Tucker Carlson Grabs Ahold Of The Female Hypergamy Question

Carlson must have been reading manosphere blogs recently and swallowed a few Crimson Pills on his journey to becoming the real-est Realtalker on the TelaViv, because in his latest show he drops a truth bomb so big it caused feminists to shriek themselves to death.

No joke, I would vote for a Carlson/Coulter presidential ticket. There are few people who could trigger the shitlib gooniverse harder than does Trump, but Carlson might achieve it, and he does it with smarts and sureness of belief.

His main point — that cratering male wages in traditionally male occupations have reduced men’s marriage market value in the rural areas and small towns which voted heavily for Trump, contributing to a host of current social ills in those areas — is spot on, and something that we here at the Chateau have been banging on about for a long time.

When the State replaces men as the primary provider for women, then women, in effect, will marry the State (and fuck around with charming, undependable cads). Compassion creates more cads.

Carlson has broached the subject of female hypergamy — the third rail of sociosexual analysis — and the femcunts and soyboy lickspittles don’t like it.

In short, men date across and down, women date across and up. Men are primarily attracted to women’s looks, women are primarily attracted to men’s social and financial status (especially for long-term commitments). When men lose status, their women lose desire for them.

The beating heart of the Trump vote was a howl from men who have experienced an SMV decline — sexual and social market value declines brought upon them by anti-White pro-Diversity agitprop and nonWhite dispossession, the disappearance of male-oriented occupations that don’t require a facility with sitting still in an office chair all day, and the cheapening of their labor by foreign invaders scabs invited in at the behest of greedy corporate oligarchs.

And, as Carlson said, almost word-for-word recapping posts written at the Chateau, the female hypergamous instinct may be distasteful to contemplate, but it’s not going anywhere soon, because the sexes have innately competing reproductive goals. A smart, sane society understands this, and works to leverage the beneficial effects of that instinct rather than encourage its worst aspects.

Thankfully, Trump has managed to turn it around, a little. The manufacturing industry posted the biggest job gains in twenty years in 2018.

On the downside, there are still too many gains in education, health services, and hospitality, which translates to dead weight gibs for women and migrants, which ultimately has a corrosive effect on the marriage market for White men.

I would have to see the percentage gains for each occupational group over the last few years to determine if this is a blip or a real and lasting course correction. It’s great that manufacturing jobs have increased, but if the increase in Shrike Jobs is larger then the gains in manufacturing, than the benefits from the latter will be swamped by the negative consequences of the former.

A successful realization of MAGA means the top two occupation groups are at the bottom, and at least six of the bottom eleven occupation groups storm the top of the jobs gain chart.

***

Great comment from bigjohn33,

That was a very powerful piece by Tucker. I dont think it’s overly dramatic to say that speech has the potential to become a landmark historical event. This was an implicit call for white Americans to (presumably peacefully) overthrow the government. Tucker is clearly saying both political parties are working against the interests of normal (meaning white) men, their families, and descendents and their power over the People is illegitimate.

There are so many good quotes in there. I am greatly encouraged. There is hope yet. The metapolitical landscape is changing. I have never seen anything like this in the mainstream before. This is something new. This is what a revolution looks like.

Our ruling class is illegitimate. This is our battle cry.

***

Another great comment, from Screwtape,

There is another element of the invader labor problem: the erosion of the culture of work.

The ‘jobs Americans wont do’ lie is not just about depressed wages. It is about creating an environment that does not encourage and facilitate the matriculation of labor in the young heritage population.

The browing of physical and low-skill labor has accelerated the cultural decline of the value of hard work, of doing a job that is tough and often sucks, and of honing social and other skills in dealing with a work environment.

This has fed into the pussified, entitled, and soft generation who never had to work at mcdonalds or dig irrigation ditches. Like “good schools” all these prog white parents won’t subject their precious spawn to the brown hoards who dominate jobs that teenagers used to regulalry perform.

While I hardly blame them for that, there is more to a labor market than wages and the invaders have played a major role in the rite of passage of labor and incentives and ultimately, community and culture.

Mass nonWhite immigration destroys White culture. We may as well stop beating around the bush on this matter.





Comments


  1. “….the female hypergamous instinct may be distasteful to contemplate, but it’s not going anywhere soon, because the sexes have innately competing reproductive goals. A smart, sane society understands this, and works to leverage the beneficial effects of that instinct rather than encourage its worst aspects.”

    so what would a “smart, sane society” that leverages the “beneficial effects” of hypergamy look like? Dresden? Normandy? Berlin? Okinawa? Kursk? Gettysburg?

    Like


    • Touche’

      If muh boomers hadn’t dropped all them bombs and shot all them bullets and et up all the ice cream, we’d have colonies on Mars already.

      Like


      • Ordinarily-astute PJ and Greg have taken a figurative dump on the “front porch” of this excellent and important CH post.

        All you yeggs should listen to Tucker’s entire monologue. It’s a tour de force.

        [CH: yeah these two have gone bonkers on black pill overdosing. talk about missing the forest for the REEEEs]

        Liked by 5 people


      • If said post is truly “excellent and important”, a few wry observations about ongoing strawmen aren’t going to upend the message.

        And check your premises about ANYTHING “important” coming through the (((MSM))) megaphones… see below for how this noble effort by Tucker is, at heart, still solidly within the accepted Narrative.

        Like


      • no, PA. it is not a dump. we all need to be considering what harnessed-hypergamy produced in the past. other than the obvious upsides that were lost – beauty, order, fertility – (which nobody here seems to ever tire of idealizing) it also enabled the formation of large armies of pussy pedestalizing betas willing to do anything to fulfill their end of the social contract.

        “competing reproductive goals”?!? LMAO. yeah, Normandy and infinity Holocaust memorials really makes women want to “reproduce” don’t you find it an odd coincidence that the very types that followed orders and turned Dresden and it’s civilians to ash are the very same types of men that hypergamous women are now in the position to reject out of hand? where’s the real talk about THAT?

        Tucker and many others are merely scratching the surface, thinking they can go back to the past. WHICH past? the past forms a tapestry. if you bring back the social contract you have to bring back the ENTIRE thing, for both men AND women. and that means more beta male scorched Earth atrocities and feel good “progress” to appease the ladies so sneaky fuckers can get laid.

        the fact of the matter is, we’re in uncharted territory here and going back to the past (to repeat the same mistakes of the past) simply isn’t an option. that’s the ultimate realtalk that none of these realtalkers are talking about. we can’t. go. back..

        Liked by 4 people


      • the fact of the matter is, we’re in uncharted territory here and going back to the past (to repeat the same mistakes of the past) simply isn’t an option. that’s the ultimate realtalk that none of these realtalkers are talking about. we can’t. go. back..

        Well-said, pj… but I think several yeggs ’round chere, myself included, have often stated there’s no going back, and the seeds of the current malaise were planted long, long ago… any “Golden Age” was merely (as we now see) a germinating stage camouflaging the growth of “flowers of evil” ready to burst forth under the right type of (((gardening))).

        PA made a very astute comment the other day about how, in the past, White society always had a self-correcting governor mechanism, as it were, to balance out White extremes of thought and behavior.

        The influence of nonWhites of all stripes have thrown a monkey wrench (no pun intended, but you got one anyway) into that mechanism, and with the rising tide of color and (((influence))), there is undoubtedly “no going back”, once the tipping point of demographics has been reached.

        What a lot of otherwise RealTalkers haven’t taken to heart is the fact that we’re not going to vote, argue, reason, or meme our way out of this… and any alleged victories along those lines are NOT cause for celebration as significant… they’re little more than laughing at your foe because he happened to stumble slightly while marching to your imminent funeral.

        Liked by 2 people


      • “yeah these two have gone bonkers on black pill overdosing. talk about missing the forest for the REEEEs”

        so what does that “smart, sane society” look like CH, the one that harnesses the beneficial aspects of hypergamy, while avoiding the downsides of a duty-bound, obedient, beta male patriarchy? serious question.

        Liked by 1 person


      • [CH: yeah these two have gone bonkers on black pill overdosing. talk about missing the forest for the REEEEs]

        Niggah, please.

        CH, if you can’t be honest with your definitions either, well… this is why we lose, alt-R ally.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • You laugh, but no one born after 1964 will ever see one red cent of Social Security. Fucking Boomers are sucking the planet inside out for resources to support their lavish retirements. And bringing in IQ-55 Squatemalan goblins by the tens of millions to mow their lawns and empty their bedpans. “Hey Grandpa Boomer, don’t you care that you’re turning this country into Brazil?” “Apre moi le deluge, and let ’em eat cake.”

        Liked by 1 person


      • Anyone still claiming to be “alt-right” in 2019 is a faggot (no offense to anyone), im just pointing out the facts. Spencer=faggot who cant miss brunch and has literal satanist, leftist GF, RedIce=Pagan faggots, blonde, wall hitting b!tch with 0 children, prob gets fucked by jamals on the side, Daily Stormer is run by a MGTOW faggot who did a 180 after the synagogue of satan shooting, the Alt-right did not help any white person who got fucked in the charlotsville protest, etc etc..

        Tucker Carlson does more for the White man than these Alt-right losers have ever done. Anyone failing to see this is a low-iq retard.

        Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 11:15 am Oswald Spengler

      “what would a “smart, sane society” that leverages the “beneficial effects” of hypergamy look like? Dresden? Normandy? Berlin? Okinawa? Kursk? Gettysburg?”

      America, circa 1960.

      A nation with a unified, cohesive culture. A society with low levels of immigration, however, immigrants are expected to adapt to their host country, not the reverse. A society that is forward looking, self confident, with an elite that still basically loved their country and its citizens more than yhe rest of the world.

      Liked by 3 people


      • 1960? That was a society well in the grip og the (((bastards))) already.
        You have to go much further back to get the proper setting for good demographics.
        Maybe Edward Longshanks in 1290, og Isabella of Castille in Spain in 1492. The latter did not really get rid of them, though.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on January 5, 2019 at 5:31 am terryegrafed7039

        America, circa 1960: High marginal tax rates for high-income individuals and corporations; widespread union membership; massive government spending on a (worthwhile) space program and a jobs program called the Cold War? You mean THAT America, circa 1960?

        Liked by 1 person


      • Give me America 1960 please …

        Liked by 1 person


      • Left out the gold standard Terry.

        Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 4:15 pm Captain John Charity Spring MA

      This has to be a trick question. None of these cities were hit with the Nigtron Bomb. All are pleasant cities to carouse in still.

      What of Detroit, St Louis, Chimpcongo, New Orleans and Ookland?

      Liked by 2 people


      • on January 5, 2019 at 7:43 am Big Dick Bandit

        while the rent is climbing from migrating San Franciscans who themselves are priced out, Oakland is fucking fantastic. our public schools are great, it’s clean (not tough to do when San Francisco is a point of comparison, but still) and fun in a way that even the 65 year olds on this site would appreciate–see Lake Merritt.

        keep bedwetting over scary blacks tho!

        [CH: the only good part of oakland is rock ridge, aka whiteyville]

        Like


    • why we lose-

      case in point. British soldier gets attacked and run over by fuckin paki muslims in his own country because they heard he’s a soldier.

      Tommy Robinson is on some social media with the SAME “can you imagine if…” bullshit WHINING about how there is a double standard or something.

      what happened to calling for immediate revenge? no, instead we get boo hoos about how the other side are the REAL racists or…something about how if the races were reversed, somethingorother.

      oh, and to respond to Gayg- your parents’ generation destroyed the other societies, YOUR GENERATION destroyed ours. fuckin boomer cuck jesus freak locust

      Like


      • tommy robinson is a jew

        Like


      • He really ain’t, But he might as well be.
        I suspect a certain demographic, possibly in collusion with out own alphabets (beginning in MI) “solved” his domestic financial/jail problems for him, et voilà!
        Mr Stephen Yaxley- (a wurzelly village off the A1 in Cambs.) -Lennon (Oirish>Scouse, as ye all ken) morphs into ‘Tomi Robinstein’, greatest ally.

        Like


      • Which soldier? I only know about Trooper Rigby, targeted and chopped up by a pair of nigger muslims who’d defected from their African parents’ Christianity in one, or both cases, I believe.

        The usual reason is these useless parasites are invariably “mentally ill”, i.e. normal for Africa, like the last one at Christmas in Manchester (some species of wog) or the guy on the Guildford train stabbed to death in front of his son a few days ago
        Black as satan’s ass, dressed all in black, white trainers, mysteriously escaped of course, even though it was lunchtime and every corner of the train, the stations and streets down there positively glitter with hi-def CCTV lenses (and microphones).

        @Er Indoors was spooked by a groid chuntering away to himself “on the phone” about the Bible and “people who deserved to die” some 2 years ago on that very same train.
        Reported it to Transport Police. Can you guess what they said?
        “Oh yeah we know who that is”.
        And that was that.

        tl;dr “They” are doing this on purpose. To justify their methods, and to terrify and demoralise the natives. There’s only one way out now.

        Like


      • oh, and to respond to Gayg- your parents’ generation destroyed the other societies, YOUR GENERATION destroyed ours. fuckin boomer cuck jesus freak locust

        My parents were immigrants from Europe, lucky to be alive… so there’s one more fail to your ever-growing list.

        My particular generation gave life to your generation, and all you did with it was put the finishing touches on the West.

        Go out and fuck some more n1ggers, asshole, and cry about how the boomers ate all the ice cream.

        Like


      • My parents were immigrants from Europe, lucky to be alive

        Holocaust survivors, I presume.

        BTW, my grandpa Schultz also almost died in a concentration camp: the poor man fell off a guard tower.

        Liked by 5 people


      • Recycling my jokes now? That’s okay, a good tale bears retelling.

        And no, my parents weren’t no renegades from any KZ. Funny how the concept of “survivor” automatically knee-jerks even the alt-R mind towards muh Hall Of Costs.

        Like


      • Recycling my jokes now?

        Don’t be ridiculous. I’d never recycle such Borscht belt garbage as you shit out.

        Seriously, though, why shouldn’t I recycle them? You’ve dug them out of the ol’ recycle bin about ten times before shitting them out here. (I first read that material when I was on fucking dial-up.)

        Liked by 2 people


      • I’ve always admitted many of my jests were (ahem) borrowed. But I brought ’em ’round chere first.

        I’d go back and find the original post, if’n I thought one of youse yeggs would admit you’re wrong. lz0zlz0lz

        Like


      • I’d go back and find the original post, if’n I thought one of youse yeggs would admit you’re wrong.

        OK, Greg. If we all admit we were were wrong, will you go away and stop shitting this place up with your ridiculously unjustified conceitedness and faggy Ivanhoe dialect?

        Because if you will, then I was wrong. I was more wrong than anyone in the history of the universe.

        Liked by 1 person


      • How about you just kiss my ass?

        Look, I understand that it’s annoying to keep getting smacked around every time you try to put a burr in my saddle, but the solution is to just STFU and not keep trying to match wits with your betters.

        And some of the other half-wits ’round chere need to learn that lesson too.

        Gods of the copybook headings 101: Don’t start no shit and there won’t be no shit.

        Like


      • How about you just kiss my ass?

        Look, I understand that it’s annoying to keep getting smacked around every time you try to put a burr in my saddle, but the solution is to just STFU and not keep trying to match wits with your betters.

        And some of the other half-wits ’round chere need to learn that lesson too.

        Gods of the copybook headings 101: Don’t start no shit and there won’t be no shit.

        Like


    • The smart, sane society would “look like” the high middle ages, what the Enlightenment kikes call “dark.” Christendom prior to Gutenberg was the pinnacle of humanity and civilization (cf. Chesterton, Lewis, Tolkien), although I suspect few even have the capacity to grasp that truth since it has been propagandized against for centuries.

      We are too programmed to be enamored by technology to understand its soullessness and propensity for evil (see the game discussion infra). Without the enkikenment, we would still have the technology, except our moral/political capacity wouldn’t have unnecessarily been frittered away by bien pensants who insisted nihilism was the price of “””progress.”””

      The smart, sane society sublimated both hypergamy and manliness into stable institutions which yielded joy and blazing creativity, institutions whose capital we are still living off today, like niggers banging bones on a nuclear cooling tower long after we have forgotten not just how to split the atom, but what atoms are. (h/t some long forgotten anon internet wag…)

      Let me correct myself — we wouldn’t have just retained the technology, which is at best incidental and at worst contrary to liberalism, we would have been generations ahead. (We will have had a fifty-year head start in July of this year, and today the Chinks are colonizing the moon.) You’ve heard of Cyberpunk or Steampunk? Call it Cybermonk. Amid all the faggoty lycra-jumper multiculti Star-Trek fantasies of the future we are burdened with, the true stroke of the imagination is to extrapolate not from this fifty-year Marxist nadir but rather from the heights of Chartres eight centuries ago, which we have allowed to desiccate under the false-guilt-prompted attempt to raise shit-brown hordes above their white-instilled ressentiment.

      Allowing ourselves to decline is first a failure of imagination. We need an entirely new science-fiction based not in the loser inclinations of noodle-armed nerds but myth-making poets in the model of Bronze Age Pervert and Alt-Right Fan Fiction and Donald Trump’s Space Force. We failed when we substituted the saints and gods of history immemorial with superheroes and tech-geeks, who serve the same function but eschew the possibility of mystery.

      We can’t aim until we identify the target.

      Liked by 8 people


      • Practically speaking, this would mean Liberalism in One Class Only — which we used to call royalty. Life’s instinct for hierarchy is “older than trees” — J. Peterson. Aristocracy plus Christendom’s noblesse oblige and balance of political and religious powers constitute the peak capacity of mankind in all its disparate (diverse!) inequalities. Equality ironically can only be found in the equality of dignity along “The Great Chain of Being”! The yeoman who fulfills his final cause qua yeoman is the equal to the king as king, with relative positioning along the hierarchy offsetting power with responsibility — “uneasy lies the head that wears a crown.”

        The meaning of Christian equality, long ago (((hijacked))) and (((hidden))) from the men who taught you:

        For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ. For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit.

        For the body does not consist of one member but of many. If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. If the whole body were an eye, where would be the hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell?

        But as it is, God arranged the organs in the body, each one of them, as he chose. If all were a single organ, where would the body be? As it is, there are many parts, yet one body.

        The eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you,” nor again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.” On the contrary, the parts of the body which seem to be weaker are indispensable, and those parts of the body which we think less honorable we invest with the greater honor, and our unpresentable parts are treated with greater modesty, which our more presentable parts do not require. But God has so adjusted the body, giving the greater honor to the inferior part, that there may be no discord in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together.

        Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it. And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, then healers, helpers, administrators, speakers in various kinds of tongues. Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? Do all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? But earnestly desire the higher gifts.

        And I will show you a still more excellent way.

        — 1 Cor 12:12-41

        Liked by 5 people


      • on January 5, 2019 at 5:35 am terryegrafed7039

        TL; DR: Beef up the space program. NOBODY should be beating us there.

        Like


      • King-The meaning of Christian equality, long ago (((hijacked))) and (((hidden))) from the men who taught you:……..

        The collective ‘churches’ abandoned the anointing of members of the body by the Spirit for certain tasks, and have instead instituted a Rotary Club type of mentality for church ‘leadership’.

        Ex: Jim the blue collar worker, filled with the Spirit and dedicated to Christ in all aspects of his life, will almost always be passed over for election as an elder because he doesn’t have a ‘degree’ etc. But they’ll vote in white collar corporate middle-management types in a heart beat without any real vetting because he’s employed by some large well known local business, healthcare company, bank, etc. Because that fits our superficial view as to what’s successful in our mammon driven society.

        And these middle-management types are perfect as far as Satan is concerned. They won’t rock the boat by causing any controversy by standing on the Word of God, and will green-light a host of Madison Ave style marketing campaigns to promote church ‘growth’. Spiritual maturity of the body of believers be damned, it’s all about the numbers!

        It really is a sad state of affairs.

        Like


      • My sister fucked a n166r, and slanteye’s on the moon
        Chapeau a Gil Scott Heron

        Like


      • King, your rare view of the “Dark Ages” is very refreshing. I have often thought the same. Many accomplishments of this civilization were not equalled since, despite pretensions to the contrary.

        Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 11:22 pm Skyscraper of flesh

      You should learn to stop internationalist agitation for war rather than blaming it on the only societal structure that works synergistically with nature.

      Why did the Christmas truce happen if any of the men on the frontlines wanted to be there simply for the sake of violence and acquiring controlled female hypergamy? Try arguing that the only system that accounted for this wasn’t forced into war by Russia, France and Britain Internationalists and communists terrified at the absolute refutation of their slave societies. I’ll wait.

      Liked by 1 person


      • “the only societal structure that works synergistically with nature.”

        hahahaha! works synergistically with nature. that’s a good one. the black plague also “worked synergistically with nature”. has it ever occurred to you that there are limits to what harnessed hypergamy can accomplish, just are there are limits to UNharnessed hypergamy can accomplish?

        if harnessed hypergamy was so in-line with nature then why was it such an easy, low hanging fruit to pluck once our societies reached the right moment. it fell like a house cards, helped along by a lot of beta males and civilization wreckers who ALSO thought they were working “synergistically with nature.”

        “Why did the Christmas truce happen if any of the men on the frontlines wanted to be there simply for the sake of violence and acquiring controlled female hypergamy?”

        oh right… the Christmas Truce. the exception that proves the rule. smdh. here’s a better question: how were they able to get so those men to the front lines in the first place? they certainly didn’t drag them there in chains. now if the Christmas Truce had happened on Capitol Hill, where guerilla armies fought out it on their home turf, with one side refusing to go overseas to kill their brothers, while the other tried to force them to go… now THAT would be something.

        but that’s not how it went…is it? because the social contract doesn’t say “you get a wife for fighting for your own tribe”. it says “you get a wife for doing what your told”. and despite the ONE DAY Christmas Truce, these men still did what they were told.

        further, if the Christmas Truce had gone on for a week, you think TPTB (who are SO totally working synergistically with nature) would have stood for that?

        “Try arguing that the only system that accounted for this wasn’t forced into war by Russia, France and Britain Internationalists and communists terrified at the absolute refutation of their slave societies. I’ll wait.”

        erm… that wasn’t my point. how would you get legions of starry-eyed men, clueless about their parasitic overlords, clueless about the nature of women, to go out and ultimately IN FAVOR of slave societies, killing their own brothers in the process, WITHOUT harnessed-hypergamy? it’s impossible. the two systems go together.

        so perhaps the old system of harnessed-hypergamy => obedient males WASN’T actually working synergistically with nature ANYMORE, and it was due for a major culling/revision, and that what we’re living in now is the aftermath of a system that sustained itself and our societies for as long as it could…

        Like


      • Jeez…he cites the Christmas Day truce.

        British and German men were chomping at the bit to go fight. Read Mein Kampf.
        Men invade, fight and fuck.

        That’s real competition. .not faggy professional sports with faux masculine behavior

        Like


  2. Tucker’s 16 minute opening monologue on Wednesday night is absolutely must-watch material. He nailed everything. His point about women not wanting to marry lower-earning men is of course true. If memory serves, I read here at CH that North Dakota has the highest white birthrate in America and it is because of the high-earning men in oil field jobs.

    Liked by 1 person


  3. Tucker has just gotten better and better in the past year. My wife’s favorite show. My mistress likes him too.

    Liked by 10 people


  4. Tucker is spot on. I wish some of my gung-ho Republican friends got it like he does. They thought I was crazy for liking Bernie Sanders over all the GOPers except for Trump … they still don’t get it

    Liked by 2 people


  5. Dis nigga better watch his back, real talk. He is spitting WAAAAAY too much truth these days and you know in Sodom on Potomac that is going to get you an “unfortunate and horrifying accident nobody could have predicted”.

    This may come in the form of your car losing it brakes, a fall down a long flight of steps, or even a double tap self inflicted gunshot wound to the BACK of the head. You had juuuust enough willpower to pull the trigger again after your brains were already on the wall.

    Liked by 9 people


    • He’s still only saying what is allowed to be said, otherwise (((they))) would have pulled his megaphone a long time ago.

      And why is this particular piece of the red pill allowed to be said?

      Because it merely deals with

      a) economics

      and foremost

      b) White men are falling behind the times, whining and running scared, and can’t get laid (mårried).

      C’mon, mah yeggs… this isn’t a comeuppance of female hypergamy that’s going to hit THEIR heart of darkness.

      This is doubling-down on the White Men Fading agitprop, although Tucker’s intentions might be noble and meant to rebuke the Synathedral.

      [CH: this is a morbidly black pill even for you greg. first, if what tucker was saying wasn’t novel or courageous then we wouldn’t hear howling from the left wing mob, but we do. a lot of howling. because carlson hit the target. he said things that respectable pundits don’t say, and never will say because they are cowards and enemies of the people. second, on the topic of female hypergamy i can’t think of ONE TV personality, off the top of my head, who has mentioned the subject, even tangentially. Just because Carlson isn’t dropping 1488 bombs doesn’t mean he isn’t pushing Overton to the breaking point.]

      Liked by 5 people


      • Gotta agree wit da GE. It’s great TC is warming up, but I see it as couched in The Narrative.
        I did burst out laughing at, “happy to fight malaria in the Congo.”

        But true real-speak? Anyone at all who will say – time to put a check on female behavior and save the White Race? We’re not there yet.

        Like


      • It’s allowed to talk about the symptoms… and maybe even blame ’em on Reps and Dems… or muh economy…

        … but you aren’t going to hear Fox News… or ANY person with an (((MSM))) megaphone… speak of necessary radical procedures for treating the malaise… which is difficult when you aren’t allowed to even name the virus.

        Like


      • I disagree. He spoke in the kind of language that challenges people whi rarely think to think.

        Dont discount the main thrust of his address: the direct hit on the country’s mercenary leadership class.

        I was about to cringe, admittedly, when he started talking about inner cities but he then took that in a good direction.

        Liked by 3 people


      • on January 4, 2019 at 12:24 pm Carlos Danger

        What is your solution then? I agree with PA here. The biggest problem is too few people want to admit the current paradigm is rotten, that is willfully destructive. Most people avoid thinking about these issues because it makes them nervous and angry. Tucker broke through that comfort zone and spoke well.

        Liked by 4 people


      • Tucker and Coulter are doing what we can’t do. They’re shattering the hypnosis on the normies as far as they can go. They’re also doing work that some of us (such as myself) don’t have the patience for.

        Sure, they’re not an endpoint, but they’re preparing the soil while the steely-eyed fanatics lurk in the background, biding their time and counting the seeds that need to be planted.

        Liked by 4 people


      • Maybe I’m being naive, but nearly all the folks I know are already aware of these alleged “bombshells” that Tucker mentions… several of us have been having these conversations for decades now about how the eroding of male occupations and wages, ESPECIALLY with the entry of women and other cheap labor, are upending the normal order of things in re relationships and mårriage.

        If youse yeggs say that “normies” are waking up because of this Tucker fellow, then I’ll defer to your superior experience… but I don’t see it because most post-40 ‘normies’ already know about these things, but are impotent to do much as individuals except keep their own houses in order, while the rest remain in their loved Egyptian nights of n1ggerball and porn and fast food, and twenty Tuckers broadcasting 24/7 FIRMLY WITHIN THE NARRATIVE of muh economics and (subtly) “White men are falling behind” aren’t going to budge them an inch, except to MAYBE vote for a Trump when the booth curtain is closed and they don’t have to say it out loud.

        So pardon my breathing if I speak with an air of “been there, done that, got nuthin’ but a T-shirt”.

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 1:45 pm Pretty Boy Looch

        Gayg could ruin a keg party in heaven.

        Liked by 7 people


      • ” their loved Egyptian nights of n1ggerball and porn and fast food, and twenty Tuckers broadcasting 24/7 FIRMLY WITHIN THE NARRATIVE of muh economics and (subtly) “White men are falling behind”

        That’s my experience as well.
        Great question CD-

        It needs to be something simple, repeatable, and strike at the heart of the issue. One thing I use to measurable success against libtard acquaintances is:

        “I don’t care how much you preach or how many studies you have. You will never convince me I should hate myself. I don’t care if my ancestors captained the S.S. Negro-hauler. You will never convince me I should be ashamed or hate myself.”

        I usually also add, “And if you’re teaching your kids to hate themselves, they should be taken from you and placed with loving families.”

        Open to suggestions. Works so far for me.

        Liked by 4 people


      • Says the sock who recently squawked about not seeing any “black queens” on the Beauty thread.

        Begone, shill… your only apparent mission ’round chere is to litter the chateau with your n1gger bullshit and then get smacked around by your betters.

        No way to go through life, son.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 2 people


      • Be patient. We’re currently living through the first waking moments of the DOTR. I’m actually surprised at how fast things are changing considering it took a century to get us into the current mess, and we haven’t even gotten out of bed yet.

        It’s too early to tell if the memes are working but at any rate, don’t let people on teh interwebs convince you to put down your sword.

        Liked by 2 people


      • What’s this keg talk, PB Mooch?
        Would’ve thought you’d be sipping on Colt Fowty – Five

        Liked by 2 people


      • on January 4, 2019 at 3:05 pm Carlos Danger

        Gayg could ruin a keg party in heaven

        You got that right Mah Nigga!

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 4:06 pm Carlos Danger

        FE, I think you need to emphasize the great civilization we created more. WE owe them NOTHING! They follow us around like dogs to live at our expense and we let them do it. Jim Crowe forced them to earn it themselves and that was the wisdom in it. You had a thriving albeit small black professional and middle class. Coons took care of their children more, and had intact families to a far greater extent. Welfare destroyed all of this. That was also deliberate.

        Liked by 1 person


      • [CH: this is a morbidly black pill even for you greg. first, if what tucker was saying wasn’t novel or courageous then we wouldn’t hear howling from the left wing mob, but we do.

        Please.

        I already explained it all in other posts, so I won’t bother repeating it within the same thread.

        It was neither novel nor courageous, but because we White folks of the woke persuasion have been starved for something, anything resembling RealTalk from the (((MSM))), even this small victory appears as if something to shout from the rooftops to youse yeggs what haven’t been around as long as some of us who have taken these things as common knowledge since the eighties.

        If memory serves, you even found Dynamic Silence to be somewhat novel, although that term and practice had been around since baby boomers were babies.

        In short, don’t exaggerate the idea black-pill, or mistake old-hat common knowledge due to inexperience.

        Like


      • Only a n1gger would even think of a keg party in heaven… and of course, Danger Dweeb rushes in to thank him for such a pointless burr in Eliot’s saddle.

        You fucks are worse than high-school cooze, and THIS is why we lose.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • JFC, gayg you are a repulsive eeyore boomer lickspittle chump.

        all you do is fucking bitch, take shits all over the comments section, pontificate like every other fucking insufferable boomer, and have NOTHING WHATSOEVER POSITIVE or CONSTRUCTIVE to offer or add, AGAIN like a typical fuckin boomer.

        All you have is your fucking attempts to seduce people into your religious death cult which ALSO OFFERS NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE, which is why people are abandoning it in droves.

        Tucker gives a very fine soliloquy and you just SHIT ON IT.

        because people like you (of course, the center of the world boomer) have been saying it for…ever or since last week or…something.

        and know what? YOU AIN’T ON TV. You did NOTHING. You took NO RISKS.

        Carlson risks his entire career going down this path- you risk…nothing.

        you’re a fucking coward from a generation of cowards, you faggot. Drop dead already.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Cripes, FastEddie, Greg … enough with the detailed negativity, already. It’s as draining as the guys who show up on other forums occasionally who date the collapse of White civilization to the end of the Middle Ages or something, even though the Europeans would be triumphant for another half-thousand years after that.

        Haven’t heard this much croaking since I lived next to a swamp full of frogs six years back. Lighten up, guys.

        Hell, at this rate, you’re going to drive me back on board the Trump train despite all the glaring lost opportunities said railway has racked up.

        Liked by 1 person


      • JFC, gayg you are a repulsive eeyore boomer lickspittle chump.

        all you do is fucking bitch, take shits all over the comments section, pontificate like every other fucking insufferable boomer, and have NOTHING WHATSOEVER POSITIVE or CONSTRUCTIVE to offer or add, AGAIN like a typical fuckin boomer.

        All you have is your fucking attempts to seduce people into your religious death cult which ALSO OFFERS NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE, which is why people are abandoning it in droves.

        Tucker gives a very fine soliloquy and you just SHIT ON IT.

        because people like you (of course, the center of the world boomer) have been saying it for…ever or since last week or…something.

        and know what? YOU AIN’T ON TV. You did NOTHING. You took NO RISKS.

        Carlson risks his entire career going down this path- you risk…nothing.

        you’re a fucking coward from a generation of cowards, you faggot. Drop dead already.

        If I wasn’t locked out of my dummy email account right now, I’d register a wordpress account for the sole purpose of upvoting this comment.

        Many thanks for posting this. I, and I’m sure many others, have received a great deal of vicarious catharsis therefrom.

        Liked by 1 person


      • A tedious boomer but I repeat myself
        There are legions of them pontificating as it was 1968 out there
        At each fucking corner you step on the shit of their making yet they keep accusing you of having filthy shoes

        Liked by 2 people


      • One other function of Tucker & Coulter is that they can kick Trump in the ass when he wavers. Our opinions are invisible to him. They may fail to influence him enough in the end, but they’re at least at a level where he’s likely to actually see the message, at which point it’s up to him to act on it or ignore it as he sees fit.

        I’ve been in a state of rage over the symbolic flop that is No Wall for over a year, and that has less effect on Trump than the squeak of an angry dust mite in Hoboken. However, Coulter’s sneer went direct to his eyeballs.

        Even if they’re saying nothing we don’t already know, they’re saying it on a billboard in front of Donaldo’s eyes. Whereas we can scream it until we’re blue in the face and not a whisper of it will ever reach the ear of Ivanka’s Thirteenth Assistant Ass-Kisser.

        Liked by 4 people


      • on January 4, 2019 at 11:29 pm Skyscraper of flesh

        I tend to agree with you. I hope this is him out for blood after a jew destroyed his career on CNN, but my instincts, which are almost never wrong, tell me that this is their sadistic tendency to brag about what they are doing and give a semblance of hope only to take it away. The culture in this country has been removed and transformed to protect them from any political angle, only guerrilla tactics like turning metoo against them work to a certain extent.

        The only real way to solve this problem is put them in a situation they can be semi-permanently expunged for a few hundred years. That means winning the upcoming civil conflict and installing our own government in a newly formed country and creating a new white identity there. It sucks, by why just make pussy submit when you can make the world submit? We have to return their level of destruction in kind to win.

        Liked by 3 people


      • Well, if the Truth about staying within the Narrative is so painful to youse yeggs, and you believe this was a watershed moment in (((MSM))) history, then I can’t help you.

        Dismiss it under the muh-boomer-et-mah-ice-cream adolescent mentality ’round chere of all-too-many wanna-be stalwarts (heh, talk about shitting on allies and missing the point!) if you wish, but that’s your hang-up, not mine.

        The alt-R is so starved from something/anything that they’ll tout Fight Club as a manly primer, not seeing the ghey for the trees… and now they’ll clap an (((MSM))) talking haid on the back for telling us that muh economics needs to be addressed because the White man can’t get laid.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • Liked for CH point

        Like


    • Yes, unfortunate accidents happen. Probably another notch on the Hillabeest’s record. The world howled when Pinochet disappeared people. But the Hillabeest is allowed to operate without much comment, no hue and gnu.

      Like


    • … that is going to get you an “unfortunate and horrifying accident nobody could have predicted”

      [Trump leaning into the mic and saying:] Wrong.

      It’s no doubt prudent to prepare for the worst, but purveyors of los pills de negros always leave out the idea of expecting the best, which sustains morale.

      Let’s consider the starker example of Trump himself. If something of this gruesome nature were to happen to the singular figure of American hope in the modern world, the reaction would be many multiples of what it would have been if they allowed the man to continue his God-ordained mission. It wouldn’t even matter if it were truly an accident. His role as Focal Point of All Hope for millions of Shitlord-Americans would not dissipate but rather concentrate still more potently in the memory of his martyrdom. For Tucker it is the same but on a smaller scale. For obstacles short of death such as impeachment, likewise the same but smaller scale.

      I have already found and planted the tiniest mustard seed which suffices for me — and maybe you’ll laugh, but — I have seen it in how quickly “Happy Holidays” has been dispatched and replaced by “Merry Christmas” following the merest virtual nod from The Presidentissimo. It is something we were already primed to do, and we just needed a signal of official pushback to reclaim that tiny cultural space without a shot. Most important, however, is how it demonstrates that the Leftist Ratchet no longer obtains. If that hateful mandate is so easily reversed, then they all are.

      Figure out what the promising development of the last three years is for you, and hold onto that pearl of great price, even while the pessimists join the hateful in their premature funeral dirges for American manhood. The reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated.

      If they start knocking off high-profile and effective allies of ours, the gloves will truly come off. They’re smarter than attempting to pull an Andrew Breitbart “heart attack” in the age of Trump, or they are too gutless knowing what pogroms would ensue. I believe 30-60 million American men are just waiting for an official nod a la “Merry Christmas.” And then a merry time will be had by all indeed.

      While blaqpillers like Greg denigrate this idea as “waiting for a permission slip,” the truth is that it is a feature of the discipline of white men, 1) to keep one’s powder dry, and then, once the dogs are let slip, 2) to “make a desert and call it peace,” i.e., kill and kill and kill until the enemy understands the meaning of the word “unconditional.” Solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant. — Tacitus

      Waving a bloody shirt will only accelerate the reckoning/eschaton/Ragnarok.

      Liked by 4 people


      • “Most important, however, is how it demonstrates that the Leftist Ratchet no longer obtains. If that hateful mandate is so easily reversed, then they all are.”

        This is indeed the most important development. It’s like the moment Xerxes witnesses his own blood and realizes, horrified, that he is no god and that he’s in imminent mortal danger.

        The pearl of great price for me is how Trump dismantled public trust in the MSM. He smoked out the enemy. He’s done irreparable damage to a legacy institution that has gotten WAY too big for its britches.

        Liked by 1 person


  6. on January 4, 2019 at 11:32 am Carlos Danger

    We need to get the AA imperium under control. It is a cornerstone in driving men from the workplace. SF recently removed all experienced firemen from consideration for their new Fire Chief position in order to benefit the special people on the left. Not a single experienced man was even considered for the position. This has become a trend everywhere to disastrous effects. I have Never seen a good female manager. Most are disastrous.

    Liked by 10 people


    • Actually, there are some good female managers. Margaret Thatcher. Golda Meir.

      Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 12:20 pm Carlos Danger

        Not really. You are speaking as a Swede again and failing to curtail your nations now reflexive feminism. Europe’s biggest problem is that it is run by cat ladies for cat ladies. I have lived here 27 years and never has my respect for the European paradigm been lower.

        Liked by 8 people


      • No women in positions of authority.

        Even in the case of the few who can actually handle it (though I’ve yet to see one), they’re still lowering the societal status of men simply by existing in these positions, which is one of the key disasters that causes niggers, jews, and faggots to walk on the face of normality today.

        Liked by 2 people


      • No wōmen in pōsitiōns of āūthōrity.

        Even in the cāse of the few who can āctually hāndle it (thōugh I’ve yet to see one), they’re still lōwering the sōcietal stātūs of mēn simply by ēxisting in these pōsitions, which is one of the kēy disāstērs that causes nīggērs, jēws, and fāggōts to walk on the fāce of nōrmālity tōday.

        Liked by 4 people


      • Nah. Females with power are the same as Gammas with power: they abuse it as much as they possibly can.

        Female managers have no understanding of hierarchy and its obligations to those both below and above you, considering that females have a horizontal hierarchy and not a vertical one like men. They do not understand that those below you are worthy of respect. They think that being above someone in a hierarchy gives you free reign to do as you please to them, to boss them around and tell them what to do, say, how to live their lives.

        Men compete and cooperate, women compete and eliminate. See for example “prisoners dilemma” experiments that showed women over repeated trials nearly always choosing to throw the other person under the bus, whereas men eventually and more quickly learned to trust the other and cooperate.

        Compare to the multitude of women and Gammas in power today: complete disregard for what the people of their nations want and demand.

        Men under the yoke of women and Gammas is totally unnatural and does not last long, as we’re seeing with the Yellow Vests in France and the #ichbeineinenazi movement in Germany, as well as the growing rage of Brexit in the UK.

        Liked by 2 people


      • 4 out of the top 5 CEOs of defense contractors are women.

        Like


    • if every white man started committing crimes against this system, the courts and jails would crawl to a halt.

      but no…the french are out in the streets, where are the american white men? in front of an afroball game?

      we live in an immoral nation with an immoral system bent on exterminating us but the FIRST THING anyone does is tell you omg you will go to jail or something if you act against it. They’ll “ruin your life”…kinda sounds like your life already sucks. So then are you a willing cuck or not?

      if the fire dept won’t hire competent men, then BURN SHIT.

      Liked by 2 people


      • but no…the french are out in the streets, where are the american white men? in front of an afroball game?

        Yes, and American white men posses a private arsenal of firearms that is greater than that of any military on earth, which makes out dereliction even more disgraceful. What the hell are we even afraid of?

        And we call the French cowards…

        Like


      • Laz-E-Boy General Travis Chimpout and his comrade Admiral Armchair misapprehending the advantageous patience to choose one’s battlefield as “coward[ice].” Because niggers historically have had the best campaign strategies.

        Gen. Tavis calls for “One, two, many Fergusons,” only this time it would be whites burning down their own “SHIT.” High time preference smash and grab! Talk about cultural appropriation!

        I think the chocolate vag secretions have burrowed and microchimerically infested Trav’s brain. What else explains the fetishtastic consistency? At least start wearing latex on your trips to deepest browntown, my dude.

        Liked by 2 people


      • I thought the Inauguration crowd was a bit disappointing. I felt a little sorry for Trump. It should have been a dont fuck with us show of force on enemy ground

        [CH: Dems always get bigger inauguration crowds because the locals along the acela corridor are shitlibs. Trump’s base is scattered throughout the country.]

        Liked by 2 people


      • So put down your fork and take to the streets… What’s stopping you? Your gubmint pension?

        Liked by 1 person


      • Spare us your ” if every white ” shit Tavis Smiley, cuz white you damn sure ain’t . When somebody needs input from a muzzie about niggerfucking and overpriced sketty-o’s feel free to chime in , pissant.

        Liked by 2 people


      • He’s always talking about punching people. I want to know how many has punched in the face today, this week, and this month — and if the totals are all “zero,” as we know they are, how does this Consumer of Niggers’ Sloppy Seconds justify the fact that he doesn’t live up to what he constantly urges others to do, with gibes about cowardice?

        Liked by 1 person


      • on January 4, 2019 at 11:32 pm Skyscraper of flesh

        If the French pull this off and remove the true problem, I will support them unconditionally and never disparage their name again. Worshiping bulls on television like a cuck is disgusting but is what their generation thinks masculinity is, a mess of dorito dust and vomit.

        Like


      • on January 6, 2019 at 5:57 pm Corinth Arkadin

        “…I am the new Fire Department. If people don’t pay, I START FIRES!”

        Like


      • Many “men” in San Fran are homosexuals.

        You have a great point. American white men are still too comfortable, or just naive, and football (which I watch) is their #1 opiate. Even southern whites are fanatical for 80 percent nog college teams because they wear shirts with their state on it.

        Like


    • We eventually need to modify or repeal the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, Title IX, and everything else that has caused discrimination against whites and men. These laws and the judges who pervert them must be target number one.

      Like


  7. Give him Kudos for alluding to the rigged Donkey/Elephant game that the Deep State loves to play. Fighting in dirt world countries gives the banks the opportunity to finance materiel and the war effort itself which the Elephants love, while according the opportunity to import dirt-world “refugees” the Democrats love. It’s a win-win for everyone.

    But us….

    Liked by 3 people


    • How do the banks actually make money financing a war anyway?

      And how do the Dems use the war as an opportunity to import refugees?

      Like


      • Seriously?

        Oil arabs give you money, nations like Afghan you get the spoils (heroin, oil pipelines etc)
        New dictators who cant pay you back, you control any assets/resources of the country. The IMF give out massive loans that can never be paid bsck.

        See Confessions of an Economic Hitman

        Liked by 3 people


      • on January 5, 2019 at 9:14 am Carlos danger

        Good book. Highly recommended, especially since Auntie Eliot would call it CT.

        Like


      • You should take the foot out of yo’ mouf and stop putting words into mine, Danger-Dweeb.

        Try getting me out of yo’ haid for one day as well… you’ll be surprised how much space you’ll free up for more noble endeavors.

        Or, just keep losing, it’s your choice.

        Proper use of free will and commensurate accountability are the marks of manhood, and please God.

        Like


  8. on January 4, 2019 at 11:38 am Enfant Terrible

    Happy New Year everyone.

    The democracy+capitalism as a holy alliance is a deeply ingrained mindset in the US consciousness, and because of it, Americans have been sold a whole bunch of social/economical policies engineered by the (((special people))) to make themselves, and their stooges, richer than ever, while destroying everybody else. Maybe the outcome of this engineered destruction can be reversed peacefully, and some new way be found, but I doubt it. The people in power will not let go of the power so easily. They’re so greedy, not even crumbs they’re willing to throw at the little people. They just want to churn through the little people and discard them for other little people on a regular basis, while keeping themselves at the top, generation after generation.

    Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 11:40 pm Skyscraper of flesh

      Let’s call it what it is: a soft alliance between communists and capitalists that initially formed to destroy fascism, which was an existential threat to parasitic ideologies like theirs. They may have squabbled for more hosts afterward, but they are too sides of the same coin, and democracy inevitably leads to communism. Anyone who tries to make merit about popularity rather than power is trying to get you to abandon yours while they implement theirs in secret.

      Like


  9. “cheapening of their labor by foreign invaders scabs invited in at the behest of greedy corporate oligarchs”

    Indeed. The current mass unregulated immigration depresses wages for low and even medium skilled labor. Supply and demand at work. And the Dem’s cheering this on proves (if we didn’t already know) that they have abandoned the “working class”, loosely defined. This group, until less than 20 years ago, used to be the pillar of Dem supporters. But these people have figured out the Dem reversal (actually, betrayal), and Pennsylvania and other “rust belt” states voted for Trump.

    Liked by 3 people


    • There is another element of the invader labor problem: the erosion of the culture of work.

      The ‘jobs Americans wont do’ lie is not just about depressed wages. It is about creating an environment that does not encourage and facilitate the matriculation of labor in the young heritage population.

      The browing of physical and low-skill labor has accelerated the cultural decline of the value of hard work, of doing a job that is tough and often sucks, and of honing social and other skills in dealing with a work environment.

      This has fed into the pussified, entitled, and soft generation who never had to work at mcdonalds or dig irrigation ditches. Like “good schools” all these prog white parents won’t subject their precious spawn to the brown hoards who dominate jobs that teenagers used to regulalry perform.

      Whil I hardly blame them for that, there is more to a labor market than wages and the invaders have played a major role in the rite of passage of labor and incentives and ultimately, community and culture.

      Liked by 3 people


  10. Thousand times worse than you’d ever believe.

    Report from Clown World Ground Zero:

    My little bro just got a job as an accountant with a big 4 firm. Who are his fellow accountants? Little grey old White guy bean counters?

    Nope. Banging hot brain-dead sorority broads. He claims they don’t understand even basic accounting principles. He was showing me pics. Unbelievable. This accounting firm could put the Playboy Mansion out of biz.

    Or my cousin. Also got an accounting degree (from a joke of a school.) She got a 19 on the ACT. Borderline retarded. That’s the equivalent of about a 980 SAT.
    She makes about 150K.

    None of this is even remotely sustainable.

    Glad you’re all my bros.
    FE

    Liked by 4 people


    • I doubt she makes 150k if it’s any comfort.
      Men (mostly white has to be said) who reach ceo/principal level feel entitled to poon they never got before. So they hire these hotties to spend time with them. Fantasy harems.
      But even still they pay them as little as they can as most care more about financial security, retirement, kids education etc.
      Most if not all will be on 50k to 70k in shitropolis which is slightly above entry level.
      I’ve seen this over 20 years

      Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 12:26 pm Carlos Danger

        That is my experience as well. The dirty little secret of public accounting is that it is very cook book in nature, works people to the bone and pays as little as possible.

        Liked by 1 person


      • That is my experience as well. The dirty little secret of public accounting is that it is very cook book in nature, works people to the bone and pays as little as possible.

        Get your experience and get the hell out. 60 hour weeks and not stop travel. It’s not a fun job. It’s not quite biglaw bad but it still sucks.

        Liked by 1 person


      • The biggest bullshit high paying jobs are in (((PR Firms))).
        You can have the likes of the Kellogg Foundation give you millions for a ‘racial healing ‘ PR campaign.
        Its impossible to measure the effectiveness.

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 11:43 pm Skyscraper of flesh

        They love their dick more than they love their race, and by extension, family. The beta male version of a coke addicted investment banker.

        Like


      • No. Finance people especially love money more and ate extremely frugal based on my experience.

        I know a few hot sugar babies and they tell me that men scam them all the time when it comes to paying up.
        Some unbelievable stories…when it came to the crunch, dudes would ‘go to the bathroom ‘ in a restaurant and not come back etc .

        On another point, I wonder with the government shutdown has the number of sugar babies spiked in the DC area on the websites this week?

        Like


      • I doubt she makes 150k if it’s any comfort.

        It is.

        Like


      • Lichthof, the number of sugar babies is set by the number and carrying capacity of sugar daddies. They’re just wannabes until Sugar Daddy puts up the $. So, my expectation would be that the government shutdown would reduce the solvency of sugar daddies, thus lowering the overall earnings of sugar babies.

        Like


    • And a lot of them are trophy employees to show off to their clients aka faux friends and faux golf partners

      Liked by 1 person


    • None of this is even remotely sustainable.

      Which is great news for us.

      Naturam expelles furca, tamen usque recurret.

      Like


    • My little bro just got a job as an accountant with a big 4 firm. Who are his fellow accountants? Little grey old White guy bean counters?

      Nope. Banging hot brain-dead sorority broads. He claims they don’t understand even basic accounting principles. He was showing me pics. Unbelievable. This accounting firm could put the Playboy Mansion out of biz.

      It was the same in 2007 when I graduated my accountancy program. The hot girls don’t stick around. I used to tutor these broads (way before I knew any game). They got big 4 jobs, I did not. Knowing what I know about big 4 now, I’m glad I didn’t.

      Go to an accounting conference with owner operated firms and it’s 95% whites, mostly guys, with a few Jews. The AICPA is pressing hard for ‘diversity’ and always have a token minority speaker but they never seem to last. Accounting isn’t Astrophysics level hard but it’s hard enough it weeds out the idiots.

      Like


    • you know i have direct experience working for one or more of those firms, right? lol

      the women are hot but you cannot make a move or you’ll get fired. it’s worthless. eye candy that you can’t touch, like tantalus or something

      Like


      • I dated a Siberian hottie who worked for Accenture surrounded by betas.
        From the bits she told me I figured out she hardly did any work for a good 2 years.
        Project managers were always sending her to training courses or seminars in different states or to Europe.
        She’d be on many project teams on proposed jobs that would never happen.
        She’d attend a lot of meetings with prospective clients and just sit there or make small chat.
        The easy life she had was a real eye opener.
        She also use go on dates and get free dinners 3/4 times a week.
        Guys she just met would invite her on paid trips to Italy etc.
        She then worked as a sales rep with a phone company. Shed accompany a beta sales rep who would do all the talking.

        Hardest woman I’ve ever gamed. A real challenge.
        Shes now married to a restaurant owner.

        The consultancy firms hired on looks only circa 2006. Firms like Booz Allen even covered plastic surgery.
        ADP hire hot sales reps.

        Like


      • I dated a Siberian hottie who worked for Accenture surrounded by betas.
        From the bits she told me I figured out she hardly did any work for a good 2 years.
        Project managers were always sending her to training courses or seminars in different states or to Europe.
        She’d be on many project teams on proposed jobs that would never happen.
        She’d attend a lot of meetings with prospective clients and just sit there or make small chat.
        The easy life she had was a real eye opener.
        She also use go on dates and get free dinners 3/4 times a week.
        Guys she just met would invite her on paid trips to Italy etc.
        She then worked as a sales rep with a phone company. She’d accompany a beta sales rep who would do all the talking.

        Hardest woman I’ve ever gamed. A real challenge.
        Shes now [email protected] to a restaurant owner.

        The consultancy firms hired on looks only circa 2006. Firms like Booz Allen even covered plastic surgery.
        ADP hire hot sales reps.

        Like


    • on January 5, 2019 at 5:57 am terryegrafed7039

      Babes getting hired for their looks. I’m shocked; shocked! (Now if they were fugs, at least we could presume they were competent.)

      Like


    • on January 6, 2019 at 6:00 pm Corinth Arkadin

      I work in an office. There’s a bunch of Abyssinians there. The click-pop of their hideous language makes me ill. It’s like being in a goddamm termite mound.

      Like


  11. That was a very powerful piece by Tucker. I dont think it’s overly dramatic to say that speech has the potential to become a landmark historical event. This was an implicit call for white Americans to (presumably peacefully) overthrow the government. Tucker is clearly saying both political parties are working against the interests of normal (meaning white) men, their families, and descendents and their power over the People is illegitimate.

    There are so many good quotes in there. I am greatly encouraged. There is hope yet. The metapolitical landscape is changing. I have never seen anything like this in the mainstream before. This is something new. This is what a revolution looks like.

    Liked by 8 people


    • agree. Profound…

      “we do not exist to serve markets”

      Could get somebody KIA’d…

      Liked by 2 people


      • What Tucker has given light to is the War Against (White) Men…

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 1:49 pm Oswald Spengler

        “You shall not crucify mankind on a cross of gold.”

        Like


      • bbbbut…bbbbut…*I* specifically have been saying EXACTLY the same thing about how the economy is supposed to serve US not the other way around…to everyone who would listen. I mean I have actually quite literally said identical things to what TC said so many times i was like df, did I time travel back and write this with him?

        So therefore Tucker isn’t doing anything at all just because he’s putting his ass on the line and doing it on television in front of a giant audience including jackals who would love to see him eviscerated. He has mobs trying to break into his fuckin house. But he’s putting his shit on the line to even say this stuff, risking everything he has. HE actually has a lot of money and could walk away and not give a fuck and be rich. Or even better he could sell the fuck out and just say whatever they tell him to like Rachel Madcow does or Matthews or the Blob Moore. He’s going to cost himself his CAREER by doing this as he gets closer and closer to the 3rd rail.

        so let’s all shit on him as “controlled opposition” or otherwise try to steal his thunder and criticize him from the fucking peanut gallery

        Liked by 2 people


      • The point you miss (surprise, surprise) isn’t that anyone is “shitting” on Tucker.

        The point is (aside from your mystery meat side robbing you of much needed IQ for reading comprehension) is that the chateau is over-touting yet again this victory, and if you’d all take a breath for a moment, you’d realize he was ALLOWED to say these things within losing his job because, at the end of the day, the Narrative remained safe.

        Last time, and TRY to let it sink in this time, because you’re getting more tedious than usual:

        As long as the red-pill stays within a) muh economics and b) White men falling behind, the (((MSM))) will let 1000 Tuckers do their alleged “wake the normies” schtick.

        This was NOT a blow against feminism, and no woman on either side of the fence is going to stay at home from now on because the poor White man is no longer mårriage-worthy.

        Geez, Louise, it would be NICE if youse alt-R allies would wake up, let alone the normies.

        Sorry (not sorry) if my opinion hurts your collective butts, but RealTalk is supposed to be RealTalk, not some giddy-meme fest or (((MSM))) right-leaning talking haid celebration of paper-thin victories.

        Like


    • Feminists are the foot soldiers of the totalitarians…

      New MI Congresswoman

      Liked by 1 person


  12. The one thing that is essentially verboten even on Fox is the elephant in the living room, i.e. Dems planning for the future, illegal immigrants and their spawn as useful voting cattle. I view Fox a lot, and ONCE a guest mentioned it, less than one second of coverage.
    Fox is a corporation, and corporate managers love their shareholder more than they love – in this case – their viewers.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on January 4, 2019 at 10:43 pm Sean Fielding

      Tucker frequently mentions Dem importation of a new electorate. He’s well schooled on Sailer and Brimelow.

      Like


  13. How long more can Tucker survive before he gets the Helen Thomas treatment?

    Like


  14. OT: Been wanting to ask this so i figure this post is a good spot.

    What’s the fine line between letting a girl know you know something about her — say a comment she made in passing or as part of a talk with her — without letting her know or giving her cause for concern you’re a sperg that’s held onto every word she said?

    Obviously I’m not talking about reciting what she said verbatim, but casually tossing some info about her now and then.

    Like


    • “I have an intuition about you… I feel that you …”

      Mind blown…

      😉

      Like


    • Women remember everything you say, tweek minimally for desired effect, and present it as the gospel truth to fuck you over. Exception: during the honeymoon period you can do no wrong. Point being, women are not concerned with being spergs. Learn by example.

      High IQ is an asset if not paired with giving a shit about your gaslighting tormentors. Is your desire based on emotional attachment? Standard inner game is to let go of needing to tell people (subhumans) the rest of the story. If you want to leverage something, go ahead and experiment with it. If you want wuv, get a puppy from the shelter. The honest language of women is body language. You will attract women with effective body language. Word excellence from the woman’s perspective is excellent sophistry but body language is the sizzle that sells it.

      I think you need to test some strategies and accept the results if you don’t simply need to not give a shit. I think the best thing you could try is to repeat verbatim what she said and practice maintaining frame regardless of response. No oneitis. You’re way too invested. There is no fine line. You are rationalizing what is not there.

      Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 7:20 pm Captain Obvious

      Mendo, I don’t fully understand what you’re talking about, but it feels like the psychology here is all wrong.

      ZFG says that if you screw up the convo with her, then who cares?

      And “You are the Prize” also chimes in with “Who cares?”

      Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 7:26 pm Captain Obvious

        STACY, JULY 2018: “God I love UGG boots but I just can’t afford them.”

        ***************

        MENDO, JULY 2019: “Hey, Stacy, were you the one who told me you love UGG boots, or was that Heather?”

        STACY, JULY 2019: “Oh, it was definitely me.”

        MENDO, JULY 2019: “Well I met a chick for lunch at the Nordstrom cafe this past weekend, and she was going all gaga about how they have the UGGs at 33% off.”

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 7:28 pm Captain Obvious

        Oops. Cut -n- Paste error. Meant to write January 2019.

        Anyway, just be cool about it, and throw into the conversation the fact that THOTs like her and “Heather” are utterly interchangeable in your memory [which should be enough of a secondary neg to awaken her Hamster].

        Like


      • And there’s Danger-Dweeb yet again, projecting the high school mentality onto the chateau, go figger.

        How many lockers did you get shoved into back in your school daze? The trauma of those times, as well as the vocabulary, never seem to have left you.

        As far as try-hard’s attempt to dog-pile, meh… I forgot more than that n1gger fucking off-White will ever know.

        Keep losing, boys. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 9:22 am Carlos Danger

        How many lockers did you get shoved into back in your school daze? The trauma of those times, as well as the vocabulary, never seem to have left you.

        None. I was a big strapping lad, got laid quite a bit, and played football and wrestled at a championship high school in Fairfax County. I was fairly popular and had an ROTC scholarship. Pound sand mah ever envious nigga!

        Like


      • Heh, heh… so, from all those glorious days of your godlike youth, what the hell happened that you became such a pissy little bitch of an adult whose projection of the traits he accuses in others could rival that of a megaplex theatre?

        Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 1:18 pm Carlos Danger

        You’re the pissy little bitch Auntie Eliot. Moreover, you’re thick as two short planks. The entire board is calling you out as a douchebag and I have been relatively quiet while others beat the snot out of you. And you try to pretend it isn’t happening. I am enjoying the show immensely. I gave you some fair advice the other day but you are too prideful to take it. You know everything and are the first to tell us. You asked me about being stuffed in wall lockers, so I gave you a fair response based in fact. If you were half the man you wish to be and try to convince us you are, you would not be so defensive or schooled in deflecting criticism. I also played rugby in college. I’ve had a lot of fun and committed more than my share of sin. God will hopefully forgive me for it. Its a big reason I am sweet on the BVM. She can push you over the goal line when things look bleak otherwise. I pray several times a day and I even pray for you. I’ve been blessed and had a good life. Many here have. The average guy here has an above average CV and I enjoy learning from them all. I am proud of the company I keep here, even men like Pretty Boy Looch are ok in my book and I dislike it when others pile on him. He makes fun of them by playing a nigger in return. Why does all that bother you so much? I can only imagine you feel deficient in some form or another. Perhaps you feel you missed out on too much vice in life with so many here who have led an interesting and adventurous life. I can only speculate. If I told you my academic and professional record, you would hit the roof.

        Like


      • I don’t mind writing minority opinions, Danger… and for all the “calling out”, which has been nothing but ad hominem, with no gainsay of the points I spelled out, without starting any piss-wars with anyone, unlike all the “callers out”, I could give a rat’s ass on what “the whole board” thinks… because most of you ankle biters have proven yourselves no better than the enemy you claim to disdain.

        Now, tell me more about your credentials, alt-R ally… I’m fascinated that such a fine education never went to yo’ haid.

        Like


      • Gayg, stop trying to outwit and shame people

        you’re really actually just a dick

        work on that

        Like


    • Can anyone find a better video of her sexy dance that was in the poll yesterday very grainy?

      Like


      • Daily Mail has the full video…

        Like


      • She should give up the ruse and just go work the stripper poll. So long as she keeps her mouth closed and we don’t see those horse teeth she could pull down a few bucks.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on January 4, 2019 at 3:21 pm Carlos Danger

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 4:10 pm Carlos Danger

        N1gger, get the FUCK out of the chateau. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        I like him way better than you. Besides, he’s white and just taking the piss playing as a nigger. He;s also very well read but you were envious of him then.

        Like


      • HAHAHA!

        Danger, the original clown, trying to shame with “just jealous” valley girl gambit that ONCE AGAIN belies his own projection.

        Geez, Louise, the chateau is starting to really reek of petulant adolescence that make the soiboiz you would trash look like he-men.

        Wake up to yourselves, already.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 5:11 pm Carlos Danger

        Don’t try so hard to be cool and maybe the cool kids will like you too. You deserve all the shit you get tossed your way. Stupid, out of touch and opinionated are no way to go through life son.

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 5:20 pm Carlos Danger

        Auntie Eliot is sputtering mad again. Bless his little heart!

        Like


      • Deranger hits the nail on the head here Gayg

        you talk too fuckin much

        i realize that’s because you stupidly assume yourself to have wisdom. You don’t. you’re a delusional boomer who lies to yourself and has been ingesting his own shit for so long that it’s made you into a walking pile of it

        Like


      • Yup… def gonna have a “Female Teacher” sex scandal… She is emotionally 19…

        Liked by 1 person


      • on January 4, 2019 at 1:37 pm Pretty Boy Looch

        She’s adorable.

        Just needs a snow nugga to put a bun in her oven and a leash around her neck.

        Like


      • “Adorable”, eh?

        Mystery meat valley girl twerking her way into your heart… and the halls of Congress, ready to pick the White man’s pocket without so much as a ‘thank you’ or ‘by your leave’.

        N1gger, get the FUCK out of the chateau. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 2 people


      • on January 4, 2019 at 4:02 pm Captain John Charity Spring MA

        This is going to blow up in her face eventually.

        My suspicion is that shes going to bang an under 18 intern.

        Like


      • What a joke…

        Like


      • looch is correct, she’s fuckin adorable.

        such energy and enthusiasm as opposed to the soulless spiteful rage of the white woman these days.

        i will vote for Ocasio in a heartbeat bc she’s HONESTLY TRYING to burn everything the fuck to the ground and start a race war and jew purge.

        I’m with HER.

        The SOONER the demoncrat party is purged of all white males the better.

        Liked by 2 people


      • Ocasio and the the mushlim woman will bring us closer to the day of rope and the collapse/chaos need. More please!
        Some shitlibs were congratulating the mushlim on a comments section and said ‘go get the orange one’ and I tagged ‘Allahu Akbar’ on to their every sentence.
        It hit a nerve.
        Some mushlim men or Chad’s trolling were then calling for shitlib women to get beheaded.
        This is the shock they need and even the hardcore ultra shitlib college girl will be sucking your cock white man to escape a knife wielding Ahmed
        Shitlibs I know are worried about the ‘radical turn the party has taken’

        Like


      • And the cucks on (((Breitbart))) 50,000 comments on that mushlim bitch

        Gotta give credit to the mushlims… beating yehuda to a pulp on a Brooklyn street on a Sunday morning (even stopping the car to chase him down)..
        Bring on the chaos

        Like


    • She’s becoming the candidate of the people… such as “the people” are these days.

      A few more dancing videos, a few more finger snaps at her detractors, and the (((MSM))) will have her slated for the first woman president.

      Like


  15. I watched this live on Wednesday and I was shocked at what I was hearing because it contained so much RealTalk. I knew that there would be some backlash, but for the most part, there’s less talk on this than the other segment where he talked about illegals. He’s waking up normies with these redpills, and i couldnt be happier.

    Liked by 7 people


  16. In the 1980’s, lefty progressives fought to save the family farm, ie, livelihoods of intact rural families led by white men.

    In the 1990’s, lefty progressives & anarchists fought globalism — sometimes physically, smashing windows at World Trade Agreement meetings — to conserve the manufacturing sector, a good proxy for livelihoods of middle class white men.

    And shifting the tax burden to investment income from inherited wealth.. who ever heard of such a godless commie idea?

    Suddenly, the lights are going on.

    Liked by 2 people


    • WTA –

      Union workers were not middle class, they were slaves to their union masters… and were sold out by them as well… and in the 90’s not so white…

      Like


    • lol. I’ve seen better trolling, but I’ve also seen worse. 5/10. Hasbara or Media Matters?

      Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 3:26 pm Carlos Danger

      Now you are killing them off with regulations and demoralizing the white men who own and operate them. Get the fuck out of here Bolshevik. You work for the very people that caused these problems in the first place. Dems of today are nothing like the Dems of the 80s. You are the war party, Wall street Jews, the Central Banking Cabal and the party of white genocide. You want nothing more than to steal my infant son’s future and turn my daughter into a whore for the Jews.

      Liked by 2 people


      • Jews get all the best shiksa while they’re younger, tighter, hotter, and sweeter.

        http://www.infovisual.co/robbie-shapiro-and-cat-valentine.html

        Like


      • You are the war party
        I should have mentioned in earlier comment:

        In 2003, lefty progressives organized the biggest global street protests in human history (wiki: 100k+ crowds in many cities, more than 600 cities, up to sixty countries).

        I remain truly dumbfounded, not so much that the US went to war in the end (a complex subject), but how the American people could hold their government to such a low standard for explaining and justifying it.

        As I said earlier: Suddenly, the lights are going on. This piece by Tucker Carlson touches on super important ideas, but these ideas have been swirling about certain liberal centrist intellectual circles for decades, literally (but ignored by the Dem party, and hated by left-wing identity politics types). These ideas should not require the Trump-Romney catspat-du-jour as justification, but that they should be reaching Fox News viewers at all warms my kike heart.

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 6:35 pm Carlos Danger

        You are a disingenuous liar and huckster for the Deep State and Central Banking Cabal.

        Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 3:48 pm Carlos Danger

      You want to tax the inherited wealth of the middle class but will never touch the central bank and the usury racket that it is. We could have all this stuff you promise and pay for it with tariffs without the central bank. The very wealthy create tax free foundations and trusts to avoid paying taxes. GTFO with your misleading Bolshevik snake oil.

      Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 7:02 am terryegrafed7039

        Too many tax dodges for the very rich. “Liberal” politicians never put much more of a dent in this system than do “conservative” politicians. And all because getting and keeping office requires big money donations–unless you yourself are independently wealthy, in which case you too will rule in the interests of the very rich because you are one of them.

        Like


    • Hehehe kike kwetching again, this time against through generations inherited welth of the heritage America he would like to see it further taxed as opposed to the Ill gotten usury of his ilk
      Asshole each time I see your handle I am reminded why 110 is my favourite number

      Like


    • Tell us what to think, Jew.

      https://goo.gl/images/GkYTJa

      Like


    • Farm foreclosures were high as hell during the 80 ‘s, handrubber. I know you kikes are just like your half brother’s bunch, you would rather lie when the truth would work just as well.

      Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 9:28 am Carlos Danger

        Exactly. The intention was to kill off small family farms in favor of corporate farms, the new form of collectivization. I intend to homestead after I retire in South Alabama. I may turn it into a farm as well. Good honest hard work that will keep me young and fit into my 80s.

        Like


  17. I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again. May the good lord bless you and keep you Tucker Carlson. There was so much goodness in what he said that it warmed even my black dead heart. It was like Senna at Donnington in ‘93 Or Luke skywalker blowing up the deathstar.
    He is absolutely spot on, straight no chaser. A double shot of your favourite scotch neat, the way it should be drunk.
    The following night he reported on the reaction from ‘The View’ with the ‘unfckables’ who are really unforgivable. And he invited on another woman who was on Levin before Christmas who repeated her thesis that she spoke about with Levin. Both of them danced around the point, which you can only do on TV.
    The bottom line is 1) Women 2) Crony Capiltalism 3) demoralisation from the lack of religious faith. All of these forces need to be brought to heal. Women are impressionable and most of them want the Disney fantasy (get married have children) that was sold to them as little girls. Matt Damon said these movies are like crack for toddlers and he was right. The angry battlaxes that you find in the corporate world dressed and acting like men suffering from reaction formation with their shorthair cuts are to a small extent outliers. And as someone else pointed out they are awful. They awful at their jobs ,awful people, awful managers and awful co-workers. Who will never be happy… ever.
    It’s been said here and else where that the rules for men and women need to be changed. The incentives for getting divorced need to be changed and removed altogether. The incentives for single motherhood (out of wedlock births) need to be removed altogether. We could start by giving the child to the father immediately with a ‘no soup for you policy’. No money no benefits, nothing. It would stop the trash-hags from reproducing. The family court really needs to be demolished altogether throughout the Anglosphere, that would go a long way to chopping the rate down the male suicide rate by at least half in my estimation. And our entire society needs to be de-feminised. Much like the de-nazification that happened in Germany after the War. With the removal of voting rights, and leadership positions. In particular in education, journalism and the legal professions. As well as a constant attack on feminist agitprop and a ban in countries that will allow it.
    Because (by and large) women can’t make decisions, they’re neurotic, petty, conniving and side with outsiders constantly. The reason why we have gay marriage is because of women (and weak male politicians who think this is an easy way to get votes) sided with them (homosexuals who are 2% of the population). Which is why we have mass immigration and the constant images of dead children playing to the nurturing instincts of single cat women. It’s the reason why women side with moslems because they’re an outside group. It’s the reason why we have stifling language and behaviour policing, because they don’t want us to hurt the feelings of outsiders. They don’t care about the men in they’re in group. Until women’s voting rights are taken away. We are going to get more of the same, and our civilisation will implode from within. Women have no skin in the game and they know it. They are the drivers of the demoralisation. In the past a guy would die at the end of a needle or walk in front of a bus (by accident) because he was stoned – due to being demoralised. Now we call them incel’s. When you believe in something ( and you can get laid) you have a future. When you have a meaningful job – you have a future. When you have a Male manager you have a future (because they value competence and conscientiousness on average). If you believe in a higher power (regardless of it being true or not) you’ll treat yourself with respect. When women believe in men, men and women have a future and people are happier.

    [CH: good comment.]

    Liked by 9 people


    • on January 4, 2019 at 3:55 pm Carlos Danger

      Great comment and exactly why Satan’s children and Marx’s disciples started with female emancipation. Repeal the 19th.

      Liked by 7 people


    • An honest description of female nature, thank you.

      Liked by 2 people


    • depending on working within the system is foolhardy.

      the system is the problem

      Like


    • The angry battlaxes that you find in the corporate world dressed and acting like men suffering from reaction formation with their shorthair cuts are to a small [near TOTAL] extent outliers.

      QFT! Preach!

      Take some time away and then come back. You might be surprised at how little these “outliers,” which boomercon media get so agitated over, affect your zen. There’s a great deal of ruin in a nation, and a dozen outrages are manufactured from molehills to colonize your eyeballs. It really isn’t so bad. But down here in the comboxes, we feed on each other’s dudgeon in an act of social solidarity that slowly putrefies the soul. Plus, the more attention you give to the freaks that lead the “””news”””, the more they’re empowered to go on irritating the world.

      Carlson stands out because he has begun eschewing the outrage du jour and laying out a foundation for an entirely new school of political thought, which is explicated in fine detail in his Top-Five Book of The Year,* Ship of Fools.

      Happy warriors and smirking rakes will win this thing through sheer joie de vivre. Dour jewish temptations to despair might be regarded as more realistic, but the ultimate reality is that nobody follows a slump-shouldered doomsayer.

      * The other four are: The Virtue of Nationalism, Why Liberalism Failed, The Coddling of The American Mind, and Life after Google, in no specific order.

      Like


  18. Easily one of the most breathtaking displays of succinct RealTalk that I’ve ever seen come out of the MSM.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Government we deserve, right Greg?

      Liked by 1 person


    • I was wondering where my 101 dalmations went to, now I know.

      Like


    • on January 4, 2019 at 7:40 pm Captain Obvious

      42 years old.

      No ch!ldren.

      She is unbreeding her bl00dlines out of existence.

      Like


      • how many kids do you have captain?

        Like


      • You say that like it’s a bad thing that she birthed no soychugger or coalburner switch-hitters like herself Hell, I am way more pissed about comparing her to Mamie Van Doren , she ain’t even close.

        Like



    • … Mamie Van Doren cosplayer…

      That’s the spirit!

      I have a soft spot for “I’m still Alex from the Bronx” AOC and Kyrystyn “schoolkid giantess” SINema, little girls acting tough to conceal how far in over their head they are. It’s endearing and attractive on a primal level, to watch them innocently grapple for the first time with the gap between expectation and reality. If you take them to be serious threats against the republic, you don’t understand the first thing about political theater, which men should be amused by rather than wring their hands about.

      Come on, Gameos, if you saw these two spectacles in a bar (where AOC literally made a living not two years ago), wouldn’t you be amused more than threatened? Now just extrapolate a typical social scene to the national/political scene, and the same dynamics are at play. Tone, body language, what they’re wearing speak many times louder than the words coming out of their mouths, or the legislation they sponsor on the floor. What does it mean that the mesomorph muffmunching senator wears skin tight dresses and problem glasses? Now that’s true political analysis. Trump should fuck her. And, like I said a few posts back, one of you DC playas should earn the PUA GOAT award by landing AOC.

      [CH: AOC is attractive from a distance. sinema is just weird looking. and a dyke.]

      Liked by 2 people


      • These cunts would be more amusing if it weren’t for the fact that they would gladly vote jackboots to our doors. Which, if the Dems sweep 2020, is a very real possibility.

        Like


      • 2/10 would not bang!? Do you mean to say you have never Closed Your Eyes and Thought of England for the sheer payoff of glory, which in this case would be indisputable, untouchable, legendary glory?

        Kyrsten is a sometimes-dyke because she’s only ever been surrounded by leftoid omegamale ectomorph orbiters (while pining for the patriarch who abused her in puberty). Alex is a yuppie poseur who grew up in one of the richest neighborhoods in the country, and she is dying to confess it — scream it — to the first man to fuck the truth out of her body of lies.

        The Lord Almighty himself created these challenges just for your socio-political sociopathic shitlord skill set, and you would deny Him!

        It is your d e s t i n y .

        GET PHOTOS

        Saving that, at least quasi-confabulate a story for purposes of propaganda! When the legend becomes fact, print the legend. Your final role in this Nietzschean drama is maker of new myths, which the white world is literally killing itself in the absence of. You are a fucking derelict asshole for not writing fiction, like that short story you posted here one time years ago.

        [CH: sinema crosses the believability threshold. could not get hard, would not bang. AOC reminds me of bartender chicks i date. all charming ditziness with a hint of manipulative “every guy is checking me out in this place” malice.]

        Like


      • “Vote jackboots” is a contradiction in terms. Those who would jackboot would never do so at the behest of diffuse majority sentiment but rather concentrated power.

        You need to stop being so ploddingly literal about this political fairy tale and groove to the subtext. That’s the plane the enemy is operating on, and that’s how they win. We never even show up on the field of ecstatic imagination, save a few rare cultural hybrids like CH, who only dabbles, and Trump, who can only do so much himself.

        We need countermyths bigger and more compelling than theirs. Your microparanoia about potential jackboots and stale thoughts about how some 1/100th of a 1/2 of a 1/3 might “vote” doesn’t even get its pants on before JouTube Rewind 2018 has been around the world 100,000,000 times.

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 9:41 pm Captain Obvious

        This is the Twilight Zone Thread.

        Wherein I find myself nodding in agreement with F-Street & The Legalist.

        Like


      • sinema crosses the believability threshold. could not get hard, would not bang.

        Boner pills are the operative’s indispensable Q-branch gadget for this patriotic mission. Just think of all the ways you could gaslight her into voting for the wall, through casual negs about her hitting the wall.

        AOC reminds me of bartender chicks i date. all charming ditziness with a hint of manipulative “every guy is checking me out in this place” malice.

        Perfect! You can go through the motions once more, blindfolded if you have to, but this time in service to Heritage America. Like riding a bike. Or in Kyrsty’s case, ryding a dyke.

        For once, use your estimable social powers for the political ends you have been promoting since last decade! If not you, who? If not now, when? On this medium of wordy activism, this is a rare opportunity to act in concert with all the principles that got you here.

        If the mentor demurs, which one of his e-proteges will stand in his stead? The people are crying out for a champion.

        Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 9:30 am Carlos Danger

        Note that finger digit ratio on Sinema.

        Like


      • AOC is so nutty she could have a few points of agreement with conservative populists. Like her proposal to raise taxes on millionaires. We absolutely should do this. They mostly vote Democrat.

        Like


      • Forget the digits, just look at the shoulders!

        Where is that freak commenter who calls every woman in the public eye a surprise-tranny? This might be xir time to shine

        Like


      • “F-Street & The Legalist.”

        Wasn’t someone asking about the next buddy flick? Ask and you shall receive.

        Like


    • Aw right, whose the wise guys what elected Cybill Shepherd?

      “Ma’am?”

      “Yes?”

      Love the suit.”

      Like


    • I do believe the whore made a point of ditching the stole and baring her shoulders for a picture with Pence.

      Like


      • Pence’s interaction with her at the swearing-in is a marvelous study. Substitute Trump for that gameless cornpone stiff and imagine the interplay.

        I’d post, but I’m done fighting The Mod over links.

        Like


    • on January 5, 2019 at 2:43 am SteveRogers42

      The bi wouldn’t put her hand on the Bible.

      Prolly afraid it would burn.

      Like


  19. How did the U.S. change? in 1960, we had roughly 100 million men working, 75 million women married with children, home making. The other 25 million women, single and searching for a husband. Then Ugly Betty Friedan got the wives unhappy, Dworkin got all the women hating, Mary Tyler Moore glorified the working girl. Fast forward.

    Here we are. That’s it in a nutshell. Ugly girls, they’re the problem.

    Liked by 2 people


    • ‘Ugly girls, they’re the problem. Spot on, I might add that sprinkle some zog tinsle to make those repulsive ideas really sparkle.

      Like


    • 1965 happened.

      Like


    • Television happened.

      It became fairly widespread in the 1950s and by approximately 1960 there were more households in the USA with televisions than without them.

      Is it mere (((coincidence))) that near-universal invasion of the idiot box into American livingrooms and a rapid shift from the sanity of the past to the insanity of the present occurred about simultaneously? IMO, no.

      The (((tribe))) already controlled the levers of propaganda, but the printed word and even a disembodied voice on the radio have less effect on one’s thought processes than the immemorial reality sitting in front of your eyes; that men are men, women are women, nogs are nogs, etc. etc.

      The boob tube allowed the immediate, apparently real presence of “experts” to invade everyone’s home and tell them face-to-face what was real. An astonishingly effective propaganda tool, in the hands of the (((skypes))) and their stooges.

      It allowed them to reshape opinion in a matter of a decade or so, a process which might otherwise have taken closer to a century, if it was even possible to produce dementia of this scale with the written word vs. the weight of observable reality. The TV allowed the jew to change observable reality itself and replace it with (((marxist))) insanity in an astonishingly short period of time.

      Nobody here believes this, but I’m willing to bet that if TV had somehow not been invented, we’d still be largely normal. Men in charge, women in the house, nogs in their ghettos, foreigners still in foreign parts, and the feminists and other wackos still a fringe group — perhaps slowly gaining ground, but with maybe a 15% to 20% voice in affairs, rather than the 99.999% voice they have right now.

      Liked by 2 people


      • Additionally, South Africa maintained tight control over television for decades, with just two channels, and maintained White rule. Then they allowed a free-for-all on TV in the late 80s/early 90s and almost immediately collapsed into niggery, white-masochism desolation.

        It’s the television, dammit.

        Even most of the stuff ascribed to the “Boomers” is because they were the first generation bombarded from childhood onward by television.

        He who controls the tube controls the boobs.

        And (((((((((((((((((((who))))))))))))))))) is controlling it at the moment, gentlemen?

        Like


      • He who controls the tube controls the boobs.

        Excellent. 😉

        Like


      • Thanks! 😉

        Like


      • And nahzees were a leader in television in the 1930s…showing Germans opera and other national culture in the evening.
        Showing women and daughters how to manage the household…
        British TV especially the BBC was a bit like that up to the 1980s.
        Now it’s a joke.

        Like


      • TV behind the Iron Curtain was two channels, heavily censored and full of Party propaganda. But it also appealed to three-digit IQ audiences, was patriotic within the confines of Red constraints that viewers took with a wink and a nudge anyway, it showcased some great conematographic talent, and children’s programs like Teleranek were done with a genuine care for the intellectual and civic growth of the young.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on January 5, 2019 at 1:25 pm Carlos Danger

        TV behind the Iron Curtain was two channels, heavily censored and full of Party propaganda. But it also appealed to three-digit IQ audiences, was patriotic within the confines of Red constraints that viewers took with a wink and a nudge anyway, it showcased some great conematographic talent, and children’s programs like Teleranek were done with a genuine care for the intellectual and civic growth of the young.

        I am also impressed with the availability of classical literature. I was impressed with the books my wife had read as a girl and was able to get from libraries in Kiev.

        Like


      • I remember one morning program in ’70s Poland about a youth action called “Invisible Hand” which was about scouts helping old people with everyday tasks such as carrying their bags of groceries up flights of stair of communist apartment blocks that had elevator outages. Assisting old people with walking over icy sidewalks, and so on. Things were austere back then. Many of those older people were were Home Army veterans whose selfish boomer children left them alone to die by emigrating to the West.

        Libraries were serious places. All of the books were wrapped in protective paper cover. If it was wet or snowy outside, you had to put on those shoe protectors before you walked in.

        Like


    • on January 5, 2019 at 6:44 am terryegrafed7039

      According to those calculations, in 1960 there were about 25 million men who were single; and, thanks to the mores of the time, only a small percentage of them got laid on a regular basis.

      Like


  20. No cohencidence that divorce rates shot up after women entered the workplace. It’s not just women working, it’s the “my career means everything” mentality that makes women elevate themselves beyond the reach of working class guys.

    Liked by 2 people


    • on January 4, 2019 at 3:57 pm Carlos Danger

      It also makes them insufferable to live with or useless to raise children. When momma is working 60 hours a week, she is a constant bitch and there is no time or energy for nookie.

      Liked by 2 people


      • And women who r not on the regular are unbearable to be around.

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 5:18 pm Carlos Danger

        Why did you feed the Bolshevik troll? It was all about Feminism the first time it came here. He isn’t talking about making the Fed’s owners pay an inheritance tax or even an income tax. That goes to the middle class and sounds like it will tax the mobsters who run our country. Your taxes all go to them in the form of interest on the debt. They hide their wealth offshore and in trusts and foundations. It will be you paying those taxes and your children losing their inheritance not the pedo mafia that runs the banking system. It is bait and switch of the most basic kind.

        Like


      • on January 4, 2019 at 9:43 pm Captain Obvious

        CD, I think you replied out-of-order here [meaning I think you meant to reply at some other point in the thread].

        Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 6:50 am terryegrafed7039

        But on the upside–less chance of divorce rape. (And less incentive for her to frivorce for cash and prizes.) The guy might even come out ahead. (Just ask Mike!)

        Like


  21. An economy that protects normal people.
    I think that would be called National Capitalism.

    Like


    • Trump’s speech today was good. He again (in Qlike fashion) painted the Jew party (aka Democrats) as supporting CHILD AND WOMAN SEX TRAFFICKING.

      I have to say when I listen to Trump speak unfiltered, sounds like Q.

      Liked by 1 person


  22. First female in the U.S. to hold a presidential office. Washington would run like a T.G.I.Fridays. Post-it notes that read, “Your mother does not live here, please do not leave water rings on your desk.”

    Every female boss ever. Every time I think “Oh, but she’s different,” there is an enormous focus on irrelevant details and unnecessary contention with staff members. I think we’d be better off if the Democrats got voted in with an all-female staff.

    Oh, but we’re talking about Ann, s h e ‘s d i f f e r e n t . . .

    Liked by 2 people


    • I want to point out that I’m not parodying the situation. I can guarantee you that Ann Coulter would nit-pick about a spot of water or something like that, as the Vice President.

      Like


      • Ann Coulter has shown her colors in this regard by nagging daily about the wall. Women universally equate bitching with action, and Ann is no exception.

        Like you, I don’t exactly blame them for their nature, as action is not their domain. In some ways, therefore, it is plausible to say their nagging men to act is the woman at her most effective, since haranguing men to do even a half-assed job yields better results than attempting to do anything her own damn self.

        Still, the virtuous woman understands the effectiveness of feminine passivity over shrewish confrontation. She finds ways to pull men rather than push them, thereby raising their hackles by direct challenge.

        Ultimately though, most nagging is just a shit test, a concealed whine about the general inadequacies of her partner, which has little to do with the content of the action at hand. They are deathly afraid of being yoked to a loser, as Ann in her feminine fear/insecurity occasionally projects onto the president. But that’s a whole different topic.

        Women in leadership is fine when there is no alternative. For a time they can unsex themselves and put on the big boy pants. But every moment grates her against her nature until it is an androgyne nub. Coulter has a bit of the nubbiness about her.

        People who successfully promulgate ideas aren’t always leadership material, male or female. Persuasiveness is a necessary but not sufficient factor that women are not drastically worse at than men (with women being trained their entire lives in the art of indirect influence), unlike just about all of the other leadership traits in which women aren’t even minimally competitive.

        There will never be a female President of the United States.

        Like


      • Indeed they would ,sir. You also would see mandatory coasters, felony arrest for ring leaving putting your feet on desks, not putting the seat down, long stint in the pokey,no jokey, Things like manspreading will be punishable by death.
        The future is female,and it ain’t gonna be very bright .

        Like


      • There will never be a female President of the United States.

        Brother-man, I used to hear the same thing about negros, back in the days of Instauration.

        I’ll take that bet, and give 3:2 odds over the next 20 years. 😉

        Liked by 1 person


    • on January 4, 2019 at 9:53 pm Captain Obvious

      >>>>> “an enormous focus on irrelevant details and unnecessary contention”

      Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder & Passive-Aggressive Personality Disorder.

      The PAPD actually feeds off of the OCPD, because the OCPD gives the PAPD the opening to snark about “Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, look at that mistake you just made, you nitwit,” and then thrust & twist the knife just a little further for good measure.

      From the point of view of Biological Calvinism, PAPD has to be an affliction of the end times of a rotting putrid civilization with one gigantic stinking foot in the grave.

      There’s no way that primitive hominids could have survived the Sabre-Toothed Tigers if those hominids were constantly back-stabbing one another all the [email protected] time.

      PS: It gets SOOOO MUCH WORSE after they enter menopause and cease to be sexual creatures.

      Women who no longer ovulate might as well be sold off in bulk to the Purina Dog Chow factory [and then have their bones sent on over to the Elmer’s Glue Factory or to the Jell-O Brand gelatin factory].

      Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 3:36 am mudsharks are the greatest losers

        the future is going to be either islamic or white christian patriarchy. there’s no 3rd option. feminism will only last as long as there are enough white betas willing to pay into the system or not enough vibrants to override its precepts.

        Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 7:10 am terryegrafed7039

        Send them to the Colonies, right? 😉

        Like


  23. The last minute of Cucker’s monologue is key.

    He gets it.

    Elites must cease the attack on white babies OR WHITE NATIONAL SOCIALISM COMES NEXT.

    As we’ve been saying since 2015.

    Your move, antiwhites.

    Liked by 1 person


    • you’re right, they better not push us too far or else…or else we’re gonna…vote more or something or post about how angry we are.

      the saxon is gonna hate but be too worried about his credit score to actually act. they better stop pushing us or else, someone hold us back.

      wake me up when there is more than hot air

      Liked by 2 people


  24. From the very first day against poz
    that is the way to do it

    Liked by 3 people


    • Slipping up Cort

      Netanyahu calls him a brother and visited him last week and attended the Inauguration
      Bolsonaro’s sons are pro M0ssad

      Like


    • on January 5, 2019 at 4:17 am Les Saunders, Protestant

      Guys,
      The war will be long and brutal. But mostly long.
      I maintain that within the next 10 years of the war, a realistic, attainable, and tangible goal is to achieve Breitbart-level changes. Build walls, eliminate illegal immigration, reduce lawful immigration (cotton’s bill), and stick it to the globalists and globalism. Alliances will need to be made. If we build a wall and end lgbtqrstuvwxyz2 programmes while doing photo ops in Tel Aviv talking about how “walls work”, we’d be orders of magnitude ahead of where we were 5 years ago and salvation may be possible.
      Once that is achieved, which is still relatively mainstream stuff, will come the real and arduous task of taking on and dismantling the (((globalist))) power structure.
      Trump, Bolsanaro are not the end-all. Rather, they are just the beginning.

      Like


      • Agreed. I like Bolsonaro but …

        Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 1:48 pm Carlos Danger

        The Fed needs to go most of all and we need a new dollar based on gold and silver. I would be happy with ditching the Fed and building a wall. The ethnic cleansing will be the ugly piece.

        Like


      • “The Fed needs to go most of all and we need a new dollar based on gold and silver. I would be happy with ditching the Fed and building a wall. The ethnic cleansing will be the ugly piece.”

        I believe this is what will happen, except the Fed won’t actually go away. it will just be made irrelevant.

        how hard would it be for the superpowers to create their own currency? and then just tell the bankers “sorry about your money, but we’ve decided not to pay you back.”

        it would be mayhem for awhile but it will settle into a new system. I don’t know how all the wealth of citizens would play out if the international banking slate were wiped clean. real estate and gold would still hold, I guess…

        Like


    • Thank goodness. Homosexuals and their allies are as much of an enemy as we have.

      Like


  25. for those of you who wonder what happand to strapon
    apparently he became fashionista
    lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Like


    • Holy fuck, that’s so repulsive that it’s disturbing.

      Like


      • Like some degenerate quasi-human out of Lovecraft, in fact.

        Like


      • Noodle arms, pencil neck -chk
        Paunch -chk
        Girly lips -oh yeh
        Strange droopy fatty accretions, where the pectoral muscles normally occur on an actual Man -eww
        And prematurely bald into the bargain.

        Do these “people” have absolutely no self-awareness? What the fuck do they think they look like?
        OK it might be a troll, but …

        Liked by 1 person


  26. on January 4, 2019 at 5:59 pm traitors first

    “it caused feminists to shriek themselves to death”

    that warms the cockles of my black heart

    Like


  27. […] Carlson must have been reading manosphere blogs recently and swallowed a few Crimson Pills on his journey to becoming the real-est Realtalker on the TelaViv, because in his latest show he drops a truth bomb so big it caused feminists to shriek themselves to death. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSuQ-AyiicA No joke, I would vote for a Carlson/Coulter presidential… — Read on heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/01/04/tucker-carlson-grabs-ahold-of-the-female-hypergamy-question/ […]

    Like


  28. blah blah blah blah blah

    Bunz => Oven

    Like


  29. Breitbart: ‘Trump Prepared to Keep Government Shut Down Months or a Year’

    Good. The longer this goes on the more people will wonder what we need it for.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Breitbart: ‘Trump Prepared to Keep Government Shut Down Months or a Year’

      Good. The longer this goes on the more people will wonder what we need it for.

      Reminds me of a supposedly true story I heard years ago about a preliminary Voir dire questionnaire to be filled out by prospective jurors. One of the questions was, “Can your employer manage without you for an extended period of time?” One wit answered, “Yes, but I don’t want him to know.”

      Like


    • on January 6, 2019 at 6:23 pm Corinth Arkadin

      I want a TOTAL SHUTDOWN, no partial. Complete, utter shutdown.

      Like


  30. You will see that the only way this gets fixed is with a mountain of Leftoid corpses.

    There is no other way – they will never leave us alone.

    Like


  31. on January 4, 2019 at 8:01 pm Jonathan Castle

    After watching Carlson’s full speech….wow. What a bold and scathing attack on our corporo-government ruling class! And a full-throated argument for populism and nationalism.

    Don’t get caught up in whether he ‘gets’ the entire sexual red-pill. Feminism is just one weapon the ruling class uses to enrich themselves and disarm the rest of us, like multi-culturalism and environmentalism – and cultural degradation.

    Trump brought this revolution to the Republican party and they resisted it with all their being. Mittens and others aren’t done fighting. But this revolution goes beyond party lines.

    Ordinary people know they’re getting screwed, whether they’re historically democrats or republicans. Look at the yellow vests in France – it’s not party-based. It’s a broad rebuke of the ruling class. This is a time to build bridges across fading lines formerly drawn by the ruling class.

    Liked by 2 people


  32. Why would you care about these ‘traditional’ shit jobs that men did and still do? 40yo men men used to look old from this sort of work.
    Bring back manufacturing jobs but make females do them like the Chinese and Russian females had to do. They can also work on the roads and utilities etc Most females are worth nothing to men(only worth is sex value) so treat them like robots.
    Men can take the safe comfortable high paying jobs and for exercise do what females do eg. yoga or gym (fun time really)
    We’re not living in a sparsely populated world where we needed to make new workers for the family. The world is overpopulated and we have machinery for everything.
    Huxley’s tongue in cheek book about Brave New World is the future. Of course it’s not going to be exactly the same but the ideas will be the future.
    1984 is an entirely different sort of world and some of that totalitarianism is creeping in but it’s not the future. Orwell was a mild Fabian sort of socialist but the book was really about the totalitarianism of Stalinism and also his experience with the Soviets during the Spanish civil war. And I guess the fact that he was dying of TB at the time added to the bleakness of the book.

    Like


    • And btw, when I read BNW as a teen I thought that it was a terrible world and instructors always sort of taught it this way.
      But now that I’m old I can see that most of the ideas are actually good and that society will be happier and run smoothly in a world like that.
      Read the section towards the end where the Director is explaining to the Savage how things work.
      The Savage, who was really an Alpha,was sort of stranded on the savage reservation and was brought up with the Indians.After he was brought back into the civilised world there was a big conflict in his mind and he ends up killing himself because he didn’t fit into any world.
      I’m sure that in the transition period there will be many people like this.

      Like


    • on January 5, 2019 at 2:05 am Carlos Danger

      Huxley’s book was by no means tongue in cheek. The plan is to make you love your slavery and control you with technology. These guys were all aristocrats and in on the plan to re-establish a two tier society.

      Liked by 1 person


    • on January 4, 2019 at 10:01 pm Captain Obvious

      L, I’m so tired, I just read your link and then re-poasted it.

      I gotta get some sleep one of these days.

      LOLing.

      Like


  33. on January 4, 2019 at 10:00 pm Captain Obvious

    ‘Vanquished white male’: Houellebecq’s new novel predicts French discontent https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jan/04/vanquished-white-male-houellebecqs-new-novel-eerily-predicts-french-discontent

    Like


    • Houellebecq is in far the most consequential writer of this age
      It looks like Serotonin is an excellent book, perhaps equaling or being close to Elementary Particles

      For those who read French there is a good review here

      https://culturebox.francetvinfo.fr/livres/la-rentree-litteraire/pourquoi-serotonine-est-le-plus-houellebecquien-des-romans-de-houellebecq-283629

      [CH: houellebecq is the best writer of this age. he’s also prolific, which is rare among currently feted novelists.]

      Like


      • prolific and prophetic

        2001 Platform ending with a massive terrorist attack, Few days after the book release 9/11happens A year after Bally 200 killed in the same fashion as depicted in the book
        2015 Submission- Same day as the release massacre at Charlie Hebdo
        followed by other terrorist attacks including Bataclan
        2019 Serotonine describing the french agricultural revolt against EU
        Written before/foresaw “Jillet Jaunes”
        Book ends with a violent clash and massacre with police-To be Seen

        Like


    • Houellebecq is in far the most consequential writer of this age
      It looks like Serotonin is an excellent book, perhaps equaling or being close to Elementary Particles

      Typical Houellebecq

      “Lors de ma séparation d’avec Claire, mon sort avait été notablement adouci par la fréquentation des vaches normandes”.
      ———————————————————————————————

      Houellebecq -Serotonine

      During my separation from Claire, my fate had been significantly softened by the attendance of norman cows

      Like


  34. Like


  35. Paris is burning.

    Liked by 1 person


  36. My first job was at a supermarket. It was boring work, but a good experience. An important experience. The other stockers and I would have fun, too. Great camaraderie, a lot of ball-busting. I was a teenager. My hometown supermarket looks vastly different 20 years later. Mostly Haitian and Latin. A lot of Haitian women who dont give a shit. I cant imagine being a White teenager in that environment.

    Like


  37. Tucker’s essay is a landmark AND a bridge-builder.
    The American Revolution movement wasn’t inspired or sparked by one single act or written piece. One element built upon another while new expressions were being infused along the way. All the while, the Poz or the Establishment of the time doubled down – which only stoked the flames, which is what Pelosi, for example, is doing. Ready. Set.

    Like


  38. on January 5, 2019 at 9:50 am CalvinDecline

    Just got around to watching the Carlson video… really good stuff.

    Sad part is it still doesn’t have even 200,000 views… it should have millions by this point. Youtube is definitely keeping it hidden. Sad.

    Liked by 1 person


    • I sat through it a second time, just to make sure I did it justice and didn’t miss anything and my initial impression wasn’t off-kilter.

      As far as I heard, from my frame of reference… and barring the milieu ’round chere, I’m sure I’m not alone:

      a) muh economics has transformed the White man in red ‘Murrica to the same level as ghetto negros… with an underlying connotation that solving said economic issues would take care of the issues in BOTH populations. Fail

      b) the equivalent of “Eat the Rich” – well, boys, I’ve been hearing that gambit since the sixties, from those that we now consider our enemies. And while the singling out of Romney is deserved, making him the icon of the problem is the same shtick as the “rich White men be killing us all” gambit of the same era. Win for pointing the finger at at least ONE of the problems, but Romney’s more the puppet than a string-puller, so Fail overall. I don’t expect Tucker to name the jew, per se, but naming the gentile shouldn’t get such big applause from otherwise astute yeggs.

      c) Kudos to Tucker for pointing out that both Dems and Reps are our banes, but DUH! Who DOESN’T know that by now? In short, nothing revolutionary there, nothing that would cause the (((paymasters))) to pull the plug, which of course, they didn’t.

      d) Win for pointing the finger at that yenta and her “stockholders are more important than children” – sub rosa naming of the jew sure to be trumpeted by alt-R yeggs, but don’t think that any normies put 2 + 2 together on a grand scale.

      e) Here’s one of the main beefs here – CH trumpeted this as Tucker calling out hypergamy, but like I already mentioned, if anyone without our red-pilled colored glasses picked up on that, I seriously doubt it. No woman came out of this 15 minute lecture with the idea or inspiration to stop the pursuit of college, career, or lotsa cockas. Sorry, but Fail on the wishful thinking and false claim of awakening on this issue.

      Again, we’ve been so starved for any semblance of RealTalk in the (((MSM))) that this latest monologue has the scent of fresh air, and obviously this sort of common sense (which is obvious to most thinking adults) has dropped out of popularity among the Occasio and other cargo cultists.

      But it’s a message that has been said many times over for the past forty years, and by many that used to have a forum in the (((MSM))).

      This is not “shitting” on Tucker or the message. But the way it’s been touted has been us lying to ourselves and/or just plain naive la-la-la’ing about what was ACTUALLY said… a message FIRMLY and safely well within the Narrative, the root being “muh economics” can be blamed and pointed to as the solution, when in fact, we all know its demographics and (((undue parasitism))) by more than just a few old White gentiles.

      Like


      • The speech called out the government as illegitimate. One either sees this or he doesnt. When he doesnt and he respects his fellows on this board, it behooves him to make his point once and then stfu.

        The ancillary facts of who spoke and on what platform are intangibles that go a long way. Also Carlson’s seriousness and delivery. The fact that he stands to lose a lot. Antifa already tried to invade his home.

        Liked by 1 person


      • In other words, Carlson breaks the seal on one of the important taboos holding back a bottled-up revolution, and all Greg can do is nitpick it into the usual ornery litany more appropriate to a time gone by (holding libertardian practices to account for their insouciant destruction of our social capital = “Eat The Rich”?). Forest for the trees; a promising gambit “falls flat.”

        Like


      • The speech called out the government as illegitimate.

        Did it? I thought the title of this post was calling out hypergamy.

        If ragging on the Dems and the Repubs is “calling out the government as illegitimate”, then he’s going to have to get in line… and said nothing that would jeopardize his job, nor be a surprise to anyone since the days of Huey Long.

        One either sees this or he doesnt. When he doesnt and he respects his fellows on this board, it behooves him to make his point once and then stfu.

        To get respect you have to give it, and if anyone wants to address and gainsay the actual points I spelled out, rather than trying to shout me down for voicing my take on the issue, I’ll listen. Otherwise, it’s punch-counterpunch, and as you may have noticed, I hit back harder than the ankle-biters.

        The ancillary facts of who spoke and on what platform are intangibles that go a long way. Also Carlson’s seriousness and delivery. The fact that he stands to lose a lot. Antifa already tried to invade his home.

        He stands to lose nothing by staying within the Narrative, which he did… merely because he voiced a few of the homespun virtues about mårriage, he nonetheless couched in all in “muh economics”… same old story that’s been burying us for decades now.

        Youse yeggs have to stop acting like a cherry bomb is a nuclear weapon.

        And merely because the lunatic left threatened him at home doesn’t make him a martyr yet.

        Now listen up, one last time… this is NOT shitting on him or his message. This is calling a spade a spade, and if you want to see a backhoe, fine… but don’t keep trying to snow the snowman.

        Like


      • You’re entitled to your opinion King, but Carlson broke no seal and stayed well-within the Narrative, for the reasons I’ve outlined above, and which NO ONE has gainsaid yet.

        Like


      • Prudent people stay within the narrative rather than going off half-cocked, as you perpetually advocate in a “Screw Your Optics” kind of way. You fail to visualize how a successful strategy actually must manifest itself in a world of poz, bit by frustrating bit, so as not to provoke an automatic, overwhelming counterresponse, annihilation, and setback for the survivors to square one.

        You are becoming the kid in the car who can’t stop/won’t stop asking, “Are we there yet?”

        Liked by 1 person


      • King, when even you miss the point and have to resort to ad hominem, it’s a dark day indeed.

        NOBODY is blaming Tucker for staying within the Narrative, as you yourself FINALLY admit. (sheesh)

        The point was, by staying within said Narrative, this was no comeuppance to hypergamy, as the title of the fucking post itself made it out to be… and it was no revolutionary or revelationary speech to mark as a bellwether in “How We Won The War”.

        If the opinion of others vary, fine… but nobody is making their case, unless of course the case is to stifle any contrary opinion by shooting the messenger.

        Like


      • on January 5, 2019 at 3:04 pm Carlos Danger

        Auntie E, the plain truth is we don’t yet have the power. We may never have it. What we discuss here is pretty bold and beyond the pale for most people in the US and Europe as well. Tucker inched that timid population quite a bit forward assuming enough hear the message to make the change in consciousness. We are not at 1933, no matter how much you wish it to be so. We are at 1921 or so, maybe earlier because hyperinflation has not set in yet and the communist threat has not been made plain for all to see yet. I for one want my country and republic back. I don’t romanticize Nazi Germany as many here do. However, we have no one who is capable of leading us or who holds the power to bring about the dramatic change you so openly crave. That seems to be the big picture you fail to see here. What blood treasure or sacred honor have you risked? I dare say none. You critique Carlson from the vantage point of a football spectator yet Carlson took a big risk and will not take more unless the payoff in public support warrants it. You want a big dramatic putsch where the dictator of your dreams sweeps away the table of your enemies and sets things right as you see it. How do you know everyone here wants the same as you? Matt wants us to return to Fernand Braudel’s description of the late Middle Ages. I want 1787 America. Others would be happy with the 80s. None of this has been decided or even discussed. As you point out we are not even free to openly name the enemy so we hint at him instead. But by naming Romney, you are then free to name Carl Icahn and not specifically dwell on his ethnicity, which is important at this juncture. So Matt was by no means engaging in ad hominem attacks and to say so betrays a powerful lack of introspection and grasp of the situation as it is at this time. Until we have the things I discuss above, any magic dictator is doomed to failure. Most likely it will be a Sulla or a Marius, not a Hitler. I used to listen to the White Power message in 1973 and 1974 as a kid after my paper route. They always talked about needing economic ruin in order to gain power. Most people are in the tightening their belt stage as you frequently point out. Carlson risked a great deal in making this speech and saying it was only controlled opposition is disingenuous and childish.

        Like


      • Gayg, you’re just fucking pathetic.

        Tucker stayed in the narrative?

        LOL…when he said we aren’t supposed to serve markets?!?

        you fucking IDIOT, that is THE CORE OF THE NARRATIVE. This is the jews’ central power, get you in the market, borrowing their confetti so they can get rich and put your wife to work too

        you think your wife CAN stay home now? NO mfer, they want her working and buying and borrowing, this is WHY THEY FUCKING ADVERTISE empowerment at work TO HER. Not because they have some sinister fucking plot to wreck your idyllic white nuclear family out of spite you fucking MORON. They want MONEY.

        This is ALSO why they flood us with brown savages- they need another layer of the ponzi.. They wanted low wage workers not to wreck your precious white society. They get a lot of useful idiots to go along with the latter theme and the equality shit but the REASON for it is MONEY.

        You fucking jew monomaniacs miss the ENTIRE forest for the trees- these things are MEANS to an end, not the end themselves. And this is why you’re stupid and you lose. Jews love money more than anything, they even name themselves after it. the ENTIRE system orbits around debt.

        Now, there may be a few (lately) outliers who are chasing a social agenda for reasons that are new, but historically jews care about taking your shit and making it theirs. the rest of it is just mostly noise.

        Like


      • — Now, there may be a few (lately) outliers who are chasing a social agenda for reasons that are new, but historically jews care about taking your shit and making it theirs.

        What you are neglecting to mention,though, is that when the target nation objects to be strip-mined for their profit and makes some kind of a movement to block it, they take it VERY PERSONALLY. That’s when they bring on the poz artillery.

        Like


      • Tucker stayed in the narrative?

        LOL…when he said we aren’t supposed to serve markets?!?

        you fucking IDIOT, that is THE CORE OF THE NARRATIVE. This is the jews’ central power, get you in the market, borrowing their confetti so they can get rich and put your wife to work too

        Pay attention, fer cryin’ out loud, if you would shout.

        Speaking as if “muh economics” is the cause of problems and, doing muh economics right, will be the solution to said problems is one of the keystones of the Narrative.

        Avoiding the third rail of race and the demographics war that Whites are losing, mostly due to (((agitprop))) and undue influence of those on our culture is another keystone, studiously avoided if one wants to work on the (((MSM))) stage.

        Adding one of the Narrative’s favorite leitmotivs, White man falling behind, economically AND thereby socially, is merely carrying water for the enemy.

        DUH on you.

        You’d make your points more convincingly if you didn’t have to bolster your weak hand by yelling epithets at the top of your lungs, try-hard.

        And this is why you’re stupid and you lose

        I’ve been winning all my life… you’re the one divorced, you’re the one who hasn’t replaced your numbers with enough children, and YOU’RE the one whose vocabulary and ability to debate is at low high-school level.

        Keep throwing me the softballs, try-hard… I have plenty of swings left.

        Like


      • [i]c) Kudos to Tucker for pointing out that both Dems and Reps are our banes, but DUH! Who DOESN’T know that by now?[/i]

        Uh…everyone who watches his show and has voted for a Cuckservative up until Trump ran for office.

        Like


    • on January 5, 2019 at 12:54 pm Carlos Danger

      It will be on the Fox News website and a few million probably saw it when it originally ran. You Tube needs to be trust busted into oblivion just as should jewgle.

      Liked by 1 person


  39. A completely peaceful overthrow is a pipe dream. The globohomo coalition has too much power and money. This isn’t going to be easy and we need to understand that.

    We need to focus our resources on younger, college educated whites. Many dislike Trump, especially the women. They don’t realize the good he’s doing for their children. They are fed garbage from college and the media daily.

    Liked by 1 person


  40. it seems Sci-Fi has a purpose after all.

    Poul Anderson explained this +50 years ago.

    https://2m2l2d2d.blogspot.com/2019/01/poul-anderson-refutes-tucker-carlson.html

    Like


  41. on January 5, 2019 at 2:55 pm Oswald Spengler

    “They have to go back.”

    The unassimilable immigrants — they have to go back to their home countries.

    The flamboyant homosexuals — they have to go back in the closet.

    The careerist women — they have to go back to being wives and mothers again.

    Liked by 1 person


    • In short, men date across and down, women date across and up. Men are primarily attracted to women’s looks, women are primarily attracted to men’s social and financial status (especially for long-term commitments). When men lose status, their women lose desire for them.

      That’s never desire for them, that’s desire to use them, and you know it.
      Just have no social status and no money — or tell them you have not, if you want to breast the challenge of being liked.

      Why are you telling people it’s good to be proud of their being commodities?

      Like


  42. You mean I must be sad that women use State provision instead of manwallets?

    Why?

    I am no fan of prostitution, in any form..

    Like


  43. I always get a testosterone boost pursuing these comment sections.

    Like


  44. on January 5, 2019 at 10:38 pm epochehusserl

    David French has already refuted Tucker Carlson. His argument is that having interests as a white man is “victimhood politics”. Cuckservatism inc is working overtime.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/01/the-right-should-reject-tucker-carlsons-victimhood-populism/

    Like


  45. on January 6, 2019 at 2:53 am pleasuremonster

    Random question, but related:

    Is there a word-replacer app for Chrome that substitutes the word “Jargonism” for Intersectionality and “Self-Control” for Privilege?

    It’s also okay if it does Blibbityblarp for Intersectionality.

    Like


  46. It doesn’t get much more hypergamous than cucking a multi-millionaire ,

    “THE GREATEST BETRAYAL – Millionaire wins £250k payout from ex wife after she ‘tricked’ him into believing three sons were his for 21 YEARS – when he was actually infertile since birth”

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8130171/man-receives-250k-payout-from-ex-wife-after-dna-test-reveals-he-is-not-the-father-of-her-three-sons-after-21-years

    Like


  47. Tucker’s wrong on the idea that the free markets are hurting the working man.

    I wish there was a level playing field, or market, where the elites didn’t get special favours, and we could all just compete purely on our merits and hard work.

    Sadly, what people commonly think of a market nowadays, is really just a rigged game with the ersatz veneer of a market, dominated by central banks inflating wages to nothing with ZIRP and QE (whilst the elite’s assets rocket in value)

    And/Or the labour market flooded with illegal immigrants, who get employed under the radar by the elites, so as to avoid all of the onerous employment laws and taxes that the small employer, without access to connections and expensive lawyers, is subject to.

    Like


  48. on January 6, 2019 at 8:07 am baked georgia

    I was just reading a pro-free market article on bbc. it’s funny how the cucked right understand that they wrong about everything… but somehow are right about free market? oy vey

    Like


    • What the BBC claim is a market, is just a government rigged game of QE, ZIRP, bailouts, subsidy, and mind bending tax + employment law.

      Like


      • on January 6, 2019 at 2:02 pm baked georgia

        government intervention is not necessary bad.

        sure all those cases that you mentioned are awful for us. but not because of the “Model” but how we used it.

        more important than those decisions is “WHO” was behind those decisions. and how we should do everything to stop them.

        and the only solution right now it’s true government power. we can’t “buy out” amazon or apple or google or banks. the libertarian wet-dream that everyone can open a similar business if they dont like the ones that already are there is an insane concept

        Like


    • I’ll give you a very pertinent example of a market the government have rigged, and ruined….the sexual market.

      It’s not just this blog, but countless others, that have pointed out for years the artificial incentives the government have created to encourage women to behave like little more than low grade hookers.

      The government have sanctioned:-

      – No fault divorce (a woman can blow half the neighbourhood and still expect at least half of the man’s assets in a separation settlement).
      – Family courts that are biased towards women.
      – Forcing men to support children in cases of fraudulent paternity.
      – Entitlement programmes for single mothers
      – Free birth control
      – Presumption of male guilt after an accusation of rape or sexual assault.

      I would prefer a sexual market, or any other market for that matter, where bad/foolish/disruptive behaviour is discouraged, unfortunately government intervention always seems to cause the opposite.

      Like


  49. Just look at video of Mike Ashley (owner of Sports Direct and House of Fraser) under questioning from MPs, where he “magnanimously” calls for a tax on internet businesses to save the failing high street, or in other words, protect his failing high street business from smaller and more efficient competitors on the internet.

    It’s one example of endless lobbying and collusion between the elite, corporations, and the government, to make up unfair rules to the detriment of everyone else.

    Markets are fine if everyone has to play by the same rules, but that’s not how it works, tycoons and corporations lobby the government, so they can cheat and lie, whilst everyone else has to work hard and play fairly.

    Government shouldn’t have the power to make these sorts of decisions, because this level of power always leads to corruption.

    Like


    • on January 6, 2019 at 1:56 pm baked georgia

      there should be a internet tax to protect high street business.

      the government should do anything to restrict the power of corporations and their agenda.

      I prefer living in a white communist country than in a brown capitalist country

      Like


  50. […] US civil war. Many took notice of the themes discussed in the Reactosphere: American Sun and Heartiste, for […]

    Like


  51. If I said the word ‘nigger’ around Cucker Carlson, his head would spin around a la The Exorcist.

    Like


  52. […] Tucker Carlson Grabs Ahold Of The Female Hypergamy Question Actually its Heartiste who chomps down on it, gives it the pit bull shake, he is being red pilled modest. […]

    Like


  53. Great monologue. Even like the shot at the devils lettuce which needs to be knocked off its pedestal. On cultural issues his arguments reflect the North Atlantic conservativism typical of those thinktanks that were to the right of Never Trump. R.R. Reno has been casually sniping globohomo and shoveling populist apologetics for about a year from a traditional Catholic perspective; even going as far as naming the sodomites who make up the upper class that pushed for same-sex “marriage” and how that ties with consumerism (to dovetail with Tucker’s criticism of the cult of free market that makes up an otherwise progressive right wing). Charles Murray also illustrated the decline of the ruling class in “Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010”. It’s a good sign that normies and boomercons won’t be able to ignore these topics forever. Bad that it’s just now being discussed after 16 years of the two worst presidents the nation ever had.

    Like


  54. The “self-appointed leaders” (i.e., those who hijacked the movement) of the French “Yellow-Vests” are communists.

    Like


  55. bigjohn33: “This was an implicit call for white Americans to (presumably peacefully) overthrow the government.”

    — White men aren’t going to overthrow anything until they can manage to overthrow their own women.

    TWRA.

    Like


  56. This video blew me away. I had to pause it every minute or so to let the truth sink in.

    He spares nobody, which is so refreshing after this hyper-partisan crap we’ve been seeing for the past 20 years.

    Like


  57. Has anyone started a pool on how much longer Tucker’s got on Fox?

    Like