Get ready for an id-scorcher of a study. Feminists (male and female) are on stand-by, their eyes pre-welling with salty tears.
Perception Of Rapists As Successful People Decreases Likelihood Of Crime Being Labeled As Rape, Study Finds (Via)
Executive Summary: HSMV alpha males are given a rape pass, LSMV beta and omega males get the book thrown at them for daring to look below a girl’s chin.
Never mind the feminist gobbledygook attempting to reframe the study results as an example of a mass self-delusional belief in the SOMETIMES WOMEN LIE “false myth“. The results are far more revealing than the feminist researchers dare to explore.
CH coined the term “Regret Rape” (or Retconned Rape) to describe the false accusations that women make when they’ve willingly slept with a man who didn’t call them back the next day and gave them the sads.
Unfounded rape charges are twice as high as any other felony. More women lie about being raped than about any other criminal perpetration upon them. Why is this? One, women gain a lot from passing off a rape lie. Psychologically, they gain “re-virginization” from an awkward welling of regret after, say, a one night stand (or a UVA shattered glass ganglia rape). Socially, they gain an air lifted provision of support — financial and emotional — from family and friends. They also avoid potential social ostracism from dating badboys. Finally, some women are simply malevolent and impulsive, and utilize the expedience of a false rape accusation to slake a thirst for vengeance or to assuage a bitterness brought on by sexual market failure. (Recall from CH tomes of yore that success in the sexual market is defined differently for women than it is for men. If women don’t extract commitment from a worthy man, they have failed.)
And false rape accusations, vile as they are, are undoubtedly encouraged by rooted social and legal incentives. If the jurisprudence, academic, and media industrial complexes are biased to favor women’s accounts of lurid sexual events, then some women at the margins will be tempted to leverage that spontaneous favoritism for their own ends. This is precisely what happened in the catfishing UVA rape hoax story.
These women regret having given their bodies away so freely, and to absolve themselves of accountability they turn to retconning the previous night’s sexytime as an assault, and to smearing the men who reneged on their part of the implicit deal to reward the women’s sexual favor with the men’s romantic, financial, and protection services.
The study discussed in this post is sort of the mirror image of Regret Rape.
In Regret Rape, you have a woman deliberately mischaracterizing a consensual sexual encounter as a nonconsensual assault to save her reputation or salve her ego (among other possible psychological motivations). See: UVA rape hoax, mattress girl.
In Reconsidered Rape, you have disinterested third parties interpreting a rape accusation, or the accusing woman herself interpreting her less-than-ideal sexual encounter (later regretted), through the lens of a nuanced, consensual basis if the accused man is high sexual market value and made the woman feel good about herself. If the accused man is lsmv, he’s toast. NO BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT FOR YOU, GOON SIR!
The underlying revelation is the stuff of paradigm implosions. The REAL subconscious reason that people are less likely to assume the rape-y worst about an hsmv man is because they grasp, on a darwinian level, the evolutionary truth that women actively seek the attention and company of hsmv men and DELIBERATELY PUT THEMSELVES IN HEATED SITUATIONS in which intimacy is more likely to occur with those kinds of men.
People recognize, on an instinctual level, that women sometimes, maybe even often, “ask for it” — “it” meaning sexual adventure — when the man involved is a high value alpha. Those alpha men don’t come along every day for women, so women tend to lose their self-control around them.
Just as men tend to lose their good sense and aloof calm when in the company of a stunning beauty.
It’s akin to that moment Trump exposed a cosmic truth when he boasted that women “let you grab them by the pussy”, if you’re a billionaire playboy. He was right, and it had nothing to do with nonconsensual groping, despite ugly, unloved catlady insisting to the contrary. The women who wormed their way into hsmv Trump’s sights, and flirted with him like they never did with boring betas, inching closer, tossing hair, batting eyes, giggling like little girls….these women would not have objected all that convincingly if, as they were thrusting their pelvises forward, Trump placed a hand on the opening invitation.
It gets darker still. People, as well as the “victim” herself, also intuit that sex with an alpha male is HOTTER if he is aggressive and takes liberties with the prim and proper boundaries she normally establishes for garden variety beta males taking a glancing stab at her…heart. She will walk away from 60-40 consensual sex with an alpha male perhaps feeling on a logical level like she was taken advantage of, but it will have felt SO GOOD and SO RIGHT that she post hoc reconsiders the unsavory parts of her seduction as beautiful romantic abandon in the arms of a delightfully undomesticated beast of a man. This is Reconsidered Rape.
This is not to say alpha male rape doesn’t occur; rather, it’s a nuanced description of a real, working sexual market — instead of a fantasy devised in Wymyn’s Studies thothouses — in which alpha male sexual attention that would get a beta or omega male hauled before a feminist tribunal is massaged by both third parties and by the participating woman as a consensual gray area.
Reconsidered Rape is the hindbrain realization that men and women are constitutionally different in all the ways that matter, and male power is a lure to women which female power is not to men. A powerful man known to his accuser will therefore be given benefits of the doubt in accusations that involve a woman’s participation, because everyone knows, deep down, that the woman wasn’t a totally innocent victim, as would be a woman who was accosted in the middle of the night by a Dindoo in an Alley™.
And, just as I have predicted, we are seeing this biomechanical reality play out in the Weinstein trial, as evidence is presented that most of Weinstein’s “victims” were glorified prostitutes who knew what they were getting into when Weinstein dangled…roles…in front of them but who might have had, from among the hundreds of cock suckings they gave Weinstein, one or two rough cocksucks that weren’t sufficiently softened with sweet nothings in the aftermath.
The solution to Reconsidered Rape is the same as that for Regret Rape: don’t allow your society to devolve into an alpha fux, beta bux plunderdome.