The Fundamental Problem With Man-Hating Feminists

Ultimately, the problem with stupid, bitter feminists and their lackeys is their inability to understand, let alone empathize, with how differently from women that men are aroused to desire. Once you have convinced yourself that there are no real biological or psychosexual differences between men and women, it’s a small step from there to bemoaning catcalling while your tits are thrust three feet in front of you. This is what a religious adherence to feminist lies gets you: Fear and loathing of men because they get turned on by visual stimulus with an intensity and swiftness that is alien to your gynocentric worldview.

Most women who aren’t deranged feminists trying to make a victim class point know that, for instance, catcalling is mostly harmless, and take it in stride (even if driven to annoyance by excessive street solicitations). Normal, psychologically healthy women (read: pretty women), intuitively grasp that men and women are very different on and under the hood. They may not know the evolutionary reasons for the differences, or care to know, but their acceptance of men as men permits them to behave in a more charming feminine manner, and to appease men’s desire (or avoid inciting it when necessary) because it’s fun and exciting instead of an “injustice” that must be raged against. Feminist spite and resentment towards men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of male sexuality. I think a lot of avowed feminists are ugly broads who secretly yearn to possess the liberated and unencumbered sexual joy that is the birthright of men.

If there’s one common bond that unites all feminists and feminist-lite pundits, it’s a loathing of male desire. Scour away the SJW jargon and that’s the angry little id you’ll find deep inside shaking a clenched black fist at an unforgiving reality it cannot change.





Comments


  1. I think it’s actually backwards. Feminists don’t loathe male desire, they loathe the lack of male desire that they receive. Specifically, ALPHA male desire. This is why the usual recipient of the scathing feminist hatred is the average beta male. Anyone would be annoyed by the snivelling-for-sex method.

    Feminists of all varieties are simply sex market failures.

    Like


    • It could be argued that feminist controls on male behavior, speech, and action are attempts to manipulate the SMP in favor of less desirable women, i.e. feminists.

      Though they are loathe to admit it, less desirable women benefited from a society characterized by more formal, traditional sexual mores and courtship process.

      Non-beautiful women probably thrived in Victorian era compared to today, where a free sexual market prevails.

      Like


    • As I read the post it made me think a lot of these SJW male feminists have a problem with male desire because they just don’t even experience it themselves, and they see it in action all around them and reciprocated by the normal women that ignore them. Thus, the rage.

      Our civilization and technology have removed so much evolutionary feedback that we’ve ended up with huge numbers of misfits reproducing.

      Like


    • nah; they really, really hate men. All men.

      Like


    • “The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. She likes masculine admiration, however violently expressed, and is quite able to take care of herself.” – H.L. Mencken, 1918

      Like


      • Agree with the above statement, except for the “. . . however violently expressed,” part. Catcalling, smiles and winks are good fun. However, the day a man pursued me into a coffee shop and started aggressively asking me my name, my relationship status, where I was from. . . that was very frightening.

        Like


    • “Alpha” male desire? Hardly. There is nothing that leftists (which feminists are) enjoy more than bringing down the successful.Envy, the essence of leftism? I’ve seen more than one woman try to destroy “Alphas,” contrary to the delusions they are gods somehow immune to female backstabbing. “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”

      Like


      • on November 4, 2014 at 1:39 am Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

        If that were true, Bob, you could easily list instances of hardcore professional feminists attacking true Alpha Males. For example, where is the shitstorm of rants against Paul Walker for shtupping 16-year-old girls? Where is the shitstorm of rants against Bill Clinton for shtupping Monica Lewinsky?

        Liked by 1 person


      • Is this why so many women end up in bed with the men they claim to hate? hehehe

        The violent love of a strong man is a drug to any woman.

        Like


  2. That they hate male desire is definitely true, and they deny evolutionary psychology. I would like to see evolutionary psychology and basic macro economics taught from junior high and up. At the end of the first year all students should be able to answer these three simple questions:

    1. What do men or women find attractive? Name ten examples and explain why.
    2. Why do tribes and nations conquer, and how has it affected human progress?
    3. What is the basic connection between a change in demand, prices and production?

    When these three questions are understood instead of demonized, a lot will have been won right there.

    As for shouting at a woman in the street, however, I don’t see that as a necessary result of natural flirting between men and women. I have done countless cold approaches in the street and elsewhere, but I wouldn’t just shout out like some tree-swinging ghetto dweller.

    Like


  3. On topic: I kind of don’t understand where this particular (typical) Jewess comedian (of course) is going with this campaign to show us her huge boobs while saying “what is this–1845? a woman can’t show her nipples?” and spouting other feminist nonsense like “whatever a man can do, a woman has a right to show that she can do better” (referring to posting pic of her topless on a horse).

    She’s just plain stupid and confused? This is right on CH’s topic. Yes, um, a woman’s boobs are a sexual object and sexually stimulating to the (normal) opposite sex. A man’s chest is not, at least not at that level (though women like well build pecs). Simple typical YKW complete failure to understand BIOLOGICAL REALITY.

    What is it?

    Like


  4. I revel in the fact that men still hold doors open for me, offer me social niceties, and give me admiring looks. The best was when I tried on a new dress for a wedding last week and hubby, who was on the phone at the time, skipped a few words when I walked in to show him.
    Feminist women are jealous, bitter, ugly, and wholly uninformed in the ways of men and women.

    Like


  5. Feminists don’t loathe male desire. They FEAR it, because they cannot control it. Hence pretty much everything they’ve tried to achieve has nothing to do with egalitarianism or emancipation, but is really all about criminalising male desire and attempting to brainwash betas into thinking they function like women in the sexual arena.

    Like


    • It is really about dividing Western men and women, making women join the Left with its Marxist paradigm where the world is presented in terms of oppressors/oppressed (instead of explaining how the struggle for survival has shaped human behavior).

      ”Women’s liberation, if it abolishes the patriarchal family, will abolish a necessary substructure of the authoritarian state, and once that withers away Marx will have come true willy-nilly, so let’s get on with it.”
      — Germaine Greer, Marxist, lecturer at the University of Sydney, lecturer at the University of Cambridge, columnist at The Sunday Times

      ”I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.”
      — Robin Morgan, Marxist, editor of MS Magazine

      ”Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex.”
      — Valerie Solanas, feminist writer, SCUM founder (Society for Cutting Up Men), homosexual, Marxist, would-be murderer of Andy Warhol

      ”If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males.”
      –Mary Daly, homosexual activist, professor at Boston College where she refused to admit male students to her classes

      ”Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession… The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn’t be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that.”
      — Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, The Daily Illini, 1981

      ”Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole … patriarchy!”
      — Gloria Steinem, columnist for the magazine New York, editor of MS magazine

      Like


  6. Ordinary, more genteel approaches are not far removed from street cat calling. They are close enough to make you wonder if women, or certain women, think they are also “harassment”. Not to mention, the condemnation of males merely looking at women. I would like to know how Shoshanna Roberts’ boyfriend asked her out. Did he use his eyeballs at any point in the process? Did he say he thinks she is attractive? I am curious how relationships or even reproduction are supposed to work under the feminists vision. Maybe I will ask @proflbnielsen that.

    Like


    • Example of “harassment”. She feels entitled to stare, stalk and approach and give him her number. That IS RAPE!

      Like


      • on November 6, 2014 at 4:48 am haunted trilobite

        His tattoo reads ‘the sky is the limit’ (for the number of love truncheons a perverted party grrl can have impaled herself upon, without jeopardising his undying devotion to her)

        Like


    • they ARE harassment when and if the woman feels that they are.

      This can happen after you fuck her friend and she gets jealous, or any time she’s feeling spiteful at that MINUTE even if she unfeels that in the next minute.

      This is SERIOUSLY how women operate. However they feel in any particular moment is reality to them.

      Like


    • I heard he stuffed a $100 bill wrapped around a bunch of $1 bills into a bagel, tied it to a stick and dangled it in front of her.

      Like


  7. @Skinner

    no, you have it backwards. They fear it because it passes them by and ignores them for their peers.

    Women don’t want to be in control. They have a desperate desire to surrender it.

    Like


    • Incorrect. Feminists DO want to be control. Most actual feminists (a very small proportion of the total affiliating cohort, but all of those who generate the ideology) are high-T lesbians.

      Like


      • Are they feminists because of high T, or have they developed high T in a response to their perceptions of the needs of their environment, ie because their world perception is feminist?

        When a woman is in a high stress, no male environment, it stands to reason she will generate high T as a survival mechanism. If I tell a woman every day of her life that men are unnecessary, that she can and must do everything men do, it stands to reason that as she grows up her body will develop masculine traits on a physical level to compensate. Something heartiste has already shown to happen across the last 40 years to women in America.

        I contend, that this is a case of their view influencing their hormonal state, leading to high T. Rather than the reverse, their high T leading to their insane views.

        If a woman has completely adopted a radical feminist view, regardless of why, then in effect she lives in a world where the only legitimate men for mating purposes are eunuchs. That is, she lives in a world where penis, legitimate, socially acceptable penis, is scarce. This can explain why feminists have been observed to surrender to men expert in frame/state control faster and more thoroughly than normal women. You would think it’s the reverse, as men in a female scarce environment will be more inclined to chase after women. The mistake the betas who encouraged this disaster made, was that they did not realize the “socially acceptable” part is so great a filter that only the best penis will be able to overcome it.

        Whereas if we stuck everyone from RSD on a deserted island with HB4’s they would be willing to put in the same effort for an HB5 that they normally put in for HB10’s, women are a bit of the reverse.

        In their case the social constraints are intense, as well as whatever other neurotic fears and pressures exist preventing them from trusting themselves to surrender to a normal penis. Thus you have a curious situation of man hating (really man fearing) women lusting after thug bad boys. They have “good enough” penis available given the social, emotional and political constraints. “Good enough” is boring, and does not sate their competitive nature re: other women. However the filters are strong enough to resist men with decent but not great game. But thpse filters are totally worthless for men with expert game. (I’ve never actually done this, and am relying on the testimony of other men)

        I recognize that I may have just wrote a great pile of shit, and I thank you in advance for your patience in reading it

        Like


      • Feminism, like all prog nonsense could be eliminated with a few, well targeted assassinations. Where’s Pinochet or Franco when you need them?

        Like


      • Agree 100%, Carlos. But we don’t need dead dictators. We just need to persuade the IRA or ETA out of retirement. Or your namesake, Mr The Jackal.

        Like


      • We always need dictators. The West prospered under dictatorship and is hijacked and killed under the corrupt, media-controlled institution called democracy.

        Like


      • Arbiter, what’s wrong with you? It’s true that neither Britain, during its long slow ascendency during the Industrial Revolution and the heyday of the Empire, nor America in its own gradual rise to take Britain’s place at the top of the world economic order, ever completely lived up to their ideals–but neither of them was *ever* remotely close to being a dictatorship during those times.

        Like


      • But isn’t leftist-feminist socialism a covert dictatorship? There you have it already.

        Like


  8. Penis envy.

    Like


  9. “Normal, psychologically healthy women (read: pretty women)”

    really? I thought pretty women were the most damaged and hence the “don’t stick your dick in crazy” motto. Cause otherwise which healthy man would stick his dick in ugly?

    Like


  10. Nonsense. White men generally don’t do that (they need not). It’s a Nog thing, 90%.

    Like


    • true, but it’s being presented AS IF white men are scum and they should all be ashamed!
      Criminalize all male desire while letting women run around in NY half naked as if that ain’t provocation and harassment!

      Like


      • blacks are the reason you can’t own guns; they are the reason for the drug war, poverty war, and everything else like this. They have destroyed entire metropolises. Propping them up has cost trillions of dollars, all so we can hear their whining about waycissm in 2014. NASA cannot any longer launch an astronaut into space because of purposeful infestation of that agency by blacks post-’72.

        Our crime rate is horrid due to blacks, poverty rate, wedlock birth rate, child mortality rate…every QoL factor is destroyed by them. They rapidly revert wherever they inhabit to African norms.

        Like


      • Regarding the video, I really think her purpose was to show how the hoodrats behave. But she can’t say that out loud. But that is, of course, the effect of the video.

        Like


  11. Lol. My husband would be hated by these women! He grabs my ass when he wants, gropes me, often slaps my butt as he walks by when I am making food for him and often talks sexually dirty to me. Horror of horrors!! I am such a loser for allowing a man to treat me that way!

    Sigh. I actually enjoy the sexual energy he brings to the table. I feel loved and wanted. It gives me great pride that even after so many years of marriage, he is sexually aroused by me. For me, these are the ways he shows me he finds me attractive.

    If I started castrating and castigating him every time he showed that he was turned on by me, it would make our relationship such a drag.

    To be honest, I feel a little annoyed when he doesn’t do those things now. If he just walks by and ignores me, I always quickly check myself to make sure I don’t look uninviting or smell weird or something 🙂

    Now of course, I wouldn’t want a random man to do this to me, but I don’t get bent of shape if a man whistles at me or says something a little suggestive. For Heaven’s sake, he is not going to rape me! He is just telling me he appreciates beauty, in his own way.

    It pains me greatly to say this as a woman, but I’ve come to the conclusion that some women are just joy kills. It is important for men to stay away from such women. I’ve written a blog article on a test that every guy can mentally administer to figure out if his beau will turn out to be such a joy kill. If she scores low on this test. RUN!! RUN AWAY!!

    You can read it here

    http://blog.desidaasi.com/2014/10/how-to-find-and-keep-submissive-woman_24.html

    Please be advised this is NSFW and it will drive feminists totally crazy, I have come to swear by it. I have actually seen one of husbands close friends use it and Charles now has pretty women eating out of his hands. These girls are so much nicer than his terrible ex-wife who took him to the cleaners.

    Like


  12. […] The Fundamental Problem With Man-Hating Feminists […]

    Like


  13. pretty girls vs what a feminist looks like:

    Like


    • Is this one of those eyesight tests? I can see the top row just fine.

      The bottom row looks all blurry and soft around the edges

      Like


    • The top picture is what I was foolishly expecting when I was accepted to Yale oh so long ago. The bottom picture is what I discovered when I was finally on campus.

      Like


      • Honestly, I feel really sorry for Americans. Looking at the obesity statistics and hearing the testimonies, it must be painful to look around you and see the eyesores everywhere. And such a waste. So many who could have been attractive instead being turned into landwhales.

        Feminist has latched onto this to win the fatty vote, but they weren’t the reason for this. West European countries also have feminism but not the same obesity rates. It is very much about food being much cheaper in the U.S. – you can see how obesity went up as food prices went down, which happened when the agricultural lobby convinced the government to stand handing out subsidies. Low taxes, which are otherwie a good thing of course, contributed by making food even cheaper.

        I would suggest moving potato chips, soda and other poisonous products out of grocery stores as a first step. Put them in a separate store. People who are used to eating a lot simply cannot control themselves when these things are right in front of them every time they go to the store. What a relief to go to the grocery store and only see groceries. Unfortunately, neither leftists nor libertarians would ever support this.

        Like


      • …you can see how obesity went up as food prices went down…

        That’s only part of the story. The other aspect is the heinously-misguided ‘food pyramid’ and pro-carb anti-fat diet recommendations put out by, guess who, the FedGov.

        Like


      • Highly educated and highly intelligent women generally aren’t attractive. Higher ed. is for ugly and mediocre girls that can’t get men to pay their bills. Very attractive women need a higher education diploma like a fish needs a bicycle. Bottom line.

        Like


      • on November 3, 2014 at 4:14 pm Modern Primitive

        Arbiter, because it’s an impractical idea.

        Like


      • You know the old line about beauty and brains multiplying to a constant?

        Like


    • If the bottom-rung ladies are trying to make a case for their bodies, why are they covering up?

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 12:37 pm Shortest Straw

      L to R

      WB WNB CB WB CB WNB WB WB WNB WB

      50% WB
      20% CB
      30% WNB

      in other words, completely not representative of the female population as a whole, which is something like 25% 25% 50%

      I love how on the Dear Kate site, a bunch of women say how perfectly beautiful the second set is … nauseatingly condescending comments … and others complain about the mix.

      Like


      • Aw c’mon! 2nd from R is okay…you’d have roll her in flour to find her wet spot, then tie a 2X4 to your back so you wouldn’t fall in….but hey: EQUALITY!

        Like


    • Note how in the second shot, the thin ones, who would show up the whole farce for what it is, are very carefully placed – they were required to hide themselves via awkward or turned poses. Specifically the tallish, thin and proportionate Asian third from right. They were trying to make a point, but even the photographer knew that to show them objectively would expose the lie – thus the posing.

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 1:48 pm Carlos Danger

      About half of the second set of women are doable.

      Like


    • we’ve always been at war with Eurasia.

      These femcunts wish to dictate to us what is attractive. No, bitch, you’re not fucking PERFECT, no matter how strenuously you wish for it.

      Like


    • Funny how in the heavier pic the slimmest is an Asian and the fattest are Blacks. Even in a feminist group. Plus ça change….

      It is only fitting that the heavier cohort is at the bottom. They’d have trouble getting up the stairs to the top pic, and the top floor might cave in. For safety reasons feminists should always be on the bottom floor.

      Like


    • 2 gorillas in that bottom shot…

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 4:18 pm Modern Primitive

      “As if women need a reminder of our society’s homogenous definition of beauty”

      That line was the cracker, although the job title stuff at the bottom is almost as hilarious.

      “New York based performance artist, who tackles issues of social/political injustices within her work”

      As an opressed black wymyn she’ll never be out of work.

      Like


    • You never see men complaining that their looks don’t measure up to what is advertised. Women’s looks set their ranks amongst men and women, and it is so patently obvious. And yet they cannot see how their sexuality is different from men’s.

      Feminism is not just about control/not understanding men’s sexual desire, penis envy, marxism, etc, its mostly about women wanting to be taken seriously when there is nothing serious about them. If Western Civilization (lets face it, the only one that really matters in this world) had not given women rights, but instead kept them covered head to toe like nuns and closeted in their own family circles until marriage, would any of our inventions or discoveries not have been made?

      Besides breeding, child rearing, and giving men sexual pleasure, what else are women needed for?

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 11:42 pm Hilary Clinton

      Top – Correct
      Bottom – the slogan you want is THIS IS WHAT A FEMINIST LOOKS LIKE!!!

      Like


  14. Down in Chapel Hill, the kooks are protesting the NCAA Af-Am scandal by declaring it to be “White Supremacy & Heteropatriarchal Capitalism”.

    http://collegeinsurrection.com/2014/11/liberal-group-blames-student-athlete-fraud-at-unc-on-white-supremacy-and-heteropatriarchal-capitalism/

    The scary thing is that some of the white chicks are not bad looking (or at least not fat yet).

    Like


  15. Ch, A little tip from a reader
    http://henrymakow.com/2014/11/gender-chaos-females-demand.html
    Exerpt/ Last month, Mount Holyoke College announced a more far-reaching policy: It would admit all academically qualified students regardless of their anatomy or self-proclaimed gender, except for those biologically male at birth –

    Like


  16. They (feminists) resent the fact that nature/God gave them a womb that can and will be home to a child, and that as a result they must be *responsible* for that womb and child. Thus, they must be held accountable for their actions BY NATURE. This is where the women’s lib movement toward birth control and then abortion came from. **It isn’t liberation from men. It is liberation from their own bodies.** They hate that there are consequences for their sexual behavior, where men have practically none. They resent men for not having the burden of being selective about mating, and dealing with the consequences of their sexual agenda.

    In short, the fem-twats want to be freed from having to live in a word of consequences.

    Like


  17. It’s really about the expectation that white men should ensure safety for white women to better compete against white men.

    Like


    • I propose a volunteer army of white avengers based on the Guardian Angel model, complete with paramilitary get-ups and ill-fitting berets. These elite commandos can set up stations near every street corner where shiftless idle black men congregate and provide safe passage escort through the gauntlets of braying black jackasses for young female liberal-arts graduates who are just trying to do their damn jobs. Should some Black Gentleman say something imprudent to a white lady they can call for reinforcement and video-tape the miscreants acting the fool. If he gets boisterous and has to be “put down” it will provide fodder for 10,000 world-wide-web think-pieces and television expose’s, thus feeding this vital segment of our economy.

      I volunteer to work along side web journalists from Salon and Slate to set up a site to collect donations for uniforms and communications gear. Concerned black male allies (themselves disgusted by the behavior of their “brothers”) can provide realistic training scenarios (to be featured on PBS and ABC’s 20/20) for recruits to endure as they aspire to attain the coveted White Wings badge for service in defense of the homeland gender. I will retain a small percent of the monetary contributions to compensate for my marketing and management expertise.

      Like


      • Any “concerned black male allies” would merely attempt to wear their berets backwards.

        Like


      • You need something more distinctive that black berets. Something white, and eye-catching. Maybe a tall pointy white hat. And you can include a face-covering for warmth . . .

        Like


      • “…shiftless ? idle? black?….” unnecessary redundancies anyone?

        Like


      • For elmer’s army I suggest shirts in a brown nuance, to show that it is a down-to-earth movement that seeks to return things to their natural state. The ancient symbol for the sun wheel could be carries on their upper arms to further emphasize the back-to-nature aspect. To show that they mean to put an end to ghetto-style nonsense their greeting would be to hold up a hand, palm facing forward, as a stop sign. Stop right there, buddy! None of your shenanigans here!

        Like


      • on November 3, 2014 at 3:44 pm Hammer of Love

        ” Concerned black male allies ”

        Oh man, that’s a good one, had me rolling on the floor. I challenge anyone to name a cause the black race is concerned about, that isn’t directly connected with itself. Hell, even the rich blacks in America have never lifted a finger to help their brethren, in beloved mother Africa, although they have the means. They don’t have an altruistic bone in their bodies.

        Like


      • Hammer of Love

        I challenge anyone to name a cause the black race is concerned about, that isn’t directly connected with itself.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        But isn’t that what game is all about?

        Making YOU the most important person in your world?

        (Don’t make me get Nicole in here to splain it to you)

        Like


      • thwack

        Hammer of Love

        I challenge anyone to name a cause the black race is concerned about, that isn’t directly connected with itself.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        But isn’t that what game is all about?

        Making YOU the most important person in your world?

        (Don’t make me get Nicole in here to splain it to you)
        ——————————————————————————
        Perhaps it is
        but that is exactly what a civilization is about
        That is why your ilk will forever remain uncivilized and the burden to any civilization unfortunate enough to be blessed by your vibrant presence

        Like


      • Dear Thwack, since the owner of this blog has come out of the closet, I have no desire to explain anything that would be helpful to these eunuchs.

        One thing I try to do is keep my few European genes in check, so I did take the advice given here (that was probably not for my benefit, but oh well) about pathological altruism on board. Trying to help people who want to hang you from a tree is self destructive and stupid.

        So they have my full blessing for whatever “white” knight organization they create to protect ugly yet immodest feminists from African and culturally aware European sexual attention. Eunuchs protecting the collective harem. That’s good comedy. 🙂

        Like


      • Apparently thwack and Nicole… and perhaps a few other of the chateau’s dusky visitors… have a hot line…

        … or is it merely the Sunstein network?

        Like


    • White male spite and resentment towards black men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of black male sexuality. I think a lot of avowed beta white males and wannabe alpha white males are ugly dudes who secretly yearn to possess the liberated and unencumbered sexual joy that is the birthright of alpha men in general and black men in particular.

      If there’s one common bond that unites all racist beta white males and wannabe alpha white males racists, it’s a loathing of black male desire. Scour away the HBD jargon and that’s the angry little id you’ll find deep inside shaking a clenched pale fist at an unforgiving reality it cannot change.

      I couldn’t have said it better myself…

      Like


      • on November 3, 2014 at 5:10 pm Carlos Danger

        You guys don’t have anything to trade. No one wants your women. Everyone wants ours.

        Like


      • Plus you guys built dem ‘Gyptian Peermids and Flyin Machines!!

        Like


      • Who said anything about trading?

        Like


      • on November 3, 2014 at 6:07 pm Hammer of Love

        Uhmmm yeah right. It has nothing to do with the skyrocketing crime rates, the debasement of culture, the lack of honor, the lack of work ethic, the entitlement attitudes, and the uncontrolled aggression that has been unleashed on white societies by the the “mythical ” black man.

        Where are the great African works on sexuality, since they are such masters at it ? Anything comparable to the Karma Sutra will suffice. That’s right, there are none. These masters of sexuality haven’t produced any great work about it ? How odd. How odd in deed.

        Like


      • Coat hanger of Love

        Where are the great African works on sexuality, since they are such masters at it ?
        ———————————————————————————–

        They are out PRACTICING it instead of shaking a clenched pale fist at an unforgiving reality they cannot change.

        Like


      • I always marvel at the accomplishments of the African Space Program, the intricate mud hut architectire and the advanced health care technology.

        Like


      • can i trade your delusional Mandingo Myth for….oh, I dunno, organized control of the entire planet?

        Oh wait, I already have that, and your whole thing is …… schtick…

        Like


      • Buffoonikum
        can i trade your delusional Mandingo Myth for….oh, I dunno, organized control of the entire planet?
        ———————————————————————————-

        If you have organized control of the entire planet, why do you need to learn game?

        Like


      • Thwack said: ” Who said anything about trading?”.

        He’s absolutely right, black men just take what they want –
        “http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26368

        Like


      • White male spite and resentment towards black men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of black male sexuality.

        Odd that… when it comes to spite, resentment and envy, YT could learn a thing or two from you darkies, who are past and current masters at THOSE traits.

        Then again, that’s the LAST thing your ilk would want to have happen… for then there wouldn’t be a shit-coloured visage left on the planet.

        Like


      • thwack
        Who said anything about trading?

        Derek Bell, but he got the payer/payee thing backwards.

        Like


  18. Two points:

    99% of sexist, terrible, horrible men said absolutely nothing to her

    Retard spam game gets you more tail than no game

    Women still expect men to approach, so if retard spam game is all you got – use it.

    Like


    • Actually, catcalling works well for black guys and latin guys – black and latin women can respond favorably to it and I’ve seen it in person. Once saw a black guy get on an elevator and start playing with a black girl’s braids. After some initial halfhearted protests, he got her number so he could “hit [her] up.”

      Like


    • Yup.

      If you approach 100 women with a tactic guaranteed to work 1% of the time, you get a date.

      If you don’t approach 100 women, you get no date.

      It’s why men are so aggressive–fortune favors the bold.

      Like


    • I was astonished as a young fella observing Black Gentlemen grabbing their dicks and making an exaggerated hand gesture while loudly saying “Psssssttt!!!!” to women on the other side of the street. Astonished because some of the targets responded positively to these entreaties.

      Like


  19. OT, but I think Snowden’s girlfriend coming to be with him has more to do with him living in Moscow and having free access to all that world class poon than with him missing her.

    Like


    • She is a good woman for joining him, knowing how the tyrannical establishment will mark her for life. And he is a good man. I wish them all the best. If there was ever a president who truly cared about Americans he would put Edward Snowden in charge of the NSA to clean up that agency and put those who have broken American law behind bars.

      Like


      • on November 3, 2014 at 3:48 pm Hammer of Love

        There’s another possibility. She might have been gently ” persuaded ” by one of the Alphabet agencies to track his movements, and provide information to facilitate his ” voluntary ” return, so that “justice” can be served.

        Like


      • on November 3, 2014 at 4:33 pm Carlos Danger

        Actually HOL, I’m inclined to agree with you. @Arbiter- although I’m inclined to see the heart warming aspects of her move you cite, being a sentimentalist myself, that tendency is contradicted by the fact that she is/was a stripper.

        Like


      • If that’s her background, bet money that she’s working as a shill for the Firm in re Snowden.

        Like


  20. most men and women in the us think of themselves are a feminist…but show them what a feminist really is and they will deny the de facto essense even if they keep the form…

    Like


  21. I understand the feminist concern with the male desire to possess women. It’s a desire that barely exists in our society but in theory men on some level want to raid the next tribe and enslave their women or control women so no one else can have sexual access to them. I understand why this male desire is problematic if expressed. But I don’t really get the concern with the male desire to express attraction. Even more baffling is the feminist concern with the male desire to differentiate between women. As in Feminists are apeshit over the fact that men like thin women more than obese ones. I don’t get how preference is oppression.

    [CH: there are good reasons for a male desire to “control” women to have evolved.]

    Like


  22. on November 3, 2014 at 12:50 pm Put Down Artist

    I can understand what is going on with the fugly ones. It’s just jealousy. If they ever get attention it is by men that no woman with high SMV would even look at, and since women generally aren’t really after the sex but after a high status male, all that does is remind them that they are fugly and that there are beauties out there enjoying what they’ll never, ever, get. And even if they score a gamma, that gamma’s eyes will always be roaming to more beautiful bounty.

    What really perturbs me is that there are some reasonably attractive women who are feminists. Not many, but enough for it to be something that needs further explanation. I know a small selection of these via my professional networks, and some of the fucks are even married to high status males, so what gives there?

    Like


  23. Don’t miss your man Phillip Wyeth giving the stick to Wellesley College on Henry Makow’s Nov 3, 2014 post
    http://henrymakow.com/2014/11/gender-chaos-females-demand.html

    BLT on G sesame buns served up on the Boassian smorg at Wellesley. Neglects the Juice however. So no Mazel Tov.

    Like


    • I told you all about this intra-leftist dyke v. tranny fight….

      But PA successfully distracted us all with more “active measures.” Well done, comrade!

      Civilization rape!

      Like


    • women run their hands over the TRT tranny biceps and the wymynmen feel “objectified.” Welcome to fucking real life. Women put their hands on you any time they want to. If you complain at work about it, they will fire you for being a fuckin complainer.

      And they’ll fire you for disputing that there are massive double standards that favor men or that society doesn’t “cater to” men. They won’t be able to point out any actual examples of catering other than where your own hard work got you a more favorable outcome.

      Like


  24. There is one way to over-come manhating feminism..

    and no, PA and thwack, it isn’t your beloved communism….

    anyone else??

    Like


  25. So little update on the previous challenges I had with the chick from Texas. Met at a convention and was cockblocked by my really good looking “friend”. Almost got the bang but no cigar. HABD and Walawala gave me some really good advice on how to be more alpha with specific steps. And Trav777 mentioned on how to game my so called friend. That always helps. So like I was saying she went back to her hometown but she visits here frequently. And we left it open agreeing to stay in touch when she comes to town.
    Well I have waited a couple of weeks and want to reengage to maintain a little contact. Nothing too heavy just keep in touch so we can make plans. So far not so good though. I texted her couple of days ago and this is what has happened so far.

    Me: Hey there this is that sexy man from ____. (trying to open with something flirty.)
    (almost exactly 24 hours later)
    Her: Hey there! HRU?
    (I waited about 12 hours)
    Me: Young did with a dream…just got off the driving range…what are you up to? (trying to get her to engage)

    Its been two days and no response. I know the goal is to get her to chase me. But I am not getting there. What would you guys recommend? I know that my texts aren’t the best but that’s all I have. I cannot just create witty banter out of nothing. Especially when she is giving me nothing. Is this a case of just cut my losses and move on? Or should I just tell her to contact me when she comes out? Or my natural friend said he is a big fan of confrontation. And said to just send a humorous text like “you are breaking up with me already?” I didn’t like that one. Or maybe just ask to set up a meeting date and time. What would you guys do?

    Like


  26. Feminism. Let’s see.

    Like


  27. It’s a mistake to assume that all Feminists are just bitter ugly girls. That may have been true 10-20 years ago, but now it seems that a lot of attractive women are using Feminism as a shit test. Shoshana Roberts is one of them. Don’t believe me? Take a look at this photo of her and tell me you would not bang:

    Like


    • CH, this pic gets through but mine are stuck in moderation? There is no justice in the world.

      Like


      • But yes, women – and many men – calling themselves feminists is now as important as calling yourself a communist in the Soviet Union. Or siding with the conquerors in any defeated nation. The same mental reflex is involved.

        Punjabi porn actress Belle Knox comes to mind. After being exposed in the media she calls herself a feminist, despite doing something feminists hate. She says “I am extremely dangerous to the patriarchy, a woman in charge of her own sexuality.” So other women, who don’t do porn and only sleep with those they are attracted to, are not in charge of their own sexuality? It’s only if you are forced to sell sex for tuition money that you are in charge of the sex? Completely upside down. But she needs to side with the feminists or she will be attacked in a number of ways, especially when residing at campus.

        Like


      • Post better pictures

        Like


      • As opposed to yours, Tim?

        No, it’s that I posted several pictures in the same post, that’s when they are moderated.

        Like


      • @Arbiter

        Dude, nobody wants to see you in an I Dream of Jeanie Costume.

        Like


      • Lovefest between Tim and Corey. How quaint.

        “I dream of Jeanie costume”? You find out the names of various costumes for women? There is only one kind of man that learns details about female dresses aside from how they show the body. Looking for a job in the fashion industry, perhaps?

        Like


      • LOL.

        Rage harder.

        Like


      • Don’t hate me because I’m fabulous.

        Like


      • “After being exposed in the media she calls herself a feminist, despite doing something feminists hate.”

        She was on Stossel’s program a while back basically claiming to be a free market libertarian and that she was saving taxpayers money by choosing to do porn to pay her tuition. I seriously doubt she’s both a libertarian and a Feminist.

        More likely, she’s a shape-shifting hamster; she’ll be anything people want to get them to approve of her porn career.

        Like


      • I would look pretty bangable in that outfit, yo.

        Like


    • I see what you did there corey.

      I approve.

      Like


    • fuckabillity isn’t a measure of attractiveness to men. Most dudes will fuck pretty much anything. BTW, face = 4, body = 6 (of you like chubby). She has that body type that especially black men like. Asians and whites aren’t too fond of it.

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 3:49 pm Hammer of Love

      Can I wear a Yarmulke during coitus ?

      Like


    • Um, no. She’s a doable chubby chick, but a 5 ——6 if you’re Jewish, and, of course, 11+ if you’re a darky. But to us all, she’s a 5.

      Doable does not mean “hot.” It means doable.

      Next you’ll be telling us how “hot” 45 year old cougars are.

      Secret feminist rape!

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 5:12 pm Carlos Danger

      I’d bang her but I would be reluctant to put a ring on it because she’s still only about a six.

      Like


    • It looks as if she has hair on her stomach.

      She gives me the stinky poon hairy butthole with toilet paper dinggle berry vibe.

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 6:08 pm AlmostAnonymous

      Gross. WNB. Some of us have standards.

      Is this how bad things have become that she would be considered attractive?

      Like


    • Would not bang. Jew, you didn’t see the happy trail because it’s buried in her fat crease?

      Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 7:22 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

      Yeah, I’d bang.
      I’d also like to stick it her jew asshole (wrapped of course) and make it gape.
      Take away her impressive rack and she immediately loses 3 points.
      Shoshana Roberts is 10 years (at best) from “pulling the ripcord” (think parachuting visual) and blowing out by at least five dress sizes.

      Like


    • fat with a beat face. I wouldn’t touch her with YOUR Arbiter.

      Like


    • With that swarthy man face, I wouldn’t be surprised if she had a big pair of matzo balls tucked between her hairy legs.

      Like


    • Would not bang. Do not like hook-nosed ape faces.

      Like


    • Take a look at this photo of her and tell me you would not bang:

      That phiz is definitely a deal breaker for me… guess I’m just not “alpha” enough. lzozlzozlzolzolozl

      Like


  28. I’m of the belief that feminism was invented to drive a wedge between the Western man and the Western woman in order to undermine and destroy Western Civilization.

    Like


  29. Where the hell are Lena Dunham and the other feminists to protest slavery of teenage girls in the Middle East:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2818598/Footage-shows-ISIS-fighters-attending-slave-girl-market.html

    Like


    • on November 3, 2014 at 3:52 pm Hammer of Love

      They don’t want to offend the religion of ” peace “. A piece of slave girl’s ass that is.

      Like


    • NO Euro-gentile men to blame=NO controversy

      Who, whom?

      But Lena’s too busy diddling her sister to care.

      Lenin rape! (PA wept)

      Like


    • The same place all those whoring starlets were at the Academy Awards awhile back… each of them tearfully pontificating about their brave and stalwart grandmothers and mothers who “inspired” them to “go beyond the boundaries”… until you could hear a pin drop and not a peep when “It’s Hard Out Here For A Pimp” won Best Song.

      Like


  30. If Lena Dunham has taught us anything, it’s that it’s OK for rich white girls to molest toddlers. It’s “ironic” and “refreshingly revealing” since she’s a woman. While men showing interest and giving compliments to a grown woman walking in public is not OK and may become illegal:

    http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/10/31/do-we-need-a-law-against-catcalling/street-harassment-law-would-restrict-intimidating-behavior

    Like


    • this kerfuffle will take this dumb beaver down. 10-1 odds.

      Like


      • I’m doubtful. The toxicity of U.S. culture is to the point where even admitting such depraved behavior while profiting from it in a book will be a speed bump in her career at most.

        Like


      • i dunno. the left is freaking on her.

        Like


      • fingerrape!

        Like


      • That’s the beauty of the MSM… they make depravity seem acceptible so that the depraved ones eventually out themselves… only to learn what the real world truly thinks about their swinery.

        Expect a sort of “it’s only a piece of stream-of-consciousness fiction” backpedaling.

        Like


  31. on November 3, 2014 at 6:26 pm Holden Caulfield

    Relevant to MSM and libtards preaching about white privilege:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268366

    Like


  32. There’s definitely a ritualized aspect to this – arousing male desire and then cruelly shaming and mocking it. Most people can see that for what it is – a demonstration of power. It’s a continuation of middle school girls getting a kick out of publicly rejecting and shaming boys who have made their interest known. From that perspective the feminists are creating a bit of nostalgia.

    Like


  33. (Edit: Please delete the other one as I copy/pasted too much)

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0044456

    Results

    Women’s Ratings of Partner’s Sexual Attractiveness

    In-pair attraction.

    There was no main effect of fertility on women’s feelings of in-pair attraction, F (1, 38) = 0.34, pdir = .35, partial η2 = .01. However, the interaction between fertility and women’s ratings of partner sexual attractiveness was significant, F (1, 38) = 6.05, pdir = .01, partial η2 = .14. As shown in Figure 1, the less sexually attractive women rated their partner, the less in-pair attraction they reported at high fertility compared with low fertility (partial r = .37, pdir = .01). Follow-up analyses revealed that when ratings of partner sexual attractiveness were one standard deviation below the mean, women reported significantly less in-pair attraction at high fertility than at low fertility, F (1, 38) = 4.75, pdir = .02, partial η2 = .11 (marginal mean at high fertility = 0.30, SD = 0.22; marginal mean at low fertility = 1.06, SD = 0.31). However, when ratings of partner sexual attractiveness were one standard deviation above the mean, women’s reported in-pair attraction did not differ significantly between high and low fertility, F (1, 38) = 1.54, p = .22, partial η2 = .04. When the control variables were added to the analysis, the main effect of fertility remained non-significant, F (1, 34) = 0.03, pdir = .54, and the interaction between fertility and partner sexual attractiveness remained significant, F (1, 34) = 3.63, pdir = .04.

    So, to avoid activating the alpha fucks/beta bucks mating strategy/psychological module in a woman, make sure you are one standard deviation above the mean in sexual attractiveness (which is the 85th percentile for sexual attractiveness).

    Like


    • This also has interesting political repercussions I would think.

      In a feminist/matriarchial society which culturally, socially and legally incentivises cuckoldry, the bottom 85 percent of men are better off shifting their loyalties to an anti-feminist/patriarchal society, as such a society would proscribe women’s natural/instinctual inclinations to cuckold such men.

      In the future, you may see a mass exodus of the bottom 85 percent of men to patriarchal countries like Russia and the Middle East or atleastly a shift in support of the cultural imperialism/hegemony of those countries as those countries would espouse a cultural, social and legal regime that proscribes the bottom 85 percent of men’s reproductive exploitation.

      Like


      • on November 4, 2014 at 6:08 am Hammer of Love

        The problem is though, that patriarchal societies would look down upon men who fled their own nations, because they were too frightened to stand up and fix the femo-judaic injustices perpetuated on their own countries. I strongly doubt your average beta mangina would last one minute in the battlefields of East Eukraine or the Middle East. No one respects a cuckold.

        Like


    • Also, what would be interesting if there was a breakdown in the women which experienced the ovulatory shift and the women which didn’t for a man at the same level of sexual attractiveness.

      I would hypothesise that masculinised women would be more prone to this shift (lower digit ratio and higher testosterone levels).

      Then again, it maybe possible that more feminine women are more prone to the shift as this shift is peculiar to the female brain and the female brain is organised under the influence of estrogen.

      [CH: i’ve wondered this too. my personal observation is mixed. i’ve fucked some very feminine women who had confided to me of cheating on past lovers, and some tomboys who also had checkered sexual histories. but my overall impression is that it’s the women with feminine bodies and masculine minds (they like risk and danger) who will succumb more readily to the temptation to have a fling.]

      Like


  34. Hidden down in the results section of this study

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17201549

    The results of this study support the good genes hypothesis. When women are fertile and rating men’s attractiveness as short-term partners, they are particularly attracted to traits that tend to be valued in short-term mates. No preference shifts in favor of traits deemed more valuable in long-term mates (e.g., good father, faithful, warm, financially successful) were found (although men perceived as less faithful were rated as particularly attractive as short-term mates by fertile women, perhaps because such men possess other traits that women find attractive in short-term mates). Consistent with past research (Gangestad et al., 2004; Haselton & Miller, 2006; Johnston et al., 2001; Penton-Voak et al., 1999; Puts, 2005), we did not find shifts in mate preferences over the reproductive cycle in both long-term and short-term mating contexts. Rather, mating context interacted with fertility status to predict women’s specific mate preferences. Near ovulation, traits indicative of greater intrasexual competitiveness were viewed as particularly attractive in short-term compared with long-term mates.

    Like


  35. Heartiste,
    I think you have it wrong. It’s not loathing of male desire that creates or defines feminists, it’s SELF LOATHING. These women hate that they are women and are different from men. They express that self hatred by projecting their own feelings of inferiority and loathing on to men becasue the truth is just too hard to accept.

    Like


  36. You have nailed the psychology for the man-faced worldview, but I believe the philosophical underpinnings for the average clipped-haired man-hater are far simpler. Your run-of-the-mill, self-described feminist takes her bowlegged stance against men because it is easy and profitable. Easy in that she will not be challenged by more sane members of society and easy to justify the lack of attention she receives from male suitors. Profitable in that it allows the socially awkward and unattractive to gain a curious status within polite society and, in a some cases, advances their career and earning potential.

    Lower income, uneducated gooey excuses for the fairer sex seldom take the feminist position as they rightfully see the futility in it. It will not earn them a higher social status nor will it profit them financially. Obese ghetto broodmares and tooth rednecks, provided they are getting their welfare checks, could give a fat frog’s ass about the patriarchy. They only turn to man-hating when it comes to nailing some sad sap who forgot the cardinal rule: jerk before you squirt.

    Like


  37. And so help me Jeebus, I hope that Emily Ratajkowski is just shi-testing when she calls herself a feminist.

    http://www.independent.ie/style/beauty/body/emily-ratajkowski-on-feminism-i-wear-what-i-want-sleep-with-who-i-want-and-dance-how-i-want-30629431.html

    Please, by the power of RSD, tell me she’s not going to turn out just another example of GBFM’s used-up Bernankified btthexxers.

    Like


    • One look at her and I can assure you that she can’t dance. Any woman who announces her dance ability usually is so awkward that it bangs your joints horribly trying to stay on-beat. They are best avoided for more humble fare.

      Like


    • She’s a rodent-faced YKW with a banging body. What do you think is going to happen.

      Like


  38. […] Ultimately, the problem with stupid, bitter feminists and their lackeys is their inability to understand, let alone empathize, with how differently from women that men are aroused to desire.  […]

    Like


  39. I think the problem of all fanatical ideologists is demonizing and dehumanizing their opponents. If they would stop and think for a minute they would realize that men have problems as well despite being “privileged”.

    They’ve taken their toxic shame and alienation and displaced it onto us in a constant attack on our values. The manosphere is a creation of feminism.

    Like


  40. […] Olympics. Related: Cat-calling, race, and rape stats. Related: Wright comments. Related: The fundamental problem with man-hating feminists. Related: 10 hours walking as a racist white woman. Related: Should […]

    Like


  41. Women are so downtrodden. Men are such bad, evil people. Don’t believe me? Check this out:

    http://www.realsexism.com/

    After you read this, there will be no doubt in your mind as to why men are so evil.

    #KillAllMen
    #CastrateAllMen

    Like


  42. […] Normal, psychologically healthy women (read: pretty women), intuitively grasp that men and women are very different on and under the hood. They may not know the evolutionary reasons for the differences, or care to know, but their acceptance of men as men permits them to behave in a more charming feminine manner, and to appease men’s desire (or avoid inciting it when necessary) because it’s fun and exciting instead of an “injustice” that must be raged against. Feminist spite and resentment towards men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of male sexuality. I think a lot of avowed feminists are ugly broads who secretly yearn to possess the liberated and unencumbered sexual joy that is the birthright of men. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/11/03/the-fundamental-problem-with-man-hating-feminists/ […]

    Like


  43. Interesting. This website says avoid women who exhibit any of the traits of many of the authors and commentators clearly do. Bitterness, negativity, sarcasm, and cynicism.

    How funny that you devalue the only women who might just be compassionate or bored enough to throw oblivious boys like you guys a bone. Sluts are cool in my book, and by the standards suggested by the articles here, I am sorry to say that 99.9% of women out there today are complete sluts. yay. I’m glad. I celebrate that shit. Only a dinosaur and a ignorant sexist would stop a woman from fucking who she pleases.

    And frankly, many of you guys should be celebrating women who are sluts. They enjoy sex just like you and me. And no offense, how can you say a woman loses her marriage points from having too many partners? Are you guys the type who are hoping for a million virgins waiting for your corny ass in heaven? In that case, do go jump off a bridge… because dissing women for enjoying sex is as dumb as making fun of men for not getting laid. And btw, you all are kidding yourselves if you think women today are anything but as sexually active as the next guy. (If you believe that your wives and girlfriends are all 1-2 partner virgins, well, you’re either really dumb, in denial, are dating brilliant liars – and fact, women are exceedingly advanced at most things social or mental than men – or you guys are dating your mothers).

    If you really want to understand women, stop seeing them as objects or jerks who won’t fuck you. We are all people, and are not really that different. Think of your sisters and mothers growing up. They are pretty much like you. Men too put up with a lot of unfair standards from society, and you know it. Doing it back to women will only make things worse for everyone in the long run. You want a real woman? Look for a partner in life to be your friend and partner. Not pet wifey and virginal mute walking 10 steps behind you. If you don’t like it, move to a planet that doesn’t have humans on it.

    The more dickish you act, the less you really understand about women. Real men are as comfortable being friends with women (easily acknowledging that the desire to sleep with them comes up naturally from time to time) as they are with the reality of who women are and what they really are – a human fucking being, just like you and me.

    Like


  44. Noticed that in the video Shoshana Roberts, if that’s her real name, has straight hair on her profile, while in the video it’s rather naturally curly, making her look more Jewish, which explains her hatred of attraction from men not of the Tribe.

    Like