Stereotype Accuracy Is One Of The Most Robust Social Science Findings

CH is fond of asserting that stereotypes don’t materialize out of thin air. They usually have a kernel of truth. The intent of stating this bleedingly obvious fact is to drive equalist, race creationist leftoids insane in the membrane. But, perhaps the truth embodied in common man stereotypes is more than a kernel.

There are many different ways to test for the accuracy of stereotypes, because there are many different types or aspects of accuracy.  However, one type is quite simple — the correspondence of stereotype beliefs with criteria.  If I believe 60% of adult women are over 5′ 4″ tall, and 56% voted for the Democrat in the last Presidential election, and that 35% of all adult women have college degrees, how well do my beliefs correspond to the actual probabilities?  One can do this sort of thing for many different types of groups.

And lots of scientists have.  And you know what they found?  That stereotype accuracy — the correspondence of stereotype beliefs with criteria — is one of the largest relationships in all of social psychology.  The correlations of stereotypes with criteria range from .4 to over .9, and average almost .8 for cultural stereotypes (the correlation of beliefs that are widely shared with criteria) and.5 for personal stereotypes (the correlation of one individual’s stereotypes with criteria, averaged over lots of individuals).  The average effect in social psychology is about .20.  Stereotypes are more valid than most social psychological hypotheses.

Generalizations about groups of people are useful because they are short cuts to evaluating another group’s values and predicting their behaviors in a variety of social contexts. Generalizations, aka stereotypes aka your lying eyes, work because they are more often right than wrong. There are big social (and reproductive) advantages to the person who is comfortable stereotyping ethnies, races, and sexes, not least of which is the ability to tailor one’s trust response according to the likelihood that a member of a different group shares one’s values, or will behave similar to oneself given the operative environmental cues.

As for the relevance of stereotyping to Game, if you enter the dating market believing that every woman is a unique snowflake (as opposed to feigning this belief with the purpose of moving a seduction forward), you will encounter a lot of failure from your inability to accurately gauge how women will respond to your romantic efforts. Learning from your mistakes becomes impossible if you refuse to notice patterns. There’s no faster route to incel than to go on believing that any one woman’s bad reaction to your beta supplication predicts nothing about how other women will react.

Which raises a question:  Why do so many psychologists emphasize stereotype inaccuracy when the evidence so clearly provides evidence of such high accuracy?  Why is there this Extraordinary Scientific Delusion?

There may be many explanations, but one that fits well is the leftward lean of most psychologists.

Color me shocked. Soft science field filled to the rafters with delusional shitlibs churns out slanted studies and deceptive interpretations of findings that validate their fragile cuckbaya egos.

And when something happens where they can’t avoid looking at [unpalatable findings], they have denigrated its importance.  Which is, in some ways, very amusing — if, after 100 years of proclaiming the inaccuracy of stereotypes to the world, can we really just say “Never mind, it’s not that important” after the evidence comes in showing that stereotype accuracy is one of the largest relationships in all of social psychology?

Can zero-integrity shitlibs really just utterly contradict themselves without a second thought? Does a fat feminist simultaneously claim fat is beautiful and beauty is in the eye of the beholder?

***

Via Canadian Friend,

This year, a team of scholars from six universities studying ideological diversity in the behavioral sciences published a paper in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences that details a shocking level of political groupthink in academia. The authors show that for every politically conservative social psychologist in academia there are about 14 liberal social psychologists.

Arthur C. Brooks, New York Times, October 30, 2015

How ironically banal that the group which preaches the endless benefits of Diversity™ is the group with the least amount of thought diversity in their academia bathhouses.





Comments


  1. Psychologists are all crazy. They become psychologists to self diagnose.

    Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 2:27 pm Captain Obvious

      > “Soft science field filled to the rafters with delusional shitlibs” ——— You are being way too kind. The marionettes are delusional. The Puppet Masters most certainly are NOT delusional. They know exactly what they’re doing. It’s the same with psychologists [both theoretical and applied]: Marionettes -vs- Puppet Masters. Freud and Marcuse and Alinsky and Kahnemann and Sunstein were [and are] NOT crazy. They’re just particularly nihilistic psychopaths who know [email protected] well that the gullible and malleable* amongst the Shkotzim will accept any lie as truth just so long as that lie is repeated often enough and especially if the gullible and malleable* are fed the lie via the most seductive and hypnotic medium of all: The Printed Word.

      Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 2:32 pm Captain Obvious

        *gullible and malleable == Lutherans, Quakers, Unitardians, Jesuits, all Spinster Cat Ladies, all nogs, all Pacific Rim Asians, and all mohammedeans voting in Dar al-Harab [and even in Dar al-Islam, if the Puppet Masters can become as powerful as they were in e.g. the Ottoman Empire or the Iberian Caliphate]. The jury is still out on the gullibility and malleability of the Brahmin – my gut instinct is that they would like to be the Puppet Masters themselves, but that they’re just too [email protected] lazy to be bothered.

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 2:53 pm Captain Obvious

        PS: Here’s a good stereotype – Brahmin and “Scholar-Gentry” Mandarins really really really hate each other. Like Sunni -vs- Shiite hatred. It would be trivially easy for the Eskimos to manipulate the Brahmin and the Mandarin into a nukular war. On the other hand, I don’t know enough about the Sassanid/Persian elites to have any sense of how they might or might not figure into it all. But the Eskimo hatred of the Shiites [and especially the Persians] is second only to their hatred of the Christians [the Eskimos are now in bed with the Sunnis – wedded at the hip – from Sandy Burglar to Sidney Blumenthal to Benjamin Netanyahu to Anthony Weiner (literally)].

        Like


      • “The marionettes are delusional. The Puppet Masters most certainly are NOT delusional.”

        Bingo!

        The same with open borders advocates. Sure, some of them are naive, others downright stupid. But those organising the overall program – and it IS a program – are highly intelligent psychopaths who know exactly what they’re doing. And why.

        Like


    • Yeah, there is some of that. But my primary observation is that this psychology majors are overwhelmingly people who started in real majors, couldn’t hack it, and settled in where they could pass and graduate.

      Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 2:56 pm Captain Obvious

        And dutifully regurgitate whatever nonsense they read in their textbooks or are fed by the Puppet Masters who conduct the lectures.

        Like


    • Yes – use this in your pick up… I’ll have another one tomorrow exactly on this point.

      Like


  2. My personal stereotype of believing every woman is a flaky slut has yielded me great reproductive success so far. All hail stereotypes.

    Like


  3. Do scientists not have internet access? A simple hour on WorldStarHipHop will prove every negative stereotype about blacks has been spot on.

    Like


  4. “Does a fat feminist simultaneously claim fat is beautiful and beauty is in the eye of the beholder?”

    One lie breeds another. Fat is not beautiful and beauty is hardly subjective. But I repeat myself. It’s necessary to claim beauty is in the eye of the beholder. To do otherwise opposes Social Construct theory and Blank Slatism. If beauty is subjective, then you personally have power over what you believe is beautiful, and therefore can be shamed and punished for seeing beauty in the wrong things and not in Socially Just and Politically Correct things—congratulations, you are now guilty of bad think. You can stare into the fat folds, and even throw up at the sight, but as long as you unwaveringly declare your admiration (mere acceptance is not enough) of all things disgusting, the vomit on the floor will be seen as art rather than puke. Praise the barf splattered on the ground, and you will soon be known as a sophisticated man who is appreciative of all true art that mirrors abstract life so well.

    Like


  5. That’s funny…a lot of, how you say, zero integrity shit libs we meet on campus sure seem to have a lot of stereotypes about my brahs.

    all true….except for one. We slay poon at her pleasure.

    Like


  6. Hi CH, can you do another pictures post? Maybe a varied one with shitlibs, shitlords, fat broads, freaks etc. I love that shit but hate clicking through “people of walmart” because of all the freaking ads. Besides, the comments on this blog are sometimes priceless.

    Like


  7. Zero integrity shitlib = the male perception of the outward appearance of the mysterious female mind – i.e. – the man saying to himself – “what is it of the deep nature of the female mind that commands such confounding mental behavior (i.e. – the female words)?

    I sure still don’t have an answer for this.

    But one thing for sure: a man = zero integrity shitlib = he should get his balls examined.

    Like


  8. This year, a team of scholars from six universities studying ideological diversity in the behavioral sciences published a paper in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences that details a shocking level of political groupthink in academia. The authors show that for every politically conservative social psychologist in academia there are about 14 liberal social psychologists.

    Arthur C. Brooks, New York Times, October 30, 2015

    [CH: how ironic that the group which preaches the endless benefits of Diversity™ is the group with the least amount of thought diversity in their academia bathhouses.]

    Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 3:26 pm Hilary Clinton

      Boycott Jewniversity!
      Profs – Chosen:Goy ratio=14:1
      ¿Why no AA @ HLS?

      Like


      • It’s always easier to be a front-runner when you’ve got a team behind you, running interference upon those not of the tribe… and making corridors for fellow tribesmen.

        Like


      • I worked at UI Champaign for a while and it was an open secret that the Eskimos systematically favoured one another in direct appointments (especially tenured ones) but also in publishing one another’s papers, favourably commenting etc. The value of this second tier support cannot be over-stated.

        The experience was one factor that lead me to question the whole Eskimo Victimhood Narrative.

        And look at me now!

        @Hillary….if you have you any links to support that ratio I could use them

        Like


      • How much longer until we can truly have our kids not attend Jew college and earn a living in a real economy?

        Will it be accomplished without a civil war?

        Like


  9. Years ago, a buddy of mine told me that stereotypes were useful. Blue Pill Bastard that I was, excoriated him for that, but essentially, I was just mouthing off what I thought I was supposed to say or what should be said.

    Like


    • MT – Yes, this dynamic has been akin to cancerous, in the sense the the zero-integrity shitlib camp has inculcated PC stereotypes within the culture, that are very much so negatively correlated with actual objective observation (and as such show as an anomaly to the overall point CH is making in this post). The zero-integrity shitlib camp has done this by seizing the levers of the meme-making machines, Orwellian-style, as CH as alluded to.

      It is a master stroke when you think a bout it – supposedly proving that stereotypes are not accurate by upsurping the the reins of stereotype production and then using this power to produce very inaccurate stereotypes. It is a cultural mindfuck – 1984 style. Bottom line end-result – don’t trust anyone. Social rational discourse therefore becomes an impossibility.

      I think this is the main theme of what Captain Tautological (and some others) have been describing in their comments here (at least since I have been reading the comments section, for well over a month now).

      Where I disagree with CT and some of the others though, is I don’t think there really is any conspiracy for which an over-riding intentional agency, of one sort or another, is controlling this dynamic. Instead I think it is more like I said in my post above, something to do with the deep mysteries of womanhood, and how the “feels” aspect of that, has gotten the upper hand, culture-wise, because there are now such a large confluence of so many varied circumstances that support what Rollo over at The Rational Male is calling the Female Imperative. If the “feels” aspect gets the upper hand over the more masculine “rational” aspect, of too many of the cultural variables, it is then not hard to imagine the eventuality of the mess we find ourselves in now, especially when taken within the context of much other strangeness with respect to the deep-seated womankind traits, such as their tendency to close ranks around the “sisterhood” etc.etc. There are a lot of self-reinforcing negative (to my mind anyway) cultural fem-centric feedback loops now rampantly occurring.

      I’m still not sure if something should (and can) be done about this, in the sense that maybe this is really beyond humankind’s control and actually happening at such a deep level it is more like Darwinian forces at play, that when played out, may perhaps naturally cause a positive correction back to the cultural ascendancy of the rational (but this could take a long time). I’m still not sure if this “Darwinian forces” idea is completely the right way to look at it though. Still watching and thinking.

      Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 2:44 pm mendozatorres

        Good stuff, Wild Man. I completely agree with “…how the “feels” aspect of that, has gotten the upper hand, culture-wise,”

        Second paragraph is spot-on.

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 3:05 pm Captain Obvious

        WM, we are at a cataclysmic [and hugely unstable] era in the future of the White Race [which of course is the future of Mankind itself]. As Philip Longman has been screaming about since forever, genetics dictates that we will see a resurgence of the Patriarchy, since only tradcons and masculine sh!tlibs are having any children. But whether the resurgence will come soon enough, or whether the Eskimos will succeed in flooding the West with enough human diarrhea to destroy us, once and for all, only time will tell. For now, though, get busy PREPARING. The most likely scenarios are catastrophically ugly, whereas the unicorn-defacating-skittles scenarios are few and far between.

        Like


      • Hey CT – I agree some shit is going down, but I think this might be a bit more slow motion than you are alluding to. Do you think it is all going to go to complete shit in our lifetimes?

        The reason I give some weight to a more slow unfolding is because I don’t really see the coming further changes as something that has been planned by a certain group, but instead more due to a matter of Darwinian pressure with regards to natural selection, causing pertubations within the sexual selection aspect of our species (because men are less useful than we used to be, with respect to natural selection pressures, because humanity has become so utterly successful at meeting the natural selection pressures via masculine trait strengths). So therefore variables within the social environment that favor the ascendancy of more fem-centric traits become emphasized.

        I am still watching and thinking, but if I am seeing this correctly, then next I see that there really is a good possibility that we are not actually marching towards some sort of holocaust of humanity, Them-vs.-Us-wise, (though that could still happen via, let’s say, all out war between the various out-groups), but instead we may be marching towards further inculcations of the ascendancy of the Feminine Imperative, world wide, across all cultures (with the west unfortunately, or fortunately, depending upon your perspective, taking the lead in this respect).

        You and I have already had supposed disagreements over the “Jewish Question”. There certainly are many stereotypes with respect to the Ashkenazi Jews that are accurate. I don’t disagree with you there. I just disagree about whether there is anything that you could point to that bespeaks of intentional agency there. Instead I see a deep-seated emphasis of traits for both men and women in this group that do align rather well with traits of womankind overall, and therefore, if true, this would have some potential explanative force with respect to Jewish exceptionalism, and concentration of Jewish cultural power within what has been coined as the “Cathedral” on this site etc., given the changed dynamic towards the fem-centric in the culture at large, that has occurred mainly for other reasons. However this phenomenon of Jewish exceptionalism etc. would be an example of one of those self-reinforcing fem-centric cultural feedback loops I mentioned in my comment above.

        If I am seeing correctly with respect to what is occurring as more of a Darwinian phenomenon, then it would follow that we could expect that the resulting changes would occur in a more slow motion fashion as compared to seeing it instead as a cultural phenomenon that is being driven by intentional actors.

        CT – I’m not prepared to say you are wrong, for now, but perhaps the best way to proceed in deciding the matter would be to continue watching to look for new evidence that may favor either of these theories as to what may be happening, and for me, in the meantime, for my application of Occam’s Razor, given the particular state of my knowledge, it would be to favor the Darwinian theory at this juncture.

        But this sure is fascinating stuff.

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 6:53 pm driveallnight

        Great comment. Have reached the same conclusion myself.

        Like


      • @Wild Man
        Red Shield power is reliant on directing, and controlling, the culture of Whites. Control of the media MUST be wrested from them if we want to effect change sooner rather than later.

        Like


      • There is video on Youtube by Aaron Russo. He is the director of Trading Places the big 80s hit movie. He was recruited by Gene Rockefeller to join this conspiracy and describes his meetings with Rockefeller at length. There are several excerpts out as well as the full interview. Watch the full interview. Aaron gave the interview while dying of cancer. He was likely murdered for talking as that is usually what happens. You will have no doubts after that.

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 11:51 pm gunslingergregi

        Wild Man

        Hey CT – I agree some shit is going down, but I think this might be a bit more slow motion than you are alluding to. Do you think it is all going to go to complete shit in our lifetimes?
        ”””””””’

        25 years id say more than enough time at this acceleration
        shit germany looking like months

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 11:58 pm gunslingergregi

        I am still watching and thinking, but if I am seeing this correctly, then next I see that there really is a good possibility that we are not actually marching towards some sort of holocaust of humanity, Them-vs.-Us-wise, (though that could still happen via, let’s say, all out war between the various out-groups), but instead we may be marching towards further inculcations of the ascendancy of the Feminine Imperative, world wide, across all cultures (with the west unfortunately, or fortunately, depending upon your perspective, taking the lead in this respect).”””””””””””””’

        the places we go to war with have this forced on them so yea it is planned

        ”””””If I am seeing correctly with respect to what is occurring as more of a Darwinian phenomenon, ”””””””

        nope being implemented on purpose on pain of death the femcentric rob money from dudes give to woman shit

        Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 12:03 am gunslingergregi

        not actually marching towards some sort of holocaust of humanity, Them-vs.-Us-wise, ””””””””

        there allready has been an ongoing holocost of humanity in the world you haven’t been watching?
        places where people were just living there lives were fucked up to bring the divorce laws but yea still being fucked up
        i dont think anyone even has a clue how fast life changes look around
        this shit could happen tomorrow is someone gave permission in europe and us

        Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 12:05 am gunslingergregi

        we are allready in a world war and have been for a while
        it just hasen’t hit us yet but it is now troops are coming in now

        Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 12:15 am gunslingergregi

        looking at murder statistics we actually been in war in us too and looking at large areas of land looking like escape from la yea might as well be war going on the reality on ground worse than the movie that tried to show what shitty conditions look like

        Like


  10. America’s credit getting downgraded under Obama was stereotypical

    Like


  11. Most stereotypes hold up well under scrutiny. One glaring exception: the stupid blond. This is purely the product of Hollywood YKW slander against Germans for daring to stand up to them.

    [CH: yes. there are a few obviously false stereotypes that are so exceptional they prove the rule. another one is the dumb polack. poles have one of the higher national avg IQs in europe, and polish-americans do pretty well for themselves. i think it’s a crude slander started by polish-eskimos who, relatively speaking, were smarter than the natives. or thought themselves smarter.]

    Like


    • The dumb polack stereotype has little to do with the IQ of Poles in Poland. It’s an American thing and I think there is *some* truth to it. It seems like it came about as a sort of stand-in for the dumb, menial laborer, many of whom were illiterate Poles around turn of the twentieth century. Europa did not always send her best and brightest to America. I still heard the adults throw it around occasionally as a kid(two generations on from said menial laborers) as a sort of in-group scold when someone was acting especially obstinate.

      Myself, I remember the older folks as not particularly intellectual for sure, but certainly not “dumb”. They were hard workers and usually a little crooked.

      Like


      • The dumb pollack stereotype arose when a Polish terrorist was given orders by his cell commander to blow up a car… and he burned his lips on the tailpipe.

        Like


      • And of course, when their scientists lost the formula for ice.

        Like


      • And of course, when their scientists lost the formula for ice.

        I thought it was when their engineers designed a parachute that opens on impact. (Or a solar-powered flashlight.)

        Like


      • Or their planned spaceflight to the sun… scheduled to arrive at night, so nobody gets burned.

        Like


      • I thought it was that screen door on the submarine.

        Like


      • The submarine’s deck hands never complained.

        Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 8:14 am The Spirit Within

        Europa did not always send her best and brightest to America.

        You’re right, but those kinda statements will get you tarred and feathered around these parts because master race, blah blah blah.

        Like


      • whether or not Europe sent its best in the past is irrelevant. right now the third world is sending us their worst.

        Like


      • And Strapon chimes in to (yet again!) earn his nickname.

        Damn, boy, you’re becoming a parody of yourself… no mean feat, mind you… but still.

        (((shakin’ it)))

        Like


    • Polack jokes came from the borscht belt comics and moving to vaudeville in some instances. The origin is really goy jokes…

      Like


      • Killing the Christ, Communism, the Holodomor, USS liberty, 24/7 anti-white and miscengenation propaganda and that whole subversion of western civilization thing…I could have let it go…but inventing the dumb polack joke…unforgivable

        Like


      • Yeah, there comes a time when a man’s just gotta draw a line in the sand and so “This far, and no further!”.

        Like


    • Blondes aren’t stupid in an IQ way, but they do tend to be unbelievably naïve, trusting, and gullible. See Sweden. (I am a natural blond guy so I can get away with saying this.)

      RE: The dumb pole, here’s a classic Steve Sailer article showing that “Borat” was just a long polack joke from the Jew Sacha Baron Cohen:

      http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/09/borat-somebody-else-finally-gets-it.html

      Like


      • Whoops that was a Sailer follow-up and I can’t find the original. Sorry.

        Like


      • That sailor article was an eye-opener.

        Jesus Christ… Every. Fucking. Time.

        I’m just gonna go ahead and assume from now on that any disparagement, slander or denigration of white people has a kosher origin.

        Like


  12. on November 5, 2015 at 1:19 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    As I’ve said elsewhere, there is a reason the country is full of Irish bars and Italian restaurants and not the other way around.

    Gee, do you think that could it possibly be Irish people really do like to drink and Italians really do eat excessively? Even as a teenager, being Italian and dating an Irish girl, I knew this was true. And so did she. We used to have running jokes about it.

    The question is why “educators” (gag) and people in the media insist on feeding us the blank slate lie. Notice I said “feeding” there. That’s the Italian in me subconsciously coming out.

    Like


    • I don’t know if Italians actually eat more calories than others, but they seem to be one of the most in-shape white ethnic groups, actually. Men mostly mesomorph, women usually thin with good asses (guinea broads do seem to take a particularly harsh post-partum SMV hit though).

      Most of the guys I know with heavy italian ancestry would be mistaken for Stallone before Chris Christie.

      [CH: yeah i’m not sure wops actually eat more calories than other american ethnic groups, but they do put a lot of emphasis on family dinner time (communal eating). so do eskimos for that matter, which probably explains some of their mutual affinity. euro italians are one of the longest-lived ethnic white groups in europe, btw.]

      Like


      • I’m a guinea (albeit an American one). I think the Italians in Italy live longer because they break at lunch, eat and then siesta for like 3 or 4 hours. I once saw Rome pretty much shut down for a soccer game. They don’t work like us Americans.

        Like


      • The Italians are by far the most hospitable folks on the planet… God bless ’em!

        Truth be told, though… the only Eye-Tye dame ever put the hook in me was Sophia Loren…

        … oh, and vicky, of course. 😉

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 4:16 pm mendozatorres

        Don’t forget Monica Bellucci!

        Like


      • I never did go for the thin glamour dolls…

        My wiring calls for the zaftige likes of the aforementioned Loren… the Mansfields… the Ekbergs.

        Like


      • Gregory my dear, you just made my day – I don’t have Ms. Loren’s facial features, mine are softer…but I bet I could channel a combo of her and Ms. Mansfield after you’ve had a bourbon or two 😉

        Like


      • Joe Jackson’s The Other Me will be our song, luv.

        Like


  13. But…

    There are some stereotypes which are simply wrong and so far from the truth. What for instance is your likelihood as a woman of being physically attacked? One might think, given all their self-defence classes women attend that it iss high and higher than for men, but that is very mistaken. Likewise the likelihood of being sexually assaulted (I mean Real Rape not thought rape or eye-rape or even that oxymoron date rape).

    Then again there are contradictory stereotypes: are lawyers bumbling fools (as portrayed in comic operas) or sharp-as-a-knife mean bastards as portrayed in Hollywood. They are (as it happens) both seriously mistaken.

    Worse… I have never had any trouble with Eskimos, but my own race (white and anglo) will stitch you up without thought.

    Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 1:48 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      Those aren’t stereotypes. Those are misleading statistics.

      The stereotype about women is that they’re hysterical and overly emotional and therefore inflate every sideways glance into SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND RAPE OMG!!!!! So the reason for those self-defense classes and all that goes with that is that the stereotypes about women are, in fact, true.

      Like


  14. On the topic of how libtardery is mandatory in soft-science academia today: I know a white man who does not come from money. In fact, he comes from a broken home. His parents divorced and his dad did nothing to help him get through college–didn’t give him one penny. This man put himself through State University by doing such thing as (1) not owning a car while he was there; (2) working shit jobs at restaurants; and (3) selling bone marrow to earn money.

    Through much hard work and determination, this man put himself through State University and graduate school and became a Physician’s Assistant — not quite a doctor but they make good money and it requires a lot of schooling. This man was recently awarded a doctorate degree.

    To earn his doctorate degree, the man’s thesis paper was something like: “The Reason African Americans Don’t Perform Well in College and on Standardized Tests is that Their Families Lack Capital So They are Disadvantage.”

    lzolzozozozlzozllzo.

    Chicken? Or egg?

    This hard-working white man, who had truly pulled himself up by the boot straps with zero help from anybody or any entity, was forced to denigrate his own hard-won achievements in order to join the academia club.

    And he’s thoroughly brainwashed; he believes his conclusions. He conducted his study and work over 3 or 4 years and never once had he heard of the ideas of K-selection or r-selection until I asked him about his thoughts on those theories. He pushed the communist idea that insults the work of our ancestors. Even if there is some kind of “white privilege” from which any individual might benefit, it was earned by said individual’s father, grandfather, great grandfather, great great grandfather, etc. Any wealth passed down even after the death tax is something a man can be proud of.

    Things did not get how they are because of magic dirt or some evil magic God that chose white people to be the ones to invent steel, guns, boats, electricity, the wheel, airplanes, computers, iPhags, etc.

    Of course stereotypes are based in truth. lzozllzzool I’ve been telling people CH’s first two sentences for 20 years.

    Every single god damned person in the first world knows damned well that stereotypes about a large percentage of the young male dindu population are true. Period.

    On every single issue, big and small, what you see from the leftist mainstream media is a lie, an attempt to censor truth and facts. On every single issue.

    What’s gotten especially frustrating is that the last few years they’ve done it at such a preposterously insulting level, taking it to things like #blacklivesmatter as if we don’t know the bleedingly obvious truth.

    But what do I know? I’m just an evil white man. On that note, those who control MSM know darned well the power of thought control. They have tried very, very, very hard to make the stereotype regarding white men one of these:

    1. wimpy beta nerd or clown (sitcom father)
    2. evil criminal murderer (bad guy in every movie)
    3. evil naht zee
    4. dangerous rapist
    5. child rapist (normal man in a park is seen as weird now) (something like Mr. Rogers teaching children in a normal way could not be done today; he’d be seen as child molester)
    6. wife beater/redneck trash.

    This matters. This is not beta whining (I get laid), but every time in the past 10 years that you have tried to get a woman, perhaps to marry and have kids with, she has subconsciously been taught to fear or at least be leery of you — to not like you. It is an uphill battle from the start. Yeah, game is necessary, but it is more necessary now than it should be, and that was done on purpose, compared to a time just 60 years ago when women saw marriage and finding a husband as something good to do.

    Like


    • Great points…

      “Every single god damned person in the first world knows damned well that stereotypes about a large percentage of the young male dindu population are true. Period.”

      You are exactly right. Lived in blue cities and seen this so many times. Idiots that protest tookie Williams being executed because its racist but vote down a rail line coming into their Hancock Park neighborhood because they don’t want certain visitors. Or libtard Georgetown not having a metro stop (closest is Foggy Bottom as I remember). Marin County not allowing BART to extend to them. And I could go on and on…

      Like


    • White men should start embracing number 3.

      It’s the only avenue left for being alpha.

      Like


      • White men should start embracing number 3.

        It’s the only avenue left for being alpha.

        Number 6 should work pretty well, also.

        Like


  15. As an INTJ, continually using my knowledge-based intuition to judge the world, I have always heavily relied upon stereotypes. Disregarding that bullshit left shame-tactic was one of my first steps in a redpill direction. They push for not judging books by their covers because their covers are fat, lazy and revolting.

    Like


  16. I have long wanted to see a book entitled “Stereotypes: an Aid to Understanding”. Of course that is what they are. A lot of people (disproportionately female in my experience) seem to have trouble distinguishing between “generalization” and “universalization”. A 60% truism is better than a coin toss.

    Like


  17. Readers may want to check out “Women are all the same, Part II”, on Alpha Status (or something like that). The routine referred to in the post (an anticipation of 50 Shades) is eventually revealed in the comments. It is worth noting that his sample included only women in singles bars. But for them his anecdotal evidence is pretty convincing. And a tad disturbing.

    Like


  18. Life would be impossible without stereotypes. Imagine having to judge each new person/situation afresh, without recourse to knowledge gained from previous experience. “Stereotyping” is only a derogatory term for inductive reasoning.

    Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 3:17 pm Captain Obvious

      Which is why it is so imperative for the Eskimos to stamp it out. They can control the Deductives via the hypnotically seductive power of the written word, but they powerless over the Inductives [the actual observable Truth about reality]. Which, of course, is why they CHEAT, and create fake statistics invented out of thin air, and then declare that e.g. “unemployment is 5%” or that “the earth is warming”.

      Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 7:22 am Captain Obvious

        From the current Drudge Report [as I type], here is the scorched earth totalitarian warfare which the Eskimos are waging against the vary idea of Empiricals and Inductivism: “Labor force participation at 38-year low…”

        Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 7:23 am Captain Obvious

        To his credit, Drudge is an Eskimo. A very, very, very strange Eskimo.

        Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 7:24 am Captain Obvious

        Okay, he just updated it [again, to his credit]: “94,513,000 Not in Labor Force…
        Participation rate at 38-year low…”

        Like


      • Yeah, Drudge is a rare eskimo who manages to not have irritating politics… not an anti-white progressive shitlib, but also not a neocon Israel shill. Yet he’s still… really weird? I don’t know what to else to say about him. His website has been a very nice thing.

        Like


    • “Stereotyping” is only a derogatory term for inductive reasoning.

      Stereotyping is just practicing sociology without a license.

      Like


  19. on November 5, 2015 at 2:39 pm Experienced Father

    Speaking of stereotype’s, see this for details of the UC Merced knife attack:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3305467/Freshman-named-Faisal-Mohammad-identified-man-went-stabbing-spree-injured-four-California-college-shot-dead-police.html#ixzz3qeYToves

    The dead perp named Faisal Mohammad is getting praised by ISIS and the attack is the same as the knife attacks by Muslims on Jews going on in Israel.

    The FBI is involved in the investigation.

    FBI involvement = Federal Domestic Terrorism jurisdiction has been invoked.

    That the Obama Administrations is brining in tens of thousands of Syrian refugees is insane, regardless of whether this is related or not.

    We know for damned sure that there are ISIS operatives in the E.U. refugee flow and this is their M.O.

    Like


    • OMG we need knife control!!! Call Hillary!! We need to confiscate all knives. The problem was the knife laws, not the brown guy.

      Like


  20. There have been several outbreaks of truth at Psychology Today. Does anyone know what’s going on over there?

    [CH: a CH mole.]

    Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 3:21 pm Captain Obvious

      Yeah, CH has been posting some highly technical shiznat lately, which had made me wonder whether he had co-writers and/or “Oath Keeper” informants within the [serious] behavioral psych community.

      Like


      • “There have been several outbreaks of truth at Psychology Today. Does anyone know what’s going on over there?

        [CH: a CH mole.]”

        *heh*

        Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 3:26 pm Captain Obvious

      Got a comment in the stack about the possibility of “Oath Keepers” within the serious behavioral psych community, but holy cow, did you see how the treasonous traitor toad of a turd, GHWB-41, came out with all guns blazing at Oath Keepers Donald Rumsfeld & Dick Cheney? Even if GHWB-41 were completely senile, that attack had to have been approved by wifey Babs and sons GWB-43 and El Jeb. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3356885/posts

      Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 3:28 pm Captain Obvious

        Donald Rumsfeld is the single most intelligent and most principled and most INSIGHTFUL man that I have seen in the government bureaucracy over the course of my entire life.

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 3:53 pm mendozatorres

        I was surprised by that as well. I always thought that W chose those men (well, other than being told to) was due to the fact they worked with pops.

        Interesting take on Rummy. Then again, I wasn’t paying much attention during the W administration, so I’ve only got hearsay about the man.

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 4:45 pm Captain Obvious

        His “known unknowns and unknown unknowns” is Taleb’s Black Swan hypothesis in a nutshell. Only a supremely confident [and intelligent] man acknowledges the unknown unknowns. And his “You go to war with the Army you have” [not the Army you wish you had]. And, when asked to sign his 1040 under threat of felony perjury: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/04/15/donald-rumsfeld-to-irs-my-taxes-are-a-known-unknown/

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 4:46 pm Captain Obvious

        ‘He added that his wife of 59 years “also knows that she does not have any idea whether or not our tax payments are accurate.” Mr. Rumsfeld has been sending similar letters to the IRS for at least two decades, if not longer, according to a person familiar with the situation…’

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 4:51 pm Captain Obvious

        Rumsfeld is P-Town from the 1950s: That’s how American men used to comport themselves. Dudes like MacArthur and Patton and Pershing. Not this painty-waist “Ross Geller from Friends” weasly metrosexual disingenuous pajama-boy lisping horsesh!t nonsense.

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 9:19 pm mendozatorres

        Hey, Cappy, comparing that unknown unknowns to Taleb’s Black Swan…it makes sense now.

        I always thought, or rather, bought the sentiment that he was the usual political dolt for making that statement, but have read about Taleb and about the black swan theory, it’s a slam dunk now.

        Also, there is a great article Taleb wrote with another man about religion and ethics…something along those lines. I keep putting off reading Taleb’s books, but the little that I’ve read, I like. Guy writes like sage.

        Like


      • on November 6, 2015 at 7:34 am Captain Obvious

        MT, apparently he’s been sending that basic language of “Known/Unknown Unknowns” to the IRS for about a frigging quarter of a century. I think the first edition of Black Swan only dates from about 2007, so it’s not like he’s plagiarizing Taleb when it says that sh!znat. And obviously philosophers would have been thinking about this sort of sh!znat since forever, but when was the last time you saw a gubmint bureaucrat with both the brains and the g0nads to confess something like this in public? For me, it would be: Never before Rumsfeld!

        Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 3:27 pm Sean Fielding

      “In the future I see open fields for more important researches. Psychology will be securely based on the foundation already laid by Mr. Herbert Spencer, that of the necessary acquirement of each mental power and capacity by graduation.” – Charles Darwin, 1859

      After one and a half centuries of obfuscation and power-grabbing, eliminating most Aryan voices from the field, the rational Eskimos like Pinker are slowly taking over from the ideological Eskimos like Lewontin, and the results are filtering down to the Eskimos that run Psychology Today.

      Like


  21. i think i found a good entry for beta orbiter of the month contest:

    https://goodbyeamericainaphoto.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/hierarchy.jpg?w=620&h=821

    Like


    • Whose orbiter is he… the blonde’s or the n1gger’s?

      Like


    • I seriously doubt that white kid in the background is an orbiter; he’s probably a brother or maybe a cousin. I doubt it’s possible for even the most abject American beta to sink to that level of abasement. If it is, then God help us all.

      Like


    • [email protected], that is some repugnant sh!t.

      Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 4:23 pm gunslingergregi

      the wierd part is on the basketball court the blacks did not have white girlfriends it was rare hence training the few who would fuck em
      wasn’t until push by media and them being able to get the chick on drugs and rape it started being more seen
      rape really prob works quite a bit to get a girl if she dont have you put in jail

      Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 4:27 pm gunslingergregi

        hell they didn’t even have girlfriends was only one black chick that came down to court one time and smashed a can on a dudes head lol
        other than that im only one who had a bitch drive to watch him
        same when i played ball at the university actually my girlfriend would come watch no other dude had a bitch there either and i was in high school rofl

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 4:33 pm gunslingergregi

        id lay on her lap shed wipe the sweat off those were the days he he he

        Like


  22. In all fairness, I did know a Chinaman once who was a pretty good driver.

    Like


  23. Gotta love the lede writers at Yahoo on this article on the “Plus-size fashion revolution”… “Katie Couric looks at how retailers are finally paying attention to this vast, untapped market”.

    [CH: doubled up heh.]

    Like


  24. on November 5, 2015 at 4:47 pm gunslingergregi

    so my former chick saying she 4 months pregnant now
    heartbeat slow prob not gonna make it
    guess see
    the only time she actually preg is when she doesn’t think she preg its kind of funny how many times she said preg and wasen’t

    Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 4:50 pm gunslingergregi

      if it pops no less than 15 dna tests will be done

      Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 6:54 pm gunslingergregi

        im laughing so hard
        this chick is the terminator baby chick
        she can’t be reasoned with she will not stop will not rest she will have a baby of mine
        she did say to when i was going home im the only one who didn’t pay child support i know she said cause you got no kids

        if you had kids you would pay before she said she preg shit
        but yea i told her come back relacks she said i aint coming back there to have my kid taken away
        i guess if mine and she want my dna that dam bad shit
        see if it changes my attitude on life i guess

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 6:56 pm gunslingergregi

        my chick buddy said if true you know what to do push her off a bridge
        then said just joking

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 6:59 pm gunslingergregi

        but yea will be trying to get it if mine i wouldnt mind raising a rugrat
        get my single dad merit badge

        Like


    • Some wenches will pull the preggers card on you,my friend. And they will do it as often as they can get away with . The bitches lurve to keep you on the hook and in your head. This how that eskimo Morty Pobitch and Bill F . Cuntingham make a crust.And gunny,15 might not be enuff, go for 20.
      BTW if you wind up on one of those tabloid shows, lemme know so the ol’ lady can Tivo it. The best to ya ,sir.

      Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 7:02 pm gunslingergregi

        my chick buddy was like of course she is he he he
        yea been wishing she was having my kid bout thousand time
        but so far she actually was preg once when she didnt say she was and this time didnt say it either just fouond out after went to hospital
        first one didnt make it though
        not sure this one will either
        im going for 40 if i live through this shit and escape lol

        Like


      • on November 5, 2015 at 7:12 pm gunslingergregi

        well i thouoght you guys would get to see my take a bullet for trump no response yet though on the volunteer bodyguard for free he he he

        Like


  25. on November 5, 2015 at 5:38 pm The Straw That Stirs the Drink

    Drudge headline pic today for Goodbye America…

    Like


    • What a sweet little el pricko that one is. Wake the fuck up, white man !

      Like


    • If you did not hate them before, you do now.

      Invaders, all of them.

      Like


    • Nothing like showing your true (ahem) colors.

      The little shit and those like him would be the first to cry big alligator tears as he’s being herded into the van…

      … and a more apt way to wipe that smile off that snarky little brat’s face, I can think of none.

      Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 9:26 pm mendozatorres

      He may say he’s a dreamer and he’s not the only Juan, unfortunately.

      Also, by holding up the sign, isn’t he literally asking to be deported? I mean, shit, for all we know, this could be a cry for help.

      Like


    • on November 6, 2015 at 8:24 am The Spirit Within

      Y’all know that I read this website mostly for the game stuff, and that I’m more sympathetic to the inclusive, diverse side of this cultural war…

      …but that kid needs to be smacked so hard his head spins. And the adults who scripted it should be charged with something, I don’t know, child abuse. That is foul and a horrible representation of Latinos.

      Because of their staunch Catholicism, most Latino cultures don’t exhibit public disrespect to elders or authority figures. Mexicans in particular have a more zany sense of humor, not a vicious one.

      Damn.

      Like


    • I would be happy to deport that little sh1t myself.

      Like


  26. “Generalizations about groups of people are useful because they are short cuts to evaluating another group’s values and predicting their behaviors in a variety of social contexts.”

    This rabbit hole goes deeper than that. Generalizing is a basic, natural brain function. Every time you open a door you automatically make thousands of assumptions. Despite having no concrete evidence you will assume that the room you are entering has gravity, an atmosphere, no ion storm in progress, a temperature between 200 and 2000 Kelvin, low radiation levels, some form of illumination, a floor, no trapdoors, etc.

    A roomist; someone who stereotypes rooms; See also: everyone.

    A generalizer; someone whose brain is operating normally; See also: sanity.

    Like


    • on November 5, 2015 at 9:27 pm mendozatorres

      They’re petitioning to ban the Super Bowl for 2017 and someone quipped, “Texas cancel a football game?”

      Viva Trump!

      Like


      • They’re petitioning to ban the Super Bowl for 2017

        They did the same thing to us here in Arizona way back in the ’80s with Marchin’ Lootin’ Killin’ day. Just another reason I despise professional sports.

        Like


    • They lost the gay marriage votes dozens of times before they went the supreme court route.

      As the left’s causes get less and less popular democratically, they have to use activist judges to FORCE them more and more. Let’s hope Trump is good on Supreme Court appointments.

      [CH: yes, the left resorts to judicial activism, but most polls have shown increasing popular support for gay marriage, especially over the last five years. chalk it up to sustained propaganda or estrogens in the water, the fact is the leftward march through the institutions is almost complete.]

      Like


  27. on November 5, 2015 at 9:16 pm The Night Porter

    I agree entirely and have never hesitated to stereotype – but unlike alt-right Americans, I use it comprehensively, not selectively. Examples of stereotypes ignored by the otherwise truth-telling Neoractionaries:

    Southerners are less intelligent and less sophisticated than Northerners. True or false? If you’re honest, even if you love Faulkner, you know this is true.

    White guys like “the Derb” who end up with Oriental women do so because the more high value white girls are with more Alpha types? Anyone with a modicum of sincerity, good looks and natural game knows this to be true – as a general rule.

    Italians, Latins and southern Europeans are naturally better with women than Protestant northern Europeans, especially Scandinavians? Too obvious to even comment on save for the fact that this has never been mentioned on any game website I have read. (Then again, I don’t spend all my time on these sites).

    Short guys lift weights more than tall guys, and notwithstanding the athleticism issues and general fitness, guys who lift A LOT are naturally less secure…

    Men give 1,000 reason for growing a beard, but most men grow beards because they are not as good looking as the guys who can wing it clean-shaven. Don’t think this is true? Be honest. (Exceptions like David Beckham prove the Rule).

    So by all means we should stereotype…

    Like


    • Yankees overall may have access to more sophistication I will concede. Bigger cities, more museums, more wealth. But intelligence. No. I’ve spent time in New England, and most of it is a garbage dump. Even Boston, is mostly a White derived ghetto. Also, whilst rednecks do have their bad side, yankees can be such assholes to their very core… The more caustic their accent the easier they are to dislike.

      Like


    • Italians, Latins and southern Europeans are naturally better with women than Protestant northern Europeans, especially Scandinavians? Too obvious to even comment on save for the fact that this has never been mentioned on any game website I have read. (Then again, I don’t spend all my time on these sites).

      The southern Europeans are more unctuous and fancy themselves Lotharios… but if memory serves, many of the polls taken among European women rated the German men as “best lovers”. Leastwise, that was what I remember reading back in the eighties when I still had occasion to pick up a European magazine or two. “Strength and endurance” were the money quotes.

      Like


  28. ‘Southerners are less intelligent and less sophisticated than Northerners.”
    Bullshit . Who has been on the wrong end on this,? dumnfuck yankees, period.
    YOU wanted the Ubangi’s to habs dey free, why you not took ’em in, huh ?

    Like


  29. Why did you not take ’em ? You wanted they free so damned bad, why not ?

    Like


  30. So by all means we should stereotype=- shithead Yank.
    You bet I do, dick.
    YEH . i spake to you.

    Like


  31. Folk stereotypes are true. Certain people push false stereotypes e.g. “dumb blondes”.

    Like


    • Dumb blondes like this guy:

      (Yes I know Ken Jennings is a liberal and would hate us if he knew us. Still I admire his brainpower.)

      Like


  32. “Folk stereotypes are true{”
    Who are these “folk ” you speak of ? Define if you would indulge the masses here.

    Like


  33. A stereotype that life has taught me, you’ll never meet anyone as closed-minded as an open-minded liberal. Truly a life maxim.

    Like


    • on November 6, 2015 at 1:19 am gunslingergregi

      http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/berkeley-high-students-walk-out-over-racist-post/ar-BBmSRpB?li=AAa0dzB&ocid=1PRCDEFE
      ”””””’
      Brenda Hartman ·
      Hastings Senior High School
      love their solidarity as depicted in the above photo–whites on one side and blacks on the other.””””””’

      lol funny fucking comment
      and that is liberals?
      the truth will set ya free

      Like


      • I can’t imagine how the police would be involved with someone leaving a gif on a computer.

        What kind of made up crime is that?

        ” In the spring, the yearbook was altered just prior to printing, identifying an academy within the high school that serves primarily students of color as “trash collectors of tomorrow,” the newspaper reported.”

        Now that’s funny.

        But tell me…why is there an academy in the school that primarily serves only “students of color”.

        Isn’t THAT more racist?

        Like


  34. […] Stereotype Accuracy Is One Of The Most Robust Social Science Findings | Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  35. A redirect for realtalkers could be to explore the difference (in conversation with SWPLs or as you like) between superstition and stereotype. A superstition has 0 demonstrable causation between the action and feared effect. However, knock-on effects may exist: I open my umbrella indoors all the time – however, I don’t walk under ladders. It may be that careful people try to be aware of their surrounds (and having someone working above you certainly raises the probability of having a hammer dropped on your head), and careless people don’t-thus people who walk under ladders tend to be people less aware of their surroundings and more likely to get blindsided by some accident. Here’s another one: are left-handed people smarter, or more creative than righties? I’d say the jury is out on that stereotype. The evidence is hard to judge and probably incremental, or perhaps just random, and random sample may skew one way or the other. But as CH just highlighted, all stereotypes are based in observable probabilities. Superstitions are not-no matter how many lucky rabbits feet you have.

    Like


  36. So, then, ya’ll shall indulge my own bias to view American PIGS as murderous bumblers.

    In turn, I promise to indulge your (extremely reasonable) anti-orc bias.

    Like


  37. After reading it many times, I finally figured out what “eskimo” means. Yet, I just typed “calling jews eskimos” in Google and got nothing that makes sense. Is this lingo exclusive of CH comments?

    Like


  38. Lolzlolzlolzoz

    Like


  39. What if there was no God?
    What if there was no Government?
    What if there was no war?
    What if we didn’t send troops to other countries?
    What if we minded our own business?
    What if we only stayed with our own kind?
    All the niggers and brown people would die of starvation!
    They say I’m a Dreamer, but I’m not the Only One!
    Whites should only feel guilty for not loving their Own Race!

    Like