lost respect for him after reading this article. Any man who worships a woman has a mental problem.

    Like


  200. This article makes me want to crank Decapitated on my bedroom speakers whilst giving my girl roughshod anal sans lube…

    ..

    again.

    Like


  201. on November 16, 2010 at 11:40 pm rebelliousvanilla

    Seran, yes, by you, I mean the US. And I apologize if I hurt your American chauvinist way of thinking you’re better. lol

    Like


  202. o you are
    such a
    rebel

    Like


  203. […] in rare form in the comments here, here (this thread is really good), here, here (some repeats early, but then he gets going), and […]

    Like


  204. “Seran, yes, by you, I mean the US. And I apologize if I hurt your American chauvinist way of thinking you’re better. lol”

    Ah! I see the insults come out so very quickly, but, what’s THIS?! No actual defense of your ridiculous statement?

    How very…female of you.

    You’re sweet, dear. Now run along like a good girl…

    Like


  205. So much of what RV says amounts to, “[blah blahblah blah blahblahblah blah blahblah blah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblahblah blah blah blahblah blah blahblahblah].”

    And as it goes in one ear and out the other, guys sit there and nod at her with goofy grins on their faces while sneaking glances at her cleavage.

    Like


  206. “And as it goes in one ear and out the other, guys sit there and nod at her with goofy grins on their faces while sneaking glances at her cleavage.”

    Yeah, I admit I have not read many of her comments in depth, but she comes off as a chick that considers herself an intellectual, but there’s a lot less going on upstairs than she imagines. Kind of like:

    “Apes read philosophy, Otto. They just don’t understand it.”

    I think you are onto something with her SOP.

    Because she has guys sit there pretending rapt attention, she thinks she is imparting some deep wisdom. Uhm, not so much, honey. Take a seat in the corner while the adults talk.

    What I love about this site is how some women will come here and in an attempt to engage in conversation, will confirm so much about what it said about them here.

    Like


  207. Brilliant.

    Like


  208. I think my puke just turned into spiky swords and tried to cut their way out of my stomach.

    Like