Why Men Don’t Have BFFs

Watch this video of a man and a woman, respectively, dropping a mickey in their dates’ drinks.

When the man attempts to drug his date, a mongrel horde of white knights descends upon him to break him on the wheel. But when the woman does the same to her date… crickets. Not a stir among the white knight brigade to defend from bodily harm the man who is the victim of her mickey. Only one person — a woman — steps up to tell the guy that his date put a pill in his drink.

This is all unsurprising to Chateau regulars who are familiar with the fundamental premise governing human sociosexual dynamics.

Interestingly, this reluctance to come to a man’s aid (relative to the eagerness to do so for women) is why men’s same-sex friendships are so much deeper and more meaningful than women’s same-sex friendships. When a man has earned another man’s true friendship, their loyalty can last for decades, through the worst tribulations. Women’s friendships are, by way of contrast, quite a bit more… how shall we say?… gossipy and fickle.

This is the reason why women invent terms like “BFF”, (Best Friend Forever). When you can’t really count on your friends to be there, you artificially pump the value of your friendships with branding exercises that allow you and them to think the relationship is more profound than it is. Men have no need for such verbal calisthenics, because a man’s close friends have earned their place in his world by their action, not by their word. His loyal male friends are presumed BFFs. No marketing or product branding required.





Comments


  1. on October 1, 2013 at 9:06 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozozozo owen womensz have no HONOR which is why da ebenrnakesiferes put dem in power zlzozolzi

    Lots of people talk and few of them know,soul of a woman was created below.
    Every day I work so hard, bringin’ home my hard earned pay, Try to love you baby, but you push me away.-

    LED ZEPPELIN – DAZED AND CONFUSED LYRICS

    Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.

    HOMER TEACHES:

    You have to watch out [20] She doesn’t carry off all your treasure. You know what a woman’s heart is like. She wants to enrich the house of the one who weds her, Never mind about her former children And the husband she once loved. Once he’s dead, [25] She doesn’t give any of them a thought. –Homer; Lombardo, Stanley; Murnaghan, Sheila (2010-07-02). Odyssey (Translated & Annotated) (Kindle Locations 6813-6817). Hackett Publishing. Kindle Edition.

    lzozoozozlzozoz dat is because a owmenz is gudied by materialz insticnstinct and mater = mother = matter = material you fanabaoyz zlzloolzolzoz. DA ANCIENTZ KNEW IT–all dat da bernnkeifierz conceal and hidez as tehy d create false LAWS allowing womenz to arbitrarily transfer a man’s property and chirlederen to da state zlzlzlooz!!!

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 9:07 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozoz

      THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN WILL RIDE AGAIN: THE INVERSION OF ALPHA & BETA: THE FALSE SIREN OF DR. HELEN SMITH’S MEN ON STRIKE & Michelle Malkin’s Hand-Wringing

      All men should begin immediately by reading the following books which the central bankers and their fellow churchians hate, fear, and detest:

      0. THE BIBLE
      1. Homer’s Iliad
      2. Homer’s Odyssey
      3. Exodus & Ecclesiastes & The Psalms
      4. Virgil’s Aeneid
      5. Socrates’ Apology
      6. The Book of Matthew & Jefferson’s Bible
      7. Plato’s Repulic
      8. Seneca’s Letters from a Stoic
      9. Aristotle’s Poetics
      10. Dante’s Inferno
      11. The Declaration of Independence
      12. The Constitution
      13. John Milton’s Paradise Lost
      14. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
      15. Newton’s Principia
      16. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments
      17. Henry David Thoreau’s Walden
      18. Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn (& all of his work)
      19. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
      20. Ludwig von Mises’ A Theory of Money and Credit
      21. F.A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom
      22. Herman Melville’s Moby Dick
      23. Einstein’s The Meaning of Relativity
      24. Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth
      25. Ron Paul’s Revolution & End the Fed
      26. THE BIBLE

      Please note that neither Dr. Helen Smith nor Michelle Malkin ever, ever, ever quote nor acknowledge THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN. Next time you see them, ask them why they never salute our EXALTED FATHERS and our NOBLE HERITAGE and the FOUNDATION OF NATURAL RIGHTS, THE FAMILY, FATHERHOOD, and NATURAL LAW.

      For instance, in her book http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/1594036756

      Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters

      why does Helen Smith never quote Moses nor Genesis nor Jesus who DEFINE MARRIAGE? Why does Helen Smith never quote Genesis?

      13: And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
      14: And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
      15: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
      16: Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

      DOES HELEN SMITH NOT REALIZE WHY MEN HAVE BOYCOTTED MARRIAGE? It is because it has been desouled, debauched, and bernankified, robbed of its exalted spirit, and transformed into yet another beenrnekified fraud to transfer assets from men to da beenrkeiified statez zlolzozoz.

      Why does HELEN SMITH never quote Moses? Did not Moses know a thing or two about BEING A MAN, even though he never negged, nor peacocked nor wore furry hatsz to get some pre-berbebenkiifed butthozlzizol buttcockinzg (which da noeocnths sectreletly tape zlzzoz):

      6 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.

      7 “You shall have no other gods before[b] me.

      8 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 10 but showing love to a thousandgenerations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

      11 “You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.

      12 “Observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy, as the Lord your God has commanded you. 13 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 14 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant,nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns, so that your male and female servants may rest, as you do.15 Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the Lord your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm.Therefore the Lord your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day.

      16 “Honor your father and your mother, as the Lord your God has commanded you, so that you may live long and that it may go well with you in the land theLord your God is giving you.

      17 “You shall not murder.

      18 “You shall not commit adultery.

      19 “You shall not steal.

      20 “You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.

      21 “You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife. You shall not set your desire on your neighbor’s house or land, his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.”

      RIGHT THERE WE SEE THAT “THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR’S WIVES ASS & THOU SHALT NOT COMMITT ADULTERY” meaning dat it is worng so very worng to buttcock someoenes future potential wife and tape it in sectrievz zlzzlzloozoz

      Why does DR. HELEN SMITH never quote JEsus? 3Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?”4And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE,5and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’?6“So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.”7They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?”8He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way.9“And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

      So one can see that MOSES JESUS and GENESIS all agree dat der is to be no sectirve tapings of butthxte nor any transfer of a man’s welath to da beernnake state nor shall any other man be allwedz allowedz to buttcock nor ginacock your wifez. WHY DOES HELEN SMITH NOT QUOTE MOSES, NOR JESUS, NOR GENESIS? lzozoz DOES SHE NOT SEE THAT RETURNING TO THE EXALTED PRINCIPLES SET FORTH IN THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN WOULD RESURRECT MARRIAGE?

      Ask the neocons next time you see them–what do they have against the exalted wisdom of MOSES, JESUS, HOMER, and the GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN?

      And as men are reading the Great Books for Men, they must start enacting their principles in the living world, so as to exalt our legal system and universities, for it is not enough to think and read, but virtue is ultimately defined by *action*.

      One of the remarkable things you will learn by READING THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN is the contemporary inversion of Alpha and Beta.

      In THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN, the Alphas were ACHILLES, JESUS, ODYSSEUS, AENEAS (THE PIUS AENEAS), JEFFERSON, WASHINGTON, ADAMS, MADISON, HAMILTON.

      In all too much of pop manosphere and neoconthz culture, the Alphas are teh secrtetive tapers of buttehxt and the negging wearers of furry hatsz. While Odysseus and Christ and Aeneas resisted womanly and worldly temptations, the modern peacockingz neoconcth gamerz buttehxtesz them. Note how while Charlotte Allen of the Weekly Standard refrains from ever speaking of Odysseus or Achilles or Aeneas, she dutifully repeats the lies of sectrieve taperz of buttehxt whose films lost $10,000,000+ on $12,000,000 budgets, thusly fitting the neocons’ definition of “Art” scucucctetehe” and “”manliness” by creating more debt than wealth while butthetxingz.

      MAny churchian commenters at Dalrock’s blog preach that “Women crave exalted, manly, alpha leadership,” and what they mean by “exalted, manly, alpha leadership” is secrteive tapers of buttehxt buttehxting themz, instead of, say, the wisdom of MOSES, JESUS, ODYSSEUS, PAUL, ACHILLES, MISES, AENEAS, HOMER, VIRGIL, AND DANTE. One of the remarkable aspects of Dalrcok’s Christian/Churchian blog is how THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN and Jesus and Moses are constantly under attack as his commenters oft teach that 1) Jesus came not to fulfill the law, but to abolish it so as to sanctify their lust for buttcockingz, 2) The gospel of Jesus is “noise,” 3) High-value men are those who stick their cockasz in other men’s potential wives the most, 4) Homer’s Nobility is Satanic, and 4) Women crave exalted leadership and it is men’s fault that they do not get it: (BREAKING CHURCHIAN NEWS: All evil ever perpetuated by women is a man’s fault. For women naturally crave manly, exalted leadership. Sometimes it appears otherwise, but really, this is just a woman’s way of testing a man to see if he is strong enough to make her butt and gina tingellzlzo simultaneously. For instance, when a woman checks herself into an abortion clinic, by her choice, and has the baby vacuumed out of her womb, by her choice, it is no cause for alarm, as it is just a “shit-test” of the men in her life. Manly men will rise to the occasion, whence her butt and gina will tingle, and they can conceive another bastard out of wedlock, so she can shit-test him again by murdering her baby.)

      One commenterzz at dalrockz blogz claimes but but but WOMENZ CRAVE MALE LEADERSHIZP (meaning of course not the exlated form of male leadership fournd in THE GRETA BOOKSF FOR MENZ but the domiznziece of peacockingz buttccoekrz). lzozoozozo

      but, it is simply not true dat womenz crave exalted male leadership. read tehir cosmo and you will see dat womenz crave tipz on buttehxt and anal lubez, as opposed to, say, MOSES, MISES, HOMER, SHAKESPEARE, VIRGIL. any time a woman is given a leadership pososition, it is for teh puroppoees of debauching and destorying the GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ and NATURAL RIGHTS and FAMILY, GOD, and FAITH.

      for afterall, Dear SSM,

      If women are really craving male leadership,
      Why do they not repeal
      All the misandric, anti-male laws
      which penalize and persecute men for leading?

      As women are the vast majority of law students
      why do they not form men’s rights legal groups
      to defend the leadership of men?

      SSM, as you state women crave male leadership,
      why are not women acting in a way
      to return male leadership to the center and circumference
      of society?

      SSM–are you going to blame this on men too
      are you going to state that even though women
      are the vast majority of law students
      they need a man to found the men’s rights group
      and lead women into it?

      Is that what women are waiting for on all the college campuses?
      Men to found men’s rights groups
      and Corral/herd women into them?

      SSM–you really do have quite a low opinion of women
      and yet, you blame men for their inadequacies
      and you see your low opinion of woman
      as being a man’s fault.

      To the neoconthz churchiansz Alpha= fornicating forinicating teahcing Jesus came t9 o abolish the law of Moses, now and then reaidng PJMedis, butteockcingz, creating debt, and never, ever, ever talking about THE GRETA BOOKS FOR MENZ nor the CLASSIXCXZ, except to teach that Homer, Virgil, and Dante are Satanic, while their own peakciingz and buttoccking and sectriev tapingz of butthetx is good, true, virtuous.

      Beta traits to the PUA neocncths churchiansz= Honor, Integrity, Restraint, Purity, Valor, Piety, Refusal of Temptations, Duty, Courage

      But in the GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ, one finds the exact OPPOSITEZ.

      AND HAVE FIATH DAT LONG AFTER DA MISLED, DEBASED, DEBAUCHED RAMBLINGZ OF TH EBUTTCOCKERZ AND NEONCOTH BUTTCOCKERZ HAVE DFDAED TO NAUGHT, CHRIST, MOSES, HOMER AND THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN WILL ONCE AGIAN EXALT THE TRUE ALPHA TRAITS OF HONOR, INTEGRITY, PURITY, CHASTITY, RESTRAINT, AND MORALITY instead of the smelly buctccokingz of teh neoocnth bolshevik communists mooveemnzt.

      DA GBFM REVIEWS HIS FRITS BOOKZ!!! ”Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters Yo YO yo llzooz” lzozozozozo

      http://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Fatherhood-ebook/dp/B00APDFXKO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1370732726&sr=8-1&keywords=marriage+strike

      Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters

      Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters

      Buy from Amazon

      firstsoff i was rather dismayed to knotice some misspleiingz in da titles which should read:

      Menz on Strike: Why Menz r Boycotting Marrying Benenrkiikfied PRe-Buttcocked, Desouledn Womenz, Risking Having der assetsts rapepdd by multi-asscocked womnz, DA Farce of modern Fatherhood attacked by da BERNEKaz TV, and da fiat false American Dream as definedz by da elitez zlzozoozz- and Why It don’t relaly really Matters zlzozozozlz

      Den da next sad sad so very sad thing I noticed about da book for menz titled MEN ON STRIKE is dat just like EVERY OTHER BOOK WRITTEN BY WOMEN FOR MENZ is dat it made no mention of

      HOMER

      nor

      MOSES

      nor JESUS

      nor SOCRTAESZ

      nor MISEZ

      nor VIRGIL

      nor DANTE

      nor JEFFERZONSOZN

      nor HAYEK

      nor ADAM SMITH

      nor JOSEPH CAMPBELL

      nor ACHILLEZ

      nor ODYSSEUSZ

      nor STAR WARS nor THE MATRIX nor BRAVEHEART nor 300

      nor KING LEONIDAS

      nor DAVID form da bible story DAVID VS. GOLAITH

      nor SODOM

      nor GOMMORRAHZ zlzlzolzo

      nor NOAH

      nor WHITMANZ

      nor SHAKESPEAREZ

      nor DA BIBLE

      nor da OLD TESTAMENT

      nor da NEW TESTAMENTZ

      nor any of MY FRIENDZ

      nor any of da GREAT BOOKZ FOR MENZ

      NOR THE FALL OF EVE which launched DA BIBLE nor DA ADULTERY OF HELEN which laucnhed da TORJAN WAR

      as if

      HOMER, MOSES, JESUS, SOCRATES, JEFFERSN, ADAMS, MADISON, WASHINGTON, LEONIDAS, SOCRATES, GALIELEOZ , COPERNICUS, NEWTON

      KNOW ABOSLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT BEING A MAN

      as if ACHILLES KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT HONORZ

      as if DA BIBLE IS COMPLETELY FUCKING USLEFLESS TO MENZ

      HOW MANY MORE FUCKING BOOKZ

      ARE GOING TO BE WRITTEN ABOUT MEN AND FOR MEN

      WHICH FUCKING IGNOREDTHE FUCKIUNG GREAT FUCKING BOOKS FOR FUCKING MENZ???? AND TGUS IGNORE DA CLASSICAL, EXALTED, PUINNACLE, PAARGAON, FORM OF MAN AND EPOIC MANHOODZ?

      lzozlzoozzlzozolzozozozozozooz

      and den when i found out da book made no metion of da GRETA BOKS FOR MENZ

      nor classic epic heoresz which da neococnths hate while they exalt tucker mwax rhmeys with godlmanssnachsz da butcokeekrz in da wekelsy standadrdth lzozozolz

      i got boredz and went and palyed some playatatstaion grand theft autos zlzozoz

      and tunered on da ESPN and picked up a GBFM iliad hoddodyse HOMER JESUS & i texted a bunch of my hotties:

      http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/great-books-for-men-greatbooksformen-gbfm-tm-gb4m-tm-gr8books4men-tm-lzozozozozlzo-tm/

      and i PICKE DUP HOMERZ ILAIDZ AND ODYSSEYZ

      and I EXLATE DIN READING THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

      WHICH HAVE BEEN BANNED AND BANISHSED

      AND WICH WOMEN CARE NOT FOR

      AS THEY NEVER READ, NOR TALK ABOUT DEM, NOR WRITE BAOUT DEM

      AS THEY COMPLETEYTEY IGNORE THE GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ

      and den think dat they can write BOOKS FOR MEN

      while completely ignoring da ARHCETYPAL PINNACLES OF HEORIC MANHOODS

      AND DA GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ!!!!!

      thusly endeth da GBFMZ first book rievewz lzozolzlz

      i hope u ejoyedz it up next i will review da HBO seriez GIRLZ which at least dey get right with da fat fattassed fattie who takez it up da butt form a loser beoryfieerbndsz, so women can get womenz right (as dey feel da buttingzlzozo firts hand zlzooz), but when it comesz to classical, exalted, moral, menz like MOSES ZEUS JESUS SOCTRETATE CICERO CATO SENECAZ leave it to MENZ OKZ? lzlzozoozozozozo

      ZEUS’ LIGHTNING & MOSES’ THUNDER: Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.

      IN THE MIDST OF ZEUS’ LIGHTNING & MOSES’ THUNDER

      A LOST GENERATION OF MEN BEHLD DA GBFM IN WONDER.

      AS HE CAME DOWN FROM HIGH OFF THE MOUNTAIN PEAK

      TO DELIVER DA TRUTH & HONOR ALL YOUNG MEN SEEK.

      Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 9:10 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      da GBFM’s church defuneded my bible studey study greta books for men club cause they needed the moneyz to fund the “Repentant Sisterhood of the Sore Buttholez in Search of Beta Providers to Support Our Bastard Kidz” Bible study club zlozozozozo

      MANy OF you have realized by now dat da GBFM is a prinminet prominent CHRUCH LEADERZ LEDERZ ELDERZ CHRUCH CHRUCH HIGHER UP GRAND PUPAZ zozozzl zlozlzlzo!!!

      but i have bad newsz sad sad so very sad neewsz churchian church news

      my church defuneded my bible studey study greta books for men club cause they needed the moneyz to fund the “Repentant Sisterhood of the Sore Buttholez in Search of Beta Providers to Support Our Bastard Kidz” Bible study club zlozozozozo

      this is they’re hymnal hymenal hymnal no-hymen hymneell lzozozzoz:

      THE PRAYER OF THE REPENTANT SISTERHOOD OF DA SORE BUTTHOLEZ lzozoz

      ten alphas pumped and dumped me
      so i considred myself a ten
      told all the betas “let’s wait and see,”
      and now i am a single old dried up hen.
      empowered today with my haughty blogs
      calling on men to man up everywhere
      where cocks once penetratd my hole for logs
      jesus now forgives me via my prayer
      please jesus please heal my sore butthole
      i repent so send a beta provider my way
      a good manned-up man with a good soul
      the ones i ignored back in the day
      but now i desrve me a nice nice moneyed guy
      to pay for dates while i make him wait ’til i die.

      to make him pay for what i gave away for free
      back when i was younger hotter tighter
      no longer can he butthext the reformed me
      like they did when i was fifty pounds lighter.

      so please jesus please help da men man up everywhere
      to marry da jesus-healed butts of slutty slutts
      and pay to raise our bastard kidz it’s only fair
      dat betas we don’t lay gotta pay & never touch our holey butts
      jesus holy jesus you had better answer our sisterhood’s prayer
      or da sisterhood of da sore buttholzizoz gonna cut off ur nutts.

      lzozozozozoozozooz

      cluck clcukc cluck cluck clcuck
      clukc clcuclkuc lcuk clukck clcolzozlzozolzzoozzozlz

      hey dalrocklas lostsas cockas and heearteiztztets i think dat glen stanton is gonna put this in his hymnal bookz at all his mega churches/fort godz zlozlzozozoz

      Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 9:13 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozozo

      lzozozozozozoz

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:28 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozoozozozo

        zlzoozozozozoz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:32 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzoziziozlzoz

        lzozozozozo

        Like


      • Kinduva stoopid question, but what powder would a woman want to drop in a man’s drink?

        Powdered viagra? Powdered cialis?

        Or are we talking about one of these whores who drugs the john so that she can steal his wallet and his smart phone and his rolex?

        Like


      • Drugged drinks are a bullshit urban myth anyway. No sensible criminal would go through the effort of acquiring a banned substance, another charge if they are caught in whatever misdeed they are doing, when they can just keep feeding a mark alcohol.

        Spiked drinks… the convenient excuse of every irresponsible drinker ever.

        Like


      • Oh yes, KGB agents are a good authority – the world’s best liars. You always have to resort to insignificant people who either are relegated to the subculture or have an axe to grind. Pathetic.

        Like


      • Shut up.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:46 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozl enjoy ur buetethxt!! lzozozzooz

        Universities Abandon Western Civilization

        http://frontpagemag.com/2012/tait-trussell/universities-abandon-western-civilization/

        “Most students no longer are taught their nation’s triumphs that would equip them to be knowledgeable citizens.

        Major universities have turned from instruction in the significance of Western Civilization to the “profound” influence of Lady Gaga, (real name: Stephanie Germanotta), the bizarre recording artist whose commercial success has somehow topped charts around the world. In some colleges today even history majors don’t have to delve into our nation’s influences and beginings.”

        lzozozozozozozo

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 5:11 pm Michael Maier

        Seconded.

        Like


      • Here’s what the Frankfurt School YKWs really think of the USA Shkotzim dullards who risked all to liberate them from the death camps:

        NY Mag Writer Mocks WWII Veterans Barred from D.C. Memorial
        http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/10/01/NY-Mag-Writer-Mocks-WWII-Veterans-Barricaded-from-D-C-Memorial

        Remember: THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT THE YKWs THINK OF YOU.

        TO THEM, YOU’RE NOTHING MORE THAN FUEL FOR THE CONFLAGRATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

        Never forget.

        That’s what the YKWs consider to be “gratitude”.

        Never. Forget.

        Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 9:18 am RappaccinisDaughter

      I can’t wait to hear how a woman coming to a man’s aid—to tell him that his drink has been drugged without his knowledge—is proof that women have no honor.

      Extra points will be given if you can provide one single case of any of your Great Books ever having been banned in the United States. One.

      Like


      • What the fuck are you talking about? The trash you spew is insane.

        So because ONE girl helps a guy somehow that makes the situation equal?

        Also how utterly delusional that you think books have not be banned. You can pick just about any book and find somewhere it has been banned.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:33 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Let me break this down for you:
        1. CH posts a video in which a woman drugs a man’s drink. None of the men around help him. A lone woman does.
        2. GBFM posts one of his copypastas stating that a) women have no honor, and b) the “Great Books for Men” are being banned everywhere.
        3. This is despite the fact that a) the video demonstrates a woman who is behaving with honor, and b) none of his “Great Books” have been banned anywhere in the United States.

        That is what the fuck I am talking about. Try to keep up.

        Like


      • Wow, she really through the gauntlet down.

        I’m just not sure why she’s taking GB4M so seriously.

        Like


      • She not only through the gauntlet down, she also threw it down.

        Like


      • And…..it’s that time of the month again. Menses are here!! Yay! ; )

        Like


      • He was probably referring to women being backstabbing bitches towards each other.

        Like


      • he’s a force of nature. best to just enjoy the best bits like the songs and his exchange with a particularly unfeminine woman the other day. get in a fiht with him and the comments thread will be miles long

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:02 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Force of nature, my heart-shaped arse. He copies and pastes the same six walls of text and the same four YouTube clips into every single thread. Even if you thought it was brilliant the first time—and I would argue that to do so is really more an example of pareidolia than anything else—surely you must be getting a bit tired of it by Number 1,000.

        Like


      • I think Rollo says it best, women “fight/compete” in the covert psychological domain, men “fight/compete” in the overt, physical domain. When women “fight” in the overt they have exhausted their options…. It would appear RappaccinisDaughter has exhausted her options, posting here….. she’s just itchin for a tangle…..

        Like


      • The reason no one reads his blog is that he sucks, so instead he shitposts here, with a combination of copypasta and lozolozoloolozzolloz.

        Like


      • > “pareidolia”

        Fuck.

        We got a humanititties major on our hands.

        Anybody feel like googling that word to find out WTH it’s supposed to mean?

        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pareidolia

        “The word you’ve entered isn’t in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia

        “a form of apophenia”

        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apophenia

        “The word you’ve entered isn’t in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia

        “the experience of seeing meaningful patterns or connections in random or meaningless data”

        Like


      • One woman helps one man one time (hey dude someone put something in your drink) and suddenly the average woman has honor.

        The experiences of most men with most women throughout the ages are now completely invalidated.

        Wow.

        Now try to get your average woman to honor a commitment she made a week ago.

        I love how this hamster says “try to keep up” like she actually said something intelligent.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:33 am RappaccinisDaughter

        First, I’d like to invite you to refer to yesterday’s CH post for the definition of “wow.”

        Second, I request that you show me where I said that the video invalidated anyone’s experiences. (If you feel it will help you in your search, I can show you where I said that the video invalidated GBFM’s point. You know, for process of elimination.)

        Thirdly, I eagerly await your proof that the average woman cannot be relied upon to honor commitments she made a week ago.

        Like


      • Nah, I really don’t care about CH definition. You tried to use this video as evidence that women have honor.

        Sorry but most men know most of ya’ll don’t.

        There is no proof of anything needed, this is not a courtroom. This is about shared experiences and we all know what shared experiences we have here.

        Nice try though.

        We’ll continue discussing as free men.

        Like


      • I’ll admit I don’t have any honor. However, there are a lot of men I don’t think much of either. All men are not the same. Not even close.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:27 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozozlzozzoo

        zlzolzozozoozlzozozo

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:29 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Did you even feel a breeze when my point sailed over your head? Because I don’t think it so much as parted your hair.

        Like


      • @Lara

        This is true; many men don’t have honor, not just women. That’s why as a woman you better make sure he possess those qualities you like before you take the plunge. That’s why dating for a while before you sleep with him is best. I think honor in a man makes him more alpha than being a weasel.

        Like


      • “I can’t wait to hear how a woman coming to a man’s aid—to tell him that his drink has been drugged without his knowledge—is proof that women have no honor.”

        If there was a point to that I missed it.

        You invited us to tell you how a woman coming to a mans aid is proof that women have no honor.

        What you said was completely retarded.

        Then you act like everyone else has a problem.

        Classic.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:59 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Let me break this down for you. One more time.

        1. CH posts a video in which a woman drugs a man’s drink. None of the men around help him. A lone woman does.
        2. GBFM posts one of his copypastas stating that a) women have no honor, and b) the “Great Books for Men” are being banned everywhere.
        3. This is despite the fact that a) the video demonstrates a woman who is behaving with honor, and b) none of his “Great Books” have been banned anywhere in the United States.

        Did your mother ever have any kids that lived, John South?

        Like


      • That is not honor.

        Honor is when you make a commitment and keep it despite adversity.

        For example you borrowed money from a friend but despite having further economic troubles you pay him back.

        THAT is honor and women DO NOT HAVE IT.

        Those other men did not act with dishonor, it was none of their business.

        Honor is not “hey dude somebody put something in your drink.”

        Yes, she did.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 3:11 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Standing by a commitment is one way to display honor. Refusing to back down from your principles is another way. Helping someone out at personal risk to yourself—as the woman in the video did—is also honorable.

        What in your “shared experiences” has you so invested in the belief that all women are without honor, and that all men have it?

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 6:23 pm Carlos Danger

        The very fact that it is uncommon is why we hold it up as an ideal and seek to teach others to emulate such acts of valor or to be honorable in one’s dealings with everyone. It is one of the factors of cultural erosion some of us complain about. The KGB defector above explains why this is so.

        Like


      • Being a nosy bitch is not a principle and it cost her nothing.

        Try getting a woman to pay back a personal loan when there’s no way to enforce it.

        Women don’t have THAT kind of honor AT ALL.

        Like


      • Many beta men WILL NOT speak up in public especially against a female.

        They know how that goes…

        Females can afford to be bold as they have no fear of being beat up by white knights, arrested or attacked by a psycho harpy they are not allowed to hit back.

        That’s exactly what’s going on with the men in this video, they are trained through repeated beatings to keep their heads down.

        Again, it costs a female NOTHING to make a scene in public.

        I know a lot of “brave” girls and they live in a fantasy world of no consequences for their actions.

        That is why they are brave.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:12 pm Johnny Thunder

        But it’s their business if the woman’s getting drugged? Let’s face it, most men would help the woman and mock the man because they’re sex starved losers who are only helping in one case because they think they’re getting something out of it. If you see a man getting drugged and you say nothing you have no honor. The fact that it doesn’t cost them anything makes it less excusable, not more.

        Like


      • “One woman helps one man one time (hey dude someone put something in your drink) and suddenly the average woman has honor.”

        Well, some men don’t have honor either.

        But I don’t think this is about honor, this is about how the sexes approach friendship. Women’s friendships are fleeting, which is why as CH says, they have to come up with declarations like BFF. Women compete, especially when they are young, so they know that once the friendship ends (and it will, make no mistake), they will stick the knife in each other’s back. It’s inevitable, so to calm these worries and reassure themselves they declare themselves best friends forever. It’s childish. Most women don’t remain best friends forever. Their friendship ends, and they end up calling each other bitches.

        Men are different. They have solidarity and fraternity that is not likely to be dissolved over insignificant stuff. That’s why their relationships can last for decades. But this fraternity trait in males also makes armies possible – soldiers protecting each other like brothers. There are many men who would move heaven and hell for their army buddies, or keep Skull and Bones or Freemason secrets till the day they die. I don’t think anyone reveled Skull and Bones or Freemason secrets to date. Women don’t have such strong fraternity traits simply because they don’t need them as men do.

        Like


      • I agree honor is very important, and most people don’t have it. However, KGB agents are not a good authority on the truth – the world’s best liars. You always have to resort to insignificant people to prove your conspiracy bullshit; people either relegated to the subculture, or have an axe to grind. Pathetic.

        That said, holding up honor like there is nothing more important in life, is hypocritical. If that were the case, we would come down on men who leave their wives once they gained weight and the sexual excitement is over. However, we understand that sex and love are conditional, and that a man must have an option to renege on his marriage promise when it’s not working for him, thereby appearing dishonorable. The same goes for women of course, but I am only referring to the men now because all of you men are speaking about having absolute honor – honor at all costs – as if you always exercise it, and you don’t. We’re not holding you to it either, cuz it’s an impossible standard to uphold, but please don’t act holier than thou. When it doesn’t fit men, they don’t have honor either.

        Like


      • It could definitely cost the man something confronting a female in a room full of white knights.

        Like


      • Rapp, “why-men-dont-have-bffs” has nothing to do with Israel, yet GBFM keeps posting unrelated shit, obviously because he’s a loser and he needs to stir the pot to make himself feel better. Why else?

        Like


      • Is that making you feel better?

        It’s not compulsory to go through all his posts if you don’t like them, you know?

        Like


      • Believe me I don’t. I used to skip them. But lately, he posts dozens per thread, which just get people sidetracked and distracted, instead of focusing on the subject of the thread.

        Hell, some threads have 90% Jew-bashing comments, and just 10% game comments. It’s hard no not notice.

        Like


      • Well you can’t put them all on him. Others do participate in those too.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:28 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        RP, normally I just scroll past ’em. Today I opened the post when there were 2 comments posted. The video is approximately 10 minutes long, and the text took me about 2 minutes to read. In those 12 minutes, GBFM had copied and pasted about 12 videos and posts, none of which were original content (let alone coherent or on-topic). So, just for today, I made an exception.

        I’m done now, though. I’m kind of starting to feel bad, like I made fun of the kids who ride the short bus.

        Like


      • I’m glad you girls are calling GBFM’s utter crap what it is.

        Look, dudes, you can like “gobbledygook for men’s” material if you want (stole that one from matt king), but I’m just going to give you some advice about it- it’s completely unattractive. Writing like this dude does will not help your game. Writing “lotzas cockas” as a text response to anything is disgusting and annoying.

        When I read GBFM, I want to vomit. My vagina recedes back in towards my cervix and goes bone dry. Whatever he does, it is not game.

        Like


      • Femx.. I have to disagree with you, GBFM’s stuff is brilliance. It is so insightful and profound- when you get past the looollloooozzzz you will be enlightened.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 3:47 pm Hugh G. Rection

        It really gets old. I scroll more than I read these days.

        Like


      • What is it you want? Are you forbidding us to read gbfm’s stuff? Uhm..OK I wont read him anymore,lol.

        Like


      • Mmmmmmmm…I see:

        • female snarkiness
        • attempted shaming behaviour
        • herd activity (ganging up on a man)
        • attempts to control the narrative (aka moderate the content of the Chateau via shaming commentary in female gaggles – good luck suborning Heartiste)
        • attempts to control the content of a male-oriented place (you really think you’re gonna get Heartiste on your side just ’cause you got a pussy)
        • RappucinisDaughter attempting to ManSplain™ as another form of belittling, shaming attempt (nooooo!)

        Plus a whole lotta other crap that I cannot be bothered enumerating – the above is enough for starters. It’s a brilliant example of how women attempt to invade, subvert, and control the dialogue in men’s spaces.

        Wait! This is all too wordy. I think it can be best summed up with one single word:

        meow

        Like


      • For fucks sake. The chick noise ratio here is starting to become ear piercing. A few comments here and there for a laugh sure but this is a joke.

        Come to website based on debunking pretty lies…… Cry bloody murder and whine at GBFM.

        Just not THOSE pretty lies you meanies.

        Like


      • I see:

        Classic shaming attempts.
        Attempting to isolate a man (cutting off all male support).
        Belittling.
        Demeaning.
        Mansplaining (wtf RappucinisDaughter)
        Herd behaviour.
        Groupthink.
        Attempts to twist things towards the female perspective.
        Lots of emoting (the short bus? that’s the best you could manage?)
        Whining.
        Attempts to control the narrative.
        Attempts to control and subvert a male space.

        Plus more that I cannot be arsed pointing out – I’ll leave that for others. This is an excellent example of an attempt at female infiltration and control of a male-dominated space, via all the above.

        Wait – too wordy of me! I’m mansplaining. Never mansplain anything to a woman. Let me sum it all up in a single word:

        meow

        Like


      • That’s the whole thing; conspiracy theory gibberish isn’t truth.

        Just because a demented idiot produces sinister sounding videos filled with innuendo, misinterpreted evidence, accompanied by ominous music don’t mean it’s debunking pretty lies. On the contrary, it’s creating lies, lol.

        Besides, “where pretty lies perish” implies lies that women tell, not conspiracy theory central.

        Even the “lies” is in red, suggesting lipstick. CH loves putting on the fine touches 🙂

        Like


      • I forgot some prize things:

        1/ you girls assume the pussy-pass
        2/ you girls assume men in here will lap up your runny shit like a Beta
        3/ you girls assume men in here will take you seriously

        Hubris. It goeth before the fall (of civilization).

        Here kitty-kitty. /patpat

        meow

        Like


      • “”That’s the whole thing; conspiracy theory gibberish isn’t truth.

        Just because a demented idiot produces sinister sounding videos filled with innuendo, misinterpreted evidence, accompanied by ominous music don’t mean it’s debunking pretty lies””.

        Hmmm. The man puts up quite a lot of videos though. And your saying each and every one is produced by a “demented idiot” eh?

        What an amazingly remarkable coincidence.

        Like


      • RD is complaining about GBFM’s walls of text? Bitch please.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:38 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozolzlzoz butzzhetdx omgz lzozozlo

        http://www.amazon.com/Who-Killed-Homer-Classical-Education/dp/1893554260/

        lzozozozoz

        http://www.amazon.com/Bonfire-Humanities-Rescuing-Classics-Impoverished/dp/1882926544/

        lzozozoziozlzzizolzbuttehxtomg zlziuzzlzloz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:50 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozoozozo

        the frankfurt schoolszz is striving to destory da wets destory the west DESTORY THE WEST lzozozl zlzizuzlzizzlzozz

        zlzozoozzoo
        lzozlzz
        zloz
        lzlz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:49 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozoozozo

        the frankfurt schoolszz is striving to destory da wets destory the west DESTORY THE WEST lzozozl zlzizuzlzizzlzozz

        lzozozozoz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:52 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        eve ran striaght for da serpent lotas cockas snake sperepent lostas cockas seperpent snake snakey snake lotssa cockas!

        9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
        10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
        11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
        12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
        13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, 2 Cor. 11.3 and I did eat.
        14 ¶ And the LORD God said unto the serpent,

        Because thou hast done this,
        thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field;
        upon thy belly shalt thou go,
        and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
        15 and I will put enmity between thee and the woman,

        and between thy seed and her seed;
        it shall bruise thy head,
        and thou shalt bruise his heel.
        16 Unto the woman he said,

        I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception;
        in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children;
        and thy desire shall be to thy husband,
        and he shall rule over thee.

        and so you see why da benrnakifiers banned HOMER & THE BIBELES ZLzozlzlzlzolz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:03 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozo

        da frankfureter schoolz zzozlzozlzizlzozoz “Western society is morally decaying not by chance, but rather, BY DESIGN.”

        lzozozozozo

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:11 am Hammer of Love

        If you haven’t noticed, the USA uses a totally different control system, they dont ban books, the controversial books just dont get published, or if they do, there is an instant media campaign to discredit them or the author’s character. Its a more sophisticated and devious system.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:02 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozozolz

        lzlzozozozozozo

        Like


      • “Banned” in this context doesn’t mean outlawed. Stop being deliberately obtuse. It means the books are ignored by the education establishment and everywhere else. You know, the education establishment that once taught courses explicitly called “Great Books” courses. The education establishment that once had a defined canon of classic works of Western literature (nearly all written by white males) and fed them to eager young minds.

        Well all of that has been tossed on the scrap heap, and instead of Homer we get “I, Rigoberta Menchu” or whatever other piece of multi-cultie, Commie trash they are propagandizing with this week. Even when they still teach Shakespeare it gets filtered through the usual grievance pant-wetting. Oh look at the sexist-racist-homoist subtext of the text!

        You don’t have to legally proscribe something to effectively “ban” it.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:09 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Yes, you do have to legally proscribe something to ban it. That is the definition of “ban.” Words mean things.

        In addition to not being banned, the “Great Books” are indeed still taught. It’s no longer universal, but that’s in part due to the fact that literacy rates are so low that they’re beyond the skills of many high-school students. Which is absolutely a problem of great significance, but it’s not a conspiracy.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:29 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlzozlzoz Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho, Western Civ Has Got to Go

        http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/crosby112307.php3 reports:

        “Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho, Western Civ Has Got to Go The title of this week’s column was a student protest chant started by Jesse Jackson at Stanford University in the 80’s. The idea was to throw out the university’s required courses on Western Culture because they were filled with “European and Western male bias” and replace them with courses that teach non-Western cultures and “works by women, minorities, and persons of color.” Jackson was successful – today almost all colleges and universities stress A.C.B.W. (Any Culture But Western) courses and ignore the classic teachings of Western civilization’s “white men.” Looking back now, over two decades later, we can see the results of Jackson’s efforts. How do you like it?”

        lzozozooz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:31 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lozozozozoz

        lzozozzolozzol

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Congratulations. You’ve actually posted a sober and rational discussion between William F. Buckley and Allan Bloom about the role of affirmative action in higher education. What you have not done, however, is show me a single instance of a “Great Book” being banned in the United States, or indicated how CH’s video or accompanying text underscored your belief that women have no honor.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:01 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lozztas caococaks 4u zlzlzolzo lzoizzlz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:09 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Somehow I doubt that.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:11 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozooz

        BEAUTY WILL SAVE DA WORDZLSZ!

        BOOTY WILL SAVE DA GBFMZ ZLZozozizlz

        lzozozozozo

        Like


      • Nancy’s daughter you don’t bitch what is happened since no-fault divorce became the law proves women have no honor and do not honor commitments they fucking steal good men’s women you don’t fucking can’t sitting here reading this alone right now without my beautiful kids because of that you dumb bitch

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:58 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozlzlozozo read a boosks dummy beeatc zlzizizl

        http://www.amazon.com/The-War-on-Men-ebook/dp/B00B5I6PXC/

        “Over the last four decades, America has witnessed a profound change in marriage and gender relations–for the worse. And while there are definitely a handful of reasons for the fractured family unit, the most significant phenomenon to rupture marriage was feminism. In the span of a few short decades, the movement managed to demote its men from respected providers and protectors of the family to superfluous buffoons.To a large segment of the population, the idea that men can be victims at all is preposterous. Everyone knows there’s more work to be done for women to achieve so-called equality. Everyone knows the patriarchy is alive and well.But Americans have been had.Feminism isn’t about equal rights, nor is it about providing women with choices. I don’t care how pretty feminists package their agenda–the mission is clear: Feminism is a war on men.ItÆs time to say what no one else will: the sexual revolution was a disaster. Modern men have no respect for modern women and vice versa. Marriage has turned into a competition rather than a partnership. Dating is defunct and any reference to gender differences it met with skepticism or outright derision. Post-feminist America thinks males and females are virtually identical. We’ve become genderless.To end the war on men, women must stop clamoring for something we already have–and have had for quite some time: equality. They must adopt the mantra equal, but different. Men and women have been equally blessed with amazing and unique qualities that each brings to the table.Isn’t it time we stopped fussing about who brought what and just enjoy the feast?”

        lzoozozozozozo

        Like


      • “Which is absolutely a problem of great significance, but it’s not a conspiracy.”

        That’s about as ignorant a statement as you could make.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:45 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        All right; I’m game. Tell me how low literacy levels among America’s high-school students are proof of conspiracy.

        Like


      • Good god ur a bitch on ur menses. We are the ones with a right to be angry.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 8:29 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozo

        u stoopid stoooopzi stoopidhead lzizkzlz

        http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2003/09/24/dumbing_down_american_readers/

        “Dumbing down American readers
        By Harold Bloom, 9/24/2003
        THE DECISION to give the National Book Foundation’s annual award for “distinguished contribution” to Stephen King is extraordinary, another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life. I’ve described King in the past as a writer of penny dreadfuls, but perhaps even that is too kind. He shares nothing with Edgar Allan Poe. What he is is an immensely inadequate writer on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis. The publishing industry has stooped terribly low to bestow on King a lifetime award that has previously gone to the novelists Saul Bellow and Philip Roth and to playwright Arthur Miller. By awarding it to King they recognize nothing but the commercial value of his books, which sell in the millions but do little more for humanity than keep the publishing world afloat. If this is going to be the criterion in the future, then perhaps next year the committee should give its award for distinguished contribution to Danielle Steel, and surely the Nobel Prize for literature should go to J.K. Rowling.Our society and our literature and our culture are being dumbed down, and the causes are very complex. I’m 73 years old. In a lifetime of teaching English, I’ve seen the study of literature debased. There’s very little authentic study of the humanities remaining. My research assistant came to me two years ago saying she’d been in a seminar in which the teacher spent two hours saying that Walt Whitman was a racist. This isn’t even good nonsense. It’s insufferable.” from: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2003/09/24/dumbing_down_american_readers/

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:51 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlzzol dudmmd dudmm dmdumdmd stoppidz beatchz hey ho ho zlozlzoz

        Hey Hey Ho Ho Western Culture Is Gone

        Or, maybe it should be called “Intended Consequence.”
        from “http://countenance.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/hey-hey-ho-ho-western-culture-is-gone/”
        “InsideBayArea.com:

        They may be attending some of the best universities in the world, but students at UC Berkeley and Stanford don’t know much about history, according to a study released Tuesday.

        Neither, apparently, do students at many other universities.

        A study of more than 14,000 randomly selected freshmen and seniors at 50 colleges found that students scored poorly on a series of multiple-choice questions designed to test their general knowledge of American history, government, foreign affairs and the economy.

        Students were given 60 multiple choice questions on wide-ranging topics in American history, from the Founding Fathers to the Persian Gulf War. At UC Berkeley, freshmen averaged 60 percent on the test, while seniors scored 55 percent. Stanford’s numbers were slightly higher, with freshman averaging 62 percent, and seniors averaging 63 percent.

        The study rated UC Berkeley second from last in a ranking it created that assigns a “learning rank” to schools based on students’ scores. Berkeley was one of 16 universities, many of them among the most prestigious, that earned a “negative learning” rank because freshmen scored higher than seniors. UC Berkeley earned a negative 5.6, followed only by Johns Hopkins University, with a negative 7.3.”
        -from http://countenance.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/hey-hey-ho-ho-western-culture-is-gone/

        zkzozlzizzlzoizlzo

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:56 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlzlzl dummmy dudmmy bieetahc zlzozlzl

        http://www.amazon.com/Taken-Into-Custody-Against-Marriage/dp/1581825943/
        zlzozlziuzzlzlo

        http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/default/

        “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States, Britain, and the other English-speaking democracies. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

        The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in the Western world today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.

        The divorce regime is much more serious than simply “unfairness” or “gender bias” against fathers in custody proceedings. It is the government’s machine for destroying the principal check on its power – the family – and criminalizing its main rival: fathers. The most basic human and constitutional rights are routinely violated in America’s family courts. The lives of children and parents are in serious danger once they are, as the phrase goes, taken into “custody.” Systemic conflicts-of-interest among government and private officials charged with child custody, child support, child protection, and connected matters have created a witch hunt against plainly innocent citizens.”

        stopdpdi stoopsid beatch hates da GBFM and da fmaily which she msut dtetrosy to sevr ebebrnakekd zlzozlzozzo

        Like


      • TIT PICS or your argument is invalid.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 3:39 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        CLOWN MASK or no TIT PICS.

        Like


      • Ladies first. Rape privilege!

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 3:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        O.K., fine, but you’d better have brought the trained seals. I can’t tell you how disappointed I was last time. “Big Top,” indeed.

        Like


      • whorefinder’s back! I guess you found someone to post bail?

        Like


      • Bail, nothing! On the lam, bitches! Rape!

        Like


      • Because the woman coming to the man’s aid does so not out of a sense of honor — but out of a desire to foil the plans of another female.

        That’s how.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 3:52 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        She’s trying to foil the plans of another female to drug an unsuspecting man, so, yeah. If I see somebody trying to cut your brake lines, and I warn you, I’m trying to foil their plans, too.

        Doesn’t mean my actions are dishonorable.

        Like


      • But that’s not the point.

        The issue is what motivated her actions — not the action itself.

        “Honor” is a masculine, not feminine, virtue.

        We get the point that in today’s society, women are apt to try and adopt not only male mannerisms, but male virtues as well. However, that doesn’t mean that we have to pretend that the Emperor does, in fact, have clothes.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 5:12 pm Michael Maier

        She only did it to sabotage a woman that’s pulling out of her own league.

        “She thinks she’s pulling a rich guy? FUCK HER!”

        Like


      • What has honor have to do with a straight forward point about the relative social value of genders (women = first on the lifeboat, men = fuck you pal)?

        Like


      • Rap’s daughter,

        I don’t understand why you are so pissed off, but here is my take on why things are the way they are.

        Because of feminism and the bizarro men-are-always-wrong/women-are-unnacountable-no-matter-what world feminists have created, men are now afraid of the consequences of daring intervening when a woman is doing something that seems wrong, no matter if she is beating up a child or pouring some drug in someone’s drink.

        Men are afraid of getting involved because we know for the last few decades anything men do to women can be called “abusive” ( same thing as with rape, just about anything short of a signed contract with 20 witnesses in front of a lawyer and a notary can be called rape )

        I wish I had saved the link but this is related ; a few years ago men’s health magazine published a lot of statistics and it was appalling ( but no surprise to me ) that when a man calls the police on his wife because she is hitting the children, hitting him and breaking stuff in the house, the police makes the man spend the night in jail.

        yup the man spends the night in jail in about 90% of the cases where it is the woman who is abusive and violent.

        is it any wonder men are afraid of getting involved where a woman is misbehaving? odds are extremely high the situation will be turned against him.

        On the other hand when men feel it is safe that no one will accuse them of crazy things, such as when helping a woman pick up her books and papers that she dropped on the sidewalk or when they see a man pouring drugs in her drink, they still have the knight/savior instinct to save damsels in distress.

        but women sadly, just as blacks have been brainwashed into believing whites have some kind of unfair privilege, thus no one should ever provide them with any help, when in reality for decades it is blacks who are provided with unfair advantages ( from affirmative action to a lying liberal media ) women have been brainwashed into believing that men have some kind of unfair privilege thus do not need nor deserve anyone’s help.

        and if he needs help then she considers him a wimp and women have intense disdain for wimps…

        Thanks to feminism, women are behaving worse than ever and treating men worse than ever.

        while men are still doing the honorable thing, still saving damsels in distress ( except when they fear it could be turned against them.)

        In the past women had a reason ( or an excuse ) for having ” less honor”; being physically weaker they risked injury or life, it is understandable there was a limit to what they could do or were willing to do,

        but now after decades of feminism, women are “groomed” into believing there is nothing wrong in treating men like shit and having no honor.

        it is now a culture
        it is now a choice

        another symptom of this disease is the growing number of foul mouthed, binge drinking, tattooed, dressed as whore, promiscuous semi-fat out/of shape women who post semi-pornographic selfies on facebook.

        where is the honor in that?

        and who has made things that way?

        it was not men.

        Like


    • Yep. Women are selfish and they are forced to be that way on account of their inferiority and vulnerability.

      Like


  2. It’s also why men don’t usually use words like “best” to describe their friendship, using words like “oldest” or just “good” instead. I have men who have been my friends for 40 years or longer, and we don’t even have to verbalize our friendship, let alone quantify it. In fact, verbalizing it would make us all uncomfortable.
    As for invented terms like “bromance”… ugh .Words fail me.

    Like


    • bromance and those kinds of things, maybe a guy made it up (?) but i doubt it. i think it’s a way to attempt to minimize male friendship, women are almost universally threatened by it.

      try a test. next time girls go to coffee together– you feel like calling them lesbos? no, me neither. but do something with another guy and tell your girl(s) about it, you will get a lot of “how was your gay date” or similar.

      i’m closer to anonymous male disqus posters that ask for advice than most girls are to each other.

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:20 am The Burninator

        Bromance seems to have been intentionally coined in order to ghettoize straight men. The thought seems to me to be “See? Even straight guys fall in love with each other” or some such bilge. It reeks of a marketing created word.

        Agree with Kim du Toit on the “best” label. My friends of decades length don’t need me to describe our friendship, nor do I need them to qualify our friendship in such terms to others. Friend itself seems to encapsulate all that’s required, between men, if it’s spoken at all.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:37 am Hugh G. Rection

        It subtly insinuates that there is something wrong with men who sometimes pursue activities that don’t include women.

        Like


      • anybody watching ‘we are men’? it’s actually pretty entertaining about married/divorced life. surprisingly not pissed off so far

        Like


    • This!

      Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 12:04 pm ballsweatsoop

      I think the irony here is that men are more sensitive of the perfectly rational logic that, if you call one person your best friend, then you are insulting others. In a woman’s world, many people can be “best”, at which point the word ceases to have meaning.

      Like


      • yeah ‘besties’ oh man. i do have a best friend, essentially like another brother. but i don’t generally say it to other people, he knows and i know and we don’t need to tell strangers. i can express his good qualities to them if they apply to the situation, but lord save me from all these made up words.

        Like


  3. “Interestingly, this reluctance to come to a man’s aid (relative to the eagerness to do so for women) is why men’s same-sex friendships are so much deeper and more meaningful than women’s same-sex friendships. When a man has earned another man’s true friendship, their loyalty can last for decades, through the worst tribulations.”

    How interesting! What constitutes “true friendship” to men?

    Like


  4. How is this double standard related to how society treats men and women in general (aka the fundamental premise), lead to the conclusion of men having deeper relationships with friends????

    Like


    • i didn’t get that segue either but i agree with both of his points. just not seeing where the video leads to the friendship stuff

      Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 9:51 am Hugh G. Rection

      Because men can’t rely on strangers or superficial relationships as much as women can. If you’re a pretty girl you can get some idiots to do pretty much anything for you, help you move, provide you a place to stay, lend you money etc.. It doesn’t work that way between men unless there’s some deeper bond.

      Like


      • thank you that does make sense. everytime i see your username i think of lloyd bonafide on phil hendrie sheepishly admitting that he was the original hugh g rection in a series of stag films

        Like


      • I’ve noticed that female acquaintances at work try to say we are friends when we don’t see each other outside of work.

        I think they use this to get men to do things for them.

        Doesn’t work on me, I will say “no, we are not friends. We do not spend time together outside of the office”.

        They don’t really know what to do after that but it’s not my problem.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:20 am Hugh G. Rection

        I think the term friend has been diluted pretty well by Facebook and similar sites.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:59 pm leavesarefalling

        Another one I hate from female coworkers is “you’re the best/greatest!!!”. It is supposed to be thanks enough, I guess.

        Like


      • Maybe if your vagina carousel wasn’t spinning so fast you’d be able to spot a swamp rat from time to time but your obvious cognitive dissonance is another grievance mongering cry baby diatribe when someone even tries to say something nice to you IT HAS ALWAYS GOT TO MEAN SOMETHING ELSE with your dicktology think-not-machinations of latent, bitter, angry, closeted homo erectus because the world revolves around youuuuuuuuu and your ‘whaaaaaaaaambulance’ cries of “The Vagina isn’t paying attention to my sad wittle peeeeeeeeeeeeenis”.

        Cry me a river of Sperm Denied Access.

        Like


  5. Girls are trite, and would slit each others throat in a second. MOST males are not that much different, especially when sex is on the table, but a few men indeed can have very deep, true friendship.

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 12:04 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lozozozoozo

      zlzozoozozozoz

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:05 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozoz

        zlozozozozoz

        Like


  6. Hey CH, you mind checking for my FR’s? The ones I posted over the weekend haven’t shown up. I think they caught in the spam folder.

    Like


    • hey hunter….I thought you might want to save your FR’s in a word doc and paste into the comment section. This way if a posting is caught up in the spam filter, you can re-paste the report rather than re-typing it!

      Like


      • Thanks for the tip, Naz. I did that with my Friday one. Might have to rewrite Saturday’s tho.

        Like


      • Same issue here. Have tried copying and pasting several times re Friday night but none are posting.

        Like


      • Can we ease up on feminism and the decline of western civilization and Jewish conspiracies for a few minutes and talk about how much I FUCKING LOVE GAME?
        The HB9 I bagged this weekend was admittedly not my first–I was, after all, a greater beta/sensitive musician in my prior life with occasional access to nubile young things. But it was the first HB9 I ever bagged without having to spend a dime, make promises of commitment, wait weeks or months while building comfort, write love songs for…or even having to be nice to.
        I am in my mid-40s and have been actively running Game since the end of 2012, and it has brought me a steady and consistent supply of HB6s, HB7s and the occasional pre-wall HB8 looking to trade in her slut card for a wedding ring, all ranging in age from mid-20s to late 30s. But after missing a morning workout session several weeks ago to sleep in with a post-wall divorced mom, I realized that I still wasn’t living up to my potential and I was a little bit disgusted with myself. So I dumped my harem, stopped texting with hot/cold flakes, and resolved to do more cold approaches and settle for nothing less than HB8s in their 20s.
        Anyway, I was having a beer after work with a friend on Friday afternoon when friends of friends arrived and sat at our table–the aforementioned HB9 (a 22 year old former swimsuit model and reality TV “star”) and her friend, your typical “sassy” mid-20s professional HB6. I quickly came to understand that the HB9 was the mistress of a very wealthy and socially dominant married man in my same professional field (I am a relative nobody in said field). You could even call this man semi-famous in our medium-sized city.
        So I proceeded to run what my Blue Pill friends would call “Sixth Grade Game,” but which some of you may recognize as simply “Game”. To wit: ignoring the HB9 to openly flirt and banter with the HB6, then once the HB9 attempted to interject herself, alternating between ignoring and teasing her, then doing something juvenile like taking the sunglasses off of her head while walking back from the bathroom and pretending that I didn’t have them. Of course this all worked like a charm and the HB9 maneuvered over to my side of the table so that she could attempt to monopolize my attentions. After bantering back and forth for about 10 minutes, the HB9 ended one of her sentences in a voice just loud enough so that only I could hear it: “Do you want to fuck me?” Slutty? You bet. But HB9s don’t proposition betas for sex at 6:30 on a Friday night no matter how slutty they are. Go try to have sex with a slutty HB9 without a substantial amount of looks, money or fame–or a small amount of Game–and let me know how that plays out for you.
        Anyway, I played it off like I get propositioned all the time, and was appropriately coy in my responses. We of course did end up fucking that night (and the rest of the weekend before I called her a cab and told her to GTFO on Sunday morning), but not before I made out with and felt up the HB6 in front of the HB9. The weekend was one shit test after another, but I passed them all with flying colors–most with an alpha smirk, but a few of the more egregious ones with cruelty or mild physical violence as circumstances dictated. She of course visibly tingled with each response and fucked me even harder.
        Two notes: (1) She and I shared some solid laughs over the desperate beta-ish texts sent by the wealthy businessman once he realized that she was hooking up with me; and (2) I met the boyfriend of the HB6 later in the weekend and to my great surprise, he was taller, younger and better looking than me, yet a lower beta at best–I mourned briefly for the pussification of the western male and then returned to my own awesome existence.
        Lessons:
        Game beats looks.
        Game beats money.
        Game beats power.
        Game even beats fame, up to a certain level–after that, fame essentially is its own Game.
        If you deny the efficacy of Game, you’re simply not doing it right.
        Anyway, cue GBFM talking about butt tingles and Zombie Shane telling me to man up and impregnate some white bitches. Peace.

        Like


      • Ditto.

        Comment section is becoming 90:10 noise:content.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 5:16 pm FuriousFerret

        Really?

        You mean you don’t want to hear about how the jews control the world and then have an annoying harpy write a whole textbook debunking them?

        This despite the fact that these issues aren’t even hinted at in the CH post itself.

        Like


      • It’s obnoxious as fuck.

        I wrote a chrome extension that lets you hide dumbass commenters: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/rescue-heartiste/efgmedjokohnknecmfpcbaphafnkpdjn

        Like


      • It sucks angry ass. I made a chrome extension that lets you hide the worst commenters.

        Comment with the link is stuck in moderation. If you go to the chrome web store and search for “Rescue Heartiste” the extension will show up.

        Like


      • Kind of weird. You think maybe CH is developing a conscience and is worried that we’re hastening the demise of Western civilization by providing concrete examples of how Game actually works in the real world? Now there’s a conspiracy theory worth discussing.

        Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 10:53 am Hugh G. Rection

      They just distract from important discussions about the Hebrews.

      Like


  7. [OFF-TOPIC]
    Brazilian assorted marriage stuff blog. The guy participates in a photoshoot with his soon-to-be wife inspired on Beyonce’s “Single Ladies” theme.

    http://wp.clicrbs.com.br/noiva/2013/09/27/noivos-fazem-ensaio-inspirado-em-single-ladies-voce-precisa-ver-isso/

    Like


  8. I don’t know what best friends are, but there are a couple of faggots I hang out with a lot.

    Like


  9. Maybe a WOMAN has honor but definitely not women.

    You already know the very second gossip and rumors start, even the most professional strict ladies degenerate and debauch tehmselevs in a cacophony of scandal.

    Rappacini, I’m not even going to go the YaReally route.

    You’re more of a tomboy/man so that’s internalized.
    So I’ll just ask a few questions.

    Which gender did not spread their legs wide open and fought for their national identity when foreign threats came about? Which one DID spread their legs with barely a fight?

    Which gender clings on to self-aggrandizingnotions like “being complicated” as opposed to being congruent? Which gender despises simplicity and goodness and humble hardworking honorable traits?

    Which gender is vehemently nastily opposed to any kind of “black and white” thinking?(Ayn rand witholding)

    Which gender shows a thorough consistency in thought through many of their years despite external influences? Which one is easily influenced and malleable?

    Which gender is more prone to chasing philosophies and ethics to reign the foundations of their life? Which gender is more prone to disregarding higher cerebral superego-esque thoughts in favor of status, fun, popularity, vanity, security, love and other traits?

    Which gender is more prone to acting the same way when they are alone in comparison to when others are looking at them?

    Which gender derives less pleasure from slander and character assassinations?

    Which gender is more apt to show compassion to a homeless man or a misunderstood person if that person has NO BENEFIT to them (yes public displays of one’s image enhanced generosity count as a benefit)

    Which gender actually gets THRILLS from infidelity as opposed to simply a means to getting sexual relief?

    Which gender considers sacrificing themselves for their spouse to be foolish and unreal? Which gender finds great moral courage in doing such?

    …. Do I need to fukking go on?

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 11:22 am RappaccinisDaughter

      They say that the use of a logical fallacy invalidates an argument. I say there are situations in which it doesn’t. For example, the argumentum ad hominem has a valid application: If a known pedophile is arguing for the revocation of age-of-consent laws, his status as a pedophile is relevant.

      No, I’m not calling you a pedophile. This is mere preamble to my response, which is going to consist almost entirely of “tu quoque.” However, in a discussion about “which is better—man or woman,” the tu quoque is valid.

      For example:

      “Which gender did not spread their legs wide open and fought for their national identity when foreign threats came about? Which one DID spread their legs with barely a fight?”

      Neither of them. The Vichy government was run by men, not women. The only reason why their cowardice wasn’t matched by actual fraternization is because the Nazis weren’t particularly interested in buggery.

      “Which gender actually gets THRILLS from infidelity as opposed to simply a means to getting sexual relief?”

      Both of them. If you don’t believe me, please refer to any comment thread on CH in which men brag about “plate-spinning.” How many of them are YaReally-types, who’ve been open and honest with the women in question about the relationship not being exclusive?

      “Which gender derives less pleasure from slander and character assassinations?”

      Neither of them. Men love to gossip and spread lies as much as women do. They just tend to use a shorter wordcount.

      None of your examples works as evidence that men are inherently more honorable than women. Lies, deceit, thievery, hypocrisy, self-aggrandizement, self-preservation at any price…these are a regrettable part of the human condition, not part of any gendered construct.

      In short, most people suck. Our best bet is to find as many as we can who suck the least and spend as much of our time as we can not putting them to the test.

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:29 am The Burninator

        Actually, tu quoque doesn’t work because the status/motivations of the individuals in the argument do not diminish the logical points they may make in the argument. Their interest is already presumed to be on the side of the argument they are taking, ergo, tu quoque is a non-sequitur as well as being a form of ad hominem. That’s why logical fallices do not work and are not applicable. If they applied to the argument, they wouldn’t be a fallacy.

        I can see why women would want them to be valid, since they lead into shaming techniques, but that doesn’t mean that the use of tu quoque invalidates the actual argument(s) themselves.

        I actually enjoy your point of view, whether I agree with it or not, it’s good to see intellectual rigor being applied, even on topics with which I disagree.

        Slainte

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:39 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Tu quoque works in this particular situation because his argument is “Men are better than women because women do X and men do Y.”

        My response is, “No, men are not better than women, because they both do X and Y.”

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:46 am The Burninator

        That’s just doubling down on the fallacy. A better response that would actually work without invoking tu quoque would be to show statistics/numbers that demonstrate that the claims are incorrect. So for example, following up with “No, men are not better than women, because they both do X and Y at a similar rate” and then supplying data would work; but without data the actual assertion(s) and counter-assertions are meaningless exercises in non-logic equally dependent on the same fallacy they are trying to counter. In short, rhetorical madness.

        Tu quoque answered by tu quoque is little more than playground fussing about whose dad can beat up the others dad. In neither case are facts or logic present, and the argument boils down to emotionalism aka Pathos. That may be fine for the school yard fight, but it serves no functional purpose.

        Or best put, two wrongs do not make a right. A fallacy is a fallacy is a fallacy, and if it’s a fallacy it fails by definition, even if its used as a counter to the fallacy of somebody else.

        I think my computer is tired of me typing the word “fallacy”, heh.

        Like


      • Actually there are numbers.

        It would take me all day to go to my old computer and dig out all the URL I have saved along the years but from memory,

        Less than 10% of entries at Wikipedia are done by women

        Less women have scientific curiosity than men, women score lower on general knowledge/science/history etc etc

        Less women care about politics than men, yet still vote despite not knowing anything about what the candidate stands for.

        About 80% of book women buy online are about…women, while men tend to buy books about everything from electronics to anthropology.

        It is almost exclusively men who run into burning building or sinking ships and who die saving women and children’s life

        It is almost exclusively men who have occupations so dangerous that there is a high rate of deaths, occupations necessary so that we can enjoy all these nice things and sleep well at night

        Women get acquitted or get lighter sentence for identical crimes about 80% of the time.

        Women rarely spend a night in jail even if it was the husband who placed the call about his wife hitting him, hitting the kids or destroying property, usually the man ends up spending the night in jail even if he did absolutely nothing ( yes there are numbers on this, I just don’t have them handy )

        More women commit “infanticide” ( murdering their own children ) at a much higher rate than men ( although men commit more murders of other people’s children )

        A high rate of mothers are either aware of the situation – and chose to remain silent – or willing participants when the father abuses sexually the children ( I posted the link a couple weeks ago )

        and I could go on

        We are very different and we have the numbers to prove it.

        Like


      • Oh Razzle dazzles, how do you actually gain praise for talking like this? How is it that I do not win any fans for pointing out potential flaws in logic?

        srs question.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:08 pm The Burninator

        Nice bikini. Is that you in real life? If so, I might deign to admire your ability to craft sound rhetorical arguments. Heh.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:09 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        @ Burninator: Last 3 replies disappeared. All valid points. The problem is that there’s so little hard data out there that will either counter or support any of dave’s assertions.

        I think the point that is being missed here is that it is harmful to assume that either sex is morally superior to the other. That’s part of why I’m so staunchly against the current culture’s pedestalization of women and demonization of men. But the antidote to that is not to switch places. It is to accept that although men and women are different on a number of fronts, neither is morally superior.

        @ femx: Burninator’s the only one who’s doing any praising right now, and it’s more damning with faint praise than anything else.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:10 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Burninator’s the only one praising right now, femx, and that’s more of the “damning with faint praise” variety than anything else.
        Also, Burninator, WordPress just cockblocked my last four replies to you.

        Like


      • Yeah, that’s me in the flesh.

        “If so, I might deign to admire your ability to craft sound rhetorical arguments. Heh.”

        Like for real? As in appeal to flattery + false attribution, my appearance in a bikini has no relevance to the validity of my arguments?

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:18 pm The Burninator

        No damning at all, just pointing out the problem with your argument. Me, I would have pointed out the fallacy he made at the start, or at least consulted him for data to back up his assertions.

        More guidance than damning, not that you asked for it nor care about my opinions on your offerings of course. I’m not particularly fond of passive aggressiveness, to be straight on the point. If I want to insult you, I’ll do so outright. Keeps everything nice and simple and direct.

        The WordPress selectivity with posts is a bit of a crap sandwhich at times, I usually try to copy what I’ve written before I Post Comment. Sometimes that doesn’t even work, when I try to post again if it doesn’t show up I get “You already posted that”, which is a clear and blatant lie given as it hasn’t shown up. So yeah, I feel for ya’ on that point.

        Like


      • “Burninator’s the only one praising right now, femx, and that’s more of the “damning with faint praise” variety than anything else.”

        Meh. I can’t afford to maintain standards that high. My game is not yet at that level or something.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:22 pm The Burninator

        @Fem

        It was a joke. I was shamelessly flirting with you in that case, as at heart I am indeed a square jawed cad with cruel yet handsome eyes. I haven’t seen your actual arguments yet on any given thread, or better put, if I’ve seen them I’ve been caught up responding to others. For all I know you advocate mixing orange juice and toothpaste together as a great breakfast drink, or even worse, you may well implore others to watch Pauly Shore movies which I think most would agree would be a horror beyond horror. I really have no way of knowing at this time.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:23 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Essentially, I was saying that I mostly agreed with you on the playground-argument point, but that we are all hampered by a lack of solid evidence. And that the real point that everyone’s missing here is that it is harmful to assume that either gender has a moral edge on the other. This includes the current culture’s pedestalization of women and demonization of men…but I argue that the antidote is not to simply switch places.

        Like


      • Burninator,

        My comment was also in jest. Here’s to hoping that my personality seems less square than your jaw.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:08 pm gunslingergregi

        yea fem that shit is looking pretty good now must be the red

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:05 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        All valid points. The problem is that there’s so little hard data out there that will either counter or support any of dave’s assertions. All we have is anecdotal and—yes—at this point the discussion has rather deliquesced into a schoolyard argument about whose dad could kick whose dad’s ass. (Except there’s a potential resolution to that argument: Dad Cage Match!)

        I think the point that is being missed here is that it is harmful to assume that either sex is morally superior to the other. That’s part of why I’m so staunchly against the current culture’s pedestalization of women and demonization of men. But the antidote to that is not to switch places. It is to accept that although men and women are different on a number of fronts, neither is morally superior.

        I think my computer is now tired of me typing the phrase “morally superior.”

        Like


      • You’re impressive. I like the way you write and think.

        Like


      • Get it into your head. Just like St. Paul wrote, you are to be subordiante for MANY reasons. if this new age philosophy you spew is so profound, how come things are more screwed up then ever. you must use linear logical thought. Last, a man is the boss of the house because has to give up his life. Imagine not being able to go outside on a cold winter day, close your eyes and tilt your head at the sun and feel its life giving warmth. Men give up their lives for “people” like you.Let’s say we were married and I had to die for you, why should I? For me never to see the sun again and die because you’re so [email protected]!*ing gorgeous. LMAO! Just like JESUS gave up His Life, He is the Boss.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:52 pm The Burninator

        Thanks Odysseus. I admire the great job you did during the Trojan War and how you really took it to Ajax.

        The internet is probably the last place I choose to display any intellectual leanings. Real life doesn’t care in the least, so I mostly hang out and ride with other bikers. Not the most intelligent cast of characters, but most of them are direct and honest to a fault, as well as generally being real “alpha males” without having to take lessons off of websites or classes. In this day and age you have to pick and choose your associations where you can.

        Like


      • I don’t think you understand the rationale behind plate-spinning. It isn’t for thrills or bragging rights, it’s done mostly out of necessity for a sexual market that has more or less been defined by women. It’s the male response to hypergamy, if you will.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:40 am RappaccinisDaughter

        I don’t think there is a rationale behind plate-spinning, other than the one about why a dog licks his balls.

        Like


      • So you haven’t actually read anything about it. That’s all you should’ve said.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:01 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        No, I’ve read several posts about it. The point is to have sex with as many women as you can, because you can.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:06 pm gunslingergregi

        I think ya have to do it with hot chicks it is what it is
        keeps them focused on you instead of externals he he he

        Like


      • ” The point is to have sex with as many women as you can, because you can.”

        No. The point is women are generally so fucked up you must show them that you can do better than them, in order for them to fall for you.

        I wasted my 20’s looking for that one special girl who would appreciate my loyal, honorable, monogamous qualities. No takers. Since I started juggling, I can’t get rid of them for trying.

        The extra sex is a bonus, the real prize is women competing for your affections and forming a nearly unbreakable bond based on the amount of time and energy they invest to win you.

        Like


      • “Men love to gossip and spread lies as much as women do. They just tend to use a shorter wordcount.”

        This can’t be supported by anyone who has any basic observational skills whatsoever.

        You should read up on some evo-psych. Men aren’t affected by sexual reputation damage that women are, so thus have never had the need to develop the verbal attack and defense mechanisms that compromise gossip.

        A woman tearing a rival down can get her a leg up in the sexual market, but the same dynamic doesn’t work for men. (Or if anything, it works in their favor.)

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:03 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        They gossip and lie about different things. No, you can’t hurt your rival’s chances with women by calling him a slut. But you can hurt him by spreading the tale about the emo poem he wrote for his ex-girlfriend.

        Like


      • Maybe modern day emo guys do this sort of thing, but it isn’t a topic most guys find any interest in, unless its being used for brief comic relief.

        Like


      • Why will this hurt him Rap? poetry’s amazing It is my dream to have a man that can write poetry for me.

        Like


      • Good comment. A lot of men really aren’t that great or admirable. Some women can be. It just depends on the person.

        Like


      • Lara,

        My buttox are producing whopping quantums of gas, and have ballooned in size.

        When the gas is discharged, it will be dense and creamy.

        At that time, it will be your privilege to….

        ….. Detox my Buttox.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:54 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozizizzl tsioopi d stoppid dummybietethc zlzozlzoz

        http://www.amazon.com/Who-Killed-Homer-Classical-Education/dp/1893554260/

        lzozozlzozzozo

        http://www.amazon.com/Death-West-Populations-Civilization-ebook/dp/B000FA5QIG/

        zlzozizlzzozilz omgz zlzolzo

        Like


      • They say that the use of a logical fallacy invalidates an argument. I say there are situations in which it doesn’t. For example, the argumentum ad hominem has a valid application: If a known pedophile is arguing for the revocation of age-of-consent laws, his status as a pedophile is relevant.

        Women’s difficulty with logic never ceases to amaze/infuriate me.

        His status as a pedophile is indeed irrelevant. His argument would be no stronger if he were not a pedophile. Arguments are to be evaluated based on their logical consistency and the empirical support for their propositions, not based on your feelings about the person making the argument. It’s precisely this sort of situation in which the fallacious nature of the ad hominem argument must be recognized.

        Now, the fact that he’s a pedophile may be relevant to your decision to listen to his arguments or not. You may decide that you aren’t going to hear him out because there are only so many hours in the day and you may suspect his argument is unlikely to be strong. But then you have merely ignored his argument rather than refuting it.

        Like


      • +1, Anonymous.

        I too love it when females try and think logically.

        Like


      • on October 2, 2013 at 8:33 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Once upon a time, for my sins, I was doing tech support for this one product that was a vital part of a number of business environments. Sweet Ty-D-Bowl Jesus skating across the azure waters, that job was awful. But I was very, very good at it, so they kept stuffing raises up my ass to keep me around.

        The company had a 24-hour service, and the redeye shift paid time-and-a-half. Because I’m a night owl anyway, I’d sign up for it as often as possible.

        About 75% of the support was done online, in an IM-style app. When you were IMing me, of course, you were talking to my first initial and last name, so there was no way to tell I am female. I was famous for my resolution rate, which was over 95% in 5 minutes or less. But sometimes…they’d have to call me. And then they’d realize they had been talking to a woman all along.

        And at least half the time, they would then insist on being transferred to a man. The problem was that at that time of night, I was often alone on deck. So they’d be content to sit, completely dead in the water, LOSING MONEY, until the next day.

        If you choose to believe that women have nothing to offer you, that we’re incapable of logic and honor and love and whatever the hell else you’ve convinced yourself…go ahead. No skin off my ass.

        Like


    • Why don’t men help out the guy whose drink was drugged? It is a reasonable question. Men help out women because they subconsciously think it could lead to sex. Guys may be better than women but that video doesn’t prove it.

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:48 am Hugh G. Rection

        Most people just don’t give a shit about men, that naturally includes men. Men are expendable. Something happens to a man and many think that on some level he deserves it.

        Like


  10. I don’t understand why the woman would put a pill to the man’s drink? What is this pill for?

    It’s true what you said, I’ve observed that most of the time male friendships are deeper and more meaningful, women throw around the term BFF very loosely. Men often remain friends for life, without feeling the need to live in each other’s pockets.
    All of my friends are women- I don’t have male friends, but I wouldn’t say I have one “BFF”, the closest I could say I have to this is my sister, and that is because the loyalty between sisters is one much deeper and more withstanding than what I would find with a “BFF”.
    And I prefer to have deep connections with women, I don’t like superficiality that I find in many women, if I cannot get past this superficiality to something deeper the woman will remain an acquaintance to me.

    Like


  11. on October 1, 2013 at 10:24 am The Burninator

    Serious questions here, this is not a subject I’m particularly well versed in, so excuse my ignorance.

    There are date rape drugs for *men*? Or are the generic “roofies” something that a man can get an erection while being under the influence of? As I said, I have very little medical knowledge of such things. I did once have two girls joke that they were going to put roofies in my drink when my back was turned, however, I clearly saw that as a joke and thought “um, yeah, sure”. Is it for real (not their teasing, rather the concept)? Anybody know of any men who have been drugged in the manner? I’m quite curious.

    Like


    • If a woman was drugging a man’s drink, it wouldn’t be for sex. Revenge, robbery, humiliation all come to mind.

      Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 10:39 am The Burninator

      Fair point Sad Clown, I hadn’t considered that. My general assumption is that most all women want me in bed, so things like revenge never came to mind, lol.

      Seriously, that is an interesting point though. I wonder what others have to say about it?

      Like


      • I suppose it could also be a nefarious means of getting pregnant, but I’ve never heard of a case. And then I’d ask the same question about getting hard.

        Like


      • Well if it was some NBA SuperNigga,she’d have a good reason to drop a pill in his “drank”. But-you watch all them white betas rush to his aid!

        Like


    • It’s called cocaine.

      Anyway, nobody knows anyone who was drugged by anyone other than their anesthesiologist because it’s pointless to drug someone who is taking shots of drugs on their own volition.

      Like


    • GHB, which is used as a date rape drug, is also used recreationally as a stimulant and aphrodisiac. Men can still be physically capable of having sex when dosed with other drugs, just like you can have sex when drunk. And if your attacker isn’t a woman, it doesn’t matter whether you’re capable of getting it up:
      http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/dec/21/ukcrime.gender

      Like


      • gays drugging and raping men?

        The left and their media must be working over time to sweep this inconvenient fact under the carpet.

        Especially since according to the Center for Disease Control, over 80% of HIV/AIDS cases are gay men…

        you get drugged, you get raped, you get AIDS…what a gay’old’time!

        If you were around in the 80s and 90s then you remember how the left kept hitting us on the head while yelling at us that AIDS was not a gay man disease

        well well…it seems the “homophobic”ones were right after all…

        …If by some magic lying suddenly became impossible, the liberal/left would instantly vanish as everything they stand for is based on lies.

        Like


  12. Always humours me when women make claim to;
    1) only being able to get on with men / men are easier to get on with.
    2) having hardly any female friends.
    3) claiming women are always bitchy.

    The true interpretation (in respective order to the above) to women of this nature is;
    1) they cannot tolerate sharing attention with other girls.
    2) they are jealous of being in the company of a hotter woman.
    3) they have no ability to talk about anything or any subject beyond the parameters of their own existence.

    I would always be suspicious of a woman who lays down her innocence that, when she can’t get on with other women, it is because they allegedly don’t like her. This is her back-handed self-compliment way of saying women are jealous of her. And of course, the majority of men fall for it.

    Like


    • I don’t think other women are jealous of me, but they can still be hard to get along with. In small doses, they are great company, but I’d never want to live with one.

      Like


      • You’re right about the small doses. And this is why I also don’t confide in any of them. I don’t trust them. As I mentioned in another thread, I don’t share many secrets with them. While my friends tell me all, I only share superficial stuff. But I will keep a secret forever, no matter what. I might be mean in the face and tell them off for misbehaving if I thought they were wrong, but a conversation or a secret told in confidence won’t leave the two of us, and my friends know that.

        Like


  13. I walked back to my drink once while leaving it un-attended and a chick said to me:

    Her: someone could have drugged your drink.
    Me: good.

    Like


  14. The show “What Would You Do?” is beyond the pale in setting up phony teachable moments to denigrate decent heterosexual whites. Have they produced a single episode of a white person being treated badly in black contexts? Would that some target of Chris Hanson or Juan Cinones prissy, moralizing sting operations lash out and cut their fucking throats.

    Like


    • Furthermore , any enterprise that colludes with ABC to scrutinize random patrons for possible thought-crimes through one of these insulting contrivances should be boycotted out of business. When I dine out I expect my privacy to be respected. Imagine being secretly video-taped to get your possibly non-compliant reaction to some phony homo-erotic or racial incident.

      Like


    • “Have they produced a single episode of a white person being treated badly in black contexts?”

      It’s not necessary to manufacture this type of incident. Any resident of a modern american babel can see it daily with their own lying eyes.

      Like


  15. Lololzzzz 80% (!!!!!!!!!) of Jews aggressively promote the faggot agenda. Even more than the % who are democrats. Lololzzzz.
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/01/america-jews-religion-jewish/2900871/

    Hmmmmmmm

    Also 100% admit that Jewishness is a race and tribe having nothing at all to do with Judaism the religion.

    Like


  16. on October 1, 2013 at 11:30 am Ternarydaemon

    It is only natural. Women lack the neuronal structures to develop impersonal bonds. It is a survival mechanism, which I will explain.

    For around 200,000 years, men had to trust each other during hunting expeditions and/or war. Betrayal meant death by hunger, battle or predators, either for one or all. Distrust among males meant the exile or death of the traitor, in order to benefit the group.

    Women had to think into personal short-term survival, lacking the physical strenght to fight. That is why they developed gossip, lies and deceit in order for their offspring to had a chance for survival; never hesitating to betray the group, other women and even his offspring’s father (war brides).

    The rest, is history. To this day, women, as a group, can only consume resources and make short-term goals; while men, as a group, can produce and make long-term goals. A prime example is that men formed armies, corporations, religions, guilds and gangs, while women have so far been unable to do so.

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 11:31 am The Burninator

      Rollo made a variation of your argument in his article War Brides, I believe.

      Like


    • You took the words out of my mouth. I used to wonder why the male teachers at the “female dominated” school, I taught in, seemed so tight lipped….After awhile you catch on.

      Like


    • Right. All day spent tending children and gathering berries enabled a lot of airtime for chicks to shoot the shit with one another. Basically superfluous communication when compared to men out hunting and fighting who actually had to focus their communication on the task at hand so as to not die.

      Like


    • What a phantasmagoric load of crock!

      Like


      • You sir are a waste of cum.

        Like


      • Aren’t we all?

        Phantasmagoric story, still phantasmagoric.

        Like


      • The need for a neat, simple story to explain how we’re got here. Such a pussy b/o need. Let’s indulge it, shall we?

        We’re the vanguard of mankind fighting back the undead libtard hordes. We are in an life-or death confrontation with the BLOB. The other side controls the mightiest propaganda apparatus and the largest weapons arsenal in the history of mankind, and we’re gonna be motivated by some silly-ass fairy tale?

        Are U guys out of you minds?

        Like


      • Sounds like a big fight. Write me a postcard if you get out of it alive.

        Like


      • I guess one of my grand-grand-grand-grand sons will have to take a leak on your grave to let you know, if you so absolutely need to know.

        Alternatively one of my grand-grand-grand-grand sons could blow a load in the face of one of your spawn …. if there should be any such around at that time.

        Like


      • Why do you say it is a fairy tale?

        And who says we are not fighting the left and their controlled media because we believe in evo-psychology?

        why would believing in the “fairy tale” ( as you call it ) and fighting the left and their propaganda machine be incompatible?

        Like


    • Exactly this, and any man who has been married knows this to be true.

      Like


  17. Goes to show that men can’t trust men either.

    Those white-knighters who came to the woman’s rescue did so not because they cared about the woman. But because they wanted a good reason to hate the man who was able to get a date with her. And by being a hero thus curry favor with women.

    The same men would not warn the drugged man because they resent him for for his success and figure he deserves to be taken down a peg or too. They don’t care if he drops dead; just one less competitor.

    There is no doubt that all these actions are driven by competitive evolutionary biology.

    Can’t trust anybody on this world except your parents if you’re lucky.

    Like


  18. CH – you didn’t even mention the best part of this video…

    In the last scene, once the female date-raper interacted with the other female present “as a woman… we’re on a first date”… the second female appears to act on jealousy motives to protect the guy.

    Like


  19. on October 1, 2013 at 11:38 am gunslingergregi

    she could of also been trying to make him fail a drug test fuck up his job
    funny that two chicks said the chick that was driving my truck was trying to kill me
    she did say i hate white boys right before she pulled out and accelerated into the metal pole lol
    umm
    so maybe ya can overgame these things

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 11:40 am gunslingergregi

      i didn’t tell the chicks that though they just came out from beginning bitch was trying to kill me wtf

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:46 am gunslingergregi

        i did tell her i was bout to drive out to see chick from back in school so yea can’t now unless i get rental but yea dam fuck
        then chick from country talking bitches are crazy no not her but yea woman and one of em gonna end up killin me and shit
        Murder Game?
        got some new shit comin out now
        well actually i have seen this played a dif way but yea

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:53 am gunslingergregi

        she didn’t get the two grand on me so wasn’t robbin me
        battery from cellphone was out and phone back together and my house key was off ring in truck lol
        aww she must like me hahahahaahahahahaha

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:02 pm gunslingergregi

        isen’t that sweet when they like you enough they try to kill you they so innocent and pure and good

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:04 pm gunslingergregi

        i didn’t tell the chicks that though they just came out from beginning bitch was trying to kill me wtf””””””

        and does that mean those bitches think about killing me wtf is going on that they would say that
        didn’t say accident didn’t say she was drunk didn’t come up with excuses said she was trying to kill me
        DAM WTF

        Like


  20. Oh now I saw why she drugged him- for his money. The video didn’t work here.

    Like


  21. I can’t believe the men are laughing about it. this is crazy they don’t care about each other

    Like


  22. Do you think possibly this could be staged? and the woman who told him was an actress and the men who laughed actors? It really seems unbelievable that not one man would speak up. Maybe it was staged to make the men look bad.

    Like


  23. After being out all night, a woman comes home early one morning smelling of booze and cheap cologne. Her boyfriend asks her where she has been all night and she says that she got too drunk to drive last night so she stayed at her best friends house until she was able to drive. Suspecting her of cheating, her boyfriend makes a list of her 10 best friends and calls each one of them. Out of the 10, NONE of them say she stayed there last night, and some of them even say they havent seen her in weeks, how is she doing?

    New scenario:

    After being out all night, a man comes home early one morning smelling of booze and cheap perfume. His ol lady asks him where he has been and he says that he got too drunk to drive last night and stayed at his best friends house until he was able to drive. Suspecting him of cheating, his ol lady then makes a list of his 10 best friends and calls each one of them. Out of the 10, ALL 10 says Yes, he did stay here last night and 2 of them even say that he is still there on the couch.

    Like


  24. I think there’s also the factor that if a man gets a mickey, most people are thinking, “Da-n, it’s his lucky day!” “Nice, he’s gettin’ laid tonight!” whereas for a woman, people think “Beta loser trying to fertilize her eggs without her consent, better intervene!”.

    Like


  25. OT but here is an interesting Vanity Fair article on teenage sex and the internet. Seems like some of the young men have a lot of game. The thoughts of the young females reveal much about their personal hamsters.

    http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2013/09/social-media-internet-porn-teenage-girls

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 4:39 pm Ternarydaemon

      A gem from the comments:

      “Girls gain sexual power from their ability to attract males. However the competition among girls is fierce and since sex is so common, their coin has been debased. It is peer pressure. Girls at very young ages pursue boys and it does not do boys any good, because they learn it is ok to be a jerk.”

      The way I see it, the generation under 20 growing in urban areas will be like this:

      Men: Lesser bettas will be able to easily demand sex from women in the 4-6 range or just next her. So, more sex for the betas, but it will not be because of game. Alphas will have it as good as now.

      Men over 25 shallowing the red pill right now will have a very active future. As things go, in 10 years this girls from highschool will have the experience of an average pornstar, and being only 23-27, they will be in prime age to be gamed by experienced men in their 30s and 40s before they hit the wall.

      Women: Girls in the 5-7 range will have it very though because of competition from multiple validation sources, the complete devaluation of the pussy and game becoming mainstream.
      Women in the 8-10 range will achieve levels of shallowness, attention whoring, selfishness and social ineptitude unheard even now. Long abandoning any notion of decency towards men, only the very best of battle-hardened players will have them. They will actually have less sex than now, since they will find pleasure from permanent validation rather than from men.

      What about love? Has it ceased to exist?

      Like


  26. Hm, I dunno about this one. I read somewhere that men tend to have large networks filled with shallower relationships, whereas women tend to have smaller networks with more meaningful relationships. Now, that said…it’s easy for me to believe that if you looked at the relationship between two male best friends and two female best friends, the male relationship would probably contain more loyalty.

    But then again, that depends on who you roll with. If you gain the respect and trust of a high value male — then ya, they are your friend to the end. Admirable, unadmirable….alphas seem to be there with you (after you earn the respect and trust).

    It just seems like betas/omegas are more shifty in their friendships/alliances. But that’s kind of unfair…they’re just a different type of friend. They lack the ability to stand up for themselves, so naturally, this extends to an inability to stand up for a friendship.

    Like


    • My experience differs. Men tend to have fewer but deeper relationships. Women want to be close to everybody they like, but this spreads them too thin, so they end up having more but shallower friends. Betas, if anything, are better friends than anybody else. That’s how they roll, this is why they try to pick up girls by being a good friend—they value loyalty a great deal.

      Like


      • Betas/Omegas are good friends when it’s one-on-one. But as soon as you’re out in the real world, they’re just pussies.

        You roll with a crew of natural/alphas/whatever…what you get is a real ‘us vs the world’ vibe. You’re part of a tribe.

        Betas are kinda just ‘well this is my friend, but I’m not going to put myself in a bad situ over it because I’m rational and blah blah blah.’

        Ask yourself….if you were out with a beta and a random tried to instigate something with you, what would they do? What they’d do is wait until you handled it/situ was over/etc. and then, afterwards “oh man that sucks what happened, wow…” = pussy.

        Strong people don’t do that. They’ll either back the person off, tell him to take a hike, etc. but they will make it VERY CLEAR that they have your back.

        Weakness is weakness, and it’s fucking gay.

        Like


      • Punk boy: real men with families to support cannot afford to get into “situs” (by this you mean a bar fight) and get arrested or have an arrest record. We have work in the morning and a family to feed.

        Like


      • I see your point, and yes, a lot of men are like that.

        But a lot of men who don’t do well with women are tough and will stick by you. Either they’ve swallowed a load of Disney crap or they’re tough when it comes to a fight but scared of women. Now that I work in the white-collar world, I see more pussies. But the blue-collar world and the military are full of tough men who will back your play and then go home and obey a woman.

        See http://militarywallofshame.blogspot.com/

        Like


      • Sorry, but Gang-Mentality is NiggerThink.

        In the minds of a bunch of natural-fucking-idiots, it can easily turn into something like:

        “OMG! My entire self-worth is tied up in my ‘Street-Cred’,

        because I come from a Nigger-culture where we have to make our own laws,

        because we’re all such a bunch of fucking criminals, none of us could ever go to the police,

        So we better gang-up 6:1 and beat-down any random who even looks at us funny,

        otherwise what happens if we internalize that perceived slight as a value judgment?!!

        OH NOES! We’re not right 100% of the time? We’re not all Steven Seagal in ‘Under Siege’???

        But what about mah street-PEEN, bro! Can’t I prove my man-juice with a beat-down? B-b-b-because I’m a Man, man.

        Even if I have to go to Riker’s to prove it!

        because I’m a dumb shit who puffs-up and hangs out with a crew to make it look like I’m not the insecure little girl I really am on the inside,

        because Pretending Changes Everything! It’s like the David Copperfield of Self-Esteem! -MAGIC!”

        You and your ‘crew’ are a bag of dicks. Soon to be incarcerated dicks. World War II is over, dipshit. It ain’t you against shit, much less the world, squiddy.

        Smart people will refuse to put themselves in a bad position if their ‘friend’ is a natural-fucking-idiot.

        Smart people will make their natural-fucking-idiot friend accountable for his own goddamn thoughts, words, and actions.

        Smart people are clear enough to know when to stop defending a shitbird at all costs and kick his ass out, because he’s got a case of terminal shitbirdness.

        There is no fucking ‘backing up’. You simply do not engage a situation with scumbags or criminals. Your answer is, “Whatever, Bro.”, if you say anything at all.

        There are legions of perfect fucking penniless morons with much less to lose than you, and who will instigate shit because they are frustrated at being losers in life.

        Are you such a fucking dumb Spic you’ve decided to waste the time God has given you on Planet Earth, by repping your nuts up hard against each and every asshole out there??

        If you live in the ghetto, then sucks for you. You should probably not even be on a site where normal people congregate.

        But defending your dance troupe at every and all cost, for whatever dumb shit they do or say is just plain dumb.

        If some jackass decides to come up to you and your friends, either ignore him or stop being scumbags and hanging out in a shitholes.

        Clean your fucking selves up, behave and go somewhere worthwhile. -Or fuck off to prison, shitstain.

        What are you, fucking 14? Malibu’s Most Wanted? What a stupid fucking punk.

        Like


    • You are confusing the terms friendships and relationships. Men have larger networks of shallower connections for the good of business, society etc. These connections are based on merit alone.

      Women have smaller networks based on things other than merit. Actually, mostly just personal politics of what suits them. These networks are their BFFs.

      But when it comes to friendship and loyalty… men have that.

      Like always, women are in the meatier part of the curve. Very large, very shallow relationships as well as small number of very tight friendships are both manly domains.

      Like


    • “It just seems like betas/omegas are more shifty in their friendships/alliances. But that’s kind of unfair…they’re just a different type of friend. They lack the ability to stand up for themselves, so naturally, this extends to an inability to stand up for a friendship.”

      I agree, this aligns with my experience as a beta and (vainly speaking) an alpha.

      Anyway I have nothing else to add, other than I don’t have many male friends and it doesn’t bother me at all. Some people are just outliers.

      Like


    • This gets to another overlooked aspect of the game. I’ve started to get more results by just letting it all hang out and be vulnerable. The only real difference is refusing to apologize or feel shame for who I am or how I feel in any given moment.

      It’s kinda like just be yourself, but I mean….it should really be ‘just express yourself.’

      So, the friendships with higher value people — who understand vulnerability — are higher quality, because people communicate. If someone’s annoyed with you, they say that they’re annoyed with you. Issues get resolved, people come together, etc.

      A beta or omega just lacks that skillset. They are fundamentally afraid. They’re afraid of their own emotions — as example, the beta orbiter strategy is the height of cowardice, and it’s all to avoid the 20 second sting of rejection.

      Like


      • Betas don’t know the rules of social game. Family used to teach that, but it’s been taken apart. So they are absolutely defenceless in any social situation, that’s where their fear comes from.

        Like


  27. I think the saddest part of this that everyone is missing is that people want to drug each other in order to do nefarious things.

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 1:49 pm gunslingergregi

      yea bitches will definitely try to get you started on drugs be careful out there guys

      Like


      • Do you gang rape your father with your plethora of English annihilation with that titty-baby mouth or or do you suckle on Mommy’s ginormous tittay bags of pity for youl, fooliio? Pee Ess, were you always born with a bad lisp and a penchant for terrible troll-speak?

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 5:59 pm gunslingergregi

        just stating a fact carry on

        Like


      • The only ‘fact’ I see here, stinky poodle paws, is you dickwads typing with one finger in your hairy brown-eye munching, mouth breathing, pillow biting, sausage-casing inhaling, down-low bottom feeding, fetid halitosis exhaling snot whilst the other hand barely hen-pecks the saddest, anti-QWETRY stench-fest which doesn’t even pass the troll feces test.

        #FAIL

        Even your hash tags smell like hash marks.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:57 pm gunslingergregi

        verbous dam he he he

        Like


    • Fellows, let’s take a second and greet the the nice comrade propagandist that came to visit.

      Hello comrade!

      Like


      • Hey, that’s Miss Propagandist to you, young man.

        Like


      • RP = Angel ?!?

        Like


      • I’m Satan’s master. Nice you took ‘just looked away from the idiot tube’ notice with your non-typing gay porn hand so full of fail. Did the ‘crying game’. Whilst your crocodile spooge-fest tears weep for humanity, I cry for real issues. Like scrotum cancer.

        I take that back, scrotum cancer is as funny as fuck much like the brain cancer that infects you dimwitted gerkin lurkin’ in yer speedo saggin’ sm all armed t-rexin’ textin’ tardation nation cry baby labia hatin’ man thong worshipping faggotry.

        Yes, We get it, angry men. You hate Vagina. You blog amongst yourselves with great passion on the ‘Gina hatin’, How’s that working out for you, dip sticks?

        The sooner you all learned to suck each other’s dicks with utmost mastery, the better off you stupid fucking whiners without vaginers would be.

        Like


  28. Comrade Angel, I trust all comrades in the Propaganda Direction of the Drug Enforcement Agency of our beloved federal governement are fine and well.

    Please, give them our warmest wishes.

    Like


  29. on October 1, 2013 at 2:12 pm gunslingergregi

    question for the chicks on here have you ever thought about killing a dude that you wanted but couldn’t have?

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 2:20 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      No.

      Like


      • I thought Rappaccini’s Daughter killed every man she loved. Ooh wait, I get it. You don’t have to think about it; it’s in your nature!

        Like


    • I know a guy whom a woman tried to stab once. A scorned ex lover, he told us she was.

      Like


    • I had a female friend whom once tried to run over a Mexican she had been fucking. He tried to get money out ofher;she is a joo. Be careful trying to hustl a joo,they dont take kindly to the money thing.joo=$$$. Thing is,she was overweight and older and only mexicans really were attracted to her.Guess what? mexicans are shitty in bed. Except THIS guy was GREAT in bed. When he was revealed as a cad she was sooooooooooo outraged. So mad. It was a double blow:She thought she had a long term good-lover,and lost him AND the dirtbag had tried to hustle her. THank the Lawd nothing came of it, he ran like a motherfucka and no cops ever showed,even tho she created a ruckus,almost hitting some innocent folks,and this in quiet joo suburb!!

      Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 6:10 pm gunslingergregi

      guess need how not to get killed game I thought the honesty thing was working pretty good lol

      Like


    • Question for Colonel Sanders:

      Have you ever felt guilty about killing chicks, Quick Slaw McGraw?

      Like


  30. One of my best friends went down in flames when he finally got busted for embezzling huge sums of money to pay for nose candy. His being a fugitive from justice hasn’t really changed our friendship, except that I haven’t seen or heard from him since he went underground. If he showed up tomorrow, I’d stash him and help him on his way.

    Girls, on the other hand, will throw a friend under a bus because her taste in fashion changes. “Can you believe that whore? She always wore flats like a decent human being, but I saw that whore wearing 6″ heels. Heels! I can’t believe I was ever friends with that whore! What a slut!,” my wife prattled one day. They’re no longer friends, because Amy wore high heels. Fucking shoes! Who could possibly give a fuck?!

    Like


  31. Wait one fucking minute. Now I’m all for facts and I am a true Red Piller, BUT this website is INACCURATELY portraying the events in this special.

    I’ve seen both episodes of this show, and only 2 people actually spoke up.

    In the first test when the man “drugged” the woman, a loud mouthed man with a New York accent spoke up and even told his wife to “shut up during the process” ( a solid red pill move btw lol) to tell the woman she was drugged. ALL other men AND women did nothing to actually speak up and call the guy out.

    In the second scenario, only the woman spoke up. Rightfully so, as a human she did the right thing.

    From the Heartiste Website:

    “When the man attempts to drug his date, a mongrel horde of white knights descends upon him to break him on the wheel. ”

    Heartiste is twisting the facts here, to try and depict a bunch of white knights when in reality ( if you watched the full version of the FIRST experiment) no one defended the woman except the loud mouthed man. If AND when we win the war against feminism we should use facts and logic to prove how it’s poison. To manipulate and twist information to prove our cause would ESSENTIALLY be mimicking the very thing we are trying to, and eventually will defeat: Feminism.

    Come with facts and logic.

    Leave the manipulation to the girls.

    Like


  32. I have been to an increasing number of funerals and upon reading this I realized that I can’t even count the number of men that have crossed oceans on short notice to attend them, but I can’t recall any instance where women have done the same.

    And back when my dad died, one of his good friends didn’t get the news until about 12 hours before the funeral and drafted a 4-page eulogy he asked to have read because he couldn’t be there in time.

    Like


  33. Men have the same friends they had at 14.

    Women change friends every 5 years.

    Women don’t really ave friends, just enemies they keep a close watch on.

    Like


    • LOL. I wouldn’t call them enemies, but you do keep a close watch on.

      Men have solidarity that women don’t understand. Women might follow each other and/or agree with each other, but at the end of the day, it’s every girl for herself.

      Like


    • Men have the same friends they had at 14.

      This is how ‘circle jerks’ are born, ladies and germs.

      This is how ‘gay’ happens.

      lolollolololool,ol.o.o…zzzzzzzzzzzzz derp

      Like


    • I’m no longer friends with any of the guys I knew in highschool, but my girlfriend’s still close with women she’s known since she was six. In my experience, the types of friendships men and women have depend a lot more on the individuals involved than on their gender.

      Like


  34. submitted without comment:
    http://www.quickmeme.com/p/3vn3li

    Like


  35. on October 1, 2013 at 4:37 pm Greatest Beta

    Wow.

    Just met two young men, aged 17. Both are obese. One of them was talking about going to anger management. We spoke and he told me how his parents had a bad divorce, abuse, abandonment, all that shit.

    Said his older brother got into the drug scene and was murdered. Said he followed bros footsteps and got heavily into drugs such as meth and pills, heavy drinking.

    Said he’s been sober for 100 some odd days. I cheered him on Said to stop fucking up his life and that he’s young enough to do something instead of ODing, working a menial job, etc.

    I wouldn’t be surprised the obesity comes from serious self esteem issues, all coming from the pain of a bad divorce. Would be interesting to see the correlation between obesity and dysfunction during childhood.

    Like


  36. Need some CH readers help. Been going out sarge’n by myself lately. I never do this, trying to throw myself into my fears. I’m 30 so time is not on my side. I met this Hawaiian girl at a bike festival with her gay friend(guy). She had an amazing body, big ass HB 7.5. face was alright nothing amazing. We all talked for a bit, I got her number about 10 minutes into the convo. She gave me a free token for a beer/basically bought me a beer and told me I had “nice eyes”. Anyways they were leaving and asked if I came alone I said yea I was gonna meet someone but they bailed. She said come with us to the street fair you aren’t doing anything. I told her there was a party later and she and her friend should come and I was going to hang around. (bad move right??). I thought I could ride out my high and stay approaching.. I guess this is a good lesson in know when to close the day?

    I text her later on that day

    Me- ” hit me up if you want to come to the party”
    her- “ok for sure”.

    Never heard from her.

    1 day later I text her around 10:30 am a funny meme that has samuel L jackson from Pulp Fiction pointing a gun and say “morning mother fucker”

    nothing all day, until 10:30 I text her again..

    me- I owe you a beer unless you handed out free beers to every guy who approached you

    a day later

    her- “haha so they all owe me beer”

    How should I attack this?

    I feel like I had the upper hand but I didn’t move to another venue and now somehow the power dynamic has switched? While with her I ran into some random people I knew we talked for a while and I thought that showed I had value. I’m a bit unsure of what route to take this.. Any help greatly appreciated. I want to smash this one.

    Like


  37. I once rescued a guy from getting slipped a ‘Mickey Mouse’ and twat was my fanks? He slipped a mickey Roony Toony to the guy beside him.

    You idiots and your gay bars.

    Like


  38. Weird: Youtube blocked this video from playing on Heartiste’s site in particular, but if you follow the link to youtube.com it plays perfectly from there. The message says that explicitly: “This video contains content from ABC News, who has blocked it from display on this website. Watch on Youtube” — now ABC is coming after you, Heartiste!

    Like


  39. The lady in the video was being over the top obnoxious and building him up to be a richie rich so the other men may have resented him for that even though he did nothing. Perhaps it ignited class differential feelings and an attitude of f him let him fend for himself.

    The woman who told also had more information like they were basically strangers just meeting vs. the men who didn’t react. Doesn’t excuse their actions really still mostly schadenfreude justified by envy.

    Like


    • Men don’t care about ‘class’. They just care about penis size when they stand in front of the Meter-Maid of Male judgment aka *pissin’ on a urinal cake and making quick, furtive glances at each other’s junk*.

      You juveniles are so slow on the uptake. Penis envy is a male thang, pretty bois.

      Like


  40. The talk of honor is a digression. It’s been dying a slow death for a long time now…

    See we all know right and wrong and so do the men in the video. However, in current america, Men confronting women on their bullshit is misogynistic and patriarchal – and very controversial. On the other hand confronting men is not – which is why they jumped to the help of the woman, but not the man. It’s not an honor.

    By the rules of modern society, only women are allowed to confront other women. You see this on a larger scale too – the mainstream face of the manosphere is a woman. Why ? Because only a woman can safely speak about the bullshit that is feminism, and men’s issues – if a man does it he is labelled sexist and misogynistic and he will probably lose his job.

    Most people shy away from controversy – men included. And confronting women on their bullshit has become controversial.

    Like


    • on October 5, 2013 at 5:23 am haunted trilobite

      That’s a good perspective, and definitely a possibility, since the various men were obviously perturbed by what they saw, but didn’t act. The best they managed was when one guy tryed to direct the guy to a pharmacy, and saying ‘fweaky’ when they were gone. Other possibilities: the spiked actor was a big fellow, so perhaps people were afraid they’d be asked to holster up and have a shoot-out at high noon, which is always a possibility in the land of the strapped. The girl was a blonde, and men worship blondes, and wouldn’t say boo to a goose.

      Like


  41. on October 1, 2013 at 6:27 pm gunslingergregi

    oh shit the exception broke her vow of silence I got the warm fuzzy belly this week ain’t endin man sheootttttt!!!!!!!!!
    put this shit in the history books he he he

    Like


  42. on October 1, 2013 at 6:41 pm gunslingergregi

    told her i’m bout to come out there
    unless she says no i’m goin

    I guess maybe two chances we’ll see

    Like


  43. The latest and greatest in videos gone viral:

    Would this have gotten 6+ million views if a guy did this? GEE……I wonder?

    As for the post, I agree. Never used any terms to describe my male friends…Notice women using “BFF Forever!!!!” all the time though. Most women I’ve met usually do have at least 1 or 2 close friends though….but they can change “friends” once they notice another girl start getting more attention than them

    Like


  44. women have no fucking honor and the sheer fact that this Manosphere blog is selfishly dominated by so many women who actually think we give a rats fucking ass as to what they say proves it….If any of you women had any honor you would have more respect for us and not comment Blah Blah Blah Blah.

    Like


  45. Hello fellow CH reader.. need some help.. I thought I posted but not sure where it went? basically been going out alone.. pushing into my fears approaching a lot more than i normally do, I’m 30 so time to get this shit top notch.

    I met a hawaiian girl at a bike festival HB7.5 call her N banging body, face ehh. She was with a gay dude. I befriended them both, showed value (some random people ran into me from another city and we talked). she even gave me a token for a beer (basically bought me a beer) and said “you have nice eyes”.

    They asked who I came to the festival with, I said the person I was meeting bailed so I was solo. They invited me to another street fair, N says you aint got nothing better to do come with us. I told em there was a party tonight and they should come and I was going to stick around longer (bad move right?)

    I text her later

    ” nice to meet ya, let me know if you want to come to the party”
    her- “ok for sure”.

    Next day I text her a funny meme and no response. around 11pm that night
    I text her

    ” I owe you a beer, unless you were handing out free beers to all the guys who approached you”

    Next day she responds

    ” haha so they all owe me beer”

    How do I attack this? I feel like I’ve done some solid things but maybe I didn’t build enough comfort? when we hugged bye, she told me in my ear I don’t hug strangers” and I just laughed. How should I respond to this text or do I re frame and tell her we should just meet up? Thanks everyone

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 7:52 pm gunslingergregi

      why didn’t ya go
      but the problem is ya didn’t go said going to another party and texting her again when she not texting back
      exception I said some shit no response waited year asked how she was doing lol she responded
      I went for it said comin to see you although I have talked with chick for over a year before that lolzzzz
      i’d say meet up fuck it
      see what happens with me

      yea you readin ain’t ya girly we better hang out he he he

      Like


      • great advice. I don’t know I thought I could game a bit longer and talk to some more people. I know I fucked up and should have gone.

        She is a cook.. I figure I respond with I’m coming over with my home made guacamole to rock your world.

        Like


  46. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/why-music-moves-us/201309/music-fame-and-sexual-selection

    When doing a cold approach on young women on the street, you chances improve from 9% to 31% if you go from holding nothing to holding a guitar case.

    “The results? The hard-working confederate approached over 300 women. Of these, 31% gave their phone number in the guitar case condition, 14% in the no bag control, and 9% in the sports bag condition. The experimenters’ faith in their hypothesis seems to be validated.”

    Like


  47. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201309/cruzonomics-the-problem-free-market-psychology

    “To those who get angry at such Rational tactics, there is more than philosophical and political justification for their feelings. Our minds are designed such that the market approach to decision-making only applies in a very small percentage of normal interactions – those with complete strangers from other tribes.

    Free Markets are Strange Places

    Psychological anthropologist Alan Fiske has argued that human beings the world over have several different models by which we calculate costs and benefits: Market thinking applies to dealings with strangers, but friends use a very different model (equality and turn-taking), whereas family members use yet a different mental ledger (from each according to his ability to each according to this needs). People in organizations use still another model (superiors offer leadership and protection, followers offer respect and dedication, contingent on leaders not misleading them).”

    Like


  48. Hugo Schwyzer felony DUI.

    He removed it from his blog but you can still read the Google Cache.

    Can someone find the police report and upload it to the Internet for all to see in it’s beautiful, faggy, beta glory?

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_DyNk6084CIJ:www.hugoschwyzer.net/2013/09/30/picking-up-a-felony-dui/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

    Like


  49. Need some insights here…girl I’ve been seeing now for 9 months tells me she went out for a birthday dinner with a kind of “friend” who is also someone I know. She insisted this was only as “Friends”….and that he said it was as “Friends.”.

    My spider sense tells me this is some type of shit-test in response to a recent thing I did where I went out to a party hosted by an ex gf of mine.

    The whole thing doesn’t sit right. It also comes on the back of a bunch of slow withdrawing, less interest in putting out, complaints and a lot more back and forth.

    My game has been tight but this now seems to be culminating in some tsunami.

    Am I over-reacting?

    The more I read these various posts the more I realize women no matter what you do for them or with them can’t really be trusted.

    Like


  50. on October 1, 2013 at 11:59 pm Altruistic Marketer

    The Rational Male book is now in print. Get yer copy hot of the press. Order today on Amazon.

    Like


  51. on October 2, 2013 at 12:16 am Altruistic Marketer

    “In short, most people suck.” ~Rap.daughter
    No, most women suck in most ways than most men do.

    Like


    • Gf told me she had a birthday dinner with a “Friend” who is actually a mutual friend of ours. The thing is he asked her out for her birthday claiming it was a “Friend” thing but he doesn’t know her and I are going out.

      She downplayed the whole thing after telling me say it was “nothing”.

      But this whole “women suck” thing has gotten me thinking…is this something that I need to be concerned about?

      I have the feeling that this comes on the heels of her being pissed off that I went to a party hosted by my ex….

      This “tit-for-tat” doesn’t sit with me.

      I usually just pull away for a few days —soft-next.

      But then she starts to notice this and confronts me about “disappearing” and doesn’t quite know what to make of the ‘I was busy’ response I give.

      Any thoughts on this situation?

      The more I game girls and become successful, the less I trust them to ever do the right thing or appreciate anything I ever do.

      Like


  52. […] Watch this video of a man and a woman, respectively, dropping a mickey in their dates’ drinks. When the man attempts to drug his date, a mongrel horde of white knights descends upon him to break him on the wheel.  […]

    Like


  53. on October 2, 2013 at 4:56 am gunslingergregi

    for now im managing my own internet caffe.
    remember we talk about this when we still in iraq..

    i remember you gave me some advice and you make a chart in excel showing me the details about income, how much per hour… how much per one computer etch. about gross and profit etch..

    my father gave me money to start this business. and its good. this business is fit for me.

    ””””””””””””””””””””””

    yea facebook cool
    bros
    7 years later talk to dude and I had that much of an impact
    been working on going to heaven too dangit

    Like


  54. Gentlemen, just ask yourself this question:

    If you had to hide your gun right now, who could you count on to

    hide it for you, without first asking a bunch of questions and lookin at you all sideways-n-shit?

    When the police show up to question them about you, which ones will turn to sugar VS which one goes stone face?

    Remember how famous OJ was?

    Tha Juice! Tha Juice!!!

    But when he got in trouble, his only friend was a nigga you never heard of; thats right, one of his “diaper buddies” from back in the day.

    All the hot women and rich white people he knew abandoned him.

    Like


    • on October 2, 2013 at 9:55 am Hammer of Love

      No one abandoned him, Mr. thwack. OJ was guilty as hell. Would you stand by an obvious murderer ?

      Like


      • Would you stand by an obvious murderer ?
        ———————————————————————-

        So you can:

        a) talk him out of taking his own life (which makes him look guilty as hell)

        b) Help the cops avoid taking him out with a SWAT team by being there with him and keeping him from doing something stupid.

        Think about it, if OJ had been killed, or killed himself, black people would have put him right up there next to St Traycoon.

        Just like Zimmerman, I’d rather have a good defense team and be guilty, than have a “public defender” and be innocent.

        Like


  55. As the Michael Vick and Barry Bonds stories show, possibly a white male. The right white male.

    Like


    • I really felt for Vick, and how crackie tried to destroy him was appalling. But if his tribulations allowed him to shake off the negro sycophant hangerons around him, it’s a steep but worthy price to pay.

      Like


  56. I really felt for the railroading of Vick, but if it allowed him to shake off the housenigger sycophants that were around him, it’s a steep price to pay, but still worth it.

    Like


  57. Advice or insights needed in a situation.

    Girl I’ve been seeing is not in a frame control battle. I went to an ex gf’s party a few weekends ago and blew off my current one. The irony of course was my ex was there with a new guy so I went because it was fun and there were other people I knew there–my current gf didn’t know that.

    So then my current gf tells me she went for a birthday dinner with a kind of common acquaintance of ours. I asked if he knew we were together “He didn’t ask and I didn’t mention it” she told me.

    She insisted that this was only as “Friends” and “he even said we were just friends”.

    What do I do about this? I dont’ really doubt that this played out the way she said…but the fact she kind of acted cagey about the whole thing makes me wonder if I’m over-reacting or if this is a “thing” to be concerned about.

    Like


  58. my posts keep getting lost

    Like


  59. My current gf of 9 months and I have been going through a recent “frame control” battle. She’s constantly shit-testing about one thing or another.

    It amped up a few weeks ago when after a series of this nonsense I blew her off and went to a party my ex-gf was hosting. I went because it was fun.

    Since then my current gf has been acting out. She told me she had a birthday dinner with a common friend of ours who asked her out “as friends”. I asked whether he knew we were involved. “He didn’t ask” she told me.

    I think the guy is sniffing around and she’s not being totally up front.

    Any thoughts on how to handle? Am I over-reacting by being worried?

    Like


  60. She’s hot so they don’t say anything if the woman doing the drugging was a fat ugly heff then people would be clamoring to let the guy know he’s about to be sucked dry.

    Like


  61. Male or female, anyone who has more than maybe a handful of REAL friends in their lifetime can count themselves lucky.
    And NO ONE has ever had a better friend than a dog.

    Like


  62. on October 2, 2013 at 9:01 am RappaccinisDaughter

    Once upon a time, for my sins, I was doing tech support for this one product that was a vital part of a number of business environments. Sweet Ty-D-Bowl Jesus skating across the azure waters, that job was awful. But I was very, very good at it, so they kept stuffing raises up my ass to keep me around.

    The company had a 24-hour service, and the redeye shift paid time-and-a-half. Because I’m a night owl anyway, I’d sign up for it as often as possible.

    About 75% of the support was done online, in an IM-style app. When you were IMing me, of course, you were talking to my first initial and last name, so there was no way to tell I am female. I was famous for my resolution rate, which was over 95% in 5 minutes or less. But sometimes…they’d have to call me. And then they’d realize they had been talking to a woman all along.

    And at least half the time, they would then insist on being transferred to a man. The problem was that at that time of night, I was often alone on deck. So they’d be content to sit, completely dead in the water, LOSING MONEY, until the next day.

    If you choose to believe that women have nothing to offer you, that we’re incapable of logic and honor and love and whatever the hell else you’ve convinced yourself…go ahead. No skin off my ass.

    Like


  63. The Black and white undertow:

    Fight at Walmart over the last GTA V copy. Son landing bombs at 0:24 — 0:32

    foot patrol at 0:37

    Like


  64. Keep da phone sidewayz!

    Like


  65. What happens when a group of Japanese sailors during WW2 are stranded on an island with only one woman? Hmmm, her series of boyfriends somehow seem to keep getting “swallowed by waves while fishing”. Google it, its fascinating…

    “Personal aggravations developed as a result of being too long in close association within a small group on a small island and also because of tuba drinking. The presence of only one woman, Kazuko Higa, caused great difficulty as well. Six of eleven deaths that occurred among the holdouts were the result of violence. One man displayed thirteen knife wounds.

    Ms. Higa would, from time to time, transfer her affections between at least four of the men after each mysteriously disappeared as a result of “being swallowed by the waves while fishing.” In July 1950, Ms. Higa went to the beach when an American vessel appeared off shore and asked to be removed from the island. She was taken to Saipan aboard the Miss Susie and, upon arrival, informed authorities that the men on the island did not believe the war was over.”

    Like


  66. I would have told the guy. Id expect anyone (man or women) to tell me if someone drugged me. Not doing so is the reason this fucking planet is still nothing, but a backwater shithole, and will stay that way for years to come.

    You cant let someone (man, women, or tranny) go around drugging people against their will. Hell for all we know maybe she was drugging him to accuse him of false rape after the night was over, cause we all know thats never happend before. Any man whose ever descended into the bowels of red pill land should not have to be told this. Your also passively letting the feminists win.

    Every man that I can help that needs help or asks(which is really a sign of strength and courage) I do. Do I count on them to help me? No, they are probably insanely selfish like the majority of people. I do it out of the kindness of my heart. We are but brothers on starship earth, and there is a chemical, societal, and ideological war against our very nature. Not doing so is just sitting idly by and letting those who want our kind erradicated from the face of the earth win and continue their onsault against us. To put it bluntly its not honorable, more cowardly. Who does that anymore. Lets just get drunk at the bar and act like the fucking monkeys that we are

    On a side note if she was smart she would have used a bottle of water and done it in the bathroom.

    Like


    • on October 5, 2013 at 5:44 am haunted trilobite

      There are a number of reasonable explanations above as to why the male audience held their pieces, but I agree with you that sheer cowardice was the over-riding factor. In the 19th century the woman would have been beaten black and blue. We were led to an old article as to why a man’s life ain’t worth jack, but perhaps the more recent article about why men are becoming total pussies was more appropriate. The ‘fweaky’ quote from the avid reader was a giveaway. A bad day for men when the role-reversal is complete, and the only honour among those thieves was to be found in a woman.

      Like


  67. Advice needed here…have been having on-going frame-control battles with my current gf.

    A few weeks ago after a series of shit-tests I blew her off and went to a party my ex gf was hosting.

    A few days later my current gf goes for a birthday dinner with a common “friend” of ours who doesn’t know we’re together.

    Clearly this was a date even though she insisted he had told her it was only as “Friends”—plausible deniability and she insisted it was only as “Friends”.

    I was pissed off about this.

    But am I over-reacting?

    I’ve frozen her out and she’s been acting distant.

    Any thoughts on this?

    Seems that she’s gone from worshipping the ground I walk on to resenting everything and finding fault beyond the normal shit-tests.

    Like


  68. […] So we have this article from our usual verbalist and expert explainer of female erratic behaviour and obvious wont – Heartiste.. Why Men Don’t Have BFFs […]

    Like


  69. And this here blog is what, my dear one-fish-at-a-time feeder of the hungry? Chopped liver?

    Like