Here’s How Trump Can Win The Election Today

Yesterday, someone took a pick-ax to Trump’s Hollywood Walk of Fame star and destroyed it. The perp was later identified as Jamie Otis, a (surprise!) white knight betaboy rich limousine libfag (a “hillbully” as Scott Adams coins it):

limolibfag

This sideways merlot-drinking goober looks like he was sexual assaulted by a buttplug.

The story has developed with a twist. Reader Corvo explains,

The star was repaired, and now a homeless American black woman is sitting there guarding it, holding up a sign asking why we are letting 20 million illegal immigrants stay here when Americans are sleeping in the streets.

trumpstarhomeless

GBFM — I know you’re working for the Trump campaign. Tell him to fly out there and give this woman a hug; give her a job; tell her he’s “With Her” and fighting for her, and that it’s time America take care of its own citizens first. This is an election-winning moment.

Corvo is right. This is a golden opportunity for the Golden Don to not only squeeze out some good press from fence-sitting virtue signaling Book of Cucking apostles, but to maximally depress black turnout for thecunt and improve his own black vote by a margin no GOP presidential candidate has won in generations.

Trump, are you listening? Fly out to Pedophileland…excuse me Hollywood…give this woman a hug and a free night at your new Washington DC hotel, say you’re with her (heh), and that you’re fighting for Americans and not for globalist whores who want to line their own pockets, and then put your chair into the reclining position as your poll numbers soar.

***

Trump: “A moment of reckoning”

In the last month, Trump has been landing hammer blows on the globohomobezos alliance against heritage America. Whatever happens Nov 8……everything’s changed.





Comments


  1. It must be a frustrating and miserable existence to be a shitlibfagpedophace. Just when they think they can speak for all black people, a black woman swings their dainty expectations, yet again. Whenever blacks have voice or self-determination, they always shatter some liberal narrative or another. I suppose they do have a use after all. Some of them, at least.

    Liked by 2 people


    • I agree. Do not respect virtue-signalling phonies. They invent problems because they NEED to bitch about something. like the faggots trying to get inn-n-out burger to offer vegan patties lmao go work on your family or goals and quit trying to make outrage your identity.

      Ted Kaczynski (yes that one) on the liberal need to identify with weakness:

      The Psychology of Modern Leftism
      6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.

      7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much a movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)

      8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th century.

      9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.

      [edit]
      Feelings of Inferiority
      10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum of related traits: low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

      11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftist anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the word “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

      12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual, white males from middle-class families.

      13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not suggest that women, Indians, etc., ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology).

      14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.

      15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

      16. Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative”, “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc. play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his own ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

      17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftist intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.

      18. Modern leftist philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftist philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e. failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

      19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. 1 But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.

      20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.

      21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.

      22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.

      23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism.

      Liked by 2 people


      • on October 27, 2016 at 6:01 pm Victor Vaughn

        Speaking of Ted Kaczynski, I heard he has a new book that was just recently published. It’s called, “Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How”

        https://www.amazon.com/Anti-Tech-Revolution-Theodore-John-Kaczynski/dp/1944228004/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1477612856&sr=8-1&keywords=anti-tech+revolution+why+and+how

        …I wonder what else he has to say about leftist psychology, or what can be done to counter it.

        Like


      • I have heard that Ted Kaczynski was quite a persuasive anti-Left. However, this is the first time I have read anything substantial of his (i.e. not a two-line quote, which don’t interest me).
        This paragraph hooked me;
        20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.

        The leftist described here purposely provokes a severe, negative reaction because he enjoys the attention, yet doesn’t feel confident enough or valuable enough to earn/elicit positive attention. He doesn’t excel in sports, or academia, nor class-clownery; not even his bullying inspires fearful respect.
        So he harasses, insults, disturbs and assaults those who he knows will react. However, the conditions of eliciting those reactions, are chosen by the leftist; There is a strong tendency toward cowardice and provocation of those who cannot retaliate…..mob-on-one violence, or harassing beyond absurdity while on camera, or of police when he can feel safe knowing that any reaction will be measured, and yet morally outrageous. That isn’t to say that a sever reaction isn’t desired, strongly, by the aggressor, but only that no possible reaction (not quite true, but I will get to that) will cause the terroriser not to consider himself superior, vindicated, victimized and deliciously pitied.

        For most people unaccustomed to confronting a leftist, he will typically follow the emotional flow of the leftist, falling into his frame and getting drawn into supplying the leftist the sweet, sweet emotional rush he desires. There are only two, and striving for one doesn’t undercut attempts to reach the other:
        [Masochistic Victory] and [Morally Superior Lambastion]
        [Masochistic Victory]: The victim steps beyond either moral or legal defensability by screaming, punching, pushing or excessively insulting (“fuck off, cunt”) the leftist. The leftist is allowed to feel the sweet agony of being victimized
        [Lambastion]: The victim is made to retreat each of his arguments, apologise and end all engagement (including physically withdrawing) Whether the victim retreats physically, or just his argument, the leftist will harry the backtracking with even stronger insults and moral derogitation (“You are a racist, a hater, I can’t even”). Dogpiling by the peer group, media, polite society and any other leftist allies occurs until maximum feels and genuflection has been achieved.

        Like


      • @donperegrine

        +1
        Great analysis. Agreed: Kick their ass or mock/ridicule them mercilessly Do not attempt to engage in a rational argument. These are the strongest tools to take the air out of their tire.

        Like


      • Very interesting, but it begs the question: If the Left is consumed by feelings of inferiority, how did they achieve such power over society? Two thoughts: In some people, feelings of inadequacy spur a drive to succeed, if only because of the fear of failure (most Ivy grads who made it on the merits qualify here, in my experience).

        My second thought is more insidious. The real leaders of the Left (the Lenins of the world) do not suffer this affliction, but they recognize it in others and cynically exploit it for power. Psychopathy 101.

        Like


    • I think about this all the time. Their lives are completely devoted to being miserable all the time, and they don’t have the balls to kill themselves. Just worthless people.

      Like


    • Was there a black woman in the photo? All I could think about was eating some Hersheys……

      Like


  2. on October 27, 2016 at 12:26 pm Divine Son of Kek

    The media would trip over themselves to blast it as the most cynical thing….ever.

    [CH: of course they would. and it won’t matter. pandering works, especially with blacks and faggot white cucks.]

    Liked by 2 people


    • on October 27, 2016 at 12:27 pm Divine Son of Kek

      Only the left is allowed to shamelessly pander.

      Like


      • What CH suggests isn’t shamelessly pandering, it’s persuasive pandering. Gets the job done.

        [CH: in politics, “pandering” is another word for “playing hardball”.]

        Liked by 1 person


    • Unless they could prove she’s a plant… which I’m assuming she ain’t… the MSM better just shut they moufs and come along with the ride.

      Otherwise, THEY’LL out themselves even more as being the cynical ones.

      Like


    • I’d say the most cynical thing is . . . pretty much anything The Cunt has ever done in her miserable life.

      Or some wealthy shitlib taking a sledgehammer to Trump’s Hollywood star.

      But this — nah, this isn’t cynical. Trump is known in NYC as the type of guy who has done stuff like this all his life.

      You see, unlike The Cunt, to whom people are merely things to manipulate for personal gain, means to an end, Trump actually likes people. And people like him.

      Like


    • on October 27, 2016 at 2:09 pm Hackett To Bits

      This is a gift, a chance for a ‘high ground maneuver’ from the grassy knoll of our politics.
      It isn’t pandering because it wouldn’t be aimed at shitlibs; it would take away the inhibitions from the fence sitters to going Trump.

      Like


      • And if I were the luegenpresse and Hillary, pulling that Khan stunt and the gropegate stunts, I wouldn’t talk about any “pandering”.

        Like


    • It ain’t pandering if you really mean it.

      And Trump is the kind of guy who’s been helping out people like this all his life.

      Like


  3. paging GBFM we need your lololoz

    Liked by 3 people


  4. Damn son. This is good stuff right here.

    Liked by 2 people


  5. Wise advice. It would also preempt any attempt by the media to portray her as a paid plant. Don Jr., are you listening? We know you’re a reader.

    Liked by 2 people


  6. […] Here’s How Trump Can Win The Election Today […]

    Like


  7. I think my “She’s our Rosa Parks” should at least have gotten an honourable mention. 😡

    /always a bridesmaid rape!

    Liked by 1 person


  8. Totally off topic, but judging by Alex Jones’ performance during this election, I say he’s earned a second chance at being considered legit rather than a kook or shill. Yeah he can be obnoxious, but he is covering things every day that the Lugenpresse won’t touch. Sure, he avoids the (((third rail))) but so do most others if they want to make a good living. He’s done more for Trump than any of the GOP or the NRO Cucks.

    [CH: the interesting thing about alex jones’ red pill evolution is that he didn’t need kooky conspiracy theories after this past year, when reality is offering up enough clown world grist for him to expose.]

    Liked by 2 people


    • Seconded, as I’ve said before, he’s been the absolute best non-left news source on this entire election cycle, and terrifyingly right so many times. He’s basically Glenn Greenwald of the non-Left, but instead of being a single reporter he built a shadow news organization out of podcasting, livestreaming, and hungry young reporters.

      Infowars rape!

      Like


    • I’ve been listening more to Alex Jones lately. I largely dismissed him as a cuckspiracy theorist in that he would ascribe every globalist plot as some sort of Nazi eugenics scheme (as if they were the heirs of Hitler. He was constantly playing into the leftists’ framing of history here). The globalists are hardly even pro-Aryan–it is obvious to anyone who can rub their two brain cells together that the globalists want to flood white European lands with Third worlders who will drive down wages and vote for corrupt establishment leftist politicians. The real eugenics plot going on here is outright soft genocide against whites.

      But I think he has gotten better of late, not mentioning the Nazi boogeyman as often (but he’ll still mention Soros’ alleged collaboration with the Nazis when he was 12 years old–as if this was his greatest character flaw). And the Wikileaks dumps of late have validated a good portion of what he has been saying.

      Liked by 1 person


      • You’ve missed the point. The globalists only want to flood the land temporarily. Once they’ve gotten those Third-worlders to vote in the corruption, they’ll eliminate them and the vote.

        Like


  9. Often it’s these seemingly insignificant acts that spark the great conflagrations.

    If Trump doesn’t avail himself of this opportunity, then we’ve truly learned nothing from the past century, and shame on us.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Kennedy’s TV-star moment in his debate with Nixon.

      Jimmy Carter’s “malaise” moment.

      “Tear down this wall!”

      “I won’t hold my opponent’s youth and inexperience against him.”

      Dukakis sitting in a tank looking like a tool.

      Willy Horton ad.

      Slick Willy “I feel your pain”

      People remember these little moments of an election that are seen in retrospect at turning points.

      Like


  10. Obama’s greatest legacy making woke the million white gentile men to the hatred and evil he and his ilk have for them.

    Irony rape!

    Like


    • obama’s real legacy should be getting the blacks woke with respect to how the DNC uses them.

      How odd is it this chick knew where DJT stands when it comes to our homeless versus the …. migrants?… that the left is flooding the usa with?

      Like


      • You’re assuming he actually cares about his bruthas.

        The DNC machinery may tell on themselves when it comes to down-low and other such swineries, but they will never… EVER… tell on themselves when it comes to how they manipulate their beloved bloc vote.

        Liked by 1 person


  11. Setting aside what mistakes she made to find herself in the situation she’s in, you have to give this woman credit for doing this.

    She’s homeless and has enough problems to deal with; yet she’s aware enough to realize what’s going on and pissed off enough about it to stage her own personal sit-in supporting the candidate that the media, the so-called “social justice warriors,” and all of her “betters” tell her is Hitler incarnate because he doesn’t toe the PC-bullshit line and because he said “pussy.”

    Her solitary protest puts to shame the lilly-White shitlib “Occupy Wall Street” social-signaling “protest” carried out by trust-fund babies and potheads all across America a few years ago—all of whom are now lining up to social-signal again and vote for Hillary Clinton, the corrupt candidate of Wall Street, Goldman Sachs, and all the other big banks who’ve given her (personally) millions of dollars.

    America First. That means Americans First.

    We have neither the obligation nor the capacity to take in millions of people (legally or illegally) when we don’t even have jobs for the people that are here.

    This is our country — not an international job bank, shopping mall, or dumping ground.

    Vote for Peace.
    Vote for Jobs.
    Vote for Security.
    Vote for Law and Order.

    Vote Trump 2016!

    MAGA

    Liked by 2 people


    • on October 27, 2016 at 4:16 pm Observasaurus Rex

      Women coherent enough to write such placards are only ever homeless by choice thanks to all the women’s shelters and the fact that any pussy can find a guy thirsty enough to support her.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if this woman was actually not homeless, but instead was one of those people who fake being homeless because they make more panhandling, and she figured this would be a great way to increase her publicity and therefore her income. In fact I’d be more impressed if this was the case. Either way, Trump had increased a black woman’s wage and he isn’t even president.

      Like


    • #1: Vote for a Border

      Like


  12. Touching story. No fucking way Hilda inspires such devotion. I hope Trump hears and helps.

    Liked by 2 people


  13. 1. As most other commentators have suggested, the media will likely spin it as a cynical move, were Donny to visit the woman. Remember how he was portrayed when he visited the flooded sights? N.B. Hillary was nowhere near the floods.
    2. But I wonder: would some ‘press conference’ or something of the sort work instead, plus tack on Scott Adams’s provocative statement, i.e., have single professional women subsidize reparations to fund ‘free college’ for eligible blacks? Combine the two, and that will indeed be dynamite.
    3. CH may have covered this before — and this relates partly to principles of game, too. And this also reminds me of an old post of CH about ‘game in the movies’ for ‘as good as it gets’. Remember in the second debate, I think, that the last question was something of the sort: ‘what good thing can you say about your opponent’. Now you know most people are expecting the candidates to give a bullshit inauthentic answer. Hillary certainly did. ‘Donny’s got great children.’ Come on. It sounded so fake. But Donny pulled a Jack Nicholson/vulnerability game manuever. It was fantastic. That alone sent shivers up my spine because you get the feeling he was dead-on honest and it came across as authentic. ‘I disagree with Hillary on XYZ ad infinitum, but one thing I do admire about her is she doesn’t quit and is a fighter.’ That was, in my opinion, as Scott Adams would say, ‘very persuasive.’

    Like


    • Fuck how the media will spin it. This homeless woman is sincere in what she’s doing. Trump can be sincere in deciding that her courage deserves recognition and a personal embrace—Trump’s candidacy is all about fighting for the forgotten Americans and a big F-U to the media.

      Let the (((media))) and the Clinton campaign snark and smarm about how this silly woman doesn’t know that “more Clinton” is what’s good for her. Let people see them try to do that.

      Trump can show up to help this woman, hug her and thank for her support, tell her not to worry about guarding his star because (((Hollywood))) isn’t important, give her a helping hand and promise to fight for policies that will bring jobs back to America.

      Liked by 1 person


    • That was doubly effective because, debate genius that she is, when asked the question, Hillary jumped in to go first with her BS answer and gave Trump the last word and the final impression. Subliminally, since people know that what you choose to praise shows what you value, it gave the impression that HE never stops fighting, but that he respects his opponents. Most of all it showed he really is a bigger man than she is.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Totally agree with your assessment.

        I’m imagining that if you (still!) were some sort of undecided, and you came across two segments, these two segments would persuade you to vote in his favour (it did for me and then reinforced):

        1. ‘Only Rosie O’Donnell.’ When first interviewed by Megyn.
        2. ‘I disagree with Hillary on everything, but she’s a fighter and she doesn’t quit. I admire that.’

        Unbelievable game. Not only does he come across as the bigger man, the authenticity levels are through the roof. He isn’t going to lie about what he dislikes about Hillary. He’s up front. So when he concedes and offers up something he actually admires, you admire him ever the more. Contrast that with the poor game of Hillary. When you say you admire Donny because of his children, that comes off as a cop-out. Having children isn’t an accomplishment or a trait you can honestly admire. So saying that makes you sound even more fake, more rehearsed. She might as well start saying “SIGH” aloud again, over and over. Unbelievable. SIGH.

        Like


      • History may show that Trump’s “Only Rosie O’Donnell” quip was the turning point not only in this election but the future of the western world. It came at a moment early in the campaign while Megyn Kelly was unleashing her carefully constructed, carefully rehearsed, nuclear-force question clearly designed to take Donald out early, decisively and permanently.

        With three little words, Donald totally defused the question and left both the audience and American public laughing at Kelly, her transparent ploy, and the self-interested geniuses who put her up to it. Fourteen months later, Donald is still standing, the bodies of sixteen political foes lie around him, and Megyn and her ilk are very, very nervous.

        It’s interesting to speculate where things might now stand had Donald instead chosen to be a beta gentleman and not make a joke at Ms. Rosie’s expense. The man has phenomenal instincts.

        [CH: agreed. that line was the trumpening blast that shattered the ruling class ceiling.]

        Liked by 1 person


      • Yup.

        She spent all that time with trying to trap the guy, I bet from the time he announced his candidacy to minutes before the debate, thought she had the better of him and within seconds, on-the-spot, shivved open that Overton Window so even Rosie could fit through.

        Like


      • And when she tried to shame Imperator Trump for having called her a bimbo, he replied:

        “Did I say that? Excuse me.” … “Over your life, Megyn, you’ve been called a lot worse, wouldn’t you say?” BAM!

        Ever since then, I personally have made a point of never saying sorry. Never.

        Not just in my relationship, it’s a given that I don’t apologize to the gf. I mean in all social situations. Whenever I impinge on anyone’s personal space, I smirk, give that person a look in the eye and confidently say “Excuse me”. The other person, male or female, will invariably say “Sorry!” in an earnest way.

        “Excuse me”. Make it a habit, it works.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Revelation 22:11

        Like


  14. Trump would never make it out alive if he went down to the hollywood walk of fame star. I think it’s a good idea but he would have to fly her out.

    Like


    • Arrive unannounced, but with a nice show of 40 or so “honor” guards… or just have reps whisk her on out to meet him wherever he is, but do it in private… the press will get wind of it soon enough.

      Like


    • Nah, man — right there, right there where she’s camped out, with her signs and everything. Trump is the type of hombre with the balls to do it.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Good point… if the next prez can’t walk any neighborhood in his own country, well… THAT should be blasted across the news as well.

        Like


  15. You have to be a really big pussy fag to actually take the time to dress up as a construction worker to vandalize a sidewalk. This asshole would never have the stones to mouth off face to face with some Trump supporter.

    Liked by 1 person


  16. This kind of thing happened in 1980 too.

    And I remember the disbelief that the media exhibited every time they met a Regan Democrat in the flesh. I recall many TV people just dumbstruck when asking a blue collar UAW type about Regan and getting only praise.

    Liberals in my experience love to extol how open minded they are. But when you ask them about Latinos for example they have no clue about the diversity just in that segment of the population. These nimrods would go to Miami and be stunned that a brown skinned woman would get vocal about the scourge of liberal socialism practiced in Europe. Of course the woman being related to people who lost their country due to socialism is lost on these libtards.

    What is happening now is that 2016 is shaping up to be a wave election. And believe me everyone is going to be blown away by the results.

    If there is one thing that both Regan and Trump have in common it’s the entertainment background. They both knew how to play to a crowd. But one thing that I believe is critical to both of their successes. Is the inoculation effect that their previous entertainment background gives them.

    At first the Democrats loved that Regan was the nominee because they thought they could put him a Goldwater box and replay LBJs Daisy and win by a landslide. But they could not make crazy stick to Regan. No one could really believe that a Hollywood star with credits like “Bedtime for Bonzo” would start a nuclear war.

    It goes the same for Trump. No one believes that someone on TV for a few seasons is the new Satan or Hitler.

    And if you have been keeping score at home the Hillbullies are chomping at the bit to have more ammo to fire at Trump and nothing is coming. They fired early right after the Democratic convention. Then they attempted the kill shot with the P* grabber tape. They thought that tape was such a lock they informed Ryan who immediately rolled over and showed his belly for Hillster to rub. You can tell the Dems really thought that the P Grab tape would be the “Daisy” of this election. Now Hillbullies don’t know what to do.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on October 27, 2016 at 4:57 pm Wizard of Poz

      Yes, I believe they mistimed the p-grab cocktober-surprise (heh)…then when they thought they had him on the run tried to snuff out last glimmer of life with the “he sexually assaulted me!” trollop-parade.

      Like an over-excited/under-sexed beta about to spelunk a 6.5, they blasted too early.

      Metaphors, how do they work?

      Like


      • That was also the only word I read lol sorry brah

        Like


      • They knew the Wikileaks dumps were coming, and they had to do something to make sure that wasn’t the story for the next 3 weeks. So they shot their wad…might cost them the election.

        Like


    • why does everybody misspell “Reagan”?

      Like


    • on October 27, 2016 at 6:11 pm Captain Obvious

      > “Ryan who immediately rolled over and showed his belly for Hillster to rub” ——— NO!!! Exposure of the belly & genitals is ALPHA behavior amongst mammals [and especially amongst canines] – it’s the Beta which shows submission by rubbing the Alpha’s belly. So: “TheCunt who immediately rolled over and showed her belly for CuckRyan to rub.”

      Like


  17. CNN is investigating allegations that Donald Trump went thru the “10 items or less” express lane with 11 items 20 years ago.

    Like


  18. Listen to what she says LOL

    Like


  19. He needs to get on this. He needs to go out there and thank her, give her a job etc. Woman/black vote locked.

    Like


  20. on October 27, 2016 at 4:12 pm Wizard of Poz

    Picked up a bright, solid red tie today. This Friday and next it’s swing the big-dick red Trump tie day. Do it.

    Like


  21. Abso-fucking-lutely!! The fact that the protester is a vibrant clinches the deal. An election-swinging opportunity.

    Like


  22. Here’s the latest ejaculation from ButtNekkidCare architect Johnathan “Stupidity of the Average American Voter” Gruber:

    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/10/26/obamacare-architect-the-law-is-working-as-designed-we-need-a-larger-mandate-penalty/

    “The law is working as designed. However, it could work better. And I think probably the most important thing experts would agree on is that, we need a larger mandate penalty. … The penalty right now is probably too low, and that’s something I think ideally we would fix.”

    The basic idea of this genius scheme is for healthy people to overpay while sick people underpay. Of course, as anyone who has ever studied economics for five minutes can tell you, this is insane. When you distort prices, you end up with gluts and shortages.

    Imagine if the government decreed that gas costs fifty cents a gallon. You would have a massive glut of buyers, and a massive shortage of gas, because the entire production chain would shut down. Likewise, when you overcharge healthy people and undercharge sick people, guess what? Gluts of sick people, shortages of healthy people.

    The socialist “solution” to this is the same as it always is: punish those annoying market participants for not behaving the way they should in your socialist dream world. Keep increasing the punishment until they do what you want.

    Fortunately Trump seems to be banging the drum on this. Vote Hillary, and rest assured she’ll hike taxes until your eyes pop out of your skull and dangle by their optic nerves, waging her hopeless war on the free market, like Sisyphus rolling his boulder up the mountain.

    Like


  23. on October 27, 2016 at 5:02 pm Kermittheefrog777

    Jesus tapdancing Christ I want this man to win. I would give my left nut.

    Liked by 1 person


  24. 12 more days, Jews. 😉

    Like


  25. haha the manlet can barely swing the pickaxe. what a statement!

    Like


  26. (((They))) still don’t get it.

    There is no such thing as a Republican woman (or Jew) now, Jews.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/11472e8b-7142-34ea-8085-904663a518b2/republican-women-increasingly.html

    Like


  27. It’s 430pm pst.
    The rain is coming, the storm looms overhead. The clouds are about to open.

    This poor homeless patriot has nothing but the love of America and Trump.
    MAGA will keep us together.

    The night will come with a howling storm, but that homeless patriot will stand like the rock of gib- it doesn’t give a fuck about your time or weather.

    MAGA will stand tall.

    That homeless patriot has backup inc.
    I’m getting done with work and heading over right now, with a hot meal and a MAGA hat. No lie, a little wet eye too.

    If you ain’t from Cali-land, you just wouldn’t understand how brave that homeless patriot is.

    The angels are on the move in the city of angels.
    The star is heating up and shining bright.

    MAGA UP
    surfs up
    guns up

    Liked by 1 person


  28. on October 28, 2016 at 10:06 am Beautiful Truths Ignored

    If everyone voted their ethnic self-interest:

    Trump, America First – autochthonous Americans (White American, Black Americans, American Indians)

    Stein, Open Borders and Welfare – most recent immigrants groups (Hispanics, Africans, S.E Asian etc.)

    Johnson, Open Borders and Free Trade – (Northeast Asians)

    Clinton, Open Borders and War – (Jews and Sunnis)

    Trump sweeps 49 states, 3/4ths of popular vote

    Stein vs. Johnson too close to call in Hawaii

    Clinton is a distant 4th with less than 4% of popular vote

    Like