#SheColluded

If you’ve been keeping abreast of the news these past two weeks, you might have noticed the anti-Trump enemies have become discombobulated and put on the defensive by recent exposure of their criminal misdeeds. What was “a reckless and treasonous Trump Administration suffering daily leaks and subterfuge by establishment loyalists” narrative has turned into a “by Zeus’ beard, the Trump Train is rolling and the lamentations of the shitlibs and their Bitch Queen Clinton are heard over hill and dale!” battering ram of truth.

Too funny that the Podesta-cooked Russia-Trump collusion scandal has completely boomeranged and threatens to take down the Clintons and their scummy surrogates for good. You think I’m exaggerating out of a misplaced love for Herr Furor. Nope. Check the latest bombshells.

PAY FOR PLAY, INFLUENCE PEDDLING, STRAIGHT UP BRIBERY. Foreign investors shoveled $145 million into the Clinton Foundation while thecunt was heading the State Department, to ensure thecunt and Gay Mulatto would OK a deal that transferred 20% of America’s uranium stores to a Russian energy company. IOW, thecunt colluded with Russia. Bill Clinton, meanwhile, got a cool half mil for a canned speech he delivered in Moscow the same time the Russian energy company Rosatom inked its deal for a stake in Uranium One.

President Trump (may God guard his path) recently inquired about the Seth Rich murder mystery. (He knows, fam)

thecunt campaign and the DNC (and now it’s been revealed, the Bushes and McCain) paid hefty sums to Fusion GPS to research manufacture the hillary fanfiction known as the Piss Hooker Dossier, with the intent to undermine the incoming Trump Administration (this is called treason).

Quads over at MPC writes,

In short: Tucker was contacted by a lobbyist from the Podesta Group. Lobbyist claims that the Russians, using a Ukrainian shell company, funneled money to the Podesta Group for the explicit purpose of influencing the Clintons. Paul Manafort was the go-between. Tucker is satisfied that his Lobbyist isn’t lying and has been verifying the details, so far all successfully. I.e., Tucker is reporting that Hillary colluded with the Russians and Manafort was in on it. Tucker promises more to come.

Surely it’s no surprise to any here that Hillary was a corrupt hag selling State to the highest bidder. But this news, on the heels of the Uranium One and Dossier stories, has great implications. Hillary allowed Uranium to be sold to Russia after they donated to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary funded Kremlin-compiled pissgate allegations which were then investigated by Obama’s Justice Department. That same Justice Department was headed by Loretta Lynch, who colluded with Bill Clinton on the tarmac to squelch investigations into Clinton’s crimes. This is no longer 4chan anon LARP conspiracy theories but verified news in the public record. What do we make of this?

First this calls into question Manafort’s role in the Trump Campaign. Is it a coincidence that Trump hired Manafort when Manafort had funneled money from the Russians to the Clintons? It’s hard to believe that Trump would work with Manafort to defeat Hillary without hearing Manafort’s dirt on Hillary. Alternatively: if Manafort colluded with the Clintons, and Manafort was the FBI’s justification for tapping the Trump campaign, did the Clintons collude with the FBI to wiretap Trump?

Second, what to make of Mueller? It came out yesterday that Mueller was investigating Tony Podesta. Manafort is one of the only other people we all know Mueller was investigating. Without going full /pol/lack conspiritard, is it possible that Mueller really is investigating Democratic corruption? Remember, Mueller was interviewed by Trump the day before he took up the special council. At the very least: if Manafort was working with the Clintons, doesn’t this shed new light on Mueller’s investigation?

This is all starting to sound too opaque, like a police cork-and-pinhead bulletin board. I wouldn’t worry too much about the details which, if true, imply much more dramatic conspiracies to be. The takeaway is that this isn’t in the realm of internet myth and rumor. This is real, verifiable. Senate investigations are starting and more is on the way. Is it possible that Clinton will really see the inside of a jail?

Hillary Clinton is going to jail.

I repeat, HILLARY CLINTON IS GOING TO JAIL.

Basically the whole Russia-Trump Collusion Narrative is a massive case at its root of psychological projection and deliberate misdirection by the Clintons and their depraved surrogates in the Deep State and the Gaystream Media. They smeared an incoming President with the very same crimes and treasonous actions that they themselves had committed. The best defense is a slanderous offense to Cuntlib, Inc.

This isn’t a White Pill, kind readers. This is a bucket of White paint dropped on your head from a booby-trapped door in Trump Tower. You’re swimming in White.

Who needs Challahwood when you have this kind of quality entertainment beamed into your eyeballs and earhalls every day IN TRUMPERICA? We are blessed to be alive at a time when our mortal enemies are closer than they have ever been to the breaking wheel.

Update: CNN checks in with their CONSISTENTLY hot take!

Bonus Shiv (it’s all related once you identify the anti-White source malignancy): PA on why Whites shouldn’t race-mix. The cruelest and truest of shivs: the cold heart gazes upon one’s own children and remains unmoved when it sees nothing of oneself in them.





Comments


  1. is it possible that Mueller really is investigating Democratic corruption? Remember, Mueller was interviewed by Trump the day before he took up the special council.

    I find this to be far fetched. Way too far fetched, even for a “stranger things have happened” thing.

    It’s nice to think about but given all the intensity of the Mueller investigation and the Dems all for it, I sincerely believe they’re trying to take down Trump, rather than Dem corruption.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on October 25, 2017 at 5:04 pm Captain Obvious

      The terrible fear here is that Mueller will grant immunity from prosecution to everyone on the DEM side of the aisle, and then (((the judiciary))) will rule that the immunity from prosecution is sacrosanct, and can’t be revoked by Sessions or even by Trump himself.

      Liked by 2 people


      • on October 25, 2017 at 5:25 pm Captain Obvious

        Another possibility, though, is that (((someone))) very powerful amongst (((the Uber-Sanhedrin))) decided that it was time to throw Bubba & thecunt overboard, and that (((Harvey Weinstein))) would have to be sacrificed with them, in which case Mueller will have been (((ordered))) to take out the Clintons once & for all.

        Then the obvious questions would be:

        1) Who amongst the Uber-Sanhederin made & enforced the decision?

        2) Whom have the Uber-Sanhedrin chosen to replace Bubba & thecunt?

        PS: A slight variation would be that it was not the Uber-Sanhedrin, but rather Ghey Melungeon and his Sheboon wife [or maybe Valerie Jarrett], with the idea of running the Sheboon against the Goad Emperor in 2020 [or against Pence in 2024].

        Liked by 1 person


      • on October 25, 2017 at 5:26 pm Captain Obvious

        But a decision to take out the Clintons would not have been acted upon unless a successor had first been (((chosen))).

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 5:33 pm Captain Obvious

        PRO-TIP: Keep an eye on the j00 chauvinist, Alan Dershowitz. Both Yossi Cohen & Benjamin Netanyahu have Dersnowitz on speed dial, i.e. Dershowitz’s talking points in all of this will be coming straight from the Mossad & Likud.

        Like


      • It’s really time to shut CNN down. I mean, I never thought I would see the day where authoritarianism against journalists would seem not just warranted but mandatory. Yet here we are.

        It’s borderline incontrovertible at this point that Clittons funded this whole shebang and so did FBI. Fucking even WAPO said it, ffs, and they are a pro-clitton blog!

        Hang these traitors, put Muhcane up there with them.

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 12:53 am The Philosopher

        Yes, Dershowtiz is very deep state. He defended Epstein’s paedophile blackmail ring in court believe it or not.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on October 26, 2017 at 5:21 am Captain Obvious

        Epstein -vs- Weinstein is the key to understanding all of this, but M0d is eating it.

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 5:29 am Captain Obvious

        WEINSTEIN

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 5:29 am Captain Obvious

        EPSTEIN

        Like


    • Agreed. Mueller was appointed by Bush to lead the FBI. He is a very close friend of Comey, who Trump fired. That is obviously why the Jew Rosenstein appointed him, to take revenge on Trump for both Comey and for the Bushes, after Trump humiliated Jeb Bush and the entire Bush wing of the party.

      Mueller has filled his team with Democrats, who have donated large sums to the Democratic Party.

      Mueller has now brought along the liberal Jew Andrew Weissman as prosecutor. He has destroyed people’s lives before with accusations that have later been shown to be false. He did this to the accounting firm Arthur Andersen LLP with 85,000 employees worldwide – and later a court overturned the earlier decision, as it was a bogus charge. He did the same to the Merrill executives in the Enron case, sending them to prison – and this too was overturned on appeal.

      A lawyer tells the story of how Weissman sent in a guy with a wire to tell the lawyer he would sign a testimony supporting the lawyer’s client’s story in a financial case. They had the testimony printed up and everything, and only when he was just about to sign it did the guy say, “You know this is all false, I am only doing this because your client is a friend of mine and I want to help him.” He was sitting there with the pen in his hand about to sign. If the lawyer had allowed him, that would have meant the lawyer would have gone to jail. But obviously the entrapper was instructed to wait until the last moment in the hope that the lawyer would let him go on with signing, tasting the victory. Rather than stating from the beginning that it was a false story.

      This is how it goes. The Jew Rosenstein appoints Mueller, who gets a Jewish attack dog known for inventing false charges to do the job, while Mueller is the front man in the media.

      And because of the ridiculous rights given to a “special counsel” Mueller can just dig and dig wherever he wants, for as long as he likes. Terrorizing people close to Trump by confiscating their personal computers in early morning raids, as has already happened. And he has access to Trump’s tax returns and can leak them, so the yahoos who never built anything can laugh at how Trump made less money in some year or had to fold some business.

      Anyone involved in big business knows it is IMPOSSIBLE not to have something – or a lot of things – in your past that can be used against you in court. Especially in international business. Especially in business with a center in New York’s highly politicized and backrooms-dealy real estate market. And financial cases can go on and on, for a year and a half, or more. This is what will happen to Trump.

      This will handicap Republicans’ trying to be re-elected to Congress. So they will want to get rid of Trump, or at least vote with the Democrats to block his agenda. And it will definitely sink Trump in 2020, when the complicated, inflated cases will no doubt still go on while the media scream of how it already definitely proves what a criminal Trump is.

      Like


      • I disagree and I think The President had his ducks in a row long before he announced he would run. Remember, he’s a tv guy as well as real estate, he knows these people, he knows how they operate, he knows their tricks. 2018 is already shaping up to add another coach to the Trump Train as Flake just dropped out of running for re-election. If Ward can keep from blowing the election to a democrat it’ll be a wake up call, again, to the establishment and they’ll all scurry to bend the knee and kiss the ring.

        Like


      • Mueller angle is covered. Mueller either pledged allegiance to save his own but or Trump has something on him or a contingency plan. Still lots to do but almighty for less than a year the left has been blitzkrieg-ed hard. We wanted immediate action we’re getting plenty now. Can’t wait for the “cause you’ll be in jail” memes to pop.

        Liked by 3 people


      • As I said. It doesn’t matter if Trump had his ducks in a row – that he never committed crimes. We’re not talking about murder here, of course he isn’t guilty of any of the crimes people see in TV shows. We are talking about financial investigations. There is not a single large corporation on earth that can’t be prosecuted for many things, because the laws are so many and complicated. And it’s not just Trump’s actions but the actions of all his executives, for many years. Taxes, regulations, it’s endless. You can always find something if you have unlimited resources, an unlimited team, and unlimited time to look for whatever you want. Which is what Mueller has.

        If the court case leads to a conviction – is another matter entirely. But it can drag on and on and on.

        There was a story about some staffers at a prosecutor’s office who amused themselves with coming up with things to prosecute random people for. As they said, every person can be prosecuted for something, if you look long enough. And that’s just ordinary people. Not people responsible for enormous international corporations that deal with foreign and domestic businessmen, local and national politicians, and foreign governments.

        Like


      • “or Trump has something on him or a contingency plan”.

        3D chess! 4D! Trump has thought of everything!

        Wishful thinking much? This isn’t a TV show. And Trump hasn’t been able to sic the law on the Clintons for nine months even though they have committed obvious crimes – yet you think he has spies finding things in Mueller’s closet? How would he even go about digging about Mueller, search online? Go to Mueller’s and Comey’s anti-Trump FBI? Hah. Maybe he hired a rugged but clever private investigator with an attractive female sidekick and an interesting backstory.

        Liked by 1 person


      • The best plans take time to come to fruition.

        Are you naive enough to think it would only take a month to really start wrecking the corrupt cunt and her minions?

        Something wicked this way comes. The storm is only just starting for these “people”.

        Liked by 1 person


      • problem is that all roads lead back to Hillary now. All of them.

        Most corrupt people in recent history. Obama too.

        If Sessions won’t indict, he should be fired and indicted with them.

        Liked by 2 people


      • If the people financing and pushing for those investigations are in prison, they lose most if not all of their steam.

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 1:00 am The Philosopher

        Punching In

        I think there is a way around Mueller extra legally by invoking a constitutional crisis. Basically trump if hes ever under the cosh like that should go on tv and state that a coup is happening or that the ‘Democrats’ are trying to overthrow the president. Its a nuclear option if Trumps justice department and lawyers can’t sandbag Mueller.

        Remember, the CIA and NSA have much more dirt on trump than Mueller will ever get from manual investigative methods. The fact that we haven’t seen anything more than a warning to Trump not to talk about the Epstein rings is the key thing. In my opinion, the deep state would have thrown the kitchen sink at trump in the election or primaries via media or patsy surrogates if there was something there, even something fake but plausible.

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 5:20 am Captain Obvious

        I wanted to mention Epstein above, and Dershowitz’s connection to Epstein, but it felt like too much to throw into a single subthread.

        What fascinates me about all of this is that Epstein was protected*, but that Weinstein was considered expendable, and was thrown to the wolves.

        It suggests to me that Epstein is much closer [in terms of “degrees of Kevin Bacon” separated-ness] to the Uber-Sanhedrin than is Weinstein.

        Which, in turn, is why I am urging people to keep an eye on Dershowitz.

        Dershowitz is “plugged in”.

        *Protected by Bill & Hillary’s consigliere, the creepy “Chr!stian” pervert, Kenneth Starr, who, in addition to covering up Bubba & Epstein’s [email protected], also tried to cover up the [email protected] of White girls by the ch!mpanzees on the Baylor football team.

        Like


      • “If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I shall find something in them which will hang him.” – Cardinal Richelieu

        Like


      • Yeah he can dig and dig just like Starr did during Whitewater. What goes around comes around

        Like


  2. […] #SheColluded […]

    Like


  3. F*ck Gotti, Trump is the real Teflon Don.

    Liked by 2 people


    • He’s got the WH whipped into shape now. Notice you haven’t seen or heard from Ivanka, Jared or Don Jr. in a while now. The quarrelsome family members have quietly gone away. Funny coincident — now that Bannon is gone, no more daily leaks to the press.

      General Kelly replaced Preibus and cleaned house. Now things are looking a lot more professional.

      Like


      • Ivanka was on Hannity the last two nights in a row. So, back to the drawing board…

        Like


      • He could have asked the family members to go away on day 1. He could have asked his DOJ to investigate Clinton like his famous “you’d be in jail” quote

        Endless soap opera and endless speculation

        Like


  4. Question(s) of curiosity for CH & readers:

    Why would any male buy ‘lunch’ for a female unless he is: a) already sexing her or b) wants to but is an orbiter? Related: and is there any other reason but b) if the female refers to this male as a ‘friend’ because she knows she can milk him for all he’s worth?

    Recent hire at my firm: 30+ broad. Looks to be the sort of career shrike Murphy Brown type. Nice legs. Nice face. If you didn’t know better, she’d be the type out in the mid-West but of course the older set. Now you can tell she’s gone on the carousel, has already peaked & is now looking at the horizon over the hill. Given that I live in uber-SWPL land (San Francisco), it’s almost a relief in comparison: unlike the rest of the female staff in torn jeans, muffin belly tops, and other horrendous wear tear & appearance, she is clearly in shape & dresses professionally (albeit her clothes remind me more of power business wear from the 80s & 90s rather than the nicer 30s, 40s & 50s eras).

    She entered the kitchen to heat her lunch while I poured myself a cup of coffee. I asked her what she was eating. She mentioned she had no idea (!) and that her ‘friend’ has been buying her groceries as well as frozen lunches, and that she has no idea what frozen lunches ‘he’ buys her [I instantly caught on to the reference of ‘friend’ and that this friend was male by ‘he’].

    Now I’m not at all interested, and besides she’d be the type to scream bloody murder & then sue the firm & me, so I’m strictly hands off.

    But as a question of analysis: why would anyone buy her groceries & frozen lunches & suffer being referred to as ‘friend’?

    Seems bizarre to me. Just throwing it out there for analysis & amusement.

    [CH: i wouldn’t put it past some pre-Wall women to make up stories of a mysterious “he” who lavishes them with endless gibs. otherwise, if true, the lunch-buying gentleman is gay or a total feeb.]

    Like


    • She’s probably lying and doesn’t want to sound pathetic that she’s eating a frozen meal for lunch so she makes up some story about some guy buying her food.

      Even you caught that she had no idea what she was heating up, which is why I’m of the mind she was saving face.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Yes. There’s no chance a woman would bring lunch to work without knowing what it is. She could have easily opened it at home. So she was embarrassed because it was too cheap and just pretended she didn’t know what it was.

        Or – she knew, but for some reason wanted an excuse to bring up her male friend, real or fake.

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 6:42 pm Vagina dominator

        A woman will always check before opening it. It could be a bento box with a sex toy theme.

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 6:51 pm Vagina dominator

        But to be serious, she’s obviously lying. But why? And why such a bizarre and unlikely lie?

        Unless “he” is some house-proud sub fag ball-gagged and leashed geek and she is his power-mistress.

        Which might be something you hint about in the lunchroom. Deep mystery. But conclusion? Avoid like typhoid. Obviously a dangerous fruitcake and/or really hot sex (if you can ignore the chained gimp watching from inside the wardrobe.)

        Like


      • And this is a better quality woman in California? You guys are delusional to stay.

        Like


      • it’s a lie. it’s a shit test.

        take it as a compliment.

        use this to shiv(neg) her from time to time and roll off around the office. the attraction will build and eventually one boring office HH on a weekday and you could lay it with impunity.

        2 weeks from now u see her in lunch room or whatever:
        “hey, I made my tinder date some frozen dinner the other night. (pause). she loved it.” (roll off) and ignore her for a while. bonus points if she’s in a conversation with office beta dudes and you interrupt.

        Like


    • Sugar daddy / sugar baby relationship? She wouldn’t admit those details to you.

      Like


    • on October 25, 2017 at 5:37 pm Captain Obvious

      ZFG.

      Just ask her, man.

      YOU: “Whatcha got there for lunch?”

      SHE: “I dunno. My friend packed it for me. He does all my shopping.”

      YOU: “How long you been sleeping with him?”

      Like


      • lol., CO.

        In SF in 2017?

        no white man can talk like that. you’d have to be black or illegal.

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 7:04 pm Captain Obvious

        You’re confusing White Man with white eunuch.

        It’s precisely what a White MAN would say, and score the lay.

        But a white eunuch? Not so much.

        Like


      • CO is drinking heavily again, probably paint thinner.

        Dude you simply cannot, no matter who tf you are, ask a lib chick in SFO a question like that. She’s gonna get triggered two days later and light you up in HR

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 12:29 am Observasaurus Rex

        “So what’s Jenny Craig made you for lunch today?”

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 4:53 am Captain Obvious

        “She’s gonna get triggered two days later and light you up in HR”

        A Real White Man would have his own S-Corporation.

        Only white eunuchs work as cubicle-monkey wage-slaves for ZOG, terrified of their own shadows, trembling in fear of “HR”*.

        If you cant speak freely throughout your life, then you’re not a man – you’re a eunuch.

        *A strange cohenincidence that those also happen to be Hillary Rodham’s call letters.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Trav, you act like drinking heavily is a bad thing

        Like


      • And what about paint thinner?

        Like


      • I agree that one should never drink paint thinner. Unless you’re broke. Or unless you can mix it into something like a mojito. But for God’s sake, don’t drink it straight, like a loser.

        Like


    • He’s probably a fag.

      Like


      • All your analyses sound correct to me, but good God…in any of those scenarios, it’s a clear sign to stay as far away as possible from these Murphy Browns. We hardly talk except for the random encounter in the supply room or kitchen just to be polite, plus I’ve never hit on her, so it’s not as if I care. And she doesn’t go out of her way to initiate talk, really, etc., so I don’t think she’s into me or anything. Which I’m way fine with. But it’s just bizarre why she’d even mention this ‘friend’, imaginary or real. I mean, does she really think she’s impressing me with this ‘friend’ who buys her groceries & shit? and why should she try to impress me? If I were in her shoes, I’d think that sounds even more pathetic: a) you’re using a schmuck; b) the schmuck is letting himself be used; and c) you’re a grown woman who can’t do her own shopping. And the office is so super casual that the boss brings in cheap frozen lunches, and no one bats an eye, so why should she need to save face? Now granted — our office is disgustingly casual & tasteless (one chick comes in bicycle shorts; another torn jeans; another God knows; and the other men in tee shirts or slacks with athletic shoes), so she does stand out in actual professional wear (which I’m glad to see as refreshing change of pace), such as skirts, pumps, and blouses. I have to thank & credit this blog & CH & readers here, because I’m now trying to be far more attuned to women’s bizarre speech & deluded rationalizations.

        Liked by 1 person


    • No man ever buys a woman frozen lunches to take to work. Ever. That’s super creepy. I can’t imagine a single scenario in which that makes sense, unless the man legitimately has no interest in fucking her… like a gay bestie who’s critical of her food choices and calls her fat, or her dad, maybe?

      Liked by 1 person


    • She’s looking for a suitor to hitch her wagon to but wants to trade up from what’s currently available. Grocery guy doesn’t know she’s calling him a ‘friend’ at work, entirely possible he’s a boyfriend that she’s not sold on as the final choice. Mentioning him though as a provider of sorts is humble bragging that’s she’s worth providing for.

      Like


    • Absolutely, she knew what it was. Women lie habitually for no reason. She was probably embarrassed that it wasn’t something politically correct, like organic kale locally farmed by refugees.

      I’d stay away from her if you don’t want trouble at work.

      Like


    • “He” may be a “she”. Corporate death to reveal one’s lesbian relationship. Would be tolerated of course but would thwart ascendancy.

      Like


    • It’s San Fran, so remember too many geeks, gays and weak men.

      This guy is a “friend” of some kind. And when I mean friend I mean not F-ing her. Beta or Gay she’s just another well put together women in her 30s in the Bay Area who can’t find a real man to nail down.

      A good way to test her situation is to use a line like. “Is lunches all he packs for you?” This is so PC that you will probably get a straight hint about where she stands. Most likely Beta with a bit of money buys too much food shares and she is his “friend”. Plenty of Geeky dudes are doing this out in SF/Valley these days with the 30 something non-tech gals.

      These geek guys are accomplished but know nothing about women. They can’t escalate so they just try to reason their women into bed. Sad really.

      These women are frustrated in the extreme and the geeks are on Xbox and coding sites all the time.

      Like


    • on October 26, 2017 at 10:33 am Les Saunders, Protestant

      It’s some guy who’s banging her and maybe paying for groceries, but he’s not officially a “boyfriend” and she’s embarrassed to say so. When women are getting banged by a guy, the guy is known as a “friend”. To admit the truth would out these women as the sluts they are.

      Whenever a girl mentions “a friend” assume he is banging her.

      Liked by 1 person


    • i bet it was lean cuisine. nobody knows what’s really in that shit.

      Like


  5. While I cringe when liberals come on his show and steamroller him with their talking points, Tucker delivered a stunning opener last night. A five or six minute monologue about the mysterious figure who stepped forward to share what he knows with Fox News. The story is still breaking. Good stuff.

    Liked by 3 people


  6. Sessions recused himself and put (((Rod Rosenstein))) in charge.

    Like


      • This is known. Sessions recused himself because he had been a “surrogate” for Trump during the campaign, and therefore, he said, he couldn’t make the decision when it came to Russia charges. And Trump of course tries to appease the Jews by giving them top positions everywhere in his administration, so the next in line was a Jew, Rosenstein. Who used the firing of Comey as an excuse to appoint a “special counsel” to investigate Russia collusion, whatever the two issues had in common. (A special counsel who just happens to be Comey’s very close friend. But apparently in THAT case it doesn’t matter that someone has reason to be biased.)

        Trump was furious when Sessions recused himself, leakers claimed. He didn’t know that would happen, and said that if Sessions knew he’d have to recuse himself he should have never taken the job as attorney general.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Sessions is no traitor but has proved weak and unfitting for the role.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Sessions is way too annoying about weed (I love weed). He’s a petty dude.

        Like


      • Was it not Goebbels who pointed out the best way to take out a Jew was with another Jew?

        Like


      • Kaganovitch and Mekhlis helping Joseph Vissarionovitch in handling ((cosmopolitans)) comes to mind.

        Here’s hoping TrumpFuhrer’s jews are better than swamp’s cathcucks.

        His “false song of globalism” speech indicates many billions standing behind him.

        Like


      • >Was it not Goebbels who pointed out the best way to take out a Jew was with another Jew?

        Ironic, for a Jew.

        Like


    • Rosenstein is as involved as ANY of the other players.

      (!!!)

      Yes, he’s up past his eyeballs in this mega-scandal.

      He needs to frog marched — right now.

      What we’re looking at is a wholly corrupted FBI — topped by politicians that suckle at the teat of the Clinton Crime Machine.

      Meuller
      Comey
      McCabe
      Rosenstein

      Yes, they’re ALL involved up past their hairline.

      Like


  7. I love Trump, his achievements both financial and personal (wives, children and Grandkids) And I know he speaks the truth when he says seemingly outlandish and out rageous things. But every time he’s proved right, I always remember a scene in the Simpsons When Bart says to Lisa “Dad was right”, and the two kids have a terrified look on their face and vow never to speak of it again. Lets hope he keeps on being right.

    Liked by 1 person


  8. #sendhertoprison2018
    #shebetrayedus
    #treasonhasconsrquences
    #dressherinorange
    #leanherforwardandassumetheposition
    #orangepantsuitforher
    #sheistheswamp
    #duhclintontookbribes

    Liked by 1 person


  9. From a realpolitik perspective, think about what Putin was able to accomplish here. In 2005, 2006 Clinton via the Foundation (and current NY Senator and former POTUS prestige) nudges a Khazakstan dictator to sign over Khazak uranium reserves to the Clinton oligarch in Canada, Guistra.

    Putin sees a bordering neighbor’s nuclear asset suddenly going not to the Khazak people (where Putin can better control its use) but to some Canadian billionaire half way around the world who is friendly with the Clintons and decides this cannot stand. So he muscles the same Khazak dictator to cancel the deal (Hillary being so stupid and greedy never forsaw this possibility) threatening the massive financial investment for Guistra and the Clinton’s future ability to trade government muscle for Foundation slush money. So Putin gets Guistra, Clintons and Khazak dictator in a room a strikes a deal for a cut of the loot but then demands an additional ask to be allowed to buy into Uranium One. Now Putin has regained control of Khazak uranium and has leveraged control of US uranium out of this.

    And now that Putin has Clinton AND Obama on his leash as a result of Uranium One (which Putin can hold over them as blackmail), Obama sings Putin’s tune for the last 5 years of his presidency. (“Mitt, the 1980’s called and wants its foreign policy back.” “I’ll have more flexibility after the election.”) Putin moves in on Crimea, Ukraine, Syria and forces the US into the Iran-friendly Iran deal. And has the likely next US President in his pocket for another 4-8 years but for Trump.

    Like


  10. ……it’s all related once you identify the anti-White source malignancy)….

    Bingo, nail on the head, BOOM, Eureka!, word up, yup, true, this, on point, bullseye.

    Like


  11. on October 25, 2017 at 5:22 pm Lord Sir Covfefe

    Hillary “Rosenberg” Clinton needs to be electrocuted

    Like


  12. The only thing that surprised me was Manafort. He was going to be the shiv that Trump never saw coming.
    I think once this starts unraveling the real shitshow will begin. I, for one, cannot wait.

    Liked by 1 person


    • We can hope. But what happened when Hillary Clinton committed severe, blatant crimes by storing information on an un-secure server that anyone could easily hack into, in order to hide her pay-for-play affairs? Nothing. Maybe that was because Obama was the president then? Nope, after Trump got in, still nothing.

      But maybe. Maybe this will be the time when the agencies in Washington finally turn on one of their own. One of the top members of the party they are all loyal to, even though it would destroy the careers of those involved. Maybe this time witnesses will come forward. It sure would be about time.

      Liked by 1 person


      • What happened with the Rose Law Firm? What happened with Whitewater? What happened with Vince Foster? Travel Office? Benghazi? Clinton Foundation pay for play? Classified & missing emails? Trips to Orgy Island? etc etc etc.
        And to top it off her husband The Great Stainmaker -sodomized an intern in the oval office. But nothing.
        It’s almost like she’s got a (((guardian angel))).

        Liked by 2 people


      • All of that stuff was under uniparty rule. Uniparty is dead. Arresting a former secretary of state and a former president in a year would be impressive. SEAL Team Six gunning the Clintons down the day after the election would have been satisfying, it wouldn’t have been good for the nation. Keeping America’s electricity on is a delicate thing.

        Like


      • Yeah he can dig and dig just like Starr did during Whitewater. What goes around comes around

        Like


      • What happened with Foster? He killed himself. What happened with Whitewater? It was throughly investigated. What happened with Benghazi? After numerous hearings and millions of our dollars spent, she was exonerated. And now with Niger, Trump has his own Benghazi.

        Like


    • on October 25, 2017 at 5:41 pm Captain Obvious

      “The only thing that surprised me was Manafort.”

      Yeah, that came out of Left Field.

      If the Goad Emperor knew about Manafort’s connection to Uranium One & the Clintons before appointing him as campaign manager, than truly the Goad Emperor is playing 157-dimensional chess.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Yeah, that’s the question that jumped to my mind as well.

        Where did Manafort’s loyalties lie in all this, and is he going down? Was he trying to screw Trump, or did he just cross too many streams while chasing dollars?

        Interesting subplots.

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 7:39 pm MikkaJackxxon

        Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer

        Like


      • Lewandowski saved Trump from Manafort.
        Kushner wanted Manafort, would be an epic twist if Jared is dirty and Ivanka got played bad.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on October 26, 2017 at 10:54 am Les Saunders, Protestant

        Manafort is a hitman and probably unscrupulous,to put it charitably. Trumpovitz hired him to help win the nomination and he delivered, but the cocksücker is loyal only to hisself.

        Like


  13. It’s funny how CNN spun it. “Trump had a good Tuesday, but every other day of his Presidency has been a disaster.”. Oh yeah? Everything he said to this point has been validated in one day and they are still trying to sell The Great Delusion to America. These (((people))) are about to lose hard.

    Like


  14. Twitter thread by @thelastrefuge2, an account run by more than one person, with 37,000 followers. Had more before the first account was banned.

    Not sure what to make of this. Except that people talk about “the Russians” as if it was one entity. I don’t think Putin wanted Hillary to win – she’d bomb Damascus for one thing, and oppose him everywhere. “The Russians”, there are millions of them, could be Russians completely unrelated to the government who aided in creating the dossier.

    Another thing: Hillary didn’t need leverage on Comey, he was always a Clinton creature. His career started when Bill Clinton took bribes to pardon the Jew Marc Rich. Rich’s wife Denise gave one million to the Democrats, including $100,000 to Hillary’s Senate campaign, and $450,000 to the Clinton Library foundation. Comey was put in charge of the investigation of this corruption – and closed it. He rose in the ranks to be appointed head of the FBI by Obama. He wrote his statement clearing Hillary for her server crimes long before the investigation was finished. He handed out immunity to every one of her underlings, which is normally only done to small-time crooks in order to get them to testify against a gangster boss. He destroyed evidence. He re-opened the investigation to take documents the NYPD had found on Weiner’s server, then closed it again. He willingly did everything for the Clintons. So we don’t need to speculate about Hillary having leverage on him.

    Anyway, here’s the thread:

    1. Steele began work June 2016. FBI counter-intel investigation began July 2016. They are one in the same.

    2. Mr. Steele formerly worked under Sir John Macleod Scarlett, a retired senior British Intelligence Officer in Moscow.

    3. Sir John Scarlett was behind the Tony Blair dossier claiming Saddam had deliverable weapons of mass destruction.

    4. WaPo: “Fusion GPS did not start off looking at Trump’s Russia ties” when commissioned for original oppo-research. (link)

    5. It’s obfuscation to claim connection, based solely on Fusion GPS, because Steele didn’t start until June 2016.

    6. Steele began his “dossier” assembly after contracted by Clinton/DNC (through Fusion GPS) likely w/ coordination w/ Obama White House.

    7. And that’s where Comey and the FBI come in w/ their July counter-intel investigation which he admits they kept hidden from congress.

    8. Dates are key. June 2016 was when FBI failed to get FISA warrant (was denied). Oct 2016 is when they managed to get a FISA warrant.

    9. The FBI’s failed FISA warrant (very rare) was at same time as Steele starting his work on now debunked “Russian dossier.”

    10. Comey Testimony: Q) “Why didn’t you notify congress”? A.) “b/c of the sensitivity of the matter”.(link)

    11. And therein we discover leverage Clinton had over Comey on joint oppo-research operation leading to Comey clearing Clinton on emails.

    12. In Oct 2016 -height of pres. campaign- Steele approached FBI w/info Oct ’16 FBI successful with FISA warrant (link)

    13. Russia had U1 leverage on Clinton. Russia wanted HRC to win. HRC had leverage on Comey via his part of this joint intel op against Trump

    14. Russia had interest in making up intel against Trump. Clinton held interest to use fake intel against Trump. Comey enabled/went along.

    15. Intel community has exposure risk w/origin of Steele $$. Hence WaPo puts out Clinton & DNC story to hide bigger picture (protect Obama).

    Like


  15. I don’t know when exactly the switch flipped, or what was the impetus.

    But it really feels like Trump has just taken power. Like within this past month.

    There were many disappointing things about the admin at the beginning. Bad hires, bad policy, etc. But all of that is explained if you believe he wasn’t actually in power…. yet. He had to go along with all of this stuff because saying “I’m handcuffed and not the one making decisions” is not a great look for a president.

    So he gradually built up his people behind the scenes and collected enough of the right evidence/blackmail…. .and its finally starting to come together to the point where he is the one with leverage.

    They tried to impeach him and co-opt him. But damnit, he just might be winning.

    Like


  16. Generation Zyklon greeting President Trump in Dallas today: https://youtu.be/Zmk91SKst3Q

    Like


  17. From a realpolitik perspective, think about what Putin was able to accomplish here. In 2005, 2006 Clinton via the Foundation (and current NY Senator and former POTUS prestige) nudges a Khazakstan dictator to sign over Khazak uranium reserves to the Clinton oligarch in Canada, Guistra.

    Putin sees a bordering neighbor’s nuclear asset suddenly going not to the Khazak people (where Putin can better control its use) but to some Canadian billionaire half way around the world who is friendly with the Clintons and decides this cannot stand. So he muscles the same Khazak dictator to cancel the deal (Hillary being so stupid and greedy never forsaw this possibility) threatening the massive financial investment for Guistra and the Clinton’s future ability to trade government favor for Foundation slush money. So Putin gets Guistra, Clintons and Khazak dictator in a room and strikes a deal for a cut of the loot but then demands an additional ask to be allowed to buy into Uranium One. See, Clinton is now SOS so this suddenly becomes something that’s possible for Putin so he seizes the opportunity. This was Obama’s fatal mistake, consenting to making Clinton SOS. Now he’s caught up in this and under Putin’s thumb. Thus Putin has regained control of Khazak uranium AND has leveraged control of US uranium. Think about that, Putin plays Clinton and Obama for control of the domestic supply of a strategic nuclear asset of his top geopolitical rival with avenues opening up to not just mine the material but to move it around the globe where it suits Russian interests best. Iran? NK? But it doesn’t stop there, Putin pushes further.

    And now that Putin has Clinton AND Obama on his leash as a result of Uranium One (which Putin can hold over them as blackmail), Obama sings Putin’s tune for the last 5 years of his presidency. (“Mitt, the 1980’s called and wants its foreign policy back.” “I’ll have more flexibility after the election.”) Putin moves in on Crimea, Ukraine, Syria and forces the US into the Iran-friendly Iran deal. And has the likely next US President in his pocket for another 4-8 years but for Trump. Incredible really.

    Like


  18. on October 25, 2017 at 6:37 pm Vagina dominator

    Remember Goy, you can believe it if you see it on the telewitz!

    Like


    • on October 25, 2017 at 6:51 pm Captain Obvious

      VagDom, have you been following this story: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3598150/posts

      Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 6:53 pm Captain Obvious

        Dude was carrying, but he lacked the gonads to f!re on the meth-head, and he ended up getting sh0t [& k!lled] with his own g*n.

        Unfortunately, due to “construction”, the camera wasn’t working in the dairy section where it all went down, so no video for you to analyze directly.

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 6:56 pm Captain Obvious

        Dude even told the meth-head where to find the steak knives [with which the meth-head would subsequently [email protected] him]. http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/crime/how-did-the-kroger-homicide-victim-die

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 7:57 pm Vagina dominator

        This is the first I have seen it. The violence and fuckupedness of the black community is amazing. And no video is weird. The victim was carrying a gun but did he use it? Don’t know. Apparent assailant was a coon on meth.

        You know, one trouble with teaching/learning self defense is to get guys to understand that – from nuts to soup – it isn’t about risk elimination, it is about risk elimination.

        So first risk to reduce is your risk of being pricked as prey. Try to look like someone who isn’t easy prey. Doesn’t mean sleeve tattoos and roids, but it does mean look strong and move well and *look around* so they see you are aware of the environment and they know you are aware of their presence. But even then a methie isn’t sensible, so he may choose you anyway.

        Next, pre-empt. When do you deal with someone? What is the right moment? After he starts to attack is far from ideal. You deal with someone as soon as he attempts to intimidate. Thisis hard for many men to absorb but think about that Polish/Russian guy with the coon blocking the road. Correct attitude.

        Someone threatens you (he knows what he is doing!), you have to KO him. That is the only safe thing. Not wrestle him to the ground. KO him. Otherwise he he may reach for weapons or he may go get them, as happened here.

        So it seems that this victim did not have the right mindset. That’s big trouble right there.

        Also the gun. I understand carrying, but you can’t go straight to a gun in such a situation. Use of force has to be proportional. If you have a gun are you willing to use it? And when? And a draw takes time when it may be better to attack with hands. And if you get into a scuffle, can you keep the gun secure? In a struggle, if you have to have weapon, a knife requires little protection bcs a knife is such an evil bitch, she can usually look after herself.

        Guys who are KOed don’t reach for your gun or go browse the knife section to come back and stab you.

        But damn nigs.

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 7:59 pm Vagina dominator

        Sorry, stupid me. I meant

        “Self defense isn’t about risk elimination, it is about risk reduction.”

        Like


      • on October 25, 2017 at 8:03 pm Vagina dominator

        “Soup to nuts”. Even got that wrong. I give up

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 8:51 am Captain Obvious

        VagDom, the meth-head had already asked the dude where the steak kn!ves were.

        Then the meth-head comes back, demands the dude’s cellphone, but the dude [who, by this point, should have realized what he was dealing with] instead decided to talk smack to the meth-head.

        So the meth-head charges the dude, [email protected] him repeatedly with the steak kn!fe, then grabs the dude’s g*n and sh00ts him repeatedly with that.

        tl;dr == Conc3aled [email protected] ain’t worth sh!t if you lack the will [and the street smarts] to draw & sh00t & k!ll in self-def3nse.

        Like


      • “teaching/learning self defense is to get guys to understand that – from nuts to soup – it isn’t about risk elimination, it is about risk elimination.”

        heh.. agree with VD here. the first step in “self defense” is learning to value your SELF, so that every choice you make defends it from harm.

        first step this guy should have taken to “defend himself” is (once deciding it was absolutely necessary for the wife to have her juice RIGHT NOW!) was to drive a few extra miles to an evening hours store in a better neighborhood. problem solved. risk reduced. life saved.

        a person who wants to live a long, healthy life needs to reduce his exposure to situations where life is cheap. what’s to be gained from engaging with someone who has nothing to lose?

        Like


      • Thing is, when someone is close in like that and then moves to assault you, there’s an element of what I can only call “Stunned Disbelief” that you feel/think. Surprise is a very real thing, and it takes some serious mental preparedness to overcome.

        It’s not a matter of having the stones to shoot, it’s a matter of having the stones to mentally prepare yourself that I agree with Dominator on here. The guy did not have situational awareness going, and did not regard the dindu as a threat.

        You have to train and prepare yourself not to be surprised when the shit goes down. If you don’t you won’t react in time.

        Like


  19. Carlos Danger was right.

    Liked by 2 people


  20. People need to hang.

    We are slaves.

    Liked by 1 person


  21. This isn’t a White Pill, kind readers. This is a bucket of White paint dropped on your head</strike yo’ haid from a booby-trapped door in Trump Tower. You’re swimming in White.

    FIFY

    Like


  22. Hillary Clinton is going to jail.

    I repeat, HILLARY CLINTON IS GOING TO JAIL.

    From yo’ mouf to God’s ear.

    But didn’t we have it on solid “insider source” a-u-t-h-o-r-i-t-y that Trump was bribed $40B, and his fambly was threatened, to leave her alone? :duckface

    Like


    • Haha was going to call BS on that shill story. If you have ten billion dollars, and happen to be the President, why would you lower yourself to being someone’s bitch for 40 billion more? And if you do, do you take the 40 billion lump sum or monthly payments? lolz

      Like


      • What I’d like to know is, who actually counts it all out? :duckface

        Like


      • Do they pay in singles or coins?

        Like


      • It would be an electronic transfer via one of the several banks owned by the Rothschilds. Sending the money would be child´s play. This isn´t the mafia you know. Nice deflection attempt Greg.

        Like


      • Which is why I am agnostic on the subject. Many would be tempted to play hero. Trump is one of them.

        Like


      • You might have noticed by the duckface I was being facetious about counting it out… ’cause, like, you know, even one billion would take about 32 years.

        I admit to jests falling flat, but damn, SOMETIMES the audience gets the blame.
        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


    • That is a mischaracterization and you know it. I also said I was an agnostic on the subject and think Trump is playing 4 D chess. I said I was throwing that out there as a plausible reason we were not seeing any action. I specifically cited it was speculation from other people who are more in the know who in turn claim it is a plausible rumor. You deliberately misconstrue and conflate in order to win versus seeking the truth, a Jew tactic. Don’t be such a disingenuous dumbshit Yenta all the time.

      Like


      • Nice backpedal, but if you just now admitted yet again that you’re merely “throwing out” speculations that (sorry, not sorry) are the furthest thing FROM “plausible”, well… that’s a pretty good definition of squid ink… alt-R ally.

        Those “people who are more in the know” had better check their premises… and you’d better quit carrying their water, because it’s making YOU look like an ass.

        Stick to religion… you have a fair handle on that… these political matters and intrigues, not so much.

        That said, if and when Hillary and company finally DO get fitted for orange jumpsuits, I will personally fly to Germany and treat you and your family to the best dinner money can buy.

        Like


      • KKK dindu nuffin

        catchcuks gotta go

        Like


      • You deliberately misconstrue and conflate in order to win versus seeking the truth, a Jew tactic. Don’t be such a disingenuous dumbshit Yenta all the time.

        Just paying you back in the coin of your own realm… I can name a few times you’ve tried this gambit on me, foremost that whole “if it’s not on TV it isn’t true” bullshit you’ve tried more than once.

        Stings, don’t it?

        Now go forth, and sin no more.

        Like


      • Quit lying you disingenuous pismire. Go back and read what I wrote. Rather go find it and post again. You won´t because it would refute you. Take your lumps like a man for once.

        Like


      • Greggie, you will always be our girl. No need to try so hard.

        Like


      • I think the men of the chateau can see for themselves, just by this subthread alone, who’s trying hard.

        You already admitted to squid inking, alt-R ally. And it wasn’t the first time.

        With allies such as you, who needs joos?

        Like


      • Quit lying you disingenuous pismire. Go back and read what I wrote. Rather go find it and post again. You won´t because it would refute you. Take your lumps like a man for once.

        Okay, since you brought my jargon of insults into the mix, let’s play.

        Here’s exactly what you posted when the issue came up “Why isn’t Trump and Sessions going after Hillary on the uranium deal bribes to the Clinton Foundation, since it’s so well known.”

        Robert David Steele says he thinks Trump took the Rothschild bribe to play nice. It was supposedly $40 billion. Throw in threats to the family and it becomes tempting.

        Two points here:

        1) You’re constantly posting videos by this Steele character, vouching for him to be a reliable “inside source”. By your past endorsements of him, and by repeating his thoughts here, you’re giving credence to what is rank speculation… totally ridiculous, in fact. On that subject, I can’t think of ANY of his information that ever panned out, but that’s another book that could be written.

        2) On the topic of squid inking, what’s the purpose of even throwing something like this into the mix, since it only serves to muddy the waters and distract? And like I say, this isn’t the first time you’ve done these things, it seems to be a constant pattern of yours, starting as far back as the week before the election, when you posted numerous videos AND GAVE PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS ASSURANCE that the NYPD and FBI underlings were in a state of uproar and were going to blow the lid off the pizza gate stuff, and DNC operatives, like Podesta and others were going to be arrested within a week.

        Look, if you just want to hear yourself talk and like throwing chum into the water for sport, then just admit that that’s the game from the get-go… don’t make it like you have a concern for the truth and your letting us in on alleged “inside information” that turns out to be spun of whole cloth or assurances that never seem to come to fruition.

        Now I hope the record is straight. Have your rebuttal and let’s be done with it, because this tale is becoming clammy, tedious to tell and harsh to hear.

        Like


  23. […] Source: Heartiste […]

    Like


  24. Jew#1 writes a hit piece on general Kelly praising McCuck
    Jew#2 praises the article as the best thing since bread sliced
    While we are still waiting for Jew#3 to express his admiration for the skills of both Jew#1 and Jew#2
    you goys are cxetainly getting some ideas ’bout (((their)))high IQ

    Like


  25. Indeed the emperor deserves our praise after having unequivocally stated that white Christian are to become minority in America and that need to stop
    Sorry wut, they just told me that was not Trump but Putin
    Too late I am already white painted

    Like


    • “I am not saying this is good or bad…”

      Even big bad Ivan has to hedge his bets, looks like.

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like


      • Yap still he said it
        How long we will have to wait till a major Western politician do the same
        even with “I am not saying this is good or bad…”?

        Like


      • Fair point… and at least he said White Christian, amirite?

        Like


      • His primary audience is in Europe, especially super pozzed places like France, Netherlands, Germany and Scandinavia. He would lose his credibility there if he spoke that plainly.

        Like


      • Another dumb theory of yours… just by saying “White Christian”, and showing concern that that demographic is dwindling, is pretty much sticking his neck out far in that milieu.

        Readily volunteering that oh-by-the-way phrase wasn’t going to suddenly gain him any new support.

        And that’s the point… he self-backpedaled without first being questioned.

        Like


      • “amirite?”

        Note the desperate need for validation

        Like


    • Putin in Berlin in 1989 as the chief KGB officer
      It seems as if the picture was taken at a bus station
      You can smell the fall, the wall is about to crumble and 20th century was
      about to end
      89 years of a constant fall

      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMU2OQHX0AAYkd6.jpg:large

      Like


      • The all time Putin classic: chatting it up with President Ronald Reagan — as an ordinary Ivan — with the Kremlin in the back ground — Red Square and everything.

        Poke around, you’ll find it out on the Internet.

        Though he spoke fluent Russian, German and English — he pretended to need a translator, too.

        Cute, all the way around.

        Like


      • Any Putin fans out there…watch the Stone interviews. Brilliant.

        Like


  26. on October 25, 2017 at 9:54 pm hamster_wrestler

    No way the Clintons are taken down cleanly. They’ll take many down with them – on the Democrat side.

    Like


  27. #youwerewithher should trend as well

    Like


  28. Those of you who live in DC and have State Department neighbors or people they meet on the Metro or commuter lines- you must mock these people without mercy or restraint for working for and prostituting themselves to this woman. Most support her without question still today.

    Liked by 2 people


    • on October 26, 2017 at 1:12 am The Philosopher

      People who take bribes are usually just serveants. Trump said it himself, they are just kinds of employees. Same with mccain, mcconnell, ryan and that. To be honest, if Bill wasn’t so personally charismatic, we would be bashing another stand in, so I don’t have a lot of hate towards them. It could be any servant really.

      I’m more interested in who is bribing/blackmailing and what they ask them to do for the money.

      Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 1:15 am The Philosopher

        You could argue politicians like Blair, Renzi, Merkel, Macron etc are kinds of victims. At least useful idiots. They take all the flak and hate and they have no will in what they do with their pen. They get peanuts compared to how rich they make their masters. For example, Bill deregulating Wall Street and the media in the 90s made a lot more money for jews than Bill ever made in ‘speeches’. Now 60% of America is fairly aware he is sexual predator.

        Like


    • medice, cura te ipsum

      Like


    • And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

      Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

      Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

      Like


  29. The case isn’t going to prosecute itself. Sessions has to grow a pair and I’m highly doubtful that he can. Maybe get Giuliani in there instead?

    Like


  30. Hillary Clinton is going to jail. I repeat, HILLARY CLINTON IS GOING TO JAIL.

    Under no circumstances should ANYONE say ANYTHING that even so much as IMPLIES a threat of violence or even A DESIRE to do violence to the cunt.

    If this is real, then we are at a critical stage. DO NOT FUCK UP. It is A LOT easier for the Left to simply oopsie Hillary out of the way, one of the biggest tricks of Leftists is to assassinate unneeded prominent Leftists and THEN BLAME IT ON THE RIGHT.

    Make it clear to everyone you know that you want this bitch to live a long, happy and healthy life in prison. That you want her to have a nice long comfortable trial with every amenity imaginable.

    Draining the swamp is NOT vengeance. You can have vengeance or justice, you cannot have both.

    It is essential to get that piece of shit on the stand so she will tell us where all the goddamn bodies are buried. This means deals, this means people she cares about get a pass. It also means a good chunk of the corrupt go to prison, and the rest bolt for their hiding holes.

    Like


    • This is the biggest tell that all these stories of her corruption and skullduggery have to be somewhat exaggerated.

      If she truly were that connected to all these tentacles, she would have died of a heart attack or car accident within days after losing the election.

      People with “the goods” on even more powerful people tend not to live long, once they’re no longer in a position to do the latter much good.

      Like


      • That said, if just one tenth of the allegations are true, she’s done enough to spend out the rest of her life in a pain amplifier.

        Like


      • “Live out your life in a pain amplifier”, very good movie. I like the old Dune movie.

        Like


    • You can have vengeance or justice, you cannot have both.

      Let’s not go crazy now, spouting namby-pamby shibboleths.

      The Lord God is a just God, and even He says “Vengeance if mine.”

      Like


    • You can have vengeance or justice, you cannot have both.

      Let’s not go crazy now, spouting namby-pamby shibboleths… sometimes the two concepts do align..

      Like


  31. cancer shouldve came for mccuck long ago

    Like


  32. The whole WSJ editorial board kicks an op-ed on the matter, demands a full congressional investigation, suggests Mueller should resign

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-russians-and-the-fbi-1508971759?mg=prod/accounts-wsj

    It’s happening guys. The mainstream press doesn’t want to be caught in that. Shit is getting real.

    Like


    • I like this… the rest of the (((MSM))) can’t ignore or snow it over now that the WSJ has broken the ice.

      Like


    • “By The [WSJ] Editorial Board
      Oct. 25, 2017 6:49 p.m. ET

      It turns out that Russia has sown distrust in the U.S. political system—aided and abetted by the Democratic Party, and perhaps the FBI. This is an about-face from the dominant media narrative of the last year, and it requires a full investigation.

      The Washington Post revealed Tuesday that the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee jointly paid for that infamous “dossier” full of Russian disinformation against Donald Trump. They filtered the payments through a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie)…”

      Just another day here in the best of the alternate realities.

      Like


  33. Maitre,

    the correct picture of McCain, Weinstein, Hillary Rodham also has the chief lackey of the Bush clan (house negro Powell) to the left of HER.

    (Cap’n taught me how to poast pictures, once, but I stupidly forgot)

    Like


    • Cap’n, help a fellow thraco-illirian Neaderthal out

      Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 9:59 am Captain Obvious

        Liked by 1 person


      • on October 26, 2017 at 10:00 am Captain Obvious

        Like


      • oink, you gotta get off this weird Neanderthal Pride kick of your’n.

        They weren’t even the same species as us, fer cryin’ out loud. Geez, Louise, I even read somewhere that modern man shares more dna with chimps.

        And they haids was shaped like that monster from Alien. One of them “evolutionary offshoots” that wound up a daid end.

        Cro-Magnon be us… and I got a sneaking suspicion all that haploid and DNA stuff of late is about as reliable as carbon dating… in short, close but no cigar.

        Liked by 1 person


      • ^bullshit

        if a neanderthal were walking around today it would act very spergy but u wouldn’t consider it a diff species

        Like


      • 2.4% neanderthal

        holla back

        Like


      • Looch, you realize that you just gave a self-refuting argument, right?

        Thraco-illirian would be a good rap name, tho. You’re welcome

        Like


      • I still remember his marvelous UN-speech about WMD in Iraq. At least I sensed some kind of discomfort in Mr. Powell when all the lies came out of this mouth. You really have to sell your soul if you want to get in powerful position.

        Like


      • Cap’n, that’s the biggest pile of human excrement assembled in two photos that I can remember seeing: two traitors who need to hang until [email protected] (followed by unlimited abuse of the corpse in the case of Juan McAmnesty), a perfidious anti-White house nigguh, and…. well, I don’t have much against that (((fat guy))). If a prostitute admits her line of work to police, do the police let her keep her “””earnings”””? Any thot who did tricks for flicks and is now crying foul should return her earnings made from said flicks. Otherwise, shutup, bish.

        Like


      • on October 26, 2017 at 1:24 pm The Philosopher

        Look at the Mandela logo in the back. Some kind of magic negro globalist worship ritual. Israel is pleased.

        Like


      • >”Looch, you realize that you just gave a self-refuting argument, right?”

        semantically, yeah

        but nah

        Like


      • Well, some round ‘chere would say you’re a different species.

        Liked by 1 person


      • if a neanderthal were walking around today it would act very spergy but u wouldn’t consider it a diff species

        Last I read, it was scientifically classified as a different species from homo sapiens, unlike Cro-Magnon.

        I understand there’s still some debate on that particular issue, like most inexact sciences.

        .And I’m sure if N-man were walking around today nobody would blink an eye… all of us have spied alleged humans walking around that were pretty much one swing out of the trees.

        Like


      • you gotta get off this weird Neanderthal Pride

        u jelly?

        4 to not worry, TPTB’s ((frontrunners)) and cathcucks are importing hordes of 100% non-Neanderthal African hominids to the Neanderthal-infested Lutheran lands (diluting the subpar Neanderthal blood).
        You’re ecstatic, I’m sure.

        As for me,
        Fost-am Omu’ padurii
        Si nu m-o mancat lupii

        Euro-Neanderthal Pride, baby!

        Like


      • Jealous?

        Neanderthal pride is a step below Black Pride and Native American pride in the historical parade of “We Got Our Asses Kicked”..

        Even the Aborigines laugh at the idea.

        Like


      • so if Neanderthal blood is so bad, the wave of neanderthal-free blood flooding Lutheran lands meets your enthusiastic approval?

        :duckface:

        Like


      • ohne Neandertaler, kein Europa

        Like


      • Ach, kvatsch.

        Like I said, this relatively recent haploid nonsense has even its proponents arguing among themselves… some say joo too, some say only joo, some say it has nothing to do with N-man, it’s merely a common factor that would appear in any primate.

        Bottom line… they ain’t been ’round chere as White men for over 35K years… and there’s a lot more important stuff that separates Europa Man (Cro-Magnon) from earlier dead-ends of evolution.

        It’s all just some more squid ink, 2.0

        Like


      • Hell, ya even got eggnog braggin’ on his Neanderthal roots…

        … if’n THAT don’t rest mah case, nuthin’ will.

        Like


  34. We’ve known about these things for years. Why is the MSM bringing them up now? Especially when they could have continued to ignore it and the majority of the American public would never have known. Everybody should be extremely suspicious. It’s good to see them get what they deserve, but they’re suddenly making Clinton take the fall for everything, and they definitely have a good reason.

    [CH: skeptics said the same thing about swinestein. but sometimes a truth cascade is just a breakdown in command and control communication. it didn’t happen, and then it happened. simple as that.]

    Like


  35. “Hillary Clinton is going to jail.”

    Tempting. But my guess is she strokes out before she ever gets there. And since she’s the self-appointed face of the Democrat party, as Trump I would just let her keep campaiging for me by reeeeeeing about systemic misogyny and other demented hallucinations. If the Dems are sick enough of losing by 2024 or so, they can try to shut her up themselves.

    As for Butt Nekkid, Holder, Lynch, Wasserman-Schultz, et al – yes, put them in jail.

    Like


    • on October 26, 2017 at 1:27 pm The Philosopher

      When I first saw people calling Obama Butt Naked I laughed out loud. I like calling him a Magic Negro.

      Like


    • https://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8496-the-donald-trump-presidential-archive/page__st__30380#entry392527

      Also

      Kebab saving robot: “Today the Don settles all the family business.”

      Dr. Hasslein: “Will they baptize Ivanka’s kids as each of the Clinton mafia is [dispatched] in a suitably ironic manner?”

      Like


    • A surprisingly sane NYT article on the decucking of the GOP.

      https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/10/25/us/politics/trump-republican-party-critics.html

      ‘“We have a leader who has a personality disorder,” said former Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, “but he’s done what he actually told the people he was going to do, and they’re not going to abandon him.”

      This grass-roots loyalty is why no prominent Republicans on the ballot next year have broken with Mr. Trump — only lame-duck lawmakers and Republicans out of office, such as former President George W. Bush, have been harshly critical of him.

      By calling last week to offer his support to a handful of Republican senators that Mr. Bannon had named as potential targets, the president demonstrated he would not blindly follow his former adviser. [Trump: That crazy Bannon guy, I just can’t control him, lolzlzlz.]

      Establishment Republicans are attempting to convince Mr. Trump that “if you join with Bannon, you cut your own throat,” Mr. Graham said, because it could lead to an impeachment effort by a Democratic-controlled Congress. [lolzlzlz]’

      Like


      • Having learned nothing from the fake polling debacle last year, the Left is now apparently fixated on the idea they’re going to steamroll us in 2018. If guess if you’re going to lie…

        2016: GOP defended 24 seats, Dems defended 10, result, GOP lost two seats for a total of 52.

        2018: Dems defends 25 seats, GOP defends 8. Supposedly the Dems are going to take at least 3 of those seats??

        1 GOP seat is in a state that went blue last year (NV).
        I count 10 Dem seats in states that went red last year: MT, ND, MO, IN, MI, WI, FL, OH, WV, PA.

        The House might be another story, I haven’t looked at it.

        Liked by 1 person


  36. No one is going to jail
    It’s an endless soap opera and the corrupt establishment are not going to arrest themselves.

    Like


  37. What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women “Baaaaaaaalllllllloooooonnnnnneeeeyyyyyy!!!!– Hillary Clinton.

    Like


  38. Mark Levin is an excellent source of information on this.

    Like


    • Levin is never worth listening to. I don’t care if he occasionally says something you like, its only to hook you so he can funnel you to supporting free trade ‘n Israel. Just ditch him.. He’s a jew. You can find the info elsewhere.

      Like


  39. A cucked nation

    Voters in Northern Virginia can vote in either English, Spanish, Vietnamese or Korean.
    And they ain’t voting GOP.

    Like


    • Ever noticed how many Hispanics handle important records and data? I went to the dentist today and wrote my SSN down on the paperwork they gave me. Handed it to the Hispanic Administrative Assistant. She probably memorized my name and SSN or has access to the entire file anyway.

      Many HR departments now have Hispanic females handling their data. Brace yourself for a huge wave of Tax fraud this season.

      Like


    • How’s this for squid ink?

      “Theories, theories, and theories: Chris Simms of NBC Sports Network says the league has made it too easy for young fans to stream condensed versions of games. Mike Florio at Pro Football Talk claims the NFL focused too much on growing the sport outside the U.S. USA Today noted that significant injuries (Aaron Rodgers, J.J. Watt, Odell Beckham, Julian Edelman) are probably not helping ratings. Forbes meanwhile attributes some of the softness in viewership to the National Anthem protests. We note that in Week 6, most NFL broadcasts did not show the anthem, instead moving to commercial breaks.”

      As their last speculation, they toss in the oh-by-the-way about the n1ggers and their anthem protest… themselves admitting how the broadcasts gaslighted said anthem in favor of commercials.

      Makes one wonder how the writers can even look in the mirror each morning.

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Liked by 1 person


      • I hate that the media focus with the anthem protests is more about who is or isn’t doing it versus making sure people know what the protest is about-excessive police murders of black people and not disrespecting the flag and military.

        As for any downturn in stadium attendance, the answer is simple-it just costs too damn much to go.

        Like


  40. […] CIA warning Trump not to release the JFK Files and now where it’s been revealed that Trump is inquiring to learn more about Seth Rich — this admitted deep state coup may be taking too long for the […]

    Like


  41. Hillary Clinton is not going to jail. I repeat, Hillary Clinton is not going to jail. Your hatred of her is blinding you to reality. I am not a big fan of hers but at least I recognize a mountain being made out of a mole hill.

    Like


    • I’m of the “believe it when I see it” school of thought on all this DNC/Clinton Foundation stuff coming to justice.

      But let’s ask this question… do you believe the Clinton Foundation was peddling tit-fer-tat influence?

      Is it a big nuthin’, or are things like the uranium deal with Russia treasonous?

      Just curious.

      Like


      • IF they are peddling money for influence follow the money. Who gave money for what. Clinton was one of 9 unanimous votes for the Russian uranium deal- and all the leg/grunt work was done by a undersecretary.

        Let Mueller and Nunes do their jobs and let the chips fall where they may.

        Like


  42. […] thinking this will hurt Trump, but the media is enstupidated by its Trump Derangement Syndrome. As I explained, the Manafort indictment will likely boomerang on thecunt and her cabal of Creep State operatives, […]

    Like