Sex Machine

I strongly suspect there is a correlation between a woman’s body type and her preferred method of lovemaking.

Narrow hips + muscular upper body + high and tight ass + abs + dark forearm hair = Fucks like a man.

madonna.gif
built to be on top with a riding crop

Curvy hips + baby fat + wide and plump ass + delicate upper body + small belly pouch = Makes love.

monica_bellucci_reference.jpg
oxytocin factory

The farther a woman is from the ideal feminine, the more likely she will be to fuck like a sex machine, all pistons and friction.  She will be the type of girl who is not as emotionally hollowed by bed-hopping.

The closer a woman gets to the superfeminine in body shape, facial features, and temperament, the more submissive and tender will be her lovemaking.  For her, the culmination of the act is not in orgasm but in the bonding and the joy of knowing she is pleasing her lover.  Expect her legs to wrap around you during sex in a subconscious display of possession. 





Comments


  1. Most men do not consider overly muscular women to be particuarly sexy.

    Obviously, I am not “most men.”

    Like


  2. If you make an overly muscular woman put on some football pads and a helmet, that doesn’t make you gay does it? Just asking

    Like


  3. So much to say on this, but silenced by your intriguing combination of genius and piggishness…

    Like


  4. Option 2 plz. You can keep the Gwen Stefanis and Pinks of the world.

    Salma Hayek might have been a better photo for the second one.

    Like


  5. on October 30, 2007 at 6:34 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Why is the media constantly pushing first body type on women? It screws them up royally — and then we guys have to deal with the fallout.

    Women think they should look like they’re starring in “Billion Dollar Baby” when no straight guy could possibly have found any female in that movie attractive.

    And has anyone ever seen photos of 1950s sex pinups like Jayne Mansfield and Mamie Van Doren? It’s funny that women with bodies like these were semi-mainstream in the friggin’ conservative 1950s, but now these women would be relegated to porn.

    Yet another way feminism has fucked things up — KS Lang and freak-of-nature Madonna are now the “ideal” body type for women. Why do other countries hate us?

    Like


  6. The difference is predicated on higher than average circulating testosterone, which has masculinizing physical and psychological effects in women.

    Whether feminism can impact epigenetics is another speculative discussion.

    Like


  7. It depends what kind of man you’re sexin’ as well.

    Like


  8. Very interesting subject, not discussed much even in men’s magazines. Of course, you put your inimitable “Roissy” stamp on it, of having had huge amounts of experience with all kinds of women… I unfortunately cannot claim to have that kind of breathtaking range of experience.

    Although I like a wide variety of body types (except for fat), I see the appeal of the ultra-feminine body. However, why is it that this type of idealized woman has rarely taken an interest in me?

    Usually what I get is the “amazon” types… the athletes, the runners, the swimmers. Yes, they’re toned, but they’re not the ideal, “Raphaelite” female. I think I have yet to have my experience with that kind.

    Also, have any “shorter” guys noticed this… I am 5′8″ (not really short, but in the DC area, I was definitely considered short)… Cute shorter girls (say, 5′5″ and under) were never really much interested in me. By contrast, taller, amazon-like women (5′8″ and up) in my experience, have much fewer or no qualms about my being on the short side.

    What about height people, and how it figures into male-female relations and attraction….?

    Like


  9. Joe T. Also, have any “shorter” guys noticed this… I am 5′8″ (not really short, but in the DC area, I was definitely considered short)… Cute shorter girls (say, 5′5″ and under) were never really much interested in me. By contrast, taller, amazon-like women (5′8″ and up) in my experience, have much fewer or no qualms about my being on the short side.

    Luxury of choice. Women generally prefer men to be taller than themselves, and once that condition is satisfied, they look for someone of above-average height. (Just look at all the demands in personal ads for men six feet tall or better.) Thus, an attractive woman of average height essentially has her pick of men, since the majority of men will be taller than herself and will be willing to date her because she is shorter.

    A tall woman, on the other hand, has a much smaller pool of men taller than herself to choose from — and that pool may be narrowed further by tall men who prefer shorter women, which many do. What remains may not be that desirable to her, so she must expand her search beyond the usual female height requirement and consider shorter guys.

    As an analogy, let’s take two guys, one with size 10 feet (US) and one with size 14 feet. The size 10 guy with his average feet has his pick of styles and colors; as a result, he can afford to develop very particular tastes about what shoes he’ll wear. (This may make him slightly gay, but that’s another discussion.) The size 14 guy, by contrast, can’t afford to be so picky; he basically has to take what he can get, so he’ll consider shoes that fall outside of his ideal preferences.

    Like


  10. Sorry Roissy, I can’t disagree with you more. The deadest lay I ever had was a latina who looked like a cross between angelina jolie and vanessa williams, and I’ve gotten my socks thoroughly knocked off by the most unassuming pre-teen looking asians. Either way I’ve never been able to call it, and the first experience I mentioned really soured me to looking at a girl and thinking “man I wanna try that out.” I thought that about her too and it turned out to be the most disappointing sexual experience of my life.

    What contributes the most to how a girl behaves in the sack? The stuff you can’t see — past experience, psychosis, and daddy issues — all of which will eventually contribute to your inevitable breakup.

    Like


  11. Sprecken: Excellent explanation, very rational and methodically thought-out, but how do you account for the disproportionate preference among shorter American women (say, 5’5″ and under) for men who are not just taller, but actually tall compared to the general population?

    What I mean is girls who are 5’4″ wanting men who are “6′ tall or taller”…?

    I find this situation, where short women are setting the standards for everyone, short, medium-sized and tall, to be ubiquitous in US culture, but almost unheard of in just about every other culture outside of the US.

    Like


  12. I never quite understand why people talk about height so much. Maybe it’s because I’m right at the American male average of 5’10”, but all throughout my adult life height has been a nearly irrelevant factor. Over the years I’ve probably thought about my height less often than I’ve thought about my eye color. Nor do I generally notice the heights of other people unless they’re unusually tall or short. When it comes to online discussions, however, height is everything. No idea why.

    Like


  13. Peter, that’s funny, height is the very first thing I think about. Very early on, when I first started dating, I used to think that since I wasn’t exactly the tallest tool in the shed, that it was natural and normal for me to go for the cute shorties… girls who were say, in the 5’2″ to 5’4″ range.

    It turns out many years later, that I was dead wrong. After living over 10 years in the DC area and having been rejected by innumerable short hotties there, who seemed to prefer men not just taller than themselves, but also statistically tall — tall in comparison to the male population at large — something deep inside me “clicked” and I realized how hot TALL women can be.

    Mind, this was not an intellectual decision on my part, but a sudden denouement, an epiphany if you will. It struck like a lightning bolt at the core of my sexual psyche.

    Now, I am a full-fledged Amazon FETISHIST… yes, you heard it people, a shorter man who lusts for the women at the very statistical upward “tail” of the bell curve. Yes, I am a 5’8″ man who is hot for girls who are between 6′ and 6’3″.

    And all this as a result of being rejected by little short bitches…

    That’s not to say I haven’t had a few shorties… in fact my last gf, here in Las Vegas, was 5’1″. But that was a pleasantly brief spell.. I am back on the prowl, doin’ the proverbial buffalo hunt for the volleyball players…

    Like


  14. I agree with DF. Women have different circulating levels of testosterone, just like men, which affects body type. It also explains the large clitorises on the lawyers.

    Like


  15. “how do you account for the disproportionate preference among shorter American women (say, 5′5″ and under) for men who are not just taller, but actually tall compared to the general population?”

    In addition to the luxury of choice factor, it could also be that smaller, more feminine women subconsciously desire a taller, physically more robust man to protect her, a throwback to more chaotic times perhaps. A taller, larger woman might be able to defend herself better from more men. Just offering an alternative theory.

    Like


  16. on October 31, 2007 at 2:27 am Days of Broken Arrows

    The height thing has been discussed elsewhere. And if you look at match.com (or Craig’s List) you’ll see that really short women prefer really tall guys. There is prolly a genetic reason — they don’t want to produce short offspring. Women who are taller have more leeway as to who they will date.

    By the way, if you thrown all the Hispanic and Asian guys in the DC area in to the height average, the average heights shoots down to something like 5’5.” I’ve noticed an inordinate amount of white women going for Hispanics. White women are weird — if you’re “ethnic” often the height thing goes out the window — prolly another genetic thing (they get a wider gene pool when breeding and height is less relevant). Anyway, Joe T., just pretend you’re Hispanic and it’ll be easier with short women.

    Now, we just have to address why any man would want to date a really short woman. I find short women are usually loud, irritating and obnoxious. And when they get to middle age they look like piglets or mini golf clubs.

    Anyone else notice this?

    Like


  17. my one sex dream (that i can remember) involving another woman was with madonna. she seems man enough to handle a woman in the bedroom.

    Like


  18. So what does this mean for a guy like me who loves chubby white girls AND the skanked up porn girls?

    What about height people, and how it figures into male-female relations and attraction….?

    I’m 5’8, so while I’m taller than my dad and brother, I’m still on the shorter side when compared to other males.

    Like


  19. #11 “how do you account for the disproportionate preference among shorter American women (say, 5′5″ and under) for men who are not just taller, but actually tall compared to the general population?”

    It’s probably some combination of Hope and Broken Arrow’s points: a tall man represents (subconsciously, at least) greater physical protection and also provides a genetic route for the woman’s descendants to be tall as well.

    In addition, men tend to want women who are shorter than themselves — though this rule isn’t as ironclad as it is with women — so demand for a woman who is 5’8″ is going to be less than for a woman who is 5’2″. And because tall men tend to be more attractive to women, they have their pick of average-to-short girls, leaving the taller girls to look for shorter guys.

    Like


  20. Sprecken… interesting!

    My brother-in-law, who’s 5’10”, has a slightly older sister who is actually taller than he is at about 5’11”. I imagine this must have pained him a lot growing up. And he married my sister, who is 5’2″.

    To this day I am convinced he sought out a short girl because of the eternal stigma he had of being shorter than his sister.

    Like


  21. men tend to want women who are shorter than themselves…so demand for a woman who is 5′8″ is going to be less than for a woman who is 5′2″

    haha. that’s funny. and so not true. you see short guys hitting on tall girls all the time and tall women putting the shorter guy in the “friend zone” b/c he’s “so cute.”

    1) a guy would fuck an amazon if he thought she was hot. 2) the bigger the wallet, the taller the women men think they can score 3) short men take a bigger social beating than short women so if a short man can give his offspring the genetic advantage of height from a taller woman, he’ going to take. demand for the 5’8” woman will be greater.

    Like


  22. Days, your comment about white girls in the DC area with short Hispanic guys is so funny, because I noticed that too when I lived there. I mentioned this in another thread.

    There were definite “periods” of interracial dating I noticed in the DC area:

    1) The BMWF Era, which peaked around 1995.

    2) Next was the Asian Male/White Female Era — markedly smaller in numbers than the BMWF Era, but still noticeable. This peaked in the late ’90s.

    3) Finally there came the Hispanic Male/White Female Era in the DC area, and as far as I know, y’all are still in it. It consists of frequent sightings of young white women with 5′ tall, shaved-head Latino gangsta types in baggy football jerseys… Go to Springfield Mall if you wanna catch some memorable sightings of this phenomenon.

    One day, when I saw a literally stunning girl of around 18 sitting at a lunch table in DC with a kid who looked like some street urchin caught pickpocketing Roosh in Bolivia, and they were obviously on a date, I finally decided to pack it in and move away from DC.

    Like


  23. whenever Days and Joe start in with their thinly-veiled racism I feel the need to comment, even if their comments have nothing to do with me or my group. it’s just good practice.

    -“Of course, you put your inimitable ‘Roissy’ stamp on it, of having had huge amounts of experience with all kinds of women… ”

    I wonder how Roissy manages to get up and walk away from the keyboard with you hanging on his nuts like that.

    -“I find short women are usually loud, irritating and obnoxious”

    Idiotic overbroad generalization.

    -“I am 5′8″ (not really short…)”

    lol keep telling yourself that

    Like


  24. How is it racism, thinly veiled or otherwise, to discuss people’s dating patterns, on a dating-themed blog?

    Unless Mike is a religious fundie who feels that certain heresies musn’t be uttered (contemporary Liberalism being a religion)

    Or he’s just a not-too-bright dope of political correctness.

    Like


  25. At first glance Joe and DoBA’s comments appear racist but it is actually envy.

    Like


  26. There were definite “periods” of interracial dating I noticed in the DC area:
    1) The BMWF Era, which peaked around 1995.
    2) Next was the Asian Male/White Female Era — markedly smaller in numbers than the BMWF Era, but still noticeable. This peaked in the late ’90s.
    3) Finally there came the Hispanic Male/White Female Era in the DC area, and as far as I know, y’all are still in it.

    Does the DC area have much White Male/Asian Female dating? Those pairings seem quite common in many places.

    Like


  27. on October 31, 2007 at 3:03 pm rhymenocerous

    Hm, I’m not sure where you are meeting all these tall girls who love shorter guys. I’m a girl, 5’10” and an avowed tallist, meaning, I don’t care what race or religion you are, but you better be at least 6′ tall or I won’t even look at you (anyone shorter just isn’t attractive to me). I should just put up a sign like at Six Flags that says “You must be this tall to ride the rhymenocerous” in my bedroom.

    Like


  28. re: male height.
    i have an anecdote about a guy, a world class player, who bedded over 30 hot women, all in their early 20s, in a single year.
    he was 5’6″. white.
    he did it by focusing on three conditions.
    one, he avoided clubs. he understood that in those environments the bigger taller guys would simply swamp any game he brought to the table and horde the attention of the women. his prowling grounds were bookstores, grocery stores, malls, online.
    two, he targeted girls who were shorter than him. this was a smart marketing move. exceptions to the contrary, most girls prefer to date men who are a few inches taller than they are. in my experience, this is about as ingrained as the male preference for a 0.7 waist to hip ratio in women.
    three, he learned to exude tremendous self confidence and honed his game to perfection. he was known in our circle as “the closer” because once he got a girl out on a date (not counting the first meet) it was virtually guaranteed that she would sleep with him.

    Like


  29. “whenever Days and Joe start in with their thinly-veiled racism I feel the need to comment, even if their comments have nothing to do with me or my group. it’s just good practice.”

    You feel the need to comment, but your comment is thinly-veiled bullshit. There’s no reason to believe you are a civil rights crusader. More likely, you’re a white, apolitical poseur who takes convenient potshots at people to help spread the rumor that you’re morally superior. You no more care about racism on a random blog than you care about … well, you probably don’t really care about anything, do you? You just want to look good sayin’ it.

    “I wonder how Roissy manages to get up and walk away from the keyboard with you hanging on his nuts like that.”

    And who cares? Are you his little organ grinder’s monkey to jump in and run interference as soon as someone mentions his name?

    Like


  30. “Does the DC area have much White Male/Asian Female dating? Those pairings seem quite common in many places.”

    Peter, actually this is HUGE in DC, in my experience. Not in my personal experience, as I’ve never been big on Asian women… some can be hot, but I just don’t feel a visceral attraction. However, take note that the Asian-American women of DC have evolved and seem to have just as much of an entitlement complex as their white counterparts. Also, socially they tend to be VERY standoffish and aloof.

    Like


  31. Rhymenocerous, you’re a woman? Some of the rhymes you posted in other threads have been fantastic (I’m assuming you’re the Hiphopapotomous too). You should rap, or whatever the kids are calling it these days.

    Like


  32. on October 31, 2007 at 5:12 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    rhymenocerous: “Hm, I’m not sure where you are meeting all these tall girls who love shorter guys. ”

    Well, since I’ve already been accused of prejudice, I’ll just push the envelope more!

    I hate to tell you Rhymenocerous, but for every inch a woman is over the average 5’4″, the LESS chance she has of getting married and having kids. This is all well and dandy till said woman hits around 27-28. Then she totally stops getting asked out because all the sought after tall guys are taken. Thus, we have the phenom of tall girls suddenly “realizing” short guys are cute — if only to stave off another lonely barren night.

    I’ve seen this first hand many many times. It might not count for you personally, but I have seen it and the height preference on Match.com I mention bear it out.

    I still find really tiny women obnoxious and don’t cvare what anyone says. Why is prejudice bad? It’s usually based on experience.

    Like


  33. on October 31, 2007 at 5:14 pm David Alexander

    exceptions to the contrary, most girls prefer to date men who are a few inches taller than they are

    I think you may have some truth there. The girl I lost my virginity to was 5’4 and her b/f was 6’2, but she didn’t mind at all that I was 5’7 or so.

    BTW, any tips for my confident 5’5 brother?

    Like


  34. Days, you’re generally right about attitudes on short women. I’m not trying to hate on short women, but lots of them especially in the DC area thought they were queen shit.

    rhymenocerous – You know the average height of males in the US is around 5’9″ – 5’10”. Aren’t you worried you’ve written off a huge chunk of the male population — like more than 50%?
    This has dramatically narrowed your dating prospects.

    Also, isn’t it sexist to hold the view that the guy should always be taller in a heterosexual relationship? This kind of begs the question of distribution of power in a relationship, and I thought we were beyond assuming the man should always look and act as if he’s in control. What are we, still in the 1950s? Are you Doris Day, waitin’ on Lloyd Bridges to come save you or something?

    Like


  35. on October 31, 2007 at 5:39 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Joe T said: “Also, isn’t it sexist to hold the view that the guy should always be taller in a heterosexual relationship?”

    Joe — I think Roissy and Roosh will back me up on this — trying to talk politics and/or logic with many women is like trying to tach calculus to a kid with Down’s Syndrome. Women accuse men of being two-faced and thinking with their penises, when its women who have exactly these qualities. Women also want to earn as much as men yet will only date those that earn more. How is a society like that possible?

    Anyway…

    Now, will someone tell me what to do here? I have a six foot blonde old friend who is ready and willing. I’m too short to ever wanna be seen with her in public but would love to have those long legs wrapped around me. But I would feel guilty if I bedded her and that was that (she is a genuinely sweet girl). Yet she persists in that backhanded female way. Why do I have to have a conscience?

    Like


  36. Days, if she’s hot, get your freak on. Strike while the iron is hot, and you get 10 official stud points for every inch she is taller than you.

    Like


  37. “Women also want to earn as much as men yet will only date those that earn more. How is a society like that possible?”

    There have always been “haves” and have-nots.” For men with the trifecta, game, resources, and looks, the future is a sexual utopia but when hasn’t this been true?

    Like


  38. on October 31, 2007 at 7:37 pm rhymenocerous

    Joe T. – Nope, I’m not worried about writing anyone off. The way I see it, I’m taller than what, 80% of women out there? So I’m working with shitty statistics on my part bc I’m sure a large chunk of the male population has written *me* off because I’m too tall. Goes both ways. I’m not worried about finding someone simply because I want a taller guy. Also, I don’t think the guy should always be taller in a hetero relationship, I just prefer it for my own relationships. Height has nothing to do with power struggles or whatnot to me; it’s more that I just find a taller guy much more attractive, much like a guy might prefer a woman with a large ass or brown eyes.

    mq – Those rhymes are great, but not my own. They’re from a group called Flight of the Conchords. Check this out: http://youtube.com/watch?v=boafDfigiAo Are you saying chicks can’t rap? 😉

    Days of Arrows – WHY do women over 5’4″ have less of a chance of getting married and having kids? Is this a proven fact (if so, plz link to the journal article) or just your personal hypothesis? I mean… interesting, but it’s not like I can shrink myself so I’m not going to worry about it.

    Like


  39. on October 31, 2007 at 7:49 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Rhyme-

    There are several theories as to why taller women have fewer children and marry less/later. I can’t find the original story on this, but what it said was: For every inch over 5’4″ a woman was she was less likely to breed and for every inch a man was under the average (5’9″) HE was less likely to breed.

    Here are some links. They’re attributing it to both extra testosterone and being less likely to find a mate. The fact is, though, that most guys prefer shorter women — again check Match.com and such for the stats. My guess is this is biological — when two tall people breed, they produce freakishly tall offspring, thereby making mating for said offspring more difficult (height stops being a credit for men over 6’4″ — white men, anyway).

    Links:
    http://english.pravda.ru/society/family/13-10-2005/9063-tall-0
    http://www.physorg.com/news7000.html

    Like


  40. TracyLord“haha. that’s funny. and so not true. you see short guys hitting on tall girls all the time and tall women putting the shorter guy in the “friend zone” b/c he’s “so cute.””

    Take a guy who’s 5’5″. Put two women in front of him, one who’s 5’2″ and one who’s 5’8″ but otherwise equal in terms of physical attractiveness and personality. Who does he hit on? The answer is the shorter one. It only seems like short guys are hitting on tall girls “all the time” because the girls are tall in relation to the guys.

    Your second statement about the “friend zone” reinforces my point. Women often don’t take guys shorter than themselves seriously as romantic prospects, though I acknowledge there are many exceptions.

    1) a guy would fuck an amazon if he thought she was hot.</i.

    Correct. That’s why I said the preference for a shorter partner is much less rigid in men than women, overall physical attractiveness being much more important. In my example above, if the 5’8″ woman were an 8 and the 5’2″ were a 6, the guy would go after the 8.

    2) the bigger the wallet, the taller the women men think they can score

    Replace “taller” with “hotter” and “think they” with nothing at all, and I’m right there with you.

    3) short men take a bigger social beating than short women so if a short man can give his offspring the genetic advantage of height from a taller woman, he’ going to take. demand for the 5′8” woman will be greater.

    This is a good point, and interesting from an evolutionary standpoint. Why don’t men care about height as much as women, and when they do care why do they prefer shorter girls? I could see why from a social or relationship-dynamics point of view, but the evulutionary angle breaks down for me at this point.

    Like


  41. on October 31, 2007 at 8:36 pm rhymenocerous

    Days, thanks for the links. This is all very interesting.

    I plan on bucking the trend and procreating early and with someone like, 6’6″ or something. Then our army of freakishly tall children will dominate basketball and volleyball worldwide, (ensuring their prime desirability to other tall mates), and the freakishly tall army will keep on growing… muwahahaha.

    Like


  42. on October 31, 2007 at 8:37 pm extremely short

    I think the genetics guess was right– As a five-foot-tall woman, I fear for the heights of my children if I’m with a guy below average height.

    Like


  43. on October 31, 2007 at 9:19 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Rhyme said: “I plan on bucking the trend and procreating early and with someone like, 6′6″.”

    First, most of thsoe guys are with the very short women because of either genetic reasons (above) or the fact that sought-after short women like to show guys off like accessories.

    If you’re out of college, your probably already too late to procreate, sad to say. Anyone who is “fringe” (brilliant or tall women, short guys, guys with low future incomes, blacks who wanna uplift themselves) needs to meet their mate in college. Otherwise, you get thrown into the dating ring of fire, where you’re cold-competing against the Alphas. College offers a social structure where men/women actually have to get to know each other and shame is visited upon those who senselessly screw each other over. Plus, most everyone is somewhat idealistic — the female lawyer does not mind the future male teacher because the social context is different.

    Also, the workplace is now off-limits for romance. Thank feminists for that. And Match.com is a hang-out for guys who promise you the world and leave you with their condoms to pick up. And the clubs? Well, they leave you with guys who…well, you read this blog, you know how we are!

    If you have found a way to sidestep this maze (a “dating loophole”), let all the other fringe people know. Sorry to be negative!

    Like


  44. on October 31, 2007 at 9:45 pm rhymenocerous

    Days, I don’t think it’s a bunch of negativity, just an honest dose of what you feel the inevitable future for me is. I have faith in the tall dudes; my last serious boyfriend was 6’7″ and all about the tall girls, so I know guys like that are out there. If all else fails, I’m moving to the Netherlands. Average height for guys there is 6’1″ so I’ll be set. 😉

    Like


  45. rhyme – the Netherlands is cool, and I’m all in favor of 6′, blonde Dutch chicks for myself, but I was there last November and noticed the tall Dutch guys seem to prefer short, “exotic” immigrant women – Asians, Moroccans, Indonesians — over their own women these days. Which doesn’t bode too well for a 5’10” white (presumably) American girl trying to go over there and score. I’m just sayin’…

    Also, the biggest place I’ve ever seen for the WM/BF thing has been Germany. An amazing number of those types of pairings there…

    Like


  46. on November 1, 2007 at 12:12 am David Alexander

    Also, the workplace is now off-limits for romance. Thank feminists for that.

    Personally, I’d never date women from the workplace, and not because of sexual harassment. The problem with dating at work is that gossip and rumours spread rapidly, and the last thing that needed is everybody at work knowing about your bizzare nail fetish or taste for latex.

    Like


  47. Joe T. a similar thing happened in my home town a few years ago, according to my mom. There was an influx of Hispanic men into Charlotte, NC because it’s a brown friendly town. Then suddenly there was a baby boom of mixed Black/Hispanic children.

    The reason is because Hispanic men pursue commitment like men.

    So they’re not waiting until they’re 35+ to start thinking about maybe settling down. They want to secure a mate while they’re still young enough to make children safely.

    So it’s just a matter of survival of the fittest.

    Like


  48. “rhyme – the Netherlands is cool, and I’m all in favor of 6′, blonde Dutch chicks for myself, but I was there last November and noticed the tall Dutch guys seem to prefer short, “exotic” immigrant women – Asians, Moroccans, Indonesians — over their own women these days. Which doesn’t bode too well for a 5′10″ white (presumably) American girl trying to go over there and score. I’m just sayin’…”

    Hehehe says the exotic Dutch girl.

    Different guys like different women anyways, some prefer a tall blonde, others a cute exotic girl and again others an average height redhead.

    Average height is even higher for twentysomethings, and most young men are fairly fit here.

    I’m short for my country, but average height in most places. I don’t care much about height and have dated guys just slightly taller than me up to 2 meters tall.

    Like


  49. […] toxic sludge). What she lacks in original thinking she makes up for with energetic verve. I bet she piston-fucks like a man. How much do you want to bet that the guy who wrote the article would respond to that last […]

    Like


  50. where do eternal ingenue’s fall in?

    Like


  51. on June 15, 2009 at 1:16 pm The Masculinization Of The Western White Female « Roissy in DC

    […] 2. Women living under the new rules of the polygyny-favoring modern sexual market are choosing alpha males at greater rates than women under the older, monogamy-favoring system. And naturally, the alpha males these women choose are more masculine than the betas they are no longer keen on settling down with. When they have kids with these alpha skittles men — and it’s the low class Idiocratic brood sows who are having more kids than the play-by-the-rules plush beta herbs — the thug genes are passed on and their sons are born with their fists already swinging or holding a beer and their daughters are born with lantern jaws and a propensity to fuck with piston-like efficiency. […]

    Like