¡SCIENCE!: The Matriarchy Creates Shitlibs, The Patriarchy Creates Shitlords

Via Passerby, a bombshell 2010 research paper that found shitliberalism is a product of a feministed matriarchal system, while shitlordism is a product of a traditional patriarchal system.

CH, this is interesting. Young people raised by single mothers or from families where the mother had more influence are more likely to be lib/left (egalitarian), young people raised by their father or from families where the father had more influence were more likely to be more right wing (anti-egalitarian).

Definition of egalitarian in this case: support of racial and social equality.

Additionally, males were more right wing than females.



Using 4 samples of adolescents from 3 nations (Australia, Sweden, and the United States), the authors explored whether the gendered nature of the family socializa-
tion environment affected young people’s level of group-based social egalitarianism. It was hypothesized that the greater the father’s influence in the family, the greater the children’s level of group-based social anti-egalitarianism. The results were consistent with the authors’ expectations. Children from father-headed households had the highest level of group-based social anti-egalitarianism; children from mother-headed households had the lowest level of group-based anti-egalitarianism; and children from dual-parent households were in between. Similarly, children from homes in which the father had the greatest decision-making power tended to exhibit the highest levels of anti-egalitarianism, whereas children from homes in which the mother had the greatest decision-making power displayed the lowest levels of social anti-egalitarianism. Family structure did not interact with either the nationality or gender of the child.

Single moms produce soyboys and pussyhat sluts.

Single fathers produce warriors and tradwombs for the West.

Don’t you love when science affirms your gut instinct? It’s like, why bother with painstaking methodology and securing grant money when you can just open your door and step outside for a front row view of the world?

THAT MEN HAVE HIGHER AVERAGE LEVELS of social dominance orientation and group-based anti-egalitarianism than women is one of the most thoroughly and consistently validated research findings in contemporary social and political psychology…

…the relative influence of male and female parental figures should influence the general group-based anti-egalitarianism of their children. Specifically, because of the relatively higher level of social dominance orientation and group-based anti-egalitarianism found among men, the greater the overall relative influences of male versus female parental figures, the higher the average level of group-based anti-egalitarianism children would have.

“Social dominance orientation” = a great trait for players and pappies alike.

But how exactly was social dominance orientation measured in this study? This way (fyi left unmentioned but safe to assume: most of the test subjects were White):

This [anti-egalitarian/social dominance orietnation] scale assesses the degree to which one supports or rejects social equality. Because two of these four items specifically refer to race and were also embedded in a series of other questions referring to race and social class (see Sidanius, 1976), this scale has a distinctly group-based flavor. The respondents were asked to indicate the degree to which they agreed or disagreed with each of the following four stimuli: (a) White superiority, (b) racial equality, (c) increased social equality, and (d) social equality. Each response was given on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 7 (strongly disagree). All responses were then coded into the direction of anti-egalitarianism.

That first stimuli goes right for the id, eh? I’ll guess that, paraphrasing, the responses broke down to “men invade, women invite“.

Swedish families tended to have slightly less male-dominated family decision-making patterns; Texas families tended to have slightly more male-dominated family decision patterns.

Stereotypes R Us!

And from the Conclusion:

Though the strength of the effects was relatively weak, the data indicated that the greater the father’s presence and decision-making power within the family, the greater the child’s level of group-based anti-egalitarianism. However, consistent with the invariance hypothesis (see Sidanius & Pratto, 2001), these family structure and family power variables did not interact with the respondent’s gender. In other words, these environments had essentially the same effects on boys and girls. Thus, the gendered-environment effect appears to be relatively constant across both the gender of the child and nationality, at least within the restricted populations sampled here.

Altogether, these results suggest that group-based anti-egalitarianism is not only affected by one’s own gender, but is also a function of the gendered nature of the family environment. Not only do men have a tendency to display transsituationally higher levels of group-based anti-egalitarianism than women do, but one’s degree of group-based anti-egalitarianism will also increase as one is exposed to male parental figures, regardless of one’s gender. […]

…these data were collected in the 1970s and 1980s, an era when paternal custody of minor children was less common than it is today….a contemporary sample of paternal caretakers would most likely have more typically male social attitudes than a sample of paternal caretakers from the 1970s and 1980s.

Will it be single fatherhood that saves European Christendom? Or will it be single mommyhood that destroys it? The race, so far, is a losing one for Team Patriarchy, but that last lap is where the warriors show their mettle.

Naturally, this paper being the product of social scientists, genetic influence is given no quarter. It could simply be that the issue of single moms inherit their pathological pussyhattery, while the issue of single fathers inherit their tribal protective instincts, and these inheritances get confused for attitudes resulting from the “gendered nature of the family in which one is raised”. Nevertheless, it confirms for everyone who doesn’t have their senses numbed by SJW screeching that there is something intuitively dangerous about ordering one’s society around matriarchy at the expense of patriarchy. You simply can’t entrust your nation and its posterity to the political preferences of women or feminized men.

To be fair, the authors did skate close to mentioning the possibility of causative mechanisms unrelated to self-survey responses:

Second, because these are correlational and self-report data, one is faced with the perennial direction-of-causation problem. Thus, rather than family structure’s affecting social attitudes, it is possible, on the one hand, that the respondents’ social attitudes were affecting their recollections of family life. On the other hand, this direction-of-causation problem is much more of a potential issue for the family-power, rather than the family-structure, variable. It is possible that those with high levels of anti-egalitarianism, for whatever reason, recalled their fathers’, rather than their mothers’, making most of the family decisions. In contrast, it is unlikely that respondents’ anti-egalitarianism attitudes also affected their recollections of family structure, regardless of whether they were raised in a single-mother, single-father or dual-parent household.

How about we play it safe and orient our society around discouraging single mommery and encouraging Father Knows Best?


  1. Trump just gave speech on caravan and called out human trafficking. What exactly can the communists say that Trump said that is wrong.

    Every position of the left is literally simply anti-white, period.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Women/men and egalitarianism

      An easy one.

      Who competes in nature? Who doesn’t?

      You just solved it…it’s biological.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Of course, the study that was cited says because the results are correlational and self-report data, one is faced with the perennial direction-of-causation problem. Thus, rather than family structure affecting social attitudes, the respondents’ social attitudes impacted their recollections of family life.

        So in other words, it is not settled science. Try again.


  2. And in other news:
    Water is wet.


  3. […] ¡SCIENCE!: The Matriarchy Creates Shitlibs, The Patriarchy Creates Shitlords […]


  4. You simply can’t entrust your nation and its posterity to the political preferences of FEMINIST women or feminized men.

    Liked by 3 people

    • on November 1, 2018 at 9:04 pm Macro Investor

      No, but when you have lemons you can make lemonade. I’ll happily fuck future pussy hatters when they are young an pretty.

      Not having a father makes them seek older men. They won’t get a ring on their finger, which is perfect, because they’ve been trained to expect abandonment by men.

      Liked by 1 person

    • on November 1, 2018 at 10:34 pm traitors first

      I believe this is why there used to be no 19th amendment and why it must be repealed


    • on November 2, 2018 at 4:57 am John Joel Glanton

      Anyone advocating for a group other than national-ethnic is a Marxist and should be imprisoned.


  5. When your country is ruled by a hard core right-wing sexist misogynist who doesn’t want kebabs coming in and makes shitlibs cry…the country flourishes.

    ‘According to the pro-Orbán “About Hungary” website, Hungary’s demographic policy – which eschews mass migration in favour of homegrown babies – has already had a strengthening effect on the nation’s families:

    “Since 2010, when Prime Minister Orbán’s government took office, Hungary’s demographic policy has shown real results: by 2017, abortion numbers had dropped by more than a third, from 40,449 to 28,500, divorces saw a marked decline (from 23,873 in 2010 to 18,600 in 2017), and the number of marriages had risen by some 42 percent.”

    There were 35,520 Hungarian marriages in 2010 and 50,600 in 2017.’


    [CH: wow! those numbers tell the story. orban is a hero of the nationalist right.]

    Liked by 6 people

    • In short, men man up and women swoon and submit by a strong leader’s example. Another reason commies scream when one emerges.

      Liked by 2 people

    • on November 1, 2018 at 11:54 pm gunslingergregi

      only problem is hungary with 72000 live births 23873 abortions is still almost half
      babies killed

      but 40k jesus

      ;;;;;;;;Beginning in the late 1970s, the birth rate declined and mortality increased. By the early 1980s, Hungary’s growth rate had become one of the lowest in the world. More ominously, beginning in 1981, deaths outnumbered births. Over the 1980s, population decreased absolutely after peaking at a post-World War II high of 10.7 million in 1980. Thus, the 1988 census reported that about 10.6 million people lived in the country. ”””””

      as usual since the 70’s everything got fucked up as the pill and abortion came out


  6. on November 1, 2018 at 4:25 pm gunslingergregi

    even down to giving the woman the kids all planned out

    Liked by 1 person

  7. on November 1, 2018 at 4:26 pm gunslingergregi

    in mostly white town down road they doing the mouse experiment on the kids

    they already moved the middle school in with high schoolers and I heard already major problem with bullying the little kids

    but now they are gonna move the grade school in too

    ex ex daughter like why would they do that

    I guess the rat experiment cap posted tells us why


  8. on November 1, 2018 at 4:29 pm gunslingergregi

    amazing how smart the people are running this shit and making it happen

    you can literally get people to genocide themselves and do whatever you want them too

    Liked by 3 people

    • on November 1, 2018 at 4:46 pm gunslingergregi

      I just don’t get why
      someone made someone else a dollar bet they couldn’t get rid of whites

      I get the nog throwing makes whites run and drives up real estate prices
      then the people on drugs on welfare they get the money back to make net cost almost nothing
      but how far can it go


      • on November 1, 2018 at 5:23 pm Abraham Lincoln

        >but how far can it go

        To extinction. Obviously.


      • on November 1, 2018 at 5:27 pm gunslingergregi

        did they get that bored that they wanted to self extinct
        I imagine probably so


      • on November 1, 2018 at 7:43 pm Captain Obvious

        >>>>> “I just don’t get why… someone made someone else a dollar bet they couldn’t get rid of whites…”

        Gunslinger, I don’t think it’s possible to misunderestimate how Evil these mutha-phuckers are.

        These child psychologists & edumakashun psychologists in the universititties know [email protected] well that overcrowding is RUINOUS to a child’s psychological state of mind.

        And yet they do it anyway.

        A bunch of [email protected] sadistic psychopathic nihilists is what the he11 they are.

        Liked by 1 person

      • I am still waiting for a divine presence to come down and rearrange the deck chairs, these evil (((pricks))) just can’t get away with it

        Liked by 1 person

  9. on November 1, 2018 at 4:31 pm gunslingergregi

    cap talking bout Frankfurt school and such I finally am getting it

    Liked by 1 person

    • on November 1, 2018 at 4:35 pm gunslingergregi

      wages same or lower since 70’s when abortion made legal but technology went way up
      was that what the pact with the devil was to get tech and improvements in medicine for killing the babies


  10. Thursday whitepills: an NBC survey finds only 1/2 of millennials plan to vote, and Gulag employees say “fuck work, I’m on strike because some guy noticed my lipstick.” (These same people would cut your r4cist tongue out for mentioning Rotherham, naturally.)



    • on November 1, 2018 at 5:11 pm gunslingergregi

      “Elevate the Chief Diversity Officer to answer directly to the CEO and make recommendations directly to the Board of Directors.””””””


    • on November 1, 2018 at 5:13 pm gunslingergregi

      look at all those white dudes
      china could really make a move
      and provide a workplace with actual ho’s how could the nerds resist


    • on November 1, 2018 at 5:14 pm gunslingergregi

      or Russia could make a move shit is wide open to takeover


      • You’re not the sharpest tool in the shed, but you get it.

        People should be paying attention- this is a weak country. It’s fucking jEWS calling the shots, they are pussies. We have a military full of trannies and AA niggers. The gov here is CHOCK FULL of the latter…it cannot even function at a basic level.

        Our army couldn’t win in Afghanistan OR Iraq without having to slaughter everyone. And I talked to a woman last week about how feminization means we cannot win wars and she used the “but” that we could kill everyone there and I said yeah but women and the 19th make that impossible. No response.

        My go-to line on feminism and trannies and whatever else with war is, “we have carbon fiber drones, laser guided munitions, and supercomputing blimps. They have Men.”

        I let that last one hang there for a pregnant pause. Then I repeat it. Even feminists *implicitly* know what I mean by this. They know what a Man is. That’s why they’re voting to try to bring a bunch of outsiders in.

        Bc they see what you see- nothing but pussies as far as the eye can look.

        Liked by 1 person

      • I made this same point recently about a war with Russia. We have been deliberately weakened. We do not have any generals like Chesty Puller or Nathan Bedford Forrest anymore either.


      • on November 2, 2018 at 8:52 pm gunslingergregi

        People should be paying attention- this is a weak country.”””””

        it is the strongest militarily


      • strongest militarily? Seeing our resounding victory in Afghanistan? Or Iraq? Or…remind me of which war we’ve won in the past 20 years….


      • on November 2, 2018 at 9:48 pm gunslingergregi

        well in both places no army left like tanks
        and we had camps all over the place
        so won as far as way us wages war


      • on November 2, 2018 at 9:49 pm gunslingergregi

        it was possible to kill them all but we didn’t


      • on November 2, 2018 at 9:50 pm gunslingergregi

        bosnia we stopped the fighting and bunch of them were working in Iraq
        and made them institute American divorce laws


    • on November 1, 2018 at 5:17 pm gunslingergregi

      prob china or Russia pushing sex harassment shit
      so companies like Halliburton move there headquarters to dubai and America ends up with no companies lol


      • on November 1, 2018 at 5:18 pm gunslingergregi

        and making the f35 windscreen in turkey and other places


      • Good point Gregi…and I was thinking that the other day
        It’s never really mentioned on the MSM at all and the Right misses a trick here but the West is prime land now for an invasion.
        And western societies are so divided that the tanks would roll over them.
        And western men so pussifed they would be slaughtered in any street fighting.
        If Russia did advance West many would probably join them.


      • on November 1, 2018 at 7:49 pm gunslingergregi

        not an invasion lichthof
        im talking bout other countries could offer the nerds a much better deal thn they get here to leave


      • on November 1, 2018 at 7:52 pm gunslingergregi

        although what ten years ago dude said to actualy use chemical engineering degree to build plants had to go to china to actually use it anyway

        so we prob already got brain drain for a while now


      • on November 1, 2018 at 7:55 pm gunslingergregi

        I still think us could whip the worlds ass kind of handily if wanted to
        with outsources of making of our tech though and outsourcing of building our weapons yea gonna be a problem
        and multinational corporations ahh yea might be changing


      • on November 1, 2018 at 9:39 pm Captain Obvious

        >>>>> “the West is prime land now for an invasion”

        I’ve been worrying about this for a while.

        I sense that a lot of us are “Lone Wolves” in terms of sneaking around & sniffing out teh p00ntang from the cover of the shadows.

        And moast of us are probably exercising & fasting & keto-dieting & getting rather hardened physically.

        But have you spent any time recently around Normie Cucks and witnessed what a bunch of koolaid drinking phag-cunts they are?

        One thing “The Walking Dead” series got right was that in a true SHTF situation, a huge percentage of all Normie Cucks would probably have a complete nervous breakdown, and choose su!cide rather than standing their ground and fighting.

        Modern Home Sapiens are weak as he11 – physically, but especially psychologically.

        Weak & Lazy & Fat & Entitled [not just physically, but psychologically] is a sure-fire recipe for getting your ass kicked.

        Liked by 2 people

  11. Single fathers won’t save the west. There is only one way to do that: Go back to relentlessly promoting the family. Period.

    Single parents just don’t produce children on the scale necessary. People don’t seem to grasp how many kids actually need to be produced to sustain their own numbers in the current year *tm.

    In order to have steady state population in white nations, every single white human on Earth would have to produce two children. This means every land whale, every fug, every beta, every homo, every tranny, every prison inmate, every lowlife slacker, EVERY SINGLE ONE.

    Of course, this won’t happen. If only 80% of each sex reproduced (likely generous estimate), that would drive up the required children per capital to 2.5. Aka half of those 80% would have to produce 3 children, the other half two just to counteract the bottom 20% of SMV not breeding which is highly likely.

    If the bottom third doesn’t reproduce, the number surges to 3 per person minimum just to replace itself. Patriarchy is the only way to avoid complete Africanization, which is a disaster strategy in the modern world where the only good careers require huge parental investment and resources.

    Liked by 1 person

    • on November 1, 2018 at 5:35 pm gunslingergregi

      1,982,936 non-Hispanic white infants born 2015

      cant find later one so like England cutting off at 2011 I guess for reasons

      740000 abortions in first ten months of this year

      that’s getting close to raising tfr 50 percent just getting rid of abortion


    • on November 1, 2018 at 5:44 pm gunslingergregi

      In order to have steady state population in white nations, every single white human on Earth would have to produce two children. This means every land whale, every fug, every beta, every homo, every tranny, every prison inmate, every lowlife slacker, EVERY SINGLE ONE.””””’

      the problem is the children are being made but they are being killed by abortion and iud and birth control

      get rid of that and give woman babysitter so they can go to college for free they might go for it


      • on November 1, 2018 at 5:45 pm gunslingergregi

        we getting rid of abortion and birth control but will give you babysitter so you can keep riding cock carasel and go school

        Liked by 2 people

      • All aspects of parenting have been outsourced. I think it’s a carryover from whites who used to have wet nurses; it was considered low class to be a normal human that breastfed their own infant.

        Thots were tightly controlled resource as the husband was on-site, producing food on the farm directly to sustain his progeny. Women have not changed but society has; they need alpha close by or their mind wanders. So when he’s gone predictably 9/5, and she has babysitters, now she has time for mamosas, gossip and pool boys all day.

        Woman needs the drama of children to survive and feel complete. It is good for her to manage her own babies, keep her busy, actually be useful instead of some stupid “career” that’s just doing makework that the men give her at her job. Get women back in the home, so they can establish social networks again with other women who actually produce children for a change. They can share the burden and tend to the babies. The men will produce again and they will take the adolescent men out and incorporate them into manhood and work.

        Liked by 3 people

    • on November 1, 2018 at 6:31 pm Captain John Charity Spring MA

      CS Lewis leads the way again.



    • One cannot promote the family on one hand, and promote divorce rape on the other, and expect my heroes to be pounding on any more eggs.

      I’m a single full time dad with a couple kids, and would happily have a couple more, except I won’t ever share anything with a female ever again.


    • Oh Polly Oh Polly its for your sake alone, I left my old Father, my country and my home. I left my old mother to weep and to moan. I am a rebel soldier and far from my home…


  12. Related, the Google walk out is priceless. What are the odds that 90% of the walk out chicks are 100% useless to the company’s bottom line? (sure, a few beta boy engineers may have followed them outside hoping to get a touch – won’t work). This is what happens when companies start prioritizing diversity over core competencies. Google was built, and is sustained, by a few male nerds. There is literally no need for chicks there except for beta engineers to awkwardly hit on (and to score weak and fleeting diversity points). That wasn’t a problem until #MeToo weaponized the pushback. Hahaha SUCK IT, GOOGLE! Even a shitlib company can never go far enough to appease the SJWs.


    • Men are the only ones with the mental physiognomy to do scientific and conceptual work. Some women can handle it, the vast majority cannot. The XX chromosomes stabilize each other and regress towards the mean. Our Y chromosome introduces the variation which allow for the extreme autist genes to predominate to innovate technology.


    • On that note, from the Daily Mail:

      ‘Megyn Kelly texted Luann de Lesseps to apologize for referencing her in the panel about blackface that led to her dismissal from Today reports US Weekly
      That report has left NBC staff ‘livid,’ with a source telling DailyMail.com that a number of people are angry she never personally apologized to her colleagues
      ‘NBC staff is shocked that she would reach out to Luann, but say nothing to any of the people she actually offended with her comment,’ explains the source
      DailyMail.com revealed last week that black staff members at Today and NBC were upset that Kelly was claiming her remarks did not warrant her dismissal
      De Lesseps has suffered no real fallout from Kelly’s comments but both Al Roker and Craig Melvin were vocal in expressing why her comments were hurtful’

      I think it’s time for a three-word apology, Megyn.


      • on November 2, 2018 at 9:12 am Corinth Arkadin

        Well, she got herself into the mess, it’s up to her to get herself out, right? Unless she wants a man to do it for her.

        She is a chick, after all.

        Empowered until the ‘check engine’ light comes on.

        Liked by 1 person

      • None of these cunts can think on their feet… she should have just said, when the braying started, “Excuse me, I didn’t hear anyone calling for an apology from the Wayans’ brothers over their “White Chicks” movie.

        And left it at that… if they were going to let her go, they were going to do it whether she apologized or not. :By sticking to her guns, she could have played up the “empowered womyn” angle who wasn’t going to let hypocrites, male or female, make her crawl over a harmless observation.

        White folks have got to STOP APOLOGIZING!!! 😡 Fucking DUH!


      • Although I agree with you, she walked away with a cool $69 million and was failing at it. She may well have thrown the whole thing to look better than failing. Meghyn is pretty cunning.


    • And that Indian prick who is the CEO…his statements today were very weak and embarrassing


  13. Men’s Rights Movement skeptics btfo.

    If this study is true, and if almost half of all US births are to unwed mothers, and if almost always the mother gets the kids in a custody battle, then in the coming decades there’s going to be a huge population of young men who are inclined toward Soyness, and huge population of listless, absentee fathers who are inclined toward Suicide. If the Fuggernaut is to be felled, we need to tailor our message to these populations.

    Liked by 1 person

    • on November 1, 2018 at 7:34 pm Corinth Arkadin


      Game will create, sustain, and keep families together and in line.

      Liked by 1 person

      • on November 1, 2018 at 7:57 pm Captain Obvious

        Over the generations, the Darwinian effects are going to concentrate the various pathologies which are at work here.

        And then sooner or later, something like Generation Zykl0n will step to the fore.


    • Why do you think they encourage divorce? This is just another case of “science” confirming the obvious.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. What about shitheads, who creates those?

    [CH: shitsluts and soyheads]

    Liked by 1 person

  15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12187-017-9443-1

    The Living Conditions of Children with Shared Residence – the Swedish Example

    “Among children with separated parents, shared residence – i.e., joint physical custody where the child is sharing his or her time equally between two custodial parents’ homes – is increasing in many Western countries and is particularly common in Sweden. […]The outcomes were grouped into: Economic and material conditions, Social relations with parents and peers, Health and health behaviors, Working conditions and safety in school and in the neighborhood, and Culture and leisure time activities. Results from a series of linear probability models showed that most outcomes were similar for children with shared residence and those living with two custodial parents in the same household, while several outcomes were worse for children living with one parent. However, few differences due to living arrangements were found regarding school conditions. This study highlights the inequalities in the living conditions of Swedish children, with those living with one parent having fewer resources compared with other children.”
    What this study finds is that children whose parents are separated but with shared custody do just as well on several measures as children whose parents still live together. They do discuss the possibility that better functioning families are more likely to agree to shared custody compared to families with other problems, so the findings could possibly be caused by hidden variables, that the researcher were unable to correct for (they corrected for parental education and parental country of birth).

    It’s still an interesting study, because it shows that it is at least possible for separated parents to still raise children, who do just a well as children raised within a nuclear family, as long as the man spends as much time with the children as the woman.

    Shared custody is also becoming the norm in my country, Denmark. Unless there’s a really good reason for single parent custody, then they usually go for shared custody if that’s what the parents want. If we can’t stop people from getting divorced, then we can at least make the best possible living arrangement for the children, so they’re raised by both their father and their mother.


  16. Single mothers do their best to raise soyboys and sluts. That’s why the special people have done (and continue to do) their best to destroy the family. They know exactly what they are doing.

    Liked by 3 people

    • The problem is not all of them will be faggy soyboys, but some will be feral as hell after being some psycho single mom’s mad science attempt at child rearing .
      A bunch of ticking time bombs just ready to blow , Single Moms destroys society like a terminal illness, because it is one..

      Liked by 3 people

      • yep

        a woman who can’t even manage to keep a man around to raise his own flesh in blood is most likely BPD, has that passive aggressive disorder captain talks about, or any number of other mental issues that make her a failure in relationships.

        no coincidence that she has effed up mothering abilities

        Liked by 1 person

      • I concur completely. Late 30’s single mom, OCD for sure, probably BPD. She was an HB8.5+ back in the day, still doesn’t keep around men when you make wild, unsubstantiated accusations day after day and needle them and abuse them constantly out of jealousy. Ends up bearing me from hot tempered, shiftless loser YOUNGER biological dad (or so I’ve been told…) before she fully collided with the wall.

        My childhood was the definition of emotional and psychological torture and mindfukkery. Only male child fighting endlessly to fight off psychosis and constant emasculation. It is a miracle I made anything of myself, truly. Years of failure led me to this blog, which has saved me from wasting 10 more years down the gutter.

        I have spent almost all of my mental energy in the past 3-4 years of life simply sifting through all the ridiculous garbage that has been injected into my brain throughout my life. It has been my largest undertaking ever, but is my only hope for ridding myself of awkward, squirrelly bugmen behaviors and arrive at some semblance of true manhood. Probably will only be half the man I would have otherwise been with a dad though, which I accept.

        Takeaway: Single mommery is not a joke. Thankful for all she did for sure, but it is the undiluted truth that most single moms are alcoholic manic depressives that have no place raising the next generation of white men.

        Liked by 2 people

      • on November 2, 2018 at 8:29 am Captain Obvious

        >>>>> “Ends up bearing me from hot tempered, shiftless loser YOUNGER biological dad (or so I’ve been told…)”

        You don’t know who your Father is?!?!?


      • Good luck Shitlourde.

        Most important rule …dont stress it.
        You now have the keys to the kingdom of knowledge. Some poor fuckers never do.


      • @Cap

        Yessir. Got forcibly cut off from him entirely. She didn’t want any disruptive interference from him essentially.


        Oh I know and yes, thank you. My story was not supposed to be a “pity me” thing, but just a word to the wise. It’s just not good to have a kid get cornered and exposed to out breaks of mental illness because they can’t distinguish normal from abnormal as well.

        Liked by 1 person

  17. CH for prez

    Anyone second………?


  18. Let us not abuse the language, even though I love your conclusions. A sample size of 4 people isn’t science.


  19. is there a site that helps jewish women meet blacks?


  20. “Cemeteries in Bohemia are like gardens. The graves are covered with grass and colorful flowers. Modest tombstones are lost in the greenery. When the sun goes down, the cemetery sparkles with tiny candles… no matter how brutal life becomes, peace always reigns in the cemetery.

    ― Milan Kundera, The Unbearable Lightness of Being

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Remember this little girl when replenishing your hate


  22. on November 1, 2018 at 11:24 pm hamster_wrestler

    “Wow. That young person was raised by a single dad!” ….said no one ever. And the reason is in the subconscious of both men and women, it’s to be expected that children coming from a single dad household are going to have their heads screwed on straight. Change the scenario to a single mother, and yes it is remarkable to have a kid turn out ok.


  23. on November 2, 2018 at 12:30 am gunslingergregi

    check this next time feminist says something about the pay gap

    tell them no we ain’t equal woman have killed

    over 1 billion 500 million babies worldwide since 1980

    they have no compassion or no honor or no long list of shit compared to men


    top wars of world since fucking god dammed ancient times sorry God
    was only 345,304,404

    less than a third of what woman killed in 36 years when they were allowed to kill the defensless

    men at war aint shit compared to woman at “peacetime”

    so fuck no they should not get the kids

    men can’t fucking kill more than woman even when the men are armed with the latest weapons of the time period and all of recorded fucking history compared to 38 years of womans brutality


    • The yelling chick is a “pastor” of a nearby Church. I kid you not.
      Just another reason why God himself said women should not be leaders of men.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yeah, this was posted on an earlier thread… kike phiz, kike name, but supposedly a Presby “reverend”… yelling about “our” neighborhood and how folks can’t sit shiva in peace.


      • on November 2, 2018 at 9:21 am Corinth Arkadin

        Protestant churches need to get their houses in order.

        This bitch isn’t about Christ. It’s about grandstanding and making a spectacle of herself.

        Real Christian men need to smack these bitches up.

        He told his own mother, “WOMAN, my time hasn’t come yet. Don’t crowd me.”

        When cucks and bitches say, WWJD?

        Tell ’em that throwing over tables and whipping the sh!t out of people is an option.


      • God knew a good portion of churches would be found wanting, come the end of days.

        Of the seven churches mentioned in Revelation, only two were praised fully and without fault.

        The lukewarm namby-pamby churches, and those who teach human secularism rather than fear of the Lord will be discards like so much chaff from the wheat.


      • on November 2, 2018 at 10:39 am UndertheDRADIS

        What kind of man puts his money and effort into a church run by a woman? “I suffer not that woman Jezebel to teach” should have put the cap on that one two millennia ago.


  24. on November 2, 2018 at 12:32 am gunslingergregi

    woman have killed
    over 1 billion 500 million babies worldwide since 1980
    top wars of world since fucking god dammed ancient times sorry God
    was only 345,304,404


  25. on November 2, 2018 at 12:34 am gunslingergregi

    lol woman have killed more babies in 38 years than all wars combined

    Liked by 1 person

    • on November 2, 2018 at 12:34 am gunslingergregi

      to include ancient times


    • on November 2, 2018 at 12:38 am gunslingergregi

      top wars of world was only 345,304,404 killed added up 174 wars going back to 549 bc


    • on November 2, 2018 at 12:40 am gunslingergregi

      got chills and started sweating adding it up felt the presence of evil


    • on November 2, 2018 at 12:49 am gunslingergregi

      its the most mind boggling shit I have ever contemplated other than infinity of god and extermination of world


    • on November 2, 2018 at 12:58 am gunslingergregi

      all wars only 22.8 percent


    • Abortion and the Ancient Practice of Child Sacrifice/b>


      And you shall not let any of your children pass through the fire to Molech, neither shall you profane the name of your God: I am the LORD ~Leviticus 18:21

      Liked by 1 person

      • on November 2, 2018 at 4:21 am gunslingergregi

        There was, however, a rite performed in ancient Israel which has many parallels to the modern practice of abortion and is specifically addressed in the Sciptures. It was the rite of child sacrifice and Moses said it was one of the “detestable things the Lord hates” (Deuteronomy 12:31). In this article the largely neglected parallels between the ancient rite of child sacrifice and the modern practice of abortion will be examined in detail. ”””””



      • on November 2, 2018 at 4:48 am gunslingergregi

        This suggestion is supported by archeological evidence at Carthage that the practice of child sacrifice flourished as never before at the height of its population as well as civilization.[17]”””””’

        A funerary stela dedicated to the goddess Tanit at Carthage. Archaeologists have discovered upwards of 20,000 burial urns at the Carthaginian Tophet, which contain the incinerated remains of children sacrificed to Tanit and her consort, Ba’al Hammon. The Carthaganians came from Phoenicia (north of Israel in modern day Lebanon), and brought with them Canaanite customs and practices, including child sacrifice. The Israelites were repeatedly warned by God not to adapt the despicable practices of the Canaanites. Failing to heed these warnings, God eventually brought judgment upon the Israelites. Wikimedia Commons””””””””’

        so maybe not new im thinking didn’t hit 1.5 billion world wide though

        ””””The Lord said to Moses, say to the Israelites: “Any Israelite or any alien living in Israel who gives any of his children to Molech must be put to death. The people of the community are to stone him. I will set my face against that man and I will cut him off from his people; for by giving his children to Molech he has defiled my sanctuary and profaned my holy name. If the people of the community close their eyes when that man gives one of his children to Molech and they fail to put him to death, I will set my face against that man and his family and will cut off from their people both him and all who follow him in prostituting themselves to Molech. (Leviticus 20:1-5; see also 18:21).””””””

        But Josiah’s reformation was short-lived as evidenced by Jeremiah’s prophetic witness (see above). God used Rome to judge Carthage in 146 B.C., bringing an end to child sacrifice there.[27b] Hundreds of years earlier God used Babylon to judge Israel when the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem, leveling God’s temple which signified God’s just abandonment of His people, and leading Israel into captivity. While exiled in Babylon, Ezekiel reminded the two prostituting sisters Oholah (representing Samaria in Ezekiel 23:4) and Oholibah (representing Jerusalem) of the reason they had been exiled. In confronting the two with “their detestable practices” the Lord through Ezekiel said:
        they have committed adultery and blood is on their hands. They committed adultery with their idols, they even made the children they bore to me pass through the fire as food for them (Ezekiel 23:36-37).””””””

        so 146 bc rome made carthage stop child sacrifice wow

        so the patriarchal romans were not killing babies hmm


    • on November 2, 2018 at 4:55 am John Joel Glanton

      Women in the West are out of control due to weaponization of sex, and must be reined in. White Sharia.


  26. on November 2, 2018 at 12:45 am gunslingergregi

    my links in mod for once now I know it feels


  27. on November 2, 2018 at 12:46 am gunslingergregi

    345 mil killed in all wars


  28. on November 2, 2018 at 3:00 am PBR Streetgang

    Never mind all that – the Sex Bots are coming!

    And true to sexual market forces – a bidding war has started to pop their silicon cherrys …“The concept of virginity will always be appealing in society where women are highly sexualized while their sexual purity is simultaneously held in high regard …It’s no different for a female robot.… Everyone is clamoring to be the first person to sleep with these robots because it is truly a historical act.”

    Talk about science!


  29. on November 2, 2018 at 4:10 am gunslingergregi

    the matriarchy creates the greatest mass killing in history of the world
    and hardly a peep about it
    and the woman who did it show no remorse for killing more people than all wars
    and there are no trials


    • on November 2, 2018 at 4:15 am gunslingergregi

      hey there is something new under the sun after all

      ”””””Answer: Ecclesiastes 1:9 is the origin of what has become a common proverb, “There’s nothing new under the sun.” The verse reads like this: “What has been will be again, / what has been done will be done again; / there is nothing new under the sun.” As a modern idiom, “there’s nothing new under the sun” is often used as a world-weary complaint …”””””’

      Liked by 1 person

    • on November 2, 2018 at 10:43 am UndertheDRADIS

      The only conclusion is that women feel no loyalty higher than to themselves and the offspring they choose to have.


  30. Feminism Isn’t Christian, It’s Sin – The Family Alpha



    And unto Adam he said: Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten of the tree, of which I commanded you, saying, You shall not eat of it: cursed is the ground for your sake; in sorrow shall you eat of it all the days of your life ~Genesis 3:17

    Liked by 1 person

    • on November 2, 2018 at 4:38 am Captain John Charity Spring MA

      Tastes good man…tastes good.


    • on November 2, 2018 at 10:45 am UndertheDRADIS

      I have often said that the Sin of Adam was in looking at her incredulously, saying, “You did WHAT?”, then beating her unconscious.


      • on November 2, 2018 at 10:47 am UndertheDRADIS

        I have often said that the Sin of Adam was in not looking at her incredulously, screaming, “You did WHAT?”, in her face, then beating her unconscious.

        Must read before punching “go” button.


  31. on November 2, 2018 at 8:38 am Captain Obvious

    Gunslinger, knock up ex ex & ex ex’s daughters & ex & the 16yo and all the rest of them.

    You withholding your seed from them is almost as bad as the chicks murd3ring their own ch!ldren.


  32. It makes sense. Societies that have lost too many men at war leave the women vulnerable. So, war-torn nations must invite immigrant men to replace the lost men. This actually happened in Europe after WW2, which saw a surplus of about 12-15 million females in Northern Europe. (In Russia, for example, the ratio of men:women rose to 1:1.5 after WW2; https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/2007_820-4g_Brainerd1.pdf).

    After WW2, these ‘surplus’ mothers without husbands raised a generation of leftists boomers. These boomers were literally raised to open the borders to welcome immigrant men.


  33. so the patriarchal romans were not killing babies hmm

    Indeed they didn’t Gregi

    Roman law and tradition – mos maiorum – established the power of the Pater familias within the community of his own extended familia. In Roman family law, the term “Patria potestas” (Latin for “power of a father”)



  34. Explains why the Marxist attack on the family works in their favor. I always wondered why. Now Engels couldn’t have known this explicitly although he did reason from examining the correlation among primitive tribe’s attitude toward paternity issues and their attitudes toward private property.