Tragedy Vs Statistic

Kazakh beauty jumps to death in financial district.

Ruslana Korshunova, 20, whose face has graced the cover of French Elle and Russian Vogue, apparently jumped from her ninth-floor apartment in her Water Street building in the Financial District just before 2:30 p.m.

VERY inspiring.

Lots of fat shits dying prematurely.

Conclusions:  The estimated number of annual deaths attributable to obesity among US adults is approximately 280,000 based on HRs from all subjects and 325,000 based on HRs from only nonsmokers and never-smokers.

sleeps in a piano.





Comments


  1. http://www.nmha.org/go/state-ranking

    “In terms of 2004 suicide rates, the District of Columbia was the lowest, followed by New York and Massachusetts. Alaska had the highest suicide rate, followed by Nevada and New Mexico.”

    Chances are Ruslana was on antidepressants.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061206095421.htm

    “Patients taking any kind of antidepressant had a 36 percent increased risk of a subsequent suicide attempt leading to hospitalization …. compared with those taking no antidepressants..”

    Like


  2. This whole anti depressants lead to suicide stuff is highly suspicious to me. First of all, there’s a lot of sample selection going on (more severely depressed people would both be more likely to commit suicide and be prescribed antidepressants more often, correlation does not mean causation here).

    Then there’s the point about anti depressants not working very quickly (or not at all, best medications work for maybe slightly under 50% of patients) so if you get the medication and it won’t work for you, you’ll understandably be in even stronger despair than before (BTW this is what I believe is behind the alleged Roaccutane suicides, if the last resort medication won’t work all bets are off).

    The whole story of antidepressants giving patients the energy to commit suicide is somewhat fishy. If it was actually true, you could easily counteract it with tranquilizers.

    Like


  3. on June 30, 2008 at 9:41 pm SeaFighter HSV

    She’s not really hot, no tradgedy here.

    Like


  4. Nupnup,

    I imagine there must be studies looking at suicide rates in non-depressed individuals taking antidepressants for other medical reasons (headache control for example). What do those show?

    Like


  5. on June 30, 2008 at 10:44 pm SovereignAmericanMale

    @1 Sara
    the time honored “correlation is not causation” will rear its head, and this brings to mind the statistics I have read:

    1. By the time a female in this country is 18 years old, 38% have been sexually molested.

    2. Most strippers, as with other women who work in the sex industry, are adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Research indicates the number is between 60%-80%
    -Mary Anne Layden, Ph. D

    Does that mean all of the 60-80% of the 38% of the females (those molested by the age of 18) became sex workers?

    By No means, is this the case. There are 20%-40% of sex workers who were not abused as minors working in the industry.

    or consider this:

    One study found that 35% of strippers have Multiple Personality Disorder, 55% had Borderline Personality Disorder, and 60% had Major Depressive Episodes.

    But I defy anyone to prove which causes which, Do you have to become crazy to be a sex worker, or does being a sex worker cause mental illness?

    But then we can dial up the complexity by factoring drug usage among the sex workers. Did drug abuse cause the mental problems, and then sex-acting-out, or did mental illness lead to (cause) drug abuse, which led to the sex trade for money to get a fix?

    Like


  6. The explanation is quite simple. A victim of depression is too depressed to do ANYTHING, usually including suicide. A quick burst of energy from antidepressants can be used to do something, unfortunately including suicide.

    Like


  7. “35% of strippers have Multiple Personality Disorder”
    Sounds about right.
    Doesn’t it sometimes seem like at least 35% of All women have MPD though?

    Like


  8. This clearly indicates the best way to deal with depression is the old fashioned method, drinking yourself into a incoherent stupor.

    What really makes the bottom picture is that she appears to be wearing a tiara. The whole getup looks like she’s about to try to seduce/poison Conan the Destroyer.

    Commenter #3 is named after a glorified yacht.

    Like


  9. Body For Life. It works.

    nuff said.

    Like


  10. >The explanation is quite simple. A victim of depression is too depressed to do ANYTHING, usually including suicide. A quick burst of energy from antidepressants can be used to do something, unfortunately including suicide.

    That is the usual idea. Antidepressants generally don’t give quick bursts of energy though (side effects are pretty instant though, now what I might believe that a few people have very adverse reactions that may drive them into suicide), most take a few weeks to be noticeable, some months to reach full potential. And as I say, if there was overweighing evidence for this, you could always combat it with tranquilizers.

    Besides, after these studies first went public, SSRI prescriptions in the US sank but overall suicide rates rose. So correlation is not causation *does* rear its ugly head.

    Like


  11. on June 30, 2008 at 11:51 pm SovereignAmericanMale

    as above sans shady smiley

    Does that mean all of the 60-80% of the 38% of the females { those molested by the age of 18 } became sex workers?

    Like


  12. I’ve seen much better pictures of Korshunova. She was amazingly beautiful. Everyone should Google Image her to get a much better picture of this beauty.

    JAMA is not the paragon of effective medical reporting that it used to be, so take that one with a grain of salt.

    But all things being equal, be lean, be fit, fuck the slender beauties and get them pregnant for the betas.

    Like


  13. I think I saw that dude in the bottom pic singing “I’m Your Venus” at a drag queen cabaret act.

    Like


  14. on July 1, 2008 at 12:47 am Yakking Guy

    “1. By the time a female in this country is 18 years old, 38% have been sexually molested.”

    Sorry Sara, but that holds about as much water as “50% of males have had a homosexual experience.”

    Such conclusions are arrived at by sheltered university professors. Their sway–and spendable income–will hold only as long as the world accepts the linen paper–er, Federal Reserve mouse-clicks–known as “United States Dollars.” My guess is somewhere between five and fifteen years.

    Like


  15. Damn! What a shame such a hot babe offed herself!

    She needed to give some of my younger brothers a chance to take care of her correctly.

    Back in the day it would have taken about three firemen and a can opener to get my toungue out of her gap. What a genetic loss……………………would have liked to have seen that hottie have five kids. Instead some disgusting AFDC hoochie-mamma fat-ass in the projects will breed more scum instead. Life is not as it should be, and we have to work on that.

    Like


  16. Kazakh beauty jumps to death

    It was Borat’s fault!

    Like


  17. on July 1, 2008 at 3:29 am Tupac Chopra

    Peat:

    “Doesn’t it sometimes seem like at least 35% of All women have MPD though?”

    Sara wept.

    Like


  18. 5 S.A.M.

    “But I defy anyone to prove which causes which, Do you have to become crazy to be a sex worker, or does being a sex worker cause mental illness?”

    You have to be crazy to be a sex worker. I don’t need for it to be proven. I can feel the truth of it. What is crazy but self destructive behavior? With that definition we are all varying degrees of crazy at any given time.

    “Did drug abuse cause the mental problems, and then sex-acting-out, or did mental illness lead to (cause) drug abuse, which led to the sex trade for money to get a fix?”

    People take drugs to feel better which means they must feel pretty bad before taking drugs because drugs are incompatible with our natural chemistry. One needs to ask oneself why they feel so shitty in the first place that the relief is found in poisoning yourself. Some drugs are worse than others. Dependence on drugs makes existing mental problems worse.

    The sex trade has come about because of sexual repression but not the way you are probably thinking of it. When I say “sexual repression” I mean the efforts put out by various powers to control and limit our use of sexual energy. As long as it is used as recreation or the release of pent up energy and not for transformation, we remain slaves and easily controlled. A person who is truly sexually free is a “danger” to those who would control him/her.

    Like


  19. 14 Yakking Guy and 17 Tupoc:

    Sorry, you guys are both idiots. I was not the one who said anything about 38% anything.

    Like


  20. on July 1, 2008 at 6:37 am SovereignAmericanMale

    @19 sara

    Yep. Misquoting ME and my quote, by failing to read what I said, and assuming I was quoting you (sara) when I was not.
    Ad factorum, I never quoted you in that post, I was making a series of points about correlation vs Causation.

    Like


  21. Oh please Sara. Grow up. The Sex Trade was around in Babylonian times. There’s cuneiform tablets describing how it was regulated. Not to mention the experience of Japan (pre-contact), Thailand, Africa, etc.

    Everywhere there’s humans, there’s women trading sex for other resources. That’s the way it is and always will be.

    “Limit and control ‘sexual energy’?” Please. Ever since Thog the caveman stuck a spear in Og for feeling up his girlfriend, Human Beings have controlled their sexuality to prevent mass slaughter!

    I blogged about a failure to do just that Last Week regarding Pitcairn Island. Everyone knows the “romantic” legend of Fletcher Christian, his mutiny on the Bounty, his return on the Bounty to Tahiti to pick up his girlfriend and other women and ending up in Pitcairn Island. Fade out.

    What the stories omit is the reality: nineteen years later the US ship Topaz found only one man and 6 women alive. All the others had been slaughtered in a raw struggle over the women (the men outnumbered them). In a situation outside a larger society with it’s own rules and enforcements, “Alpha” Fletcher Christian was murdered by some of his pals ticked off about not having women. Alphas don’t have it their own way because weapons equalize things in the “state of nature.” Ask Fletcher Christian. About that or “repressing sexuality.” He’d have been better off with Bligh. Bligh got all HIS people to safety over 3,000 miles of open sea in a tiny boat. Testified on behalf of some of his crew, later as well who had stayed in Tahiti.

    Oh the best part? Christian’s direct descendant was recently convicted, along with a bunch of other Pitcairn Island men, of abuse of minors in cases going back decades! Yes by all means llet’s have unfettered sexuality! [Which means the strong exploit the weak.]

    Like


  22. on July 1, 2008 at 7:58 am SovereignAmericanMale

    @12 El Guapo

    “But all things being equal, be lean, be fit, fuck the slender beauties and get them pregnant for the betas”

    I am having bad cognitive disidence at the moment… Hot Milfs or hotter Alphaspawn daughters for the beta’s sexual gratification. I am not so sure that the father would make the first move, if the stepdaughter gained her father alphamentality via genes, she may make a move to squeze her mother out.

    But Take El Guapo’s above comment and read it in the light of Gannon’s worldview reporting:

    Gannon (on the I love Abortion Thread, selected passages)

    “and has two step children”

    “I bet he is fucking the 13 year old step daughter. If not, he would have chosen a 26 year old childless woman”

    “It’s very common for stepfathers to have sex with their stepdaughters as soon as they enter their early teens. Some men proactively target single/divorced women with teen daughters to gain sexual acces to them. A normal heterosexual man can be attracted to an eleven year old girl if she shows obvious signs of puberty, like menstruation, a rounded arse and developing breasts. Fat girls enter puberty fairly early.”

    “Yes, such behaviour is definitively normal. A normal heterosexual man does not recognize a stepdaughter as a daughter, but as a potential bealthy, very fertile sexual partner. So yes, that behaviour is normal but could be considered inmoral. The potential for abuse is high in such a situation, but should the law always presume abuse?.”

    “Shouldn’t it be obvious to the 40 year old woman that the only reason she was chosen was the acces to her teen daughter(s)?. The sexual relationship in such cases usually starts when the stepdaughter shows clear first signs of puberty.”

    Like


  23. on July 1, 2008 at 8:12 am johnny five

    the slaughter of innocents is tragic.
    injustice is tragic.
    catastrophic suffering that stems only from being in the wrong place at the wrong time is tragic.

    the suicide of a young woman on a steep rise to the top of her profession is not at all tragic; it’s just pathetic.

    Like


  24. shit, natural selection at its finest…

    thin the herd i say

    i also say “kick a bitch”

    Like


  25. How low we are. “My nasty and miserable death is morally superior to your miserable and nasty death.

    Like


  26. Who’s that hottie in the pic on the bottom? WOOF!!!

    Like


  27. Yesterday, a supermodel, today, a doctor. What is it with jumping?

    Like


  28. 21 Whiskey

    As usual my statements about sexual repression are 100% misunderstood. I expected as much. In your defense, I’m attempting to express something very few people actually get. My meaning is more esoteric; spiritual if I might be allowed to use that word here. It’s really out of place in this limited intellectual arena. I could post the Sex Matters by Osho book link again; but why bother? LOL I have zero expectation anyone here would get it anyway.

    Like


  29. 21 Whiskey

    ” Yes by all means llet’s have unfettered sexuality! [Which means the strong exploit the weak.]

    Real intelligence comes from the mind AND heart. By that definition, you are an idiot.

    Like


  30. “I don’t need for it to be proven. I can feel the truth of it.” — sara

    And that folks, is the game….

    Like


  31. 30 Jay

    The “game” as you call it is far from a game. You want to be respected for your intelligence, correct? Of course intelligence applies to both sexes. How about when you are having an emotional day? Does that ever happen? When you are just plain happy, excited, devastated, or upset? Should you suddenly be required to justify and logically prove WHY you are feeling such emotions?

    And have you heard of “intuition” as a possibly higher form of intelligence? Does it irk you when a woman can go from A to Z without having to go through the entire alphabet? And then she is RIGHT? LOL She could no sooner explain how she does that logically than fly. It would be using the left side of the brain to explain the right side. Doesn’t work.

    So why should you not respect her for that ability? Why should she respect your “intelligence” when you cannot respect her intuition or emotions? Are they not both equally valuable? You seem to think not which probably lead to lots of women trouble for you.

    Like


  32. Ooops. Hit Submit too quickly. The post should have read:

    I’ve seen much better pictures of Korshunova. She was amazingly beautiful. Everyone should Google Image her to get a much better picture of this beauty.

    JAMA is not the paragon of effective medical reporting that it used to be, so take that one with a grain of salt.

    But all things being equal, be lean, be fit, fuck the slender beauties and get them pregnant for the betas to cherish and raise the kids.

    ***
    That should fix the cognitive dissonance.

    Like


  33. Sara,

    The cognitive dissonance of your posts is absolutely astounding. Intuition and emotion are two totally different things, yet women almost universally have a difficult time telling the difference between the two. Put simply, just because something feels right, doesn’t mean that it is.

    Like


  34. For some stepfathers, a stepdaughter is just another whore to fuck. For the biological father, his daughter will always be his princess. That’s why only very selfish women get divorced.

    Like


  35. 34 Gannon

    Your cognitive dissonance is astounding.

    Like


  36. Please elaborate Sarah, I love to hear your esoteric thesis.

    Like


  37. Since we’re beating the term to death, “Cognitive Dissonance” sounds like a good name for the new Rock Band of Roissy and crew.

    Like


  38. get them pregnant for the betas to cherish and raise the kids

    I wouldn’t mind that per se as long as I still have access to sex with her…

    That’s why only very selfish women get divorced.

    Even if the couple argues a lot? Or if the man is a wife-beater?

    For some stepfathers, a stepdaughter is just another whore to fuck.

    Since you’re attracted to 16 year old women, it makes sense in your sphere of the world. Of course, you’ll want that precious abortion that you hate once said step-daughter gets pregnant.

    Now in the rest of the world where we cherish and love our children, our stepdaughters in many cases will be loved just as much as our own biological children.

    Like


  39. Jay-

    Roissy should crib William Gibson and call the band the Cognitive Dissidents!

    Like


  40. on July 1, 2008 at 10:27 pm SovereignAmericanMale

    @39 Brutus

    “Jay- (Gatsby)

    Roissy should crib William Gibson and call the band the Cognitive Dissidents!”

    Correction it should be:

    Bad Cognitive Dissidents

    After all, the Engine that pulled that train is found with in post 22 (expert past master in typonese)

    “I am having bad cognitive disidence at the moment…”

    Proof again: that Superior thoughts need no correct spelling to manifest intended effect and unintended effects (Ego basks in the glow) I want to thank Roissy, Gannon, and El Guapo for helping to make this possible. You may now be my wingmen.

    Like


  41. on July 1, 2008 at 11:12 pm SovereignAmericanMale

    Almost everyone here loves to hate on Gannon for his view that 14 year olds are fair game for LTR. (Never mind that He is not in the US or Western Europe hemisphere and could be considered as being in Thailand/Cambodia, culturally speaking)

    Almost all of the GannonHaters don’t know or realize, where they got their internal values. Ones not arrived at by Pure Reason & Logic, but instead informed by public, trendy morals and/or cultural bias (that change over time)

    [Not to mention “group dynamic” based social planning by skilled operators who understand how to fabricate “Public Opinion, and Political Correctness” by using groups to change individuals personal beliefs. Damn these guys are so good, you don’t even see them at work. Like a pick pocket]

    Beginning Rant in 3,2,1…
    [Ask yourself, why the Modern Public education system uses the Socratic method to form minds, and has forsaken teaching Logic. “don’t think, instead trust and obey” Ask yourself could it be planned failure? Are the people of the US inmasse being dumbed down? *DO NOT ASK WHY*] /end rant

    (in the long view of history Creationists = 6000+, Evolutionists 3.5 million + years)

    The notion of “childhood” is actually a fairly recent one, certainly post-Industrial Revolution. During the Industrial Revolution kids worked in steel mills, coal mines, on navy ships etc.

    Before then, kids were working the farm and pulling their weight. It isn’t like farmers have large families as investments!

    Question: where do we draw the line with childhood? In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juilet, the star-crossed lovers were 13.
    Does that play advocate childhood sexual activity? By modern standards it would certainly seem to.

    One of Mohammed’s wives was eight when he married her, and that seemed to be fairly common by the standards of his society.

    Livia was married to Tiberius Claudius Nero when she was 12 and he was 45, and she was considered to have taken a first husband fairly late.

    Seeing that the Definition of childhood, is in fact a moving goal post, I expect AOC to continue to go up rather then start going back down. (E.G. Looking at alcohol laws, during world war II, Korea, Vietnam 18 was a legal drinking age, now presently 21.)

    The biggest problem I see: is the hipocrisy shown by (United States and state republic) D.A.s as they certify 8-14 year olds as adults in murder and rape cases by claiming the “children” were capable of reason and logic as Adults. on the one hand…

    For State punishment purposes, children are adults,

    While on the other…

    for business contract purposes (e.g. bank accounts, credit cards, car loans, employment) children are not adults.
    and relationship skill development and sexual development children are not adults.

    (a good example are the cases pending on minor girls sending Cellphone porn to their minor boyfriends, unasked for by the boyfriend I might add, but the minor boyfriend/s gets arrested)

    Like


  42. #40 -S A M
    “pulled that train”

    a mixed metaphor?

    Like


  43. on July 1, 2008 at 11:54 pm SovereignAmericanMale

    @42 Peat

    ” #40 -S A M
    “pulled that train”

    “a mixed metaphor?”

    Nothing mixed as there is no second metaphor.

    Nothing deliberate, its an organic, coincidental wordplay.

    Product of a deviant mind? No doubt about it.

    Like


  44. “Western Europe hemisphere”
    Age of consent IS AROUND 14 in Europe by the way, as well as Latinamerica: For example, Spain 13, Austria 14, France 15, Germany 14-16 (requires explanation), and so on. The Eurpean Union wants an uniform age of consent of 14 for heterosex and 16 for homosexual male sex. The US is the excetion in the Western World, thanks to Femenism and the religious right (which is strange, the bible says marriageable age for girls is 13). During medieval and roman times, girls married at 13/14, minimum age of marriage was 12. As late as the late nineteenth century, age of consent was 10 in anglo countries and twelve in continental Europe.
    I think 14 is fair. All girls at that age are sexually mature and know what they are doing. People who believe otherwise fall into three categories:
    1. fathers who love their princesses too much
    2. aging mother’s who can’t admit who is the star of the party now
    3. People who don’t know real 14 year olds.
    94.9% of adult men have a strong sexual appetite for teen girls.
    The 5% who don’t are gay. And the 0.1% refers to people with a distorted sexuality like David Alexander, and maybe also to persons who have a fetish for glorious natural pelts, although I believe that the later are only in self denial.
    Rising ages of consent when girls develope and menstruate earlier is nonsense.
    By the way, for the people who appreciate Goethe’s masterpiece Faust: Gretchen, who is the epitome of female beauty is 14.

    Like


  45. “During medieval and roman times, girls married at 13/14, minimum age of marriage was 12”

    During medieval and roman times, women were also chattel. Gee, might *that* have had something to do with it? That they didn’t have any say in the matter?? I mean, jeez, a large contingent of people at that time believed the earth was flat, too. Just because that’s how it was done doesn’t mean it was a good idea.

    “I think 14 is fair. All girls at that age are sexually mature and know what they are doing. People who believe otherwise fall into three categories:
    1. fathers who love their princesses too much
    2. aging mother’s who can’t admit who is the star of the party now
    3. People who don’t know real 14 year olds.”

    4. People who have *been* real 14 year old girls. Dude, 14-year-old girls are neither psychologically nor emotionally stable enough to be making life-altering decisions, and I say that as someone who has first-hand experience of it. That they’re physically capable of having sex/getting pregnant isn’t the point: it still doesn’t logically follow that they *should*.

    Clearly you’re obsessed, so good luck with that. But attempts to demonize people who happen to disagree with you but have just as many valid reasons for their belief? Lame.

    And it’s a fairly sure bet that you’ll be changing your tune once you have a 14-year-old daughter of your own. I hope so, for her sake.

    Like


  46. >I think 14 is fair. All girls at that age are sexually mature and know what they are doing.

    I content most of them dont know that even with 20 so it should either not be a criterion or if it was, it hurts your argument.

    Now I’m not opposed to 14 year olds having sex, I just see a lot of issues by having them seduced by 35 year olds. OTOH, even with age of consent of 14 or 16 we probably would not see it very often.

    Coincidentally, some countries actually allow prostitution at age of consent at which point I would rather not see it any lower than it is. I have no problem with prostitution per se but I doubt a 16 year old, much less a 14 year old (and neither most 18 year olds, while we’re at it) can handle it.

    Like


  47. No problem Nupnup. Prostitution, participation in pornography can all be at 18.

    Like


  48. on July 2, 2008 at 3:15 am SovereignAmericanMale

    @44 Gannon

    “the religious right (which is strange, the bible says marriageable age for girls is 13)”

    Let me give you an insight into the Religious Right wing conservative culture.
    in short..
    Religion = bible + social-religious customs and traditions (doctrine or dogmas)

    In the differing groups (sects) of protestant Christianity, (as well as the Roman Cathlics)that make up the comprise the de facto “Religious Right”, the Episcopalians, Baptists, Lutherans etc.
    You will have pronouncements of faith that spawn from traditions not found within, and sometimes over-rulling the bible.

    An excellent example is the day on which the Sabbath is kept. The bible makes it clear God said to keep it on the 7th day (from Friday at sunset to Saturday evening at sunset) But a ruling by the Pope moved it to Sunday to separate christianty from judaism, and the Jewish people in general have kept the original day of the week.

    I have been doing research on the Age of Consent to Marry and will post it shortly.

    Like


  49. on July 2, 2008 at 3:22 am SovereignAmericanMale

    According to the Latin Rite (aka Roman Catholic)

    Until 1917, canon law had basically considered anyone above the age of 12 capable of marriage.

    Thus, when the 1917 Code raised the minimum age for marriage in the church:

    “The marriageable age is fourteen full years in males and twelve full years in females, under penalty of nullity (unless natural puberty supplies the want of years).”
    -Source the Chatholic Encyclopdia

    As of 1983 Code of Canon Law made further changes:

    Canon 1083.1 A man cannot validly enter marriage before the completion of his sixteenth year of age, nor a woman before the completion of her fourteenth year.

    Canon 1083.2 conference of bishops may establish a higher age for the lawful celebration of marriage.The can establish a higher age for licit marriage, although this has not been done in the United States

    The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has risen the age of marriage to 18th for both man and woman.

    In Canada, and also in New Zealand, this minimum age has been set to 18 years old for both parties.

    In England and Wales, this minimum age has been set to be in accordance with civil law (i.e., 16 years old for both parties).
    In South Africa, and also in Switzerland, this minimum age has been set to be in accordance with civil law.

    Historically Parental consent was vital under Civil Law:

    This matter was not taken lightly by the Crown, and in the “Ordonnance de Blois” the stipulated punishment for marrying a minor (of less than 25 years)
    without the consent of the parents was:

    “death without any hope of pardon or commutation of sentence”.

    Heavy Bad Mojo! She had to be 25 years old to consent without her parents in France.

    Outside of the Catholic Church Law
    In the Common Law of England, a boy of fourteen and a girl of twelve could contract marriage validly.

    That norm was adopted in Civil Code
    of Lower Canada.
    In the United States, English Common Law was general
    adopted, but many of the norms of that law have been changed by statute in the various states.

    Woywod & Smiith, A Practical Commentary on the Code of Canon Law [c. 1925, reprint 1952] cites

    Hall & Brooks, American Marriage Laws : “In seventeen states no marriageable ages have been fixed by statute.

    In nine of these, common law [14 & 12] has been formally recognized. In states where marriageable ages have been established by statute, the most usual ages are 18 for males and 16 for females.”

    Like


  50. 36 Gannon and 33 Jay

    I was kind of goofing on 33 Jay’s comment on My cognitive dissonance which according to the online dictionary means:

    “the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, esp. as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change.”

    Your statement….

    “For the biological father, his daughter will always be his princess. That’s why only very selfish women get divorced.”

    …. is about as senseless as I’ve heard. Because a daughter his the father’s princess, a woman should never divorce her husband? What are you snorting over there? The classic ‘daddy’s girl’ is often a neurotic mess, and a father’s semi-incestuous attachment to his biological daughter does not seem like a great reason to stay married. How sacrificing are women supposed to be? I think in your mind, she should be a servant to his selfishness.

    Like


  51. @Sara
    Daughters need a protector, and the only person to fulfil that ideal is the father, grandfather or uncle. Unrelated man will want to fuck her. So only selfish women divorce, because they prefer to havock their children instead of learning to renew their love to their godgiven husband.

    Like


  52. 51 Oh, Gannon, you make it sound so easy, and here’s a wake up call. Everyone is selfishly motivated. How else would you have it? Even the man who is protective of his wife and daughters does it to make himself feel good about himself. There is NOTHING wrong with that. You talk about “renewing love” like there is a switch a woman can turn on and off at will. That may literally be true as in “love is a decision” but relationships are complex and a great deal depends on the health of the individuals involved.

    Like


  53. There are a few justified cases for divorce. Usually however the real reason is that the woman is bored or wants new thrills. Therefore, society should shun divorced women and men should use divorced women only for fucking and dumping.

    Like


  54. 53 Gannon

    You are very silly indeed. “Bored or wants new thrills?” Where do you find this kind of stuff? Roissy? I was neither bored nor thrilled at my two (count ’em) two divorces. Divorced women only good for pumping and dumping? LOL I mean, really.

    Like


  55. Oh BLAAAAA BLAAAA BLAAAAAA…. Where did you get the pic of the hot fattie?????

    Like


  56. This is my favorite blog entry so far. Excellent catch. One beautiful woman is more important than 280,000 fatties. Hilarious, good job.

    Like