There Is Institutional Sexism, But It’s Not Against Women

The Fundamental Premise (introduced to a curious world on this blog) states that the biological reality of women’s higher reproductive value relative to men’s results in an inborn psychological bias in both sexes that manifests in favoritism toward women and indifference toward the plight of men, at the individual and societal levels.

Institutions will, over time, take on the complexion of this innate bias favoring women, and the smallest inconveniences women suffer are blown up into national emergencies while grave insults that are suffered predominately by men are minimized in their significance, ignored, or cruelly inverted to lay blame for that suffering on men and to make restitution demands for women who are the “real victims”.

Now the World’s Foremost Newspaper of Record has broken ranks and defied the cuntventional wisdom to report on a global study showing that men are the real victims of sex-based discrimination.

Men are disadvantaged in 91 countries compared to 43 nations for women

The UK, the US and Australia all discriminate against men more, a study claims

Italy, Israel and China are harder environments for women, researchers say

Scientists created the Basic Index of Gender Inequality to assess inequality

Closer the BIGI score is to zero the greater the level of equality is in the country

[…]

The UK, the US and Australia all discriminate against men more whereas Italy, Israel and China are harder environments for women, according to the study.

Researchers say this is due to men receiving harsher punishments for the same crime, compulsory military service and more occupational deaths than women.

Those are coarse metrics, but the Fundamental Premise acts on innumerable, less conspicuous social dynamics shaping the life outcomes and well-being of men and women.

The study was carried out by the University of Essex and the University of Missouri-Columbia and published in the journal Plos One.

Scientists created a database which deciphers a nation’s discrimination called the Basic Index of Gender Inequality (BIGI).

The closer the BIGI score is to zero the greater the level of equality is in the country.

Zero is a perfect score, indicating absolute parity between the genders – and Italy came the closest with a score of 0.00021. Slightly favouring males.

The top ranked nation to favour women over men is claimed to be Saudi Arabia, with a score of -0.001554.

If it is a negative number it indicates females are better off and if the BIGI score is positive it shows males are less discriminated against.

I doubt any regular readers of the Chateau are surprised by this study’s findings that the Anglocuck nations (where post-sanity feminism and the divorce industrial complex were invented) are the most discriminatory against men and their interests.

Professor Stoet also believes the complexity of the Global Gender Gap Index makes  it difficult to distinguish whether gender differences are the result of social inequalities or personal preference.

The simpler BIGI method, he says, is a much sounder alternative.

He said: ‘No existing measure of gender inequality fully captures the hardships that are disproportionately experienced by men in many countries and so they do not fully capture the extent to which any specific country is promoting the wellbeing of all its citizens.

Hillary Clinton would call Professor Stoet a misogynist while cavalierly dismissing the premature deaths of millions of opioid-addicted deplorable men in the heartland.

PS The Sex Pay Gap is a lie. I’ll keep saying it until the media stops credulously reporting on it as if it hadn’t already been debunked a thousand times.





Comments


  1. The countries where women have the most rights have the lowest birthrates. The countries where women are treated the worst have the highest birthrates.

    Liked by 3 people


    • I wonder if the Russian birthrate increased after Putin made wife smacking great again.

      Like


      • on January 8, 2019 at 11:12 am Sorcerygod at sorsgod.wordpress.com

        Putin doesn’t scare the Krauts the way earlier czars did.

        The Germans were concerned about the booming Russian population in the 1800s. Natural as they were enemies. As with all newly industralized nations (like Quebec going from 600,000 to 6 million) there was a sprouting of little sprouts in Rus along with a newly installed confidence in electricity and potash-based farming.

        My hunch inflexion tells me the Russians will make a slight rebound and take in some of the 25 million Russians living “abroad” — resulting in a final population of about 160 million around which it revolves, 145 to 168, in a twirling gyrex.

        Like


      • Fuckin evahbody was concerned by the booming (((Russian))) population in the latest 1800s. They ended up in the Anglosphere Formerly Known As The World Empire (yes that means you too, Septics, in case you forgot), in vast pullulating numbers.
        Read your Conrad.
        Only the stragglers got caught up in the queue for the Hall of Cost.

        Like


      • Pootin has stopped the decline and turned it round

        Like


    • we must #believeallwamen tho

      so whatever they want this second we must give them even if they hate us for giving it to them because they wanted it

      bc vaginas

      Liked by 1 person


    • The “BIGI” is the UN model of rating countries. The apparent fact that they are now trying to show how a positive rating for women is a negative for men (or vice versa don’t care) is indicative, to me, of the global elite realizing the men’s movement needs co-opting.

      Expect to see numerous “studies” highlighting how men need to be catered to. How men have it “baaaaddd!” How men need loving to!

      And as soon as they see an uptick in the sexual production of homes, bullet shields, and baby makers to tax to death; they will revert it right back to a pro-feminist narrative!

      Men don’t buy crap. Women do. Or, at the very least, women are the almost sole beneficiaries, or fiduciary recipients of said largesse.

      Yes, commercials for the purchase of sports cars may target men. But whose in the passenger seat that he needs to impress? Yeah, that’s right! The future recipient of 2-3 months pay on that diamond engagement ring.

      Like


      • on January 8, 2019 at 11:13 am Jonathan Castle

        “Men don’t buy crap. Women do.”

        Correctomundo. But men build stuff. And they need enough of us around to build their control grid.

        Excess men not needed for that and for everwar, are welcome to opiocide themselves.

        Like


  2. on January 8, 2019 at 9:01 am Seymour Buhtz

    Deep down I knew there was no way that you were actually referring to the New York Chaims as the World’s Foremost Newspaper of Record.

    Like


    • on January 8, 2019 at 11:11 am Sorcerygod at sorsgod.wordpress.com

      The Screw Your Torque Times has the best writing, of any newspaper, period, and the most leftward declarative articles of any major paper also, period. I study it to improve my own musings.

      Like


      • I thought you had died, it has been so long since you graced us with your wit and wisdom.

        Like


      • on January 8, 2019 at 12:56 pm Seymour Buhtz

        The Jew Yuck Times has nothing on the Washington Poz in the leftward slant department.

        Like


      • on January 8, 2019 at 1:19 pm Sorcerygod at sorsgod.wordpress.com

        I generated a lot of heat as earlier Sors, writing incendiary pieces about women and linking to my own site. Cries of “ban Sorceryqueer!” filled the land. I waited it out as a half-dozen different sock puppets (Xloveli, Xtrabeing), and here I am. The bad articles have been forgotten and I learned a valuable lesson: don’t make a roomful of men think a femme-thrown social grenade is going to splatter their guts on the wall. Grudge women; don’t hate them. But I have plenty of hate inside me, plenty to go around. It’s the polar twin of energy.

        Liked by 1 person


      • O alrighty, you don’t have a job.
        It’s OK, I understand. It’s hard for those on the spectrum.
        Live long and prosper, [email protected]

        Like


  3. on January 8, 2019 at 9:34 am clarence boddiker

    read this and thought it was soemthing to share:

    https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-doomed-mouse-utopia-that-inspired-the-rats-of-nimh

    lessons for mammals:

    “Such rapid growth put too much pressure on the mouse way of life. As new generations reached adulthood, many couldn’t find mates, or places in the social order—the mouse equivalent of a spouse and a job. Spinster females retreated to high-up nesting boxes, where they lived alone, far from the family neighborhoods. Washed-up males gathered in the center of the Universe, near the food, where they fretted, languished, and attacked each other. Meanwhile, overextended mouse moms and dads began moving nests constantly to avoid their unsavory neighbors. They also took their stress out on their babies, kicking them out of the nest too early, or even losing them during moves.”

    Liked by 2 people


  4. “Italy, Israel, and China are harder on women”.

    Hard on women = UNDENIABLE cultural identity

    Like


    • on January 8, 2019 at 11:14 am Sorcerygod at sorsgod.wordpress.com

      Women have excessive control at the interpersonal level even in these 3 states, thus negating the public appearance of lost status. A bitch says jump, beta-bux hands her his wallet and asks her how high.

      Also, ever notice how “the woman is the neck and the man is the head” saying means that chicks choose the direction the relationship is going to go in and men do all the grunt-work?

      Like


  5. Have seen many women roll into Silly-con Valley companies and within 6 months of their start date proclaim that we need to skew all hiring towards women, and chase a very small pool of mildly qualified chicks.

    In fact, happens every time with C suite types.

    Like


  6. “These women survived domestic abuse, now they’re sharpshooters protecting animals from poachers”

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-brave-ones-zimbabwe-domestic-violence-survivors-trained-sharpshooters-hunt-poachers/

    lolol

    Like


  7. I can still stand and pee, so I got that going for me….for now

    Liked by 1 person


  8. They might also look at custody disputes.

    Study is flimsy, obviously, because the line between “is discriminated against” and “has a harder life” is not clear. For example, in the case of one party being discriminated against in re child custody, it seems that that would create a hardship on said party. But in the case of one party being discriminated against in re selective service, this would make life EASIER for said party.

    So at many points in the research, someone has to make a value judgement as to whether a particular instance of discrimination makes life easier or harder… Who the hell gets to decide that?

    Like


    • on January 8, 2019 at 10:40 am Captain Obvious

      >>>>> “Who the hell gets to decide that?”

      Liked by 1 person


    • on January 8, 2019 at 11:05 am Jonathan Castle

      Just look at the child custody split. If it’s not 50/50 in the aggregate, it’s discriminatory.

      This is a BIGGIE. If men can’t retain a lIved-out paternity, you ain’t going to have a civilization for long.

      Like


      • Wrong.

        If it’s not at least 95/5 in the aggregate in favor of men, it’s discriminatory. The man should get automatic custody unless CONVICTED of physical/sexual assault BEFORE divorce is filed.

        Like


  9. on January 8, 2019 at 10:16 am gunslingergregi

    saudi top country favoring woman over men
    pretty much all oil arab countries the woman have live in maids they pay less than 200 a month they been living like queens with nannies at pennies on dollar

    Liked by 1 person


  10. “The top ranked nation to favour women over men is claimed to be Saudi Arabia, with a score of -0.001554.”

    Huh? This seems questionable, to say the least.

    Like


    • on January 8, 2019 at 10:30 am gunslingergregi

      look above

      Like


      • So how are the lives of the maids that get paid less than $200/month and the pennies-on-the-dollar nannies? Or were those not part of the BIGI calculation?

        Like


      • c matt – each maid that answered the survey was sent back to their hovel in indonesia, thus skewing the results.

        Like


    • I’m afraid that using “occupational deaths” as a metric without further nuance is a little bit tricky. Because it can be used for both the countries where women have the privilege to choose the easiest, most useless and danger-free jobs (e.g. the HR jobs in the Anglosphere) and the countries where women can’t have any job at all because they are confined in the home (Saudi Arabia).

      So, men die while doing the hardest jobs in the US because women choose mostly fancy, leisure-like professions, while men die in Saudi Wahhabia because women are not allowed to work anyway. That’s why we have the oddity of Saudi Arabia favoring women more than Western gynarcho-tyrannies.

      Liked by 2 people


    • ” …The top ranked nation to favour women over men is claimed to be Saudi Arabia, with a score of -0.001554…. ”

      Maybe when women are better controlled by men they are better protected as well, kind of like good parenting with a kid?

      I only slept 3 hours last night, I can not come up with something better worded

      Like


    • on January 8, 2019 at 1:21 pm Samuel Skinner

      Saudi Arabia is so pro-male that the majority of college graduates are women. And have had their fertility rate drop below replacement (2.09).

      The Saudi’s had patriarchy in the past but they certainly don’t know.

      Like


  11. Very telling that the most equal society was deemed one of the worst for women

    Like


  12. on January 8, 2019 at 10:37 am Captain Obvious

    U.S. top court’s Ginsburg misses oral arguments again http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3718216/posts

    Like


    • on January 8, 2019 at 10:38 am Captain Obvious

      U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s first absence from the bench extended into a second day on Tuesday as the 85-year-old jurist continued her recovery from lung cancer surgery at home.

      Like


      • on January 8, 2019 at 10:39 am Captain Obvious

        Special women don’t even have to show up for work anymoar.

        And they get movies made about them, featuring all the best young shiksa talent that a handful of shekels can purchase.

        Like


      • on January 8, 2019 at 11:03 am CalvinDecline

        The annoying thing about this “Ruth” movie will be during Oscar season when it sweeps and wins all the awards for being the industry’s token film about wahmen and equal rights.

        It’ll have a 99% on RT within the first few days ala Black Panther.

        Like


      • “It’ll have a 99% on RT within the first few days ala Black Panther”

        Yes, “Ruth” will be Wakandaism for wymen, like “Hidden Figures”. Over the top, cringey, absurd agitprop I feel I’m losing braincells just thinking about it.

        Like


      • but RBG had such a STRUGGLE to get appointed to the court having no qualifications whatsoever other than being jewish…or was that Kagan…

        Like


      • Almost anybody but an actual White Man gets six gorillion bonus HPs for passing as White. For a bit.

        Like


    • President Trump can announce her replacement during tonight’s speech, thus forcing the White G– Party to prove she’s still breathing.

      I’m pretty confident she expired on the operating table the last go-round.

      Do it, Mr. President.

      Liked by 1 person


    • Yup. Ruth Baader Meinhof.

      Like


  13. Work….?
    Your job is to please me.

    In the kitchen or on your back,
    I own you whore.

    Lesser men would be shocked how well that actually plays.

    Have YUGE balls in your attitude/demeanor, or have a handful of your johnson fap, fap, fappin away.

    Like


  14. Make misandry expensive…

    Liked by 2 people


  15. on January 8, 2019 at 11:48 am Sorcerygod at sorsgod.wordpress.com

    Nations that enter into an infernal compact between liberal male politicians and female feminists will suffer a decline in male status.

    The limp-wristed liberal politician makes such divorce laws and all other laws benefit his female patrons. The women will vote left.

    In the event of a “divorce” between liberal-left and feminist, they will reconcile in future decades as they did in California after manly Schwarzenegger finished his weary terms of office. The Republican pendulum ratched promptly to the left again and the left-liberal politico and his cunt opposite hugged once again. Arnold always did say those latinas had “hot” temperaments, dontchaknow.

    Like


  16. Sure. A close friend of mine, a highly qualified computer geek, was out of work and finally got to where an offer would be made. But top management intervened and insisted the lower level managers who tried to get the job done had to hire a woman – at the time a not specified individual.

    The whole business of various forms of “Affirmative Action” is based on a lie, namely that suitable (or best) candidates will magically appear in numbers proportionate to their ethnic, gender, bender whatever presence in the population at large. A dogma that MUST NOT BE CHALLENGED.

    As to the Hilldebeest, “Hillary Clinton would call Professor Stoet a misogynist while cavalierly dismissing the premature deaths of millions of opioid-addicted deplorable men in the heartland” – well I am OK with her or anybody else deploring away (including me) but when she gets into “irredeemable”, well, that is a religious term referring to perdition, and statements about irredeemability are efforts at autodeification.

    Like


  17. I look both. There is many factors involved and for sure I can talk about my personal experience here only.

    – The courts are biased against of fathers in the more countrys. My fathers story is probably the fundamental reason for me being a little bit “red pill” if that is what still name it. It has similaritys with some commentors here. My father marryed my mother,, made 5 daughters. It would be very lovely if I could talk about this polite but I must talk straight for you to understand what my father passed. My mother was the opositte of his expectation in a woman. I will not talk about her bad,, I will say only this.. she marryed 3 times. My father one time. And you can make from that your conclusion. I was 2 years old that time (youngest from 5) and I did not know my mother very much. They was going through separation and my older sister age 14 that time basicaly mothered me and my sisters. We wanted to stay with my father for sure,, and my mother took him to the court. They had split custody but we choose to stay with my father because we did not want to go to my mother. Some times we went and she had a boyfriend who would take us out but we hated it. She would say to us we are not going back to our father if he does not pay more money. Always she said that and our papa would drive out side the house crying the times we was not with him. It was hell, for him and us,, and imagine that was middle 1990’s. I can imagine how it has got worst since that time. He loved his daughters more than any thing in life but because of the split custody he still had to pay money to my mother.

    Imo it must never be about mother or father, the court must never automaticaly favor the mother.

    Ok that was only one point,, I will write my other in a other comment because it was long.

    Like


  18. My point about sexism against of men was meaning from my experience it was more “high up”. It was in the court,, and now more in the young generation who are more educated.

    Our age of first birth and marriage has got older rapidly in a small time. I believe so now it is older than USA. Most of the young girls now are going to university, usualy abroad. We have cable tv, the world has become very much more “connected’. The young men are more feminine,, perfect feminists in theyre skinny jeans. It is a fast transmorfation in about 20 years. Not only the city people,, also in rural areas this generation are diferent. I am 27, but I did not go to university or finish the high school. I learned a trade and I worked part time low pay jobs like waitor,, kitchen help etc. There as a young woman is where you will experience sexism. Maybe not in all countrys because I imagine now things changed and people are afraid of being sued. When I worked this low paying jobs I say to you with all of my heart women do experience this. I remember one time I was 19 working part time as a waitor. The boss was about 40 years old. He asked me to help him close up one night and said he would take me home. We was sitting at a table he was fixing some things and he started to ask if I had a boy friend. I said no but he kept to push me for information and then he start to touch my leg!! First I thought he touched me by a accident so I did not do any thing. Then he starts again and it was clear he wanted some thing. I said to him I am going home. I did not go back to work.

    Things like this hapen. But that is because there is sh*t people in this world. If women are not educated and more naive for sure they will be easy prey for men who do not have good intentions. My father warned me many times and I think so I always thought he was a little bit paranoid untill I experienced that!! You grow up and you realise there is some wolves so be carefull. You use common sense.

    From my understanding, the educated and modern class do not experience this things very much. I only have to see the news to see the stupid things they prosecute men about eg. “A comment”. It happens but it happens to the people who do not shout about it to much. I would never have dreamed to say to my father or cousins what hapened to me that the boss touched my leg! Because in one heart beat they would have gone there makeing sure he could not do that again. And it is stupid to cause trouble and problems for the men you love because of one small thing. (My father already had a court case from when one of my sisters was 15 years old. She had a boyfriend who was not good and he was always calling the house. My father he went and took out the house phone from that boys house.) So if some thing hapens and you can deal with it alone, do NOT say to your father or other men in your family if you want to make them not go to court or worst, prison.

    That is why I say even with sexism against of women, we know fundamentaly not all men are rapists, we know they do not all want to opress us. There is bad people in both genders, there is bad men and bad women. Women now are more educated,, they can get careers easy. I will not beleive one minute that a woman is being discriminated againset a man with the same qualifications. Modernity loves to see women in high roles even if it means a more good qualified man loses out.

    To gather my point, sexism is hapening against women, but imo more in the working class. High up they are to frightened of a womans ease to cry, sexism, assault etc. And in high up places like court of law,, forget if you think so the woman does not have the higher hand.

    Modernity made it crazy. We do not have equality, we have career women wishing to be superior. I wish this feminists would focus more on the real women suffering. Women in the middle east, trafficking victims etc. It is more logic considering that they claim to care about womens rights but welcome the men who treat theyre women like cattle to theyre own lands.

    Like


    • Smart girls have stern fathers. Or even better (in my “culture”), shedloads of crazy (unmarriageable) uncles and cousins, who do not respond to reasonable entreaties.

      Like


  19. Israel got much worst divorce laws against men than Australia and much harsher military service for men which is 3 years compulsory for men and then reserve duties until they are 40 vs. only 2 years for women where most of them don’t do anything dangerous or even remotely hard.

    The only reason they might include it as “harsher” to women is because two communities, the ultra orthodox and the Arabs which are more traditional and keep the women in check. Those are about 30% of the country population.

    Funny thing to note is that in the ultra orthodox community the women earn much more than the men, they are actually the main bread winner as the men sit and study religious studies while the women go out to work. Still they manage to pop out an average of 6 children per family, double of the average in Israel with almost no crime or social problems. This of course screws up with feminist theories completely and they can’t wrap their head around it.

    The Arabs are more classic Muslim traditional so the feminists can just mark them as an “oppressed” group and support them in whatever mischief they are up to.

    Like


    • Women “earn”? Don’t you mean “qualify for maximum gibs”? The entire Entity is based on NATOsphere enforced welfare. For now.

      Like


      • You might be surprised but a lot of the orthodox women got to professions like software development. Somehow the patriarchy doesn’t stop them from doing this job the same way it does for their more liberated and “liberal” sisters. You will not find them in gender studies, that’s for sure.

        Like


  20. Smart girls have stern fathers.

    Like


    • Or even better, as in my “culture”, loads of crazy uncles and cousins who do not respond to civilised discourse.

      Like


  21. on January 8, 2019 at 3:58 pm Richard North

    Another major factor is that men are in occupations that deliver more value to society, they work more hours and contribute more in taxes. Women do the opposite. They work less hours, less stressful jobs, pay less taxes, but consume much more of men’s excess labor via government services and redistribution.

    Like


  22. Ah, but can women open their own jars?

    Like


  23. Aneone ever read the actual methodology in the Global Gender Gap Index, which the mainstream ledia loves to quote without context?

    It is written right into the calculations that gaps in favor of men count against a society whereas gaps in favor of women are ignored. So you get a 157-way tie for the top spot when measuring longevity “gaps” (because women live longer than men almost everywhere) while a country where men live just one day longer gets shoved down to last place.

    It’s a total joke.

    Like


  24. Women are more valuable, so society should treat them as such.

    Like


  25. on January 8, 2019 at 9:38 pm Bound for Glory

    “On the Basis of Sex” is a highly appropriate title for that movie about a stronk independent woman who doesn’t need a man. Since every female’s life is based on sex (the act) or some vector regarding said act.

    Like


  26. “The top ranked nation to favour women over men is claimed to be Saudi Arabia, with a score of -0.001554.”

    Which shows how much journalists understand simple statistics. Look through the rankings (https://bigi.genderequality.info/#_data) and you see that Saudi Arabia is the most equal country that still favours women.
    Italy was #1 most equal, giving men 0.02% advantage, then Israel with 0.06% advantage for men, then Saudi Arabia with 0.15% advantage for women. Which are all equal to the fourth decimal point. In Saudi Arabia, for every 100 “points” of goodlife that man has, a woman has 100.15 “points”.

    Most extreme inequalities:
    Favoring men – Chad (lol) 23.11%, Benin 18.72% and Mali 16.04%
    Favoring women – Lesotho 15.26%, Philippines 9.87% and Suriname 8.44%.

    Just go to the source and play around with the data in the table, instead of reading what some idiot journo had to say about it (or trying to come up with some “every Saudi woman has a maid” bullshit).

    Like


  27. Having a Y chromosome is easy street, ya know…

    Like


  28. It should be no surprise that Chad is the best for the guys according to their numbers.

    Like