Single White Women And Open Borders

Go to this link and watch the video (I can’t hotlink it here on WordPress as there is not yet an option to link up PewTube videos).

It recaps much of what I’ve previously written at this blog about the sexual nature of women, but otherwise does a good job tying those Crimson Pill truths to the currently operative hyper-virtue signaling political culture that exists among single White women and how White men have to figure out a way to stop their reckless, callow women from driving Western Civ over a cliff.

From the vid:

“The only way we are going to make White Nationalism appeal to women, is if… White Nationalism is identified with the type of masculinity that women are interested in.”

A reader says this deserves concise guidelines. That’s a tall order for what I intended to be a short blog post, but I’ll offer a few suggestions anyhow:

  • First, I wouldn’t announce yourself as a White Nationalist. It’s like calling yourself a womanizer when trying to pick up a girl. Emotional baggage, justified or not, is associated with the term. Some things are best left implied. (I’m saying this in the context of winning over single White women in the era of Jewish Interest Media…there is such a thing as too much try-hard self-seriousness in the realm of dissident revolution.)
  • Never grovel or apologize for your beliefs. A refusal to cuck gets you an audition with women. The second you backpedal on your bold statements when you catch flak for them, her vaj turtles.
  • Humor and mockery are a deadly combination on the female hindbrain. If violence is the physical manifestation of assertive masculinity, then ZFG mockery is its psychological equivalent. Mocking feeble shitlib manginas and bitterbitch shitlib cunts with flair and cavalier abandon — to the point that one may accuse you of skirting the line between the thrill of the hunt and sadism — is fertilizer for flowering furrows.
  • State control. Amused mastery. In practice, what this means is that no matter how much women object, you stay firm in mind, message, and member. And when attacking enemies of your race and nation, you don’t get flustered or dangerously unstable; you lob your rhetorical artillery mit precision.
  • Openly defy shitlibs in your midst. When a single White woman who may be on the fence between Woke and Turncoat bears witness to you saying “that’s so gay” while laughing in some punchable manlet’s face when he utters a vapid lib platitude, she won’t be able to contain the splooge cresting in her womb fjord.

There’s more, but for now this should get aspiring pro-White men in the right FRAME of mind to find, meet, attract, and close wayward single White women.





Comments


  1. Let’s stop mincing words. Even most here do.

    Trump is a failure if he does not name the Jew. It’s obvious now. We’re not supposed to notice?

    I don’t understand how Trump feels due to (((Ivanka)))-(((Jared))). And he’s doing the merry Christmas thing.

    But he’s not on our side if he doesn’t do it.

    How much more can the host nation endure?

    Every. Single. Time.

    https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/05/mueller-deputy-praised-doj-official-after-defied-trump-travel-ban-order-am-so-proud.amp.html

    Like


    • On top of everything else, this 104 IQ mutant pockmarked faced Jew is a moron.

      He should have any job, let alone as a “top prosecutor.” He’s an idiot who knows nothing of Anglo law. Or he does and he’s an open enemy of our nation. He should be unemployed.

      Like


    • This is the crux of the issue. Trump says all the right things, and attempts to do all the right things, except when it truly matters.

      The Sanhedrin Question is the single most important question facing the west. Every other malady is downstream of this ancient sickness. If we don’t treat the cause, we will forever suffer the symptoms.

      Read E. Michael Jones’ “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History”. Begin by watching the interviews. This is a very old battle, and it has ebbed and flowed for countless centuries.

      All is for naught if we do not win this final battle.

      Like


    • Practicing your German longsword forms with a positive shoulder/waist ratio might help.

      Like


  2. I remain skeptical at the PUA “conventional wisdom” that it’s all a manifestation of some sexual desire within unwed White women.

    Then again, youse yeggs are the kind o’ yeggs what thinks a girl is DTF just because she’s trying to be nice and avoid confrontation instead of calling you out on your dancing monkey antics.

    [CH: stupid comment. you’re better than this.]

    Like


    • greg I respect u and all breh but u haven’t approach a woman since the 1960s

      why the fuck should I listen to u?

      Liked by 1 person


      • You’re off by a few decades, eggnog. And whether you listen to me or not is immaterial, but do so to your own benefit.

        Like


    • No, it’s not a stupid comment… and when I strike a raw nerve, think of it as the slap on the back o’ de haid that yo’ daddy never gave you.

      [CH: more like you struck a dulled nerve benumbed to this sort of stupidity coming from bitter femcunts and incel white knights. one, men have to “monkey dance” for women if they want any action. that is the nature of the sexual market and the sexes. now, that dancing can take many forms (such as working hard to build up a career and bank account), but what you can’t say is that any man who tries to seduce a woman is operating outside the darwinian imperative. two, any man halfway experienced with women knows when a woman is trying to nicely reject him and when she’s aroused but playing coy.

      if you don’t want to be treated the way i treat the perennial motley jizzebel cranks who occasionally stroll into this happy hunting ground, then don’t regurgitate ross douthatian tradcon suckup boilerplate about intersexual dynamics.]

      Like


      • Funny because I was here to post something that says kind of the opposite of what Greg said,

        I was going to, well I will post my play on word and what it is about, but it is not to annoy Greg, it is simply a coincidence

        Women sleep with the enemy figuratively or literally but they are not on our side

        this excerpt says it all,

        …Supreme Court allows full enforcement of Trump travel ban

        The Supreme Court is allowing President Donald Trump’s latest travel ban on six Muslim-majority nations to go into effect.

        Two of the nine justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor — dissented.

        yep the only two who agree with the enemy are women.

        this is “anecdotal” but damn typical of how women think or “feel”

        Liked by 2 people


      • While I agree with you, Canadian Friend (I’m not actually trying to countersignal here), it’s also true that the pair mentioned are a beaner and an (((eskimo))). They’d be pro-open-borders regardless, but your point still stands — it’s hard to tell where the wench ends and the wog begins.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on December 5, 2017 at 7:02 pm traitors first

        Yeah CH and Canadian Friend ………. it always comes down to “let you and him fight it out” and no women are never on our side, women always side with the winner of “let you and him fight it out” and no women don’t think they FEEL.
        Pro-tip: Never Ever, Ever Never, Never Ever look to a woman for loyalty because you’ll never find any.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Good for you, Greg. Whether you’re right or wrong, at least you are showing these faggot suck-ups how to be a friend among peers. Sometimes (often) respect requires fraternal correction. Anyone with a brother and a solid family knows that by heart and doesn’t get butthurt over disagreements.

        one, men have to “monkey dance” for women if they want any action. that is the nature of the sexual market and the sexes. now, that dancing can take many forms (such as working hard to build up a career and bank account), but what you can’t say is that any man who tries to seduce a woman is operating outside the darwinian imperative.

        This is a raw nerve because it’s something that CH has never been able to come to terms with as he grows older and the wheel keeps turning. Back in the dark ages, CH sold a teensy bit of his white soul for a touch of the niggershines, which is excusable under the “any port in a storm” imperative: men were demoralized.

        But we are in a different time now, thanks in great part to him. This “bustamove” theory was sketchy even back then, but today it is almost malpractice to recommend it as we simultaneously attempt to nurse white culture back to preeminence. “Dancing” for someone else, even if it is a means to an end, deniggrates the dancer, a pedestalizing by lowering oneself to her entertainment value. Even “working hard to build up a career” solely for a little dick friction is low class. The idea is to accomplish great things for their own sake, and pussy is the ancillary minge benefit.

        Greg has the instinct of an earlier age, when a man wouldn’t risk debasing himself for an interchangeable fleshlight that just so happens to be attached to a woman. But now CH has the instinct of a passing age too, when we had to operate in the dark corners and do undignified things to survive and thrive. Now the winter of our discontent is made glorious summer by those very sacrifices. Monkeyshines were a means to an end — that’s the best that could be said about them. They should never have become mistaken for a permanent facet of masculinity: healthy (white) cultures don’t allow it.

        Like


      • The other dark road CH is going down:

        if you don’t want to be treated the way i treat the perennial motley jizzebel cranks who occasionally stroll into this happy hunting ground, then don’t regurgitate ross douthatian tradcon suckup boilerplate about intersexual dynamics.

        As the millennials wreck themselves on Boomer delusions, Gen Z will be exactly that reactionary “tradcon” generation CH is making himself an enemy of out of nostalgia and pique. And it is beyond retarded to think of Douthat as any sort of spokesman for traditionalism given that he’s been out of the cuck closet since Sarah Palin began making straight the paths for Trump.

        It’s a strange blind spot to regard the orthodoxy that kept female sexuality from destroying civilization as ignorant of “intersexual dynamics.” You know, the traditions that called girls harlots for being precocious, men cuckolds for being unable to control their women, and women spinsters (they had their own word for it) for being unattached by 25. It’s almost as if they knew just how quickly everything can spin out of control if the entire society didn’t band together and shame girls in their prime for deviating one inch from the ideal. Gen Z is rediscovering why those “oppressive” protocols were put in place, having been left to mop up the rancid cum slick and STD cheese stains brought on by the “jizzebel” philosophy.

        Like


      • As usual, even our own alt-R allies fall into the trap of honing in on a phrase and letting that blind them to the bigger picture.

        I’ll explain this one last time, and if y’all, including CH, want to keep retreating into your loved Egyptian night, then so be it.

        My point is/was/remains: one of the first things this video dweeb comes out with is that the impetus of young women virtue signalling in favor of immigrants is because it’s purely a sexual desire thing.

        In short, they’re only lusting after swarthy cock.

        IF this were true… and it’s not, mind you… but even IF this were true, WTF is the chateau, of all places, giving further legs to that muh dik demoralization agitprop?

        And since it’s NOT true, it’s merely the silly naivete’, brain-washing, and feelz hivemind, then it’s our job, AS CH HIMSELF SAYS IN THIS VERY POST, to mock and disdain mercilessly this whole idea of White women wanting only swarthy cock, because the latter are merely a bunch of dancing monkey alphas who, by themselves, don’t amount to shit, ESPECIALLY AS EVINCED by the shitholes they and their ancestors built… and from which they now run like apes with their asses on fire.

        And any stupid ideas of romantisizing these shitskins have enough meatworld instances of harassment and rape and worse to convince even the most gullible White woman that once these swine arrive and hold sway in an area, it becomes a no-go zone.

        So MISS ME with staying in the frame of the Synathedral and giving legs to muh dik demoralization agitprop, ESPECIALLY AS AN ALT-R ALLY, who should know better by now.

        Until y’all wise up, fuck this ghey earth, this is why we lose.

        And yeah… I’m mad, bro. 😡

        Liked by 1 person


      • Two of the nine justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor — dissented.

        yep the only two who agree with the enemy are women.

        this is “anecdotal” but damn typical of how women think or “feel”

        You’re making a BIG mistake when you say these are “women”.

        They are first, and foremost, a jew and a (ahem) “wise Latina”.

        It’s a racial thing… gender is secondary, in this particular instance.

        These women OBVIOUSLY are past the age of sexual desire, amirite?

        Like


      • And since it’s NOT true, it’s merely the silly naivete’, brain-washing, and feelz hivemind, then it’s our job, AS CH HIMSELF SAYS IN THIS VERY POST, to mock and disdain mercilessly this whole idea of White women wanting only swarthy cock, because the latter are merely a bunch of dancing monkey alphas who, by themselves, don’t amount to shit, ESPECIALLY AS EVINCED by the shitholes they and their ancestors built… and from which they now run like apes with their asses on fire
        ———————————————————————————————
        So it is not true because you say it
        Do you have any study, everyday real life example, story whatever to corroborate your opinion?
        As others pointed Greg you know very little about young women being for so long out of trenches otherwise you would not say the following:
        “because the latter are merely a bunch of dancing monkey alphas who, by themselves, don’t amount to shit”
        While woman’s inclination to offer herself to the pure brute force has been forever part of her sexual being it had been stifled by laws and mores in civilized societies for the most of our history
        In this day and age it is has been openly encouraged by our (((enemies)))
        while at the same time (((they))) have been doing everything possible to make young white males effeminate and thus the object of ridicule by their own women
        Had you spent any time with young women you would have realized to which point “dancing monkeys” are “cool” new thing to them
        Years of ridiculing and denigrating white man have taken its toll and the confused entity some refer to as woman’s mind now acts in full unison with the above mentioned primal sexual instincts
        Needles is to say that this is not the case of all or perhaps even majority of white women yet the number is growing by the day
        If you compare the today number of shitskins and ni66ers you can see with decently looking white women to the one you could see only 5 years ago you will realize that some kind ugly shift has been taking place
        You think that if you do not talk about the problem it will go away
        But it will not
        It is only by illuminating it and shaming shiny stupid objects caught in the light that will work (along with ridiculing both subjects and objects of the degenerate enterprise)
        The other necessary ingredient,the law that is, will be outside of our reach for foreseeable time

        Like


      • You misspelled “deniggrating.” Also, double-returns between paragraphs are your friend (and ours).

        Like


      • on December 5, 2017 at 9:48 pm gunslingergregi

        Greg Eliot when I was on the basketball court with the blacks they had no white woman
        none
        0
        only one black chick ever came to court
        I come back from Iraq blacks got chicks here
        but guess what else there is crack and pills and heroin
        that they deal only
        so yea you figure it out
        white bitches love drugs for sure
        so yea that’s the missing piece plus fucking media on constant barrage and rap
        so yea and even then ya go outside here it is white couples
        so yea
        a diferent world
        there alphas don’t become ceo’s or successful they become dealers
        so the bottom of barrel whites competing with all the types of blacks

        Like


      • on December 5, 2017 at 9:52 pm gunslingergregi

        its pretty much impossible to understand until ya see it
        but yea if ten percent white chicks still a lot of white chicks but whatevs
        let em get beat to death od and nooone calls police I guess not your fault
        cept white dudes getting od and murdered if they alpha so yea that’s prob not good

        Like


      • on December 5, 2017 at 9:55 pm gunslingergregi

        which maybe better competing in the ghetto than the boardroom I suppose

        Like


      • on December 5, 2017 at 9:57 pm gunslingergregi

        prob why rap been kept alive so long kept the blacks from aspiring to do anything else but become dealers

        Like


      • talkin’ to me?

        I do not think that I misspelled -denigrating-
        You did

        Like


      • I do not think that I misspelled -denigrating-

        Yeah, I don’t actually correct people’s misspellings online.

        I suppose you spell that country in Africa with one ‘g’ too, you grammar cuck.

        Like


      • wut?
        King of Cucks calling others cucks is as ridiculous as
        60 years old virgin Matt King giving advice about how to get some pussy
        What do you know about women asshole?

        Like


      • Perfect example of trying to engage an r-selected dimwit with even the lowest level of subtlety. There’s two dots in this game of connect the dots, and he still can’t manage the objective. It’s like talking to a nigger.

        What ESL program did you use and have you sued them for non-performance yet?

        Like


      • subtlety?
        jesus christ what a pretentious fool
        only in your mind “deniggrating” is a subtlety

        Like


      • You think that if you do not talk about the problem it will go away
        But it will not

        Ah, yes… because I don’t want more demoralization agitprop given front-and-center trumpeting by our own alleged allies that means “bury haid in sand”.

        There are various stages of middle ground, and discussion is never suppressed…

        But what even YOU, the normally cogent cortesar don’t see is the point about keeping that discussion WITHIN THE FRAME OF THE SYNATHEDRAL, e.g., the White women just want muh dik from darky agitprop.

        There are a lot of ways to approach this issue, and CH himself mentioned the disdain and mockery angle.

        But when you start off the discussion with a video in which the first thing mentioned is that the reason for the immigrant virtue signalling by single White women is because they want swarthy cock, well…

        You’re carrying more water for the enemy than he could ever carry for himself, no matter what you say after that.

        That this isn’t balls-ass clear to yourse yeggs just astounds me.

        Wake the fuck up out of the stupor of this binary arguing nonsense, will ya? Nobody is saying “don’t discuss”.

        God DAMN, it’s like talking to elementary school kids ’round chere. 😡

        Like


    • Speaking of dancing monkey antics…turns out Lauren Southern is a smoke jumper.

      https://voat.co/v/Identitarian/2273728

      Like


      • And we still have people here playing the “muh Civ” card. That stuff is beta male game and won’t work, ever.

        White men have to realize that women/nigs/etc. don’t actually care about all the drugs/vaccines we invented, or that we sent people to the moon or anything. That’s why they call it the WHITE MAN’S BURDEN. It is that we have always striven for greatness that transcends the shitty meat-grinder of history to reach for new horizons.

        It is fine to be proud of your history, but it always has to be kept in the context that white genius was never about earthly achievement, and can never be expected to yield any sort of sensual/sexual result because it was never intended to.

        This is the crux of why this stuff cannot be left to women.

        Like


      • on December 6, 2017 at 12:07 pm HungarianPatriot

        Pro comment by Shitlourde.
        Women are apes. They are attracted to men who exhibit ape like qualities. If you’re smart enough and not an autist, you can turn the ape on to get bitches, then turn it off and go invent your vaccines or whatever.

        “Civilization” is an enemy of white people, as Varg Vikernes said. And before any of you talk shit about Varg, he has like six beautiful kids with a cute French girl who’s like twenty years younger than him. That he homeschools at his self-sufficient compound in the French countryside. If more of you thought like that instead of useless bullshit like space shuttles, Europe wouldn’t be in such a mess.

        Like


    • [CH: stupid comment. you’re better than this.]

      Actually, he is not. He reveals this often (such as now).

      Dreg Smelliot is very anti-Game, and is not smart enough to realize that Game works.

      Like


      • I love it when the aging gamesters tell on themselves. As if it’s 2003 and they’re still mixing it up on the So Suave forum.

        Prime girls today were starting kindergarten back then, but PUA dead-enders imagine the up-and-comers will still react to the same shopworn tricks that worked before they got their AARP cards. While principles are eternal, the social scene is always changing, and old men don’t mess with what worked for them last they tried.

        The one little insight that gave your loser existence its first and only taste of victory is now proof of your own obsolescence, and you think using cult-based shame language is supposed to faze worldly men.

        How many approaches did you make tonight, playa?

        [CH: the social scene may change but female nature is close to permanence. what mystery et al (re)discovered was the wisdom of the ancients. Byron and Voltaire were running the same Game in their respective milieus that the feather boa guys did in the early 2000s and the new crop are doing today (presumably at furry conventions).]

        Like


      • Dweeb kike keeps trying this sock gambit, but his gefiltre reeks a league off, each time.

        My thoughts on game have been well-documented here at the chateau, and anyone with the desire for the truth can look at the archives.

        I don’t doubt many aspects of what is called “game”, but which was simple masculine behavior back in the day, are applicable to holding a woman’s interest, and especially as a married man.

        But the muh dik dancing monkey bullshit of paper alphas I despise… always have, always will.

        And you dweebs who never had a masculine figure to shape your outlooks during your formative years continue to bristle against any man who puts you in your place.

        But that’s on you, not on the man telling you how things truly stand.

        Like


      • ghey mod is ghey, but my thoughts on what is called true “game”, but is actually simple masculine behavior when applied like a man, are well-documented here at the chateau.

        The dancing monkey antics of paper alphas, invariably of the muh dik variety, well… no use.

        [CH: flirting and charm are “dancing monkey” skills that women adore in men, and which aren’t limited to the muh dik contingent.]

        Like


      • flirting and charm are “dancing monkey” skills…

        We have a definition problem then. There’s nothing subtle or commanding or calm or aloof about dancing like a monkey.

        This is about the balance of power between the eager-to-please entertainer and the one to be entertained. And it’s about mimicking shitskins rather than developing the much more difficult/sophisticated (white) skills of “flirting and charm,” of which the mudbloods know little and need to know little — because in the r-selected muh dikk culture, their sows are always available to be mounted with little effort.

        [CH: there are effective and ineffective ways to capture a woman’s interest. but smearing the endeavor however skilled or inept as befitting a “dancing monkey” betrays a deep-seated discomfort with both male and female sexuality and the rules that govern the mating field of pursuit.]

        Like


      • Byron and Voltaire were running the same Game in their respective milieus that the feather boa guys did in the early 2000s and the new crop are doing today…

        That’s a stretch. The only connection between the two groups were their similar aims. Byron risked death and defamation, Erik von Markavik risked a girl giving him a sneer before moving on to the next unprotected naif, thus requiring very different skill sets.

        But your point is taken. Men are permanently in pursuit of pussy, sure, but the cultural milieu is instrumental on how restrained (poetry and stolen glances) or how clownish (guyliner and silly hats) the pursuer has to be. Which is my point: even in the short 20 years since PUA’s first Got Game, we are, by necessity, moving back toward restraint, which will require more white charm/integrity and less showing how red your baboon ass is (or, say, beating off to a literally captive audience). Call it r-courtship returning to K-courtship, slut abundance returning to the forced scarcity of Reaction. Byron is an excellent pre-Victorian example of the kind of cads that forced society to turn culture on its head, to stop the chaos that results from unrestrained female sexuality (his Romantic movement).

        Female nature isn’t just “close to permanent,” it’s eternal. When you try to change it by artificial means — feminism, the pill — it snaps back violently. This is why the left now must choose between patriarchy (chivalry) or permanent rape (The Gropenning). That’s always been the choice for women, civilization or the jungle, subjugation by men or subjugation by nature. We’ve been on a holiday for the last 50-100 years, pretending women could transcend the choice, and we’re finally returning home.

        Like


      • smearing the endeavor however skilled or inept as befitting a “dancing monkey” betrays a deep-seated discomfort with both male and female sexuality and the rules that govern the mating field of pursuit

        This is shithouse psychology with an ideological bent, like saying your disgust at two dudes kissing “betrays a deep seated discomfort with” your own repressed gayness.

        [CH: so you’re disgusted by male-female courtship?]

        “Dancing monkey” means selling out your dignity for a cheap piece of ass.

        [the better term for men who effortlessly supplicate to women is “try-hard”, which no PUA advises as a course of action.]

        Niggers can do this because they have no dignity when dey dikk get hard. All Greg said is: White man, remember your dignity and don’t exchange it so cheaply. Even if it does work, it’s not worth the price. And in that regard, a “deep-seated discomfort” is a good thing, the sign that you are of superior stock and recognize it.

        [again, men perform, women spectate. or another way of putting it: men have to prove themselves, women establish the proving grounds. given that this is the nature of the reality we all live in, it’s disingenuous to then slander male “performance” as something solely befitting bantu primitives and beneath the dignity of european white men.]

        The culture we are emerging from pretended there is no price for antic mimicry because we are debased degenerates just like they are, only less woke to the inescapable “darwinian imperative.” Which might be compelling if we weren’t among the ruins now trying to figure out how muh dikkery took over everything, even simple K-selected flirting.

        [the biggest difference between white men and MUH DIK is discernment. the former have it, the latter don’t. if anything, the white man’s discernment and refined taste in women necessitates a single-minded focus on perfecting his SMV performance to capture the heart of the girl of his dreams.]

        Like


      • [CH: flirting and charm are “dancing monkey” skills that women adore in men, and which aren’t limited to the muh dik contingent.]

        Well now you’re just being disingenuous… when did I ever claim old-as-time male-female flirting, ESPECIALLY WITH CHARM, was “dancing monkey”?

        I thought by now what I call “dancing monkey” was plainly known, but it looks like, as I already mentioned, even the great CH himself is guilty of the same sort of solipsism that we laugh at shitlibs about.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • Gentlemen, a few key points.

        CH definitely has a blind spot regarding historical courtship, as he has only experienced the modern, dystopic, Weimar Republic of sexual relations.

        However, King is far too eager to return to the era of Medieval Chivalry when the situation on the ground could not be furthest from it.

        You gentlemen are talking past one another, so allow me to state it plainly:

        Women have never had complete control of their reproductive choices at any point in evolutionary history. They are spoils for the taking. Thus, CH’s insistence on “charm” is unnatural, because female choice meant nothing for the majority of human existence. Conversely, King’s chivalry only makes sense in a society where females have no mate choice, and are under full dominion of Pater Familias and Coverture.

        In K-selected societies, fathers are the final arbiter of their daughter’s mate selection. In R-selected societies, the chieftain of a roving pack of men is the final arbiter of female mate selection. Both of these scenarios have zero relation to our current upside down world of intersexual dynamics.

        Currently, a hostile alien elite is using the full power of the state to prevent Fathers from exercising their rightful authority over daughters, and men from exercising their physical might, thus creating a bizzaro world of artificially enforced female safety and complete freedom from consequences.

        Like


    • Inceliot reveals that he has never been within sniffing distance of the HB10 secret society.

      Lower SMV girls will tolerate some weakness/betaness because they have to. HB10s want to get gut-checked, choked, slapped and spanked during sex (especially in early 20s).

      The more powerless she feels, the more powerful the orgasm. It is the exact inverse of men.

      Like


      • These are decade-old platitudes that the rest of us internalized the first time we saw them in action. You revert to them instinctively even when they have nothing to do with anything anyone is talking about, like you’re still trying to prove yourself.

        No wonder you achieve cognitive dissonance and panic when Greg insults tryhards who think “proving yourself” to women is the key to fucking them. You take it personally. You forget, or never knew, that getting them to prove themselves to you — the exact opposite of monkeyshines — is the key.

        Like


      • Inceliot reveals that he has never been within sniffing distance of the HB10 secret society.

        And? If such a thing does exist… and I KNOW you yeggs lurv the idea of any and all CT theories… it’s a society I’ve never had any interest in, and one which will never put anything in the nostrils of God besides a stench, redolent of Playboy mansion after a hot tub orgy.

        Not my world, and welcome to it.

        Like


      • Greg and King;

        Just tonight, I was at a get-together where a single white woman I know (early 20s) was present. Got to hear her:

        1) Shitting on Brock Turner’s appeal case and saying he got off the hook because he’s a white male

        2) Talking about her upcoming sex vacation to South America and

        3) However many dick pics she got on Snapchat today.

        So I am sure you can see why it seems a little bit disingenuous to suggest that female sexual nature doesn’t underpin, I dunno, EVERYTHING they believe?

        Unless you have a better theory, that is…

        Like


      • Are you kidding me, LeShitHaid? Because YOU came across some floozy that means AWALT?

        Geez, it’s because we ourselves as alleged red-pillers can’t escape from the two-dimensional binary thinking of our foes that we continue to lose.

        Newsflash: between NAWALT and AWALT, the truth lies somewhere in between. Yes, 40M gals read Shades of Gray… and 40M guys went and saw any given James Bond movie… but the former are the ones now complaining about harassment and crying rape when the realities of “brute” actually bite them on the ass… and the latter would shit themselves at the first sight of Jaws.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


    • on December 5, 2017 at 7:37 pm Vagina dominator

      Women like strong men. They like them physically strong and they like them to be psychically strong, that is, emotionally resilient. And they like to be led. That is something they are always looking for in a man.

      So it isn’t the politics, it’s the presentation. But aside from getting pussy, if you believe in something why would you hide it or apologize for it?

      “Yeh, sure, I’m a serial killer. I chop people up on weekends. That make you nervous?”

      “I dunno. A little bit, I suppose.”

      Like


    • on December 5, 2017 at 10:15 pm Diversity Is Good

      I remain skeptical at the PUA “conventional wisdom” that it’s all a manifestation of some sexual desire within unwed White women.

      Cool, so you are skeptical of hypergamy. Ok, lots of older men are.
      So what’s your explanation of the phenom?

      Like


      • It’s getting tedious trying to knock sense into you binary either-or (ahem) thinkers.

        Since when is letting in dirty smelly refugees that don’t have a pot to piss in “hypergamy”?

        I’m not skeptical of hypergamy at all… it’s well-know, even celebrated in literature and pulp for longer than any of us have been around, from Pride and Prejudice to Fifty Shades.

        What I’m skeptical of is that unwed White women have, first and foremost, swarthy cock on their minds when it comes to the virtue signalling of the current immigration and refugee onslaught. This cuck fetish seems to be a recurring theme of both those who would agitprop us into demoralized ennui, and yet even alleged alt-R allies who are red-pill in everything except the sexual myths and politics of the Synathedral.

        Don’t make me call you stupid again… read and COMPREHEND what is being said before attempting to put an oar in the water.

        [CH: greg, at the margins white women have demonstrated a sexual undercurrent to their open borders cheerleading. you only have to look at the rise in US miscegenation rates and mixed race marriages over the past ten or twenty years to know there’s some truth to the observation that AT THE MARGINS of single white womanhood there exists a real and profoundly unsettling desire to copulate either physically or emotionally with the Other, ie with aggressive tribal invaders. now, this doesn’t mean all women, or even a significant minority of women, feel something sexual for swarthy hordes. but it does offer a glimpse to the female id, and informs those of us with clear vision and open mind that wild and extreme behavior at the margins indicates there also exists a milder but just as notable psychological motivation in white women that differentiates them from white men, and to a lesser extent from nonwhite women.]

        Like


      • on December 7, 2017 at 4:55 am Oleaginous Outrager

        Is this a manifestation of “single white women want the swarthy cock”, or is the wider truth more along the lines of “non-whites make the best pets”?

        Like


    • Well you can talk about the swarthy dick nature of these women but it needs to be done in the same way you talk about obese land whales dating black or Hispanic men.

      Essentially make a joke out of it and make it an embarrassment to happen.

      Point out when they commit suicide after rape; that kind of stuff.

      As for being a dancing monkey; never been too big on the whole mystery style peacocking form of PUA either myself.

      Not saying it doesn’t have its place or that it doesn’t work.

      Just beyond small pieces here and there, not for me.

      Like


    • on December 6, 2017 at 5:29 pm safespaceplaypen

      maybe it is, maybe it isn’t. Regardless, whites still need to step up our game and other aspects of life if we don’t want our wom3n taken.

      Like


  3. […] Single White Women And Open Borders […]

    Like


  4. if you’re going to be laughing in their faces you better look the part too. lift, faggots

    [CH: won’t take much. have you seen shitlib soyboys lately?]

    Like


  5. First, I wouldn’t announce yourself as a White Nationalist. It’s like calling yourself a womanizer when trying to pick up a girl. Emotional baggage, justified or not, is associated with the term.

    Not only that, but it makes you look like a try-hard. That’s one of the biggest tingle killers that there is.

    First commandment of game: Thou shalt not appear to be trying too hard.

    Like


  6. on December 5, 2017 at 3:03 pm baked georgia

    I was in the downtown of the capital of my state, the first time in years. the place is looking like davos, nigeria. there are hundreds of black africans selling garbage such as fake sunglasses and watches. the worst thing is some cuckservative think this is good because “free market”

    Like


  7. Of course, some White women know the score

    Liked by 1 person


    • Don’t forget to support her patreon!

      Funny to see her videos talk about why people aren’t getting married and if everyone deserves a good relationship.

      Like


    • Don’t forget to support her patreon!

      Funny to see her videos talk about why people aren’t getting [email protected] and if everyone deserves a good relati0nship.

      Like


    • i don’t really follow any of these bitches

      but tara mccarthy and that accent man

      Like


    • Looking at the halfchan today it looks like the tradthots are being ousted.

      I’m seeing the argument of “we need these women to bring women to our side” and also “women should stay out of politics”.

      My take is that women will be what we demand of them to be. I have dated women who were with democrats before be and voted for Obama and by the time I was done with them they were building their own AR-15s and laughing at Pinochet memes. Yes they were “shocked” at first, but CH is actually correct about never apologizing.

      Bottom line is men have molded the women of their civilization before. And in wars, when those men got killed, the wives and girlfriends would end up fucking the invaders. Women are wired to be malleable because they are programmed for optimum reproductive strategy (every damned time) and that’s why they won’t be picking up our rifles and carrying on the fight. Those hamsters will rationalize every last bit of it..

      So we have the ability to pretty much get what we want. The removal of the trad-thots was a cruel necessity. The alt-right cannot be led by women, especially ones who turned out to be ex-lesbo, ex socialist, sharking, etc, as has been the case so far. We can have 100 so-called trad-girls writing books and doing speeches and all of their work will be undone by one swarthcow churning out new Muhammeds in there childbearing years. A real trad woman would know not to reducer herself to thottery, use her SMV to find a high value man, and make babies.

      Liked by 3 people


    • on December 6, 2017 at 12:25 pm HungarianPatriot

      These “alt-right” honeys are just cashing in on thirsty betas.

      “Support my Patreon guys! 😘

      Fucking lol

      Like


    • on December 6, 2017 at 5:24 pm safespaceplaypen

      Like


  8. Bravo,
    your faithful crimson-pill disciples wait and crave for the continuation of this list, as well for all the other contents of such shiv-enlightenment

    Like


  9. I would guess that single women include divorcees, dregs, and other various low value sorts and that these bias the average of single women overall. The Married women category probably reflects more accurately what normal or attractive women think. just my thoughts.

    Like


  10. It’s all about the SMV. The media will keep trying to make blacks and muslims look cool. To counter that we need to show how they are the low class dregs of the world.

    No woman, even a fatty, would want to be seen with a homeless bum. That is how browns need to be portrayed. Keep the crime stats handy for any argument you may encounter. How the top 10 cities for murder are all black. Be ready to ridicule anyone who argues everyone is the same.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on December 5, 2017 at 7:50 pm Vagina dominator

      As a “movement” should the alt-right fat-shame white men more? Is it possible to get them on the health and self respect team so they can be a better example to their sprog.

      But I am a bit conflicted about laying into a group of men who already get so much abuse and when I am sure lots of them are fat bcs their lifestyle requires that they work 80 hours a week paying for the dregs of society.

      Like


      • I would say yes, and I would also like to point out that work schedule is no excuse for overeating. But on the other hand, shaming is only an effective tactic on men if the men in question are already invested in and want to be a part of the group that’s shaming them. Men who are already alt-right, we should shame away. Millennial Woes on youtube in particular looks like a pathetic numale and I have little respect for his personal habits even though I agree with most of what he says.

        Other white men may be rationally persuaded from being fat. Most of them already know it’s unhealthy and that shedding weight will generally help with women, they just need a little nudge.

        Like


      • i just remember that a lot of these men find plenty of time to sit on their ass and worship nogballers

        i don’t think it’s wrong to tell white men to stop being beaten down quasi-cucks

        Like


      • on December 7, 2017 at 5:51 am Carlos Danger

        Over eating is often caused by too little sleep- 80 hour weeks maybe? People consume more fuel to compensate. If one is overweight and trying to lose weight, make sure you get eight hours of sleep too.

        Like


    • i can’t remember the poast but i said something similar that probably got dismissed because it had the misfortune of coming from me

      we should be depicting browns as creeps and shiftless omegas rather than world conquering bad boys

      women love a strong horse but everybody hates a parasite

      Like


  11. Why the heck should I even need to actually impress these Untermensch loving cunts?
    The ZFG is a natural as breathing now to me.

    Like


  12. By openly disagreeing and rebuking shitlibs in public you instantly are put in a position of power and advantage. They aren’t use to push back because their rants are generally done in left wing echo chambers so by openly challenging them it immediately puts them on the defensive and even into a full retreat.

    I deal with this being on the left coast. Pussy male liberals speak boldly only because they feel they are among friendly head nodders who validate they’re feeble attempts at boldness. When you immediately push back and without shame, remorse, or fear they often collapse being completely ill-equiped for a debate and even less equipped for a conflict. When you do this their cowardice really kicks into overdrive. Confrontation, unwanted attention, and pressure causes these half-men to shrivel up and disappear. If you’re lucky they will have an epic meltdown that leaves everyone present wondering, “Is that really the guy I agree with?”.

    When women witness this it can be quite intoxicating since they rarely witness raw masculine force of will so boldly put on display. This isn’t bullshit. I’ve seen even the most ardent leftist lasses unwittingly give away their interest and curiosity ( even outright desire) when they witness such a man.

    I also find that even if the women disagree they will still have a level respect and admiration for a man who boldly takes a stand. In fact, I think any woman who isn’t a blue hair slob or bitter cat lady is somewhat aroused at the prospect of a man who fearlessly goes against the “norm.”

    The real takeaway from this post is execution. You can’t seem bitter or unhinged. You have to be mountain of confidence and resolve. Cool, calculated, and articulate. That’ll make the ladies swoon and the half-men cry.

    Liked by 2 people


  13. It all comes down to being willing to exercise judgment, in favor of what is clear and true, and unapologetically. The left is all about “don’t judge me” while doing insane shit. Drives me nuts. Fuck that. Pick battles wisely, but judge them always as a man of stone. Justice reigns supreme. Women prattle on about nonsense, soyboys offer uptalking snark? Ice cold indifferent stare followed by “Bullshit.” Stare at them, they’ll either apoligize and self-correct; or double-down, whereupon you dismiss them. A strong man of few words, which when they issue are cutting, judgmental, and on the side of right is what shows power. Mastery of self shows power. Mocking the devil’s nonsense shows power. Giving others authority to use their judgment to influence you? Pffft. Why is Trump’s communication effective and not effete? Clear thinking words of judgment, pointedly concise, that speak to fundamental truth. Fat Rosie. Lyin Ted. Little Marco. Crooked Hillary. Fake news. Sad! When describing Americans. Terrific. Best. MAGA!

    Like


  14. Globohomoism:

    Like


  15. This stuff only works if you don’t need any social media platform or don’t rely on standard income sources, a.k.a a job.

    Like


  16. on December 6, 2017 at 11:39 am BlitzkriegMitDemFleischgewehr

    “…mit precision.” – bist du ein deutscher?

    Like


  17. […] has some solid psychological frame tips for WNs (and other […]

    Like