Racist Babies: More Science To Confound The Freakqualists

Once again, shitlibs who love SCIENCE will have a major cogdis to overcome, because their totem to liberal reason and intellectualism has discovered that babies show racial bias in picking their playmates.

Two white adults divided the toys, one equally and the other unequally.

Seventy per cent of the toddlers chose to play with the researcher who distributed the toys fairly.

But in a second test, when one researcher favoured a white recipient over an Asian one, they picked the ‘fair’ researcher less often, the journal Frontiers in Psychology reports.

And the babies are more likely to help those who share the same ethnicity, which is known as in-group bias when people favour those with the same characteristics as oneself. […]

The study revealed when it came to picking a playmate, the babies seemed more tolerant of unfairness when the white recipient benefited from it.

They picked the fair experimenter less often when the unfair experimenter gave more toys to the white recipient rather than the Asian one.

The researchers say this implies that babies can take into account both race and social history when deciding which person would make a better playmate.

Professor Jessica Sommerville of the University of Washington said: ‘If all babies care about is fairness, then they would always pick the fair distributor, but we’re also seeing that they’re interested in consequences for their own group members.’

I’m really starting to wonder if there’s something to the disparaged evolutionary theory of kin-based selection.

This latest study lines up with a previous study finding that 6-to-9 month old infants show a marked in-group racial preference for own-race adults and for associating nice things with own-race faces.

Technically, babies aren’t racist, they’re racialist. They prefer to play with and to be supervised by own-race babies and adults, respectively. No doubt, further research would find similar preferences among nonWhite babies (for totally shocking reasons, the research to date has focused almost exclusively on the racialism of White babies. Things that make you go HMMMMMM.)

Racialist babies are proof that God loves the separate races and wants us to be happy with our own kind. Libs could use a gleeful reminder at this point of the post that the fact of racialist babies proves racialism is inborn and not the product of social conditioning or patriarchy or White privilege. Our racialism is normal, natural, healthy, and inspiriting. It is also comforting, particularly to the most vulnerable of us. Our beautiful inborn racialism is the product of millions of years of evolution, and it won’t be dislodged by a few decades of shitlib social engineering and anti-White agitprop, nor should it. If freakqualist shitlibs want to abolish Beautiful Racialism, they will have to do it at the barrel of a gun, for they are up against human nature itself, and we know how those Wars to Eradicate Human Nature usually go.





Comments


  1. There is certainly a natural bond hierarchy people subconsciously have. Even white kids in mostly nonwhite neighborhoods/schools demonstrate this.

    Like


    • NO, NO NO NO.

      This is EVIL WHITE SUPREMACY and is WRONG.

      It’s only ok when every other racial group does it, and especially jooz.

      See, whitey? Even your BABIES are rayciss; you are born with original sin, therefore you should all just die because our babies would never do that sort of thing and when they do, it is just their tribal memories of your oppression. Because the Crusades.

      Liked by 2 people


    • on September 14, 2017 at 12:54 pm XTRABEING ZILLIONZ

      Is there a high school cafeteria anywhere where groups of blacks and white students apportion themselves equally, and cross lines, over sacred food time?

      Liked by 1 person


    • This reminds me of elementary school when we had a black kid shuffled in from New Orleans (yes, I was in elementary school during Katrina).

      Had 3 black males in my elementary school that I remember. Actually, two were biracial and one was full blooded and the difference was stark.

      The two mulattos actually were decently high performing academically up through the end of primary school, but once formal operations started (solving for X type of math), they quickly were left in the dust.

      The full blooded southern one sucked at school literally in primary school. I’m sure he went to some black school in Louisiana where they didn’t teach him shit. They constantly had to “bring him up to speed” by getting some para to work with him separately.

      They weren’t even that musically talented from what I remember, unlike what the (((media))) says. They were all very fast though (not actually very strong), got to give blacks that even though I can’t think of a more pointless skill.

      I guess hybrid vigor is somewhat true, but it fails like 80% of the time.

      Like


  2. […] Racist Babies: More Science To Confound The Freakqualists […]

    Like


  3. on September 14, 2017 at 12:02 pm An inflammatory commentator

    CH – homosapiens migrated to Europe from Africa 100,000 years ago, and spread through Asia 60,000 years ago. Racial differences among Homo sapiens evolved over tens of thousands of years, not millions.

    [CH: i was referring implicitly to the tribal instinct in humans. we have evolved far longer to notice small differences between tribes. big continental sized race differences only ping our in-group radar that much harder.]

    Like


    • The Out of Africa Theory is running up on some rocks as of late.

      They’re finding older fossils in Europe. Get current on the research.

      Liked by 4 people


      • Exactly, if environment is responsible for the goggles skin color, among other things, how do you explain southern India ? Those folks are as dark if not darker then most blacks, while coming from totally different environments. We all know goggles didn’t build boats to get there, as they don’t even know how.

        Like


      • “The Out of Africa Theory is running up on some rocks as of late.”

        No it isn’t. A mandible and a tooth isn’t enough to infer anything. Further, there is much variation in the 4th molar so the 4th molar isn’t used for classifying hominins, which the authors of the paper rightly note.

        https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2017/05/27/to-the-alt-right-modern-man-did-not-begin-in-europe/

        Like


      • The truth is that there was continual gene flow in both directions. There isn’t just one “out of Africa” ape that evolved into the modern human (white man), but rather hominids living in each major region for many hundreds of thousands of years, and often mixing even across putative “species” lines. In some cases this includes genetic material going as far back as H. erectus, sometimes through intermediaries, before reaching the “most modern”, extant, group.

        The “magic” of white and whitish people, and steppe people, is undoubtably of native, northern, ancient origin, tempered, refined, and enhanced (or not) by recent selection.

        Like


      • You know that there isn’t much evidence for Punctuated Equilibrium, either? Gradualism is the competing theory and it actually appears in the fossil record. PE is a theory for how speciation could occur in a broader sense than should have taken place with gradualism.

        The independent evolution hypothesis is true; whites and asians contain significant neanderthal admixture; there were MANY strains of humanoids for a long time and the successful strains lived on. Nobody should care about where the “original” humanoid came from. DNA analysis has all caucasians emanating from a common ancestor maybe 9000 years ago.

        I would counsel people to look at how plant evolution works- a trait that garners a selective advantage becomes ubiquitous in a short period of time. It needn’t be in response to stimulus; it is accidental and merely fortuitous.

        Like


    • Human-like footprints in Crete from 7 million years ago, I believe. Still in dispute, but if true, 100,000 years blown out of the water.

      Like


  4. I was talking to my next door neighbor the other day about negroes and dogs. He brought it up. We have a new German Shepherd puppy and he mentioned that when we were kids, blacks didn’t come around Whites that had dogs because the dogs would hurt them. He seem to think that modern dogs were less likely to notice black/White racial difference because their owners were less prejudiced. This is not the exact way he said it, but it is what he meant. I said I thought it would be more likely that dogs would be less likely to attack for several other reasons rather than picking up on human acceptance patterns. Especially since the neighborhood we live in is about 1% black. I mentioned how dogs are very olfactory in nature and would be more aware of different smells of Whites vs. blacks. Plus, I don’t know what anecdotal evidence he was basing his opinion on. What do you think? I have always believed that a dog’s reaction to humans is usually a pretty good indicator of whether the human was trustworthy or not. And he was right. White owned dogs did used to act like they viewed blacks as a threat. I think they probably still do. However, the neighborhoods I have lived in for the last 30 years have had covenant restrictions on free-roaming dogs, whereas 40 years ago they used to be loose in the neighborhood. I haven’t seen black/dog interactions in several decades. I would think their biological nature has not changed any, just like human babies.

    Liked by 2 people


    • His opinion was based on wishful thinking and social trends, two things dogs care little about. It really depends on the dog and his exposure to darkies. Default is to freak out and bark like hell. The opposite is also true. Dogs raised by blacks freak out over seeing whites. Come on down to the Contry and you learn these things.

      Like


    • the herding breed dogs in our family detest blacks and for some reason, Iranians. when I discussed this with a dog psychologist, in one of the most liberal suburbs in the galaxy, she readily confirmed that dogs are racist, and that herding breeds in majority-minority cities would be somewhat overwhelmed with fear biting/aggressiveness around blacks.

      Like


      • Dogs are literally colorblind.

        They use their sense of smell as primary means of identification and understanding the world.

        They will start barking long before they can see the black

        Liked by 2 people


      • Apparently the latest research shows that it is incorrect to state that dogs are color-blind, and that in fact they see yellows, blues and combinations thereof. Reds are tricky.

        Still your point pertains that canines react to the totality of racial appearances, behavior and scent.

        Like


      • on September 14, 2017 at 4:47 pm Oleaginous Outrager

        Trav 777 – In some cases, we can smell the blacks before we see them. We just aren’t as free to bark loudly about it.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Yep my dog hates niggers.

        Like


  5. P.S. Would you please get rid of the Christina Ricci look alike on the Goodbye, America photo journal. Its been on there over a month and I can’t stand her smug, go grrrl face. Maybe some pictures of naked women?

    Like


  6. being more comfortable among our own kind is encoded in our dna.

    if this were not true, diversity propaganda wouldn’t need to be force fed down our throats 24/7

    Liked by 3 people


    • on September 14, 2017 at 12:29 pm vaguely human slav

      how dare you, that’s only for the darkies, the slants, and hte spics. Go to any college campus and they’ll tell you they – as a race- prefer to get away from the evil whites. Seperatism for them but not for you.

      Like


  7. on September 14, 2017 at 12:27 pm vaguely human slav

    The lefties also need a reality lesson in that no where has the racial makeup they want. Every country has its own racial stats. Mexico is full of Mexicans, after all. America was once full of Americans too. There was no country with mixed tribes that didn’t have full on tribalism (Iraq) or outright racial anger (South Africa) or whatever.

    So, the question from SCIENCE is what the fuck is the left trying to construct here? Did they watch a Pitbull video and think “yeah, see whites and spics can get along, look at his backup dancers” or what? Maybe brainwashed from a Bennetton ad?

    Like


    • on September 14, 2017 at 4:54 pm Oleaginous Outrager

      And anyone who’s had any contact with them knows just how Mexicans feel about non-Mexicans, or even Mexicans that look a little too “Indian” or dark.

      Like


  8. on September 14, 2017 at 12:28 pm vaguely human slav

    the libs want white self-negation as a racial goal which sounds lovely for the badwhites who can’t afford to tribe themselves off in the far flung parts of teh country with no real welfare.

    Like


  9. on September 14, 2017 at 12:30 pm Wrong Side Luciano

    Libz will decide that human nature ought to be reconfigured b4 they ever accept it as it is

    Ur dealing with religious loons of the most violent, intractable sort

    Like


    • on September 14, 2017 at 12:56 pm XTRABEING ZILLIONZ

      If there is a transhumanist push, we can expect liberals of the French Commune, Russian Revolution, Progressive Modern Left stripes to orchestrate it according to their boring, banal, blathering bullhorn declarations.

      Liked by 1 person


  10. This stuff is so obvious you would need to be a total moron not to accept it. Does anyone think a baby giraffe is going to go towards other giraffes, or head towards the nearest lions ? Visually identifying your own kind is the ultimate survival tactic. Dis be science and sheet.

    Like


    • How else would they know their mommy and lieu of that extended family that have a vested interest in their survival.

      Like


  11. Couldn’t predict this outcome. SMH.

    – Boy Who Began Sex Change at Age 12 Changes His Mind 2 Years Later –

    https://vigilantcommunity.com/news/boy-who-began-sex-change-at-age-12-changes-his-mind-2-years-later/

    Like


  12. We’ve got some googles at work and when we have certain work events, you’ll always seem them together. In fact, just above every job I’ve had where vibrants are in the workplace, they’re sticking to their own kind.

    Same with some of the chinks here too, and I will also throw in the language barrier to that too, since a handful are FOB.

    Though it’s always a trip to see an FOB talking to some chink born here cause even though they look alike, they differ in many ways.

    Like


  13. Estrogen Good. Testosterone Bad. Go it ?

    – Now we men can blame our hormones: testosterone is trouble –

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/25/men-blame-hormones-testosterone-trouble-aggression-decision-making#img-1

    Like


  14. You guys are all interpreting this study wrong. The proper interpretation is that whitey has racism baked into his genes. The only way to make the world a safe and fair place is to exterminate the white race or at a minimum enslave them so they can’t wield racist power over any of the naturally good races.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Which outcome they will definitely get. Look at Trump — nothing but a filthy, useless traitor whose sole purpose was to make whites feebly stand up for themselves, so that they would have the excuse to begin the Final Solution to the White Problem. With Trump laughing and laughing at us while flushing his toilet on the stupid white slaves he hates.

      Like


    • on September 14, 2017 at 1:33 pm Hackett To Bits

      The other method, as we know, is indoctrination. (((They))) make it more sophisticated and demanding with every iteration of (((their))) rules. Now (((they’ve))) got self-cuck guides for you like WikiHow “How To Respond When Someone Calls You A Racist”. You are commanded to abase yourself by following a list of steps including

      Section one excerpts:
      3. Preemptively apologize
      5. Validate their frustrations
      8. Acknowledge any racist things you have done
      11. Make amends for any harm done

      and on and on for four (!) sections until your cuckening is complete and your dog collar stops feeling so uncomfortable, nay, it feels welcome!

      Of course our problem comes from #sosorry whytes, who are blindly giving away what the whyte race has accomplished. How do we reduce their influence and the influence of their (((masters)))?

      But (((they))) keep pushing. (((They))) just released “Mother!”, which appears to be an all too typical anti-Catholic provocation, filmed by a ykw no less. I’m not even Catholic and I’m offended – I’m offended that there is no uproar at all. Imagine if someone made an occult movie based on Jewish or Muslim theology… how many milliseconds it would take to elicit screeches of “Rrraaaacissst!”

      Like


  15. But… but… racism is taught by adults!

    They say so in the (((South Pacific))) musical!

    Like


  16. Cologne brought 20,000 white fans to London today for a soccer game. Cologne have anti-sharia gangs and also have banners/slogans that say : ‘our end (of the stadium) is clean’

    Huge potential there for the future…

    Like


  17. Why are most of these studies on babies white?

    My guess it’s the scientists themselves, white people being more prone to doing science are more prone to using their own race to study on.

    Don’t expect cultures that don’t value science or education to get a whole lot of scientific studies going.

    Like


    • what, you mean that nonwhites don’t really even have a culture or history?

      So when white society is destroyed, white history is eradicated, who has a history that will be left? Control the past and you control the future.

      Like


  18. on September 14, 2017 at 2:51 pm Wrong Side Luciano

    I used to chill with mostly blacks in jr high/HS. they treated me like one of the brothers and didn’t give a fuck when I tossed a casual n-word.

    The first time I really felt unwelcomed was when I started getting close with a black chick. there’s just boundaries u can’t cross.

    I think TPTB are making a yuugee mistake by pushing the accelerator on the race-mixing prop.

    Like


    • Yeah the thing I noticed about blacks is that it’s all good… Until it’s not.

      And when it’s not all good, there is a swift switch. It’s like those African honeybees that when you swat the nest, they’ll chase you miles to sting you.

      Same goes. They’re very cordial and jovial, but if you try to show any dominance, the true colors come through. Can’t blame them though, I hate how whites bend over backwards to please every other group.

      Like


      • Rwanda- the hutus engaged in a sudden race war against neighbors they had known their whole lives. The chimp switch is real. It lurks beneath the surface.

        Like


  19. This won’t stop them. They’ll just acknowledge how “we all have these implicit biases we must overcome” while disregarding or (((knowing full well))) that only white people are good at doing so.

    Like


  20. Babies who recognize their own: More Science To Confound The Freakqualists…Racist is a anti-white christian Marxist word.

    Like


  21. They’ll just use it as an excuse to begin indoctrination earlier.

    The one positive of being socialized with other races is that, assuming you don’t latch onto school agitprop, you get firsthand experience from a preconscious age of otherness.

    The worst thing you can do, though, is only expose your kids to the exceptions to the rule. They’ll keep thinking that every black is like the one whitewashed mulatto in their class, when in reality that kid is the son of one of the few halfway productive black men who could actually escape the ghetto and try to assimilate into white life.

    Like


  22. “Professor Jessica Sommerville of the University of Washington said: ‘If all babies care about is fairness, then they would always pick the fair distributor, but we’re also seeing that they’re interested in consequences for their own group members.’” So if my kid plays with a chink it’s because he cares about fairness? Like, he couldn’t just LIKE the friggin’ chink, it HAS to be some kind of affirmative action? And why is a bias indicative of concern for other in-group members? Couldn’t it just be concern for oneself? I don’t avoid Tyrone because I prefer Larry, I avoid Tyrone because Tyrone. So many possibilities that simply cannot enter into shitlib consideration.

    Like


  23. Well yeah. Niggers smell weird and are a different species. This obvious fact is apparent to any first grader.

    #theageoftruthspeech

    Like


  24. Your race is your father…

    White babies are racists, proper…

    The (F)ather begat the (S)on who redeemed the (f)athers made manifest by their (s)ons.

    Ergo, the cause that is a white baby is the effect of his white father ultimately seeking redemption in an errror of vicious anti-racism.

    Like