When The Red Pill Meets The Crimson Pill

Read this depressing but illuminating account by JudgyBitch recalling her wicked mother alienating her and her siblings from their father, and how it affected the children. At the end, a redemption and the victory of truth will lift your spirits, because this is one sad tale that is repeated all too many times in post-America.

There are two pills to swallow from this story. A Red Pill on the divorce industrial complex and how it effectively shields bad mothers and wives from punishment while shafting fathers and husbands with extreme prejudice, and a Crimson Pill on the primal sexual nature of even good-hearted, well-meaning women.

First, you take the Red Pill:

[My father] met my mother when she was just nineteen years old and he was considerably older.  He never told her about his family back in Germany, and they married and had four children by the time my mother was 25 years old. My three brothers, and me.

And they were fucking horrible parents.  There is no nice way to spin it.  They embraced a religion that encouraged extreme violence against children.  Their philosophy was that a child’s will must be completely broken so that the child will then accept the will of God.  My mother was ecstatically violent, and my father less so, but they were both culpable. Their particular brand of religious violence continues in America to this day.

[…]

And then….my mother discovered feminism. She exchanged one violent, irrational, dehumanizing ideology for another, and she soon decided that she needed a man like a fish needed a bicycle. After countless physically violent arguments with my father, including one episode where she hit him in the head with a cast iron frying pan and left him for dead on the front porch, he turned his back and walked away from us, just like his first family.

One day we woke up and he was gone. My mother was quick to inform us that he simply walked away, and left us to starve in the streets, and that she alone would be the sole reason we survived and prospered. She never missed an opportunity to curse him.  She told us about his first family, and how she did not need to divorce him, because they were never married in the first place.  She hated him and hated all men and our daily lives were filled with her anger and vitriol and violence.  She never gave a moment’s thought to what her hatred of men and our father was doing to her sons. She gave us daily rations of rage and blame and every bad thing that happened was always his fault.

Being a child, I believed it.  So did my brothers.

And we loathed him for it.  How could he leave us with such an evil woman? My mother once held a knife to my throat and made me beg for my life.  When I was eleven. And I remember going to bed, thinking not how much I hated her, but how much I hated HIM for leaving us to her devices.

Turning children against fathers has been a female specialty since forever, but only the post-industrial man-hating femcunt dystopia we know as the progressive West institutionalized and weaponized this malevolent female predilection, by removing moral culpability from women and adding a presumption of guilt to men.

The Red Pill payoff (you knew this was coming):

And then I received a phone call.  It was my father, calling to tell me that my mother’s mother had passed away, and that I should let her know.  So much of the pain had seeped away that I felt confident confronting my father, and I asked him why he had done it.

Why did you just turn your back and walk away?

And then the truth came to light.  He hadn’t walked away.  He certainly had not left us to starve.  My mother had filed for an annulment and requested a restraining order, which she was granted. When I finally saw my father again, he had two boxes with him.  One was filled with income tax returns showing that he had never missed a child support payment, and court orders preventing him from seeing us based on his violence towards my mother, along with supervised visitations that were all scheduled for when he was overseas, working to meet his child support payments.

The other box contained cards and letters.  Birthday cards and so many letters.  All returned.  By my mother.  He never stopped sending them, hoping one of us would one day get the key and fetch the mail, but my mother was always adamant that the mail was her business.

As an adult, it makes so much sense.  How did we continue to live in our house?  How was my mother able to afford food and clothing and YMCA memberships for four children without my father’s support? Of course she had his support.  But she hid it from us, and poisoned our minds against our father.  It’s called parental alienation, and she is not the first, nor the last woman to destroy her children in this way.

It’s a special kind of evil.

In the end, she meets her father, he asks her forgiveness for the way he raised her before her mother excised him from his kids’ lives, she forgives him and welcomes him into her family, he gratefully becomes a much better grandfather to her kids than he was a father to her. As for the awful mother, JudgyBitch did to her what mom did to her dad: removed her from her life.

Nestled in the middle of this story is a Crimson Pill so big it’s a choking hazard.

Interestingly enough, I was never attracted to men who behaved badly.  I never sought to enmesh myself in relationships that replicated the worst of my father.  Quite the opposite.  I didn’t seek out pain in an effort to work through what I had suffered.  I had a lovely boyfriend who was all kindness and sympathy.  He was the gentlest man I have ever known.  And I cannot adequately articulate how his gentleness and caring healed me.

He proposed marriage, but ultimately, he was far too compliant and mild, and I was disconcerted by his willingness to acquiesce to what I wanted, even though I never wanted anything bad.  I could trust him to treat me with the utmost kindness and care, but I could not lean on him.  That was impossible. I declined his proposal and moved on.

Appeasing, supplicating niceguys turn off women, because women perceive their niceness for weakness. And sometimes, the women are right. Very nice men who give women what they say they want, and who dutifully parrot feminist boilerplate and share the household chores under the false assumption that equality out of the bedroom is carnality in the bedroom, sow distrust in women.

Women trust the jerk because they know the jerk won’t tell them whatever he thinks will win their approval. And THAT’S how the jerk, ironically, wins their approval. By not trying for it.

A big reason women are attracted to jerkboys is the aversion jerkboys have for acquiescing to anyone’s demands, let alone women’s demands. That delightfully novel and romantically exhilarating jerkboy self-regard leaves a potent impression on women, who see refracted in the trait a forthrightness and strength of character and purpose that is lacking in niceguys.

Recall the CH Poon Commandments: You are the oak tree, immoveable and solid, under which she frolics and runs to when the rains come. She senses this strength in jerkboys because she can trust them not to bend to her whim, unlike niceguys who do nothing but bend and bend until they’re licking girls’ boots. And no tingle ever gushered for a polite lackey.

***

safespaceplaypen comments,

Thesis:

Interestingly enough, I was never attracted to men who behaved badly. I never sought to enmesh myself in relationships that replicated the worst of my father. Quite the opposite…

Antithesis:

I had a lovely boyfriend who was all kindness and sympathy. He was the gentlest man I have ever known. And I cannot adequately articulate how his gentleness and caring healed me.

Synthesis:

He proposed marriage, but ultimately, he was far too compliant and mild, and I was disconcerted by his willingness to bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit logic bullshit logic bullshit I declined his proposal and moved on.

Heh. The Tingle is Synthesis. And Syllojizzm.





Comments


  1. I’m thinking of getting a T-shirt made that says “ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS”.

    When cuties giggle and ask “Is that true?” I’ll scowl and jerk my thumb toward the parking lot. “GET IN THE VAN”.

    When SJW fatties and cat women snidely express agreement: “Nice try. You’re not my type.”

    Should be an all-around win-win.

    Liked by 7 people


    • on December 20, 2017 at 4:01 pm Gregory Daniel Nikolic

      Or if you were in impolite society you could Photoshop up a mountain of lard and emblazon FAT FUCKER in red and black shaky letters below.

      Or a picture of Hillary Rodham the Shrill in a coffin.

      Or her daughter whoring herself on skid row with needle track marks in her arms. I’d pay at least $25 for a distraught and aimless-eyed Chelsea.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Appeasing, supplicating niceguys turn off women, because women perceive their niceness for weakness….. Very nice men who give women what they say they want….

        In all the time that you have understood this decryption code for women, CH, there is no excuse for you not to have advanced it beyond its most basic application to the sexual difference.

        The truth is painful. Niceguys avoid pain (receiving and inflicting). Niceguys are liars.

        Women trust the jerk because they know the jerk won’t tell them whatever he thinks will win their approval. And THAT’S how the jerk, ironically, wins their approval. By not trying for it.

        Both men and women are drawn to the truth. The truth is painful, especially to the deluded who have only ever known the intoxication of “pretty lies.” Virtuous men are not deterred by pain because it is the sign of proximity to truth.

        Women trust the jerk because, especially today, truthtelling itself is defined as “jerkiness.” How dare you upset our fraudulent tranquility! But once she submits to the truth, the utility of being a “jerk” vanishes.

        That delightfully novel and romantically exhilarating jerkboy self-regard leaves a potent impression on women, who see refracted in the trait a forthrightness and strength of character and purpose that is lacking in niceguys.

        This.

        Liked by 4 people


      • But it matters that you characterize so liberating a quality as negative — jerk, asshole, dark — because you introduce a state of further confusion to the already confused rather than a final clarity and alignment of the well-adjusted/sociable man. By failing to identify their liberation with generosity and selflessness, you encourage all manner of weakness and petty acts of pique in the name of truth. You give a readymade cover story for anybody who is just plain antisocial.

        How many of your pale imitators have been encouraged to regard sociopathy per se as a virtue in itself, rather than the necessary means to the end of truth in a world of lies? They brag here all the time about how their tawdry ghetto/shtetl behavior is the sign of raw alphatude and therefore justified. They are baffled by any attempt to treat women well. You taught them to regard such impulses as errors and signs of weakness.

        As we are learning from the Gropenning, this kind of mischaracterization has psychologically justified all manner of beta- and omega-males to act on their creepiest instincts whose very expression is the definition of beta- and omegatude. It is the canopy of cover under which the relentless “energy and shamelessness of Jews” (Steve Sailer, paraphrased) is left undisturbed to prey on white ingenues. If being a jerk is justified, then all of those dark impulses — making a woman watch you jack off into a plant, etc. — must be justified as well.

        Liked by 1 person


      • A correction is in order. King commented: “Niceguys avoid pain (receiving and inflicting). Niceguys are liars.” Completely wrong. All organisms pursue pleasure and flee pain. Nice guys have an artificial and perverted but very real understanding of pleasure and pain, a faux morality made flesh by mommy et al.’s psychological abuse. Why? Women are liars, the best liars. That is the fundamental premise of red pill philosophy. If nice guys were effective liars, they would be shaping the world not be losers. Women have been weaponized to create our social norms. Women and their animal bitch truth are not sacrosanct except as inescapable by government force. It is mangina for a man to take the woman’s frame so seriously he adopts her virtue as his own, which precludes the truth of culture and civilization. Pedastalizing female purity in the abstract is effective blue pill. Hard to dethrone an abstract martyr like the virgin Mary in the mind of a cowardly follower. Truth? ‘Tis to laugh.

        Like


    • To anyone who might try or romanticize such a thing, it’s not worth trying unless you absolutely must find out the hard way by not studying history and experience. In my field experience any requirement of a woman to play in the sandbox will be foiled. They compulsively must do that. Don’t tell them how they can! Multi-step openers do not work because of it. You could have specified True or False, she could have emphatically agreed, then all the sudden she’s a fucking philosopher.

      More importantly, the Inquisition is here. No need to volunteer for implacable state abuse. Again, animals you don’t and can’t control as alpha will find a way to foil you commensurate with the social investment you make but can’t defend. Pure evil judo from the vacuous. ZFG requires either sovereignty or nihilism. Only pay the taxes you must and let others be grist. Don’t fall for provocateurs, like GDN seems to be.

      Like


    • How about using a picture of Harvey Weinstein and Hillary Clinton together and putting that on a tee shirt.
      It might blow a few minds plus be good for a few laughs.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Problem is, would leftists even recognize Weinstein? They’re not known for being well-read in politics.

        Perhaps names labeled below in large, sans-serif font.

        Liked by 1 person


    • Comment of the year. Do it, and post results.

      Like


    • Make sure they’re over the age of consent first… just sayin’:

      Like


  2. […] When The Red Pill Meets The Crimson Pill […]

    Like


  3. This Christmas consider making a donation to one of the Father’s Rights Advocacy groups.

    Found an article listing a few.

    https://www.thespruce.com/fathers-rights-groups-in-us-2997692

    Know too many dads getting the shaft from the family court de-unification proceedings, e.g. she cheated on him several times AND embezzled $$$$ from his business but she has custody etc.

    #endnofaultdivorce should become a meme

    Like


  4. Reading this a second time, I found it more telling that even though she wasn’t attracted to men like her father–though she sounds more like an outlier in that regard–she was still turned off by how compliant her boyfriend was.

    Reminds me of one of my first relationships wherein the girl had a jerk of an ex and me, all pre-RP and all, was acting like the compliant guy in the above story. I thought I had to be extra nice, which I can now see only kept setting me back.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on December 20, 2017 at 5:20 pm Captain Obvious

      The incongruity of that paragraph [within the theme of the larger essay] really leapt out at me.

      As much as she wanted to escape from the violence of the badly disfunctional family of her ch!ldhood, she still wasn’t willing to settle for a squishy mealy-mouthed little Nice-Guy-Who-Always-Finishes-Last beta.

      PS: I got to wondering about the level of Darkness in the man whom she did settle down with – whether he calls her out on her bullsh!t, whether he has a temper, whether he ever smacks her…

      PPS: And I also got to wondering how her own personality turned out. My gut instinct is that personalities are just about 110% nature and -10% nurture, but she claims that she got plenty of nurturing in that ch!ldhood of hers…

      Liked by 1 person


      • iirc, her husband didn’t like her doing MMA stuff but didn’t really stop her.

        Like


      • Twin study evidence suggests parenting style makes no difference to child outcome at all. I buy that: biological Calvinism.

        Liked by 1 person


      • A real bitter sweet symphony. Almost brought me to tears reading it, thinking “omg she’s seen the reality” swallowed a female red pill, if you will. But no. NO. The concluding paragraphs almost had me in a rage. “So, what, you now reject exactly the kind of decent man you discovered your father was all along??” Women. We’d have made them extinct 100 thousand years ago, if only we didn’t want to f*** them >:-(

        Like


      • Her own personality is plainly wounded and scarred. See, e.g., Moira Greyland of The Last Closet: she wrote a great book and makes amazing points, but you don’t want to even befriend her, let alone romance her, due to all the damage. It leaps off every page.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 7:19 pm Captain Obvious

        “iirc, her husband didn’t like her doing MMA stuff but didn’t really stop her.”

        If her husband is that Beta, then the dude she ditched in college must have been an Incel Gamma.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 7:21 pm Captain Obvious

        “Twin study evidence suggests parenting style makes no difference to child outcome at all. I buy that: biological Calvinism.”

        The Red Pill is a bitter, bitter swallow.

        Even fundamental conceits such as Freedom of the Will start to fall under the shadow of suspicion.

        Liked by 1 person


    • The interpretive key is simple but consistently ignored around here because, for all of your pretenses of having overcome the “blue pill” illusion, you still proceed from the blue pill frame, using their concepts and terms, namely, mistaking “niceness” for “the good” (or caritas or agape or charity or love).

      And because you have discovered the impotence of niceness you correlate weakness with any attempt to effect the good. Hence your affinity for objectively nasty behavior that proceeds from a lack of strength and an absence of the overabundance that makes generosity possible.

      You need to go one level deeper than the definitions handed down to you by subversive (((people))) who want to destroy what’s good in you. Niceness is evil. It is pusillanimity in the face of challenge, an avoidance of conflict, the essence of cowardice, the passivity that allows death to reign.

      We were seduced into thinking we could keep Christian ends while jettisoning the Christ, and that monumental arrogance began the latest Transvaluation of All Values. Long ago, before you were born, the manly virtue that created the immemorial conditions for the good to flourish — courage, fortitude, sangfroid, magnanimity — was redefined to mean “cruelty” and “harshness” and “violence” and “hate.”

      By embracing the “jerk” persona, you have allowed clever cowards to define you as the villain and the enemy of the culture, rather than its savior, its indispensable man without which good people must degenerate into nihilism, anomie, chaos, abyss.

      Woe to those who call evil good
      and good evil,
      who put darkness for light
      and light for darkness,
      who put bitter for sweet
      and sweet for bitter!

      — Isaiah 5:20

      Liked by 4 people


      • Preach it, brother!

        Until this sort of comments gets the lion’s share of likes, we’re just going to keep on losing.

        “We have met the enemy, and he is US!” – Pogo

        Like


      • excellent

        Like


      • Niceness is evil. It is pusillanimity in the face of challenge, an avoidance of conflict, the essence of cowardice, the passivity that allows death to reign.

        This rings very true.

        Like


  5. Only one. Only one.

    – Flights Logs Show A Single Israeli Plane Secretly Flew Out of Atlanta During Airport Blackout –

    http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/flights-logs-show-a-single-israeli-plane-secretly-flew-out-of-atl

    Liked by 1 person


    • Are you trying to tell us that Israel gets special privileges on this side of the pond?

      I’m shocked… shocked to learn!

      Like


      • As has happened before, you’re missing the bigger picture.

        Like


      • Ah yes… “The Big Picture”… right up there with 4D chess, Oswald dindu nuthin’, and Hitler’s still alive in South America.

        Explain it for us, then… what is this “Big Picture”, beyond Israel and kikes getting special considerations throughout the West?

        Like


      • Let’s go, Miesz… tell us about this “Big Picture” in re this plane… no time for crickets now, amirite?

        Or are you just gonna keep spamming us with non sequitur links about various and sundry other irrelevancies, like flying Tic-Tacs spotted over a decade ago?

        (((shakin’ mah haid))

        Liked by 1 person


      • Read up on Qanan and get back with us.

        Like


      • Wha, the story is this Israeli company’s plane getting sole permission to leave the air port during the blackout has something to do with Allah?

        Even for you, Danger, that’s an… um… interesting piece of news. By all means, enlighten us further.

        Or just keep coming back with non sequitur avoidance and diversion… like your buddy Miesz…

        … he IS your buddy, right… not some sock that got lost in the dryer, right?

        Like


      • Or do you mean the usual ISIS stuff… as if we don’t already know it’s a front org funded and encouraged by the Synathedral?

        So what’s so tremendously conspiratorial about this given plane that we should know some new twist to the ISIS saga?

        Like


      • Are you Miesz’s mouthpiece now? Does he have you on retainer?

        Like


      • Qanon, pardon me. The future reveals the past.- EGK

        Like


      • No, I get the reference. I like the guy and get his posts. He’s a Pole and they are naturally a bit dour. I also like his posts about degeneracy because they motivate me to do something about it. You need to get out of NYC. It is an anti-reality bubble.

        Like


      • I also like his posts about degeneracy because they motivate me to do something about it

        The only thing some of his weird and lurid queer photos motivate me to do is (((shake mah haid))) and be thankful ah ain’t just et.

        On the task at hand, avoidance and distraction noted. Whoever the fuck this Qanon and the latest Storm (a PERFECT Storm of CT, I might add) is, I’m still wondering wtf it has to do with Miesz airplane post, which as far as I can tell is yet another CT about Israel smuggling nukes on a cargo plane from this side of the pond to Tel Aviv… by way of Belgium, fer cryin’ out loud?

        Every time I try to give one of these (ahem) news breaks a fair shake, I wind up wasting my time… both on the link itself and further digging… and then ’round chere, trying to get a straight story from you alt-R allies.

        And I mean EVERY… FUCKING… TIME. 😡

        One day I’ll learn to just let the inanities pass from our own alleged team… but there’s still this thing inside of me that demands a certain standard of veracity from my own alleged folk.

        Like


      • Give it a rest.

        Like


      • You’ve never been man enough to say “gots nuthin'”, have you?

        YOU give this tripe a rest… alt-R ally. 😡

        Like


    • Mieszko,

      I don’t have the technical knowledge to judge the plausibility of the theory. Why would 10+ hours of outage be necessary? Would it really take that long for the radiation to return to background levels?

      Like


  6. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

    – Brussels has said that Europeans must accept mass migration from the third world as the “new norm”, warning that neither walls nor policies will allow any part of the EU to remain “homogenous and migration-free”. –

    http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/brussels-commission-eu-too-white-mass-third-world-migration-must-

    Liked by 1 person


  7. Judgybitch has that Canadian spunk that few women possess today. A sharp mind and clear focus that would send any gamma sperglord into tizzies of trigger episodes.

    She carried quite the burden at a time when speaking out against the Feminist Uberlords had consequences. Nowadays, the Meryl Streeps of the world are seen more as pre-committal contenders.

    HT should also go out to another Canadian realtalker, Girlwriteswhat.

    Like


  8. OT : is The Daily Stormer down ?
    https://dailystormer.red/ doesn’t respond.

    Is anybody on gab.ai ?

    Like


  9. on December 20, 2017 at 3:58 pm Gregory Daniel Nikolic

    In my Canadian family, my mother would watch for my father to be driving up to the house and then say, “Hurry, hurry, your father is here, hide!”

    I was so glad when she was dead. A lot of my classes with the inferior sex — and determination to stand my ground — started with her. Once, she had police put handcuffs on me because I wouldn’t follow her instructions and orders. Another time she stabbed me (admittedly, I had thrown her to the ground in the kitchen because she was berating my father’s mistress and annoying me).

    Moral of the story: Women’s love is for themselves only; secondarily for femsoulmates.

    Liked by 4 people


    • Why am I not surprised you are Canadian? Your “nationality” should be entered into the next DSM as a mental disorder.

      Also: sockpuppeting is one thing. But creating entirely separate WP accounts to “like” your own comments is about as sad as it is possible to get online.

      Liked by 1 person


  10. That sounds very similar to this story from 4chan. Via @PNN_Unleashed:

    Liked by 2 people


  11. on December 20, 2017 at 4:09 pm pathfinderlight

    It always amazes me why women who destroy families, lie to children to turn them against their fathers, and devastate lives aren’t routinely subjected to actual physical violence.

    Liked by 1 person


  12. …. A Red Pill on the divorce industrial complex ……

    I was a party to civil suit pertaining to a business matter a few years ago. During that time I had to make several visits to the courthouse and confirmed what I already knew to be true about the divorce industrial complex.

    Both the civil & criminal court’s clerks offices had literally no security. You could walk right in, file your briefs, etc, speak directly with a clerk. The only thing that separated the clerks from you was a waist-high counter with an unlocked swinging half door.

    On the way out I had to walk by the ‘Family’ court clerk’s office on another floor. That freaking place looked like Ft. Knox. The office was positioned directly across from the gaggle of sheriff’s deputies that run security for people entering the building, a quick reaction force if you will. The office had high counters and then what looked like bullet proof glass going from the counter to the ceiling. You could only speak to a clerk through a small electronic voice box similar to one of those bodegas with all the Plexiglas around it. And I believe the only entrance/exit was controlled via electronic lock & buzzer. Everything about that office just silently screamed out you’re f*cked.

    Liked by 2 people


    • I’m wondering if the security for the family courts is to prevent men who’ve been wronged from going into Fallen Down mode.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Loved that movie. Great ending. “I’m the bad guy?”

        Liked by 2 people


      • Wonder no more. It is so. The state sees you as the piggy to be slaughtered when you reach commercial weight.

        Like


      • It absolutely is. As the last 60 years has shown, white men have an enormously high threshold for fuckery. You can steal their money, infringe their freedoms, uglify everything in their culture…. but start fucking with his children, and you tap straight into a million years of evolutionary instinct.

        “Pissed off” doesn’t begin to cover it. Hence, the bunker mentality of the evil, cowardly parasites huddled within it.

        Liked by 1 person


    • Hit ’em where they ain’t.

      Like


    • Makes a certain sense tho: stakes are high when genetic legacy is involved.

      Liked by 1 person


  13. I read judgybitch a long while back

    Like


    • I tried, but in the end, too bitchy. As in stand up comedy, no woman* can write commentary as well as a man.

      * Honorary man Ann Coulter excepted. She’s so good that I actually wonder if she has hormonal issues, such as AIS.

      Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 6:29 pm Captain Obvious

        If she’s not a yenta, then she’s been hopelessly hypnotized by the Uber Sanhedrin’s Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum psychological warfare initiative.

        Like


      • I couldn’t read Ayn Rand. Her contempt for everyone she judged inferior was just too much. A few chapters in to Atlas Shrugged*, I gave up after the protagonist felt it was important to mention somebody’s “moist lips”. Who the fuq goes around surveying the moistness of others’ lips? Serious issues, there.

        *The Fountainhead was no better.

        Like


      • BTW, the moist lips were mentioned as a reason to contemn the other.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 7:23 pm Captain Obvious

        All of her followers are Rand/Rosenbaum spergtarded pod people.

        Weird, because she seems to care about her kids.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 7:25 pm Captain Obvious

        Meaning the b!tchy judge or WTFE her name is.

        As for Rand/Rosenbaum, how can anyone read more than a few sentences from that yenta twat and not realize that it’s just another (((Psychological Warfare Campaign)))?

        Like


      • You’re missing a point she was making… liars and untrustworthy people lick their lips more than normal… it’s one of those “tells” that people do when they’re being less than straightforward.

        And one would think, with the alpha worship that goes on ’round chere, that Fountainhaid and Atlas would be in the Top Ten recommended reading.

        Personally, I enjoyed both books immensely, and invariably the people who offhandedly dismiss one or both are missing some of the more nuanced aspects of what the characters represent.

        Like


      • I would love to cold cock with my fist anyone I run into with a bumper sticker, shirt, etc that says Who Is John Galt

        Like


      • Well, given ‘Murrica’s proclivities towards fanboi kitsch, I’ll give you that one.

        Like


      • hopelessly hypnotized by the Uber Sanhedrin’s Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum psychological warfare initiative.

        That is a big subset of the cuckservative crowd. I lost a good friend to that very phenomenon. It also made it ok to be conservative and atheist. She still does damage because so few see through it or consider it righteous if they do, to destroy all that “superstition.”

        Like


      • on December 21, 2017 at 6:40 am Les Saunders, Protestant

        Carlos, funny you mention that. I had a friend who went full Ayn Rand 10 years ago. His worship of that atheist, feminist Jéw from the Soviet Union and hatred of Christianity and anyone who punches a clock rather than creates their own wealth became unbearable. I suspect he also became a Freemason. We haven’t spoken in years.
        Anyways, who is today’s biggest Rand pusher? Saul Ryan, speaker of the House. Nuff said.

        Like


      • If there’s antiChristian verbiage in either Fountainhaid 😉 or Atlas Shrugged, someone bring it to my attention.

        As far as Rand’s personal hypocrisy, I just laughed when she railed against racism and “collective mentality”, and in the next breath manfully defended Israel, go figger… that was back in the days of the Phil Donahue show, a mesitercuck himself, but one of the last of the naive men of good will who would ask the tough questions on occasion to the leftys and Sanhedrin as well.

        Like


      • The way I read it, the characters in her novels would disdain some of the very things youse yeggs rail about ’round chere… including I myself and my disdain for sheep-thought and churches who call themselves Christian but are cowardly worshipers of human feelz.

        And since when is rugged individualism a sin? People can mistake what she wrote about, just like they misinterpret almost everything else ever proposed by another human or even God Himself… the individualism and alleged self-centeredness of her characters wasn’t Gorgon Geckoesque, it was more along the lines of great industrialists and creators of the real world, who when they followed their own minds and refused to be the servants of the masses, wound up creating things and industries that benefited the entire nation.

        That’s the self-centeredness “worshiped” by her characters… not greed and self-aggrandizement for the sake of itself… THOSE traits were in the antagonists, couched under the guise of what we here all hate today, the hypocrisy of doing it (laws, regulations, handicaps to the real producers) “for the good of the people”.

        Youse yeggs gotta learn to read… and think in more than two dimensions.

        . (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • Objectivists are known for being staunch atheists though its not a requirement. Alisa invented the movement. They consider pride a virtue as well as selfishness, for example.

        Like


      • I probably would have little truck with so-called “Objectivists” in meat world… never met one, to this day.

        But that’s all besides the point… I’m talking about the novels themselves, not some half-assed philosophy or movement generated from whole cloth.

        Pride comes in many forms, self-respect being one… and the heroes of her novels all savor of Aryan demeanor and self-respect, even when it costs them their place in society.

        And all her villains have a distinct odor of gefiltre or betacuck.

        Guys like Howard Roarke, Hank Reardon, and perhaps even John Galt himself (admittedly a character tough to suspend disbelief upon) are men that the chateau would normally praise to the skies as uber-alpha.

        The one major flaw in her outlook, from the fiction-meets-reality aspect, is that there are many more talented people in the world, and anyone who decides to “drop out” is usually easily replaced… it would take more than a handful of the world’s best machers to stop the motor, as it were.

        But both books are manly tales told, giving the Up Yours to the powers who, in their envy and greed, want to corral the brains and talents of the aforementioned protagonists.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Still waiting to hear of any antiChristian rhetoric in either novel.

        Can’t find any? No shit.

        So shut the fuck up… nobody is talking about “Objectivists” or other fools in meat world.

        One would think the fact that people twist, turn, and distort the written word, from the days of Noah on back, would be common knowledge and need not be mentioned.

        And yenta though she be, Rand wrote some of the manliest characters to ever grace the paper upon which they were written.

        Like


      • “If there’s antiChristian verbiage in either Fountainhaid 😉 or Atlas Shrugged, someone bring it to my attention”

        The Holy Spirit seems to have given this discernment to many of us. Try plugging into Him.

        Like


  14. judgybitch Antipater • 3 years ago
    Honestly? I didn’t trust myself to be a good wife to him. He would not have challenged poor behaviour on my part. He is a good man. But he was not willing to correct me.

    Like


  15. Later on in the reply to the comment section so as to further explain why she said what she said about him being too weak.

    She said partly it was because she couldn’t trust herself to be a good wife for him, that his willingness to bend over would end up with her mistreating him.

    To some extent it seems like she was doing it to also avoid becoming like her father/mother had been.

    Like


    • Three strikes against her:

      1. Dependence on (((Freudian))) psychoanalysis
      2. Self-diagnosis
      3. Attempted female cogitation

      Enthrallment with oneself is at the heart of every modern disorder. The only escape from her spiral is to, first, understand that the universe is not about her, and then, to give herself entirely away (agape). That is the definition of freedom. The maternal instinct is a huge head start to female emancipation — which is why so pure a thing has been targeted for annihilation from the beginning of modernity.

      Rather than attempting to grapple with forces well beyond her ken, she needs a few sessions with Dr. Denis Leary, one of the first pharmacists of the red pill:

      Unfortunately psychological advice like this isn’t “nice.”

      Like


      • Childbirth refocuses their solipsism and forces them to consider the needs of others, even if by force, for the first time. Also better to for them to learn this at age 16 to 18 with the guidance of a good man. It is indeed emancipating, just not in the modernist sense of the word.

        Like


      • on December 21, 2017 at 6:43 am Les Saunders, Protestant

        Enthrallment with oneself is at the heart of every modern disorder.

        …..

        That was good.

        Like


  16. As an side for the newbies, an extreme example of the beta bucks aphorism. (ps don’t do this)
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-20/dominatrix-makes-1-million-pimping-out-clients-crypto-slave-farm

    Like


  17. Her post is a nice illustration of the range women occupy between r- and K-selection and exactly how much the environment can modulate their preference.

    I imagine living through more dire times such as a prolonged famine would fully ignite her attraction for just about any beta that was inclined to commit, so long as he had the goods and she saw no other option. A man’s perceived value scales with the utility he offers as an accessory for her survival.

    Liked by 2 people


    • on December 20, 2017 at 5:27 pm Captain Obvious

      I’d be careful about second-guessing The Hamster.

      My first guess would be that in a serious prolonged famine, you’re gonna get to the point where you have to K!LL for food, and the man who emerges as the best k!ller is your Alpha.

      And my second guess would that The Hamster does a darned good job of sniffing out that Alpha.

      And my third guess would be that The Hamster is 100% perfect in sniffing out the betas who WON’T be capable of rising to the occasion and seizing control in a nightmarish SHTF End-Times scenario.

      Like


      • You need to read up on your evopsych my man. Chicks who haven’t already been lobotomized by modernity will definitely choose life and sustenance over alpha cock. Carousel riding was decidedly NOT the historical norm for the past evolutionary eon (for the ice races at least).

        Liked by 1 person


      • “in a serious prolonged famine . . . the man who emerges as the best k!ller is your Alpha.”

        This. I put it this way: base female preference is for the guy who is least likely to get raped should he go to prison.

        Far from doing best in prolonged famine (a bad time, making for strong men), betas do best in times like c1965-85: times of plenty, making for weak men. There’s a reason Game got its real start in the late 80’s/90’s: chicks were starting to get cunty and harder to bang, from all the overly weak men around.

        PS: Cap – The Hamster is the neocortical rationalization; it’s the lower centers (‘hindbrain’) that sniff out alpha.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 6:27 pm Captain Obvious

        That’s not the way I look at The Hamster.

        “Game” [to the extent that you need it] is about convincing [or fooling] The Hamster into making her mistress wet for you.

        Even “Push Pull” works because it’s hitting her hindbrain, which causes all sorts of weird, dissonant feedback loops that percolate up to her conscious mind and drive her nuts.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 7:45 pm Captain Obvious

        “You need to read up on your evopsych my man. Chicks who haven’t already been lobotomized by modernity will definitely choose life and sustenance over alpha cock.”

        My point is that even chicks who have been lobotomized by modernity have Hamsters whose sense of “Alpha” correlates strongly with the kinds of male personalities which will dissemble, lie, cheat, steal, and, if necessary, MURD3R, in order to survive a SHTF End Times nightmare.

        And, maybe more importantly, their Hamsters’ sense of “Beta/Gamma” doubtless correlates near perfectly with the kinds of dudes who will fold like a house of cards, curl up in the fetal position, start sucking their thumbs, and cry out for “Mommy!” when the SHTF.

        Like


      • on December 20, 2017 at 7:49 pm Captain Obvious

        The Hamster is very good* at sniffing out strengths in men.

        But the Hamster is [email protected] near PERFECT at sniffing out WEAKNESSES in men.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on December 20, 2017 at 7:50 pm Captain Obvious

        *Game works because her Hamster is only very good [not perfect] at strengths.

        But arguably your best Game is in learning to conceal your weaknesses from her Hamster, even moreso than merely flaunting your strengths.

        Like


      • In real life, Negen would have a harem and free dibs on any weak men’s women too.

        Like


      • on December 21, 2017 at 6:54 am Les Saunders, Protestant

        Lately, my thoughts are increasingly turning towards SHTF/end times scenarios. We are sleepwalking to disaster here. A major hit to the power grid and tens of millions of urbanites and suburbanites acrosst North America will be starving, freezing, and (in Canada) defenceless. Survivalblog is now regular reading for me (warning: lots of practical tips but heavily cucked). Too bad up here in the Great White North one can’t just walk into Walmart and stock up on Mossbergs and shells. This is a truly supercommunist cuntry and getting worse.

        Applied for a green card a few months ago, wish me luck, goys!

        Like


      • Canadian Prepper has a lot of good cold weather survival information. Buy a Norinco M1A or better yet, the real thing if you have the coin. They are legal in Canada and excellent rifles, reliable and tested that can deal death to Grizzlies if need be.

        Like


  18. Damn I get so much rushed anxiety when I’m weeks behind CH’s stories. I see you’ve been killing it though! brb catching up

    Like


  19. Lol Trump is literally Hitler. Right.

    The level of Jewish ingratitude knows no bounds.

    This Jew is guilty, guaranteed.

    Shouldn’t even have been in the country.
    Look it up Jew phone won’t copy links anymore.

    Why do Israelis get to come and go as they please? Hmmmm.
    Trump issues his first commutation – CNN

    Like


  20. on December 20, 2017 at 6:10 pm Leonard D Neubache

    Women don’t like jerkboys because they call them out on their bullshit. That’s just the expression of what’s truly valuable about the jerkboy.

    The actual substance of value is his will to power.

    If he has no will to power then how will he protect her or her children? If he has no will to power then who will protect and provide when things get tough?

    The conformist nice guy is humanity’s dodo. He survives in good times but when things get bad (and they inevitably do) he is worthless.

    Women are fundamentally hardwired to accept this, no matter what they say. Look at the state of white men and look at how many white women are welcoming foreign conquerors.

    The will to power is the only imperative worth a damn.

    Like


    • Neubache, old boy! Nice to see you here at le Chateau. I used to enjoy your insight on RVF before I gave up on that place. I hope you won’t be a stranger round here.

      Like


  21. I know it’s off topic, but the daily stormer seems to be down again.

    Like


  22. I saw female behavior at its best today.
    I was at a client site and this Asian beta incel stops by this white American solid HB 8.5.
    He is hopeless at conversation and I’m ask g myself…why is she putting up with this banal talk?
    Then I later realized..HB 8.5 has a hard stop at 5pm for her social calendar. At 4.45 pm she is struggling to get something out as she lacks decent PowerPoint skills.
    She calls up her little Asian helper….gets him to do it. Talks to him like a child, then goes hone.
    It’s genial and just underlines that women will put most men in a category and will try and use them.

    Like


  23. on December 20, 2017 at 7:16 pm safespaceplaypen

    Thesis:

    Interestingly enough, I was never attracted to men who behaved badly. I never sought to enmesh myself in relationships that replicated the worst of my father. Quite the opposite…

    Antithesis:

    I had a lovely boyfriend who was all kindness and sympathy. He was the gentlest man I have ever known. And I cannot adequately articulate how his gentleness and caring healed me.

    Synthesis:

    He proposed marriage, but ultimately, he was far too compliant and mild, and I was disconcerted by his willingness to bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit logic bullshit logic bullshit I declined his proposal and moved on.

    Like


  24. on December 20, 2017 at 7:17 pm safespaceplaypen

    Thesis:

    Interestingly enough, I was never attracted to men who behaved badly. I never sought to enmesh myself in relationships that replicated the worst of my father. Quite the opposite…

    Antithesis:

    I had a lovely boyfriend who was all kindness and sympathy. He was the gentlest man I have ever known. And I cannot adequately articulate how his gentleness and caring healed me.

    Synthesis:

    He proposed marriage, but ultimately, he was far too compliant and mild, and I was disconcerted by his willingness to bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit logic bullshit logic bullshit I declined his proposal and moved on.

    Like


  25. “Why did you just turn your back and walk away?”

    I am amazed at the utter lack of empathy required to ask this question. “She hit him in the head with a cast iron frying pan and left him for dead on the front porch” wasn’t good enough for her? He had to walk, men almost always lose he said/she said situations in both criminal and family courts no matter how bad she is.

    Liked by 1 person


  26. on December 20, 2017 at 7:59 pm strongwhitecock

    Harsh story, but needs to be heard. I love the crimson pill ending. No matter how abused a girl is or fucked up she becomes, no matter how much she *should* prefer a nice guy after all she’s been through, it she doesn’t. It’s just not in her. If there is any type of white knight that could do women justice, it comes from an alpha with a strong pimp hand inadvertently white knighting.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Physical abuse brings a woman closer to the truth than can the mental abuse of feminism (cultural marxism/modernity). Pain teaches the soul what is real whereas the numbing lies of ideology are designed to buffer the soul from ever coming in contact with reality.

      What do you think the near-universal masochism of modern Western woman is about? The spanking, the choking, the Fifty Shades of Grey? It is a lightning strike through the fog, a brief contact with truth. “Nice guys” are indistinguishable from the background, they blend in with the furniture, one more banal prop in the panorama of lies.

      “Hit me baby one more time.”

      Like


  27. I could trust him to treat me with the utmost kindness and care, but I could not lean on him. That was impossible. I declined his proposal and moved on.
    —————————————————————————————————
    While this may be one part of the truth she missed to reveal the other, more important one, namely zero vag tingles
    All of the last paragraph reads as an indictment, gentle men always leave vags dry, vags rebel and run away, gentle men suffer alone accusing themselves of not being gentle enough
    The story is old as humanity, sometimes reads as a tragedy most of times as a comedy best described by German philosopher Cunt in his famous book
    Critique of dry vagene

    Liked by 2 people


    • on December 20, 2017 at 11:11 pm Captain Obvious

      “best described by German philosopher Cunt in his famous book
      Critique of dry vagene”

      LOL’ed

      cortesar just keeps throwing out teh KKKotYzzzezes.

      Like


  28. combining best of Chekhov and Orwell

    Like


  29. When I read this,

    ”…Turning children against fathers has been a female specialty since forever…”

    Immediately in my head I thought,

    ”…Turning children against their nation ( their race or their founding fathers) has been a liberal specialty for decades…”

    and as you know, liberalism is the female side of politics

    Liked by 1 person


    • liberal and liberalism has nothing to do with these things
      both have “liberty” in their roots
      you watch too much faux news and other neocohen outlets

      Like


      • Who turned young hippies against the USA during the Vietnam war ; liberals

        Have you never seen Jane Fonda on that famous picture? She was rooting fo the enmy NOT for the USA and Foxnews did not exist back then ( at least I don t think it did )

        who turned young people against the USA during the Irak war; liberals ( hell some liberals even went over there to become human shields in a crazy attempt to try and stop the USA!!)

        All those young people in Universities who hate the USA, what kind of professors brainwash them; liberal ones

        need I go on?

        the root of the word liberal means nothing.

        homosexuals call themselves gay, who cares what the origin of the word gay is, even if it was an old sanscrit word for ” healthy” gays still are over 80 % of hiv/aids cases

        the root of a word means nothing, the most fascist group today in the USA call themselves antifacist/ antifa

        you are wrong on everything

        Like


      • what do you say antifas are real nahzi?

        who turned young people against the USA during the Irak war; liberals ( hell some liberals even went over there to become human shields in a crazy attempt to try and stop the USA!!)
        ———————————————————————
        lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

        jeez you are a helpless case you have no clue how words are used in cultural wars
        btw we do not use “gay” we call them faggots

        leftist we we call them leftards, leftoids and so on
        but you still do not get it,do you
        tell me how do you say “idiot” in sanscrit

        Like


  30. This fucking stings. My dad wasn’t in my life and I know my mom never intentionally kept him away but she wanted him to be a dad on her terms. Everything is about money when it came to him. She would tell me ‘your dad called. And he didn’t even send any damn money.’ Even though when he did send money, I never saw it. Here I am at 21 and my dad calls me. I tell my mom and the first thing she asks is about money. It’s not about the money!!! It’s about having someone tell you it’s ok. It’s about being able to sit in your dad’s lap and cry because kids are bullying you. It’s about the father daughter dances. It’s just about having a man around. My dad wanted to come to my graduation and my mom made me tell him no because she felt it would be offensive to her and her contributions. I’ve had a long talk with my dad and he explained to me he never had a dad and by being so young he didn’t know how to be one. And to be honest I’ve never resented my dad for not being around. I don’t think I’ll ever get the relationship I should have with mt dad. But I hope to one day find a husband who will be a father I never had

    Like


    • My wife, who grew up with a useless, weak father occupying part of the house, would tell you to take cheer and know that there are indeed men out there who are both manly and tender. Pray for one like she did.

      Liked by 1 person


  31. She said her husband became the son he (her father)never had. Yet her father had three sons. Maybe they didn’t fare as well as Ms. JB or perhaps she means there was no rapprochement with them, but if she did, why not them?

    Like


  32. on December 20, 2017 at 8:36 pm Unacknoldeded_Legislator

    CH , on maybe on this one since Judgy Bitch kinda laid it all, messaging was fine maybe couch the jerk boy … that is a bit less on the sophomoric …more

    Like


  33. I think we have some exclusive footage from a shtetl in Ukraine

    Like


  34. I wonder what is ethnicity of fellow white on the left
    just kidding looks like a caricature feom the der sturmer 1933 new year edition

    Like


    • This is why we lose… that fucker on the left should be spitting teeth the moment he got within arm’s reach of the protester.

      “Fighting words” while invading personal space… hell, even I could make that hold up in court, let alone any journeyman shyster.

      Like


      • The guy on the right is a minister from Milton Florida, I believe. It would be unbecoming of him to do that.

        Like


      • Since when? Since Mickey Mouse took over his church?

        And if he’s a minister of Christ, tweets should be, not the LAST thing on his agenda, it shouldn’t even be on his radar.

        I repeat, Beckmesser: THIS IS WHY WE LOSE.

        And your attempts to contradict every jot and tittle on my account is ANOTHER chapter in that ever-growing tome.

        Like


      • They lose because too few of them want to play. Unless you change the “too few”, nothing else in the equation changes.

        Like


      • There is something churlish about armchit-quarterbacking someone who got up and did something.

        “This is why we lose” is retarded.

        We lose because the state, at the moment, has its boot on our necks.

        Liked by 3 people


      • Punch a pansy like that in the mouth or nose, he’s going to bleed on you and no telling what you’re going to catch – AIDS, hepatitis, STDs. Need to be wearing tough, waterproof gloves before even considering it, and a face shield would be a good idea, too.

        Like


      • You go beat the guy up then.

        Like


      • There is something churlish about armchit-quarterbacking someone who got up and did something.

        “This is why we lose” is retarded.

        We lose because the state, at the moment, has its boot on our necks.

        We lose because we let dweebs like the kike in the picture disrespect us, even when we’re doing something of no-account in the real world, like putting duct tape on our mouths and whining about twitter, of all things.

        You think that same oh-so-punchable phiz would be standing next to a muzzie or a n1gger with such a sign and look on his smug face?

        Check your premises, PA… although you usually clear the table, you seem to be playing to a weak hand of late.

        Like


      • You go beat the guy up then.

        Again with the petulance? Jeez, give it a rest.

        And trust me, if I were in the vicinity, that soyboy would be eating his notepad.

        Like


      • His name is Robert Breaker and he is a good man. I watch his sermons sometimes. He would last about two minutes before being arrested in SF and validate all their prejudices. You should beat that Twitter guy up for us instead.

        Like


      • His church is called the Cloud Church and his email is on his website. You should contact him and offer to provide security for him and set the example for us to follow. As a stalwart, it is incumbent upon you to do so. I am nothing more than a disingenuous pismire and therefore unable to act or make a decision.

        Like


      • You are indeed a disingenuous pismire if you think pulling up roots to go defend what appears to be a naive member of some “cloud”? church is a viable suggestion.

        I can only take part in what happens in my vicinity.

        Newsflash: posting items such as these pictures on an internet forum is for the purpose of bringing things to that audience’s attention, and inviting comment.

        DUH. Stop trying to break chops with inane neener-neeners, alt-R ally.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • — You think that same oh-so-punchable phiz would be standing next to a muzzie or a n1gger with such a sign and look on his smug face?

        It’s stupid to ascribe manly valor to parasites who are emboldened because the government is on their side. This is why you lose.

        — Check your premises, PA… although you usually clear the table, you seem to be playing to a weak hand of late.

        I always play a strong hand. In part because I don’t armchair-QB anyone on our side who acts and because I never tell people to do something I’m not already doing myself.

        Like


      • It’s easy to excuse the outright cowardice of White men and the fact that shitskins will defend their honor, such as it is, by saying that “the gummint” is on their side.

        This instance here has nothing to do with the gummint… it has to do with individual valor and not letting people within your space to insult you… ESPECIALLY little kike dweebs like the one in the picture.

        You can call this “armchair QBing” if you want, but I hold others to the same standards I myself practice, and YES, in this case you are playing to a weak hand, defending this guy for not making the snarky cocksucker back off.

        The fact that he’s, of all things, a minister concerned with Twitter… and putting duct tape over his own mouth… is just one more instance of the inanity of our times AND the Christian churches.

        This is the kind of “protest” that EVERYONE antiWhite laughs at… and perhaps the little smirking kike is right after all, the guy’s a clown.

        Any man with an ounce of self-respect doesn’t let some pismire stand next to him with an insult… especially if he’s trying to make some kind of larger issue point.

        And the fact that I have to put up with alleged alt-R allies scolding ME for being outraged at the kike for his snark and the so-called minister for his half-assed protest and swallowing insult, well… like I said, it has LOSE written all over it.

        And if any of youse yeggs think I wouldn’t practice what I preach, then you’re the same sort of petulant snarky assholes that you see in the picture above.

        Like


      • if this place wasn’t the biggest and gayest of all online circle jerks u’d actually have to admit that greg is quite fucking unbearable.

        carlos seems to be the only long time commenter with balls

        Like


      • Another new sock swoops in to say Eliot has green hair, go figger.

        When I want your third-man-in opinion, schmuck, I’ll let you know. Until then go play in traffic, fool.

        Like


      • You sound like another Danger sock puppy… the only guys with balls around here are the ones who would wipe the smirk off of that smarmy kike in the picture.

        Makes sense, though, that YOU identify with him… and that you say the only person with balls around here is the one who snarkily says “Go beat him up, then”.

        This place is starting to stink of old socks again. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • it’s luciano.

        and I actually agree with u about the turd in the pic

        it’s just ur psychobitch obsession with getting the last word

        Like


    • Oh that face…

      Triggered.

      Like


    • That is a most punchable face.

      Like


    • throw in me jail

      idgaf

      i’m choking out a soybean for thinking he can disrespect me like that

      Like


    • let us see the details of “unjust sentence”

      ————————————————————————————————
      Mr. Rubashkin, who ran the Iowa headquarters of what was the country’s largest kosher meat-processing company, received a 27-year sentence in 2010.

      The plant had been raided in 2008 for immigration violations; Mr. Rubashkin was accused of employing illegal immigrants for commercial gain and helping them secure fake documents, in what was seen at the time as a sign of stepped up enforcement by the Bush administration against employers who use illegal labor.

      In November of the following year, Mr. Rubashkin was convicted of 86 counts of federal bank fraud in connection with loans to the company, Agriprocessors. He subsequently received a sentence that critics said was long in comparison with other contemporary cases including WorldCom fraudster Bernie Ebbers, who got a 25-year sentence, and Enron’s Jeff Skilling, who got a little more than 24 years and later saw his sentence vacated.

      “The president’s review of Mr. Rubashkin’s case and commutation decision were based on expressions of support from members of Congress and a broad cross-section of the legal community,” who raised objections to the evidentiary proceedings in Mr. Rubashkin’s case as well as the severity of his sentence, the White House said

      Like


      • Don’cha know? In exchange for this pardon Trump has been given permission to bring the hammer down on pizza deliveries… it’s one o’ them thar 4D chess maneuvers that those of us unaware of The Big Picture might not see.

        Expect the arrests of DC pedophiles and uranium hawkers Real Soon Now.

        Like


      • Notice the crickets from the usual rah-rah rally who accuse us “WTF?” realists of being black-pillers?

        I’m all ears, boys… explain the 4D chess behind THIS maneuver.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


    • on December 20, 2017 at 9:11 pm gunslingergregi

      and that is what ya can do working together

      Like


  35. Hey heartiste when are you going to stop being a MAGA cuck?

    Trump just pardoned some feral jew who was literally employing hundreds of illegal Mexicans while committing bank fraud

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2017/12/21/maga-trump-frees-jew-imprisoned-for-employing-hundreds-of-illegal-aliens/

    At this point Trump is just Jeb Bush.

    2017 is the year Trump ignores MAGA passively

    2018 is the year of the full betrayal.

    [CH: trump is not jeb bush. stop lying about what trump is and isn’t. your black pills are deformed and poisonous. spit them out.]

    Like


  36. CH: this “man” needs a CH intervention

    Premise: cuck seeks the advice of self-help soyboy regarding his wife’s decision to do porn. Soyboy instructs cuck to compromise and “overcome his prejudice against sex work” (ie keep cuckin)

    https://lifehacker.com/help-my-wife-is-a-porn-star-1821428945

    Like


    • on December 21, 2017 at 4:01 am Obstinatus Ludificator

      One of the reasons cuck offers why the bitch he shackled himself to decided to become a video whore: “She has a learning disorder and never could excel in the professional world.”

      This man is doomed. It’s too late to prevent the unfolding disaster, we can only hope he learns the right lessons. The outlook is bleak, though.

      Like


  37. But does game work on extraterrestrials ?

    – EX-NAVY PILOT DESCRIBES ENCOUNTER WITH TIC-TAC-SHAPED EXTRATERRESTRIAL –

    http://www.newsweek.com/ufo-sighting-ex-navy-pilot-encounter-tic-tac-shaped-flying-object-752359

    Like


  38. Yo, bitches. (But y’all won’t, so f*ck you and kiss my ass– bitches dig that… )

    Liked by 1 person


    • yep

      have to hold women accountable. only way to change things is if men start sacking up and being more discerning about who they reward with attention and commitment.

      men who tolerate mistreatment/disrespect by women send a message to all of them that they can do anything and still get and keep a man.

      men who treat good girls like shit and reward sluts with girlfriend/wife status are adding to the problems we see with our women a huge amount

      i’ve learned and changed my ways after doing both those things. have to hold both sides accountable for the part we play or nothing’s going to get better.

      Like


  39. She hated him and hated all men and our daily lives were filled with her anger and vitriol and violence. She never gave a moment’s thought to what her hatred of men and our father was doing to her sons. She gave us daily rations of rage and blame and every bad thing that happened was always his fault.

    My mom was no feminist, but she was an alpha widow and oh boy she hated men in general and my father in particular. And yes, she had no thought whatsoever to the effect of her rage, man-hate, and father-hate on her son. I subsequently discovered that she lied to me; she said he’d never tried to contact us, and in fact he had, but she destroyed all the letters he sent.

    In short, AWALT.

    PS My father has lived rent-free in her head for 40 years now, and being a classic narcissist hasn’t given her a moment’s thought.

    Like


  40. I think the author missed a key point from the site he cites: she “Did not shun nice guys or seek a bad boy.” The reason is obvious–her hard childhood. A woman that is not spoiled wiht male attention, will not need bad boys to excite them. This is the main reason Americans do so well abroad.

    Like


  41. The whole “women love jerkboys” isn’t intuitive. The only way to understand is in the context of Eve/Delilah, biblical femme fatales.

    If you realize that women are more evil than men (particularly in modern times), and that borderline disorder is just female psychopathy, then you just put yourself in a woman’s frame of mind. If she’s a psycho, she’ll view kindness with dripping contempt. She’ll hate beta males and derive sadistic glee from torturing them.

    Bonobo women attack men. This is our closest primate relative. They are hardwired to challenge you and constantly test your strength. So, your woman is your adversary. You just don’t realize it yet.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Well there’s truth to your post, and Simon Sheppard has written a lot on this very topic.
      From a darwinian viewpoint, the male purpose’s is to seek to reproduce with as many females as possible (better if plum ones); the female’s purpose is to make coupling and reproducing with her has hard as possible.

      A very interesting read is also the Treatise of Love, you see it on the right-hand side of the page on this blog’s blogroll.

      However, you won’t understand female psychology in an integral, unbiased, and surely sourly realistic way so long as you step back from understanding human psychology as a war.

      Take for example what you write here:
      ” If she’s a psycho, she’ll view kindness with dripping contempt. She’ll hate beta males and derive sadistic glee from torturing them.”

      Wait, that “psycho” we could name the LiL Imp. It’s in everyone of us. What change are its pre-eminence in the psyche of each of us, “genotipically” and “phenotipically” and situationally — meaning that we can be relating with a person that feeds and triggers our inner imp, or by another that puts it to sleep.
      And as for everything, there’s an Impishness Quotient, varying by individual (and by circumstance, and contingencies). Being women lower in material violence on the average, they have a higher Impishness Quotient (mental violence) on the average.

      Being all people, man first of all, more of bodies than they are of minds, society sees as wrongdoing only the hurting of the body, and glosses over (at best) the hurting of the mind.
      Meaning: women (who, like all people) can feel guilty only when doing something society tells them makes one guilty have the playing field tilted in their favour, and bigly so. It’s become an uneven match, and a sad parade indeed.

      As for the Hamster. The Hamster’s activeness and size negatively correlate with a person’s “ego strength”. Hence, women out-hamster men. This doesn’t mean that men come hamsterless: they don’t, in the least (unless we are talking of the kind of sociopath who takes “you are a sociopath” as praise, such as our Humble CH, or myself).

      Like


      • “Psycho” is an imprecise way of describing what is wrong with female character, but there is definitely something wrong. The contrariness, adversariality, need for constant discipline, the abuse of power, manipulativeness.

        As a rule, if you think a woman is “nice”, that’s likely a testament to how manipulative she is. Does she drink or use drugs? Fake personalities require huge alcohol/drug consumption (creating a fake alter ego is emotionally draining so they need drug consumption). Ultimately, drug consumption is the ultimate red flag with “nice girls”. The authentic nice ones generally don’t touch them (and not as recovering abusers who clean up there act). “Nice women” do not have substance abuse issues and never have. This could be as simple as two drinks a day, but it’s the ultimate crisp flying red flag for a fake personality.

        Like


  42. […] H/T Heartiste […]

    Like


  43. A great quote by H.L. Mencken:

    “The two happiest times in a man’s life are when he falls in love with a woman for the first time and when he leaves the last woman he fell in love with.”

    Like