Bone Zones

Nestled in the quaking bosom of the Chateau comment section was a discussion about European female beauty and why it seems more often to float down from the mountain than emanate from the plain. I suggested that hot spots of female beauty from around Europe (and yeah sure the rest of the crappy world too) be labeled Boner Zones, riffing on the Blue Zones where the healthiest people live. Although now I’d like to change that term to Bone Zones, for its symmetrical quality.

for reasons that are a bit beyond my ken atm, striking white female beauty seems to emerge more often and with greater intensity of flourish from mountainous regions. though not always. if we designate hot spots of white female beauty — call them Boner Zones — then the big three would be the Italian Alps, the Ukraine steppe, and the Baltic seacoast.

A reader emailed with a reply addressing the likely causes for the eruption (heh) of Bone Zones in particular geographic and historical regions. Bottom line: it’s the sex skew.

Remember, ABD: Always be Darwinian.

Why would female beauty emerge anywhere? Because there is a shortage of men, and women have to compete for men, which is not the usual thing. Where do women have to compete for men? Where the men are engaging extremely dangerous occupations and lots of them get killed, occurred in Northwestern Europe over the centuries. Working in the mountains, logging, mining, fishing in the North Sea, all very dangerous ways to make a living. Or in places where there has been sustained violent conflict and huge numbers of men were killed off. Beautiful women in Kiev? World War I, Red Revolution, Holodomor, Great Purge, Barbarossa, Nazi occupation … . All of Eastern Europe is similar. The Baltics were especially hard hit.

Female beauty is nature reasserting life and fertility in the face of bloodshed and slaughter.

That’s a great final insight. Beauty is the flower of bloodshed.

At least for some peoples and places. Has endless bloodshed in Africa given rise to female beauty?

Generally, though, there does seem to be something to the hypothesis that native White European Beauty is unique in the world and uniquely arose from an environment that became the premature resting place for millions of its young native men, resulting in a veritable pornucopia of pussy for the men left alive who did what men naturally do with a surfeit of choice in women: they chose the hottest, youngest, tightest, and had a lot of kiddies with those proto-HBs.

I hate to leave a post viewed through a soft focus lens, so here’s a jarring depth-of-field corollary to whet your inner masochist:

In regions and in times that there isn’t any culling of men, and the sexes enjoy a stable, long-lasting 50:50 ratio that restricts male choice and in which women don’t have to compete for the hordes of thirsty betas begging for cummies, women evolve to become……

uh oh…..

uglier.

Does this corollary remind you of a specific time and place?

If we are fated for Civil War 2, one upside is that in the aftermath white female beauty may return to the land of the twee, home of the knave.





Comments


  1. Monogamy + shortage of men = female beauty optimized.
    ( polygamy | dindu female abandonment strategy ) + any number of men = all females fertilized = declining female beauty
    hijab = female beauty has no social status = bearded ladies

    Liked by 2 people


    • on September 7, 2017 at 3:36 pm Wrong Side of History

      “hijab = female beauty has no social status = bearded ladies”

      spandrell theorizes that this is why feminists have an inexplicable soft spot for Islam.

      Like


    • the all females fertilized part that you mention is key here.

      just take a look around your circle of friends or even at yourself and you’ll see that many men are settled with women who are substandard in the looks/personality department.

      there used to be a standard that women had to live up to. if they didn’t meet that standard their men would cheat or leave.

      now most men won’t do that. either because they are too weak or because they would feel too much guilt because of all the conditioning they’ve gotten that says men have to suck it up and stay with women no matter how crappy they are.

      that thinking is fine if the girl is worth it. i’m all for monogamy and honoring commitment if it’s the right girl. problem is, most men today don’t have girls who are worthy of that.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Well said, Cracka. It’s like a shell of chivalry. Most of the women aren’t worthy of it, and most of the men are slaves to it.

        Liked by 2 people


      • They asymmetry I see in modern couples is absolutely striking. If you could time machine yourself back 30 years ago and shown rando couples in public spaces, malls, wherever you’d jump out of your skin.

        It is quite common to see some absolute pigs with “average” guys and some low end of average women with straight up studs. It makes me sad.

        Liked by 2 people


      • it is sad. that used to be uncommon. use to see mostly couples where the woman was more physically attractive and the man had other good traits to attract and keep her.

        if you did see a couple where the woman was below his status in looks, you’d assume they met young and felt obligated to stay. probably had some hot girls on the side and she looked the other way because she knew she couldn’t offer what he needed. either that or she had a really great personality and treated him exceptionally well because she knew she had to make up for her lack of attractiveness.

        now you see ugly gross girls with bad personalities with decent looking successful men all the time. and the girls treat them like crap.

        pretty sad

        Like


      • I think you’re on to something. I see the cigstache and taco toad and my first thought was that they are not that unusual. I see women like that every time I’m out in public. And they have husbands and boyfriends with them. And kids. I think that is what the future is going to look like. These 0/10 women are going to be the new 5 in a couple generations. I’ve been reading the wiki pages on a lot of these beautiful women people are posting about and they usually have 1 or 2 kids in their mid 30s. I bet the cigstaches and taco toads of the world are having >2.1 kids on average. That is what the future is going to look like.

        Liked by 1 person


    • This is what I’ve always said. Not only is this good but it would keep the men from becoming soft and able to co-operate better since we now know that humans care less for large number of groups and more for small tighter in-group.

      It’s also why I disagree with some of the theories of Rollo Tomassi in that women were the ones choosing men back then. No, it’s more like testosterone was, and always will be the case. Always follow Darwin.

      [CH: it’s difficult to disentangle the vectors of sexual selection. did humans evolve because women chose alphas, or because men chose attractive women through sheer dominance (took what they wanted)? a little of both? if alpha males were chosen, was it by default, because a lot of betas died on the field of battle/hunting? deep genetic history isn’t easy to unearth in the lab.]

      Liked by 1 person


  2. CH, why do you keep torturing us with Taco Toad?

    Oh well I suppose Zarathustra and Jesus had strange and fristrating ways of instructing their disciples as well.

    Like


  3. on September 7, 2017 at 3:41 pm Captain John Charity Spring MA

    Highland areas do produce interesting physical specimens. The physiques are often quite pleasing.

    But I think that female beauty is a little more to do with females picking handsome men. Generally sons resemble mothers and daughters resemble fathers in some way.

    Like


  4. I think it’s more likely that the beauty we see in the world had to do with selective breeding by those that had the means to do so, ie., strong, cohesive families that purposely cultivated and protected their bloodlines.

    conversely, I would posit that the low standards of the masses, and their any-port-in-a-storm, short-time-horizon mating preferences have always been a huge thorn in the side of responsible leaders, concerned about preserving the cultural identity of their people.

    any time a general raised an army and plundered their enemies there would’ve been indiscriminate mixing going on. do men select for beauty when they’re raping and pillaging? maybe the warriors alphas can, and do, but the infantry down to every last man is going to grab whatever they can, and that includes sharing whatever taco toad is available.

    are you as their leader going to deny your men their right to rape the hairy Neanderthal girls after they’ve proven their loyalty in the battlefield? and what about their mischling offspring? are you going to let them live? the fact that nearly all nonsubsaharan Africans contain, on average, 1-4% Neanderthal DNA suggests that a race- and even SPECIES-mixing has been going on for a very long time, and a blind eye was mostly turned, at least among the masses. if those mischlings were such outcasts they would’ve been killed, back when life was cheap. yet for some reason they survived…

    masses gonna mass. and purists gonna pure. those that value beauty will always find a way to create, preserve, and protect it. and in doing so keep it hidden away from the hungry, indiscriminate masses. beauty was never meant to be mass-produced. it’s exquisite rarity is what makes it so valuable.

    the lesson here is that each one of us is responsible for creating and preserving our own strength-and beauty-selecting bloodlines, regardless of what society is doing. the elites are smart enough to roll that way. why shouldn’t we?

    Like


    • — beauty was never meant to be mass-produced.

      Exquisite luminous beauty is uncommon but the point can be misleading in a White context. Every healthy European teenage girl is desirable, every commoner had a shot at a pretty mate. What made beauty rare was the tolls of time. With modern cosmetics and self-care, today’s hot thots would have been middle-aged matrons with facial hair.

      The scarcity of beauty was never, for our peope, never meant that we have to settle for a dark skinned aboriginal-mandible half animal.

      The one-drop rule keeps a clean pool, so as long as the pool is clean, beauty springs eternal.

      English colonists respected that rule: you’re White or you’re not human.  Spaniards mixed with the natives, which is why parts of Latin America are a race continuum rather than pure-Euro White America.

      — the elites are smart enough to roll that way. why shouldn’t we?

      Excellent guidance on the individual level. But in the long run, we need all-White social pyramid, or we drown in mud.

      Like


      • WithOUT modern cosmetics and self-care, IN THE PAST, today’s hot thots would have been middle-aged matrons with facial hair.

        Like


      • a lot of girls are still pretty fugly once they take the makeup off.

        have you seen any of those before and after pics of girls after they’ve caked tons of makeup on their faces? it’s pretty scary how much they can hide with that stuff.

        before makeup, the fuglies would get passed over and become nuns or old maids who took care of family, devoted their lives to charity, etc.

        now a lot of chumps get tricked into settling with them before they realize what’s happened. they get a false sense of what she really looks like and what her actual genetics are. then once you’re in, it’s hard to get out. especially because our society makes men feel guilty for caring about appearance.

        that’s why it’s always a good idea to get a look at your girl without makeup, with wet hair, etc before you decide to make her a long term girl.

        Like


      • “we need all-White social pyramid, or we drown in mud.”

        whew. I’m with you on that PA, but hows that going to happen? and where??

        I’m not waiting around for that to happen. creating my OWN friggin all-white social pyramid. and my own private, clean pool.

        Like


      • Cracker, that’s why you take prospects camping. By week’s end, you’re getting the unassisted visage.

        Liked by 1 person


      • yep

        camping is great

        it’s also a good idea to meet up with your girl after giving her very short notice to get ready. not all the time but a few times so you can see how she handles it.

        any girl can look hot if she’s got an hour or more to get ready. but that’s not a good indication of what she’s going to be like later on down the road.

        a girl who can look good even without much time is a keeper. you also get a good taste of how feminine she is and how much she likes you.

        if she shows up in clothes she’d wear when she’s sick or camping then makes excuses about her appearance because you rushed her, that’s a big sign she’s going dress like a slob most of the time and be a pain in the neck.

        if she shows up looking nice and feminine for you, no matter how little time she had to get ready, she’s a keeper.

        Like


      • Go camping? Yes, but going swimming is a lot quicker.

        Liked by 1 person


      • “Every healthy European teenage girl is desirable, every commoner had a shot at a pretty mate.”

        that’s an interesting point. it makes my head spin thinking about why that probably will never exist again, except by rolling back time in protected enclaves like the Amish.

        which leads me back to my original thought, which is, if beauty can only survive in protected enclaves, and those enclaves don’t exist yet in any meaningful sense except in elite circles, then it’s up to each one of us to create them.

        Like


      • — it’s up to each one of us to create them

        I fully agree with that. We do what we can, which is mostly in the realm of our personal lives. The deliverance of the Red Pill (aka real Christianity, racial/ethnic identity, living tradition) is that we are motivated by a sense of purpose. Those without the benefit of clear vision are a bit lost, they still wonder if racism might be bad. Our private efforts add up, as this is a culture war.

        Like


      • Crystal-clear paragraph right there, PA. Beautiful.

        I couldn’t agree more.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on September 7, 2017 at 8:01 pm traitors first

        beauty was never meant to be mass-produced

        like how alchemy doesn’t work, you can’t make gold from lead no matter how similar ……….. no niggress will ever be a princess

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 8:30 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

        “English colonists respected that rule: you’re White or you’re not human.”

        Yes, we kept a tight lid on things. I never understood how those Spaniards were so successful at ruining their colonies through miscegenation.

        Like


    • N equals big brains and blond hairy ness.

      Like


  5. What a wonderful time to be alive.
    Just saying.

    Like


  6. I’d add something else to the mountain theory. Some of the most gorgeous women I’ve seen in my recent travels through America have been in the Colorado Rockies and the Pacific Cascades. It takes a high level of fitness to climb these giants.

    Like


  7. on September 7, 2017 at 4:08 pm Hackett To Bits

    OT: Twatter bans the post of a mother speaking out against the Teen Vogue anal sex guide (mentioned a few posts ago)…but shows the magazine editor’s photo of himself kissing a nog f*g and giving the camera the finger.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEtu_OYXsAA_ZEX?format=jpg

    Sick f*cks…

    Liked by 1 person


  8. Hard times make hard men. But apparently also make hot women/Bone Zones and therefore hard men.

    Soft times make weak men and Tacotoads…so “No Bone Zones?”

    Liked by 1 person


    • on September 7, 2017 at 4:30 pm Wrong Side of History

      Capitalism = entitled fatsos

      Communist bloodbaths = fine ass bitches

      i dunno that’s what I took from the email

      Like


      • No worries though.

        The upcoming hard times/interesting times will be such a bloodbath that hotness, like a Phoenix of myth, will rise from the ashes of the West.

        Please CH do forward some photos of hotness. When I close my eyes all I can see is Tacotoad, maybe scarred for life…

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 4:59 pm Captain Obvious

        Jane Fonda.

        Possibly the most beautiful celubtard ever to walk the face of the Earth. [And yes, her mind was poisoned by the Frankfurt School, but that was not her fault, it was her FATHER’s fault – Henry Fonda’s Epic Fail.]

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:00 pm Captain Obvious

        Young Monica Belluci

        Liked by 3 people


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:05 pm Captain Obvious

        Jayne Mansfield, reputed to have had a genius IQ, and mother of FIVE HUWHYTE CH!LDREN!!!!!

        Liked by 2 people


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:09 pm Captain Obvious

        Maureen O’Hara

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:13 pm Captain Obvious

        Megan Fox, before teh Poz.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:28 pm Captain Obvious

        Virginia Madsen

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:34 pm Captain Obvious

        Young Virginia Madsen

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:35 pm Captain Obvious

        Special Bonus Virginia Madsen

        [This entire sub-sub-thread could be just Virginia Madsen – whew.]

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:36 pm Captain Obvious

        LOL’ed.

        Like


      • Thanks for the save Captain O.!

        Will File under: the Once and Future Hotness of America

        Liked by 1 person


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:39 pm Captain Obvious

        Young Uma Thurman

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:55 pm Captain Obvious

        “the Once and Future Hotness of America”

        You know, it just dawned on me that my knowledge of “Pop Culture” ends circa “Smallville” [2001-2011], and that I know NOTHING of what originated in Pop Culture during the Ghey Melungeon Administration. I’m vaguely familiar with Taylor Swift & Hannah-Montana/Miley-Cyrus & Katy Perry, but generally speaking, if it’s not playing on AMC or Fox News, then I have no knowledge of it.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:56 pm Captain Obvious

        Erica Durance as Lois Lane

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 5:56 pm Captain Obvious

        Laura Vandervoort as Super Girl

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 6:00 pm Captain Obvious

        I still gotta say, Jane Fonda’s the most beautiful.

        But assuming that JF had a wretched personality, then I think the one who would have sucked me into her vortex & never let go would have been Virginia Madsen.

        Something about VM makes you fell like you’d be a willing prisoner in that [email protected]

        Liked by 2 people


      • on September 7, 2017 at 6:01 pm Captain Obvious

        feel like

        Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 6:05 pm Captain Obvious

        Although if Jayne Mansfield were really as smart as people claim she was, then it would have been pretty much impossible to pass up an opportunity to make [email protected] with her.

        Like


      • “I think the one who would have sucked me into her vortex & never let go would have been Virginia Madsen.

        Something about VM makes you fell like you’d be a willing prisoner in that [email protected]

        You, sir, are a man of taste and discernment.

        Like


      • The best part of the Jane Mansfield pic is the also hot (but comical look) Sophia Loren sitting next to her giving her massive tittays the stink eye, LOL! What’s up with that? She has this “is she really letting her jugs hang out like that in a photo” type look.

        In my mind’s eye, they kiss and made up and went back to Jane’s for a night of hot scissoring. ;-D

        Liked by 1 person


      • on September 7, 2017 at 10:17 pm Captain Obvious

        “In my mind’s eye, they kiss and made up and went back to Jane’s for a night of hot scissoring.”

        LOL’ed.

        BTW, I had a Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon moment a little while ago – I was trying to think of any other hawt babes I knew from recent popular culture, and I remembered that Sasha Alexander chick from the early days of NCIS, and a j00gled her, and it turns out that she has given birth to Sophia Loren’s grandchildren!

        Liked by 1 person


      • Jayne Mansfield is my vote.

        Footage discovered of Monica Bellucci vs Sophia Loren in bikinis fighting would kill the the internet however.

        Jane Fonda does have a manjaw though. Maybe you can’t separate the celetard from the physiognomy.

        Like


    • Huh. Never really noticed Jane Fonda’s manjaw before.

      Like


  9. Good Lord is that Jew repulsive.

    Like


  10. on September 7, 2017 at 4:30 pm Oliver Elkington

    Facial and of course body shape is of course very important when it comes to female beauty, i think we could say that those with broader faces and builds are less attractive than those with narrower faces and builds, that is why in Europe you will more likely find attractive women in areas like eastern Spain and Italy as opposed to less lean regions like north France, Ireland and Germany.

    Liked by 1 person


    • agreed

      like i mentioned in the last post. seems to be a connection between the level of beautiful women in a region and how nice their language sounds. countries where the love languages are spoken tend to have the prettiest women.

      they also have the most beautiful cities, poetry, art, music, etc.

      in contrast, germans, brits, etc are smart and have invented and mastered many technically advanced things but they aren’t what most people would call gifted in the arts.

      beautiful women inspire men to do beautiful things. ugly women, not so much.

      Like


      • on September 7, 2017 at 6:08 pm Captain Obvious

        “in contrast, germans, brits, etc are smart and have invented and mastered many technically advanced things but they aren’t what most people would call gifted in the arts”

        Uh. Yeah. Right.

        Certainly not Romantic in the least.

        Liked by 1 person


      • in contrast, germans, brits, etc are smart and have invented and mastered many technically advanced things but they aren’t what most people would call gifted in the arts.

        C’mon, Cracker… the long line of German composers alone put the rest of the world to shame. And what Mediterranean literature compares to Russian and English works in toto, barring a few notable exceptions that barely hold their own in comparison?

        Liked by 1 person


      • alright, you both have a point.

        should have thought it through before i posted.

        suppose it’s from growing up with a german mom and grandma who were mostly hard nosed and stoic. not artistic in any way shape or form. dad’s side is french and a tiny bit of italian. a lot of artists and musicians on that side of the family.

        i also had a big crush on my neighbor’s italian mom who was the opposite of mine. very artsy. didn’t hurt that she was hot.

        those early memories do taint our judgement sometimes don’t they. haha.

        Liked by 1 person


      • No worries, Crack… even the monkeys fall from the trees on occasion. 😉

        Liked by 1 person


      • CUCKstians respond to Banon

        ?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fbig-government%2F2017%2F09%2F07%2Fnolte-u-s-conference-bishops-absurd-response-steve-bannons-60-minutes-interview%2F

        Like


      • Definitely Cuckstians.

        Christians would have called for a Holy Crusade.

        Liked by 1 person


      • sure cukstians did not respond to (((feinstain)))

        https://twitter.com/i/web/status/905509581975166976

        Like


      • Say, Pontiff… since when do a bunch of interlopers that already have their own country qualify as equal in status to the Savior sent by God The Father to take on the sin of Mankind?

        And what about other Scripture, such as:

        Matthew 26:
        7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat.

        8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?

        9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.

        10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.

        11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


  11. The War of the Triple Alliance killed off like 80% of the male population of Paraguay. The women there are nothing special, several hundred years after that conflict.

    Like


    • They didn’t have much to start with.

      Like


      • My impression is that Paraguay and Uruguay had mostly European populations, and still do.
        Generally south of the Amazon
        Basin South America becomes genetically similar to Southern Europe. Argentina, Chile, the southeastern portion of Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay.

        Where I disagree most is that I find Paraguayan girls stunning.
        In general European South American girls are among the best in my opinion. They are open like Americans but aren’t wretched like most Anglo women of today.

        She’s from Venezuela but Marelisa Gibson (partial American heritage though) is one of the top women in the world to me.

        Like


    • Compare to Mexico.

      Like


    • Agree with Nads. You can’t shine turds.

      Like


    • What everyone else said… if your baseline gene pool is somewhere between garbage and average you won’t get higher than that.

      Like


  12. I can think of a select few areas where isolated humans had extended time and space to expand and not compete for resources, so the sex ratio was 1:1 for long periods of time.

    Australia comes to mind first. Aboriginal women are among the ugliest specimens on the planet. Please, no pictures to prove my point.

    Liked by 2 people


  13. Another OT: The Atlantic: The Uncomfortable Truth About Campus Rape Policy

    Astounding hamstering when a U Mass Amherst white female marketing student gets going at a party with a male with Ghanaian ancestry. “I started to move my hand down his chest and into his pants.” They don’t have intercourse and he is fine with that, but she decides she’s been sexually assaulted!

    Like


    • Endless cockamamie nuggets on what the Obama era with its emphasis on hiring Title IX “coordinators” to examine sexual discrimination wrought on campuses:

      “A training video on sexual consent for incoming students at Brown University included this stipulation: “Consent is knowing that my partner wants me just as much as I want them.” “

      Like


      • Consent used to be a marriage certificate & laughter from any judge receiving a complaint of “marital rape” or suit for divorce w/o cause, such as adultery, felony conviction, or incapacitation.

        Like


    • Since it was an Africoon I’m highly shocked she would even consider applying a false rape charge. And I’m doubly surprised the university wouldn’t question it. All the guy had to do was claim refugee status and he did not understand the cultural norms of this country and he’s 100% off the hook.

      Like


      • Yes the incident has the usual current-day colliding “intersectionality” of race, gender, sexuality, campus lunacy and star chambers.

        Like


  14. Therefore, I guess the massive influx of goat humpers from the middle east, and the deluge of spear chuckers from Africa, is going to cause women in Western Europe to totally grow hideous ? I’m not sure what the male to female ratio is currently, but adding millions of males will cause an imbalance. Is this correct ?

    Like


    • Some observers think the deluge will not result in children, given that so many “migrants” are male, but that overlooks the ability of the “migrants” to easily impregnate pozzed Euro females who are disgusted with their own men.

      Like


    • that’s already happening in a sense with the level of immigration we have now. the always growing black population and glamorization of blacks doesn’t help.

      the ugly slutty ill-mannered women who used to get passed over because they were bad wife/mom prospects can now get desperate white dudes, black, mexican, middle eastern men, etc who will take them.

      so yes, the way things are going now, we are in for a future full of ugly dumb crappy kids. i have faith that that will change over time as things shift in the right direction again. but for awhile that’s how it’s going to be.

      before anything else, we need that f*cking wall

      Like


    • Yes, and even faster than in CH’s example of simply high male Euro populations due to miscegenation and the resulting horrific malformed half-breeds that will result.

      Did you have a point here by the way? I can’t figure out if you are this confused or a snarky cunt. It ain’t good either way though…

      Like


  15. There’s a way to mimic the culling: expose men to mortal competition throughout life, and especially during youth.

    I’m sure smart readers can make suggestions.

    Like


  16. “a discussion about European female beauty and why it seems more often to float down from the mountain than emanate from the plain”

    I didn’t see this discussion, but I just came back from a 24-day vacation (a.k.a. cultural-aesthetic pilgrimage) throughout the Netherlands, Germany, and Switzerland, and I have the precise opposite conclusion.

    By far the most beautiful girls I encountered — the blondest, fairest, softest, most feminine, most clearly estrogen-rich in appearance — were in Holland and in Northern Germany, while, by contrast, the least attractive, by a long shot, were in Switzerland.

    Like


    • People in the Netherlands are, on average, very attractive (tall, too). If you took a family from the Netherlands and had them sit in a typical restaurant in the USA, people would probably stair at them like aliens, as that contrast would be so obvious. It is sad that, decade by decade, we are getting more use (out and about in our daily lives) to plain, and maybe even ugly, as being the norm.

      Like


  17. Interesting theory. I thought it might be something like mountain air is cooler and less humid, leading to less pestilence, thus ensuring that relatively long development times are not disadvantageous (which are needed for the gracile bone structure that makes white beauty so unique). My reasoning is, the longer bone growth occurs, the more susceptible it is to malformation from infection. Mountain people aren’t exposed to as many disease vectors as people in lower lying areas, so there’s more people with gracile features that survive to reproduce.

    Like


    • For thousands of years, people in the mountains had a tougher life, had to walk more, and had to work harder to survive. Only the strong survived, and the strongest took the best women by mutual choice (as the best women gladly went with the strong man with whom she had the best chance to have strong offspring, and to protect her).

      Liked by 1 person


  18. Not completely OT–en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svetlana_Kapanina, born 1968, well preserved, pretty blonde and Russian:

    Like


  19. fast forward to ca 13:00, cool aerobatics.

    Like


  20. African women hoe the soil year-round in the mild tropical climate, so they don’t need husbands. Thus they can still pick and choose which men to mate with even if the men are heavily outnumbered.

    Like


  21. she is unbearably ugly,she is a dyke and she is jewish but she is not Rachel Madcow
    her name is Masha Gessen

    ————————————————————————————-
    … As long as politicians consider it necessary to qualify the victims as “hardworking” or “talented,” they fail to stand up to the administration’s fundamentally hateful immigration agenda.

    … It’s not immigrants’ economic contribution that makes America proud; it’s its adherence to the words inscribed inside the base of the Statue of Liberty: “Give me your tired, your poor/your huddled masses yearning to breathe free” — from the Emma Lazarus poem that the White House adviser Stephen Miller waved away last month during a news conference on immigration reform

    If immigration is debated only in terms of whether it benefits the economy, politicians begin to divide people into two categories: “valuable” and “illegal.” When countries make people illegal, the world comes apart. When we agree to talk about people as cogs, we lose our humanity
    ——————————————————————————————–
    You could hardly imagine a more disingenuous (((piece of crap)))
    Is there anybody out there unable to see the pure anti white hate barely hidden behind the platitudes of highest order
    She came here from Russia (which she hates with every fiber of her degenerate being) and this is how she thanks the very people that gave her opportunity to rebuild her life

    Liked by 1 person


    • on September 7, 2017 at 6:45 pm The Philosopher

      I’m reading culture of critique that one of the posters here linked to. The Eastern European jews are by far the most poisonous bile inducing ones. German Jews and sephardic jews are almost pleasent in comparison.

      Sailer did a good post on Max Boot the other day. All the very worst jews are the ones from Eastern Europe.

      They should all have their reproductive organs ripped off and be deported before more whites, arabs and slavs have to die.

      Like


      • Sigh. Until you post a pic of yourself boning a HB9, I’m going to be inclined to believe that sex doll deflated from disgust. Find some other ethnic group to [[[hate]]]. Try the Kurds, they tend to smile, shrug, then cut you up instead of responding on blogs

        Like


      • we will, we will when Kurds meet the following prerequisites:
        1- call us white supremacist and nahzi
        2- work for 60 years in our destitution and import at least 50 millions of turds
        3- steal 6 gorrilion shakels from living and yet to be born
        4- build 156564 kurdocaust museums
        5- Imprison at least two(2) 88 years old grannies for denying kurdcaust

        This is are just basic prerequisite
        Upon these been met a much longer list will have to complied with
        before they are officially allowed to feel Saxon hate

        Liked by 1 person


      • on September 8, 2017 at 8:42 am The Philosopher

        I will not stop talking about jews yekke. And youre going to like it.

        Like


    • on September 7, 2017 at 8:26 pm traitors first

      FFS tacotoad now this …….. barf ……. thanks a lot
      I would have taken your word on how disgusting this creature (sorry creatures) is

      Like


    • Putin exiled her. She is a Bolshevik agent. That is why she gets air time at all. She should be put down like a Bolshevik as well. She also openly states the family should be eliminated and children raised communally for easier access. Pedophilia is never far behind with these people.

      Liked by 2 people


    • Like


      • on September 8, 2017 at 3:26 am Vagina dominator

        They are completely open about it these last few years. Foolish.

        When the collapse comes, and someone “white” comes to your town, thin and broken and offering to do anything for a crust of bread, ask him if he has picture identification from the old days.

        They will all need to prove they are not Jews. IF YOU CAN’T PROVE THAT, MOVE ON, KIKE, BEFORE WE MOVE YOU ON.

        Of course this low level jew thinks he is going to be one of the ones saved by the deep state and then installed to rule over the Broken States of America. What a surprise he will get.

        Like


    • I thought it was Hammond from Top Gear.

      Like


  22. […] the post “Exquisite European Beauty,” dated 6 September and made it the crux of its own post “Bone Zones,” dated 7 September […]

    Like


  23. Any of you gents seen the documentary Girl Model? It’s about these Japanese agencies that dupe 100s of beautiful Siberian peasant girls to come to Tokyo to work as models. They make promises of mega $$$ and Victoria’s Secret level fame, but it never pans out that way. What’s fascinating is how the japs have zeroed in on these remote taiga villages as beauty factories.

    Like


    • Asians, Japs and Koreans especially, are obsessed with European beauty. You can hate on them all you like but one thing I give them props for is that they freely admit as a culture that the northern Euro female is basically the gold standard of beauty across all cultures and times.

      They go to great lengths to achieve that look where they can even though genetics is solidly against them. I did see the film, sadly, because they do see the obvious and the demand for females like that is off the charts many of them end up as the upper echelon prostitutes. A far cry from fashion model sadly but pays much better than being a Siberian peasant, so they stay and endure it.

      I have heard stories anecdotal and personal from women (blond w/ blue/green eyes especially) who were gawked at the way the meso-Americans probably looked at Cortez when he arrived on their shores the first time.

      Like


  24. on September 7, 2017 at 6:49 pm The Philosopher

    I think its to do with K selection. The mountain stuff is incidental. Relative to the nutrition/health of their women, most men of all races would also get with most asian women or indian women but not blacks or central asian/jew/gypsy or other more R selected races.

    All you need to do is look at the homicide rate of a country to tell how beautiful its women are.

    The more masculine a country – the more female beauty is not needed as men can have multiple wives/concubines after murdering betas.

    Like


  25. on September 7, 2017 at 6:51 pm The Philosopher

    Monica bellucci.

    YES.

    Liked by 1 person


  26. […] Source: Heartiste […]

    Like


  27. I strongly suggest the younger set on here watch this video, as the speaker is of similar age group, which makes his experience easier to relate to. If you are still confused about the nature of etno-nationalism do yourself a favor and watch closely. Then make a decision: Join us in the great struggle, or disappear into the dustbin of history. We are waiting.

    Like


    • on September 7, 2017 at 10:10 pm Captain Obvious

      Stalin wasn’t a globalist – Stalin was a nationalist.

      He fought a Race War with the jews and WON.

      Like


      • on September 8, 2017 at 3:21 am Vagina dominator

        True cappie. He gets bad (((press))) because he stymied the Troskyites /globalists./walls street/jews. He was ceratinly a monster but he also gets all the blame for things such as the Holodomor, which was a Jewish genocide against Christians..

        Unfortunately, the Jews still managed to get WAW2 (ie., War Against Whites2) which overthrew the remnants of national self-rule after the first go around in WAW1.

        Like


      • Stalin’s wife was a Jewess .

        Like


      • on September 8, 2017 at 8:45 am The Philosopher

        Stalin was georgian more than russian. Interesting to look at that region of the world – georgians, armenians, gypsies and I suspect Khazars (i.e. ashkenazi jews). They are probably the most psychopathic areas of the world.

        Pumpkin Person made a good anaology that jews are high IQ gypsies. This is because they are gypsies, but the gyspies left the caucuses earlier.

        Like


    • Watched this, well done to this young man.

      Like


  28. Does this corollary remind you of a specific time and place?

    Innsmouth, as documented in “The Shadow Over Innsmouth”.

    It would seem the shadow is spreading.

    Like


  29. Talking about people looks, the Guardian is freaking out from the fact that AI computers can identify gay people by their faces with higher accuracy than human beings.
    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/07/new-artificial-intelligence-can-tell-whether-youre-gay-or-straight-from-a-photograph

    Like


  30. on September 7, 2017 at 8:24 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

    Off topic.

    Bettina Arndt – Sexual consent courses should teach ‘don’t get raped’ as well as ‘don’t rape’

    Like


  31. Beer, hot babes + MAGA!

    Like


  32. on September 7, 2017 at 8:50 pm traitors first

    OT but important
    Why does nobody ask how come antifa is so well organized and funded?
    Why are leftist hate groups and leftist hate organizations so well funded?
    Shouldn’t someone be following the money? https://dstormer6em3i4km.onion.link/what-the-media-wont-ever-ask-about-antifa/
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/01/flush-with-corporate-cash-splc-stashes-cash-overseas/

    Like


  33. 22 Key Goals Of Zionist Communism In America
    How Many Have Already Been Accomplished?

    http://www.rense.com/general96/commgoals.html

    Like


  34. War is dysgenic for men. The scummiest manipulators get the other men to die for them in wars — so if CH is positing that the neolithic managed to continue the paleolithic evolution of female beauty, he’s either saying that northern European men evolved into scummy manipulators or that there was some other kind of intrasexual selection going on that didn’t involve scum buckets manipulating other men to die for them so the scum buckets could have lots of hot pussy.

    Gee, what kind of intrasexual selection might nature have found other than war?

    [CH: hunting.]

    Like


    • Precisely — and in the Pleistocene, they would be lone hunters with their wolf symbionts cum dogs. Two such Pleistocene hunters would, when in conflict over the calories supplied by overlapping grounds, engage in strategic one-against-one man hunts that looked nothing like the ‘mano-a-mano’ fights portrayed by Hollywood at the end of just about every movie. This went on for at least 20,000 years and created the individual integrity that characterizes Euroman even today, after all the dysgenic pressures of “civil discourse” to get other fighting your wars for you while you fuck their wives at home.

      Like


  35. And it’s the EE city parks and village paths where ‘recruitments’ are made for the Tel Aviv slave trade.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on September 8, 2017 at 8:48 am The Philosopher

      Ive heard rumours about sex trafficiking and jews being prominent. It wouldnt surprise me as theyre also prominent in arms dealing, bribery of politicans, war crimes, insider dealing, pornography production, counterfeiting etc etc.

      Like


  36. Blue eyed people cannot live in hot climate.
    Germany, Spain, Italy are just nearer to the border.
    In biology of development face bones and melamine of the eyes predetermined from the same cell.

    Like


  37. Just to play devil’s advocate: if men were scarce and could have their pick of the hottest girls, wouldn’t that mean that girls at the hot end of the spectrum bred with men who were less attractive than they would have done, if men were plentiful? That would reduce the quality of the offspring – including females.

    [CH: presumably the surviving men were maximally fit reps of their sex.]

    Like


    • on September 12, 2017 at 12:48 pm Native Balkaner

      [CH: presumably the surviving men were maximally fit reps of their sex.]

      Not necessarily. The male and female offsprings of a population may develope in different ways , in response to the needs of its sexual market. We know that while the slavic women are beautiful , their men are nothing special.

      [CH: define “special”. because for men the nature of their specialness is a lot more complicated than it is for women.]

      So in a man shortage + female abundance scenario , the fenale have to stunners ro reproduce , while the men can afford to “slack off” (in terms of looks at least). That may be why nowadays in the West , men are more likely to do some sort of physical training and self improvement. Because they are highly disadvantaged in the sexual market.

      [the kind of men who survive say, mortal hunting injuries might be smarter, faster, stronger, or better leaders who delegate the most dangerous parts of the hunt to lesser men. or they might just be lucky, but we can say with some assurance that any major cull of men will disproportionately cull the less fit among them.]

      Like


      • CH comments: [we can say with some assurance that any major cull of men will disproportionately cull the less fit among them.]

        “Fit” according to what selection regime? Remember, culture is artificial selection. To the extent that we shape the culture in which we live, we shape the direction of evolution. For instance, if I have anything to say about it, when we finally get our act together and formally declare war, I’ll mandate that DNA samples, if not entire sequences be collected from all that must put themselves in harm’s way. That’s what the old European aristocracy used to do with their “courts” in which “sires” would “court” the “courtesans” and produce, shall we say, The Bastards of War. The loss of such human husbandry skills among the “aristocracy” is exactly why they no longer qualified as aristocracy.

        Like


  38. Some high altitudes also tend to be blue zone, aka Colorado. I suspect this may be an effect like that of hypobaric chambers, which are known to cure many chronic diseases. Most blue zones though are at the bottom of mountains or hills-extremely nutrient rich, alkaline water. Mountains are regularly deficient in nutrients having been washed down from eons of rainfall. The Swiss were famous for Cretinism, because of the iodine deficiency there. So its interesting that beauty might have developed there.

    Like


  39. You’re missing an ingredient.

    A boner favorable female to male ratio is a necessary but not sufficient ingredient for female beauty.

    Due to the outsized spermatazoa-to-ovum ratio and the longer sexual market viability of men, you can never truly skew the female-male ratio enough. There will always be men who will give the less good looking women a throw occasionally.

    Its not that given the choice of women, men only choose the most beautiful. No. Given the choice of women, men will choose all of them.

    Even the ugly, fat woman was 18 and do-able once. (Especially in the evolutionary environment we’re talking with lower obesity rates). And that’s all it takes. She’ll get knocked up and pass on those genes.

    What you need is an environment where women are dependent on men. This is most effectively imagined by food. If an African knocks up 50 women, its good for him. The women can gather food for her and the babies. He doesn’t have to see them ever again. An ancient Scandinavian does this, and all 50 women die on the frozen tundra with their fetuses and his genes die. They NEED him to win food for them because they can’t hunt or fish reliably and there’s no gathering to be done. (Now parlay this thought to racial differences in approach anxiety).

    It is good ratio, but also male parental investment and female dependence that creates beauty.

    Like


  40. “jabowery
    War is dysgenic for men. The scummiest manipulators get the other men to die for them in wars — so if CH is positing that the neolithic managed to continue the paleolithic evolution of female beauty, he’s either saying that northern European men evolved into scummy manipulators or that there was some other kind of intrasexual selection going on that didn’t involve scum buckets manipulating other men to die for them so the scum buckets could have lots of hot pussy.

    Gee, what kind of intrasexual selection might nature have found other than war?”

    Creating and operating the Federal Reserve Bank?

    Like


    • The scummiest manipulators get the other men to die for them in wars

      That’s a libertarian view of war, all right. That’s not reality. In reality almost all the men in a tribe would fight, including the leaders unless they were too old.

      scum buckets manipulating other men to die for them so the scum buckets could have lots of hot pussy

      Such libertarian bullshit. And you claim this would be the dysgenic part of war? Just how many women would those “scumbucket” rulers be able to take as wives and have children with? And you think every man who went out to war died, and that all the men who died did so without leaving children? Your own dogma keeps you from thinking for a moment.

      Most people who fought in the wars did not die, in fact. The most common result in a battle was for one side to break and run. Rarely were even half of those on the losing side killed, and definitely not half of those on the winning side. Conquerors usually wanted a surviving population that could work for them.

      Yet you claim that wars were a plan to eradicate all the men who fought so the rulers – with inferior DNA – could take all the women.

      Like


  41. At least for some peoples and places. Has endless bloodshed in Africa given rise to female beauty?

    As someone wrote, “Except in Africa” can be added to almost every observation of human behavior for greater accuracy.

    Below the Saharan desert the only competition was from dwarf people like the Pygmies, and the Blacks made short work of them almost everywhere. So there was no hard, millennia-long racial competition like for the peoples in Eurasia.

    Same goes for the aborigines in Australia. To a lesser extent, the islanders in South-East Asia and the Indians in North and South America. Those whose ancestors had moved away from Eurasia.

    But what about Arabs, with their lower IQ? They were separated from the rest of the continent by the desert on the Arabian peninsula. You had to know the water holes to survive there, so no invading army could hold the peninsula. (These people could only conquer a large territory later because of Constantinople’s increasingly religious twenty-year war against Zoroastrian Persia, devastating both empires. Then Jews and Christians in the Levant, whose religious practices differed from Constantinople and who were forced by the empire to conform, sided with the Arabs who gave them an alliance with religious freedom initially. This was crucial.)

    Like


  42. The bottom line is, the reason why the girls of the northern European plain (northern Germany, Holland, etc.) ARE actually far more beautiful than the girls in the Alpine countries is obvious: these, the northern areas, are the regions that were historically on the Germanic side of the Limes (the boundary of the Roman Empire) — i.e., outside the reach of the Roman Empire (thanks to the great victory of Arminius), and thus experienced less historical breeding with the darker peoples to the south, where the Romans ruled.

    By the time you get to the Alpine areas, the girls are darker skinned and generally less attractive because somewhere along the way, the Romans and the peoples of the Völkerwanderung bred with them and tinted them with their less Caucasian genes.

    Hey, I know “the Aryan look” is a cliche, but it’s true when you see in in real life: whiter, blonder, fairer really IS more beautiful, and that’s is the north, not in the Alpine regions (let alone even further south, where the darker taint is even more pronounced).

    Like


    • What you say is so blindingly stupid I think you’re actually a fag LARPing as a dude who likes women. Its the only explanation. Or, you’re seriously like, 15.

      Like


  43. CH, TacoToad twice in one week? You’re a hard dude.

    At least I found another use for those eclipse glasses.

    Like


  44. on September 8, 2017 at 11:44 am long dong silver

    The face isn’t the only thing. There is a gay/straight gait, posture and mannerisms. Dykes stand and move like men. Gays walk and move like women. You can tell a tranny by gait, posture and mannerisms even if they are post op and hormone’d into near femaleness. There is far, far more in play than the face. In non-verbal communication (of which physiognomy is only one dimension), the first cue one sees will direct to the next cue. I.e. if I see a someone standing from the back with shoulders back, one foot slightly in front of other, and arms crossed, my hind brain signals “that’s a man standing there.” If I approach this person and I see a face with poor female physiognomy, my intuition will signal there is something atypical with this person. From there, I will be to consciously assess verbal and self-identifying cues (e.g. dress, piercings, tats, etc) to identify that person as a dyke. If you thought about it, you could easily write an algorithm to predict sexual orientation to near 100% accuracy because it already exists in the human mind. I wonder, however, if gays can accurately spot a straight person. I would assume whatever is going on in their atypical brains must affect their ability to see sexual orientation. Gays seem to hit on straights quite often.

    Like


  45. […] Bone Zones    Why would female beauty emerge anywhere? Because there is a shortage of men, and women have to compete for men, which is not the usual thing. Where do women have to compete for men? Where the men are engaging extremely dangerous occupations and lots of them get killed, occurred in Northwestern Europe over the centuries. Working in the mountains, logging, mining, fishing in the North Sea, all very dangerous ways to make a living. Or in places where there has been sustained violent conflict and huge numbers of men were killed off. Beautiful women in Kiev? World War I, Red Revolution, Holodomor, Great Purge, Barbarossa, Nazi occupation … . All of Eastern Europe is similar. The Baltics were especially hard hit. […]

    Like


  46. http://www.ceacb.ucl.ac.uk/cultureclub/files/CC2006-03-07_Frost.pdf

    Frost, Peter. “European hair and eye color : A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection?” Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006)
    TL;DR Ice Age hunting is dangerous. Men could only support one or at most two women, so they picked the ones with the wildest hair (blonde, red, blue-black, brown) and eyes (blue, green).
    “Finally, almost all consumable biomass was in the form of large herds of
    migrating herbivores”
    @InLikeMe see you on the Gab

    Like


  47. I can’t remember a dumber post ay the Chateau and I’ve been reading regularly for about 2.5 years. What passes for a hypothesis here–some sort of hawtness geography–can be disproven so easily that I wonder what are CH’s real motives with this post. I come here for many reasons, including the ongoing conversation about HBD, but this was a real Tsar bomba and not in the good way.
    No one will discuss how its all wrong, bc disagreement is not tolerated at the Chateau and the commentariat is usually a bunch of CH blind-worshippers. This is to the dedetriment of this otherwise phenomenal site.

    [CH: do you deny that certain regions of the world produce more beautiful women than other regions produce?]

    Like


    • If you really have been here 2.56676345 years shlomo, you’ll see that GENUINE debate is encouraged. (((Agitprop))), concern trolling, low effort trolling etc is derided, as it should be.

      Like


    • on September 12, 2017 at 12:35 pm Native Balkaner

      [CH: do you deny that certain regions of the world produce more beautiful women than other regions produce?]

      Your hypothesis is interesting CH , but I think the climate + food of a region play a major role too. Over the course of centuries they affect and shape the appearance of the native population of the region in a certain way.

      [CH: sure, but the bigger effect is the underlying genetic architecture. some races are just more beautiful and some races are uglier.]

      Like