The Number One Sign That A Woman Is Deeply In Love With You

Hackett To Bits pithily reveals a behavioral tic that indicates a woman is deeply, truly in love with a man.

Geez check out bikini chick Tatiana and her letter. Talk about trying to qualify herself to a dominant man, every sentence she writes is an apology for possibly boring him.
Let that be a reminder: never be deferential and never apologize.

Do hot chicks dig murderous jerks? You bet!

You slave and struggle to earn a keep
Give roses and vows and profess love so deep
But rarely a night do you share your sleep
with a woman who isn’t a 20 stone heap
While murderers bask in the lust of lithe sexy babes
and no effort spent to earn their unfolding labes
It all comes back to a question you evade
“What if all I am is a sexless chump to raid?”
YOU ARE BETA

Now let’s look at those love letters from Tatiana:

Women have a lot of compassion for murderers….yet so little compassion for betaboy incels. Funny, that.

Hackett To Bits is right. That letter from Tatiana to the killer “only she can understand” reads like a long form apologia for being a lovestruck woman intruding in an alpha male’s safe space. I mean, this line alone…

“If you’ve gotten this far without throwing my letter in the trash – thank you

…reads like a woman scared to death that her 20-year marriage to the man she loves is on the brink of ending. Except this is a posture of supplication from a woman to a complete stranger who just happens to be in jail for murdering his pregnant wife and two daughters.

She underlined “thank you” to emphasize her gratitude that a murderer had read that far.

When was the last time a doting, supportive, beta male feminist received a letter with anything underlined in it that didn’t say “STOP CALLING ME”?

Gratitude.

It’s what’s been missing for so long in America, and particularly from American women.

Make Amerimuffs Grateful Again.

“You to tears yet? That was my goal! Kidding, of course.”

She’s so afraid to lose his interest and approval. Would she ever be this afraid to lose the interest and approval of a law-abiding beta male?

HAHAHAHAHAAAAAA

She was so nervous her joke would fall flat that she promptly clarified for him that it was a joke.

“(I would love to tell you more about me. I’m extremely lonely and can use a friend)”

Again, have you ever heard a woman talk like this to a reliable, law-abiding, salt-of-the-earth man? She’s throwing herself at a murderer, begging for his attention. She YEARNS for his friendship *wink wink*. The non-murderous man, at best will hear a, “I can’t do Thursday, but get back to me next week and we’ll see”.

“My brother was incarcerated for a long while.”

The genetic matrix here is fascinating. Are the genes which predispose to criminal men the same genes which, in females, predispose to loving criminal men?

“I hope I’ve put a smile on your face.”

I hope I haven’t bored you.
I hope you’re still reading.
I hope you will be my friend.
I hope I can send you more half naked pics of myself.
I hope you like me.
I hope you will fill my belly with your psychopath champions.

What the typical beta male in her life hears instead:

“I hope you don’t think I see you that way.”

“Please know that there are strangers out there (like me) who care about you.”

Incels would love to know there are random hotties who care about them, too, but they aren’t very lovable. They need more blood notches on their belt before random hotties will care about them. Killer preselection.

Hackett To Bits is spot on. This love note is a woman ENDLESSLY QUALIFYING HERSELF to a dominant man with whom she has fallen in love.

Self-qualification — or supplication — is the number one sign that a woman is deeply, truly in love with a man.

If a woman’s words to you are the equivalent of “I AM NOT WORTHY”, then she is your lovething to do with as you please.

Every angle of your Game should be directed toward provoking self-qualification from a girl, because once she’s in that psychological head space she’ll subconsciously imbue you with much higher romantic value than you would have as just another man who wants to get in her panties.

The corollary to this, as Hackett wrote, is never qualify yourself to a girl. Never defer to her, never apologize for yourself, never get defensive when she presses your buttons, and never try too hard to impress her.

The simple act of NOT being a supplicating man pushes a girl into the role of the supplicating suitor. Script flipping is essentially turning the usual seduction dynamic — qualifying man, judging woman — on its head: qualifying woman, judging man. This is the way of the desirable man.

It’s interesting peering into the soul of a woman in love. You readily observe that such a woman sounds and acts EXACTLY like a run-of-the-mill beta male. That’s not an accident. Love for an alpha male confuses and intimidates women the same way that lust for a hottie confuses and intimidates beta males.





Comments


  1. This is why women subconsciously vote civilization towards the direction of collapse and then “Warlords and Harems”. Ending up in the harem of an alpha male who crushes weaker men is an ideal human reproductive condition and women are hardwired to get into that situation.
    Killers are almost on the same page as warlords.

    Liked by 9 people


    • on December 24, 2018 at 11:05 am Captain Obvious

      >>>>> “Ending up in the harem of an alpha male who crushes weaker men is an ideal human reproductive condition”

      If you want to live in a disfunctional turd world sewer like Saudi Arabia [Average IQ = 84, Lynn & Vanhanen].

      Over the long haul, K-Selection & {1-Man}/{1-Woman} always produce much broader flatter bell curves for all measures of human achievement, with vastly moar outliers [= geniuses] at the far end of the bell curve.

      Liked by 4 people


      • on December 24, 2018 at 11:05 am Captain Obvious

        And in K-Selection & {1-Man}/{1-Woman}, the Betas actually have something to fight for.

        Whereas in R-Selection & Polygamy, the Betas are like, “Fight & die fo dat fool? Phuck dat sh!t! I ain’t got no skin in dis hyunh Game.”

        Liked by 2 people


      • on December 24, 2018 at 11:12 am Captain Obvious

        Look at what happened in the original Gulf War I, in August of 1990: Relatively poor but mongamous Iraq invaded ultra-wealthy & hyper-Polygamous Kuwait, and the Kuwaiti Betas all promptly dropped their guns and ran away in fear.

        Because they didn’t have skin in the Game.

        Mongamous Iraq conquered Hyper-Polygamous Kuwait in TWELVE FRIGGING HOURS.

        Liked by 2 people


      • on December 24, 2018 at 11:17 am Captain Obvious

        Monogamous

        Like


      • on December 24, 2018 at 11:28 am Darth Caucasious

        Spawndo. It’s got what wombs crave.

        Liked by 2 people


      • This. Also, when most monogamy is strictly enforced (meaning when thots are strongly patrolled), it tends to boost the mean IQ too. Win/win.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on December 24, 2018 at 11:58 am Darth Caucasious

        If you want to live in a disfunctional turd world sewer like Saudi Arabia [Average IQ = 84, Lynn & Vanhanen].

        Over the long haul, K-Selection & {1-Man}/{1-Woman} always produce much broader flatter bell curves for all measures of human achievement, with vastly moar outliers [= geniuses] at the far end of the bell curve.

        The way women (especially the r selected types,) react to high IQ men, you’d think that it was somehow necessary for such males to force themselves upon females in the past by using their higher intelligence and applying it to mastering power dynamics and eliminating their enemies.

        It’s also interesting how the Feminist definition of rape seems to keep being expanded (starting with “every act of heterosexual sex in a patriarchal culture is rape,”) until it encompasses the very act of volition itself upon the world. To rape is to will and to will is to rape.

        But women don’t like rape. Or being dominated.

        Spawndo. It’s got what wombs crave.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on December 25, 2018 at 10:20 pm Skyscraper of flesh

        Women are too solipsistic to consider the consequences of their actions. That is why they had no rights.

        Like


    • on December 24, 2018 at 11:53 am Captain Obvious

      >>>>> “women are hardwired to get into that situation”

      Within the last week or so, someone had an epic kkk0mment to the effect that “A woman’s sense of self-awareness ends at the Hamster.”

      Liked by 1 person


    • Nah. In the old days elite men could (and did) kill each other in duels, kill animals and kill foreigners. This makes them look plenty alpha to women.

      Once you toss that and start policing male behavior, the only people who can reliably look alpha are criminals.

      Liked by