Slore Of The Month (And The Rise Of The Sexless Slut)

You’ve gotta get a load of this slore. She’s taken enough loads, it’s time for her to give one back. Wear a biohazard suit.

An inquisitive sleuth [name redacted] provides the backstory:

A 3 year old son by one man, currently pregnant by another man, and she still manages to rope in some poor sick cuck to clean up the mess

Is that a cuckfecta? Not one, but two fathers of bastards which she is currently shopping to a beta bux sap to raise as his own, for the reward of pregnancy sex with a petri dish vagina that can comfortably fit a V2 rocket. What level of cuckoldry are you on? Hold his beer…

Who said romance is dead?

B.J. has fucktoy face.

She better have a vagina that can do its own calisthenics.

A good bet is that any male who shells out for a diamond ring to wife up a literal camwhore with one bastard sprog and another on the way is a total loser. An omega dreg. The filthy crust on the floor of a dive bar’s restroom. A pap smear with a penis.

Any woman “bragging” about snagging one of these desperate losers knows in her heart that she’s settling so far down the male smv ladder — after all, what kind of man but a loser would beg for the hand of a slore — that the reflected misery of it will make her feel like shit for years to come. Naturally, she will take out her bitterness and spite on her children, especially sons.

And right on cue…

This poor kid is gonna need years of therapy.

(A reader quips, “and a presidential pardon in fifteen years”.)

(Another commenter, “Such things always backfire. In 20 years from now, her son will be the leader of the “New American Nazi Party”, the “punisher of thots”.”)

The vile slattern featured in this post is too souldead and psychologically syphilitic to affectionately grace her with the thot label. She’s a level above that…she’s a torc: a “tri-orificed chattel“.

With a circulation of about 300,000, Your Ward News has drawn a barrage of complaints from recipients in and around Toronto and as far as Ottawa. The federal government temporarily barred Canada Post from distributing the publication in 2016 and recently made the ban permanent.

The publication, Flumerfelt said, demonizes feminists as “dangerous people” and calls women “tri-orficed chattels.” It brands most feminists as “satanists exhilarated by abortion,” claims women are inferior, are “natural liars with no sense of justice,” and that feminist behaviour encourages rape.

Where is the lie?

Btw, thank God America has the First Amendment. Canada sucks.

This is a good time to mention that the percentage of married American women with premarital double digit cock counts has increased from 2% in the 1970s to 18% in the 2010s:

The only premarital sex partner categories that showed a decrease as a percentage of the total married female population over the last fifty years?

Virgins and good girls with one or two premarital lovers.

Think about that.

In the 1970s, among married women 80% had fewer than three premarital cocks.

By the 2010s, 61% of the married women cohort had three or more premarital cocks.

A total inversion of the sexual market, vaulting tramps into the position that damsels used to occupy.

No wonder the marriage rate is declining. Men have no incentive to invest in spoiled vagina.

Sex frequency may be decreasing as Pillennials retreat to their fapatoriums and cat cafes, but cock carousel riding is spinning faster than ever. Just because women don’t linger longer with their flings doesn’t mean the cockas aren’t accumulating.

Is it worse that women are cock hopping more but having less sex now than they did in the past when they had more sex with fewer men? Contrary to conventional wisdom, a lack of sex isn’t necessarily a positive social indicator if it’s accompanied by an increase in sex partners. A few heady romantic long-term relationships that end in heartbreak might not be as bad on a woman’s morale and sanity as a parade of prematurely aborted short-term flings punctuated by grinding bouts of loneliness.

What’s worse, the “sexless slut” who has had ten cocks in ten nights over ten years, with lots of ice cream and Tumblrrhea down time in between, or the well-sexed faithful girlfriend type who has had three cocks at three years apiece over ten years, with fleeting periods of clitoris-gazing solitude filling the short stints between boyfriends?

This question is not so easy to answer, but I lean toward believing sexless sluts are a bigger drag on functioning society, going by the rapid onset of pussyhat lunacy that has gripped our nation’s single women.

PS Dating in the Year 2018:

#ThotAudit





Comments


  1. on November 30, 2018 at 12:59 am Captain Obvious

    Black Pill much?

    > “Slore Of The Month (And The Rise Of The Sexless Slut)”

    > “Nation, Meet Ruin”

    > “Leftoids Know The Demographic Score”

    I’ma swallow a White pill now & try to go to sleep & dream about that cute little 17yo lifeguardette at the swimming pool.

    Sheesh.

    Like


    • So start your own fucking blog then cunt, instead of crapping up the threads here.

      Like


    • zfg ftw

      Liked by 1 person


    • gotta go to that dark place, Cap. gotta stop caring.

      Liked by 3 people


      • food for thought: is there a correlation between SMV and optimism/realism/pessimism?

        how about birth rates?

        Liked by 1 person


      • Plump Jack,,

        https://www.google.gr/amp/s/www.researchgate.net/publication/236002769_Facial_symmetry_and_the_'big-five'personality_factors/amp

        “Neuroticism was found to be negatively but not significantly related to facial symmetry whereas extraversion was positively associated. In contrast to previous data, we found significant negative associations between facial symmetry and openness and agreeableness. Conscientiousness was non-significantly related to facial symmetry. The strongest associations with facial symmetry were found for extraversion and openness. Our results suggest that behavioural perceptions of an individual may reflect an individual’s actual personality, and facial symmetry is a correlate of personality. “

        Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 12:45 pm Captain Obvious

        Biological Calvinism.

        Your hindbrain evolved to sense facial “beauty” or “hideousness” as being strongly correlated with inner moral/intellectual/spiritual beauty or hideousness.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on November 30, 2018 at 12:52 pm Captain Obvious

        >>>>> “gotta go to that dark place, Cap. gotta stop caring.”

        LOL’ed.

        Before I went to sleep last night, I was getting a little worried about all of these flagrantly nonchalant assaults which The Deep State is mounting against the G0d Emperor.

        Liquidating Whitey Bulger, raiding the home of the Clinton Foundation whistle blower, shopping for a federal “jurist” to quash the Congressional subpoena of James Comey, the perfidy of (((Michael Cohen))), etc etc etc.

        If the G0d Emperor plays Mr Nice Guy with these passive-aggressive psych0paths, then they’re gonna gut Him.

        Like


    • on November 30, 2018 at 12:51 pm Darth Caucasious

      I’ma swallow a White pill now & try to go to sleep & dream about that cute little 17yo lifeguardette at the swimming pool.

      She has 3 mulattos, is an avid Feminist, her tubes are tied, and she’s a camwhore lesbian.

      Dream of ovens.

      Liked by 1 person


  2. What reader of this blog couldn’t write a dissertation on this woman and the effects of WimmenzLib(tardizm):

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/i’m-broke-and-mostly-friendless-and-i’ve-wasted-my-whole-life/ar-BBQbUQB?ocid=mmx&PC=EMMX01

    Bill Ferrell

    Liked by 1 person


  3. This thot audit thing is more than ist seems. It is the young men taking back their women. Shaming them for bad (anti-white/anti-civilization) behavior.

    Like


    • I never thought of it that way…

      There may be hope yet. The talk talk talk is turning into action, slowly but surely.

      Like


  4. In the words of yer favourite pharisee:

    “All things work TOGETHER for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to his purpose”

    amen amen

    Like


    • RE: Christian churches in America, VoxDay called it correctly:

      If your church is preaching against manufactured non-sins such as racism and sexism, it will die. If your church permits women to speak from the pulpit, it will die. If your church is preaching that Jesus requires you to welcome refugees, it will die. If your church is preaching that homosexuality is not sin, it will die. If your church preaches racial equality, it will die.”

      Liked by 4 people


      • on November 30, 2018 at 9:16 am Oswald Spengler

        If your church preaches anything not found in the Scriptures, it will not only die, but it deserves to die.

        Liked by 2 people


      • you fuckin clown Spengler, the scriptures say we’re all equal and we should welcome refugees and to turn our other cheek.

        in fact, cuckstains are doing EXACTLY what Jesus did, assist in their own destruction. He told them on the Sermon how to behave. To not only allow themselves to be robbed but to give the robber more. If forced to walk, walk even more. Turn the other cheek. Don’t resist evil. THESE are the scriptures, and THIS is why the religion is dying.

        It’s a doomsday cult!

        Liked by 1 person


      • LOL Trav……tell us who made you sit through sunday school one too many hours.

        I won’t deny how cucked the churches are. Not for a minute, its true.

        But then again, church is where the virgin bitches are. The few that are left. Guys can keep slinging cheap peen on Tinder or find you a decent church and a virgin to have kids with.

        Like


      • on December 1, 2018 at 12:35 am Darth Caucasious

        But then again, church is where the virgin bitches are. The few that are left. Guys can keep slinging cheap peen on Tinder or find you a decent church and a virgin to have kids with.

        What are you talking about? Mormonism? Mennonites? Catholic church in my home town is basically a cuckoldry coordination center. All the old women provide the young ladies with homespun advice on male psychology and tips on not getting caught while the priests run interference with misdirecting, transcendent guilt trips for the young lads. I’m not sure if the Jezebels have the priests by the sexual abuse accusation case or if the priests are manipulating sex lives for control. Or both.

        Like


  5. You guys sound like incels. The only men afraid of confident experienced women are losers.

    Here is bestselling author John Green on the subject.

    Of course you won’t post this because you can’t refute it.

    Like


    • Confident experienced woman = Mouthy self obsessed used up whore.

      Liked by 1 person


    • on November 30, 2018 at 4:28 pm Corinth Arkadin

      (((Gold))) Hmmm.
      Why oh why do the special people name themselves after precious minerals?

      Diamond.
      Gold.
      Silver.

      Asking for a friend.

      Like


    • Is your girlfriend/wife known in town as a “confident experienced woman” by the men in your circle?

      Do you happen know how many men gave her confidence from the front and experience from the back?

      PS: What about your mom? Highly experienced as well? 🙂

      Like


    • on December 1, 2018 at 8:24 am Clay Matthews

      John Green has the telltale facial chartariatics of a parasite, where the ears are below the eyes …. Soy vei

      Like


    • This kike clown is a best-selling author, eh? High praise, indeed.

      I couldn’t listen to his smarmy soy voice or watch his twitching for more than ten seconds.

      What else you got?

      Like


    • This kike clown is a best-selling åuthor, eh? High praise, indeed. :duckface

      I couldn’t listen to his smarmy soy voice or watch his twitching for more than ten seconds.

      What else you got?

      Like


    • Old school advice, from before the invention of the pill and surgical abortion:

      Benjamin Franklin, Advice to a Young Man on the Choice of a Mistress (1745).

      June 25, 1745

      My dear Friend,

      I know of no Medicine fit to diminish the violent natural Inclinations you mention; and if I did, I think I should not communicate it to you. Marriage is the proper Remedy. It is the most natural State of Man, and therefore the State in which you are most likely to find solid Happiness. Your Reasons against entering into it at present, appear to me not well-founded. The circumstantial Advantages you have in View by postponing it, are not only uncertain, but they are small in comparison with that of the Thing itself, the being married and settled. It is the Man and Woman united that make the compleat human Being. Separate, she wants his Force of Body and Strength of Reason; he, her Softness, Sensibility and acute Discernment. Together they are more likely to succeed in the World. A single Man has not nearly the Value he would have in that State of Union. He is an incomplete Animal. He resembles the odd Half of a Pair of Scissars. If you get a prudent healthy Wife, your Industry in your Profession, with her good Economy, will be a Fortune sufficient.

      But if you will not take this Counsel, and persist in thinking a Commerce with the Sex inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice, that in all your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones. You call this a Paradox, and demand my Reasons. They are these:

      1. Because as they have more Knowledge of the World and their Minds are better stor’d with Observations, their Conversation is more improving and more lastingly agreable.

      2. Because when Women cease to be handsome, they study to be good. To maintain their Influence over Men, they supply the Diminution of Beauty by an Augmentation of Utility. They learn to do a 1000 Services small and great, and are the most tender and useful of all Friends when you are sick. Thus they continue amiable. And hence there is hardly such a thing to be found as an old Woman who is not a good Woman.

      3. Because there is no hazard of Children, which irregularly produc’d may be attended with much Inconvenience.

      4. Because thro’ more Experience, they are more prudent and discreet in conducting an Intrigue to prevent Suspicion. The Commerce with them is therefore safer with regard to your Reputation. And with regard to theirs, if the Affair should happen to be known, considerate People might be rather inclin’d to excuse an old Woman who would kindly take care of a young Man, form his Manners by her good Counsels, and prevent his ruining his Health and Fortune among mercenary Prostitutes.

      5. Because in every Animal that walks upright, the Deficiency of the Fluids that fill the Muscles appears first in the highest Part: The Face first grows lank and wrinkled; then the Neck; then the Breast and Arms; the lower Parts continuing to the last as plump as ever: So that covering all above with a Basket, and regarding2 only what is below the Girdle, it is impossible of two Women to know an old from a young one. And as in the dark all Cats are grey, the Pleasure of corporal Enjoyment with an old Woman is at least equal, and frequently superior, every Knack being by Practice capable of Improvement.

      6. Because the Sin is less. The debauching a Virgin may be her Ruin, and make her for Life unhappy.

      7. Because the Compunction is less. The having made a young Girl miserable may give you frequent bitter Reflections; none of which can attend the making an old Woman happy.

      8thly and Lastly They are so grateful!!

      Thus much for my Paradox. But still I advise you to marry directly; being sincerely Your affectionate Friend.

      Like



  6. Heineken tryin awful hard to impress (((someone))).

    Like


    • It used to be Jack Frost nippin’ at yer nose…

      … now, it’s Schlomo Schmul givin’ ya douche chills.

      Like


  7. It would be interesting to see the racial breakdown of women’s premarital sex partner number. I imagine the browning of America would have an effect here.

    Liked by 2 people


    • Not to mention less women are actually getting married. The sample is only married women, unmarried women are more likely to be in the 10+ category. So these numbers underrate the turn to slutting and whoring.

      Liked by 2 people


    • on November 30, 2018 at 7:32 am Deter Naturalist

      If I actually cared, I’d be curious if her kids are already mystery-meat.

      An acquaintance has two kids. The son is a heroin addict. The daughter has two kids, one half-black, the other half-Mestizo (and has never been married.) This acquaintance is on her fourth divorce. Funny—you cannot tell from looking at her that she has enough crazy inside for any five insane asylum inmates. She’s a walking example of Heredity-is-Destiny.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Women carry genetic material from every man whose dumped a load inside of her.

        We’re only beginning to understand how paternal personality and lifestyle in the months prior to conception affect gene expression. Your balls are constantly creating and re-creating a copy of you on a roughly 2.5 month rotation. Are you a boozebag? Stressed to the point of breaking? Doing drugs? Happy and content with life? Lifting hard at the gym regularly?

        These things are being passed on to your kids conceived during those seasons of life.

        Going back to the first point…..there’s no way the sperm from all those men don’t affect the children women have. Sex with virgins objectively sucks, but there’s a reason they are jealously guarded for offspring throughout human history. The ancients know wassup.

        Like


    • I’d bet real money that brown and black chicks, tormented by the knowledge that they can never be attractive like a white girl, take many cocksas purely for the palliative effect on their egos.

      Liked by 2 people


    • American pop culture has become increasingly negrified and spic-ified, both in spirit and in demographics.

      As the demographic rising tide of color continues, the behavior of nonWhites becomes increasingly the “norm” … and a good portion of Whites will follow suit (“when in Rome”… or should I say Babylon?).

      Hence, more premarital sex partners, less virgins… more crime, less trust… more shit, less sandwich.

      Is this actually NEWS to anyone?

      Liked by 3 people


      • Yep. Noticed they all speaka in da ebonics too:
        “Damn- he really out here setting the bar high.”

        We need a Raymond Carver for 2019: Would you please STFU, please.

        Glad you’re all my bros.
        FE

        Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 4:25 pm Corinth Arkadin

        I noticed the replacement of ‘may’ with ‘can’ in the early 90’s.

        Instead of, “May I have the fried chicken?” it became “Can I get (git) da fried chicken?”

        I knew a brawd who said it like that. “Can I get?” I immediately mocked her relentlessly, then corrected her like I was her daddy, and she got ashamed.

        I nexted her right after. Stoopid phucking cunt.

        Liked by 2 people


    • It would also be interesting to see it broken down by socioeconomic status.

      Like


      • it might be surprising but not in the way you expect.

        a lot of rich girls are straight up fucking whores these days

        Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 4:21 pm Corinth Arkadin

        Two Words:

        Paris. Hilton.

        She’s probably the prototype of what’s goin’ down today.

        Like


      • arkadin I say this about Paris Hilton I heard her on video say why do the Kar-gash-ians go with blacks who are so ugly and I heard her say on video to hell with all these faggots around me most got aids so I give her a lot of credit

        Like


      • Mr. Meener that’s consistent with the high T levels you can see in her figure and face. That and the high sex drive.

        Like


      • I did the sugar daddy thing for a couple of months a few years back and I gave it up in disgust.
        Med students, law students etc. ..18 year olds….all over me in my car while driving after just a $50 meal on a first date. All experts at sucking.
        They’re all whores now literally.

        Liked by 2 people


      • I live in an affluent town and went to a college with a lot of rich people.

        Rich girls have nothing to lose. They live on a diet of sperm and penis.

        Chicks that have it tough seem to be SLIGHTLY more inclined to make better choices out of pure necessity. After all, working two jobs leaves less time for drinking and fucking.

        But only slightly.

        Rich older women are DEFINITELY bigger whores. The longer I live in this town it feels like everyone is fucking around except me. You know what rich moms call dragging the kids all over town to sports and school?

        Dating.

        Liked by 1 person


  8. This degenerate can maintain a Twitter account, but we can’t risk offending the tender sensibilities of other Twitter users with the thoughts of Roosh and Heartiste.

    Liked by 2 people


  9. The #1 cause of erectile dysfunction is Western women. SLOP!!!!

    Liked by 2 people


  10. on November 30, 2018 at 6:11 am Hackett To Bits

    “Many Betabuxes knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Slore that day I can tell you…”

    Liked by 1 person


  11. Guys, ease up on the manospherian signaling, these guys are not necessarily “losers.” The pickings out there are slim, very slim, and with low birthrate there simply is not enough to go around; so a lot of these guys settle. And what are we doing about this? Corrupting the few remaining marriageable women, while careful not to reproduce (God forbid!) of course, hence rendering them useless to the next generation and therefore slimming the pickings further. Try to have at least a little sympathy for these guys, as we have done nothing to help them.

    Like


    • Just call a spade a spade. They’re losers.

      If someone called me a loser for letting myself gain weight, I’d be like “Yep, pretty loser thing to do alright.” But I’m currently shedding that weight, partly because I feel like a loser for gaining it.

      Words can never hurt a man who believes in himself.

      Liked by 1 person


      • on November 30, 2018 at 9:59 pm Corinth Arkadin

        After all I’ve been through, I feel entitled to weight.

        Also, after a particularly rough bar brawl, I never want to be light enough to pick up easily again.

        Liked by 1 person


  12. on November 30, 2018 at 7:24 am Deter Naturalist

    Next generation. Or the following one. Sooner or later, this woman’s line will be pruned from the tree of humanity. Culling delayed isn’t culling averted.

    An acquaintance (a teacher) had a kid in class whose mother was a stripper and almost certainly hooked on the side. “Sexworker does not equal bad parenting?” Ask a 9 year old who doesn’t understand why mommy’s bedroom door is closed and locked while she literally has six men in the room with her, when it’s time to get ready to go to school.

    When do we finally (finally) get to do what our common sense tells us?

    Liked by 1 person


    • on November 30, 2018 at 7:28 am Deter Naturalist

      PS: You cannot ameliorate the suffering of a child without enabling (encouraging and getting MORE of) the dysfunction of the parent. Today’s Plenitude will have to burn to the ground before harsh reality will suppress the pathological altruism and addiction-to-white-knighting that causes our Matriarchy to treat every weak and dysfunctional human as an object to be rescued (the way cat hoarders are addicted to adding another stray cat to their feces-strewn cesspool of a home.)

      Matriarchy: what happens when cat hoarding insanity becomes social policy.

      Like


    • “Culling delayed isn’t culling averted”

      Fucn ay

      Related….

      “The God of biomechanics will not be denied.”

      Like


    • the “beta male patriarchy” ended because those “beta males” lost control of their culture and country. they didnt need game because they had a proper culture and system of religious values to control their women. hence, when (((certain folks))) started peddling womens rights, free sex & the pill, title ix, they had no understanding of how disastrous these things would be for future generations of men to come. learning the ugly truths about women was not necessary for them. a daily shower and employment was all that was needed for them to get a quality, chaste wife.

      i dont know what dresden has to do with anything. go read vonnegut or something.

      Like


      • I wondered myself what Dresden has to to with the price of china in T.

        Like


      • “i dont know what dresden has to do with anything.”

        you answered your own question:

        “a daily shower and employment was all that was needed for them to get a quality, chaste wife.”

        and sometimes your “employment” entailed firebombing your own blue eyed brothers and sisters. did their chaste women make them do that?

        “they had no understanding of how disastrous these things would be for future generations of men to come.”

        apply that universally. how was not knowing the ugly truths about women any different/worse than not knowing the ugly truths about men. for example, if men were willing to die fighting/kill your own brothers for… whatever…. because (((certain folks))) told them so, then what good does THAT do for future generations?

        this whole idea that we can go back to having obedient women without also going back to having to be obedient men seems a bit silly to me. how can you have one without the other?

        “oh yeah, we’re going to have our wheatfield virgins, but there won’t be a draft and we won’t have to go kill whoever they tell us to! we get to have EVERYTHING, our way, all the time!”

        ooookie dokie.

        Like


      • I think that’s a bit of a stretch… whether it is (((them))) telling us to kill our brothers… or the popes and kings of yesteryear… the White man has always been up to the task.

        Difference is, back then, we still had control of our vimmen… and a hard enough life… with no (((MSM))) influences… so that the first order of business was just seeing to where the next meal would come from for oneself and one’s children.

        Like


      • “Difference is, back then, we still had control of our vimmen… and a hard enough life… with no (((MSM))) influences… so that the first order of business was just seeing to where the next meal would come from for oneself and one’s children.”

        so was it a fair trade? loose women in exchange for a more comfortable life and freedom from having to go kill our own brothers?

        Like


      • I don’t follow… nobody is saying women’s freedom was EVER a good thing… nor was the killing of our own White brothers.

        I’m only saying that the kikes giving the marching orders may add some rancor, but Whites have been killing their own brothers since Cain and Abel, and we haven’t lost our (ahem) supremacy due to it until the current malaise of 20th and 21st century secular humanism-cum-feminism became State Religion.

        In short, killing our brothers doesn’t seem to have anything to do with it… there was always enough White men left over to carry the torch, so long as our women were still fer us, rather than agin.

        Like


      • “In short, killing our brothers doesn’t seem to have anything to do with it… ”

        not ALL men willingly kill their own brothers. the question is, what kind of men DO?

        and are those the kind of men women want? ie, did women start going hog wild for obedient GIs once the shackles off?

        Like


      • I can’t speak for what women want…

        I just know from experience it’s something along the lines of fried ice.

        Liked by 1 person


      • plump, hitler declared war on America. perhaps his worst decision ever. thats why we were bombing them. in mass, industrial war, civilians and factories themselves are implicit participants in battle as they are the ones making the tanks and planes.

        war against germany was massively unpopular and had no legitimate support even after pearl harbor, see the America First movement. by declaring war on america hitler allowed fdr to wage war in europe as well.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 12:33 pm Captain Obvious

        Do you clowns simply ignore The Prophet?

        THEOREMA NIGRUM; Monday, November 19, 2018 at 9:24 am: “what do ya get for ki11ing black alphas? black women?”

        Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 12:39 pm Captain Obvious

        Whites can NEVER go on the offensive against non-Whites, simply because non-White women are not worth fighting & dying for.

        OTOH, Whites can always be tricked into fighting other-Whites, simply because other-Whites have hoards of young nubile fertile women which are worth fighting & dying for.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 12:39 pm Captain Obvious

        You’re dealing with a SELF-SELECTING STATISTIC here.

        The Frankfurt School will never trick Ol’ Whitey into fighting and dying in Liberia or Bangladesh or Ceylon, but the Frankfurt School [email protected] sure can trick e.g. White Amerikkkanz into fighting White Russianz simply because each side’s women are worth the effort.

        Like


      • “thats why we were bombing them.”

        “war against germany was massively unpopular and had no legitimate support even after pearl harbor, see the America First movement.”

        all carried out by men who faithfully followed the social contract to the letter. a woman for every man, and a man for every woman, so long as they both do what they’re told. that was the agreement we had, and it “worked” for thousands of years, until it didn’t.

        so what are supposed to do now, restore only ONE HALF of the contract, ie., make women obedient to the collective (the state) again, but not the men? what’s the benefit to the collective/state of the men can’t be controlled through the draft?

        “the “beta male patriarchy” ended because those “beta males” lost control of their culture and country.”

        why? WHO had control? when did the average beta male ever actually HAVE control over ANYTHING, except his own household, if that?

        Like


      • Hitler tried to save the white race from the jews . He lost. and you can see the effects from it

        Like


      • The (((US))) was seen as a puppet of the tribe by the nahzees and FDR was freezing German assets, supplying the Russkies and making inflammatory speeches long before Pearl Harbor.
        Siding with the honorable Japs. .the Japs will be around in 100 years…

        Like


      • I think it comes in cycles.

        The last few hundred years of the Roman Empire were *bretty bad*.

        The Middle Ages and early Renaissance were *bretty bad*.

        The Reformation, the restraint on the rule of kings, and the birth of the New World came out of darkness. Europe was a cesspit of hedonistic popes and bloody persecution of anyone who opposed the monarchies and their indulgence of pleasure and corruption on the backs of literal slaves. The thoroughly corrupt catholic church and the absolute authority of the nobility kept each other in power for centuries perpetuating their iniquity.

        The price for all of this was paid in blood. So much and so frequently it blends together. How many countless noble families were slaughtered in the streets of France and Italy by their subjects?

        The sack of Rome?

        It will be no different this time. There will be another Dark Ages. Always is.

        Like


    • Nobody does gangbangs at 7:30 a.m.

      Like


  13. on November 30, 2018 at 7:35 am William of Orange County

    A better argument for accelerationism I’ve never heard.

    Great piece here http://monsterhunternation.com/2018/11/19/the-2nd-amendment-is-obsolete-says-congressman-who-wants-to-nuke-omaha/.

    My favorite part?

    “A friend of mine who is a political activist said something interesting the other day, and that was for most people on the left political violence is a knob, and they can turn the heat up and down, with things like protests, and riots, all the way up to destruction of property, and sometimes murder… But for the vast majority of folks on the right, it’s an off and on switch. And the settings are Vote or Shoot Fucking Everybody.”

    Faster faster faster please. I’m one-o those guys that has an abnormally high percentage of Cro-Magnon holdover DNA and a 10 combat branch background. Run the train into the brick wall already!!!

    Liked by 1 person


    • From your keyboard to God’s ear.

      Yes, yes. I have no idea how bad it will get and grown men will cry, and I’m a pussy keyboard warrior etc. etc.

      All true to some extent.

      WCVOWOOT — also true.

      There is a small subset of exceedingly powerful people who would murder you and your entire family and sleep like babies if they could get away with it — also true.

      This is not only a war that is inevitable, it has actually already begun. The only thing at issue is the ultimate number of casualties.

      Liked by 1 person


      • “This is not only a war that is inevitable, it has actually already begun.”

        it never ended. it started at the beginning of time. our mistake was ever thinking we were exempt from natural selection. on the meta and individual levels, both.

        Like


  14. Jesus Christ. Re-read this and weep for the future of the West:

    “The federal government temporarily barred Canada Post from distributing the publication in 2016 and recently made the ban permanent.”

    Talk a police state. The libertardians are right about that much. “Political correctness” is far too soft a term for that type of censorship. In fact, this blog needs to brainstorm a term for increased entrenchment of authoritarian censorship. I mean, that’s exactly what it is.

    It has to be catchy, though, and not so obnoxiously alarmist that it turns off normies. A term like “white genocide” may have elements of hard truth but it’s a step too far. It has, to borrow a phrase from /ourguy/ Scott Adams, little persuasive value.

    [CH: industrial scale censorship. surveillance state. State-sponsored speech. Mass silencing. Gaglaw. Speech czars. Eye of Sauros. tbh Orwell coined all the best terms for this: big brother, crimethink, newspeak, two minutes hate.]

    Like


  15. What the hell is that last thing? Glen or Glenda? The toothy grin is terrifying

    Like


  16. “all thats left for normal men are rotten women”

    Pilfered from these great halls.

    Like


  17. OT, but did Strap on within get hired as m0d????

    Liked by 1 person


  18. Curious as to what line you would use to hit and quit that thot? Obviously the guy qualified himself to her, so he got beta-slapped.

    Like


  19. That slore is why domestic violence should be encouraged.

    Liked by 2 people


  20. Omega loser dude knows this slut will ask him to babysit the kids while she hangs out with her friends and flirts with other guys. Single moms are a bonanza for pedophiles!

    Like


  21. She wants a “white boi.” Translates into, a beta cuck who will provide and frankly, she is racist, as they say. Anyone who buys into her hypergamy game will having endless grief in their life.

    Liked by 2 people


    • Thought (thot?) only poofs and Avril Lavigne spelled boy boi…

      Fuck what a depressing way to start the day; at least I’m doing real work, not sitting in an office

      This female is going to be a sixty year old crone (well maybe not the way things are going) one day wondering where she went wrong.

      Like


    • The problem I have with sp4n!sh women is their palpable hatred for wh!t3 people. They’re some of the most openly hateful goons I’ve ever had the displeasure of being around.

      In terms of buying into the sh!t cnn peddles, women (but -especially- sp4n!sh women) buy into that sh!t without a second thought.

      Like


  22. on November 30, 2018 at 9:17 am everlastingphelps

    There are no men who like country music but hate hunting.

    Liked by 1 person


  23. 61% of the market is essentially dead to anyone with marriage on the mind. Crazy.

    The worst part of that? There are males who will still wife these chicks. That’s a big part the problem.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Precisely…the fact there’s still that golden parachute for the slattens is why this lifestyle isn’t ending anytime soon.

      Men actually have the power to end this…but first they need to take care of the thirst. Drinking saltwater does not get rid of the thirst.

      Like


  24. “What’s worse, the “sexless slut” who has had ten cocks in ten nights over ten years, with lots of ice cream and Tumblrrhea down time in between, or the well-sexed faithful girlfriend type who has had three cocks at three years apiece over ten years, with fleeting periods of clitoris-gazing solitude filling the short stints between boyfriends?”

    It’s like the HIIT of sex and mental health. Slingshotting between two extremes men’s huge results… On soul sapping.

    Like


  25. CH, I think your question is easily answered. A woman entering legitimate relationships and failing is much, much better than a carousel rider. Such a women is AT LEAST trying to genuinely pair bond with a man, while the carousel rider most definitely is not, and iteration after iteration of pump-and-dumps will ruin her ability for future pair bonding.

    Like


    • So a woman who only had 3 cocks but had been divorced 3 times would be better LTR material than a girl married 0 times with 10 cocks?

      [CH: see? it’s a tough question. alpha widowhood shouldn’t be ignored either. women who have been in and out of LTRs probably have more pained regret than women who have had a string of ONSs, but women who have had fiery short term affairs with alphas will take those memories with them forever, polluting any new relationships later in life with beta males.]

      Like


      • “So a woman who only had 3 cocks but had been divorced 3 times would be better LTR material than a girl married 0 times with 10 cocks?”

        Ok, I love CH site and he has incredible insites in to how is women’s psychology and behaviors,, there is some amazing commenters here also with very important points and insites. But I do have some thoughts maybe a little different on this…

        First I will say I think so the woman divorced 3 times is a more bad candidate for marriage. Why? Because she marryed them so it must to mean she loved them. Divorce is a giant red flag. Maybe the more big. A woman promised to be serving her husband untill death, but left? One time,, In very dificult circumstances you can understand it from a worldly perspective. 3 times? This means she promised to 3 men to serve them to death, like oath. And 3 times broke the oath. Do you think the next man does not have the odds against to him?

        2. This is I think something men will not think of straight away. But as a woman, here I will say my point about a situation if a woman made sex with many men before marriage vs. Divorced woman.

        We are human,, we fall in love. With romantic love comes the want to make sex. My husband was my first but we did not wait untill marriage, (but we was engaged) I was almost 4 months pregnant on our wedding day. It was sinful, for sure. But in a very big way,, I was blessed that he is a good man and he married me. What if a woman is not so fortunate and maybe she loves one man and does sex with him and then he does not want her? That things happen. Ok, for that to happen with 10 is more strange, and maybe could mean 1 or 2 things. 1. She is romantic and naive 2. She likes many men. I supose point 1 is a exeption to the norm,, but it is still better than a woman who will break a oath, imo.

        Like


    • By that logic a woman only had 3 cocks but had been divorced 3 times would be a better bet than a woman with 10 cocks who never merried?

      Like


    • on November 30, 2018 at 3:43 pm Domingo Montoya

      I believe that her capacity for future pair bonding gets more impaired when she tried to genuinely pair bond and actually succeeded in it. Basically what bigjohn33 suggests, but not necessarily marriages, longish LTRs are enough. With carouseller vs failing monogamist there are two quite different sets of issues, that need to be considered and addressed, when it comes to the bonding problem: and I really don’t know what is worse for her bond to the next man: short term very intense impact, repeatedly, or longterm ‘merging’ of two persons and lives, with deeper and more powerful connection, and with her personality being at least partially permanently soaked with the past men’s influences.

      Like


  26. You guys are just women hating incels hating on this innocent, beautiful, emp0wered hottie.

    She’s CLEARLY a chaste and good girl.

    Notice the rosary on the wall of her ghetto abode……

    Meanies.

    Like


  27. In the article about sex frequency decreasing, it says that only 31% of males orgasm during hook up sex. WTF? Call me old fashioned or crazy, but if there’s no nut, why bother?
    You’re the guy ffs, you’re always supposed to nut! It’s only supposed to be a bonus for the woman if she does.

    Like


    • must be drunk af, but jfc i’m one of the 31% unless the chick turns out to be repulsive somehow

      Like


    • on November 30, 2018 at 7:41 pm Macro Investor

      If this is true, it really shows how pitiful hookup culture is. They’re so desperate to get laid, yet they can’t come. Why bother?

      Really broken soulless losers.

      Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 8:49 pm Captain Obvious

        Has the White race now devolved to the point that – in order to achieve 0rgasm during c0itus – White men require more of the sentimentalistic romantic relationship building beforehand than do White women?

        More cuddling? More back massages? More sweet little nothings whispered in the ear?

        That would be a pretty terrifying

        PS: I wonder if this correlates with plunging sperm counts?

        Like


      • on November 30, 2018 at 8:50 pm Captain Obvious

        Or maybe it’s a nasty sociological residue resulting from excessive [email protected] & p0rn addiction on the part of White males?

        Like


    • on November 30, 2018 at 10:04 pm Corinth Arkadin

      I could only discharge my protein shake PFFFBBT PFFFBBBT PFFFBBTT on her face or her back, stomach, neck, etc, without a condom.

      Like


  28. I defer commentary to the GBFM the great. Where are you? We need you here

    Like


    • I seen the great man came back. The place isn’t the same with berkanified lotsa cockas, and broken engreeeesshhh. Lolzolzolzolzolz

      Like


  29. ‘No wonder the marriage rate is declining. Men have no incentive to invest in spoiled vagina.’

    Not to mention the other graph that shows marital stability tanks for each sexual partner a woman has before marriage. Not only do most normal red blooded men don’t want to marry a spoiled vagina…they don’t want that spolied vagina to throw them into the divorce meatgrinder when she has the whim she doesn’t want to be married anymore.

    Like


    • Everyone is so carefully to avoid touching on the why men don’t group together to start changing the laws, and legal practices as well…

      They seem very upset about “notch counts” but much less so by the cultural and legal blatant discrimination they undergo.
      In other words: pride >> reason and will to fairness.

      So things won’t improve.

      My 2 concerns would be: consistently reject aggro, innerly empty, Vainbags, and put an end to all the cultural and legal misandristic abuse.

      That said, they can take all the dicks in the world as far as I am concerned.
      If it’s their gain, they gain, if it’s a loss, their loss.

      Like


  30. on November 30, 2018 at 4:15 pm Corinth Arkadin

    I’m lolo’ing the hispanic Thot in the bottom pic, who is posing in front of her ghetto-azz apartment building in the barrio, complete with mold, scaling and water damage.

    These types really should take a photography class.

    Like


  31. Like


  32. A little different from the pavement princesses in the ‘Kwa:

    But the same withered hags in full fight against it.

    Like


  33. […] the nationalist right we disparage the state of women today, whether they be THOTs and sloots, slores, or careerists lamenting the state of their barren and neglected […]

    Like


  34. Yeah, I’ve noticed that. A notch count of 2 where she let a guy fill up every hole raw dog an hour after he met her is worse than a notch count of 15 if it was condom sex with the boring small dick guys in her dorm. That said, ‘that girl’ with 10 dicks in 10 nights is DTF every night if the guys are worthy enough.

    Like


  35. This poor kid is gonna need years of therapy.

    How many unlucky kids, and female children as well, are gonna need a lot of therapy, and how many will be really healed?

    Damn, what a sight.

    Like