Vicarious Female Submission

This is a great Game vajnette from VinnyVette, illustrating the concept of vicarious female submission.

Current girlfriend of four years…
First night I met her, on the second beer at a local drinking establishment. Was talking about a crazy freak I was banging who was stalking me. Grabbed new girl by the hair, pulled her to me, looked her in the eyes and said “and I slapped her in the face and told her to look at me while I’m fucking you!” The look in new girls eyes said I’d be fucking her that night, and I did. Been my love slave ever since…

Clever, clever. Allow a girl to experience that intoxicating submission to a dominant man, while maintaining a MeToo-proof plausible deniability by expressing that dominance through the alibi of a remembered fling with another woman.

First, there’s the DHV and hamster-stroke table setting: he’s so irresistible he turns girls into “crazy freak” stalkers.

Then, there’s the kino escalating hair-grab delivered with a built-in, face-saving retraction should it be unwelcome (he’s just demonstratively recalling a story about a girl who was crazy for him).

The physicality of the move is pure pulp romance rape fantasy fuel. Gentlemen, if you really want to heat up the bedroom, skip the roses and sweet nothings and go straight to the hair grab and head-pull toward your face.

Strong eye contact is critical when attempting a power play over a woman’s hindbrain. Don’t break the spell by glancing upward thinking about what you’ll say next.

The follow-up line slyly embeds “Look at me while I’m fucking you!” within a larger, at-a-remove narrated context. You obviously won’t say this to a girl on the first night you meet her, after the second beer. But you can get away with arousing the same feelings in her as she would have swooning under the throaty delivery of that line from an actual lover in an actual bedroom situation, by saying the line within the safe space of a recalled romance with another girl.

This is a version of NLP — embedding trigger words (the good kind of triggering) into a conversation to lead a girl to imagine scenarios, transactions, with you.

It’s unrealistic to say to a girl you just met, “Look at me. Look at me! I’m the pussy smasher now”, but you can get away with it if you frame it as a retold story: “and I slapped her in the face and told her to look at me while I’m fucking you!”.

Note that final pronoun. Not, “…told her to look at me while I’m fucking her”, but “…told her to look at me while I’m fucking you”. YOU. The girl sitting there listening to this is now an active participant in the story. She is the girl from his story, getting wet for the pimp hand.

Finally, the romantic slap. You don’t have to do it, you only have to say you’d do it, or that you’ve done it, to elicit similar feelings of feral, pre-orgasmic submission in a woman. Words are their own form of hyperconsensual foreplay.





Comments


  1. Bravo, gentlemen, bravo❗

    Liked by 2 people


      • on December 7, 2018 at 5:40 pm Sean Fielding

        “I think the driver of the car is a disgrace to himself, his family and this country.You can call it terrorism, you can call it murder, you can call it whatever you want.”

        Any minute the guy who said that is going to find his balls, play chess and build walls. Sure thing.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on December 7, 2018 at 6:49 pm Captain John Charity Spring MA

        Fields might as well have represented himself. The passive defense perhaps was designed to avoid the Hanging Judge during sentencing.

        Had he Beerhalled his own defense they’d have probably killed him happily enough.

        Like


      • In a normal world the charge would have been manslaughter and the case would have been dropped.
        I had a friend of mine who walked free after the Heysel Disaster

        Like


      • I can just imagine the shitlibs on the jury foaming at the mouth.
        Poor kid.

        Like


      • Kate Steinle’s killer walks free today

        Like


      • It will be vacated on appeal. No way could they prove that Fields left the house that day with the specific intent to kill anyone.

        Liked by 1 person


      • you don’t need it from when he left the house, murder requires only specific intent and malice aforethought in the moments preceding the crime.

        Like


      • In a normal world the charge would have been manslaughter and the case would have been dropped
        ——————————————————————
        what is up goy you do not have confidence in then jewdicial system?

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 9:31 pm Corinth Arkadin

        That kunt Casey Anthony walked.

        The thirst is real, gents.

        If I had my way, Mizz. Anthony would be tied to a giant rock and tossed in a quarry used by skin divers to witness what happens to killers.

        Like


      • Lisa – “The point that is being missed in all my comments, is that men should not absolve themselves of their responsibility for their contribution towards the degradation of society. Women’s responsibility is their own and I’m not arguing for it to be lessened (and would probably accept ours is higher for many obvious reasons).
        Perhaps what I was saying was overly complex and I lack the communication skills to properly elucidate. I was really just highlighting a pattern I’ve noticed, and while I can understand why men make the choices they do, I just see them sometimes complaining about the current society without accepting their role…not all men of course.”

        All right. Your point is that the tiny proportion of the male population who engage in rampant promiscuity should bear equivalent responsibility for societal degradation as the quite large proportion of the female population who are busy banging those few men.
        Got it.

        Like


  2. on December 6, 2018 at 11:27 pm Captain Obvious

    >>>>> “girlfriend of four years”

    ***cough***

    WHITE BUNZ -> WHITE 0VEN

    ***cough***

    Liked by 6 people


    • she must have ideal finger digit ratios.

      Liked by 1 person


    • Yup. Once she’s dumped, it is a lose-lose for both of them, for society, for white civilization as a whole.

      Not much to celebrate here. He reached a NFG zone, be it momentarily or semi-permanently, that landed him a hard slut. Wow, she’d probably have slept w a nog that night if he had done the same. This is a win?

      This is what happens in war zones and war-torn nations, with listless hooores desperate for attention and strength submitting to the first man that rapes her.

      It is desperately sad. She’s been debased unto her most base animalistic desires, not even human anymore.

      Liked by 2 people


      • on December 7, 2018 at 10:19 am John Joel Glanton

        Perhaps. I’m sure back in medieval times lots of guys and gals would fuck around after a long night of hard drinking at the tavern. ‘Course it’s entirely different when hordes of low-IQ foreigners start doing it and spawning ugly bastards.

        Like


      • Debased is a male only construct. Along with honor, morality and virtue etc. Etc.

        Women simply do not operate in this space.

        Animalistic is exactly the right word for them.

        Time to grow up…

        Liked by 1 person


      • Nah. One can have animalistic urges and tendencies, impulses, but have self-control (which is what ‘chastity’ really means, self-control).

        I agree, it is much, much more difficult for women to operate within that space. Hence, you must have Patriarchy.

        Debased is no mere ‘moral’ or ‘social’ construct (time to stop being liberal), but rather a very real word describing a person who has lost self-control and given themselves over to carnality.

        This self-control is the basis for White Civilization, the entire idealistic purpose of Patriarchy, and entire civilizations live and die by it.

        Time to grow up.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Even the ancient Greeks knew and spoke about self-control in the face of debauchery. These are very real, incarnate, and consequential concepts. Not mere ‘constructs.’

        You live in an entire Creation that speaks to this, all of human history speaks to these things.

        And you are on a blog that is constantly filled with realtalk comments about how nogs and other high T, low IQ ethnicities have problems…. with self-control. And that this is directly correlated to their inability to create decent neighborhoods, families, sewage systems, schools, artwork, technology, nations, or any remotely decent civilization.

        Time to grow up indeed.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Up until relatively recently it was taken for granted that, while we all (both men and women) have fallen short of the glory of God, both sexes do indeed have notions of honor, morality, and virtue attributed to their respective sex… and I say again, if anyone maintains women don’t have free will and the responsibilities that that entails, then they’re making a liar out of God… a precept not the least of which shovels hot coals upon their distorted views of the world in which, among other things, men would then have the moral obligation to open the doors and then close down all women’s prisons… or just call them zoos and charge admission.

        Liked by 5 people


      • Right.

        We all have base impulses, some of them are the “natural”’passions, eating and sex, etc. that are not bad in and of themselves, but become evil and bad due to proportion or improper timing/place of acting on or satisfying them.

        The West has lost distinctions, even within Christian and conservative worlds, even within “woke” and “based” communities like this.

        We ALL have carnal impulses, desires, needs. Lacking self-control and letting those get out of porportion, allowing them to control us, acting upon them in improper moments or with proper proportionality… is what makes a man, woman, or nation… debased.

        Try and explain that to half the commenters here and you’ll get wails and shrieks of “we be RealTalk!” and other chimp-worthy chest thumping that would make silverbacks blush. And these are the “men” who will save the West? Not.

        Liked by 3 people


      • pelayo1683 is correct. The patriarchy is beneficial to women because it actually allows them to realize their humanity, at least within the limits of race, intelligence, etc.

        There are very few women who are capable of the introspection necessary to develop this trait on their own, though there is a tiny smattering. For the most part, though, they require a powerful structure of customs and guidance to even partially achieve that potential.

        A fair proportion of guys need something similar, though it’s more of nudge here and there rather than the heavy-duty channeling women require. Men are, in effect, the more civilized sex because we’re designed to work together in warbands, so we already have an urge to self-control and building.

        Without strong guidance, 95% of women go feral. That doesn’t mean they can never be anything BUT feral, though. They too can be honorable members of the Volk, you just can’t trust them to lead themselves.

        It’s really something that an out-and-out fascist like myself has a far more positive view of humanity than some of the chaps on here.

        Liked by 1 person


      • dude, women are women. they don’t give a shit what your opinion of what they should be is

        Liked by 2 people


      • dude, women are women. they don’t give a shit what your opinion of what they should be is

        Some do… the “good” ones…

        The fact that YOUR mileage varies, hanging around with “bang me today, see ya later” odds and sods of mystery meats does not make your solipsistic view of AWALT true.

        Liked by 1 person


      • “dude, women are women. they don’t give a shit what your opinion of what they should be is“

        Nah, they DO give a shit what you think they should be. Now, that “giving a shit” is not akin to a male version of giving a shit, and women are far more susceptible to momentarily ditching and forgetting all morals and values as their social and hormonal fears and desires kick in… but they still give a shit, even if minimally.

        Basic Game principles speak to this as well. Flipping the script, shit-testing HER and giving her standards to live up to… these things work.

        Muslim women fall in line, social shaming works entirely because they give a shit what we think of them. Feminism is an entire movement based not on self-introspection but obssession with what males think of them and rebelling against it. Girls do better in facist-style, modern schooling because they do give a shit about their grades more than boys because they care much more about what others think about them.

        Now, how long their desire to live up to said standards lasts, how quickly or easily it is sabatoged by other impulses, etc., that is another matter.

        They care, just not the way we men do. In a way that is difficult to respect, and we need not respect it but rather merely accept its (lower) quality, and use it to their benefit and unto ours.

        Prob not gonna happen anytime soon. I guess it’s easier to just go bang her.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Women may be giving in to temptation but men are actively seeking the same temptation out. For every woman who is having sex there is also a man, so logically I don’t see how it is just women who lack self-control.

        Pelayo, when you say “it is much, much more difficult for women to operate within that space”. Are you saying this because of how easy it is for women to obtain sex while men have to seek it out, so therefore it’s more difficult for women to show restraint (due to sex being offered to them on a plate), or are you saying there is some character or moral deficit in the female population?

        Liked by 2 people


      • Lisa,

        A larger supply of temptations most certainly increases the chances of and instances of falling to those temptations, regardless of gender. That is pretty straightfoward and why Christ warns us not to even think unclean thoughts, much less act on them.

        Yes, women have defects in moral character. So do men. They are of a different quality, with different ramifications upon their own souls and those around them, than the defects and weaknesses of men.

        There is no equality.

        Like


      • Ok, I do understand that the ramifications of women having meaningless sex are larger than for men and for a myriad of reasons. I’m not debating this at all or arguing for equality. Simply though, neither man nor woman is exercising self-control if they engage in meaningless sex. It’s time men faced up to this, if you pump and dump then you’re just as much part of the problem, and you also require the guiding hand of the patriarchy as much as the ladies do. If you pump and dump you have no business believing yourself fit to lead a patriarchy.

        Liked by 1 person


      • “I’m not debating this at all or arguing for equality…. then you’re just as much a part of the problem.”

        “it’s time you faced up to this… you also require the guiding hand…”

        What do you want, woman?

        Like


      • @pelayo1683: “She’s been debased unto her most base animalistic desires, not even human anymore.”

        @Sentient: “Debased is a male only construct. Along with honor, morality and virtue etc.”

        The positive news is that we are getting correct expectations about women’s behavior. However, let the philosopher set this straight. You’re both meaningfully right. Pelayo’s apparent error is to correlate female debasement with female desire, correctly qualified as animalistic. His diction allows the interpretation that her debasement is mental as in mental processes. Her mental processes can’t degrade very strictly speaking, as Sentient seems to say.

        However, the experience data is debasement of her mental parameters, which does change her mental processes for the worse, vis-a-vis bonding per expectations. Men are attracted to female innocence; women, to male worldliness. The mileage on her body is presumably some debasement too, negligible or not. She is debased, but she falls from civilized or ‘human’ utility, not from human capacity. That is an important point from Sentient. This sort of thread makes me believe my blog is not a totally wasted effort.

        Marriage as naturally defined is stewardship of female utility. J.D. Unwin, Sex and Culture may make or lead close to that conclusion, so I have heard. The consistency of HIStory is sufficient proof to me.

        Like


      • Overthink. Materialistic and nihilistic. And wrong.

        Like


      • unseenwarfare.net

        Like


      • Pelayo

        Yeah you keep listing things that MEN built… Patriarchy, civilization, etc…

        As for free will and temptation, there is a reason Eve ate that Apple from the off…

        Don’t be dumbasses when it comes to women. They don’t think or act like men and never will.

        Like


      • Read. Carefully.

        Like


      • guys, this was not the proverbial, general “you,” it was addressed directly to him

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 9:34 pm Corinth Arkadin

        Why is anyone debating a woman on this board, much less engaging her?

        Your mouth should be full of kock, honey, or tending to the kids. No time to be online.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Sorry, I think my comment may have been misunderstood. I didn’t mean to imply anything negatively towards you Pelayo, or to come across as being here arguing for equality/feminism. I’m not!

        We are probably way more in agreement than not. However, I just wanted to make in a general way the point that, if an act (in this respect it’s sex) is carried out by a man and a woman, then the man is not less culpable than the woman. The consequences may be different for each, but does it matter if it is, for instance, a man or a woman who sets a house on fire? The house still burns down.

        Before posting I had read some of the comments further down this thread and I just wanted to point out that the men who conduct themselves in a way that damages society cannot consider themselves to be morally superior to the women, and therefore in a position to lead them to a better society. It was said above by someone else that men are more moral, virtuous, etc., in a debate purely about morality, this is certainly up for debate, but when it is directly related to specific behaviour we can look at the ramifications of that behaviour by all participants, but surely we can’t conclude that some engaging in the behaviour are superior to others to the degree that they can lead them. When I mentioned the patriarchy, what I meant was that there are men who need to be guided as well, as some of them don’t seem to realise their part in the problem.

        Liked by 1 person


      • His Greg Eliotness says, “does not make your solipsistic view of AWALT true.” after his piety says, “if anyone maintains women don’t have free will and the responsibilities that that entails, then they’re making a liar out of God… a precept [] in which, among other things, men would [] open the doors and then close down all women’s prisons… or just call them zoos and charge admission.”

        Philosophy criticizes all. Let me fix if for you Greggy: “does not make your solipsistic view of God true.” The evidence for AWALT is manifest; for your God, pure fantasy. Your faith armor is cracking because you know the truth in jest. You are the liar, not your God. More libtard projection me thinks, yet you are so close to the natural definition of marriage.

        Like


      • Lisa – “For every woman who is having sex there is also a man, so logically I don’t see how it is just women who lack self-control.”

        Your “takes two to tango” routine is eclipsed by the apex fallacy you commit.
        All women, excluding perhaps the most gruesomely disfigured or obese, have the option of being promiscuous. In contrast, the vast majority of men could not be promiscuous no matter how badly they wanted to.

        Like


      • Farmlegend,

        I don’t disagree with what you’ve said, but it’s not really related to the point I was (obviously badly) trying to make. The point that is being missed in all my comments, is that men should not absolve themselves of their responsibility for their contribution towards the degradation of society. Women’s responsibility is their own and I’m not arguing for it to be lessened (and would probably accept ours is higher for many obvious reasons).

        Perhaps what I was saying was overly complex and I lack the communication skills to properly elucidate. I was really just highlighting a pattern I’ve noticed, and while I can understand why men make the choices they do, I just see them sometimes complaining about the current society without accepting their role…not all men of course. The men I commented to above seem to have plenty of wisdom, which is why I commented in the first place.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Lisa – “The point that is being missed in all my comments, is that men should not absolve themselves of their responsibility for their contribution towards the degradation of society. Women’s responsibility is their own and I’m not arguing for it to be lessened (and would probably accept ours is higher for many obvious reasons).
        Perhaps what I was saying was overly complex and I lack the communication skills to properly elucidate. I was really just highlighting a pattern I’ve noticed, and while I can understand why men make the choices they do, I just see them sometimes complaining about the current society without accepting their role…not all men of course.”

        All right. Your point is that the tiny proportion of the male population who engage in rampant promiscuity should bear equivalent responsibility for societal degradation as the quite large proportion of the female population who are busy banging those few men.
        Got it.

        Like


      • Also worth pointing out, Lisa – the moment you identify those bad promiscuous men for shaming, you have….made them MORE attractive to women, not less.

        Pre-selection. And men ain’t wired the same way.

        Like


    • on December 7, 2018 at 2:22 pm Reinald Vallejo

      Because Lisa, your few precious eggs are far more valuable than the millions of sperm that men have. So being a stupid slut.

      Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 2:24 pm Reinald Vallejo

        *Stop

        Like


      • The conversation above was about self-control, from your comment I wonder how much command you have over your own. I happen to think that men who pump and dump sluts are just as bad as the sluts themselves. Anyway, nothing you have said has contributed in any meaningful way to my comment…so I suppose you know what you can go and do with yourself.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Lisa,, I understood what you mean. Sometimes the understanding of the intention can be confused when it is through text.

        I understand when you say men who use women for sex are to blame also. But this is where the responsibility falls on the shoulders of women. Women have more need to guard theyre bodies. Not only for reasons of pregnancy,, but also because we are more able to do this, generaly. (Not all but generaly). Hormone levels makeing higher libidos, biological imperative etc. It is not some thing new that men are more willing to have sex with multiple partners and before marriage. Nature predisposed them to this. Women also will,, But imo it is more dependant on exterior circumstances. That could be not normal hormone levels, financial instability,, or (which I think is the more factor now) culture. Modern culture not only accepts it that women can be so casual about sex like men, but even encourage it. For sure it is not so natural for women,, and deep down women understand this.

        To give example, do I want my son to be virgin untill marriage? Yes, absoluteley. Do I think so he will? Probably not. And this is absoluteley a double standard that we have it (but a double standard with logic behind it). Womens son’s flirt or date many women and we roll our eyes to it, we may even be secretely a little proud. Sinful, I know. But it is normal to feel some level of pride that your son/nephew/cousin etc. is groweing up to a man that women want. Fathers are usualy openley proud. My husband is already proud how much little flirt our son is. It is just is that way. Even great religious men will admit that it is different for men. St. Augustine had a concubine,, and struggled greatley with his temptations. “Oh Lord, give me chastity, but do not give it yet.”,, he said. This is like a sinner reluctant to stop his favorite sin. This made him to after express some extreme views about sexuality almost as like he feared it because he knew it how easy it was for a man to fall to it. And he still was blessed enough that he become saint and a father of the Church.

        The flesh is weak. There is a song that I love, by Alan Jackson. “Between the devil and me”.

        “This world can take you by the hand
        And tempt the soul of any man
        You can choose your path
        There’s two roads you can take
        One way is right and one is wrong
        The flesh is weak
        But love is strong
        She’s all I see between the Devil and me
        The gates of Hell swing open wide
        Inviting me to step inside
        I’ll be your friend
        Because again I know it’s him
        The flames are spreading everywhere
        Through the smoke I see you there
        She’s all I see between the Devil and me.”

        He is not saying the woman is a devil,, he is saying he is weak to the temptation and it is so easy for him to fall to that. Women, in some level we know this. We know sex has potential to be a weapon against men because we know it is where they are more vulnerabel. The all of modern culture is showing this. Why is every thing so hyper sexualised? Why is fashion the way it is? Women are not dressing the way they do for each other (accept of the real high fashion strange stuff). It is just hypersexualised age because we know men are very vulnerable to it.

        And that is dificult for women also, because there is allready enough competition with out feeling we look boreing and plain next to the other women. But how many times my husband has said to me to change my dress because it was too short, I can not even count. That is because men know how men think and react to women dressed in that way. And they do not want theyre wife and daughters the subject of other mans fantasys. This is very normal primal feelings. And really I think I would feel less secure of a mans love if he did not care enough to say to me, no you can not wear that. Does that make me insecure? Probably.

        In one of my favorite peices of writings ever, Saint Gregori the theologian even encourages the wives to try to influence theyre husbands regarding fast days. Imagine!! Wives must be subject to theyre husbands but he is saying to try to convince husbands to abstain from sex on holy days! First this can be dificult to understand, but what he is saying is that men are weak in this area and a woman can influence him to observe the fasts because she has more control in this area. And obviousley if you are religious you care about your husbands soul so you are going to try to do that.

        I know women want sex also. I am not saying we are some not sexual beings. But for diferent reasons to men. They are not children, they must try to have self control yes, but I believe with all of my heart in this area we are the guards and more suited to be the guards. And that is why yes men are also acountable for casual sex,, but it is very different for men and women. It is not equal in this regard. From puberty my father told me to be carefull, all men have that one thing in theyre mind. My older sister told me the same. I thought they were crazy and paranoid. They were not. Even our grandmother’s would warn young women to be carefull of the “womanisers”.

        This is only my opinions. I just wanted to say to you I understand your point and your reason for that point. It was not kind for some one to say “slut” for your comment. I know your intention was good because you write so insitefull clever comments.

        Like


      • on December 11, 2018 at 6:39 pm Reinald Vallejo

        Well good for you Lisa. Yeah your comment at 2:11 needed more explanation.

        Like


      • on December 11, 2018 at 6:42 pm Reinald Vallejo

        But you are arguing on a false premise that self-control for men is the same as for women. Again, you have fewer eggs than sperm, so it’s simple math. I can fuck a thousand women and you can fuck maybe two or three men.

        Like


  3. I mentioned my go to phrase is trying to make a comment about pulling girls hair early in a conversation. I’ve never gotten a bad response and have slept with a very large amount of them. The most common way i get the comment out is when I’ve just met a new woman and she starts to probe about my dating life. I’ll look around and lean into them and quietly say something like “I don’t really like to date. Its a lot more fun to just pull girls hair. ” (Han Solo smirk) Then change the subject. Hamsters spin out of control. They always try to bring it up again. Then I’ll say something like “oh you must like that too. Good to know”.

    Liked by 5 people


  4. on December 7, 2018 at 12:40 am Alea Iacta Est

    I love the anecdotes and comments here. Pure gold. My primary news source..and, well… anyway.. are y’all ever concerned about poasting game pearls here and girls discover this site and then the jig is up?

    Like


  5. This is one key thing game taught me is to use language that makes a woman FEEL. And I find its always better to have talked about the subject of sex so that she has already imagined fucking you. The odds of closing the deal on the first night after the sex talk(which is a whole art in itself) probably adds 50 percentage points or so.

    Liked by 2 people


  6. Women want Leaders, not losers. Feminine women want to submit to masculine men…but they will shit test the fuck out him first because if he can’t dismiss her shit test, how would he ever protect her from other, predatory males?

    When I’m chatting up a new girl, I move the topic over to her fantasies, which will have some gay, frou-frou shit like “I wanna make love outdoors!” but at bottom, there are two common ones: “I wanna do another chick!” and “Tie me up!”

    So I tell them, early on, even on a first date, that I’m going to tie them up and do what I want to with them. I create imagery in their head about playing their helpless bodies like a Stradivarius, and wildly arousing them until they are moving their hips in frantic little circles, and begging for orgasm. Then I will climax them until they are begging to stop orgasming, or they pass out, which ever happens first.

    Her brain (verbally): “No guy has ever talked to me like this before!”

    Her Pussy: “YESSH!! FINALLY! SOMEONE WHO UNDERSTANDS MEEEEEE!”

    Pussy Tingle Generator Level: Niagara Falls.

    While all my girls are submissive, one sought me out because an ex of mine she knew told her some of the shit that I did to her. So when she’s with me, she serves, domestically and sexually. We sometimes talk about her orbiters (she brings them up because they, in her mind, emphasize her value), and so I will ask what they would think if they knew what little slut she was.

    Her Expression: “OMG! Nooooo!”

    Her Pussy: “PURRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!”

    Fortune favors the bold, gentlemen. Think and act accordingly.

    Liked by 4 people


  7. on December 7, 2018 at 3:43 am Rant Casey - BR

    Been pulling this kind of thing for a long time now.
    It’s rather surprising for some that not only women like to be submissive to a man, but a nontrivial number of them would go BDSM lenghts at it.
    And it was already like that before 50 shades was around.

    Now dominance plays are good but she can flip the terms later if you only do that. Need to be coupled with selective attention: leave her no other option when it comes to getting your attention: submitting; anything else resulting in disinterest. As soon as its burned on her that anything other than submission makes her boring, she might even become a try hard at being your pet.

    Liked by 2 people


    • on December 7, 2018 at 11:24 am Captain Obvious

      >>>>> “a nontrivial number of them would go BDSM lenghts at it”

      Their hindbrains are aching for the infinite pain, followed by the elysian ecstasy [of the endorphine release], which accompany NATURAL [email protected] CH!LDBIRTH.

      No Caesarean.

      No Epidural.

      The Creator, in His infinite wisdom, endowed females with the moast intense 0rgasms of their l!ves when they push out & welcome new souls into this world.

      Liked by 1 person


      • on December 7, 2018 at 11:28 am Captain Obvious

        BDSM is nothing moar than an artificial psychological poultice which temporarily salves a THOT’s desperate need to become a M0mmy the old-fashioned way.

        Liked by 1 person


      • From Genesis:

        “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;in pain you shall bring forth children.”

        This is a feature, not a bug.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Just out of curiosity, Cap’n, how does your birth theory of BDSM account for the considerable number of guys who seem to be into that crap also?

        If your premise is correct, it’s difficult to account for the existence of dominatrixes and other such peculiarities of the human psyche.

        Liked by 1 person


      • no they aren’t dude

        Liked by 1 person


      • Child labor is horrific. (Ok, I never pushed my son out) because after maybe 12 hours in labor I had emergency c section. I was induced with the pitocin (the contractions are some thing horrific). My sister’s warned to me crowning is the more easy part because it is so much releif (That was the part I was very in fear about). Contractions make you tired and you cry with the pain,, But I am say you now with all of my heart,, from my experience, It is not the more bad pain in the world. I would endure one week of labor pains before I pass again even one night of shattered and dislocated bones with the muscles in spasm to try to keep them in correct place. And it is open and infected!! That is the kind of pain make you want to die. A other woman who experienced that said to me it is 10 times more bad than child labor.

        Maybe our body just knows child labor is a very organic style of pain,, the body is doing what it is suposed to be doing. For sure it is terrible, But not like some other pains. And after you hold your baby all the pain is worth it. It is the more high feeling you will ever feel in this life (before “baby blues ” start when the milk comes) not depression but a very over whelming feeling of sensitivity for the couple days after starting to lactate. My doctor had talked me about it but I was not expecting the intensitey of it. Every time I looked to my baby the first some days my heart was just acheing with so much love and pain. Love and awe for what we made, pain thinking depressing thoughts,, like “shy he can not be this innocent forever,, this world is painfull etc.) The paeditrician was trying to make him latch to the breast the day after delivery and I was crying mess. He said to me do not worry it is normal!

        Interesting fact,, did you know historicaly it was known how women are in the first week post delivery and the husband would actualy stay away from the home for some weeks? I did not know it,, my Priest told it to me. It makes complete sense to me. Post labor we are in a complete emotional hormonal roller coaster. We are withdrawing from many of the high hormone levels of pregnancy and adjusteing to high prolactin levels. For maybe 1 week it is dificult until you adjust to it.

        I am missing my point again. Child labor hurts,, But imo it is not the more bad pain in the world. You could say I am not enough qualified to feel that because I did not push my baby out,, But I experienced labor and for me (subjectivaly) I give it a 8 in the pain scale.

        Like


      • And this is funny story,, in HIND SIGHT. In the time I was not feeling happy about it.

        The weeks before I was due to deliver my son, I was in the “nesting” mode. The house was perfect,, you get some moments where even you can not sleep and wake up to clean one floor tile you think is not enough clean. Really crazy OCD clean. Every thing was in the perfect place and I was missing only one thing,, I had just took a new indoor plant pot. I wanted a new plant for inside. The garden place was too far for me to walk to it so the last one week I asked many times to my husband to take the plant I wanted. He is very forgetfull some times and he forgot.

        After delivery I was very tired and ready to come home to our clean house with our son! His sister and brother in law walked me in the house because my husband has truck and it was too high for me to climb in. So we walk in the door and our house looks like a garden center. I can not even explain how many plants my husband had took. I wanted to break down in tears from horror that the house was a disaster and from the kindness and zeal of my husband.

        In hind sight, it is funny and adoreable. In the moment, I was very neurotic but only I said thank you. His sister is more straight talking than me and really told him it was too much. I say this only because we are talking about child birth and I love the story because it is adoreable. 😄

        Like


  8. i literally told a girl, ”call me, im your daddy” while holding tiger eyes in front of a christmas tree while we were sitting, i remember she said, ”why should i?” i said, ”its just the way it is…”

    half n hour later she swallowed my cum inside the car.

    Liked by 3 people


  9. seems like a lot of guys are full of shit smacking girls around pulling their hair etc. in todays faggot controlled society you would get arrested. all you have to do to get women going after you is ignore them make like they don’t mean shit to you and chase other women like their girlfriends so they know about it. no need to beat them up

    Like


  10. “And then the whole bar clapped…”

    Like


  11. Strikes me as a tactic most effective as part of GLGG, ie., good-looking guy game.
    For an average looking man, police involvement would be likely.

    Like


    • on December 7, 2018 at 11:27 am TerryThePirate

      But then, good-looking guys don’t need game. Game is for the rest of us.

      Like


      • Step 1. Be attractive.
        Step 2. Don’t be unattractive.

        Srsly tho, everyone needs game. As someone who is repeatedly told he looks like a specific famous highly attractive actor, I can tell you that if you do the wrong things it negates any benefit from looks. I didn’t do well with women until I found this place. Now it’s ridiculous what game skills have done for me.

        Liked by 4 people


      • But then, good-looking guys don’t need game

        I was very good looking in college and never got laid. Every guy needs game.

        Liked by 2 people


      • on December 7, 2018 at 9:41 pm Corinth Arkadin

        I didn’t need Game for a short window. I was bleach blonde, had eight pack abs and didn;t give a shi!t.

        Before and after, Yes.

        Like


      • “As someone who is repeatedly told he looks like a specific famous highly attractive actor, I can tell you that if you do the wrong things it negates any benefit from looks. I didn’t do well with women “until I found this place. Now it’s ridiculous what game skills have done for me.
        “I was very good looking in college and never got laid. Every guy needs game.”

        Though all men can benefit from game, those with the most to gain, by far, are conventionally attractive men who have shit game.
        Benefits to unattractive men from learning game are considerably lesser, despite the “I know a short ugly dude who slays ’em like mad” anecdotes.

        Like


  12. I see we’re reverting once again to dance band on the Titanic mode.

    What woman worthy of a man’s attention, on a first date, listens to his lurid braggadocio and allows him to, for all intents, assault her with both hand and word?

    Got news for youse yeggs… if she’s putting out like that for you, YOU’RE one of the plates SHE’S spinning.

    (((shakin’ mah haid)))

    Liked by 2 people


    • that doesn’t matter. if she’s with him then clearly her other “plates” are not doing it for her and she’s fair game.

      would you begrudge a woman for shopping around for the best possible deal? she’s doing what’s best for her, as she should. with the right guy that selfishness becomes an asset. she’ll look after her own kids and family with the same selfish devotion she’s presently putting towards being turned on.

      you either have arranged marriages or you allow women to use the only tool they have which are their hypergamous instincts.

      it’s 6,000,000% the man’s responsibility to pull a woman off the market and make her into something useful. ie, a w1fe and m0ther. if he’s just using her for sex and eating up her fertility window then of course he deserves nothing more than to be just another one of her “plates”.

      Like


    • on December 7, 2018 at 8:57 am Rant Casey - BR

      Hi Greg. How are you doing?

      “What woman worthy of a man’s attention, on a first date, listens to his lurid braggadocio and allows him to, for all intents, assault her with both hand and word?”

      Most. Women are perverts. Moreso than men.

      Plus, they love to talk about relationships. They will talk about bad relationships all day long but it’s “good” relationships that will pry open their imagination – rather than memories. Lurid bragaddocio included.

      Good women also have erotic and romantic aspirations. If that is confined to the private conversation between two dates, its no indictment against her character.

      Liked by 1 person


      • And how YOU doin’?

        Good women also have erotic and romantic aspirations. If that is confined to the private conversation between two dates, its no indictment against her character.

        No argument there… my point is there’s “first date” behavior of “good” women, and then there’s this Letters To Penthouse mentality and morality that seems to be more coin of the realm in Cyberia than meat world… and when it evinces itself in meat world, “good” don’t factor into the equation.

        Of course, we may be traveling in different circles, so there’s that.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Perversion is a male only construct.

        Women are about feelz. Full stop.

        Feelz in the moment.

        Like


      • That’s pretty much too binary a notion…

        But if true, then every man has a duty, as of yesterday, to physically destroy every institution and person who does not return women to the legal status of chattel…

        … or forever hold his manhood cheap while any speak of PUA, feminism and/or equality.

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 11:32 am Captain Obvious

        >>>>> “Of course, we may be traveling in different circles, so there’s that.”

        Says the Boomer born during the Eisenhower Administration.

        Liked by 2 people


      • I’ve always traveled with a younger crowd though…

        … even when I was eatin’ all y’all’s ice cream.

        /more muh boomer snark from yet another alt-R ally, go figger rape!

        Like


    • I don’t disagree with the spirit of your comment, but it’s best not to lump women into “good” / “bad” categories; it typically winds up in spergy debate as to what constitutes a “good girl” (or a girl girl worthy of a man’s attention).

      If one’s girl wouldn’t put out on the first night, then one’s uninspiring performance was more likely the cause than her innate sense of decency. Even the best girls will be a whore for SOMEONE.

      The continuum of chastity.

      Like


      • I was trying to figure out how to say something similar. it’s the “men lead, women follow” double standard: when women are good it’s because they followed a man/have no agency, but when they’re bad it’s their own fault/have agency.

        it’s ALWAYS on the guy to grab a woman and mold her into something useful, ie a w1fe and m0ther. but if all she has in the meantime are guys sniffing around for the free sex, wasting her f3rtility window, then why WOULDN’T she play her options?

        Liked by 1 person


      • on December 7, 2018 at 9:22 am Rant Casey - BR

        I don’t say “good” as in santly. I do not for a moment think that women are anything like that. Being the chtonic, dyonisean creatures that they are, its the oposite of that.

        Take good as “sufficiently sane, grateful, cooperative, materialistic just enough to be competent in the material world, and romantically able”.

        All else is male lunatism.

        Like


      • Even the best girls will be a whore for SOMEONE.

        Not on the first date, chum… even in debauched times such as these.

        Of course, every man thinks HIS dick is sugar-coated and the otherwise demur lass just couldn’t help herself. :duckface

        Liked by 1 person


      • it’s ALWAYS on the guy to grab a woman and mold her into something useful, ie a w1fe and m0ther. but if all she has in the meantime are guys sniffing around for the free sex, wasting her f3rtility window, then why WOULDN’T she play her options?

        I point that sounds better on paper than evinces in real life.

        As much as we deny it, women are in possession of free will, agêncy, and in both God’s and Man’s eyes, are held responsible for their behavior.

        And believe it or not, some of ’em actually hold up their end of the bargain, in re morality and civilization… it’s just that Cyberia tends to amplify the worse, helped eagerly along by (((MSM))) culture war encouragement.

        But let’s play, and say it’s the responsibility of men to corral women and maintain civilization…

        If that’s true, then youse yeggs of the Red Pill should be smacking down the Casanovas even more vociferously than us “old-fashioned, out of touch” greybeards, nicht wahr?

        To celebrate the profligacy is to be the true enemy of a future for White children.

        Liked by 3 people


      • “it’s ALWAYS on the guy to grab a woman and mold her into something useful, ie a w1fe and m0ther.”

        Agreed, 100 percent. This postmodren, kafkaesque nightmare of a romantic dystopia begins and ends with MEN. Women do not have control over it. They are NPCs perpetually running the “follow strong man” script. (And there’s nothing wrong with that—it’s what makes the world go ’round.)

        “Take good as “sufficiently sane, grateful, cooperative, materialistic just enough to be competent in the material world, and romantically able”.”

        I think I can live with that.

        Like


      • “If that’s true, then youse yeggs of the Red Pill should be smacking down the Casanovas even more vociferously than us “old-fashioned, out of touch” greybeards, nicht wahr?
        To celebrate the profligacy is to be the true enemy of a future for White children.”

        I’ll take this rebuke right on the chin… Been trying to come to terms with this for about a year now. I can’t stand the fact my/our behavior helps keep this shit snowball rolling. For further elucidation, see Cortesar’s comment last thread about playing by the old set of rules.

        “Not on the first date, chum… even in debauched times such as these.”

        I disagree.

        Like


      • I’ll take this rebuke right on the chin… Been trying to come to terms with this for about a year now. I can’t stand the fact my/our behavior helps keep this shit snowball rolling.

        Scripture tell us that a wise man loves a rebuke, and you’ve proven yourself wise, PK.

        “Not on the first date, chum… even in debauched times such as these.”

        I disagree.

        We can disagree without being disagreeable.

        Who knows, you may just very well be one of them yeggs what can’t be resisted even by the chastest debs. 😉

        Liked by 1 person


      • It’s up to men to mold their daughters into ‘good’ women, knowing without their strong hand in every area of her life, the bad in her will dominate.

        He should enlist his sons, male relatives and friends, his ‘tribe’, to help him do so and keep an eye on her as much as possible. Any male who wishes to get near her should come through him first, and the father should know she needs to be pregnant, in birth pains, and raising kids most of her life because it’s good, humbling for her, and deeply satisfying for her to make a family.

        He will give her the “ok, go get your sex, you finally get to be a whore… but to THIS man” approval for marriage.

        That’s really what it is. It’s all based on an acceptance of reality. An ofttimes not-so-pretty reality.

        Like


      • The Bible clearly states that finding a spouse… is the duty of the parents. We have utterly lost this. So boys being fools and girls being dumb whores, whilst they both take on roles they are not made for taking on, while wasting away on social media and in shitty bars and date spots, will continue to flail in the West until parents take over the entire courtship process again.

        Prob not gonna happen anytime soon.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Lot of good points in this thread. My experience, I mostly agree with GE on this. There’s no line between good and bad girls, but there is definitely a line between submissive and defiant. (Could also just be broads who are into me and those that are not.) Who knows- or cares.

        I strongly advise AGAINST a man aggressively laying his hands on a chick before he’s banged her. In the hysteria bubble we live in, that’s just asking to get thrown in the can. I refuse to do it even after I’ve banged her AND the chick has requested it. No way will I be the guy standing in front of a judge pleading, “But your honor- she WANTED it!”

        That said, I regularly demonstrate other behaviors that really offend one of my libtard buddies. He routinely lectures me that I can’t “just command women to come talk to me or snap my fingers in their faces if they aren’t paying attention.

        Yes, you can get away with a lot more (probably out of necessity) in a loud, liquor soaked environment like a bar or club than on a date. If that’s the message, it’s a great story. I’d caution anyone against using the embellished parts as an instruction manual.

        Glad you’re all my bros.
        FE

        Liked by 3 people


      • Decency is a male only construct.

        Like


      • No way will I be the guy standing in front of a judge pleading, “But your honor- she WANTED it!”

        Heh, heh… from a jurisprudence standpoint, that line is right up there with “I vuz only following orders.” 😉

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 11:39 am Captain Obvious

        >>>>> “it’s ALWAYS on the guy to grab a woman and mold her into something useful, ie a w1fe and m0ther”

        Whoah, whoah, whoah there horsey.

        That’s getting mighty close to Blank Slate Theory.

        If you’re dealing with a badly Insula-dominant chick, then you’re probably correct.

        But your duty is to seek out a breeding partner who has enough of an Amygdala to have at least a hint of a sense of the difference between Right & Wrong.

        Whereas if you [email protected] with one of these chicks who are utterly amoral, then G0d only knows what your pr0geny will be – even in the best case scenario, they’ll be carrying recessive genes for amorality.

        Liked by 1 person


      • “But your duty is to seek out a breeding partner who has enough of an Amygdala to have at least a hint of a sense of the difference between Right & Wrong.”

        and what’s her metric for what’s right and what’s wrong? in my experience what’s “right” is whether it attracts the men she wants. maybe it’s a closed loop system, determined by her genetics. I dunno. but it IS a malleable standard and the right guy (in many cases) can overwhelm her circuits and get her to want more of what HE thinks is “right”. especially if he’s ACTUALLY right, ie, he’s pushing her towards using her sexuality for breeding.

        “Whereas if you [email protected] with one of these chicks who are utterly amoral, then G0d only knows what your pr0geny will be – even in the best case scenario, they’ll be carrying recessive genes for amorality.”

        maybe. I’ve never met a girl who was COMPLETELY amoral. most have wanted to live, wanted to be liked, etc. the “amorality” I’ve seen is as sentient says: a guy’s view of things from the outside looking in. they are simply doing what their fertile, horny, and, God bless them… WILLING biology is telling them to do.

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 12:27 pm Captain Obvious

        PJ, there’s a gonna be a bell curve to EVERYTHING.

        And your duty is to find a chick over to the right side of the bell curve for morality, who has just tiniest little innate sense of the difference between Right & Wrong.

        So that when all the other Carthaginian chicks are tripping over one another in a mad rush to sacrifice their ch!ldren at the altars of Tanit & Baal Hammon, your chick’s hindbrain is saying “Uhhh, maybe not.”

        Liked by 1 person


      • on December 7, 2018 at 12:29 pm Captain Obvious

        Smarts [in a chick] are moar rare than Beauty.

        And a strong innate sense of morality [in a chick] is even moar rare than Smarts.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Unfortunately, I don’t think that the problem is fixable from within. On a personal level? Sometimes. Society-wide? There’s no gaming that from ground level.

        Essentially, the Europeans and Asians created, for most of recorded history, a “societal alpha state” in which EVERY man shared to some extent in dominant status relative to women. Harold Eaglenostrils the Warrior had more of that status than Mort Mildew the Cobbler, but even Mort had SOME, simply by virtue of being male.

        That, plus familial “protection” of women (which also had some characteristics of benign imprisonment), pretty much allowed the normal male-female dynamic to flow naturally, the guys provided and the brawds obeyed. Plenty of exceptions, plenty of individual turmoil, betrayals, whatever, but the WEIGHT of social custom and male status pushed everyone in the direction of a functional structure, even if it obviously couldn’t guarantee it in every individual case.

        The dethroning of men via female suffrage was probably the fatal break point. Not even necessarily because of how women VOTED, but because of how it changed the weighting and push of STATUS.

        When a naturally larger, more aggressive, more focused, more purposeful creature adopts equality to a smaller, weaker, more docile, more ditzy and scatterbrained one — both will inevitably perceive it correctly as not true equality, but the submission of Entity #1 to Entity #2.

        Equality is submission of the superior party when one of the parties is ACTUALLY superior in some fashion. You can see that every day with how the Whites have to grovel and abase themselves to give even a pretense of equality to the groids — and even so, they still win at everything they set their hand to.

        So, men lost status, and the gyroscope of social energy will continue trying to spin itself apart until men regain their status — collectively — and stabilize it.

        Like


      • In m0d, and it might actually be interesting.

        Like


      • you can escalate hair pulling by starting with a strand or two and testing the waters a couple of times playfully

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 9:43 pm Corinth Arkadin

        Plumpjack knows nothing about women, as he has aptly demonstrated here.

        Talk about someone who needs Game, because he is devoid of any charisma, real or imagined.

        Like


      • Unfōrtunatēly, I dōn’t think that the prōblem is fixāble from within. On a pērsonāl lēvel? Sōmetimes. Sōciēty-wīdē? There’s ṇō gāmīng that from grōund level.

        Essēntiālly, the Eūrōp=ēans and Asīāns crēated, for most of recōrded hīstōry, a “sōciētāl ālphā stātē” in which EVĒRY mān shāred to sōme ēxtent in dōminānt stātūs relātive tō wōmēn. Hārōld Eāglenōstrils the Wārriōr had more of that stātus than Mōrt Mildēw the Cōbbler, but even Mōrt had SOME, simply by virtūe of being mālē.

        That, plus fāmilial “prōtection” of wōmen (which also had some charāctēristics of bēnign imprīsōnmēnt), prētty much allōwed the nōrmal māle-fēmāle dynāmic to flōw nāturally, tḥe gūys prōvided and the brāwds ōbēyed. Plēnty of excēptions, plenty of indiv=idūal turmōil, betrāyāls, whātever, but the WĒIGHT of sōciāl cūstōm and ṃāle stātus pushed evēryone in the dirēction of a fūnctional strūcture, evēn if it obviōusly coūldn’t guārantēe it in evēry individūal cāse.

        The dethrōning of mēn via fēmāle sūffrāge was prōbably the fatāl brēak pōint. Not even necēssarily becāuse of how wōmen VŌTED, but because of how it chānged the wēighting and pūsh of STĀTŪS.

        When a natūrally lārger, mōre aggrēssive, mōre focūsed, mōre purpōseful creāture adōpts ēquālity to a smāller, wēāker, mōre dōcile, more dītzy and scātterbṛāined =one — both will inēvitably percēive it corrēctly as not true equālity, but the sūbmissiōn of Entity #1 to Entity #2.

        Ēquālity is sūbmissiōn of the sūpērior pārty when one of the pārties is ACTŪALLY sūpērior in some fāshion. You can see that every day with how the Whitēs have to grōvel and abāse thēmselves to give even a prētense of equālity to the grōids — and evēn so, they still win at evērything they set their hand to.

        So, mēn lost stātus, and the gyrōscope of sōcial energy will continue trying to spīn itself apart until mēn regāin their stātus — cōllēctively — and stābilize it.

        =======

        Like


    • reread. He pulled her at a bar over his 2nd beer. not a date, this is properly calibrated. that he kept her for 4 years after that speaks to a diff dynamic

      Like


      • Heh, heh… if it wasn’t even an official “date” and this cooze came even more cheaply, then that makes my points about both “good” girls and men’s responsibility to not add to the current malaise all the more, doesn’t it?

        Liked by 1 person


      • yes EVERYONE let’s hate on the dude for having the balls to do something we could never summon the courage to do and then call his 4-year gf a whore!

        YAY FOR INSEL

        Like


      • He himself called her a “love slave”… and after 4 years, doesn’t see fit to wìfe her up… so by his own words…

        As far as having the “courage” to do such things, you probably meant “shame”, but mixed up the pages in that self-written thesaurus of yours.

        Btw, have I told you lately you’re an asshole?

        Like


      • Well, Sir Greg, I’ve got to hand this much to trav, at least.

        I’m taking my example in assholery from him. He just comes in here, says whatever the fuck he wants to, and doesn’t care who it offends.

        Same here, now. I’m through with even pretending to remotely like the Bog Emperor and his Magic J00z. That’s not the only thing I’ll comment on, as can be seen by the observations on male/female relations and society in this thread. But I’m done walking on eggshells.

        So, from one asshole to another, thanks, trav. You asshole.

        Like


      • Well, Sir Greg, I’ve got to hand this much to trav, at least.

        I’m taking my example in assholery from him. He just comes in here, says whatever the fuck he wants to, and doesn’t care who it offends.

        Same here, now. I’m through with even pretending to remotely like the Bog Emperor and his Magic J00z. That’s not the only thing I’ll comment on, as can be seen by the observations on male/female relations and society in this thread. But I’m done walking on eggshells.

        So, from one asshole to another, thanks, trav. You asshole.

        Like


      • I’m taking my example in assholery from him. He just comes in here, says whatever the fuck he wants to, and doesn’t care who it offends.

        You may have noticed I myself am a member of that club… indeed, considered chief by a few, two of which ONLY post to nip at my ankles. 😉

        Like


    • Well-said, pelayo… and as you say, there are already too many genies out of the bottle, I fear, for the West to recover any time soon, short of an apocalyptic event.

      Liked by 1 person


  13. When you’re done with eating at a restaurant get up first and put your hand in her shoulder as she starts to stand assist her by grabbing her hair and lift !!! Watch her bit her bottom lip, take short breaths and try and walk with a tingle quake between her legs

    Bonus points if the hot waitress sees you do it

    Double bonus points if you’re girl sees hot waitress see you do it

    I thank this blog and the savages that comment for bringing out the savage in me !! Keep on keeping on men

    Liked by 3 people


  14. Back in the 90s, I read this book (that’s how we did it pre-Heartiste) “Light Her Fire” written by some boomer psychologist guy. It discussed the female desire for men to “talk dirty” to them.

    It detailed this one guy’s failure to do so properly: “C’mere you bitch”. But it never gave an example of what effective dirty talk looked like (author was probably a virgin).

    Enter CH.

    [That’s what she said]

    Like


  15. For the last year or more I have slapped girls I meet at the bar or club when we go out for a cig (ie iso and make out), and they all love it. I don’t think I have had one experience of the bitch freaking out when she gets slapped during the make out. I highly recommend doing it. It also sets the stage for when you fuck her.

    And I’m not brad pitt so the ‘it’s good looking guy game’ stuff is nonsense. It’s all about the vibe.

    “If this guy is doing this to me like it’s normal it must be normal to him”

    Like


    • I like to do a throat squeeze mid make out then stick two fingers in her mouth. They love it.

      Liked by 1 person


      • I like to put my cigarette out on the back of her neck while I’m pulling her hair. Takes a few seconds for her to sort the the multitude of stimuli. By the time she notices its a molten cash crop tattooing her scruff, she’s already gushing. To be fair, it might be my thumb up her twat that gets the gush but let’s not split hairs. Lets pull them.

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 9:50 pm Corinth Arkadin

        Throat squeeze. It works.

        I’ve even done the two in the pink then put them in their own mouth right after.

        Not LTR material, and rather a test of what they won’t do.

        I am always surprised, thought I shouldn’t be.

        Like


      • “Not LTR material,”

        You guys really really don’t understand women…

        Like


      • on December 8, 2018 at 11:05 am Corinth Arkadin

        Speak for yourself.

        Like


  16. The arrest in Canada of Chinese Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, daughter of the company founder, basically a Chinese princess, at US request, is a really bad moment for the Donald

    It’s Deep State asserting not only control to frack things up, but showing off that DJT is not in charge, he can’t stop something really embarrassing to himself … he can’t even protect a lady, he’s not alpha … clever scum bastards … When China counters in Canadian courts exposing USA court corruption to block the extradition, they may do more to hit the DeepState than DJT can do now … Trump needs to make his move or he is rekt

    Liked by 1 person


    • It does seem odd that Trump would just let this new circus of an extradition play out, while proven betrayers of the American people not only continue to go free, but still hold positions of public office from which the president could easily oust them.

      Clown world gonna clown, I suppose… but why Trump continues to play an absentee ringmaster in certain issues boggles the mind… leastwise, if we’re to take his alleged swamp-draining intentions seriously.

      Liked by 1 person


      • 60 Minutes was blabbing about Huawei being involved in some nefarious stuff years back when the Magic Mullato was in office if someone wants to dig it up.

        Like


    • “When China counters in Canadian courts exposing USA court corruption to block the extradition, they may do more to hit the DeepState than DJT can do now”

      You’ve potentially answered your own question. Possible 4D chess movement here, possible absentee landlord. Time shall tell…

      Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 3:52 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

        Jay,
        Are you still down in CR?
        final thoughts on it as a location to relax and bang locals/tourist girls?

        Like


      • ” Are you still down in CR?
        final thoughts on it as a location to relax and bang locals/tourist girls? ”

        You can bang all you want, Prostitution is legal there. Also, all the chicas will be all over you, as You’re their potential ride to the US, at which point they’ll take you for a ride in US courts. Happy hunting Alpha dog. SMH

        Like


      • No, back in the States unfortunately, that was a ‘test drive’ for the time being.

        I consider it a stop for myself on a longer trip of expat status. Maybe a few years at most, probably less.

        For your purposes, relaxation spot and bang hub, yes for certain IF and only if you command at least a bit of Spanish. I don’t even mean conversational and in fact, that would work against you. Part of the exotic nature of foreign interaction is the language barrier. I have experienced this many times with the Eastern Euros I’ve hooked up w/ in the States over the years.

        So don’t be a total gringo who is no habla, but don’t become so good you are too local. As I said white skin is like Brazil, it is highly desirable (as it should be) so if you are taller than a squatemalan (which is easy) and white, you are already way ahead of the curve.

        You can dip down into the early 20s with great ease, but like anywhere, your wallet should be kept on a short leash. Poor women aren’t stupid and will be looking for long term finance if you foolish enough to wave it around.

        The only two caveats I’d give is: 1) You have to have a taste for light brown. There are hordes of darker skinned mestizos, a good amount of ‘mocha’, and a smattering of Spaniard descended light skinned women who obviously, have extreme SMV in a country like that.

        2) You have to be tolerant of Third Worldism. This is the great Wonder and Beauty shitlibs are trying to import here en masse. Which is rolling power black outs a few days a week, roads that may or may not just come to a dead end, two lane highways with no way to pass, slow as fuck commerce, etc etc.
        If you cannot go with the flow you will find yourself quickly frustrated.

        In summary- It is beautiful and laid back, but in a third world sort of way. If you look like a mark you will be hustled often. They tried that shit w/ me at the airport right as I stepped off the plane and at various times for various reasons. Parking, “tour guide”, whatever short con they can run, so you have to be on point about that.

        I speak enough Spanish that they got the message to fuck off, but you have to be firm about that because it is nearly constant. They aren’t usually aggressive like some American city bums, and offer ‘something’ in exchange but you’ll get it at least once a day if you are out and about, and tall and white. Count on it.

        Like


      • ” 2) You have to be tolerant of Third Worldism. This is the great Wonder and Beauty shitlibs are trying to import here en masse. Which is rolling power black outs a few days a week, roads that may or may not just come to a dead end, two lane highways with no way to pass, slow as fuck commerce, etc etc.
        If you cannot go with the flow you will find yourself quickly frustrated. ”

        Not sure where you’re staying Jay, but its not as bad as you make it sound. I go to San Jose and Liberia every three months and have yet to experience a blackout of any sort. Yes, there many fine women down there, who dress very feminine and look hot, however for most of them you have to have a taste for an enhanced posterior, Latino style. Not really my thing.

        Like


      • Liberia and San Jose are a big city and the capital respectively, so yeah, diff story there.

        But out in the hinterlands on the west coast / beaches I lost power twice and this is a common occurrence according to the Ticos I spoke with. East coast? forget it, you take your life in your hands it is getting much worse since it is now a stop for Colombian drug boats / narco subs. Stay the fuck away from the carribbean side. 🙂

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 9:53 pm Corinth Arkadin

        Jay, my thoughts exactly.

        Never let a good crisis go to waste…using their own playbook.

        It ain’t over till the Fat Catlady sings….

        Like


    • Add it to the list of events showing he is not in control. You’ll need several pieces of paper.

      Like


  17. Sh1t, I wondered if m0d would have a problem with my post. Decided to go with it anyway.

    Nope. WP has been getting pussier and pussier, it seems.

    Like


  18. Random, but just thought of Mike Tyson and the THOT that he married, who clearly had him wrapped around her little finger. What kind of games did that woman like to play? What kind of sick ego-trips, flirting w death and beatings, did that woman love?

    Like


  19. on December 7, 2018 at 10:04 am John Joel Glanton

    If you can get away with pulling hair/grabbing ass/tit you’re likely getting laid

    Like


  20. If men can figure out this, and follow through, they can have any woman they desire.

    Like


  21. I have posted many of his videos here
    I believe he was German and and the shoah order may have come directly from mutti burkel or her cabal
    note the physiognomy of the leftoid rejoicing

    RIP

    Like


  22. To the naysayers… This slut was married for 18 years out of high school. One two year relationship before I got there.
    Washes my clothes, cooks my my meals, supported me for two years while I sat around drinking her booze, smoking her cigarettes, and playing guitar… Two fucking years.
    As an adendum…
    Every now and then I’ll fuck her from behind, pussy, in the ass I’ll grab her by the hair and say… “Who owns your ass!” She’ll say “I do”, slap her in the ass or face, fuck her harder… “Who owns your ass?” “Me”… Pull harder fuck her mercylessly… “WHO OWNS YOUR ASS!!!”… “YOU DO!”
    End of fucking story!

    Like


  23. Globoshlomo has not been under so much pressure in long time
    Cabal central at this point considers throwing poor granny f*ucker to wolves
    I guess it is tomorrow that will decide the fate of the clown

    Like


    • Screw that, as its just an attempt at appeasement. I want a full blown military coup to cleanse France of all it other ((( problems ))).

      Like


    • Maybe they could go old school and have some wench stab him when he’s in the bathtub, but I almost forgot that ze modren day fronch do not like to bathe.

      Like


      • Marat had been suffering of a skin disease his bath contained salts to alleviate the terrible pain and stench
        so charlotte had to overcome both before stabbing him
        thot’s of today resemble little to charlotte corday but I am sure some of them would do the job if convinced them that the clown is somehow the represent of evil patriarchy

        Like


      • Impressive historical reference, Mosby. Well-played. 😉

        Like


    • lol women are NEVER responsible…

      read the story, it’s hilarious, the kid’s GF ratted her out when he told her. JEALOUSY. He was probably criticizing her bj skills compared to the older woman lol

      and they call him a CHILD, lol…at 15, you aren’t an adult but you ain’t a fuckin child

      Like


  24. I posted a photo of this Bernini’sculpture the other day
    Video is much more impressive
    But most impressive is the fact that Bernini did it at the age of 23
    tt gives you a perspective how terribly mediocre this age is

    Liked by 1 person


    • One of my favorites. It is completely breath takeing. The Rape of Proserpina actualy looks like real human flesh. The hands carve dimples to the thighs,, just imagine the talent behind some thing so realistic.

      Like


    • Great and all., but was he an Alpha ? Did he “slay” alot of poo tang ? Did he pull hers hair on the first meeting ? That’s what truly matters around these parts. SMH.

      Like


      • sure he once stole the frame from Leonardo
        he was also the master of text game
        according to his famous thesis
        “How long you have to wait before texting back to a girl
        and other crucial existential questions of the age”

        the answer was 3 hours 15 minutes and 46 seconds

        Like


      • on December 7, 2018 at 7:05 pm Captain John Charity Spring MA

        He had a very interesting bio. Fighting and fucking was the name of Berninis game.

        Like


  25. It will work but it will very depend what you want from the woman. Women you want to marry and not married yet, will have the same visceral reaction. But,, they will fight it. For very good reason.

    This is very a affective game move men can use on theyre wife, or a woman who deserves it (they are tryeing to game her, And you said like maybe in the 2nd or 3rd date and she is not yet feeling attraction to him). But this is a strong move. But maybe I am being hyper sensitive here I will say it is not a move to pull on a woman who you think so is a good girl you want to marry. Because it works,, if it goes wrong it has the potential for 2 bad reactions, 1. You made good girl bad 2. She is afraid and will run far.

    If you you use it in your wife when talking about the past?? Prepare for a busy night.

    Like


  26. […] was composed as a comment on “Vicarious Female Submission,” dated 07 December 2018 and by CH, but the comment has been filtered from posting immediately […]

    Like


  27. Lets get these boys some guns.

    – German biker gangs are standing up for their country’s women by beating the hell out of the muslim ‘refugees’ in the midst who keep assaulting them –

    https://www.ludinfo24.com/2018/12/03/german-biker-gangs-are-standing-up-for-their-countrys-women-by-beating-the-hell-out-of-the-muslim-refugees-in-the-midst-who-keep-assaulting-them/

    Liked by 1 person


    • on December 7, 2018 at 8:34 pm Alea Iacta Est

      “Standing up for their country’s women…”. No they are standing up TO their women, the majority of whom welcomed the hordes of human trash into their borders.

      Like


    • on December 7, 2018 at 9:58 pm Corinth Arkadin

      I want Hunter S. Thompson’s Hell’s Angels to make a reappearance…

      Like


    • Biker gang my ass. If these guys are what passes for 1% ‘ers over there then Europa is far more fucked than I thought.

      Like


  28. Oh where to begin ?

    – Man raped by inmates during ‘scared straight’ prison tour awarded $175K from B.C. –

    http://www.madnesshub.com/2018/12/man-raped-by-inmates-during-scared.html

    Like


  29. Great post. I just wanted to drop a nomination for a Beta of the month, this mother fucker. Look at the despicable, creepy way he smooches up on his wife. He is begging her to ream him, and I am sure she will. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3X7t0GkYfxo

    Like


  30. Fucking incredible

    Like


  31. Related : oh boy Tucker Carlson IS woke !

    “How close to a revolution is your country?

    TUCKER : By revolution, let me be clear, I don’t think that we’re anywhere near an outbreak of civil war, armed violence between two sides for a bunch of different reasons… Testosterone levels are so low and marijuana use is so high that I think the population is probably too … What you don’t have, prerequisite fall revolution, violent revolution, is a large group of young people who are comfortable with violence and we don’t have that.”

    https://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2018-49/artikel/trump-is-not-capable-die-weltwoche-ausgabe-49-2018.html

    Like


  32. Sex seems like a foreign concept to me.

    Like


  33. Sex seems like a foreign concept to me.

    Like