The Tradcon’s Troubled Relationship With Female Sexuality

A comment by Greg Eliot (a longtime valued contributor to this fappy forum) spurred me to write a bit about tradcons and their discomfort with female sexuality. He wrote,

CH: And, yes, seducing and fucking a cute girl on the same night you meet her [is one of a man’s greatest pleasures in life].

Especially when she’s “never done this with anyone else”.

:DUCKFACE

Get real, gentlemen… any girl who bangs on the first date is more a petrie dish than LTR material.

And if you’re out looking for a quick bang… and not a woman who you’d trust as a mother to your children and a true helpmeet, then you’re just a muh-dik no-account who deserves whatever physical and/or emotional ailments you get from those types of women.

And this is why we lose.

This world ain’t no Ian Flemming novel, and you ain’t no James Bond.

I’m not saying Greg is a tradcon, but his comment is emblematic of so many tradcon howls of spite for men who have a way with women and for the women who let those men have their way. So his idburst gives me a springboard to write a rebuttal I’ve been meaning to for a while addressing the typical smears that tradcons keep in their rhetoric rucksack.

I’m not talking about marrying one night stands. Sure, a man should think twice about wifing up a girl he plowed the same night she twatted him a come hither eyeplay twitter. But there’s room in a man’s life for one night stands as well as for marriage, should he decide nuptial chains slip easily on his scrote. The one does not preclude the other. In fact, I’d argue a man is best positioned to choose a bride-to-be if he has some experience dealing with women’s emotional landscape both before and after sex. The best defense is a good offense.

To my points.

  1. Not every girl who has premarital sex is a slut. If that’s the standard for sluttery, you may as well give up finding a wife in the world we inhabit right now.
  2. Experienced men have a honed sense of which girls are slutty and which are chaste. It’s not that hard to know if a one night stand is a cock carousel veteran or an innocent naif caught up for the first or second time in her life in the heat of the moment (generated by your superb seductive prowess, of course). So just saying you’ve had a one night stand is not incontrovertible evidence that you banged a slut.
  3. The petrie dish metaphor is indicative of a favorite myth of tradcons that cutie patootie sluts sleep with any man who will have them. No, that would be fatties and Wall-imminent cougars. Prime nubility sluts are just as discriminating as damsels; that is, sluts prefer the company of the same alpha males who inspire a quaking of the mons in damsels. Beta males are still left out in the cold. Which means you are gonna need skillz to bang sluts, and perhaps even sharper skillz than you would need to bang damsels considering that sluts are masters of shit testing. The difference between sluts and damsels is one of impulsivity and to a lesser extent of quantity. Sluts jump into bed quicker and make more rounds sharing the tiny pool of acceptable alpha males.
  4. If you are dominant and sexy and charming as fuck, you can make any girl LTR material. It may be a more efficient use of your time and energy to screen for LTR material from the get-go if that’s your quest, but even the sluts will bend the knees to a man of incomparable HSMV.
  5. Whether mounting slut or damsel, one night stands will make a man feel like a king, as long as his conquest is a verifiable hottie. If he has a ONS with a grotesquerie, he will experience the Walk of Self-Abasement and avoid looking any women in the eyes for a month lest they sense the tunastank on him.
  6. Addendum to #5: Any man with a robust ledger of cuntquests to his name will know very early on in the evening if the girl he is seducing is a no muss no fuss slut or a hard-to-whet modest mouse. This means that really good players often deliberately seek out more challenging girls because they know that the afterglow of despoiling a low cock count coygirl shines so much brighter than it would emptied into the dark ravine of a slut’s war-torn womb. Be careful tradcons; that womanizer you accuse of banging bar skanks may be the one who cut his ONS chops on your tradwife before she lost her taste for fun and met you.

On a conciliatory note, Greg and his genre of female sexuality spiters aren’t totally off-base about the slut life. While not a guarantee of a girl’s sluttery, a predilection for one night stands is a leading indicator. And though it’s hard to find chaste women in 2017 (as measured against historical chasteness standards), it nevertheless remains true that even one additional partner over the bare minimum greatly increases a women’s risk of marital infidelity. Therefore, all things considered and all nuts busted, tradcons have their hearts in the right place when they advise men looking for wife and mother candidates to be wary of investing in a property that is trespassed without a preliminary scouting expedition.

Bottom line: If you fall in love with a ONS, and forever dangles on the edge of your dreamy thoughts, best give that gril a few extra months or years of up close premarital personal assessment. If she’s truly a natural born slut, you’ll see the signs long before she hears the wedding lines.





Comments


  1. […] The Tradcon’s Troubled Relationship With Female Sexuality […]

    Like


  2. ONSs aren’t always with carousellers. I remember a student friend, pretty alpha/ZFG, ending up in bed with a genuine “taken” nice girl, boyfriend at home, after a drunken evening in halls. The following morning she rushed home in sober tears to confess all to the boyfriend, she never got drunk like that again, kept well away from Mr Alpha, and she married the boyfriend.

    Fifteen years and two kids later she left her husband for another woman. Nowt as queer as folk, as they say up North.

    Like


    • she may not have been a carousel rider but your description is proof positive that she was not LTR/wife material

      Liked by 2 people


      • on September 26, 2017 at 5:56 pm Captain Obvious

        “not LTR/wife”

        No kidding.

        My G0d, what a fool.

        And those poor, poor ch!ldren.

        Doomed both nature-ally [genes for mental illness on their Mom’s side of the family, genes for cuckery on their Dad’s side of the family] but also nurture-ally [being raised in broken homes with batsh!t f*cking insane dyke w!tches poisoning the household].

        Both of those kids will be at very high risk for su!cide.

        Liked by 1 person


      • yep, the dad was almost asking for a disastrous ending. he [email protected] her AFTER she had already cheated.

        no man with any sense could expect anything other than a bad ending to that story.

        Liked by 3 people


      • CO, that’s a damn good observation. A full generation of mentally weak + cucked offspring explains a lot of what we see today.

        Like


      • In general I have three categories for women:
        1. Virgin or virgin-ish (0 to 3 male partners in her life)
        2. Average bitch
        3. Slut (lotsa cocks)

        “Average bitch” may not be a carousel rider but she is not LTR material. You should m-a-r-r-y a virgin or a virgin-ish. In an ideal world, you get your hands on a hot virgin and never let go.

        Like


      • Naa bro one cock that she don’t stay with affects a bitches whole life shit bitch that sucked my dick was thinking bout getting with me now 25 years later for fucks sake woman marry virgins if the marriage don’t work then go be a ho if they want but the dude and the woman at least get a chance to have something special once I’m their fucking lived.

        Like


      • on September 26, 2017 at 11:10 pm Captain Obvious

        HL, I am convinced that Assortative Mating in the 20th Century, primarily driven by the rise of Coedumakashunal Institions of Higher Learning – also driven by easy access to communication [telephone, internet] & easy access to transportation [train, automobile], but mostly driven by Coedumakashunal learning – I am convinced that this Assortative Mating is allowing badly malformed personalities to seek out one another, [email protected], and have ch!ldren whose personalities are even more horribly malformed [in more concentrated forms of sickness] than were either of the parents’ personalities.

        So that e.g. Narcissistic Males will seek out Borderline Females on campus, [email protected], [email protected], and then have ch!ldren who could very well be outright Psychopaths.

        Or Nice Guy panty-waist cucks could end up as “Safety B0yfriends” for at-risk mentally-unstable highly-impressionable drama queens, with the resulting 0ffspring being Scalzis or Taco-Toad mudsharks.

        Liked by 2 people


      • For whatever reason, women often try to lock down weak, sometimes borderline gay, men to marry rather than alphas, and then are surprised when their marriages break down.

        And in her case, go dyke because she realized that she was past her shelf life and no alpha would want her ever again.

        Liked by 1 person


      • For whatever reason, women often try to lock down weak or borderline gay men to m4rry rather than alphas, and then are surprised when their m4rriages implode.

        And in this one’s case, go dyke because she realized that no alpha would want her ever again.

        Liked by 1 person


      • easy to see the why they do it

        they know he will put up with all her crap and stay with her no matter what she does. he will blame himself for all of her bad behavior, excuse/ignore her past and tolerate any mistakes she makes while she’s with him.

        i’d do it too if i was a bitter ex-sloot who knows she is not girlfriend/wife material and can’t do any better.

        Like


    • So he should have dumped her immediately and saved himself 15 years of cuckoldry (like the kids are his) and the eventual frivorce rape

      Like


      • I love it how everyone knows why the marriage broke down. Maybe he’s the one who got her into pussy.

        Anyway, I usually get it on the first date no matter what kind of chick it is. Some of them have been honest-to-goodness good girls.

        Like


  3. Slow clap.

    I’m going to give this to my son to read.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on September 26, 2017 at 5:38 pm Captain Obvious

      Tell him to be sure to read Hugh Mann’s kkk0mment just above here, about the fool who forgave his college girlfriend after she got drunk and f*cked Mr Big Man on Campus.

      That story sure had a happy ending.

      /sarc

      Liked by 1 person


      • “I’m gonna find any way I can to shame those who date and have sex. That makes me feel better about myself and will make me seem big when I spend every night hanging out in the comments to a dating blog.”

        Like


    • Give him this link here too..

      Like


      • Yet men can’t make lists detailing their conquests or rating girls based on hotness, lest they get in trouble. Mind you, I think this is tacky and way inappropriate in both cases, but it is still amazing how gender inequality actually works.

        Like


      • on September 27, 2017 at 5:50 am Les Saunders, Protestant

        Jesus H. Christ, that makes my spreadsheet look downright modest.

        Like


      • on September 27, 2017 at 7:04 am Vagina dominator

        On 2/17/14, 4/5/14, 4/15/14, 4/20/14 and 5/314 she doubles up on the same day. And it seems that Alex (30) sure has captured her heart. He’s a very lucky guy.

        Like


      • Good Heavens!

        Like


      • Sweet Lord…

        A list?!

        The idiot who married the “good girl” who accidentally slept with the alpha was marrying an alpha widow. His father failed to educate him.

        Like


      • No Dad on the scene. Am I right?

        Like


      • I see there’s a 15 year-old in there. What are the chances of a statutory rape charge following? Zero.

        Like


      • “And it seems that Alex (30) sure has captured her heart. He’s a very lucky guy.”

        Yeah, whatever reason I get far, far, far more attention from college-age sorority chicks and the like now, in my 30s, than I ever did when I was college age myself.

        Ironically enough, if she had been wh0ring exclusively on Tinder, she would have likely never met Alex, due to online dating’s insistence on age-matching.

        Like


      • this girl is damaged for life

        even after showing her love for that alex guy, she was still hooking up with a bunch of other dudes days after

        that heart next to his name means nothing. she doesn’t know or understand love if she can bang other guys so soon. women aren’t like dudes. when they are in love and happy with a guy, they aren’t even looking at other men, let alone jumping into the sack with them

        she will probably will be one of those women who says she loves her man and other people but never actually means it because she has a cold ruthless heart

        Liked by 1 person


      • It seems that in her eyes that guy Alex is Alpha as fuck, however this is a clear example that it doesn´t matter how Alpha you are if the woman has already broken her capacity to pair bond. Very sad!!!

        Liked by 1 person


      • exactly. don’t understand why people don’t get that

        Like


      • In case some beta white knight thinks this is an outlier..
        https://imgur.com/a/vdp6e

        Like


      • An interesting article of Rollo Tomassi about the importance of Women´s sexual past. Read it complete!!!

        From the article:

        “Women must keep the details of that past secret and obscured. So grave is this anxiety that men must be punished for having the temerity to be curious about it. It is vitally important because a woman’s capacity to bond with a man is reduced with every new sexual partner. Every new sexual partner is a potential Alpha to be widowed by, but the man who marries her must be kept ignorant of those men if she is to secure his resources and his parental investment.”

        Liked by 1 person


      • Look at the numerous double bookings…

        Like


  4. on September 26, 2017 at 4:26 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Great writing, as always.

    But I do have to admit that I think the “slut radar” of some men needs to be tuned up a little. There are several women I knew who did the filthiest of filthy things. I’d give examples but I’m sure the auto-moderation will block phrases like “d i l d o u p t h e b u t t.”

    Anyway, I checked back in with a few of them and they were on the road to marriage. They told me they and their husbands-to-be were doing this pre-marriage “religious counseling ” or something with priests. WTF???

    I practically fell on the floor laughing. These are girls who would have made porn stars blush years ago. And now they have men “courting” them through the “church” as if it’s the 1910s. I’d love to be a fly on the wall in one of these religious counseling sessions.

    Anyway, the moral is that some men seem to only see what they want to see. Maybe we need to make some sort of “s l u t tell” list here. Ex-alcoholic should be a “tell” right off the bat and the lower-class type nurses with little education seem like porn stars who moonlight in hospitals.

    Liked by 2 people


    • a slut tell list is a good idea

      i think a lot of men miss or ignore the signs. i personally see a lot of men getting into LTRs and wifing up some really low quality women. women who have in no way earned LTR/wife status.

      these are decent dudes too. they have good intentions and all but end up getting used, abused, and cheated on without fail.

      i don’t care what people say about all girls being trainable/manageable, it pays to be choosy and it’s says a lot about a man that he will settle for trying to fix keep a bargain basement dud instead of bettering himself enough to go out and get a better girl.

      just like all men aren’t alpha success stories, some women are a bad investment.

      Liked by 1 person


    • on September 26, 2017 at 5:40 pm Captain Obvious

      “I think the “slut radar” of some men needs to be tuned up a little.”

      EVERYTHING on the White Man needs to be tuned up a LOT.

      The Saxon got a whole he11uva lotta beginning to hating yet to begin.

      Liked by 1 person


      • “I’m gonna comment on every comment I can find here, grandstanding about how White men need to improve so I sound like a guru. It’s nothing they haven’t heard a thousand times before, but hey, what else do I got.”

        Like


    • I do have to admit that I think the “slut radar” of some men needs to be tuned up a little. There are several women I knew who did the filthiest of filthy things. I’d give examples but I’m sure the auto-moderation will block phrases like “d i l d o u p t h e b u t t.”

      ^This. I’ve been saying it for years.

      Like


    • The Catholic Church has pretty extensive religious counseling because they want to make sure you are serious and have your eyes open. I consider it to be valuable because it at least prevents people from getting married and divorced casually and forces you to think about the true purpose of marriage, which is Buns=ovens

      Like


      • Respectfully, the purpose of Christian marriage is not bunz–>ovenz but to assist both the man and woman to get closer to God. Children are a consequence of this attempt at achieving theosis, but they are not the end in and of themselves.

        Liked by 1 person


    • I did everything with my ex-girlfriend, including your spelled out phrase and much more.

      Broke up with her, and she “recommitted” herself to the church. I responded, “isn’t that like closing the barn door after the horses got out?”

      She’s now married to a pastor. I do wonder if she has the same sort of crazy sex life with him that she did with me, or if she’s “not that kind of girl” anymore.

      Like


  5. To be fair to GE, he is taking a knee against whyte men acting like ghetto subhumans. I think we can all agree on that.

    GE is no fool, so I wouldn’t lump his argument in with that of the Tradcons, whose eyes are permanently shut to the reality of female nature until, and probably after, all those daytime 1 hr motel charges by the woman who ‘completes him’ show up on credit records.

    Liked by 1 person


    • on September 26, 2017 at 5:44 pm Captain Obvious

      “whyte men acting like ghetto subhumans”

      I do sincerely wish that one of these doofus beey0tches would lie to CH about being on B!rth C0ntrol and get herself knocked up with his pr0geny.

      Particularly one like the beey0tch in that essay, who surrendered everything to him.

      It’s time for CH to take the plunge.

      Liked by 2 people


      • “How dare CH and others have sex and a social life while I don’t! Oh, and I have no wife and no children, but that doesn’t mean I can’t use Moar Whyte Children as a cudgel against them. In a blog with a racialist tone that means I win, and I don’t have to make any actual contributions to the conversation to do it!”

        Like


      • “It’s time for CH to take the plunge.”

        I agree.

        Like


    • Thank you, brother Hackett… good to see there are still rational judgments to be read in this forum.

      Like


      • Would this be a bad time to post my current Field Report Greg?

        Like


      • Do I look like I give a rat’s ass?

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • Greg “I’m the Chateau’s hall monitor!” Eliot says:

        “Do I look like I give a rat’s ass?”

        yes, Greg. it does look like you give a rat’s ass. in fact, pages and pages and pages of repetitive, predictable, finger-wagging rat’s asses. one might even say that you’re a ‘giving a rat’s ass’ missionary.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Asshole, I was addressing that other poster’s asking of permission to give a field report.

        Strain more, trying to throw those flaccid barbs that never stick, fool.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • It was just a joke Greg. Truth is, you are a great guy. Tho, i do miss the old days of YaReally posting on here (that you drove away)…that immoralgables guy not so much.

        Like


  6. on September 26, 2017 at 4:27 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Damn! Can you get my comment out of auto-moderation? It was a good one and useful to guys who fall into the category you describe.

    Like


  7. disagree. if a woman is not a virgin she is not wife or mother material. and yes that means that .01% of western females are wife/mother material, which is why we need to renormalize the idea of marrying off quality girls in their mid-late teens at peak fertility to men who are at the stage of being ready for a family (not that this is not the same age, typically for men this will be mid 20s-30s)

    that being said a man is entitled to one night stands. it’s what feminists call the “madonna/whore complex” – it’s not a complex, it’s a caste system. one you can move down but never back up. women stay in the madonna caste until they have lost their virginity to someone other than their husband, or committed infidelity. once a woman enters the whore caste, forever she remains a whore, and is there for the use of men’s entertainment, to satisfy their need for variety, for the use of men who haven’t yet reached the stage of being ready to settle down. now to prevent the scourge of single motherhood, we forcibly sterilize females when they enter the whore caste.

    this is what we need to remake society into. and it will probably take a lot of violence to bring it into existence since stupid preceding generations decided to give women “rights”.

    Like


    • Totally dig the flabs of skin on the chick on the far left. Can’t tell if it’s a strapless dress or if she’s wearing an actual T shirt underneath her dress. And of course the chick with the tattoo. But the highlight are the guys in the tuxedo. Let’s just say it’s partly thanks to these guys that I refuse to grow a beard.

      Liked by 1 person


      • on September 26, 2017 at 6:16 pm Oleaginous Outrager

        Clearly their tailor gave zero fucks.

        Like


      • Clearly their tailor gave zero fucks.
        ——————————————————
        why should they?
        It is omnipotent God himself who gives zero fucks here

        Like


      • i just looked at the pic again. it’s not just one who has a tattoo and the girl who looks like she doesn’t probably does have one. it’s just not on her back like the rest.

        every pic i see on facebook has disgusting brides and bridesmaids like this. they are either lesbians, tattooed, have ugly hair dye, or they are fat. every pic gets a shitload of likes from women too. even the girls who seem normal and attractive.

        that goes back to the point of being choosy when picking a girl for LTR/wife. check out what she likes or encourages on social media. people flipping the bird, tasteless jokes, unnaturallly dyed hair, gay couples, etc.

        that will give you a good idea of where her head is at and what you’re going to be dealing with. a lot of girls will say one thing to you as far as what they think is socially acceptable but they will secretly feel differently and express it in ways you won’t notice when you aren’t looking. that will cause problems for you over time. they will contradict you and tell kids lies and try to brainwash them beyond your back, etc

        Like


    • I think I see 3 or 4 out of 5 with tats ………… wanna take wagers on tramp stamps ………. yeah I don’t typically agree with tradcon’s but when I do it’s because I know a slut or 5 when I see’em

      Like


    • Those are petri bowls. . .

      Like


    • All weddings post about 1980 are cringey as fuck.

      I’ve been to two in the past 20 years that weren’t. One was SSPX and the other was Eastern Orthodox.

      Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 6:28 am Lord of the Gulf Stream

      Those guys look like they totally deserve those pig women. Imagine what their FACES look like.

      Liked by 1 person


    • Leaving the utter grossness of almost all these people aside, notice how the “most alpha” guy (2nd from right) actually has eye-contact with the kneeling bride while his chick has her eyes GLUED to his boots?

      ´nuff said..

      Like


  8. Quoting Owen Cook (Tyler) from RSD :

    “So, she goes home with a guy. Every girl does that.
    E-ve-ry-girl-does-that.
    Except WEIRD girls. Like, super ultra religious nut case girls, they DON’T GO HOME WITH GUYS.”

    …Some one said it here before : marry a mormon.

    Like


  9. It should be easy to accept that each woman could have a ONS with some man. If that is not the case then we are left with strange conclusions that women only have sex with men they are in relationships with, but how long exactly must that relationship be before they are biologically programmed to have sex with him? May it start happening one day after the relationship started? But I think it’s also possible to judge sex morally, that seems like a consistent statement. Not all sex is equal. So if we say that there is no morality in sex I think that brings us into some strange conclusions as well that should be easy to guess.

    Like


    • @martin
      “So if we say that there is no morality in sex I think that brings us into some strange conclusions as well that should be easy to guess.”
      Welcome to the party pal

      Like


  10. on September 26, 2017 at 5:16 pm Wrong Side Luciano

    he’s a tradcon who woke about kikes and shit

    that’s all

    but u can tell he still has this eternal optimism about female nature

    like in his mind every white girl is naturally headed 4 the nunnery until a joo pulls her off the tracks

    Liked by 2 people


  11. We are getting back to virgin brides after RAHOWA

    Like


  12. Dear Heartiste Proprietors,

    Please allow me to share a wonderful story of how I SO BADLY fucked up and found your blog, which led me to erase the traces of betadom that disrupted and ruined an obviously good opportunity.

    I met a cute brunette with blue eyes at an event and she talked about being “stressed about her long-distance relationship with her boyfriend”. We hit it off and I asked her to drop me home.

    I invited her to come up. She giggled. I have a apartment by the pool. She stood on my balcony and started talking about her problems, how she had anxiety disorder. I did some light kino by touching her feet (she had a weird foot band on) and putting her hands in my palms.

    She then came into my living room and sat down on my close sofa. And said hug me. I did BUT immediately leaned in for a kiss like a moron. She backed off and said “I have a boyfriend”.

    Now here’s where I really fucked things up. I’m usually immaculately articulate but I just spaced out and sat back in my seat for an awkward 5 minutes. Her boyfriend messaged her and I told her not to take the text and she agreed. Now, despite my awkward silence for another 10 minutes she didn’t leave and stayed plopped on my sofa with heavy breathing and even said “look at my hair, it’s multi-colored”, asking me to run through it.

    I found your blog, Heartiste, and read through a hundred posts. I feel like an idiot because I thought that my typical dominant, aloof personality wouldn’t work on the “sweet, shy, innocent” girls. I should have laughed off her silly first kiss rejection shit test and tried again. I should have negged her. She asked me to twirl her fucking hair. I should have escalated kino gradually, asking her to sit on my lap, then kissed her neck, and then kissed her, and then pulled away feigning disinterest. Your stuff is ALL on point.

    There’s no way a girl would act this way in the hopes of gaining a “friend” or a beta orbiter, right? I mean, the fact that she came up to my room at 11:30pm and stayed for 2 hours alone makes me feel that this was an opportunity beyond obvious and I blew it.

    Nothing lights the fire in your loins (heh) like a rough encounter with reality. Unlike the larpers here I’m not going to pretend I’m a total alpha or anything like it. I’m a young 20s guy with alpha and beta traits and I’ll have to weed out the latter.

    Laugh at me and feel free to share the story with your readers, but goddamnit, I owe you a debt of gratitude for waking me the hell up.

    Cheers
    Mason

    Like


    • You need to be more playful and detached. Less outcome dependant. She just wants to feel good about everything. She’s a girl, that’s all they want. So make her feel good that she’s cheating and about everything else. Also study what a Boyfriend Destroyer is and then invented your own implementations.

      Liked by 1 person


    • on September 27, 2017 at 9:10 pm Vagina dominator

      Too early on the kiss, I’d say.

      A kiss opportunity arises from doing things together. I don’t mean mountain climbing or blowing up Tiger tanks, it can something as simple as standing together on the balcony and talking about the view, making sandwiches together, even just going through a door at the same time, probably with some closeness or touching.

      People mirror each other. They even let their breathing fall into sync. So once she has the habit of being synced to you – and this can happen fast – she will accept your kisses easily.

      Of course, these scenarios give her the opportunity to signal the green light to you too, brushing her boob on your arm, reaching across you and so on.

      Like


      • Or just do what I do and say Hey. Then clutch her shoulders or her face under the chin and give her a deep kiss. Don’t hesitate. You lead. Even if she resists and talks shit, she will have more respect for your dick. If she does just tease her back. It’s easy man do it.

        Like


  13. CH when are you going to write how to get pregnant lots of white girls?

    Like


  14. Depends on females your talking about ones In America just throw em In a pile and watch em burn

    Like


    • Ok maybe not that severe but if they really think they equal they need to prove no free house just cause kids no food stamps whoever want to raise kids can no allimony no child support whatever dude thinks he should do for support he will do. Fuck generations of people who don’t respect other people’s shit cause they thing everything free

      Like


  15. This produces mixed thoughts. On the one hand, finding a “decent” or completely trustworthy woman is pretty much impossible now. Guys need to “settle” for used merchandise and hope it’s not all that used, if the species is going to continue at all.

    On the other hand, as the carousel count rises, the trustworthiness plunges. The first woman I ever had sex with was an example; she was all over me with apparent devotion, which lasted for approximately eight months, until she ran into some other guy who seemed more appealing in whatever fashion. She went from apparently sincere happy, romantic fun combined with vigorous amatory activity with me, to heading off with this other guy, in one day. She was there, she told me in a kind of apologetic way that she couldn’t resist this chap, and she was gone.

    I actually ran into her a couple of years ago, probably ten years after we were together. In that time, she had been married twice and divorced twice, had a number of lovers she told me about casually, and had just started sleeping with a guy who had randomly helped her carry her boxes inside the most recent time she moved.

    I had known at the time of our first encounter that she had been with several guys before me, but I was totally inexperienced at the time and just sort of accepted it. She went through all the stuff of talking about getting married, having 2-3 kids together, etc., we even looked at a couple of houses together and she seemed really interested in all of it.

    Then some guy with a bigger dick or snazzier cologne or a haircut that caught her eye when the wind blew from the south-southwest or whatever wandered by, and she was out of there. Totally casually, calmly, as suddenly and easily as you’d say “bye” to a toll booth operator and drive off. She went through all the motions, with apparent zest and interest, and then she tossed them in a second and was off on a new tangent, apparently with zero regret or emotion.

    Something is clearly burned out in the female brain by repeated sexual encounters.

    The problem is, where’s the cutoff? I see people in the store, couples, with 3, 4, even 5 kids who look like them, so they’ve been together for the lifetime of those kids, with the oldest sometimes in the 14-16 range.

    So clearly, those women married and raised stable families for up to 15 years with the same guy despite probably carouseling a bit in their younger years. So, those guys married damaged goods and it worked for them. On the other hand, I’ve seen women who changed guys as casually and cheerfully as changing shirts.

    Sometimes it seems like a totally unpredictable lottery with no rules other than chance.

    Like


    • See The Rational Male on War Brides

      Like


    • 2 things, on the main:
      the youth of the woman, and the alphaness of the man. The younger the woman is, the stronger an alpha / zfg man can imprint on them, and shape their behaviour (actually, beauty and fertility aside, I believe malleability in women’s character is a strong motivator for men to pursue her).

      Anecdotally, one of my family’s closest friends came from a big family, played around in his late teens/early 20s, then found a girl who was around 18 (I think). She already had a young daughter by that time but he wasn’t put off. Screened her fully, married and took her daughter as his own; then proceeded to give her 6 kids over the 20-something years they have been together; by all accounts it won’t stop there either – he is one of 9.

      Like


    • Search for microchimerism, heck here´s some links to get you started..
      https://archive.is/JxRah
      https://archive.is/zZ3H8
      https://archive.is/SuPmO

      tl;dr this slut has been literally fucked out of her mind and damaged for life
      Congrats on dodging that bullet.

      Like


  16. This produces mixed thoughts. On the one hand, finding a “decent” or completely trustworthy woman is pretty much impossible now. Guys need to “settle” for used merchandise and hope it’s not all that used, if the species is going to continue at all.

    On the other hand, as the carousel count rises, the trustworthiness plunges. The first woman I ever had sex with was an example; she was all over me with apparent devotion, which lasted for approximately eight months, until she ran into some other guy who seemed more appealing in whatever fashion. She went from apparently sincere happy, romantic fun combined with vigorous amatory activity with me, to heading off with this other guy, in one day. She was there, she told me in a kind of apologetic way that she couldn’t resist this chap, and she was gone.

    Like


    • I actually ran into her a couple of years ago, probably ten years after we were together. In that time, she had been married twice and divorced twice, had a number of lovers she told me about casually, and had just started sleeping with a guy who had randomly helped her carry her boxes inside the most recent time she moved.

      I had known at the time of our first encounter that she had been with several guys before me, but I was totally inexperienced at the time and just sort of accepted it. She went through all the stuff of talking about getting married, having 2-3 kids together, etc., we even looked at a couple of houses together and she seemed really interested in all of it.

      Then some guy with a bigger dick or snazzier cologne or a haircut that caught her eye when the wind blew from the south-southwest or whatever wandered by, and she was out of there. Totally casually, calmly, as suddenly and easily as you’d say “bye” to a toll booth operator and drive off. She went through all the motions, with apparent zest and interest, and then she tossed them in a second and was off on a new tangent, apparently with zero regret or emotion.

      Like


    • The story continues, and there are more observations, but the thread won’t let me post them. Damn it.

      Like


    • I actually ran into her a couple of years ago, probably ten years after we were together. In that time, she had been married twice and divorced twice, had a number of lovers she told me about casually, and had just started sleeping with a guy who had randomly helped her carry her boxes inside the most recent time she moved.

      Liked by 1 person


    • had been married twice and divorced twice, had a number of lovers she told me about casually, and had just started sleeping with a guy who had randomly helped her carry her boxes inside the most recent time she moved.

      I had known at the time of our first encounter that she had been with several guys before me, but I was totally inexperienced at the time and just sort of accepted it. She went through all the stuff of talking about getting married, having 2-3 kids together, etc., we even looked at a couple of houses together and she seemed really interested in all of it.

      Like


    • It is interesting how women in relationships can disconnect themselves from it from one day to the another and move on. Last year in Reddit Red Pill there was a post about it.

      Liked by 4 people


      • Thank you for posting this.

        Like


      • the upside to this is that women are able to close off their hearts and break the bond with former loves so they are able to love someone new without pining away for an ex.

        problems occur when this happens a few times over a woman’s life though. eventually she’ll lose the ability to open herself back up to a new man and won’t truly love or bond with him like she’s supposed to.

        that’s one of the reasons why women with higher notch counts cheat, leave, treat their current men badly, etc. they aren’t properly bonded, in love/awe with him and never will be.

        sad thing to see.

        Like


      • the best antidote to the “light switch effect” is the “two-in-the-hopper effect”: always make sure she knows she’s free to leave if she’s not happy… and MEAN it.

        your detachment makes it very difficult for her to blame you for her situation. it also encourages her to work harder to make things better.

        Liked by 1 person


      • I know one shitlib female who had a seemingly good life – kids, job, wealth of millions, travel..everything. She is in her 60s now but has turned into an angry bitter bitch since the election. Her frame of reference now is Mad Men and she complains all the time about how bad the past was through that show.

        I once had a great date with a young cutie student..took her to the IHOP ..lol at the end and she said the pancakes were the best she ever had. Had another date… not so good..took her to the IHOP and the pancakes “not as good as before..did not like them at all”
        It’s all in the moment feelz.
        Women vote on their feelz and on personality..never on policies.

        I don’t know if I am more alpha now, higher status etc but i noticed in the last two years, I had girls more often than not take their clothes off on first dates (sometimes in the car..could not wait to even get back home) than say 5 years ago.
        Girls between 15 and 20 are out of control sexually now. I use flirt openly with them even if they were with their parents and I’m twice their age. They are all dirty cunts and i tap into that but it made me sick so I stopped..

        Like


      • It’s possible they are being ruled by their emotions. It’s also possible they have felt that way for a long time.

        That they were just using you until they could most comfortably and easily move on, economically, maybe get through college first or the kids if its close enough for them to get going on depending on when it took them.

        Even in “short term” relationships don’t be surprised if she really broke up a year and a half ago.

        Liked by 1 person


      • @Random Guy

        that’s true

        some girls will break up or leave on a whim but for most, the relationship has been over in their heads/hearts for quite awhile before they actually leave

        Like


  17. Greg isn’t much of a thinker or much to look at but he’ll do things to your lollipop that will make you believe in the almighty.

    Like


  18. Main thesis of this essay on the virtue of sluts is that certain chaste girls of everlasting sorrows will when faced with a true alpha succumb to his charms but this transgression cannot be held against their LTR values since we all know resistance of the vaginal juices to an alpha seduction is barely 0.01 Ohm
    However there are a certain kind of men which I am sure you goys encountered that not even remotely reassemble to an alpha yet they have that sense that recognizes the special frame of women’s mind (if such a thing existed) which combines vulnerability with her being horny
    Though in normal circumstances those fortress of chastity would not even dream of sharing their orifice(s) with those sleazy creatures, they cannot help but spread they legs when unbalanced
    So what is the moral of the story?
    This state of mind so to speak repeats itself in less and less spaced time intervals as time passes until the point where self loathing that comes afterwards becomes unbearable
    But that is precisely where your place is, dear loving husband
    Remember your wedding oaths

    Like


  19. Main thesis of this essay on the virtue of sluts is that certain chaste girls of everlasting sorrows will when faced with a true alpha succumb to his charms but this transgression cannot be held against their LTR values since as we all know resistance of the vaginal juices to an alpha seduction is barely 0.01 Ohm
    However there are a certain kind of men which I am sure you goys encountered that not even remotely reassemble to an alpha yet they have that sense that recognizes the special frame of women’s mind (if such a thing existed) which combines vulnerability with her being horny
    Though in normal circumstances those fortress of chastity would not even dream of sharing their orifice(s) with these sleazy creatures, they cannot help but spread they legs when unbalanced
    So what is the moral of the story?
    This state of mind so to speak repeats itself in less and less spaced time intervals as time passes until the point where self loathing that comes afterwards becomes unbearable
    But that is precisely where your place is, dear loving h_usband
    Remember your w_edding oaths

    Liked by 1 person


    • Slut? What does that even mean?

      Like


      • SexLovingUnhingedThot

        Like


      • So whatever you want it to mean.

        [CH: slut is somewhat relative to the sexual norms of the times, but i think a good working definition is a girl who jumps into many beds quickly. if we’re gonna put a number on it, the slut has more than the average number of sex partners, which in 2017 america means she has accumulated more than 3 lifetime lovers. a bit rough, but that’s what the cdc self-report data says. (given the usual caveats about the reliability of self-report)]

        Like


  20. The few tradcons I know seem to be red-pilled on everything except women.

    To be fair to them, if you haven’t been single at any time in the last 10 years, and especially the last 5 since the inception of hook-up apps and social media whoring outlets like Instagram, your views on the sexual market would be almost completely out of date.

    I’ve seen quite a few men come out of marriages or long-term relationships in the last 5 years, and get absolutely steamrolled by the current state of play. These men were not shrinking violets either, they were confident, decently-equipped men who were just totally ill-prepared for the brutalities of the current sexual market.

    It’s shown me how full of shit most men in relationships are, who try and dish out advice on women and dating.

    If you haven’t been single in the last five years, I’m afraid you don’t know shit about what’s going on out there. THE landscape has changed THAT MUCH in this short space of time.

    Like


    • The big change is whoring for me. Every student is a sugar baby wanna be and for the price of a meal alone in a lot of cases, she’ll be on her knees on the first date.
      It’s not the money as such it’s the role play of being a dirty whore to an older man. It gets them hot as does spanking or some 50 Shades stuff.
      And they always want their man to buy them lingerie to act the whore.

      Like


  21. Dreg IncEliot has always been a whiteknight faggot.

    Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 10:39 am Hackett To Bits

      Saudi Arabia’s gone soft. Feminists are crowing about having “won” the right to drive, though in fact it was a privilege newly granted by a patriarchy.

      Now feminists are clamoring for the next area of male power to destroy: “freedom of movement” from male guardianship, i.e., get their chance to ride lotsa cockas.

      If you’re going to have a patriarchy, you can’t do things half way. Feminists never give up on destroying what men have built.

      Like


  22. on September 26, 2017 at 7:14 pm safespaceplaypen

    Either (a) White Sharia

    or (b) dick sucking cunt pumping bohemia

    If we don’t have White Sharia laws and mores, then we get dick sucking whores and cunt pumping cads.

    Tradcons want a mystical in-between land where w0men can have the “freedom” to be whores without actually becoming whores and still being “mother worthy”. This is where the Man-up-and-marry tradcons come into play. They want you to “ball up” and have k!ds with a bitch whose sucked 12 dicks before yours and without ANY plan to avoid the inevitable d!vorce. When you ask them about no-fault d!vorce they either say “wtf is that lol?” or “muh equality w0men deserve equal treatment bruh” The idea that there is a connection with the changing of the laws and the skepticism of [email protected] does not register with these types.

    I notice a lot of these tradcons are baby boomers too, or early GenXer’s. Basically, people whose childhoods were completely devoid of the ravages that changing laws and mores (which they lived through and supported) had on the following generations.

    Like


  23. CH, I luv ya like a brother, man, but your lengthy and disingenuous reply reeks of protest-too-much…

    My point wasn’t about premarital sex in and of itself… that’s as old as man, and we’ve all been there.

    My point was with your statement, quoted exactly by me, about a girl who bangs on the first date…

    And now you try to backtrack it like I was talking about ANY sex before m-a-r-r-i-a-g-e with statements such as::

    Not every girl who has premarital sex is a slut. If that’s the standard for sluttery, you may as well give up finding a wife in the world we inhabit right now.

    ?

    Poorly done, my friend… if I need misquoting and twisting of words, I’ll look to assholes like dweebstreep.

    (((shakin’ mah haid)))

    Liked by 1 person


  24. Maybe it’s presumptuous of me to connote tradcon more to political stances rather than personal ethics and morality, but I like a more exacting form of stereotyping.

    Tradcon makes me think of clowns like McCain and other loathsome lackeys of the Synathedral.

    My politics, as anyone here knows, are the furthest thing from that.

    My White Knighting along the lines of racial morality and such, well… I don’t consider that the insult that some here feel it is. Life is better when you don’t automatically assume the worst in each and every instance, especially of the women of your own tribe who you come across, knowing that your tribe’s in a current malaise when it comes to a future for children that look like you.

    Like


    • VD’s sociosexual rank system is helpful in clarifying one’s default attitude toward women. People talk past each other when “white knighting” “NAWALT” and other such words are thrown around because it’s different psychologies, therefore different deeply personal attitudes, talking about the same thing.

      As I see it:

      Alpha and Sigma: satisfied contempt
      Beta: benevolence
      Delta: idealism, anger when illusions are shattered
      Gamma: fear
      Omega: hate

      Like


      • satisfied contempt

        I like the way this sounds, but I’m not quite following. Contempt for women or contempt for the world?

        Like


      • Contempt for women, but coming from a place of satisfaction rather than frustration. I was thinking of a CH post last year where he catalogued Trump’s comments about women.

        Like


      • Contempt for women, but coming from a place of satisfaction
        you are satisfied because women are contemptible or you are satisfied knowing the ugly truth?

        What do you think about tradecon question?
        Do one night stands make a good LTR and if so under what circumstances?

        Liked by 1 person


      • The man’s challenge posed by women seems to produce satisfied contempt tempered by a side order of idealism topped with a dollup of benevolence, sprinkled with a bit of anxiety, which upon marinating for a long long while, finally tends to alchemize the kingly elixer sought by all – magnimity rendered by a ferocious, ruthless forbearance.

        When all is as it should be in our fair lands, that’s probably what women are selecting for.

        Like


      • You can call it satisfied contempt. I call it working them before they work you.

        Like


      • Satisfied contempt as in you know how to game the system and game women to where you get what you want when you want it, however any man who has success like this can feel contempt for woman’s nature and how easily manipulated it is.

        Like


      • – also keeping in mind that when you’re successful across the board with women you can start to dislike a lot of them, that ugly soft underbelly, however this general disregard or dislike will make you more successful in turn so it’s a silly cycle.

        Like


      • What about “bemused condescension?

        Like a parent vis-a-vis a toddler i.e. you know what they are, why they do what they do as slaves to their natures, but you chuckle it off and act as the leader or parentlike authority figure thatthey need.

        Like


      • Please define a Sigma.

        Like


      • “Alpha and Sigma: satisfied contempt”

        an alpha understands that the whole world is up for negotiation, and that includes sex. he seeks nothing more than to do things on his terms. he knows that if he wants something of quality he’ll either have to take it, negotiate for it, or both.

        what all the other guys in that fluid heirarchy generally have in common is that they still believe they are OWED something in life, that if they play by the rules and follow ye olde social contract then they are still guaranteed a homestead and their own personal vagina, hard IRL facts be damned.

        Like


      • … and if you view sex and it’s optimal outcome, procreation, as a negotiation, then the whole question of whether a girl is a sloot or not becomes irrelevant. you and her are going to negotiate the best possible terms for yourselves for all your various wants and needs as you possibly can.

        …and if you meet and fuck and then both decide you’re worthy of each other then you build something together. that’s when the REAL work begins. all the other stuff is relatively meaningless compared to doing real, day-to-day shit together over weeks, months, years, etc.

        Like


      • Sigma and the others are a Vox Day construct. It’s two parallel hierarchies as I extrapolate the model from there  — social and asocial.

        The Social hierarchy ranking is a bell curve. Alpha (leader), Beta (lieutenant), Delta (soldier – most men), Gamma (saboteur: alpha entitlement without the alpha goods).

        The latter, Asocial scale is a polarity, Sigma (lone wolf) – Omega (outcast).

        [CH: Vox basically took my alpha-beta-omega sliding scale and added definitional clarity to those who fall in between the three major male SMV categories while adding a couple of orthogonal terms like gamma and sigma. it’s interesting, but i’d still put gammas somewhere in the lesser beta rank where you find the try-hard bullies who are bitter about not measuring up. sigmas would be a variant of alpha and maybe it’s correct to draw the distinction at the level of introversion/extraversion, but as my definition of male SMV makes clear, it’s all about (in the final analysis) how beloved a man is by HSMV women. if sigmas clean up, they are alpha. keep in mind that there are multiple avenues to alpha maledom, and sigmas occupy the space of the brooding man of mystery.]

        Like


      • People who first read about that scale immediately jump in with “I am a Sigma!”

        Unlikely. Sigmas and Alphas are rare. If you’re confident and highly succesful socially, you’re probably a Beta. If you’re a normal man who gets along with most people, you’re probably a Delta.

        Like


      • Please define a Sigma.

        @Mieszko I
        A loner/weirdo who does surprisingly well with very attractive women.

        but i’d still put gammas somewhere in the lesser beta rank where you find the try-hard bullies who are bitter about not measuring up.

        I still find it useful to distinguish gammas from deltas (regular betas). There really does appear to be a distinct difference in mentality. On your alpha-beta-omega scale, you could call gammas “bitterbetas”.

        People who first read about that scale immediately jump in with “I am a Sigma!”

        Unlikely. Sigmas and Alphas are rare. If you’re confident and highly succesful socially, you’re probably a Beta. If you’re a normal man who gets along with most people, you’re probably a Delta.

        @PA
        I’d say that most men I run into are probably delta, with gamma being the second-most common.

        Furthermore, I think Vox’s system is incomplete, primarily because I’ve seen quite a few “alpha” types who don’t in fact do all that well with very attractive women, even if their N-count is likely higher than normal. They might score an attractive woman occasionally, but usually get with women in the middle of the belle curve. So I prefer an x-y system with different ranks for leaders, followers, and loners. Like this attempt at a table:

        Rank Leader Follower Loner
        High Alpha Beta Sigma
        Middle Delta-leader Delta Delta-loner
        Low Gamma-leader Gamma Gamma-loner
        Outcast Omega-leader Omega Omega-loner

        (Omega-leader? Sure… but only obvious in situations like playing World of Warcraft.)

        Like


      • I attempted once to CLARIFY the difference between the original CH scale and the derivative VD one, in that they measure two different things — and not necessarily as simplistically as meets the eye. On re-reading, I think it still holds up (sorry about the mangled “CH” word, I think it triggers mod).

        QUOTE:

        An Important Aside: the Chateau H*artist* Scale

        There are two different scales, and a note about Chateau He*rtist*’s (CH) sexual market value ranking system is indicated. The Vox Day (VD) scale I’m using here is a measure of man’s absolute, context-independent suite of character traits; his essential socio-sexual wiring. In contrast, the He*rtist* scale (also referred to as the Alpha-Beta-Omega scale) is a reading of a man’s power — by any means — to elicit sexual attraction in desirable women, itself a proxy for his masculinity.

        Unlike with Vox’s sysem, He*rtist*’s scale can be situational. For example, by Vox’s measure, John Lennon was a Gamma regardless of his station in life, and his inner life as well as his relations with his peers bore it out. However, by He*rtist*’s scale Lennon was a super-alpha by virtue of his fame and its power over women; he had no lack of willing girls and there is still a well-attended shrine devoted to him in Central Park near West 72nd Street.

        Thus, both scales correctly quantify that which they seek to appraise; however, in the example of Lennon the divergence between the two scales is an extreme case, caused by the perception-distorting effect of his fame. In fact, plenty of celebrities or otherwise powerful men in law and politics are Gammas who struck it rich, so to speak. But in ordinary cases, the two scales align as follows:

        VD’s Alpha, Sigma, Beta = CH’s Alpha
        VD’s Delta, Gamma = CH’s Beta
        Both He*rtist* and Vox understand the Omega similarly.
        Lambda is irrelevant on the He*rtist* scale.

        There is a temptation among readers who like VD’s hierarchy for its complexity to dismiss the CH scale as simplistic or limited in scope. And yet, there is a deadly snare we can trip when we dismiss Heartiste’s scale on grounds of its face-value simplicity. The cultural institutions in our feminized society have abdicated their responsibility for guiding males toward maturity and excellence. Our schools, churches, the entertainment complex lie to boys and men in the service the feminine imperative. “Man-up and m*rry those sluts brave single moms!” “Women are delicate angels who must be respected!” “Piss sitting down!”

        Many an otherwise solid Delta man will fall into one of a myriad traps that turn his virtue against him. Chateau He*rtist* periodically features a “Beta of the Month” review of the cucks’ gallery, a voyeuristic series of cautionary tales of good men doing something idiotic by blindly following a dictate of righteousness. A classic example is the guy who travels with his adulterous wife to her former lover’s grave to lay flowers and help her “find closure.”

        That is the lesson provided by He*rtist*’s “Beta” wretches. Like Alexander’s sword slicing through the Gordian knot, so does Heartiste clarify the essence of a man’s ways: are you an Alpha — a man who goes through life satisfied — or are you a Beta: a laughingstock, an oblivious cuckold, a man who lets down those who need him the most? [link to old CH post about a beta father]

        He*rtist*’s writing about the ways of Alpha and Beta men is available in the magnum opus of his archives.

        UNQUOTE

        [CH: great comment PA. the really interesting concept you reveal here is the idea of a Divergent Man. That is, the man for whom his “essence” diverges from his operative SMV aka his situational alphaness/betaness. lennon is a great example of the divergent man. so is mark cuckersperg, a billionaire who could have any trophy wife he wanted but because he’s a sniveling beta at heart settled for a lumpy waifu he could handle and who wouldn’t give him any sexy sass. of course, through the lens of evolutionary fitness, if the environment/context makes lennon or ‘berg a winner then their socio-sexual wiring will reap the rewards of that if they capitalize on their reproductive advantage. generally, though, a man’s essence and his situational SMV line up. Divergent Men are like stress points at the joints of a massive multifaceted and unrestricted sexual market.]

        Like


      • Other common variants of Divergent Men would include:

        Delta-leaders and Gamma-leaders that women mistake for Alphas at first but turn out to be hideously insecure and feel happiest banging a lot of plain janes or warpigs, respectively. (I suspect many black and Muslim men fall into this group, along with Bill Clinton, perhaps)

        For the other way:
        A Sigma or Delta-loner with a limited friendship network and who women assume at first is a Gamma or even Omega and find out otherwise over time

        Liked by 1 person


    • Your comment of monkeys falling out of trees really nailed it for me. For months now I’ve been wondering about the true face of Greg Eliot, and it’s clear as day now.

      You miserable Christ killer…

      Let’s see the scorecard:
      √ Obsessive compulsion to have the last word on every post.
      √ Struggles with some sort of (((superiority))) complex.
      √ Extensive effort to create a presence here, gain some sort of “cred” and act like some sort of “curator” to the commenters
      √ (((shakin mah yarmulke))) – did you learn about the importance of catchphrases at the Frankfurt school by any chance? Who the fuck actually does this in real life?

      I could go on with the little points, but lets get to the meat of the matter:

      √ You’ve now attacked CH.

      What is it with you foreskin deficient types and biting the hand that feeds you? Having produced nothing of value yourself, you come here daily to mark the walls with your piss and act like some (((white messiah))) but you couldn’t help yourself from your destructive nature could you? The fangs behind the carefully cultivated mask always glint with (((you))) types.

      Tell me yid, if the host is dying, who would be more concerned, the host or the parasite? The white race being the host, and the yid being the parasite…

      CH’s advice through the years: Be a man, be free, follow your spirit first and foremost by making yourself the benefactor of your ambition.

      (((Greg))): Make bayybies! Get marr(i)ed!

      Now dear readers… Think who is selling you the same old turd in a new wrapper and the Truth is clear as day.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Boy oh boy, the wheels are REALLY coming off the (((shill))) cart now.

        Don’t know who you are, boy, but your demeanor and odd manner of expression smell an awfully lot like that other sock puppy no-bones/jesusisbad. He’s the only other one who suspects me of being a kike, and with pretty much the same sort of bizarro-world logic such as yours.

        I’ll let CH and the other good men of the chateau judge whether or not they believe I’m sincere and a contributor here… on that note, they all seem to agree, as CH himself admits in the very first line of post.

        One horse on you, asshole… you and your inane (((coterie))) just keep inventing new way to fail and show your collective asses.

        Like


      • If you’ve been wondering about Greg Eliot for months, then you haven’t been paying attention.

        All things aside, calling him Christ killer means you’re beyond hope and only see what you’ve wanted to see. Shit, you probably are of the no-bones clan to miss the mark that badly.

        Liked by 1 person


  25. It never occurred to you CH that you can not land a beautiful virgin for a wife and the mother of your children because of your fowl character? Women like that exist because they value character more then their feelings and look for more in a husband then a walking petri dish of a man. Greg is right, that was pathetic. Keep telling yourself a whore is just as good as a virgin. Just like feces is just as good as chocolate ice cream. You can not get her as a wife because you are not worth it as a husband.

    [CH: my fowl character is impeckable. fyi i’ve had many women ask, directly or through unmissable innuendo, for me to make honest women of them. so the problem with your theory is that the judgment was all my doing.]

    Like


    • You do know that “making an honest women” means marrying a whore you slept with and giving her the status of wife, right?

      [CH: it’s a funny colloquialism. don’t be so anal.]

      Sloppy seconds is the best you can get.

      [speaking from experience?]

      That is fine. You should not score a loyal, kind, clean, smart and healthy virgin because you are not worth her.

      [“should not” is your moralistic bleat. it’s what you wish were true rather than what is true.]

      If you do score one she is either lying or dumb as a stack of bricks.

      [incredulity is impotent indignation.]

      But women of worth turn down the “opportunity” to destroy themselves on the marriage market with you because they are long term thinkers, cause their God and Mamas are long term thinkers and their Daddys are deadly.

      [feminist fanfic]

      You can not fish in that pond because you aint got the bait. And fowl is what I meant. Keep telling yourself chocolate ice cream and steaming crap taste exactly the same.

      [you have a real obsession with crap and filth. spend some time in the gutter, did you?]

      Like


    • You lack common sense. Many great American preachers were bred in a situation where the father was a drunken wife-beating scoundrel and the mother was a Saint. Alpha seed always wins. This is why jealousy causes you to lash out with the ego saving “slut” protest.

      Like


    • You’re a bit over the top, Wingback.

      And for the record, “making an honest woman” of a gal you’ve been seeing and having relations with doesn’t mean she was a whore or slept with many other… or ANY other men, for that matter.

      In short… lighten up, Francis.

      Like


  26. Not every girl who has premarital sex is a slut. If that’s the standard for sluttery, you may as well give up finding a wife in the world we inhabit right now.

    You get what you’re willing to put up with. I got red on my wedding night because that was my standard and I made sure I was worthy of it on my end. Every non-virgin is damaged goods in that she’s over 20% more likely to nuke her marriages via the Social Pathologist data.

    Saying “there are no virgins” is failing a shit test that guarantees there won’t be any for you, and that in a world of continually lowering standards due to male thirst and willingness to settle or lower their expectations, the amount of virginal women will plummet as well since a woman’s definition of a whore is any woman who’s had 1 more partner than herself. You get what you’re willing to tolerate.

    Like


  27. Don’t care about debating what a “slut” is, but just know that we live in a novel world.

    Antibiotics and birth control.

    We evolved for about 100,000 years without those two things. And now they’ve relieved a vast swath of consequences that women used to get for slutting it around.

    So guys have their own instincts and I’m not going to argue who holds out for a virgin. For 100 millenia, women who didn’t know the consequences ended up chancred, with an infertile uterus, got deserted, went nuts from tertiary syphilis, etc.

    Now because of Alexander Fleming (white male) men are going to ignore those deeply embedded emotions of slut disgust? Nah. Won’t happen.

    We still have our instincts. For our part, men are still disgusted by sluts. Sluts got their biological relief. Less gonorrhea and dangerous childbirth. But their evolutionary emotions remain. Their consequences are emotional. They’re disgusted by themselves.

    Liked by 2 people


    • +1

      Like


    • on September 26, 2017 at 9:12 pm Captain Obvious

      “They’re disgusted by themselves.”

      The Darkness is always growing in them.

      It’s because the Hamster’s perception of “Alpha” is NON-CONSTANT.

      Age 14: “Alpha” is second base.
      Age 15: “Alpha” is third base.
      Age 16: “Alpha” is [email protected]
      Age 17: “Alpha” is ana1.
      Age 18: “Alpha” is ana1 + hair-pulling.
      Age 19: “Alpha” is ana1 + hair-pulling + choking.
      Age 20: “Alpha” is ana1 + hair-pulling + choking + black-eye.
      Age 21: “Alpha” is ana1 + hair-pulling + choking + black-eye, all while being “trained” by every brother in the DKE house.

      Etc etc etc, until, by her mid-20s, the Hamster will need to be offered the opportunity to star as the victim in a snuff film in order to be aroused out of its slumber.

      The Darkness keeps growing because the Hamster needs ever greater humiliation & degradation & pain & heartache & despair in order to sense “Alpha” in a new male acquaintance.

      Whereas anything LESS than the worst she’s ever experienced is automatically written off by the Hamster as “Hopelessly BETA”.

      Like


      • on September 26, 2017 at 11:15 pm Captain Obvious

        In m0d, but I wonder what the ever-growing Darkness in their hearts & the manifest non-constancy of their sense of “Alpha” means on a societal level?

        Particularly when the Frankfurt School is flooding the nations with every manner of sh!tskin filth?

        Like


      • Funniest comment in a long time. That shit has my sides hurtn aweful

        Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 6:39 am Lord of the Gulf Stream

      http://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/26/health/std-highest-ever-reported-cdc/

      Highest rates of VD EVER. You go, grrls.

      Liked by 1 person


      • on September 27, 2017 at 6:53 am Vagina dominator

        But, but…they’ve all been getting regular sex education classes since the age of five!

        Holy (((unintended consequences)))!

        Like


      • ” Highest rates of VD EVER. You go, grrls. ”

        Not only that, let me add: You go Alpha males !

        Like


      • POOOODWLAAAAADNYYYY!

        Like


      • Most of those increases come from men having sex with men. Reading the article and others discussing the increase, almost all new cases of gonorrhea and syphilis come from homosexual sex. They are the real petri dishes. In other words make sure the whore you’re with doesn’t have any bisexual friends.

        Liked by 1 person


    • on September 27, 2017 at 6:57 am Vagina dominator

      Alexander Fleming is one half of the problem, but Alexander Graham Bell is probably the other half.

      Liked by 1 person


  28. OT. Breibart headline: “Nolte: Alabama’s Deafening Message–The Movement Is About Trumpism Not Trump”

    Yes. As great as Trump is, I want him to be effect, not cause. The (increasingly woke) people should be the cause.

    Like


  29. On the one hand I can see why you don’t want to marry the girl who put out the first time you met her, but on the other hand you do want any prospective wife to let you have your way with her by the third meeting or so. There’s got to be a passion there if you’re going to have a healthy long term relationship. You know there are guys out there that your woman could not keep her hands off of. You better make sure you’re one of them.

    Liked by 1 person


    • there is some truth to this

      whether it’s the third date or a few weeks along, there should always be an undercurrent of passion and attraction there that you feel coming from her end. not just how you feel toward her but a palpable sexual tension that you feel coming from her

      if you don’t have that, you’re in for a lackluster sex life down the road and that’s no good. sex play a huge part in keeping a relationship healthy.

      Like


  30. Hey Dreg Inceliot,

    Melissa Theuriau’s husband is a mulatto and shorter than her :

    Like


    • on September 26, 2017 at 8:47 pm The Philosopher

      I’d put money on David being indian or mulatto himself actually, not jewish.

      Like


      • jamal debouzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
        he may be a Maghrebin muzzie like debouzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

        Like


      • on September 26, 2017 at 8:50 pm The Philosopher

        On that subject – mixed race people is not something really talked about by the alt right or liberals. For example many half blacks identify with blacks but many half latinos/asians/arabs identify as ‘white’. So bashing whites turns off a lot of the latter. Maybe even some half blacks that grew up with their mother/grandparents I dunno.

        Like


      • they will mostly with a very few exceptions side with anti whites
        their fervor in hating white half of themselves is unmatched in the a full blown untermenschen

        Like


      • on September 26, 2017 at 9:06 pm The Philosopher

        I’d be interested to see the mixed race US pres vote.

        Like


      • vengeance is a dish best served cold

        Liked by 1 person


      • on September 27, 2017 at 6:44 am Vagina dominator

        Every son wants to exceed his dad,and every dad wants his son to do that. Unfortunately, when a white man has a mixed race son, he knows that can never happen. Sad.

        Liked by 1 person


    • And I should care about this why?

      Fail more, (((David)))… you sound like just another mischling dweeb trying to get someone’s goat… someone who appears to be living in yo’ haid, rent-free.

      Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 6:42 am Vagina dominator

      This is one of the weirder attempted trolls I have encountered on this site. Who the fuck are these people and who would care?

      Let me guess, you get all of your news from the entertainment gossip shows. Tell me, how’s John Tesh?

      What? He’s dead? Really? Excuse me, I have to sit down a minute.

      Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 6:45 am Vagina dominator

      He’s *is* shorter than her! I think you’ve made a mistake. This comment must be for wolfie65.

      Liked by 2 people


    • on September 27, 2017 at 6:47 am Vagina dominator

      And ffs but she has ugly fucking knees. I’d say maybe she spends a lot of time on them except he seems a little short for it.

      Am I still on topic?

      Like


    • And Stage Fright Greg still couldn’t bring himself to piss next to him at a stall. I laughed so hard at this post. This is Greg’s whole world. He must have been crushed.

      Like


      • Yet another shill who cried “Victory!” after getting his haid handed to him, go figger.

        And WTF are you on about now? Is my livin’ in yo’ haid, rent-free, disrupting any cogent thought process?

        Somebody is going to have to translate this clowns posts for me.

        Like


      • I know I keep joking about this, but the new trolls seem just like the old trolls. I read this from ModifiedLiving and I automatically think HEY, TOM JONES IS BACK! Same disconnected, weird insults.

        Like


      • no-bones jones is the new jesusisbad, and he’s not (((tribal))).

        These other ml/David/whatever (((sock puppies))) make no-bones seem positively rational.

        Like


      • That’s talent right there, making jonesy look rational.

        I wish there was a way we could get a new set of trolls. These retreads are just boring.

        Like


      • Boring and arm-wearying, the way you smack ’em down but they just keep comin’ back with the same ol’ nuthin’.

        Now I know how George Kennedy felt in Cool Hand Luke… except these kikes ’round chere ain’t got the Newman charm.

        Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 8:46 am Muerte aka Luciano

      (((David)))

      Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 8:57 am Muerte aka Luciano

      greg a herb

      but it is weird as fuck that dude has like 4 ppl who comment specifically to take shots at him

      Like


      • Two of which are invariably sock puppies trying to make their inanity look like consensus.

        I think the good men of the chateau can judge most issues and teapot tempests by the quality of both those who side against and those who side with any particular poster.

        I consider it a mark of honor that I seem to be the lightning rod for the dweeb squad… and that some of the best posters here often have my back.

        Like


  31. Not every girl who has premarital sex is a slut. If that’s the standard for sluttery, you may as well give up finding a wife in the world we inhabit right now.

    Yep, pretty much. Don’t feel bad. Previous generations of men have been ground up in hot war. The present generation is a different type of casualty.

    Liked by 1 person


  32. on September 26, 2017 at 9:03 pm The Philosopher

    I think its possible a girl in an LTR would cheat or show interest in a guy in the hope of getting ‘an upgrade’ but planning on being loyal to him. So the chastity holds in a sense.

    Its just the way it works as Rollo Tomassi says, that many of these women cannot hold down quality guys as the lads have too many options, and so may have to slink back to their beta. Many of these women have broken hearts and become angry and hateful as a result. ‘Alpha Widows’ he calls them.

    The commenter above also said it well when the girl simply said “I couldnt resist him”. If a famous actor, musician, etc walks starts hitting on any woman, even if shes married or long term, theres a fair chance she gives her number and lets him court her or do a secret ONS.

    I remember Jim Carey said he could have sex with any woman he wanted at one point in his career. I also remember a D list British TV host saying women would queue up at the studio. Alphas are less exaggerated.

    And so thats why we have sexual market regulation like religion.

    But i also think feminism makes men less attractive more than it makes women less attractive. Women stil have make up and plastic surgery. Men cannot develop ‘entitlement’ or be cads if they are brainwashed in feminism. So many wives and gfs are unhappy at having brainwashed duds.

    Like


  33. Trump is a coward.

    60 million armed white men have shown they have is back and are serious.

    Still “this is not about race,” says cucktrump.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/26/live-updates-judge-roy-moores-grassroots-muscle-vs-luther-stranges-corporate-money-alabama-gop-senate-runoff/

    Also, Any white man who buys a ticket to watch Levron Jniggerames should hang himself.

    Like


    • By the lolzozozoz at the idea a former state Supreme Court justice is not also part of the establishment. You don’t get that job without being a politician, even in Alabama.

      News flash (((Breitbart))): we don’t care about the NFL distraction or voting or who is a senator anymore.

      #soon

      Like


      • The guy was suspended from the bench twice, lastly for telling probate judges to defy federal orders regarding gay marriage.

        Otoh, he doesn’t seem too bright.

        Like


    • ” 60 million armed white men have shown they have is back and are serious. ”

      This is a sad fact, if you think about it. They could change things even without firing a shot.

      Like


  34. So how long did Jesus get tempted by the devil for a night? I told the devil to take my soul and when the devil came I fought it and thought I won but I think been fighting the devil ever since 23 years now. I made the devil my bitch maybe that’s why woman give me their souls.

    Like


    • there was that german fella’ Goethe who wrote something similar

      “Faust: Who holds the devil, let him hold him well,
      He hardly will be caught a second time.”
      ― Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust / Part One

      Liked by 1 person


      • What do you think that means?

        Like


      • Whenever the devil harasses you, seek the company of men or drink more, or joke and talk nonsense, or do some other merry thing. Sometimes we must drink more, sport, recreate ourselves, and even sin a little to spite the devil, so that we leave him no place for troubling our consciences with trifles. We are conquered if we try too conscientiously not to sin at all. So when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to.

        –Martin Luther

        Liked by 1 person


      • Cortesar and Reb….good stuff, gentlemen!

        Like


      • Seconded.

        Like


      • So when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to.

        A wry pundit once said: “The best way to handle temptation is to give into it immediately, then put it behind you.”

        Liked by 1 person


    • I finally get the Adam and Eve story
      Man is God and woman is the devil always tempting god
      I was loving life and it was woman who made me feel shame about living how I wanted to and acting how I wanted and sharing myself with all woman he he he
      Really I’ve always shared my shit why wouldn’t I share my love with a bunch of woman I’m good at loving.

      Like


      • Took a while but even the half black lesbian chick on permanent hot for me now

        Like


      • Exex permanent hot didn’t fuck her she said had STD so taking antibiotics now

        Like


      • Man is man is God woman are extremely jealous of his power to impregnate every bitch they know whereas they can only get pregnant once a year or so. Man is God because he almost has no limit and with current technology man can almost have unlimited kids creating his own world from his flesh
        Flesh of my flesh blood of my blood

        Like


      • I guess the problem with half black kids is the war that goes on for their soul between the black and white anscesters who knows really what the afterlife is like right maybe every time it happens there are major wars for their soul

        Like


    • When they took me hospital after I was really thinking of jumping in front some cars on highway and ex’s daughter told me call 911 I was in room by myself and there was a really really cold pressense with me the question is was it done by the hospital to me or was it the devil with me since I was so close to meeting him I don’t know but I do know it was cold enough for my body to shake so hard I couldn’t eat my french toast looks like they sent a maintenance person in after I told the lady about it. Probably still on camera you guys could check it out.

      Like


    • You can’t fight Satan without God. He will destroy you if you try. That’s pride. Not the good kind.

      Like


    • Gregi, you’re a really interesting lunatic. I’m getting hooked on your comments

      Liked by 1 person


    • “So how long did Jesus get tempted by the devil for a night? I told the devil to take my soul and when the devil came I fought it and thought I won but I think been fighting the devil ever since 23 years now. I made the devil my bitch maybe that’s why woman give me their souls.”

      I’ve just made a country blues song out of this.

      [CH: if you have the patience for run-on sentences and grammatical insouciance, gregi (formerly known as gunslingergregi) can cough up some real gems.]

      Liked by 2 people


  35. “Experienced men have a honed sense of which girls are slutty and which are chaste. It’s not that hard to know if a one night stand is a cock carousel veteran or an innocent naif caught up for the first or second time in her life in the heat of the moment.”

    This shouldn’t be a stretch for the deluded damsel chasers to comprehend. In the heat of the moment, the virginal girl gives off obvious tells. But as for part 2: “Be careful tradcons; that womanizer you accuse of banging bar skanks may be the one who cut his ONS chops on your tradwife before she lost her taste for fun and met you.”

    I believe this corollary to be equally true. But would you say the “tells” that the reformed slut gives off are as transparent as those of the low-notch count hottie?

    Barring any obvious red flags(septum piecing and Betty Friedan coffee table book), this one seems harder to me. I wonder if I’ve had enough semi-LTR experience to develop this sense yet. There are two relationships with manipulative cuties from my lesser beta years that I see in retrospect as being rife with clues, but only in retrospect.

    It stands to reason that inexperience is harder to hide than experience. The former is betrayed by anxiety. But the latter? It would seem analogous to what some shrinks say about psychopaths: Evidence of their trickery is often negative evidence. If you always keep perfect eye contact or composure when no one else would, you’re either a demigod or acting.

    As one of these deceitful women once said to me, “You always say just the right thing.” At the time her tone wasn’t overjoyed, but not negative, so I took it as a compliment. Now it seems rather obvious code for “Fly is down, your game is showing.”

    Perhaps a similar defensive “too good to be true” instinct is a man’s only protection against female lies.

    Like


    • on September 27, 2017 at 9:21 pm Vagina dominator

      @ Henry Mueller

      “Perhaps a similar defensive “too good to be true” instinct is a man’s only protection against female lies.”

      In my experience, the best protection is to keep your money in offshore assets and in safety deposit boxes. I am completely serious.

      If your assets are safe, they can break your heart ’til the cows come home and it doesn’t really matter.

      Like


  36. Saint Augustine even said that fallen women were an important safety valve to keep virtuous women virtuous.

    Liked by 4 people


  37. greg why can’t we bed the sluts and wed the good girl

    Like


    • That’s what I did and I bedded a lot of nice ones too.

      Like


      • a nice slut is actually a thing. one chick i used to fuck for a couple months was a huge slut but actually sweet and no bitchiness or entitlement just liked sex. we would fuck then hang out and watch Dr. Who lol. obviously not ltr material but there’s gray area between innocent nice ltr chicks and slutty mean bitches.

        Like


      • I think we’ve all known the nice girls who were (ahem) rather free with their favors.

        Back in the day it didn’t seem so lurid as the gals of today, amirite?

        Like


    • The “good” girl said from beginning it’s all about the money then fell in love all though maybe should get points for being honest? Lolzzzzlolzzzlil

      Like


    • greg why can’t we bed the sluts and wed the good girl

      Nobody said you couldn’t…

      But given the range of growing types of STDs, many impervious to treatment that cures, do so at your own risk.

      And try to be a cut-above the shitskin muh-dik mentality about it, there’s a good chap. 😉

      Ironic that youse yeggs can’t see the wisdom of the gods of the Copybook Headings…. if’n you ain’t part of the solution, you is part o’ de problem.

      How long before you Lochinvars of the Boudoir start whining “Where have all the good girls gone?”

      Liked by 2 people


  38. The tidal estuary of true wife material and sluttery is really centered in the Christian right at the moment with swirls and eddys occasionally making it out into the rip current of secular Western society.

    First off, you will find unicorns there. But they are rare. I did. I’m lucky.

    My experience over the years in four different churches, all of them “good”, is that 85% of the moderately attractive girls go cock crazy for some period of time in late high school/early college. I spent my virginal years with my virginal Christian male friends watching as almost ever girl, to a vag, was happily fucking non-Christian boyfriends in college and getting into the drugs and drinking scene. What was astounding was that to this day I can’t figure out what commonality they all had other than usually being above a 5. Conservative vs. liberal upbringing didn’t matter. Shy/good girl vs. tomboy loudmouth didn’t matter. It was a shotgun blast of sluttery vs. a few outliers of strict chasteness they they took to their wedding beds.

    Of course, the other thing the church won’t talk about (HEY DALROCK) is the epidemic of hot cougars leaving their husbands for lives of eat.pray.slut after the kids are in high school. Churches in America are jam packed full of men on their second marriages to their kid’s now-step mom while hot MILF-ey is chasing mid-50’s Chad and bragging about it shamelessly on social media while everyone they knew all those years pretends to support them.

    The pattern of the male in church is largely becoming watching all the hot virgin church girls go penis-crazy within 3 months of graduating youth group and waiting 5-8 celibate years before they come back, often a few kids in tow, to “change their lives” and offer used-up furrow and saggy mom-tits to the guys who “waited for their soulmates”. Many of these are destined for divorce-rapes when the strange DNA floating around in their “repentant, starting with a clean slate” princesluts starts vibrating again and she’s banging the fire chief in the school closet after the PTA meeting.

    And the beat goes on….

    Like


    • Astute and articulate observations.

      Like


    • Christianity is no match for the power of female hypergamy. To control female impulse it requires near universal adherence and strong social pressures reflecting that adherence to function as a bulwark against sluttery. That universality no longer exists in the US, hence the behavior you witness.

      Like


  39. Greg ‘State Fright’ Eliot is so full of rage and bile (as is obvious from the tone of his comments) that it is clear to any observer that he bombs with even the “petrie dish” sluts. That’s if he ever actually removes himself from this forum to sack up and have a crack at one, which I doubt. That’s my casual observation. Oh yeas, who am I…never seen you here before….forum wouldn’t be the same without good ol’ Greg….yada yada yada.

    Like


  40. Them Tradcons are really going to get their tighty whiteys in a wad when they witness the rise of the trad ladyboy. I’m calling it now.

    Like


  41. The stench of blue pill in this comment section is strong 😦

    “Not All Women Are Like That”
    “Special Snowflake LTR Material”
    “Protect Women From The Bad Guys”

    Have you guys learnt nothing from Heartiste and Rollo? Do you not know basic biology? Have you heard of White Knights and Betas? Do you understand the dual mating strategy of women?

    I’m glad Heartiste is finally calling it out. It’s clear that many readers have clearly not swallowed the Red Pill and that they don’t have a good understanding of male female dynamics from infield experience.

    Like


    • Ironic in that my very targeted remark on girls who bang on the first date turns into a twist about ALL sex before marriage rationalization by you hamstering PUAs..

      You wanna talk a weird form of White Knighting? How about when a man claims “Beware the slut who bangs on the first date” turns into a chorus of alleged red-pillers crying out “NASALT!!!”

      You want a TRUE definition of the over-used word ‘irony’, there you have it.

      Like


    • Ironic in that my very targeted remark on girls who bang on the first date turns into a twist about ALL sex before m-a-r-r-i-a-g-e rationalization by you hamstering PUAs..

      You wanna talk a weird form of White Knighting?

      How about when a man claims “Beware the slut who bangs on the first date” turns into a chorus of alleged red-pillers crying out “NASALT!!!”

      If you want a TRUE definition of the over-used word ‘irony’, there you have it.

      Like


  42. Traditionally the conservative men knew what women really are, which is why they kept their women in check.

    Tradcons =/= traditional conservatives.

    GE doesn’t sound like a tradcon to me. He sounds angry and pissed off, and maybe even for a good reason, but he sure knows (((weakened and blinded))) men are the reason behind general increase in sluttiness.

    Oh, and if you marry a non-virgin, then pray everyday because only God can help you. The odds won’t be favorable.

    Like


    • GE doesn’t sound like a tradcon to me. He sounds angry and pissed off, and maybe even for a good reason, but he sure knows (((weakened and blinded))) men are the reason behind general increase in sluttiness.

      Well, thanks, but I think I temper my Dutch Uncle persona with a goodly share of humor and wryness, here at the chateau.

      Like


  43. I’m gonna consider this another miracle I got in touch with the hottest chick I ever dated when young and her pic she had short hair and cute but not great. After I got her to say come up which of course I couldn’t because of course that would be too scary close to really putting a wedge between my wife and I . She changed her life had a baby at 40 looking glowing in the pic happy I apologised for cheating on her I didn’t realize I was probably hurting someone when I did it she said it didn’t matter it was ok we were kids but seeing the change in her life it did matter she might really be one I would ask her dude to take since I think we are meant to be after I get back with wife she could be second or maybe only I’m us but I would probably leave her alone even though I prob could take her back my first real love lust everything

    Like


  44. on September 27, 2017 at 2:16 am Diversity Heretic

    This entire discussion is why respectable girls went only on chaperoned dates one hundred years ago. The ardent suitor schemed to steal a kiss. Now he tries to estimate her notch count after a one night stand. Progress, phew!

    Liked by 1 person


    • If ya think of it from this point of view though the hottest chick I ever seen was in a shit mode and had a problem with the dude why temp broke up after talking with Greg it changed her life for better taking care of herself trying to look sexy.as fuck and succeeding and bringing life into the world she had given up on being beautiful but now she is back on it

      Like


    • Your right I think though when young woman should be virgins get married then carrosel if they just need to open their legs so bad or suck a cock cause yea prob 30 more bitches I got to heal that I interacted with I’m school days

      Like


    • Again me and the hot chick did no sexual shit and fell in love because we were respectable and didn’t need a chaperone to tell us wait for marriage to make it perfect

      Like


    • They make the rules, men play the game. From where I sit, they got nuttin’ to complain about.

      Like


  45. Maybe my dad was right hell is God taking himself away from you.
    You aren’t allowed in his presence
    If a life would be considered eternity then removing someone from your presence for life would be sending a bitch to hell for eternity but even I with the shit the ex ex did not punish her for eternity when she showed repentance I showed her more and more love as I think god would show his love to people who have wronged him.

    Like


  46. My gift is I make woman want a man even my first counselor had given up she got a dude just posted pic happy as fuck 🙂

    Like


  47. Where the equal shit is fucking us up is woman are not equal to men bitches get imprinted way worse on their first love/sex where for me I didn’t even tell a chick I loved them until I met my first wife allthough maybe men to should be virgins not sure or should be established fuck whatever they want so when they get a virgin rock her complete world.

    Like


  48. “How do you know she’s “clean”? She wears bobby socks..

    Like


  49. Waiting for the train yesterday and see a familiar face. Older dude who I used to train jiu jitsu with. Always a cool dude, when he started out he was on the heavier side but now looks like he is chiseled from granite, approaching 50 but doesn’t look it at all. Just got his black belt. I moved away so have not seen him for years. One of the last things I remember talking to him about before we lost touch was his marriage. Said it was in a bad place. Ask him about it. Says his wife was unfaithful and he’s been divorced for a few years now and he has been dating someone new.

    “As soon as I started dating this new woman my ex wife has tried to make my life a living hell”

    Like


  50. As much as we all love talking about slaying pussy, there are far more important obligations afoot. Focus people, focus.

    – EU plans to take 50,000 refugees from Africa, Mideast –

    The EU unveiled plans Wednesday to take at least 50,000 refugees directly from Africa, the Middle East and Turkey to discourage migrant boats from making the risky Mediterranean crossing. The proposal involves admitting refugees to EU countries over the next two years under the bloc’s resettlement progress, which was introduced during the migration crisis that hit the continent in 2015. “We need to open real alternatives to taking perilous irregular journeys,” EU Migration Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos said in Brussels. The European Commission said that it was “recommending a new EU resettlement scheme to bring at least 50,000 of the most vulnerable persons in need of international protection to Europe over the next two years.” (AFP)

    Like


  51. I have an idea. If a man is concerned about the sexual past of his potential partner there are a couple courses of action which may limit the odds that someone like CH, with a thousand-notch count, has banged them so vigorously they can’t walk in the morning, and ensured every bang you have with then for the rest of your marriage, LTR or whatever comes up short.

    1-Find a virgin. Good luck with that, and watch out for statutory [email protected] laws.
    2-Find a moderately attractive (in the 6-7 range) that a true player would not give the time of day. There are plenty of these girls that are sluts but it shouldn’t be that hard to vet them. If you get a reasonably young (20-22y/o) woman who plays moderately hard-to-get you have a pretty decent likelihood that you are the best she’s ever had.

    There is the added benefit that she will shit test you less, and if she recognizes your value, with the help of Game, you can have a faithful and enjoyable partner.

    You may have to get past a few things in the looks department. Overweight or bad skin would be a deal breaker for me, but not small boobs, etc.

    Like


    • Settling seems to be underrated on this blog. No doubt banging the shit out of a beautiful woman the first time you meet her is a huge ego boost, but what then? Just do that over and over again? For how many years?

      That doesn’t really seem sustainable. Especially as there is a rather large opportunity cost. Namely a family.

      I have young kids and when I get home from work it is like the Beatles are in town. Shrieking and screaming “Daddys home!” and it’s not even like I’m a truck driver and gone all the time. It’s like that every day. And that feels pretty awesome. I wouldn’t trade that for a hundred thousand “walks of triumph”.

      Like


      • I think settling is more cautiously understood than underrated.

        I’m sure many a single man on here is looking to find a woman with whom they can start a family.

        But we also know of the dangers in choosing the wrong woman, thus it’s cautiously understood so it doesn’t get much air time.

        Sounds like the best part of your day is when you get home from work. BON!

        Like


      • Mendo,
        I guess the point was maybe they are looking in the wrong place. There are many, many, girls available to guys with half-decent game that get overlooked. Oneitis is poison. Both to one’s game and to finding a good partner. If a man is looking for a woman to make a wife for the rest of his life his beauty standards are going to be extremely high. And he is going to be going after the same girls CH has alreadt banged to euphoric oblivion.

        If a man wishes to avoid this, and have pride that he may not be the only man his woman has had, but is at least the best, further down the numerical scale is not a bad place to look.

        Also the best part of my day is not always getting home from work and having little kids treat me like a rock star, but it is pretty awesome.

        Like


  52. on September 27, 2017 at 8:35 am Going to the Fields

    “on September 27, 2017 at 6:44 amVagina dominator
    Every son wants to exceed his dad,and every dad wants his son to do that. Unfortunately, when a white man has a mixed race son, he knows that can never happen. Sad.”

    I know a man whose wife died when his kids were little. Not even school aged. He raised them alone. Not always well. Daughter is recovering from heroin, son is ok but has multiple kids with shady women who can’t mother up.

    All of his grandkids are mixed, and I can see the pain in his eyes. He loves his grandkids. He loves his kids. He wants what is best for them, but knows it won’t happen.

    We all know it won’t happen, absent totalitarian regs and forced tolerance. Forced worship, forced marriage. All that stuff they rebel against. We can’t have one world. The desire for binding ties is too strong. Oh, you know your ties, but which ones do you respect?

    We want lineage. Lineage matters. A strong and largely unbroken line.

    Not to serve diversity.

    To serve strength.

    Like


  53. on September 27, 2017 at 8:58 am Days of Broken Arrows

    I’m starting to notice a trend of older thirtysomething women marrying older guys, having a kids, and then almost immediately divorcing the guy. There aren’t rich guys, either, but average men who get nailed with child support.

    This just happened to a guy I know and I don’t know how he’s going to deal with the financial fallout.

    What these women are doing has to be some sort of racket. It’s one thing when couples meet and marry young, have a few kids and then split when the kids are teens because they grew apart. That I get.

    But from what I’m seeing, these thirtysomething women (all pushing forty) are in and out of these men’s lives by the time the kids are 3. I’m posting it here because I think it plays into the main topic. Once they get past a certain age, these women don’t bond.

    I did an online court records search and this is what my formerly happy-go-lucky friend is now facing:

    Issue: DIVORCE LIMITED
    Issue: POSSESSION OF PROPERTY
    Issue: CUSTODY
    Issue: VISITATION
    Issue: SUPPORT
    Issue: FEES

    Like


  54. Who could forget the time CH posted about “Stage Fright Greg’s Troubled Relationship with Female Sexuality”
    Oh, my sides. That shit is going to live forever!

    Like


    • Hey everyone, check out the amateur hour at Trolledy Central.

      Like


      • It’s fitting the MoldyLocks finds himself amusing. Which is typical of bottom basement trolls.

        Like


      • Haha, since when did trolling losers become a bad thing?

        Like


      • Heh, heh… go figger.

        Not only did CH make it plain I was a valued contributor, he also included the necessary albeits to acknowledge the point I was making.

        And then there’s the heart-warming response from many of the good men of the chateau who covered my six.

        But this MuhLabia kike swoops in and attempts some old neener-neeners that didn’t work for him the first time, and thinks his nervous and overwrought laughter will serve to distract and cover the azz of his that he’s shown once again.

        The fucker is like dweebstreep on steroids, amirite?

        I thought (((these people))) were supposed to be smart?

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • It’s fitting the MoldyLocks finds himself amusing. Which is typical of bottom basement trolls.

        He’d have to climb a few flights of stairs to make it to the bottom of the basement.

        The kike is positively geothermal.

        Like


      • ModifiedLiving is obviously streetsweeper.

        In fact, there are only 3 men commenting on this blog. Me, Carlos and Day of Broken Arrows.

        The rest are poodles.

        Like


      • on September 27, 2017 at 9:30 pm Vagina dominator

        @ Modified Living “Haha, since when did trolling losers become a bad thing?”

        Greg is a big boy and can look after himself but what you do is bullshit because you want to play the game without putting any chips on the table.

        Anyone can snipe from the edges of the internet but where is your advice on Game, your stories or anecdotes or observations so that everyone can line up to have a free kick?

        The basic problem is that what you are doing is just gutless.

        Like


    • I’m the rothbla test for the world u just failed

      Like


    • Jonesy, I apologize for accusing you of being Modified Living. One, that’s an insult you don’t deserve, and 2, it’s obviously ML. Same Initials. I didn’t see that until now, I’ve never been so embarrassed.

      Welcome back, the newer, more bitter, ML

      Like


      • Nope, not ML.
        And the Stage Fright Greg writes back “CH, I love you like a brother, but…..(paste in some mewling response minus the vitriol he reserves for others) & I’m a valued contributor!!” Talk about battered wife syndrome! So tragic, so perfect.

        Like


  55. Gentlemen: Everything has a price. There are good reasons why our ancestors frowned on certain behaviors. I’ve always wondered why VD’s are not discussed on this site very much.

    Our great host, CH, and other Alphas here have probably slept with tens of dozens of women, if not hundreds. Statistically, its impossible that they haven’t caught multiple VD’s in their lothario adventures. Even if curable, these viruses have to have a collective damage, on the body and possibly the mind.

    [CH: i have not because the girls i preyed upon were by and large “nice girls”. i rarely cavorted with skanks. my ledger is littered with the busted cherries of innocent naifs. or at least with women who didn’t stay long on the cock carousel. also i was careful, it’s harder for men to pick up STDs from women than the reverse.]

    Like


    • interesting that you used past tense verbs in your response CH. does that mean you’re no longer out carousing for new girls because you’ve settled down with one?

      inquiring minds want to know

      [CH: mietzko used the past tense so i addressed him/her in the same tense. i can’t let past lovers’ reputations go sullied like that.]

      Like


  56. Banged my girl on the first night (well, the next morning & thereafter).

    Still with her 3 years later, may get married one day (not under our western laws, fuck that), but yes she’d “not done this before”, as she was a virgin heh. (wasn’t lying either, couldn’t hide that..).

    So there are a few out there, rare nowadays though of course. But if they’ve waited long enough (26 for her) and they ARE an actual virgin, I guess it means you’re something bloody special, and it can work.

    Of course though your mileage may vary, judge accordingly. Some of the ones who actually haven’t done it before can get catastrophically needy / psychotic, and latch onto you for all they’re worth.

    Liked by 1 person


    • yeah, you do have to be careful with girl who have low notch counts when it comes to them getting attached to you.

      they are still healthy and normal in the way they bond with men so unless you’re sure you want to keep her around, don’t waste her time and risk breaking her heart.

      Like


    • Lock her down dude!

      Liked by 1 person


    • on September 27, 2017 at 9:32 pm Vagina dominator

      Marry away, but hide your money.

      Liked by 1 person


    • You don´t need the law to approve knocking her up,
      Britpal of mine is living with his “girlfriend” and their 2 kids, it keeps her on her toes.
      And you already won the lottery bagging a fücking virgin in the West.
      Don´t know what else you´re waiting for, finding a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow?

      Like


  57. As an anonymous friend an ardent long time admirer, good sir, I must say that I am dispirited to see you falling (a couple times now) into the “look how smart i am” wordsmith distraction so often used by “of color” intellectuals and their wimpy white groveling bitches on CNN. I dont know when people began saying “to your point”, disregarding the necessary ‘with regard to’ that must precede it, but if you said that phrase in South Dakota, where I’m from, people would at least look at you funny, and probably not respect you for your inability to speak plainly. And they may even pop you if they’ve had a few brews. Black intellectuals use this kind of speech to sound smarter than they are, and they speak very fast taboot, as if that will inflate people’s perceptions of their intelligence. Just listen to the prepositions these people use when they speak. The prepositions those smarty pants use when they speak so rapidly are often incorrect, betraying their actual intelligence and perspicacity “with regard to” their ability to form good English . Keep up the work good sir, but easy on that “to your point” talk homz. It’s libby/elite as fuck, and classic doublespeak for: I am a dumbass that likes to pretend I’m smarter than you, and I know all these big words from college that are superfluous and vacuous when one could utilize the much simpler synonyms at any natural English speaker’s disposal. You still da man bro. And I feel obliged to say that I am only writing this because I think you’re a great writer. Peace

    [CH: that’s the wrist slapping I get for syntactical laziness. imagine the punishment if i really screwed the semantic pooch!]

    Like


    • If you screwed the semantic pooch, were you writing doggerel?

      [CH: take a bow wow.]

      Like


    • That was a long way to go to make a point. Mine’ll be shorter: “taboot?” TABOOT?!! You lecture, then you fuck up a common phrase like “to boot?”

      Ok, I just saw it on Urban Dictionary. But I take back nothing.

      Like


    • I can’t fault a man for using the King’s English, even on them tough woids one never hears on South Park.

      I believe I heard once that the average person doesn’t use more than about 8000 words in his or her lifetime.

      I salute anyone who attempts to get us yeggs into the 9000 range.

      Liked by 1 person


      • somewhat related…

        read awhile back that the english we speak in the US is actually closer to the english people spoke when we first colonized the US.

        current brits are the ones who are speaking a language that is unlike the original english of ages ago.

        so really americans are speaking the king’s english and current brits are speaking some bastardized modern slang version of that.

        Like


      • Heard the same about pronunciation (Americans’ closer to original), but it was eons ago, and who knows…

        Liked by 1 person


    • on September 27, 2017 at 9:34 pm Vagina dominator

      Guy who can’t paragraph makes quibbling and uninformed complaint about the contraction of an adjunct.

      Lord give me strength.

      Like


  58. While chaste women are preferable, one shouldn’t give them much credit for it. It’s easy to be chaste when you receive constant sexual validation. Every time a girl gets asked out on a date, asked for her number, greeted by a male stranger, or so much as receives a like on her selfie, she knows that guy wants to bang her. All of these actions, no matter how subtle, give her that “walk of triumph.”

    It’s much harder for men to get sexual validation by contrast. A flirtatious convo, a number, or a date could just mean that the girl is a cocktease. Even sex itself is no guarantee as she could be using him as a beta provider. Hence, men only receive true sexual validation after having multiple casual encounters.

    [CH: while what you say is true, it’s not highly relevant to women’s self-esteems. women don’t get the same ego thrill from sex that men get. for women, triumph comes from locking a quality man into commitment. that’s why women have walks of shame but glow like the sun when showing off their engagement rings.]

    Like


  59. Pray for my mom think she about to talk.

    Like


    • That’s a great opening lyric to a somber country song.

      Like


    • I said my company was waiting fore to die by killing myself I said if I could I would my mom said don’t she has also said oh God as I talk about our lives getting it baby been training for this

      Like


  60. Major7 here commenting from my trusty flip-phone. Been thinking about the word Trad-Con, it’s kinda like the word Beta, meaning it’s good, bad, or neutral depending on whose saying it and what context. I was thinking to myself, I’m a Trad-Con… So what? Beta, when Vox uses it, is almost Alpha.

    I was also thinking, this is probably why Gregi writes the way he does, if has a flip phone and typing wears him out.

    Like


  61. “I’m not saying Greg is a tradcon”

    But we know he is a Neocon. Loved at the Chateau.

    Like